Loading...
PC Min 04/14/1987PLANNING COMMISSION CITY OF CAMPBELL, CALIFORNIA 7:30 P.M. MINUTES April 14, 1987 The Planning Commission of the City of Campbell convened this day in regular session at the regular meeting place, the Council Chambers of City Hall, 70 N. First Street, Campbell, California. ROLL CALL: Present: Commissioners: Kasolas, Stanton, Olszewski, Christ, Walker, Dickson, Perrine; Planning Director A. A. Kee, Planner II Marty Woodworth, Public Works Director D. Wimberly, Recording Secretary Louise Pena. Absent: None. APPROVAL OF MINUTES: M/S: Dickson, Olszewski - That the minutes of the Planning Commission Meeting of March 24, 1987 be amended to reflect a correction to page 8: 'Commissioner Christ reported that this application was considered by the Site and Architectural Review Committee. The Committee is recommending approval of 6 directional signs, which includes one automatic teller sign.' This correction should also be reflected in the motion for approval. Motion carried unanimously (7-0-0). ~ * : COMMUNICATIONS: Mr. Kee noted that communications received pertained to specific items on the agenda and would be discussed at that time. ORAL REQUESTS: Chairman Perrine asked if there was anyone in the audience who wished to address the Commission on an issue that was not on the agenda. There being no one, the Chairman proceeded with the set agenda. * ~ -2- UP 87-06 Continued public hearing to consider Milano, M the application of Manual and Javier Milano for a Use Permit to allow auto sales on property known as 2420 S. Winchester Blvd. in a C-2-S (General Commercial) Zoning District. Commissioner Christ reported that this application was considered by the Site and Architectural Review Committee. The Committee is recommending approval with redlining on the drawings indicating two parking spaces adjacent to the building to be designated customer parking and four parking spaces adjacent to the fence line which would also be signed as customer parking. Planning Director Kee reviewed the Staff Report dated April 14, 1987, noting that Staff conc~irs with the Committee's recommendation. Commissioner Dickson asked that Staff look into the signage that is currently being used on the site and also landscaping plans for the site. There was concern expressed in that it has been noted that there is a sign being used and it appears as if business is being conducted. The sign indicates "auto repair." Mr. Kee indicated that the site has had an approved auto repair use for some time; however, the issue before the Commission at this time is auto sales. Mr. Kee further stated that as of this date, there is no approved signage on the property and that Staff would look into the signage to ensure that it complies with current regulations. Chairman Perrine opened the public hearing and invited anyone in the audience to speak for or against this item. M/S: Kasolas, Walker - That the public hearing on UP 87-06 be closed. Commissioner Dickson requested that the applicant be allowed to address concerns of the Commission prior to the close of the public hearing. Commissioners Kasolas and Walker both consented to withdraw their motion. The public hearing continued. Javier Milano, applicant, appeared before the Commission indicating that the sign in question refers to a 'grand opening.' Following discussion, the applicant was advised by the Commission that signage on this site would require Planning Commission approval. M/S: Kasolas, Walker - That the public hearing on UP 87-06 be closed. Motion carried unanimously (7-0-0). -3- M/S: Kasolas, Walker - That the Planning Commission accept the Negative Declaration which has been prepared-for this project; adopt the findings as indicated in the Staff Report of April 14, 1987; and, adopt Resolution No. 2451 approving UP 87-06, subject to conditions and redlining as indicated in the Staff Report. Motion carried with the following roll call vote: AYES Commissioners: Kasolas, Stanton, Olszewski, Christ, Walker, Dickson, Perrine NOES Commissioners: None ABSENT: Commissioners: None * : ~ UP 87-03 Public hearing to consider the California Auto application of California Auto Tinting & Tinting Polishing, Inc. for a Use Permit to allow auto tinting, polishing, and the installation of auto alarms and phones in an existing building on property known as 1610 #S Dell Ave. in a CM (Controlled Manufacturing) Zoning District. Commissioner Christ reported that this application was considered by the Site and Architectural Review Committee. The Committee is recommending approval. Planning Director Ree indicated that Staff is in concurrence with the recommendation of the Committee. Commissioner Olszewski indicated that the applicant is proposing to operate an auto tinting and polishing business and also, to his understanding, installing stereos. He further stated that he had concern regarding the percentage of the building being used for this purpose and also expressed concern regarding parking on this site. Commissioner Kasolas questioned whether the auto stereo installation portion of the building was adjacent to other businesses or residences, and whether or not any restrictions were placed on the hours of operation. Planning Director Kee responded that rather than limit the hours of operation, that Staff would contact the owner of the property, should a problem arise and would attempt to resolve the noise problem. -4- Commissioner Dickson questioned whether the application included auto stereo installation in the description. Planning Director Kee indicated that the statement that is given in the Staff Report and their description of what they propose to do would be their intent as far as the Use Permit is concerned. Chairman Perrine opened the public hearing and invited anyone in the audience to speak for or against this item. Dean Westly, attorney for the applicant, appeared before the Commision to address concerns regarding the percentage of the building that would be used for auto sound system installation. Mr. Westly introduced Greg Weber, applicant, to the Commission to answer questions regarding percentage of the business that would be auto stereo installation. Mr. Weber indicated that due to the expense and time involved, that at the most there would be no more than 4 installations of this type per month. Commissioner Olszewski questioned Mr. Westly regarding whether auto stereo installation was indicated in this application for a use permit. Planning Director Kee responded that zoning in this particular area requires that any auto-related use be brought before the Planning Commission for consideration. Commissioner Dickson stated that he understood that the legal notification was for installation of auto alarms and phones. City Attorney Seligmann stated that auto stereo installation fs reasonably related to the other installations that were noticed; however, if the Commission determines that the installation of stereos is not reasonably related, then the public hearing would need to be renoticed. Attorney Westly reported that tenants surrounding the auto stereo portion of the building were questioned regarding noise problems. At this point reference was made to three letters from surrounding neighbors in which all three tenants had no complaints or objections regarding the business operation of California Auto Tinting. These letters are from Pacer Technology, 1800 Dell Avenue; Advance Media Technology, 1640 Dell Avenue; and, Heighten Manufacturing, 1610-R Dell Avenue and will be included as part of the minutes. M/S: Kasolas, Dickson - That the public hearing on UP 87-03 be closed. Motion carried unanimously (7-0-0). -5- M/S: Kasolas, Stanton - That the Planning Commission adopt the findings as indicated in the Staff Report dated April 14, 1987= and, adopt Resolution No. 2452 approving UP 87-03, subject to conditions as indicated in the Staff Report. Motion carried with the following roll call vote: AYES Commissioners: Kasolas, Stanton, Olszewski, Christ, Walker, Dickson, Perrine NOES Commissioners: None ABSENT: Commissioners: None * • UP 87-07 Public hearing to consider the Sams, N. application of Messrs. Neill Sams, and Tom Landers for a Use Permit and approval of plans and elevations to allow the construction of an additional living unit on property known as 661 Kenneth Avenue in an R-1-10 (Single Family Residential - 10,000 sq.ft. minimum lot size) Zoning District Commissioner Christ reported that this item was considered by the Site and Architectural Review Committee, and is recommending approval with -- redlining in regard to setback requirements, from 5 1/2 feet to 6 feet on the northwest sides of the proposed unit, also there were changes to the elevations from 16 feet to 14 feet, a water heater enclosure that protruded into the north setback has been relocated, also applicant has indicated a change from T-111 siding to cedar siding. Commissioner Christ indicated that the Committee is recommending approval of only the secondary unit and the addition to the carport. There were some proposed additions to the house and driveway in the front; however, the Committee is not recommending approval, and are being removed from this application,. Planning Director Kee reviewed the Staff Report of April 14, 1987, indicating that due to recent State requirements that allowed second units on single family R-1 zoned lots, the City of Campbell Zoning Ordinance was amended to bring it into conformance. The Commission questioned whether or not one of the units had to be owner-occupied. City Attorney Seligmann responded in the affirmative. -6- Chairman Perrine indicatd that there are three letters concerning this item, which are to be made a part of the minutes; one of which is from _ Messrs. Nevin and Neill Sams and Mr. Tom Landes which describes the scope of the project. The remaining letters, one of which is a petition in which. 25 signatures were obtained objecting to the project and the other is a letter from Ms. Genevieve Baker also objecting to the project. Chairman Perrine opened the public hearing on UP 87-07, and invited anyone in the audience to speak for or against this item. Nancy Winters, 677 Kenneth Avenue, appeared before the Commission indicating concern regarding the use of the driveway. Ms. Winters indicated that she would like to see that landscaping is installed near the driveway and that some type of automatic gate be looked into, as the wrought iron gates that are being used now are very noisy. She further stated that she is opposed to the location of the driveway as it fronts three of her bedroom windows. Commissioner Christ suggested that any neighbors who have adjoining property meet with the applicant to discuss fencing of the site. Discussion ensued regarding the rental of secondary units and the legal implications involved in making decisions on the property based on the idea that one of the units may be a rental. Gordon Leinhart, addressed the Commission indicating opposition to the proposed project citing the close proximity of the project to adjacent properties and traffic concerns. Oscar Hart, 633 Kenneth Ave., appeared before the Commission and questioned whether the owner would live in one of the units. B. Budzinski, 690 Sobrato, appeared before the Commission and expressed concern regarding the long-term plans for the property should it be sold or rented and questioned whether the new owner would be required to live in one of the units. Concerns were expressed regarding the general maintenance of the property, indicating that the residents in this area are very conscientious of property maintenance and take a great deal of pride in their homes. Commissioner Kasolas stated that the new owner would be required to live on the premises in one of the units, should the property be sold. Genevieve Baker, 666 Sobrato, appeared before the Council stating that she has several concerns regarding privacy, in that one of the bedrooms in the secondary unit is approximately 20 feet from her fence; secondly, the noise level generated from the construction and the length of time involved. -7- ~ Neill Sams, owner of the property, appeared before the Commission to f address concerns, indicating that one of the owners of the property will '._ be living in one of the units and there are no immediate plans to sell the property. He mentioned ,that a considerable amount of time and money has been invested in the. property and will continue efforts to upgrade and maintain the property. Discussion ensued regarding the setback requirements and harmony of the development with the existing neighborhood. There was a general concensus of the Commission for Council clarification of the ordinance regulating secondary living- units in the City and that this item be agendized for discussion at a later date. Bill Chivers, 571 Kenneth, appeared before the Commission to state that he has been a resident of this area since 1951 and was not sent a public hearing notice on this item. He indicated that due to .the fact his property lies outside the 300 foot radius of the proposed development he was not sent a public hearing notice; and, would like the City to change the legal noticing requirements to include notification to property owners within a larger radius than what is currently be used. M/S: Kasolas, Stanton - That the public hearing on UP 87-07 be closed. Motion carried unanimously (7-0-0). M/S: Kasolas, Christ - That the Planning Commission adopt the findings as indicated in the Staff Report of April 14, 1987 and, adopt Resolution No. 2453 approving UP 87-07 subject to conditions as indicated in the Staff Report. Discussion on the Motion: Discussion ensued regarding the fencing requirements for this property. Commissioner Olszewski requested that the motion be amended to include that the property owner submit fencing plans along with landscaping plans for approval. Both Commissioners Kasolas and Christ stated that they would remove their motion in order to amend the motion to read: M/S: Kasolas, Christ - That the Planning Commission adopt the findings as indicated in the Staff Report of April 14, 1987, and that the applicant submit landscaping and fencing plans for approval; and, Adopt Resolution No. 2453, approving UP 87-07 subject to conditions as indicated in the Staff Report. Motion carried with the following-roll call vote: I -8- Commissioner Olszewski spoke in favor of the proposed project, indicating that with fencing and landscaping plans coming back for approval, he felt that this development would not present a large impact on the neighborhood. Commissioner Dickson spoke in opposition to the motion, indicating that with a long-common driveway it appears to be like that found in an apartment complex and is not harmonious with the surrounding residential neighborhood. He also indicated that the secondary living unit is of a different design. Chairman Perrine reviewed the appeal process and indicated that if there was anyone in the audience who wished to appeal the Planning Commission decision, a letter would need to be submitted to the City Clerk within 10 days. Vote on the Motion: AYES Commissioners: Kasolas, Stanton, Olszewski, Christ, Perrine NOES Commissioners: Walker, Dickson ABSENT: Commissioners: None t Chairman Perrine declared a recess at 9:35 p.m. The Commission reconvened at 9:50 p.m. * f SA 87-16 Keeper, M. Continued signing request - 900 E. Hamilton Ave. - PD (Commercial) Zoning District. Planning Director Kee reviewed the Staff Report of April 14, 1987. After discussion: M/S: Stanton, Kasolas - That this item be removed from the agenda at the applicant's request. Motion adopted unanimously (7-0-0). * * f SA 87-09 Continued signing request - 1360 Billboard Co. Whiteoaks Rd. - White Oaks Mercedes - M-1-S (Light industrial) Zoning District. Planning Director Kee reviewed the Staff Report of April 14, 1987 and indicated that the applicant is requesting a continuance to the Planning Commission Meeting of April 28, 1987. -9- M/S: Kasolas, Stanton - SA 87-15 Southbay Development That SA 87-09 - Continued signing request - 1360 Whiteoaks Rd. - White Oaks Mercedes - M-1-S (Light Industrial) Zoning District be continued to the Planning Commission meeting of April 28, 1987. Motion adopted unanimously (7-0-0). * : Signing request - 250 Hacienda Ave. - Hacienda Business Center - CM (Controlled Manufacturing) Zoning District. Commissioner Christ indicated that there was a concern of Staff and the Site Committee regarding the number. of signs and proposed signing for the property, and that a continuance to May 12, 1987 is being recommended. Planning Director Kee indicated that Staff is in concurrence with this recommendation. M/S: Kasolas, Stanton - That the signing request - SA 87-15 - 250 Hacienda Avenue - Hacienda Business Center - CM (Controlled Manufacturing) Zoning District be continued to the Planning Commission meeting of May 12, 1987. Motion adopted unanimously (7-0-0). * * : R 87-02 Request of Mr. Robert Oneto for rein- s 86-OS statement of previously approved plans Oneto, R. and elevations allowing an addition to an industrial building on property known as 661-667 McGlincey Lane in an M-1-S (Light Industrial) Zoning District. Planning Director Kee reviewed the Staff Report, dated April 14, 1987, noting that Staff is recommending a one-year extension, subject to conditions as indicated in the Staff Report. M/S: Christ, Walker - That the request of Mr. Robert Oneto for reinstatement of previously approved plans and elevations allowing an addition to an industrial building on property known as 661-667 McGlincey Lane in an M-1-S (Light Industrial) Zoning District be approved, and that the applicant be required to submit revised landscaping plans which meet the requirement of the current Zoning Ordinance. Motion carried unanimously (7-0-0). * w ~ -10- Report General discussion regarding Planning Commissioner's Institute. Several topics relating to the Planning Commissioner's Institute were discussed. The following items are proposed to be agendized for future study sessions: 1. AB 2020 - Recycling 2. Regulations mandated by the State re homeless 3. Overlay zones 4. Conduct of Planning Commission meetings 5. Scheduling of study sessions on a regular basis (5th Tues.) 6. High Rise issue 7. Balance of retail/commerical development in the City ADJOURNMENT There being no further business, the meeting at 10:30 p.m. APPROVED: Jay R. Perrine Chairman ATTEST: Arthur A. Kee Secretary RECORDED: Louise M. Pena Recording Secretary PACER TECHNOLOGY 1600 DELL AVENUE CAMPBELL, CALIFORNIA 95006 (408) 379-9701 April 14, 1987 T0: The City of Campbell RE: California Auto Tinting and Polishing Co. Dear Sir/Madam: The above Company is located next to our facility on Dell Avenue. They are an excellent neighbor in that they emit no pollution. - There is no dust, overspray or residue ever visible from their operation. There is no noise pollution whatsoever from their operation. They are neat and clean in appearance at all times. If I can provide any further information, please do not hesitate to contact me. Sincerely, PACER ECHNOLOGY J Munn President/CEO JTM/ec ~r ~ s '- t': ,. ~~ a Advance MEDIA TECHNOLOGY A Member of the Advance Group 1640 Dell Avenue Campbell, CA 95008 T~_, 4~li'tCJiil T''t:. i'1.:~' C::_ii°'(1.'!_`P'r1, l~,". !_; `'r l~t'•,•' cc, ~~~ i ~` r_ 1 ~t ~_ !"~ i=_•, t"t I;T_., :!. i_? Fi L"3 t= Y ~~= C:? '" 1::. i :i -~~ i~t:*'_ I"3 :i. <_, ~? L.:'• a::. t_? i • : I`:'_. z t'": C_ 4:3 f"'t i_~ F' !:! s. a =?; L' :i. t'1 i _ _: a .. _.. W , 4~ t J. l._ I. ., J .i_ 1... .- . _ _~ 'h __ f... e i 4... ( - [ ~:, i yi 5-•J i I ':~... i"'i C: [' L a 1 r~ v (i I Ca .' G"_., ~ . t7 •_ ~ i !~' 7.. C:..: I'~ ~s f i '~ <-.:_; ;.: i' f•::: r::_-: ~ ~:. ( <_; • i" i ci t'; L (t E;' i_ !::~ ~. ia~': _ .!~ 1_.t ,~1 .;. i.. `.' t.. . .., a:..:. r r. _, . ..J ,. J .'.. ..... l , ' 4:.. _. - _ r:.: d~ '~:::L tTl `~' _! ' 3 t 1 "~ (: 3I . r3 i~ t. i't F? iTl c.. 1 i"' ::i:. `', '-:r i.. (..3 Li-. ti,_,..,7~_1::..r'.E. t(.t. _.li tl~?.~.3 i', L3if1 '~.:~i;i.._. t::3 (li... r ~.._ .a f:a ::... ~ 1 ,: ~~ ~=A i ?c': •~ l.!..:. t ; !~ 7 1J {`" L.:. .. .: i. i.J I i t:!. d. .:. ? ,_ i 3 I'ii' .':. ?'" e ,... ~ :~ ~'' _. !_ i ('=r':= `t 7. 1`_ r~ c.:~: 1 J. ~. j ~3 (I'S f,•1~ •_`.'.r•::'-".~ ~i i••v r_I .... ._,. ~ 4t t`2 ~._ i. IS .,,... .... :!S .... .~._ ,. •. ... ' ! Y L. t.r _: ...._; t... t.. •.... L I' i P.:'. `V 31: ' ` ..? q 1-t :: ; , n i L`, ;cl ~`.' :=> 1..3 i" it _:1. ~ ~"' ' ~i ! ~. 'i...~. t:•:.' . ~._ _ Lai ._ ! c.. ;._, .l.. c:, _ •~ J~.:..:, i-'r"? :.; 1 r !~ _ .. E' C..I f_. !__°' i :L~ f. _. [-. i_"~~ u i i=.1'"!'.=i . , .:. '~'. f i !: i .,. _.. t.. 1 t"3 i .. ~'..':. i::? I ! t"..... ._ ~' ? _.. ~.:1. t ' ir;' t... ~ 6 .._ { i c'_ V .:- lit., ._ .. ~• - -. j.. .I a... !. n _ ... J ..J .: ,.., _ It _. •i .. 1... _ .L. _ 4.... ~ ~ 1: • ~ r.:J.?`: ,...... _:? I•i? ! t r'! •h r• • l .3 ~._i i..l .i. ' i to ._I t- i.) i .: -, ...., 4 4 ,..... r_: .a. 1:.. t_ 1;'; 'L: 1 1 ;_! 4. ? i ~ r•' ::t -; f'1 4_ 1-; ; =a t"1 ~! , ,_, .,. 1"t i j '~. ~~ :... i - '- - !..; :: z+ ~':. ~' '.:~t'~: '~:. ~...( ~V.~ t.., t: ITI ~ `;: 1-, :~' ~ i-3 P..:=3 ~:; .~. t•Z' i;"I W i ~i_ 1" 't. h i::•~ :i. r~ 1~: c~ ;..i .}•. 1 ;...i :..t':_=' C1 C: t:: i::. l_! i:'1 =.;".1 ....,; .: .. '* 1 .- ...., ._.1 .. . -: r`I ' }?:.X 1: 1:) Y' l= '_:. ~ t::3 c'i 4' i::7 ], is ~ ~:. ~' l 7. t? i"' ;l? O "d ~. I'l i? . ,u. =:i i:: 1"Y ~? c'i ~'~ __ ~. _ .... . ,. .. _. r... L;':'1 ::_ t`'tj;..: I ('~I;.:i.:.l ,.. a l.i~`a ,..!l._i:..'-. i::!! il_.'v Y ..::I i~... V'cJ i4..:f.'. 1 i3`i; ic. `•_r 1'1:.. ....,...=: 1,.?..., t.: .. ........_.._ .._ ', , .. .. _ s _ ~ , - •..L .: ... r•'~ ,._ ._ r.z r`• _. Z .r r...,_ ,._ n, • ..i., j ..t... _ .1.. tit ri ._.. _ 1.. ~._ .. f` ._.. >._.. :... c.~..t. .1. i ._! 1 1 t ~, ad, ri ...; '_. _.. i J. 14.. .. , i.a ...: i. _ ' ; i. ' Lf 1~ _1 tr t_' ~::i 1 4"r' 1= ..,. .... _.. , _; . .._ ~..., _. ; ~ r...~ ,._ l .-, :_ _ t .c.. ., ~..t .!< t ..3 "!~ ,1 : 1 a. ' 1-t ':. I { ~ l 1::7 t_!. P.. i ~~ 1 ,... _~ .:. t.. F... : , ._. i_i .., c...:r C 1 ..:: `.'i.~ ,;d tc,. :. t: ...t ::v Li` 1:a ... ~._S aL.,1 :. .:. .. _ _.t :C l_ _ ... 1"?i ~- - ~ ~ ..: ~. C' i.., ,..; , - 1 ._i ~_ 1.., ._. ,; _ rc: 1.. ,... .., t_.. , ... , . J.. r- - ',i ('' ': _I ".i .~ Z ,... ~ ?. t". t_i '~ ..:.~? ; I_I. ~::3 C.3 t_)?....F.. ... - ,. 7 c: :_~. i :..,'-.' k::: tc: ! ..C ? 1"': i L? i" .:; 1"3 : '~~. !...I i , ly. vl l ': i :C t. ~. '.'_? fl t_. _ _ is t %. ~. 7. l .. .... c"': . , ...i ~..... t 1'1 '%. i. I". 4? i:7 1. 1. ~ :-1 1 ! ; ( ~.7 i. C-'' a i ~ 1. !=''t. fFl •=' ~'. f i !=1•`+' Telex: 334475 Cable: Advint AAOM7A ~~d~ HEIGHTEN MANUFACTURING 1610 - R DELL AVENUE CAMPBELL, CA 95008 (408)866-6058 14 APRIL 1987 To Whom It May Concern As the owner of Heighten Manufacturing, a machine shop in Campbell that shares a common wall with California Auto Tinting and Polishing, I would like it to be known that there are absolutely no complaints on my behalf concerning their operation. They are clean, thoughtful, and hardworking individuals. I am aware there is question regarding their right to stay at their current location. It is my opinion that they deserve all consideration to which they may be entitled. I truly couldn't ask for a better neighbor. Sincerely, Bill Smeck Owner JPIS: lss NoEnc. 3-11-87 ~ ;~i~J~ k Planning Department City of Campbell Statement of Purpose: we the owners of 661 Kenneth Ave., Nevin Sams, Neill Sams, and Tom Landes, are proposing to add a "granny" cottage to the property in order to provide residence for one of the owners and his future bride. As we are sensitive to the property values of the neighborhood and the concerns of our neighbors, we intend to apply the highest standards to the proposed improvements, including appealing landscaping, high shrubs against the fence along the perimeter of the back yard, contemporary arch- itectural design, and a general layout that is not imposing and meant to blend well with the atmosphere of the neighborhood. We believe that im- proving and upgrading our property in a visually pleasing manner wilt pro- vide an asset to the neighborhood by contributing to property values. The proposed structure is to be located at the rear of our 12,750 sq. ft. lot and contains 640 sq. ft. of living space. It will have a maximum -- height of 14 ft., and will conform to all offset requirements. The inter- ior layout is: 1 bedroom, 1 small bathroom, 1 small kitchen, and a living room area. A carport will be provided at the rear of the main house, aside the garage, to allow parking out of view from the front yard. Pleasing landscaping will be provided in front and back to help integrate the prop- erty into a harmonious and functional living space. Thank you for your consideration, Nevin Sams Neill Sams Tom Landes !~~•~tyi9tc ~'m9xc,~tcrvr. - ~ ~ ~'.~ ~~ ~ ~ 62 e~~z~: ~a.. ; V P ~ 7 - o ~ - ``, v7 ev~ ~Jzr,~Gi - f}~,~ ~ ~J ~ 9 b l ./ lvi`~C ~ Zau -ACC ~ H ~L f.~a~r.~2c d~,e~ C~r~ ~~ ` ,/'~~u,i~q ~~yte~7.h.5 !ih y Lj l~i~. ,:z.~i-~t~ ~ia~=~ /~' r [l/. cyc G~~c ~°x v-~ ~v~ ~ D~ ~LG uQ ~ .~ ~~~. .' -~'~ c~ 6 66 ~o~G 2Q ~/~~ GL~te ~~ ~ 8 ~~ ~ ~~ ~~ ~ ~ 66~ r~ ~~ ~~ ~ ~e ~1v~: e ~/Jo any ~ ~~er~ir oom, o~ f~N.¢c ~ ~~ ~ ~ ~ e~~ ~-~ ~~~~~ ? ~~~ ~~ ~ ~ ' ~~~~ Vi''''`e ~X~ ~ ~ moo cc ~,l-~aL ~ u~ ~ il ~iDl ~~ eve ~'~ ~.~' ~=~ ~ ~~ ~' ~~~ Gym ~~ ~ -~ U~ ~~~~ 'l.~ Ctu ~~ ~ au Been Cf~o -~'~ ~ G~~ ~ u,~/ e~ F~ ~yyL,~ e Lo vh^ dX e l dot ~}i~t1~ .u~ nom. ~ 7-~~~ I ~ -~G 1r Lf~z ~~ ~ D :~'~~ ~ P~N~ APR 1 ~!~ X987 , ~ ~ G ~~,~ ~~~ CITY OF CAMPBELL PLANNING DEPARTMENT City of Campbell April 14, 1987 Department of Planning 70 North first Street _-^ Campbell, CA 95008 Re: UP 87-07 -- 661 Kenneth Aue. -Application for a Use Permit and approval of plans and elevations to allow the construction of a secondary lining unit on property known as 661 Kenneth Aue. in an R-1-10 (Single Family Residential) Zoning District. We the undersigned object to the plans to construct a secondary living unit on property known as 661 Kenneth Ave. in an R-1-10 (Single Family Residential) Zoning District. Reasons for our objection are as follows: • Single family Residential - As residents of this neighborhood, use specifically chose to purchase a home and reside in a zone designated Single Family Residential; Construction of the above plans is in conflict with the integrity of such zone and neighborhood. • Property Values -Property values of a single family residential zone will inevitably be negatively affected by the presence of rental unit(s) in such a zone. • Quality of Life -Approval of such plans would intrude on the spacious rural atmosphere, quality of life, and character of the neighborhood (increased noise and traffic, additional street parking problems, etc.) primarily by increasing the population and number of living unit structures for which the lots, homes and street were designed. • Neighborhood Character -Approval of above plans would be the beginning of a change in neighborhood character. ' • Neighborhood Appearance -Rental unit(s) would introduce persons of a more carefree and transient attitude towards the appearance and atmosphere of the present neighborhood. QUESTION: Re:21.61.030 D.1.F. - `No more than 1 dwelling unit on the parcel shall be rented or leased." - We the undersigned would like to know if or where the owner(s) shall reside on the parcel if the above plan is approved. Currently 1 /2 of the current living unit is being rented, the other 1 /2 is "said" to be occupied by the owner. is it his primary residence? Will 1/2 of the current unit continue to be rented after the proposed additional unit is constructed and -- rented? D 14PR 131987 ~~w ~~ f+nAAOQCI 1 NRME ADDRESS ~ PHONE 2. ~~ ~- ~ ~5 5 /~enn~~L Gil ~ ,~~~~ C~,r•-'~ ~ ~ X59 5. 6. 7. B. 9. a~ 'iRS , ~Zy~ s . 1 ~~ 1 ~t ~w/~ • ~ (rf~ ~ ~N ~~ 7/ 10. `~. ~L 13. ~,.~~~,j V c~~~ 14. 15. 17. 18. 19. 20. 21. ~i~ ~~~.~~ s~- 3~ ~ y ~~~ ~28 ~s ~~~ t .. ~ e~~~d-cam) lv ~D 3 7~-S~~ I ~~-u--~-~- ~ y, : , 2. t'rc' ''100 ems,,-zed,, ~4-~!~ 5. 7. c~ °`~ `~ ~ s. 9. 10. 11. 13. 14. 15. l~ 17. ~ 7~~~~ 7 ~?~-~~~' 8(0 ~o - l U7~0 37y -~ss~ 7i z ~~,rv~1~ .~'j'~ 3 7 ~ ~ ass G NRME flDDRESS PHONE i 2. ~~ ~ ~ ~ ~ / 9~ ~-.- 3. Lxrrc~J ~c~ ~~/ ~~ r.-s-.~E - .. 5. CZ?.~'~, ~~-~~ ~ ti'S ~ C~ 3 '7 ~ -6 76`.2 6. 7. 8. 9. 10. 11. 12. 13. 14. 15. 17. 1 S. 19. 20. ---- 21.