Loading...
PC Min 02/24/1987PLANNING COMMISSION CITY OF CAMPBELL, CALIFORNIA 7:30 PM MINUTES FEBRUARY 24, 1987 The Planning Commission of the City of Campbell convened this day in regular session at the regular meeting place, the Council Chambers of City Hall, 70 N. First St., Campbell, California. ROLI~ CALL Present Commissioners: Kasolas, Stanton, Olszewski, Christ, Walker, Dickson, Perrine; Planning Director A. A. Kee, Planner II Marty Woodworth, Engineering Manager Bill Helms, City Attorney Bill Seligmann, Recording Secretary Linda Dennis. Absent APPROVAL OF MINUTES M/S: Dickson, Christ - SPECIAL PRESENTATIONS None. That the minutes from the Planning Commission meeting of February 10, 1987, be approved as submitted. Motion carried with a vote of 6-0-0-1, with Commissioner Walker abstaining. (Note: Commissioner Walker appointed to Planning Commission on February 10, 1987.) Special Presentation - "Living Scrapbook" Chairman Perrine noted that a portion of this evening's meeting is being video-taped for the Campbell Museum's "Living Scrapbook". Chairman Perrine introduced Mr. James Walker. Mr. Walker was appointed to the Planning. Commission by the City Council on February 10, 1987. Chairman Perrine presented a Resolution of appreciation to Jo Ann Fairbanks for her service on the Planning Commission. Ms. Fairbanks thanked the Commission, noting that her work with the Commission and Staff has been a wonderful growing experience for her. Commissioner Kasolas, Past Chairman, briefly reflected on the Planning Commission's activities over the past year, including consideration of the Prometheus development, the upgrading of the industrial areas, the Pruneyard Inn, and the building height limitation issue. -2- Mr. Ree noted that communications received pertained to specific items on the agenda and would be discussed at that time. ORAL REQUESTS Chairman Perrine asked if there was anyone in the audience who wished to address the Commission on an issue that was not on the agenda. There being no one, the Chairman proceeded with the set agenda. PUBLIC HEARINGS ZC 87-01 Public hearing to consider a City-initiated City-initiated zone change from C-3-S (Central Business District Commercial) to C-2-S (General Commercial) Zoning District for property known as 1825 S. Winchester Blvd. Planner ii Marty Woodworth reported that the purpose of this zone change is to eliminate the C-3-S District from the code because C-3-S regulations are the same as the C-2-S regulations. Because the regulations for both districts are the same, existing uses, future uses and nonconforming uses will not be treated any differently than at present. Chairman Perrine opened the public hearing and invited anyone in the audience to speak for or against this item. M/S: Kasolas, Christ - That the public hearing on ZC 87-01 be closed, in that no one wishes to speak. Motion carried unanimously (7-0-0). M/S: Dickson, Kasolas - (1) That the Planning Commission recommend that the City Council accept the Negative Declaration which has been prepared for this project; and (2) That the Planning Commission adopt Resolution No. 2444, incorporating the attached findings, recommending that the City Council approve a zone change from C-3-S to C-2-S on the subject property as indicated in Exhibit A. Motion carried with the following roll call vote: AYES: Commissioners: Kasolas, Stanton, Olszewski, Christ, Walker, Dickson, Perrine NOES: Commissioners: None ABSENT: Commissioners: None. -3- UP 87-02 Continued public hearing to consider the Stowers, R, application of Mr. Richard Stowers, on behalf of Eastfield Children's Center, for approval of a conditional Use Permit to allow the construction of a two-story clinical services building and a central kitchen addition to an existing children's center located on property known as 251 Llewellyn Ave. in a P-F (Public Facilities/Public, Semi-Public) Zoning District. Planning Director Art Kee indicated that Staff is recommending a continuance of this item in order that revised plans might be submitted. Chairman Perrine opened the public hearing and invited anyone in the audience to speak for or against this item. Mr. Richard Stowers, applicant, stated that the continuance is being requested in order that they might provide information on the remodeling of an existing building on the site, as well as the new construction. Commissioner Dickson asked the applicant if he would have any objections to a continuance to March 24, 1987, due to the length of the agenda on March 10, 1987. Mr. Stowers responded that he had no objection to March 24, 1987. M/S: Christ, Stanton - That the public hearing on UP 87-02 be continued to the Planning Commission meeting of March 24, 1987, with the applicant's concurrence. Motion carried unanimously (7-0-0). S 87-01 Continued public hearing to consider the Kirkorian, K. application of Mr. Kent Kirkorian for approval of plans and elevations to allow the construction of a two-story office building on property known as 409 E. Hamilton Ave, in a C-1-S (Neighborhood Commercial) Zoning District. Commissioner Christ reported that this item was considered by the Site and Architectural Review Committee. The concerns previously raised by Staff have been .addressed; and, there is some redlining on the presented plans indicating a change in the window treatment on one elevation and the use of brick on the front of the building. The Site Committee is recommending approval as redlined, and that the__-e be no fencing on two sides of the property to provide growth survival for the landscaping. -4- Planning Director Art Ree noted that Staff is also recommending approval as redlined. Chairman Perrine opened the public hearing and invited anyone in the audience to speak for or against this item. M/S: Kasolas, Christ - That the public hearing on S 87-01 be closed, in that no one wishes to speak. Motion carried unanimously (7-0-0). M/S: Kasolas, Christ - That the Planning Commission accept the Negative Declaration which has been prepared for this project; and, that the Planning Commission adopt Resolution No. 2445, incorporating findings and conditions as indicated in the Staff Report dated February 24, 1987, approving S 87-01. Motion carried with the following roll call vote: AYES: Commissioners: Kasolas, Stanton, Olszewski, Christ, Walker, Dickson, Perrine NOES: Commissioners: None ABSENT: Commissioners: None. PD 86-02 Continued public hearing to consider the Anderson, K, application of Mr. Kurt Anderson for a Planned Development Permit and approval of plans, elevations and development schedule to allow the construction of a duplex on property known as 274 Everett Ave. in a PD (Planned Development/Medium Density Residential) Zoning District. Commissioner Christ reported that this application was considered by the Site and Architectural Review Committee. The Committee is of the opinion that the design provides a good transition between commercial and residential in the area; therefore, approval is recommended. Planning Director Art Kee noted that Staff is also recommending approval, subject to conditions as indicated in the Staff Report. Chairman Perrine opened the public hearing and invited anyone in the audience to sneak for or against this item. Mr. Kurt Anderson, applicant, briefly reviewed the project for the Commission. M/S: Kasolas, Stanton - That the public hearing on PD 86-02 be closed, in that no one else wishes to speak. Motion carried unanimously (7-0-0). -5- M/S: Kasolas, Stanton - That the Planning Commission adopt Resolution No. 2446, including findings as indicated in the Staff Report dated February 24, 1987, recommending that the City Council approve PD 86-02, subject to conditions as indicated in the Staff Report. Motion carried with the following roll call vote: AYES: Commissioners: Kasolas, Stanton, Olszewski, Christ, Walker, Dickson, Perrine NOES: Commissioners: None ABSENT: Commissioners: None. GP 87-01 Continued public hearing to consider a City-initiated City-initiated proposal to add an Air Quality Element to the General Plan; or, to add Air Quality goals and policies to existing General Plan Elements. Planning Director Kee noted that the City Council is somewhat concerned about this item; however, Staff is recommending a continuance on this item to March 10, 1987, in that additional comments are needed from other agencies Chairman Perrine opened the public hearing and invited anyone in the audience to speak for or against this item. M/S: Stanton, Christ - That the public hearing on GP 87-01 be continued to the Planning Commission meeting of March 24, 1987. Motion carried unanimously (7-0-0). The Commission recessed at 8:12 p.m.; the meeting reconvened at 8:34 p.m. PD 84-06 Continued request of Mr. Todd Wright, on Prometheus Development behalf of Prometheus Development Co., to consider revised plans for an approved office/hotel complex on property known as 900 E. Hamilton Ave. in a PD (Planned Development) Zoning District. Commissioner Christ reported that. this item was considered by the Site and Architectural Review Committee. The Committee is recommending approval subject to redlining, and the addition of a statement to one of the conditions that the landscaping plan include a pedestrian circulation plan.. -6- Commissioner Olszewski added that the Site Committee discussed the need for a clearly defined area to access the bus area on Hamilton Ave., and felt that the appropriate place to address this concern would be through the landscaping plans. Commissioner Kasolas asked why it is recommended that the revised details be re-submitted to the Parks & Recreation Commission, in that this is a commission which usually looks at public accesses (parks). This project is a quasi-public area under private control. The plans have already been reviewed by the Los Gatos Creek and Streamside Committee. Commissioner Kasolas spoke in favor of expediting the approvals for this project, and hoped that new requirements were not being added over and above the adopted ordinances. Mr. Kee indicated that the review process for Parks & Recreation Commission and Los Gatos Creek and Streamside Committee is a result of past policy of the Commission on major developments. These committees would review the plans prior to the Site Committee and the Planning Commission. Mr. Kee reviewed the history of this project, briefly discussing conditions approved under Ordinance No. 1560, conceptual plans, phasing, revised details, and redlining of plans as presented this evening. Staff would recommend that the Commission find that the conditions, as applied to Phase I, are to insure conformance with Ordinance No. 1560. Commissioner Dickson asked how much the landscaping has changed since the original submittal. Commissioner Dickson continued that he is of the opinion that the Commission is essentially working with a different plan. Mr. Kee reported that the overall percentage is slightly reduced; however, some areas have been increased. The reduction is along the frontage of Hamilton Ave. The landscaping, as presented, is considered acceptable by Staff and consistent with other projects recently approved. Commissioner Dickson expressed his concern that there is an Ordinance which approves the original plans. There are other committees/agencies who would like to review the final plans, which could result in a futher reduction of landscape area. Commissioner Dickson felt that this matter should be opened for a public hearing again because it is change in the Ordinance -- the resubmittal has caused a reduction in landscaping. Mr. Kee indicated that the Commission could make a recommendation to the City Council to reopen the public hearing, if it so desired. Commissioner Dickson asked about the layout for the Hwy. 17 off-ramp. Engineering Manager Helms stated that the presented layout has received informal approval, with the formal approval still in the process; however, ~~hat is shown on the presented plans will be very close to the final product. -7- Mr. Todd Wright, representing Prometheus Development, appeared before the ~ Commission to answer questions. Mr. Jeffery Heller, architect, reviewed the project. Mr. Heller noted that the landscaping reduction is approximately 38 because the road has been widened to accommodate traffic, as suggested by Staff; the site's landscaping percentage would be consistent with the original plans; the entry area has been enhanced; the glass is proposed as gray/green reflective; the precast wall element has both rough and smooth casts providing a strong depth appearance to the building; and, the landscaping develops from a fountain theme. Mr. Heller additionally discussed the ownership of the proposed new street; the bicycle path as it pertains to the reduction in landscaping; the requirements of the Santa Clara Valley Water District for access; and, the articulation of the building's design (stepping) and possible changes during phasing. Commissioner Kasolas noted that he was led to believe that the new off-ramp would not be constructed in Phase I, in reference to conditions 13 and 26B of Ordinance No. 1560. Mr. Helms indicated that it is the intent of the imposed conditions that all off-site improvements be constructed prior to occupancy of Phase I. Mr. Paul Laterio, landscape architect, answered questions of the Commission pertaining to the relationship of the bicycle path to the ~_ creek; the provided access for the Water District; the extension of planting along the creek; shifts in parking lot medians; and planters in the parking garage. Mr. Kamil Azoury, engineer, addressed questions regarding. the Public Works Department stipulations -- the construction of a new street; the construction of the bridge over the creek; the signalization of intersections and signal modifications; the realignment of the Hwy. 17 off-ramp; the bus shelter on Hamilton Ave.; and the pedestrian-bicycle path. along the creek. M/S: Christ, Olszewski - That the Planning Commission approve the revised plans for Phase I of PD 84-06, as redlined, subject to conditions of approval indicated in the Staff Report dated February 24, 1.987 and the previous conditions of approval under Ordinance No. 1560; and, that a condition require the inclusion of a pedestrian circulation plan within the landscaping plan; and, that the Commission find that the conditions, as applied to Phase I, __ are to insure conformance with Ordinance No. 1560. -8- Discussion Commissioner Dickson stated that the site plans have changed from those approved by the City Council. Because of the public road, there is approximately a 38 reduction in landscaping. Commissioner Dickson was of the opinion that the revised plans should be considered under the public hearing arocess. Additionally, there are four agencies who would like to see the revised plans - Commissioner Dickson felt that these agencies should be satisfied before the Commission takes action on the plans. Commissioner Dickson stated that he was opposed to this motion at this time; and, he thanked the developer for an excellent presentation. Commissioner Christ noted that the Site Committee had hoped to guarantee the Commission that everyone of the concerns brought up by the Commission, and other agencies, have been addressed in the presented plans. Commissioner Christ added that, although this project is very dense, hopefully the project's quality will enhance the community. Commissioner Olszewski noted that the Site Committee did go to great lengths to make sure that everyone's concerns were addressed; and, he felt that Staff has done a remarkable job and used the intent of the EIR to the utmost by adopting the mitigating measures, including the bicycle path, widening and existing street, and building a bridge. Commissioner Olszewski concluded that he views the density as reasonable, rather than high; and, the project as a positive addition to the community. Commissioner Kasolas stated that he would be supporting the motion on the belief that a decision is being called for based upon the City Council's approval under Ordinance No. 1560. Commissioner Walker stated that he has reviewed the Staff Reports and minutes pertaining to this project, and feels confident that he can vote on the matter. Vote on motion AYES: Commissioners: Kasolas, Stanton, Olszewski, Christ, Walker, Perrine NOES: Commissioners: Dickson ABSENT: Commissioners: None. Chairman Perrine directed Staff to forward this application to the City Council for its information. The Commission recessed at 9:37 p.m.; the meeting reconvened at 9:50 p.m. -9- ZC 86-09 Request of Mr. Yves Ghiai for approval Ghiai, Y. of a modification, to a previously approved Planned Development Permit, to allow the retention of an existing oak tree on property known as 272 W. Sunnyoaks Ave. in a PD (Planned Development/Medium Density Residential) Zoning District. Commissioner Christ reported that this matter was considered by the Site and Architectural Review Committee. The Committee is recommending approval. M/S: Kasolas, Christ - SA 87-07 Wells Fargo Bank That the Planning Commission approve the applicant's request to relocate an approved townhome unit and to eliminate one guest parking space. Motion carried unanimously (7-0-0). * ~ Signing request - Wells Fargo Bank - 200 E. Campbell Ave. - Interim Planned Development/Commercial Zoning District. Commissioner Christ reported that this matter was considered by the Site and Architectural Review Committee. The applicant is requesting a continuance to March 24, 1987. M/S: Stanton, Christ - That SA 87-07 be continued to the Planning Commission meeting of March 24, 1987. Motion carried unanimously (7-0-0). SA 86-69 Continued signing request - Griffon Griffon Computers Computers, Inc. - 412 E. Campbell Ave. - Interim (Planned Development) Zoning District. Commissioner Christ reported that this matter was considered by the Site and Architectural Review Committee. Because of a problem between the tenant and the owner, the applicant is unable to pursue a signing program that would meet with the approval of the Site Committee. The Committee, therefore, is recommending denial without prejudice, with the applicant's concurrence. M/S: Olszewski, Christ - That the Planning Commission deny without prejudice SA 86-69; and, that - the subject sign be removed within 30 days of this date (by March 24, 1987). Motion carried unanimously (7-0-0). -10- Request Continued request of Mr. Joe Testa for -- Testa, J, approval of a two foot lattice extension to an existing six foot fence on property known as 830 Virginia Ct. in an R-1 (Single Family Residential) Zoning District. Mr. Kee reported that Staff is recommending that this item be removed from the agenda, in that the property owners have reached an agreement. M/S: Kasolas, Stanton - That this item be removed from the agenda. Motion carried unanimously (7-0-0) * : S 66-21 Continued request of Mr. Tam Ly to Request modify an existing site plan to Ly, T. eliminate an approved landscaping area in front of Anastasia's Fitness Center located on property known as 2931 S. Winchester Blvd, in a C-2-S (General Commercial) Zoning District. Commissioner Christ reported that this item was considered by the Site and Architectural Review Committee. The Committee worked with the applicant to provide some landscaping on the site, and the applicant has agreed to provide upgraded plant materials. The subject 3' strip will be eliminated with the provision that landscaping be installed in front of the property. The Site Committee is .recommending approval of the presented plans with conditions as indicated in the Staff Report. Planning Director kee noted that Staff is in agreement with the Site Committee's recommendation. Commissioner Kasolas noted that there is a serious parking problem on this site. Commissioner Christ stated that the Site Committee felt that by eliminating the 3' landscaping strip, the parking on-site could be maximized. It should be noted that this project was approved 20 years ago. Discussion ensued regarding the parking problem at this location. M/S: Stanton, Christ - That the Planning Commission approve the applicant's revised landscaping proposal, subject to conditions indicated in the Staff Report dated February 24, 1987. Motion carried unanimously (7-0-0). -11- MM 87-02 Application of Mr. George Barrows for Barrows, G. approval of a minor modification to allow the construction of a 450 sq.ft. building addition and the placement of three portable storage containers on property known as 1266 Whiteoaks Rd. in an M-1-S (Light Industrial) Zoning District. Commissioner Christ reported that this item was considered by the Site and Architectural Review Committee. The Committee is recommending a continuance so that revised. plans may be submitted. Planning Director Kee noted that Staff is in agreement with the recommendation for continuance. Commissioner Dickson stated that he would like a condition added which stipulates that the storage containers are temporary, with a specified removal date. Commissioner Kasolas asked. that information be provided on the current use and coverage of this site; how the original approval compares to what is presently taking place on the site;. and, what is being proposed on the site. Commissioner Kasolas noted that any changes should provide for a more aesthetically pleasing appearance of this development, and should address the open storage of vehicles and equipment. M/S: Stanton, Christ - That MM 87-02 be continued tot he Planning Commission meeting of March 24, 1987. Motion carried unanimosuly (7-0-0). MM 87-03 Application of Mr. Lewis Bratton for Bratton, L. approval of a minor addition to an existing industrial building located on property known as 439 McGlincey Lane in an M-1-S (Light Industrial) Zoning District. Commissioner Christ reported that this item was considered by the Site and Architectural Review Committee. Discussion at the Site Committee meeting addressed several concerns expressed by the Committee and Staff. Redlining of the presented plans indicates the building addition abutting the property line.. Adequate parking is provided for the addition. The fencing issue discussed under #1 in the Staff Report has been resolved; and, items #2 & 3 will be addressed by the removal of the storage container and other items currently stored in the parking area. Item #4, the trash enclosure, will remain as a condition of approval. The Committee is recommending approval as redlined. -12- Discussion ensued as to whether or not this application was a minor modification in that the requested addition is more than 50$ of the existing structure. M/S: Dickson, Kasolas - That the Planning Commission find that MM 87-03 is not a minor modification; and, that this item be agendized for public hearing as an "Site and Architectural Approval" application due to the substantial increase in the building sized Motion failed .with the following roll call vote: Discussion on motion Commissioner Kasolas asked the applicant if the additional processing time required for a Site and Architectural application would create a hardship for him. Mr. Bratton stated that he saw no reason for the additional requirements. Commissioner Dickson noted that this application provides for an increase in building size of 62$; and, he was of the opinion that this was not a minor change. Commissioner Christ indicated that this request is minor in relation to what is happening on the surrounding. properties. Even though the square footage may not seem minor, the proposal will have minor impact on the site and will improve the property. Vote on motion AYES: Commissioners: Kasolas, Stanton, Dickson NOES: Commissioners: Olszewski, Christ, Walker, Perrine ABSENT: Commissioners: None. Discussion followed regarding a possible continuance= notification of adjoining property owners; total site coverage in comparison with site coverage on adjoining properties; the problem with high fences in the McGlincey Lane area; and, the landscaping which will be provided under this proposal. M/S: Olszewski, Christ - That the Planning Commission adopt findings as .indicated in the Staff Report and approve MM 87-03 subject to redlining of the presented plans and subject to conditions of approval as indicated in the Staff Report dated February 24, 1987. Motion carried with the following roll call vote: AYES: Commissioners: Stanton, Olszewski, Christ, Walker, Perrine NOES: .Commissioners: Kasolas, Dickson ABSENT: Commissioners: None. -13- Staff Report Requirements for Historic Districts. M/S: Kasolas, Dickson - That this Staff Report be noted and filed; and, that this matter be scheduled for a Joint Study Session with the City Council at some point in the future. Motion carried unanimously (7-D-0). Staff Report Audio Visual Aids. Planning Director Kee stated that Staff is looking for input from the Commission as to whether Staff is doing an adequate job with the presentations of .applications; and, that this item is indicated in the Goals and Objectives for the Planning Department. Following are comments from the Commissioners. Commissioner Kasolas noted that the provided location maps are very helpful; a large colored zoning map would be helpful to have in the Council Chambers; slides can be helpful when trying to see adjoining properties, however, the use of slides has proven to be very time consuming; and, for very large projects, the provision of plans showing shadow lines, solar impact, and colored renderings could be helpful. Commissioner Dickson noted that aerials are helpful, if they are up-to-date. Commissioner Olszewski preferred the use of numbers and figures to colors; and, expressed a concern that the audience is unable to see pictures that applicants sometimes pass out to the Commission during a presentation. Commissioner Christ noted that photographs being posted, when available, are very helpful. Commissioner Walker expressed his surprise at the number of cities that do not post the plans. Chairman Perrine noted that he would appreciate the provision of one additional page of plans that captures the distinctiveness of each project; also, the provision of three dimensional figures of projects would be helpful. Staff Report Planned Development Permits and City Attorney Public Hearings. City Attorney Seligmann provided a memorandum (attached hereto) addressing this matter. -14- Commisioner Dickson felt that the issue will have to be addressed on a point-by-point basis; and, that it is the responsibility of the Planning Commission to understand the Planned Development ordinance. It was the consensus of the Commission that this report be noted and filed. Staff Report Continued - Traffic Conditionso This item was continued to the Planning Commission meeting of April 14, 1987, due to the lateness of the hour. ADJOURNMENT There being no further business, the meeting was adjourned at 11:20 p.m. APPROVED: Jay Perrine Chairman ATTEST: Arthur A. Kee Secretary RECORDED: Linda A. Dennis Recording Secretary CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL: PD 84-06 APPLICANT: PROMETHEUS DEVELOPMENT CO. SITE ADDRESS: 900 E. HAMILTON AVE. P. C. MTG: 2-24-87 It should be noted that all conditions indicated in Ordinance No. 1560 still apply to the project. Conditions listed below address specific requirements identified n the most recent review of these plans. for Phase I. FIRE DEPARTMENT 1. Provide a Class I standpipe in each stairwell. 2. All areas of the building, including the parking garage, shall be protected by an automatic sprinkler system. 3. Provide municipal-type fire hydrants at 300 foot intervals along access driveways. 4. Access driveways shall be designated as fire lanes with signs designating "no parking". 5. Provide Class III standpipes and hose cabinets in the parking garage. 6~ During building construction, a temporary standpipe shall be provided as per Sec. 3806 of Uniform Building Code. 7. Building elevators shall have Fire Department recall capability. BUILDING DEPARTMENT 8. Consideration in design for the following: Wood shingles on Executive Suites shall meet requirements of Section. 3202(b) of Uniform Building Code - Phase IIi. Large window areas shall comply with energy efficiency standard effective January 1, 1987, Title 20 & 24, Phases I, II, & III. PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT 9. Process and file a subdivision map. 10. Provide a copy of title report. 11. Provide grading and drainage plan to City Engineer. 12. Obtain excavation permit, pay fees and post surety to construct all public improvements. 13. Building occupancy will not be allowed until public improvements are installed. Continued.... CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL: PD 84-06 APPLICANT: PROMETHEUS DEVELOPMENT CO, SITE ADDRESS: 900 E, HAMILTON AVE. P. C, MTG: 2-24-87 PAGE 2 14. Phase II and III of this project require the submittal of detailed elevations, site plans, and parking analysis to the Planning Department for approval of the Site and Architectural Review Committee and the Planning Commission prior to issuance of building permits for these portions of the project. 15, Landscaping plan indicating the type and size of plan materials, location of irrigation system, protection and retention of existing redwood trees, details of planters, hardscape, and a pedestrian circulation plan to be submitted to the Planning Department for review by the Parks & Recreation Commission, and for approval by the Planning Commission prior to issuance of a building permit, 3. .Applicant to provide an access easement and design details of bikeway and loading ramp, satisfactory to the City Engineer, to address the access and maintenance needs of the Santa Clara Valley Water District. CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL FILE NO: S 66-21 SITE ADDRESS: 2931 S. WINCHESTER BL P.C. MTG.: 2-24-87 1. .Landscaping plan indicating type and size of plant material, and location of irrigation. system to be submitted to the Planning Department and approved by the Site and Architectural Review Committee and/or Planning Commission by April 1, 1987. 2. Landscaping to be installed within 30 days after approval of landscape plan. RECOMMENDED FINDINGS: MM 87-03/S 79-21 SITE ADDRESS: 439 MCGLINCEY~LN•. APPLICANT: BRATTON, L•. P~c C. MTG•:: 2-24-87 r r l~: The proposed project is an appropriate scale in relationship to the adjacent developed uses-: 2: The pzoject is well designed and architecturally blends into the neighborhood: 3•. The parking provided meets the code requirements: 4; Substantial landscaping has been provided which adds to the aesthetics of the project. ~ ~_ ,.. CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL: MM 87-03/S 79-21 APPLICANT: Bratton, L•: r `• SITE ADDRESS: 439 McGlincey Lane P:a: MTGs 2-24-87 h ~ The applicant is notified as part of this application that he/she is required '~ to meet the following conditions in accordance with the Ordinances of the City of Campbell and the Laws of the State of California; 1•. Revised site plan reflecting redlining by Staff to be submitted to the Planning Department and approved by the Planning Director upon recommendation of the Architectural Advisor prior to application for a building permit. 2•, Property to be fenced and landscaped as indicated and/or added in red on the plans. Landscaping and fencing shall be maintained in accordance with the approved plans: 3: Landscaping plan indicating type and size of plant material, and location of irrigation system to be submitted to the Planning Department and approved by the Site and Architectural Review Committee and/or Planning Commission prior to issuance of a building permit: 4•: Fencing plan indicating location and design details of fencing to be submitted to the Planning Department and approved by the Planning Director prior to issuance of a building permit-: 5: Applicant to either (1) post a faithful performance bond in the amount of $3,000•.00 to insure landscaping, fencing, and striping of parking areas within 3 months of completion of construction; or (2) file written agreement to complete landscaping, fencing, and striping of parking areas. Bond or agreement to be filed with the Planning. Department prior to application fora building permits 6•. Applicant to submit a letter to the Planning Department, satisfactory to the City Attorney, prior to application for building permit, limiting the use of the property as follows: 3,120 sq-:fts industrial/warehouse use•. 7s All mechanical equipment on roofs and all utility meters to be screened as approved by the Planning Director: 8~. Building occupancy will-not be allowed until public improvements are installed: 9~: All parking and driveway areas to be developed in compliance with Chapter 21•.50 of the Campbell Municipal Code: All parking spaces to be provided with appropriate concrete curbs or bumper quards•: 10•: Underground utilities to be provided as required by Section 20-:16.070 of the Campbell Municipal Code-: 11-. Plans submitted to the Building Department for plan check shall indicate ~ clearly the location of all connections for underground utilities including water, sewer, electric, telephone and television cables,-etcs CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL: MM 87-03/S 79-21 APPLICANT: Bratton, L•: ~ SITE ADDRESS: 439 McGlincey Lane P•:C-: MTG. 2-24-87 PRGE 2 12: Sign application to be submitted in accordance with provisions of the Sign Ordinance for all signs: No sign to be installed until application is approved and permit issued by Planning and Building Departments (Section 21:68:030 of the Campbell Municipal Code): 13•, Ordinance No~: 782 of the Campbell Municipal Code stipulates that any contract for the collection and disposal of refuse, garbage, wet garbage and rubbish produced within the limits of the City of Campbell shall be made with Green Valley Disposal Company: This requirement applies to all single-family dwellings, multiple apartment units, to all commercial, business, industrial, manufacturing, and construction establishments: 14: Trash container(s) of a size and quantity necessary to serve the development shall be located in area(s) approved by the Fire Department-: IInless otherwise noted, enclosure(s) shall consist of a concrete floor surrounded by a solid wall or fence and have self-closing doors of a size specified by the Fire Department: All enclosures ~o be constructed at grade level and have a level area adjacent to the trash enclosure area to service these containers. 15: Applicant shall comply with all appropriate State and City requirements for the handicapped: BIIILDING DEPARTMENT 16~: One hour construction on walls 3'0" from property line with no openings: Roof to be protected one hour up to 5'0" front property line. PLANNING DEPARTMENT 17. Cargo storage container to be removed from the property by May 1, 1987: 18•: No materials, supplies, vehicle parts, etc•. may be stored outside of the building: FIRE DEPARTMENT -- PIIBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT • No comments at this time: n ~ / .J I M __ ~ • ~.~'~._ ~,i~' 3anf~Ir• Avg. -_ _ r r p- ~'s• - - , - - - 1 - - -_ - p ~ ,r'~ ~ r- ~~ ~ -- ~ ._ . . _ J./ . L ' ' AVE. ~ i %~ti =- ~ ~ 1 ~, ~~ ! \ ~ / f ( ~ ~ ~i -- ~ , ~ . , `` ~ .~ ~ . , ~ ~ ~ ~ I i ~ /~ i ~ , f . _ •rru~h _ AN. i - - ~ ~ ~ 1 / / --' -- ~ 1 / ~ ~P~ y . ~. , ._ -t~ / '• ~, // i I 1r~~r vo~ ,/ w ~ T- o~ '. . / _ ,_ ~,~ i ~ 1 ~ ~ e ~ ~1 i i •. ~ • ~ Y ~ ,. 1 ~ 1 - ~~ ~ j ~y \ --- ~ ~ '. ~ ~ r r .. ~ y ~ ~: ~ ~ ~ .., ~~ ~ ~ 1 a~IJ ~ ~ ~ ' ~ ~ • _ a ~ '~ _ ~~~ " .~ 1 ~ r a r t _. ..~~ M E M O R A N D U M DATE: 23 February 1987 TO: Planning Commission FROM: City Attorney vAilliam R. Seligmann RE: Referral of Revised Plans to Planning Commission as a Condition to Grant of a FD Permit Background Presently, the Planning Commission is considering revised site plans for PD 84-06. Consideration of these plans by the Commission was a condition of the PD Ordinance and Development Agreement previously adopted by the City Council. Discussion Normally development plans for projects in a PD zoning district are to be approved by the City Council by ordinance. CMC Section 21.06.030. In approving a project, through, the Council may attach conditions to secure the purposes of the general plan. CMC Section 21.06.110 B. In the case of PD 84-06, the Council did approve the development by ordinance, with the condition that a revised site plan be approved by the Planning Commission. Thus, pursuant to the ordinance of the City Council the review by the Commission is necessary for the project to proceed. Furthermore, with regard to PD 84-06, the aforementioned condition was made a part of a Development Agreement with the developer. This .agreement is adopted by ordinance, and may modify certain zoning requirements with respect to a particular project. Failure to comply with the terms of the agreement could put the City in breach of the contract..