Loading...
PC Min 05/02/1978PLANNING COMMISSION CITY OF CAMPBELL, CALIFORNIA TUESDAY, 7:30 P.M. MINUTES MAY 2, 1978 The Planning Commission of the City of Campbell convened this day in regular session at the regular meeting place, the Council Chambers of the City Hall, 75 North Central Avenue, Campbell, California. ROLL CALL Commissioners: Hebard, Campos, Dickson, Samuelson, Vierhus, Chairman Pack; Secretary Arthur A. Kee; Present Senior Planner Phil Stafford; Engineering Manager Bill Helms; City Attorney J. Robert Dempster; Recording Secretary Jeannine Wade. Absent None APPROVAL OF Commissioner Dickson moved that the minutes of the 111NUTES regular meeting of April 18, 1978 be approved, seconded by Commissioner Vierhus, and unanimously adopted. COMMUNICATIONS Mr. Kee advised the Commission that other than the item listed on the agenda under "Communications" all other communications received relate to specific items on the agenda. Report from the City Manager on the State of the Cit Chairman Pack introduced City Manager Robert Stephens to the Commission and members of the audience. City Manager Stephens reported on the 1977-82 Capital Improvement Program for the City of Campbell. He circulated copies to the Commission of the revised "Capital Improvement Program Funds Allocated (Exhibit A), Capital Improvement Program Staff Recommendations Scheduled Fiscal Year and Source of Funding (Exhibit B), and a Summary of Projected Available Financing." Mr. Stephens then discussed each item listed, giving a brief description and status report on each. After his presentation, Mr. Stephens invited the Commission's questions. Chairman Pack inquired if project No. 6 (Prelim. Architect. Plans - Site to Replace Fire Station No. 1) listed on page 1 of Exhibit "B" should have been Fire Station No. 2, and asked if project No. 5 (Winchester Boulevard to Latimer Avenue, Construction - Street Widening Only) should have stated "Winchester Boulevard from a specific area or street to Latimer Avenue." Mr. Stephens responded that Fire Station No. 2 was the station that should have been listed, and the Winchester Boulevard Improvements should have read "Winchester Boulevard - Campbell Avenue to Latimer Avenue." Commissioner Vierhus inquired of Mr. Stephens if the fire station proposed could be built on the Dot Avenue City owned site rather than on Michael Drive. Mr. Stephens explained that this location had been investigated very thoroughly and it was found that by locating the fire station on Michael Drive the response time would be reduced. Commissioner Campos inquired about the improvement of Winchester Boulevard from Hacienda to the south city limits, and stated that he felt this item should have a high priority. Mr. Helms responded that the City had hoped to construct this project jointly with the City of Los Gatos; however, it wasn't certain whether Los Gatos would have the necessary property acquired by the time Campbell is ready to improve this portion. At this time Commissioner Hebard inquired about Union Avenue, noting that it had been placed on the "Local Improvement Districts - Pending-Proposed" list attached as Exhibit "G" to the Council Referral form. He stated that he felt it should be a high priority item and wondered why it was still on the "Pending-Proposed" list. Mr. Helms responded that at the present time approximately 57 percent of the property owners were in agreement to an LtD, but 60 percent would be needed. He indicated that as soon as the 60 percent figure is reached Public Works would impel the District. Commissioner Campos inquired about the Campbell Grammar School site; he was interested to know what would happen if the funds thus far appropriated would not be enough to cover the cost. City Manager Stephens stated that the City is in the process of setting up a task force to study this project, and the task force would be investigating grants and HCD monies. Commissioner Dickson inquired of staff as to what responsibility the Commission had with respect to this item. Mr. Kee responded that the Commission's responsibility is to review the information presented by the City Manager to see if it is in conflict with the General Plan. At this time Commissioner Dickson moved that the Commission find that the 1977-82 Capital Improvement Program does not disagree with the General Plan, seconded by Commissioner Vierhus, and adopted with Commissioner Hebard voting no. -2- Chairman Pack asked Mr. Keentoor~eendhat the Commissionrwouldehaveytimentol for the meeting of May 16 make additional comments. Mr. Kee responded that he would agendize the item. ARCHITECTURAL APPROVALS Application of Mr. Kjartan 0. Armann for approval S 78-15 Armann, K. of plans to construct a commercial building on property known as 2470 S. Winchester Boulevard in a C-2-S (General Commerclal) Zoning District. Commissioner Vierhus reported that the applicant had met with the Site and Architectural Review Committee this morning, and the Committee is recommending approval. He noted that staff had two recommendations. The applicant was in agreement to all the conditions specified, and the Architectural Advisor was satisfied with the plans. Mr. Kee reported that since all concernsstaffbserecommendation isefortapproval Architectural Review Committee meeting, subject to the conditions listed in the Staff Comment Sheet. Commissioner Dickson moved that S 78-15 be approved subject to the following conditions: CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL S 7g-15 - Armann, K. 1. Landscaping plan indicating type and size of plant material, and location of hose bibs or sprinkler system to be submitted for approval of the Planning Director prior to application for building permit. 2, Landscaping and fencing shall be maintained in accordance with the approved plan. ost a faithful performance bond in the amount of 3, Applicant to either (1) P stri in of parking areas within $3,000 to insure landscaping, fencing, P 9 three months of completion of construction, or (2) file written agreement to complete landscaping, fencing and striping of parking areas prior to final Building Department clearance. 4. All mechanical equipment located on roofs to be screened as approved by the Planning Director. Revised elevations to be approved by the Planning Director upon recom- 5 mendation of the Architectural Advisor. - 3- The applicant is notified as part of this application that he/she is required to meet the following conditions in accordance with Ordinances of the City of Campbell and Laws of the State of California. A. All parking and driveway areas to be developed in compliance with Section 21.50 of the Campbell Municipal Code. All parking spaces to be provided with appropriate concrete curbs or bumper guards. B. Underground utilities to be provided as required by Section 20.16.070 of the Campbell Municipal Code. C. Plans submitted to the Building Department for plan check shall indicate clearly the location of all connections for underground utilities including water, sewer, electric, telephone and television cables, etc. D. Sign application to be submitted in accordance with provisions of the sign ordinance for all signs. No sign to be installed until application is approved and permit issued by the Building Department. (Section 21.68.070 of the Campbell Municipal Code.) E. Ordinance No. 782 of the Campbell Municipal Code stipulates that any contract for the collection and disposal of refuse, garbage, wet garbage, and rubbish produced within the limits of the City of Campbell shall be made with Green Valley Disposal Company. This requirement applies to all single-family dwellings, multiple apartment units, to all commercial, business, industrial, manufacturing, and construction establishments. F. Trash container(s) of a size and quantity necessary to serve the development shall be located in area(s) approved by the Fire Department. Unless other- wise noted, enclosure(s) shall consist of a concrete floor surrounded by a .solid wall or fence and have self-closing doors of a size specified by the Fire Department. All enclosures to be constructed at grade level. G. Applicant shall comply with all appropriate State and City requirements for the handicapped. BUILDING DEPARTMENT H. North wall shalt be minimum 1 hour Table 5-A, Section 2203. I. Roof covering not shown shall be fire retardant. Section 1603 (a) 32030(e). FIRE DEPARTMENT J. Provide 2A-IOBC fire extinguishers. K. Increase driveway widths around building to 16 feet. L. Areas adjacent to building sides to be designated as "No Parking Lane". -4- PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT M. Pay storm drainage area fee based on $765 per net acre ($477). N. Provide a grading and drainage plan for the approval of the City Engineer. 0. Obtain an excavation permit for installation of a driveway approach and planting of street trees. The applicant is notified that he shall comply with all applicable Codes or Ordinances of the City of Campbell which pertain to this development and are not herein specified. This motion was seconded by Commissioner Hebard and unanimously adopted. _~ S 78-16 Application of Mr. Robert J. Zipse for approval of Zipse, R. plans to construct an industrial building on property known as 100 Cristich Lane in an M-1-S (Light Industrial) Zoning District. Commissioner Vierhus reported that the Site and Architectural Review Committee is recommending approval of this application. He stated that the Committee had some concerns about the landscaping, but the applicant has agreed to include additional landscaping in various areas throughout the project (the project includes more than just one building). Mr. Kee stated that staff is recommending approval subject to the conditions listed in the Staff Comment Sheet. Commissioner Hebard inquired about street dedication in conjunction with this project. Mr. Helms responded that the two rights of way are not public streets, they are private access easements. Commissioner Dickson moved that S 78-16 be approved subject to the following conditions: CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL S 78-16 - Zipse, R. 1. Property to be fenced and landscaped as indicated and/or added in red on plans. 2. Landscaping plan indicating type and size of plant material, and location of hose bibs or sprinkler system to be submitted for approval of the Planning Director prior to application for building permit. 3. Fencing plan indicating location and design details for fencing to be submitted for approval of Planning Director prior to application for building permit. -5- 4. Landscaping and fencing shall be maintained in accordance with the approved plan. 5. Applicant to either (1) post a faithful performance bond in the amount of $1,000 to insure landscaping, fencing, striping of parking areas within three months of completion of construction, or (2) file written agreement to complete landscaping, fencing and striping of parking areas prior to final Building Department clearance. 6. All mechanical equipment located on roofs to be screened as approved by the Planning Director. The applicant is notified as part of this application that he/she is required to meet the following conditions in accordance with Ordinances of the City of Campbell and Laws of the State of California. A. All parking and driveway areas to be developed in compliance with Section 21.50 of the Campbell Municipal Code. All parking spaces to be provided with appropriate concrete curbs or bumper guards. B. Underground utilities to be provided as required by Section 20.16.070 of the Campbell Municipal Code. C. Plans submitted to the Building Department for plan check shall indicate clearly the location of all connections for underground utilities including water, sewer, electric, telephone and television cables, etc. D. Sign application to be submitted in accordance with provisions of the sign ordinance for alt signs. No sign to be installed until application is approved and permit issued by the Building Department. (Section 21.68.070 of the Campbell Municipal Code.) E. Ordinance No. 782 of the Campbell Municipal Code stipulates that any contract for the collection and disposal of refuse, garbage, wet garbage, and rubbish produced within the limits of the City of Campbell shall be made with Green Valley Disposal Company. This requirement applies to all single-family dwellings, multiple apartment units, to all commercial, business, industrial, manufacturing, and construction establishments. F. Trash container(s) of a size and quantity necessary to serve the development shall be located in area(s) approved by the Fire Department. Unless other- wise noted, enclosure(s) shall consist of a concrete floor surrounded by a solid wall or fence and have self-closing doors of a size specified by the Fire Department. All enclosures to be constructed at grade level. G. Applicant shall comply with all appropriate State and City requirements for the handicapped. BUILDING DEPARTMENT H. Roof covering (not shown) shall be fire retardant. Section 1603(a)3203(e) -6- FIRE DEPARTMEPJT I. Provide on-street fire hydrant at entrance of gate on Griffiths Lane. J. Provide 2A-IOBC fire extinguishers. The applicant is notified that he/she shall comply with all applicable Codes or Ordinances of the City of Campbell which pertain to this development and are not herein specified. This motion was seconded by Commissioner Samuelson and unanimously adopted. ~t ;: ,. PUBLIC HEARINGS UP 78-6 This is the time and place for a public hearing Swenson, B. to consider the application of Mr. Barry Swenson for a use permit and approval of plans to construct a racquet club on property known as 70 S. San Tomas Aquino Road in a C-2-S (General Commercial) Zoning District. Mr. Kee displayed the plans for the Commission's review, stating that the Commission had previously approved a similar building and modifications under "S" type proceedings. However, because of recent changes to the C-2 section of the Zoning Ordinance, staff felt this application should be processed as a use permit. He stated that staff is recommending approval of this use permit. Commissioner Vierhus reported that the applicant had met with the Site and Architectural Review Committee this morning and all concerns had been resolved. He stated the Committee is also recommending approval of this application. Commissioner Campos inquired whether or not this new plan would have any affect on the traffic in this area, and wanted to know if there were any ingress-egress problems. Mr. Helms responded that there would not be any ingress-egress problems, and in Public Works' opinion San Tomas Aquino Road would be able to handle the volumes of traffic generated by this facility. Chairman Pack declared the public hearing open and invited anyone in the audience to speak for or against this item. Mr. Paul McAllister, representing the applicant Barry Swenson, appeared before the Commission to state that he felt this is a very architecturally desirable building. He offered to answer any questions the Commission might have. -7- Chairman Pack inquired what would be along the south side of the property line. Mr. McAllister responded that there will be a driveway along the south property line, and that the driveway would be accommodating two-way traffic. No one else wishing to be heard, Commissioner Vierhus moved that the public hearing be closed. This motion was seconded by Commissioner Samuelson and unanimoully adopted. RESOLUTION N0. 1690 Commissioner Dickson moved that the Planning Commission adopt Resolution No. 1690 approving the application of Mr. Barry Swenson fora use permit and approval of plans to construct a racquet club on property known as 70 S. San Tomas Aquino Road in a C-2-S (General Commercial) Zoning District, seconded by Commissioner Vierhus and unanimously adopted by the following roll call vote: AYES: Commissioners: Hebard, Campos, Dickson, Samuelson, Vierhus, Pack NOES: Commissioners: None ABSENT: Commissioners: None i. •• V PD 78-7 This is the time and place fora public hearing to Peisker, Hans consider the application of Mr. Hans Peisker for approval of plans, elevations, and development schedule to allow construction of a warehouse and office facility on property known as 116 Railway Avenue in a P-D (Planned Development/Industrial) Zoning District. Chairman Pack noted that staff has recommended a continuance of this item. Mr. Kee explained that staff has recommended a continuance in accord with a request from the applicant. Commissioner Vierhus reported that this item did not come before the Site and Architectural Review Committee this morning. Chairman Pack declared the public hearing open and invited anyone in the audience to speak for or against this item. No one wishing to be heard, Commissioner Vierhus moved that this item be continued to the Planning Commission meeting of June 20, 1978• ;; ~: k -8- At this time the Commission took a short break. The meeting reconvened at 9 p.m. .V .V .4 pp ]$-$ This is the time and place for a public hearing Lampe, J. to consider the application of Mr. James Lampe for approval of plans, elevations, and development schedule to allow construction of a 45-unit apart- ment project on property known as 280, 282, and 300 Union Avenue in a P-D (Planned Development/High Density Residential) Zoning District. Mr. Kee displayed the site plan for the Commission's review. He explained that on March 13, 1978 the City Council approved plans to construct a 27-unit apartment project on a 1.07 acre site under proceedings known as PD 78-2; the applicant has now acquired the two parcels to the north, thus this appli- cation involves the following: 1. The previously approved plans being classified as Phase I of this development, 2. Approval of plans to construct 18 apartment units on a 0.67 acre site, and 3. Approval of a new development schedule. He further stated that the proposed development will consist of 15 one-bedroom apartments, 25 two-bedroom apartments, and 5 three bedroom units with 70 parking spaces (46 covered and 24 uncovered) fora resultant parking ratio of 1.56 spaces per unit, or 1.1 space per bedroom. Commissioner Vierhus reported that the applicant had met with the Site and Architectural Review Committee, and the Committee is recommending approval of this application. Chairman Pack declared the public hearing open and invited anyone in the audience to speak for or against this item. Mr. Bruce Johnson of 80 Alice Avenue stated that he is working with the applicant, Mr. Lampe, on the design and development of this project. He explained that at the time of approval of the first phase of this development he did not know Mr. Lampe was considering acquisition of any additional property. He further explained that he has tried to integrate this project with the previously approved project. Commissioner Hebard inquired about the parking. He stated the Council has expressed a desire to have more parking for toYanhouses and apartments than previously required. He indicated that 85 total parking spaces would be more in line with the Council's desire--15 one-bedroom units at 12 spaces = 222; 25 two bedroom units at 2 spaces/unit = 50; and 5 three-bedroom units at 22 spaces/unit = 122; fora grand total of 85 parking spaces. - 9- Mr. Kee stated that staff was not aware that it was a policy of the Commission to require 2 spaces for a two-bedroom unit. City Attorney Dempster stated that since certain ground rules have been established the Commission should abide by the ground rules, euen though consideration has been given to changing them. He also indicated that since the developer was not aware of the Commission's desire to change the ground rules, he acted in good faith by abiding by the present policy of the Commission. Mr. James Lampe, applicant, appeared before the Commission to explain that one of the reasons he had acquired the additional property was to make it a more desirable project. He stated he could not understand why the parking require- ments approved by the Council in March would not be applicable to this project. Mr. Bob Briggs of Curtner Avenue (owner of Parcel No. 47) appeared before the Commission to speak in favor of the type of high density developments in the area. He explained that approximately two years ago the property owners in that area had met with Councilmembers to convey their thoughts on keeping the high density in the area. He was opposed to high density developments occurring in a piecemeal fashion on small lots. He felt it would be better for a developer to consolidate the small parcels in order to develop a larger project. No one else wishing to be heard, Commissioner Vierhus moved that the public hearing be closed, seconded by Commissioner Samuelson, and unanimously adopted. Chairman Pack announced that she would be abstaining on this item due to a possible conflict of interest. RESOLUTION N0. 1691 Commissioner Vierhus moved that the Planning Commission adopt Resolution No. 1691 approving the application of Mr. James Lampe for approval of plans, elevations, and development schedule to allow construction of a 45-unit apartment project on property known as 280, 282, and 300 Union Avenue in a P-D (Planned Development/High Density Residential) Zoning District, seconded by Commissioner Samuelson and failed by the following roll call vote: AYES: Commissioners: Dickson, Samuelson, Vierhus NOES: Commissioners: Hebard, Campos ABSENT: Commissioners: None ABSTAIN: Commissioners: Pack This motion failed. Additional discussion ensued regarding parking requirements of this project. -10- RESOLUTION N0. 1691 Commissioner Vierhus moved that the Planning Commission adopt Resolution No. 1691 approving the application of Mr. James Lampe for approval of plans, elevations, and development schedule to allow construction of a 45-unit apartment project on property known as 280, 282, and 300 Union Avenue in a P-D (Planned Development/High Density Residential) Zoning District with the Council's attention invited to the fact that the parking for the proposed project is close to the minimum required by the Zoning Ordinance, seconded by Commissioner Samuelson, and adopted by the following roll call vote: AYES: Commissioners: Hebard, Campos, Dickson, Samuelson, Vierhus NOES: Commissioners: None ABSENT: Commissioners: None ABSTAIN: Commissioners: Pack At this time Chairman Pack asked that staff notify the applicant of the time and date that this application would go before the City Council. Mr. Kee responded that he would take care of that matter. _4 _~ MISCELLANEOUS GP 78-1 Request of Mr. Ronald M. Tate for approval of a Totah, Tate, revised development schedule for previously approved and Lee plans to construct a residential development on property known as 1871 and 1961 Pollard Road and 1536 and 1560 More Avenue in a P-D (Planned Devel- opment/Low-Medium Density Residential) Zoning District. Mr. Kee explained to the Commission that the applicant is requesting approval to construct this development in two phases, with a completion of the project scheduled for June 1979 instead of February 1979 as originally proposed. Commissioner Vierhus reported that the applicant met with the Site and Archi- tectural Review Committee this morning and the Committee is agreeable to the revised development schedule. Commissioner Hebard moved that the Planning Commission recommend to the City Council approval of the revised development schedule for GP 78-1, seconded by Commissioner Samuelson, and unanimously adopted. _~ .~ PD 77-8 Request of Mr. Donald F, Imwalle for approval of Imwalle, D. a revised development schedule for previously approved plans to construct a commercial center on property known as 471 East Campbell Avenue in a P-D (Planned Development/Commercial) Zoning District. Mr. Kee explained that the applicant is requesting approval of a revised development schedule. Commissioner Vierhus reported that this item had not been reviewed with the Site and Architectural Review Committee. Commissioner Hebard inquired as to why the previous application had been reviewed by the Committee but this application had not. Mr. Kee explained that the previous application would be constructed in two phases, and it was felt that the Committee should have an opportunity to review it. Commissioner Hebard moved that the Planning Commission recommend to the City Council approval of the revised development schedule for PD 77-8, seconded by Commissioner Samuelson, and unanimously adopted. ., a ;~ Residential Staff Report on Residential Conversions Conversions Mr. Kee explained that as a result of the joint City Council/Planning Commission Study Session the Council directed the Planning Commission to hold public hearings for consideration of changing the zoning ordinance pertaining to residential conversions. He advised the Commission that a public hearing will be held on May 16, 1978 to consider amending the zoning ordinance. Chairman Pack requested that staff publicize this item, other than by the notice to the press (legal advertisement). Mr. Kee indicated that staff would notify both the Campbell Press and the San Jose Mercury. Commissioner Dickson moved that staff's report be acknowledged and filed, seconded by Commissioner Vierhus, and unanimously adopted. ., ,. _12_ Fast-Food Staff Report on Fast-Food Restaurants Restaurants Mr. Kee reported that staff is recommending that a public hearing be held on June 6, 1978 to consider text amendments to the definitions of Drive-in Restaurants, Fast-Food Restaurants, and Standard Restaurants. Chairman Pack wanted to know if "Delicatessens" might also be defined. RESOLUTION N0. 1692 Commissioner Vierhus moved that the Planning Commission adopt Resolution No. 1692 setting June 6, 1978 at 7:30 p.m. as the time and place for a public hearing to consider text amendments to definitions of Drive-In Restaurants, Fast-Food Restaurants, and Standard Restaurants, as defined in Sections 21.02.343(A), 21.02.343(8), 21.02.343(C), 21.24,030 in the Campbell Municipal Code, seconded by Commissioner Samuelson, and unanimously adopted by the following roll call vote: AYES: Commissioners: Hebard, Campos, Dickson, Samuelson, Vierhus, Pack NOES: Commissioners: None ABSENT: Commissioners: None At this time Mr. Kee invited any comments from the Commission that they might have between now and the public hearing date. _~ Staff Report/Council Staff Report on the Parking Requirements of Other Referral - Parking Cities for Apartments and Townhouses. Requirements for Apartments and Townhouses Mr. Kee stated that as a result of the City Council/Planning Commission Study Session held on April 3, 1978, the Council referred the subject of parking requirements for apartments and townhouses to the Planning Commission for consideration of a possible text amendment. RESOLUTION N0. 1693 Commissioner Dickson moved that the Planning Commission adopt Resolution No. 1693 setting June 6, 1978 at 7:30 p.m. as the date and time for a public hearing to consider a text amendment to Chapter 21.50 (Parking and Loading) of the Campbell Municipal Code, seconded by Commissioner Campos, and unanimously adopted by the following roll call vote: -13- AYES: Commissioners: Hebard, Campos, Dickson, Samuelson, Vierhus, Pack NOES: Commissioners: None ABSENT: Commissioners: None City Council Referral Referral from the City Council to consider Circulation Element revisions to the text of the proposed Circulation Element. Mr. Kee reported that the text of the Circulation Element is planned to be extended in two areas, and staff is recommending that this item be continued to the first meeting in June in order to provide sufficient time. He also stated that staff is recommending that two Commissioners be appointed to serve on a committee to work with staff in preparing revisions to the draft Circulation Element. Chairman Pack appointed Commissioners Vierhus and Hebard to serve on a committee which will work with staff in preparing revisions. ADJOURNMENT Commissioner Vierhus moved that the meeting be adjourned, seconded by Commissioner Samuelson ---- and unanimously adopted. The meeting was adjourned at 10:20 p.m. APPROVED: Margaret M. Pack, Chairman ATTEST: Arthur A. Kee, Secretary RECORDED: Jeannine Wade, Recorder -14-