Loading...
PC Min 03/03/1981 PLANNING COMMISSION CITY OF CAMPBELL, CALIFORNIA TUESDAY, 7:30 P.M. MINUTES MARCH 3, 1981 The Planning Commission of the City of Campbell convened this day in regular session in the regular meeting place, the Council Chambers of the City Hall, 75 North Central Avenue, Campbell, California. ROLL CALL . Present Commissioners: Pack, Kotowski, Campos, Meyer, Dickson, Fairbanks, Chairman Kasolas; Planning Director Arthur A. Kee, Principal Planner Philip J. Stafford, Planner I Marty Woodworth, Engineering Manager Bill Helms, City Attorney J. Robert Dempster, Recording Secretary Jeannine 41ade. Absent None APPROVAL OF MINUTES February 17, 1981 Chairman Kasolas noted at this time that on Page 8 of the minutes of February 17 regarding the Rolling Hills Shopping Center, his reason for voting "no" was because the Commission had not had the opportunity to hear from the owners or the tenants of the shopping center. Commissioner Pack then moved that the minutes of the Planning Commission meeting of February 17 be approved as amended, seconded by Commissioner Kotowski and unanimously adopted. C0~1MUN I CATI ONS Chairman Kasolas noted that communications received relate to specific items on the agenda and would be considered at that time. CONSENT CALENDAR TS 81-03 Tentative Subdivision Map: Lands of Investors One. Lands of Investors APN 413-25-89 (196 Shelley Avenue) One Commissioner Campos moved that TS 81-03 be recommended for approval as noted in the Staff Comment Sheet, seconded by Commissioner Meyer and adopted with Commissioner Dickson voting "no". At this time Commissioner Pack inquired if in future Staff Comment Sheets regarding tentative subdivision map approvals Staff could also include the vote of the Commission and density of the project involved. Mr. Kee responded that this would be included in future Staff Comment Sheets. *** I -2- ARCHITECTURAL APPROVALS S 80-11 Continued application of Mr. Robert Zipse for approval Zipse, R, of revised landscaping plans for property known as 100 Cristich Lane. Commissioner Meyer reported that Mr. Zipse had met with the Site and Architectural Review Committee this morning, and after reviewing the plans the Committee is recommending approval as redlined. She noted that there will be trees planted in the ground as well as tub trees. Mr. Kee stated that Staff is also recommending approval of these plans as redlined. P4r. Zipse stated to the Commission that he is in agreement with the recommended approval of the plans as redlined. Commissioner Pack then moved that the revised landscape plans for 100 Cristich Lane be approved as redlined, seconded by Commissioner Kotowski and unanimously adopted. S 80-22 Citti Florist Application of Citti Florist for approval of land- scaping plans for property known as 1603 S. Bascom Avenue. Commissioner Meyer reported that the Site and Architectural Review Committee reviewed these plans this morning with the applicant's representative, Mr. Dick Fish. She noted that the Committee is recommending approval. Mr. Kee stated that Staff is also recommending approval of the landscape plans. Commissioner hteyer then moved that the landscape plans for S 80-22 be approved as submitted, seconded by Commissioner Kotowski and unanimously adopted. *** S 81-04 Continued application of Mr. Fred Santacroce for Santacroce, F. approval of plans and elevations to allow construction of a 2,654 square foot office building on property known as 1845 S. Winchester Blvd. in a C-1-S (Commercial) Zoning District. Commissioner Meyer reported that the Committee is recommending approval of this application subject to the added condition that the landscape plan come back before the Site and Architectural Review Committee. She further noted that all other concerns had been resolved. Commissioner Pack inquired of Engineering Manager Helms if Winchester Boulevard is planned to be widened. in front of this site. Engineering Manager Helms responded that as a condition of approval of this application the applicant must construct improvements across the frontage -3- of the property. He further noted that there is money in the Capital Improvement Program to provide for only construction of l~Jinchester Boulevard; there is no money for right-of-way acquisition. The City Council has stated that at such time as right-of-way is available, construction dollars will be provided. After further discussion, Commissioner Fairbanks expressed concern about the setback of this building and continuity. Commissioner Meyer moved that the Planning Commission approve S 81-04 subject to the conditions listed in the Staff Comment Sheet as well as the added condition that the landscape plan come back to the Site and Architectural Review Committee and approval of plans as redlined. This motion was seconded by Commissioner Pack and unanimously adopted. A copy of the conditions of approval are attached hereto and made a part of these minutes. *** S 81-07 Continued application of Mr. Kjartan Armann for Armann, K. approval of plans and elevations to construct an industrial building on property known as 954 & 960 Camden Avenue in an M-1-S (Light Industrial) Zoning District. Mr. Kee reported that a letter has been received from the applicant requesting a two-week extension of this application. Commissioner Pack inquired if any comments had been received on this application from the Park and Recreation Commission or the Los Gatos Creek Committee. She noted that it would be her preference to have their comments prior to making a decision on this matter. Mr. Kee stated that comments had not yet been received, but the Staff persons for each body would be contacted. Commissioner Meyer then moved that the Planning Commission continue S 81-07 to the meeting of March 17, 1981, seconded by Commissioner Pack and unani- mously adopted. *** S 81-08 Continued application of Mr. Brad Kunkel on behalf Bradko Enterprises of Bradko Enterprises, Inc. for approval of plans and elevations to construct 9 condominium units on property known as 215, 223 and 229 N. Central Avenue in a R-M (Multiple Family Residential) Zoning District. Mr. Kee reported that the Staff is recommending a continuance of this application to the March 17, 1981 meeting so that a joint meeting of the Historic Preservation Board and the Civic Improvement Commission can be held to review the three residences on the site. 1 T -4- Commissioner Meyer reported that the Site and Architectural Review Committee is also recommending a continuance and the applicant is in agreement with a continuance. Commissioner Pack felt that this is placing a great burden on developers, and felt this was going far beyond the idea of the Historic Preservation Ordinance; she did not feel it is the intent of the Board to look at every house over 25 years old. She felt that this delay would only cause an increase in cost to the proposed townhomes. The Chair noted that this may be an item the Commission might want to discuss at the end of this evening's meeting. Commissioner Fairbanks also expressed concern about the role of the Historic Preservation Board in relation to proposed developments. Commissioner Kotowski then moved that S 81-08 be continued to the March 17, 1981 Planning Commission meeting, seconded by Commissioner Meyer and unani- mously adopted. *** PUBLIC HEARINGS UP 81-01 Continued application of Mr. Ervin Kruse for a Kruse, E. use permit and approval of plans to establish an office building use on property known as 155 E. Campbell Avenue in a P-D (Planned Development/ Commercial) Zoning District. Mr. Kee stated that Staff is recommending a continuance of this application to the Planning Commission meeting of March 17, since the revised plans had not been received in sufficient time for all departments to review. Chairman Kasolas opened the public hearing and invited anyone in the audience to speak for or against this application. No one wishing to be heard, Commissioner Meyer moved that UP 81-01 be continued to the Planning Commission meeting of March 17, 1981, seconded by Commissioner Pack and unanimously adopted. *** The Commission took a break at 8:25 p.m.; the meeting reconvened at 8:35 p.m. *** The Chairman then announced that the Commission would now consider Item No. 14 on this evening's agenda. t1ISCELLANEOUS Conditional Exception Proposed Tentative Parcel Map for Lands of Parashis, located at 1520 and 1532 Van Dusen Lane in an R-1 (Single Family) Zoning District. -5- Ftr. Kee reported that the applicant is requesting a two-week continuance of this conditional exception. Commissioner Meyer then moved that the above referenced request be continued to March 17, 1981, seconded by Commissioner Campos and unanimously adopted. *** PUBLIC HEARIPIGS UP 81-04 This is the time and place for a public hearing to Pourshams, K. consider the application of Mr. Kamran Pourshams for a use permit to establish an arcade in an existing commercial building located on property known as 1775A S. Winchester Blvd. in a C-2-S (Commercial) Zoning District. Mr. Kee stated that the Staff is recommending denial of the proposed use permit to establish an arcade at 1775A S. Winchester Blvd. He then made reference to the Police Chief's memo to the Planning Director, dated _ March 3, 1981, explaining that 14 businesses in the subject shopping center had been contacted, and only one of these businesses had no objection to the arcade. A copy of this memo is attached hereto and made a part of this record. Commissioner Fairbanks inquired if the Commission could impose a condition on this use permit relating to the regulation of the hours of operation should this permit be approved--particularly the closing hour. Mr. Kee stated that the Commission could impose such a condition should they so desire. Commissioner Campos inquired if any evidence had been received on whether or not a use such as this in an area would cause any vandalism or problems to surrounding properties. Mr. Kee stated that Staff has no information along those lines. It was Commissioner Pack's recollection that there had been problems reported by the tenants of the shopping center at 4linchester and Budd where an arcade had been approved. Mr. Kee than reported that one other item of communication had been received opposing this application; a letter from Kenneth Machado representing his client Pete Thrappas, dated March 2, 1981, is attached hereto and made a part of this record. Chairman Kasolas opened the public hearing and invited anyone in the audience to speak regarding this item. Mr. Mike Vierra, speaking on behalf of the property owner, stated that the applicants for the arcade have much experience in running their own business and felt confident that they would be law-abiding tenants. He noted that in years past this type of business was not as well accepted as today; he feels that they are managed much better today. He asked that the Commission render a favorable decision on this matter. -6- Mrs. Maxine Lucas, one of the owners of Winchester Liquors, appeared before the Commission to speak in opposition to this application. She then stated that there is an arcade in a shopping center near her home in Cupertino, and in talking with the merchants of the center she learned that there were problems with vandalism, litter, shoplifters and bicycles being left in the sidewalk area. She then expressed concern for the senior citizens in the area, noting the increased possibility of muggings. She then urged the Commission to deny this permit. Ms. Cathy Bishop, owner of the pet shop in the center, also spoke in opposition to this application, noting that there are enough problems with children fre- quenting the shop and disturbing the animals. She further noted that there is already a problem with bicycles in the sidewalk and bicycles being knocked through the glass windows. She asked that if the arcade should be approved that there be more supervision of the children. Mr. Farzin Jahn, one of the applicants, explained that should there be a problem with the noise, they plan to sound proof the walls. Commissioner Campos inquired of the applicant the age group which would be using these facilities. Mr. Jahn noted that pre-teenagers to senior citizens would be using this facility, adding that this type of activity has become popular with all age groups. No one else wishing to speak, Commissioner Meyer moved that the public hearing be closed, seconded by Commissioner Pack and unanimously adopted. Commissioner Meyer stated that from the information received this evening she did not feel it is substantial enough to warrant denial of this appli- cation. She felt that she would rather see children frequenting an arcade such as the one proposed, rather than other places that would be more detrimental to their health and safety. Commissioner Dickson felt that the Commission should be able to make findings that this use would not be detrimental to the health, safety, welfare, etc., of the persons residing or working in the neighborhood. He felt the applicant has not done his job in satisfying these conditions. Commissioner Pack stated she is not in favor of this particular establishment at this location. She expressed concern about young people being so close in proximity to a liquor store, and felt this would not be a good type of business to be located next to a church. Commissioner Campos stated he found it difficult to believe an arcade would contribute more to the problems than presently exist at the shopping center. He further noted that there is no evidence to substantiate any problems that might come up. Commissioner Kotowski expressed concern about this arcade becoming an attractive nuisance; and possibly youngsters finding themselves frequenting an establishment such as this instead of being in school. -7- Chairman Kasolas then relinquished the gavel to Vice Chairman Meyer in order to comment. He stated that this is a shopping center where a flea market is usually held and found it hard to believe that this use could cause any more problems than that type of use. He also stated that there is not a representa- tive from the Police Department here this evening to further discuss specifics with, and there are no specifics listed in the memo. He noted he would be in ~av~~ of the roRosed arcade. Vice Chairman Fieyer then handed the gavel back o airman K~so as. RESOLUTION NO. 1981 Commissioner Fairbanks moved that the Planning Commission approve UP 81-04, application for a use permit to establish an arcade in an existing commercial building located on property known as 1775A S. Winchester Blvd. in a C-2-S (Commercial) Zoning District subject to the hours of operation being limited on Sunday through Thursday nights (closing hour) to 9:00 p.m., and on Friday and Saturday nights to 10:00 p.m., and that this application be reviewed by the Planning Commission in six months. This motion was seconded by Commissioner Meyer. Discussion of Motion Commissioner Campos noted that he would be in favor of the proposed motion. He noted that with a six month review the Commission could have a look at this permit to see if any problems have been reported. Commissioner Fairbanks spoke in favor of this motion, noting she would like to see establishments for youngsters to be able to attend for amusement. Commissioner Pack commented that once a use permit is granted there is a long process it must go through before it can be revoked. Vote on Motion AYES: Commissioners: Campos, Meyer, Fairbanks, Kasolas NOES: Commissioners: Pack, Kotowski, Dickson ABSENT: Commissioners: None *** PD 81-03 This is the time and place for a public hearing to Kadjevich, R. consider the application of Mr. Robert Kadjevich for a planned development permit and approval of plans, elevations and development schedule to allow construction of 10 condominium units on property known as 115 & 119 Dot Avenue in a P-D (Planned Development/Medium Density Residential) Zoning District. Commissioner Meyer reported that after the applicant met with the Site and Architectural Review Committee this morning, the Committee has decided to refer this application to the entire Commission due to concerns expressed by the Commission and advice of the Architectural Advisor. -8- Mr. Kee reported that Staff is recommending approval of this application subject to the conditions listed in the Staff Comment Sheet. He stated that the applicant is proposing to construct 10 condominium units on the .66 gross acre site. The project results in a density of 15 units per gross acre which is consistent with the General Plan's designation of Medium Density Residential (14-20 units per gross acre). Two existing residences will be removed. Mr. Kee further noted that the Architectural Advisor is of the opinion that the long, dead-end driveway is undesirable. He recommends relocating units 9 and 10, and possibly also units 7 and 8. In addition, he is of the opinion that the common area is not very usable. For these reasons, Staff is recommending Condition of Approval No. 1, "Revised elevations and site plans to be approved by the Planning Director upon recommendation of the Architectural Advisor, within 30 days of Planning Commission approval." Commissioner Kotowski then complimented the developer on his putting togethe r a development which is way below the maximum density, and which provides for more parking then required. He further noted that as of this morning's Site meeting, the applicant preferred not to make a change as recommended by the Architectural Advisor. Commissioner Fairbanks expressed concern about the unfinished appearance of the fence on this property. Mr. Stafford then stated that the applicant could include a new fence for this development; however, there is no provision to repair the existing fence. Chairman Kasolas opened the public hearing and invited anyone in the audience to speak on this item. Mr. Bob Ferguson, designer of the project, noted that the main concern of the Committee is the length of the driveway as proposed. He noted that of several different designs looked at, this is the best for the site. He noted that. there is provision for a play area for children in one corner. Commissioner Dickson inquired of Staff why this property is zoned P-D. He further inquired if there were any variations on this project because of this zoning. Mr. Kee explained that all of the property on the north side of Rincon Avenue was put in a P-D Zoning District in order that John D. Morgan Park could be protected. Mr. Kee stated that there are no variations in this project because of the P-D zone; this development could be constructed in an R-3-S zone. Mr. Bob Kadjevich, owner, explained that if a different layout were used the play area would be eliminated, and there would be some parking eliminated. He urged the Commission fora favorable decision on this matter this evening. No one else wishing to speak, Commissioner Meyer moved that the public hearing be closed, seconded by Commissioner Kotowski and unanimously adopted. -9- Motion Commissioner Pack moved that PD 81-03 be approved subject to the conditions listed in the Staff Comment Sheet, with the landscaping plans to come back to the Site and Architectural Review Committee for approval. This motion died for lack of a second. Commissioner Dickson then moved that the public hearing for PD 81-03 be reopened and this application be continued to the Planning Commission meeting of March 17, 1981 in order that concerns of the Site Committee, Architectural Advisor, Staff and the Commission could be resolved regarding relocation of units 9 and 10, and the "long, narrow driveway." This motion was seconded by Commissioner Campos and unanimously adopted. The applicant stated that he was in agreement with this continuance. *** The Commission took a break at 9:40 p.m.; the meeting reconvened at 9:55 p.m. *** ZC 81-07 This is the time and place for a public hearing to Woodgate Development consider the application of Mr. Thomas C. Siffermann on behalf of Woodgate Development Company fora zone change from P-F (Public Facilities) to P-D (Planned Development) and approval of plans, elevations and development schedule to allow construction of 47 townhomes on property known as 44 E. Latimer Avenue in a P-F (Public Facilities) Zoning District. Mr. Kee reported that the applicant is proposing to construct 47 residential condominium units on the 2.6 gross acre site. The resulting density for this project is 17.8 units per gross acre. The Land Use Element of the General Plan was recently amended for this site from "Public, Semi-Public" to "Medium Density Residential". The Medium Density Residential land use designation allows a range of 14-20 units per gross acre. For comparison, if the site were zoned R-2-S (Medium Density Residential), a maximum of 49 units could be considered on this site. R-2-S density is calculated on net. acres, PD or General Plan density is calculated on gross acreage. He further noted this application is similar to one which was previously considered for this site (ZC 80-13). In the previous application, a total of 52 units were proposed, at a density of 19.7 units per gross acre. The previous application was denied by the City Council on the basis of the density being too great. Building materials for this proposed project consist of textured stucco walls with cedar shingle panels, with cedar shake roofing. A six-foot high masonry wall is proposed to separate this project from the post office and single-family residential development to the east, and the commercial development along Winchester Boulevard. Anew 6' high wooden fence is indicated along the southerly property line to separate this project from the high density residential project which is proposed for the old grammar school site. This wooden fence is consistent with approvals granted for other multi-family developments. -10- The site plan indicates that the structures along Latimer Avenue will be set back a minimum of twenty feet from the property line, with a fence surrounding the private decks to be a minimum of fifteen feet from the property line. The setbacks between the rear elevations of the buildings, i.e., between the garages, is proposed to be a minimum of 30 feet. If this were an R-2-S Zoning District, the garages would have to be at least 50 feet apart since the buildings are longer than 50 feet and are parallel. The 30-foot setback, as proposed, however, is consistent with previous Planning Commission approvals for townhouse/condominium developments. This setback would satisfy the ordinance requirements if this were an R-2-S zone. Parking for the project is .provided by a total of 115 parking spaces, 88 of which are covered (enclosed garages). The remaining 27 spaces are uncovered. This parking satisfies the ordinance requirement of 2.5 spaces for each of the 41 two-bedroom units and 2.0 spaces for each of the 6 one-bedroom units. These plans indicate that approximately 25% of the lot area will be covered by buildings; 46% will be landscaping, and 29% wi"11 be paving. The Architectural Advisor has indicated that the low density shown on this plan offers more amenities, and is nicely done. Commissioner Meyer reported that the applicant met with the Site and Architectural Review Committee this morning and the Committee is recommending approval subject to the conditions listed in the Staff Comment Sheet as well as an added condition that the landscape plan come back to the Committee for approval . Commissioner Pack inquired if the applicant could discuss with the developer of the property to the south (Babet Corporation) the possibility of their jointly constructing a masonry wall rather than a wooden fence along the southerly property line separating this project from the high density residential project. Chairman Kasolas opened the public hearing and invited anyone in the audience to speak for or against this item. Mr. Tom Siffermann appeared before the Commission to explain that the density has been lowered by 5 units; he noted the units were taken out which fronted onto the single-family residences. He further noted that a recreational area was added and that the three-bedroom units were completely deleted--there are only one-and two-bedroom units in the proposed project. Lastly, he reported that he would be happy to work with Babet Corporation on a joint southerly fencing plan. Commissioner Fairbanks inquired about the size of the proposed units. Mr. Siffermann responded that the one-bedroom units will be 840 square feet, and the two-bedroom units will be 1,110-1,310 square feet. No one else wishing to speak, Commissioner Meyer moved that the public hearing be closed, seconded by Commissioner Kotowski and unanimously adopted. -11- Commissioner D1CKSOn commented at this time that he felt this site layout is outstanding and he was very pleased with this development. RESOLUTION N0. 1982 Commissioner Dickson moved that the Planning Commission adopt Resolution No. 1982 recommending a zone change from P-F (Public Facilities) to P-D (Planned Development) for property known as 44 E. Latimer Avenue, seconded by Commissioner Pack and unanimously adopted by the following roll call vote: AYES: Commissioners: Pack, Kotowski, Campos, Meyer, Dickson, Fairbanks Kasolas NOES: Commissioners: None ABSENT: Commissioners: None RESOLUTION N0. 1983 Commissioner Dickson then moved that the Planning Commission adopt Resolution No. 1983 recommending approval of plans, elevations and development schedule to allow construction of 47 residential condominiums on property known as 44 E. Latimer Avenue subject to the conditions listed in the Staff Comment Sheet, with the added conditions that the landscape plan come back before the Site and Architectural Review Committee for review, and the fencing be of a masonry wall material that the applicant would jointly construct with the adjoining property owner to the south (Babet Corporation), seconded by Commissioner Pack and unanimously adopted by the following roll call vote: AYES: Commissioners: Pack, Kotowski, Campos, Meyer, Dickson, Fairbanks, Kasolas NOES: Commissioners: None ABSENT: Commissioners: None *** ZC 81-08 This is the .time and place for a public hearing to Stokes, G. consider the application of Mr. Gary Stokes on behalf of Cal-Com Leasing and Development, Inc. for a zone change from R-M (Multiple Family Residential) to P-D (Planned Development) and approval of plans, elevations and development schedule to allow con- struction of four townhomes on property known as 50 Redding Road in a R-M (Multiple Family Residential) Zoning District. Commissioner Meyer reported that due to the comments of the Architectural Advisor that this project is repetitious, the Committee decided to refer this application to the entire Planning Commission. She further noted that due to the "panhandle" shape of this parcel, the Committee suggested the Commission consider using this area as a common recreational area for all of Mr. Stokes's other projects. -12- Mr. Kee explained that the applicant is proposing to construct four townhouse units on the .52 gross acre site. The project results in a density of 7.7 units per gross acre, which is consistent with the General Plan designation of Low-Medium Density Residential (6-13 units per gross acre). An existing structure on the site is to be removed. The site plan indicates that 54~ of the project will be landscaped. Building materials are indicated as stucco and grooved plysawn siding for the walls, and wood shake for the roof. The applicant has provided 11 parking spaces (8 covered, 3 uncovered) resulting in a parking ratio of 2.75 spaces per unit. This exceeds the code requirement of 2.5 spaces per unit. The Architectural Advisor is concerned at the fact that this plan and design is similar to others along Redding Road. (The applicant has a similar project constructed adjacent on the easterly side and another project approved across the street.) The Architectural Advisor is of the opinion that this design is becoming repetitious and non-creative. He recommends a variation in the exterior materials, such as using all plywood siding instead of stucco. Chairman Kasolas inquired about the existing house on the site. Mr. Kee stated that the home is approximately 45 years old and not in very good condition. Commissioner Pack inquired if Condition No. 6 applies. P9r. Kee stated that it does not. Chairman Kasolas opened the public hearing and invited anyone in the audience to speak for or against this application. F9r. Lon Mills, representing the applicant, appeared before the Commission to explain the project; he noted this is a small 4-unit subdivision, 20% of the lot will be building coverage and 56.7% of the lot will be landscaped area. He further noted that these will be 3-bedroom, 1,377 square foot units with two-car garages. He further noted that it would not be possible to include any portion of this project as part of the open space/recreation area for the other projects owned by this developer on this street since the CC&R's would not allow it. No one else wishing to speak, Commissioner Kotowski moved that the public hearing be closed, seconded by Commissioner Meyer and unanimously adopted. Much discussion ensued regarding townhomes, condominiums, and different ways in which this property could be developed. Commissioner Dickson then expressed concern about zoning more of the City P-D; he felt there should be another way of handling townhouses without zoning the entire City P-D. He felt the developer should be asked to submit a design which would be less repetitious.- -13- Motion Commissioner Dickson moved that ZC 81-08 be denied since he felt the applicant should have another opportunity to submit a design which is less repetitious, and for the reasons expressed this evening by the Commission and the concern of the Architectural Advisor as expressed in the Staff Comment Sheet. This notion was seconded by Commissioner Campos. Discussion of Motion Commissioner Pack explained she could not support this motion since the Zoning Ordinance allows this type of use; she could understand Commissioner Dickson's concerns, however she felt until the ordinance is changed and another type of zoning is proposed she could not go along with a denial. She also felt that it was better to have a repetitious design, than to be hodgepodge. Commissioner Kotowski also spoke against this motion. Vote on Motion AYES: Commissioners: Campos, Dickson NOES: Commissioners: Pack, Kotowski, Meyer, Fairbanks, Kasolas ABSEPJT: Commissioners: None This motion failed by a 2-5-0 vote. RESOLUTION) N0. 1984 Commissioner Pack then moved that the Planning Commission adopt Resolution No. 1984 recommending that the City Council approve a zone change from R-M (Multiple Family Residential) to P-D (Planned Development) for 50 Redding Road, seconded by Commissioner Kotowski and adopted by the following roll call vote: AYES: Commissioners: Pack, Kotowski, Fairbanks, Kasolas NOES: Commissioners: Campos, ~leyer, Dickson ABSENT: Commissioners: None RESOLUTION N0. 1985 Commissioner Pack moved that thr Planning Commission adopt Fesolution No. 1985 recommending approval of plans, elevations and development schedule to allow construction of 4 townhomes on property known as 50 Redding Road, subject to the conditions listed in the Staff Comment Sheet deleting Condition No. 6, and changing Condition No. 3 in order that the landscape plan come back to the Site and Architectural Review Committee for approval. This motion was seconded by Commissioner Kotowski and adopted by the following roll call vote: AYES: Commissioners: Pack, Kotowski, Fairbanks, Kasolas NOES: Commissioners: Campos, Meyer, Dickson ABSENT: Commissioners: None *** -14- ZC 81-09 This is the time and place fora public hearing to Chargin, D. consider the application of Mr. Dennis Chargin for a zone change from R-M (Multiple Family Residential) to P-D (Planned Development) and approval of plans, elevations and development schedule to allow con- struction of 13 townhomes on property known as 166 and 180 Shelley Avenue in a R-M (Multiple Family Residential) Zoning District. Commissioner Meyer reported that the applicant had met with the Site and Architectural Review Committee this morning, and the Committee is recommending approval, of this application as redlined on the plans. It has been proposed that the parking area be moved to the back portion of the project. Mr. Kee noted that Staff is recommending approval of this application. Chairman Kasolas opened the public hearing and invited anyone in the audience to speak for or against this application. Mr. Dennis Chargin, owner of the property, appeared before the Commission to explain the project and give some background on the application. He noted that he has attempted to create a "Cape Code" or "New England" motif. He also pointed out the common green areas and driveway areas for the Commission. No one else wishing to speak, Commissioner Meyer moved that the public hearing be closed, seconded by Commissioner Pack and unanimously adopted. Once again Commissioner Dickson expressed concern about rezoning of this property to P=D to be able to increase density of a project. Commissioner Fairbanks also felt this project is too dense. RESOLUTION N0. 1986 Commissioner Pack moved that the Planning Commission adopt Resolution No. 1986 recommendin a zone change from R-M (Multiple Family Residential to P-D for 166 and 180 Shelley Avenue, seconded by Commissioner Kotowski, and adopted by the following roll call vote: AYES: Commissioners: Pack, Kotowski, Meyer, Kasolas NOES: Commissioners: Campos, Dickson, Fairbanks ABSENT: Commissioners: None RESOLUTION N0. 1987 Commissioner Pack then moved that the Planning Commission adopt Resolution No. 1987 recommending approval of plans, elevations and development schedule to allow construction of 13 townhomes on property known as 166 & 180 Shelley Avenue subject to the conditions listed in the Staff Comment Sheet with deletion of Condition No. 5 and subject to the landscape plan being approved by the Site and Architectural Review Committee. This motion was seconded by Commissioner Kotowski and adopted by the following roll call vote: AYES: Commissioners: Pack, Kotowski, Meyer, Kasolas NOES: Commissioners: Campos, Dickson, Fairbanks ABSENT: Commissioners: None *** -15- MISCELLANEOUS S 78-30 Request of Mr. Gary Kanawyer for reinstatement of Kanawyer, G. approval 'to construct an industrial building on property known as 70 Cristich Lane in an M-1-S (Light Industrial) Zoning District. Ms. Linda Borges, representing Mr. Kanawyer (who was also present), explained that the applicant has completed all of the requirements, however the time limit of approval has expired and the applicant is now requesting a rein- statement of the plans as approved. Mr. Kee stated that Staff is recommending approval of this reinstatement. Commissioner Dickson felt the Commission should have a look at these plans since approval of these plans was over two years ago and it has been past policy of the Commission to extend approvals fora year. Ms. Borges explained that the building is complete. Commissioner Pack felt particular attention should be given to the landscaping and parking area in reviewing these plans. Commissioner Dickson then moved that reinstatement of plans for S 78-30 be continued to the March 17, 1981 Planning Commission meeting, seconded by Commissioner Pack and unanimously adopted. *** ITEMS BROUGHT UP BY COMMISSIONERS At this time Commissioner Kotowski noted to the Commission that there will be a joint meeting between the Historic Preservation Board and the Civic Improvement Commission on March 12, 1981 at 7:30 p.m. in the Council Chambers. He noted that since concerns have been discussed regarding items to be considered by the Historic Preservation Board prior to being considered by the Commission, the Commission might want to attend this meeting. It was the consensus of the Commission that the applications before the Commission which involve property listed on the Historic Preservation Survey should in no way be delayed. *** It was the consensus of the Commission that the applications before the Commission which involve property listed on the Historic Preservation Survey should in no way be delayed. *** It was the consensus of the Commission that the subject of "Density" be discussed at a future study session of the Commission. *** -16- It was moved by Commissioner Dickson and seconded by Commissioner Kotowski that the condition regarding consideration of landscape plans listed on the standard list of conditions of approval be changed to read that "Landscape plan indicating type and size to be submitted for approval of the Site and Architectural Review Committee prior to application for building permit." This motion was adopted unanimously. *** Commissioner Pack inquired if a report would be made regarding the manufacturing use on Campbell Avenue (342 E. Campbell Avenue). ~4r. Kee stated that a letter had been sent to the property owner. *** Commissioner Pack then inquired if any correspondence had been received from the Winston Tire~Service Co. regarding landscaping at the corner of Latimer and Winchester. Mr. Kee reported that a letter had been sent to the Winston Tire Company and that Staff would report back at the next meeting. *** Discussion then ensued regarding buildings in a state of disrepair, particularly in the downtown area. Commissioner Kotowski reported that the Chamber of Commerce is re-establishing its Downtown Task Force to see what improvements can be made to the downtown area. *** Afl,]Ol1RNMENT Commissioner Meyer moved that the meeting be adjourned, seconded by Commissioner Dickson, and unanimously adopted. The meeting adjourned at~11:33 p.m. APPROVED: GeorcZe C. Kasolas ' Chairman ATTEST: Arthur A. Kee Secretary RECORDED: Jeannine 4Jade ' ecording Secretary