Loading...
PC Min 09/13/1988PLANNING COMMISSION CITY OF CAMPBELL, CALIFORNIA 7:30 P.M. MINUTES SEPTEMBER 13, 1988 The Planning Commission of the City of Campbell convened this day in regular session at the regular meeting place, the council Chambers of City Hall, 70 n. First St., Campbell, California. ROLL CALL Present Commissioners: Kasolas, Olszewski, Walker, Dickson, Christ; Planning Director Arthur A. Kee, Principal Planner Philip J. Stafford, Engineering Manager Bill Helms, City Attorney William R. Seligmann, Recording Secretary Linda Dennis. Absent Commissioners Stanton and Perrine. Chairman Christ noted that Commissioners Stanton and Perrine absences were excused due to personal and business commitments. APPROVAL OF MINUTES M/S: Dickson, Walker That the minutes of the Planning Commission meeting of August 9, 1988 be approved as submitted. Motion carried unanimously (5-0-2). ~ * ~ COMMUNICATIONS Planning Director Kee noted that communications received pertained to specific items on the agenda. ORAL REQUESTS Chairman Christ asked if anyone wished to address the Commission on an issue that was not agendized. There being no one, the Chairman proceeded with the set agenda. PUBLIC HEARINGS Agenda items 4i5, 12, & 13 were taken out of order due to the recommendations for continance and the length of the agenda. PD 88-10 Continued public hearing to consider the Ward, G. R. application of G. R. Ward, General Contractor, for approval of a Planned Development Permit, plans, elevations and development schedule to allow the construction of 3 townhomes on property known as 1430 W. Latimer Ave. in a Pd (Planned Development/Medium Density Residential) Zoning District. -2- Chairman Christ opened the public hearing on PD 88-10. There being no one wishing to speak on this item, the recommendation for continuance was adopted as follows: M/S: Dickson, Walker - That the public hearing on PD 88-10 be continued to the Planning Commission meeting of September 27, 1988 in order that revised plans may be submitted. Motion carried unanimously (5-0-2). ~ ~ S 88-14 Public hearing to consider the application of Sutti Associates Sutti Associateds for approval of plans and elevations to allow an addition and exterior modifications to an existing building (Nob Hill Food Market) on property known as 1581 W. Campbell Ave. in a C-1-S (Neighborhood Commercial) Zoning District. Chairman Christ opened the public hearing on S 88-14. There being no one wishing to speak on this item, the recommendation for continuance was adopted as follows: M/S: Dickson, Walker - That the public hearing on S 88-14 be continued to the Planning Commission meeting _._. of October 11, 1988 in order that revised plans may be submitted. Motion carried unanimously (5-0-2). ~ ~ ~ S 88-15 Public hearing to consider the application of Saraydpour, S. Mr. Steve Saraydpour for a 4 lot subdivision and approval of plans and elevations to allow the construction of 4 single family homes on property known as 1231 Hacienda Ave. in an R-1-8 (Single Family Residential - 8,000 sq.ft. minimum lot size) Zoning District. Chairman Christ opened the public hearing on S 88-15. There being no one to speak on this item, the recommendation for continuance was adopted as follows: M/S: Dickson, Walker - That the public hearing on S 88-15 be continued to the Planning Commission meeting of September 27, 1988, in order that this application may be renoticed for a zone change and a Planned Development Permit. Motion carried unanimously (5-0-2). * * ~ -3- ARCHITECTURAL APPROVALS M 88-09 Continued application of Mr. John Camarena Camarena, J. for approval of a modification to allow the construction of a mansard roof design on an existing drive-in restaurant located on property known as 2255 S. Winchester Blvd. in a C-2-S (General Commercial) Zoning District. Planning Director reviewed the Staff Report, noting that the applicant has requested an extended continuance on this item; however, Staff is recommending that the matter be denied without prejudice in order to remove it from the agenda at this time. M/S: Kasolas, Walker That M 88-09 be continued to the Planning Commission meeting of March 14, 1989, at the applicant's request. Motion carried unanimously (5-0-2). ~ * ~ PUBLIC HEARINGS UP 88-07 Continued public hearing to consider the Home Church application of the Home Church for approval of a Conditional Use Permit to allow the establishment of a youth center in a shopping center on property known as 1739, 1755, and 1757 S. Winchester Blvd. in a C-2-S (General Commercial) Zoning District. Principal Planner Stafford reviewed the Staff Report, noting that petitions indicating 70 business signatures and over 1,100 residents supporting the Church's request have been submitted to the City Council. In addition, the Church presented a traffic study to the City Council at its meeting of August 16, 1988. The Council was of the opinion that this traffic study sufficiently answered questions regarding the parking usages at the site, therefore the Council determined that an EIR was not necessary as had been required by the Planning Commission. Commissioner Olszewski reported that this item was considered by the Site and Architectural Review Committee. The Committee is recommending approval of the site plan as presented, which includes some additional landscaping in the parking area although the building remains unchanged. Lengthy discussion ensued regarding the parking study which was prepared by Nolte and Associates. Discussion included the apparent availability of spaces even with the highest uses; the possibility of a number of vehicles being parked illegally, and the necessity for an approved parking layout for comparison with the presented study; and, the number of businesses being closed on Sunday, thereby allowing additional parking for church use. -4- Commissioner Olszewski asked about the availability of economic data for this shopping center. Planning Director Kee indicated that there may be difficulty obtaining fiscal information through the EIR report process. Chairman Christ opened the public hearing and invited anyone to speak on this item. Mr. Keith A. Coye, 573 Lytton Ave., Palo Alto, (a customer with Brink's Cleaners) opposed the use permit request and spoke about the potential erosion of the business community. Mr. Coye charged the Commission with honoring the City's commitment to maintain a viable commercial area. Rev. Michael Kiley, 6415 Bellvue, San Jose 95123, stated that the parking study was prepared independently by Nolte & Associates; and, briefly reviewed the parking layout, noting that he is not aware of illegally parked vehicles. Rev. Kiley continued that the study does reveal an overloading of the parking facilities during times were there are non-church related activities at the center. Mr. Julian Ruiz, 671 Hermitage Place, San Jose, spoke on behalf of Sung Loo of the Winchester Seafood Restaurant, noting that the restaurant is allotted 4 spaces on Sundays from 11:00-3:00 to accommodate customers. This does not seem fair in that the restaurant has expended approximately $10,000 for parking spaces. Mr. Adam Alb, 1757 S. Winchester Blvd., spoke at length regarding the leasing situation at the center; the church's intention to hold large receptions in the subject youth center area; the improvements that have been put into the center by the merchant's association; the methods used to finance improvements (ie. flea market, Christmas tree sales, cherry stand); the lack of cooperation from the church is participating in the maintenance of the center; the inaccuracy of the parking study; and, the lack of parking available to the merchants on Sundays. Mr. David Williams, 1375 Phelps Ave., ~t7, San Jose, supported Mr. Ruiz's statements, noting the amount of capital the businesses have invested in this commercial center, the difficulties and expenses they would have in moving, and the responsibility of the City to support the businesses in their endeavors. Mr. Tim Baker, 374 Surber Dr., San Jose, noted that the Council had determined that a traffic/parking study was not necessary; however, the Church still provided the information in hopes of clarifying the situation. Mr. Baker discussed the amount of money spent in the community by church members; the revenues indicated for this center by the City's Finance Department; the issue of the merchant's association and the Church not being allowed to join the association because they are not merchants; and, the services provided by the Church (ie. ESL instructors, East Side Outreach program, food bank). Mr. Baker continued, noting that the Church has not stated they would not renew the lease for Brink's Cleaners, but rather has taken a "wait and see" stand. He reviewed __. the parking usage for various days and uses; noted that the Church has offered to assist in relocating the barber shop; indicated that the Church provides for maintenance of their area separately from the businesses; and, in general, addressed issues presented by previous speakers. -5- Commissioner Olszewski asked Mr. Baker if he was saying publicly that the Church is upholding the cleaner's lease up to the four years contracted for, but that the Church is not willing to commit after that; and, to what extent is the Church will to help relocate affected businesses? Mr. Baker responded that this is true. The issue of the lease and relocation assistance is not really for discussion this evening; however, the Church is willing to discuss these matters at another time. It is the intent of the Church to have good public relations with the community. Mr. Paul Madieros, representing West Side Development, stated that his company opposes any conditional use permit and requests denial because the two uses are not compatible and because there is a move afoot to put together a master plan for redevelopment and the use permit could hamper the redevelopment. If the Commission feels that it is necessary to approve this use permit, then West Side Development Co. would suggest the consideration of a 6-month approval only. Commissioner Walker indicated that it would appear from statements being made regarding redevelopment that the Commission did not have full information in their agenda packets. Mr. Kee expressed a concern about information being passed out to the Commission that Staff has not had opportunity to review. If the Commission would like additional information, it would be appropriate to continue the item in order that the information could be provided. Mrs. Dorothy Shattuck, 391 California St., Campbell, expressed a concern that the flea market use might not be able to continue at this location; and, agreed that more information regarding the redevelopment should be presented to the Commission and the public. Ms. Hua Uong, 2072 S. San Tomas Aquino Rd., Campbell, owner of Brink's Cleaners, opposed the use permit, noting that the shopping center is not the right place for the Church or for a teen center. Ms. Uong stated that she is asking that the Church tell her now if they will be renewing her lease in four years so that she may make plans for her business. Mr. Jeff Timby, 755 Crockett Ave., Campbell, supported the requested use permit so that the church could meet the needs of its membership and the community. Mr. Carl Miller, 528 Northlawn Dr., San Jose, owner of Jersey's Restaurant, opposed the use permit, noting that the center should remain commercial. Mr. Miller asked that the petition listing supporting businesses be struck from the record because some of the businesses listed were never contacted. Mr. Chuck Bird, 955 Sonuca Ave., Campbell, noted that additional room is needed for youth activities and spoke regarding the importance of youth to the community. Mrs. Carol Wilson, 454 Queens Ct., Campbell, gave a brief history of the shopping center, noting that it has not flourished for some time. Mrs. Wilson stated that the subject petitions were gathered by churchmembers and represent a great deal of time, work, and love; and, that the churchmembers support the businesses in this center. -6- Mr. Rick Wardley, 1287 Colleen Ave., Campbell, spoke in favor of the use permit, noting that the Church helps hold the community together, and that the children need a place in which to have activities. Mr. Hardley noted that the subject store space was empty for some time prior to the Church buying the property. Mrs. Carolyn DeAnda, 588 Wade St., Sunnyvale, partner in Winchester Liquors, opposed the use permit; and, spoke regarding the problems caused by the growth of the church; the parking situation; the problems which could be caused if the Church increases it's activities; and, the difficulties she would have in relocating her business. Mrs. DeAnda submitted a petition (on file). Mr. James Olmos, Winchester Liquors, stated that some of the signatures on the list of businesses supporting the Church were not legal because the signers were employees - not owners. Mr. Olmos continued that the Church has parked a bus in front of his store and disembarked children, yelling at them to stay away from his store; that the petition was gathered illegally by children and the signers did not know what they were signing; and, that there would be trouble if this use were to be approved. Mr. Olmos presented a petition (on file). Mr. Joe Gentra, Charisma II Salon, opposed the use permit. Mr. Gentra noted that he was not against the church but that he would like to know that his business location was on solid ground and that he would not have to move. Mr. Baker disputed the allegations of the speakers regarding the improper _ manner in which the petitions were gathered. Mr. Baker continued that the situation was fully explained to establishments who signed the petition; that West Side Development Co. has leased a store space to the Church for ten years - a space that is restricted to church functions only; and, the Church is only looking to address a lack of space for youth needs and the purchasing of this property seemed to be the best approach. The Commission recessed at 9:25 p.m.; the meeting reconvened at 9:40 p.m. Mrs. Dimieri, Wesley Manor, Campbell, questioned whether or not a shopping center with liquor stores and pizza parlors was really the most appropriate place for youth activities. Mr. Larry Langusto, churchmember, noted that business is not made on the terms of a lease, but rather by customer satisfaction - and customers would follow a business. He asked why this center is proposed for redevelopment if it is as vital as indicated by the merchants. M/S: Olszewski, Walker - That the public hearing on UP 88-07 be closed. Motion carred unanimously (5-0-2). Discussion Commissioner Dickson stated that the issue is a request for a use permit, and the ordinance allows church uses in any zoning district with an appropriate use _- permit. The Church has demonstrated that it is a compatible use since 1981. -7- Commissioner Dickson expressed a concern about how much the extra activities (flea market, car show, etc.) do for the City. The spaces used by the Church would not have been empty for such a long time if they could have been made, under the free enterprise system, financially viable from some business. Commissioner Dickson noted that he has mixed emotions on this issue; and, he must ask himself if this request for 4,000 sq.ft. additional church use is compatible with what is at this location. Commissioner Olszewski asked about statements made regarding redevelopment and possible time frames. M/S: Kasolas, Dickson - That the public hearing on UP 88-07 be re-opened. Discussion Commissioner Olszewski believed it unnecessary to reopen the public hearing since the requested information regarding redevelopment was from Staff, and not of a testimonial nature. Vote on motion Motion to reopen the public hearing on UP 88-07 failed with a vote of 2-3-2. Public hearing remains closed. City Attorney Seligmann noted that it is not necessary to reopen the public hearing to received information from Staff; however, the public hearing could be reopened at a later time if the Commission felt it was necessary. Commissioner Kasolas disagreed, stating that it is his opinion that the public should not be foreclosed from being allowed to testify if additional information is presented. Mr. Robert Kass, Redevelopment Director, stated that there is a report on this center available from Staff. A survey was taken of the merchants and the property owners to determine some of the problems. Multiple ownership was viewed as a major hinderance to redevelopment, as well as site configuration. A proposal to identify a master developer is going to the presented to the Redevelopment Agency on October 4, 1988; June 1989 is proposed as a target for selecting the master developer; and, the Redevelopment Agency is looking at at least a two year time frame before any fiscal activity may take place at this location. Mr. Kass agreed with the recommendation of the Executive Director of the Redevelopment Agency regarding the two year approval not harming any redevelopment possibilities. Commissioner Olszewski felt that the church is a compatible use with the retail center and that the other activities at the site were good for the community. The question is whether or not a shopping center is a good location for a youth center. Commissioner Olszewski continued that perhaps this is not a good location for a youth center - that perhaps the City's Community Center or one of the school sites would be more appropriate. Locating the youth center at another site would allow the commercial uses to remain intact and still provide for the needs of the church. -8- Commissioner Kasolas stated that the real issue is one of property rights - can a property owner use the property in accordance with the rules set forth. In setting aside all the emotionalism, it is noted that originally all the neighbors supported the church use. It is also very clear that the parking is a private problem, as well as the issue of the leases. The church must be treated like any other property owner. Commissioner Walker stated that he thought that the economic dynamics were beyond the control of the Commission; and, that two years would be appropriate and in agreement with possible redevelopment issues. M/S: Dickson, Walker - That the Commission adopt a resolution approving UP 88-07 subject to the conditions indicated in the Staff Report as well as a review of the use in two years, in accordance with past practices. Discussion Commissioner Kasolas stated that he would agree if the motion were for granting the permit for two years - not for the review of the use permit in two years. Commissioner Dickson noted that a condition for review is usually put on a permit. Chairman Christ opposed the motion. He stated that if the church was coming before the Commission at this time for a use permit to establish a church in 359 of the site with the large membership it has, he would have to vote for denial. Chairman Christ continued that he thought the church taking up one-third of the center will change the character of the center. Anything that starts to impact the neighborhood must be considered very carefully. Secondly, he concurred with the comments about parking -- it is a private matter. Chairman Christ noted that if this item is passed, he would like to see some conditions imposed that would do a little more to protect the parking rights of the retail merchants - not only from the Church, but from themselves (referring to other activies, ie flea market, Christmas tree sales, etc.). Commissioner Olszewski stated that he was unable to support the motion for two reasons. First, he felt that this was not an appropriate location for a youth center and there are better locations to gather (ie the Community Center, vacant school sites, etc.). Secondly, he didn't think that the City should be restricting itself to having to have definite findings to revoke or cancel the use permit. Commissioner Olszewski noted that the natural evolution of the center should be allowed to take place. M/ Kasolas, That the makers of the motion amend the motion to provide that the use permit be granted for two years. Commissioners Dickson and Walker accepted the amendment to the motion. The motion for approval reads as follows: -9- M/S: Dickson, Walker That the Planning Commission adopt Resolution No. 254b, incorporating findings and conditions of approval as indicated in the Staff Report of September 13, 1988, approving UP 88-07 for a use permit to permit church-related activities at the subject location for a period of two years. Motion carried with the following roll call vote: AYES: Commissioners: Kasolas, Walker, Dickson NOES: Commissioners: Olszewski, Christ ABSENT: Commissioners: Stanton, Perrine. S 88-11 Continued public hearing to consider the Seibold Corp. application of Seibold Corporation, on behalf of Chevron-USA, for approval of a site and architectural application to allow the construction of an island canopy in an existing service station on property known as 3405 S. Winchester Blvd. in a C-2-S (General Commercial) Zoning District. Principal Planner Stafford reviewed the Staff Report of September 13, 1988, noting that Staff is recommending approval. Commissioner Olszewski reported that this item was considered by the Site and Architectural Review Committee. The Committee is recommending approval with the revised parking plan to be approved by the Planning Director and, the redlining of the roof line on the presented plans. Chairman Christ opened the public hearing and invited anyone to speak on this item. Mr. Carlos Moore, Sales Representative for Chevron, stated his agreement with the redlining of the plans and the changes that were made by Staff. M/S: Walker, Dickson - That the public hearing on S 88-11 be closed. Motion carried unanimously (5-0-2). M/S: Walker, Dickson - That the Planning Commission adopt findings and conditions attached hereto and approve S 88-11 subject to attached conditions and as redlined. Motion carried with the following roll call vote: AYES: Commissioners: Kasolas, Olszewski, Walker, Dickson, Christ NOES: Commissioners: None ABSENT: Commissioners: Stanton, Perrine. -10- S 88-12 Continued public hearing to consider the Mirkin, B. application of Mr. Barry Mirkin for approval of plans and elevations to remodel an existing restaurant/bar into retail shops on property known as 100 W. Hamilton Ave. in an C-2-S (General Commercial) Zoning District. Principal Planner Stafford reviewed the Staff Report of September 13, 1988. Mr. Stafford noted that the parking revisions are redlined on the site plan; and, that Staff is recommending approval. Commissioner Olszewski reported that this item was considered by the Site and Architectural Review Committee. The Committee is also recommending approval as redlined, with revised elevations addressing the window elements to be approved by the Site Committee. The applicant is in concurrence with the recommended changes. Mr. Ahron Bogomilsky, partner, asked to retain the parking plan as submitted. Mr. Bogomilsky stated that he feels strongly about this because there are more small cars. He asked to try the 90 degree parking at first, noting that it could be changed if necessary. Commissioner Walker asked that the record show that he concurs with the redlining on the plans which indicates the larger parking stalls on the right side of the property. Commissioner Walker felt that the entrance to this project would be from Dunster Dr.; that the shops would be patronized by the _ neighborhood; and, that there are a lot of older, large cars in that area. Commissioner Olszewski noted that there had been agreement from Mr. Mirkin, Mr. Bogomilsky's partner, at the Site Committee meeting, for the parking to be revised according to the .redlining on the plans being reviewed this evening. The information presented this evening by Mr. Bogomilsky is new. M/S: Dickson, Walker - M/S: Dickson, Walker - AYES: Commissioners: NOES: Commissioners: ABSENT: Commissioners: That the public hearing on S 88-12 be closed. Motion carried unanimously (5-0-2). That the Planning Commission adopt the attached findings and approve S 88-12 subject to the attached conditions, with the additional condition that the parking plan come back to the Site and Architectural Review Committee along with revised elevations. Motion carried with the following roll call vote: Kasolas, Olszewski, Walker, Dickson, Christ None Stanton, Perrine. ~ ~ ~ -11- UP 88-06 Continued public hearing to consider the Johansen, L. application of Mrs. Lillian Johansen for approval of a Conditional Use Permit to allow the establishment of a Large Family Day Care Home (7-12 children) and approval to allow the conversion of a two-car garage to living space on property known as 256 Calado Ave. in an R-1 (Single Family Residential) Zoning District. Principal Planner Stafford reviewed the Staff Report of September 13, 1988. Mr. Stafford noted that, as a result of the Site and Architectural Review Committee meeting, the applicant has indicated her willingness to reopen the garage for parking; therefore, Staff is recommending approval at this time. Commissioner Olszewski reported that this item was considered by the Site and Architectural Review Committee. The Committee is recommending approval with redlining which returns the garage to a garage use. The loss of living space inside the house was discussed, and the applicant feels that they still have sufficient space to operate legally under State law. Mrs. Lillian Johansen, 256 Calado Ave., stated her agreement to reopen the garage for parking. Additionally, she indicated that the loss of the garage as living space will still leave adequate room for the children; that drop-off and pick-up of children is not a problem because the facility is not located on a main street and traffic is not blocked by this activity. M/S: Olszewski, Walker - M/S: Olszewski, Walker - AYES: Commissioners: NOES: Commissioners: ABSENT: Commissioners: That the public hearing on UP 88-06 be closed. Motion carried unanimously (5-0-2) That the Planning Commission adopt Resolution No. 2547 approving UP 88-06 based on findings to be adopted by the Commission at its meeting of September 27, 1988; and, subject to the applicant converting the garage back to parking. Motion carried with the following roll call vote: Kasolas, Olszewski, Walker, Christ Dickson Stanton, Perrine. Commissioner Dickson stated that he voted "no" because he felt that the home was not large enough for this number of children. ~ ~ S 88-05 Continued public hearing to consider the Craig, J. application of Mr. James Craig for approval of a site and architectural application to allow the establishment of an industrial storage yard on property known as 145 Kennedy Ave. in an M-1-S (Light Industrial) Zoning District. -12- Principal Planner Stafford reviewed the Staff Report of September 13, 1988, and noted that Staff is recommending denial of this project. Commissioner Olszewski reported that this item was considered by the Site and Architectural Review Committee. The Committee has no recommendation regarding the specific request; however, if approval is considered the Committee has recommendations that (1) the use be temporary and for three years only; (2) that access to the site be consructed to standard sizes; and (3) that the existing fence and fence material be continued around to the rear of the property to the satisfaction of the Planning Director. Chairman Christ opened the public hearing and invited anyone to speak on this item. Mr. James Craig, 20524 Manor Dr., Saratoga, stated that he wishes to use the property for three years at which time he has plans for building a structure on the adjacent property. Mr. Craig indicated that the condition to replace the existing redwood fence with a fence matching the front seems like a reasonable request; he will place Cypress trees of a size somewhat higher than the fence when installed at 4 foot intervals; and, he will built a sliding gate at the southwest corner. Mr. Craig concluded that he has used the property for several years and it has been kept clean; and, he is willing to make the requested improvements. M/S: Walker, Olszewski - That the public hearing on S 88-05 be closed. Motion carried unanimously (5-0-2). M/S: Olszewski, Walker - That the Planning Commission adopt the attached findings and approve S 88-05 subject to the attached conditions which include the conditions indicated by the Site and Architectural Review Committee. Motion carried with the following roll call vote: AYES: Commissioners: Olszewski, Walker, Christ NOES: Commissioners: Kasolas, Dickson ABSENT: Commissioners: Stanton, Perrine. ~ ~ ~ V 88-08 Public hearing to consider the application of Arnold, S. Steven Arnold for approval of a variance to the minimum lot area width from 60' to 45' for one parcel and a variance to the minimum lot area from 11,000 sq.ft. to 8,782 sq.ft. for a second parcel on property known as 1260 Burrows Rd. in an R-1-10 (Single Family Residential) Zoning District. Principal Planner Stafford reviewed the Staff Report of September 13, 1988, noting that Staff is recommending denial. Chairman Christ opened the public hearing and invited anyone to speak on this item. -13- Mr. Steven Arnold, Civil Engineer, reviewed the proposal, noting that immediately east of this site there is an existing 10-lot subdivision with all the lots being 6,000 sq.ft. in size; and, immediately to the south there is an existing flag lot of approximately 7,000 sq.ft. Mr. Arnold continued that his client is not requesting anything that his neighbors do not enjoy at this point, he is only requesting that the lot sizes be made a little more practical. The hardship would be the rather small existing lot at the rear of the site. Mr. Arnold noted that there would be two new homes built on the site complete with attached garages. Commissioner Dickson agreed that this request made sense. Chairman Christ agreed that there was not a hardship with this property; however, he did feel that the property was unique and it would be to the benefit of the community to equalize the parcels. M/S: Dickson, Olszewski - That the public hearing on V 88-08 be closed. Motion carried unanimously (5-0-2). M/S: Dickson, Olszewski - That the Planning Commission adopt Resolution No. 2548, including the following findings, approving V 88-08 subject to the condition that the applicant process and file a parcel map. Findings: 1. The subject lot is unique as created under the jurisdiction of Santa Clara County. 2. The necessity for a variance is brought about by the annexation of the property into the City of Campbell. 3. The lot line adjustment will provide a more equitable distribution of property, and the resulting single family developments will be in the best interest of the community.' Motion carried with the following roll call vote: AYES: Commissioners: Kasolas, Olszewski, Walker, Dickson, Christ NOES: Commissioners: None ABSENT: Commissioners: Stanton, Perrine. ~ ~ ~ PM 88-08 Continued public hearing to consider the McClelland, R. Mr. Richard McClelland regarding the Planning Director's denial of a proposed Tentative Parcel Map allowing the relocation of an interior property line on property known as 1260 Burrows Rd. in an R-1-10 (Single Family Residential) Zoning District. -14- Principal Planner Stafford reviewed the Staff Report of September 13, 1988 and noted that Staff is recommending approval of this item in light of the Commission's approval of V 88-08, which is directly connected to this parcel map request. Chairman Christ opened the public hearing and invited anyone to speak on this item. M/S: Dickson, Walker - That the public hearing on PM 88-08 be closed. Motion carried unanimously (5-0-2). M/S: Dickson, Walker - That the Planning Commission approve PM 88-08 with the following findings: Findings: 1. The subject lot is unique as created under the jurisdiction of Santa Clara County. 2. The necessity for a variance is brought about by the annexation of the property into the City of Campbell. 3. The lot line adjustment will provide a more equitable distribution of property, and the resulting single family developments will be in the best interest of the community. ___ Motion carried with the following roll call vote: AYES: Commissioners: Kasolas, Olszewski, Walker, Dickson, Christ NOES: Commissioners: None ABSENT: Commissioners: Stanton, Perrine. ~ * ~ TS 88-08 Public hearing to consider the application of Lands of Coffey Coffey Construction Co. for approval of a Tentative Subdivision Map to allow the subdivision of a parcel of land into 12 single family lots on property known as 710 & 728 Budd Ave. in an R-1-6 (Single Family Residential) Zoning District. Principal Planner Stafford reviewed the Staff Report of September 13, 1988, noting that Staff is recommending approval of this subdivision map subject to conditions attached hereto. Chairman Christ opened the public hearing and invited anyone to speak on this item. A letter from David G. Carlson, 751 Budd Ave., requesting certain traffic mitigations was noted for the record (attached hereto). -15- Chairman Christ asked if this proposal has been reviewed by the Public Works Department; asked if there would be adequate space for sidewalks along at least one side of the cul-de-sac; and, noted that the signs being suggested in Mr. Carlson's letter would be beneficial. Engineering Manager Helms indicated that the cul-de-sac is proposed to be developed as a standard street with standard improvements. Mr. Bob McDermott, Jennings-Heiss-McDermott Engineering, stated that the applicant concurs with Staff's conditions. M/S: Walker, Olszewski - M/S: Walker, Dickson - AYES: Commissioners: NOES: Commissioners: ABSENT: Commissioners: That the public hearing on TS 88-08 be closed. Motion carried unanimously (5-0-2). That the Planning Commission adopt the findings attached hereto and recommend that the City Council approve TS 88-08, subject to the attached conditions. Motion carried with the following roll call vote: Kasolas, Olszewski, Walker, Dickson, Christ None Stanton, Perrine. ~ ~ ~ S 88-13 Public hearing to consider the application of Mortkowitz, M. Michael Mortkowitz for approval of plans and elevations to allow the construction of a retail building on property known as 2080 S. Bascom Ave. in a C-2-S (General Commercial) Zoning District. Principal Planner Stafford reviewed the Staff Report of September 13, 1988 noting that Staff is recommending approval of this item. Commissioner Olszewski reported that this item was considered by the Site and Architectural Review Committee. The Committee is recommending approval as redlined. It should be noted that the applicant would prefer a 2 foot setback in the front, rather than the 5.5 foot setback as indicated in red on the plans. This lesser setback would permit the proposed building to be even with the adjacent structure. The Site Committee is of the opinion that the 5.5 foot setback is more of a standard that the City has been approving. Commissioner Dickson asked if there had been any discussion about the location of the trash enclosure next to the residential area. He noted that the noise caused by trash pick-up has been one of the biggest complaints from residents who are adjacent to commercial areas. Chairman Christ opened the public hearing and invited anyone to speak on this item. -16- Mr. Michael Rockhold, Architect, Integrated Design Group, reviewed the site plan and explained why he is requesting a 2 foot setback. Mr. Rockhold noted that the trash bin will be pulled out to the front of the site for pick-up; that the location of the trash enclosure can be changed if the Commission so desires; and that the Z foot setback is being requested to minimize the affect of the adjacent building. Commissioner Kasolas stated that he had no objection to the revised plan presented by Mr. Rockhold, and no problem with the trash enclosure at whatever location is proposed. Commissioner Olszewski stated that he thought the trash enclosure should stay where it was originally located on the plans. Chairman Christ stated that he had no problem with the location of the trash enclosure or the 2 foot setback. M/S: Olszewski, Dickson - That the public hearing on S 88-13 be closed. Motion carried unanimously (5-0-2). M/S: Olszewski, Walker - That the Planning Commission adopt the attached findings and approval S 88-13 subject to the attached conditions, as redlined with a 2 foot setback and parking plan for the returned to the Site and Architectural Review Committee for approval. Motion carried with the following roll call vote: AYES: Commissioners: Kasolas, Olszewski, Walker, Dickson, Christ NOES: Commissioners: None ABSENT: Commissioners: Stanton, Perrine. ~ ~ ~ ZC 88-07 Public hearing to consider the application of PD 88-11 Maison Construction for approval of a zone Maison Construction from R-M-S (Multiple Family Residential) to P-D (Planned Development) and approval of a Planned Development Permit, plans, elevations and development schedule to allow the construction of 6 townhomes on property known as 600 W. Sunnyoaks Ave. in an R-M-S (Multiple Family/Low Medium Density Residential) Zoning District. Principal. Planner Stafford reviewed the Staff Report of September 13, 1988 noting that Staff is recommending approval of this application. Commissioner Olszewski reported that this item was considered by the Site and Architectural Review Committee and the Committee is recommending approval as presented. -17- (Commissioner Walker left the Chambers at 11:30 p.m.) Chairman Christ opened the public hearing and invited anyone to speak on this item. M/S: Olszewski, Dickson - That the public hearing on ZC 88-07/PD 88-11 be closed. Motion carried unanimously (4-0-3). M/S: Olszewski, Kasolas - 1. That the Planning Commission recommend that the City Council accept the Negative Declaration which has been prepared for this project; and 2. That the Planning Commission adopt a Resolution, incorporating the attached findings, recommending that the City Council approve a zone change from R-M-S to PD; and 3. That the Planning Commission adopt a Resolution, incorporating the attached findings, recommending that the City Council approve a Planned Development Permit for this project, subject to the attached conditions. Discussion on motion Commissioner Dickson opposed to motion, noting his concerns about the density; and, the long, narrow driveway. Additionally, he felt that the project did not show things that are expected in a PD Zoning District. Chairman Christ noted that he had similar concerns to those of Commissioner Dickson's. Commissioners Kasolas and Olszewski withdrew their motion. M/S: Kasolas, Dickson - That the public hearing on ZC 88-07/PD 88-11 be reopened. Motion carried unanimously (4-0-3). M/S: Dickson, Olszewski - That the public hearing on ZC 88-07/PD 88-11 be continued to the Planning Commission meeting of September 27, 1988 in order that the applicant might address the issues of the long, narrow driveway and the lack of usable common open space for the project. Mr. Mike Abdollahi, 1925 S. Winchester Blvd., stated that the 35Z of the project site is landscaped and that there is only 35~ site coverage. Additionally, the project is compatible with the neighborhood and with the adjacent projects. Mr. Abdollahi noted that the consideration of this application was delayed because of the last meeting being cancelled, and that this additional delay is creating a hardship. -18- Chairman Christ explained that three votes are needed to recommend approval of a project; and, it appears that the vote would be 2-2 at this point. Therefore, a continuance to the next meeting would be the only alternative. Vote on motion Motion for continuance carried unanimously (4-0-3). X SY X' ZC 88-08 Public hearing to consider the application PD 88-12 of Mr. Jere La Guisa for approval of a zone LaGuisa, J. change from R-M-S (Multiple Family Residential) to P-D (Planned Development) and approval of plans, elevations and development schedule to allow the construction of 3 townhomes on properties known as 880 S. San Tomas Aquino Road and 1203 Smith Avenue in a R-M-S (Multiple Family/Low-Medium Density Residential - 6-13 units per gross acre) Zoning District. Principal Planner Stafford reviewed the Staff Report of September 13, 1988 noting that Staff is recommending approval of this application. Commissioner Olszewski reported that this item was considered by the Site and Architectural Review Committee. The Committee is recommending approval with revised elevations to be approved by the Planning Director upon recommendation of the Architectural Advisor. Chairman Christ opened the public hearing and .invited anyone to speak on this item. Mr. Jere LaGuisa, 1936 Camden Ave., San Jose, stated his concurrence with the conditions and agreed to change the type of siding on the structures. M/S: Dickson, Olszewski - That the public hearing on ZC 88-08/PD 88-12 be closed. Motion carried unanimously (4-0-3). M/S: Dickson, Kasolas - 1. That the Planning Commission adopt a Resolution No. 2549 incorporating the attached findings, and recommend that the City Council approve a zone change from R-M-S to PD; and 2. That the Planning Commission adopt a Resolution No. 2550 incorporating the attached findings, and recommend that the City Council approve a Planned Development Permit for this project, subject to the attached conditions. -19- Discussion on motion Chairman Christ opposed the motion because two of the units had the rear elevations facing San Tomas Aquino Rd. He noted that he has a problem with backyards and 6 foot fences facing streets, and he felt that it would be better to have the entrance, or a front door appearance, along the street frontage. Vote on motion Motion carried with the following roll call vote: AYES: Commissioners: Kasolas, Olszewski, Dickson NOES: Commissioners: Christ ABSENT: Commissioners: Stanton, Perrine. MISCELLANEOUS ~ * ~ Action was taken on the following 4 items with a single motion, due to the lateness of the hour. The items and votes are indicated separately for record keeping purposes. M/S: Olszewski, Kasolas - That the Planning Commission approve the Staff Recommendation on the following items: R 88-02/PD 87-05; TS 88-06; TS 88-07; and R 88-04/ZC 86-05. R 88-02 Request for reinstatement of previously PD 87-05 approved Planned Development Permit allowing Callahan, M. construction of 11 townhomes on property known as 563 & 581 W. Rincon Ave. Motion carried 3-1-3, with Commissioner Dickson voting "no". TS 88-06 Tentative Subdivision Map - Lands of Callahan Lands of Callahan Sunnyoaks - 563 W. Rincon Ave. - APN 305-28-16 & 17. Motion carried unanimously (4-0-3). TS 88-07 Tentative Subdivision Map - Lands of NADCON Lands of NADCON Development - 490, 494 & 496 W. Sunnyoaks Ave. - APN 406-9-1, 2, & 3. Motion carried 3-1-3, with Commissioner Dickson voting "no". -20- R 88-04 Request for reinstatement of previously ZC 86-05 approved Zone Change and Planned Development Hodgins, B. Permit to allow the construction of an office building on property known as 42 & 60 W. Campbell Ave. in a PD (Planned Development/Professional Office) Zoning District. Plans approved as redlined. Motion carried unanimously (4-0-3). x * ~ (Commissioner Kasolas left the Chambers at 11:50 p.m.) M/S: Dickson, Olszewski - That, there being no quorum, the following items be continued to the Planning Commission meeting of September 27, 1988. Motion carried 3-0-4. R 88-01/M 88-08 Continued review of parking circulation plan S 86-21 - Pruneyard Inn - 1875 S. Bascom Ave. SA 88-09 Continued review of signing program - Pruneyard Inn Pruneyard Inn - 1875 S. Bascom Ave. M 88-14 One year review of use of temporary Church structures on property known as 110 W. Latimer Ave. - Our Mother of Perpetual Help Church - R-3-S (Multiple Family Residential) Zoning District. Request Request of Mrs. Rosa Guerra for approval of Guerra, R. a location for the placement of a satellite dish antenna on property known as 1009 Virginia Ave. in an R-1 (Single Family Residential) Zoning District. Referral Referral from the City Council regarding the City Council appointment of two Commissioners to a Subcommittee regarding Dover School. SUBCOMMITTEE REPORTS Subcommittee Reports Site & Architectural Review Procedure Subcommittee; Tree Preservation Committee; Site & Architectural Review Committee. ADJOURNMENT There being no further business, the meeting was adjourned at 11:58 p.m. APPROVED: Ronald W. Christ Chairman ATTEST: Arthur A. Kee Secretary RECORDED: Linda A. Dennis Recordintt Secretarv CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL - FILE ~{ S 88-11 SITE ADDRESS: 3405 S. Winchester Blvd. APPLICANT: Seibold Corp. - Chevron Station PC MTG DATE: 9-13-88 The applicant is hereby notified, as part of this application, that he/she is required to meet the following conditions in accordance with the Ordinances of the City of Campbell and the Laws of the State of California. Additionally, the applicant is hereby notified that he/she is required to comply with all applicable Codes or Ordinances of the City of Campbell and the State of California which pertain to this development and are not herein specified. 1. Revised site plan addressing a revised parking layout to be submitted to the Planning Department and approved by the Planning Director upon recommendation of the Architectural Advisor prior to application for a building permit. 2. Property to be fenced and landscaped as indicated and/or added in red on the plans. Landscaping and fencing shall be maintained in accordance with the approved plans. 3. Landscaping plan indicating type and size of plant material, and location of irrigation system to be submitted to the Planning Department and approved by the Site and Architectural Review Committee and/or Planning Commission prior to issuance of a building permit. 4. Fencing plan indicating location and design details of fencing to be submitted to the Planning Department and approved by the Planning Director ---- prior to issuance of a building permit. 5. Applicant to either (1) post a faithful performance bond in the amount of $3,000.00 to insure landscaping, fencing, and striping of parking areas within 3 months of completion of construction; or (2) file written agreement to complete landscaping, fencing, and striping of parking areas. Bond or agreement to be filed with the Planning Department prior to application for a building permit. 6. Applicant to submit a plan to the Planning Department, prior to installation of PG&E utility (transformer) boxes, indicating the location of the boxes and screening (if boxes are above ground) for approval of the Planning Director. 7. All mechanical equipment on roofs and all utility meters to be screened as approved by the Planning Director. 8. All parking and driveway areas to be developed in compliance with Chapter 21.50 of the Campbell Municipal Code. All parking spaces to be provided with appropriate concrete curbs or bumper guards. 9. Underground utilities to be provided as required by Section 20.36.150 of the Campbell Municipal Code. 10. Plans submitted to the Building Department for plan check shall indicate clearly the location of all connections for underground utilities including water, sewer, electric, telephone and television cables, etc. CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL - FILE 4t S 88-11 SITE ADDRESS: 3405 S. Winchester Blvd. APPLICANT: Seibold Corp. - Chevron Station Page 2. 11. Sign application to be submitted in accordance with provisions of the Sign Ordinance for all signs. No sign to be installed until application is approved and permit issued by Planning and Building Departments (Section 21.53 of the Campbell Municipal Code). 12. Ordinance No. 782 of the Campbell Municipal Code stipulates that any contract for the collection and disposal of refuse, garbage, wet garbage and rubbish produced within the limits of the City of Campbell shall be made with Green Valley Disposal Company. This requirement applies to all single-family dwellings, multiple apartment units, to all commercial, business, industrial, manufacturing, and construction establishments. 13. Trash container(s) of a size and quantity necessary to serve the development shall be located in area(s) approved by the Fire Department. Unless otherwise noted, enclosure(s) shall consist of a concrete floor surrounded by a solid wall or fence and have self-closing doors of a size specified by the Fire Department. All enclosures to be constructed at grade level and have a level area adjacent to the trash enclosure area to service these containers. 14. Applicant shall comply with all appropriate State and City requirements for the handicapped. BUILDING DEPARTMENT 15. Engineered calculations are required for the canopy installation. 16. Provide details on handicapped bathrooms. 17. Fire Department to approve new underground tanks and monitor systems. FIRE DEPARTMENT 18. Fuel and west oil tanks along with all piping and monitoring shall be reviewed with the Fire Department. 19. Construction shall be noncombustible fire retardant treated two or one-hour fire resistive as required in UBC 202(b) PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT No comment at this time. RECOI~IENDED FINDINGS: S 88-12 SITE ADDRESS: 3405 S. WINCHESTER BLVD. APPLICANT: SEIBOLD CORP. PC MTG: 9-13-88 1. The proposed canopy is an appropriate scale in relationship to the existing building and neighboring adjacent uses. 2. The building design is considered acceptable by the Architectural Advisor. 3. Retention of existing landscape areas and upgrading the landscaping in those areas will add to the aesthetics of this project. A minimum of 107. of the site area will be landscaped, which is consistent with the standards setforth in the Zoning Ordinance. 4. The existing parking facilities are being retained with no expansion of this use'. Y ; _1J .; _ '~ . -_- -~r ~ r A C 1 £AQA •~! f. _ ;~ r ~~a111 J ~• s A~ r ~e~ • ~~ \ . ~ y ~t~ ~r4i 2 ~~ ~ 3~ ~. .o ~ ; '- . _ • /~ ~= s 6 / ~ I u .~ ~~ . 1 sr ' ~ risl \ ~J~ / ' n ~~ • ~ /\\ / /. q ~/ / l ,' ' ~ I o' '~ ,, J /~ ''s \ f j~ / 1•~ S 88-11 / / 3405 S WINCHESTER BL. / '~ ti ~ ,.~' ~ T O S Ay ~. -- __ ` ' 9/8/75 ` ~. iIJ! fl ~ i ~ ~ f. ,~ ! ~ N ~ RECOMMENDED FINDINGS: S 88-12 SITE ADDRESS: 100 W. HAMILTON AVE. APPLICANT: B. MIRKIN PC MTG: 9-13-88 1. The proposed project is considered an appropriate scale for this site and neighborhood. 2. The proposed retail use is consistent with the C-2-S (General Commercial) Zoning District shown for this property. 3. The building design, with recommended modifications, is considered acceptable by the Architectural Advisor. 4. The applicant has indicated the provision of 61 parking spaces for this use, which exceeds the 38 spaces required by the parking ordinance. 5. The provision of a masonry/pre-cast concrete wall along the rear property line minimizes infringement on the neighboring property. 6. Substantial on-site landscaping has been shown which will add to the aesthetics of this project. CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL - FILE ~~ S 88-12 SITE ADDRESS: 100 W. Hamilton Ave. APPLICANT: B. Mirkin PC MTG DATE: 9-13-88 ____ The applicant is hereby notified, as part of this application, that he/she is required to meet the following conditions in accordance with the Ordinances of the City of Campbell and the Laws of the State of California. Additionally, the applicant is hereby notified that he/she is required to comply with all applicable Codes or Ordinances of the City of Campbell and the State of California which pertain to this development and are not herein specified. 1. Revised elevations and site plan addressing concerns indicated in the Staff Comment Sheet and indicating the revised parking layout to be submitted to the Planning Department and approved by the Site and Architectural Review Committee prior to application for a building permit. 2. Property to be fenced and landscaped as indicated and/or added in red on the plans. Landscaping and fencing shall be maintained in accordance with the approved plans. 3. Landscaping plan indicating type and size of plant material, and location of irrigation system to be submitted to the Planning Department and approved by the Site and Architectural Review Committee and/or Planning Commission prior to issuance of a building permit. 4. Fencing plan indicating location and design details of fencing to be submitted to the Planning Department and approved by the Planning Director prior to issuance of a building permit. 5. Applicant to either (1) post a faithful performance bond in the amount of $4,000 to insure landscaping, fencing, and striping of parking areas within 3 months of completion of construction; or (2) file written agreement to complete landscaping, fencing, and striping of parking areas. Bond or agreement to be filed with the Planning Department prior to application for a building permit. 6. Applicant to submit a plan to the Planning Department, prior to installation of PG&E utility (transformer) boxes, indicating the location of the boxes and screening (if boxes are above ground) for approval of the Planning Director. 7. All mechanical equipment on roofs and all utility meters to be screened as approved by the Planning Director. 8. Building occupancy will not be allowed until public improvements are installed. 9. All parking and driveway areas to be developed in compliance with Chapter 21.50 of the Campbell Municipal Code. All parking spaces to be provided with appropriate concrete curbs or bumper guards. 10. Underground utilities to be provided as required by Section 20.36.150 of the Campbell Municipal Code. 11. Plans submitted to the Building Department for plan check shall indicate clearly the location of all connections for underground utilities including water, sewer, electric, telephone and television cables, etc. CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL - FILE ~l 88-12 SITE ADDRESS: 100 W. Hamilton Ave. APPLICANT: B. Mirkin PAGE 2. 12. Sign application to be submitted in accordance with provisions of the Sign Ordinance for all signs. No sign to be installed until application is approved and permit issued by Planning and Building Departments (Section 21.53 of the Campbell Municipal Code). 13. Ordinance No. 782 of the Campbell Municipal Code stipulates that any contract for the collection and disposal of refuse, garbage, wet garbage and rubbish produced within the limits of the City of Campbell shall be made with Green Valley Disposal Company. This requirement applies to all single-family dwellings, multiple apartment units, to all commercial, business, industrial, manufacturing, and construction establishments. 14. Trash container(s) of a size and quantity necessary to serve the development shall be located in area(s) approved by the Fire Department. Unless otherwise noted, enclosure(s) shall consist of a concrete floor surrounded by a solid wall or fence and have self-closing doors of a size specified by the Fire Department. All enclosures to be constructed at grade level and have a level area adjacent to the trash enclosure area to service these containers. 15. Applicant shall comply with all appropriate State and City requirements for the handicapped. 16. The applicant is hereby notified that the property is to be maintained free of any combustible trash, debris and weeds, until the time that actual construction commences. All existing structures shall be secured by having windows boarded up and doors sealed shut, or be demolished or removed from the property. Sect. 11.201 & 11.414, 1979 Ed. Uniform Fire Code. BUILDING DEPARTMENT 17. Retaining walls at property lines are limited to a height of 15 inches if constructed of wood. * ~ ~ Z~-- 1.. .. ,. . • ~ •. i •~ ~O 0~. ` t w'. , . N t R. ~~~~ r 0 ~ Dol Ror C f o S 88-12 L 00 W . 1EiAM MIST AVE. -- I ~~ vQ ~ i o ,~ J m 'o ~~ ~ •.... ~ P .o~ j ~~ RECOMMENDED FINDINGS: S 88-05 SITE ADDRESS: 145 KENNEDY AVE. APPLICANT: CRAIG, J. PC MTG: 9-13-88 1. The proposed use of the property for a period of three years will not impede the orderly development of this area. 2. An open storage use at this location may be made compatible with adjacent residential uses through adequate fencing and landscaping. 3. A landscape buffer will be provided to adjacent residential uses. 4. The proposed ingress/egress to the site is considered acceptable on a short-time basis (three years). CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL - FILE ~~ S 88-05 SITE ADDRESS: 145 KENNEDY AVE. APPLICANT: CRAIG, J. PC MTG DATE: 9-13-88 The applicant is hereby notified, as part of this application, that he/she is -- required to meet the following conditions in accordance with the Ordinances of the City of Campbell and the Laws of the State of California. Additionally, the applicant is hereby notified that he/she is required to comply with all applicable Codes or Ordinances of the City of Campbell and the State of California which pertain to this development and are not herein specified. 1. Revised site plan indicating driveways, and new fencing, to be submitted to the Planning Department and approved by the Planning Director upon recommendation of the Architectural Advisor prior to application for a building permit. 2. Property to be fenced and landscaped as indicated and/or added in red on the plans. Landscaping and fencing shall be maintained in accordance with the approved plans. 3. Landscaping plan indicating type and size of plant material, and location of irrigation system to be submitted to the Planning Department and approved by the Site and Architectural Review Committee and/or Planning Commission prior to issuance of a building permit. 4. Fencing plan indicating location and design details of fencing to be submitted to the Planning Department and approved by the Planning Director prior to issuance of a building permit. 5. Applicant to either (1) post a faithful performance bond in the amount of --- $2,000.00 to insure landscaping, fencing, and striping of parking areas within 3 months of completion of construction; or (2) file written agreement to complete landscaping, fencing, and striping of parking areas. Bond or agreement to be filed with the Planning Department prior to application for a building permit. 6. Applicant to submit a plan to the Planning Department, prior to installation of PG&E utility (transformer) boxes, indicating the location of the boxes and screening (if boxes are above ground) for approval of the Planning Director. 7. Applicant to submit a letter to the Planning Department, satisfactory to the City Attorney, limiting the use of the property as follows: storage use only with no outside vehicle repair. 8. All parking and driveway areas to be developed in compliance with Chapter 21.50 of the Campbell Municipal Code. All parking spaces to be provided with appropriate concrete curbs or bumper guards. 9. Trash container(s) of a size and quantity necessary to serve the development shall be located in area(s) approved by the Fire Department. Unless otherwise noted, enclosure(s) shall consist of a concrete floor surrounded by a solid wall or fence and have self-closing doors of a size specified by the Fire Department. All enclosures to be constructed at grade level and have a level area adjacent to the trash enclosure area to service these containers. CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL - FILE 4l S 88-05 SITE ADDRESS: 145 KENNEDY AVE. APPLICANT: CRAIG, J. PAGE 2. BUILDING DEPARTMENT 10. Submit complete plans. 11. Construction office and storage locker is against property line - shall have one hour fire walls at property line. 12. Plans do not show how electrical and sewer will be supplied to construction office. PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT 13. Dedicate additional right-of-way to widen Kennedy Ave. to 30 feet from centerline. FIRE DEPARTMENT 14. Storage yard shall comply with requirements of Title 19, Campbell Municipal Code. PLANNING COMMISSION 15. Approval is for an interim storage yard for three (3) years (until September 23, 1991). 11'x`;=~I .. ~ ~ ~,, ~~~~~~ r2~ m „ ~ q N N r 129/ ~ ~ 01 19 1 / h Y Y D N N ~ ~ d , ~fss6 Ct. > 1 / ~ o J m M 3~3~ ~ Ti ' O ~. 7 ~ w {`O d °~~ 5 M N 447/173/36 ~ of 4'6 404/4 A N h e e 0 ~ l /4 u WIItOn :2/ 29 266/30 14/16 S / / 4 5 ~ ~ ~ 9nn! / am n to v~. zl/44 S 2 ~' 39/2 0 ~~ o p se v ~~ PRIVATE toe/5z V SCHOOL P 3 ~ Q,~ $ $a-175 f• 156/11 /6 0 ' 145 KENNEDY AVE. _ ~ ~ / W 14/16 Vt. W U ~ 7, R: 3 7 9 / 7 ~ .~ Q` 1 2 QP :3 3 5 3 1 6 4 / 3 a 2 9 6/4 4 ~~ 3 / 5 f. / t: Holl' 2 4 9/I s 271/55 2 2 7• / 3 S M c O `3 i0 ~ •' o 0~~! w 8 I / s S ry^ 2 LAG ~\ ~`\ - ,~ a~ ~ P Q ,r, Oell-Ave. .~ d ~ ~3 ~ ? .; 32~ Q: W J Q oc o`/ L__1 i sic CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL: PM 88-08 SITE ADDRESS: 1260 BURROWS RD. PC MTG: 9-13-88 PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT 1. Dedicate additional right-of-way to widen Burrows Rd. to 30 feet from centerline. 2. Install street improvements across the frontage. 3. Pay storm drain area fee. 4. Submit 3 sets of grading and drainage plans to the City Engineer for approval. 5. Obtain an excavation permit, pay fees, and post surety for all work in the right-of-way. i ~ ----- ---- _ ~-- ------- -- ------ -------~--- __ l --__~_ :< ~:~ GUO a ~r 2 t~ ~ ~ z ~R~'t ~ E7P~v ~~ ~:. ~b~ J -7 1 g t~O o A U1T ,~ ~O P~3~~ C~ ~, CO~=iV c ~ ~ CJ~~PC~~~ ~ l~v`7lJt ivG- C:~t-ll~t ~ S ~ 9l-~lgc7 E-1rL. C ~--~2~,~-,~-c ~ ~c~~,v ~ ~ ~ u ~~.a~~y~ ~...~c~ t'~ +~'c- D ~2- ivy A G«'t~. C~2r'a'ac't o,,~.t ~ O ~ cwt L'~ `~ o~ ~uOp A ~~~ ~ l S ~vo ~ ~n~ t,Y ~~ ~ cc a ~ S S ~ 2.c~'-'T ~Z ~Z~=S l A~~~ !N 'T~-L'`' /`(./~1 ~s%~1 q"1'TL~'`~" A2 i~~- ~ ~3 U~" lS ~ Ls~ v ~ L7 V S ~ ~3 A~ ~ Lv-i~rZt~,~--PLC- ?Lj G~I~A cr c3n-O /~ C~2 -~- S k3L 'obi ~ S 7CZ,~r' F~~ C_ ~ (a-S ~ Oc~v ~ ~O ~ /~c Cs~Z- `$'~1-~"r C. 02-j~Z Qi- ~ ~~~ `V ~ ~~ t n; iA~ ~,•: D ~ b'~F2a`I' ~V13U.3iJ~5 ~ Lbw ~~ ~ ~ . O~`r o PPS S ~ y "~~ i~2oPaS PrC.. O ~` ~ S --O ~ --~~j .~-- - t " ~n e0~'U C c~Z~~ c~ As3~ ~T~ " '1r?~-L~-- ~A,4~ 1`7-1 ~L, --T~~i C. g20C~f~- Cif} ~g ~ ,~ ti.~ ~~ Ln=' C_(Z~ s ~~- ~'c= ~' t-lf~t G~ S p~~'PI~Z` f li'l~r~- ~ }4 mil, dR.C~(~C~ bt S~-'a C ~i'= rS-~zs" __ _. _____. _...-_-__4. --1------_ _ _--- - ------- _ _ - - __ ___ ~ . _ p~~ --Z1 Z _ . `~~~- .~'~vpk~ ~ cu c~vv~ ~~~~ ~~ 'Fc~~ `~7oP S l~S c3L P ~ C~ ~ ~ `n-l-c~ ~~2 ~e~'~i t cav S O~ _~ ~vu~c~ ~ ~~,~.~ ~ S3 vow ~~ ~~~`ra-~~ r~,~ `f !v~~ :« :,~ vvu ...,.. ~v-~Y?.G~~ ~ f Z~`~ ~E~ v ~~ ~ y tel. S C.v o tit 4~ V~-t~j~ ~-(7 ___ _: ~OVCGc~ Q'~-~`- `TiZ~-~~='lL ~ '~Z'ti4-6' C~`- r2~==S tO(~JJ'~S ~~ Z ~ ~"L__ ~f'_ Cc~'S~~ D~C7 v ~(~-v~iL ~~0~ ~ ~'~'~ ~~-~ z~ G t G~,-u.~~ ~~~ ~~ ~ ~/i ~/~ ~~. FINDINGS - TS 88-08 SITE ADDRESS: 710 & 728 BUDD AVE. APPLICANT: COFFEY CONSTRUCTION PC MTG: 9-13-88 1. The proposed subdivision is consistent with the Land Use Element of the General Plan. 2. The proposed subdivision is consistent with the Housing Element of the General Plan. 3. The proposed subdivision is consistent with the City's zoning and subdivision regulations. CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL: TS 88-08 SITE ADDRESS: 710 & 728 BUDD AVE. APN: 404-24-46 & 47 APPLICANT: COFFEY CONSTRUCTION PC MTG: 9-13-88 PLANNING DEPARTMENT 1. Site and Architectural approval must be granted by the Planning Commission prior to issuance of building permits. 2. Existing trees to be retained shall be clearly indicated on the site plans submitted .for architectural approval. PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT 3. Installation of a sanitary sewerage system to serve all lots within the subdivision in conformance with the proposed plans of the County of Santa Clara Sanitation District No. 4. Sanitary sewerage service to be provided by said District No. 4. 4. Installation of a water distribution system to serve all lots within the subdivision in conformance with the plans of the San Jose Water Works. Water service to be provided by said water company. Fire hydrants and appurtenances shall be provided and installed at the locations specified by the Fire Chief, Fire Department, City of Campbell. Fire hydrant maintenance fees shall be paid to City at the rate of X195 per fire hydrant. 5. Subdivider shall create or provide any public service easement and any other public utility and/or public service easements as may be necessary for the installation of any and all public utilities and/or facilities. 6. Compliance with the provisions of Title 20, Subdivisions of the Campbell Municipal Code. 7. Subdivider to pay Storm Drainage Area Fee. 8. Subdivider shall install street improvements and post surety to guaranty the work. 9. Provide a grading and drainage plan for the review and approval of the City Engineer. 10. Obtain an excavation permit and pay fees and deposit for all work in the public right-of-way. 11. Pay a fee of $13,584.00 in lieu of dedication of land for parks. ' - toy-~~•etr~•c4elp~,+~lT1~At ~r~.#s, iair~ `; a CL4RA COUNTY, CALIFORNIA p/ tR[ Kt~CMU[ 6+r0 TAaAt1Ow,C~pt : ~~: - • .t-cc.Trvt ~A~E~ ri,r~rcH i,'~~iu ', ~• ~°• B 0 0 K P 4 Q E - r ALPAED~E:. GAttl'50N•ASSL'3~.rOR•!•• -~~ 404. 2 4 ~.... 25 ~ ~ ... ~. ~ ~ .'. ' E. N. PARR TRACT T 0 / 26 I "= 100 O 1 50 .a soB~~o ~... CAMEp ACT N" .. 3299 ~ ~ '-•--- ~ - MANOR • • • U N (T e '1 /7 '~' ~~ sOd N' 2 ''~ o ~ / 6Q W •~ ...~ 1 ~ ~ / 159.36Yc -... DRIVE 33 N 5z.os /8 c a f 6 ~° ~ V 143.50 52.50E 6f.tl 1'TN ~ o°~ S/ , 52 `_ 56' ~ ` 1fa.31-- ~-- Norio 34 ~ I_ ' 60' ~ o ~ o°+' Q `0 q1 1 .4o a . ~ "' S5 0l r~• ^ , b ~ 30 2~~• ~ bye _7505 ~ ~ 1 ,o /9 c ~ _ 103.f16 ,~ ~ l01.6- ~3 '`~ ~ 37 1 36 . ~ b ~ 29 2 f ,~ ti d ~ 50 a2 ' / ~ °•~ ~ i 1_ lop,' ~t7 h ~ o ~ 7 ~ '~ ~ ~ ~ 6~ ~ r v ,~ z ,._ 100 ~~°' 1 j .Y r -- .... ~.. /~ ~°~ ~~° ~,~ 33 57 ~r - ~ - _' -w 17 Zo ,b~, 0 7, 53 - v, ,. o ~ 36 0 ` ee ,~ 49 q3 i 1~ 54 ~ 99.45-' Q b ~0 2B 22 ~. ~o ~ / 39 ~ ~N ~'. ~ _ ~ n ~ ~ Q ~ / .~ a Io ,~ A i / • V • ~ ~ ~ OV r o ~ / / * ~ 09.65 ~o LD ~ ~ ~ 8 / ~ i' ~ ~ 22 ti ' ~~ a ._ -uo _ s •.. - -- -_,.{ ~, ~ n.~ ~ i•,~ h /r_'9 ~ ~ %1i ~ w n 26 2q eve x ~ b ~~ C ~ / /r ^~ 23 '4 1 h- `` ` ~ ,~ --_._.~ ~ or~ a ., ~ 2q 6/ ~. 2 `~ 2S l l3 40 ~ 330 ~/c . ~ b \.~.~~ '°'41 N •~ ~Og n ,~ 33 ~ .4S ~~ ~• S9 a ~~ a ~~ 3` / 31 / 130.98 t~oti 27 ~ ~ - ` o ~'`~ . • / l lti 68 /a b/ ? \'~~ s q. tie X40. 1 Ora .s l / ati~ ~~3~ 23. ~ . _ ~_ is i _ ~ TRACT N°-2995 RECOMMENDED FINDINGS: S 88-13 SITE ADDRESS: 2080 S. BASCOM AVE. APPLICANT: M. MORTKOWITZ PC MTG: 9-13-88 1. The proposed project is an appropriate scale in relationship to the adjacent developed uses. 2. The project is well designed and architecturally blends into the neighborhood. 3. The building design is considered acceptable and interesting by the Architectural Advisor. 4. The parking provided meets/exceeds the code requirements. 5. The project is designed to minimize infringement on neighboring properties. 6. Substantial landscaping has been provided which adds to the aesthetics of the project. CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL - FILE 41 S 88-13 SITE ADDRESS: 2080 S. Bascom Ave. APPLICANT: M. Mortkowitz PC MTG DATE: 9-13-88 The applicant is hereby notified, as part of this application, that he/she is required to meet the following conditions in accordance with the Ordinances of the City of Campbell and the Laws of the State of California. Additionally, the applicant is hereby notified that he/she is required to comply with all applicable Codes or Ordinances of the City of Campbell and the State of California which pertain to this development and are not herein specified. 1. Revised elevations and/or site plan per redlining to be submitted to the Planning Department and approved by the Planning Director upon recommendation of the Architectural Advisor prior to application for a building permit. 2. Property to be fenced and landscaped as indicated and/or added in red on the plans. Landscaping and fencing shall be maintained in accordance with the approved plans. 3. Landscaping plan indicating type and size of plant material, and location of irrigation system to be submitted to the Planning Department and approved by the Site and Architectural Review Committee and/or Planning Commission prior to issuance of a building permit. 4. Fencing plan indicating location and design details of fencing to be submitted to the Planning Department and approved by the Planning Director prior to issuance of a building permit. 5. Applicant to either (1) post a faithful performance bond in the amount of $3,000.00 to insure landscaping, fencing, and striping of parking areas within 3 months of completion of construction; or (2) file written agreement to complete landscaping, fencing, and striping of parking areas. Bond or agreement to be filed with the Planning Department prior to application for a building permit. 6. Applicant to submit a plan to the Planning Department, prior to installation of PG&E utility (transformer) boxes, indicating the location of the boxes and screening (if boxes are above ground) for approval of the Planning Director. 7. All mechanical equipment on roofs and all utility meters to be screened as approved by the Planning Director. 8. Building occupancy will not be allowed until public improvements are installed. 9. All parking and driveway areas to be developed in compliance with Chapter 21.50 of the Campbell Municipal Code. All parking spaces to be provided with appropriate concrete curbs or bumper guards. 10. Underground utilities to be provided as required by Section 20.36.150 of the Campbell Municipal Code. CONDITIONS OF SITE ADDRESS: APPLICANT: M. PAGE 2 APPROVAL - FILE ~~ S 88-13 2080 S. Bascom Ave. Mortkowitz 11. Plans submitted to the Building Department for plan check shall indicate clearly the location of all connections for underground utilities including water, sewer, electric, telephone and television cables, etc. 12. Sign application to be submitted in accordance with provisions of the Sign Ordinance for all signs. No sign to be installed until application is approved and permit issued by Planning and Building Departments (Section 21.53 of the Campbell Municipal Code). 13. Ordinance No. 782 of the Campbell Municipal Code stipulates that any contract for the collection and disposal of refuse, garbage, wet garbage and rubbish produced within the limits of the City of Campbell shall be made with Green Valley Disposal Company. This requirement applies to all single-family dwellings, multiple apartment units, to all commercial, business, industrial, manufacturing, and construction establishments. 14. Trash container(s) of a size and quantity necessary to serve the development shall be located in area(s) approved by the Fire Department. Unless otherwise noted, enclosure(s) shall consist of a concrete floor surrounded by a solid wall or fence and have self-closing doors of a size specified by the Fire Department. All enclosures to be constructed at grade level and have a level area adjacent to the trash enclosure area to service these containers. 15. Applicant shall comply with all appropriate State and City requirements for the handicapped. 16. Noise levels for the interior of residential units shall comply with minimum State (Title 25) and local standards as indicated in the Noise Element of the Campbell General Plan. 17. Applicant is hereby notified that he will be required to pay Park Dedication In-Lieu Fee which will be assessed at the time the subdivision map is submitted. 18. The applicant is hereby notified that the property is to be maintained free of any combustible trash, debris and weeds, until the time that actual construction commences. All existing structures shall be secured by having windows boarded up and doors sealed shut, or be demolished or removed from the property. Sect. 11.201 & 11.414, 1979 Ed. Uniform Fire Code. BUILDING DEPARTMENT 19. Retaining walls at property lines are limited to a height of 15 inches if constructed of wood. 20. South wall to be one hour fire rated with no openings. West wall to be one hour fire rated. CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL - FILE ~l S 88-13 SITE ADDRESS: 2080 S. Bascom Ave. APPLICANT: M. Mortkowitz PAGE 3 PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT 21. Modify the northerly driveway, remove the southerly one, install standard City sidewalk with a street tree and relocate electrolier out of proposed driveway. 22. Obtain an encroachment permit, pay fees and post surety for all work in the City right-of-way. FIRE DEPARTMENT Meet all the requirements of the Fire Department. RECOMMENDED FINDINGS - TS 88-06 SITE ADDRESS: 563 & 581 W. RINCON AVE. APPLICANT: LANDS OF CALLAHAN SUNNYOAKS PC MTG: 9-13-88 1. The proposed Tentative Subdivision Map is consistent with the Land Use Element of the General Plan. 2. The proposed Tentative Subdivision Map is consistent with the Housing Element of the General Plan. 3. The proposed Tentative Subdivision Map is consistent with the approval for an 11 unit townhouse development granted for this site under PD 87-05. CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL - TS 88-06 SITE ADDRESS: 563 & 581 W. RINCON AVE. APN 305-28-16 & 17 PC MTG: 9-13-88 1. Installation of a sanitary sewerage system to serve all lots within the subdivision in conformance with the proposed plans of the County of Santa Clara Sanitation District No. 4. Sanitary sewerage service to be provided by said District No. 4. 2. Installation of a water distribution system to serve all lots within the subdivision in conformance with the plans of the San Jose Water Works. Water service to be provided by said water company. Fire hydrants and appurtenances shall be provided and installed at the locations specified by the Fire Chief, Fire Department, City of Campbell. Fire hydrant maintenance fees shall be paid to City at the rate of $195 per fire hydrant. 3. Subdivider shall create or provide any public service easement and any other public utility and/or public service easements as may be necessary for the installation of any and all public utilities and/or facilities. 4. Compliance with the provisions of Title 20, Subdivisions of the Campbell Municipal Code. 5. CC&R's to be approved by City Engineer to insure provisions for maintenance of buildings and common area. 6. Provide a grading and drainage plan for the review and approval of the City Engineer. 7. Obtain an excavation permit and pay fees and deposit for all work in the public right-of-way. 8. Pay a fee of $12,452.00 in lieu of dedication of land for parks. C ~ a= z ° ~ ~ .~~Y ~c V .. Q _j ~ ~ ~~ 8o ~ i N~M ~ LTi 2 f < ' ~i ~y ° Y~z~ v ~ ~ U ~~ 6~ ~ ~W ~ _~~ _~ ~-~# W zW o ~f ~ ~ ~ Z ~ f J •o W.r~ ~ Q O N U ~ ,~ ~ = s ~ o"sue 1--- ~ o ~ z UJ J ~ ~~. g a'" ~ ~:: W o~~ w . ~X 8s 3 = tO- ~~ ~ o m ~ ~z d o t di i ~ ~t~ ~r .rig Z V t z ~i> ; r 3 ~~- Q ., O ~ ~ Cy ` ~ L7if Yrn V W ~~~ ~ ~~ W o ~3 V Rn~ 1n' fI~ ~l y J i Z 1 W t Z ~ . Z S FINDINGS: TS 88-07 SITE ADDRESS: 490, 494 & 496 W. SUNNYOAKS AVE. APN 406-9-1, 2, & 3 APPLICANT: LANDS OF NADCON DEVELOPMENT PC MTG: 9-13-88 1. The proposed Tentative Subdivision Map is consistent with the Land Use Element of the General Plan. 2. The proposed Tentative Subdivision Map is consistent with the Housing Element of the General Plan. 3. The proposed Tentative Subdivision Map is consistent with the Planned Development Permit (PD 88-07) approved by the City Council on June 7, 1988 for a 12-unit townhome development at this location. CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL: TS 88-07 SITE ADDRESS: 490, 494 & 496 W. SUNNYOAKS AVE. APN 406-9-1, 2, & 3 APPLICANT: LANDS OF NADCON DEVELOPMENT PC MTG: 9-13-88 1. Installation of a sanitary sewerage system to serve all lots within the subdivision in conformance with the proposed plans of the County of Santa Clara Sanitation District No. 4. Sanitary sewerage service to be provided by said District No. 4. 2. Installation of a water distribution system to serve all lots within the subdivision in conformance with the plans of the San Jose Water Works. Water service to be provided by said water company. Fire hydrants and appurtenances shall be provided and installed at the locations specified by the Fire Chief, Fire Department, City of Campbell. Fire hydrant maintenance fees shall be paid to City at the rate of $195 per fire hydrant. 3. Subdivider shall create or provide any public service easement and any other public utility and/or public service easements as may be necessary for the installation of any and all public utilities and/or facilities. 4. Compliance with the provisions of Title 20, Subdivisions of the Campbell Municipal Code. 5. Subdivider to pay Storm Drainage Area Fee. 6. CC&R's to be approved by City Engineer to insure provisions for maintenance of buildings and common area. 7. Provide a grading and drainage plan for the review and approval of the City Engineer. 8. Obtain an excavation permit and pay fees and deposit for all work in the public right-of-way. 9. Pay a fee of $13,584.00 in lieu of dedication of land for parks. ~; R. .. '.~ t `~ ~ ~ v ~~ yn~~N„?i ain T~ ,~~0 8 t ~2 ZZ~ ~ ~ r V.c~ v~ _ t t N r Z tll ~Q~ +~ Lr'M"~u]~9.~` W E ~ 'pares.. ,~=: v OY 1 ~~Xi .~ ~ s>a ~a.~ 1 ~ ~ o..r ~ x ~~ ~~ +~ t~ v_ Q ~ ~ ~ ~~ ~ ~r d . E m o ~ ~ma ~7+~ a JI.-.-r ~~ ~ ~` °a"o 0 o a 4 t 3 ` O ~ ~ ~t ~ s>` ~ U • t O V ~ ~ ~ ~ V ~U J ~ ~~0 3 .~'~ ~w ~ ~ ~ u' '$~~~ ~~ rr-+' ~'+3rnY~C' u<~ W~ ~ °0 3.~' °~~`r~ ~~~ ° ~n '0 .7 tR~h MT c c W C W C ' ~ E ~ , F V a V ~ N ~ Nr N~ NO W ~' p- G„r I•fajl V'4 ~ N ~ 4 M ~~ V+ Y~ r ' ~~~ I~ Z ° ~go~ ~-~~ -oo6No~ Apo .,~cvw '^~t~`n o`m,°~.d, p~'"' ~ °' ~~ F 7 v._v ~~~~ u rl" o „~ ~ ` ~ ~ o Fd~+3 1 ~dt` rsa ~$$ ~ ~~ ~~ ~= ~ ~ w zNS~~bN~+~-0yM w+~ u1^~n°,~+ ~~°~ ~t ""~ oVV * ~~ 3u w Z ; ~ (Q,w $OV r ~ ~~-_ W ,r oy-cos~rV ~y QO o Z `~ q y'"iorvo:~ 7yC ~~NO7NVi~~~ v ~V vR'd U ~ y ~ a~, u°p'p ~ W o ~Ffl~ s~ ~f ~c~*~ yn- ~ ~ ~ c ~ h `~W.aiZ-~Y10~~ t.~W~ N~vov S1V-^~,L ~ Q «i ~~~u _ ~ ~ N ^~ Vk1~D~bn c -_ N K1 ~~o~ ~.~ N 1 I OfN3~G~,.. ~ 1 -_ WI W~ •3nd s~ItiOJ.NNf15 M tI ~y` 1 N '- -F~rv.s~w O~lYJi0~0 ~ GL ~ fOLli~l --- - -L fZtl_ - e n~ V ~ ~ Ct ~~ y y . ~ ~ .. - ~ ~ '^ i ~ I 1 I I . '' n A . ~J ~ . ~~ Of t A i + 1 4 ~r t ~ ~no9~oP» FE•St i ~ 1~ I ~V l~ _ s• t oy ~ 1 ,~ ~ V - O ' F£'bE l E4'OL 4 ~ IF t I ~~ r•ss..oy..~vj s,~.v~G...nr N n ~ 1 ~ ~ ti~ n h ~1 ~~! h W ~ 1 II 1 k ~~ _ x i~;~: n~ I ,~ o FE SD ~ ~ I ~ , I IN ~ 7b~ m O 1 a I ~~ l~ddo~/ ~ ~ ^1 ~ S t 1 4t L I !~ ~ ~ o ~ Ls ~ 3 lei R ~ ,~ ~I ~9 ~ O f ~ h "1 N ~ ~ h 9 T • ~ '` h $ O ~ ~ ® \ L ; I n ~ ~ f ~ '"I v ~9 ~ I T ~ I a ~ ~ hl y , `; ~~ ~s __f ... _ i t ~rw,f y ~ ~~nfI f I ~ ~'----- b ~i~ ~, ap N O NI ! h ~ ~ n ~ - ~ FE'tF FE'I'F ~I Ff S/ I i ia•iL --~ ~ ~ Jf/ ~, ~__ ~ ~ ~ ~ O T ~ ~•7 , l ~ ~i ~ ~I I W AI , H ~ I V~ ~ ~ .~ ~ u z ~ ~ ~~ ~~ w W µYj J "Vr+ I v l ~ 1 , I ti+ L 9Lt/ .~ FILE ~~ R 88-04/ ZC 86-05 APPLICANT: HODGINS, B. PC MTG: 9-13-88 FINDING There have been no changes in the General Plan in this area and the current land use patterns are similar to those which existed at the time this project was originally approved. REVISED DEVELOPMENT SCHEDULE 1. Construction to commence by September 5, 1989. 2. Construction to be completed by September 5, 1990.