PC Min 11/27/1984PLANNING COMMISSION
CITY OF CAMPBELL, CALIFORNIA
7:30 P.M. MINUTES November 27, 1984
The Planning Commission of the .City of Campbell convened this day in
~- regular session at the regular meeting place, the Council Chambers of City
Hall, 70 N. First St., Campbell,. California.
ROLL CALL
Present
Commissioners: Kasolas, Perrine,
Christ, Howard, Toshach, Fairbanks,
Dicksonf Planning Director Arthur
A. Kee, Principal Planner Philip J.
Stafford, Engineering Manager Bill
Helms, City Attorney J. Robert
Dempster, Recording Secretary Linda
Dennis.
Absent
None.
APPROVAL OF MINUTES
M/S: Fairbanks, Howard -
That the minutes of the Planning
Commissioner meeting of November
13, 1984 be approved as submitted.
Motion carried unanimously i7-0-0).
COMMUNICATIONS
Mr. Kee reported that communications received pertained to specific agenda
items and would be presented at that time.
ARCHITECTURAL APPROVALS
S 84-22 Continued application of Mr.
Riedinger, M. Michael Riedinger, on behalf of
Design and Engineering Systems,
Inc., for approval of plans and
elevations to allow the
construction of an industrial
building on property known as 1587
and 1599 De11 Ave. in a CM=B
(Controlled Manufacturing) Zoning
District.
Mr. Kee reported that Staff is recommending a continuance for this
application in order that revised plans may be submitted.
M/S: Howard, Fairbanks - That S 84-22 be continued to the
Planning Commission meeting of
December 11, 1984 in order that
revised plans may be submitted.
Motion carried unanimously (7-0-0).
* :
-2-
MM 84-26 Application of Mr. Shawn Hailey for
Hailey, S. approval of a minor modification to
allow the remodel and expansion of an
existing industrial building into a
industrial accommodating 7774 sq.ft. of
office and 4234 sq.ft. of warehousing
use on property known as 50 Curtner
Avenue in an M-1-S (Light Industrial)
Zoning District.
Commissioner Howard reported that this item was before the Site and
Architectural Review Committee. The Committee is recommending a continuance to
December 11 in order that the applicant can address concerns indicated in the
Staff Comment Sheet regarding duel use of parking between the site and the
adjacent California Motel. Because of the controversial nature of the problem,
it is recommended that the applicant hire a consultant to provide a study for
the next meeting.
Commissioner Toshach asked about the original agreement which provided for the
dual use of parking on this site.
Mr. Kee explained that when the motel was originally approved, and agreement
was provided which indicated the dual use of 6 parking spaces. This type of
situation is within the power of the Commission to approve or disapprove. Mr.
Kee continued that it is his understanding that such an agreement can be
recorded with the deed of a property; however, he will-investigate this matter
further for the Commission.
Commissioner Fairbanks asked if the Building Department had reviewed the plans
for this proposal.
Mr. Kee indicated that the Building Department had reviewed the plans and had
no comment.
Commissioner Christ asked if the applicant would be able to provide the
necessary information for the December 11 meeting, or if he would need
additional time.
Commissioner Howard noted that the applicant was aware of the time constraints
but wanted to try to have the information for the December 11 meeting.
M/S: Howard, Perrine - That MM 84-26 be continued to the
Planning Commission meeting of December
11, 1984 in order that the applicant
might address concerns indicated in the
Staff Comment Sheet.. Motion carried
unanimously (7-0-0).
-3-
MM 84-27 Application of Mr. Rich Arias for appro-
Arias, R. val of a minor modification to a
sideyard setback to allow the
construction of a second story addition
to an existing single family house on
property known as 760 W. Latimer Ave. in
an R-1 (Single Family Residential)
Zoning District.
Commissioner Howard reported that this item was considered by the Site and
Architectural Review Committee. The applicant has submitted a letter from the
adjoining property owner indicating his approval of the addition. Because the
Committee wished to take a closer look at the "0-lot line" situation, and
because the applicant must submit revised plans indicating the correct property
lines, the Committee is recommending a continuation to December 11, 1984.
M/S: Fairbanks, Perrine -
That MM 84-27 be continued to the
Planning Commission meeting of December
11, 1984, in order that the applicant
can submit revised plans addressing
concerns expressed in the Staff Comment
Sheet. Motion carried unanimously
(7-0-0).
Commissioner Kasolas stated that he felt there was no rational basis for
requesting a letter from adjoining property owners in the case of additions to
existing residences. He continued that in a situation, such as just discussed,
it would seem totally unfair if residents in the Campbell portion of this tract
would not be allowed to add the second story when residents in the San Jose
portion of the tract, just down the street, are able to make these
modifications.
Chairman Dickson indicated that he felt the letters were necessary, in that the
Commission has an obligation to look at harmonious development in
neighborhoods.
Commissioner Christ noted that there. could be some instances in which a
neighbor might object--i.e., solar heating being blocked from the sun by an
addition. He felt that input from the neighbors is important and allows for
the redesign of a project if a problem is pointed out.
S 84-18 Continued application of Mr. Kjartan
Armann, K. Armann for approval of a site and
architectural application to allow the
construction of an industrial building
on property known as 1436 Whiteoaks Rd.
in an M-1-S (Light Industrial) Zoning
District.
-4-
Commissioner Howard reported that this item was before the Site and
Architectural Review Committee. The Committee is recommending approval subjec
to conditions indicated in the Staff Comment Sheet, as well as redlining of the
plans. The redlining indicates a modification to the trash enclosure, and a
realignment of parking in the rear to provide for additional landscaping to act
as a buffer. The Committee is of the opinion that the project is
well-designed.
Commissioner Fairbanks asked if noise factors had been discussed, in that the
automotive repair use is proposed to be adjacent to the residential area.
Mr. Kee responded that the City does not have a Noise Ordinance; however, there
is a section in the General Plan which addresses noise. The Commission can
require a noise study to be done on any project, if it deems this necessary.
Mr. Kee continued that there is always a potential conflict when industrial
uses abut residential uses. The policy has been to require a fence along the
adjoining property lines.
Commissioner Fairbanks asked if the Noise Element speaks to decibels allowed in
certain areas, specifically where different land uses abut one another.
Commissioner Fairbanks also asked if the adjacent property owners were notified
of this application.
Mr. Kee indicated that the Noise Element does not speak to allowable noise.
levels in various zoning districts.
Mr. Stafford noted that notices were sent to adjacent property owners on
Hoffman Lane.
Commissioner Howard stated that a 6' masonry wall is to be constructed at the
rear of this project, and because of grade differences, the wall will be closer
to 8' on the residential side.
Commissioner Kasolas spoke at length regarding the number of automotive-related
facilities in the City, noting that Campbell appears to be the "garage" for the
surrounding "up-graded" housing areas. Commissioner Kasolas stated that he
could not support a negative declaration for this project, in that he felt the
City has more than enough repair facilities.
Commissioner Howard noted that the applicant is more than willing to change the
location of the automotive repair to another area of the building. The
applicant is specifically requesting one auto repair use for his grandson to
use.
Mr. Kee stated that the ordinance permits this type of use in an industrial
zoning district, this being an M-1-S Zoning District. The next step would be
to see what can be done to make the use acceptable in the area.
Mr. Dempster stated that he would question the appropriateness of telling an
owner what portion of a building he can use for a certain type of facility.
-5-
Commissioner Fairbanks felt that the Commission is in a position to look at
sound attenuation problems and mitigation measures to help adjoining
residential neighbors, perhaps through building design or some other method
that does not tell the owner where to put which use. Commissioner Fairbanks
indicated that she felt there is a noise problem with automotive related uses.
Mr. Dempster indicated that it was really too late to consider this issue at
this point., in that the area was zoned to allow such uses--perhaps the area
should not have been zoned this way.
Chairman Dickson asked what criteria is used to prepare a Negative Declaration.
Mr. Kee responded that Staff does an environmental assessment. In that this
proposed type of use exists along this area of Whiteoaks Rd., Staff has
prepared a Negative Declaration. However, the Commission has the authority to
request further study and not accept the Negative Declaration.
Chairman Dickson asked if any discussion was received from the neighborhood in
the past regarding uses that have gone into this neighborhood.
Mr. Kee noted that public hearings were held when the area was zoned for
industrial uses--both for the General Plan designations and the zoning
designation. Staff would have to research past projects to see if there was
any discussion from the neighbors on individual proposals] however, to his
knowledge there have been no complaints from people along Hoffman Lane
regarding projects that have been built in this area. Mr. Ree continued that
the Negative Declaration for this project was prepared on the same basis used
for all applications] and, perhaps a study should be undertaken on all the
M-1-S areas.
Mr. Dempster noted that the Commission cannot suddenly handle this piece of
property different from all the other properties in the same zoning district.
Commissioner Howard noted that the roll-up door for the auto repair facility is
redlined on the plans to be moved to the side of the building.
Commissioner Christ asked what type of walls or landscaping have been required
of other projects in this area, and if denser landscaping is ever required to
protect the residential areas.
Mr. Kee responded that usually a masonry wall is required, and that studies
show that landscaping is not an effective noise mitigation measure.
Commissioner Kasolas stated that his primary concern is with outside storage
and outside repair. He asked if the applicant could be required to submit an
agreement, as a condition of approval, which stated that there would be no
outside storage or repair. Further addressing of the automotive facilities
issue could be done separately at another time.
Mr. Kee noted that unless specifically indicated on the approved plans, outside
storage or repair is not a permitted use.
-6-
M/S: Kasolas, Toshach -
That the Planning Commission accept the
Negative Declaration which has been
prepared for S 84-18; and, that the
Planning Commission approve S 84-18
subject to conditions as indicated in
the Staff Comment Sheet, as well as
redlining of the plans. Motion carried
unanimously (7-0-0).
Commissioner Fairbanks stated that she is uncomfortable with this type of use
abutting an R-1 area. She continued that she understands that the applicant
has a right to this type of use in this area, however, this does not release
the Commission from looking at the impact on the residential area. She felt
that the applicant should also be looking at the surrounding area with his
designs. Commissioner Fairbanks added that, in the future, perhaps the Site
Committee should speak to applicants regarding noise mitigations. She
concluded that she is speaking for the approval in that there. has been no
opposition from the neighbors.
Chairman Dickson stated that if the Commission is concerned with this issue,
perhaps they should take a look at the zoning in this area.
~ * t
PD 84-07 Public hearing to consider the applica-
Armann, K. tion of Mr. Kjartan for approval of a
Planned Development Permit and approval
of plans, elevations, and development
schedule to allow the construction of a
two-story office building on property
known as 950 E. Campbell Ave. in a PD
(Planned Development/Commercial) Zoning
District.
Commissioner Howard reported that this item was considered by the Site and
Architectural Review Committee. The Staff Comment Sheet indicates that the
Building Department cannot recommend approval of the building as currently
proposed] however, the concerns of the Building Department have been addressed
at this time, and the Site Committee is recommending approval, subject to
conditions indicated in the Staff Comment Sheet. The Committee is recommending
the removal of one parking space near the building entrance, and the provision
of landscaping in this area instead. Also discussed by the Site Committee was
the parking which is underneath the building, at ground level. The reason for
this particular design, according to the applicant, is for safety of women
using the parking facility. Commissioner Howard noted that the building is
designed to fit in with the other structures in the immediate area.
Commissioner Fairbanks asked about the possibility of eliminating left turn
movements in this area in the future.
-7-
Mr. Helms indicated that future plans provide for a median-island in this area,
preventing left turn movements from the driveways= however., left-turn movements
will still be allowed from Barbano and from Union Avenues. This item was
~_ pointed out to the applicant because the plans only indicated a driveway access
to Campbell Avenue.
Commissioner Fairbanks asked if Staff would foresee people going through the
residential areas behind the Campbell Avenue developments.
Mr. Helms noted that it would seem easier to make a u-turn at Bascom Avenue.
Commissioner Rasolas asked if a colored rendering was available for this
project, noting that he was uncomfortable with the under-building parking
design and would like to be able to better visualize this concept.
Mr. Armann, applicant, reviewed the project design for the Commission, noting
that the parking area will not be visible. to Barbano Ave., and that the face of
the building is approximately 15' from the property line on Barbano. The
building is a wood structure, similar in style to the restaurant across the
street. Regarding relative heights, this structure will be 5-10' lower than
the adjacent buildings on Campbell Avenue to the west.
Chairman Dickson opened the public hearing and invited anyone in the audience
to speak for or against this item.
M/Sc Howard, Fairbanks - There being no one wishing to speak,
that the public hearing on PD 84-07 be
closed. Motion carried unanimously
(7-0-0).
M/S: Howard, Perrine - That the Planning Commission accept the
Negative Declaration which has been
prepared for PD 84-07f and, that the
Planning Commission adopt RESOLUTION NO.
2299 recommending approval of PD 84-07,
subject to conditions as indicated in
the Staff Comment Sheet as well as
redlining of the presented plans.
Motion carried with the following roll
call vote:
AYES: Commissioners: Perrine, Howard, Toshach, Fairbanks, Dickson
NOES: Commissioners: Kasolas, Christ
ABSENT: Commissioners: None
Commissioner Fairbanks noted that it would help her to know why Commissioners
Kasolas and Christ voted "no" .
-8-
Commissioner Kasolas indicated that he voted "no" on this item because he could
not visualize what it is going to look like, and this was important,
particularly on this corner.
Commissioner Christ indicated that his reservations were with the appearance of
the architectural style.
There was lengthy discussion between Mr. Dempster and Commissioner Christ
regarding personal opinions on architectural styles and appearances, and on
methods of voting. Mr. Dempster recommended that when faced with this type of
situation, the Commissioners should refer to the Architectural Advisor in his
professional capacity.
t
TA 84-05 Public hearing to consider a City-
City-initiated initiated amendment to Chapter 21.08 of
the Campbell Municipal Code (R-1 Single
Family District) to establish
regulations for large family day care
homes on R-1 Single Family Residential
zoned lots.
Mr. Stafford reviewed this proposed amendment, noting that the State has
recently changed their regulations to give local jurisdictions three choices
regarding large family (7-12 children) day care homes.
In response to questions from the Commission, Mr. Stafford indicated that it is
difficult to determine the number of these facilities in the City in that they
do not require a business license, and that existing homes will be
grandfathered in as non-conforming uses (if they do not meet these
requirements).
Commissioner Fairbanks stated that she was not in favor of the proposed
restriction of "not closer than 300' to another large family day care home...",
nor (B) and (C) as indicated in the Staff Comment Sheet. However, she
indicated her support of a use permit procedure without the presented
restrictions.
Commissioner Howard stated that he is in agreement with Staff s
recommendations.
Mr. Kee noted that the use permit would allow the Commission to consider many
things, including compatibility of the use with the surrounding area.
Commissioner Toshach asked on what basis the 300' was determined.
Mr. Stafford indicated that this was only a suggestion, and was taken from the
regulations for half-way houses.
-9-
Commissioner Kasolas asked if this procedure was really needed, in that it is
his understanding that. to care for children .someone must go through the County
and the State to be licensed.
_ Commissioner Fairbanks felt that it is necessary to look at the impact of these
kinds of restrictions. She felt that the R-1 district is the right place for
these types of facilities, in that other zoning districts could be
inappropriate for health and safety reasons.
Chairman Dickson felt that the State was not out of line in some of these
requirements they placed on this type of activity, and that it would not be out
of line for the City to see that they are done in an orderly manner.
Commissioner Howard felt that the use permit fee of $350 would not encourage
people to apply for the use permit.
Mr. Kee stated that what this text amendment attempts to do is give the
Commission and the City a chance to review the use when it comes through]
otherwise, the City is stuck with what the State says.
Commissioner Christ asked if these types of day care homes would be subject to
the same restrictions as single family homes are with a home occupation permit,
in regard to changing the outside appearance.
Mr. Kee noted that this would be up to the Commission, and the Commission could
apply any reasonable conditions under the use permit.
Commissioner Christ asked if safety measures could be imposed if they altered
the ,appearance of the residential site.
Mr. Kee noted that this would be possible.
Commissioner Toshach asked about the public hearing notification on this item.
Mr. Kee noted that this item was published in the San Jose Mercury News as a
legal notice, as is the usual procedure for public hearings.
Chairman Dickson opened the public hearing and invited anyone in the audience
to speak for or against this item.
Ms. Dorothy Shattock, 391 California St., requested clarification on the issue;
and, noted her concern that residential areas stay looking like residential
areas. She felt that a home should remain a home, and there could be ways to
expand its uses to provide a necessary service that will not prevent it from
being a single family home. She felt that the 300 was arbitrary, and noted
concern as to how it would be determined who could have a day care facility and
who could not. She asked if this was an item that could be more clearly
flagged to the public before a decision was made.
-10-
M/S: Kasolas, Christ -
M/S: Kasolas, Fairbanks -
Discussion on Motion
There being no one else wishing to
speak, that the public hearing on TA
84-05 be closed. Motion carried
unanimously (7-0-0).
That the Planning Commission accept the
Negative Declaration prepared for TA
84-05; and, that the Planning Commission
adopt RESOLUTION NO. 2300 recommending
approval of TA 84-OS with the deletion.
of 5 (A) and 5 (B) on Exhibit A.
Commissioner Christ noted that he has the same concerns as expressed by Ms.
Shattock. He felt that homes used for this purpose should not detract from the
appearance of a residential neighborhood; however, he felt it is important
these these homes be made as safe as possible for children. In reference to
parking, Commissioner Christ stated that in the event of several employees, he
would prefer to see on-site parking; however, he would be in favor of the
motion as presented.
M/S: Toshach, Christ -
Discussion on Amendment to Motion
That the motion be amended to include
5(B) of Exhibit A.
Commissioner Kasolas stated that the use permit procedure would provide
adequate control, in his opinion. He noted that it would be difficult to get
more than 12 children in one home, and this would probably only require one
employee. If this provision is required, it could lead to the asphalting of
the front yard area.
Commissioner Christ stated that this concern is from personal experiences with
existing day care centers, wherein the needed parking infringes upon the
neighborhood. He felt that the impact of this type of use should be mitigated
for the adjacent properties.
Chairman Dickson noted that he also is in favor of protecting the residential
neighborhoods, and that the use permit is a powerful tool which can be reviewed
if problems arise.
Vote on Amendment to Motion
AYES: Commissioners: Perrine, Christ, Howard, Toshach, Dickson
NOES: Commissioners: Rasolas, Fairbanks
ABSENT: Commissioners: None.
-11-
Vote on Motion
°- AYES: Commissioners: Kasolas, Perrine, Christ, Howard, Toshach,
Fairbanks, Dickson
NOES: Commissioners: None
ABSENT: Commissioners: None.
# #
ZC 84-05
Wong, T.
Continued public hearing to consider the
application of Mr. Timothy Wong, on
behalf of Wong & Associates., for
approval of a zone change from PD
(Planned Development) to C-PD
(Condominium/Planned Development) to
allow the conversion of an office
building into condominium offices= and,
approval of a modification to the
approved elevations allowing the
placement of a brick veneer on the
building exterior on property known as
910 Campisi Way.
Mr. Kee reported that the applicant has requested that the application be
withdrawn. Staff is 'recommending that the Commission deny this application,
without prejudice, and recommend that the City Council refund a portion of the
application fee.
Chairman Dickson opened the public hearing and invited anyone in the audience
to speak for or against this item.
M/S: Fairbanks, Howard -
There being no one wishing to speak,
that the public hearing on PD 84-05 be
closed. Motion carried unanimously
(7-0-0).
M/S: Fairbanks, Howard -
That the Planning Commission deny
without prejudice PD 84-05, at the
applicant's request; and, that the
Planning Commission recommend that the
City Council refund the application fee
less cost of public hearing notification
and staff time. Motion carried
unanimously (7-0-0).
* * :
-12-
MISCELLANEOUS
R 84-12 Request of Mr. Robert Kadjevich for a
PD 81-10 reinstatement of a previously approved
TS 81-24 Planned Development Permit and Tentative
Kadjevich, R. Subdivision Map allowing the
construction of a condominium industrial
building on property known as 200 & 222
Dillon Ave. in a PD (Planned
Development) Zoning District.
Commissioner Howard reported that this request was before the Site and
Architectural Review Committee. The Committee had redlined the elimination of
a parking space near the property line, and put landscaping in its place.
However, in that this parking space does not abut parklands, as previously
thought, the Committee would withdraw this redlining.
Commissioner Kasolas questioned Condition #5, asking if the space utilization
figures will be broken down for each of the different owners.
Mr. Dempster responded that there are constant problP~ts with parking based on
one use, and then the uses changing. This conc7,ition is an attempt to mitigate
those problems right from the beginning, and will be recorded with the deed.
M/S: Perrine, Fairbanks -
Staff Report
That the Planning Commission recommend
that the City Council approve the
applicant's request for a revised
development schedule and extension of
the tentative subdivision map, subject
to conditions as indicated in the Staff
Comment Sheet. Motion carried
unanimously (7-0-0).
Staff report regarding parking at the
Fransican Apartments - 601 Almarida
Drive.
Commissioner Kasolas stated that he realized that this was an unusual set of
circumstances; however, he felt that when there is a major change--as major as
this--when the Commission is so concerned with on-site parking and the
encouragement of on-site parking--that this type of thing never be allowed to
happen again (the discouragement of on-site parking). He continued that he
would hope that in the future if there is some way that this situation can be
realigned for secured tenant parking and provision for on-site guest parking
that it be done. Commissioner Kasolas concluded that he did not know why this
situation was not brought to the Commission.
-13-
Mr. Dempster responded that he thought the issue had been before the
Commission, that this was an on-going problem for some time, and the measures
taken were really a matter of survival for the apartment residents.
Mr. Kee noted that Staff would have no problem bringing these problems to the
Commission, and would welcome any Commissioners assistance at any time.
M/S: Howard, Fairbanks -
That this Staff Report be noted and
filed. Motion carried unanimously
(7-0-0).
,r
OTHER ITEMS BROUGHT UP BY COMMISSION
Commissioner Toshach asked Staff to check on a large truck which parks in front
of Best Products on Hamilton Avenue, creating a hazardous condition.
Commissioner Toshach asked if, as a matter of practice, the Staff and
Commission shouldn~t be doing more in the way of designating parking areas for
bicycles and motorcycles, to encourage alternate modes of transportation.
Mr. Kee indicated that if a development doesn't have the required parking, per
code, Staff will usually discuss the other types of spaces.
ADJOURNMENT
M/S: Kasolas, Toshach -
That the Planning Commission be
adjourned. The meeting adjourned at
9:53 p.m.
APPROVED: J. DuWayne Dickson
Chairman
ATTEST: Arthur A. Kee
Secretary
RECORDED: Linda A. Dennis
Recording Secretary
CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL: $ 84-18
APPLICANT: Armann, R.
SITE ADDRESS: 1436 Whiteoaks Rd. P.C. Mtg.: 11-27-34
The applicant is notified as part of this application that he/she is required
to meet the following conditions in accordance with the Ordinances of the City
of Campbell and the Laws of the State of California.
1. Revised elevations and/or site plan indicating revisions to parking layout
to be submitted to the Planning Department and approved by the Planning
Director upon recommendation of the Architectural Advisor prior to application
for a building permit.
2. Property to be fenced and landscaped as indicated and/or added in red on the
plans. Landscaping and fencing shall be maintained in accordance with the
approved plans.
3. Landscaping plan indicating type and size of plant material, and location of
irrigation system to be submitted to the Planning Department and approved by
the Site and Architectural Review Committee and/or Planning Commission prior to
issuance of a building permit.
4. Fencing plan indicating location and design details of fencing to be
submitted to the Planning Department and approved by the Planning Director
prior to issuance of a building permit.
5. Applicant to either (1) post a faithful performance bond in the amount of
$5,000 to insure landscaping, fencing, and striping of parking areas within 3
months of completion of construction; or (2) file written agreement to complete
landscaping, fencing, and striping of parking areas. Bond or agreement to be
filed with the Planning Department prior to application for a building permit.
6. Applicant to submit a plan to the Planning Department, prior to installation
of PG&E utility (transformer) boxes, indicating the location of the boxes and
screening (if boxes are above ground) for approval of the Planning Director.
7. Applicant to submit a letter to the Planning Department, satisfactory to the
City Attorney, limiting the use of the property as follows: 3110 sq. ft. office
use; 34,841 sq. ft. warehousing/manufacturing use; 2800 sq. ft, auto related
use -- prior to application for a building permit.
8. All mechanical equipment on roofs and all utility meters to be screened as
approved by the Planning Director.
9. Building occupancy will not be allowed until public improvements are
installed.
10. All parking and driveway areas to be developed in compliance with Chapter
21.50 of the Campbell Municipal Code. All parking spaces to be provided with
appropriate concrete curbs or bumper guards.
11. Underground utilities to be provided as required by Section 20.16.070 of
the Campbell Municipal Code.
CONDITIONS OF RPPROVAL: S 84-18
APPLICANT: Armann, K.
SITE ADDRESS: 1436 Whiteoaks Rd. P.C. Mtg.: i1-27-84
12. Plans submitted to the Building Department for plan check shall indicate
clearly the location. of all connections for underground utilities including
^--~~ rrt:va*. -~L~r~s= -.~r~ ^rhrr~ -~r~ ~r~.~ _a~r; •.;..^- -rsl~3rz stn.
- ~ ~~ - ~~ -
13. Sign application to be submitted in accordance with provisions of the Sign
Ordinance for all signs. No sign to be installed until application is approved
and permit issued by Planning and Building Departments (Section 21.68.030 of
the Campbell Municipal Code).
14. Ordinance No. 7.82 of the Campbell Municipal Code stipulates that any
contract for the collection and disposal of refuse, garbage, wet garbage and
rubbish produced within the limits of the City of Campbell shall be made with
Green Valley Disposal Company. This requirement applies to all single-family
dwellings, multiple apartment units, to all commercial, mess, industrial,
manufacturing, and construction establishments.
15. Trash container(s) of a size and quantity necessary to serve the
development shall be located in area(s) approved by the Fire Department.
Unless otherwise noted, enclosure(s) shall consist of a concrete floor
surrounded by a solid wall or fence and have self-closing doors of a size
specified by the Fire Department. All enclosures to be constructed at grade
level and. have a level area adjacent to the trash enclosure area to service
these containers.
16. Applicant shall comply with all appropriate State and City requirements for
the handicapped.
17. The applicant is hereby notified that the property is to be maintained free
of any combustible trash, debris and weeds, until the time that actual
construction commences. All existing structures shall be secured by having
windows boarded up and doors sealed shut, or be demolished or removed from the
property. Sect. 11.201 & 11.414, 1979 Ed. Uniform Fire Code.
PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT
18. Process and file a parcel map to combine the two lots.
19. Install street improvements across the frontage of the property.
20. Pay storm drain area fee.
21. Dedicate additional land from APN 413-71-011 to realign Whiteoaks Rd. in
accordance with the plan line on file with the City Engineer.
FIRE DEPARTMENT
22. Access driveways shall be marked and designated as fire lanes with parking
prohibited.
23. Provide an on-site municipal fire hydrant at the rear of the property.
24. Provide an automatic sprinkler system for the building. System shall be
monitored by a Central Station.
25. Areas designated for auto repair and other hazardous occupancies shall meet
construction requirements for H occupancy.