Loading...
PC Min 09/18/1979PLANNING COMMISSION CITY OF CAMPBELL, CALIFORNIA TUESDAY, 7:30 P.M. MINUTES SEPTEMBER 18, 1979 The Planning Commission of the City of Campbell convened this day in regular session at the regular meeting place, the Council Chambers of the City Hall, 75 North Central Avenue, Campbell, California. ROLL CALL Present Commissioners: Meyer, Dickson, Campos, Pack, Kasolas, Chairman Samuelson; Planning Director Arthur A. Kee, Principal Planner Philip J. Stafford, Engineering Manager Bill Helms, City Attorney J. Robert Dempster, Recording Secretary Jeannine Wade. Absent Commissioner Vierhus APPROVAL OF MINUTES COMMUNICATIONS Commissioner Pack moved that the minutes of the regular meeting of September 4, 1979, be approved as submitted, seconded by Commissioner Meyer, and unanimously adopted. Mr. Kee reported that communications received relate to specific items on the agenda and would be discussed at the time the item is considered. ARCHITECTURAL APPROVALS S 79-33 Continued application of Mr. William Jury and the Jury, W. Southbay Construction and Development Company to construct a retail shopping center on property known as 770 W. Hamilton Avenue in a C-2-S (General Commercial) Zoning District. Commissioner Kasolas reported that the applicant had met with the Site and Architectural Review Committee this mornin (Commissioner Meyer sitting on the Committee in Commissioner Vierhus' absence , and the Committee is recommending approval of the revised plans as submitted. Mr. Kee reported that staff is also recommending approval of this application. Commissioner Campos moved that S 79-33 be approved subject to the following conditions, seconded by Commissioner Meyer and unanimously adopted: 1. Revised elevations to be approved by the Planning Director upon recommendation of the Architectural Advisor. 2. Property to be fenced and landscaped as indicated and/or added in red on plans. -2- 3. Landscaping plan indicating type and size of plant material, and location of hose bibs or sprinkler system to be submitted for approval of the Planning Director prior to application for building permit. 4. Fencing plan indicating location and design details of fencing to be submitted for approval of Planning Director prior to application for building permit. 5. Landscaping and fencing shall be maintained in accordance with the approved plan. 6. Applicant to either (1) post a faithful performance bond in the amount of $3,000 to insure landscaping, fencing, and striping of parking areas within three months of completion of construction, or (2) file written agreement to complete landscaping, fencing and striping of parking areas prior to final Building Department clearance. 7. All mechanical equipment located on roofs to be screened as approved by the Planning Director. The applicant is notified as part of this application that he/she is required to meet the following conditions in accordance with Ordinances of the City of Campbell and Laws of the State of California. A. All parking and driveway areas to be developed in compliance with Section 21.50 of the Campbell Municipal Code. All parking spaces to be provided with appropriate concrete curbs or bumper guards. B. Underground utilities to be provided as required by Section 20.16.070 of the Campbell Municipal Code. C. Plans submitted to the Building Department for plan check shall indicate clearly the location of all connections for underground utilities including water, sewer, electric, telephone and television cables, etc. D. Sign application to be submitted in accordance with provisions of the sign ordinance for all signs. No sign to be installed until application is approved and permit issued by the Building Department. (Section 21.68.070 of the Campbell Municipal Code.) E. Ordinance No. 782 of the Campbell Municipal Code stipulates that any contract for the collection and disposal of refuse, garbage, wet garbage and rubbish produced within the limits of the City of Campbell shall be made with Green Valley Disposal Company. This requirement applies to all single-family dwellings, multiple apartment units, to all commercial, business, industrial, manu- facturing, and construction establishments. F. Trash container(s) of a size and quantity necessary to serve the development shall be located in area(s) approved by the Fire Department. Unless otherwise noted, enclosure(s) shall consist of a concrete floor surrounded by a solid wall or fence and have self-closing doors of a size specified by the Fire Department. All enclosures to be constructed at grade level. - 3- G. Applicant shall comply with all appropriate State and City requirements for the handicapped. BUILDING DEPARTMENT H. All windows and doors on south and east walls shall be protected. Table 5A. I. All exterior walls on east and south walls shall have parapets or comply with Section 1709 Uniform Bldg. Code. FIRE DEPARTMENT J. Provide one "2A-IOBC" fire extinguisher for-each leased space. PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT K. Provide a grading and drainage plan for the review and approval of the City Engineer. L. Obtain an excavation permit for driveway modifications and any other work in the public right of way. The applicant is notified that he/she shall comply with all applicable Codes or Ordinances of the City of Campbell which pertain to this development and are not herein specified. * * * _. S 79-34 Application of Mr. James A. Silva for approval of Silva, J. plans to construct a warehouse building on property known as 180 Kennedy Avenue in an M-1-S (Light Industrial) Zoning District. Commissioner Kasolas reported that the applicant had met with the Site and Architectural Review Committee this morning and he is recommending a con- tinuance of this application to the October 2, 1979 Planning Commission meeting. Mr. Kee reported that staff is in agreement with this recommendation. Commissioner Pack moved that S 79-34 be continued to the October 2, 1979 Planning Commission meeting, seconded by Commissioner Campos and unanimously adopted. *** Request for Side Application of Ed and Evelyn Landgraf for an adjustment Yard Setback of the side yard setback requirement of 9'-O" to 6'-0" .Requirement to allow construction of a second story addition to an existing single-family residence located on property known as 1235 Nadine Drive in an R-1 (Single-Family/ Low Density Residential) Zoning District. -4- Mr. Kee reported that staff is recommending approval of this side yard setback in order to allow the construction of a second story addition. He noted that the applicant has submitted a letter signed by the neighbors who live closest to the proposed addition, which states that they have no objections to the addition. He further noted that the Commission has the authority to reduce the setback requirement on existing single-family residences to a minimum of five feet, and the construction of the proposed addition would be keeping with the past reductions of side yards. Commissioner Meyer inquired if there had ever been a problem with the fact that this would be the first two-story dwelling in .the area. Mr. Kee responded that two-story structures are allowed in an R-1 zone. Commissioner Pack then moved that the an adjustment of the side yard setback Meyer and unanimously adopted. request of Ed and Evelyn Landgraf for be approved, seconded by Commissioner PUBLIC HEARINGS UP 79-15 This is the time and place for a continued public Haigh, J. hearing to consider the application of Mr. Jack Haigh and Syufy Enterprises for a use permit and approval of plans to allow the addition of a screen and projection booth to an existing drive-in located on property known as 535 Westchester Drive in an M-1-S (Light Industrial) Zoning District. Mr. Kee reported that the applicant is in concurrence with the staff recommendation of a continuance of this item to the October 2 meeting, since the applicant, Mr. Haigh, is out of town and does wish to speak to the Commission when this item is considered. Chairman Samuelson invited anyone in the audience to speak on this item. No one wishing to speak, Commissioner Pack moved that UP 79-15 be continued to the October 2, 1979 Planning Commission meeting, seconded by Commissioner Meyer and unanimously adopted. *** UP 79-23 This is the time and place for a continued public Garcia, N. hearing to consider the application of Mr. Norman C. Garcia on behalf of Rainbow Enterprises for a use permit to allow a theater on property known as 96 N. San Tomas Aquino Road in a C-2-S (General Commercial) Zoning District. Mr. Kee reported that staff is recommending a continuance of this item to October 2 since information regarding the nature of the proposed theaters had not been received from the applicant, which had been requested at the last Commission meeting. _5_ Chairman Samuelson declared the public hearing open and invited anyone in the audience to speak for or against this item. Mr. Milton Brown of 1181 Steinway, appeared before the Commission to inquire about the types of films proposed to be shovrn at the requested theater. Mr. Kee responded that staff is awaiting that information from the applicant and that is the reason for staff' recommendation for a continuance. No one else wishing to be heard, Commissioner Pack moved that UP 79-23 be continued to the October 2, 1979 Planning Commission meeting. This motion was seconded by Commissioner Meyer and unanimously adopted. *** V 79-1 This is the time and place for a continued public Landberg, D. hearing to consider the application of Mr. Donald C. Landberg and Ruth & Going, Inc., fora variance from Sections 21.48.020, 21.48.030, and 21.48.040 of the Campbell Municipal Code to allow construction of a parking structure on property known as 350 Budd Avenue in an R-3-S (Multiple Family/High Density Residential) Zoning District. Mr. Kee reported that the applicant has requested a continuance of this item for 90 days since there is currently a moratorium on condominium conversions in Campbell and the applicant wished to have some guidelines to go by before the Commission considers this matter. The Recording Secretary read into the record a letter dated September 14, 1979 received from the applicant requesting the 90-day continuance. A copy of this letter is attached hereto and made a part of this record. Chairman Samuelson noted that this is a continued public hearing and invited anyone to speak for or against this item. Ms. Carol Peterson of 350 Budd Avenue, #G3, appeared to inquire why the applicant had requested a continuance since this moratorium did not affect the application before the Commission at the present time since it was established after the application had been submitted. Mr. Kee explained that even though this application is not legally affected by the moratorium, the applicant did wish to have some guidelines to go by before the Commission considered his application, and felt that possibly in another three months the City might have established-some criteria to go by. No one else wishing to speak, Commissioner Pack moved that V 79-1 be continued to December 18, 1979, seconded by Commissioner Kasolas and unanimously adopted. S 79-25 Continued application of Mr. Donald C. Landberg and Landberg, D. Ruth & Going, Inca for approval of plans to construct a parking structure and convert an apartment complex into condominiums on property known as 350 Budd Avenue in an R-3-S (Multiple Family/High Density Residential) Zoning District. -6- Mr. Kee stated that the applicant also desired a 90-day extension of this application because of the current moratorium on condominium conversions. Commissioner Meyer moved that S 79-25 be continued to December 18, 1979, seconded by Commissioner Dickson and unanimously adopted. *** GP 79-5 This is the time and place for a public hearing to Iacomini, L. consider the application of Luciano Iacomini and Iacomini Construction Company to consider a change in the Land Use Element of the General Plan from "Low Density Residential" to "Low-Medium Density Residential" for property known as 1231 W. Hacienda Avenue in an Interim Zoning District. Mr. Kee reported that the applicant is proposing to change the land use classification on the subject property from "Low Density Residential" to "Low-Medium Density Residential" in order to allow eventual construction of condominium units on the site. The site is approximately 1 gross acre in size and would allow a maximum of 13 residential units if this amendment were approved. The site is located at the northeasterly corner of the intersection of San Tomas Aquino Road and Hacienda Avenue, across from the Rolling Hills Shopping Center. Campbell's General Plan for the neighboring properties (with the exception of the shopping center) reflects a low density residential land use. The surrounding properties are also developed for the most part at a low density. The staff is of the opinion that some justification can be made for increased densities on sites such as the one proposed; the site is across from a shopping center and located on a street (Hacienda Avenue) which is planned as a major street with four moving lanes of traffic. The staff, however, cannot support simple lot changes such as the one proposed. Also, this area has constantly been shown as low density residential since the-first specific area plan was adopted by the Planning Commission and City Council. in 1970-71. It should also be noted that considerable discussions have taken. place during public hearings on the General Plan, during meetings of the San Tomas Task Force, and during previous hearings on requests of applicants in the area (Mr. Herb_ Orford, GP 76-5) and the results of these hearings have consistently been for lower densities. Commissioner Kasolas inquired if development of this property .would cause a widening of Hacienda. Mr. Kee responded that a condition of approval would be dedication of street improvement right-of-way. Mr. Helms added that it would be policy to require the street improvements simultaneously with the development of the property. He noted that Hacienda is shown on the Circulation Element of the General Plan as a four-lane arterial. _ 7- Commissioner Pack inquired of Commissioner Campos, San Tomas Task Force Representative of the Planning Commission, if this area had been discussed by the Task Force. Commissioner Campos responded thai; ~Y,,s ~~~~ had been discussed extensively by the Task Force, and the residents have expressed the desire to keep this a low density area. Chairman Samuelson opened the public hearing and invited anyone in the audience to speak for or against this item. Mr. Joseph A. Bonacina, 1200 Dell Avenue, attorney for the applicant, appeared before the Commission to speak in favor of the project. He introduced Mr. Marv Kirkeby, engineer of the proposed project. Mr. Marv Kirkeby, 7246 Sharon Drive, San Jose 95129, explained to the Commission that the applicant would propose 13 units for this site. He explained that access has been very carefully designed for this project, having in mind the traffic problems on Hacienda Avenue, and there would not be backing out of vehicles onto Hacienda; there would be enough room on-site in order for cars to turn around. He further reported that signali- zation of the intersection is planned. Mr. Bonacina again appeared before the Commission to distribute photos of the proposed site; he explained that he felt this was a reasonable use for this property in that this area lends itself to this type of use and because of the types of developments that have occurred in the general area. He further stated that the construction of these condominiums would not have a detrimental effect on that particular area. He felt this project has merit and _ would not have a serious affect on schools. He then asked the Commission to render a favorable recommendation on this application. Ms. Margaret Estep of 1320A Hacienda Avenue, appeared before the Commission to submit a petition signed by 46 residents of the area opposing both Item Nos. 8 and 11 on tonight's agenda, and a letter signed by Mrs. JoAnn Fairbanks (a member of the San Tomas Task Force) expressing her concern about a higher density for this area. Copies of both the petition and letter are attached hereto and made a part of these minutes. Ms. Estep noted that the traffic is already very dangerous on Hacienda and signalization would only add to the congestion. She further noted the aesthetic value of the area is going down with increased density, and the added danger to school children in the area. Mr. Milton Brown of 1181 Steinway, again brought to the Commission's attention the traffic problems of this area. He felt this development would only add more crime and traffic congestion to the area. Mr. Edward Jigour of 1302 Hacienda Avenue, felt this project would only increase the congestion of the area and would be a real detriment. He spoke in favor of single-family dwellings on this property. Ms. Denise Dellagatta of 1302 Hacienda Avenue, felt this project should be single-family homes rather than townhomes, noting it would only add more traffic to the area. -8- Mr. David Timms of 1310 Hacienda Avenue, appeared to speak against this project as well as Item No. 11 on tonight's agenda. He felt that the development of the property, as proposed, would be a detriment to the quality of life in the area. Ms. Kathy Hale of 1190 Glenblair Way, expressed her concern about a development such as the one proposed blocking the view of the Santa Cruz Mountains. She is opposed to a higher density for the area. A resident of 1361 Burrows Road felt this would be spot zoning, since the adjacent properties are developed at a lower density. He also expressed concern about added traffic and noise in the area. Mr. Joe McShary of 1216 Hacienda Avenue, also expressed concern about added traffic and congestion in the area. Mr. Helms reviewed the Circulation Element of the General Plan for that area. Commissioner Kasolas stated he felt this development for this particular piece of property might be best suited for the property, rather than single- family homes. No one else wishing to speak, Commissioner Dickson moved that the public hearing be closed, seconded by Commissioner Meyer and unanimously adopted. RESOLUTION N0. 1818 Commissioner Dickson moved that the Planning Commission adopt Resolution No. 1818 recommending denial of the application of Luciano Iacomini for a change in the Land Use Element of the General Plan from "Low Density Residential" to "Low-Medium Density Residential" for property known as 1231 W. Hacienda Avenue in an Interim Zoning District. This motion was. seconded by Commissioner Campos. Discussion of Motion Commissioner Kasolas again stated he felt this use was appropriate for this piece of property and did not feel the impact of the development as proposed would have that great an effect on the area. Commissioner Dickson felt Campbell already has its fair share of high density, and did not feel this request is appropriate for this area. Vote on Motion AYES: Commissioners: Dickson, Campos, Pack, Sdmuelson NOES: Commissioners: Meyer, Kasolas ABSENT: Commissioners: Vierhus Mr. Kee noted to the applicants at this time that a recommendation would be forwarded to the City Council, at which time the Council would hold a public hearing on this item and make a final decision. He further noted the applicants would be notified of the time and place of this public hearing. ~** - 9- The Commission took a break at 9:02 p.m.; the meeting reconvened at 9:17 p.m. ~** It was the consensus of the Commission that action on Item No. 11 be considered at this time Since it is closely related to Item No. 8. GP 79-8 This is the time and place fora public hearing to Garcia, N. and consider the application of Mr. Norman C. Garcia and Serra-Pacific Co. Serra-Pacific Compariy fora change in the Land Use Element of the General Plan from "Low Density Residential" to "Low-Medium Density Residential" for properties known as 1330, 1354, and 1376 W. Hacienda Avenue in an Interim Zoning District. Mr. Kee reported that the applicant is proposing a change in the Land Use Element of the General Plan from "Low Density Residential" (less than 6 units per gross acre) to "Low-Medium Density Residential" (6 to 13 units per gross acre). This application is very similar to one previously considered on a portion of this property. On the previous application, the staff and Commission recommended approval on the basis that a change of all the lots on the southerly side of Hacienda Avenue seemed justified rather than only one or two lots. The lots were previously shown on the General Plan for "Low-Medium Density Residential" and were located on a planned major street (four moving lanes). In addition, the subject properties were located across from the Rolling Hills Shopping Center. The resulting Council action was denial of the requested change. There have been numerous discussions in this area concerning residential densities; hearings related to the General Plan, meetings of the San Tomas Task Force regarding density, and hearings on specific applications. In almost all cases, the resulting comments have been requests for lower densities. Therefore, staff is recommending that the Planning Commission adopt a resolution recommending denial of the proposed amendment to the Land Use Element of the General Plan from "Low Density Residential" to "Low-Medium Density Residential". Chairman Samuelson opened the public hearing and invited anyone in the audience to speak for or against this item. Mr. Jim Miller, 500 S. Murphy, Sunnyvale (applicant's attorney), appeared before 'the Commission, again going over the traffic impact of Hacienda and San Tomas Aquino Road. He then asked Mr. Helms to go over the Circulation Element, inquiring of any traffic concerns. Mr. Helms again reviewed the Circulation Element of the General Plan, and responded that a concern would be with the type of access used. Mr. Miller then stated that the project as proposed would not have a signi- ficant impact on traffic in the area; he then reminded the Commission of the need for housing in Santa Clara-County. -10- Ms. Margaret Estep of 1320A Hacienda Avenue, again spoke before the Commission reiterating her comments about traffic, aesthetic value, and higher density for the Hacienda area. Ms. Lucille Keck of 1320 Hacienda Avenue explained to the Commission the concerns of her tenants in that area regarding traffic congestion, higher density and overall aesthetic values, stating she is against this General Plan change. Mr. David Timms again appeared before the Commission to reiterate his concerns about traffic and the changing of the quality of life due to a higher density being placed on this property. Ms. Kathy Hale again spoke about her concerns for this area; she felt the property should be developed with single-family homes. Mr. Bob Burrows again appeared before the Commission to express his concerns about traffic. He inquired about the housing/job balance in Campbell, noting both Santa Clara and Sunnyvale had an imbalance. Mr. Kee responded that at the present time, Campbell is pretty much in balance. Mr. Milton Brown again appeared before the Commission to reiterate his concerns about traffic and construction of two-story townhomes adjacent to single-family dwellings. Mr. Milton Cates of 1404 Hacienda Avenue expressed his concern for the safety of the children in the area. Ms. Janet Johnson appeared before the Commission to speak in favor of the higher zoning; she would like to see some change in the neighborhood. Mr. Norman Garcia, applicant, appeared to speak for affordable housing needs in the area. He indicated that the proposed townhomes would be much like a single-family dwelling, only smaller. He also noted traffic would not back onto Hacienda Avenue. No one else wishing to speak, Commissioner Pack moved that the public hearing be closed, seconded by Commissioner Meyer and unanimously adopted. Commissioner Pack noted that she is not against townhomes in Campbell, however the San Tomas Task Force has been working diligently to maintain low density in the area and she felt the Commission should not increase density without the benefit of knowing the results of the final Task Force recommendation. Commissioner Dickson stated that the residents of this area have come to meetings time and time again to express their opposition to any higher density for this area; he felt their desires should be taken into consideration. Commissioner Kasolas stated he would be in favor of this project; he feels this project at this location would be very appropriate. -ll- Commissioner Campos stated that since t~~er•e toad been a Task Force formed to study this area, the concerns of the Tasi: Force should be taken into consideration. RESOLUTION N0. 1823 Commissioner Dickson moved that the Planning Commission adopt Resolution No. 1823 recommending that the City Council deny the application of Mr. Norman C. Garcia and Serra-Pacific Company for a change in the Land Use Element of the General Plan from "Low Density Residential" to "Low-Medium Density Residential" for properties known as 1330, 1354, and 1376 W. Hacienda Avenue in an Interim Zoning District. This motion was seconded by Commissioner Campos and adopted by the following roll call vote: AYES: Commissioners: Dickson, Campos, Pack, Samuelson NOES: Commissioners: Meyer, Kasolas ABSENT: Commissioners: Vierhus Mr. Kee reminded the applicant that this would be a recommendation to the City Council and that he would be notified of the Council hearing date. *** GP 79-6 This is the time and place for a public hearing to Bryant, D. consider the application of Mr. Daniel T. Bryant on behalf of Babet Financial Corp. to consider a change in the Land Use Element of the General Plan from "Public, Semi-Public" to "Professional Office and High Density Residential" for property known as 51 E. Campbell Avenue in a P-F (Public Facilities/Public, Semi-Public) Zoning District. Mr. Kee reported that the applicant is proposing to amend the Land Use Element of the General Plan from "Public, Semi-Public" to "Professional Office and High Density Residential" for the subject property. As the Commission is aware, the ten acre site was formerly owned by the Campbell Union Elementary School District. The Old Campbell Grammar School, which is located on the southerly portion of the property, has been included in the National Register of Historic Places. The Commission may also recall that consideration of alternate land use for this site was undertaken in 1976 under proceedings known as GP 76-2-C. The hearing was continued for approximately three years for various reasons, ~~ including the possibility that the City may have been able to obtain the site for other public uses. At this time, the property is being sold to a private party. The 1968 General Plan which was adopted as part of the MERI report indicated "Special Commercial" for the site. This designation was subsequently changed to the present "Public, Semi-Public" to reflect the fact that the property was owned by a public agency. At its meeting of January 4, 1977 the Commission considered several possibilities for alternate land uses. One of those alter- natives included a combination of commercial and high density residential land uses. The Commission indicated its desire to see a specific proposal prior to making any recommendation to the Council. -12- Staff is recommending that the Land Use Element of the General Plan be amended to "High Density Residential", and that the old grammar school building be designated for "Professional Office and/or High Density Residential". This designation would allow some additional flexibility regarding the eventual redevelopment of the old building. Due to the location of the site at the intersection of two major streets, a high density residential development would seem appropriate at this location; however, special design consideration will have to be given to protect the existing low density neighborhood to the east of this site. Staff has notified the applicant that an EIR will be required prior to processing plans for this site. Commissioner Pack noted that staff has notified the applicant that an EIR would be required and inquired why it was not required at this point in time. Mr. Kee responded that it seemed more important to include in the EIR more specific comments in regard to the type of use which the Commission would 6e considering which would bring out problem areas and mitigating measures. Chairman Samuelson opened the public hearing and invited anyone in the audience to speak for or against this item. Mr. Dan Bryant, applicant, stated that his company, along with Mr. Bill Errico, purchased the site and they are excited about the proposed plans. He noted that they were the only bidder on the project, which left"them a little skeptical; however, they are very enthusiastic about moving ahead with this challenging project. He felt this project would enhance the entire downtown area.. Mr. Milton Brown of 1181 Steinway inquired about the impact this project would have on traffic in the area. Mr. Helms responded that some time back the City staff had done a study on this site, and the only real concern about traffic was access (ingress and egress) to the site. He noted this concern would certainly be brought to the attention of the developers at the time of plan submittal. No one else wishing to be heard, Commissioner Dickson moved that the public hearing be closed, seconded by Commissioner Meyer and unanimously adopted. RESOLUTION N0. 1819 Commissioner Dickson moved that the Planning Commission adopt Resolu~ion ~~`:o. 1819 recommending to the City Council approval of the application of Mr. Daniel T. Bryant on behalf of Babet Financial Corporation for a change in the Land Use Element of the General Plan from "Public, Semi-Public" to "Professional Office and High Density Residential" for property known as 51 E. Campbell Avenue in a P-F (Public Facilities/Public, Semi-Public) Zoning District. This motion was seconded by Commissioner Meyer and unanimously adopted by the following roll call vote: -13- AYES: Commissioners: Meyer, Dickson, Campos, Pack, Kasolas, Samuelson NOES: Commissioners: None ABSENT: Commissioners: Vierhus RESOLUTION N0. 1820 Commissioner Dickson moved that the Planning Commission set the date of October 16, 1979 as the date of a public hearing to consider P-D (Planned Development) and 0-S (Open Space) Zoning for 51 E. Campbell Avenue, seconded by Commissioner Meyer and unanimously adopted by the following roll call vote: AYES: Commissioners: Meyer, Dickson, Campos, Pack, Kasolas, Samuelson NOES: Commissioners: None ABSENT: Commissioners: Vierhus *~r* GP 79-7 This is the time and place fora public hearing to L.B. Nelson consider an amendment to the Land Use Element of Corporation the General Plan from "Public, Semi-Public" to "High Density Residential" for property known as 480 E. Hamilton, as proposed by Mr. Douglas Nelson on behalf of the L.B. Nelson Corporation (public hearing initiated by the City of .Campbell). Mr. Kee reported that the applicant has requested that "High Density Residential" land use be approved for the subject property. The area is approximately 7 acres and, as the Commission is aware, was formerly a large part of the Hamilton School site. It should be noted by the Commission that the Council has a written policy for development along Hamilton Avenue which, in effect, states that "Commercial, Office" and "High Density" land use will be considered. Although the Policy Statement refers to vacant land and at present this property has various classroom structures, the applicant has stated that these buildings will be removed prior to future development. A discussion of traffic along Hamilton Avenue and ingress/egress to the site was discussed by the Commission. Mr. Helms reported that there are several alternatives available and the developer would be discussing these with the Public Works Department. Commissioner Dickson inquired why this site could not be considered for Open Space zoning. Mr. Kee indicated that 0-S would certainly be appropriate for this site. Chairman Samuelson declared the hearing open and invited anyone in the audience to speak on this item. Mr. Jerry Finch, Vice President of the L. 6. Nelson Corporation, appeared before the Commission to explain the proposed project his company has in mind for this site; further noting it would be quality, affordable housing. He dis- tributed pictures of a recently developed project in Mountain View, "The Old Mill", which his company had built, noting this project in Campbell would be similar in nature to that. -14- No one else wishing to speak, Commissioner Dickson moved that the public hearing be closed, seconded by Commissioner Meyer and unanimously adopted. RESOLUTION N0: 1821 Commissioner Dickson moved that the Planning Commission adopt Resolution No. 1821 recommending approval of an amendment to the Land Use Element of the General Plan from "Public, Semi-Public" to "High Density Residential" for property known as 480 E. Hamilton Avenue (a portion of the Hamilton School site)~as proposed by Mr. Douglas Nelson on behalf of the L. B. Nelson Corporation. This motion was seconded by Commissioner Meyer and adopted by the following roll call vote: AYES: Commissioners: Meyer, Dickson, Campos, Pack, Kasolas NOES: Commissioners: Samuelson ABSENT: Commissioners: Vierhus RESOLUTION N0. 1822 Commissioner Dickson moved that the Planning Commission set October 16, 1979 as the date of a public hearing to consider R-3-S and )-S zoning fora portion of property known as 480 E. Hamilton Avenue, seconded by Commissioner Meyer and unanimously adopted by the following roll call vote: AYES: Commissioners: Meyer, Dickson, Campos, Pack, Kasolas, Samuelson NOES: Commissioners: None ABSENT: Commissioners: Vierhus GP 79-9 This is the time and place fora public hearing to Snyder, M. & consider the application of Messrs. Medford L. Snyder Iwasaki, J. and James T. Iwasaki fora change in the Land Use Element of the General Plan from "Commercial" to "High or Medium Density Residential" for property known as 655 W. Hacienda Avenue in an Interim Zoning District. Mr. Kee reported that the applicant is proposing to amend the Land Use Element of the General Plan from "Commercial" to "High or Medium Density Residential" for the subject property. The site, consist~tng of approximately 2.0 gross acres of land (1.6 acres net), is presently vacant. ". To the north and east of this subject property, the Land Use Element of the General Plan indicates "High Density Residential"; to the west across Capri Drive, it indicates "Medium Density Residential"; and to the south, across Hacienda Avenue, it indicates a "Low Medium Density" land use. The present zoning for the subject property, as well as the surrounding area, is "Interim" Prior to the Interim Zoning, however, the properties to the north and east were zoned R-3-S (High Density). Property to the west was zoned P-D (Medium Density). Property to the south is presently unincorporated. ._ ~... ',~ ..._~..._ "?~»_. _~ryin.:.Y4 ~'i=r^-S[". :-..-.-,•w ~r.,.p...,~y v.:. ^xr. r....j r:•.~r~M':~^_ -15- The subject property was zoned R-3-S up to 1973. Under proceedings to make the General Plan and Zoning consistent with one another (ZC 73-6) the Land Use Element of the General Plan was amended from "High Density Residential" to "Commercial" at the request of the property owner. At this time, the applicant is requesting that a residential use be reinstated, for the reasons expressed in his statement, submitted to staff (a copy of which is attached and made a part of these minutes). Staff is recommending approval of the proposed amendment for the following reasons. First, a residential use generates significantly less traffic. Using Public Works Department figures, a neighborhood shopping center can be expected to generate approximately 950 trip ends per acre of commercial development. This means that if the subject 1.6 acres (net) were to develop commercially, approximately 1520 trip ends per day would result. Multi-family developments generate between six and eight trip ends per day per unit. If developed at a density of twenty units per gross acre, the subject property could accommodate approximately 40 units. The resulting traffic generation would result in approximately 102 to 136 trip ends per day. Commissioner Campos expressed his concern about there being a commercial use for this area since the residents of the area did not have any close commercial areas. He felt this area should remain commercial. Commissioner Dickson also felt this area should remain commercial for the convenience of the residents of the area. Chairman Samuelson opened the public hearing and invited anyone in the audience to speak for or against this item. Mr. Milton Brown of 1181 Steinway appeared before the Commission to express his concerns about the amount of traffic generated by a commercial center if developed commercially. Mr. Helms again reminded the Commission that one day Hacienda will be a four-lane arterial and the amount of traffic generated by the property would not be significant. Mr. Bill Irvine of 1050 Castini, Cupertino, representing the applicant, noted that the commercial center located down the street is not doing very well and that was one of the reasons for the requested change. Mr. Iwasaki, one of the owners, appeared his desire to construct townhomes on the a favorable rendering on this project. before the Commission and explained site; and he urged the Commission for No one else wishing to be heard, Commissioner Pack moved that the public hearing be closed, seconded by Commissioner Meyer and unanimously adopted. Commissioner Pack stated she could understand why a commercial use might not be profitable in that area, and spoke for medium density residential Zoning of this property. Commissioner Dickson noted that there have not been problems with some of the commercial developments in the area. -16- Commissioner Kasolas noted the concerns of the residents in the San Tomas area, particularly in regard to having less dense uses and less traffic in the area, and stated that he would be in favor of a denial of this request. MOTION At this time Commissioner Pack moved that the Planning Commission adopt a resolution recommending approval of an amendment to the Land Use Element of the General Plan from "Commercial" to "Medium Density Residential" for 655 W. Hacienda Avenue. This motion was seconded by Commissioner Meyer and failed by the following roll call vote: AYES: Commissioners: Meyer, Pack, Samuelson NOES: Commissioners: Dickson, Campos, Kasolas ABSENT: Commissioners: Vierhus Mr. Kee noted to the applicant at this time that this item would be forwarded to the City Council without a recommendation from the Planning Commission. He noted to the applicant that the City Clerk's office would notify him of the time and place of the public hearing before the City Council, at which time they would render a final decision on this matter. TA 79-2 This is the time and place fora continued public Noise Ordinance hearing to consider the addition of "Title 9 - Noise" to the Campbell Municipal Code. Commissioner Dickson moved that TA 79-2 be continued to the October 2, 1979 Planning Commission meeting, as recommended by staff, seconded by Commissioner Meyer, and unanimously adopted. *** TA 79-4 This is the time and place for a continued public City-initiated hearing to consider amendments to Chapter 21.68 Signs "Signs" of the Campbell Municipal Code. Commissioner Pack moved that TA 79-4 be continued to October 2, 1979, due to the lateness of the hour, seconded by Commissioner Meyer, and unanimously adopted. *** MISCELLANEOUS Appeal Continued appeal from a decision of the Planning SA 79-46 Director denying a free-standing sign for Far West Far West Savings Savings located at 1480 W. Campbell Avenue in a C-1-S (PJeighborhood Commercial) Zoning District. Mr. Kee reported that the applicant has requested that this item be removed from the agenda since he has withdrawn his appeal. -i 1- Commissioner Kasolas reported that the applicant had met with the Site and Architectural Review Committee this morning, and he is requesting that tb}s item be removed from the agenda since he has decided to withdraw his appeal and submit another application for a sign. Commissioner Pack moved that the Commission acknowledge the withdrawal of the appeal on SA 79-46 and remove this item from the agenda at the request of the applicant. This motion was seconded by Commissioner Dickson and unanimously adopted. *** UP 79-1 Continued 6 month review of use permit allowing the Martin Oil Co. sale of secondary support products at property known as 851 E. Hamilton in a P-D (Planned Development/ Commercial and/or Industrial) Zoning District. Commissioner Dickson moved that UP 79-1 be continued to the October 2, 1979 meeting in order that the applicant can respond to the concerns of the Fire Chief as set forth in his memo of September 17, 1979 (a copy of which is attached hereto and made a part of these minutes). This motion was seconded by Commissioner Meyer and unanimously adopted. It was the consensus of the Commission that Item No. 18 be considered prior to Item No. 17. UP 78-6 Application of Mr. Paul R. McAllister for rein- McAllister, P. statement of previously approved plans to construct a racquetball facility on property known as 70 S. San Tomas Aquino Road in a C-2-S (General Commercial) Zoning District. Commissioner Pack noted that neighbors have been concerned about the lighting of the Taco Charley facility and felt this should be taken care of before reinstatement of the requested plans; therefore, she moved that this request be continued to October 2, 1979 in order that the lighting concerns could be resolved and reviewed by the Site and Architectural Review Committee, and that the Committee make a recommendation to the full Commission. This motion ~- was seconded by Commissioner Dickson and unanimously adopted. GP 77-2 Application of Mr. Marvin A. Bamburg for approval of Bamburg, M. a one-year extension of time for previously approved plans to construct a motel on property known as 675 E. Campbell Avenue in a P-D (Planned Development/Commercial) Zoning District. -18- Commissioner Pack announced that she would be abstaining on this item of a possible conflict of interest and left the Council Chambers at 11:47 p.m. Mr. Don Hebard of 205 Calado Drive, Campbell, stated that he is a member of the County Los Gatas Creek Streamside Park Committee and would like to see this application referred to the Park and Recreation Commission for their comments regarding a condition requiring the app licant to improve the proposed creekside trail. He stated that a slight additional cost of a creekside trail would be imposed on the applicant, however the benefit received from having the trail worked out now would balance out the cost. He noted that one of the conditions of approval previously imposed on this development was the granting of an easement for the construction of a trail. Mr. Russ Matesso, representing the applicant, appeared to state that he would object to such a new condition; they are already having problems with persons shooting out. windows at the Towers, and felt this would only add to the crime and vandalism. He further noted that it would be an added cost to the developer. Commissioner Dickson moved that the Commission approve a one-year extension for GP 77-2, conditions upon this item being referred to the Park and Recreation Commission for comments regarding a creekside trail, and these comments be forwarded to the Council for consideration. He further added that the applicant be invited to attend the Park and Recreation meeting prior to taking any action on this item. This motion was seconded by Commissioner Kasolas and adopted, with Commissioner Pack absent. ADJOURNMENT- It was moved by Commissioner Meyer and seconded by Commissioner Dickson that the meeting be adjourned. The meeting adjourned at 11:55 p. m. APPROVED: ATTEST: RECORDED: rthur A. Kee, Secretary Jeannine Wade, Recorder Carl E. Samuelson, Chairman