Loading...
PC Min 06/23/1987PLANNING COMMISSION CITY OF CAMPBELL, CALIFORNIA 7:30 PM .MINUTES JUNE 23, 1987 i The Planning Commission of the City of Campbell convened this day in regular session at the regular meeting place, the Council Chambers of City Hall, 70 N. First St., Campbell, California. ROLL CALL Present Commissioners: Kasolas, Stanton, Olszewski, Christ, Walker (7:50 p.m.), Dickson, Perrine; Planning Director A. A. Kee, Principal Planner Phil Stafford, Engineering Manager Bill Helms, City Attorney Bill Seligmann, Recording Secretary Linda Dennis. Absent None. APPROVAL OF MINUTES M/S: Christ, Stanton - That the minutes of the Planning Commission meeting of June 9, 1987, be approved as submitted. Motion carried una qimously (6-0-1, with Commissioner Walker being absent for this vote). COMMUNICATIONS Mr. Kee noted that communications received pertained to specific items on the agenda and would be discussed at that time. Additionally, a memorandum from the City Attorney regarding the recent Supreme Court decision on land use was noted. ORAL REQUESTS Chairman Perrine asked if there was anyone in the audience who wished to address the Commission on an issue that was not on the agenda. There being no one, the Chairman proceeded with the set agenda. CONSENT CALENDAR Request Request of Mountain Mike's Pizza for temporary signing - 301 E. Hamilton Ave. -C-1-S (Neighborhood Commercial) Zoning District. M/S: Kasolas, Stanton - That the Planning Commission take minute action approving the Consent Calendar. ~~ Motion carried unanimously (6-0-1). ,r : -2- PD-87-O1 Continued public hearing to consider the Bonnett, R, application of Mr. Robert Bonnett for a l Planned Development Permit, approval of plans, elevations, and development schedule to allow a commercial office development on property known as 145 Dillon Ave, in a PD (Planned Development/Industrial) Zoning District. Planning Director Kee reported that Staff is recommending a continuance to July 28, 1987, in that it appears that the applicant is making a reasonable effort to resolve the parking problems for this development. Chairman Perrine opened the public hearing and invited anyone in the audience to speak for or against this item. M/S: Kasolas, Christ - That the public hearing on PD 87-01 be continued to the Planning Commission meeting of July 28, 1987. Motion carried unanimously (6-0-1). S 87-04 Continued public hearing to consider the Anderson, K. application of t9r. Kurt Anderson for approval of plans and elevations to -- allow an addition to an industrial ~ building located on property known as i ~ 615 McGlincey Ln. in a M-1-$ (Light - Industrial) Zoning District. Commissioner Christ reported that this application was considered by the Site and Architectural Review Committee. The Committee is recommending a continuance to the meeting of July 28, 1987, with the applicant's concurrence. Principal Planner Stafford reported that Staff is also recommending a continuance. Chairman Perrine opened the public hearing and invited anyone in the audience to speak for or against this item. M/S: Stanton, Olszewski - That the public hearing on S 87-04 be continued to the Planning Commission meeting of July 28, 1987, with the applicant's concurrence. Motion carried unanimously (6-0-1). -3- GP 87-02 Continued Public hearing to consider the Braatz, M. of Mr. Mark Braatz for a General Plan Amendment from Commercial to Low-Medium Density Residential (6-13 units per gross acre) on properties known as 880 S. San Tomas Aquino Rd. and 1209 Smith Ave.; and a City-initiated General Plan Amendment from Commercial to Low-Medium Density Residential on property .known as 860 & 864 S. San Tomas Aquino Rd. Principal Planner Stafford reviewed the Staff Report of June 23, 1987, for the Commission, indicating that Staff is recommending approval. Responding to questions from the Commission, Mr. Stafford noted that three units could be constructed on each piece of property, after necessary dedications; and, explained that the reason for including the northern property in the amendment was to provide prevent piecemeal land uses in this area. (Commissioner Walker entered the Chambers at 7:50 p.m.) Engipeering Manager Helms addressed questions regarding required street improvements in this immediate area. Chairman Perrine opened the public hearing and invited anyone in the audience to speak for or against this item. Mr. Chris Vescera, property owner of 860 & 864 S. San Tomas Aquino Rd., stated that he was against his property being changed from commercial to residential. Mr. Mark Braatz, applicant for 880 S. San Tomas Aquino Rd. and 1209 Smith Ave., stated that he did not have a concern with the adjacent property remaining commercial; however, his client is of the opinion that the commercial land use is not economically viable for his property and requests a change to allow residential uses. Lengthy discussion ensued regarding non-conforming properties; density allowable under the requested residential use; the impact on Mr. Vescera should his property be made non-conforming by approval of this General Plan amendment; whether or not Mr. Vescera fully understood the possibilities of the proposed change; removal of 860 & 864 S. San Tomas Aquino Rd. from this application; whether or not leaving 860 & 864 S. San Tomas Aquino Rd. as a commercial use would result in spot zoning, and the effect on future development of this property and surrounding sites; and, the possibility of placing a PD (Planned Development) zoning on the properties. M/S: Olszewski, Stanton - That the public hearing on GP 87-02 be closed. Motion carried unanimously (7-0-0). -4- Discussion Commissioner Walker noted his agreement with the Staff recommendation, expressing a concern about the future of Mr. Vescera's property if it remains as a commercial use. Commissioner Christ stated his agreement with Commissioner Walker, noted that there have been problems in the past where small parcels have remained in the middle of different zonings. .Commissioner Christ noted that he felt it would be beneficial to Mr. Vescera if the property were changed to allow a residential use. Commissioner Olszewski stated that the proposed change is a practical approach; however, the one of the property owners does not wish the use to be changed. In that there appear to be no nuisances with the northern property, and no urgency for housing units, Commissioner Olszewski indicated that he hesitates to create a burden for a property owner, noting that the situation would be much simplier if there was only one property owner. M/S: Olszewski, Kasolas - That the Planning Commission adopt a Resolution recommending that the City Council DENY GP 87-02. Motion failed with the following roll call vote: AYES: Commissioners: Kasolas, Olszewski NOES: Commissioners: Stanton, Christ, Walker, Dickson, Perrine ~i ABSENT: Commissioners: None. M/S: Dickson, Stanton - That the Planning Commission adopt a Resolution recommending that the City Council approve a General Plan Amendment for 880 S. San Tomas Aquino Rd. and 1209 Smith Ave., from Commercial to Low-Medium Density Residential; and That the Planning Commission adopt a Resolution recommending that the City Council deny a General Plan Amendment for. 860 & 864 S. San Tomas Aquino Rd. Discussion on motion Commissioner Christ spoke against the motion, stating that it was not in the best interests of the community and that it is a mistake to look at this matter as a property owner issue rather than a planning issue. Commissioner Walker concurred with Commissioner Christ that this should be considered as a planning issue. -. -5- Commissioner Olszewski noted that the Commission has been consistent in the past in avoiding spot zoning; however, it would appear that the Commission is actually now considering the creation of spot zoning. __ Commissioner Olszewski felt that the three parcels should be developed together, and stated that he could not support the motion. Commissioner Kasolas suggested a multiple use for the sites, noting that he would have no objection to re-opening the public hearing so that the applicant can come up with a workable plan. Mr. Kee noted that this would require a re-noticing of the proposal, and a continuance of this item. Commissioner Dickson felt that the Commission would be creating a real problem on this corner if it considered multiple uses. Commissioner Dickson noted that this is an area in transition; and, that the Commission has always tried to take the property owner's position into consideration. Commissioner Walker noted that he would like to see the item continued in order to give Mr. Vescera time to research his options and understand just how this proposed change would affect his property. Chairman Perrine stated that despite his concern about spot zoning he would be supporting the motion to take advantage of the opportunity to upgrade this area, noting that the perceived "spot" zoning on the adjacent lot may only be a temporary situation. Vote on motion AYES: Commissioners: Stanton, Dickson, Perrine NOES: Commissioners: Kasolas, Olszewski, Christ, Walker ABSENT: Commissioners: None. Motion fails. Commissioner Kasolas asked Mr. Braatz if he would like this matter continued. Mr. Braatz stated that he would like the matter continued. M/S: Kasolas, Walker - That the public hearing on GP 87-02 be re-opened; and that GP 87-02 be continued to the Planning Commission meeting of July 28, 1987. Motion carried unanimously (7-0-0). -6- ZC 87-04 Continued public hearing to consider the ___ Braatz, M. application of Mr. Mark Braatz for a zone change from C-1-S (Neighborhood Commercial) to R-M-S (Multiple Family _ Residential) on properties known as 880 S. San Tomas Aquino Rd. and 1209 Smith Ave.; and a City-initiated zone change from C-1-S to R-M-S on property known as 860 & 864 S. San Tomas Aquino Rd. Planning Director Kee stated that this application is directly related to the previously discussed GP 87-04; therefore, Staff would recommend a continuance, in light of the action taken on GP 87-04. Chairman Perrine opened the public hearing and invited anyone in the audience to speak for or against this item. C1/S: Walker, Olszewski - That the public hearing on ZC 87-04 be continued to the Planning Commission meeting of July 28, 1987. Motion carried unanimously (7-0-0 ). S 87-07 Public hearing to consider the Saunder, J, application of Mr. John Saunder, on behalf of S & W Lumber Co., for approval '`i of a site and architectural application to allow the construction of an - administrative building in an existing lumberyard located on property known as 720 Camden Ave. in an M-1-S (Light Industrial) Zoning District. Commissioner Christ reported that this application was considered by the Site and Architectural Review Committee. The Committee is recommending a continuance, in order that the applicant may address concerns expressed in the Staff Report. Principal Planner Stafford noted that Staff is also recommending a continuance. Chairman Perrine opened the public hearing and invited anyone in the audience to speak for or against this item. M/S: Christ, Walker - That the public hearing on S 87-07 be continued to the Planning Commission meeting of July 28, 1987. Motion carried unanimously (7-0-0). * * * _. i -7- The Commission recessed at 8:50 p.m.; the meeting reconvened at 9:00 p.m. UP 87-11 Public hearing to consider the Cardinalli, O. application of Mr. Orazio Cardinalli for a Use Permit to allow on-and-off sale beer & wine at a delicatessen on property known as 420 Marathon Dr. in a PD (Planned Development/Commercial) Zoning District. Planning Director Kee reviewed the Staff Report of June 23, 1987, noting that Staff is recommending aprpoval, subject to conditions as indicated in the report. Commissioner Dickson asked how many liquor-related uses were in this area. Commissioner Perrine opened the public hearing and invited anyone in the audience to speak on this item. M/S: Stanton, Walker - That the public hearing on UP 87-11 be closed. Motion carried unanimously (7-0-0). M/S: Stanton, Walker - That the Planning Commission adopt Resolution No. 2464 approving UP 87-11, including findings and conditions of approval as indicated in the Staff Report. Motion carried with the following roll call vote: AYES: Commissioners: Kasolas, Stanton, Olszewski, Walker, Perrine NOES: Commissioners: Christ, Dickson ABSENT: Commissioners: None. Discussion Commissioner Christ expressed a concern that this use proposed on-and-off sale beer & wine, thereby allowing a customer to take alcohol off the premises in vehicles. This situation would not be in the best interests of the community. Commissioner Christ noted that he is not opposed to on-sale beer & wine -- just the proposed off-sale. S 87-06 Continued public hearing to consider the Brisker, E. application of Mr. and Mrs. Efim Brisker for approval of a Site and Architectural application to allow the remodel of, and addition to, an existing delicatessen located on property known as 1712 S. Winchester Blvd. in a C-2-S (General Commercial) Zoning District. -8- Commissioner Christ reported that this application was considered by the _ Site and Architectural Review Committee. The applicant has submitted I revised plans this evening which address concerns discussed at the Site ~ i Committee meeting. If the Commission wishes to review these revised plans '-~ this evening, the Committee would recommend that the final revised plan be required to come back to the Site Committee for review. The Committee is recommending approval of the presented revised plan, in concept only, with the final plans to be reviewed by the Site Committee and the Architectural Advisor. Commissioner Dickson asked why these plans were on the board; noting that for the Commission to review these plans, before Staff, was a dangerous precedent. Commissioner Olszewski stated that the intent was to allow the applicant to be able to begin working on the interior of the project. The revisions on the new plans present a change in the roofing elevation. The applicant wishes to speak to the Commission this evening on this matter. Principal Planner Stafford indicated that Staff could support an approval, in concept, with the revised plans to come back to the Site and Architectural Review Committee for approval, upon recommendation of the Architectural Advisor. Chairman Perrine opened the public hearing and invited anyone in the audience to speak for or against this item. __ I Mr. Leo Sheyman, representing the applicant, asked for approval of the plans, in concept, in order that they can begin work on the interior of - the restaurant. Mr. Sheyman noted that the presented revised plans indicate changes as discussed and sketched out with the Architectural Advisor at the Site Committee meeting. M/S: Kasolas, Stanton - That the public hearing on S 87-06 be closed. Motion carried unanimously (7-0-0). M/S: Olszewski, Stanton - That the Planning Commission adopt the findings as provided in the Staff Report of June 23, 1987; and, that the Planning Commission approve S 87-06 subject to conditions indicated in the Staff Report of June 23, 1987, with revised elevations to come back to the Site and Architectural Review Committee for review and approval upon recommendation of the Architectural Advisor. Motion carried with the following roll call vote: AYES: Commissioners: Kasolas, Stanton, Olszewski, Christ, Walker, Dickson, Perrine -- NOES: Commissioners: None ABSENT: Commissioners: None. The Commission requested that the final approved plans for this project come back to them for information only. -9- S 87-08 Public hearing to consider the Iwanaga, D, application of Mr. Douglas Iwanaga for approval of a site and architectural application to allow the construction of a single family residence on property known as 1366 York Ave. in an R-1-9 (Low Density Residential) Zoning District. Commissioner Christ reported that this application was considered by the Site and Architectural Review Committee. The Committee is recommending a continuance, without the applicant's concurrence, in order that revised plans may be reviewed. Principal Planner Stafford noted that Staff is also recommending a continuance. Chairman Perrine opened the public hearing and invited anyone 1n the audience to speak for or against this item. Mr. Douglas Iwanaga, applicant, asked for approval, in concept, noting that he is under a strict time frame for financing the construction. Mr. Iwanaga stated that he has made all the changes as requested by Staff and the Architectural Advisor. The plans now indicate one~type of siding, one door style, and double hung windows. Planning Director Kee noted that the plans presented by the applicant this evening have not been reviewed by the Architectural Advisor. Commissioner Kasolas asked why this matter was before the Commission; and, if it could be approved, subject to Staff approval. Mr. Kee stated that the property is in an R-1-9 (Single Family Residential, minimum lot size 9,000 sq.ft.) Zoning District, which requires a public hearing. M/S: Dickson, Kasolas - That the public hearing on S 87-08 be closed. Motion carried unanimously (7-0-0). M/S: Dickson, Kasolas - That the Planning Commission approve S 87-08, subject to conditions indicated in the Staff Report of June 23, 1987, with revised plans to be approved by the Planning Director upon recommendation of the Architectural Advisor. Motion carried with the following roll call vote: AYES: Commissioners: Kasolas, Stanton, Olszewski, Christ, Walker, Dickson, Perrine NOES: Commissioners: None ABSENT: Commissioners: None. I -10- UP 87-12 Public hearing to consider the Young, M. application of Mr. Mark Young for a Use Permit to allow the establishment of a gymnastics school on property known as ___ 1190 Dell Ave., Unit I, in an M-1-S (Light Industrial) Zoning District. Commissioner Christ reported that this application was considered by the Site and Architectural Review Committee. The Committee is recommending approval, and requested that the applicant provide more than adequate lighting on the building due to its location. Principal Planner Stafford reviewed the Staff Report, noting that Staff is also recommending approval. Chairman Perrine opened the public hearing and invited anyone in the audience to speak for or against this item. Mr. Mark Young, applicant, briefly reviewed the school's curriculum, and presented pictures showing the lighting on the building. Commissioner Christ noted that the presented photographs indicate adequate lighting on the site. M/S: Kasolas, Walker - That the public hearing on UP 87-12 be closed. Motion carried unanimously (7-0-0). M/S: Kasolas, Stanton - That the Planning Commission adopt - Resolution No. 2465, including findings and conditions as indicated in the Staff Report of June 23, 1987, approving UP 87-12. Motion carried with the following roll call vote: AYES: Commissioners: Kasolas, Stanton, Olszewski, Christ, Walker, Dickson, Perrine NOES: Commissioners: None ABSENT: Commissioners: None. The Commission recessed at 10:00 p.m.; the meeting reconvened at 10:10 p.m. UP 87-13 Public hearing to consider the Ciena, M. application of Mr. Mel Ciena for a Use Permit and approval of floor plans to allow the establishment of a restaurant _, and on-sale beer and wine on property i known as 296 E. Campbell Ave. in a PD (Planned Development/Commercial) Zoning - District. -11- Commissioner Christ reported that this item was considered by the Site and Architectural Review Committee. The Committee is recommending approval. Principal Planner Stafford reviewed the Staff Report of June 23, 1987, noting that Staff is recommending approval, subject to conditions indicated in the report. Commissioner Dickson requested information regarding the number of liquor establishments in this area. Chairman Perrine opened the public hearing and invited anyone in the audience to speak on this item.. Commissioner Kasolas noted that the proposed hours (open to midnight) appeared unusual, and requested discussion from the Commission regarding these hours as well as the establishment of another liquor use in the downtown area. Commissioner Olszewski stated that 12:00 midnight would appear out of the ordinary; and, asked about the types of permits required for entertainment. Commissioner Christ indicated that the hours may change once the use and patronage is established. Chairman Perrine noted that the use would complement other food establishments in the downtown area; and, he did not look at the application as an additional liquor use. Commissioner Walker noted that the diversity of the use, i.e. a health food restaurant, might draw more people into the area. Commissioner Dickson expressed a concern that the hours of operation and the beer & wine use did not go with the serving of health food. M/S: Christ, Olszewski - That the Planning Commission adopt Resolution No. 2466, including findings and conditions of approval as indicated in the Staff Report of June 23, 1987, approving UP 87-13. Motion carried with the following roll call vote: AYES: Commissioners: Kasolas, Stanton, Olszewski, Christ, Walker, Perrine NOES: Commissioners: Dickson ABSENT: Commissioners: None. PD 87-03 Public hearing to consider the DiBenedetto, D. application of Mr. Dean DiBenedetto for a Planned Development Permit, plans, elevations, and development schedule to - allow the construction of an industrial building and office on property known as -265 Dillon Ave. in a PD (Planned Development/Industrial) Zoning District. -12- Commissioner Christ reported that this application was considered by the Site and Architectural Review Committee. The applicant has agreed to provide building material and color samples when the landscape plans come back to the Site Committee for review; therefore, approval is being recommended. Principal Planner Stafford reviewed this project for the Commission, noting that Staff is also recommending approval. Commissioner Kasolas suggested a clarification of Condition 6 in future developments, noting that these figures are often changed at a later date. When a property owner wants these square footage restrictions changed, a great deal of Staff time and Commission time is used. Commissioner Kasolas noted that there should be ways to limit this activity through bonds and deed restrictions. Commissioner Christ stated that there should be a policy of not approving changes to the approved building usages. Commissioner Stanton suggested that that the original findings and approved usages be highlighted in reports when a change is requested, and that the applicant be apprised of the difficulty in making a change. Chairman Perrine opened the public hearing and invited anyone in the audience to speak for or against this item. Mr. Dean DiBenedetto, applicant, noted that the presented floor plan will not allow the warehousing space to be converted into office use. M/S: Kasolas, Walker - That the public hearing on PD 87-03 be closed. Motion carried unanimously (7-0-0). M/S: Kasolas, Christ - That the Planning Commission recommend that the City Council accept the Negative Declaration which has been prepared for this project; and, that the Planning Commission adopt Resolution No. 2467, incorporating the findings and conditions of approval as indicated in the Staff Report of June 23, 1987, recommending that the City Council approve this PD 87-03. Motion carried with the following roll call vote: AYES: Commissioners: Kasolas, Stanton, Olszewski, Christ, Walker, Dickson, Perrine NOES: Commissioners: None ABSENT: Commissioners: None. -13- PD 87-02 Public hearing to consider the Lindsay, M. application of Mr. Michael Lindsay for a Planned Development Permit, plans, elevations, and development schedule to allow a house move-on to a rear flag lot known as 1160 Steinway Ave. in a PD (Planned Development/Low Density Residential) Zoning District. Commissioner Christ reported that this application was considered by the Site and Architectural Review Committee. The Site Committee is recommending approval. Principal Planner Stafford reviewed the Staff Report of June 23, 1987, noting that Staff is also recommending approval. City Attorney Seligmann noted that a communication received from Grace Kubota Ybarra (included in Commission's packet), relating to this item, appears to be a private matter, and of no concern to the Planning Commission. Chairman Perrine opened the public hearing and invited anyone in the audience to speak for or against this item. Mr. Neil Phenis, previous owner of this property, stated that no one asked for approval to move this house on and it did not seem right. He was told that he had to get approval from the neighbors before he could move a house on. Mr. Terry Kensley, 1197 Audrey Ave., requested assurance that the subject property will be considered as 19,000 sq.ft., and undivisible in that it is under 20,000 sq.ft. Mr. Stafford indicated that it is Staff's understanding that the creation of more than one flag lot would not be allowable under the Zoning Ordinance, nor could the subject 19,000 sq.ft. lot be subdivided under the current regulations. Dir. Michael Lindsay, applicant, stated that a final subdivision map must be filed prior to obtaining a building permit; and, any adjustment of property lines will not affect his proposal. M/S: Kasolas, Walker - That the public hearing on PD 87-02 be closed. Motion carried unanimously (7-0-0). M/S: Kasolas, Stanton - That the Planning Commission adopt Resolution No. 2468, incorporating findings and conditions of approval as indicated in Staff Report of June 23, 1987, recommending that the City Council approve PD 87-02. Motion carried with the following roll call vote: AYES: Commissioners: Kasolas, Stanton, Olszewski, Christ, Walker, Dickson, Perrine NOES: Commissioners: None ABSENT: Commissioners: None. -14- SA 87-14 Continued signing request - 51 E. Byyant, D. Campbell Ave. - Fidelity National Title Co. - Interim Planned Development/ Historic Overlay Zoning District. Commissioner Christ reported that this applica*_ion was considered by the Site and Architectural Review Committee. The Site Committee is of the opinion that the sign supports should incorporate more of the building design; and, the Committee is recommending a continuance in that this matter has not been considered by the Historic Preservation Board. Discussion ensued regarding whether or not this type of application must be referred to the Historic Preservation Board; if the Council will be filling vacancies on the Board; and, if it is appropriate for the Commission to take action on this sign matter this evening. Planning Director Kee indicated that it would be appropriate for the Commission to act on this sign issue this evening. Principal Planner Stafford reviewed the Staff Report of June 23, 1987, noting that Staff would recommend a continuance. Commissioner Kasolas stated that the item has been previously continued in order that a signing program could be established; and, the issue should be moved along at this time. Mr. Dan Bryant, applicant, reviewed the signing proposal, noting that the ~~ signposts will be metal with stucco matching the building; and, only the large tenants would be identified on the free-standing signs. - Commissioner Christ noted that the Architectural Advisor had a strong concern about the signing materials and that more should be done to incorporate more of the building's design into the sign's design. Commissioner Olszewski asked when the existing temporary signs are to be removed. Mr. Bryant stated that he would like to leave the temporary signs up for another 45 days. M/S: Dickson, Walker - That the Planning Commission approve SA 87-14, as presented, with the finding that the proposed signing is compatible with the surrounding development. Motion carried unanimously (7-0-0). PD 85-06 Referral of request of Mr. Larry Hester Hester, L. for a change in building materials - 86 Railway Ave. - Interim Planned - Development/industrial Zoning District. -15- Commissioner Christ reported that this application was considered by the Site and Architectural Review Committee. The Committee is recommending denial. Principal Planner Stafford reviewed the Staff Report of June 23, 1987, noting that Staff is also recommending denial of the applicant's request. Mr. Larry Hester, applicant, explained his building, and presented a petition persons. Mr. Hester explained that he for the lower elevation for structural Building Department, and did not reali was also needed. his request, showed photographs of from neighbors and interested changed from wpod frame to block reasons, at the request of the ze that Planning Commission approve Commissioner Christ noted that the originally presented plans showed block for this elevaiton; that the Site Committee spent a great deal of time to get the elevation changed to stucco; and, that the applicant indicated during the last Site Committee meeting that he would be willing to paint to split faced block to match the building. Mr. Hester stated that he was still willing to paint the splitfaced block; however, in his opinion the building looks good with the contrast provided by the block. Commissioner Olszewski expressed a concern with the confusion caused by what the Building Department told the applicant. Mr. Hester clarified that the Building Department did not tell him not to stucco, just to use block; and, he chose the splitfaced block, rather than plain block. Commissioner Walker expressed his disappointment that the building was already completed, and that the plans had not been adhered to. Commissioner Christ stated that he was in agreement with the Architectural Advisor that stucco would have been better; however, he did not have a problem with the splitfaced block. M/S: Kasolas, Stanton - That the Planning Commission approve the applicant's request to change the building materials from stucco to splitfaced block; that the splitfaced block remain it's natural color; and, that the finding be made that the splitfaced block is architecturally compatible with the remainder of the structure. Motion carried unanimously (7-0-0). -16- OTHER ITEMS BROUGHT UP BY COMMISSIONERS Chairman Perrine requested that the matter of Subcommittee Reports be agendized for the meeting of July 14, 1987. ~_ ADJOURNMENT There being no further business, the meeting was adjourned at 11:30 p.m. APPROVED: Jay Perrine Chairman ATTEST: Arthur A. Kee Secretary RECORDED: Linda A. Dennis Recording Secretary CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL - FILE ~ S 87-06 SITE ADDRESS: 1712 S. WINCHESTER BLVD. APPLICANT: BRISKER, E. PC MTG DATE: 6-23-87 The applicant is hereby notified, as part of this application, that he/she is required to meet the following conditions in accordance with the Ordinances of the City of Campbell and the Laws of the State of California. Additionally, the applicant is hereby notified that he/she is required to comply with all applicable Codes or Ordinances of the City of Campbell and the State of California which pertain to this development and are not herein specified. 1. Revised elevations and site plan to be submitted to the Planning Department and approved by the Planning Director upon recommendation of the Architectural Advisor prior to application for a building permit. 2. Property to be fenced and landscaped as indicated and/or added in red on the plans. Landscaping and fencing shall be maintained in accordance with the approved plans. 3. Landscaping plan indicating type and size of plant material, and location of irrigation system to be submitted to the Planning Department and approved by the Site and Architectural Review Committee and/or Planning Commission prior to issuance of a building permit. 4. Applicant to either (1) post a faithful performance bond in the amount of 52,000 to insure landscaping, fencing, and striping of parking areas within 3 months of completion of construction; or (2) file written agreement to complete landscaping, fencing, and striping of parking areas. Bond or agreement to be filed with the Planning Department prior to application for a building permit. 5. Applicant to submit a letter to the Planning Department, satisfactory to the City Attorney, prior to application for building permit, limiting the use of the property as follows: 30 seats maximum, including outside seating. 6. All mechanical equipment on roofs and all utility meters to be screened as approved by the Planning Director. 7. All parking and driveway areas to be developed in compliance with Chapter 21.50 of the Campbell Municipal Code. All parking spaces to be provided with appropriate concrete curbs or bumper guards. 8. Plans submitted to the Building Department for plan check shall indicate clearly the location of all connections for underground utilities including water, sewer, electric, telephone and television cables, etc. CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL - FILE ~ S 87-06 SITE ADDRESS: 1712 S. WINCHESTER BLVD. APPLICANT: BRISKER, E. PC MTG DATE: 6-23-87 PAGE 2 9. Sign application to be submitted in accordance with provisions of the Sign Ordinance for all signs. No sign to be installed until application is approved and permit issued by Planning and Building Departments (Section 21.68.030 of the Campbell Municipal Code). 10. Ordinance No. 782 of the Campbell Municipal Code stipulates that any contract for the collection and disposal of refuse, garbage, wet garbage and rubbish produced within the limits of the City of Campbell shall be made with Green Valley Disposal Company. This requirement applies to all single-family dwellings, multiple apartment units, to all commercial, business, industrial, manufacturing, and construction establishments. 11. Trash container(s) of a size and quantity necessary to serve the development shall be located in area(s) approved by the Fire Department. Unless otherwise noted, enclosure(s) shall consist of a concrete floor surrounded by a solid wall or fence and have self-closing doors of a size specified by the Fire Department. All enclosures to be constructed at grade level and have a level area adjacent to the trash enclosure area to service these containers. 12. Applicant shall comply with all appropriate State and City requirements for the handicapped. ~`~ BUILDING DEPARTMENT _____ 13. Retaining walls at property lines are limited to a height of 15 inches if constructed of wood. PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT 14. Obtain an excavation permit, post surety, and pay fees to remove existing driveways, construct new City-standard driveway approach and any other work on frontage as required by City Engineer. FIRE DEPARTMENT 15. Fire protection system in the kitchen should be modified as needed to cover new appliances. 16. Wood shingles used on front canopy should have a minimum of a Class C rating per UBC requirements. PLANNING DEPARTMENT 17. Total seating not to exceed 30 seats. CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL - FILE ~ S 67-08 SITE ADDRESS: 1366 YORK AVE. APPLICANT: IWANAGA, D. PC t4TG DATE: 6-23-87 The applicant is hereby notified, as part of this application, that he/she is required to meet the following conditions in accordance with the Ordinances of the City of Campbell and the Laws of the State of California. Additionally, the applicant is hereby notified that he/she is required to comply with all applicable Codes or Ordinances of the City of Campbell and the State of California which pertain to this development and are not herein specified. 1. Revised elevations and/or site plan to be submitted to the Planning Department and approved by the Planning Director upon recommendation of the Architectural Advisor prior to application for a building permit. 2. Property to be fenced and landscaped as indicated and/or added in red on the plans. Landscaping and fencing shall be maintained in accordance with the approved plans. 3. Fencing plan indicating location and design details of fencing to be submitted to the Planning Department and approved by the Planning Director prior to issuance of a building permit. 4. All parking and driveway areas to be developed in compliance with Chapter 21.50 of the Campbell Municipal Code. All parking spaces to be provided with appropriate concrete curbs or bumper guards. 5. Underground utilities to be provided as required by Section 20.16.070 of the Campbell Municipal Code. 6. Plans submitted to the Building Department for plan check shall indicate clearly the location of all connections for underground utilities including water, sewer, electric, telephone and television cables, etc. 7. Ordinance No. 782 of the Campbell Municipal Code stipulates that any contract for the collection and disposal of refuse, garbage, wet. garbage and rubbish produced within the limits of the City of Campbell shall be made with Green Valley Disposal Company., This requirement applies to all single-family dwellings, multiple apartment units, to all commercial, business, industrial, manufacturing, and construction establishments. 8. Noise levels for the interior of residential units shall comply with minimum State (Title 25) and local standards as indicated in the Noise Element of the Campbell General Plan. 9. The applicant is hereby notified that the property is to be maintained free of any combustible trash, debris and weeds, until the time that actual construction commences. All existing structures shall be secured by having windows boarded up and doors sealed shut, or be demolished or removed from the property. Sect. 11.201 & 11.414, 1979 Ed. Uniform Fire Code. CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL - FILE ~ S 87-08 SITE ADDRESS: 1366 YORK AVE. APPLICANT: IWANAGA, D. PC MTG DATE: 6-23-87 PAGE 2. BUILDING DEPARTMENT 10. Retaining walls at property lines are limited to a height of 15 inches if constructed of wood. PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT 11. Pay storm drain area fee of 5265.00. 12. Execute an agreement to install street improvements at some future time. FIRE DEPARTMENT No comments at this time.