Loading...
PC Min 08/19/1980PLANNING COMMISSION CITY OF CAMPBELL, CALIFORNIA TUESDAY, 7:30 P.M. MINUTES AUGUST 19, 1980 The Planning Commission of the City of Campbell convened this day in regular session in the regular meeting place, the Council Chambers of the City Hall, 75 North Central Avenue, Campbell, California. ROLL CALL Present Commissioners: Pack, Dickson, Meyer, Kasolas (7:45 p.m.), Kotowski, Fairbanks, Chairman Campos; Planning Director Arthur A. Kee, Principal Planner Philip J. Stafford, Engineering Manager Bill Helms, City Attorney J. Robert Gempster, Recording Secretary Jeannine Wade. Absent None APPROVAL OF MINUTES August 5, 1980 Commiss-iorner Fairbanks noted that the Minutes are dated August 7 and they should read August 5. Commissioner Meyer then moved that the Minutes of August 5, 1980 be approved as corrected, seconded by Comunissioner Kotowski and adopted with Commissioner Fairbanks abstaining since she was not present at that meeting. COMMUNICATIONS Mr. Kee. reported that communications received relate to specific items on the agenda and would be discussed at that time. ARCHITECTURAL APPROVALS S80-20 Application of Mr. Fred Schneider for approval of Schneider, F. plans and elevations to expand an exi-sting building located on Property known as 1825 S. Winchester Blvd. in a C-3-S (Central BGsiness District/Commercial) Zcning District. Commissioner Kotowski reported that the applicant had met with the Site and Architectural Review Committee this morning. He noted that Staff is recom- mending denial of this application as presented since adequate parking is not provided. He further reported that the Committee is recommending a two-month -2- continuance of this item, at the applicant's request, in order that the appli- cant would have time to resolve the p~xrkinq problems. Commissioner Pack inquired of Public Works if there were plans to do anything about the jog in Winchester Boulevard near this property. Engineering Manager Helms responded that the jog in the street occurs south of the subject property. He noted that construction funds are available for the construction of the street; howeve-^, it is the City's intention to pur- chase the properties along the westerly portion and funds are rot yet avail- able for acquisition of these parcels. Commissioner Pack then expressed concern about the traffic at the location and felt that this should be watched closely. Commissioner Kasolas entered the Council Chambers at 7:45 p.m. Commissioner Kotowski then moved that the Planning Commission continue S80-20 to the Planning Commission meeting of October 21, 1980, seconded by Commissioner Pack and unanimously adopted. PUBLIC HEARINGS UP 80-18 This is the time and place for a City-initiated public City of Campbell hearing to consider a use permit for uses which are com- patible with the semi-public character of the P-F (Public Facilities) Zoning District for the Campbell High School site, 1 West Campbell Avenue. Mr. Kee reported that the City Council recently concluded its negotiations with the Campbell Union High School District regarding a lease of the subject property, At the present time the City is in the process of sub-leasing the property to various agencies and organizations that have expressed a desire to utilize the school's facilities. The property is presently located in the P-F (_Public Facilities) Zoning District. He then cited Chapter 21.35 of the Campbell Municipal Code, which defines the uses allowed in this district and those that require approval of a use permit. It is the intent of this use permit to further define and clarify the types of uses that may be allowed in this district, especially with regard to the high school site. Approval of this use permit would establish the acceptability of these uses and would, in turn, enable tenants to lease space on the site without having to apply far an individual use permit. If approved, Staff is recommending that any prospective tenant wishing to lease space on the high school site receive a clearance from the Building, Fire and Planning Departments. He then cited Exhibit "B", which indicates those uses which would not be allowed by the Building Department. -3- City Attorney Dempster then reported that the Council is eager to have a blanket use permit for the two school sites on this evening's agenda in order that the sub leasing of these sites can be carried out. He noted that if there should be any problems with any of the sublessees (.onuses) these problems could come back before the Commission. He further reminded the Commission that should this use permit be approved by the Commission, Staff is recommending that prior to occupancy, each tenant shall receive clearance from the Building, .Fire and Planning Departments. Concern was expressed by the Commission as to why different requirements were set forth for the High School site than for the San Tomas site, and expressed the desire to have a Building Department representative respond to some of their concerns. Commissioner Pack expressed concern about-the Building Department's list of uses, and asked that a representative of the Building Department be present at the School Committee meeting to be held on Thursday, August 21; she also. asked that this list be available to the Committee members. It was the con- sensus of the Commission that Commissioner Pack's concerns be addressed. Concerns also expressed by the Commission included "private clubs" -- a definition thereof, and the fact that those. "private clubs" not be discrimina- tory. _~ City Attorney Dempster again urged the Commission to make a decision on this matter this evening since that would enable the.Gouncil to go ahead with leasing of the sites. After considerable further discussion, Chairman Campos opened the public hearing. No one wishing to speak, Commissioner Meyer moved that the public hearing be closed, seconded by Commissioner Pack, and unanimously adopted. RESOLUTION N0. 1921. Commissioner Pack moved that the Planning Commission adopt Resolution No. 1921 approving a use permit for uses which are compatible with the semi-public character of the P-F (Public Facilities) Zoning District subject. to the conditions listed in the Staff Comment Sheet, for the Campbell High School Site, One West Campbell Avenue, requesting that a Building Department repre- sentative be present at the High School Committee meeting to be held on Thursday, August 21, 1980, and that a copy of the Staff Comment Sheet be available to the. members of that Committee and the concerns of the Commission expressed this evening be addressed. This motion was seconded by Commissioner Kasolas and adopted by the following roil call vote: AYES: Commissioners: Pack, Dickson, Meyer, Kasolas, Kotowski, Fairbanks, Campos NOES: Commissioners: None ABSENT: Commissioners: None -4- Commissioner Dickson and Chairman Campos both expressed strong reservations about this approval noting someone from the building Department should have been present to address some of the concerns, however both voting in favor of this item because of the urgency involved. *** UP 80-19 This is .the time and place for City-initiated public City of Campbell hearing to consider a use permit for uses which are compatible with the semi-public character of the P-F (Public Facilities) Zoning District for the San Tomas School site, 1510 W. Hacienda Avenue. Mr. Kee reported that the City Council recently concluded its negotiations with the Campbell Elementary School District regarding a lease of the subject property. In addition to establishing a community center on this site, the City is in the process of sub-leasing the property to various agencies and organizations that have expressed a desire to utilize the school's facilities. It is the intent~of this use permit to further define and clarify the types of uses that may be allowed in this district, especially with regard to the school site. Approval of this use permit would establish the acceptability of these uses and would, in turn, enable tenants to lease space on the site without having to apply for an individual use permit. If approved, Staff is recommending that any prospective tenant wishing to lease space on the school site receive clearance from the Building, Fire and Planning Departments. City Attorney Dempster reiterated the Council's desires regarding approval of the use permits for both the High School site and San Tomas School, noting there are sub-lessors ready to sign leases for space at the schools. He again noted that should there be any problems, the item would be brought back before the Commission. Commissioners Pack, Dickson and Chairman Campos again expressed concern about both this use permit and approval of the use permit-for the High School site. Chairman Campos opened the public hearing and invited anyone in the audience to speak for or against this item. No one wishing to speak, Commissioner Meyer moved that the public hearing be closed, seconded by Commissioner Pack, and unanimously adopted. RESOLUTION N0. 1922 Commissioner Meyer moved that the Planning Commission adopt Resolution No. 1922 approving a use permit for uses which are compatible with the semi-public character of the P-F (,Pu61ic Facilities) Zoning District for the. San Tomas School site, 1510 W. Hacienda Avenue, subject to the conditions listed in the Staff Comment Sheet and that members of .the High School and San Tomas School Committee receive a copy of this Staff Comment -5- Sheet, and that a representative of th.e. Building Department be present at its next meeting (August 21 at 4:30 p.m.) to answer any questions, seconded by Commissioner Kotowski and adopted by the following roll call vote: AYES: Commissioners: Pack, Dickson, Meyer, Kasolas, Kotowski, Fairbanks and Campos NOES: Commissioners: None ABSENT: Commissioners: None EIR 80-1 This is the time and place for a public hearing to Babet Financial consider the Draft Environmental Impact Report which Corporation has been prepared for the project known as "Heritage Village", consisting of professional offices and 164 condominium units, located at the northeasterly corner of Winchester Boulevard and Campbell Avenue. Mr. Kee reported that the applicant is proposing to convert the old Campbell Grammar School into professional .offices, and to construct 164 condominium units on the subject property. Once the application was filed, the Planning Department advised the applicant that an EIR would be required by the City of Campbell. Pursuant to the adopted guidelines for preparing EIRs, the firm of Ruth & Going was selected to con- duct the study. A Draft EIR was submitted to the City on July 18, 1980, and was distributed to the Commissioners shortly thereafter. Staff has reviewed the Draft and is satisfied that it meets the. primary con- cerns of the Planning Department with regard to this project. Under the State guidelines, an EIR need not address every environmental concern, but only those which are agreed upon as being most likely to be affected by the proposed project. In this instance, the main areas of concern identified by the staff were traffic impacts, residential density and the sharing of parking by the residential and professional office uses in the development. Copies of the Draft have been forwarded to the Association of Bay Area Govern- ments, the Campbell Union Grammar School District, and the Architectural Advisor and other City departments for review and comment. Chairman Campos opened the public hearing and invited anyone in the audience to speak on this item. Mr. Jerry deYoung, representing Ruth & Going, appeared to answer any questions the Commission might have regarding this EIR. Mr. Dan Bryant, representing Babet Financial Corporation, appeared also to answer any questions the Commission might have. He further noted that the architects for this project are present this evening should the Commission have questions directly related to the next item on the agenda. -6- Mr. Bill Hedley, architect for the pr°ofessiorial office portion of the project, noted he is in full agreement wit~-r. the EIR as presented. Mr. Barry Shilman, of 84 N. Third Street, spoke in favor of the acceleration lane as proposed. Engineering Manager Helms stated that staff is also in support of an accelera- tion lane, and it is a condition of approval cf the next item on the agenda. No one else wishing to speak, Commissioner Kotowski moved that the public hearing be closed, seconded by Commissioner Kasolas and unanimously adopted. Commissioner Dickson inquired if any comments had been received. Mr. Kee stated no comments have been received. RESOLUTION N0. 1923 Commissioner Fairbanks moved that the Planning Commission "certify" the Draft EIR as complete, and that mitigating measures contained therein be used in reviewing the development plans for the proposed project. This motion was seconded by Commissioner Kotowski and adopted by the following roll call vote: AYES: Commissioners: Dickson, Meyer, Kasolas, Kotowski, Fairbanks and Campos NOES: Commissioners: None ABSENT: Commissioners: None ABSTAIN: Commissioners: Pack Commissioner Pack noted that she abstained due to a possible conflict of interest. The Commission took a break at 8:45 p.m.; the meeting reconvened at 9:05 p.m. PD 80-2 This is the time and place for a public hearing to Babet Financial consider the application of Mr. Daniel Bryant, on Corporation behalf of Babet Financial Corporation and W. L. Errico and Associates, Inc., for a planned development permit and approval of plans, elevations and development schedule to construct 164 condominium units and to develop an existing school building as professional offices on property known as 51 E. Campbell Avenue in a P-D (.Planned Development/Professional Office and High Density Residential) Zoning District. Mr. Kee reported that this project consists of an office complex and a condominium complex. - 7- 1. Office Complex - Campbell~Grammar School Building The "Old Campbell Grammar School" which was built in 1922, is listed in the National Register as an historic landmark. Since its designa- tion as a landmark, the City Council has changed the Land Use Element of the General Plan from "Public, Semi-Public" to "Offices or Nigh Density Residential". The proposed conversion of the Grammar School to professional offices is consistent with the Land Use Element of the General Plan. Since the projec,± involves a designated historical site, the appli- cants are not proposing any alterations to the exterior appearance of the original structure. The primary changes that are proposed consist of changes to the interior courtyard, which is proposed for extensive landscaping. The original use, of course, will be changed from "educational" to "office". The proposal calls for approximately 44,000 gross square feet of office use. According to the Zoning Ordinance, this would require 294 parking spaces at a ratio of 1:150 square feet of gross floor area. In recent years, however, the Planning Commission has been approving office developments at a ratio of 1:200. At this ratio, the proposal would require 220 spaces for office parking. Ingress and egress to the site is indicated on the site plan. The EIR, which was required for this project, requires that the follow- ing measures be required to mitigate the traffic impact of this development. Staff is recommending that these mitigating measures be required as conditions of approval: A. Modify the site plan to include a second driveway with right turns in and out along South Winchester Boulevard near the northeasterly corner of the project site. This driveway will provide relief from potential peak-hour congestion at the other driveway now proposed on South Winchester Boulevard. Redesign this driveway aisle to restrict through traffic from Third Street to Winchester Boulevard. B. Dedicate and improve the following: (1) Streetefromtthe proposed drivewayototCevWCSCenter Drive~rd (2) An acceleration (230 feet) and deceleration (180 feet) lane on the north side of East Campbell Avenue to accom- modate the professional office generated traffic. (3) One bus duckout with shelter suitable to the architectural setting and approved by the County Transit District on the east side of South Winchester Boulevard just north of East Campbell Avenue. -8- C. Provide a minimum of 53' nar~:ing stalls at the rate of one stall per 225 feet of GFA for professional office use, and 1.5 per 1 bedroom and 2.3 per two or more bedrooms for resi- dential condominium units. ReQValuate the parking supply after the effects of other mitigation measures are clearer. D. Publicize the availability of the County Transit District bus service and provide a RIDES central locater at the residential condominium development to encourage carpooling to common work destinations. 2. Condominium Complex The applicant is proposing to develop 164 condominium units on the northerly 7 acres of the subject property. The resulting density is approximately 23 units per gross acre, which is consistent with the "High Density Residential" land use which is indicated on the General Plan (21-26 units per gross acre). The plans indicate that parking for the project will be provided, in part, by underground parking. According to the Zoning Ordinance, this development would require 395 parking spaces. This number, added to the number of spaces required for the office complex, brings the total number of spaces needed for this project to 615 spaces. The total number of spaces being proposed is 559, result- ing in a "shortage" of 56 spaces. The applicant is proposing that the residential and office uses be allowed to share the parking area, thus alleviating this "shortage". Staff is of the opinion that sharing of the parking areas is an acceptable solution to parking requirements for this project since the peak demand for parking for each. use occurs at different times. Due to the fact that 200 of the parking spaces for this development are located beneath the residential units, approximately 50°6 of the project is devoted to open space or recreational uses. These uses include a man-made lake, fountains, gazebo, swimming pools, and recreation building. The residential buildings themselves are proposed to be 45' high to the ridge of the roof. Building materials are indicated as stucco with terra cotta metal roofing. The Architectural Advisor is of the opinion that the design is acceptable in general. Staff is recommending approval of this project conditions listed in the Staff Comment Sheet. conditions, particularly those regarding traff modification to the site plan .and possibly the spaces, Staff is recommending that the revised back to the Commission for approval. subject to the Since some of the ic, will require number of parking plans be brought -9- Fire Department conditions were not received prior to distribution of this agenda. The applicant should be aware that code requirements of the Fire Department will have to be met as conditions of approval. Commissioner Kasolas reported that the Site and Architectural Review Com- mittee met at length this morning regarding this project. He noted that this project is probably the second Targest project i~ Campbell, with the Pruneyard being the largest. He noted the Architectural Advisor was very pleased with the project. As much as possible of the existing landscaping will be saved. He noted that discussion had taken place regarding a tot lot and security of the condominium development. He noted that these items would probably be taken care of by the Homeowners' Association. He further noted that the applicants seemed to be in agreement with the EIR mitigating measures. Discussion ensued regarding the joint parking. At this time, it was men- tioned that since there have been changes in the number of cars owned by families, as well as the types (there being more compact cars), perhaps the Commission should look into revising the parking ordinance. Commissioner Fairbanks noted she would also like to see an~elevation coming from all sides, Winchester, Third and Campbell Avenue. Chairman Campos opened the public hearing and invited anyone in the audience to speak regarding this project. Mr. Bill Hedley, architect for the professional office portion of the project, noted that he has done several projects, such as the one proposed, with the firm of Sandy and Babcock during the last 25 years. He noted that the Grammar School will be restored to its original (historical) state. Mr. Jim Babcock, of Sandy and Babcock, reported that this project is de- signed on a "village" concept. There are five clusters of buildings on parking structures placed around an open space. Mr. Dale Ikeda of Anthony M. Guzzardo & Associates, noted the central open space is quite generous. He spoke to the maintenance of the man-made lakes, and explained the concept of the landscaping. No one else wishing to speak, Commissioner Kasolas moved that the public hear- ing be closed, seconded by Commissioner Kotowski, and unanimously adopted. Engineering Manager Helms stated that he would once again like to make the Public Works position clear. He stated .that the EIR fairly well addresses the ingress and egress to the project. In a couple of areas there is dis- cussion about the possibility of modifying some of the right turns in and right turns out to something else. He wanted to clarify the Public Works' position in this matter. Specifically for Winchester Boulevard, Public Works is requiring that if there is one opening or two, both of those would be limited to only right turns in or right turns out. On the Campbell Avenue approach, the same thing would apply. Also, something that did not -l0~ come out this morning, the most southerly driveway approach onto Third Street--it would be a Public Works requirement that the driveway be limited to right turns in and right turns out as well. Commissioner Kasolas inquired about City Policy in regard to turns off of Civic Center Drive. Engineering Manager Helms noted that the City Council has adopted an informal policy regarding access off of the loop street complex that would pertain to both Civic Center Drive and Orchard City Drive, and that is they have not allowed any driveways entering or exiting from that street with the sole ex- ception of a recent modification at the Factory complex. He noted that this proposal, and the Public Works recommendations about this proposal, would be a departure from that policy. He stated he feels it is one Public Works can support because of the peculiar circumstances of this property and the rather limited access opportunities. He further noted that comment will be for- warded on to the City Council when it is before them. RESOLUTION N0. 1924 Commissioner Kasolas moved that the Planning Commission adopt Resolution No. 1924 recommending approval of PD 80-2 subject to the conditions recommended by Staff, with revised site plans (including elevations from Winchester, Third Street and Campbell Avenue) to come back to the Planning Commission with the applicants taking into consideration the concerns expressed by the Commission this evening, i.e., revised elevations, north, south, east and west views, parking operations and plans, and with respect to recommendations of Public Works Department with regard to working out acceleration lanes and bus duckouts that they be made a part of the revised plans that the applicant would be presenting so that the matter could be reviewed in total. This motion was seconded by Commissioner Meyer. The motion was then adopted by the following roll call vote: AYES: Commissioners: Dickson, Meyer, Kasolas, Kotowski, Fairbanks, Campos NOES: Commissioners: None ABSENT: Commissioners: None ABSTAIN: Commissioners: Pack Once again Commissioner Pack noted she abstained due to a possible conflict of interest. ZC 80-9 Public hearing to consider the application of Mr. Kent Kirkorian, K. Kirkorian for: (1) a zone change from R-2-S (Multiple Family/Medium Density Residential) to P-D (Planned -ll - Development/Medium Density Residential) and, (2) approval of plans, elevations and development schedule to construct 19 townhouse units on property known as 252 and 268 W. Rincon Avenue. Mr. Kee reported that after meeting with the Site and Architectural Review Committee this morning, the applicant requested a continuance of this item to the September 2, 1980, Planning Commission meeting. Commissioner Kasolas noted that the Committee is also recommending a contin- uance of this item. Chairman Campos opened the public hearing and invited anyone in the audience to speak for or against this item. No one wishing to be heard, Commissioner Kasolas moved that ZC 80-9 be continued to the Planning Commission meeting of September 2, 1980, seconded by Commissioner Meyer, and unanimously adopted. ZC 80-10 This is the time and place for a public hearing to Kunkel, E. consider the application of Mr. Eldred Kunkel for prezoning of two parcels located at 14301 S. Bascom Avenue to R-1 (P) (Single Family Residential) and R-3 (P) (Multiple Family Residential), or P-D (P) (Planned Development) Zoning Districts. Mr. Kee reported that the applicant is requesting that the subject properties be prezoned in order to allow annexation of these properties to the City of Campbell. The properties are presently within an unincorporated area adjacent to the Campbell city limit boundary, and are also within the City of Camp- bell's sphere of influence. The site consists of two parcels, which occupy approximately 2.5 acres of land between S. Bascom Avenue and Whiteoaks Drive. The applicant intends to develop the properties with the construction of 50 condominium units and the establishment of 2 single family lots along the Whiteoaks frontage. The Land Use Element of the General Plan indicates Low Density Residential (less than 6 units per gross acre) for that portion of the property having frontage along Whiteoaks Avenue, and High Density Residential (20-27 units per gross acre) for the remainder of the property. Staff is recommending that the properties be prezoned R-1 (Single Family Residential) and R-3 (Multiple Family residential), The proposed prezoning is consistent with the General Plan. Chairman Campos opened the public hearing and invited anyone in the audience to speak for or against this item. -12- No one wishing to be heard, Commissioner Meyer moved that the public hearing be closed, seconded by Commissioner Pack, and unanimously adopted. Motion Commissioner Meyer moved that the Planning Commission adopt a resolution recommending that the subject parcels be prezoned R-1 (Single-Family Residential) and P-D (Planned Development). This motion was seconded by Commissioner Kasolas. After considerable discussion regarding the applicant's having no plans at this time before the Commission for review, Commissioner Kasolas withdrew his second and Commissioner Meyer withdrew her motion. RESOLUTION N0. 1925 Commissioner Meyer then moved that the Planning Commission adopt Resolution No. 1925 recommending that the City Council prezone the subject parcels R-1 (Single-Family Residential) and R-3 (Multiple Family Residential), in conformance with the Land Use Element of the General Plan. This motion was seconded by Commissioner Kasolas and unanimously adopted by the following roll call vote: AYES: Commissioners: Pack, Dickson, Meyer, Kasolas, Kotowski, Fairbanks, Campos NOES: Commissioners: None ABSENT: Commissioners: None MISCELLANEOUS TS 80-12 Tentative Subdivision Map: Lands of Preston Lands of Preston APN 413-25-104 Mr. Kee reported that a communication had been received from the applicant requesting that in lieu of Condition No. 12 as submitted, he be able to submit an agreement satisfactory to the City Attorney stating assurance of the removal of the structures not later than 180 days from the filing of the final map. A copy of this request is attached hereto and made a part of these minutes. City Attorney Dempster noted that the condition as requested could be granted; however, the applicant will also have to submit a cash bond. The applicant was in agreement with this. Commissioner Meyer then moved that TS 80-12 be approved subject to the con- ditions listed in the Staff Comment Sheet, with a revised Condition No. 12 as stated above. This motion was seconded by Commissioner Dickson and unanimously adopted. S 78-27 Application of Mr. Marvin A. Bamburg for a rein- Bamburg, M. statement of previously approved plans to allow the addition of 2 condominium units to an existing single- -13- family development located on property known as 236 N. Central Avenue in an R-M (Multiple Family/Low-Medium Density Residential) Zoning District. Commissioner one year, as of approval. adopted. Pack moved that the Planning Commission reinstate the plans, for requested by the applicant, subject to the previous conditions This motion was seconded by Commissioner Meyer and unanimously PD 79-13 Application of Mr. Steve Evarkiou on behalf of Bradley Kaye Mr. Bradley A. Kaye and Best Products, Inc., for Best Products a reinstatement of previously approved plans and approval of a revised development schedule to allow construction of a parking lot on property known as 399 Llewellyn Avenue in a P-D (Planned Development/ Commercial) Zoning District. Commissioner Kasolas moved that the Planning Commission recommend to the City Council reinstatement of the previously approved plans subject to all previous conditions of approval, and approval of a revised development schedule. This motion was seconded by Commissioner Kotowski and unanimously adopted. PD 79-13 Application of Mr. Steve Evarkiou on behalf of Bradley Kaye Mr. Bradley A. Kaye and Best Products, Inc. for approval Best Products of a landscaping plan for property known as 399 Llewellyn Avenue in a P-D (Planned Development/ Commercial) Zoning District. Commissioner Kasolas reported that the applicant had met with the Site and Architectural Review Committee this morning and the Committee is recommend- ing approval of the landscaping plan. Commissioner Kotowski then moved that the landscaping plan for PD 79-13 be approved as submitted, seconded by Commissioner Meyer and unanimously adopted. Staff Report Resolution expressing appreciation to Barry Ludwig, A.I.A., for services rendered to the Site and Archi- tectural Review Committee. RESOLUTION N0. 1926 At this time Commissioner Kasolas moved that the Planning Commission adopt Resolution No. 1926 expressing appreciation to Barry Ludwig, A.I.A., for services rendered to the Site and Architectural Review Committee, seconded by Commissioner Meyer and unanimously adopted by the following roll call vote: - i4- AYES: Commissioners: Pack, Dickson, Meyer, Kasolas, Kotowski, Fairbanks, Campos NOES: Commissioners: None ABSENT: Commissioners: None Staff Report Consideration regarding the appointment of an Archi- tectural Advisor. Commissioner Kotowski moved that the Planning Commission appoint James D. Baldwin as Architectural Advisor fora period of one year, seconded by Commissioner Pack, and unanimously adopted. Staff Report Film for Planning Commission Review It was the consensus of the Commission that should someone be able to locate a video recorder at no charge, funds be appropriated for rental of the subject film (without the workbook). ITEMS BROUGHT UP BY COMMISSIONERS After considerable discussion, it was the consensus of the Commission that staff review the current parking ordinance in relation to the number of parking spaces required for zoning districts to see if it needs to be modified upward or downward, or any changes made to it. * * ~ Inquiry was then made as to the current status of the "Noise Ordinance". Mr. Stafford replied that a noise ordinance had come before the Commission at one time; however, the Police Department expressed opposition to it at that time. ADJOURNMENT Commissioner Meyer moved that the meeting be adjourned, seconded by Commissioner Dickson, and unanimously adopted. The meeting adjourned at 10:22 P.M. APPROVED: Geor a C. Kasolas ice Chairman ATTEST: Arthur A. Kee Secretary RECORDED: Jeannine Wade Recording Secretary