Loading...
PC Min 10/08/1985PLANNING COt~Il`1ISSION CITY OF CAPLP I:LL, CALIFOF.IdIA 7:30 P,.'. I~fII~3L'TES OCTOB~^ ;, 195 The Planning Commission of the City of Campbell convened this day in re;ular session in the City Ball Council Chambers, 70 21. First St., Campbell, California. ^OLL CALL Present Commissioners: Kasolas, Perrine, Christ, Olszewski, Dickson, Fairbanl~s; Planning Director A. A. I:ee, Principal Planner P. J. Stafford, Engineering 2lanager ;;ill Helms, Acting City Attorney Bill Selilmann, Recordin}; Secretary Linda Dennis.. ,~ Absent Commissioner Toshach. APPROVAL OF 2II"IIITLS i•I/S : Olsze~~~sl;i, Dickson - That the minutes of the Planning Commission meeting of September 10, 1985 be approved as submitted. Aiotion carried unanimously (6-0-1). COAI"IU2lICATIONS Communication Request of AIr. Jim Morelan for an Alorelan, J. opinion from the Planning Commission regarding allowing an automobile repair use on property known as 40 & 48 P.ailway Ave. in a PD (Planned Development/ Industrial) Zoning District. Air. Jim Alorelan, 100 j~'. P.incon Ave., explained that Staff had indicated that the Commission had looked at a previous application for an automotive use in this area with skepticism. Because of the application fee of $1,000, it is important for the property owner to have a sense of direction from the Commission. Air. Morelan concluded that he felt it would be possible to minimize any negative aesthetic impact of his client's use. Commissioner Dickson asked if an auto use is permissible under the Industrial Zoning District, noting that if it a permitted use, the City has to take some action to clean the situation up. Commissioner ICasolas noted that there is no question that the area between Ilinchester and Bascom Avenues is in transition. This area is becoming developed caith several nice office projects, and new business needs to be compatible with the surroundinU area. Iie continued that the real question is if an auto use appropriate for the downtoc~.m area. The Commission has spol.en out loudly regarding these uses on I2inchester Blvd. ~__ -~- There has been some serious enforcement problems h*ith a sizeable portion of the auto repair facilities. Comrissioner l:asolas added that the majority of people who come through Campbell come through the subject - docanto~,m area. Pir, tiar?: Collins, attorney representing the City on liability cases, spoke on behalf of Pir. Jovanovic, noting that he is t}ie type of person he would like to see in Campbell. Chairman Fairbanks stated to ?ir. l~iorelan that his client certainly has a right to apply for an automotive use in the subject area. She continued that she ~•~ould need to look at the type of use that is suitable for that area; and, she added that she might be disinclined towards an auto use, but cannot ma~:e a decision because there is no application at this time. Chairman Fairbanks noted that she has received a letter from Commissioner Toshacli indicating his absence due to work related travel. Additionally, Chairman Fairbanks indicated she has received information on a "Greenbelt Seminar" which she passed to Commissioner l:asolas as representative on the Transit Cor.~ittee. * ~ AP.CIIITECT'JRAL APPP.OVALS S 35-13 Application of Pir. Mike Young for Young, ti. approval of plans and elevations to allow the construction of 9 single _. family homes and the retention of an existing single family home on property knotim as 1106, 1130 & 1142 Audrey Ave. in an R-1-10 (Single Family Residential, 10,000 sq.ft. minimum lot size) Zoning District. Commissioner Christ reported that this item was considered by the Site and Architectural Review Co*.mnittee. Revie~•~ of the plans included the setbacks, second stories, and street improvements. The Committee is recommending approval with the stipulation that the previously recommended alternative street improvements be reviewed in that standard improvements may be more appropriate in light of the quality of the development. The Committee expressed a concern Taith the deterioration of asphalt driveways, curbs and gutters. Commissioner Christ noted his personal concern that the improvements for the ne~•~ court blend with the existin street. Cor,~issioner Olszewski asked about the retention of existing landscaping. -3- Commissioner I:asolas noted that this development is before the Co,~mission is only because it is in a sensitive area, otherwise it would just go through the Building Department for permits. Commissioner Dickson questioned if the ne~v homes would fit in with the surrounding homes, specifically side yards placed against back yards of adjacent homes. Commissioner Christ responded that the new homes are all designed with the privacy and line of sis;ht of surrounding hones in mind. The Committeee did not loo: at the architectural design from a compatibility standpoint; however, the homes are well beyond the normal setbacks and the only intrusions would be from second stories, with these units being placed a considerable distance from adjacent properties. The Site Committee is impressed caith the treatments on the different elevations. Commissioner Christ noted that the Site Committee also expressed a concern that the unit which is to be retained be completed before the other homes. The applicant has basically agreed to this stipulation. Chairman Fairbanks noted that alternative street improvements do not necessarily mean substandard improvements, --a cement driveway is allo~aabl.e. She asked for a review of the alternative street improvement policy. P'lr. Helms provided this review, noting, that the policy allows for materials which can be used in-lieu of portland cement. Considerable discussion ensued regarding the type of street improvements -- to be provided for this subdivision. It was noted by Commissioner Kasolas that the asphalt creates a maintenance problem, the sites can be provided with better drainage with standard improvements, and concrete would be cleaner for the homeowner. Commissioner Christ noted that it was the Site Cormittee who brought the issue of improvements up to the developer. Additionally, the Architectural Advisor expressed a concern about the driveway placements and the aesthetics of the street if alternative improvements are used. Standard improvements would allow for substantially more on-street parkin;. :ir. take Younl;, applicant, requested standard street improvements as explained by Commissioner Christ. ttr. Lee Peterson, 1156 Audrey Ave.., noted that this project appeared to be the best he has seen for this parcel so far. Hog?ever, he indicated that there are still a fe~a problems. First, the original provision for sale of this property assured that there would be no two-story homes built. Although the setbacks are good for the most part, he questioned if two-story homes were necessary--particularly on Lot ~~4. :~1r. Peterson continued that there is a traffic problem in this area, with a relatively blind corner and increased traffic. Recently installed storm drains modified t11e corner making it easier for cars to cut across the corner. He as'.ced that something be done to keep the cars from cutting across the -4- corner. Regarding alternative street improvements, I-ir. Peterson prefers earth colored concrete to asphalt, and is definitely opposed to white concrete. He also expressed a problem with not allowing a rolled curb, - notinr; that this is a cul-de-sac with little traffic, and a rolled curb would be pedestrian and bicycle friendly. Lastly, Iir. Peterson asked if the street had to be named Oburn Court. rlr. I:ee explained that the name went with the tentative subdivision map, any to change the name would involve a re-submittal of this map. ':r. helms stated that Staff is opposed to rolled curbs as well as colored concrete. Con**~issioner Dickson felt that a piece of information was missing, namely an aerial or overhead of the surroundini; area to show the layout of existing; in reference to the proposed. ~Ie asked that an aerial be provided at the next meeting for information purposes. Corrnissioner Christ noted that the layout of the new homes in relation to the surrounding homes was the first thing the Site Committee looked at, and the Committee was impressed Faith the developers attempt to maintain the setbacks and the privacy, with most of the structures are 20-30' from adjoining property lines. sir. Lothar Shicker, 1092 Lucot Way, asked about the fence line on the east side of the development, the height of the second story on Lot ~~4, the access to the former park, the access during the construction process, and the fencing policy. Staff responded that the height of the second story is 22' from grade to peal:; the access easements would be abandoned according to Condition 14 of the Tentative Subdivision tiap approval, and the subdivider is required to provide fencing. Fencing would be constructed as each lot is developed. It is Staff's understanding that all the homes would be built at the same time, however, the construction period could extend over a year's time and the fencing would not be the first thing to go up. Pi/S: Kasolas, Christ - That the Planninh Commission approve S 85-13 subject to the conditions indicated in the Staff Comment Sheet, as well as the stipulation that the existing unit to be retained be completed before any permits are issued for the new homes; and, that after considering alternative street improvements, the Planning Commission recommends the installation of standard street improvements for this development. -5- Discussian of ''lotion Commissioner Christ again noted his concern about the improvements in the area where the court will meet the existing street, hoping that Public - ~lorlcs would see to it that there will be some type of blending between the different types of improvements. Commissioner Perrine commented on the excellent work of the Site Committee. Chairman Fairbanks stated that her own particular bias is to go cJith alternative street improvements. Although she likes what is being done on this site, and the way the developer has responded to the area`s concerns. Hocaever, because of the inclusion of the street improvement issue in the motion, she stated that she would be speaking against the motion. Vote on i~totion notion carried. with a vote of 4-2-1, with Commissioner Olszewski and Fairbanks voting "no" and Commissioner Toshach being absent. * * t The Commission recessed at 8:50 p.m.; the meeting reconvened at 9:00 p.m. * ~ ~: PUBLIC HEARItdGS PD 85-06 Continued public hearing to consider the Hester, L. application of tor. Larry Hester for a Planned Development Permit and approval of plans, elevations, and development schedule to allow the construction of a warehouse building on property known as 86 P.ailway Ave. in a PD (Planned Development/Industrial) Zoning District. Commissioner Kasolas reported that this application was considered by the Site and Architectural P.eview Committee. The Committee is recommending the acceptance of the traffic report (attached hereto) compiled by Barton-Aschman Associates, as well as approval of PD ~5-06 with a change in Condition No. 7 deleting manufacturing use. Commissioner Kasolas continued that the applicant is willing to work with the City, and understands that any change in tenancy will have to come back to the Commission. Additionally, the Committee expressed concern with the type of development taking place in this area. - 21r. hee stated Staff`s agreement with the Site Committee's recommendations. -b- Commissioner Christ noted that the applicant is also concerned ~~~ith the type of development and the use for this area. The project was redesigned to loot: more like an office building than a warehouse. Chairman Fairbanks opened the public hearing and invited anyone in the audience to speal: for or against this item. '.•i/S: Perrino, Christ - That the public hearing on PD 85-Ob be closed. i~iotion carried unanimously (6-0-1). Pi/S: Dickson, Christ - That the Planning Comm~asion recommend that the City Council accept the Negative reclaration which has been prepared for PD 85-06; and, that the Planning Commission~dopt P.esolution tio. 2352 recommending that the City Council approve the plans, elevations, and development schedule for PD 85-06, subject to the conditions of approval as indicated in the Staff Comment Sheet, with a change in Condition "To. 7 to eliminate the coord "manufacturing". ::otion carried with the following roll call vote: AYES: Commissioners: l;asolas, Perrino, Christ, Olszewski, Dickson, Fairbanks NOES: Commissioners: tdone ABSENT: Commissioners: Toshach. ~: k st ZC 85-07 Continued public hearing to consider a PD £15-09 City-initiated zone change from I.-2-S Ba~;er, P. (t;ultiple Family P.esidential) to PD (Planned Development); and, a public hearing to consider the application of 2•ir. Phil Baker for a Planned Development Permit, approval of plans, elevations, and development schedule to allow the conversion of an existing building to office use on property known as 151 Rose Ct. Commissioner Kasolas reported that this item was considered by the Site and Architectural P.eview Committee. The Committee is recommending approval to allow a professional office use. Chairman Fairbanks opened the public hearing and invited anyone in the audience to speak for or against this item. -7- i~/S: Christ, Olsze~•~sr;i - That the public hearing for ZC 85-07/PD 85-09 be closed. Motion carried unanimously (6-0-1). :1/S: Kasolas, Terrine - Discussion on Notion That the Planning Commission recommend that the City Council accept the P;ebative Declaration which has been prepared for this project; and, that the Planningc, Commission adopt P.esolution I1os. 2353 & 2354 recommending that the City Council adopt findings attached to subject resolutions approving the zone change and Planned Development Permit, subject to conditions as indicated in the Staff Comment Sheet, as well as a chan!;e in f indin, ~f2 adding "In the event that the use is not harmonious, there will be a review of the PD Ordinance by the Staff for recommendation to the Planning Commission. tlotion carried with the following roll call vote: Commissioner Dickson stated that he is still opposed to this application, and feels that it is an imposition into the residential area. Coranissioner Perrine spoke in favor of the motion, noting, this is an excellent example of working together and finding a workable solution. Commissioner I:asolas recommended a unanimous vote on this item, in that the General Plan has been changed and it is necessary to have the zonin; changed to be in conformance with the General Plan. Commissioner Christ commented on the control on the site gained through the PD Ordinance. Commissioner Dickson noted his agreement with the intent of the remarks issued, hot•Tever he also recalls that years ago when a school use was allowed it was never on anyone's mind that the site would be converted to an office use. Ile concluded that he is still opposed to this use in this area. Chairman Fairbanks stated her agreement with Commissioner Dicl:son's. Vote on lotion A~"sS: Commissioners: ::asolas, Perrinz, Christ, Olsze~~ski P:0 ~~ : Conrnissioners : Dickson, r airban's !`,DS+:,I,T: Commissioners : Toshac h. .4 .A. -S- ZC CS-O6 Continued public hearing to consider the l~un'.~1, I3, application of ?Ir. Bred '_;un';el for a zone change fron ?:-11-S (?Multiple Family I:esidential) to PD (Planned ~evelopnent); and approval of plans, elevations and development schedule to alloi* the construction of 27 toi•m'iorhs on property lcnoim as 175 Redding d. Commissioner ?:asolas reported that this iterli:~as considered by the Site and Architectural ?;evieir Comriittee. The Com:~itten is recori:~endin approval as rec~-lined, with color and material sar<ples being made available to Staff for final approval. Cor~iissioner Olszecrslci expressed a concern iritil the proposed Unit Type A acco„immodatinR one bedroom and a loft, faith the loft possibly being used as a bed.roorl, thereby causing potential parking, problems. There was discussion regarding the parking ratio, the type of parl:ina spaces provided, and the areas where the spaces are to be provided. Chairman Fairbanks opened the public hearing; and invited anyone in the audience to spew:: for or against this item. *:r. Jim Parissenti, 125A l;edding Rd., noted his concern with the location of the scaimmina pool suggesting that it be put by Hoffman Lane rattier than adjacent to residences in his development. lr. Parissenti continued that tale visual effect of the proposed units, fron Orcltarci Viei•r Toianhomes, will be a lame white and gray wall;. that the parkin; provided is inadequate; that some of the driveways are extremely close to the street and not very aesthetic; and that the site layout is not very creative, creating a "tunnel" effect. Additionally, he suggested that future development be provided faith heavier on-site roadiaays due to rapid breakdoim caused by trash trucks. ISr. Andre ?~olezsl;i, 1258 Redding I.d., asked for a definition of tocanhomes, and expressed his concern about the proposed tandem parkin;. ^'..r. 'dark Bees, 133A Redding ?'.d., President of Orchard View townhories, noted the petition presented to the Commission at a former neetin;. IIe stated that the honeoimers are concerned crith the removal of existing trees, crith the setl~acl_s on the western property line, two-story units abuttina_ tiro-story units, the pool fro,a a noise standpoint, par_•cing on ':edding i;d., nar?;.ing alonrt the street as it relates to visual safety, and tandem par':cin,; bac'~:-up distances. PIr. °rad Loi.*en, 1390 ?loffman Lane, reaffirmed his previously expressed concerns about privacy and requested an ~' fence with the addition of tall landscaninry along the northerly property line. He also stated his concern faith available parking, noting that other developments in the area have inac'_equate parkins. t'r. Lowen stated that he is pleased with the reca:~mendation for no parking on Iloffnan Lane. ____ -9- 1'r. Brad '.:un~el responded to concerns expressed by area residents. The tande~,~ parkin; provides more usuable parking for guests; ^v0,a of the trees over 12" are being saved; CC&P,'s will be provided for the units addressing the exterior maintenance as well as the pool (noise and annoyances); an 3' fence will be provided for the northerly property line; and, the unit mixture has been changed along the northerly property line to reduce the nualber of two-stor;~ units. :Ir. IIees recommended an ~' fence along the westerly property line, as well as tall landscaping, to provide privacy for the adjacent residents. ;:/S: L:asolas, Christ - That the public hearing on ZC 35-06 be closed. *totion carried unanimously (6-0-1). Discussion Commissioner Dickson asked if an 8' fence glom; the westerly property line would be a problem. tfr. Kee responded that the property o~mers who are in existing units at Orchard View may have an objection to such a high fence, especially when the sunlight is affected. I.1r. I:ee noted that he would be very careful ~~ith recommending an 8' fence along that property line, unless the people were contacted and were in agreement. Commissioner Kasolas added that the policy is for a 6' fence, and only in extraordinary cases has an 8' fence be allowed, because the 8' fence really provides a tunnel effect as well as affecting light. Commissioner Kasolas continued that with the CC&R's, location of pool equipment, and landscaping in the area, the pool will be a self-policing situation. Commissioner Dickson asl.ed Ifr. Bees if he represented the homeowners who would be affected by an 8' fence in the adjoining townhouse development. Pir. Hees indicated that he represent these residents, and they would be in agreement with an 8' fence. if/S: Perrine, Kasolas - That the Planning Commission recommend that the City Council accept the tlegative Declaration which .has been • prepared for this project; and, that the Planning Commission adopt Resolution Nos. 2355 and 2355 recommending and the City Council approve the zone change and the Planned Development Permit, subject to conditions as indicated in the Staff Comment Sheet, with a change in Condition i3o. 2 regarding fencing to provide for an 3' fence along the northerly property line, and a 6' fence -10- along the westerly property line; and, tall landscaping provided along bot;i property lines to soften impacts on residents, fencing and landscaping plan to come bacl: to Staff for approval. Discussion of notion Commissioner Christ stated that he would be speaking against the motion because he has some strong concerns about project density, and parking. Five of the units do not have tandem parking, and there is no off-site parl;in~ provided for guests. Commissioner Dickson stated that he would normally be against this type of project because of the density; however, the applicant has done a great deal to maximize amenities and has provided an exceptional plan. Commissioner "ictcson noted that he was amazed at the number of items that were channec', to address the neighbors com-nents, as well as the number of existinb~ trees to be retained. Vote on Motion AYES: Commissioners: Kasolas, Perrine, Olszewski, Dickson I10ES: Commissioners: Christ, Fairbanks ABSENT: Commissioners: Toshach. ~ t ~ UP 85-10 Continued public hearing to consider the Reali, C. application of Peter & Cheryl Reali for approval of a Use Permit to allow the conversion of a single family residence to a pre-school/day care center with a maximum of 30 children on property known as 947 4'. Campbell Ave. in an R-1 (Single Family Residential) Zonin; District. Commissioner Kasolas reported that this item was considered by the Site and Architectural P.eview Committee. The applicant is withdrawing the application because of potential traffic hazards. The Committee is recom-~endinP that a portion of the application fee be refunded in that the problem of no left-turn lane is not of the applicant's doing. Chairman Fairbanks opened the public hearing and invited anyone in the audience to speai: for or against this project. ?i/S: ~;asolas, Olsze~•~slci - That the public hearing for UP 35-10 be closed. notion carried unanimously (6-0-1). -11- ,'i/S: Kasolas, Christ - That the Plannin Cor,-mission recommend that the City Council refund a portion of the application fee in that the hardships for this project are not self-imposed, and the application has been withdra~,m. t4otion carried unanimously (6-~-1). •~ ~ ~ GP ~~5-02 Public hearin; to consider the applica- Pinn giros. tion of Pinn Taros. Construction to amend the Land Use Element of the General Plan from Loc•T Density P.esidential (less than G units per gross acre ) to Loca-Aiedium Density Residential (G-13 units per gross acre) on property known as 1154-1178 Smith Ave. Iir . I:ee reviewed the Plan designation, 12 proposed designation applicant has submit zero lot-line homes, acre. application, notin; that under the existing General units would be possible on the 2.03 gross acres. The of Low-;•tediu« Density would allow 26 units. The ted a preliminary plan indicating 18 single family, which would result in a density of 9 units per gross i4r. I:ee continued that although there is some justification for the requested change, as discussed in the Staff Comment Sheet, Staff cannot support the proposal based on the San Tomas. Area Policy and the previous Council actions in the area. Clearly the proposed increase in density is not consistent with this policy. Cor~issioner :{asolas asked if the development across the street has improved one-half the street; if there have been any problems from the density across the street; if the subject parcels are two lots away from existing commercial uses; and, if Staff is making their recommendation from a planning basis or a policy basis. 2'[r. Kee responded that developrent is required for street improvements; Staff is not at~~are of any complaints about ttie development across the street the subject parcels are t~•ao lots away from existing commercial; and, density is a policy decision adopted by the City Council. This area has been revie~•red many times, and ori?inally Staff supported a low-medium density; ho-•rever, the recommendation was changed to low density as a result of public hearings. Co...,issioner Dickson noted that this area has been studied two or three times, and the reason for the current zoning is that the neighborhood came forward in full force to request to low density. -12 Cormsissioner Y.asolas noted the lo;a-medium density project on San Tomas Aquino ..^.d, which backs up to this parcel, and recalled that Host property owners on Smith Ave. have requested low-medium density. Additionally, the -~ Plannins Commission has recently requested the Council to revie;a the San ` Torras Policy. Commissioner Christ stated that t11e issue is not whether the property should be developed, but rather at iahat densit?~--re~ardless of street improvements. Chairman I'airbanks opened the public hearing and invited anyone in the audience to speak for or against this item. 2ir. Alan Pinn, applicant, explained that the economics of development would matte lour density horses cost over $200,000 for this niece of property. ;,rith the low-medium density, he is actually as':;ing for an increase of 5 homes over the current maximum. I:r. Pins continued that this is a prime area for the development of 3/4 bedroom homes, and that this type of housing structure would fit well into the community. *is. Stephanie Olsen, £398 Torero Plaza, spoke in favor of the increased density, notin she would like to see the area developed, and the moderately priced homes would be an asset to the community. rir. Ton Paolucci, 1134 Linda Dr., spoke in favor of development, as well as noted his concerns caith the traffic in the area. 2•ir. Paolucci indicated that he had written a letter over a year ago, with no solution as yet. 1%e asked for a study of the traffic flow in the area, and submitted a letter regarding the area traffic and asked for support. Additionally, tlr. Paolucci felt that the commercial area nearby should not be considered commercial because it is not being; used as such. 11r, helms responded that the traffic impact of this proposal has not been loo'.ced at in that a specific plan has not been submitted; however, Staff is of the opinion that the difference between low density and low medium density would not be significant enou;h to warrant a traffic report. Pir. Doug Almack, 1154 Smith Ave., spoke in favor of the proposed density notin; that the area looks impoverished and he felt the only solution is development; and, that he is in complete concurrence caith 2~1r. Pinn's initial renderings. tfr. Almack recalled that when rezoning was done, the property o;•mers came enmasse to support the higher density. Pi/S: Christ, Olszewski - That the public hearing for GP 85-02 be closed. Motion carried unanimously (6-0-1). 2",/S: Kasolas, Perrine - That the Planning Commission recommend that the City Council accept the ldegative Declaration which has been prepared for this project; and, that the Planning Commission adopt a resolution recommending that the City Council approve GP 85-02. -13- Discussion on Iiotion Commissioner Christ stated that he is in agreement with the need for development in this area, and he could support changing some commercial areas to residential; however, he felt that the proposed number of units was inappropriate for the area, and would be speaking against the motion. Commissioner I:asolas felt that it is important that the Council take action to revieca the San Tomas Report, particularly in light of comments made this evenin and the fact that this area needs help now. Commissioner I:asolas also noted a minority report that was presented,but never published,on the San Tomas area. Commissioner Olszewski stated that the views expressed by the residents say it all; however, he is a little concerned that the density will cause a problem that may perpetuate. Iiowever, this could ber looked at later, since the issue this evening is for the General Plan chance only. Commissioner Dicl:son stated that the zoning is not a result of the San Tomas Tasl; Force report, but rather a result of hearings held. He continued that he would be in favor of having study session in the area to see what the residents wish. At this point he saw a property owner and a speculative property owner speaking for increased density. Vote on notion AYLS: Commissioners: Kasolas, Perrine, Olszewski NOES: Commissioners: Christ, Dickson, Fairbanks ABSI;IIT: Commissioners: Toshach Motion for approval fails with a vote of 3-3-1. I1/S: Olszewski, I:asolas - That the public hearing on GP 85-02 be reopened, with the applicant's concurrence; and, that the item be continued to the Planning Commission meeting of October 22, 1985 in order that a full Commission may be present. Motion carred unanimously (6-0-1). Mr. Pinn stated his agreement with the continuance. Cormissioner Dickson requested traffic information for this area at the next meeting. n i4 ~: T;ie Conraission recessed at 10:50 p.m.; the meeting reconvened at 11:00 p.m. ~ x -14- ZC 85-0~ Public hearing to consider the applica- iiaclerzad, I;, tion of Pir. I:. Idaderzad, on behalf of Devland Construction, for approval of a zone change from :-2-S (Multiple Family ^esidential) to PD (Planned Development); and approval of plans, elevations and development schedule to allo~:~ the construction of 12 tocmhorles on properties 'cnoG•m as 28b & 290 t•). Sunnyoa?;s Ave . Commissioner Rasolas reported that this item Baas considered by the Site and Architectural Revieca Cor~imittee. The applicant is requesting a continuance to the meetin? of October 22, 1935. Chairman Fairbanks opened the public hearing and invited anyone in the audience to speak for or against this item. '•?/S: Dickson, Olszewski - That ZC 35-0~ be continued to the Plannin Commission meeting October 22, 1985. Aotion carried unanimously (b-0-1). ;~ :~ ~: V 85-02 Public hearin; to consider the request Redlich, II. of 'Ir. Herb Redlich for approval of a ____ sideyard variance from 5' to 3'4" to allo~•~ the construction of a residential addition between the existing residence and garage on property kno~•m as 1325 Freda Ct. in an R-1-9 (Single Family Residential) Zoning District. Commissioner I:asolas reported that this item was considered by the Site and Architectural F.evieca Committee, and approval is recommended. t:r. Stafford reviewed the plans, notin; that Staff is also recorvnendina approval. Chairman Fairban';s opened the public hearing and invited anyone in the audience to speak for or against this item. '~/S: Dickson, Olszewsl;i - That the public hearing on V 35-02 be closed. Ilotion carried unanimously (b-0-1). Pt/S: Christ, Olszewsl;i - That the Planning Con;:~ission adopt P.esolution "do. 2357 approving V 85-02 subject to findings and conditions indicated in the Staff Comment Sheet. I•totion carried with the following roll _~_ call vote: -15- AYES: Commissioners: l:asolas, Perrine, Christ, Olsze~islci, Dicson, Fairban-a i;OES : Conr:.issioners : Florae ~ ?~'iSP.;?T: Commmissioners : Toshach. Commissioner Dicl•:.son felt that the issue of what makes a garage attached should be considered in the review of the Zoning Ordinance. ~: * ~ TS ~5-05 Pu31ic hearing to consider the applica- [~. L. Chalmers Lion o` rlr. [•l. L. Chalmers for a Tentative Subdivision flap to create 12 sin ;le family lots on the southerly portion of 700 l~icGlincey Lane in an P.-1-6 (Single Family P.esidential/Low Density) Zoning District. i•1r. I:ee reviecaed this application, noon; that Staff is recommending that a 6' masonry caall be constructed along the northerly property line of the subdivision. This is a standard requirement where residential uses abut industrial or commercial uses, and it would provide some sound mitigation as indicated in the noise study. The Commission should be aware that this same map (with an exception to allow two lots less than 6,000 sq.ft.) coas recommended by the Cormission in 198:0 (Commissioners Dickson and Fairbanks voting; "no"). The Council subsequently approved the map, which has since expired. Commissioner Olszecaski inquired about the noise study, particularly the sound levels. I4r. Stafford referred to the study done by F. L. Paclc Associates, page 3. Commissioner I:asolas noted that it would appear that once a wall is constructed and a landscaping buffer installed, the noise level will be even less because of the buffering. Chairman Fairban's opened t17e public hearing and invited anyone in the audience to speak for or against this item. Coruaissioner Olszewski expressed concern about the proposed development being between a recyclin; center and a construction yard, in that both these uses are inherently noisy and considerable time has been spent discussing the noise that the area residents have been subjected to. Cor.~missioner Dickson noted that the study concludes, on page 4, that no noise problems exist--erhat more could be asked. Commissioner l;asolas added that Pack Associates is a noted authority in sound studies, and both :•ir. and ?irs. Pack have served on Campbell's Planning Commission so they are aware of the community's needs. -16- ?*,/S; Kasolas, Perrine - That the public hearing on TS 85-OS be closed. ?lotion carried unanir~lously (6-0-1). M/S: Dickson, Christ - Discussion That the Planning Commission recommend that the City Council accept the t;egative Declaration which has been prepared for this project; and, that the Planning Commission find this tentative map is consistent caith the General Plan and recommend that the City Council approve TS 85-05, subject conditions as indicated in the Staff Comment Sheet. Commissioner Kasolas asked if he should abstain on this application, noting a law suit filed by the applicant which named some of the commissioners . Dir. Jim Chalmers, 786 ticGlincey Ln., stated that the law suit was not from T•?. L. Chalmers, but rather Bay Area P.ecycling. ?ir. Seligmann clarified that the subject legal action was in suit, and W. L. Chalmers was a real party in that suit; however, commissioners present are not parties to that suit any longer, therefore, abstention is not necessary. Vote on Ifotion AYLS: Commissioners: IZasolas, Perrine, Christ, Dickson, Fairbanl;s P70ES; Commissioners: Olszewski AhSI';PdT: Commissioners : Toshach. ~ ~ ~ I•iI S Cr LLA.IF.OUS Canbanit F.equest of Alcanco to place a "canbank" on property known as 855 S. San Tomas Aquino I.d. in a C-2-S (General Commercial) Zoning District. Commissioner Christ reported that this item was considered by the Site and Architectural Review Committee. The Committee is recommending approval, subject to a chan;e in the location. The recommendation is that the canbank be moved into one of the parking stalls at t1~e center, in that it seems more appropriate if cars can park next to the unit. The plans provide for some landscaping around the unit. One suggestion would be to locate the canbanl; somew':iere near the existing landscaping in the center of the shoPpinQ center. -17- I`r. hee stated that Staff is also recommending approval. Commissioner Olszecoski asked what precaution is taken to keep cars from running into the unit. Pis. Lynne I~ieredith, Alcanco, responded that bu:aper poles surround the equipment for protection, in that t11e units are very expensive . r`:/S: Perrine, Christ - Ai~t 85-24 S 84-06 Spiering Construction That the Planning Commission approve the placement of the "canbank" subject to the relocation of the unit towards the existing landscaping, in the shoppin center, as well as conditions indicated in the Staff Comment Sheet. Pfotion carried unanimously (6-0-1). ~ t ~ Request of Spiering Construction Co. for a modification to the approved building usage from manufacturing to office and parking use on property '.Kno~,m as 341 & S47 S. I.1cGlincey Ln, in an I1-1-S (Light Industrial) Zonin District. Commissioner I~asolas reported that this item was considered by the Site and Architectural Revie*.a Committee, and approval is recommended. Pi/S: I:asolas, Christ - That the Planning Con~nission approve i1r•i 85-24 subject to conditions as indicated in the Staff Comment Sheet. Piotion carried unanimously (6-0-1). ~ :: ~ SA 85-33 Continued si;nin? request of Pir. Om Kar~boj, 0. I:amboj to allow the construction of a freestanding si,n on property known as X80 ~. Campbell Ave. in a PD (Planned Development/Commercial) Zoning District. Commissioner I:asolas reported that this iten was before the Site and Architectural Review Committee, however, the applicant did not attend; therefore, a continuance is recomrionded. ~~/S: Perrine, Christ - That SA 35-33 be continued to the Planning Commission meeting of October 22, 1935. notion carried unanimously (6-0-1). ~: ~; :~ -13- SA ~5-35 Continued sign application of ShauQh- Allstar Inns messy Properties Corp. for property known as 1240 Camden Ave. (Allstar Inns) in a PD (Planned Development/Industrial) Zoning District. rr/S: I:asolas, Christ - That SA 55-35 be continued to the Plannin; Commission meeting of ~over~ber 12, 1935, at tl~e applicant's request. I•iotion carried unanimously (6-0-1). ;~ ;~ A?*"_ 35-22 request for modification to existing I•Ioaclt, 'i. restaurant (Burger I:ing) located on property kno~~m as 4;.kW. IIamilton Ave . in a C-1-S (teighborhood Commercial) Zoning District. M/S: Perrine, Kasolas - That >`'~' 35-22 be continued to the Planning Commission meeting of I3ovember 26, 1935 at the applicant's request. iiotion carried unanimously (6-0-1). t t :: UP 31-01 P.equest of Iir. James Rueter for elimina- Rueter, J, tion of a condition of approval - 155 E. Campbell Ave. - PD (Planned Development/Commercial) Zoning District. ti/S: Christ, Perrine - That this request be caithdracm per the applicant's request. Iiotion carried unanimously (u-0-1). •~ ;Iii 35-19 Continued application of Iir. Dave Provenzano, D. Provenzano for modification to approved plans allowing the construction of two townhomes on property known as 146 Sunnyside Ave. in a PD (Flanned Development/iiedium Density Residential) Zoning District. Cornissioner I:asolas reported that this item caas considered by the Site and Architectural P.evieca Committee, and approval is recommended. The major change is the provision of garages in-lieu of carports, and the use of horizontal siding to conform caith the surrounding neighborhood. -19- "q/S: Kasolas, Christ - Pn 34-OS Bonnett Construction That the Plannin? Com^~ission recommend that the City Council approve the requested modifications; and that the Planning Commission reco~.Tmend that the City Council reinstate its approval of this project, subject to conditions as indicated in the Staff Com-Tent Sheet, as well as redlining of the presented plans. Potion carried unanimously 6-0-1). :~ ~: :~ P.equest of Bonnett Construction for a modification to an existing buildin; on property known as 30 S. Central Avc. Con-~issioner Kasolas reported that this item caas considered by the Site and Architectural Revie~•? Cormittee, and approval is recommended. I~i/S: Kasolas, Perrine - Tliat the Planning Commission recommend that the City Council approve the requested modification for PD 34-05. 2~fotion carried unanimously (6-0-1). ~ * ~: OTIIF.R ITEPiS BROUGIiT UP BY COI ~ fISS IOId Discussion regarding settin a date for a tour of the City - item to be agendized for meetin; of October 2Z, 19135. Discussion regardin; a policy for the downtos~m area, particularly the Railway/Dillon area - possible item for Study Session with City Council. Discussion regarding driveway requirements from the Building Department, specifically stability of driveways under certain vehicle weiht - report to Cor,Tr!ission for meeting of October 22, 195. Staff to check into satellite dish on top of building at 2605 S. Iainchester Blvd. Public ~?or':s to present traffic information for Iiack/Audrey corner - meetin of October 2?_, 1955. There being no further business, the meeting ~•?as adjourned at 11:45 p.m. APPOVED: JoAnn airbanks Chairman ATTEST: Arthur ,4. i:ee Secretary R~COT'.n':D: Linda A. Dennis recording Secretary Barton-Aschman Associates, Inc. 100 Park Center Plaza, Suite 450 San Jose, California 95113 408-280-6600 October 4, 1985 Mr. Larry Hester Heson Investments 400 Industrial Street Campbell, CA 95008 Dear Mr. Hester: Barton-Aschman Associates, Inc. has conducted a cursory analysis of the proposed warehouse development located at 86 Railway Avenue in Campbell, California. The results of our analysis are presented in this letter. The site is located near the intersection of Railway Avenue and Orchard City Drive and is surrounded by primarily light industrial uses. The project as proposed is compatible with the surrounding land uses.. The proposed project size is 3,825 square feet of warehouse space. Applying trip generation rates obtained from trip generation studies conducted by Caltrans, it is estimated that the project will generate approximately 18 trips per day with 3 occurring during the PM peak hour. The addition of these trips will have a negligable impact on the operation of the streets of Campbell The width of Railway Avenue (one-way) along the site is 16 feet. The width of Railway Avenue and the proposed 26-foot driveway can accommodate single unit trucks up to thirty feet in length. Due to the size and nature of the project, it is unlikely that larger trucks would use the site. If you have any questions or comments concerning the results of our analysis, please do not hesitate to call Sincerely, BARYON-ASCHMAN ASSOCIATES, INC. ~~-~l~v'C~ V Abdul R id, P.E. Principal Associate .Jane A. Bierstedt, P.E. •- Associate ~1 ! ~' (~ n ,r' `' ; - : ~f-l ; 't, I_ {;, n ~ - --_ t '1 r ]~~ AR/JAB/85257ab --: (~~ EXHIBIT B P. c. P1t~, ; 8/13/85 STANDARD DEVEIOPMENI SCHEDULE FILE N0: rT1 85-19/ZC 82-05 . Dave Prove' ~° APPLICANT ~• side Ave• SITE ADDRESS: 146 ~Y I ix months of final approval. in within s ~• Construction to beg o be competed within one year of starting 2, Construction t date. _ t'- I_ schedule is a Stan submitted ay schedule NOTE: Above development Iicant has not Planning Department when aPP for his protect. ._. CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL: S 85-13 ' APPLICANT: Young, M. _ SITE ADDRESS: 1106, 1130 S 1142 Audrey Ave. P.C. 2fTG. October 8, 1985 -- The applicant is notified as part of this application that he/she is required to meet the following conditions in accordance with the Ordinances of the City of Campbell and the Laws of the State of California. 1. Property to be fenced and landscaped as indicated and/or added in red on the plans. Landscaping and fencing shall be maintained in accordance with the approved plans. 2. All parking and driveway areas to be developed in compliance with Chapter 21.50 of the Campbell Punicipal Code. All parking spaces to be provided with appropriate concrete curbs or bumper guards. 3. Underground utilities to be provided as required by Section 20.16.070 of the Campbell Municipal Code. 4. Plans submitted to the Building Department for plan check shall indicate clearly the location of all connections for underground utilities including water, sewer, electric, telephone and television cables, etc. 5. Ordinance No. 782 of the Campbell Municipal Code stipulates that any contract for the collection and disposal of refuse, garbage, wet garbage and rubbish produced within the limits of the City of Campbell shall be made with Green Valley Disposal Company. This requirement applies to all single-family dwellings, multiple apartment units, to all commercial, business, industrial, manufacturing, and construction establishments. 6. Applicant shall comply with all appropriate State and City requirements for the handicapped. 7. Noise levels for the interior of residential units shall comply with minimum State (Title 25) and local standards as indicated in the Noise Element of the Campbell General Plan. 8. Applicant is hereby notified that he will be required to pay Park Dedication In-Lieu Fee which will be assessed at the time the subdivision map is submitted. 9. The applicant is hereby notified that the property is to be maintained free of any combustible trash, debris and weeds, until the time that actual construction commences. All existing structures shall be secured by having windows boarded up and doors sealed shut, or be demolished or removed from the property. Sect. 11.201 & 11.414, 1979 Ed. Uniform Fire Code. PUBLIC ~dOr.KS DEPAP.T~;ENT 10. Complete the processing of the subdivision map. BUILDING AND FIRE DEPARTISENTS No comments at this time. COIIDITIO:IS OF APP:;OVAL; ii' 85-19/ZC 82-OS APPLICA';T: 'ir. D. Provenzano SITS LDT)R%SS: 146 Sunnyside Ave. P.C. IfTG. October 0, 1905 _'..~ ~.~licant is notified as part of this application that he/she is require c' _ to meet the following conditions in accordance with the Ordinances of the City of Campbell and the Laws of the State of California. 1. .^-.evise: elevations and/or site plan indicating revisions to front par}:ink area, provision of color/buildinh material samples to be submitted to the Plannin; Department and approved prior to application for a buildin; permit. 2. Property to be fenced and landscaped as indicated and/or added in red on the plans. Landscaping and fencin; shall be maintained in accordance with the approved plans. 3. Landscaping plan indicating type and size of plant material, and location of irrigation system to be submitted to the Planning Department and approved by the Site and Architectural Review Committee and/or Planning Com,-nission prior to issuance of a building permit. 4. Fencin; plan indicating location and design details of fencing to be submitted to the Planning Department and approved by the Planning Director prior to issuance of a building permit. 5. Applicant to either (1) post a faithful performance bond in the amount of $5,000.00 to insure landscaping, fencing, and striping of parking areas within 3 months of completion of construction; or (2) file written agreement to complete landscaping, fencing, and striping of parking areas. Bond or - agreement to be filed with the Planning Department prior to application for a _, building permit. 6. Applicant to submit a plan to the Planning Department, prior to installation of PG&E utility (transformer) boxes, indicating the location of the boxes and screening (if boxes are above ground) for approval of the Planning Director. 7. All mechanical equipment on roofs and all utility meters to be screened as approved by the Planning Director. 8. All parking and driveway areas to be developed in compliance with Chapter 21.50 of the Campbell Municipal Code. All parking spaces to be provided with appropriate concrete curbs or bumper guards. 9. Building occupancy will not be allowed until public improvements are installed. 10. Underground utilities to be provided as required by Section 20.16.070 of the Campbell tunicipal Code. 11. Plans submitted to the Building Department for plan check shall indicate clearly the location of all connections for underground utilities including water, sewer, electric, telephone and television cables, etc. CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL: Mt~t 85-19/ZC 82-05 APPLICA,':T: tir. D. Provenzano SITE ADDRESS: 146 Sunnyside Ave. P.C. 'iTG. October 8, 1955 13. Ordinance P7o. 7ti2 of the Campbell Municipal Code stipulates that any contract for the collection and disposal of refuse, garbage, wet Rarba~e and - rubbish produced within the limits of the City of Campbell shall be made with Green Valley Disposal Company. This requirement applies to all single-fanily d~aellinos, multiple apartment units, to all commercial, business, industrial, manufacturing, and construction establishments. 14. Trash container(s) of a size and quantity necessary to serve the development shall be located in area(s) approved by the Fire Department. Unless otherwise noted, enclosure(s) shall consist of a concrete floor surrounded by a solid wall or fence and have self-closing doors of a size specified by the Fire Department. All enclosures to be constructed at grade level and ...have a level area adjacent to the trash enclosure area to service these containers. 15. Applicant shall comply with all appropriate State and City requirements for the handicapped. 16. Noise levels for the interior of residential units shall comply with minimum State (Title 25) and local standards as indicated in the Noise Element of the Campbell General Plan. 17. The applicant is hereby notified that the property is to be maintained free of any combustible trash, debris and weeds, until the time that actual ---, construction commences. All existing structures shall be secured by having windows boarded up and doors sealed shut, or be demolished or removed from they property. Sect. 11.201 b 11.414, 1979 Ed. Uniform Fire Code. - PUBLIC WORKS DEPART!~'~?7T 18. Obtain an excavation permit to widen the driveway approach to 20 feet, and any other work in the right-of-way. FIRE DEPA?'.TTiE1~T No comment at this time. BL*ILDLdG DEPAP.Tt•tENT No comment at this time. '1 CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL: MM 85-24/S 84-06 - APPLICANT: Spiering Construction Co. SITE ADDRESS: 841 & 847 S. McGlincey Ln. P. C. MTG. 10-8-85 1. Applicant to submit a letter, satisfactory to the City Attorney, limiting the use of the building to 2518 sq.ft, of office use, 5995 sq.ft. of warehouse/manufacturing use, and 378 sq.ft. of interior parking for 2 compact cars. 2. Project to be reviewed by the Planning Commission one year from date of modification approval to insure that a parking problem does not exist. CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL: CANBANR LOCATION: SAP1 TOPIAS AQUINO RD. AND ELAM AVE. P.C. MTG.: 10-8-85 1. Prior to installation, applicant to: A. Obtain property owner's signature authorizing location on property and landscaping; and submit evidence of this to the Planning Department. B. Obtain any necessary electrical or other permits from the Building Department. All electrical lines shall be underground. C. Submft a landscaping plan indicating type and size of plant material, and location of irrigation system to be approved by the Site and Architectural Review Committee. D. Install landscaping and irrigation system as per approved plan. 2. The Planning Commission to review the use within one year of installation. 3. Approval of the "Canbank" may be revoked if, after a hearing, the Planning Commission finds that the use is creating a nuisance as a _` result of trash accumulation, vandalism, or other reasons. 4. Area surrounding the "Canbank" to be kept free of trash at all times.