PC Min 07/28/1987PLANNING COMMISSION
CITY OF CAMPBELL, CALIFORNIA
7:30 PM MINUTES JULY 28, 1987
The Planning Commission of the City of Campbell convened this day in
regular session at the regular meeting place, the Council Chambers of City
Hall, 70 N. First St., Campbell, California.
ROLL CALL
Present Commissioners: Kasolas, Stanton,
Olszewski, Christ, Walker, Dickson,
Perrine; Planning Director A. A. Kee,
Planner II Marty Woodworth, Engineering
Manager Bill Helms, City Attorney Bill
Seligmann, Recording Secretary Linda
Dennis.
Absent None.
APPROVAL OF MINUTES
M/S: Christ, Stanton - That the minutes of the Planning
Commission of July 14, 1987, be approved
as submitted. Motion carried
unanimously (7-0-0).
COMMUNICATIONS
Mr. Kee noted that communications received pertained to specific items on
the agenda and would be discussed at that time.
ORAL REQUESTS
Chairman Perrine asked if there was anyone in the audience who wished to
address the Commission on an issue that was not on the agenda. There
being no one, the Chairman proceeded with the set agenda.
t * :
PUBLIC HEARINGS
ZC 87-OS Public hearing to consider the
PD 87-04 application of Mr. Rassoul Aleshi for. a
Aleshi, R. zone change from R-M-S (Multiple Family
Residential) to PD (Planned Development)
and approval of a Planned Development
Permit, plans, elevations, and
development schedule to allow ttie
construction of two townhomes on
property known as 548 W. Hacienda Ave.
Planning Director Kee reviewed the Staff Report of July 28, 1987, noting
that Staff is recommending a continuance in order that the applicant may
submit revised elevations per recommendation of the Architectural
Advisor. Mr. Kee also noted the memorandum from the Public Works
Department expressing a concern regarding cars backing out onto Hacienda
Ave. from this project.
-2-
Commissioner Christ reported that this application was considered by the
Site and Architectural Review Committee. 'The Committee is also
recommending a continuance to address the concerns of the Committee, the
Architectural Advisor, and Staff.
Commissioner Kasolas asked Staff to provide information in the next report
regarding: the possible benefits of this project for the widening of
Hacienda Ave.; how future street improvements are funded; and dedications
required.
Commissioner Walker requested that the issue of street improvements.-
specifically ingress/egress on busy streets such as Hacienda Ave. and
limiting driveways - be placed on a future study session agenda.
Chairman Perrine opened the public hearing and invited anyone in the
audience to speak for or against this item.
M/S: Walker., Stanton - That the public hearing on ZC 87-05/PD
87-04 be continued to the Planning
Commission meeting of August 25, 1987.
Motion carried unanimously (7-0-0).
t * :
PD 87-01 Continued public hearing to consider the
Bonnett, R. application of Mr. Robert Bonnett for
approval of plans, elevations, and
development schedule to allow a
commercial office development on
property known as 145 Dillon Ave. in a
PD (Planned Development/Industrial)
Zoning District.
Letter from Campbell Station Associates, dated July 22, 1987, entered into
record (attached hereto).
Planning Director Kee reviewed the Staff Report of July 28, 1987; and,
reported that Staff is recommending denial of this application based on
the length of time that the application has been active, with no
resolution of the parking situation.
Mr. Jim Eller, representing the applicant, stated that they have had
communications with Southern Pacific indicating an interest in leasing
property; Rev. Hastings has indicated that the church board will be
considering a proposal for leasing spaces at its meeting of July 29, 1987;
and, the applicant is pursuing the acquisition of adjacent property on Sam
Cava Ln., however, he has had difficulty contacting the property owner.
Mr. Eller requested a continuance for "a couple of months'; or, that the
Commission grant the Planned Development Permit which a one-year review.
Commissioner Walker asked if the applicant could provide letters from
people he has been negotiating with as verification of attempts.
Commissioner Kasolas noted that the issues are: does the applicant have
to provide his own on-site parking plan; and, does the Commission want to
establish a policy of allowing off-site parking and part-time use of
another's parking (or borrowing from a neighbor to expand one's use).
-3-
Discussion ensued regarding the possibility of the City using the railroad
property for future parking; the time-frame of the application, and
'reasonable" time to resolve the concerns; problems of shared parking; how
the shared parking is going to be used.; how will it be policed= and, will
the Commission be recommending a new policy in the community the location
of the subject property in relation to the downtown area; the uniqueness
of the development; and, whether or not a continuance would result in
progress.
Commissioner Olszewski was of the opinion that the applicant has been
granted more than reasonable time to resolve the problems with this
project.
Commissioner Kasolas noted that, should he support a continuance, he would
not be indicating his support of the solutions which might be presented.
Commissioner Dickson noted that he was not surprised with the length of
time involved because of the entities involved; and, he would favor a
continuance.
M/S: Kasolas, Dickson - That the public hearing on PD 87-01 be
continued to the Planning Commission
meeting of August 25, 1987 for a status
report, with the possibility of another
one month continuance if progress is
shown.
Discussion on motion
Commissioner Christ stated that the site is over-developed; and, it would
be less expensive to remove the excess development and bring the site into
conformance than to lease or buy other property for parking. He felt that
the issue has been before the Commission long enough, and that it should
proceed.
Commissioner Olszewski stated that he would hesitantly support the motion;
however, he felt that the length of time this matter has been unresolved
is not in the best interest of the community.
Commissioner Walker noted his agreement with Commissioner Christ.
Vote on motion
AYES: Commissioners: Kasolas, Stanton, Olszewski, Dickson, Perrine
NOES: Commissioners: Christ, Walker
ABSENT: Commissioners: None.
S 87-07 Continued public hearing to consider the
Saunder, J. application of Mr. John Saunder, on
behalf of S & W Lumber Co.,~for approval
of a site and architectural application
to allow the construction of an
administrative building in an existing
lumberyard located on property known as
720 Camden Ave. in an M-1-S (Light
Industrial) Zoning District.
-4-
Planning Director Kee reviewed the Staff Report of July 28, 1987, noting
that Staff is recommending approval of this project.
Commissioner Christ reported that this application was considered by the
Site and Architectural Review Committee. The Committee is recommending as
redlined, with the redlining indicating (1) the proposed entry sidewalk
increased to a minimum of 4' in width; (2) fencing to be located at rear
of landscape areas where possible; (3) and, protective curbing provided
for landscaping areas. Additionally, the details for the fencing and
plantings along the railroad right-of-way are to come back to the
Committee for approval.
Commissioner Olszewski suggested that landscaping along both sides of any
wall on the railroad property line might be appropriate to deter
vandalism; and, expressed a concern that the on-site areas which
accommodate vehicles be paved to lessen dirt and mud being tracked onto
the street and creating traffic hazards.
Engineering Manager Helms reported that one of the conditions of approval
requires the installation of a drop-gate at the railroad crossing. This
will, in Staff's opinion, greatly improve traffic safety at this location.
Mr. Kee indicated that the parking area will be paved, as required by the
Building Department.
Chairman Perrine opened the public hearing and invited anyone in the
audience to speak for or against this item.
Mr. Bruce Johnson, architect, reported that his client has been working
with Southern Pacific and a landscape architect regarding the type of
landscaping materials and fencing which can be used.
M/S: Olszewski, Walker - That the public hearing on S 87-07 be
closed. Motion carried unanimously
(7-0-0).
M/S: Kasolas, Dickson - That. the Planning Commission accept the
Negative Declaration which has been
prepared for this project; and, that the
Planning Commission adopt the following
findings, and APPROVE S 87-07, subject
to conditions attached hereto, with
Conditions 3 & 4 being changed to
require the landscaping and fencing
plans to come back to the Site and
Architectural Review Committee and the
Planning Commission for approval.
Findings:
1. The proposed project and use is
consistent with the M-1-S (Light
industrial) Zoning shown for this
property.
-5-
2. The project is an appropriate scale
in relationship to adjacent developed
uses.
3. The Architectural Advisor fs of the
opinion that the building design is
acceptable.
4. The provided 49 parking spaces is
satisfactory for the proposed office and
lumberyard use.
5. The introduction of new landscaping
areas will improve the aesthetics of
this area.
Motion carried with the following roll
call vote:
AYES: Commissioners: Kasolas, Stanton, Olszewski, Christ,
Walker, Dickson, Perrine
NOES: Commissioners: None
ABSENT: Commissioners: None.
~ : :
GP 87-02 Continued public hearing to consider the
Braatz, M. application of Mr. Mark Braatz for a
General Plan Amendment from Commercial
to Low-Medium Density Residential (6-13
units per gross acre) on properties
known as 860 S. San Tomas Aquino Rd. and
1209 Smith Ave.; and a City-initiated
General Plan Amendment from Commercial
to Low-Medium Density Residential on
property known as 860 & 864 S. San Tomas
Aquino Rd.
Planner II Marty Woodworth reviewed the Staff Report of July 28, 1987,
noting that Staff is recommending approval.
Chairman Perrine opened the public hearing and invited anyone in the
audience to speak for or against this item.
Mr. Vescera, owner of property at 860 & 864 S. San Tomas Aquino Rd.,
stated that he would not be opposed to the proposed change if he can
maintain the existing commercial use on the site.
Discussion ensued regarding the potential use of Mr. Vescera's property,
including the non-conforming commercial use which would be created by
changing the zoning,
-6-
Mr. Val McMurdie (land use attorney representing the applicant, Mr.
Braatz, and the property owner of 880 S. San Tomas Aquino Rd. and 1209
Smith Ave.) stated that his clients had some extensive meetings with Mr.
Vescera covering the issues of the zone change and the creation of a
non-conforming use for the commercial portion of his property. Mr.
Vescera does not want to lose the commercial use of his property. With
the non-conforming use, he would be able to continue the commercial use of
the front part of his property. The residential use of the site is much
larger than the commercial portion, and would be more valuable to him; the
risk is in having the, commercial use. Should Mr. Vescera wish to change
the zoning on his property in the future, he would have to go through the
expense of these hearings. Mr. McMurdie noted that Mr. Vescera needs to
be clear about the non-conforming use, zoning, and the general plan; and,
that it is clearly in Mr. Vescera's best interests to have the property
changed.
Mr. Vescera again stated that, after conferring with his wife, he agrees
to the general plan and zone change as long as they can maintain the shop
on the front portion of the property.
M/S: Walker, Stanton - That the public hearing on GP 87-02 be
closed. Motion carried unanimously
(7-0-0).
M/S: Dickson, Stanton - That the Planning Commission adopt
Resolution No. 2469, including the
following findings, recommending that
the City Council approve the General
Plan Amendment from Commercial to
Low-Medium Density Residential for
properties known as 860, 864, 880 S. San
Tomas Aquino Rd. and 1209 Smith Ave.
Findings:
1. The change will be consistent with
the Low-Medium Density Residential
designation for the properties adjacent
to the north & east.
2. Commercial uses are not viable at
this location.
3. The area is already adequately
served by Commercial uses.
Motion carried with the following roll
call vote:
AYES: Commissioners: Kasolas, Stanton, Olszewski, Christ,
Walker, Dickson, Perrine
NOES: Commissioners: None
ABSENT: Commissioners: None.
-7-
At this time, Mr. McMurdie asked if he could address the Commission
regarding the competency and integrity of Planning Director Ree. Mr.
McMurdie noted that in he has been a zoning specialist for ten years and
worked all over California and nearby States, and he complimented Mr. Kee
as being the most capable and knowledgeable planning official that he has
encountered. Mr. McMurdie concluded that he would hope that the
Commission realizes that because of their capable Planning Director,
Campbell does not have many of the problems that other communities
experience.
M/S: Dickson, Christ - That Mr. McMurdie's comments be
forwarded to the City Council. Motion
carried unanimously (7-0-0).
ZC 87-04 Continued public hearing to consider the
Braatz, M, application of Mr. Mark Braatz for a
zone change from C-1-S (Neighborhood
Commercial) to R-M-S (Multiple Family
Residential) on property known as 880 S.
San Tomas Aquino Rd. and 1209 Smith
Ave.; and a City-initiated zone change
from C-1-S to R-M-S on property known as
860 & 864 S. San Tomas Aquino Rd.
Planner II Marty Woodworth reviewed the Staff Report of July 28, 1987,
noting that Staff is recommending approval of this zone change based on
the Planning Commission's recommendation for approval of GP 87-02.
Chairman Perrine opened the public hearing and invited anyone in the
audience to speak for or against this item.
M/S: Dickson, Stanton - That the public hearing on ZC 87-04 be
closed. Motion carried unanimously
(7-0-0).
M/S: Christ, Stanton - That the Planning Commission adopt
Resolution No. 2470 , including the
following findings, recommending that
the City Council approve the zone change
from C-1-S to R-M-S for properties known
as 860, 864, 880 S. San Tomas Aquino Rd.
and 1209 Smith Ave.
Findings:
1. The proposed zoning will be
consistent with the Land Use Element of
the General Plan.
2. The proposed R-M-S zoning will be
consistent with the surrounding land
uses.
-8-
3. That the establishment, maintenance,
and operation of the proposed use will
not be detrimental to the health,
safety, peace, morals, comfort or
general welfare of the persons residing
or working in the neighborhood of such
use, or detrimental or injurious to
property and improvements in the
neighborhood or the general welfare of
the City.
Motion carried with the following roll
call vote:
AYES: Commissioners: Kasolas, Stanton, Ols2ewski, Christ,
Walker, Dickson, Perrine
NOES: Commissioners: None
ABSENT: Commissioners: None.
t
The Commission recessed at 9:15 p.m.; the meeting reconvened at 9:25 a.m.
t
S 87-04 Continued public hearing to consider the
Anderson, K. application Mr. Kurt Anderson for
approval of plans and elevations to
allow an addition to an industrial
building located on property known as
615 McGlincey Ln. in a M-1-S Zoning
District.
Planning Director Kee reviewed the Staff Report of July 28, 1987, noting
that Staff is recommending approval.
Commissioner Christ reported that this application was considered by the
Site and Architectural Review Committee. The Committee is recommending
approval as redlined, with redlining indicating an increase to 25' back-up
distance in the parking area .
Chairman Perrine opened the public hearing and invited anyone in the
audience to speak for or against this item.
Mr. Kurt Anderson, applicant, stated his concurrence with the redlining
and other conditions.
M/S: Stanton, Christ - That the public hearing on S 87-04 be
closed. Motion carried unanimously
(7-0-0).
M/S: Stanton, Christ - That the Planning Commission adopt the
following findings and approve S 87-04,
subject to conditions indicated in the
Staff Report of July 28, 1987.
-9-
Findings:
1. The proposed project is an
appropriate scale in relationship to the
adjacent developed uses.
2. The building design is considered
acceptable by the Architectural Advisor.
3. The parking provided meets/exceeds
the code requirements.
4. Substantial landscaping has been
provided which adds to the aesthetics of
the project.
Motion carried with the following roll
call vote:
AYES: Commissioners: Kasolas, Stanton, Olszewski, Christ,
Walker, Dickson, Perrine
NOES: Commissioners: None
ABSENT: Commissioners: None.
MISCELLANEOUS
M 87-16 Request of Mr. Richard Flowers for a
Flowers, R. modification to the sideyard setback for
property known as 423 Kings Ct. in an
R-1 (Single Family Residential) Zoning
District.
Planning Director Kee reviewed the Staff Report of July 28, 1987, noting
that Staff is recommending approval of this application.
Commissioner Christ reported that this application was considered by the
Site and Architectural Review Committee. The Committee expressed a
concern that there were no building materials indicated on the presented
plans, therefore, it was not possible to determine the compatibility of
the addition with the existing structure. The Architectural Advisor
expressed a concern that a deck was proposed on top of the existing
garage. Therefore, the Site Committee is recommending continuance.
Commissioner Christ noted that the applicant was not present at the
Committee meeting.
Commissioner Dickson expressed his concern with the Planning Commission
getting involved in the design aspects of single family homes.
Mr. Kee explained that the zoning ordinance states that if a property is
in excess of 8,000 sq. ft., then it must go through the public hearing
procedure for development.
-10-
Discussion ensued regarding policies for reviewing single family home
designs.
M/S: Kasolas, Walker - That M 87-16 be continued to the
Planning Commission meeting of August
11, 1987, in order that the applicant
may submit information regarding
building materials; and, so that the
applicant may be present at the
meetings. Motion carried unanimously
(7-0-0).
t t
Referral Referral from City Council on the
GP 87-05, application of Mr. Kurt Anderson for
Anderson, K. a General Plan Amendment from High
Density Residential to Professional
Office for properties known as 3803 &
3835 S. Bascom Ave., from Low Density
Residential to Professional Offfce for
the easterly portion of property known
as 1956 Whiteoaks Rd.
Planner II Marty Woodworth reviewed the Staff Report of July 28, 1987.
A letter from Andarch Associates, dated July 28, 1987, was entered into
the record (attached hereto).
Commissioner Dickson expressed his concern with changing the general plan
for these properties, but leaving the parcel adjacent to the south as
residential.
Mr. Rurt Anderson, architect, stated that the developers have worked with
the objecting homeowner's association to address their concerns. He
presented a conceptual plan which addresses landscaping, privacy,
security, noise and lighting concerns expressed by the neighborhood.
Mr. Rudolph Herz, 1888 Whiteoaks Rd., President of White Oaks Manor
Neighborhood Association, stated that the Association is quite comfortable
with the conceptual plan which has evolved from working with the
architect. He expressed a concern that the project be developed within
the framework that has been agreed upon and requested the following
clarifications (relating to specific item numbers) be added to the letter
from Andarch Associates: (1) The dedicated rear landscape easement strip
be 20' wide; (2) Specified no windows or decks above the first floor of
the building in the rear; (3) The parking facilities be secured during all
non-working hours to discourage vandals; and, (6) The lighting height
should be limited to 6 feet to minimize impact on residential yards.
Mr. Richard Florence, Vice-President of White Oaks Maner Neighborhood
Association, complimented the architect for working with the community in
developing an acceptable plan. Mr. Florence stated that the neighborhood
does not like the multiple family zoning, at this point, because of the
traffic that would be caused by the density.
-11-
Mr. Anderson noted that this has been an interesting experience for his
staff, as well; and, they will be working closely with adjoining neighbors
on all future developments to ease the process.
Commissioner Dickson stated that he was still concerned about the parcel
to the south of the subject property being zoned for residential, but
being forced into a commercial use. He thought that if this amendment was
going to be approved, good planning strategy would be to include the
adjacent parcel. He stressed that the single family lots in this area are
being seriously affected by changing the use of the subject property.
Discussion ensued regarding the uses being developed on surrounding
properties.
Commissioner Christ noted to the applicant and residents that his previous
vote was because he had concerns other than those addressed this evening;
and, those concerns are still intact and have not been resolved yet.
M/S: Kasolas, Dickson - That the Planning Commission recommend
that the City Council consider new and
additional information, as presented to
the Commission this evening, regarding
GP 87-05. Motion carried unanimously
(7-0-0).
M/S: Kasolas, Olszewski - That the Planning Commission recommend
that the City Council favorably consider
GP 87-05, based on new information
provided to the Commission at its
meeting of July 28, 1987.
Discussion
Commissioner Dickson stated that he would be opposing the motion based on
his previous comments.
Vote on motion
AYES: Commissioners: Kasolas, Stanton, Olszewski, Walker, Perrine
NOES: Commissioners: Christ, Dickson
ABSENT: Commissioners: None.
Mr. Gil Erikson commented, for the record, that the property owner (Mr.
Sal Canatta) of Parcel 116, immediately adjacent to the south, would agree
that his property should be changed from residential to commercial or
professional office.
-12-
Referral Referral from City Council regarding
City Council criteria for approving additional living
units; and, a policy regarding
additional utility meters in R-1 (Single
Family Residential) Zoning Districts.
Planning Director Kee reviewed the Staff Report of July 28, 1987.
Commissioner Kasolas stated that, due to the obvious controversial nature
of this issue, he would like to see this matter highly publicized and
thoroughly discussed. Some of the issues would be the intent of overall
regulations; conflict between people in the community; duties of the
community to provide housing; and, safety features. Commissioner Kasolas
indicated that he would like comments from as many groups as possible,
including the utility companies.
Commissioner Stanton requested clarification of the State's regulations;
information regarding the governing body's philosophy; information
regarding remuneration to the City if the unit becomes rental property (is
the City entitled); and, information regarding the legality of 'granny
units' on residential lots if they become rental units.
Discussion ensued regarding the establishment of a policy that the City is
against granny units; the provision of a second utility meter making
property eligible for income generating status= ethics of restricting the
number of people living in a unit; and, enforcement problems associated
___
with a restrictive ordinance.
Commissioner Dickson commented that one of the strongest things in our
zoning ordinance is the statement `harmonious development' which, if
interpreted from the strictest standpoint, could be an invaluable tool.
Unfortunately, we have aimed the development of additional living units
towards the larger lots and this is not harmonious.
Commissioner Christ expressed a concern with the long, narrow driveways
that develop. The Commission doesn't want these types of driveways in
townhome developments; however, with additional living units, we approve
them.
Commissioner Dickson asked Staff to agendize an informational history of
the issue, prior to a public hearing be set.
Chairman Perrine asked Staff to contact other cities for information.
Commissioner Walker noted that there is a tape of the last session at the
League of California Cities available on this issue. Commissioner Walker
felt that this matter is a reaction to one small group taking issue to
City policy; and, perhaps education might be the answer. He noted that
this small group may be limiting their own options.
Commissioner Kasolas felt that it would be important to include any out ____
buildings and detached buildings (carports, garages, etc.) in any study.
Also, a list of potential lots that could actually be developed with
additional living units, under the present ordinance, in relation to the
total number of single family lots, should be provided.
-13-
Commissioner Stanton requested clarification of Councilmember Kotowski's
comments on page 7 of the City Council minutes of July 7, 1987.
_ It was the consensus of the Commission that this matter be agendized for
the Planning Commission meeting of August 25, 1987; that Commissioners
Dickson and Stanton be appointed as a committee to assist Staff; that as
much information as possible be provided at the meeting of August 25,
1987; and, that after reviewing the information, the Commission set a date
for public hearing on the matter.
* * x
Staff Report
Staff Report regarding noticing of
public hearings.
M/S: Kasolas, Walker -
Staff Report
That the subject Staff Report be noted
and filed. Motion carried unanimously
(7-0-0).
* * •
Staff Report regarding guidelines and
minor modifications.
It was the consensus of the Commission that this matter be continued to
the Planning Commission meeting of August 11, 1987, due to the lateness of
the hour.
Subcommittee Report Site & Architectural Procedure
Subcommittee; Liaison to City Council;
Site & Architectural Review Committee.
It was the consensus of the Commission that this matter be continued to
the Planning Commission meeting of August 11, 1987, due to the lateness of
the hour.
* * :
ADJOURNMENT
There being no further business, the
meeting was adjourned at 11:10 p.m.
APPROVED: Jay Perrine
Chairman
ATTEST: Arthur A. Kee
Secretary
RECORDED: Linda A. Dennis
Recording Secretary
CAMPBELL STATION ASSOCIATES
145 Dillon Avenue - Suite B
Campbell, CA 95008
(408) 378-4000
July 22, 1987
Marty Woodworth
CITY OF CAMPBELL
Planning Department
70 North First Street
Campbell, CA 95008
RE: 145 Dillon Avenue
PD 87-01
Dear Marty,
The following is an update on the status of the abovereferenced application:
As of this writing we have had no response from Southern Pacific Railroad.
Reverend Hastings of Calvary Temple (lurch has not yet presented our offer of
( leasing parking spaces to his Board of Directors but he will do so at his next
Board meeting.
In regards to the two properties (residential) located on Sam Cava Way, please
find attached a letter from Barry McCarthy of Norris, Beggs, & Simpson stating
our intentions to purchase both properties.
Please contact our office if you should have any questions or require additional
information.
Very truly yo~
B. Ro rt Bonnett rD
Campbell Station Associates i`~~ 1~ ~ != n ~ ,,
BRB:dcr _
Enclosure ~~L~, ~ ~.,~ i
'~.C~.•
~` ` _.,
[~r_ ~'
.; n.., - `
NORRIS, BEGGS & SIMPSON
1731 TEChYrOLOGY DRIVE SUITE t00 SAN JOSE, CAUFORJJIA 951 t0
P.O. BOX 8088 SAN JOSE, CA 95150 TELEPHONE (1081287-7900
July 22, 1987
Mr. Bob Bonnett
145 Dillon Avenue
Campbell, CA 95008
Re: Parking Requirement for Campbell Buildings
Dear Mr. Bonnett:
In response to our conversation on July 15, 1987, I wish to inform
you that purchase agreement and deposit receipts have been written
for the properties located at 472 and 466 San Cava Lane, Campbell.
In regards to 466 San Cava Lane, the owner has been contacted and
is aware that an offer is forthcoming.
The owner of 472 San Cava Lane, Mr. Jerry Horton, has not been
,- contacted yet despite several attempts to do so. Since both
offers are contingent upon the .successful simultaneous close of
escrow of both properties, it would be best if we can submit them
.both at the same time. Therefore, we are employing a Title
company to assist us in the search for contacting any other
persons involved with Mr. Horton.
Mr. Bonnett, we understand the scope of your situation and are
continuing working diligently to produce the desired solution to
the parking requirement. As always, feel free to call at any
time.
Sincerely,
NORRIS, BEGGS & SIMPSON
Barry cCarthy
BM/neb ;
BM 8 7114 4 ,~ ~ CL I1-
,~S n i ~l j~
n ~ ,~
,
,, ~
- V
,~ fT.Y L' .
~- ~
.
`~
.
~' <<YT
SAN FRANCISCO • SAN JOSE • SACFUMENTO • NEWPORT BEACH • PORTLAND • TACOMA • LAFAYETTE • VANCOUVErI
CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL - FILE # S 87-07
SITE ADDRESS: 720 CAMDEN AVE.
APPLICANT: SAUNDER, J.
PC MTG DATE: 7-28-87
The applicant is hereby notified, as part of this application, that he/she
is required to meet the following conditions in accordance with the
Ordinances of the City of Campbell and the Laws of the State of
California. Additionally, the applicant is hereby notified that he/she is
required to comply with all applicable Codes or Ordinances of the City of
Campbell and the State of California which pertain to this development and
are not herein specified.
1. Revised elevations and/or site plan addressing concerns as indicated
in the Staff Report of July 28, 1987, to be submitted to the Planning
Department and approved by the Planning Director upon recommendation
of the Architectural Advisor prior to application for a building
permit.
2. Property to be fenced and landscaped as indicated and/or added in red
on the plans. Landscaping and fencing shall be maintained in
accordance with the approved plans.
3. Landscaping plan indicating type and size of plant material, and
location of irrigation system to be submitted to the Planning
Department and approved by the Site and Architectural Review Committee
and Planning Commission prior to issuance of a building permit.
4. Fencing plan indicating location and design details of fencing to be
submitted to the Planning Department and approved by the Site and
Architectural Review Committee and the Planning Commission prior to
issuance of a building permit.
5. Applicant to either (1) post a faithful performance bond in the amount
of 55,000.00 to insure landscaping, fencing, and striping of parking
areas within 3 months of completion of construction; or (2) file
written agreement to complete landscaping, fencing, and striping of
parking areas. Bond or agreement to be filed with the Planning
Department prior to application for a building permit.
6. Applicant to submit a plan to the Planning Department, prior to
installation of PG&E utility (transformer) boxes, indicating the
location of the boxes and screening (if boxes are above ground) for
approval of the Planning Director.
7. All mechanical equipment on roofs and all utility meters to be
screened as approved by the Planning Director.
8. Building occupancy will not be allowed until public improvements are
installed.
9. All parking and driveway areas to be developed in compliance with
Chapter 21.50 of the Campbell Municipal Code. All parking spaces to
be provided with appropriate concrete curbs or bumper guards. ----
10. Underground utilities to be provided as required by Section 20.16.070
of the Campbell Municipal Code.
CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL - FILE ~ S 87-07
SITE ADDRESS: 720 CAMDEN AVE.
APPLICANT: SAUNDER, J.
PC MTG DATE: 7-28-87
PAGE 2.
11. Plans submitted to the Building Department for plan check shall
indicate clearly the location of all connections for underground
utilities including water, sewer, electric, telephone and television
cables, etc.
12. Sign application .to be submitted in accordance with provisions of the
Sign Ordinance for all signs. No sign to be installed until
application is approved and permit issued by Planning and Building
Departments (Section 21.68.030 of the Campbell Municipal Code).
13. Ordinance No. 782 of the Campbell Municipal Code stipulates that any
contract for the collection and disposal of refuse, garbage, wet
garbage and rubbish produced within the limits of the City of Campbell
shall be made with Green Valley Disposal Company. This requirement
applies to all single-family dwellings, multiple apartment units, to
all commercial, business, industrial, manufacturing, and construction
establishments.
14. Trash container(s) of a size and quantity necessary to serve the
development shall be located in area(s) approved by the Fire
Department. Unless otherwise noted, enclosure(s) shall consist of a
concrete floor surrounded by a solid wall or fence and have
self-closing doors of a size specified by the Fire Department. All
enclosures to be constructed at grade level and have a level area
adjacent to the trash enclosure area to service these containers.
15. Applicant shall comply with all appropriate State and City
requirements for the handicapped.
BUILDING DEPARTMENT
16. Retaining walls at property lines are limited to a height of 15 inches
if constructed of wood.
FIRE DEPARTMENT
17. Roofing materials shall meet the requirements for a Class C roof
covering or a special purpose roof per U.B.C. requirements.
PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT
18. Install temporary improvements in Camden/Winchester shown on Allied
Engineering Company Drawing No. 8714 dated 4-29-87, as modified by the
City Engineer.
19. Obtain an excavation permit, pay fees, and post surety for all work in
the public right-of-way.
CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL - FILE ~ S 87-07
SITE ADDRESS: 720 CAMDEN AVE.
APPLICANT: SAUNDER, J.
PC MTG DATE: 7-28-87
PAGE 3.
20. Obtain permits from Southern Pacific Transportation Company for all
work in their right-of-way.
21. Install fencing along the property line common to SPTC.
22. Process and file a parcel map to combine the two lots.
COt7DITI0NS OF APPROVAL - FILE ~ S 87-04
SITE ADDRESS: 615 MCGLINCEY LN
APPLICAP7T: ANDERSON, K.
PC MTG DATE: 7-28-87
The applicant is hereby notified, as part of this application, that he/she
is required to meet the following conditions in accordance with the
Ordinances of the City of Campbell and the Laws of the State of
California. Additionally, the applicant is hereby notified that he/she is
required to comply with all applicable Codes or Ordinances of the City of
Campbell and the State of California which pertain to this development and
are not herein specified.
1. Property to be fenced and landscaped as indicated and/or added in red
on the plans. Landscaping and fencing shall be maintained in
accordance with the approved plans.
2. Landscaping plan indicating type and size of plant material, and
location of irrigation system to be submitted to the Planning.
Department and approved by the Site and Architectural Review Committee
and/or Planning Commission prior to issuance of a building permit.
3. Fencing plan indicating location and design details of fencing to be
submitted to the Planning Department and approved by the Planning
Director prior to issuance of a building permit.
4. Applicant to either (1) post a faithful performance bond in the amount
of $3,000.00 to insure landscaping, fencing, and striping of parking
areas within 3 months of completion of construction; or (2) file
written agreement to complete landscaping, fencing, and striping of
parking areas. Bond or agreement to be filed with the Planning
Department prior to application for a building permit.
5. Applicant to submit a plan to the Planning Department, prior to
installation of PG&E utility (transformer) boxes, indicating the
location of the boxes and screening (if boxes are above ground) for
approval of the Planning Director.
6. Applicant to submit a letter to the Planning Department, satisfactory
to the City Attorney, prior to application for building permit,
limiting the use of the property as follows: 1152 sq.ft. of office
use; and, 3140 sq.ft. warehouse/storage use.
7. All mechanical equipment on roofs and all utility meters to be
screened as approved by the Planning Director.
8. All parking and driveway areas to be developed in compliance with
Chapter 21.50 of the Campbell Municipal Code. All parking spaces to
be provided with appropriate concrete curbs or bunper guards.
9. Underground utilities to be provided as required by Section 20.16.070
of the Campbell Municipal Code.
10. Plans submitted to the Building Department for plan check shall
indicate clearly the location of all connections for underground
utilities including water, sewer, electric, telephone and television
cables, etc.
CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL - FILE # S 87-04
SITE ADDRESS: 615 MCGLINCEY LN
APPLICANT: ANDERSON, K.
PAGE 2.
11. Sign application to be submitted in accordance with provisions of the
Sign Ordinance for all signs. No sign to be installed until
application is approved and permit issued by Planning and Building
Departments (Section 21.68.030 of the Campbell Municipal Code).
12. Ordinance No. 782 of the Campbell Municipal Code stipulates that any
contract for the collection and disposal of refuse, garbage, wet
garbage and rubbish produced within the limits of the City of Campbell
shall be made with Green Valley Disposal Company. This requirement
applies to all single-family dwellings, multiple apartment units, to
all commercial, business, industrial, manufacturing, and construction
establishments.
13. Trash container(s) of a size and quantity necessary to serve the
development shall be located in area(s) approved by the Fire
Department. Unless otherwise noted, enclosure(s) shall consist of a
concrete floor surrounded by a solid wall or fence and have
self-closing doors of a size specified by the Fire Department. All
enclosures to be constructed at grade level and have a level area
adjacent to the trash enclosure area to service these containers.
14. Applicant shall comply with all appropriate State and City
requirements for the handicapped.
15. The applicant is hereby notified that the property is to be maintained
free of any combustible trash, debris and weeds, until the time that
actual construction commences. All existing structures shall be
secured by having windows boarded up and doors sealed shut, or be
demolished or removed from the property. Sect. 11.201 & 11.414, 1979
Ed. Uniform Fire Code.
BUILDING DEPARTN;E?~T
16. Retaining walls at property lines are limited to a height of 15 inches
if constructed of wood.
PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTPIENT
FIRE DEPARTtdENT
No comments at this time.
PLANNING DEPARTIiENT
17. No outside storage of materials or trash containers is permitted in
the approved parking area. Material storage to be restricted to
designated material storage area.
ANOARCH
A S S O C I A T E S
MULTI-DISCIPLINE ARCHITECTURE
PLANNING DEPARTMENT
CITY OF CAMPBELL
70 N. First St.
Campbell, CA 95008
RE: GP 87-05
Dear Staff,
July 28, 1987
My client and I have spent a considerable amount of time with the White
Oaks Homeowners Association and have identified areas of their concern.
We feel that we can positively deal with those concerns in an architec-
tural manner.
These are the following items of concern:
1. Dedicate rear landscape strip as an easement.
2. No windows or decks on rear of building.
3. Secure the parking area in the evening.
4. Construct the single-family residences on White Oaks at the same
time at the office building.
5. Construct an 8' solid fence for sound control and security.
6. Exterior lighting located to minimize impact on residential rear
yards.
7. Plant mature trees in the dedicated easement.
8. Dumpster to be 100' from rear property line.
We would like to extend our thanks to the Commission and the Staff for
all of their support, assistance and a chance to present our project at
the commission again.
Most importantly, a thank you needs to be extended to the White Oaks
Homeowners Association and their officers for their willingness to work
_ with us on this project. We look forward to their continued support
and input during the Site and Architectural process. Without their
Kurt B. Anderson 300 Orchard Cily Drive
Architect. AIA Suite 137
Campbell, CA 95008
(408} 374-7137
Oui;ide CaGloro a
(800) 732-2225
ANOARCN
A S S O C I A T E S
MULTI-DISCIPLINE ARCHITECTURE
possitive attitude we would not be back at the Commission.
I feel that this is a perfect example where the imput of the surround-
ing neighbors and the Staff in conjunction with the architect and
developer results in'a project that mitigates everyone's concerns and
desires. This results in a project that we all can be proud of and
represents a positive addition to the community.
Sin er ly,
Kurt B. Anderson, AIA
Principal
cc: Gilco Development
White Oaks Homeowners Association
Kurt B. Anderson 300 Orchard City Drive
Arch~leG, AIA $uif6 137
Campbell.. CA 95008
(408j 374-7137
O WSiOc Caldorma
(800) 732-2225