Loading...
PC Min 11/26/1985PLANNING COMMISSION CITY OF CAMPBELL, CALIFORNIA 7:30 PM MINUTES NOVEMBER 26, 1985 The Planning Commission of the~City of Campbell convened this day i:. regular session at the regular meeting place, the Council Chambers of City Hall, 70 N. First St., Campbell, California. ROLL CALL Present Commissioners: Kasolas, Christ, Toshach, Olszewski, Dickson, Fairbanks; Planning Director A. A. Kee, Planner II Marty Woodworth, Engineering Manager Bill Helms, Acting City Attorney Bill Seligmann, Recording Secretary Linda Dennis. Absent APPROVAL OF MINUTES P1/S: Dickson, Christ - COMMUNICATIONS Commissioner Perrine That the minutes of the Planning Commission meeting of November 12, 1985 be approved as submitted. Motion carried unanimously. Mr. Kee noted that communications received pertained to specific items on the agenda and would be discussed at that time. Chairman Fairbanks submitted information regarding a conference on traffic mitigation to be held in Sunnyvale on December 6, 1985 and asked if anyone might be able to attend. ARCHITECTURAL APPROVALS S 85-14 Application of Mr. Marc Williams for Williams, M. approval of plans and elevations to allow the construction of a 7,182 sq.ft. retail building on properties known as 915 & 921 S. San Tomas Aquino Rd. and 1271 Elam Ave. in a C-1-S (Neighborhood Commercial) Zoning District. Commissioner Kasolas reported that this application was considered by the Site and Architectural Review Committee. The Committee is recommending continuance to December 10, 1985 in order that revised plans may be submitted. -z- M/S: Dickson, Christ - That S 85-14 be continued to the Planning Commission meeting of December 10, 1985. Motion carried unanimously (6-0-1). S 85-15 Application of Mark and Helen Poppenberg Poppenberg, M. for approval of plans and elevations to allow the construction of an industrial building on property known as 430 Industrial St. in an M-1-S (Light Industrial) Zoning District. Commissioner Kasolas reported that this application was considered by the Site and Architectural Review Committee. The Committee is recommending approval as redlined, with the redlining being a minor change to the building's trim carrying architectural lines across the front of the building and keeping doors and windows the same length. Mr. Kee noted that Staff is recommending approval subject to conditions as indicated in the Staff Comment Sheet. M/S: Toshach, Dickson - That S 85-15 be approved subject to redling of presented plans and conditions of approval as indicated in the Staff Comment Sheet (attached hereto). Motion carried unanimously (6-0-1). PUBLIC HEARINGS PD 85-10 Public hearing to consider the applica- Anderson, K. tion of tor. Kurt Anderson for a Planned Development Permit and approval of plans, elevations and development schedule to allow the construction of 13 townhomes on property .known as 75 Union Ave. in a PD (Planned Development/High Density Residential) Zoning District. Commissioner Kasolas reported that this application was considered by the Site and Architectural Review Committee. A continuance is being recommended so that the applicant might address concerns expressed by Staff and the Committee. Brief discussion ensued regarding the shortage of on-street parking in this area. Chairman Fairbanks opened the public hearing and invited anyone in the audience to speak for or against this item. -3- Mr. Jeff Glick, 712 Duncanville Ct., spoke regarding the lack of parking in this area. Mr. Marc Williams, 718 Duncanville Ct., reemphasized the parking problem in the area, noting that the Commission may wish to reevaluate parking ratios for high density areas. 2d/S: Christ, Toshach - That PD 85-10 be continued to the Planning Commission meeting of December 10, 1985 in order that revised plans might be submitted. Motion carried unanimously (6-0-1). UP 85-11 Public hearing to consider the applica- Troquato, A. tion of Mr. Angelo Troquato for a use permit to allow the establishment of a wholesale nursery on property known as 1791 Pollard Rd. in an R-1-9 (Single Family/Low Density Residential) Zoning District. Commissioner Kasolas reported that this application was considered by the Site and Architectural Review Committee, and approval is being recommended. Brief discussion ensued regarding the nature of this temporary use within the Rte. 85 corridor; and the proposed fencing for the property. Mr. Troquato indicated that the property will be surrounded by chainlink fencing. Chairman Fairbanks opened the public hearing and invited anyone in the audience to speak for or against this item. M/S: Toshach, Christ - That the public hearing on UP 85-11 be closed. Motion carried unanimously (6-0-1). M/S: Christ, Dickson - That the Planning Commission adopt the findings as indicated in the Staff Comment Sheet; and adopt a resolution approving the applicant's request subject to conditions of approval as indicated in the Staff Comment Sheet. Motion carried with the following roll call vote: AYES: Commissioners: Kasolas, Christ, Olszewski, Toshach, Dickson, Fairbanks NOES: Commissioners: None ABSENT: Commissioners: Perrine. -4- PiISCELLANLOUS MM 85-22 Continued application of Mr. Mark Noack Noack, M. for modification to an existing restaurant (Burger King) located on property known as 49 W. Hamilton Ave. in a C-1-S (Neighborhood Commercial) Zoning District. Commissioner Kasolas reported that this application was considered by the Site and Architectural Review Committee, and a continuance is being recommended with the applicant's concurrence. M/S: Olszewski, Christ - That MM 85-22 be continued to the Planning Commission meeting of December 10, 1985. Motion carried unanimously (6-0-1). * ~ MM 85-27 Continued application of Mr. Adron Fulk Fulk, A. for a modification to building usage from approved office/warehousing use to auto related use on property known as 1436 Whiteoaks Rd. in an M-1-S (Light Industrial) Zoning District. Commissioner Kasolas reported that this application was considered by the Site and Architectural Review Committee. The Committee is recommending approval as redlined, with the redlining indicating that there be no auto-related uses abutting the residential area. Commissioner Olszewski indicated his concern with the parking problem in this area, which could be further complicated with an auto body use. Commissioner Kasolas referred to the Paragraph 6.3 in the applicant's lease which restricts parking for the property. It has also been suggested to the applicant that he inform leasees about the one year review for final approval of the use, which creates a possible interim use . Mr. Kee noted that Staff is recommending approval subject to redlining and conditions as indicated in the Staff Comment Sheet. M/S: Toshach, Christ - That Mt1 85-27 be approved sub3ect to redlining of presented plans and conditions of approval (attached hereto) as indicated in the Staff Comment Sheet. Motion carried unanimously (6-0-1). -5- TS 85-08 Request for approval of Tentative Kunkel, B. Subdivision Map of Bradko Enterprises - 175 Redding Rd. - APN 413-23-40. Mr. Woodworth reported that the applicant has submitted the proposed map which would allow the creation of 27 townhomes lots (approved under ZC 85-06) on the project site. The proposed project would be developed at a density of 12.2 units per gross acre. The proposed density is consistent with the Low-P•fedium Density designation (6-13 units per gross acre) as shown on the Land Use Element of the General Plan. M/S: Dickson, Kasolas - That the Planning commission find the proposed mep to be in accord with the General Plan; and that the Planning Commission recommend that the City Council approve this Tentative Subdivision Map, subject to conditions indicated in the Staff Comment Sheet. Motion carried unanimously (6-0-1). Referral Referral from City Council regarding additional properties in the Smith Ave. area to be considered for a General Plan change from Low Density Residential to Low-Medium Density Residential in conjunction with GP 85-02, 1164-1178 Smith Ave. Mr. Woodworth reported that at its meeting of November 19, 1985 the City Council referred GP 85-02 back to the Planning Commission with a direction to initiate a public hearing to consider a general plan amendment for other properties in conjunction with GP 85-02. Staff is recommending that the Commission set the date of January 14, 1986 for a hearing to consider parcels 42, 63, 64, 11, 15 & 16 for a general plan change. Because of the surrounding zoning and the large size of the parcels, it would seem logical to change the General Plan on the parcels to Low-Medium Density Residential. This would allow the development of townhomes, condominiums, or apartments as is developed on the north side of Smith Ave. and provide a transition between the commercial uses and help clean up some unsightly properties. Commissioner Kasolas asked if the propeYti~s under aiscu__~on ~.~~L~, ai ~..~ time, low-medium density and changed to R-1 by the Council. Mr. Woodworth indicated that this was correct. Commissioner Dickson asked if the area would also lend itself nicely to low density development. Mr. Woodworth responded that development could work either way. -6- Commissioner Olszewski asked what areas have been annexed from the County, noting that a copy of the County zoning map prior to annexation would be useful. Commissioner Toshach noted that the Commission has recommended that parcels 12, 13, & 14, under GP 85-02, be changed. The referral from the Council asks that additional parcels be considered as well. Are the additional parcels being incorporated with the parcels under the previous recommendation? Mr. Woodworth indicated that the referral is to consider the other parcels in conjunction with the initial parcels, thereby looking at the area as a whole rather than piecemeal. Commissioner Christ stated that his understanding of the Council's direction is to study the impacts of any further change in this area--not the change recommended under GP 85-02. Commissioner Kasolas noted that a public hearing has been concluded and a recommendation has been made on three of the parcels (under GP 85-02)--these three parcels have been spoken to. The Commission took two separate actions, one on GP 85-02 and one to suggest consideration of other parcels in this area--they should be kept separate. Commissioner Dickson felt that the Council is recommending something that the Commission should have done in the beginning, and he hoped that something might be set as policy regarding the size of a General Plan change. GP 85-02 seemed to be more of a specific plan. M/S: Kasolas, Dickson - That the Plan::i..g Com~^iss_o.. .et ~L:: date of January 14, 1986 for public hearing to consider changing the General Plan from Low Density Residential to Low-Medium Density Residential for parcels 15, 16, 11, 64, 63, ~ 42 (as indicated in attached Exhibit B); and, that the Commission inform the Council of the public hearing. Discussion of Motion Chairman Fairbanks stated that she would be speaking against the motion in that she believes the Commission may be getting into a "spot" zoning situation. She disagreed with the buffer theory; felt that the whole area needs to be looked at carefully, including densities; noted difficult traffic situations in the area; and thought that a general plan like this would be against what the Council has already set in motion for this area. Commissioner Dickson stated his agreement with Chairman Fairbank's comments; however, he is speaking in favor of the motion because he believes in listening to general plan change suggestions. Vote on Piotion Motion carried with a vote of 5-1-1, with Commissioner Fairbanks voting "no" and Commissioner Perrine being absent. -7- Information only Set date for Planning Commission Study Session. The date of 2•ionday, January 27, 1986 was set for a Planning Commission Study Session for review of the Zoning Ordinance. Information only Ordinance from other jurisdictions regarding vehicle storage in front yard areas. It was the consensus of the Commission that this information be noted and filed. * * ~ OTHER ITEMS BROUGHT UP BY COMPIISSION Commissioner Toshach asked Staff to check on the signing at the Montesorri School on Latimer Ave. Commissioner Christ indicated that he would attend the Traffic Mitigation conference on December 6, 1985. Commissioner Olszewski requested information from the Historic Preservation Board on PD 85-10 (75 Union Ave.). * ~ ~ ADJOURNMENT There being no further business, the meeting was adjourned at 8:35 p.m. APPROVED: JoAnn Fairbanks Chairman ATTEST: Arthur A. Kee Secretary RECORDED: Linda A. Dennis Recording Secretary FILE N0: S 85-15 APPLICANT: POPPENBERG, M. SITE ADDRESS: 430 INDUSTRIAL ST. P. C. MTG.: 11/26/85 RECOMMENDED FINDINGS 1. With the revised elevations to be approved by the Planning Director, the building will be architecturally acceptable and will enhance the appearance of the neighborhood. 2. The applicant has provided the 10 parking spaces as required by the code. 3. Due to the narrowness of the lot (60 feet), a 25 foot backup space cannot be provided and 50X compact parking space is justified. 4. The project is in conformance with the M-1-S (Light Industrial) zoning on the property. 5. Substantial landscaping is provided to enhance the appearance of the site. CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL: S 85-15 APPLICANT: Poppenberg, M. SITE ADDRESS: 430 Industrial St. P.C. MTG. 11/26/85 The applicant is notified as part of this application that he/she is required to meet the following conditions in accordance with the Ordinances of the City --- of Campbell and the Laws of the State of California. 1. Revised elevations indicating improved relation of office to industrial portion of building to be submitted to the Planning Department and approved by the Planning Director upon recommendation of the Architectural Advisor prior to application for a building permit. 2. Property to be fenced and landscaped as indicated and/or added in red on the plans. Landscaping and fencing shall be maintained in accordance with the approved plans. 3. Fencing plan indicating location and design details of fencing to be submitted to the Planning Department and approved by the Planning Director prior to issuance of a building permit. 4. Applicant to either (1) post a faithful performance bond in the amount of $3,000.00 to insure landscaping, fencing, and striping of parking areas within 3 months of completion of construction; or (2) file written agreement to complete landscaping, fencing, and striping of parking areas. Bond or agreement to be filed with the Planning Department prior to application for a building permit. S. Applicant to submit a plan to the Planning Department, prior to installation i ;~ of PG&E utility (transformer) boxes, indicating the location of the boxes and j ~' screening (if boxes are above ground) for approval of the Planning Director. 6. Applicant to submit a letter to the Planning Department, satisfactory to the City Attorney, prior to application for building permit, limiting the use of the property as follows: 440 sq.ft. of office use; and 3,183 sq.ft. of industrial or warehouse use. 7. All mechanical equipment on roofs and all utility meters to be screened as approved by the Planning Director. 8. Building occupancy will not be allowed until public improvements are installed. 9. All parking and driveway areas to be developed in compliance with Chapter 21.50 of the Campbell Municipal Code. All parking spaces to be provided with appropriate concrete curbs or bumper guards. 10. Underground utilities to be provided as required by Section 20.16.070 of the Campbell Municipal Code. 11. Plans submitted to the Building Department for plan check shall indicate clearly the location of all connections for underground utilities including water, sewer, electric, telephone and television cables, etc. CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL: S 85-15 APPLICANT: Poppenberg, M. SITE ADDRESS: 430 Industrial St. P.C. MTG. 11/26/85 Page 2. 12. Sign application to be submitted in accordance with provisions of the Sign Ordinance for all signs. No sign to be installed until application is approved and permit issued by Planning and Building Departments (Section 21.68.030 of the Campbell Municipal Code). 13. Ordinance No. 782 of the Campbell Municipal Code stipulates that any contract for the collection and disposal of refuse, garbage, wet garbage and rubbish produced within the limits of the City of Campbell shall be made with Green Valley Disposal Company. This requirement applies to all single-family dwellings, multiple apartment units, to all commercial, business, industrial, manufacturing, and construction establishments. 14. Trash container(s) of a size and quantity necessary to serve the development shall be located in area(s) approved by the Fire Department. Unless otherwise noted, enclosure(s) shall consist of a concrete floor surrounded by a solid wall or fence and have self-closing doors of a size specified by the Fire Department. All enclosures to be constructed at grade level and have a level area adjacent to the trash enclosure area to service these containers. 15. Applicant shall comply with all appropriate State and City requirements for the handicapped. 16. The applicant is hereby notified that the property is to be maintained free of any combustible trash, debris and weeds, until the time that actual construction commences. All existing structures shall be secured by having windows boarded up and doors sealed shut, or be demolished or removed from the property. Sect. 11.201 b 11.414, 1979 Ed. Uniform Fire Code. BUILDItdG DEPAP.TliENT No comment at this time. PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT 17. Pay storm drain area fee. 18. Submit three sets of on-site grading and drainage plans. 19. Obtain an excavation permit, pay fees and post surety to reconstruct driveway approach and any other work in the right-of-way. FIRE DEPARTMENT No comments at this time. CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL: P4~1 85-27/584-18 APPLICANT: MR. ADRON FULK SITE ADDRESS: 1436 WHITEOAKS RD. P.C. ACTG. 11/26/85 1. Applicant to submit a letter, satisfactory to the City Attorney, restricting the use of the property to: A. 2,250 sq.ft. of office use. B. 16,517 sq.ft. of warehousing/manufacturing use. C. 22,050 sq.ft. of auto-related uses. D. Reservation and designation of 6 interior (10'x20`) parking spaces. E. Associated exterior parking facilities. 2. Applicant to provide a copy of executed leases demonstrating restriction of overnight parking. 3. Building usage to be reviewed by the Planning Commission one year from date of building occupancy. MEMORANDUM CITY OF CAMPB'~Ll 70: ARTHUR A. KEE Date: 1J t~ V. 21, ~ ~1 4'S" Planning Director From: JOSEPH ELLIOTT , Director of Public Works Sub]ect: Tentative Subdivisippn Map Lands of -3rg dco ------APN X113--23- ~~_--------------------------------- The following conditions of approval are recommended c cer ing the subject tentative subdivision map submitted by ~er,ninnS - McUermo~~ - I~c,ss Installation of a sanitary sewerage system to serve all lots within the sub- division in conformance with the proposed plans of the County of Santa Clara Sanitation District No. 4. Sanitary sewerage service to be provided by said ~. District No. 4. Installation of a water distribution system to serve all lots within the sub- division in conformance with the plans of the San Jose Water Works. Water service to be provided by said water company. Fire hydrants and appurte- nances shall be provided and installed at the locations specified by the Fire Chief, Fire Department, City of Campbell. Fire hydrant maintenant2 Z . fees shall be paid to City at the rate of X195 per fire hydrant. Subdivider shall create or provide any public service easement and any other public utility and/or public service easements as may be necessary for the 3 . installation of any and all public utilities and/or facilities. Compliance with the provisions of Title 20, Subdivisions of the Campbell Municipal Code. ~. Subdivider to pay Storm Drainage Area Fee. . Subdivider to furnish copy of Preliminary Title Report. Subdivider shall (install street improvements and post surety to guaranty G the work) Dedicate additional right-of-way to widen feet from centerline. to C.C.&R.'s to be approved by City Engineer to insure provisions for maintenance ? of buildings and common area. Provide a grading and drainage plan for the review and approval of the City ~. Engineer. 9 • Obtain an excavation permit and pay fees and deposit for all work in the public right of way. r I f s t Q~ r ~ 5, to. Pc~y cc ir1 ~ t~cu n'~ cledtcatiPr~ of ~Qi~d {ar 1 Bv: BILL M. HELMS