Loading...
PC Min 09/09/1986PLANNING COMMISSION CITY OF CAMPBELL, CALIFORNIA 7:30 PM MINUTES SEPTEMBER 9, 1986 The Planning Commission of the City of Campbell convened this day in regular session at the regular meeting place, the Council Chambers of City Hall, 70 N. First St., Campbell, California. ROLL CALL Present Commissioners: Dickson, Olszewski, Christ, Perrine (7:35 p.m.), Fairbanks, Kasolas; Planning Director A. A. Kee, Planner II Tim J. Haley, Engineering Manager Bill Helms, Acting City Attorney Bill Seligmann, Recording Secretary Linda Dennis. Absent Commissioner Stanton. APPROVAL OF MINUTES M/S: Christ, Olszewski - That the minutes of the Planning Commission meeting of August 26, 1986 be approved as submitted. Motion carried unanimously (4-0-2-1), with Commissioners Perrine and Stanton being absent, and Commissioner Fairbanks abstaining because of absence from the meeting of August 26, 1986. COMMUNICATIONS Chairman Kasolas noted that Commissioner Stanton is excused from this evening's meeting because of a family matter. Mr. Kee noted that communications received pertained to specific items on the agenda and would be discussed at that time. Commissioner Perrine entered the Chambers at 7:35 p.m. PUBLIC HEARINGS ZC 86-09 Continued public hearing to consider the Ghiai, Y. application of Mr. Yves Ghiai for a zone change from R-2-S (Multiple Family Residential) to PD (Planned Development) and approval of plans, elevations and development schedule to allow the construction of 6 townhomes on property known as 272 W. Sunnyoaks Ave. -2- Commissioner Perrine reported that this application was considered by the Site and Architectural Review Committee. The Committee is recommending a continuance. Mr. Kee reported that Staff is in concurrence with the Site Committee's recommendation, and noted that revised plans will be submitted to the Planning Department prior to the next meeting. Mr. Kee suggested that those in the audience who are interested in this item come in to look at the plans. Chairman Kasolas opened the public hearing and invited anyone in the audience to speak for or against this item, noting that this item will probably be continued. Mr. Ernest Cook, 282 Sunnyoaks Ave., stated his interest in keeping the height of the proposed buildings lower than those on the other side of his property. He also expressed concern with the proposed density. There being no one else wishing to speak, it was M/S: Fairbanks, Dickson - That the public hearing on ZC 86-09 be continued to the Planning Commission meeting of September 23, 1986. Motion carried unanimously (6-0-1). PD 86-02 Continued public hearing to consider the Anderson, K. application of Mr. Kurt Anderson for a Planned Development Permit and approval of plans, elevations and development schedule to allow the construction of a duplex on property known as 274 Everett Ave. in a PD (Planned Development/Medium Density Residential) Zoning District. Mr. Kee reported that Staff is recommending a continuance in that a revised set of plans has not yet been received. Chairman Kasolas opened the public hearing and invited anyone in the audience to speak for or against this item. There being no one wishing to speak at this time, it was M/S: Fairbanks, Perrine - That the public hearing on PD 86-02 be continued to the Planning Commission meeting of September 23, 1986. Motion carried unanimously (6-0-1). -3- UP 86-09 Continued public hearing to consider Loher, J. the application of Ms. Joan Loher, on behalf of Raggedy Ann and Andy Preschool and Daycare, for the establishment of a preschool and daycare center on property known as 1291 Elam Ave. in a C-1-S (Neighborhood Commercial) Zoning District. Mr. Kee reported that Staff is recommending that the Commission adopt the indicated findings and approve this use. In addition to the packet received by the Commission, a report from the Police Department indicating crime activity in this area is at the Commission's station. Mr. Kee noted that Staff's recommendation is from a zoning standpoint; and, the Police Department is recommending against this particular location for a daycare use. Sgt. Paul Kern, Campbell Police Department, reviewed the Police Department's report for the Commission, noting that the report does not indicate a drastically high crime rate, but represents steady crime activity over the 5 months covered in the report. Commissioner Dickson asked what the average crime rate was in the City, compared to the studied Grids 7 & 8. Sgt. Kern responded that he would have to expand the grid study for an accurate representation. Chairman Kasolas asked if Grid 8 was atypical of the community, or in the 5 month period is it atypical to have a crime activity of one incident for each block for eack week. Is this area typical of the community at large? Sgt. Kern indicated that further study would have to be done to answer this question. Commissioner Christ asked if Grid 7 included Rolling Hills Shopping Center as well as the San Tomas Shopping Center. Sgt. Kern noted that it does include both shopping centers; and, it has been his experience that there is more crime in areas where there are commercial uses. Commissioner Fairbanks asked Sgt. Kern if he was typically the officer who would respond to Planning Commission questions. Sgt. Kern stated that this is the first daycare use he has reviewed; however, he has been reviewing the Planning Commission applications sent to the Police Department for 2-1/2 years as part of his assignment. Commissioner Fairbanks asked if these criminal activities occured at specific times of the day, evening, or afternoon. Sgt. Kern responded that further research would be necessary to gather this information. -4- Commissioner Fairbanks questioned. the statement in the Police Department memorandum, "juveniles and young adults", asking Sgt. Kern what he was "- saying with this terminology. Sgt. Kern noted that the front of the shopping center has been a gathering location because of the surrounding area. The statement was made as an observation only. Commissioner Christ asked for an opinion if the daycare use was proposed near the Rolling Hills Shopping Center, 3-4 blocks away, but still in Grid 7. Sgt. Kern indicated that his concern with the Rolling Hills Shopping Center would be the two bars located in this center, and he would have similar concerns; however, this is his opinion only. Commissioner Olszewski expressed his appreciation to Sgt. Kern for his participation. He asked about the analysis that the presented number did not reflect a high crime rate, and how one determines that the numbers are or are not a high crime rate -- what is a high crime rate? Sgt. Kern responded that the analysis of what crime rate is high is subjective, and further study of all the other grids in the City would be required. Commissioner Olszewski questioned the statement in the memorandum - "It is _ questionable this would occur." pertaining to State licensing. Sgt. Kern stated that in looking at the site, he would have concerns about the security for the children, regardless of what type of fence is constructed. The physical location of the structure may or may not cause licensing agencies to have questions. Commissioner Olszewski asked about the final paragraph of the memorandum from the Police Department which indicates "...,we would recommend..." - where did the word "we" come from? Did Sgt. Kern meet with others? Sgt. Kern noted that he talked with key staffinembers who are in the subject area on a daily basis, as well as discussing the issue briefly with Commander Lockwood, ergo the term "we". Commissioner Fairbanks asked what officers handled Grid 7. Sgt. Kern noted that the Department is in the process of shift changes; however, he believes that Officers Haole, Pearson, and Perry are some of the staff assigned to Grid 7. Commissioner Perrine asked under what circumstance would the Police Department recommend in favor of a daycare location; or, what factors draw _ the conclusion that this is not a good site? Sgt. Kern stated that the factors indicating that this is not a good location are consistency of criminal activity coupled with the location adjacent to a shopping center. -5- Commissioner Dickson stated that he would like to make it clear that Sgt. Kern is speaking for the Police Department as designated by the Police Chief. Mr. Kurt Anderson, representing the applicant, thanked Sgt. Kern for his presentation, and noted that he felt the time of the criminal activities has a bearing on the issue. Mr. Anderson discussed the actual operation of a daycare, noting that the children are escorted into and out of the center by their parents; and, at no time do the children leave the confines of the center unaccompanied by an adult. The children are supervised at all times of the day in the completely enclosed site. The State has reviewed this location and has been positive about the use pending the use permit and the structure being brought up to code. The applicant is in concurrence with all the conditions indicated by Staff. Mrs. Joan Loher, applicant, explained that the childcare center is an educational facility with strict supervision and plenty of love. Child care centers have existed in the worst ghettos, and the children thrive from the love and care they receive there. More and more children will be moving into this neighborhood, and most of the children who will come to the daycare center already live in the area. Mrs. Loher noted that she did not understand why it was okay for the children to live in this neighborhood, but not to be cared for in this area. Surely the City can take code enforcement actions to abate illegal and undesirable activities. The children will have little or no contact with the people in the neighborhood. Mrs. Loher noted that the Alcoholic Beverage Control's response states that they would have gone ahead with the approval for a liquor store in spite of the daycare facility. Commissioner Dickson asked Mrs. Loher what criteria is used in selecting a location. Mrs. Loher responded that the primary issue is finding a site where the neighbors will not object, where noise factors are not bothersome, adequate yard space, and the amount of interior space per child. Mrs. Joan Petri, 661 Ardis, San Jose, spoke in favor of granting the use permit; cited the things her children have learned at Raggedy Ann & Andy Preschool; and, stressed the importance of good daycare, noting that Mrs. Loher really cares. Mrs. Petri suggested that some of the problems in the area are a result of boredom, and perhaps a positive change in the area will show people a different direction. Ken and Julie Rose, 1155 Garber Place, San Jose, spoke in favor of the use permit and expressed their confidence in Mrs. Loher and her staff. Mr. Craig Cowell spoke highly of Mrs. Loher and expressed trust in the selected location, noting that he feels the children will be safe. Mr. Joe Elek, owner of the adjacent San Tomas Shopping Center, noted that there is a lot of fence climbing at the shopping center. He continued that the neighborhood has improved quite a bit; however, he still sees quite a bit of vandalism in the area. -6- There being no one else wishing to speak, it was M/S: Olszewski, Fairbanks - That the public hearing on UP 86-09 be closed. Motion carried unanimously (6-0-1) . Commissioner Christ asked if there was a way to make the fencing higher and more secure, since this was a concern. Mr. Kee responded that the submitted site plans indicate a 6' chain link fence around the property, and 6' is the normal fence height. Staff is of the opinion that the applicant has responded to the concerns expressed. Commissioner Dickson stated that he wished to go on record as being in favor of daycare centers. He is, however, looking at the location in this case to see if it is harmonious with the type of use proposed. Chairman Kasolas noted that the issue is that of land use only--is a daycare center an appropriate land use for this site. He noted the improvement in the area; the fact that the economy now requires two-family incomes; and, there are a number of families in this area with children that need care. Chairman Kasolas concluded that any decision made by the Planning Commission would not be made to impugn the integrity of the applicant in any way. M/S: Olszewski, Christ - That the Planning Commission adopt the Negative Declaration which has been prepared for this project; and, that the Planning Commission adopt a Resolution approving UP 86-09, based on the attached findings, and subject to conditions indicated in the Staff Report dated September 9,.1986. Discussion of motion Commissioner Christ noted that there is another shopping center in this grid that has crime problems; and, that the City itself has a community center that operated a daycare center with extensive children's activities across the street from that shopping center. The daycare center operated at that location for a number of years without trouble. Again, it is a neighborhood that is improving. Commissioner Christ felt that this would be a step in the right direction for everyone in this area. Commissioner Olszewski felt that crime could be attributed to the urban design of a neighborhood, and there have been documented incidents where crime has lessened because of improvements in the area. Commissioner Olszewski noted that he sees this application as an improvement of a structure and the addition of a viable climate for children who might otherwise be left at home alone. P.C. meeting of 9/23/86 SEE APPROVAL OF MINUTES for -7- additional comment from Dickson Commissioner Dickson stated that shopping centers have a high probability - of crime. He felt that there are many other desirable locations in which - a childcare use could be located; and, is it very difficult to keep track - of 24 children with only two people. Commissioner Dickson concluded that he did not think this site is a proper location for this type of use. ---------- Mr. Seligmann noted that the standard for a use permit is if the use will be detrimental to the neighborhood, not necessarily if the neighborhood will be detrimental to the use. Vote on motion AYES: Commissioners: Olszewski, Christ, Perrine, Fairbanks, Kasolas NOES: Commissioners: Dickson ABSENT: Commissioners: Stanton. Chairman Kasolas noted that he would hope that this use would be a positive step in continuing the improvements in this neighborhood. The Commissioner recessed at 8:50 p.m.; the meeting reconvened at 9:00 p.m. UP 86-10 Continued public hearing to consider the Filice, A. application of Mr. Al Filice, on behalf of Medevac Inc., to establish a paramedic station with a living unit and a paramedic van in an existing building on property known as 145 Dillon Ave. in a PD (Planned Development/Industrial) Zoning District. Mr. Kee reported that Staff is recommending approval for one year, with a review of the use at that time. Chairman Kasolas asked about possible ingress/egress from this Dillon Ave. area for the emergency vehicle; and, if there was any need to exit to Railway Ave. to blend with eastbound Campbell Ave. traffic. Mr. Helms indicated that the unit could use Dillon or take Sam Cava to Gilman. Mr. Helms noted that the station has been operating for approximately 1-1/2 years without any problems that Staff is aware of; a review of the accident records indicates no significant problem as a result of this paramedic operation. Chairman Kasolas opened the public hearing and invited anyone in the audience to speak for or against this item. -8- Commissioner Christ asked Battalion Chief Paul Gantt, Campbell Fire Department, about the location of close calls mentioned in a previous memo regarding this issue; specifically, the proximity to the fire station - or elsewhere in the City. Battalion Chief Gantt responded that he did not believe any close calls have been documented. The mention of close calls in the subject memo was merely indicated as a potential concern when emergency vehicles are using the same intersections. The concern is simply that the Campbell Fire Department does not know when the other ambulance is coming, or where it is coming from. If Medevac is using any major intersection, there is the possibility of a conflict. Commissioner Dickson asked Mr. Filice about "stand-by points". Mr. Filice explained that when a Medevac unit from another sector is on a call, the Campbell unit is moved into a "stand-by point" to cover the area. Commissioner Dickson noted to Mr. Filice that he is trained in both medical and legal points, and asked him why the facility has been operating without a use permit for a year. Mr. Filice responded that the previous landlord assured Medevac that there was no problem with the living unit on the site, and told them that a use permit was already granted. Mr. Filice stressed that Medevac had no intention of breaking the laws of the City. Commissioner Fairbanks asked Mr. Kee about Condition 3. Mr. Kee indicated that at present, the City is in discussion with the current property .owner about bringing the whole site into conformance with the zoning ordinance. This use permit request is a completely separate issue. There being no one else wishing to speak, it was M/S: Fairbanks, Christ - That the public hearing on UP 86-10 be closed. Motion carried unanimously (6-0-1) . M/S: Fairbanks, Christ - That the Planning Commission adopt the attached findings and adopt a Resolution .approving this UP 86-10 for a period of one year, subject to conditions as indicated in the Staff Report dated August 26, 1986. At the end of the one year period, the Planning Commission will hold a hearing to review the use and may extend the time period of the use permit or terminate it. Motion carried with the following roll call vote: -9- AYES: Commissioners: Dickson, Olszewski, Christ, Perrine, Fairbanks, Kasolas NOES: Commissioners: None ABSENT: Commissioners: Stanton. Commissioner Fairbanks thanked Battalion Chief Gannt for coming to the meeting, noting that he clarified her concerns on this issue. Commissioner Olszewski noted that at the last meeting he agreed with Commissioner Dickson that additional information regarding trip generation was needed. He stated that he is completely satisfied that the information has been presented, and that his initial feeling that this is a good use has been verified. UP 86-13 Public hearing to consider the Younan, H. application of Mr. Homer Younan for approval of a use permit to allow on-sale and off-sale beer and wine from a pizza parlor on property known as 865 S. San Tomas Aquino Rd. in a C-1-S (Neighborhood Commercial) Zoning District. Mr. Kee reported that Staff is recommending approval of the on-sale beer and wine use only, and recommending denial of the requested off-sale beer and wine. Chairman Kasolas opened the public hearing and invited anyone in the audience to speak for or against this item. Mr. Zaya, President of Pizza Run, Inc., appeared to answer questions. Mr. Zaya stated that the use is adjacent to the grocery store in the shopping center; the hours will be from 11 a.m, to 10 p.m.; 70~ of his operation is delivery, and the beer is just in case someone wants beer with pizza when they eat on-site. Mr. Zaya stated that he is withdrawing the request for off-sale beer and wine, and is in accord with Staff's recommendations and conditions. Mr. Joe Elek, property owner, noted that the pizza parlor has 12 seats on-site. The applicant is requesting beer and wine in conjunction with the on-site eating facilities. Mr. Elek continued that during the ten months he has owned this shopping center, there has not been one crime report from the location, and that he supervises every operation within the center. He stated that he is also in concurrence with Staff's recommendations and conditions. There being no one else wishing to speak, it was M/S: Fairbanks, Christ - That the public hearing on UP 86-13 be closed. Motion carried unanimously (6-0-1) . -10- M/S: Perrine, Christ - Discussion on motion That the Planning Commission adopt the attached findings and adopt a Resolution approving on-sale beer and wine, but denying off-sale beer and wine, subject to conditions as indicated in the Staff report dated September 9, 1986. Motion carried with the following roll call vote: Commissioner Dickson noted that the use permit procedure was originally established to curtail the number of liquor establishments in the downtown area. Now it appears that there is a problem developing in this shopping center. There are other uses in this center which are selling beer and wine, and a recently approved video use. Commissioner Dickson felt that there was too high a concentration of these types of uses for this area. Chairman Kasolas noted that Vote on motion AYES: Commissioners: NOES: Commissioners: ABSENT: Commissioners: this area is very heavily populated. Olszewski, Christ, Perrine, Fairbanks, Kasolas Dickson Stanton. ZC 86-10 Public hearing to consider a City- HPB 86-01 initiated zone change from R-1 (Single City-initiated Family Residential) and/or P-O (Professional Office) to R-1-H and/or P-O-H (Historical Overlay District) for the Alice Avenue Neighborhood (all properties having frontage on Alice Avenue: 20 through 235 Alice Ave., 235 S. First St., 189 & 190 S. Third St., s 2200 S. Winchester Blvd. Mr. Kee reported that there is a Revised Staff Report at the Commission's stations recommending that this item be continued in order that a public hearing may be set to consider a text amendment to the Zoning Ordinance, modifying the procedures for review of changes to properties within an historic district. Chairman Kasolas asked if the subject area was close to the redevelopment area being considered by the consultant. Mr. Haley indicated that the Alice Avenue Neighborhood is outside the Redevelopment Area. -11- Chairman Kasolas asked if there was any feeling or belief that this may have positive or detrimental effect in the direction of the Redevelopment Agency since there is a significant land mass that fits into the Redevelopment Area. Mr. Kee noted that the subject area is shown on the General Plan for low density, and if this proposal were adopted, the area would stay low density. Staff does not think the low density residential use will create problems with the Redevelopment Area; however, if the Commission so desires, the issue can be referred to the Redevelopment Agency for comment. Chairman Kasolas opened the public hearing and invited anyone in the audience to speak for or against this item. Mr. Nash Kunkel, 86 Alice Ave., asked for clarification on the procedure. Mr. Monty Smith, 136 Alice Ave., stated that he shared the concern of many elderly residents on the street that if we don't curtail known or unknown threats, we will lose the street; however, he did not see Alice Avenue as an improving neighborhood, noting that many of the old houses are badly in need of repair. He felt that the proposed historical zoning would hurt the street. Mr. Smith continued that he felt the existing R-1 zoning is adequate protection, and that he would object to changing the architectural styles on the street, but he did not feel that a historic zoning would accomplish anything except make homeowners less able to fix and maintain their homes. Mr. Smith stated that he would very much object having to come to the City to ask if he could put on a new roof or paint his home; and, there are no tax benefits involved for the additional rules and regulations. Chairman Kasolas asked if it was true that homeowners would have difficulty improving their homes if the historic zoning is approved. Mr. Haley responded that the proposed ordinance does not preclude maintenance of the existing dwellings. The intent of the ordinance is to provide for a review procedure for when someone wishes to add onto or make significant changes, which would involve a public hearing before the Historic Preservation Board. Mr. Haley continued that the Historic Preservation Board recognizes the street as a changing street - just so that the proposed changes are sensitive to the structures that are there. Mr. Smith questioned the appeal procedures. Mr. Haley explained that an appeal procedure is provided, and briefly explained it. Chairman Kasolas asked if statutes allowed public hearings to be held by Boards other than the City Council and the Planning Commission, particularly in light of the financial report regulations. Mr. Seligmann indicated that he was not sure that the Historic Preservation Board could make final land use decisions. -12- Commissioner Fairbanks noted her concern with tying the hands of those living in historic homes. Mr. George Stowers, 199 Alice Ave., stated that he is completely opposed to the proposal. A homeowner would have to go through three levels of bureaucracy before he could do anything with his property. Mr. Stowers continued that it has been his experience that properties zoned historic have decreased in value because they cannot be sold, except to specialized people. Chairman Kasolas asked Mr. Stowers if those who are opposed to this zone change have directly communicated this opposition to their neighbors. Mr. Stowers responded that prior to the last Historic Preservation Board meeting, he canvassed the neighborhood and passed out copies of the proposed ordinance. Those property owners who are opposed to the change have agreed to come together and approach the Commission. This issue has been discussed on a street corner level, but not at a neighborhood meeting. There being no one wishing to speak further at this time, it was M/S: Olszewski, Fairbanks - That the public hearing on ZC 86-10 be continued to the Planning Commission meeting of October 14, 1986; and, that the Planning Commission set the date of October 14, 1986 for public hearing to consider a text amendment modifying the Zoning Ordinance for review of changes to properties in a historic district. Motion carried unanimously (6-0-1). Chairman Kasolas asked the Commission if there was any interest in referring this matter to the Redevelopment Agency for comment, specifically its possible impact on the downtown plan. There was no apparent interest. ZC 86-11 Public hearing to consider a City- HPB 86-02 initiated zone change from P-F (Public City-initiated Facilities) to P-F-H (Historic Overlay) Zoning District for property known as 1 W. Campbell Ave. (Campbell Community Center). Mr. Haley reported that the Civic Improvement Commission has initiated an application for Historic Landmark designation on the southeasterly portion of the Campbell Community Center, comprising 2.8 acres of the overall 30.7 acre parcel. Mr. Seligmann clarified that this item is for a change of zoning to the specific buildings - not for a change in the procedure, as the last item was. -13- Chairman Kasolas opened the public hearing and invited anyone in the audience to speak for or against this item. There being no one wishing to speak, it was M/S: Olszewski, Christ - That the public hearing on ZC 86-11 be closed. Motion carried unanimously (6-0-1) . M/S: Fairbanks, Olszewski - That the Planning Commission recommend that the City Council accept the Negative Declaration which has been prepared for this project; and, that the Planning Commission adopt a Resolution recommending that the City Council designate the southeasterly portion of the Campbell Community Center as an Historic Landmark and change the zone for this portion of the site from P-F (Public Facilities) to P-F-H (Public Facilities/Historic Overlay) Zone. Motion carried with the following roll call vote: AYES: Commissioners: Dickson, Olszewski, Christ, Perrine, Fairbanks NOES: Commissioners: Kasolas ABSENT: Commissioners: Stanton. MISCELLANEOUS SA 86-42 Sign application - Anastasia's Fitness Anatasia's Fitness Center Center - 2931 S. Winchester Blvd. - C-2-S (General Commercial) Zoning District. Mr. Kee reported that the applicant is requesting approval of an 84 sq.ft. sign reading "Anastasia's Fitness Center and Swim School" to be placed over the entrance to the building. Staff is recommending approval. Commissioner Olszewski noted that the item was considered by the Site and Architectural Review Committee; however, it is before the Commission without a recommendation. Commissioner Olszewski continued that he could not see where there was an outstanding need for a larger sign when there was already an approved 50 sq.ft. freestanding sign. Additionally, he felt that the building's location, being set back from the street, made it unique - therefore, drawing attention to it because it is not on the street frontage. M/S: Perrine, That the Planning Commission adopt the attached findings and approve SA 86-42. Motion dies for lack of a second. -14- M/S: Dickson, Christ - That SA 86-42 be continued to the Planning Commission meeting of September 23, 1986, in that the applicant was not present. Motion carried unanimously (6-0-1). Request Continued request of Mr. Scott Borgia to ) have a recording studio classified as an allowed use in the M-1-S (Light Industrial ) Zoning District. It was the consensus of the Commission that this item be removed from the agenda, at the applicant's request. OTHER ITEMS BROUGHT UP BY COMMISSION Chairman Kasolas noted that since he and Commissioner Perrine will be away for the meeting of September 23, 1986, Commissioner Dickson will Chair the meeting. Commissioner Stanton will serve on the Site and Architectural Review Committee for the meeting of September 23, 1986. Additionally, Commissioner Dickson will serve on the Site and Architectural Review Committee in October, since Commissioner Perrine will be on vacation. ADJOURNMENT There being no further business, the meeting was adjourned at 10:15 p.m. APPROVED: George C. Kasolas Chairman ATTEST: Arthur A. Kee Secretary RECORDED: Linda A. Dennis Recording Secretary ~m ~ ._ CAMPBELL POLICE DEPARTMENT GRID MAP 7 ~ 8 MAY THROUGH AUGUST 1986 APRIL_1986 Grid 7 i. Assault ~ Batterye 2. Theft 3. Burglarye 4. Assault b Battery+E 5. Drunk in publics 6. Drunk in publics 7. Probation violation arreste 8. Attempted suicides MAY_1986 Grid_7 1. Burglary* 2. Assault ~ Battery 3. Recovered stolen car* 4. Warrant arrests 5. Probation violation arrest JU1~~_ 1986 Grid 7 1. Vandalism 2. Thefts 3. Burglary 4. Warrant arrests 5. Assault ~ Battery 6. Burglary 7. Possession weaponsa Grid 8 1. Theft 2. Assault, deadly weapon 3. Annoying children Grid 8 i. Possession - drugs 2. Vandalism 3. Vandalism 4. Assault ~ Battery Grid 8 i. Runaway 2. Runaway 3. Crank calls 4. Theft 5. Vandalism 6. Warrant arrest JULY_1986 Grid_7 Grid_8 1. Burglarys 1. Possession marihuana 2. Theft* 2. Assault ~ Battery 3. Threatening victims 3. Assault & Battery 4. Warrant arrest 4. Trespass 5. Unlawful fires 5. Drunk in public 6. Arson AUGUST_19A6 Grid 7 Grid_B i. Annoy molest childrens 2. Assault ~ Battery. 3. Drunk in publics ' 4. Assault ~ Battery 5. Stalen vehicles Out of 49 crime reports taken in Grid #7 and Grid #8, during months listed, 30 were taken in Grid #7 and 19 were taken in adjoining Grid #B. Out of the 30 reports taken in Grid #7, 22 were in close proximity of 1291 Elam Avenue. s Crime reports in immediate area, within approximately three square b 1 ocks. MEMORANDUM ~~ CITY OF CAMPBELL Marty Woodworth September 3, 1986 _ ~ T~ ~ P l Inner I I Oate: Sgt. Paul Kern From: police Department Subject: 1291 ELAM AVENUE ---------------------------------------------------------- Crime analysis of this location and surrounding areas show the fallowing numbers of crime reports generated by this Department - (this does not inculde calls for service such as, disturbances, P. R. details, Patrol checks, etc.) 1986 April - 11 May - 9 June- 13 July - it August - 5 49 criminal reports in a 5 month period These numbers do not reflect a high crime rate, per se, but do reflect a steady flow of activity ranging from assault, vandalisrn, drunk in public, bicycle theft, disturbances, burglary, drugs, and warrant arrests. The shopping center at Elam and San Tomas Aquino Road has always been a gathering place for juveniles and young adults. The actual structure of 1291 Elam is bordered directly by the rear of the shopping center on its Eastside and by the gravel parking lot on the Westside and Northside. This offers little or no security far young children at 1291 Elam. The rear of the shopping center is yet another deposit area for dunk cars, garbage, and on occasion, undesirables. ,.SfAf~ Another issue s the licensing for a daycare center. They would have to obtain gapproval for this site and the structure itself. It is questionable this would occur. Collectively speaking, we would recomrnend against this particular location for a daycare center. Sincerely, - -•- -lc-.~.~ -- - Sergea Paul Kern Crime Prevention Division /sca ITEM N0. 4 ME!lORANDUlI TO: Arthur A. Kee, Planning Director FROM: Gary K. Smith, F~'re Chief SUBJ: UP 86-10 145 DILLON AVE. - MEDEVAC September 5, 1986 This memo will serve to answer the written questions in your memo of August 28, 1986. 1. The Medevac station on Dillon Avenue serves County Zone 3, which encompasses an area from Highway 280 on the north to Lark Avenue on the south and from Leigh Avenue on the east to Saratoga Avenue on the west. 2. Medevac Unit 303, stationed on Dillon Avenue, fiscal year 1984-85. 3. We have checked with our company officers reg. calls" with Medevac units and fire apparatus. been able to document any occurrences where a with a Medevac unit. handled 1,750 calls in the srding the question of "close At this time we have not near-collision has occurred At the commission meeting on September 9, Battalion Chief Paul Gantt will - attend to represent the Fire Department. We would request that this item be moved to the start of the agenda if possible, because Battalion Chief Gantt will be on-call for emergency response that evening. GKS/MSY/cb c: B/C Gantt SEP 0 81986 CITY OF CAMPBELL pL,ANNING DEPARTMENT