Loading...
PC Min 07/18/1978PLANNING COMMISSION CITY OF CAMPBELL, CALIFORNIA TUESDAY, 7:30 P.M. MINUTES JULY 18, 1978 The Planning Commission of the City of Campbell convened this day in regular session at the regular meeting place, the Council Chambers of the City Hall, 75 North Central Avenue, Campbell, California. ROLL CALL Commissioners: Hebard, Campos, Dickson, Samuelson, Vierhus, Kasolas, Chairman Pack; Secretary Arthur A. Present Kee; Senior Planner Bruce R. Powell; Engineering Technician I James Penoyer; City Attorney J. Robert Dempster; Recording Secretary Jeannine Wade. Absent None INTRODUCTIONS Chairman Pack introduced James Penoyer, Engineering Technician I, to the Commissioners and people in the audience and explained that this evening he would be taking Mr. Helms' place who was on vacation. Chairman Pack then mentioned that Commissioner Hebard would be stepping down from his position on the Commission and this would be his last Planning Commission meeting. She stated that he had chosen not to seek reappointment, since he felt that two terms were sufficient. She further stated unequivocally that Commissioner Hebard would be sorely missed as his knowledge of planning matters and the city in general is unmatched; his astuteness as a Commissioner had been an inspiration to her personally and she felt the Planning Commission in general and the city as a whole would sorely miss him. She wished him well in whatever he decided to undertake and hoped he would stay active in Campbell matters. ;: ;; ;; APPROVAL OF Commissioner .Dickson moved that the minutes of the MINUTES regular meeting of July 5, 1978 be approved, seconded by Commissioner Samuelson and unanimously adopted. COMMUNICATIONS Mr. Kee informed the Commission that items received relate to specific items on the agenda and would be discussed at the time the item is considered. ARCHITECTURAL APPROVALS S 7$-25 Continued application of Marvin A. Bamburg, A.I.A. Bamburg, M. for approval of plans to construct 19 condominium units on property known as 134 W. Rincon Avenue in an R-2-S (Multiple Family/Medium Density Resi- denital) Zoning District. Commissioner Vierhus reported that the applicant had met with the Site and Architectural Review Committee this morning and the revised plans as submitted are an overall improvement to the previously submitted plans in that the parking ratio had been improved as well as the density. The Committee is recommending approval of this application. Mr. Kee stated that staff is also recommending approval. Commissioner Dickson moved that S 78-25 be approved subject to the following conditions: 1. Property to be fenced and landscaped as indicated and/or added in red on plans. 2. Landscaping plan indicating type and size of plant material, and location of hose bibs or sprinkler system to be submitted for approval of the Planning Director prior to application for building permit. 3. Fencing plan indicating location and design details of fencing to be submitted for approval of Planning Director prior to application for building permit. 4. Landscaping and fencing shall be maintained in accordance with the approved plan. 5. Applicant to either (1) post a faithful performance bond in the amount of $5,000 to insure landscaping, fencing, and striping of parking area within three months of completion of construction, or (2) file written agreement to complete landscaping, fencing and striping of parking areas prior to final Building Department clearance. 6. All mechanical equipment located on roofs to be screened as approved by the Planning Director. The applicant is notified as part of this application that he/she is required to meet the following conditions in accordance with ordinances of the City of Campbell and laws of the State of California. A. All parking and driveway areas to be developed in compliance with Section 21.50 of the Campbell Municipal Code. All parking spaces to be provided with appropriate concrete curbs or bumper guards. -2- B. Underground utilities to be provided as required by Section 20.16.070 of the Campbell Municipal Code. C. Plans submitted to the Building Department for plan check shall indicate clearly the location of all connections for underground utilities including water, sewer, electric, telephone and television cables, etc. D. Sign application to be submitted in accordance with provisions of the sign ordinance for all signs. No sign to be installed until application is approved and permit issued by the Building Department. (Section 21.68.070 of the Campbell Municipal Code.) E. Ordinance No. 782 of the Campbell Municipal Code stipulates that any contract for the collection and disposal of refuse, garbage, wet garbage, and rubbish produced within the limits of the city of Campbell shall be made with Green Valley Disposal Company. This requirement applies to all single- family dwellings, multiple apartment units, to all commercial, business, industrial, manufacturing, and construction establishments. F. Trash container(s) of a size and quantity necessary to serve the development shall be located in area(s) approved by the Fire Department. Unless other- wise noted, enclosure(s) shall consist of a concrete floor surrounded by a solid wall or fence and have self-closing doors of a size specified by the Fire Department. All enclosures to be constructed at grade level. G. Applicant shall comply with all appropriate State and City requirements for the handicapped. H. Noise levels for the interior of residential units shall comply with minimum State (Title 25) and local standards as indicated in the Noise Element of the Campbell General Plan. FIRE DEPARTMENT I. Provide one on-site fire hydrant 210 feet south of sidewalk at west property line. PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT J. Process and file a tract map. K. Pay storm drainage area fee based on $765 per acre. L. Provide a copy of the preliminary title report. M. Obtain an excavation permit to replace uplifted curb, gutter and sidewalk and to modify the driveway approach. The applicant is notified that he/she shall comply with all applicable codes or ordinances of the City of Campbell which pertain to this development and are not herein specified. -3- This motion was seconded by Commissioner Samuelson and adopted, with Commissioner Hebard abstaining. .V J. .1. PUBLIC HEARINGS PD 78-10 This is the time and place for a continued public Perfecto, C. hearing to consider the application of Carlos and Maria Perfecto for approval of plans, elevations, and development schedule to allow construction of two residential units on the rear of property known as 109 S. Fourth Street in a P-D (Planned Development/ Medium Density Residential) Zoning District. Commissioner Vierhus reported that the applicant had met with the Site and Architectural Review Committee this morning, and the Committee pointed out that the plan as presented could not be approved because of the inadequate parking. After a discussion with the applicant the Committee recommended a 30-day continuance, and the applicant was in agreement. The applicant stated that his designer would be meeting with the staff to resolve the problems, and that most probably a different plan would be submitted. Commissioner Hebard moved that PD 78-10 be continued to the August 15, 1978 Planning Commission meeting, seconded by Commissioner Dickson and unanimously adopted. J_ ZC 78-7 This is the time and place for a public hearing to Wilson, A. consider the application of Mr. Alfred M. Wilson for: (1) a change of zoning from R-2-S (Multiple Family/Medium Density Residential) to P-D (Planned Development/Medium Density Residential), and (2) approval of plans, elevations, and development schedule to allow construction of six townhomes on property known as 257 W. Rincon Avenue. Commissioner Vierhus reported that the applicant had met with the Site and Architectural Review Committee thi's morning. He explained that the revised plans had not been submitted in sufficient time to allow them to be routed through the necessary departments for comment. The Committee is recommending that this item be continued to the next Planning Commission meeting. Commissioner Hebard moved that ZC 78-7 be continued to the August 1, 1978 Planning Commission meeting, seconded by Commissioner Campos and unanimously adopted. i ~1` J, -4- ZC ]8-$ This is the time and place for a continued public Szucs, E. hearing to consider the application of Elizabeth Szucs for: (1) a change of zoning from R-2-S (Multiple Family/Medium Density Residential) to P-D (Planned Development/Medium Density Residential), and (2) approval of plans, elevations, and development schedule to allow construction of nine townhomes on property known as 268 W. Rincon Avenue. Commissioner Vierhus reported that the applicant had met with the Site and Architectural Review Committee, and the revised plans submitted incorporated the suggestions made by the Committee at the last meeting. The Committee felt a recommendation of approval was in order, however a stipulation should be included which would save any existing trees and landscaping. The applicant was to submit a map to the Planning staff by this afternoon showing all the trees on the property. The Committee is recommending approval subject to the conditions listed on the Staff Comment Sheet with an added condition that the Planning Director approve the final site plan. Mr. Kee indicated that a map showing all the trees had been brought into the Planning office by the applicant. He further stated that staff is also rec- ommending approval of Alternate No. 2 subject to the added condition imposed by the Committee. The Architectural Advisor is also recommending approval. The Commission asked to see the plans. Mr. Powell displayed the site plans, and explained the parking, ingress and egress, and overall site layout. Chairman Pack expressed concern about play areas for the children and open space. Mr. Powell stated that there would be a barber ue area, which will be landscaped, and also individual backyards with a patio; each unit will have a two-car garage. Commissioner Hebard wondered if, since this is a townhouse development, a condition should be added regarding the garages being used for parking of vehicles only. Mr. Kee stated that a condition should be added which would include the use of the garages. Chairman Pack indicated she would like to see higher landscaping between the barbecue area and the garage. Mr. Kee indicated that staff would review the landscaping at the time the plan comes back before staff. Chairman Pack invited anyone in the audience to speak on this item. -5- Mr. Zawalski of 121 S. Milton Avenue indicated that he hadn't seen the plans and wondered if they were the same as the ones for the other side of the street. He stated he felt the play area for the children would end up being the middle of the street. He felt the density was over the limit, and expressed his concern about the street becoming a raceway. Mr. Kee explained to Mr. Zawalski that the Land Use Element of the General Plan indicates Medium Density Residential with a maximum density of 20 units per acre; the proposal under consideration would be only 11F units per acre, and they will be owner-occupied. No one else wishing to be heard, Commissioner Hebard moved that the public hearing be closed, seconded by Commissioner Dickson and unanimously adopted. Commissioner Hebard stated he questioned this project since there are 9 three- bedroom units- The parking arrangement isn't the best circulation plan ever presented to the commission. He also felt the applicant was trying to get too much on the property. Mr. Kee stated that the alternate plan submitted indicated 9 units, however 2 of the units were two-bedroom units; the Architectural Advisor felt this layout was better, and staff and the Public Works Department concurred in that opinion. Commissioner Vierhus stated he felt this plan was a better plan. Commissioner Dickson stated that this is a medium density development with townhomes; it is not an apartment complex with a higher density which could be proposed for this particular type of lot. He felt this was a good plan. Chairman Pack again expressed her disappointment that the proposal didn't include more open space. RESOLUTION N0. 1715 Commissioner Vierhus moved that the Planning Commission adopt Resolution No. 1715 recommending that the City Council change the zoning from R-2-S (Multiple Family/ Medium Density Residential) to P-D (Planned Development/ Medium Density Residential) for property known as 268 W. Rincon Avenue (ZC 78-8), seconded by Commissioner Dickson and adopted by the following roll call vote: AYES: Commissioners: Dickson, Samuelson, Vierhus, Kasolas NOES: Commissioners: Hebard, Campos, Pack ABSENT: Commissioners: None -6- RESOLUTION N0. 1716 Commissioner Vierhus moved that the Planning Commission adopt Resolution No. 1716 recommending that the City Council approve the plans, elevations, and development schedule to allow construction of nine townhomes on property known as 268 W. Rincon Avenue with two added conditions (1) Planning Director to approve final site plan, and (2) CC~R's will contain provisions that garages will be used for parking only, seconded by Commissioner Dickson and adopted by the following roll call vote: AYES: Commissioners: Dickson, Samuelson, Vierhus, Kasolas NOES: Commissioners: Hebard, Campos, Pack ABSENT: Commissioners: None ;~ :~ :: ZC 78-9 This is the time and place for a continued public hearing Schwoob, T. to consider the application of Messrs. Thomas Schwoob Profit, S. and Spencer Profit for a change of zoning from R-2-S (Multiple Family/Medium Density Residential) to P-D (Planned Development/Medium Density Residential) for property known as 338 W. Rincon Avenue. Mr. Kee reported that this item was continued from the July 5, 1978 meeting in order that the applicants could submit preliminary plans of their proposed development; however, the applicant indicated to the Planning staff that he would not be able to submit plans in time for this meeting, Therefore, the staff is recommending a two-week continuance. Commissioner Hebard Planning Commission adopted. moved that ZC 78-9 be continued to the August 1, 1978 meeting, seconded by Commissioner Dickson and unanimously ~V .1. J. ZC 78-10 (1) May Inc. (2) C i ty Investment, of Campbell (1) The application of May Investment, Inc., for prezoning of three lots, APNs 413-13-30, 44, and 43, known as 808 McGlincey Lane, 595 Union Avenue, and 571 Union Avenue, for P-D (Planned Development) zoning; and This is the time and place for a public hearing to consider: (2) Application of the City of Campbell for prezoning of property located on the southerly side of McGlincey and westerly of Union Avenue, known as APNs 413-13-28, 29, and 80, and 413-48-36 and 67 (75o McGlincey, 786 McGlincey, 655 Union Avenue and 669 Union Avenue) for M-1-S (Light Industrial) R-1 (Single-Family), and P-D (Planned Development) zoning. - 7- a Mr. Kee reported that this area is presently being considered by the City Council for possible change in the General Plan, and the Council will be hearing the matter on July 24. He further stated that in staff's opinion the prezoning should follow the consideration of the land use designation, and therefore is recommending a continuance of this item to the first meeting in August. He mentioned that only one communication had been received regarding this item and it was fora request to postpone this hearing until after the hearing before the City Council. This communication was from Chester Stojanovich, 750 E. McGlincey Lane, Campbell. Chairman Pack declared the public hearing open and invited anyone in the audience to speak for or against this item. Diane Fowler of 1454 Parsons inquired of Mr. Kee about P-D zoning. Mr. Kee explained the use of the P-D zoning to Ms. Fowler, and further stated that the Planning 'Commission has recommended to the Council that the density for this area be reduced to 13 units per acre which will be considered at the July 24, 1978 Council meeting. Mr. Gene Haun of 2196 Central Park Drive appeared before the Commission to express his concerns about the traffic in this area. No one else wishing to be heard at this time, Commissioner Vierhus moved that ZC 78-10 be continued to the August 1, 1978 Planning Commission meeting or until the Council has taken action on the General Plan amendment in this area, seconded by Commissioner Samuelson and unanimously adopted. ~. ~. .~. MISCELLANEOUS TS 78-7 Tentative subdivision map, Lands of Williams, Land of Williams APN 405-25-8 and 9 Mr. Kee reported that staff is recommending that the Planning Commission find that the proposed tract map is in conformance with the General Plan and that the Commission recommend to the Council approval of this map subject to the conditions listed in the Staff Comment Sheet. He stated the Council had adopted an ordinance approving the applicant's plans, elevations, and devel- opment schedule to construct a seven-unit townhouse development on the northerly 317 feet of property known as 705 and 725 W. Hacienda Avenue, and one of the conditions of approval of this ordinance was that a tract map be filed. Commissioner Hebard moved that TS 78-7 be recommended for approval to the City Council and the Commission find that it is in conformance with the General Plan, seconded by Commissioner Vierhus and unanimously adopted. .4 .I. .~. -8- GP 78-9 Referral from the City Council to consider revisions Circulation to the Circulation Element of the General Plan. Element Commissioner Hebard felt that since Mr, Helms was not present that this item should be continued to the next meeting of the Commission. He mentioned that there were a couple of items he would like to discuss and some possible rewording, which he stated he would discuss with staff in the next couple of weeks. Chairman Pack then mentioned that there were not any comments on the Trails and Pathways; the Trails and Pathways Element of the County is coming before the Board of Supervisors for approval and adoption, and all the cities within the County have been asked to include any portions of this element which pertain to each city in its Circulation Element. She stated that she felt it would be proper to have at least a comment made on any portion within Campbell. Mr. Kee invited any other suggestions or comments from the Commission and asked that they be forwarded to staff before the next meeting. Commissioner Hebard then moved that GP 78-9, Circulation Element, be con- tinued to the August 1, 1978 Planning Commission meeting, seconded by Commissioner Vierhus and unanimously adopted. .~. a .~. The Commission took a break at 8:30 p.m. and the meeting reconvened at 8:40 p.m. .~. A .4 GP 78-12 Referral from the City Council for reconsideration of Whiteoaks-Bascom Area a recommendation regarding amendments to the Land City Council Referral Use Element of the General Plan for the Whiteoaks- Bascom area of the community. Mr. Kee explained that at its meeting of May 16, 197$ the Planning Commission considered possible amendments to the Land Use Element of the General Plan for the Whiteoaks-Bascom study area; staff had presented a report which noted that there were four sub-areas or discussion areas which would be most affected by any changes in the General Plan (these areas were chosen on the basis that they were presently undeveloped or could be redeveloped at a higher density than what currently exists). He then displayed a map which defined the location of each of the discussion areas which were considered by the Commission. He then displayed an exhibit which explained the action taken by the Commission to recommend amendments to the Land Use Element after the public hearing at the May 16, 1978 Planning Commission meeting. He further explained that when this item was considered by the City Council at its June 12, 1978 meeting (first reading) and after the public hearing was closed, the Council took action to amend the Land Use Element of the General Plan as recommended by the Commission; however, when this item was before the Council for second reading on June 26, 1978 there were several property owners from Area 2 who indicated that they were not aware of the hearing which was held by the Planning Commission and subsequently the Council took action to refer Area 2 back to the Planning Commission for further study. -9- Mr. Kee then noted that two petitions had been received from property owners in the area and requested that the Recording Secretary read these petitions into the minutes. The Recording Secretary then read into the record the two petitions received (one endorsing the proposed amendments signed by approximately 90 residents in the area, and the other objecting to the proposed amendments signed by approximately 45 property owners). These petitions are attached hereto and made a part of these minutes. Chairman Pack invited anyone in the audience to speak on this item. Ms. Audrey Sugarman of 1121 Holmes Avenue appeared before the Commission to explain that she was in favor of the proposed amendments. She stated the traffic has become horrendous in the area; she also wondered if rezoning is considered would anything be done about the intersection of Whiteoaks and Redding since any further construction in the area would increase the possibility of accidents. Mr. Kee explained that what is before the Commission at the present time is not zoning, it is consideration of possible amendments to the Land Use Element of the General Plan; there would be zoning at some future time, but not at this juncture and the Circulation Element of the General Plan would remain as is at this moment. Commissioner Hebard agreed that this intersection was a serious problem and also felt that something should be done about it; however, the Public Works Department would handle this and this is not what is before the Commission this evening. Mr. Riggs of 205 Redding Road spoke in opposition to the proposed amendments, explaining that he is in the County and wants the existing Land Use Element to rema i n as i s. Mr. Tony Lister, Lenore Way, explained that he is in the city of Campbell and felt that there were many advantages to being in the city of Campbell, i.e., fire and police protection, for the low tax rate of only approximately $30 per year. Mike Barber of g0 Redding Road explained that the .traffic in the Whiteoaks area is tremendous. He stated that in the year he has lived in the area he had nearly been hit six times. He further explained if the density were increased that would only increase the traffic on Whiteoaks. He requested that the lower density be imposed. Mr. Joseph Laurita of 115 Shelley Avenue appeared before the Commission to state that he was in favor of the existing zoning and did not desire any change to the existing General Plan. He further stated that he appreciated the letter notifying the property owners of the hearing, rather than just posting of the area. He explained that not many of the people in the area see the posted notices. -10- Commissioner Kasolas noted for the record that on the petition signed by the 45 property owners it had been signed according to the number of parcels owned, so many of the same signatures had appeared more than once. Commissioner Hebard then noted that some of the signatures are those of property owners in Area 1 or outside of Area 2 who are in opposition to the Planning Commission recommendation of May 16. Mr. Lee Liebmann of 50 Shelley Avenue appeared to speak in favor of leaving the area as it exists on the Land Use Element of the General Plan. Mr. Charles Woodward of Star Realty, representing Mr. Frank Calabray of 60 Shelley Avenue, explained to the Commission that the petition objecting to the change in the General Plan is representative of how the homeowners feel. He stated that if the Land Use Element is changed the property would be downgraded by approximately $30,000. He stated that he felt if developers came into the area the entire area would be upgraded. He further noted that he is negotiating for several pieces of property in the area, and if this change is effectuated he would not proceed with his negotiations. Mr. Peter Coscarelli, 324 Redding Road, stated that at the present time he is in the county and would like to remain county, with the Land Use Element of the General Plan remaining as it is. He further stated that he didn't feel that San Jose or Campbell should be able to determine the zoning since he was in the county. Mr. Kee explained that since this area was in Campbell's Sphere of Influence this area is in Campbell's General Plan. He further explained that at some future time when this area is annexed into the city the zoning will be deter- mined within the Land Use Element of the General Plan. Diane Fowler of 1454 Parsons Avenue stated she has lived in the area 13 years and is located near Areas 1 end 2 and was afraid that however these areas were designated that her pr ;~erty would also be considered to have that designation. She felt that the lower density determined a quality of life, where people were not packed in; there is the opportunity to have more space between houses and more open space and .privacy. Aase Eiriksson of 215 S°~elley Avenue appeared to speak in favor of the existing zoning and remaining the county. Mr. Bill Brown of 1" ,edding Road, property owner since 1861, stated he had appeared before th~ until in June and requested that all property owners be notified of th` =paring before the Planning Commission in order that their desires coy ~e considered. He explained that he was in favor of leaving the deny as it is. He felt that if the density were changed the property owners the area would be hurt by the decreased valuation. He felt that t' r•affic congestion in the area was not a result of densities but a result +- ~-affic coming through the area from Los Gatos and San Jose. Mr. Dwight Huffman of 55 Redding Road stated to the Commission that he wishes to remain in the county and to not be incorporated into the city; he desired the zoning to remain as is. Daisey Wiley of 1400 Hoffman appeared to state that she felt apartments would downgrade the area. She explained that the people who develop the area would not be living there. Joe Scaranteo appeared to speak regarding Area 3. He stated he couldn't under- stand why the density was changed from high to medium. He felt the area should remain high density. Ms. Marie Hamburger of 1198 Holmes Avenue appeared to speak regarding Area No. 4. She stated she was against apartments going in and that she did not want two- story units adjacent to her property. She further stated that the neighbors were also against any apartments going in adjacent to their property. She inquired who she could contact regarding her concerns. Mr. Kee noted at this time that the proposal for apartments at this location was before the County and not the City, and Ms. Hamburger should be contacting the County Planning Department regarding her concerns on this development. Chairman Pack again expressed her concern about high density in this area, and explained that that was one of the reasons for the hearings on these areas at the present time. Frances Silva of 1194 Homes Avenue inquired of the Commission what the difference between medium and low density was. Mr. Kee explained that low density meant that less than 6 units per acre could be developed and medium density meant that 15 to 20 units per acre could be developed. No one else wishing to speak, Commissioner Vierhus moved that the hearing be closed, seconded by Commissioner Campos and unanimously adopted. Commissioner Hebard stated that there is just about every land use in the community in that area, and to be able to choose a correct one would be a very difficult task. He indicated that whatever designation chosen approx- mately 75 percent of the property would be nonconforming. At this time Commissioner Vierhus moved that Area 2 remain as it now exists on the General Plan (Low-Medium Density) and seconded by Commissioner Kasolas. Chairman Pack indicated that other Commissioners had not expressed their opinions, and she felt that they should have the opportunity to speak. Commissioner Kasolas then withdrew his second, and Commissioner Vierhus withdrew his motion in order to give the other Commissioners an opportunity to express their views. Commissioner Dickson stated that he was in favor of reducing the density; however, the property owners in the area have expressed their desire for this area to remain as is. He stated he would be in favor of the motion proposed by Commissioner Vierhus. -12- Commissioner Hebard stated he was a bit dismayed. He felt the Commission had to take into consideration all of the people in the area, not just the property owners in Area 2. Commissioner Samuelson stated that what Commissioner Dickson reflected was also the way he felt, and Bill Brown explained the situation the best. Commissioner Kasolas commented that one of the reasons for the hearing was to hear from as many people as possible. He stated his decision was based on all testimony heard. Commissioner Campos stated that he felt everything had already been said. At this time Commissioner Vierhus moved that Area 2 remain as it is in the existing General Plan (Low-Medium Density), seconded by Commissioner Kasolas and adopted by the following roll call vote: AYES: Commissioners: Campos, Dickson, Samuelson, Vierhus, Kasolas, Pack NOES: Commissioners: Hebard ABSENT: Commissionrs: None Commissioner Dickson noted at this time that this item would have to again go before the City Council. Chairman Pack advised persons in the audience to contact the City Clerk to find out exactly when this item would be considered by the Council. Commissioner Hebard inquired about the Redding-Whiteoaks intersection. Chairman Pack requested that the Public Works Department present a report on plans to alleviate the critical condition of this intersection to the Commission at the next Planning Commission meeting on August 1, 1978. ~: ;; ~: At this time the Commission took a short break at 10:40 p.m. The meeting reconvened at 10:50 p.m. :: :: :~ Referral from Referral from the City Council regarding sign City Council controls for residential conversions. TA 78- 1 Residential Conversions Mr. Kee reported that this item had been referred back to the Planning Commission by the City Council for further consideration regarding signing. The Council seemed to be concerned that more effective sign control should be integrated into the conversion procedure. Staff is recommending inclusion of the Sign Ordinance provisions within the use permit procedure; proposed signs would then be considered at the same time as a use. permit. -13- Commissioner Vierhus moved that the Planning Commission recommend to the City Council an amendment to Section 21.64.080(1) to read as follows: "(1) Office uses 21.42 (Site and Architectural Review) and 21.68 (Sign Ordinance)." This motion was seconded by Commissioner Dickson and adopted with Commissioner Samuelson voting no. J. .V .L TA 78-3 Referral from the City Council to consider a proposed Parking ~ Loading text amendment relating to Chapter 21.50 (Parking and Referral from Loading). City Council Mr. Kee explained that 8t the June 6, 1978 Planning Commission meeting the Commission recommended approval of a text amendment relating to parking and loading which was then forwarded to the City Council for approval. When the item was before the Council at its June 26, 1978 meeting, the Council heard testimony in opposition to the proposal which was primarily aimed at the proposed requirements for Townhouses/Condominiums and apartments. He further stated that it is the staff's understanding that the Council would prefer to allow developers the opportunity to install a certain amount of parking at the time of construction and to provide an area which might be landscaped and later converted to parking if the need should arise (this approach to a parking reserve has been used previously with the most recent being the Totah- Tate application for a 55-unit townhouse development). Mr. Kee then went over the new proposed parking schedule contained in the Staff Comment Sheet. Mr. Phil Burns, a local developer, appeared before the Commission to state that in his opinion the proposal which was before the City Council required more parking for condominium and townhouse developments than other cities in the area. He noted his primary concern was what the additional parking require- ments would do to a project; i.e., the sea of asphalt cuts down on the landscaping and amenities. After much discussion, Commissioner Samuelson-moved that this item be continued to the August 1, 1978 Planning Commission meeting in order that this could be reviewed by the Site and Architectural Review Committee as well as Mr. Phil Burns and Mr. Marvin Bamburg. This motion was seconded by Commissioner Hebard and unanimously adopted. The Chairman then noted that copies of the new Parking Schedule, as well as the meeting date this will go to the Site and Architectural Review Committee, should be mailed to Messrs. Burns and Bamburg. .V J. .V -14- Referral from the Referral from the City Council regarding closure City Council of schools in the community and loss of open space. Surplus School Sites Mr. Kee reported that the staff is recommending that the Planning Commission continue this item to their meeting of August 1, 1978 in order that it could be considered by the Open Space Committee. Commissioner Dickson moved that this item be continued to the August 1, 1978 meeting, seconded by Commissioner Samuelson and unanimously adopted. n iC :~. ITEMS BROUGHT UP BY CHAIRMAN Chairman Pack noted that with the summer going by so quickly and the fact that the City is not going to sponsor a Planning Commission dinner (mainly because of the Jarvis-Gann initiative passing), it might be in order to have a no-host Planning Commission dinner. The Commission seemed to be in agreement to having a dinner. The dinner will be at Renzo's at 6:30 p. m. on Thursday, July 27, 1978• .~ ADJOURNMENT Commissioner Dickson moved that the meeting be adjourned, seconded by Commissioner Hebard and unanimously adopted. The meeting was adjourned at 11:25 p.m. APPROVED: Margaret M. Pack, Chairman ATTEST: Arthur A. Kee, Secretary RECORDED: Jeannine Wade, Recorder -15-