Loading...
PC Min 07/09/1985PLANNING COMMISSION CITY OF CAMPBELL, CALIFORNIA 7:30 P.M. MINUTES JULY 9, 1985 The Planning Commission of the City of Campbell convened this day in regular session at the regular meeting place, the Council Chambers of City Hall, 70 N. First St., Campbell, California. ROLL CALL Present Commissioners: Kasolas, Perrine, Christ, Olszewski, Toshach, Dickson, Fairbanks; Planning Director A. A. Kee, Planner II Tim J. Haley, Engineering Manager Bill Helms, Acting City Attorney Bill Seligmann, Recording Secretary Linda Dennis. Absent None. APPROVAL OF MINUTES M/S: Toshach, Christ - That .the minutes of the Planning Commission. meeting of June 25, 1985 be approved as submitted. Motion carried unanimously. COMMUNICATIONS Mr. Kee noted that communications received pertain to specific items on the agenda and would be discussed at that time. PUBLIC HEARINGS ZC 85-04 Continued public hearing to consider the Huang, T. application of Mr. Thomas Huang for a zone change from R-M-S (Multiple Family Residential) to C-PD (Condominium- Planned Development) and approval of plans, elevations and development schedule to allow the construction of 5 condominiums on property known as 177 N. Central Ave. Commissioner Christ reported that this application was considered by the Site and Architectural Review Committee. The Committee is recommending approval of the presented plans subject to redlining which indicates an increase in the open space landscape area. Mr. Kee noted that Staff is also recommending approval, subject to conditions as indicated in the Staff Comment Sheet. In response to a question from Chairman Fairbanks regarding the placement and screening of _~ the utility boxes, Mr. Kee indicated that Condition 6 requires the submittal of a plan for approval of the Planning Director. -2- Chairman Fairbanks opened the public hearing and invited anyone in the audience to speak for or against this item. Mr. Bruce Johnson, architect for the project, appeared to answer any questions the Commission might have. Mrs. Rhonda Runkel, 191 N. Central Ave., asked that the plans be reversed on the site so that the sunlight would not be affected in her backyard. She also requested that the trees along the fence line be retained. Mr. Johnson stated that the project was designed, after considerable thought, to maintain privacy for this project and to gain the southern sun exposure; however, it would work just as well reversed, if the applicant wished to have the plans reversed. Mr. Thomas Huang, 324 Casitas, Los Gatos, representing the property owner, noted that the current design of the building shows the second story recessed more than 20 feet from the fence. Mr. Huang continued that he felt, with this distance, the sunlight on the adjacent project would. not be affected; and, he would like to maintain the exposure for his potential buyers. M/S: Rasolas, Christ - That the public hearing on ZC 85-04 be closed. Motion carried unanimously (7-0-0). M/S: Toshach, Olszewski - That the Planning Commission recommend that the City Council accept the Negative Declaration which has been prepared for this project; and That the Planning Commission adopt a resolution recommending that the City Council approve the requested zone change from R-M-S to C-PD; and That the Planning Commission adopt a resolution recommend that the City Council approve the plans, elevations, and development schedule for ZC 85-04, subject to conditions indicated in the Staff Comment Sheet, as well as redlining of the presented plans indicating an increase is open space landscaped area. Motion carried with the following roll call vote: fli Rn~ia~i nn -3- Commissioner Dickson stated that he would be voting .against the motion, because of the density of the project. Commissioner Dickson felt that a Planned Development zoning for this project resulted is a higher density than should be on this site. He added that it is his understanding that the City Council has indicated that development should be at the lower end of the density range. Mr. Kee noted that the same number of units would be allowable under the R-M-S zoning for this site. Commissioner Kasolas noted that the density range is allowable under the Zoning Ordinance; the City's responsibility to provide housing; and, the revitalization of the downtown area. Commissioner Rasolas asked what factual basis such a decision could be made on, in that there are condominiums along both sides of this street and there is no evidence that these other developments are at the lower end of the density scale. Chairman Fairbanks stated that she liked the opportunity to have a density range; however, in this case, she thought that this area is going to be badly impacted in the future and she will be speaking against the motion. Commissioner Christ stated that he usually looks at the quality of the development when it is presented at the high end of the density range; and, he was swayed by the high quality of this project. Vote on Motion AYES: Commissioners: Rasolas, Perrine, Christ, Olszewski, Toshach NOES: Commissioners: Dickson, Fairbanks ABSENT: Commissioners: None. PD 85-06 Continued public hearing to consider the Hester, L. application of Mr. Larry Hester for a Planned Development Permit and approval of plans, elevations and development schedule to allow the construction of a warehouse building on property known as 86 Railway Ave. in a PD (Planned Development/Industrial) Zoning District. Mr. Ree reported that Staff is recommending a continuance of this item so that a focused EIR may be prepared. Chairman Fairbanks opened the public hearing and invited anyone in the audience to speak for or against this item, noting the recommendation for continuance. -4- Mr. Robert Aviles, pr sect designer, requested that the continuance be moved closer because, in his opinion, the EIR would not take two months to prepare. Mr. Ree indicated the time constraints imposed for the public hearing noticing. and review o the EIR; however, Staff would have no problem with trying for an earlier date if the Commission so desired. M/S: Rasolas, Pekrine - PD 85-07 Navai, R. Mr. Kee reported th project, therefore, Chairman Fairbanks audience to speak continuance. M/S: Perrine, MISCELLANEOUS UP 83-21 O'Neill, C. That PD 85-06 be continued to the Planning Commission meeting of August 20, 1985. Motion carried unanimously (7-0-0). Continued public hearing to consider the application of Mr. Kamil Navai for a Planned Development Permit and approval of plans, elevations and development schedule to allow the. construction of two townhomes on property known as 131 S. Third St. in a PD (Planned Development/Medium Density Residential) Zoning district. revised plans have not been received as yet for this taff is recommending a continuance. ned the public hearing and invited anyone in the or against this item, noting the recommendation for gist - That PD 85-07 be continued to the Planning Commission meeting of August 13, 1985. Motion carried unanimously (7-0-0). Continued request for modification to a previously approved Use Permit to allow an auto display rack at Preferred Sales and Leasing on property known as 1405 Camden Ave. in a C-1-S (Neighborhood Commercial) Zoning District. Mr. Kee reported tha~ Staff has received no new information from the applicant as yet, co sequently, a continuance is being recommended. -5- M/S: Christ, Perrine - That UP 83-21 be continued to the Planning Commission meeting of July 23, - 1985. Motion carried unanimously (7-0-0). MM 85-10 Continued application of Chamber of SA 85-15 Commerce and the Game Table for approval of elevations to allow a refacing of an existing building located on property known as 326 & 328 E. Campbell Ave. in a PD (Planned Development/Commercial) Zoning District. Commissioner Kasolas excused himself from discussion on this item, due to a possible conflict of interest. Mr. Kee reported that Staff is recommending that this item be removed from the agenda, in that no additional information has been continued through four meeting and no new information has been received. Mr. Seligmann indicated that a denial without prejudice would be the most appropriate action. Mr. Kasolas addressed the Commission as President of the Chamber of Commerce, and requested one additional continuance to determine the intentions of the Chamber's manager. M/S: Olszewski, Christ - That MM 85-10/SA 85-15 be continued to .the Planning Commission meeting of July 23, 1985. Motion carried unanimously (6-0-0-1, Commissioner Kasolas abstaining). Commissioner Kasolas resumed his position on the Commission. PD 83-06 Continued request of Southbay Construc- Southbay Construction tion Co. for a modification to previously approved plans in order to add an outside stairway on property known as 910 Campisi Way. Commissioner Christ reported that this application was considered by the Site and Architectural Review Committee. Concerns which were previously expressed by the Committee and by Staff have been addressed, therefore, the Committee is recommending approval. -6- M/S: Olszewski, Christ - That the Planning Commission approve the modification to PD 83-06 adding outside stairway, sub3ect to conditions indicated in the Staff Comment Sheet. Motion carried with the following roll call vote: AYES: Commissioners: Kasolas, Perrine, Christ, Olszewski, Toshach, Dickson, Fairbanks NOES: Commissioners: None ABSENT: Commissioners: None. TS 85-03 Request for approval of tentative sub- Lands of Ainsley Corp. division. map - 1200 W. Latimer Ave. - Lands of Ainsley Corp. - APN 307-49-5. Mr. Ree reported that this tentative subdivision map is directly related to ZC 85-03 approved by the City Council on June 18, 1985. Staff is recommending that the Commission find the map consistent with the General Plan and recommend that the City Council approve the map, sub3ect to attached conditions. Commissioner Toshach asked if all the proposed lots meet the minimum area required under the R-1 zoning district. Mr. Haley responded that some of the lots are not 60 feet wide; however, all of the proposed lots exceed the 6,000 sq.ft. minimum lot size. The setbacks are also satisfactory under the R-1 zoning; however, one garage is shown for 22 feet, rather than 25 feet, as typically required in an R-1 subdivision. Mr. Helms reviewed the private street width, as well as the public right-of -way dedications; and, briefly discussed the Quimby Act for parkland in-lieu of dedication fees. M/S: Olszewski, Perrine - That the Planning Commission find this. tentative map (TS 85-03) consistent .with the General Plan; and, that the Planning Commission recommend that the City Council approve this TS 85-03, subject to conditions indicated in the Staff Comment Sheet. Discussion on Motion Commissioner Toshach stated that he would be voting against the motion on the basis that the development, as proposed, is substantiallq more intense that would be under an R-1 zoning; and, since the surrounding properties are R-1, he felt it would be out of character with the area to be developed at this intensity. -7- Vote on Motion The motion for approval of TS 85-03 carried with the following roll call vote: AYES: Commissioners: NOES: Commissioners: ABSENT: Commissioners: Kasolas, Perrine, Fairbanks Toshach, Dickson None . Christ, Olszewski, Commissioner Dickson asked if there was a way to monitor the maintenance of private streets. Mr. Helms responded that the construction of private streets is not checked by the Public Works Department, but .rather by the Building Department; and, there is not provision for the monitoring of the maintenance of these private streets by Public Works Staff. Mr. Kee noted that the maintenance of these streets is up to the homeowner's associations and property owners. Chairman Fairbanks indicated that she, has noted parking along these private streets, possibly blocking emergency vehicle access. Mr. Kee stated that if the project was developed under a Planned Development zoning, the plans would have been reviewed by the Fire Department and the provisions for the driveway access would be included in the PD ordinance. This would mean that it would not be up to the homeowners to determine the appropriateness of parking along the driveway, if it were not approved under the PD. Staff would check on a violation, if notified. Responding to a question from Commissioner Olszewski, Mr. Kee noted that he could not recall any problems with private streets that Staff has been asked to investigate. SA 85-28 Application of Tire Market for approval Tire Market of a wall sign at 960 Dell Ave. in an M-1-S (Light Industrial) Zoning District. Commissioner Christ reported that this item was considered by the Site and Architectural Review Committee. The Committee is recommending approval with the condition that the existing sign, previously approved, be changed to match the new signage and the entire building be re-painted with a color to be approved by Staff. Mr. Haley indicated the location of the proposed signage, noting that the '_ new sign is not illuminated. Additionally, the building's owners have indicated that the building will be painted beige. -8- Commissioner Dickson asked for comments regarding the various brand names of tires on the sign--how does this differ from a readerboard situation. Commissioner Kasolas noted the obscure location of the building and the difficult access. Even though this does not address the "readerboard situation", it may be that this is one of those instances where this type of signage might be allowable.. Commissioner Kasolas noted that the location will be cleaned up by virtue of it now accommodating only one use. Commissioner Christ added that the site was previously a recap tire service, and will now be selling dealer tires. The change will result in a cleaner, more competitive, business. Chairman Fairbanks noted that she also looked at the listing of the brand names, and she felt that because tires are such a specific item, the brand names became an identifier for her. M/S: Perrine, Christ - MM 85-18 UP 83-04 Russ, D. That the Planning Commission adopt the following findings and approve SA 85-28, subject to conditions indicated in the Staff Comment Sheet: (A) The size of the sign is needed to adequately identify the business because of the size and location of the building; and (B) the sign is architecturally compatible with the buildings. Motion carried with a vote of 6-0-1, with Commissioner Dickson voting "no". Application of Mr. David Russ for a modification to an approved Use Permit to allow storage racks, crates, and cargo storage container in a parking area on propertq known as 1143 Dell Ave. in an M-1-S (Light Industrial) Zoning District. Commissioner Christ reported that this application was considered by the Site and Architectural Review Committee. The Committee is recommending approval with the relocation of the cargo container to the storage area where it was originally approved for, with a review in one year. Commissioner Rasolas added that the applicant has voluntarily agreed to relocate the container to the recommended location within 45 days. Mr. Ree noted that Staff is in concurrence with the Site Committee's recommendation. -9- Commissioner Dickson asked about the established policy for these storage containers. Mr. Kee stated that this particular container use was approved prior to the City having an ordinance with guidelines and limitations. This item is a result of code enforcement action. Staff is asking that the applicant comply with the original approval and relocate the container in the rear storage area behind a sight-obscuring fence. Additionally, the applicant is requesting storage racks and wooden crates for parts. Commissioner Olszewski noted that he would like to make sure that the driveway area is not being used for storage. M/S: Kasolas, Olszewski - That the Planning Commission approve the racks and crates as indicated on the plgn and require the relocation of the cargo storage container to the storage area behind the sight-obscuring fence, with a one-year review as recommended by the Site and Architectural Review Committee. Motion carried unanimously (7-0-0). Request Request of Fred and Homa Babaei to PD 83-03 operate a take-out restaurant on property known as 880 E. Campbell Ave. in a PD (Planned Development/Commercial) Zoning District. Mr. Kee reviewed this request, noting that the applicant is requesting approval of a fast food take-out restaurant in the rear unit on the ground floor. The use would occupy approximately 725 sq.ft. of the building and would have no seating. Staff is unable to support this request based on a parking shortage of approximately 17 spaces for this use at this location. Mr. Om Rambo, property owner, noted that there are 15-20 parking spaces available on-site at any given time, therefore, parking should not be a problem. Discussion ensued regarding site access and traffic circulation, as well as parking ratios for fast food restaurants and mixed-use developments. Commissioners Christ did not see a problem with the parking for the proposed use; however, he questioned the appropriateness of the use for this particular building. Commissioner Toshach asked if this particular PD ordinance was limiting with respect to this use. -10- Mr. Kee indicated the PD specified retail sales, and this type of use could be classified as a retail-type of operation. Commissioner Olszewski stated that he did not see a problem with this use being harmonious with surrounding development, nor a parking problem. Chairman Fairbanks asked how much of this development was visible from Michael Drive. Mr. Kee indicated that the building is over 100 feet from Michael Drive, with exposure to the parking area. Commissioner Toshach asked about signage for this business. Mr. Haley noted that this would be a problem, particularly in that this business would have no Campbell Ave. frontage. Chairman Fairbanks asked if this use is allowed under the PD, does it continue forever, or can any retail use occupy the floor area. Mr. Kee responded that the PD would specify a restaurant use, but a fast food use would not be automatically approved forever. Commissioner Rasolas asked if the applicant would have to come back with specific plans indicating the layout, hours of operation, trash - enclosures, etc., noting that he would be reluctant to approve the use as it is presented this evening, especially when it is adjacent to a residential area. Mr. Kee indicated that there is a layout that shows how the use would work within the building. There are no conditions made as to how the use would work on the outside of the building. However, if there was a problem, Staff would contact the business aad request cooperation in policing the area. Mr. Helms noted that there is an adopted City Council policy prohibiting access onto Michael Drive from this commercial area. Commissioner Dickson felt that this request presented some serious circulation problems, and that the request should come back as a modification of the Planned Development with a public hearing. Commissioner Toshach asked if the original PD ordinance's plan would limit this building's use so that a restaurant use would not be permitted. Mr. Kee indicated that retail sales-were approved specifically; however, the different types of retail sales were not specified. The assumption would be that retail sales of food would be allowed; however, if there are any tables at all within the subject square footage, it would constitute a different matter under the ordinance. Mr. Seligmann stated his belief that this tgpe of use would fall under retail sales. -11- Commissioner Toshach noted that this issue (making a somewhat artificial difference between a fast food restaurent and a regular restaurant) should be looked at by the Zoning Review Committee. Commissioner Perrine noted that he was uncomfortable with this request, and perhaps it need to be further clarification as to how it is going to be laid out. Mr. Seligmann reminded the Commission that it has the authority to decide if this request falls under the definition of a minor modification. If a determination is made that this request is not a minor modification, then the applicant would have to proceed with another PD application. Mr. Kee added that a minor modification to a PD would have to be renoticed for public hearing. M/S: Dickson, Christ - That the Planning Commission make a determination. that this request is not a minor modification to the PD ordinance. Discussion on Motion Commissioner Olszewski stated that he felt it was a minor modification, in that the menu is highlq specialized. Commissioner Kasolas noted that a conditional use permit could be granted. There are no conditions indicated in the applicant's request letter. With a use permit, the Commission would be able to review the matter in detail, and address concerns as indicated in this evening's discussion. He added that a favorable vote for the motion does not deny the request. Vote on Motion Request Motion carried unanimously (7-0-0). Request of Terry Kent - use of Citti's Florist building at 990 E. Hamilton Ave. for jeweler. Mr. Ree reviewed this request, noting that the requested modification of the building's usage would warrant the provision of .5 additional parking space; however, Staff is of the opinion that the requested use is consistent with the approved plans and that the on-site parking should be adequate. Therefore, Staff is recommending approval. M/S: Kasolas, Christ - That the Planning Commission approve a diamond wholesaler/retailer use in a portion of the building approved for office use. Motion carried unanimously (7-0-0). * ~ ~ -12- Request Request of Steven K. Ford, Inc., for Planning Commission approval for inclusion in the City's list of approved environmental consultants. Mr. Kee reviewed this request for the Commission, noting that Staff has reviewed the information contained in the applicant's letter of request and is recommending approval. Chairman Fairbanks noted to Mr. Ford the concerns the Commission has about mitigation measures which have been presented in the past which did not really mitigate anything. M/S: Kasolas, Dickson - That the Planning Commission include Steven K. Ford, Inc. on the list of approved environmental consultants for the City of Campbell. Discussion of Motion Commissioner Olszewski expressed his concern about voting on this matter with so little background information, as well as his concerns with the process of choosing a consultant. Mr. Kee indicated that there is not a set procedure for verifying indicated degrees, etc. Staff usuallq accepts the information given by the consulting firm. Commissioner Toshach felt that one way to allay concerns would be to get a statement of the professional qualifications of the firm's members. He noted that there is no reference made bq Mr. Ford as to the traffic expertise of his firm, and he would particularly like to understand how this aspect of the report will be satisfied. Commissioner Kasolas asked for clarification on the consultant selection process. Mr. Raley responded that the City Council's adopted resolution allows the Planning Commission to approve the consultants, as well as the EIR document. Mr. Ford reviewed his qualifications for ,the Commission, noting that his degree is in Environmental Science, with expertise in industrial wastes, and he would be subcontracting the traffic portions. Commissioner Christ asked if a consultant is approved by the City, does the sub-contractor also have to be approved by the same process. Mr. Kee responded that in the past, Staff has required the sub-contractor to give their portion of the report to the appropriate City department ---~ (ie. traffic to our Traffic Engineer). Mr. Kee stressed that the Commission has the authority to accept or not accept the report. -13- Mr. Helms added that it has ' practice that if the traffic - registered traffic engineer, work with the consultant. been the Traffic Department's standard portion of reports are prepared by a the department will accept the report and Mr. Ford noted that it seems peculiar that the Commission goes so far as to approve consultants. Mr. Ford continued that he saw his position as being responsible to the client, rather than the City; and, that the consultant is being paid for an objective opinion. Mr. Kee explained that the consultant is obligated and responsible to the City, but paid by the applicant through the City. Commissioner Dickson noted that the Commission has always relied on Staff's recommendation regarding consultants. He continued that he felt the Commission did not have expertise enough to challenge anyone's qualifications. Roll Call Vote on Motion AYES: Commissioners: Kasolas, Perrine, Christ, Toshach, Dickson NOES: Commissioners: Olszewski, Fairbanks ABSENT: Commissioners: None. S 81-29 Request to convert compact parking Hamilton Group, ltd. space to motorcycle/bicycle parking - 260 W. Hamilton Ave. Mr. Kee reviewed this request, noting that a final inspection of this project showed a support pole in the center of one of the designation parking spaces. Therefore, the applicant is requesting that this space be designated for motorcycle/bicycle parking only; thereby reducing the parking spaces for this project from 14 to 13, resulting in a parking ratio of 1:240. The Commission has the authority to adjust the required parking when facilities are provided for alternate means of transportion. Staff is recommending approval of this request. M/S: Kasolas, Toshach - That the Planning Commission approve the request for a reduction in the number of parking spaces for S 81-29 from 14 to 13, with the condition that the parking space with the support pole in the center be clearly marked for motorcycle/ bicycle parking only. Motion carried unanimously (7-0-0). -14- Commissioner Kasolas excused himself from the meeting at 9:55 p.m. Staff Report Staff Report regarding gross vs. net area in PD (Planned Development). zones. Mr. Kee reviewed this report, noting that if the Commission and Council wish, a policy could be adopted stating that the maximum number of units allowed under a PD or C-PD cannot exceed the maximum number allowed under the comparable R-M-S, R-2-S, or R-3-S Zoning District. Mr. Kee continued that the existing method of calculation was originally for a general plan speaking for gross acres; however, it differs when applying the method to one particular site. That difference was magnified when the State required the General Plan and Zoning to be in conformance, and the policies in the ordinance have not been changed. However, a new zoning ordinance is being developed, and this would seem an appropriate time to address these types of problems. M/S: Toshach, Dickson - That the Planning Commission accept the ' Staff Report and refer this issue to the Zoning Review Committee. Motion carried unanimously (6-0-1, with Commissioner Kasolas having left the meeting). Referral Referral of accessory building - 97 E. Rincon Ave. Mr. Kee reported that Staff is recommending a continuance of this item, after meeting with the applicant and his contractor this morning. M/S: Olszewski, Toshach - That this referral be continued to the Planning Commission meeting of July 23, 1985. Motion carried unanimously (6-0-1). OTHER ITEMS BROUGHT UP BY COMMISSION Commissioner Perrine asked Staff to check into the installed landscaping at 990 E. Hamilton Ave. (Citti's Florist) in that it appears to be something other than what was approved. Commissioner Perrine also noted a cargo storage container in use at the Union 76 Station at the corner of Hamilton/Central. Commissioner Olszewski asked what action has been taken regarding the ' signage at the Chevron Station at the corner of Bascom/Hamilton. -15- Mr. Kee responded that Staff has sent a letter regarding this signage. All signs that are up at this point, except the free-standing sign, are temporary. ADJOURNMENT M/S: Olszewski, Toshach - That the Planning Commission meeting be adjourned. The meeting was adjourned at 10:13 p.m. APPROVED: JoAnn Fairbanks Chairman ATTEST: Arthur A. Kee Secretary RECORDED: Linda A. Dennis Recording Secretary CONDTTIONS OF APPROVAL: PD 83-06 APPLICANT: SOLTTHBAY CONSTRUCTION CO. SITE ADDRESS: 910 CAT~ISI tiVAY P.C. MTG. 7/9/85. 1. Applicant to submit a revised landscaping and irrigation plan for the approval of the Planning Director prior to issuance of a building permit. 2. Applicant to secure any necessary building permits. MEMORANDUM - ~. ~ ro: ARTHUR A. KEE Planning Director From: JOSEPH ELLIOTT Director of Public Works CITY OF CAMPBELL. Date: MG'/ ~ 1°i YS~ sin;~~t: Tentative Subdivision Map Corp. Lands of A Insley Fir~c-nG-c~~ APN 3n-1 - q~ s --------------------------- The following conditions of approval are recommended concerning the subject tentative subdivision ma' submitted by V ~ rA ~~ Installation of a sanitary sewerage system to serve all lots within the sub- division in conformance with the. proposed plans of the County of Santa Clara Sanitation District No. 4. Sanitary sewerage service to be provided by said 1.. District No. 4. Installation of a water distribution system to serve all lots within the sub- division in conformance with the plans of the San Jose Water Works. Water service to be provided by said water company. Fire hydrants and appurte- nances shall be provided and installed at the locations specified by the Fire Chief, Fire Department, City of Campbell. Fire hydrant maintenance Z__. fees shall be paid to City at the rate of $195 per fire hydrant. 1 Subdivider shall create or provide any public service easement and any other ~- public utility and/or public service easements as may be necessary for the 3•. installation of any and all public utilities and/or facilities. Compliance with the provisions of Title 20, Subdivisions of the Campbell ~}•. Municipal Code. S . Subdivider to pay Storm Drainage Area. Fee. . Subdivider to furnish copy of Preliminary Title Report. Subdivider shall (install street improvements and post surety totguaranty the work). Dedicate additional right-of-way to widen ~tlgsl ~-Q"`~mcr Av'~h~c to "l 3 d feet from centerline. C.C.&R.'s to be approved by City Engineer to insure provisions for maintenance ~. of buildings and common area. Provide a grading and drainage plan for the review and approval of the City °~. Engineer. 10. Obtain public 1!. pay / an excavation permit right of way. Gc trt ' ltV and c~ pay fees and deposit for all work in the o r dtdtta ton o ~ ~a-r1d p 1 4r ~rpos~s• ~ t t ~ ~. B,v: BIL M. HELMS En~ineerina Mananer CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL: SA 85-28 APPLICANT: TIRE MARI~T SITE ADDRESS: 960 DELL AVE. P.C. MTG. 7/9/85 1. Sign to be installed within 30 days of date of approval. 2, All other signs (with the excepption of the 32 sq.ft. "Tire Market" sign facing E, Sunnyoaks Ave. -previously approved) to be removed within 30 days. 3, Entire building to be pair~tesl,_per approval of Planning Director.