PC Min 11/04/1980PLANNING COMMISSION
CITY OF CAMPBELL, CALIFORNIA
TUESDAY, 7:30 P.P1. MINUTES NOVEMBER 4, 1980
The Planning Commission of the City of Campbell convened this day in regular
session in the regular meeting place, the Council Chambers of the City Hall,
75 North Central Avenue, Campbell, California.
ROLL CALL
Present Commissioners: Pack, Dickson, Meyer, Kasolas,
Kotowski, Fairbanks, Chairman Campos; Planning
Director Arthur A. Kee, Principal Planner
Philip J. Stafford, Engineering Manager Bill
Helms, City Attorney J. Robert Dempster,
Recording Secretary Jeannine Nlade.
Absent
APPROVAL OF MINUTES
October 21, 1980
None.
Commissioner Meyer moved that the minutes of
the regular Planning Commission meeting of
October 21, 1980 be approved as submitted,
seconded by Commissioner Pack and adopted
with Commissioner Kotoa~ski abstaining since
he was not in attendance at that meeting.
COMh1UNICATIONS
Mr. Kee reported that communications received relate to specific items
on the agenda and would be considered at that time.
CONSENT CALENDAR
Commissioner Dickson requested that PD 78-19, Brondon Corporation, be
removed from the Consent Calendar.
Commissioner Dickson then inquired of Mr. Kee if, under TS 80-17, the
property adjacent to the proposed application should come in at some
future time would it need a separate application for consideration of
additional parking, rather than the parking for the currently approved
site automatically going with that property since the overage of parking
for this application is to accommodate the adjacent site.
Mr. Kee responded affirmatively.
Commissioner Kasolas then moved that the following items be approved under
the Consent Calendar, seconded by Commissioner Meyer and unanimously adopted:
-2-
TS 80-17 Tentative Subdivision Map: Lands of Lampe
Lands of Lampe APN 413-13-50, 51, 52, 53, 150 and 160.
Condominium Draft of Condominium Conversion Ordinance
Conversion
Ordinance
PD 78-19 Request of Brondon Corporation for reinstatement
Brondon Corporation of the development schedule for Orchard City
Plaza, located on property known as 30 South
Central Avenue.
Commissioner Dickson felt that since this is in the P-D zone the
Commission should review the plans, and therefore moved that the Planning
Commission continue this item to the Planning Commission meeting of
November 18, 1980. This motion was seconded by Commissioner Kasolas
and unanimously adopted.
AP.CHITECTURAL APPROVALS
S 80-22 Continued application of Citti Florist for
Citti Florist approval of plans and elevations to allow
construction of an office and retail building
on property known as 1603 S. Bascom Avenue
in a C-2-S (Commercial) Zoning District.
Chairman Campos noted that a communication had been received from the
applicant requesting a continuance of this item.
Recording Secretary Wade read into the record a letter from Ken Rodrigues
of Leach-Rodrigues-Shen Associates requesting a continuance of this
application to the Planning Commission meeting of November 18, 1980,
a copy of which is attached hereto and made a part of these minutes.
Commissioner Kasolas then moved that S 80-22 be continued to the
Planning Commission meeting of November 18, 1980, seconded by Commissioner
Kotowski and unanimously adopted.
S 80-24
Laguisa, J.
Commissioner Kasolas
Commissioner Fairbanl
Architectural Review
Application of Mr. Jere Laguisa for approval
of plans and elevations to construct an office
building on property known as 399 N. Third
Street in a C-1-S (Commercial) Zoning District.
reported that due to a possible conflict of interest,
<s would be making the report from the Site and
Committee on this application.
-3-
Commissioner Fairbanks reported that the Committee discussed the zoning
of the adjacent property to the west (R-1) and the possible impact of
this development on that property. It was felt that there would not
be much of an impact, and the Committee is recommending approval of
this application.
Commissioner Kasolas left the Council Chambers at 7:50 p.m.
Mr.-Kee noted that the location of the compact parking stalls has been
shifted (redlined on the plans), and other concerns brought up by the
Committee regarding alignment of the entrance for ingress and egress
have been resolved. He noted that staff is recommending approval.
Commissioner Kasolas re-entered the Council Chambers at 7:55 p.m.
Commissioner Dickson then moved that S 80-24 be approved subject to
the conditions listed in the Staff Comment Sheet (a copy of which is
attached hereto and made a part of these minutes), seconded by
Commissioner Meyer and adopted with Commissioner Kasolas abstaining
due to a possible conflict of interest.
PUBLIC HEARINGS
PD 80-06 This is the time and place fora continued
Calvary Temple public hearing to consider the application
of Rev. Lloyd Hastings on behalf of Calvary
Temple, Inc., for a planned development
permit and approval of plans, elevations,
and development schedule to construct a
day-care center and assembly hall on
property known as 202 Railway Avenue
in a P-D (Planned Development/Industrial)
Zoning District.
Mr. Kee reported that Staff has received revised plans, however they
were not received in sufficient time for Staff review. Therefore,
Staff is recommending a continuance of this application to the November 18,
1980 meeting.
Chairman Campos opened the public hearing and invited anyone in the audience
to speak on this item.
Mr. William F. Jennings of 219 Dillon Avenue inquired if the Commission
had received his letters.
Mr. Kee explained that the Commission had received Mr. Jennings' letters
at its meeting of October 21; however, he noted that the letters would
again be available for the Commission at the November 18 meeting for
further consideration.
No one else wishing to speak, Commissioner Pack moved that the Planning
Commission continue PD 80-06 to the November 18 meeting, seconded by
Commissioner Meyer and unanimously adopted.
-4-
UP 80-27 This is the time and place for a continued
Smithson, R. G. public hearing to consider the application
of R. G. Smithson, Inc., for a use permit
and approval of plans and elevations to allow
construction of two automobile related
structures on property known as 2885 S.
Winchester Boulevard in an Interim (Commercial)
Zoning District.
Commissioner Kasolas reported that the Site and Architectural Review
Committee, after meeting with the applicant, felt that it may be appropriate
to determine the validity or continuation of a Commercial Highway use in
this area which would allow auto repair facilities. It is the
recommendation of the Committee that Staff prepare documentation as to
where the Commercial Highway designation is used in the City and how much vacant
land is still left within this zoning. He noted that there were also questions
raised regarding the layout of this project.
Commissioner Pack inquired if there could be some restriction on auto service
type facilities along Winchester Boulevard, similar to the type of implementa-
tion used to restrict service stations and liquor stores in the past.
Chairman Campos opened the public hearing and invited anyone in the audience
to speak for or against this item.
No one wishing to speak, Commissioner Meyer moved that UP 80-27 be continued
to the meeting of November 18, 1980 in accord with the Site and Architectural
Review Committee's recommendation. This motion was seconded by Commissioner
Pack and unanimously adopted.
ZC 80-12 This is the time and place fora continued
Schwenke, B. public hearing to consider the application
of Mr. Bob Schwenke on behalf of Woodgate
Development Company for: (1) a zone change
from R-2-S (Multiple Family Residential) to
P-D (Planned Development/Medium Density
Residential); and (2) approval of plans,
elevations, and development schedule to
construct 18 condominiums on property
known as 252 and 268 W. Rincon Avenue.
Commissioner Kasolas reported that this application had been reviewed
by the Site and Architectural Review Committee this morning. He noted
that the Architectural Advisor has recommended approval of this application,
however there seems to be a split vote on the recommendation of the
Committee. He noted that the concerns expressed as regards rear eleva-
tions, windows, decks, and sliding glass doors and their interference
with privacy upon adjacent neighbors to the rear had been resolved to the
satisfaction of the Advisor. He further noted that the Advisor has
recommended eye-level windows on the second floors to allow light into
the proposed units. Commissioner Kasolas then stated that he is recommending
approval of this application subject to Conditions Nos. 3 and 4 to include
the wording ". for approval of the Site and Architectural Review
Committee."
Commissioner Fairbanks reported she felt that the deck and window situation
as regards privacy for the R-1 development to the rear of the site was not
-5-
addressed. She did not feel that a 5'-4" deck is sufficient. She noted
that landscaping would help the situation, however there is no guarantee
that it would always be there.
Chairman Campos opened the public hearing and invited anyone in the audience
to speak for or against this item.
Mr. Bob Schwenke, applicant, appeared before the Commission to report
that the property owner to the rear of this site is planning to install
a swimming pool. and is therefore concerned about privacy. He stated
that he would propose an 8' high fence at the rear property line in order
to insure as much privacy as possible at the rear yard. He further noted
that landscaping would also be used to insure privacy.
No one else wishing to speak, Commissioner Meyer moved that the public
hearing be closed, seconded by Commissioner Kotowski and unanimously adopted.
Commissioner Dickson spoke against approval of this development, noting
the over-use of the P-D zoning. He felt that after projects such as the
one proposed are constructed they look too dense. He also noted the
construction of an 8' fence at the rear property line would give the
appearance. of being enclosed--it is more for the private residence behind
this development.
RESOLUTION N0. 1943 Commissioner Kasolas moved that the Planning
Commission adopt Resolution No. 1943 recommending
that the City Council adopt an ordinance approving
a zone change from R-2-S (Multiple Family
Residential) to P-D (Planned Development/Medium
Density Residential) for property known as 252
and 268 W. Rincon Avenue, seconded by Commissioner
Meyer and adopted by the following roll call vote:
AYES: Commissioners: Pack, Meyer, Kasolas, Kotowski, Campos
NOES: Commissioners: Dickson, Fairbanks
ABSENT: Commissioners: None
RESOLUTION N0. 1944 Commissioner Kasolas moved that the Planning
Commission adopt Resolution No. 1944 recommending
that the City Council adopt an ordinance approving
plans, elevations, and development schedule to
construct 18 condominiums on property known as
252 and 268 W. Rincon Avenue subject to the conditions
listed in the Staff Comment Sheet with Revised
Conditions Nos. 3 and 4 to include ". for
approval of the Site and Architectural Review
Committee. .", seconded by Commissioner Meyer
and adopted by the following roll call vote:
AYES: Commissioners: Pack, Meyer, Kasolas, Kotowski, Campos
NOES: Commissioners: Dickson, Fairbanks
ABSENT: Commissioners: None
-6-
Commissioner Pack expressed concern about Rincon Avenue. She noted that
as a result of the developments approved along Rincon Avenue there will
be more and more complaints about traffic. She felt perhaps stricter
guidelines should be considered for the remainder of the undeveloped
properties along Rincon; possibly a change of zoning or not allowing
any more P-D zoning in this area.
At this time the Chair requested that Staff come back with a report
for possible solutions in response to Commissioner Pack's concerns.
It was requested that included in this report should be a comparison
of Rose Villas IV on Rincon with other developments approved during the
last year regarding density; and a recommendation from Staff on how
growth can be controlled along Rincon Avenue.
The Chair then requested that Staff also prepare an informational report
on the intent of the P-D Zoning--what the P-D zoning was actually intended
for.
The Commission took a break at 8:40 p.m.; the meeting reconvened at 9:02 p.m.
MISCELLANEOUS
Staff Report Continued report from the San Tomas Area Study
San Tomas Committee.
Area Study
Committee
Mr. Kee reviewed the background on this item for the Commission.
Mr. Helms reported that the San Tomas Area Committee, along with the
Planning Commission, reviewed this resolution at its last meeting.
Commissioner Dickson inquired if this resolution would apply City-wide.
Mr. Kee responded affirmatively.
Commissioner Kasolas felt the word "would" in both paragraphs 2 and 3
should read "may".
Mr. Helms stated that there would not be a problem with a change of
wording.
Commissioner Pack then moved that the Planning Commission recommend that
the City Council adopt the resolution attached to the Staff Comment Sheet
with a change of the word "would" to read "may" in the first line of both
paragraphs 2 and 3, seconded by Commissioner Fairbanks, and unanimously
adopted.
-7-
Referral from Referral from the City Council regarding residential
City Council developments in which an existing residence is
proposed to remain.
Mr. Kee reported that this proposed policy was considered by the City Council
at its meeting of September 22, 1980. At that time, the Council expressed
concern over the fact that the proposed policy would allow the existing
structure to be incorporated in a condominium development with the same
area allocated to it as for the new units. It was the opinion of the
Council that at least 6,000 square feet of land should be allocated to the
existing structure regardless of whether it was to be parceled off or
incorporated in a condominium development. Based on this concern, Staff
is recommending that the policy statement attached to the Staff Comment
Sheet be adopted.
After a short discussion and Mr. Kee's review of past meetings held by
the Commission on this subject, Commissioner Kasolas moved that the
Planning Commission adopt the following resolution to be forwarded to
the City Council for ratification:
RESOLUTION N0. 1945 Commissioner Kasolas moved that the Planning
Commission adopt Resolution No. 1945 requiring
a minimum of 6,000 square feet allocation for
an existing structure on a lot proposed for
development, and the balance of the property
may be considered for development a t the
density allowed by the Zoning Ordinance and/or
Land Use Element of the General Plan. This
motion was seconded by Commissioner Pack and
adopted by the following roll call vote:
AYES: Commissioners: Pack, Dickson, Meyer, Kasolas, Kotowski, Campos
NOES: Commissioners: Fairbanks
ABSENT: Commissioners: None
Commissioner Fairbanks noted for the record that her reasons for voting
"no" are as follows: (1) there may be a residence that doesn't need
6,000 square feet, and (2) she believes this will encourage demolition
of possibly good housing.
Items Brought up by Commissioners
Commissioner Dickson reported on his recent trip to Los Angeles for the
League of California Cities Conference.
-8-
ADJOURNMENT
Commissioner Dickson moved that the meeting
be adjourned, seconded by Commissioner P1eyer
and unanimously adopted.
The meeting adjourned at 9:26 p.m.
APPROVED: Daniel Campos
Chairman
ATTEST: Arthur A. Kee
Secretary
RECORDED: Jeannine !rlade
Recording Secretary