Loading...
PC Min 02/03/1981PLANNING COMMISSION CITY OF CAMPBELL, CALIFORNIA TUESDAY, 7:30 P.M. MINUTES FEBRUARY 3, 1981 The Planning Commission of the City of Campbell convened this day in regular session in the regular meeting place, the Council Chambers of the City Hall, 75 North Central Avenue, Campbell, California. ROLL CALL Present Commissioners: Pack, Kotowski, Campos, Dickson, Fairbanks, Vice Chairman Meyer; Planning Director Arthur A. Kee, Principal Planner Philip J. Stafford, Engineering Manager Bill Helms, City Attorney J. Robert Dempster, Recording Secretary Jeannine I~fade. Absent Chairman Kasolas. APPROVAL OF MINUTES January 20, 1981 Commissioner Campos moved that the minutes of the regular meeting of January 20, 1981 be approved as submitted, seconded by Commissioner Kotowski and unanimously adopted. COh1t~1UN I CAT I ON S Mr. Kee reported that other than the communication listed on the agenda from Mr. Jacobsen, other communications received relate to specific items on the agenda and would be considered at that time. Letter from Mr. Warren Jacobsen, A.I.A., dated January 29, 1981. Mr. Kee reported that staff has received a request that the Planning Commission make a determination regarding the interpretation of the Zoning Ordinance, specifically as it relates to compact car parking. Specifically, the letter asks if the Commission has the authority to approve more than 30% compact car stalls fora given development. After discussing this with the City Attorney, it was his opinion that this matter of ordinance interpretation should be decided by the Commission rather than staff since this is essentially a policy decision. The question arose because Section 21.50.020(14) states that "The total number of compact car stalls on any site shall not exceed thirty percent of the total parking provided." Section 21.50.030 states, in part, that: "The Planning Commission shall have authority to adjust these requirements for a specific use at a specific location to require either a greater or lesser number of parking spaces when it determines that circumstances are such as to warrant an adjustment. For all uses not specific in this section, parking spaces shall be provided as required by the Planning Commission." Discussion then ensued regarding the increasing number of compact cars being built and the possibility of increasing the number of compact spaces to 40 percent. After further discussion, Commissis~erDickson moved that the Planning Commission adopt a motion stating that in cases of unusual hardship an applicant may pro- pose more than 30 percent of the total parking provided for compact stalls, as provided in the ordinance, however the applicant must justify that before the Planning Commission. This motion was seconded by Commissioner Pack and unani- mously adopted. *** CONSENT CALENDAR TS 80-ZO Tentative Subdivision ~9ap: Lands of Cal-Com Lands of Cal-Com Leasing and Development. APN 413-23-44 & 45 (55/79 Redding Road). Commissioner Campos moved that the Planning Commission find the proposed Tentative Subdivision Map to be in accord with the General Plan and recommend that the City Council approve this map subject to the conditions listed in the Staff Comment Sheet. This motion was seconded by Commissioner Pack and adopted with Commissioner Dickson voting "no" since this project is developed at maxi- mum density. ARCHITECTURAL APPROVALS S 80-28 Continued application of Mr. Robert Peepari for Peepari, R. approval of plans and elevations to allow con- struction of an 8,680 square foot commercial (retail) building on property known as 2160 S. Bascom Avenue in a C-2-S (General Commercial) Zoning District. Commissioner Kotowski reported that the applicant, architect and adjacent property owner (Mrs. Robinson), had met with the Site and Architectural Review Committee this morning. He noted that after a lengthy discussion, the Committee recommended approval of this project as proposed; all the concerns seemed to have been resolved. Mrs. Robinson expressed interest in placing solar panels on her property, and had concerns about the effect of this project on her property and proposed solar heating units. It was the Architectural Advisor's opinion that the solar heating units not be placed on the garage, but either on or adjacent to the house. He then noted that both the applicant and Mrs. Robinson are in the audience this evening. Mr. Kee stated that the front yard setback is now 25' and that the proposed side yard setback is now 5', which means a total of 15' from the proposed structure to Mrs. Robinson's home. He stated that staff is also recommending approval. Commissioner Fairbanks inquired if this means that the concerns of the adjacent property owner have been resolved. Mr. Kee stated that as of this morning's meeting there seemed to be a general agreement. Commissioner Dickson stated for the record that Mrs. Robinson had called him last evening to discuss this matter; he advised her to attend the Site and Architectural Review Committee meeting this morning in order that her concerns could be discussed. Mr. Peepari, architect for the project, appeared to state that he had spent two hours this afternoon after the Site meeting discussing this matter with a solar heating consultant. He showed the plans to the consultant, and the consultant felt there would not be a problem. Mrs. Robinson appeared before the Commission to report that her solar heating installation people feel that 5' will not be sufficient. Commissioner Kotowski expressed concern about the difference of opinion from the solar heating consultants, and wondered if the Commission should ask for reports from each. Commissioner Meyer stated at this morning's Site meeting the Architectural Advisor felt that a western exposure would not be necessary for any length of time during the day; he also stated the solar panels would be better placed on the home rather than on~the garage. Mr. Joseph Gemma, property owner, stated that the garage is not the only structure that could be used for solar heating.. He asked fora favorable decision on this project. Engineering h1anager Helms then reported on the traffic in the area and the impact of this development on the area. He noted the traffic accident experience for this intersection is quite low; two accidents in 1978, one in 1979 and one in 1980. He noted that the posted traffic speed limit is 35 m.p.h. on Bascom and the cars travel very close to that posted speed. He noted the overall impact of this development would be no more than what exists j for the area on Bascom between Hamilton and Dry Creek. Motion Commissioner Kotowski then moved that the Planning Commission approve S 80-28 subject to the conditions listed in the Staff Comment Sheet with the added condition that the Landscape Plan be approved by the Site and Architectural Review Committee, and acknowledging the Traffic Report made by Engineering Manager Helms. This motion was seconded by Commissioner Pack. Commissioner Dickson felt that the progress made thus far by the developers is notable, however he felt that it might be better arranged in order-that it would have less of an impact on the residential area; particularly where there is residential next to commercial. Commissioner Fairbanks spuke against the motion; she noted her concerns regarding commercial next to residential, and felt there should be at least 10 feet from the proposed structure to the property line. Commissioner Campos also spoke against the motion. He felt the developers could resolve some of the concerns expressed this evening. He felt the developer should do everything possible to accommodate the single-family residence. After considerable discussion, Commissioner Pack withdrew her second to Commissioner Kotowski's motion for approval of S 80-28. Commissioner Kotowski's motion for approval failed because of a lack of a second. At this time it was asked of the applicant if he desired a continuance or a decision this evening on this project. Mr. Kee also noted that this application has been before the Commission since November. He stated the applicant would have the right to appeal the decision of the Planning Commission,within 10 days of any action taken,_ to the City Co~mcil. Mr. Peepari felt that various alternatives had been looked into; he felt that this project should not be denied. Mr. Gemma, property owner, asked fora decision of the Planning Commission this evening, noting he could consider an appeal to~the Council should this be denied. Once again, Commissioner Kotowski moved that S 80-28 be approved, as previously conditioned. This motion died for lack of a second. Commissioner Dickson then moved for denial of S 80-28, based on the discussion this evening relating to this application, seconded by Commissioner Fairbanks, and adopted by the following roll call vote: AYES: Commissioners: Pack, Campos, Dickson, Fairbanks NOES: Commissioners: Kotowski, Meyer ABSENT: Commissioners: Kasolas Commissioner Kotowski expressed concern about commercial property abutting residential property; he felt the decision on this matter was not really fair and there should possibly be some guidelines for developers to follow. *** S 81-04 Application of Mr. Fred Santacroce for approval of Santacroce., F. plans and elevations to allow construction of a 2,654 square foot office building on property known as 1845 S. Idinchester Blvd. in a C-1-S (Commercial) Zoning District. Commissioner Kotowski reported that the applicant had met with the Site and Architectural Review Committee this morning and the Committee is recommending a continuance in order that the applicant could submit revised plans. The applicant is in agreement with a continuance. Mr. Kee stated that staff is also recommending a continuance. Commissioner Fairbanks then moved that S 81-04 be continued to the Planning Commission meeting of March 3, 1981, seconded by Commissioner Kotowski and unanimously adopted. S 81-05 Application of Mr. Jack Nelson for approval of Nelson, J. plans and elevations to allow construction of a 10,422 square foot warehouse/office building to be located on property known as 1320 Whiteoaks Road in an M-1-S (Industrial) Zoning District. Commissioner Kotowski reported that the applicant had met with the Site and Architectural Review Committee this morning, and the Architectural Advisor had concerns about the roof line being carried around the building, and treatment of walls in the back. .The applicant is in concurrence with a recommendation of a continuance to the next meeting from the Site and Architectural Review Committee. Conxnissioner Fairbanks then moved that S 81-05 be continued to the Planning Commission meeting of February 17, 1981, seconded by Commissioner Pack and unanimously adopted. At this time Commissioner Fairbanks suggested that plans for items recommended for continuance also be displayed for the Commission's review since after looking at the plans the Commission may have some recommendations before revised plan are submitted. *** PUBLIC HEARINGS ZC 81-03 This is the time and place fora continued Leigh 80-5 public hearing to consider the establishment of zoning for an area annexed to the City of Campbell under proceedings known as Leigh 80-5. P-1r. Kee reported that the annexation of the area known as Leigh 1980-5 to the City of Campbell was recently approved by the Board of Supervisors. This annexation became effective on December 31, 1980. Due to time constraints, however, the area was not prezoned. At this time, staff is recommending that the area be zoned in accordance with the Land Use Element of the General Plan, with the exception of approximately 4 lots fronting to Bascom Avenue which are proposed for C-2-S (General Commercial)., the area is proposed to be zoned R 1 (Single Family Residential). Chairman P~eyer opened the public hearing and invited anyone in the audience to speak for or against this item. Mr. Herb Weinman of 1059 Arroyo Seco Drive expressed concern about R-1 zoning for his property, when in fact it has a fourplex built on it. He wondered if the area which has been developed as fourplexes or duplexes could remain as such rather than being zoned R-1. He noted for insurance purposes if afire should destroy the fourplex it would not be able to be reconstructed in an R-1 Zoning District. Mr. Kee stated that Staff could come back to the Planning Commission with a General Plan change in order to accommodate the current uses along Arroyo Seco. He noted that a study could be made of the current County Zoning then a report could come back to the Planning Commission with a recommendation; the Commission may want to apply the R-3 Zoning. Mr. Ben Margherone of 1160 Arroyo Seco Drive appeared to report that the traffic conditions on Arroyo Seco have been very congested; buses have been using the street as a thoroughfare. No one else wishing to speak, Commissioner Pack moved that the public hearing be closed, seconded by Commissioner Dickson and unanimously adopted. RESOLUTION N0. 1962 Commissioner Pack moved that the Planning Commission adopt Resolution No. 1962 recommending establishing zoning for the area known as Leigh 80-5, and that staff study the areas that are now developed in that area at a higher density than R-1 for the purpose of zoning those properties to be compatible with existing developments. This motion was seconded by Commissioner Kotowski and adopted by the following roll call vote: AYES: Commissioners: Pack, Kotowski, Campos, Dickson, Fairbanks, Meyer NOES: Commissioners: None ASSENT: Commissioners: Kasolas *** ZC 81-04 This is the time and place for a public hearing to Dover 80-6 consider the establishment of prezoning for an area proposed for annexation to the City of Campbell under proceedings known as Dover 80-6. Mr. Kee reported that the City's application for annexation of the area known as Dover 1980-6 to the City of Campbell was recently submitted to the Local Agency Formation Commission. LAFCO will consider the City's application on February 4, 1981. One standard requirement of LAFCO is that the area be prezoned. At this time, staff is recommending that the area be prezoned in accordance with the Land Use Element of the General Plan. Chairman Meyer opened the public hearing and invited anyone in the audience to speak for or against this item. Mr. John Vokman, property owner of 1800 Hamilton Avenue appeared to speak in favor of this prezoning. He noted that he intends to demolish the single- family residence at the corner of Hamilton and Hurst in order to provide for additional parking which will be needed when further improvements are made to the professional office building. At this time the Chair asked Mr. Kee what the procedure would be for applicants who have made application with the County. Mr. Kee stated that the applicants should proceed with obtaining approval through the County. Mr. Paul Jordano of 1830 Hamilton Avenue appeared to speak in favor of this prezoning. Ms. Joanne Auerbach of 1992 Montemar Way, San Jose, appeared to inquire about setbacks in Campbell vs. the County. She noted she would be in favor of this prezoning. Mr. Kee explained the setback requirements in Campbell, noting if she had any further questions she could contact the Planning Staff at any time. No one else wishing to speak, Commissioner Kotowski moved that the public hearing be closed, seconded by Commissioner Pack and unanimously adopted. RESOLUTION N0. 1973 Commissioner Pack moved that the Planning Commission adopt Resolution No. 1973 recommending establishing zoning for the area known as Dover 80-6, ZC 81-04, and that Staff study the areas that are now developed in that area at a higher density than R-1 for the purpose of zoning those properties to be compatible with existing developments. This motion was seconded by Commissioner Kotowski and adopted by the following roll call vote: AYES: Commissioners: Pack, Kotowski, Campos, Dickson, Fairbanks,_Meyer NOES: Commissioners: None ABSENT: Commissioners: Kasolas ~** UP 81-03 This is the time and place for a public hearing to Gamble, T. consider the application of Mr. Thom Gamble for a use permit to convert an existing residence and beauty shop to offices and approval of plans and elevations for property known as 565 E. Campbell Avenue in a C-2-S (Commercial) Zoning District. Commissioner Kotowski reported that the applicant had met with the Site and Architectural Review Committee this morning, and the Committee after discussion, is recommending approval subject to rewording of Condition No. 1 to read "Revised elevations and/or site plans indicating a reduction of 265 square feet in office floor area to be approved by the Planning Director upon recorrnnendation of the Architectural Advisor, within 30 days of Planning Commission, approval" and an added condition which would state: "Applicant to submit a letter, satisfactory to the City Attorney limiting the use of the property to 265 square feet of storage space, and 1,235 square feet of office space." P•1r. Kee noted that Staff is in agreement with the conditions as recommended. He further noted that the Architectural Advisor made the statement that "... the remodel is outstanding and very well done." Chairman Meyer opened the public hearing and invited «nyone in the audience to speak for or against this item. Mr. Thom Gamble, applicant, appeared before the Commission to state that he is in agreement with the Committee's recommendation and asked that the Commission render a favorable decision on this matter. Commissioner Pack expressed concern about the area designated for storage remaining storage. Mr. Gamble assured Commissioner Pack that because of the location of this area it would not be conducive to any other use. No one else wishing to speak, Commissioner Kotowski moved that the public hearing be closed, seconded by Commissioner Campos and unanimously adopted. RESOLUTION N0. 1974 Commissioner Kotowski moved that the Planning Commission adopt Resolution No. 1974 approving the application of Mr. Thom Gamble fora use permit to convert an existing residence and beauty shop to offices and approval of plans and elevations for property known as 565 E. Campbell Avenue, with the revised Condition No. 1 as recommended by the Site and Architectural Review Committee and an added condition requesting that the applicant submit a letter limiting the use of the property. This motion was seconded by Commissioner Pack and adopted by the following roll call vote: AYES: Commissioners: Pack, Kotowski, Campos, Dickson, Fairbanks, Meyer NOES: Commissioners: None ABSENT: Commissioners: Kasolas UP 81-02 This is the time and place for a public hearing Arias, W. to consider the application of Mr. William Arias for a use permit to allow the establishment of an on-sale beer and wine eating place for property known as 1875 S. Bascom Avenue, #114 in a C-2-S (Commercial) Zoning District. Mr. Kee reported that the applicant is applying fora use permit to allow the sale of beer and wine in the existing Bumbleberry Restaurant which is located in the Pruneyard Shopping Center. No interior or exterior modifications will be made to the structure. He further noted that the City Council, in August 1980, amended Chapter 21.22 (C-1), 21.24 (C-2) and 21.26 (C-3) of the Campbell Municipal Code so as to require a use permit for any establishment selling liquor in these commercial zones. Thus, this matter is before the Commission at this time. The Police Department is of the opinion that the use seems appropriate and the Fire Department is requiring that a Permit to Operate a Place of Assembly 50-300" shall be obtained from their office, thus Condition No. 1. -y- Chairman Meyer opened the public hearing and invited anyone in the audience to speak for or against this item. Ms. Terrie Priddy, Manager of the Bumbleberry, inquired as to when the restaurant could start serving alcoholic beverages. Mr. Kee indicated there would be a 10-day waiting period before alcoholic beverages could be served, roughly February 13, 1981. No one else wishing to speak, Commissioner Pack moved that the public hearing be closed, seconded by Commissioner Kotowski and unanimously adopted. RESOLUTION NO. 1975 Commissioner Pack moved that the Planning Commission adopt Resolution No. 1975 approving UP 81-02 subject to the conditions listed in the Staff Comment Sheet, seconded by Commissioner Campos and adopted by the following roll call vote: AYES: Commissioners: Pack, Kotowski, Campos, Fairbanks, Kasolas NOES: Commissioners: None ABSENT: Commissioners: Kasolas ABSTAIN: Commissioners: Dickson Commissioner Dickson noted his reason for abstaining on this application is that he is morally opposed to this type of use. *** GP 81-04 This is the time and place fora continued City- City-initiated initiated public hearing to consider the Land Use Element of the General Plan. Mr.Stafford reported that over the past three years or so, there have been several amendments to the Land Use Element of the General Plan approved by the City Council. Staff has attempted to keep the Land Use Element map up to date, but has only recently had the staff necessary to prepare an updated map. This map represents the most recent policy decisions of the City Council. It seems important to the Staff that the map that has recently been updated be established at an early date as the current version of this important element of the General Plan. It also seems important to identify and schedule for specific study and hearings, any areas which the Planning Commission determines in need of further study. He then made reference to the twenty areas that changes have been made in. Commissioner Kotowski expressed concern about the change of area No. 6; he felt that Medium Density Residential is not the best use for this property. Chairman Meyer opened the public hearing and invited anyone in the audience to speak for or against this item. No one wishing to speak, Commissioner Campos moved that the public hearing be closed, seconded by Commissioner Kotowski and unanimously adopted. Much discussion then ensued regarding areas of particular interest to some of the Commissioners. Mr. Kee stated that if the Commission should desire that a certain area be considered, they could indicate that to staff, and staff could start the mechanics of considering that area. He also noted any public hearings could be held in specific areas in order that the property owners would be encouraged to attend should the location of the meeting be closer to their homes than City Hall. He noted any areas of concern could be scheduled for hearing at the next General Plan hearing date. RESOLUTION N0. 1976 Commissioner Campos moved that the Planning Commission adopt Resolution No. 1976 recommending approval of the new map of the Land Use Element of the General Plan, seconded by Commissioner Dickson and adopted by the following roll call vote: AYES: Commissioners: Pack, Kotowski, Campos, Dickson, Fairbanks, Meyer NOES: Commissioners: None ABSENT: Commissioners: Kasolas *** At this time it was the consensus of the Commission that items No. 14 and 15 be considered next since there were persons in the audience waiting to hear the outcome on thPSe items. 1~ISCELLANEOUS TS 80-22 Tentative Subdivision Piap: Lands of Billmaier Lands of APN 413-25-81 (60 Shelley Avenue). Billmaier Commissioner Pack moved that the Planning Commission find the proposed Tentative Subdivision Map in accord with the General Plan and recommend that the City Council approve this map subject to the conditions listed in the Staff Comment Sheet, seconded by Commissioner Kotowski and unani- mously adopted. *** S 79-44 Request for an extension of approval by Per. Jung, J. Jim Jung for an office building on property known as 2006 S. 4inchester Blvd. Commissioner Pack moved that the Planning Commission grant the applicant a one-year extension of approval for S 79-44 subject to the previous conditions of approval, seconded by Commissioner Kotowski and unanimously adopted. At this time Commissioner Fairbanks reported seeing a sink on top of the building nowlocated at 2006 S. Winchester and wondered if this could be brought to the attention of the property owner since it is an eyesore, and this is one of the major intersections in Campbell. t~1r. Kee reported that staff would investigate this problem. *** PUBLIC HEARINGS EIR 81-01 This is the time and place fora public hearing to City of Campbell consider a Draft Environmental Impact Report which has been prepared for a proposed fire station to be located at 125 S. Union Avenue in a P-D (Planned Development/High Density Residential) Zoning District. At this time Commissioner Pack announced that she would be abstaining on Items No. 11 and 12 due to a possible conflict of interest; she left the Council Chambers at 10:20 p.m. Mr. Stafford reported that the City has acquired a parcel of land at the southwest corner of the intersection of Union Avenue and Duncanville Court. The City's stated intent is to construct and operate a fire station at this location. Once specific site plans were prepared for the proposed fire station, the City engaged the services of George S. Nolte and Associates to prepare a focused EIR for the project. As stated in the request for proposals, the City staff indicated the main areas of concern as being noise, traffic circulation and congestion, and the impact of afire station on a residential neighborhood-- including its possible effect on property values. On December 29, 1980 the consultant provided the City with copies of the Draft EIR. These copies were subsequently submitted to the Resources Agency of the State of California and to the Association of Bay Area Governments (ABAG) for review and comment. In addition, the Draft was sent to the Campbell Fire Department for its comments. Staff has reviewed the Draft EIR and is satisfied that it meets the primary concerns of the Planning Department with regard to this project. Under the new State guidelines an EIR need not address every environmental concern, but only those which are agreed upon as being most likely to be affected by the proposed project. He noted, finally, that staff is recommending that the Draft EIR be certified as complete, and the information contained therein be used in reviewing the proposed project and in mitigating the adverse environmental impacts specified in the report. Mr. Stafford then stated that on Page 22, paragraph 6, line 2 the EIR reads "Bracebridge Court"; it should have read "Duncanville Court." Chairman Meyer then opened the public hearing and invited anyone in the audience to speak for or against this item. ~4r. Bob Zelick of 175 Duncanville Court inquired about parking along Duncan- ville. He noted that there is currently a parking problem and expressed concern about parking problems. Mr. Kee stated that the Zoning Code is set up to handle off-street parking. Engineering Manager Helms stated that staff will be recommending to the City Council that all on-street parking be removed along Union Avenue. Mr. Fred Plusser of George Nolte & Associates appeared before the Commission to state he would be happy to address any concerns the Commission might have regarding the EIR. _ A representative of the Windsor Homeowners' Group appeared before the Commission to also express concerns about parking. He noted that he also has safety concerns for children on the street. He inquired about the timing of the improvement of Union Avenue and wondered about the intersection of Campbell and Union Avenue. Engineering P~anager Helms then made a presentation on the improvement of Union Avenue; he noted that Union Avenue is proposed to be improved, but not widened. It is planned to be ultimately 40' from curb to curb, however it will be recommended to the City Council that on-street parking not be allowed. It is planned to have two moving lanes, plus a continuous two-way, left-turn lane down the center from Campbell Avenue to Bascom Avenue. He further reported that a traffic signal is proposed for Duncanville and Union Avenue which will be hard-wired to the Campbell Avenue intersection. Fire Chief Mchlullen then appeared before the Commission. He reported that there will be two engines, one ladder truck, and one staff car located at the new station; there will be 8 staff people at the site. Commissioner Dickson inquired of Engineering Manager Helms when the peak traffic hours occur. Engineering Manager Helms stated that the northbound a.m. peak hour is between 7:30 and 8:30; the southbound p.m. peak hour is 4:30 - 5:30. Mr. Jeff Glick of 712 Duncanville Court expressed a desire to review the EIR. Commissioner Kotowski gave P4r. Glick a copy of the EIR. No one else wishing to speak, Commissioner Campos moved that the public hearing be clgsed, seconded by Commissioner Dickson and unanimously adopted. RESOLUTION PLO. 1977 Commissioner Dickson moved that the Planning Commission adopt Resolution No. 1977 certifying the Draft EIR as complete for 125 S. Union Avenue and that mitigating measures contained therein be used in reviewing the development plans for the proposed project. This motion was seconded by Commissioner Kotowski and adopted by the following roll call vote: AYES: Commissioners: Kotowski, Campos, Dickson, Fairbanks, Meyer NOES: Commissioners: None ABSENT: Commissioners: Pack, Kasolas *** PD 80-08 This is the time and place for a public hearing to City of Campbell consider the application of the City of Campbell fora planned development permit and approval of plans, elevations and development schedule to allow construction of a fire station on property known as 125 S. Union Avenue in a P-D (Planned Development/High Density Residential) Zoning District. Commissioner Kotowski reported that the Site and Architectural Review Committee reviewed the plans this morning and the Committee is recommending approval of this application, with the added conditions that the landscape plan be approved by the Site and Architectural Review Committee. Chairman Meyer opened the public hearing and invited anyone in the audience to speak for or against this application. Mr. Marvin Bamburg, architect for the project, appeared before the Commission to explain the site layout and review the plans with the Commission. Fire Chief McMullen appeared before the Commission to answer any questions the Commission might have. He also introduced Fire Engineer Jack Christian who was also present to respond to any questions the Commission might have. No one wishing to speak, Commissioner Kotowski moved that the public hearing be closed, seconded by Commissioner Dickson and unanimously adopted. RESOLUTION NO. 1978 Commissioner Dickson moved that the Planning Commission adopt Resolution PJo. 1978 recommending approval of a planned development permit and approval of plans, elevations and development schedule to allow construction of a fire station on property known as 125 S. Union Avenue in a P-D (Planned Development/High Density Residential) Zoning District, with the added condition that the landscape plans come back to the Site and Architectural Review Committee for approval. This motion was second- ed by Commissioner Kotowski and adopted by the follow- ing roll call vote: AYES: Commissioners: Kotows!i, Campos, Dickson, Fairbanks, Meyer NOES: Commissioners: None ABSENT: Commissioners: Pack, Kasolas Commissioner Pack re-entered the Council Chambers at 11:18 p.m. *** MISCELLANEOUS Staff Report Motion Condominium Conversion Ordinance After brief discussion Commissioner Pack moved that the Planning Commission recommend that the City Council direct the Planning Commission to initiate a a text amendment which would include the condominium conversion ordinance as part of the Zoning Ordinance. This motion was seconded by Commissioner Kotowski. Discussion of Motion Commissioner Dickson expressed opposition to this recommended ordinance, stating he did not feel the P-D zoning should be used in this way, and he did not feel an ordinance should be used for controlling the number of rental units. Commission Fairbanks also spoke against this resolution. Vote on Motion AYES: Commissioners: Pack, Kotowski, Campos, Meyer NOES: Commissioners: Dickson, Fairbanks ABSENT: Commissioners: Kasolas Appointments to Planning Commission Committees for 1981. Vice Chairman Meyer noted that this item should be tabled to the next Planning Commission meeting in order that the Chairman could be present. ADJOURNMENT Commissioner Fairbanks moved that the meeting be adjourned, seconded by Commission Dickson, and unanimously adopted. The meeting adjourned at 11:26 p.m. APPROVED: Jane P. Meyer Vice Chairman ATTEST: Arthur A. Kee Secretary RECORDED: Jeannine 4Jade Recording Secretary