Loading...
PC Min 04/12/1988PLANNING COMMISSION CITY OF CAMPBELL, CALIFORNIA 7:30 P.M. MINUTES APRIL 12, 1988 The Planning Commission of the City of Campbell convened this day in regular session at the regular meeting place, the Council Chambers of City Hall, 70 N. First St., Campbell, California. ROLL CALL Present Commissioners: Kasolas, Stanton, Perrine (at 7:45 p.m.), Olszewski, Walker, Dickson, Christ; Planning Director Arthur Kee, Principal Planner Phil Stafford, Engineering Manager Bill Helms, City Attorney Bill Seligmann, Recording Secretary Linda Dennis. Absent None. APPROVAL OF MINUTES M/S: Dickson, Stanton That the minutes of the Planning Commission meeting of March 22, 1988 be approved as submitted. Motion carried unanimously (6-0-1). COMMUNICATIONS Planning Director Kee noted that communications received pertained to specific items on the agenda. ORAL REQUESTS Chairman Christ asked if anyone wished to address the Commission on an issue that was not agendized. There being no one, the Chairman proceeded with the set agenda. ARCHITECTURAL APPROVALS M 88-05 Application of South Bay Construction Co. for South Bay a modification to approved plans to allow exterior modifications to an existing building on property known as 250 Hacienda Ave., Building G, in a CM (Controlled Manufacturing) Zoning District. Principal Planner Stafford reviewed the Staff Report of April 12, 1988, noting that Staff is recommending approval of the requested modifications. Commissioner Olszewski reported that this item was considered by the Site and Architectural Review Committee. The Site Committee is also recommending approval. M/S: Olszewski, Walker - That the Planning Commission approve M 88-05 subject to conditions as indicated in the Staff Report of April 12, 1988 and attached hereto. Motion carried (6-0-1). ~ ~ ~ -2- M 88-04 Application of Mr. Todd Wright for approval _ Prometheus Dev. of a modification to the approved parking ~ layout on property known as 1777 S. Bascom ~~ Ave. in a C-2-S (General Commercial) Zoning ' District. Principal Planner Stafford reviewed the Staff Report of April 12, 1988, noting that Staff is recommending approval of eliminating 2 parking spaces and replacing the planting strip where these 2 spaces would be removed. This would result in a change from 92 to 90 parking spaces for this project, resulting in a parking ratio of 1:207 for the existing retail use. Commissioner Olszewski reported that this item was considered by the Site and Architectural Review Committee. The Committee concurs with Staff's recommendation. M/S: Stanton, Walker - That the Planning Commission adopt findings as indicated in the Staff Report of April 12, 1988 and attached hereto; and, that the Commission approve the elimination of 2 parking spaces and replacing the planning strip where these 2 spaces would be removed, allowing the subject property to have a parking ratio of 1:207 for the existing retail use, for a total of 90 parking spaces. Motion carried (6-0-1). ___._ * * ~ Commissioner Perrine entered the Chambers at 7:45 p.m. * ~ S 88-02 Application of Mr. Troung Phu for approval of Phu, T. revised elevations and plans to a previously approved house move-on of a single family residence on property known as 1590 Walters Ave. in an R-1-9 (Single Family Residential) Zoning District. Principal Planner Stafford reviewed the Staff Report of April 12, 1988, noting that Staff is recommending approval of these revised elevations as redlined. Mr. Stafford suggested that the applicant's letter (attached hereto) be noted and filed and that Staff will work with the applicant to determine his direction. Commissioner Olszewski reported that this item was considered by the Site and Architectural Review Committee. The Committee is also recommending approval, with the redlining addressing fencing height restrictions. M/S: Walker, Perrine - That the Planning Commission approve the -- modification to S 88-02 as redlined on the presented plans. Motion carried unanimously * * ~ -3- R 88-01 Application of Mr. Morris Stark for a M 88-08 reinstatement of previously approved plans to S 86-21 allow the construction of a 118-unit motel Pruneyard Inn with related services on property known as 1875 S. Bascom Ave. in the northerly portion of the Pruneyard Shopping Center in a C-2-S (General Commercial) Zoning District. Principal Planner Stafford reviewed the Staff Report of April 12, 1988, noting that Staff is recommending a continuance in order that clarification can be provided on the parking issue; and, Staff is recommending approval of the increase in the number of units from 116 to 118. Commissioner Olszewski reported that this item was considered by the Site and Architectural Review Committee. The Committee is also recommending a continuance to May 10 in order that a circulation plan may be submitted to address concerns expressed about the designated parking areas and ingress/egress on the site, specifically relating to the proposed motorized gate. Additionally, the Committee would like to have information addressing the Fire Department's concern about the ingress directly in front of the Inn. Discussion at the Committee meeting also involved the planting of hedges, and better definition of the parking area for the Inn. The Committee expressed satisfaction with the presented building plans and how the Inn will fit in with the rest of the center. Discussion ensued regarding the proposed parking circulation and the issue of designated parking for the Inn. Mr. Fred Sahadi, 1901 S. Bascom Ave., Campbell, stated that the original approval was with designated parking and barriers, with the actual circulation to come back to the Commission for discussion. Mr. Sahadi offered to review the possible circulation plans with the Commission this evening. Chairman Christ noted his concern with the on-site circulation in that the situation involves a one-way street. He indicated he would like to see how the traffic will work on the site, and would like this circulation reflected on the plans. Commissioner Olszewski added that the Site Committee was also concerned about vehicles stacking on Bascom Avenue with the use of a motorized barrier. M/S: Olszewski, Walker - That the Planning Commission adopt the attached finding, and reinstate this project for a period of one year and approve the requested modifications, subject to the previous conditions of approval, with the added condition that approval from the Fire Department be gained, and that the site circulation plan come back to the Planning Commission for approval. Motion carried unanimously (7-0-0). ~ ~ ~ -4- PUBLIC HEARINGS M 88-01 Continued public hearing to consider the Hansell, R. application of Mr. Rod Hansell for approval of a modification to a previously approved Planned Development Permit to allow the construction of a residential addition to an existing structure located on property known as 1405 Harriet Ct. in a PD (Planned Development/Low Density Residential, less than 4.5 units per gross acre) Zoning District. Principal Planner Stafford reviewed the Staff Report of April 12, 1988, noting that Staff is recommending approval. Commissioner Olszewski reported that this item was considered by the Site and Architectural Review Committee. The Committee is also recommending approval. Commissioner Olszewski expressed a concern that the covered patio area might be used as an open storage area. Chairman Christ opened the public hearing and invited anyone to speak on this item. Mr. Chris Hansell, 1405 Harriet Ct., stated that the are is proposed as a covered patio and not intended to be used for storage. Mr. Hansell indicated that he would be willing to look at the idea, presented by Commissioner Kasolas, of putting a planter-type barrier across the front of the patio area to prevent it from becoming a parking space. M/S: Dickson, Perrine - That the public hearing on M 88-01 be closed. Motion carried unanimously (7-0-0). M/S: Dickson, Walker - That the Planning Commission adopt the findings and conditions as indicated in the Staff Report of April 12, 1988, and recommend that the City Council approve M 88-01. Motion carried with the following roll call vote: AYES: Commissioners: Kasolas, Stanton, Perrine, Olszewski, Walker, Dickson, Christ NOES: Commissioners: None ABSENT: Commissioners: None. ~ ~ ~ ARCHITECTURAL APPROVALS R 87-07 Continued request for reinstatement of S 85-14 previously approved plans allowing Johnson, R. construction of a retail building on property known as 915 & 921 S. San Tomas Aquino Rd. in a C-1-S (Neighborhood Commercial) Zoning District. -5- Principal Planner Stafford reported that the applicant has requested a continuance so that a revised building design could be studied. M/S: Stanton, Walker - That the Planning Commission continue the consideration of this application to its meeting of April 26, 1988, so that a revised plan may be submitted. Motion carried unanimously (7-0-0). ~ ~ ~ M 88-07 Application of Mr. Richard Reilly, on behalf S 69-30 of R. V. Cloud Co., for approval of a modifi- Reilly, R. cation to a previous site and architectural approval to allow a change of use from office/warehousing to office/auto-related for an existing industrial building located on property known as 2970 S. Winchester Blvd. in an M-1-S (Light Industrial) Zoning District. Principal Planner Stafford reviewed the Staff Report of April 12, 1988, noting that a revised list of conditions adds a Condition X116 requiring additional landscaping on the subject site. It is Staff's understanding that the applicant is in agreement with this additional condition. Commissioner Olszewski reported that this item was considered by the Site and Architectural Review Committee. The Committee is recommending approval with --- the additional conditon which addresses a need to screen the use and to increase the on-site landscaping. M/S: Olszewski, Stanton - That the Planning Commission approve M 88-07/S 69-30 subject to conditions as indicated in the Staff Report of April 12, 1988, with the additional condition ~~ 16 to read: Landscaping to be provided along entire frontage. Landscaping and fencing plan to come back to the Site and Architectural Review Committee within 45 days of Planning Commission approval. Motion carried unanimously (7-0-0). The Commission recessed at 8:50 p.m.; the meeting reconvened at 9:05 p.m. ~ ~ ~ PUBLIC HEARINGS - ZC 88-02 Public hearing to consider the application of PD 88-05 NADCON Development for a Zone Change from NADCON Development R-M-S (Multiple Family Residential) to PD (Planned Development) and approval of a Planned Development Permit, plans, elevations, and development schedule to allow the construction of 11 townhomes on property known as 490 & 496 W. Sunnyoaks Ave. -6- Principal Planner Stafford reviewed the Staff Report of April 12, 1988, noting that although Staff is recommending a continuance to May 10, the applicant is requesting a continuance to April 26, 1988. Commissioner Olszewski reported that this item was considered by the Site and Architectural Review Committee. Discussion of the Committee entailed the density of the project and the scale of the buildings, as well as retention of existing landscaping; therefore, a continuance is recommended. Chairman Christ opened the public hearing and invited anyone to speak on this item. Mr. Que Naderzad, 1401 Pollard Rd., Campbell, requested a continuance to April 26, 1988, noting that he would be able to meet the deadline for submittal of revised plans. Commissioner Stanton expressed his concern about the single family home that will remain on a separate lot in the middle of this project. Additionally Commissioner Stanton asked about the General Plan for Sunnyoaks Ave. in that it is mostly developed at a higher density and still remains a two lane street. Planning Director Kee indicated that the Circulation Element of the General Plan indicates Sunnyoaks will remain a two lane street, as well as indicates this area for the low-medium density on the southerly side. Commissioner Dickson noted his concern with the presentation of two long, narrow driveways. --- M/S: Olszewski, Kasolas - That the public hearing. on ZC 88-02/PD 88-05 be continued to the Planning Commission meeting of April 26, 1988. Motion carried unanimously (7-0-0). * ~ ZC 88-01 Continued public hearing to consider the PD 88-03 application of NADCON Development for a Zone NADCON Development Change from R-M-S (Multiple Family Residential) to PD (Planned Development); and approval of a Planned Development Permit, plans, elevations, and development schedule to allow the construction of 8 townhomes on property known as 454 W. Sunnyoaks Ave. Principal Planner Stafford reviewed the Staff Report of April 12, 1988, noting that Staff is recommending approval of this item. Commissioner Olszewski reported that this item was considered by the Site and Architectural Review Committee. The Site Committee is also recommending approval. Chairman Christ opened the public hearing and invited anyone to speak on this item. M/S: Walker, Stanton - That the public hearing on ZC 88-01/PD 88-03 be closed. Motion carried unanimously (7-0-0). -7- M/S: Perrine, Walker - Discussion on motion That the Planning Commission recommend that the City Council accept the Negative Declaration which has been prepared for this project; and, that the Planning Commission adopt Resolution Nos. 2521 and 2522, including the findings and conditions of approval as indicated in the Staff Report of April 12, 1988, and recommend that the City Council approve the ZC 88-01 and PD 88-03 to allow the construction of 8 townhomes on property known as 454 W. Sunnyoaks Ave. Motion carried with the following roll call vote: Commission Dickson opposed the motion, noting that the application is at maximum density under a PD zoning. Commissioner Dickson felt that the PD Zoning was being used to maximize the use of the site and that the developer owes the City a less dense silhouette. Vote on motion AYES: Commissioners: Kasolas, Perrine, Olszewski, Christ NOES: Commissioners: Stanton, Walker, Dickson ABSENT: Commissioners: None. ~ ~ ~ PD 87-12 Continued public hearing to consider the Pluto, D. application of Mr. David Pluto for a Planned Development Permit, plans, elevations, and development schedule to allow the conversion of an existing residence to an office on property known as 121 N. First St. in a PD (Planned Development/Low-Medium Density Residential and/or Professional Office) Zoning District. Principal Planner Stafford reported that Staff is recommending denial of this application. Revised plans have not been submitted in a two month period, and the Architectural Advisor is of the opinion that the overall design of this project is poor and does little to improve the aesthetics of the downtown area. Chairman Christ opened the public hearing and invited anyone to speak on this item. M/S: Walker, Stanton - That the public hearing on PD 87-12 be closed. Motion carried unanimously (7-0-0). M/S: Stanton, Walker - That the Planning Commission adopt Resolution No. 2523 recommending that the City Council deny PD 87-12. Motion carried with the following roll call vote: -8- AYES: Commissioners: NOES: Commissioners: ABSENT: Commissioners: Kasolas, Stanton, Walkers Dickson None None. Perrine, Olszewski, Christ * ~ ~ M 88-06 Public hearing to consider the application of UP 84-19 Mr. Joe Salvador for a three year extension Salvador, J. of an approved use permit allowing a storage yard that must be vacated upon termination of the use permit on property known as 238 & 246 Railway Ave. in a PD (Planned Development/ Industrial) Zoning District. Principal Planner Stafford reviewed the Staff Report of April 12, 1988, noting that Staff is recommending approval. Commissioner Olszewski reported that this item was considered by the Site and Architectural Review Committee. The Committee is recommending approval. Discussion ensued regarding the possibility of an agreement between the applicant and the City whereby should the City wish to begin redevelopment in this area within the three-year extension time, the applicant would agree to vacate the site at the City's request. Commissioner Kasolas spoke against the three-year time period, noting that the Commission should be encouraging private development in this area; and, expressed concern with the razor-wire on the fence. Chairman Christ opened the public hearing and invited anyone to speak on this item. Mr. Joe Salvador, applicant, stated that the property has standard street improvements, landscaping, screen fencing, and no parking provisions on both sides of the street. Mr. Salvador continued that he has adhered to all the conditions of approval; he has relocated the major portion of his business to another area; and is willing to vacate the site at the City's request provided he is given at least six months in which to move. Additionally, he indicated that he would remove the razor-wire if the Commission so requested. M/S: Walker, Stanton - That the public hearing on M 88-06/UP 84-19 be closed. Motion carried unanimously (7-0-0). M/S: Dickson, Olszewski - That the Planning Commission adopt Resolution No. 2524, including findings in Staff Report of April 12, 1988, with all previous conditions to remain in effect, except that Condition ~I22 shall be modified to read: "Use Permit shall expire on June 3, 1991. Property shall be vacated at such time, unless approval to continue is granted by the City Council."; and, that the following -9- condition be added: "Applicant to sign an agreement, satisfactory to the City Attorney, indicating his compliance with any subsequently adopted zoning on the property; and, providing for a six-month time period for the applicant's relocation of his business if the property is rezoned." Motion carried with the following roll call vote: AYES: Commissioners: Stanton, Perrine, Olszewski, Walker, Dickson, Christ NOES: Commissioners: Kasolas ABSENT: Commissioners: None. * ~ ~ TA 87-04 Continued public hearing to consider a City-initiated City-initiated text amendment to Sections 21.61.070 and 21.50.050 of the Campbell Municipal Code establishing standards and procedures for review of Large Family Day Care Homes which provide family day care facilities for 7-12 children, including children who reside at the home, in residential zoning district. Planning Director Kee reviewed the Staff Report of April 12, 1988, noting that Staff is recommending approval of Exhibit D. Commissioner Walker asked if the notification distance would be calculated in radius or linear? Mr. Kee indicated that the normal procedure for notification is radius. Chairman Christ opened the public hearing and invited anyone to speak on this item. Ms. Flo Firuke, 1799 S. Winchester Blvd., Department of Social Services, felt that 300 feet for notification was excessive. Commissioner Dickson expressed concerns with the memorandum submitted by the City Attorney, noting that things are not always black and white and sometimes the City Attorney tries to put issues into a black or white category before it is necessary. Commissioner Dickson continued that he felt some comments should be saved until they are possibly needed in court because the comments are giving the Commission direction even if they were not intended to give direction. For example, on page 1 of the memorandum, "Consequently, this broad construction would seem to violate the intent of the State law...", the word "seem" would indicate a situation that is not black or white. One page 2, under "Living Space and Open Space Requirements", "...might be impermissible unless impose...", again presents a situation that is not black or white. These statements indicate that the Gity may be without power, and are very influential to the Commission because they come from the City Attorney. -10- Commissioner Dickson concluded that he felt the legislation has taken powers from the local jurisdictions that someday will have to be taken to court; and, although the City Attorney's opinion is respected, Commission Dickson felt that it does not allow the Commission to breathe at times. City Attorney Seligmann indicated that his job was, in his opinion, to point out possible legal conflicts for the Commission's considerations; and, agreed that some of the recent issues which involve the State law's will have to be resolved in court eventually. Commissioner Kasolas noted that what is being considered by the Commission gives the community an opportunity to be heard on the issue. Additionally, he spoke in favor of square footage guidelines because of the large number of small homes in the City. Commissioner Dickson noted that Exhibit E, 5 a/b, came directly from a model ordinance; and, Exhibit E, 6 a/b came from him to address a concern about the lack of space for children. Commissioner Walker in favor of Exhibit D, and for fewer restrictions because of the costs involved to someone operating such a day care home, and because a square footage restriction could seriously limit the number of homes that could be available. Commissioner Kasolas asked if a complete change in the neighborhood was going _ to be allowed, with people opening up a single family home for nothing but day care. This would differ greatly from the home occupation ordinance. Commissioner Kasolas felt that the traditional integrity of the single family neighborhood must be maintained. Commissioner Dickson continued that the City should also be very careful in assuming that the State and County are doing certain things, in that they are governed by ever-decreasing budgets. Additionally, the State has given the City the general charge to take care of zoning, the general plan, and health, safety, and welfare of it's citizens. Chairman Christ stated that he did not see the issue as just two choices, and he spoke in favor of a combined Exhibit maintaining the traditional living section. Commissioner Kasolas noted that caring for 7-12 children is big business, being put into a small single family home. He felt it should be looked at as a land use issue and concern should be taken for the neighborhoods. Chairman Christ indicated that he could support the Commission review of these uses because the Commission is able to get a broader view of the issue, and he felt that the concerns should be considered on an individual basis. M/S: Kasolas, Stanton - That the public hearing on TA 87-04 be closed. Motion carried unanimously (7-0-0). M/S: Kasolas, Dickson - That the Planning Commission recommend that the City Council accept the Negative Declaration which has been prepared for this -11- project; and, that the Planning Commission adopt Resolution No. 2525, including findings indicated in Staff Report of April 12, 1988, recommending that the City Council approve Exhibit E, deleting page 2, 6. Square Footage a/b, replacing this deleted section with a statement "That the Planning Commission may consider the availability of recreational/open space and indoor/outdoor living space per child." Discussion on motion Commissioner Dickson stated that he feels quite strongly about the provision of a definite square footage; however, in the spirit of compromise he will support the motion. Commissioner Stanton supported Commissioner Dickson's position. Commissioner Olszewski expressed a concern with the recommended statement on required space in that it did not provide definite guidelines. Commissioner Kasolas noted that a policy will very quickly evolve if needed. Commissioner Perrine spoke against the motion, noting that he would rather add the square footage requirement to Exhibit D. Commissioner Walker stated that he would be voting against the motion. Vote on motion Motion carried with the following roll call vote: AYES: Commissioners: Kasolas, Stanton, Dickson, Christ NOES: Commissioners: Perrine, Olszewski, Walker. ABSENT: Commissioners: None. * ~ ~ TA 88-01 Public hearing to consider a City-initiated City-initiated Text Amendment amending Section 21.88.040 Penalities of the Campbell Municipal Code. City Attorney Seligmann reviewed the Staff Report of April 12, 1988, noting that this change would give the City more latitude by being able to choose whether to issue a citation as an infraction or a misdemeanor. Currently, violations of the Zoning Ordinance are all misdemeanors, which is a more serious violation than an infraction, with the possibility of fail time. The infraction customarily would result in a small fine. By approving this amendment, the City could decide for each offense which type of citation would be appropriate. Commissioner Kasolas asked who would decide whether an issue was a misdemeanor or an infraction, and when. -12- Mr. Seligmann indicated that the decision would ultimately be with the City Attorney. Commissioner Kasolas felt that everything should be a misdemeanor or everything should be an infraction, in that the decision as to what will be could be arbitrary and capricious and that decision should not be the burden of one person. Discussion ensued regarding the procedure for determining of fines; the intent of the ordinance; and, the potential problems with all the authority being with one person. Commissioner Dickson indicated he would rather see a review board situation, rather than the authority resting on one person, and he recommended against this change as written. Mr. Seligmann noted that the authority to make this decision is vested to the office of the City Attorney by the State. Authority is also vested to the issuing officer. Chairman Christ opened the public hearing and invited anyone to speak on this item. M/S: Dickson, Stanton - That the public hearing on TA 88-01 be closed. Motion carried unanimously (7-0-0). M/S: Dickson, - That the Planning Commission adopt a resolution recommending that the City Council deny TA 88-01 for reasons indicated in the discussion. Motion dies for lack of second. M/S: Perrine, Walker - That the Planning Commission adopt Resolution No. 2526 recommending that the City Council amend Section 21.88.040 of the Campbell Municipal Code as indicated in Exhibit A, attached hereto. Discussion on motion Commissioner Dickson opposed the motion, stating that he felt the way the amendment is written does not give .potential for fairness. Commissioner Kasolas opposed the motion, stating that it .does not appear to be equitable. Commissioner Olszewski opposed the motion, stating that he would like to have the language clearer. Commissioner Perrine spoke in favor of the motion, stating that if the wording is arbitrary, the issues will be coming before the Commission. He sees the amendment as a step to address the backload of litigation and efficiently address planning functions in the City. Chairman Christ supported the motion. -13- Vote on motion Motion carried with the following roll call vote: AYES: Commissioners: NOES: Commissioners: ABSENT: Commissioners: SA 88-05 Baja Saloon Stanton, Perrine, Walker, Christ Kasolas, Olszewski, Dickson None. * * * Continued signing request - 499 E. Hamilton Ave. - Baja Saloon - C-2-S (General Commercial) Zoning District. Planning Director Kee reported that a representative of the Baja Saloon, Mr. Dennis K. Frydenger, has requested a continuance as of this evening. M/S: Perrine, Stanton - That SA 88-OS be continued to the Planning Commission meeting of May 10, 1988. Motion carried (6-0-0-1) with Commissioner Kasolas abstaining due to possible conflict. * * * SA 88-10 Signing request - 1975 Pollard Rd. - Rinconada Hills Rinconada Hills Christian Chruch - P-F (Public Facilities) Zoning District. Principal Planner Stafford reviewed the Staff Report of April 12, 1988, noting that Staff is recommending approval. Commissioner Olszewski reported that this item was considered by the Site and Architectural Review Committee. The Committee is also recommending approval. M/S: Stanton, Perrine - That the Planning Commission approve SA 88-10 with the findings and conditions indicated in the Staff Report of April 12, 1988. Motion carried unanimously (7-0-0). * * * Staff Report M/S: Kasolas, Dickson - Continued Staff Report regarding Crockett Ave. area study. That the Planning Commission continue this item due to the lateness of the hour; and, that this matter be referred to the City Council for clarification from the Council regarding the Commission's role (active or passive) in initiating land use and zoning issues/studies. Motion carried unanimously Correction made: See minutes * * * of 4-26-88; page 1, para. 1. under Approval of Minutes. -14- SUBCOMMITTEE REPORTS Subcommittee Reports Site & Architectural Review Procedure Subcommittee; Tree Preservation Committee; Site & Architectural Review Committee. There were no Subcommittee Report at this time. ~ ~ ~ ADJOURNMENT ATTEST: Arthur A. Kee Secretary There being no further business, the meeting was adjourned at 10:55 p.m. APPROVED: Ronald W. Christ Chairman RECORDED: Linda A. Dennis Recording Secretary RECOMMENDED FINDINGS: M 88-05 SITE ADDRESS: 250 HACIENDA AVE., BLDG. G APPLICANT: SOUTH BAY CONSTRUCTION PC MTG: 4-12-88 1. The propsoed project is an appropriate scale in relationship to-the adjacent developed uses. _ Z. The project is well designed and architecturally blends into the neighborhood. 3. The building design is considered acceptable and interesting by the Architectual Advisor. 4. Substantial landscaping has been provided which adds to the aesthetics of the project. CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL: M 88-05 1. Landscaping plan indicating type and size of plant material, and location of irrigation system to be submitted to the Planning Department and approved by the Planning Director prior to application for a building permit. 2. Applicant to submit a plan to the Planning Department, prior to installation of PG&E utility (transformer) boxes, indicating the location of the boxes and screening (if boxes are above ground) for approval of the Planning Director. 3. All parking and driveway areas to be developed in compliance with Chapter 21.50 of the Campbell Municipal Code. All parking spaces to be provided with appropriate concrete curbs or bumper guards. 4. Plans submitted to the Building Department for plan check shall indicate clearly the location of all connections for underground utilities including water, sewer, electric, telephone and television cables, etc. FIRE DEPARTMENT 5. Sprinkler contractor to submit plans and fees for modification to sprinkler system. PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT BUILDING DEPARTMENT No comments at this time. • L .. ~j ~ ,' ,,~ • ~~ `T /i, ~~~~= ., -, _~ ~ ....; .- I RECOMMENDING FINDINGS: M 88-04 SITE ADDRESS: 1777 S. BASCOM AVE. PC MTG: 4-12-88 1. The proposed modification would eliminate Z parking spaces for this project, resulting in a parking ratio of 1:207 for the existing retail uses on this property. 2. This proposal would maintain the landscaping strip between the parking area and public improvements along Campisi Way thus maintaining an aesthetically pleasing parking area. CONDITION OF APPROVAL: M 88-04 1. Applicant to submit a revised landscaping plan for the Planning Director's approval prior to construction of improvements. / ' ~L, N m m~ N ~~ ~~ Rio PI y~^ ~' 4~ • x }1~ ~~~ ~~~ 1. b ~j~z ~~• NM '~' .. --EAST- 'q HAMILTON -AVE.-'y' ~-- P. M. , ' 527-M- 7 - u~.rl \ 9 O 0 ~~ o' I 1 .l .~~ a ~ I^1 ~~ Im ' W b t W O O $ '~ V ' ~ D~AW I(.C p D 1p tf v Z r ~ :. ~v ;N tA~ ~ y !'w NW y~ :4~ ~ a N O 9~• 9a o ° c• N C '~ ~ • 4 , jb V . :~ Mo n ~ a ~ M ; N ?[7:7 ~ ~ ... ~a euw o ~~ ti ~~ D , ay h a to d ~ ~ I~ ~. P . f 1. (~ ~.IV~ q -\ ~ ~ C~ C y a // / ...w ~ I w w ~ s N . ~/ N J.l~~ow % / / _ ~ v to J n y ~ ... 173.90 •••. I a O /~~~ /V - / : w t~1 y ~ / v 1 ~ ;~ `~ ~ I I _. ._.. .7 / / A .[' ~ ,~i- ~ ~ ~ r0~ I ~^ ~ ; i ...I s O / ~ I ~ ~ h ~9 j~ / ~ry np~1 ~ 10 w a ~ IT r s s O ~ / ,° / a I ~, ,'~ ~ v I Iv C) g . ~ / a I' ~ . ~ A o N _ NJ ~ / il r l ~ ~ ~ / a'_ n v~ I o / / Z ,~ . ~ ~ 4 2 M ~S -o'`F ~ ,, w :8 u / ~• RECOMMENDED FINDINGS: S 88-02 SITE ADDRESS: 1506 WALTERS AVE. APPLICANT: PHU, T. PC MTG: 4-12-88 ITEM N0. 3 1. The proposed project is an appropriate scale in relationship to the adjacent developed uses. 2. The parking provided meets the code requirements. 3. The building design is considered acceptable by the Architectural Advisor. ~Z~~ ~ ~ ~? ~ ~ ~ ~ ~Lc,,~ yLC 3 ,a ~~ vz ~c ~ ~ ~ 1- ~- - ~ ~ u~u, o~c_cn" ~~tu.~v~ a~.~e ~Cu.e...~- a.L c;,~-~ , U a ") .. 1..0 iNc. I~.Q,. ~il.~-+/1. ~ ~d~n~ o~ o.~c-c-y+. ~ m~ Y.Z - O'er- '''`,° u~je- b T r ~ ~ c a Inc ~ k ~ ~ o.~n,~i, ~ ~.o~'YV+- it -rte arQQ ~I ~-~~e . C~ ~ ''"~ ~ p ~v-~n .¢. inn GQ.~.~ O~ c~, ~t e•G~,~, Q ~ u~/ ~ t'~, OTC ~ n,b.ciiy 2. ~ f3 ~-~,-~a.~ ~~, (~.~' 01.x;.., c~ Pe~.,,,,,;,,~ _. a.l ~c ~~.,c o~ ~ ~ a~.c.~ I ~a dom. ~,~.~..~ -~ ~- kC.,~ .~:~ ~;~, ~ ~,~,. ~. ,~..o.~ na p 2~~~ RECOMMENDED FINDING: R 88-01/M88-08/S 86-21 SITE ADDRESS: 1875 S. BASCOM AVE. APPLICANT: PRUNEYARD INN PC MTG: 4-12-88 1. The addition of two rooms and the parking barriers are minor changes which will not have an adverse effect on the proposed hotel. . ~ ~ ~ RECOMMENDED FINDINGS: M 88-01 SITE ADDRESS: 1405 HARRIET CT. APPLICANT: HANSELL, R. PC MTG: 4-12-88 1. The proposed patio cover meets the setback requirements of a typical residential zoning district. 2. The building addition design is considered acceptable by the City's Architectural Advisor. CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL: M 88-01 1. Applicant to remove small storage shed within 30 days of City Council approval. 2. Applicant to secure all necessary building permits. o ~~~ ' L---HACIENDA rnetr w w w nr rfucr • ,~.~ I R.o.s tSY~M-4g I AVEN U E u s ~ ~ ~ 1 D h -------- I# I ---A----- _ M 0 Su I ~ ~1~ SN ~ ~ O -_A_.~ 1~{}-- 1 O _ 'SL~4__~ I ~ C ~ ~ 3t7e ____. . p ~~ I p~ ti ~~~ M .f I -"Q'p-'--'-~""QW---__ f ... X01 !.. a \ f . f O " u~ ~. -,.. ~ I 1 ~, ~ woi z ~b ~ I IS I~j m ;_ ~ --I~--~ r----- W ~ ~e '-Ifir'~, 1--h-- ~ COMMON A I~ u ~ . a ~~ ~ I• __~" db' ~a = --~-_ s _ ~ ~w ro .~ O ~--~: _ :j ~N w p t 1 fti C D N ~ ~T1 ;i o al a R ~ ...., ' ~ ~ _ -..~ ~ _ 1405 Harrie Lt. - ~ a ~ ~~ t ,~ ~ M 88-09 ~ f:'e; W +I N ~ ~ ~ W+y' iC eS n• ~ +N A fl1 ~ ~ al D I'~ C ~ ~ I~~i ~ V NARR/ET (prl.I 1' CT (~ C + I 1 St ( ~~i9o ~ .~ R1 c sf i~u ~ . Ilj~l~l ~ ~I o~ ~q ~ o N ~ ~ MMa~ C I~ b ~--- 1111 ~ 1;1111. ~ ~1 Iq . ~y ~ 8 V q_~ m ' 1 ~ = ° I~ t S =i r ~ ~f ~, __p . I ex~ ~s d~ D r ~ O f„ "' F s ro ~ ' ~. -~ fo ~-. ~~I ~. ~~ I ~ ~~s ~ ~ s: ~" q~ . ~,E ~ ~~~~ ~~~ ~~~\ . ~ n rI ~ ,.~ . O n w a g N A N W~ wa~TERS AVENUE RECOMMENDED FINDINGS: M 88-07/S 69-30 SITE ADDRESS: 2970 S. WINCHESTER BLVL APPLICANT: R~ILLY, R. PC MTG: 4-12-88 1. The building design is considered acceptable and interesting by the ` Architectural Advisor, with an updated painting scheme. _ 2. The parking provided meets/exceeds the code requirements by 2 spaces. 3. Upgraded landscaping shall be provided which will add to the aesthetics of the project. 4. An improved fence design shall improve the appearance of this project from the street. CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL SITE ADDRESS: 2970 S. APPLICANT: REILLY, R. PC MTG DATE: 4-12-88 - FILE ~i M 88-07/S 69-30 WINCHESTER BLVD. The applicant is hereby notified, as part of this application, that he/she is -- required to meet the following conditions in accordance with the Ordinances of the City of Campbell and the Laws of the State of California. Additionally, the applicant is hereby notified that he/she is required to comply with all applicable Codes or Ordinances of the City of Campbell and the State of California which pertain to this development and are not herein specified. 1. Revised elevations plan indicating reapinting the building to be submitted to the Planning Department and approved by the Planning Director upon recommendation of the Architectural Advisor within 90 days of Planning Commission approval. 2. Property to be fenced and landscaped as indicated and/or added in red on the plans. Landscaping and fencing shall be maintained in accordance with the approved plans. 3. Landscaping plan indicating type and size of plant material, and location of irrigation system to be submitteu to the Planning Department and approved by the Planning Director within 30 days of Planning Commission approval. 4. Fencing plan indicating location and improved design of fencing to be submitted to the Planning Department and approved by the Planning Director within 30 days of Planning Commission approval. 5. Applicant to submit a letter to the Planning Department, satisfactory to - the City Attorney, limiting the use of the property as follows: 8,541 sq.ft. of auto repair use; 1,351 sq. ft. of office use; and 3,561 sq.ft. of warehousing use. 6. All parking and driveway areas to be developed in compliance with Chapter 21.50 of the Campbell Municipal Code. All parking spaces to be provided with appropriate concrete curbs or bumper guards. '7. Plans submitted to the Building Department for plan check shall indicate clearly the location of all connections for underground utilities including water, sewer, electric, telephone and television cables, etc. 8. Sign application to be submitted in accordance with provisions of the Sign Ordinance for all signs. No sign to be installed until application is approved and permit issued by Planning and Building. Departments (Section 21.53 of the Campbell Municipal Code). 9. Ordinance No. 782 of the Campbell Municipal Code stipulates that any contract for the collection and disposal of refuse, garbage, wet garbage and rubbish produced within the limits of the City of Campbell shall be made with Green Valley Disposal Company. This requirement applies to all single-family dwellings, multiple apartment units, to all commercial, business, industrial, manufacturing, and construction establishments. CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL - FILE ~/ M 88-07/S 69-30 SITE ADDRESS: 2970 S. WINCHESTER BLVD. APPLICANT: REILLY, R. PC MTG DATE: 4-12-88 PAGE 2. 10. Trash container(s) of a size and quantity necessary to serve the development shall be located in area(s) approved by the Fire Department. Unless otherwise noted, enclosure(s) shall consist of a concrete floor surrounded by a solid wall or fence and have self-closing doors of a size specified by the Fire Department. All enclosures to be constructed at grade level and have a level area adjacent to the trash enclosure area to service these containers. 11. Applicant shall comply with all appropriate State and City requirements for the handicapped. PLANNING DEPARTMENT 12. Repair of vehicles outside of building is prohibited. FIRE DEPARTMENT 13. Individual occupancies shall comply with provisions of the Uniform Fire Code, 1979 edition, with regard to obtaining all necessary fire and hazardous materials permits and with the maintenance of all required occupancy separations. BUILDING DEPARTMENT 14. Show measurements from property line to building northside. 15. Show access to parts storage rooms; and, show support structurally for upper level storage. PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT No comments at this time. SITE AND ARCHITECTURAL REVIEW COMMITTEE 16. Landscaping to be provided along entire frontage. Landscaping and fencing plan to come back to the Site and Architectural Review Committee within 45 days of Planning Commission approval. ~M ~~ / I I ~ v ~ . W SuNN~ppKS t E• SUA~ -!_ ~ ~ p~E. 0 v ~ ~ ~~~. ti~ c ~ ~, ~ ~ ~e~ ~ __ ~ ,~`~ a~_. ~, ~ ~~ ~~ ~. til ~ ~~ . i i 9 d ~~~~. • ~ ~:jam ~ ~ •° i ~ p ,~/ hi ~~ 6 NN ~ t ~ ~~~ t ~ f 0 ~.. G r {r t" i ' ~ a 2 i1'N~~N w • ss v ~.~ 'J~ A Q O• .fj h O , O . V: .~ ~ ~ ~ D ~~ i ~ ry ~ ~I VN z •t . p i ~ W s' i . u ~' ~ ! .,N ~'1, , 6t'~ ,~ ~ ~ ' a i • t a ~ u ~. ai ~~ f A a QI ~ -- x ~' i h ^ ri•,~. FJ ~I , O • ~ a~ r R f /ti~ K ~ 71.0 ~ W ~^, QI ~ ~ V M na.zo o Z, ~ w A 3 ~ r ~'~~ 21 °r o . O Q ~ ry ~ ~ u0 1' ~ hI ~~ W y ~. M r. ~ ,~ v a "•a. /yQ f ~ ~ W ~, o;. a ~ d• ~ , •f ~ / J w~ NI / i ~ y h ~. .. ~ ~ a e~ r $ :.~21: . ~I b ~ S 1 ~ O l . 9Ei M ; ~n a •~ ~ ~. ~~ ~ •~ ~9 0 __ ~ ~ Q bON3j~~H a i ~~~~ 4 W N ~~ ~3 NI o V •j • ~J ~ ``f``t, RECOT~IENDED FINDINGS : SA 88-10 SITE ADDRESS: 1975 POLLARD RD. APPLICANT: RINCONADA HILLS CHRISTIAN CHURCH ` PC MTG: 4-12-88 1. The 8 foot height is justified in order to provide visibility of the sign when vehicles are parking along the street. 2. The sign is well designed and aesthetically pleasing. CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL: SA 88-10 1. Submit revised plan for approval of the Planning Director incorporating day care/nursery school sign into the main sign. 2. Remove other free-standing signs within one week after construction of new sign. 3. Obtain an necessary permit from the Building Department.