Loading...
PC Min 06/24/19860 PLANNING COMMISSION CITY OF CAMPBELL, CALIFORNIA 7:30 PM MINUTES JUNE 24, 1986 The Planning Commission of the City of Campbell convened this day in regular session at the regular meeting place, the Council Chambers of City Hall, 70 N. First St., Campbell, California. ROLL CALL Present Commissioners.: Dickson, Olszewski, Christ, Perrine, Stanton, Fairbanks, Kasolas; Planning Director A. A. Kee, Planner II Marty Woodworth, Engineering Manager Bill Helms, Acting City Attorney Bill Seligmann, Recording Secretary Linda Dennis. Absent None. APPROVAL OF MINUTES M/S: Christ, Olszewski - That the minutes of the Planning Commission meeting of June 10, 1986 be approved as submitted. Motion carried unanimously (7-0-0). COMMUNICATIONS Mr. Kee noted that communications received pertained to specific items on the agenda and would be discussed at that time. ARCHITECTURAL APPROVALS S 86-10 Continued application of Mr. Jovan Jovanovic, J. Jovanovic for approval of plans and elevations to allow construction of an automotive repair building on property known as 169-181 Kennedy Ave. in an M-1-S (Light Industrial) Zoning District. Commissioner Perrine reported that this application was considered by the Site and Architectural Review Committee. The Committee is recommending approval, without redlining, in that the applicant has addressed concerns previously expressed by the Committee and Staff. M/S: Perrine, Olszewski - That the Planning Commission accept the Negative Declaration which has been prepared for .this project; and, that the Planning Commission adopt the findings attached hereto and approve S 86-10, subject to conditions indicated in the Staff Report dated June 24, 1986. Motion carried unanimously (7-0-0). -2- S 86-11 Application of Mr. Bob Dubcich for Dubcich, J. approval of plans and elevations to allow the construction of a retail building on property known as 3495 S. Bascom Ave. in a C-2-S (General Commercial) Zoning District. Commissioner Perrine reported that this application was considered by the Site and Architectural Review Committee. The Committee is recommending a continuance to July 8, with the applicant's concurrence, in order that revised plans may be submitted. Mr. Kee noted that Staff is also recommending a continuance. M/S: Perrine, Olszewski - That S 86-11 be continued to the Planning Commission meeting of July 8, 1986. Motion carried unanimously (7-0-0). S 86-12 Application of Mr. James Smith for Smith, J. approval of plans and elevations to allow the construction of a building to be used for carpet and upholstery cleaning on property known as 3255 S. _, Winchester Blvd. in a C-2-S (General Commercial) Zoning District. Commissioner Perrine reported that this application was considered by the Site and Architectural Review Committee. The Committee is recommending a continuance to July 22, with the applicant's concurrence, in order that revised plans may be submitted. Mr. Ree noted that Staff is also recommending a continuance. Mr. Richard Smith, representing applicant, requested a continuance to July 8, rather than July 22, noting that it is his intention to have the revised plans finished this week. M/S: Fairbanks, Christ - That S 86-12 be continued to the Planning Commission meeting of July 8, 1986. Motion carried unanimously (7-0-0). -3- PUBLIC HEARINGS PD 86-05 Public hearing to consider the Rodrigues, K. application of Mr. Ken Rodrigues, A.I.A., for a Planned Development Permit, plans, elevations and development schedule to allow construction of a retail building on property known as 890 W. Hamilton Ave. in a PD (Planned Development/Commercial) Zoning District. Commissioner Perrine reported that this application was considered by the Site and Architectural Review Committee; however, the applicant did not appear at the meeting because he is requesting a continuance. Mr. Ree indicated that a letter has been received from the applicant requesting a continuance. Chairman Kasolas opened the public hearing and invited anyone in the audience to speak for or against this item. M/S: Fairbanks, Stanton - That the public hearing on PD 86-OS be continued to the Planning Commission meeting of July 8, 1986. Motion carried unanimously (7-0-0). ZC 86-04 Public hearing to consider the applica- Chan, F. tion of Mr. Fred Chan for a zone change from C-PD (Condominium-Planned Development) to PD (Planned Development); and approval of a Planned Development Permit, plans, elevations, and development schedule to allow the construction of 4 townhomes on property known as 1430 W. Latimer Ave. Commissioner Perrine reported that this application was considered by the Site and Architectural Review Committee. The Committee is of the opinion that the proposed development is compatible with the surrounding area, and is recommending approval with redlining of the plans which address the enhancement of the entrances. Mr. Kee stated that Staff is also recommending approval, subject to the conditions of approval indicated in the Staff Report. Chairman Kasolas opened the public hearing and invited anyone in the audience to speak for or against this item. -4- M/S: Perrine, Olszewski - That the public hearing on ZC 86-04 be closed. Motion carried unanimously (7-0-0). Commissioner Fairbanks asked about the accessibility of the open space; and, the amount of open space provided. Commissioner Dickson asked if there were any setbacks in this project that would not be allowed under the R-2-S zoning district. Mr. Kee responded that it is his understanding that the open space exceeds the open space requirements for C-PD or PD or R-M-S Zoning Districts. Additionally, the setbacks, height, and building limitations meet all the normal requirements and could be developed under the R-2-S district. M/S: Perrine, Stanton - That the Planning Commission recommend that the City Council accept the Negative Declaration which has been prepared for this project; and, that the Planning Commission adopt the attached findings, and adopt a Resolution recommending that the City Council approve a zone change from C-PD to PD for 1430 W. Latimer Ave.; and, that the Planning Commission adopt a Resolution recommending that the City Council approve the Planned Development Permit, plans, elevations, and development schedule for ZC 86-04, subject to conditions of approval indicated in the Staff Report dated June 24, 1986, as well as redlining of the presented plans, with revised plans to come back to Staff for approval. Motion carried with the following roll call vote: Discussion of motion Commissioner Dickson stated that he would be speaking against the motion in that the Planned Development zoning should provide for a better use of the property. He was of the opinion that the development's profile was very plain, with minimum outdoor access. The applicant could have developed under the R-2 zoning and have had a few more restrictions on the plans. Chairman Kasolas stated that he would be voting in favor of the motion, based on a reduction in density from the originally approved plans. He noted that the townhomes allowed for individual ownership which would develop stability in the neighborhood. -5- Vote on motion AYES: Commissioners: Olszewski, Christ, Perrine, Stanton, Kasolas NOES: Commissioners: Dickson, Fairbanks ABSENT: Commissioners: None The Commission recessed at 8:05 p.m.; the meeting reconvened at 8:15 p.m. ZC 86-05 Continued public hearing to consider the Jacobsen, W. application of Mr. Warren Jacobsen for a zone change from PO (Professional Office) to PD (Planned Development); and approval of a Planned Development Permit, plans, elevations and development schedule to allow the construction of an office building on property known as 42 ~ 60 W. Campbell Ave . Commissioner Perrine reported that this application was considered by the Site and Architectural Review Committee. The Committee is recommending approval, with minor revisions coming back to the Planning Director for approval. Mr. Kee reported that the building design is acceptable to the Architectural Advisor. Chairman Kasolas opened the public hearing and invited anyone in the audience to speak for or against this item. Mr. Warren Jacobsen, applicant, reviewed the plans for the Commission noting that the height of the building will be minimized by the use of berming and vegetation; they have elected to off set the entrance from the redwood trees; and, the goal of the design is simplicity, with the use of columns, tile, and hips to blend with the grammar school across the street. Discussion ensued regarding the traffic generated from the use; the shadowing on adjoining properties; and fencing. Mr. Helms noted that a traffic report has been submitted which indicates approximately 360 vehicle trips per day. Staff is of the opinion that this will not adversely affect the level of service at the adjacent intersection. M/S: Fairbanks, Dickson - That the public hearing on ZC 86-05 be closed. Motion carried unanimously (7-0-0). -6- M/S: Dickson, Fairbanks - That the Planning Commission recommend that the City Council accept the Negative Declaration which has been prepared for this project; and, that the Planning Commission adopt the attached findings and adopt a Resolution recommending that the City Council approve the zone change for 42 & 60 W. Campbell Ave.; and, that the Planning Commission adopt a Resolution recommending that the City Council approve the Planned Development Permit, plans, elevations, and development schedule for ZC 86-05, subject to the fencing plan coming back to the Site and Architectural Review Committee, as well as the conditions indicated in the Staff Report of June 24, 1986. Motion carried with the following roll call vote: Discussion of motion Commissioner Dickson noted that this application shows proper use of "the PD district, and is compatible with the surrounding area. Commissioner Christ felt that the application was not a proper use of the PD zoning, and expressed his concerns with the parking ratio, the height, and the site coverage. He stated that he would be speaking against the motion. Commissioner Olszewski noted that it was difficult for the Site Committee to have the trees saved on this site. He expressed a concern about the aesthetic appearance of the modern-looking design going across from the high school building, and indicated that he would be watching the development of this building very closely. Commissioner Olszewski stated that he would be voting in favor of the motion with reluctance. Chairman Kasolas stated his concurrence with Commissioner Dickson's statements regarding the proper use of the PD district. Vote on motion AYES: Commissioners: Dickson, Olszewski, Perrine, Stanton, Fairbanks, Kasolas NOES: Commissioners: Christ ABSENT: Commissioners: None. -7- UP 86-07 Continued public hearing to consider Manoukian, 0. the application of Mr. Ohan Manoukian for a use permit and approval of plans to allow the conversion of a garage to living space on property known as 750 Century Drive in an R-1 (Single Family Residential) Zoning District. Commissioner Perrine reported that this application was considered by the Site and Architectural Review Committee. The Committee is coming forward with a recommendation for approval, with the understanding that the applicant will have six months to complete the necessary work of changing the "garage" facade to stucco which is compatible with the rest of the structure. Chairman Kasolas opened the public hearing and invited anyone in the audience to speak for or against this item. M/S: Christ, Fairbanks - That the public hearing on UP 86-07 be closed. Motion carried unanimously (7-0-0). M/S: Christ, Stanton - That the Planning Commission adopt the attached findings and adopt a Resolution approving UP 86-07, subject to conditions indicated in the Staff Report dated June 24, 1986, as well as the condition that the applicant have six months to complete the necessary work of changing the "garage" facade to stucco which is compatible with the rest of the structure. Motion carried with the following roll call vote: AYES: Commissioners: Dickson, Olszewski, Christ, Perrine, Stanton, Fairbanks, Kasolas NOES: Commissioners: None ABSENT: Commissioners: None. PD 86-03 Continued public hearing to consider the Hester, L. application of Mr. Larry Hester for approval of a Planned Development Permit, plans, elevations and development schedule to allow construction of an office/warehouse building on properties known as 40 & 48 Railway Ave. in a PD (Planned Development/Industrial) Zoning District. Chairman Kasolas noted the Referral from the City Council regarding this item (attached hereto). -8- Commissioner Perrine reported that this application was considered by the __ Site and Architectural Review Committee, and the information regarding the referral was passed on to the applicant. Mr. Kee noted that it is his understanding that the applicant is in concurrence with a continuance. Chairman Kasolas opened the public hearing and invited anyone in the audience to speak for or against this item. M/S: Perrine, Fairbanks - That the public hearing on PD 86-03 be continued to the Planning Commission meeting of July 22, 1986. Motion carried unanimously (7-0-0). EIR 86-01 Continued public hearing to consider a Sahadi, F. Draft Environmental Impact Report (EIR) which has been prepared for the proposed expansion of an existing motel located at 675 E. Campbell Ave. in a PD (Planned .Development/Commercial & Public Facilities) Zoning District. Mr. Ree reported that as of this writing, the consultant has not had adequate time to respond to all of the issues raised. Staff has been involved in discussions with the EIR consultant and a representative of the applicant. As a result of these discussions, it was generally agreed that a continuance of 4-6 weeks on this item would be desirable. Staff is therefore recommending a continuance to the Planning Commission meeting of August 12, 1986. Chairman Rasolas opened the public hearing and invited anyone in the audience to speak for or against this item. Mr. Lawrence Ames, 1218 Willow St., San Jose, spoke regarding the Santa Clara County Trails and Pathways publication noting that the proposed development would make the Los Gatos Creek trail into a parking lot. He urged denial of this application. Mr. Ames indicated that he was representing the Santa Clara County Planning Department Trails and Pathways Committee. Ms. Christine Svensson, 1468 Nogalo Ct., San Jose, spoke on behalf of the Los Gatos Creek and Streamside Committee, and asked that the Open Space Element of the General Plan be carefully considered in the decision regarding this EIR. Chairman Kasolas requested that the consultant be asked to address the effect of the tractor work being done in the creek on the riparian community. -- -9- Commissioner Perrine asked that Mr. Ames be given a copy of the Parks and Recreation Commission's memorandum to the Planning Commission regarding the bicycle path along this development. Chairman Kasolas noted that the creek is under private ownership and not available to public use, but rather has easements for running water through. He suggested that this might be appropriate for the consultant to address also. M/S: Dickson, Perrine - That the public hearing on EIR 86-01 be continued to the Planning Commission meeting of August 12, 1986. Motion carried unanimously (7-0-0). PD 85-12 Continued public hearing to consider the Sahadi, F. application of Mr. Fred Sahadi for approval of a Planned Development Permit and approval of plans, elevations and development schedule to allow the expansion of an existing motel accomodating 73 additional units,' breakfast room, conference rooms and related service facility on property known as 675 E. Campbell Avenue in a PD (Planned Development/Commercial and Public, Semi-Public) Zoning District. Mr. Kee reported that no new environmental information has been received, therefore, Staff is recommending that this item be continued to August 12, 1986. Chairman Kasolas noted the correspondence received (attached hereto) regarding this item from the City of San Jose Parks & Recreation Commission, Greyland Properties, and from Dr. Lawrence Ames - Willow Glen Trails Committee. Chairman Kasolas opened the public hearing and invited anyone in the audience to speak for or against this item. M/S: Fairbanks, Dickson - That the public hearing on PD 85-12 be continued to the Planning Commissin meeting of August 12, 1986. Motion carried unanimously (7-0-0). t MISCELLANEOUS MM 86-02 Mervyn's -10- Continued application of Mr. Jack Weymer, on behalf of Mervyn's, for a modification to PD 72-09 to allow the placement of 13 cargo storage containers on property known as 950 W. Hamilton Ave. in a PD (Planned Development/ Commercial) Zoning District. There was brief discussion regarding whether or not building permits have been issued for the addition to this store. Mr. Kee indicated that he was not aware of any permits being issued at this time. M/S: Fairbanks, Christ - That the Planning Commission adopt the attached findings and allow the storage containers to remain on the property until December 1, 1986. Motion carried unanimously (7-0-0). SA 86-28 Sign application of Mr. Al Munoz for AM's Porsche AM's Porsche located on property known as 866 McGlincey Ln. in an M-1-S (Light Industrial) Zoning District. _. Commissioner Perrine reported that this application was considered by the Site and Architectural Review Committee. There was brief discussion regarding whether or not the proposed sign was lighted. Mr. Kee indicated that lighting is not shown on the plans, therefore, Staff would take the position that if lighting is requested the plan would have to come back to the Planning Commission. M/S: Fairbanks, Olszewski - That the Planning Commission adopt the attached findings and approve SA 86-28 subject to the applicant obtaining any necessary permits. Motion carried unanimously (7-0-0). MM 86-13 Application of Mr. Daniel DiBenedetto DiBenedetto, D. for a minor modification to previously approved Planned Development Permit to allow the construction of a residential addition on property known as 1407 Harriet Ct. in a PD (Planned Development/Low Density Residential) Zoning District. ----_ -11- Commissioner Perrine reported that this application was considered by the Site and Architectural Review Committee. The applicant is requesting the extra length to the garage for the purpose of storing a 21' recreational vehicle. The addition appears to be compatible with the existing structure, and the Committee is recommending approval recognizing that the request does go into the frontyard setback by 2'. Chairman Kasolas questioned the width of the private street, and asked if parking was allowed on the street. Mr. Woodworth responded that the street is 22-24' wide. Mr. Helms indicated that parking is not monitored on the street due to its private nature. There was discussion regarding street width; parking on the street; the designation of afire lane; and, lot sizes in this development. M/S: Perrine, Olszewski - That the Planning Commission approve the applicant's request, subject to conditions as indicated in the Staff Report dated June 24, 1986, with the understanding that the frontyard setback be 13'. Discussion of motion Commissioner Dickson asked if this item should be a public hearing for a variance, rather than a minor modification, in that it is in a PD Zoning District . Commissioner Christ stated that he is against the motion, and expressed his concern with the reduction of the setbacks. Commissioner Perrine stated that he would be voting for the motion, noting that he would rather see the recreational vehicle covered even it meant a slight infringement on the frontyard setback. He added that the design includes a balcony which provides relief to the architectural element. Commissioner Dickson noted that he is not speaking against the request, but rather against the process. Mr. Kee noted the 6 letters (attached hereto) in support of the request from surrounding property owners. Roll Call Vote on Motion AYES: Commissioners: Olszewski, Perrine, Stanton NOES: Commissioners: Dickson, Christ, Fairbanks, Kasolas ABSENT: Commissioners: None. Motion for approval fails. -12- Mr. Daniel DiBenedetto, applicant, explained that the frontyard area varied in size because of the curve in the cul-de-sac. -- Chairman Kasolas noted that the issue may be at what point does a change _ become a minor modification or a higher usage and more intense development. M/S: Dickson, Fairbanks - That the Planning Commission determine that this request is not a minor modification; and, if the applicant wishes to reapply, fees already paid to be applied to the reapplication fee. Discussion Commissioner Olszewski felt that this procedure only develops more red tape. The plans seem to be fine, but the concern is how this fits into the Zoning Ordinance. He felt that there was enough information upon which to base a decision, and he thought it was unfortunate that people should be put through a maze. Commissioner Dickson stated that he had the same feelings for the application and the applicant; however, when a change is made to something that could apply to many lots throughout the City -- the decision could result in a change in the law, without the Commission even being aware of it. This is a rather large change that affects both the front and rear yards. Commissioner Christ stated that a lot of allowances are made under the PD zoning, and he was concerned that the Commission is being asked to make additional allowances. He noted that he liked the applicant's plans; however, he could not vote for approval. Chairman Kasolas noted that this appears to be a very sensitive issue, and the public should have an opportunity to speak. Vote on motion AYES: Commissioners: Dickson, Christ, Fairbanks, Kasolas NOES: Commissioners: Olszewski, Perrine, Stanton ABSENT: Commissioners: None. Chairman Kasolas advised the applicant of the appeal procedure. The Commission recessed at 9:50 p.m.; the meeting reconvened at 10:00 p.m. 6 -13- PUBLIC HEARINGS TA 86-01 Continued public hearing to consider a City-initiated City-initiated text amendment to revise the Zoning Ordinance of the City of Campbell. Mr. Woodworth reviewed the proposed amendments for the Commission. Chairman Kasolas expressed a concern about whether or not more units were possible under the PD zoning. There appears to be a tremendous pressure throughout the community to have more units - and where to put them. Perhaps there should be selected areas where the additional units are permitted. Commissioner Fairbanks noted that the proposed statement does not, in reality, stop anyone from applying or using the PD zoning for the purpose of more units. Mr. Seligmann indicated that this amendment would become law after approved by the City Council. Commissioner Dickson felt that the proposed PD statement clarified, rather than tried to block additional units. Chairman Kasolas stated that he believed that the PD ordinance gives the City the utmost control, and gives the surrounding community an opportunity to comment on issues. He asked if it is the intent of the law not to stop anyone from applying for more units, does that mean they could still have the possibility of applying for more units. Mr. Seligmann responded that if it is stated in the zoning district to not allow more units, then you can't allow more units. Mr. Kee noted that the law requires that the zoning be consistent with the General Plan - it's a matter of interpretation. This statement would make it consistent by making the PD consistent with all the other zoning districts. The conflict occurs on corner lots in that the density is determined on the gross square footage which is calculated to the center of the street. Commissioner Olszewski commented on the notification procedures, noting that he felt the site should be posted so that area residents who are not property owners could be informed of what is happening. M/S: Dickson, Christ - That the Planning Commission recommend that the City Council accept the Negative Declaration which has been prepared for this project; and, that the Planning Commission adopt a Resolution -~ recommending that the City Council adopt the revised Zoning Ordinance on file in the Planning Department. Motion carried with the following roll call vote: -14- AYES: Commissioners: Dickson, Olszewski, Christ, Perrine, _ Stanton, Fairbanks, Rasolas NOES: Commissioners: None ABSENT: Commissioners: None. Commissioner Olszewski noted that he is against not having the notification procedures changed to include posting of the site. Chairman Kasolas noted that he is against the added Planned Development statement. MISCELLANEOUS EIR Review Process Informational item outlining EIR review process. Mr. Stafford reported that Staff is recommending a continuance of this item due to the lateness of the hour. It was the consensus of the Commission that this item be continued to the Planning Commission meeting of July 8, 1986. Staff Report Staff Report regarding policies of `, Redevelopment Agency for plan review. Mr. Ree reported that Staff has been asked to bring a Draft Interim Ordinance for the Downtown Area to the City Council for consideration. It is suggested that this item be continued. It was the consensus of the Commission that this item be continued to the Planning Commission meeting of July 8, 1986. OTHER ITEMS BROUGHT UP BY COMMISSION Commissioner Dickson. thanked Mr. Seligmann for the memorandum regarding x-rated video sales. He asked Staff to find any cities that have been successful in making the connection as stated under conclusions in Mr. Seligmann's memo. Commissioner Fairbanks asked if it could be tied to something other than zoning, ie. health, safety, welfare, etc. Mr. Seligmann responded that this would result in restricting the entire community - you have to allow somewhere in the City for the sale of such material. -15- Commissioner Dickson noted that the sound system did not seem to be working correctly - there seems to be too many highs and lows in it. He asked Staff to have it checked out again. ADJOURNMENT There being no further business, the meeting was ad,~ourned at 10:33 p.m. APPROVED: George C. Kasolas Chairman ATTEST: Arthur A. Kee Secretary RECORDED: Linda A. Dennis Recording Secretary FILE 2d0.: S 86-10 APPLICAi1T: JOVANOVIC, J. SITE ADDRESS: 169-181 ICEN?7EDY AVE. P. C . 2•iTG .: 6-24-86 RECO?~L~1E~y'DED FINDINGS 1. An automotive repair use is allowed in the M-1-S (Light Industrial) zoning district. 2. The project meets the parking standards of the City with the provision of 14 parking spaces. 3. The building design is aesthetically pleasing and will add to the area. 4. Substantial landscaping is provided which adds to the attractiveness of the project. CO;dDITIONS OF APPROVAL: S 86-10 APPLICANT: Jovanovic, J. SITE ADDILESS: 169-181 I:ennedy Ave. P.C. PiTG. 6-24-86 The applicant is notified as part of this application that he/she is required to meet the following conditions in accordance with the Ordinances of the City of Campbell and the Laws of the State of California. 1. Property to be fenced and landscaped as indicated and/or added in red on the plans. Landscaping and fencing shall be maintained in accordance with the approved plans. 2. Landscaping plan indicating type and size of plant material, and location of irrigation system to be submitted to the Planning Department and approved by the Site and Architectural Review Committee and/or Planning Commission prior to issuance of a building permit. 3. Fencing plan indicating location and design details of fencing to be submitted to the Planning Department and approved by the Planning Director prior to issuance of a building permit. 4. Applicant to either (1) post a faithful performance bond in the amount of $5000 to insure landscaping, fencing, and striping of parking areas within 3 months of completion of construction; or (2) file written agreement to complete landscaping, fencing, and striping of parking areas. Bond or agreement to be filed with the Planning Department prior to application for a building permit. 5. Applicant to submit a plan to the Planning Department, prior to installation of PGbE utility (transformer) boxes, indicating the location of the boxes and screening (if boxes are above ground) for approval of the Planning Director. 6. Applicant to submit a letter to the Planning Department, satisfactory to the City Attorney, prior to application for building permit, limiting the use of the property as follows: 3410 sq. ft. automotive use, 558 sq. ft. office use b 558 sq. ft. storage use. 7. All mechanical equipment on roofs and all utility meters to be screened as approved by the Planning Director. 8. Building occupancy will not be allowed until public improvements are installed. 9. All parking and driveway areas to be developed in compliance with Chapter 21.50 of the Campbell tiunicipal Code. All parkin; spaces to be provided with appropriate concrete curbs or bumper guards. C02dDITI02IS OF APPROVAL: S 56-10 APPLICA2~T: Jovanovic, J. ADDRESS: 169-181 Kennedy Ave. Page 2 10. Underground utilities to be provided as required by Section 20.16.070 of the Campbell Municipal Code. 11. Plans submitted to the Building Department for plan check shall indicate clearly the location of all connections for underground utilities including water, sewer, electric, telephone and television cables, etc. 12. Sign application to be submitted in accordance with provisions of the Sign Ordinance for all signs. No sign to be installed until application is approved and permit issued by Planning and Building Departments (Section 21.68.030 of the Campbell 2unicipal Code). 13. Ordinance No. 782 of the Campbell Municipal Code stipulates that any contract for the collection and disposal of refuse, garbage, wet garbage and rubbish produced within the limits of the City of Campbell shall be made with Green Valley Disposal Company. This requirement applies to all single-family dwellings, multiple apartment units, to all commercial, business, industrial, manufacturing, and construction establishments. _ 14. Trash container(s) of a size and quantity necessary to serve the development shall be located in area(s) approved by the Fire Department. _ Unless otherwise noted, enclosure(s) shall consist of a concrete floor ~, surrounded by a solid wall or fence and have self-closing doors of a size specified by the Fire Department. All enclosures to be constructed at grade level and have a level area adjacent to the trash enclosure area to service these containers. 15. Applicant shall comply with all appropriate State and City requirements for the handicapped. 16. The applicant is hereby notified that the property is to be maintained free of any combustible trash, debris and weeds, until the time that actual construction commences. All existing structures shall be secured by having windows boarded up and doors sealed shut, or be demolished or removed from the property. Sect. 11.201 ~ 11.414, 1979 Ed. Uniform Fire Code. PLANt1I?7G DEPART?~NT 17. Parking area to be kept clear of dismantled cars and auto parts. 18. All automotive repair to be done within the building and not in the parking area. 19. Cars shall be parked in designated spaces only. Driveways to be kept clear at all times. CO1dDITI0t1S OF APPROVAL: S 86-10 APPLICANT: Jovanovic, J. ADDRESS: 169-181 Kennedy Ave. Page 3 L_. BUILDING DEPARTtiE~'T 20. B1 - One hour construction with no openings to property line. This classification can change depending on the type of automotive repair. PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT 21. File and process a parcel map to combine the lots. 22. Submit three copies of the on-site grading and drainage plans to the Department of Public Works. 23. Obtain an excavation permit, pay fees and post surety to modify driveways and any other work in the public right of way. FIRE DEPAP.TTiE21T No comments. ;C.'' ~ ~:.. ' ~ ITII~1 N0. S June 18, 1986 Mr. Tim Haley City of Campbell 70 North First Street Campbell, CA 95008 RE: Hamilton/Marathon Drive LRS Project 8.680 WF 2.23 Dear Tim: I am requesting a continuance of the reference project from the planning commission hearing June 24, 1986. Our client, Imwalle/Stegner, has been unable to resolve an easement problem on the site with an adjacent property owner. We will be revising the drawings to reflect this and will be resubmitting this to you next week. Sincerely, SRS ASSOCIATES, INC. .~ enneth A. Rodrigues AIA rincipal KAR/ee enclosure D [~~~~~~~~~ D JUN ~ ~~ 198 CITY OF CAMPE3ELL PLANNING DEPARTMENT LRS ASSOCIATES Architecture and Planning 1283 OAKMEAD PARKWAY • SUNNYVALE, CA 94086 • 408 773.1700 4 CITY OF CAMPBELL REFERRAL FORM CITY COUNCIL/ADVISORY aDMtdISS10N/STAFF To George Ka,solas, Chairman ?lanning Ca-mission ITEP4 N0, 9 ~~~. ~:,,~EF FROM Michael F. Kotowski, Chairman Campbell Redevelopment Agency 1N5TRUCT1Ohl5 FoR u5E OF THIS FORM CITY OF CAh1PEELL PLANNING DEPARTMENT THtB FORM SHOULD BE UTILIZED NHENEVER A REFERRAL IS MADE FROM ONE ELECTED OR ADVISORY BODY TO THE CITY COUNCIL OR ADVISORY COMMISSION OR CITY MANAGER• THE INFORMATION REQUIRED TO COMPLETE THIS FORM SHOULD BE PROVIDED BY THE INITIATOR AT THE TIME THE REFERRAL /3 MADE- THE STAFF ADVISOR NILL BE RESPONSIBLE FOR COMPLETING THE FORM FOR REVIEN AND SIGNATURE BY THE MAYOR OR COMMISSION CHAIRMAN- RE: REVIEW ~' P~P06~D PL,ANI~D DEVELICPi1!~1T PERMIT - 40 & 48 RAILWAY AVENUE SUBJECT (A SPEC 1 F 1 C S1Jb~lARY OF THE REFERRAL ) The Redevelopment Agency reviewed the nrono~ed P1 ann~x3 TMval ~rmant Permit for the subject property at its June 17 1986 McPtin>7 and offer the following oomnents• 1) The Redevelopment Agency rPcorm~ended th t the (`~ to ~n, mr i l proceed with an Interim Zoning Ordinance. 2) The Redevelopment Agency expressed concerns rep'arr9in~' the lot configurations on Railway Avenue and +I,a+ +t,o ('.antral Plan designations for Railway Avenue should be reviewed. ACTION REQUESTED a INFORMATION ONLY ~ REVIEN AND a TAKE ACTION RECOMMEND ACTION ODf+IF~NTS (1 F 1~CESSARY ) RESPONSE REQUESTED BY (BY MIfiAT DATE THE ACTION SHOULD BE COMPLETED. IF ND DATE IS SPECIFIED, THAT SHOULD BE INDICATED.) DATE 6/20/86 Sic~iATURE Michael F. Kotowski, Chairman by: Any MAYOR OR ADVISORY COMMISSION Coyne, CHAIRMAN Secretary ITERi N0. lOB PD 85-12 e P~ T g c PARKS &~ RECREATION COMMISSION ~ "` - `~ CITY OF 8AN J03E, CALIFORNIA W q ~, 151 W. Mission Street •San Jose, California 95110 (408) 277-4661 ,J''~y F .. ~ A P P June za, 19'86 E- r~~~+' ,• Mr. Kevin Duggan City P4anager City of Campbell 70 North First Street Campbell, CA 95008 Dear Mr. Duggan: At its meeting of June 11, 1986, the City of San Jose Parks and Recreation Commission discussed the proposed expansion of the Campbell Inn on Los Gatos Creek. The Commission is very con- cerned about this proposed development and unanimously adopted a motion to direct a letter to the City of Campbell voicing strong oppostion to this development. The Commission has also requested that the City of San Jose Parks and Recreation and Planning Departments comment on the pending environmental clearance application before the City of Campbell Planning Commission on June 24, 1986. The Parks and Recreation Commission is concerned about the pro- posed project because the project would set an inappropriate policy direction by allowing private development to encroach on the Los Gatos Creek trail system; the project is insensitive to trail plans and practices established by the County and re- spective Cities; and the project physically interrupts and re- stricts public use of the trail along Los Gatos Creek. The City of San Jose Parks and Recreation Commission respectfully requests that the City of Campbell not approve the proposed ex- pansion of the Campbell Inn on Los Gatos Creek. Sincerely, , / .~ ~ -~ ~~t `_ i, ~,L :_ r,-- ,• ~ c• may, ._ :, , Virginia Holtz, Chairperson Parks and Recreation Commission VH:J ITEM N0. lOB PD 85-12 GREYLAND PROPERTIES 43 Harrison Street Campbell, CA 95008 408/866-4772 June 23, 1986 Mr. Arthur Kee Planning Director City of Campbell 70 North First Street Campbell, CA 95008 Re: Campbell Inn Expansion - 86A333, 86E333 Dear Mr. Kee: I am in support of the additional overnight lodging units for the Campbell Inn. A high quality project by Mr. Sahadi will benefit Campbell and will reduce the need for visitors to find overnight -- lodging outside the City. Assurances have been made that protection will be provided to prevent any erosion or instability to the westside of the Los Gatos Creek Channel which is expected to occur when only one side of the channel is lined as shown in the Draft EIR. At the May 27th Planning Commission Meeting, the Santa Clara County Water District expressed concern in it's May 23rd correspondence, and requested that erosion protection be provided for the opposite bank. It was also indicated in the May 27th meeting that any erosion protection needed because of the project would be the developer's responsibility. As one of the owner's of property opposite the proposed project, I had also expressed .concern on this issue at the May 27th meeting. When the Draft EIR is finalized, how protection will be provided by the Developer to assure continued channel stability on the westside should be shown with a preliminary cross section, dimensions, and location of the retaining walls needed. The draft EIR now shows a deflection wall approximately 20 feet long plus a retaining wall paralleling the eastside of the creek for about 400 feet approximately 20 to 25 feet from the centerline. This wall extends opposite parcel APN 279-46-006 where studies are underway for development according to the Professional Office Zoning. A final comment is that the provision for the traffic leaving the Campbell Inn to make a left and "U" turns on Campbell Avenue near the City Park accommodates the automobile, but does not help the existing 6 Mr. Arthur Kee June 23, 1986 Page Z pedestrian safety problem near the Park. Since this portion of Campbell Avenue is certain to experience increased pedestrian and vehicular traffic from redevelopment slated for the areas bordering Los Gatos Creek and Campbell Avenue, and also from increased outsider traffic flowing through Campbell streets, master planning and coordination for a longer range solution for the pedestrian safety problem such as traffic lights at Poplar or Gilman Avenue should begin to be considered. Sincerely, Q~,,,~~ ~ Robert B. Hicks RBH/emz JUN ~ l~rs6 CITY OF CAMPBELL PLANNING DEPARTMENT ITIJT4 N0. 10 B DD 86-12 1218 Willow St. San Jose, CA 95125 June 10, 1986 Planning Commission City of Campbell ?0 N. First St. Campbell, CA 95008 re: Campbell Inn Expansion Dear Sir, I am very concerned about the proposed expansion of the Campbell Inn, and I urge you to not accept their current plane. The addition would irrevocably damage several hundred feet of the Loe Gatos Creek bank, and would change the character of the Loe Gatos Creek Recreational Trail from a peaceful tree-lined path to a route across a parking lot. I am pleased that the -~- Campbell Inn built their section of the trail, and am glad that their business is successful, but I hope they can come up with an expansion plan that doesn't degrade the quality of the creek and its park-like surroundings. For years I have enjoyed bicycling along the Loe Gatos Creek Trail in Campbell. I have been working with the county and the city of San Jose to get the trail extended (hopefully from downtown San Jose to the Santa Cruz Mountains), and I have been holding Campbell up as an example of how nice a trail can be. But now, if you allow this construction between the trail and the creek (and over the creek's bank), it too will act as a precedent and model for the rest of the creek. If development like this takes place, what is the point of s trail-aide path?--a route along Bascom Avenue would also move traffic between points 'A' and 'B' and would give as much of a view of nature. San Jose ie finally beginning to work on its section of the creek trail. But already a developer wants to build a concrete block wall immediately adjacent to the trail, thereby inhibiting the enjoyment of the creek. Even though it is a different city, the developer is sure to mention the Campbell Inn as an example of what is done. It's important to have open apace and access to nature in this sprawling urban area. It's vital to preserve the creeks with their riparian beauty for all, and not just the motel guests to view thru windows. Please do not grant the Campbell Inn permission to build their current design. Thank you, Dr. Lawrence Lowell Ames Willow Glen Trails Committee. cc: Mayor Michael Kotowski, City of Campbell Campbell Planning Dept. Felix Errico, Santa Clara Parks Department Chris Svensson, S.J. Parks Commission Don Hebard, Loa Gatos Creek Streamside Park Trail Committee Don Weden, Santa Clara Co. Planning Dept. (Trails ~, Pathways). S.J. Councilmember Nancy Ianni (Los Gatos Creek Master Plan) Joan Dosa, president, Willow Glen Neighborhood Association. ~ c ~ ~ ~ [~ D JUfV ~ ~ 1986 CITY OF CAMPBt'LL pl-ANNING DEPARTMENT RECO*rTi3DEn FIIIDIIdGS FILE IdO: IIII 86-02 APPLICEu7T : [rT.'YL~' P., J.- PL~'I:VI'Id' S SITE ADDI.ESS : 950 [:. IIA'1ILT0:7 AV1; P. C. I~G.: 6-24-86 1. Iiervyn's is in the process of constructin; a warehouse addition which caill eli«inate the need for the containers. 2. The containers do not adversely affect parlcin~ facilities. 3. Due to the location of the containers behind the building, they do not impair the orderly and harmonious development of the neighborhood and are architecturally compatible with the buildings. CO?iDITIO",S OF APP..^.OVAL FILE IJO: IL1 86-02 - APPLICAIIT: i?EYI.ICP., J.- IiERVI'Id'S SITE ADD?tESS: 950 W. HAIIILT02J AVE P. C. MTG.: 6-24-86 1. All containers to be removed from the property by December 1, 1986. RECOPQ'lENDED FINDINGS FILE N0: SA 86-28 APPLICANT: MUNOZ, A. SITE ADDRESS: 866 MCGLINCEY LN. P.C. MTG.: 6-24-86 1. The business location lacks substantial street exposure in that it is 290' from the public right-of-way. 2. The proposed sign square footage of 9 sq.ft. is significantly less than the minimum sign area of 20 sq.ft. provided for commercial and industrial uses. 3. Approval of this request will not establish an undesirable precedent in that this is a unique circumstance. CONDITION OF APPROVAL FILE N0: SA 86-28 APPLICANT: MUNOZ, A. SITE ADDRESS: 866 MCGLINCEY LN. P.C. MTG.: 6-24-86 1. Applicant to obtain all necessary building and/or electrical permits.