PC Min 04/28/1987PLANNING COMMISSION
CITY OF CAMPBELL, CALIFORNIA
7:30 PM MINUTES APRIL 28, 1987
The Planning Commission of the City of Campbell convened this day in
regular session at the regular meeting place, the Council Chambers of City
Hall, 70 N. First St., Campbell, California.
ROLL CALL
Present Commissioners: Kasolas, Stanton,
Olszewski, Christ, Walker, Dickson,
Perrine; Principal Planner Phil
Stafford, Planner II Tim Haley,
Engineering Manager Bill Helms, City
Attorney Bill Seligmann, Recording
Secretary Linda Dennis.
Absent Planning Director A. A. Kee.
APPROVAL OF MINUTES
M/S: Dickson, Christ - That the Planning Commission minutes of
the meeting of April 14, 1987, be
approved as submitted. Motion carried
unanimously.
COMMUNICATIONS
Mr. Stafford noted that communications received pertained to specific
items on the agenda and would be discussed at that time.
Mr. Stafford also noted that a status report regarding 900 E. Hamilton
Ave. has been distributed to the Commission as an information item. The
Commission may note & file this report, or agendize it for discussion at a
future meeting.
ORAL REQUESTS
Chairman Perrine asked if there was anyone in the audience who wished to
address the Commission on an issue that was not on the agenda. There
being no one, the Chairman proceeded with the set agenda.
ARCHITECTURAL APPROVALS
MM 87-02 Continued application of Mr. George
Barrows, G. Barrows for approval of a minor
modification to allow the construction
of a 450 sq.ft. building addition and
the placement of three portable storage
containers on property known as 1266
Whiteoaks Rd. in an M-1-S (Light
Industrial Zoning District.
-2-
Commissioner Christ reported that this application was considered by the
Site and Architectural Review Committee. The request for the building
addition has been removed. The Site Committee is recommending approval of
the cargo containers, as redlined. The redlining of the presented plans
includes the up-grading of landscaping, the designation of parking spaces,
and a fence separating the parking area from the equipment storage area.
Principal Planner Stafford indicated that Staff is in concurrence with the
Site Committee's recommendation for approval as redlined.
Commissioner Kasolas expressed a concern with the outside display areas,
noting that it has been the policy to have businesses operate within the
buildings, and with the aesthetic appearance of this site. Commissioner
Kasolas commented regarding the issue of uniformity throughout the
community, and the fairness to others in the community that are not
allowed to have outside storage.
Discussion ensued regarding the designation of the parking spaces on the
site; the portion of the site to be used for storage of the rental
equipment; the proposed wrought-iron fence] and, the landscaping.
Commissioner Christ noted that nothing will be displayed along Whiteoaks
Rd.; and, the applicant has agreed to work with the City to improve the
appearance of the site.
Mr. Stafford noted that outside storage is an allowed use in the M-1-S
(Light Industrial) Zoning District if approved by the Planning Commission.
Commissioner Olszewski expressed a concern that the conditions of approval
did not specify that there was to be no display of equipment in front of
the building.
City Attorney Seligmann stated that this issue is addressed with the
approval of a site plan. Anything not shown on the site plan would result
in a violation of the approval and subject to enforcement action.
Mr. Haley indicated that the plans also include redlining for a 20'
driveway. The landscaping provided on the site is approximately 48, which
is less than would currently be required for industrial developments. The
applicant's current request is for cargo storage containers and a wider
range of rental equipment. Staff is of the opinion that it would be
unreasonable to ask for additional landscaping based on this type of
tequest. The Planning Commission may, however, require additional
landscaping.
Commissioner Kasolas stated that he saw the use as being expanded, but the
amenities being provided by the applicant were not expanded. He felt that
this was a policy decision to be made by the Commission.
Commissioner Dickson did not see where the use was being intensified. He
thought that the use was being made better, with smaller equipment being
offered, rather than the large U-Haul items.
-3-
M/S: Olszewski, Walker - That the Planning Commission adopt the
attached findings, and approve MM 87-02
as redlined, subject to conditions as
indicated in the Staff Report dated
April 28, 1987. Motion carried
unanimously (7-0-0).
PUBLIC HEARINGS
GP 87-01 Continued public hearing to consider a
City-initiated City-initiated proposal to add an Air
Quality element to the General Plan; or,
to add Air Quality goals and policies to
existing General Plan elements.
Principal Planner Stafford reviewed the Staff Report of April 28, 1987,
noting that Staff has published a display ad in the San Jose Mercury News,
and notified the Campbell Chamber of Commerce, the Building Industry
Association, and an interested citizen, as per the directive of the
Commission at it's meeting of March 24, 1987.
Mr. Stafford continued with regard to the Air Quality District's second
recommendation (quantification of estimated levels of pollution), staff
recommends that such quantification be made the burden of a developer as
part of an EIR for a specific proposal. This quantification could then be
based on an estimated level of pollution, or on actual measurement of air
___.- samples in the area - at the City's option.
In summary, the draft Air Quality Element before the Commission at this
time will establish certain goals, objectives and policies of the City
regarding air pollution. By having an adopted Air Quality Element, these
goals, objectives and policies will be readily available to persons
wishing to develop projects in the City. The draft also emphasizes that
the responsibility for air quality monitoring and enforcement of State and
Federal air quality standards remains with the Bay Area Air Quality
Management District, and the State Air Resources Board.
Chairman Perrine opened the public hearing and invited anyone in the
audience to speak for or against this item.
Mr. Irwin Mussman, Senior Planner from the Bay Area Air Quality District
(BAAQD), appeared before the Commission to discuss the Air Quality Element
and to answer questions. Mr. Mussman spoke at length regarding the
response to the request for consideration of an Air Quality Element from
other cities; air quality monitoring activities fn the area; the levels of
carbon monoxide at the Bascom & Hamilton intersection; the poor ozone
quality in Los Gatos as a result of it's geographical location; the need
to support reduction in automobile usage and support mass transit and
alternative transportation systems; and, the organization of the BAAQD and
it's powers.
-4-
Commissioner Stanton asked about the impact of training fires on the air
quality. _,
Mr. Hussman indicated that he would respond to Staff with this
information.
Commissioner Olszewski expressed his concern with energy to waste
facilities being proposed in communities to the north of this area, and
the impact of these facilities on air quality.
Mr. Hussman noted that most energy facilities must have permits from
BAAQD; and, a facility such as this would require computer modeling to
indicate where the contaminates will go.
Commissioner Dickson asked if the BAAQD issued air quality alerts.
Commissioner Dickson asked Mr. Hussman how this element could be used to
the City's advantage, noting that there should be a way to warn people
when the air quality becomes a health issue.
Mr. Hussman explained measurements used for alerts, and noted that slower
traffic results in a higher level of carbon monoxide, thereby causing the
problems which have been evident at Hamilton & Bascom. There is a warning
system through BAAQD. From a planning standpoint, Mr. Hussman continued,
the Commission can address the levels of intensity of development projects
that might cause a lot of traffic, and try to have the develop provide
other transportation services. This concern can be address in the
environmental impact report. "-~
Commissioner Kasolas noted that a previous Staff Report referred to a
telephone conversation with a Dr. Gene Leong. Dr. Leong indicated his
support for the draft air quality element, however, he indicated the City
should not use the element as a tool for restricting development. What
type of mitigation measures would this result in, and what can Campbell do
on it's own to help air quality control?
Mr. Hussman responded that Campbell cannot do everything - but Campbell
can do more than every other city has been doing by working over a period
of time to alleviate intensity at certain intersections; begin to focus on
problems that might have some mitigations; support regional approaches.
Commissioner Kasolas asked if Campbell
will this element affect Campbell. By
General Plan, we will be requiring Sta
issue each .time there is a development
expensive in terms of time and money.
to warrant this expense.
adds an Air Quality Element, how
adding another element to the
Ef and community to address this
request. This is obviously
Is the problem significant enough
Mr. Mussmann responded that it is his belief that there are things that
cities and counties (in the absence of a strong regional government) can
do to make a difference; i.e. cities can pass transportation systems
management rules.
-5-
Commissioner Kasolas stated that what is being proposed is a lofty ideal
which really may accomplish nothing, noting that there are really only one
or two corners, within several square miles, that have potentially
significant air quality problems.
Commissioner Walker asked if BAAQD was available to do air quality testing
at the request of a community.
Mr. Mussman indicated that testing is done around the area with no
specific agenda; and, BAAQD would certainly consider any requests coming
from a city.
Commissioner Kasolas felt that it was obvious that the only way air
quality can be addressed is on a regional basis, or with several cities
banding together. He asked if more impact might be gained if we were to
suggest that surrounding communities work together in doing something.
Commissioner Kasolas Qxpressed a concern with uniformity throughout the
valley.
Mr. Mussman responded that this was a fine idea, however, it would not be
easy to do. BAAQD would assist to the extent that it could with this type
of effort.
Chairman Perrine asked about the organization of the BAAQD; and, projected
mitigation measures from indirect sources.
Mr. Mussman explained that funding comes from local cities, and from fees
levied against industry. Projected mitigation measures will result from
__ traffic management -- trying to get people to double up in their vehicles
for commutes to work, or diverting traffic away from peak traffic hours.
M/S: Olszewski, Christ - That the public hearing on GP 87-01 be
closed. Motion carried unanimously
(7-0-0?.
Commissioner Kasolas stated that it might be appropriate for Campbell to
take a leadership role and contact neighboring communities to address this
issue with a uniform plan that would be significant county-wide.
Commissioner Kasolas added that the construction of Hwy 85 may solve some
of the problems.
Commissioner Christ stated that other cities may have different
requirements because of specific conditions. There definitely needs to be
cooperation between cities to solve the problems; however, adding this
element to the General Plan would be an initial step. Commissioner
Christ agreed that this element should not be used to stop development,
except where the development is a direct polluter; however, this issue
should be looked at even without an element.
-6-
Commissioner Dickson noted that Staff has tried to
Kasolas' suggestion in the draft element. Measure;
local and regional basis, and getting this element
well for the City. Commissioner Dickson continued
this to look like a way of controlling development
helping to improve the air quality in the area.
address Commissioner
s must be taken at a
on the record shows
that he did not want
- it is strictly for
Commissioner Olszewski stated that it is apparent that air quality is a
regional problem, illustrated by the ozone and carbon monoxide levels in
this area and other bay areas. Campbell is in a direct line to receive
air flows from as far away as Richmond. The ability of other communities
to lessen our air quality is a real concern, and this element is an
opportunity to make a statement that Campbell wishes to do something to
improve the situation. Commissioner Olszewski thought that this element
should be adopted, and that Campbell should demand that other cities
consider adopting similar elements (particularly Union City and Fremont,
where waste to energy facilites are being considered).
Commissioner Kasolas asked if an environmental impact report would have
aided in the decision-making process for this issue.
Mr. Stafford responded that, in Staff's opinion, an EIR would not have
brought out anything that-has not already been discussed. Staff took the
position that the Air Quality Element, if adopted, will require more
detailed review of the environmental impacts of a project requiring an
EIR. In the Staff's opinion, the Air Quality Element qualified for a
Negative Declaration.
M/S: Olszewski, Walker -
That the Planning Commission adopt
Resolution No. 2454 recommending that
the City Council: (1) Accept the
Negative Declaration which has been
prepared for GP 87-01; (2) Accept the
findings attached hereto; and (3) Adopt
the Draft Air Quality Element to the
General Plan. Motion carried by the
following roll call vote:
Discussion on motion
Commissioner Kasolas stated that he would not be voting in favor of the
motion, noting the 'Appendix" as the reason for his negative vote.
Vote on motion
AYES: Commissioners: Olszewski, Chrfst, Walker, Dickson, Perrine
NOES: Commissioners: Kasolas, Stanton
ABSENT: Commissioners: None.
t
-7-
The Commission recessed at 8:55 p.m.; the meeting reconvened at 9:05 p.m.
•
PD 87-01 Public hearing to consider the applica-
Bonnett, R. tion of Mr. Robert Bonnett for approval
of plans, elevations, and development
schedule to allow a commercial office
development on property known as 145
Dillon Ave. in a PD (Planned
Development/Industrial) Zoning District.
Commissioner Christ reported that this application was considered by the
Site and Architectural Review Committee. The Committee is recommending a
continuance to May 26, 1987, with the applicant's concurrence.
Principal Planner Stafford noted that Staff is in agreement with this
recommendation.
Chairman Perrine opened the public hearing and invited anyone in the
audience to speak for or against this item.
Mr. Robert Bonnett, applicant, appeared before the Commission to review
his application. Mr. Bonnett stated that there is no parking problem for
his development because the tenants are usually. not there; he is asking
the City to assist him in his endeavors; this development is a start-up
community of small offices, providing a needed environment in the
community; and, the site is well-maintained. Mr. Bonnett noted that he is
willing to participate in a parking district.
Commissioner Olszewski indicated that there was discussion in the Site
Review Committee meeting about the applicant trying to acquire parking
near his site; in particular, some property owned by Southern Pacific
Railroad. This effort seems to be entangled in bureaucracy. Commissioner
Olszewski asked if Staff could explain this situation.
Engineering Manager Helms explained that the area under discussion is
currently owned by Southern Pacific, and the City has been in contact with
this agency to see if that property might be for sale or lease. No
response has been forthcoming at this time. Apparently, it is not a
simple matter, which has been further complicated by the perspective
merger of Southern Pacific with Sante Fe Railroad. Additionally, it has
not been made clear by the Council, at this point, what use this area
would be put to if it were available for sale or lease. One other
complication is the possibility of a light-rail facility along this
corridor.
Commissioner Kasolas noted that the Commission recently approved an
ambulance service in a portion of this development, and he asked why it
was not brought to the Commission's attention that a problems existed at
that time.
-8-
Mr. Stafford reported that the ambulance service use was brought before
the Commission as part of a code enforcement action. Staff did advise the
Commission at that time that there were problems with the site, as a
whole, and that there was legal action being taken against the applicant.
Staff considered the ambulance use appropriate because the original
Planned Development application for this property established office use
as acceptable.
Commissioner Christ noted that the Site Review Committee felt there was a
distinct possibility of working out the problems with this site, therefore
the recommendation for a continuance.
Commissioner Dickson asked if there have been parking complaints filed for
that particular area.
Mr. Stafford indicated that the Planning Staff has had no complaints.
Planner II Haley explained the existing parking on the site and in the
immediate area.
Commissioner Dickson asked if the subject property is within the
Redevelopment Area.
Mr. Stafford noted that the site is in the Redevelopment Area, however, it
is not within the Downtown Interim Zoning area.
M/S: Olszewski, Christ - That the public hearing on PD 87-01 be
continued to the Planning Commission
meeting of May 26, 1987. Motion carried
unanimously (7-0-0).
r
ZC 87-02 Public hearing to consider the applica-
Anderson, K. tion of Mr. Kurt Anderson for a zone
change from R-M-S (Multiple Family
Residential) to PD (Planned
Development/Low-Medium Density
Residential); and, the approval of
plans, elevations, and development
schedule to allow the construction of 3
townhomes on property known as 235 N.
Third St.
Commissioner Christ reported that this application was considered by the
Site and Architectural Review Committee. Discussion in the meeting
centered on concerns expressed in the Staff Report. The applicant is
addressing these concerns; therefore, a continuance to May 12, 1987, with
the applicant's concurrence, is being recommended.
Principal Planner Stafford indicated that Staff is in agreement with the ,_
recommendation for continuance.
-9-
Chairman Perrine opened the public hearing and invited anyone in the
audience to speak for or against this item.
M/S: Stanton, Dickson - That the public hearing on ZC 87-02 be
continued to the Planning Commission
meeting of May 12, 1987. Motion carried
unanimously (7-0-0).
UP 87-08 Public hearing to consider the applica-
Kong, A. cation of Mr. Andrew Kong for approval
of a Use Permit to allow on-sale beer
and wine in an existing Chinese
restaurant on property known as 845 S.
San Tomas Aquino Rd. in a C-1-S
(Neighborhood Commercial) Zoning
District.
Principal Planner Stafford reviewed the application, noting that Staff is
of the opinion that on-sale beer and wine is typically provided with a
restaurant operation; therefore, approval is being recommended.
Chairman Perrine opened the public hearing and invited anyone in the
audience to speak for or against this item.
Commissioner Kasolas asked if it might be appropriate to restrict the
hours of operation, in that this use is adjacent to residential.
Mr. Stan Yem, representing Mr. Kong, noted that the area is quiet after 10
p.m.; and, the previous use at this location was a chinese restaurant,
without beer b wine.
M/S: Kasolas, Christ -
M/S: Kasolas, Christ -
That the public hearing on UP 87-08 be
closed. Motion carried unanimously
(7-0-0).
That the Planning Commission adopt
Resolution No. 2455, including findings
and conditions indicated in the Staff
Report dated April 28, 1987, approving
UP 87-08. Said approval would include
the hours of operation being limited as
follows: Sunday through Thursday - 6
a.m. to 10 p.m.; Friday & Saturday - 6
a.m. to 11 p.m.; and the Eves of all
Holidays - 6 a.m. to 11 p.m. Motion
carried with the following roll call
vote:
Discussion on motion
-10-
Commissioner Dickson stated that he would be opposing the motion, in that
there are already several other uses in the immediate vicinity which sell
alcohol. There is a child care facility, as well as a church, near this
location. Commissioner Dickson was of the opinion that this area is
saturated with businesses providing alcohol sales.
Vote on motion
AYES: Commissioners: Kasolas, Stanton, Olszewski, Christ,
Walker, Perrine
NOES: Commissioners: Dickson
ABSENT: Commissioners: None.
UP 87-09 Public hearing to consider the applica-
Giancola, M. tion of Mr. Mike Giancola for approval
of a Use Permit to allow the
construction of an additional living
unit and detached garage on property
known as 1287 Munro Ave. in an R-1-9
(Single Family Residnetial - 9,000
sq.ft. minimum lot size) Zoning
District.
Commissioner Christ reported that this application was considered by the
Site and Architectural Review Committee. The applicant was not present at
the meeting; however, the applicant is in concurrence with the
recommendation for a continuance to May 12, 1987.
Principal Planner Stafford noted that Staff is also in agreement with a
recommendation for continuance.
Commissioner Kasolas asked if it was appropriate, in these cases, to look
at the overall development to make sure that the existing structure is in
conformity and meets the architectural standards, etc.
Mr. Stafford responded that Staff reviews the site for illegal additions
or accessory structures which may have been built without permits. In
terms of the architectural standards of a single family residence, it has
not been the policy of the Commission to review these; however, the policy
could be changed.
Commissioner Kasolas continued that if someone comes through the process,
under the Use Permit procedure, to add a structure, and does not have a
home that would meet the standard, this Commission could look at requiring
the existing structure to be brought up to standard.
-11-
Mr. Stafford noted that there are a number of buildings, which were built
under the County's jurisdiction, that have lesser setbacks than Campbell
currently requires. Staff's position is that if it was constructed
legally in the County, we would consider it legal in the City.
Commissioner Kasolas asked that photographs of the existing structures and
site be provided for these types of applications.
Commissioner Christ noted that the Architectural Advisor does review the
existing structure for architectural compatibility for the proposed
structure, therefore, this issue is reviewed by the Site and Architectural
Review Committee.
Chairman Perrine opened the public hearing and invited anyone in the
audience to speak for or against this item.
M/S: Christ, Walker - That the public hearing on UP 87-09 be
continued to the Planning Commission
meeting of May 12, 1987. Motion carried
unanimously (7-0-0)
* .
UP 87-10 Public hearing to consider the applica-
Scott, J. tion of Mr. John Scott for approval of a
Use Permit to allow the establishment of
a medical massage school in a 900 sq.ft.
portion of the Campbell Plaza Shopping
Center, located on property known as
2509 S. Winchester Blvd. in a C-2-S
(General Commercial) Zoning District.
Principal Planner Stafford reviewed the application, noting that Staff is
of the opinion that the operation of a massage school itself would not be
detrimental to the neighborhood or the City. However, anytime a massage
use is considered, concerns of illicit activity must be considered. This
type of massage school should not cause problems; however, because a Use
Permit goes with the land, and not with the current owner or applicant,
the City must be cautious and try to prevent possible future problems.
Staff has recommended a number of conditions to assure that the approved
activities are very clearly defined and limited.
Commissioner Christ asked if the students must also be licensed.
Mr. Stafford indicated that this issue is determined by the Police
Department.
Chairman Perrine opened the public hearing and invited anyone in the
audience to speak for or against this item.
-12-
Mr. John Scott, applicant, appeared to answer questions regarding his
application. Responding to questions from the Commission, Mr. Scott
indicated that he has been operating a massage school since 1984. This
school is located just outside Campbell's city limits, on Whiteoaks Ave.
Mr. Scott's intention is to upgrade the massage profession; 98$ of the
school's business is by doctor's prescription; demonstrations for training
purposes are 'hands-on•, with students working only with each other;
students do not work on the public; the school works with medical doctors,
and has a physical therapist on the staff. The school does not have any
type of medical degree; instructors have 5-14 years of experience, with
training through state recognized schools; 100 hours of training is
required for a certificate. The general public is admitted, without a
doctor's prescription, for the purpose of medical/therapeutic massage
only. Mr. Scott further explained the certification process; and, the
types of ailments treated. Responding to a question regarding the
proposed floor plan for the location, and how it would function with the
number of classes and treatment rooms being proposed, Mr. Scott noted that
the floor plan provided is that of the existing building. A detailed
floor plan, accommodating the massage school, is being designed by a
contractor, and will be provided to the Building Department.
Commissioner Dickson indicated that a floor plan for this specific request
was essential.
Commissioner Kasolas noted that the request is for a Use Permit to
determine if the massage school is an appropriate use at this location.
The Commission has not previously required a specific floor plan for this
type of request.
Commissioner Dickson felt that if there is a need to make the
determination that this use is not detrimental to the health, safety, and
welfare of the community, a floor plan should be provided showing how the
operation will function.
Mr. Stafford indicated that Staff concurs with Commissioner Kasolas'
understanding that a detailed floor plan will be required by the Police
Department when the application is filed for appropriate permits.
Chairman Perrine asked what means does the City have to correct a
situation, should an operation such as this not be legitimate.
Commissioner Olszewski asked if the Commission has the authority to impose
additional review periods, if determined necessary.
Mr. Stafford responded that the Police Department has the authority to
immediately close down any operation it suspects as being illegitimate;
and, certainly the Commission has the authority to impose additional
review periods.
M/S: Kasolas, Oklszewski - That the public hearing on UP 87-10 be
closed. Motion carried unanimously -,
(7-0-0).
-13-
M/S: Kasolas, Walker -
That the Planning Commission adopt
Resolution No. 2456, incorporating the
findings indicated in the Staff Report
of April 28, 1987, approving UP 87-10
subject to conditions of approval as
indicated in the Staff Report; and, with
the added condition that 'Additional
review periods may be stipulated as
deemed appropriate.' Motion carries
with the following roll call vote:
Discussion on motion
Commissioner Dickson stated that he would be opposing the motion. He
expressed concern with the lack of definitions for terminology discussed
(ie. physical therapist), and the lack of a specific floor plan, which he
felt is necessary to make a determination required under the Use Permit
process.
Commissioner Christ agreed with Commissioner Dickson regarding the floor
plan, noting that it should be provided in the interest of .public safety
and privacy. Commissioner Christ also noted that he did not understand
how a school could be open to the general public, and he was not sure how
this would work. Commissioner Christ stated that he was not in total
opposition to this use; however, he would prefer more detail and a floor
plan.
Commissioner Olszewski stated that he did not recall looking into the
__ inner workings of businesses in the past - not even housing developments.
Commissioner Olszewski continued that he does, however, see massage as a
medical operation and that through the testimony given this .evening
regarding the licensing and credential program, it is clear what type of
operation this is; therefore, he is speaking in favor of the motion.
Commissioner Kasolas stated that it is true that normally a site plan is
provided, however, not for the interior. What is being asked is to make a
determination that a use is allowable at this location. It is not the
Commission's job to police situations. The added condition allows for an
open-ended review process; and, the fact that the school is located in a
shopping center polices the situation.
Commissioner Christ stated that he is looking at the request as three uses
-- school, medical therapy, and therapy to the general public -- and, he
is not sure how this will work, especially all at the same time.
Commissioner Walker stated that he is in favor of the motion, noting that
this school has been in operation nearby for some time.
Vote on motion
AYES: Commissioners: Kasolas, Stanton, Olszewski, Walker, Perrine
NOES: Commissioners: Christ, Dickson
ABSENT: Commissioners: None.
* * :
-14-
SA 87-09 Continued signing request - 1360 White-
Billboard Co. oaks Rd. - White Oaks Mercedes - M-1-S
(Light Industrial) Zoning District.
Commissioner Christ reported that this application was considered by the
Site and Architectural Review Committee. The Committee is recommending a
continaunce to the meeting of May 26, 1986, in that revised plans have not
been submitted at this time.
Principal Planner Stafford noted that Staff is in agreement with this
recommendation.
M/S: Stanton, Christ - That SA 87-09 be continued to the
Planning Commission meeting of May 26,
1987. Motion carried unanimously
t7-0-0).
* # •
MM 87-04 Request of Mr. O. J. Mitchell to convert
Mitchell, O. warehouse/industrial space to
automotive-type use in an existing
building located at 1360 Whiteoaks Rd.
in an M-1-S (Light Industrila) Zoning
District. _
Commissioner Christ reported that this application was considered by the
Site and Architectural Review Committee. The Committee is recommending a
continuance, with the applicant's concurrence, to the meeting of May 26,
1987.
Principal Planner Staff noted that Staff is in agreement with this
continuance.
M/S: Kasolas, Stanton -
Information Only
That MM 87-04 be continued to the
Planning Commission meeting of May 26,
1987. Motion carried unanimously
(7-0-0).
: * t
Study Session topics.
It was the consensus of the Commission that the Chairman work with Staff
on a plan for setting study sessions, and that the matter be agendized for
the meeting of May 12, 1987.
Commissioner Olszewski requested that the matter of community identity,
specifically 'gateways', be added to the list.
-15-
There was brief discussion regarding the appropriateness of quarterly
study sessions, including the amount of Staff time which would be
required.
t
1s T1.T(1i1T7NMRNT
There being no further business, the
meeting was adjourned at 10:40 p.m.
APPROVED: Jay Perrine
Chairman
ATTEST: Arthur A. Kee
Secretary
RECORDED: Linda A. Dennis
Recording Secretary
RECOMMENDED FINDINGS: MM 87-02
SITE ADDRESS: 1266 WHITEOAKS RD
APPLICANT: BARROWS, G. (U-HAUL CORP.)
P. C. MTG: 4-28-87
1. The placement of the 3 storage containers will not impact on-site
parking facilities.
2. The storage containers will be placed and painted so that they are not
highly visible from the street frontage.
3. The placement of the storage containers for a period of one year will
not impair the orderly and hamonious development of this neighborhood.
CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL: MM 87-02
APPLICANT: BARROWS, G. (U-HAUL CORP.)
SITE ADDRESS: 1266 WHITEOARS RD.
P.C. MTG. 4-28-87
The applicant is notified as part of this application that he/she is required
to meet the following conditions in accordance with the Ordinances of the City
of Campbell and the Laws of the State of California.
1. Revised elevations and/or site plan indicating changes per Staff Report to
be submitted to the Planning Department and approved by the Planning
Director upon recommendation of the Architectural Advisor prior to
application for a building permit.
2. Property to be fenced and landscaped as indicated and/or added in red on
the plans. Landscaping and fencing shall be maintained in accordance with
the approved plans.
3. Landscaping plan indicating type and size of plant material, and location
of irrigation system to be submitted to the Planning Department and
approved by the Site and Architectural Review Committee within 30 days.
4. Fencing plan indicating location and design details of fencing to be
submitted to the Planning Department and approved by the Planning Director
within 30 days.
5. Applicant to either (1) post a faithful performance bond in the amount of
_ $3,000.00 to insure landscaping, fencing, and striping of parking areas
~ within 3 months of completion of construction; or (2) file written
--- agreement to complete landscaping, fencing, and striping of parking areas.
Bond or agreement to be filed with the Planning Department prior to
application for a building permit.
6. All parking and driveway areas to be developed in compliance with Chapter
21.50 of the Campbell Municipal Code. All parking spaces to be provided
with appropriate concrete curbs or bumper guards.
7. Underground utilities to be provided as required by Section 20.16.070 of
the Campbell Municipal Code.
8. Plans submitted to the Building Department for plan check shall indicate
clearly the location of all connections for underground utilities including
water, sewer, electric, telephone and television cables, etc.
9. Ordinance No. 782 of the Campbell Municipal Code stipulates that any
contract for the collection and disposal of refuse, garbage, wet garbage
and rubbish produced within the limits of the City of Campbell shall be
made with Green Valley Disposal Company. This requirement applies to all
single-family dwellings, multiple apartment units, to all commercial,
business, industrial, manufacturing, and construction establishments.
-- 10. Trash container(s) of a size and quantity necessary to serve the
development shall be located in area(s) approved by the Fire Department.
Unless otherwise noted, enclosure(s) shall consist of a concrete floor
surrounded by a solid wall or fence and have self-closing doors of a size
specified Dy the Fire Department. All enclosures to be constructed at grade
level and have a level area adjacent to the trash enclosure area to service
these containers.
CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL: MM 87-02
APPLICANT: BARROWS, G. (U-HAUL CORP.)
SITE ADDRESS: 1266 WHITEOARS RD.
P.C. MTG. 4-28-87
PAGE 2.
11. Applicant shall comply with all appropriate State and City requirements for
the handicapped.
PLANNING DEPARTMENT
12. Applicant to provide an agreement, satisfactory to the City Attorney, which
provides that the storage containers will be removed from this site within
one year from date of Planning Commission approval. Agreement to be
submitted within 30 days of approval.
BUILDING DEPARTMENT
FIRE DEPARTMENT
PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT
No comments at this time.
GIIIERAL RII~TTAL ITEMS FOR DISPLAY
ON A SEASC7NAL BASIS
GARDEN DQUIPTgNT
.Auger, earth, 1 man
-" Auger, earth, 2 man
Blower, backpack
Sod cutter, 13"
Weed cutter
Lawn edger, gas Powered
Vacutm, lawn, gas
High weed mower, 24". Push
Lawn mower, 21", push
Chain saw, 20"
Iog sputter
Spreaxlers
Lawn thatcher
Tiller
Tractor 33 HP w/one attac~tanent
Auto transport (with tractor)
OOl~TRACI~RS DQUIPNIENT
Arc welder, 200 A, towable
Generator, 3I~1
rnippir~g hams, 20 lb.
Portable air compressor, 6C~i
Air orscpressor 125 CFM, t~r~ble
Air ooc~essor 175 CFNI, towable
r~~,-a
_ Scaffolding
Forklift, 5000#
_ -_ PutQ, centrifugal, 2"
PuaQ, sulxnersible, 1/6HP, electric
~, ~TICNAL DQIJIPN~NT
-- 14' aluni.nun boat
canoe 17'
5 ~ outboard engine
8 HP outboard engine
800 W generator
Concrete grinders
Ratazy ha¢mier, 1 1/2" . ,
Cement mixer, electric 1.5 CF
Gemertt mixer, electric 4CF
Oeneatt mi~aP.r, qas, 4Cf
Sledg~eha~oer
~d~eelbatrrow
Ocapactor, Ra¢nnes (Ju~ing Jack)
ntcavator, crawler
Trendier, spririlcler
Inflatable kayak
Sailboat
Boat trailer
Winch, gas. Portable
Hydraulic jack, 20 ton
Engine stand, 1/2 ton
Jack, 5 ton (pair)
Pressure washer, electric 900 PSI
Pressure washer, gas, 2000 PSI
Snake, drum, 50' marn~al
Snake, drum, 100', electric
Airless Paint sprayer