Loading...
PC Min 09/04/1979PLANNING COMMISSION CITY OF CAMPBELL, CALIFORNIA TUESDAY, 7:30 P.M. MINUTES SEPTEMBER 4, 1979 The Planning Commission of the City of Campbell convened this day in regular session at the regular meeting place, the Council Chambers of the City Hall, 75 North Central Avenue, Campbell, California. ROLL CALL Present Commissioners: Meyer, Dickson, Campos, Pack, Vierhus, Kasolas (7:57), Chairman Samuelson; Planning Director Arthur A. Kee, Planner II Richard L. Schneider, Engineering Manager Bill Helms, City Attorney J. Robert Dempster (7:42), Recording Secretary Jeannine Wade., Absent APPROVAL OF MINUTES COMMUNICATIONS None. Commissioner Meyer moved that the minutes of the regular meeting of August 21, 1979, be approved as submitted, seconded by Commissioner Dickson and unanimously adopted. Mr. Kee reported that the representative of the applicant for Item No. 7 (UP 79-17, PM 79-6) had communicated by telephone that he was in agreement with the staff's recommendation of a continuance and inquired if the Commission wished to continue this item at this time on the agenda. He further reported that other communications received relate to specific items on the agenda and would be discussed at the time the item is considered. The Commission was in consensus that Item No. 7 be considered later during the meeting. _ Commissioner Pack then noted that since .there was only one Tentative Subdivision Map on this evening's agenda, the Commission may wish to consider it earlier in the evening in order that the applicant would not have to wait until the end of the meeting since the public hearing portion of the meeting could be quite lengthy. The Commission was in consensus that the Tentative Subdivision Map should be considered at this time. MISCELLANEOUS TS 79-15 Tentative Subdivision Map: Lands of Maslesa Lands of Maslesa APN 413-25-118 and 413-25-119 Commissioner Pack moved that the Commission find TS 79-15 to be in conformance with the General Plan and forward a recommmendation of approval of this Tentative gun- vision Map to the City Council. This motion was seconded by Commissioner Meyer and unanimously adopted. *~~ -2- ARCHITECTURAL APPROVALS S 79-33 Application of Mr. William Jury and the Southbay Jury, W. Construction and Development Company to construct a retail shopping center on property known as 770 W. Hamilton Avenue in a C-2-S /General Commercial) Zoning District. Mr. Kee reported that staff is recommending a continuance of this application to the September 18, 1979 meeting, and the applicant is in agreement with this recommendation. Commissioner Vierhus reported that the applicant had met with the Site and Architectural Review Committee this morning, and there were still concerns about the parking and roof that had not been resolved; therefore, the Committee is also recommending a continuance of this item. City Attorney Dempster entered the Council Chambers at 7:42 p.m. Commissioner Pack inquired about the concerns regarding the roof. Commissioner Vierhus explained that the plans show a mansard roof only along a portion of the building, and the Architectural Advisor and Committee felt that the mansard roof should wrap all the way around the building. Commissioner Dickson inquired if there would be a problem with the Planning Commission approving this application upon revised plans being approved by the Planning Director. Commissioner Vierhus explained that there was also a Building Department condition (H) that alsc needed to be resolved. Commissioner Meyer inquired about the low percentage of landscaping. Commissioner Vierhus responded that .this was another concern of the Committee. Commissioner Pack then moved that S 79-33 be continued to the September 18, 1979 Planning Commission meeting, seconded by Commissioner Meyer and unanimously adopted. Request for Request of Mr. and Mrs. John Dippolito for an adjustment Side Yard of the side yard setback requirement of 9'-0" to 5'-0" Setback to allow construction of a second story addition to an Dippolito, J. existing single-family residence located on property known as 1088 Fewtrell Drive in an R-1 (Single-Family Residential/Low Density Residential) Zoning District. Mr. Kee reported that both staff and the Architectural Advisor are recommending approval of this request for an adjustment in the side yard setback requirement subject to deletion of the larger window located on the west wall of the proposed second story addition to allow greater privacy for the residents of the property that is closest to the proposed addition. He further noted that this request is in accord with Commission policy regarding setbacks for second story additions. -3- Commissioner Vierhus moved that the request of Mr. and Mrs. John Dippolito for an adjustment of the side yard setback from 9'-0" to 5'-0" to allow construction of a second story addition be approved subject to deletion of the larger window located on the west wall of the proposed second story addition. This motion was seconded by Commissioner Pack and unanimously adopted. Request for Request of Mr. and Mrs. Mike Taylor for an adjustment Side Yard of the side yard setback requirement of 9'0" to 6'-0" Setback to allow construction of a second story addition to an Taylor, M. existing single-family residence located on property known as 1809 Palo Santo Drive in an R-1 (Single- Family Residential/Low Density Residential). Zoning District. Mr. Kee explained that this request is very similar to the one just approved on tonight's agenda, and others approved by the Commission. The Staff is recommending approval. Commissioner Pack then moved that the request of Mr. and Mrs. Taylor for an adjust- ment of the side yard setback from 9'-0" to 6'-0" be approved, seconded by Gommissioner Meyer and unanimously adopted. S 78-1 Request of Mr. Sherman Naymark and the Quadrex Naymark, S. Corporation for approval of a temporary modification to the use of a previously approved industrial building at 1610 Dell Avenue in a CM:B-80 Zoning District. Commissioner Vierhus reported that the applicant's representative had met with the Site and Architectural Review Committee this morning, and the Committee is recommending approval of this temporary use. Mr. Kee explained that Quadrex is presently pursuing options to add on to its present building (1700 Dell Avenue), and in the interim, approval is being requested to use 15,120 square feet of floor area in the building at 1610 Dell Avenue for office purposes. He noted that the building at 1610 Dell Avenue was approved by the Commission as an industrial building on February 21, 1978. The parking ratio for this building is one space for every 290 square feet of gross floor area and one of the conditions of approval was that 11,300 square feet of the building be limited to warehouse use only. If this request is approved, the use of the building would be: 15,120 s.f. of office, 11,300 s.f. of warehouse, and 7,880 s.f. of speculative industrial. Since approval of this request would require an additional 13 parking spaces, the applicant has indicated he would provide a gate between the two properties in order that the parking lot at 1700 Dell Avenue may also be used. Mr. Kee then stated that staff is recommending approval subject to the conditions listed in the Staff Comment Sheet. Commissioner Pack inquired how it could. be made certain that this portion of the building would revert back to the originally approved use. -4- Mr. Kee stated that Condition No. 2 in the Staff Comment Sheet covers the temporary use of this building; he noted that the wording of that condition could include "and any future property owner'.. Commissioner Pack felt this would be advisable. Commissioner Kasolas entered the Council Chambers at 7:57 p.m. Mr. Rusty Hamner, representing the applicant, appeared before the Commission to state that the applicant is in agreement with the Committee's and Staff's recommendations. Commissioner Vierhus then moved that the applicant be allowed to use 15,120 square feet of the subject building for office use, subject to the following conditions: 1. The use of 15,120 square feet of floor area as offices is limited to a maximum period of three years from the date of approval by the Planning Commission. 2. The property owner and any future property owner shall submit a letter to the City Attorney which acknowledges the temporary nature of this approval. This motion was seconded by Commissioner Pack and unanimously adopted. PUBLIC HEARINGS EIR 79-1 This is the time and place for a continued public Santa Clara hearing to consider a Draft Environmental Impact County Housing Report which has been prepared fora proposed Authority multi-story 200-unit senior retirement apartment facility to be located on property known as 400 W. Rincon Avenue in a P-D (Planned Development/Multiple Family Residential) Zoning District. Mr. Kee reported that at its August 21 meeting the Commission considered the Draft EIR for this project and after much consideration and hearing public testimony, determined that additional information was needed. He noted that there were ten specific areas of concern, as staff understood it, and those questions are noted on the Staff Comment Sheet. The EIR consultant has submitted a supplement to the Draft EIR which addresses the concerns of the Commission. A copy of this "Supplement" is on file in the Planning Department. He then gave a brief summary of the project. Mr. Stan Kulakow, Creegan & D'Angelo, appeared before the Commission noting that his firm had prepared the EIR and Supplement, and proceeded to address all ten areas of concern. He noted that Mrs. Jean VonEzdorf, Administrator of Adlai E, Stevenson House (a project similar to the one proposed) in Palo Alto, is in the audience and the Commission may want to ask some questions of her. He brought to the Commission's attention an error on page 2, paragraph 2, second line--the number of senior residents-would be 225-235 rather than 300. -5- Chairman Samuelson inquired about the residents of this facility--whether or not residency would be limited to people who already live in Campbell. Mr. John Burns, Executive Director of the Housing Authority, responded that as long as the occupants met the requirements (income, etc.) senior residents of Campbell would have first priority. Commissioner Pack inquired of Mr. Kulakow what the grade level of the school is adjacent to the Adlai E. Stevenson House project. Mr. Kulakow responded that it is an elementary school, grades 1-6. Chairman Samuelson noted to the audience that this is a continued public hearing and invited anyone in the audience to speak for or against this project. Mr. Dwayne Reed, 890 Scott Court, Chairman of the Park and Recreation Commission, appeared before the Commission to express his concerns about this project. He noted that the organized sports programs would be conducted right next to the proposed senior development, not away from it. He further noted parking problems which already exist for users of the park, and noise problems which might be a hindrance to the proposed development. Mr. John Ashworth, 230 Cal.ado Avenue, also a member of the Park and Recreation Commission, appeared before the Commission to address three specific items. (1) He stated the closest neighbors to the park (on Cherry) have expressed concern about the noise generated by the park and wondered if this might also be a problem to the proposed development. He felt the kinds of recreation for the park were not too conducive to the neighbors. (2) He also felt some of the concerns expressed by the Commission (5 or 6 specific concerns were listed some time back) were really never addressed. He noted the adult activities proposed to be constructed adjacent to the project--tennis court, volley Ball court, and horse shoe pits--might some day be lighted and felt this could cause some problem to residents. (3) Parking has been continuously a problem; and it is only going to worsen. He expressed concern about vandalism and close proximity of the school. Mr. Ashworth then stated that in the best interest of the community he felt this project should not go in on that piece of property; it should be preserved for open space. He felt if a private development were to go in it should be conducive to the further development of the park. Commissioner Campos then stated that he felt the communications from the Commissions were very vague in describing the inappropriateness of this facility at this location, and failed to see how some of the comments made relate to what is being accomplished this evening. Mr. Hank Cary, 113 N. Second Street, also a member of the Park and Recreation Commission, stated that placing a facility such as the one proposed adjacent to John D. Morgan park would abort the use of the park. He also expressed concerns about vandalism in the area; noting there had been considerable vandalism problems at the park. -6- Mr. Ralph Pfirrman, 266 California S;reef, Member of the Civic Improvement Commission stated that when the Commission held a study seslacedwaththis Burns it expressed concerns about this particular project being p particular site; the project itself s e:~:;_G;le;-t. One of the concerns about this site was traffic; the Civic Improvement Commission felt that a better location could be found. The Commission took a break at 9:02 p.m.; the meeting reconvened at 9:20 p.m. Mr. John Burns, Executive Director of the Housing Authority, appeared before the Commission to state that four of the Housing Authority's Board members are over 62 and have all been actively involved in the planning of this project since it was first discussed in 1976. He felt, as stated at the meeting of August 21, that seniors should not be put in "boxes" and should have a right to choose where they would like to live. He noted the Housing Authority was well aware of future uses of the park; he felt the adult activities as proposed would be quite conducive to the overall project. He noted that the sharing of parking spaces is still in the discussion stages with HUD; and he could not make any promises in that regard. Mrs. Jean VonEzdorf, 455 East Charleston, Palo Alto, Administrator of the Adlai E. Stevenson House, appeared before the Commission to explain the project which she administrates, and which is also adjacent to a park, Mitchel Park in Palo Alto. She reported that Stevenson House is a 202 Housing project for the elderly and had been in operation for 12 years. She explained the project in detail, noting similarities of her project to the proposed project. She explained thata~eanhindrancet andathehseniors trulylenjoyvtheblocatione complex, rather th adjacent to the park. Commissioner Pack inquired about the difference of having. an elementary school adjacent to a project such as this versus a junior high school. Mrs. VanEzdorf stater she felt it could be worked out just as well; working with the students, teachers, and the principal, and possibly even having a "Grandparent" program. Commissioner Campos inquired about vandalism in the area. Mrs. VonEzdorf responded that towns such as Palo Alto and Campbell would probably not have the magnitude of problemslosmanroblemsathStevensonrHouseco. She reported that they do not have a real vanda p Mr. Don Hebard of 205 Calado Avenue appeared to state that he had visited Stevenson House and he felt it was quite a different project from the one proposed this evening in that, in his opinion, Mitchel Park is a much larger, more passive than active, park than John D. Morgan Park. He further noted that the proximity of the units to any activity going on in the park is much greater than that of the proposed project f thee ark and the~StevensonaHouseounot~nghthat Commission photos of the grounds o p it really is a beautifully done senior complex in an excellent setting; however, he did not feel that it could be compared to this project. Commissioner Kasolas inquired of Mr. Hebard if he found anything specifically wrong with the EIR. Mr. Hebard stated he felt the EIR presented opinions, not facts. -7- Commissioner Vierhus, feeling that.~the issue had been belabored long enough, inquired if phase one would be to consider the EIR and then go on to the development plans. City Attorney Dempster noted that the Commission would first either certify or not certify the EIR; if certified, the Commission would then go on to the PD portion of this project. Mr. Ken Abler, Architect, appeared before the Corrunission to state that Mitchel Park is one of Palo Alto's most active, if not the most active, parks in the Palo Alto park system. Commissioner Dickson stated he felt the Commission was: trying to do what it felt best for the City of Campbell; he then "inqu fired of Mr. Burns what could happen if only l00 units were approved. Mr. Burns responded that it would probably kill the project if a lesser number of units were approved. ". Commissioner_Dickson expressed his concerns about the parking problems; he noted that at least with the skating rink approval there would have been parkino avail- able to park users „sand a skating rink would have been a more compatible use. Discussion ens~l~ed regarding the noise problems, and what time of the year and day the noise consultant chose. to make his study. - Commissioner Dickson stated that he wished the environmental consulting.engineer had addressed the housing needs of others in Campbell (young married, older married, etc.). He then expressed concerns about the. 40-year commitment. Mr. Burns explained that this is a normal procedure for all of HUD's loans. Commissioner Dickson mentioned that he could not recall when three of the City's Commissions had expressed such strong doubts about a project. Commissioner Pack inquired of Mr. Burns if he had heard of any plans for the expansion of the junior high school; she had heard that there is a possibility that in the near future this junior high will be the only. one left in the elementary school district. Mr. Burns stated that~he has been in contact with Mr. Hauss of the School District; some additional buildings have already been constructed, however he did not feel that this would be detrimental. Commissioner Pack expressed her concerns about traffic on Rincon and accessibility from Rincon to Winchester. Mr. Kulakow responded that he had been in contact with Keith Manley of the Public Works Department, and there are no plans for the improvement of Rincon Avenue. Commissioner Pack expressed her concerns about the overall EIR, however she did not feel the project should be held up because of the EIR. She also expressed her concern about the lack of time to properly consider this. Commissioner Kasolas inquired of Mr. Burns why this item had been held up for so long. -~- Mr. Burns responded that the City Counc~i7 had asked the Housing Authority to stop progress on the project while they attempted to investigate possibilities of purchasing the Old Campbell Grammar School site and trading that for the Rincon Avenue site. He noted that this has caused a 3-month minimum delay, which has turned into 6 months. No one else wishing to be heard, Commissioner Vierhus moved that the public hearing be closed, seconded by Commissioner Meyer and unanimously adopted. RESOLUTION N0. 1815 Commissioner Dickson moved that the Planning Commission adopt Resolution No. 1815 certifying EIR 79-1, Draft Environmental Impact Report prepared fora proposed multi-story 200-unit senior retirement apartment facility to be located on property known as 400 W. Rincon Avenue in a P-D (Planned Development/Multiple Family Residential) Zoning District, and that the minutes of the meeting of September 4, 1979 regarding this EIR be forwarded to the City Council for con- sideration at the time PD 79-4, application of Mr. John Burns and the Santa Clara County Housing Authority is presented to the Council. This motion was seconded by Commissioner Kasolas and unanimously adopted by the following roll call vote: AYES: Commissioners: Meyer, Dickson, Campos, Pack, Vierhus, Kasolas, Samuelson NOES: Commissioners: None ABSENT: Commissioners: None *** The Commissioner took a second break at 10:28 p.m.; the meeting reconvened at 10:40 p.m. *** It .was the consensus of the Commission that Items No. 7 and 8 be considered prior to consideration of Item No. 5, since that item might be quite lengthy. UP 79-17 This is the time and place fora continued public PM 79-6 hearing to consider the application of Ms. Nellie Carvalho, N. Carvalho for approval of a minor subdivision and a use permit to allow future development of the resulting single-family lot located on property known as 430 Budd Avenue in an Interim (Low Density Residential) Zoning District. Mr. Kee reported that staff is recommending a continuance of this item and the applicant is in agreement. Chairman Samuelson noted that this is a continued public hearing and. invited anyone in the audience to speak for or against this item. No one wishing to be heard, Commissioner Pack moved that UP 79-17 and PM 79-6. be continued to October 2, 1979, seconded by Commissioner Meyer and unanimously adopted. -9- UP 79-23 This is the time and place for a public hearing to Garcia, N. consider the application of Mr. Norman C. Garcia on behalf of Rainbow Enterprises for a use permit to allow a theater on property known as 90 N. San Tomas Aquino Road in a C-2-S (General Commercial) Zoning District. Mr. Kee explained that the applicant is proposing to construct a 520 seat, three- screen, theater in the San Tomas Plaza shopping center. The proposed theaters will be~located between the D&J Hobby Center and the Campbell Racquetball Club in an area formerly used for retail sales (fabric store). He further reported that this 7,259 square foot area, if used for retail sales, would have a parking requirement of 49 spaces (1 space per 150 square feet of gross building area). As a theater, the parking requirement would be 174 spaces (1 space per 3 seats). Staff is of the opinion that because theaters usually have maximum patronage in the evening hours when the other shops are closed, a dual use of parking areas is acceptable. The Commission may recall that a two- screen theater was formerly located in the 9,600 square foot area now occupied by the Racquetball Club. Staff is not aware of any parking problems with the previous theater and does not anticipate any parking problems with this theater, and therefore is recommending approval of this application. Commissioner Kasolas inquired about Condition B--Signing, for this application. Mr. Kee stated that when the application is submitted it would be looked at from an overall program for the shopping center--they could possibly add their name, etc., to an existing or proposed new overall program for the entire shopping center. Chairman Samuelson opened the public hearing and invited anyone in the audience to speak for or against this application. Mr. Lawrence Silva of 104 Superior Drive inquired of Mr. Kee what "dual use of parking areas" meant. He also inquired about the types of movies that would be shown at this theater. Mr. Kee explained dual use of parking areas, and noted he did not know exactly what types of movies would be shown at this theater, however Campbell has very strict guidelines in what will be allowed. '~ City Attorney Dempster explained to Mr. Silva that he did not anticipate any problems with the types of movies shown since that would be controlled by the Police Department. Commissioner Kasolas felt the applicant should be present to respond to questions of this nature. No one else wishing to be heard, Commissioner Vierhus moved that UP 79-23 be continued to the September 18 meeting in order that the applicant could be present to respond to any questions and that staff notify the applicant of this action and attempt to find out the types of movies planned to be shown. This motion was seconded by Commissioner Pack and unanimously adopted. -10- The Commission then requested they by sup~~lied with a copy of the Government Code which pertains to this. City Attorney Dempster noted he would have that for them by the next meeting. *** PD 79-4 This is the time and place for a continued public Housing Authority hearing to consider the application of Mr. John Burns and the Housing Authority of Santa Clara County for approval of plans, elevations, and development schedule to allow construction of a senior citizen housing complex on property known as 260-400 W. Rincon Avenue in a P-D (Planned Development/Medium Density Residential) Zoning District. Mr. Kee explained the applicant is proposing to construct 200 units of housing for the elderly on the subject property. The property is approximately 4.8 gross acres in size, or 4.33 acres net. The resulting density is approximately 42 units per gross, acre. Recent approvals for senior citizen housing in Campbell have ranged from 104 units per acre for the Wesley Manor project on Winchester Boulevard to 59 units per acre for the Corinthian House project on Budd Avenue. Building materials for the two and three-story buildings include textured stucco walls (painted white), bronze anodized aluminum doors and windows, stained redwood trim on balconies, and red the or double tab asphalt shingles for the roof. Staff concurs with the Architectural Advisor's comments favoring the red the roof, and is recommending that if this project is approved, that the roofing material be the red the and not the asphalt shingles. Building coverage for the site is approximately 35%. Parking for. the proposed development consists of a total of 74 spaces. Of these, ten are designed for the handicapped and seven are designated for compact cars. The resulting ratio is one parking space for each 2.72 units. This ratio is in excess of the Ordinance requirement of one space for every three units. The plans for this development indicate that approximately 94,000 square feet or 50% of the lot area will be landscaped. Additionally, there are paved areas of open space for shuffleboard games and for walking. The Architectural Advisor has indicated that the plans are acceptable. Commissioner Kasolas reported, as noted in the minutes of the last meeting, the applicant met with the Site and Architectural Review Committee on August 21, 1979, and the Committee unanimously recommended approval of this project as submitted. Chairman Samuelson noted that this is a continued public hearing and invited anyone in the audience to speak for or against this project. Mr. Ken Abler, architect, appeared before the Commission and went over the plans in great detail, noting that careful consideration had been given to the needs of the senior citizens in designing this project. He then gave a slide presentation to the Commission, further explaining in detail all aspects of this project. Mr. Dwayne Reed, Chairman of the Park and Recreation Commission, once again appeared before the Commission to state that the Park and Recreation Commission did not have any problems with the plans; it was the site that they were not in favor of. He hoped that this project would be able to accommodate approximately 98% Campbell seniors rather than seniors from other cities. He also stated that if this project is approved and constructed, all of Campbell could be proud of it. No one else wishing to be heard, Commissioner Vierhus moved that the public hearing be closed, seconded by Commissioner Dickson and unanimously adopted. RESOLUTION N0. 1816 Commissioner Kasolas moved that the Planning Commission adopt Resolution No. 1816 recommending approval of the application of Mr. John Burns and the Santa Clara County Housing Authority for approval of plans, elevations and development schedule to allow construction of a senior citizen housing complex on property known as 260-400 W. Rincon Avenue in a P-D (Planned Development/Medium Density Residential) Zoning District, and that this application be referred to the Park and Recreation Commission and Civic Improvement Commission in order that their comments may be forwarded to the City Council. This motion was seconded by Commissioner Campos. DISCUSSION OF MOTION Commissioner Dickson stated that he has some very serious misgivings about this project at this location regarding density for the area., parking, circulation problems, and access. Commissioner Meyer expressed her concerns regarding massiveness and traffic problems. She did feel, however, that senior citizens should have a choice of where they would like to live. Commissioner Kasolas stated that he is quite pleased with this project. Commissioner Vierhus stated he felt it is a very good plan, however he did not feel this is the right location for the project. He noted the lack of open space which already exists in Campbell, and felt that open space should be guarded. Commissioner Pack inquired of Mr. Burns what would happen if this project were not approved. Mr. Burns responded that the monies would be recaptured by HUD and disposed of at their will. The Housing Authority would lose the money. Commissioner Campos felt that there is a real need for housing such as this, and with the longevity of seniors, Campbell will be ready for future needs. VOTE ON MOTION AYES: Commissioners: Meyer, Campos, Pack, Kasolas, Samuelson NOES: Commissioners: Dickson, Vierhus ABSENT: Commissioners: None -12- Commissioner Pack then stated that it was a real struggle for her to make a decision, especially in view of the fact that so many Commissions had opposed this project at that particular site. *** TA 79-4 This is the time and place fora public hearing to City Initiated consider amendments to Chapter 21.68 "Signs" of the Signs Campbell Municipal Code. Due to the lateness of the hour, Chairman Samuelson declared the public hearing open and invited anyone in the audience to speak for or against this item. No one wishing to speak, Commissioner Pack moved that TA 79-4 be continued to the Planning Commission meeting of September 18, 1979, seconded by Commissioner Dickson and unanimously adopted. *** MISCELLANEOUS Appeal Continued appeal from a decision of the Planning SA 79-46 Director denying a free-standing sign for Far West Far West Savings located at 1480 W. Campbell Avenue in a Savings C-1-S (Neighborhood Commercial) Zoning District. Due to the lateness of the hour, and no one being present to discuss this item, Commissioner Pack moved that the appeal on SA 79-46 be continued to the Planning Commission meeting of September 18, 1979, seconded by Commissioner Meyer and unanimously adopted. *** UP 79-1 Six-month review of use permit allowing the sale of Martin Oil secondary support. products at property known as Company 851 E. Hamilton Avenue in a P-D (Planned Development/ Commercial and/or Industrial) Zoning District. Due to the lateness of the hour and no one being present to speak on this item, Commissioner Pack moved that UP 79-1 be continued to the Planning Commission meeting of September 18, 1979, seconded by Commissioner Meyer and unanimously adopted. *** ANNOUNCEMENTS Mr. Kee announced that Commission on Tuesday, consider prezoning of Campbell, and reminded noted that staff would as a reminder. there will be a public hearing before the Planning September 11 at 7:30 p.m. in the Council Chambers to properties -for proposed annexation to the City of the Commissioners to mark their calendars. He also give each Commissioner a call on the day of that meeting *** -13- ADJOURNMENT It was moved by Commissioner Dickson and seconded by Commissioner Meyer that the meeting be adjourned. The meeting adjourned at 12:13 p.m. APPROVED: Carl E. Samuelson, Chairman ATTEST: rthur Kee, Secretary RECORDED: Jeannine Wade, Recorder