Loading...
PC Min 01/28/1986PLANNING COMMISSION CITY OF CAMPBELL, CALIFORNIA 7:30 PM MINUTES JANUARY 28, 1986 The Planning Commission of the City of Campbell convened this day in regular session at the regular meeting place, the Council Chambers of City Hall, 70 N. First St., Campbell, California. ROLL CALL Present Commissioners: Olszewski, Christ, Perrine, Dickson (7:35 p.m.), Fairbanks, Kasolas; Planning Director A. A. Kee, Planner II Marty Woodworth, Engineering Manager Bill Helms, Acting City Attorney Bill Seligmann, Recording Secretary Linda Dennis. Absent None. APPROVAL OF MINUTES M/S: Fairbanks, Christ - That the minutes of the Planning Commission meeting of January 10, 1986 be approved as submitted. Motion carried with a vote of 4-0-1-1, with Commissioner Dickson not being present for the vote, and Commissioner Perrine abstaining due to his absence from the January 14, 1986 meeting. COMMUNICATIONS Mr. Kee noted that communications received pertained to specific items on the agenda and would be discussed at that time. Commissioner Dickson entered the Chambers at 7:35 p.m. ARCHITECTURAL APPROVALS S 85-14 Continued application of Mr. Marc Williams, M. Williams for approval of plans and elevations to allow the construction of a retail building on properties known as 915 & 921 S. San Tomas Aquino Rd. and 1271 Elam Ave. in a C-1-S (Neighborhood Commercial) Zoning District. -2- Commissioner Perrine reported that this application was considered by the -' Site and Architectural Review Committee. The Committee is recommending approval subject to conditions indicated in the Staff Comment, as well as redlining of the presented plans which includes the roofline being wrapped around the corner of the building and enlargement of roofline uprights. Mr. Kee stated that Staff is recommending that revised plans be submitted for the approval of the Planning Director, upon recommendation of the Architectural Advisor; and, Staff is of the opinion that the conceptual layout and general design of this project are acceptable. Responding to questions from the Commission, Mr. Kee indicated that the applicant concurs with the redlining on the plans; and, that the landscape plan is to come back to Staff prior to issuance of a building permit. M/S: Fairbanks, Perrine - That the Planning Commission accept the Negative Declaration which has been prepared for this project; and, that the Planning Commission adopt findings as indicated in the Staff Report and approve this application, subject to conditions indicated in the Staff Report as well as redlining of the presented plans. Discussion of Motion Commissioner Olszewski stated that this project seems to be marginal, at best, and he would prefer to see a higher quality development in this area; therefore, he personally is not in favor of this particular application. Commissioner Olszewski continued that this application has been before the Site Committee a number of times, and given the circumstances and discussions, it appeared that the developer was not able to make further commitments given the constraints of the property owners. Consequently, the Site Committee was of the opinion that the project should be brought before the Commission, since further improvements were not forthcoming. Commissioner Christ noted that he had concerns similar to Commissioner Olszewski, noting that the Architectural Advisor is of the opinion that the project is mediocre. This site should be setting a standard for the area. Commissioner Dickson stated that he would have the same concerns, however, he was unaware of anything which defines marginal. If the Commission is not happy with this project, perhaps a continuance would be appropriate in order that further improvements might be made to the development. Commissioner Dickson asked what items would be suggested for improvement, should action be taken to continue this application. -3- Commissioner Olszewski responded that he felt the project should be started over, in that he did not like the building for the area -- marginal is not acceptable. Chairman Kasolas indicated that it is his understanding that the Staff, the Architectural Advisor, and the Site Committee is recommending approval with redlining of plans. Roll Call Vote on Motion AYES: Commissioners: Perrine, Dickson, Fairbanks, Kasolas NOES: Commissioners: Olszewski, Christ ABSENT: Commissioners: None bfotion for approval passes with a vote of 4-2-0. PUBLIC HEARINGS PD 85-11 Continued public hearing to consider the Morelan, J. application of Mr. Jim Morelan, on behalf of Jovan Jovanovic, for approval of a Planned Development Permit; and plans, elevations and development schedule to allow the construction of a building addition and a new office/auto related building on properties known as 75 Dillon Ave. and 40 & 48 Railway Ave. in a PD (Planned Development/Industrial) Zoning District. Mr. Woodworth reported that Staff is recommending a continuance of this Z item to February 11, 1986, in that the applicant has indicated by telephone that he will be submitting revised plans. Chairman Kasolas opened the public hearing and invited anyone in the audience to speak for or against this item. M/S: Fairbanks, Christ - That PD 85-11 be continued to the Planning Commission meeting of February 11, 1986 at the applicant's request. Motion carried unanimously (6-0). -4- GP 86-01 Public hearing to consider the Morley, E. application of Mrs. Edith Morley for an amendment to the Land Use Element of the General Plan from Low Density Residential (less than 6 units per gross acre) to High Density Residential (21 to 27 units per gross acre) for the rear 100 feet of property known as 649 E1 Patio Dr. Mr. Woodworth reported that the applicant is requesting approval of a General Plan Amendment from Low Density Residential (less than 6 units per gross acre) to High Density Residential (21 to 27 units per gross acre) for the 7500 sq. ft. parcel. This parcel was recently created through a parcel map procedure. The other parcel created, which fronts onto E1 Patio Dr., is also approximately 7500 sq. ft. and is occupied by a single family home. This parcel is currently indicated as Low Density Residential and is not proposed for change. Mr. Woodworth continued that Staff cannot support the High Density designation on the property primarily because this property could then be developed with up to 6 units which would be inconsistent with the developed density of 13 units per acre of the project to the north. On the other hand, if the designation on the subject property were changed to Low-Medium Density Residential, a maximum of 2 units would be allowed on the property which would be more consistent with the project to the north. This use would also provide a transition between the zero lot-line townhomes to the north and the single family homes to the south. The access to the subject property would be off E1 Patio Ct. which is one access to the project to the north. Being that the project would front E1 Patio Ct. it would not disrupt the single family residential character of E1 Patio Dr. It is the only property in this unique situation, consequently additional requests for General Plan amendments in the area are not anticipated. Commissioner Fairbanks asked how many units would be possible if both the subject lot and the lot immediately to the south of it were changed to allow low-medium density. Mr. Woodworth indicated that four, possibly five, units would be possible under those circumstances. Chairman Kasolas opened the public hearing and invited anyone in the audience to speak for or against this item. Mrs. Edith Morley, 649 E1 Patio Dr., appeared before the Commission to speak in favor of her application, stating that she has no intention of selling the front (southern) lot. She is requesting this general plan change in order that a duplex or triplex might be developed on the property, thereby bringing her a better selling price. Mrs. Morley noted that there are eight homes to the acre on the property to the west of her property. -5- Mr. Donald Bennett, 620 Birch Dr., President of Pruneyard Homeowner's Association, asked if E1 Patio Ct. is a private or public street, noting that his association has been paying for the electricity for the light standards. Mr. Bennett asked where people are going to park if this development is allowed to continue and spread; where will the ingress/egress for this parcel be located; what parking controls would be instituted and who would see to the enforcement; and what the possibility is of the higher density spreading. He continued that the residents on Cypress Lane would loose their privacy if the new construction was not below the fence line; that Campbell does not need any more rental units; and, why start putting units in residential territory. Mr. Bob Burdell, representing the applicant, spoke in favor of being allowed to construct a tri-plex on the subject property. M/S: Fairbanks, Christ - That the public hearing on GP 86-01 be closed. Motion carried unanimously (6-0-0) . Discussion Commissioner Dickson stated that the Commission should be looking at entire areas rather than individual lots. He noted that even though he is sympathic to the applicant, he is opposed to this type of specific change in that it leads to spot. zoning. The City has a General Plan, and this is a fairly nicely located low density area which needs to be protected. Commissioner Fairbanks commented and she agreed with Commissioner Dickson's opinion that a General Plan is not something to be taken lightly. She continued that when this type of application is before the Commission, she attempts to look far into the surrounding area to see possible impacts. Commissioner Fairbanks expressed her concern with the request for high density in this application, noting that she would prefer to see low density; however, she felt that the number of units possible under low-medium density are not going to impact this area too intensively. Chairman Kasolas stated that this area has a substantial amount of commercial uses and higher density developments across the street and to the rear. He spoke for higher densities to support possible light rail transportation activities in the downtown area, noting that this area is probably one of the more appropriate areas in which to increase the density. Chairman Kasolas agreed that the whole area, from Campbell Ave. north, should be looked at relative to possible General Plan changes in that the General Plan is supposed to meet the needs of the people now and in the future. Chairman Kasolas stated that he is in favor of the applicant's request for High Density Residential. -6- Motion M/S: Fairbanks, Perrine - That the Planning Commission recommend that the City Council accept the Negative Declaration which has been prepared for this project; and, that the Planning Commission adopt a Resolution recommending that the City Council amend the Land Use Element of the General Plan to Low-Medium Density Residential (6-13 units per gross acre) for the rear 100 feet of property known as 649 E1 Patio Dr. Motion carried with the following roll call vote: AYES: Commissioners: Perrine, Christ, Ols2ewski, Fairbanks NOES: Commissioners: Dickson, Kasolas ABSENT: Commissioners: None. MISCELLANEOUS MM 85-26 Continued application of Mr. James Rueter, J. Rueter for a modification to approved plans to make exterior alterations to an existing building and to convert a part of the building from storage use to office use on property known as 155 E. Campbell Ave. in a PD (Planned Development/Commercial) Zoning District. Mr. Kee briefly reviewed the application, reporting that the applicant has submitted a proposed "Change of Use Agreement" which would permit him to use the subject 1,500 sq.ft, for office space, and stipulates that if a parking problem which cannot be resolved results from the conversion then the subject square footage must be converted back to storage use. Staff is recommending that the Commission deny the request to convert the requested space from storage to office use; and, Staff is recommending that the Commission approved the exterior modifications, subject to conditions as indicated in the Staff Report. Mr. Seligmann stated that he has discussed the "Change of Use Agreement" with the applicant's attorney and has expressed a concern with the first paragraph in the agreement (particularly #8, which would probably not be enforcable). The applicant's attorney has noted that this agreement is a proposal only and they are willing to make changes per the Commission's recommendations. -~- i Mr. Jim Rueter, applicant, stated that he was unable to work out any shared parking with the Bank of America. He is definitely interested in ~- improving the building to attract a higher caliber tenant, and is offering the agreement as a compromise in that he feels a means to take care of possible parking problems can be developed. Responding to a question from Commissioner Christ, Mr. Rueter indicated that there would be a total of 12 offices in the building, with two persons per 500' space. Commissioner Perrine asked if the applicant might hold off converting the subject 1,500 sq.ft. until the parking situation was worked out. Mr. Rueter indicated that this would not be economically sensible, and that the tentants have no need for this much storage space. Mr. Rueter continued that he is 99~ confident that there is not going to be a parking problem, and it is his intention to make sure that there is not. Chairman Kasolas asked if the subject 1,500 sq.ft. originally could have been used for library purposes or something similar. Mr. Kee responded that the area could be used for storage purposes for the building's tenants, it could not contain desks and people. The Zoning Code specifies one parking space for each 225 square foot of building. Storage/warehouse uses have a completely different parking ratio. The issue is whether or not the subject 1,500 sq.ft. which was originally shown on the plans for storage should be converted to office use without additional parking being required. Commissioner Dickson asked what criteria is used to determine if something is a minor modification. Mr. Kee indicated that t}:are is no set criteria. The situation is usually based on a judgement call, stewing from a request which might result in the applicant and the Planning Director not coming to an agreemer.c--therefore the request is brought before the Planning Co;~uni s s ion . Commissioner Dickson felt that since the subject property is in a Planned Development Zoning District, and the issue should go to the City Council regardless of the Commission's decision, the Commission should make a determination that this request is not a minor modification and it should - be forwarded to the Council. Mr. Kee noted that Staff is recommending that it be forwarded to the City Council. Commissioner Christ stated that he has personal knowledge that the subject square footage has been used over the last year for in excess of nine employees, and that these employees were instructed to park in the Bank of America lot. He continued that if there are 15 vacant spaces, with the 1,500 sq.ft. already being used for offices, he could see that the agreement being brought forth should be considered. -8- Commissioner Olszewski asked if it might be feasible to work out the __ parking once the applicant has a tenant, and leave the 1,500 sq.ft. as storage. Mr. Rueter indicated he was even open to limiting the number of people per square foot. Mr. Kee noted that Mr. Rueter's approach would be more desirable to Staff than trying to keep tract of the number of people in the building. Chairman Kasolas asked if the request could be handled as a use permit, and suggested a continuance in order that Staff might research the possibility. He noted that other people in the area have had to build to specific codes, and the Commission must know why this application is different in order to render a decision. Mr. Rueter stated that he would be happy to work out any approach. Commissioner Dickson noted that all the older buildings in the downtown area are going to have a parking problem, and this needs to be addressed at some time. M/S: Olszewski, Christ - That MM 85-26 be continued to the Planning Commission meeting of February 11, 1986 in order that Staff might research the possibility of a use permit - application for this request. Motion carried unanimously (6-0-0). TS 86-01 Tentative Subdivision Map - Lands of Lands of 886, Inc. 866, Inc. - 296, 360, 380 & 390 W. Sunnyoaks Ave. - C-PD (Condominium- Planned Development) Zoning District. Mr. Kee reviewed this item for the Commission, noting that it is a requirement of a recent zone change application which was approved by the Commission with a 7-0 vote. M/S: Dickson, Olszewski - That the Planning Commission find the proposed map to be in conformance with the General Plan; and that the Planning Commission recommend that the City Council approve this map, subject to conditions indicated in the Staff Report. Motion carried unanimously (6-0-0). The meeting recessed at 8:50 p.m.; the meeting reconvened at 9:10 p.m. -9- MM 86-01 Request of Mr. Paul McAllister to per- McAllister, P, mit elimination of one parking space in an approved office project on property known as 1690 & 1700 S. Winchester Blvd. in a C-2-S (General Commercial) Zoning District. Commissioner Perrine reported that this application was considered by the Site and Architectural Review Committee, and approval is recommended. M/S: Perrine, Fairbanks - That the Planning Commission approve the applicant's request, subject to the condition that the applicant submit a revised landscape plan for the approval of the Planning Director. Motion carried unanimously (6-0-0). * * # SA 86-03 Sign application of Holiday Travel on Holiday Travel property known as 840 E. Campbell Ave. in a PD (Planned Development/Commercial) Zoning District. Commissioner Perrine reported that this application was considered by the - Site and Architectural Review Committee. Approval is recommended, subject to conditions indicated in the Staff Report as well as redlining of the presented plans. M/S:, Olszewski, Christ - That the Planning Commission approve SA 86-03, subject to conditions indicated in the Staff Report as well as redlining of the presented plans. Motion carried unanimously (6-0-0). SA 86-05 Sign application of H & S Food Villa Food Villa for property known as 1415 Hacienda Ave. in a PD (Planned Development/Commercial) Zoning District. Commissioner Perrine reported that this application was considered by the Site and Architectural Review Committee. The Committee is recommending approval per the Staff Report. Commissioner Fairbanks felt that this use did not need any larger signage that what was currently on the building for the former use. Chairman Kasolas noted that the removal of the Food Plaza signage from the freestanding sign will leave only the sign for the Desparados. In this case, the Commission may wish to have the food store put identification on the freestanding sign. -10- Commissioner Perrine noted that the property owners have indicated that they may be proposing a new freestanding sign in the near future. M/S: Perrine, olszewski - That the Planning Commission adopt findings indicated in the Staff Report, and approve SA 86-05 subject to conditions indicated in the Staff Report. Motion carried unanimously (6-0-0) . SA 86-02 Appeal of Planning Director's denial Play It Again Video of sign application for "Play It Again Video" on property known as 2091 S. Bascom Ave. in a C-2-S (General Commercial) Zoning District. M/S: Perrine, Christ - That SA 86-02 be continued to the Planning Commission meeting of February 11, 1986 at the applicant's request. Motion carried unanimously (6-0-0). * * rr SA 86-06 Sign application of Mr. Fred Washington, --- Razzamatazz on behalf of Razzamatazz Hair Design Studio, for property known as 2188 S. Bascom Ave. in a C-2-S (General - Commercial) Zoning District. M/S: Perrine, Christ - That SA 86-06 be continued to the Planning Commission meeting of February 11, 1986 in order that the applicant can submit revised plans to indicate a multi-tenant sign. Motion carried unanimously (6-0-0). MM 85-29 Continued application of Mr. Helmut Dombrow, H. Dombrow for a modification to allow the construction of an automobile spray booth in the parking area of an existing automobile garage on property known as 238 Curtner Ave. in an M-1-S (Light Industrial) Zoning District. Commissioner Perrine reported that this application was considered by the Site and Architectural Review Committee. The Committee is recommending approval subject to redlining of the presented plans, subject to "' conditions indicated in the Staff Report, and with the addition of a one year review from the date of approval. -11- M/S: Perrine, Dickson - That the Planning Commission adopt findings indicated in the Staff Report and approve MM 85-29, subject to conditions shown in the Staff Report as well as the addition of a one year review. Motion carried unanimously (6-0-0). SA 85-51 Continued sign application of Mr. Mukuno, D. Douglas Mukuno for property known as 2970 S. Winchester Blvd. in an M-1-S (Light Industrial) Zoning District. Mr. Kee indicated that Staff is recommending one final continuance for this application, noting that the sign is in existence. M/S: Perrine, Dickson - That SA 85-51 be continued to the Planning Commission meeting of February 11, 1986. Motion carried unanimously (6-0-0). SA 85-54 Sign application of Mr. Henry Hom, on Hom, H. behalf of Baskin-Robbins, for property known as 1720 W. Campbell Ave. in a C-2-S (Neighborhood Commercial) Zoning District. Commissioner Perrine reported that this application was considered by the Site and Architectural Review Committee. The Committee is recommending approval as redlined, with the redlining indicating a wood treatment around the pole of the existing freestanding sign. Commissioner Christ noted that this site has more existing signage that is allowable under the current sign code; and, he felt that over 100 sq.ft. of signage for a building this size was excessive. Chairman Kasolas indicated that the only thing before the Commission is the proposed new wall sign; and, that the existing freestanding sign is legal. M/S: Christ, Dickson - That the Planning Commission adopt the following findings, and deny SA 85-54. (1) The existing signage on the subject site is more than would be allowed under the current Sign Ordinance; and (2) A total signage of over 100 sq.ft. is excessive for the size of the subject building. Motion carried with the following roll call vote: -12- AYES: Commissioners: Olszewski, Christ, Dickson, Fairbanks NOES: Commissioners: Perrine, Kasolas ABSENT: Commissioners: None. Commissioner Olszewski noted that he had over-looked the total square footage of signing during the Site Committee review. Chairman Kasolas noted that the Commission must understand that there are grandfathered signs in the City, and the issue cannot keep being rehashed. S 84-11 Continued appeal of the Planning UP 84-08 Director's decision denying the Lincoln Property Co. applicant's request to modify the approved building elevations to permit a patterned horizontal treatment in lieu of a colored granite veneer accent band on property known as 2105 S. Bascom Ave. in a C-2-S (General Commercial) Zoning District. Commissioner Perrine reported that this application was considered by the Site and Architectural Review Committee. The Committee had asked that granite be installed, or the band be painted; and, the Committee is of the opinion that a more subdued color, such as on the windows, would be more appropriate (rather than the red which was originally presented). The applicant is willing to work with the City. M/S: Dickson, Fairbanks - That S 84-11/UP 84-08 be continued to the Planning Commission meeting of February 25, 1986. Motion carried unanimously (6-0-0). OTHER ITEMS BROUGHT UP BY COMMISSION Commissioner Perrine asked Staff to investigate the recently constructed Bruener's parking area being used as a trailer parking lot. ,r ADJOURNMENT There being no further business, the meeting adjourned at 9:45 p.m. APPROVED: George C. Kasolas Chairman --- ATTEST: Arthur A. Kee Secretary RECORDED: Linda A. Dennis Recording Secretary FILE NO.: S 85-14 SITE ADDRESS: 915 & 921 S. SAN TOMAS AQUINO RD./1272 ELAM AVE. APPLICANT: WILLIAMS, M. P.C. MTG.: 1-28-86 RECOMMENDED FINDINGS 1. The project meets the parking code of 1 space for each 200 feet of gross floor area. 2. Substantial on-site landscaping has been provided to enhance the appearance of the project. 3. The project complies with the development standards of the C-1-S (Neighborhood Commercial) Zoning District. 4. The project will not be detrimental to the health, safety or welfare of people residing in the area or to the City as a whole. CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL: S 85-14 APPLICANT: Williams, M. SITE ADDRESS: 915 & 921 S. San Tomas Aquino Rd. 1271 Elam Ave. P.C. MTG. 1/28/86 The applicant is notified as part of this application that he/she is required - to meet the following conditions in accordance with the Ordinances of the City of Campbell and the Laws of the State of California. 1. Revised elevations and/or site plan indicating: 1. Retention of the existing pine tree and the incorporation of this tree into the landscaping plan for this project; 2. Provision of a masonry or precast concrete wall along the residential property lines; 3. Provision of a color/material sample board for approval of the Architectural Advisor; 4. Provision of trash enclosure and bicycle parking details. 5. Possible refinement of the storefront designs to alleviate repetitive use of the same window layout submitted to the Planning Department and approved by the Planning Director upon recommendation of the Architectural Advisor prior to application for a building permit. 2. Property to be fenced and landscaped as indicated and/or added in red on the plans. Landscaping and fencing shall be maintained in accordance with the approved plans. 3. Landscaping plan indicating type and size of plant material, and location of irrigation system to be submitted to the Planning Department and approved by the Site and Architectural Review Committee and/or Planning Commission prior to issuance of a building permit. 4. Fencing plan indicating location and design details of fencing to be submitted to the Planning Department and approved by the Planning Director prior to issuance of a building permit. 5. Applicant to either (1) post a faithful performance bond in the amount of $5,000.00 to insure landscaping, fencing, and striping of parking areas within 3 months of completion of construction] or (2) file written agreement to complete landscaping, fencing, and striping of parking areas. Bond or agreement to be filed with the Planning Department prior to application for a building permit. 6. Applicant to submit a plan to the Planning Department, prior to installation of PG&E utility (transformer) boxes, indicating the location of the boxes and screening (if boxes are above ground) for approval of the Planning Director. 7. All mechanical equipment on roofs and all utility meters to be screened as approved by the Planning Director. 8. Building occupancy will not be allowed until public improvements are installed. 9. All parking and driveway areas to be developed in compliance with Chapter 21.50 of the Campbell Municipal Code. All parking spaces to be provided with appropriate concrete curbs or bumper guards, CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL: S 85-14 APPLICANT: Williams, M. SITE ADDRESS: 915 & 921 S. San Tomas Aquino Rd. 1271 Elam Ave. P.C. MTG. 1/28/86 PAGE 2. 10. Underground utilities to be provided as required by Section 20.16.070 of the Campbell Municipal Code. 11, Plans submitted to the Building Department for plan check shall indicate clearly the location of all connections for underground utilities including water, sewer, electric, telephone and television cables, etc. 12. Sign application to be submitted in accordance with provisions of the Sign Ordinance for all signs. No sign to be installed until application is approved and permit issued by Planning and Building Departments (Section 21.68.030 of the Campbell Municipal Code). 13. Ordinance No. 782 of the Campbell Municipal Code stipulates that any contract for the collection and disposal of refuse, garbage, wet garbage and rubbish produced within the limits of the City of Campbell shall be made with Green Valley Disposal Company. This requirement applies to all single-family dwellings, multiple apartment units, to all commercial, business, industrial, manufacturing, and construction establishments. 14. Trash container(s) of a size and quantity necessary to serve the development shall be located in area(s) approved by the Fire Department. Unless otherwise noted, enclosure(s) shall consist of a concrete floor surrounded by a solid wall or fence and have self-closing doors of a size specified by the Fire Department. All enclosures to be constructed at grade level and have a level area adjacent to the trash enclosure area to service these containers. 15. Applicant shall comply with all appropriate State and City requirements for the handicapped. 16. The applicant is hereby notified that the property is to be maintained free of any combustible trash, debris and weeds, until the time that actual construction commences. All existing structures shall be secured by having windows boarded up and doors sealed shut; or be demolished or removed from the property. Sect. 11.201 & 11.414, 1979 Ed. Uniform Fire Code. PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT 17. File a parcel map to combine the lots. 18. Dedicate additional right of way to widen San Tomas Aquino Rd. and Elam Avenue to 30 feet from center with a 20 foot radius return at the corner. 19. Pay storm drain area fee. CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL: S 85-14 APPLICANT: Williams, M. SITE ADDRESS: 915 & 921 S. San Tomas Aquino Rd. ----- 1271 Elam Ave. P.C. MTG. 1/28/86 PAGE 3. 20. Install street improvements across both frontages. 21. Obtain an excavation permit, pay fees and post surety for all work in the public right of way. FIRE DEPARTMENT 22. Property line walls shall have parapets as per UBC requirements. 23. Required fire flow of 3,000 gpm is required for the building. Veri- fication from San Jose Water Company is required. BUILDING DEPARTMENT No comments. FILE NO.: MM 85-29 APPLICANT: DOMBROW, H. ADDRESS: 238 CURTNER AVE. P.C. MTG.: 1-28-86 RECOMMENDED FINDINGS 1. The spray booth and other small building is screened from view of the street. 2. The on-site parking greatly exceeds that as required by the code. 3. The required landscaping at the front of the project will enhance the project's appearance. FILE NO.: MM 85-29 APPLICANT: DOMBROW, H. SITE ADDRESS: 238 CURTNER AVE. P.C. MTG.: 1-28-86 CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL 1. Landscaping plan indicating (1) 10' landscaping area behind location of proposed curb; (2) type and size of plant material, and (3) location of irrigation system to be submitted to the Planning Department and approved by the Planning Director prior to application .for a building or electrical permit. 2. Applicant to sign an agreement, satisfactory to the City Attorney, to install landscaping and irrigation system within 60 days after the City installs curbing in front of site. This agreement to be signed prior to issuance of building or electrical permit. 3. Applicant to obtain all necessary permits from the Building, Fire and Public Works Departments. 4. Project to be reviewed in one year from date of approval. MEMORANDUM CITY OF CAMPBELL. ! ~ To: ARTHUR A. KEE Date: JQt, . Z i ~ 19 8'~ Planning Director from: JOSEPH ELLIOTT Director of Public orks sub)ect: Tentative Subd~ vision Ma Lands of M~~ k~ < ~ APN g06- - 9 D -~ The following conditions of approval are recommended concerning the subject tentative subdivision map submitted by j~NNINGS • ~1cV~RMOTT • t~~lSS !NL• Installation of a sanitary sewerage system to serve all lots within the sub- division in conformance with the proposed plans of the County of Santa Clara Sanitation District No. 4. Sanitary sewerage service to be provided by said ~ District No. 4. Installation of a water distribution system to serve all lots within the sub- division in conformance with the plans of the San Jose Water Works. Water service to be provided by said water company.. Fire hydrants and appurte- - nances shall be provided and installed at the locations specified by the Fire Chief, Fire Department, City of Campbell. Fire hydrant maintenance - ~,:. fees shall be paid to City at the rate of $195 per fire hydrant. Subdivider shall create or provide any public service easement and any other - public utility and/or public service easements as may be necessary for the 3 . installation of any and all public utilities and/or facilities. Compliance with the provisions of Title 20, Subdivisions of the Campbell ~. Municipal Code. S~. Subdivider to pay Storm Drainage Area Fee. . Subdivider to furnish copy of Preliminary Title Report. Subdivider shall (install street improvements and post surety to guaranty the work) (execute an agreement and post surety to install street improve- - ments in the future and agree to join a Local Improvement District). Dedicate additional right-of-way to widen to feet from centerline. C.C.&R.'s to be approved by City Engineer to insure provisions for maintenance G . of buildings and common area. Provide a grading and drainage plan for the review and approval of the City . Engineer. ~. Obtain an excavation permit and pay fees and deposit for all work in the public right of way. ~, ~q. tom. \lZ ,ItU o dedicA~~on ~~ ~4nd ar ~Jc1r~S. i f By: BILL M. HELMS ~~+ 7 P.~. rc,-~ ,z~ ~ o ~~ s December 5, 1985 Sonia Clara 1-~~ey Woter DistrKt 5750 ALMADEN EXPRESSWAY SAN JOSE, CALIFORNIA 95118 TELEPHONE (408) 265-2600 Mr. Arthur Kee D Planning Director D City of Campbell O 70 North First Street ~~ 1985 - Campbell, CA 95008 ~ E Attention Mr. Tim Haley, Planner II ~~TY OF CAMPBELL PL/-NNING DEPARTMENT Dear Mr. Kee: We have reviewed the sire plan for Pepper Tree Terrace, File ZC85-09, sent to us on November 19. The site's southerly property line is adjacent to a Page Percolation System pond. The pond right of way i.s fenced with chain link fencing. This fencing should be shown and labeled on improvement plans with a note stating that any fence damaged due to construction is to be replaced in kind and in accord with Section 80 of State specifications. Site drawings and grading should be designed so there is no drainage into ---- the percolation pond. In accordance with District Ordinance 75-6, the existing well shown on the plans should be properly registered with the District, and either maintained or abandoned in accordance with District standards. Improperly constructed or abandoned wells can be a hazard and may be a source of groundwater contamination. We request that wells be sealed in accordance with District standards unless they are to be used for the proposed development. In this case, they should only be used after proper testing and inspection. Please call Mr. David Zozaya at 265-2600, extension 382 or 254 for information regarding permits and the registering of or abandonment of any wells. We request written confirmation from the developer or his engineer regarding the existence of any wells and their proposed disposition. Site grading and improvement plans should be sent for our review prior to start of construction. Sincere , "'~ . F. Carlse Division Engineer Design Coordination Division cc: Hedley and Stark, Inc., 346 East Campbell Avenue, Campbell, CA 95008 Public Works Department, City of Campbell, 70 North First Street, Campbell, CA 95008 AN AFFIRMATIVE ACTION EMPLOYER RECOMMENDED FINDINGS FILE NO: SA 86-03 APPLICANT: HOLIDAY TRAVEL SITE ADDRESS: 840 E. CAMPBELL AVE. P. C. MTG.: 1-28-86 1. The signs as proposed are needed to adequately identify the business. 2. The signs as proposed meet the requirements of the sign code. 3. The signs as proposed match the existing signing for these buildings. CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL FILE NO: SA 86-03 APPLICANT: HOLIDAY TRAVEL SITE ADDRESS: 840 E. CAMPBELL AVE. P. C. MTG.: 1-28-86 1. Prior to erecting new signs, existing wood sign on Campbell Ave. indicating "Holiday Travel Parking" to be removed. 2. Applicant to obtain all necessary permits from the Building Department. RECOMMENDED FINDINGS FILE NO: SA 86-OS APPLICANT: FOOD VILLA SITE ADDRESS: 1415 HACIENDA AVE PC MTG: 1/28/86 1. The building has approximately 160 feet of frontage. 2. The building is setback approximately 200 feet from the street. 3. No freestanding sign to identify Food Villa is proposed at the shopping center. 4. The 87-1/2 sq.ft. sign is needed to adequately identify the business. 5. The sign is proportional to the size of the building. CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL FILE NO: SA 86-OS APPLICANT: FOOD VILLA SITE ADDRESS: 1415 HACIENDA AVE PC MTG: 1/28/86 1. Applicant to obtain all necessary permits from the Building Department. 2. Prior to erecting new Food Villa sign, applicant to remove Food Plaza sign and sign cabinet from the existing freestanding sign.