Loading...
PC Min 03/24/1987PLANNING COMMISSION CITY OF CAMPBELL, CALIFORNIA 7:30 PM MINUTES MARCH 24, 1987 I _ The Planning Commission of the City of Campbell convened this day in regular session at the regular meeting place, the Council Chambers of City Hall, 70 N. First.St., Campbell, California. ROLL CALL Present Commissioners: Kasolas, Stanton, Olszewski, Christ, Walker, Dickson, Perrfne; Planning Director A. A. Kee, Planner II Marty Woodworth, Engineering Manager Bill Helms, City Attorney Bill Seligmann, Recording Secretary Linda Dennis. Absent None. APPROVAL OF MINUTES M/S: Christ, Dickson - That the minutes of the Planning Commission meeting of March 10, 1987, be approved as submitted. Motion carried unanimously (7-0-0). : * : COMMUNICATIONS Mr. Kee noted that communications received pertained to specific items on the agenda and would be discussed at that time. f • : ORAL REQUESTS Chairman Perrfne asked if there was anyone in the audience who wished to address the Commission on an issue that was not on the agenda. There being no one, the Chairman-proceeded with the set agenda. : * : MM 87-02 Continued application of Mr. George Barrows, G. Barrows for approval of a minor modification to allow the construction of a 450 sq.ft. building addition and the placement of three portable storage containers on property known as 1266 Whiteoaks Rd. in an M-1-S (Light Industrial)~ZOning District. •- -2- Planning Director Kee reported that Staff is recommending a continuance of this item, with the applicant's concurrence, to the meeting of April 28, 1987, in order that revised plans may be submnitted. --~{ M/S: Rasolas, Stanton - That MM 87-02 be continued to the ~__ Planning Commission meeting of April 28, 1987. Motion carried unanimously (7-0-0). f : t PUBLIC HEARINGS OP 87-01 Continued public hearing to consider Morgan, D. the application of Mr. David Morgan for a Use Permit to allow an auto stereo installation business to operate from a detached garage on property known as .2200 S. Bascom Ave. in a C-2-S (General Commercial) Zoning District. Commissioner Christ reported that this application was considered by the Site and Architectural Review Committee. The applicant has addressed the parking concerns .with the .presentation of a lease for parking across Bascom Ave. The Site Committee is of the opinion that this is not acceptable, therefore, denial fs recommended. Planning Director Kee reviewed the Staff Report., dated March 24, 1987, noting that Staff is also recommending denial due to the gotential for noise which could impact the adjacent residential properties, and because ' of the inadequate parking on-site. Chairman Perrine opened the public hearing and invited anyone in the audience to speak for or against this item. Mr. John Wagner, 1058 Shady Dale Ave., spoke against this groject because of it's potential for noise impacts on the residential area= and, the probablity that customers would not want to be inconvenienced by parking across the busy street. Additionally, Mr. Wagner commented that there has been an increased amount of traffic on his street with people making turning around to get back onto Bascom Ave., as well as damaging his front yard while making u-turns. Mr. Charlie Purnell, 1070 Shady Dale Ave., spoke against this project, citing traffic and noise. Additionally, Mr. Purnell commented regarding a parking problem on the street because of overflow parking from the Valley Title Co. use on the northeast corner. Mr. Steven Siner, attorney for applicant, spoke at length regarding the proposal, noting that the applicant fs sensitive to the resident's concerns. Mr. Siner indicated that the the business is operating from a detached garage (and has been for approximately 7 months) which will ___ -3- accommodate only one or two vehicles at a time; the business closes by 7:00 p.m. Mr. Siner noted that he has statements from surrounding businesses that they have heard nothing from this use, and in fact, the noise level, when tested, from Bascom Ave. is significantly higher than that of any auto stereo. The closest Weigher, Mr. Sweet, was very much opposed to this use at the first hearing; however, he has subsequently retracted his opposition when he learned that the business has been in operation for 7 months. Mr. Siner noted that Mr. Sweet is not supporting this application, but is withdrawing his opposition. Mr. Siner continued addressing the parking concerns, stating that the office use in the main building has six employees, and the property owner is willing to have these people park across the street at 7-11, resulting in a minimum of people crossing Bascom Ave., with the pedestrian signal 200' south, twice a day. The applicant is submitting, therefore, that the parking problem is solved by the leasing of required spaces across the street, and the applicant is willing to go on record to have the use permit issued conditionally upon the maintenance of the lease for parking across the street. If that lease is lost, the applicant is willing to give up everything within 60 days. Commissioner Dickson asked Mr. Siner if the property owner would enter into an agreement to do something. else with the parking ff there was a change in the type of use on this site. Also, if there was a way of controlling the testing of stereo systems after installation. Mr. Siner responded that the property owner would probably enter into such r an agreement regarding the parking; and, that the applicant may be able to ---- return customers vehicles to them only on the street. Mr. Siner noted that the property owner has an office in the main building, and it is unlikely that he would put up with any high level of noise. M/S: Kasolas, Walker - That the Public hearing on UP 87-01 be closed. Motion carried unanimously (7-0-0). M/S: Dickson, Kasolas - That the Planning Commission adopt findings as indicated in the Staff Report dated March 24, 1987, and adopt Resolution No. 2447 denying UP 87-01. Motion carried with the following roll call vote: AYES: Commissioners: Kasolas, Stanton, Olszewski, Christ, Walker, Dickson, Perrine NOES: Commissioners: None ABSENT: Commissioners: None. Mr. Kee explained the appeal process to the applicant. :: -4- DP 87-02 Continued public hearing to consider the Stowers, R. application of Mr. Richard Stowers, on behalf of Eastfield Children'-s Center., for approval of a Conditional Use Permit to allow the construction of a two-story clinical services building and a central kitchen addition to an existing children's center located on property known as 251 Llewellyn Ave. in a P-F (Public Facilities/Public, Semi-Public) Zoning District. Commissioner Christ reported that this application was considered by the Site and Architectural Review Committee. The applicant has, in the Committee's opinion, addressed the concerns expressed by speakers at the last meeting regarding overflow parking; therefore, approval is recommended. Planning Director Kee reviewed the Staff Report, dated March 24, 1987, noting that information submitted by the applicant indicates that provided parking should be adequate. However:,. Staff is recommending a condition whereby additional parking will be provided if it is needed. Staff is also recommending approval, subject to conditions as indicated in the Staff Report. Chairman Perrine opened the public hearing and invited anyone in the ~_ audience to speak for or against this item. Mr. Richard Stowers, applicant, appeared to answer questions., and -- presented slides of the subject site and the model of the proposed additions. M/S: Kasolas, Christ - That the public hearing on UP 87-02 be closed. Motion carried unanimously (7-0-0). M/S: Kasolas, Christ - That the Planning Commission accept the Negative Declaration which has been prepared for this projects adopt - findings ms indicated in the Staff Report dated March 24, 1987s and, adopt Resolution No. 2448 approving UP 87-02 subject to conditions as indicated in the Staff Report. Motion carried with the following roll call vote: 1~YES: Commissioners: Kasolas, Stanton, Olszewski, Christ, Walker, Dickson, Perrine NOES: Commissioners: None ABSENT: Commissioners: None. s -5- UP 87-04 Public hearing to consider the applica- Denson, R. tion of Ella and Richard Denson for approval of a Use Permit to allow on-sale beer and wine in a restaurant on property known as 1395 Hacienda Ave. (Rolling Hills Shopping Center) fn a PD (Planned Development/Commercial) Zoning District. Planner II Marty Woodworth reviewed the Staff Report, noting that Staff is of the opinion that the use is acceptable in conjunction with the restaurant use, subject to conditions as indicated in the report. Chairman Perrine opened the public hearing and invited anyone in the audience to speak for or against this item. Mr. Richard Denson, applicant, appeared to answer questions. M/S: Stanton, Christ - That the public hearing on UP 87-04 be closed. Motion carried unanimously. (7-0-0) M/S: Rasolas, Olszewski - That the Planning Commission adopt the findings as indicated in the Staff Report of March 24, 1987= and, adopt Resolution No. 2449 approving UP 87-04, subject to conditions as indicated in the Staff Report. Discussion Commissioner Dickson noted that this location has a terrible history in terms of alcohol= therefore, he will be voting against the motion. Vote on motion AYES: Commissioners: Rasolas, Stanton, Olszewski, Christ, Walker, Perrine NOES: Commissioners: Dickson ABSENT: Commissioners: None. t * • UP 87-OS Public hearing to consider the applica- Sanfilippo, A. tion of Andrea Sanfilippo for a Use Permit to allow a dog grooming business in an existing building on property known as 186D E. Sunnyoaks Ave. in an M-1-S (Light Industrial) Zoning District. Planner II Marty Woodworth reviewed this application, noting that the use appears to be compatible with the surrounding uses] therefore, Staff is recommending approval, subject to conditions as indicated in the Staff Report. -6- Chairman Perrine opened the public hearing and invited anyone in the -- audience to speak for or against this item. Ms. Andrea Sanfilfppo, applicant, appeared before the Commission to answer questions. M/S: Olszewski, Stanton - That the public hearing on UP 87-05 be closed. Motion carried unanimously (7-0-0). M/S: Kasolas, Dickson - That the Planning Commission adopt the findings as indicated in the Staff Report of March 24, 1987; and, adopt Resolution No. 2450 approving UP 87-05 subject to conditions as indicated in the Staff Report. Motion carried with the following roll call vote: AYES: Commissioners: Kasolas, Stanton, Olszewski, Christ, Walker, Dickson, Perrine NOES: Commissioners: None ABSENT: Commissioners: None. # * f UP 87-06 Public hearing to consider the applica- -- Milano, M. tion of Manual and Javier Milano for a Use Permit to allow auto sales on property known as 2420 S. Winchester Blvd. in a C-2-S (General Commercial) Zoning District. Commissioner Christ reported that this application was considered by the Site and Architectural Review Committee. The Committee ,is recommending a continuance with the applicant's concurrence. Commissioner Christ continued that the applicant would discontinue the auto repair use and change to auto sales - repairing only those autos that would they would be preparing for sale. The applicant would continue to upgrade the site. Planning Director Ree noted that Staff is in agreement with the continuance. Commissioner Kasolas asked if this application was before the Commission as a result of code enforcement; and, noted that an aerial of this site would be helpful. Mr. Ree indicated that this site has been used for auto repair for some time. The issue before the Commission at this time, however, is auto sales. Commissioner Dickson asked if the landscaping issue was part of the reason "-' for the continuance. -7- Mr. Kee noted that the applicant is still working out the final details. Chairman Perrine opened the public hearing and invited anyone_in the audience to speak for or against this item. Mr. Javier Milano, applicant, appeared to answer questions. M/S: Olszewski, Stanton - That the public hearing on UP 87-06 be continued to the Planning Commission meeting of April 14, 1987. Motion carried unanimously (7-0-0). : * : MISCELLANEOUS SA 87-06 Continued signing request of Mr. Joe Santa Cruz Sign Co. Elek for approval of a signing program - 845-896 S. San Tomas Aquino Rd. - C-1-S (Neighborhood Commercial) Zoning District. Commissioner Christ reported that this application was considered by the Site and Architectural Review Committee. Commissioner Christ noted that the signs have a metal can painted brown (they are not wood), and the redlining of the presented plan require all signs to be off-white or cream colored background. The Committee is recommending approval. Planning Director Kee stated that Staff is also recommending approval. Commissioner Walker expressed concern about the aesthetics of the program if a number of people put up 16' signs. Commissioner Christ clarified that there are only two locations in this shopping center which will accommodate 16' signs. M/S: Kasolas, Dickson - That the Planning Commission adopt findings as indicated in the Staff Report, dated March 24, 1987, and that SA 87-06 be approved, subject to conditions as indicated in the Staff Report, and redlining of the presented plans. Motion carried unanimously (7-0-0). -8- SA 87-07 Signing request - Wells Fargo Bank - Pettibone Signs 200 E. Campbell Ave. - Interim (Planned Development/Commercial) Zoning District. Commissioner Christ reported .that this application was considered by the Site and Architectural Review Committee. The Committee is recommending approval of a 23 sq.ft. free-standing sign adjacent to Campbell Ave., a 23 sq.ft. free-standing sign adjacent to Orchard City Dr., and 6 automatic teller signs.-~" Planning Director Kee stated that Staff is also recommending approval, per the Site Committee's recommendation. M/S: Rasolas, Walker - That the Planning Commission adopt findings as indicated in the Staff Report dated March 24, 1987, and approve signage for SA 87-07 as indicated by the Site and Architectural Review Committee: a 23 sq.ft. free-standing sign adjacent to Campbell Ave., a 23 sq.ft. free-standing sign adjacent to Orchard City Dr., and 6 automatic teller signs, subject to conditions attached hereto . Discussion on motion Commissioner Olszewski stated that he was of the opinion that the second free-standing sign was excessive based on the square footage of this particular sign, and incompatible with this site; therefore, he would be speaking against the motion. Commissioner Rasolas noted that this signage did not seems any more excessive than that which was approved for the Bank of America down the street. Commissioner Christ clarified that one of the concerns Staff expressed was the direction the sign faced. This has been changed and will not cause any visual impact on traffic trying to access Orchard City Dr. Commissioner Dickson stated that he was also opposed to the bank's excessive signage. Roll Call Vote on motion AYES: Commissioners: NOES: Commissioners: ABSENT: Commissioners: Rasolas, Stanton, Olszewski, Walker, None. Christ, Perrlne Dickson t • : CORRECTION.~"ROM 4=14-87 "Commissioner Christ report- ed that this application was considered by the Site and _._.: A~cchite~tura~;_Revew_. Committee.~~. The Committtee is-::.;recommending -9- SA 87-14 Signing request - Fidelity National Byrant, D. Title - 51 E. Campbell Ave. - Interim (Planned Development/Historic Ovelay) Zoning District. Planning Director Ree reported that the applicant has requested a continuance of this matter to the meeting of May 26, 1987. M/S: Christ, Stanton - That SA 87-14 be continued to the Planning Commission meeting of May 26, 1987. Motion carried unanimously (7-0-0). SA 87-16 Keeper, M. • * : Signing request - 900 E. Hamilton Ave. - PD (Commercial) Zoning District. Commissioner Christ reported that this application was considered by the Site and Architectural Review Committee. The Committee is recommending approval. Planning Director Kee noted that Staff is in agreement with the recommendation for approval. Commissioner Dickson asked if the existing temporary sign is still on this site; and, if all the other signs have been removed. Mr. Ree indicated that, to his knowledge, all other signs have been removed. Commissioner Kasolas asked why this sign is needed. Commissioner Christ explained that when the previous sign was approved, the applicant indicated that, until they started construction, they would continue to rent spaces on this site= and, that they would come back with a signing request for that purpose. The requested signing for the rental of Recreational Vehicle spaces would be temporary, until the property owners give notice to the tenants to vacate the property, prior to construction. M/S: Kasolas, Christ - That the Planning Commission deny SA 87-16. Discussion on motion Commissioner Dickson noted that the property owner has a right to use the property for Recreational Vehicle hookups. -lo- Commissioner Rasolas stated that he would withdraw his motion, and ask ~' that the matter be continued until Staff can come back with a full report, including pictures, to indicate if the site meets current health ' regulations. Commissioner Rasolas felt that the site is detrimental to the health and safety of the community, and asked that the report include the status of the electrical hookups, the gas, condition of the streets, the condition of the sheds on the site, and the number of people living in what types of vehicles. Commissioner Dickson agreed with the direction that Commissioner Kasolas was leading= however, he was unsure of the method, noting that the Commissioner may be challenging a condition of the existing project. Commissioner Christ expressed his concern that the requesting sign was excessive for the needs that it is trying to address, and that it contains unnecessary information. Commissioner Christ stated that he would remove his second of the motion, and to look at another sign application. Commissioner Rasolas stated that approval of the requested signage would, in his opinion, indicate that the City approves of what is going on at this location. At this time, Commissioners Christ and Rasolas removed their motion for denial of SA 87-16. M/S: Rasolas, Dickson - Discussion on motion That SA 87-16 be continued to the Planning Commission meeting of April 14, 1987= and, that a Staff Report be _ prepared addressing the conditions at the subject location; and, that this continuance is in no way to be construed as approval of existing signage at this location. Commissioner Christ felt that a continuance allowed the owners to keep the existing signage for the additional time period. 8e thought that the existing sign should be dealt with at this time, and asked the City Attorney if the owners would be required to remove the existing sign. City Attorney Seligmann noted that the existing sign should be removed. Ms. Maureen Reeper, applicant and property manager of the Hamilton Park, stated that she had removed the signs from the site= however, when someone from her office spoke with Staff, they were told that they could put the sign back up - pending approval. Ms. Reeper explained that there are currently two signs on the property -- one for the future development, and one for the rental of Recreational Vehicle spaces. -11- Commissioner Stanton stated that he did not wish to see a sign advertising something that is less than attractive to our community; and, with that in mind, he spoke in favor of having Staff prepare a report on the conditions of the site. Once the information is obtained, the Commission can make a decision as to whether or not they wish to have the situation advertised. Chairman Perrine stated that he was opposed to the continuance of 45 days; however, he would support a continuance to the nest meeting. Commissioner Rasolas noted that the Commission could act on the signing request this evening, and discuss the condition of the property at a future date; however, he would be more comfortable with the 45 day continuance because he though the applicant could more adequately address the Commission's concerns. Mr. Ree indicated that Staff would request at least 30 days for the gathering of information for the requested report. Ms. Beeper noted that the site is about 454 occupied at this time, which adds to it's barren appearance; she did not think that there were any serious safety concerns; and, the real issue appears to be the property's appearance. Ms. Beeper stated that she was not sure what the Commission wanted, and that she was unsure how the property's appearance became an issue in the sign application. The original sign, which was located where the development sign is now located, was taken down; however it was put back up because the manager was of the understanding that this was acceptable. Commissioner Kasolas asked Ms. Beeper if she would take the sign down tomorrow, and leave it down for 30-45 days. Ms. Beeper stated that she did not understand the issue -- if she should have not put up the sign in the first place, then - yes - the sign would be taken down, if necessary. Commissioner Rasolas stated that if the applicant would commit to taking the sign down tomorrow, it could alleviate some of the problems under discussion. Ms. Keeper stated that she would be willing to take down the sign tomorrow; and, she requested that the matter be continued to the next Planning Commission meeting. Vote on motion Motion for continuance to April 14, 1987 carried unanimously (7-0-0). • * • ~~ -12- Staff Report •Canbank• - 1 year review - 855 S. San - Tomas Aquino Rd. - C-1-S (Neighborhood Commercial) Zoning District., ..,,. Planning Director Ree reported that a review of this file indicates that the canbank was appcoved next to an existing landscape island. A condition of approval required the upgrading of the landscape island. This upgrading has been completed. M/S: Kasolas, Walker - That this Staff Report be noted and filed, with no further action required. .Motion carried unanimously (7-0-0). +r : : PUBLIC BEARINGS GP 87-01 Public hearing to consider a City- City-initiated initiated proposal. to add an Air Quality Element to the General Plan; or, to add Air Quality goals and policies to existing General Plan Elements. Commissioner Kasolas stated that, in order for the Commission to do it's job properly, comments should be solicited from developers and various groups regarding this item. There may be environmental groups who are ---~ interested in this matter. Commissioner Kasolas noted that there was no one in the audience to speak on this item. Commissioner Kasolas referred to t5 of the Goals/Objectives - •...to reduce dependency on the private `~ automobile for transportation.' This is a significant issue and extra care should be taken. Planning Director Ree indicated that the City Council has expressed a concern that this matter be acted on in a timely manner. Commissioner Christ noted that this matter has been before the Commission on a number of occasions, and has been properly notified for public hearing. It would seem that any interest would have been expressed by this time. Commissioner Olszewski noted that the presented element is only a draft; that inviting specific groups may create a problem if some groups are inadvertently left out; and, fn his opinion, the matter has been handled in a professional manner and properly noticed. Commissioner Olszewski spoke in favor of taking action on this item. Chairman Perrine ogened the public hearing and invited anyone in the audience to speak on this item. Principal Planner Phil Stafford reviewed the Staff Report and Draft Element. ~- ___. j ~, -13- Commissioner Kasolas asked if ft was known where the ozone .problems, that show up in this area, are created; how many cities have Air Quality Elements; and, would it be possible to have someone from the Bay Air Quality Management District address the Commission regarding the need for such an element. Mr. Stafford responded that these problems can be generated some distance from here and travel with the wind. The cities of Pleasanton and Palo Alto have an air quality statement in their general plan. The BAAQMD has indicated that they have support staff available. Staff will contact them to see if someone might be available to address the Commission. Commissioner Dickson noted that he would also be interested in comments from other interested parties, since this is an original problem. Mr. Stafford noted that the crux of the matter is to establish policy; and, if an EIR is required, that report would be referred to the Air Quality District. The Air Quality District would probably make suggested mitigations, which could become a part of the project. Commissioner Christ noted the work being done by other communities on air quality elements, as well as on Transportation 2000, indicating that Campbell is not out of line on this issue. Commissioner Walker stated that he was ready to take action on the matter. Commissioner Kasolas expressed his concern that if there is an element, there will have to be an EIR, and there must be people who understand the reports. Commissioner Kasolas continued that this matter was very important and he was bothered that there was no one to speak on this issue. The City must maintain services equal to, or better than, the surrounding jurisdictions, or be swallowed up. M/S: Dickson, Stanton - That GP 87-01 be continued to the Planning Commission meeting of April 28, 1967; and, that appropriate groups be notified of the hearing; and, that., representatives from the Bay Area Air Quality Management District be invited to speak at this meeting= and, that Staff ask for an article to be printed in the press. Motion carried with the following roll call vote: AYES: Commissioners: Kasolas, Stanton, Olszewski, Christ, Dickson, Perrine NOES: Commissioners: Walker ABSENT: Commissioners: None. It was requested that this public hearing be set on the agenda as early as possible. ~- • • : -14- OTHER ITEMS BROUGHT UP BY COMMISSION Commissioner Walker requested information regarding AB2020, and it's potential impact on the City of Campbell. Commissioner Dickson requested that general discussion regarding the Planning Commissioner's Institute be agendized for the next meeting. Commissioner Olszewski suggested that the policy of noticing for public hearings be put on the list for future Study Session topics. * : • ADJOURNMENT There being no further business, the meeting was .adjourned at 10:45 p.m. APPROVED: Jay Perrine Chairman ATTEST: Arthur A. Kee Secretary RECORDED: Linda A. Dennis Recording Secretary CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL: SA 87-06 SITE ADDRESS: .845-895 S SAN TONAS AQOINO RD P. C. MlTG: 3-24-87 1. Applicant to obtain any necessary building and electrical permits. 2. All future canopy signs to be located similarly to the presented signage. 3. All canopy signs to have a dimension of 2.6' in height, and be trimmed with a mitered wood border. 4. The permissable square footage for each business fs related to the linear footage of the business. One square foot of signage area for each linear foot of business frontage, up to a maximum of 50 eq.ft. 5. A scaled sign elevation must be submitted for each proposed sign. RECOMMENDED FINDINGS SITE ADDRESS: 845-895 S SAN TOMAS AQUINO RD P. C. MTG: 3-24-87 1. The proposed sign location is compatible to the building and roof design. 2. The size of the proposed sign is consistent with the standards set forth in the Sign Ordinance. 3. The sign is well designed and architecturally compatible with the building. RECOMMENDED FINDINGS: SA 87-07 SITE ADDRESS: 200 E CAMPBELL AVE APPLICANT: WELLS FARGO BANK P. C. MTG.: 3-24-87 1. The bank is really located on two corners (E. Campbell Ave. and Second St., and Orchard City Dr. and Second St.). Traffic comes from all directions, consequently, a sign is needed on all 4 elevations to adequately identify the business. 2. The square footage of the signing is about the same as the existing signing. However, afree-standing sign (which is non-conforming because it exceeds the 14 ft. height limitation) will be removed. 3. The sign is tastefully done and will complement the building. 4. The free-standing sign proposed near Orchard City Drive impedes visibility at the corner of Second Street oand Orchard City Drive. CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL: SA 87-07 SITE ADDRESS: 200 E CAMPBELL AVE APPLICANT: WELLS FARGO BANK P. C. MTG.: 3-24-87 1. Applicant to secure any necessary permits from the Building Department.