Loading...
PC Min 01/17/1978PLANNING COMMISSION CITY OF CAMPBELL, CALIFORNIA TUESDAY, 7:30 P.M. MINUTES JANUARY 17, 1978 The Planning Commission of the City of Campbell convened this day in regular session at the regular meeting place, the Council Chambers of the City Hall, 75 North Central Avenue, Campbell, California. ROLL CALL Commissioners: Hebard, Dickson, Samuelson, Vierhus Chairman Pack, Secretary Arthur A. Kee; Planner II Present Richard Schneider; City Attorney J. Robert Dempster; Engineering Manager Bill Helms; Recording Secretary Jeannine Wade. Absent Commissioners: Campos, Lubeckis Outgoing Chairman Dickson introduced the new Chairman for 1978, Margaret M. Pack. After taking the chair, Chairman Pack presented Commissioner Dickson with Resolution No. 1659 adopted by the Commission on January 3, 1978 in appreciation of the outstanding job he did as Chairman of the Commission during 1977. APPROVAL OF Commissioner Hebard moved that the minutes of the MINUTES regular meeting of January 3, 1978 be approved, seconded by Commissioner Vierhus, and unanimously adopted. COMMUNICATIONS Mr. Kee stated that communications received related to specific items on the agenda. ARCHITECTURAL APPROVALS S 77-39 Continued application of Mr. Alfred Wilson for Wilson, A. approval of plans to construct a triplex on the rear of property known as 257 W. Rincon Avenue in an R-2-S (Medium Density Residential) Zoning District. Commissioner Vierhus reported that this item was not reviewed by the Site and Architectural Review Committee this morning. Mr. Kee stated that the staff recommendation is for denial of the plans as presented, and that it has been on the Planning Commission agenda since November 1, 1977. He also stated that revised plans, which were to be in before the meeting this evening, had not been received. Commissioner Hebard moved that s 77-39 be denied without prejudice since revised plans had not been submitted, seconded by Commissioner Dickson, and unanimously adopted. S 77-51 Continued application of Mr. Richard B. Pasek for Pasek, Richard approval of plans to construct a lumber storage yard on property known as 925 McGlincey Lane in an M-1-S (Light Industrial) Zoning District. Commissioner Vierhus reported that this item was not reviewed by the Site and Architectural Review Committee this morning. Mr. Kee stated that it is staff's recommendation that this item be continued to the next regular meeting in order to allow time for the applicant to submit revised parking plans that would include the adjoining lot. The applicant, Mr. Richard Pasek, appeared before the Commission and indicated that he had iris revised plans with him. The Commission expressed the desire that the plans be reviewed by the Site and Architectural Review Committee before they are presented to the Commission. Mr. Pasek stated that he would submit his revised plans to the Planning Staff tomorrow morning. Commissioner Dickson moved that S 77-51 be continued to the next regular meeting in order to allow time for the applicant to submit revised parking plans. .4 .4 .4 s 77-52 Application of Mr. Frank Gippetti for approval of Gippetti, Frank plans to construct an industrial building on property known as 1460 Whiteoaks in an M-1-S (Light Industrial) Zoning District. Commissioner Vierhus reported that this item had been reviewed in the Site and Architectural Review Committee meeting this morning. He explained that this application is for the construction of an industrial building on Whiteoaks Road. He stated that the Site and Architectural Review Committee is rec- ommending approval with the added condition that the revised elevations be submitted to the Planning Director as indicated in red on the approved plans. Commissioner Vierhus pointed out that the Committee had recommended that the building be set further back on the lot than was originally submitted. The applicant was agreeable to this. -2- Commissioner Hebard moved that S 77-52 be approved subject to the following conditions, which includes the added condition that revised elevations be submitted to the Planning Director as indicated in red on the approved plans: CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL - S 77-52, Frank Gippetti 1. Applicant to submit a letter, satisfactory to the City Attorney to be recorded as a deed restriction, limiting the use of the property to: 960 square feet of office use, 5,800 square feet of speculative indus- trial use, and 15,190 square feet of warehouse use. 2. Building to be relocated to the east property line. 3. Applicant to provide one parking stall for use by handicapped persons; stall shall be appropriately signed. 4. Revised elevations to be approved by the Planning Director upon recommend ation of the Architectural Advisor. 5. Property to be fenced and landscaped as indicated and as added in "red" on plans. 6. Landscape plan indicating type of plant material, location of hose bibs, or sprinkler system and type of fencing to be submitted for approval of the Planning Director at time of application for building permit. 7. Landscaping shall be maintained in accordance with the approved landscape plan. 8. Faithful performance bond in the amount of $3,000 to be posted to insure landscaping, fencing and striping of parking area within three (3) months of completion of construction, or applicant may file written agreement to complete landscaping, fencing and striping of parking area prior to final Building Department clearance. g. All mechanical equipment located on roofs shall be screened as approved by the Planning Director. The applicant is notified as part of this application that he is required to meet the following conditions in accordance with Ordinances of the City of Campbell. A. All parking and driveway areas to be developed in compliance with Section 21.50 of the Campbell Municipal Code. All parking spaces to be provided with appropriate concrete curbs or bumper guards. B. Underground utilities to be provided as required by Section 20.16.070 of the Campbell Municipal Code. -3- C. Plans submitted to the Building Department for plan check shall indicate clearly the location of all connections for underground utilities, including water, sewer, electric, telephone and television cables, etc. D. Sign application to be submitted in accordance with provisions of the sign ordinance for all signs. No sign to be installed until application is approved and permit issued by the Building Department. E. Ordinance No. 782 of the Campbell Municipal Code stipulates that any contract for the collection and disposal of refuse, garbage, wet garbage, and rubbish produced within the limits of the City of Campbell shall be made with Green Valley Disposal Company. This requirement applies to all single-family dwellings, multiple apartment units, to all commercial, business, industrial, manufacturing, and construction establishments. F. Trash container(s) of a size and quantity necessary to serve the devel- opment shall be located in area(s) approved by the Fire Department. Unless otherwise noted, enclosure(s) shall consist of a concrete floor surrounded by a solid wall or fence and have self-closing doors of a size specified by the Fire Department. All enclosures to be constructed at grade level. G. Applicant shall meet State requirements for the handicapped. FIRE DEPARTMENT H. Provide an automatic fire extinguishing system. I. Provide a "2A-IOBC" fire extinguisher for each leased space. y BUILDING DEPARTMENT J. Group F-2, Type U shall require roof architectural appendage to be limited to front and south elevations. PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT K. Provide copy of preliminary title report. L. Revise plans to show existing White Oaks right of way. M. Dedicate street right of way in accordance with proposed plan line. N. Pay storm drainage area fee based on $765 per acre. 0. Execute agreement for street improvements and post a bond. P. Provide a grading and drainage plan. Q. Obtain an excavation permit for any work in the street right of way. The applicant is notified that he shall comply with all applicable Codes or Ordinances of the City of Campbell which pertain to this development and are not herein specified. This motion was seconded by Commissioner Dickson and unanimously adopted .4 .4 .~ -4- S 77-54 Application of the City of Campbell for approval of City of Campbell plans to construct a storage building on property known as 290 Dillon Avenue in a P-F (Public Facilities) Zoning District. Commissioner Vierhus reported that Wally Byron, the Building Official for the City of Campbell, was not present this morning at the Site and Archi- tectural Review Committee, but Mr. Kee was there to represent the applicant. The Committee recommended approval with the condition that the roof line be continued across the south elevation. Mr. Kee stated that it was staff's recommendation as well as the Site and Architectural Review Committee's recommendation that the roof line be continued across the south elevation. Commissioner Hebard moved that S 77-54 be approved with the condition that the roof line be continued across the south elevation, seconded by Commissioner Dickson, and unanimously adopted. .4 .V S 77-55 Application of Mr. William (. Rosen for approval Rosen, William of plans to construct a 60-unit apartment complex on property known as 3555 S. Bascom Avenue in an R-3-S (High Density Residential) Zoning District. Commissioner Vierhus reported that this item had been reviewed by the Site and Architectural Review Committee this morning. Before approval was recommended, the Committee discussed several points the Architectural Advisor had brought up regarding the project. He stated that all of the suggestions the Architectural Advisor had were incorporated into the approval. Commissioner Hebard brought out the fact that the rear yard setback was only 12 feet and reminded Commissioner Vierhus that the Site and Architectural Review Committee had decided to refer the setback question to the full Commission. He stated that one of the concerns of the Committee had been that this is a two-story development with windows upstairs which will be adjacent to single-family residences; since the Commission has had past concerns regarding rear yard situations, it was felt by the Committee that the full Commission should have an opportunity to review this. Commissioner Vierhus pointed out that the applicant agreed to an additional three-foot setback, which would give a total of 15 feet. At this time Commissioner Dickson inquired of staff what the required setback was for this development, and what would it be for a single-family residence. Mr. Kee indicated that it would be nine feet for this development, and the same fora residence. -5- Mr. Gene Masciocchi with Dick Finnegan, Inc. (the architect for the project) explained to the Commission that the plans had been originally submitted with a 12-foot rear yard setback, and after discussing this matter revised the plans to indicate a 15-foot setback. He explained that the way the project was designed the bedrooms would be at the rear rather than the living areas so that the majority of the time the rooms would not be occupied. Chairman Pack inquired if all the concerns of the Architectural Advisor had been met. Mr. Kee answered that they had. Mr. Masciocchi stated to the Commission that the builder was in agreement with all the changes to the plans. Commissioner Vierhus moved that S 77-55 be approved subject to the following conditions, which includes the added condition that the building shall be set back 15 feet from the rear property line: CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL - S 77-55, William Rosen 1. Applicant to provide a minimum of 60 covered parking stalls - minimum stall size to be 9' x 20'. 2. Revised elevations to be approved by the Planning Director upon rec- ommendation of the Architectural Advisor. 3. Property to be fenced and landscaped as indicated and as added in "red" on plans. 4. Landscape plan indicating type of plant material, location of hose bibs, or sprinkler system and type of fencing to be submitted for approval of the Planning Director at time of application for building permit. 5. Landscaping shall be maintained in accordance with the approved land- scape plan. 6. Faithful performance bond in the amount of $5,000 to be posted to insure landscaping, fencing and striping of parking area within three (3) months of completion of construction, or applicant may file written agreement to complete landscaping, fencing and striping of parking area prior to final Building Department clearance. 7. All mechanical equipment located on roofs shall be screened as approved by the Planning Director. 8. Building shall be set back 15 feet from rear property line. The applicant is notified as part of this application that he is required to meet the following conditions in accordance with Ordinances of the City of Campbell. -6- A. All parking and driveway areas to be developed in compliance with Section 21.50 of the Campbell Municipal Code. All parking spaces to be provided with appropriate concrete curbs or bumper guards. B. Underground utilities to be provided as required by Section 20.16.070 of the Campbell Municipal Code. C. Plans submitted to the Building Department for plan check shall indicate clearly the location of all connections for underground utilities, including water, sewer, electric, telephone and television cables, etc. D. Sign application to be submitted in accordance with provisions of the sign ordinance for all signs. No sign to be installed until application is approved and permit issued by the Building Department. E. Ordinance No. 782 of the Campbell Municipal Code stipulates that any contract for the collection and disposal of refuse, garbage, wet garbage, and rubbish produced within the limits of the City of Campbell shall be made with Green Valley Disposal Company. This requirement applies to all single-family dwellings, multiple apartment units, to alt commercial business, industrial, manufacturing, and construction establishments. F. Trash container(s) of a size and quantity necessary to serve the develop- ment shall be located in area(s) approved by the Fire Department. Unless otherwise noted, enclosure(s) shall consist of a concrete floor surrounded by a solid wall or fence and have self-closing doors of a size specified by the Fire Department. All enclosures to be constructed at grade level. G. Applicant shall meet State requirements for the handicapped. FIRE DEPARTMENT H. Provide an on-site fire hydrant system connected to the Bascom Avenue main. I. Provide 2A-IOBC fire extinguishers in metal cabinets. PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT J. Provide a copy of a preliminary title report. K. Provide a grading and drainage plan. L. Obtain an excavation permit to install sidewalk, driveway, and an electrolier on Bascom Avenue frontage. M. Modify driveway to provide for only one curb cut. The applicant is notified that he shall comply with all applicable Codes or Ordinances of the City of Campbell which pertain to this development and are not herein specified. This motion was seconded by Commissioner Samuelson and adopted with Commissioner Hebard voting no. -7- SA 77-61 Appeal by Francis Andreson and San Tomas Foods of San Tomas Foods a decision of the Planning Director which denied an application for approval of a 7' by 20' free- standing sign located on property known as 651 West Hamilton in a P-D (Planned Development/ Commercial} Zoning District. Commissioner Vierhus reported that because of the sensitive nature of signs, the Architectural Review Committee felt this sign should go back to the Sign Review Committee for further review. The applicant was not present at the Architectural Review Committee meeting this morning. Commissioner Samuelson stated that the Sign Review Committee had reviewed this application. Their recommendation had been consistent with their policy to take every opportunity to seek a reduction in the size of existing large signs. Commissioner Vierhus moved that SA 77-61 be referred back to the Sign Review Committee and that the applicant be present at the time this item is again discussed. This motion was seconded by Commissioner Hebard and unanimously adopted. .~ PUBLIC HEARINGS GP 78-1 This is the time and place for public hearing to Totah, Tate & Lee consider the application of Messrs. John Totah, Ron Tate, and Howard Lee for: (1) an amendment to the Land Use Element of the General Plan from "Commercial" to "Low Medium Density Residential;" Chairman Pack explained that there are three parts to this application, and that each part would be considered in a separate public hearing. Commissioner Vierhus explained that only part 3, relating to the plans and elevations, was before the Site and Architectural Review Committee this morning. Mr. Kee explained that the applicant is proposing to amend the Land Use Element of the General Plan from "Commercial" to "Low Medium Density Residential" for properties known as 1871 and 1961 Pollard Road, in order to facilitate the development of a townhouse project. He stated that the zoning on the properties proposed fora General Plan Amendment is P-D. Mr. Kee indicated that staff has no problem in recommending approval of this. He mentioned that staff was opposed to changing the zoning to "Commercial" about seven years ago. He indicated that the P-D zoning is already existing so there would be no conflict. - 8- Commissioner Hebard inquired: "Since the PD zoning is an ordinance, with plans, wouldn't that ordinance have to be rescinded?" Mr. Kee stated that when the Council adopts an ordinance approving one PD development, the previous ordinance and PD developments would automatically be rescinded. Mr. Kee stated that the staff's recommendation is that the Planning Commissicr~ adopt a resolution recommending approval of the proposed amendment to the Land Use Element of the General Plan from Commercial to Low Medium Density Resi- dential (6-13 units per gross acre) for properties known as 1871 and 1961 Pollard Road. Chairman Pack declared the public hearing open and invited anyone in the audience to speak for or against this item. No one wishing to be heard, Commissioner Vierhus moved that the public hearing be closed. This motion was seconded by Commissioner Samuelson and unanimously adopted. RESOLUTION N0. 1660 Commissioner Vierhus moved that the Planning Commission adopt Resolution Pao. 1660 recommending approval of an amendment to the Land Use Element of the General Plan from "Commercial" to "Low Medium Density Residential" for properties known as 1871 and 1861 Pollard Road, seconded by Com- missioner Samuelson, and adopted by the following roll call vote: AYES: Commissioners: Hebard, Dickson, Samuelson, Vierhus, Chairman Pack NOES: Commissioners: None ABSENT: Commissioners: Campos, Lubeckis This is the time and place for public hearing to consider the application of Messrs. John Totah, Ron Tate, and Howard Lee fora change of zoning from R-M (Multiple Family/Low Medium Density Residential) to P-D (Planned Development/Low Medium Density Residential). Chairman Pack announced that this is a public hearing to consider the change of zoning from R-M (Multiple Family) to P-D (Planned Development) for properties known as 1536 and 1560 More Avenue. Chairman Pack then declared the public hearing open and invited anyone in the audience to speak for or against this item. No one wishing to be heard, Commissioner Vierhus moved that the public hearing be closed. This motion was seconded by Commissioner Samuelson and unanimously adopted. -9- RESOLUTION N0. 1661 Commissioner Dickson moved that the Planning Commission adopt Resolution No. 1661 recommending approval of a zone change from R-M (Multiple- Family) to P-D (Planned Development) for properties known as 1536 and 1560 More Avenue, seconded by Commissioner Vierhus, and adopted by the following roll call vote: AYES: Commissioners: Hebard, Dickson, Samuelson, Vierhus, Chairman Pack NOES: Commissioners: None ABSENT: Commissioners: Campos, Lubeckis This is the time and place for public hearing to consider the application of Messrs. John Totah, Ron Tate, and Howard Lee for approval of plans, elevations, and development schedule to allow construction of a 60-unit residential development on property known as 1871 and 1961 Pollard Road, and 1536 and 1560 More Avenue. Commissioner Vierhus reported that this item had come before the Site and Architectural Review Committee this morning. He indicated that the Committee has recommended approval of a plan and an alternate. Mr. Kee reported that the plan as presented is proposing to retain the two existing residences and construct 58 townhouse units on a 6.76 acre site. This proposed development is contingent upon the applicant purchasing the land to the north which is owned by the Pacific Gas and Electric Company. The alternate plan proposes 54 townhouses instead of 58, and only one of the two existing residences would remain, on a 6-acre site. He stated that the applicant is providing two covered parking spaces per unit and 32 additional spaces for guest parking. Staff is of the opinion that the parking ratio of 2~ spaces per unit should be adequate for this development. The parking ratio for the alternate plan would also provide 2~ spaces per unit (two covered). The site plan indicates that 68 percent of the net lot area will be open space (landscaping, patios, and recreation areas). Mr. Kee stated that staff is recommending approval subject to the conditions attached to the Staff Comment Sheet. Chairman Pack called to the attention of staff that Condition No. 5 in the list of conditions attached to the Staff Comment Sheet was not applicable to this proposal. Mr. Kee agreed and stated that it would be omitted. At this time the Commission took a short break in order that persons in the audience as well as Commissioners could take a look at the displayed plans for the proposed project. The meeting reconvened at 8:50 p.m. -10- Chairman Pack briefly summarized the action taken thus far by the Commission on GP 78-1. She then declared the public hearing open and invited anyone in the audience to speak for or against this item. Mr. Larry Lagier representing Prodis Associates, architect for the project, appeared before the Commission to explain the project and answer any questions the Commission might have. He explained that these units are roughly 1,680 square feet to 2,000 square feet in size, each unit has a private garage. They are all two or three bedroom two-story units with two and a half baths. Chairman Pack inquired of Mr. Helms if there had been an agreement to participate in the formation of an assessment district. Mr. Helms replied that it would be a condition of approval of the proposed development that the developer either execute an agreement to participate in an assessment district or install street improvements and post bonds. Commissioner Dickson stated that he had some questions regarding the Environmental Assessment prepared on this project. Mr. Kee explained that staff also had some questions about the Environmental Assessment but that staff was fairly satisfied with the overall report. Commissioner Dickson mentioned that in reviewing the report he noticed that in order to take care of noise pollution the units are self-enclosed, air conditioned, with sealed windows. Ms. Vicki Rudin, representing the firm of ENVIROS the firm which prepared the Environmental Assessment, appeared before the Commission to answer any questions. Commissioner Dickson inquired of Mr. Helms if there were any plans to improve More Avenue. Mr. Helms answered that it is hoped that More Avenue will be improved in the near future under an assessment district proceeding. No one else wishing to be heard, Commissioner Vierhus moved that the public hearing be closed. This motion was seconded by Commissioner Hebard and unanimously adopted. RESOLUTION N0. 1662 Commissioner Hebard moved that the Planning Commission adopt Resolution No. 1662 recommending approval of plans, elevations, and development schedule to allow construction of (1) a 60-unit residential development on property known as 1871 and 1961 Pollard Road, and 1536 and 1560 More Avenue with the added condition that the P.G. E. property be purchased and included in this development; and (2) in the event the P.G. E. easement is not avail- ab}e that the 55-unit residential development be approved with an added condition that the recre- ational area come back to the Planning Director for approval, and (3) the added condition that if and when the West Valley Freeway is built, the sound barrier described in the Environmental Assessment shall be constructed by the developer, seconded by Commissioner Vierhus, and adopted by the following roll call vote: AYES: Commissioners: Hebard, Dickson, Samuelson, Vierhus, Chairman Pack NOES: Commissioners: None ABSENT: Commissioners: Campos, Lubeckis .~ GP 78-2 This is the time and place for public hearing to West Valley Freeway consider possible amendments to the Land Use Corridor - Area I Element of the General Plan for the area currently City Initiated indicated as "Proposed West Valley Freeway" between Hacienda Avenue and Van Dusen Lane. Mr. Kee explained the recommended amendment to the Land Use Element of the General Plan and displayed the location of the property in question for the Commission. Mr. Helms reported that at this time CALTRANS has undertaken the preparation of Environmental Impact Statement to determine whether or not this Corridor should be preserved for some type of transportation facility. This study has the support of most of the cities in the West Valley area, the County, and the Board of Supervisors. He stated that it was his understanding that the Statement would be completed in approximately nine months and in that point in time, assuming the project should be pursued, State and Federal funding may be available for right of way acquisition and facility development. Mr. Kee stated that staff was attempting to designate a particular land use for the proposed corridor area so that the City has a specific land use policy for the area. He stated that there would be no problem in bringing this back to the Commission at the next consideration of the Land Use Element of the General Plan. Mr. Helms clarified his statement to emphasize that he is in support of the Planning Department staff. He stated that he thought there is a good chance that some type of facility will be in that corridor. Commissioner Vierhus inquired as to why this matter was before the Commission at this time. Mr. Kee responded that last year there was a proposal for two of the lots, and there was no land use indicated on the General Plan. The applicant and the land owner approached the Commission and the Council stating that if this is a corridor then someone should buy the property; if not, someone should be able to develop it. They also wanted to know if it +kere approved for development whet the dE~n~ity would -12- be. The position of the City was that the City could not purchase property forsuch projects. This item is on the agenda in order that the Commission and Council may designate an alternative land use for this area in the event that the transportation corridor is not developed. He stated that the rec- ommendation from the Public Works office is to not make a change at this time. Commissioner Hebard inquired if any application for a development in this area which should come before the Commission would require a General Plan change. Mr. Kee responded that it would come before the Commission, the same as the last one, and would have site approval as well as the General Plan change. Three things would be involved; General Plan amendment, zoning, and site approval. Chairman Pack declared the public hearing open and invited anyone in the audience to speak for or against this item. No one wishing to be heard, Commissioner Vierhus moved that the public hearing be closed. This motion was seconded by Commissioner Hebard and unanimously adopted. RESOLUTION N0. 1663 Commissioner Hebard moved that the Planning Commission adopt Resolution No. 1663 recommending denial of an amendment to the Land Use Element of the General Plan for the area currently indicated as "Proposed West Valley Freeway" between Hacienda Avenue and Van Dusen Lane to include "Low Density Residential" since the proposed land use change 'is not in the best interest of the City of Campbell, seconded by Commissioner Samuelson, and adopted by the following roll call vote: AYES: Commissioners: Hebard, Dickson, Samuelson, Vierhus, Chairman Pack NOES: Commissioners: None ABSENT: Commissioners: Campos, Lubeckis ,. ., GP 78-3 This is the time and place for public hearing to West Valley Freeway consider possible amendments to the Land Use Corridor - Area 2 Element of the General Plan for the area currently City Initiated indicated as "Proposed West Valley Freeway." Mr. Kee explained that the purpose for possibly amending the General Plan is that staff has had numerous calls regarding development in this area. Chairman Pack declared the public hearing open and invited anyone in the audience to speak for or against tt7is item. -13- Mr. Bill Errico, 236 N. Santa Cruz Avenue, Los Gatos., appeared before the Commission to indicate that he was in favor of an amendment to the Land Use Element of the General Plan for this area. He stated that he was not prepared to present anything to the Commission this evening, but if this item were continued he would have input at a later date since plans that he would propose were before the County Planning Commission at the present time. Commissioner Hebard moved that GP 78-3 be continued to the Planning Commission meeting of February 7, 1978 in order that more input might be received, seconded by Commissioner Samuelson, and unanimously adopted. .~ GP 78-4 This is the time and place for public hearing to 1047 Ridgeley Drive consider a proposed amendment to the Land Use Element City Initiated of the General Plan from Low Density Residential to Commercial for property formerly known as 1047 Ridgeley Drive (APN 288-10-54). Mr. Kee stated that this proposed amendment involves a very small lot. Staff is recommending that the Planning~Commission adopt a resolution recommending approval of a proposed amendment to the Land Use Element of the General Plan for property formerly known as 1047 Ridgeley Drive from "Low Density Res- idential" to "Commercial". Chairman Pack declared the public hearing open and invited anyone in the audience to speak for or against this item. No one wishing to be heard, Commissioner Hebard moved that the public hearing be closed. This motion was seconded by Commissioner Vierhus, and unanimously adopted. RESOLUTION N0. 1664 Commissioner Hebard moved that the Planning Commission adopt Resolution No. 1664 recommending approval of an amendment to the Land Use Element of the General Plan for property formerly known as 1047 Ridgeley Drive from "Low Density Residential" to "Commercial" seconded by Commissioner Samuelson, and adopted by the following roll call vote: AYES: Commissioners: Hebard, Dickson, Samuelson, Vierhus, Chairman Pack NOES: Commissioners: None ABSENT: Commissioners: Campos, Lubeckis ~. .~ GP 78-5 This is the time and place for public hearing to Apricot Avenue consider possible amendments to the Land Use Element City Initiated of the General Plan for properties fronting on Apricot Avenue. -14- Mr. Kee explained that since the Commission had expressed concern on several occasions over the extent of the high density development and traffic impact in this area, staff felt it appropriate to bring this before the Commission at this time. He stated that during the past few years new residential developments along Union Avenue have occurred as apartments or townhouses; the Land Use Element of the General Plan calls for the development of both Union and Apricot Avenues as High Density Residential (20-27 units per gross acre) and the present zoning in this area of Union and Apricot Avenues is either R-3-S or P-D. Mr. Kee stated that a communication had been received on this item and a copy of it had been placed at each Commissioner's seat. Chairman Pack asked that the communication be read into the record. The Recording Secretary read into the record the communication from Dorothy W. Marcyes, 861 Apricot Avenue, Campbell, California (dated January 17, 1978). This communication is incorporated into the record and attached hereto. Chairman Pack inquired if structures destroyed by fire would have to be reconstructed under the current zoning of any property. Mr. Kee responded that rebuilding of any structures destroyed by fire would, in fact, be mandated by the current zoning law at the time of reconstruction. Chairman Pack declared the public hearing open and invited anyone in the audience to speak for or against this item. Mr. Franz Kaufhardt of 905 Apricot Avenue, Campbell appeared before the Commission to state that he wished the zoning to remain as is. He stated that the traffic is very bad on Apricot Avenue, and that it has become a race track. Mrs. Edna Munk of 166 Michael Drive, Campbell also appeared before the Commission to speak in favor of the R-3-S zoning. Mr. Hersey of 933 Apricot Avenue appeared before the Commission to speak in favor of the R-3 zoning. Mr. Hersey stated that he did not wish to come into the City at the time of annexation. Chairman Pack explained to the residents that the reason the Commission called for this item to be brought before them was because at the time when a proposal come before the Commission regarding Union Avenue many people expressed concerns because of the increase in traffic on that street, so the Commission decided to review whether this should remain a high-density area. The Commission has been in favor of reducing density of some of the areas in the city. Valerie McKnelly of 876 Apricot Avenue stated to the Commission that she has only lived in the area three months and does not object to the R-3 zoning remaining, and that she likes Che street as it is. She stated that the street is used as a speedway, but it does have something special as a residential street. -15- Commissioner Hebard agreed in that he has. always felt that Apricot Avenue has always been one of the most charming streets in Campbell. Mr. Bill Cunningham of 889 Apricot Avenue then appeared before the Com- missionto speak in favor of retaining the R-3 zoning. He stated that there are already apartments at the rear and side of his residence, with windows looking down at the residence. Mr. Larry Critchlow of 845 Apricot Avenue stated to the Commission that he has been there almost 30 years; he feels that it is a lovely street although it was much nicer years ago. He also favored retaining the R-3 zoning. Ms. Jessie Welch of 962 Apricot Avenue appeared before the Commission and presented a letter from Marie J. and Howard R. Barnett of 961 Apricot Avenue, who could not be present this evening. The letter, dated January 17, 1978, is attached hereto, and expresses a desire to remain R-3 zoning. Ms. Welch stated the value of property is much higher in the R-3 zoning, and was in favor of the R-3 zoning. Ms. Dorothy Marcyes, 861 Apricot Avenue, Campbell appeared before the Commission and mentioned that some time ago the Parks Department or Public Works Department was asked to look into the traffic problems and they were to set up a meeting; however, nothing further took place. Mr. Helms responded that apparently there had been a lack of communication; it was his understanding that the residents wished the street to remain as it was. He indicated that staff would be happy to meet with the residents to discuss the traffic problem. Mr. Helms stated that he would meet with the property owners after this hearing in the conference room off of the Council Chambers to discuss any traffic problems they might wish to bring up. Mr. Bill Pierce of 934 Apricot Avenue appeared before the Commission to speak in favor of the R-3 zoning. Mr. Ed Mattews appeared before the Commission to also speak in favor of the R-3 zoning. Mr. Vance Southerland, real estate broker, appeared before the Commission to speak for the R-3 zoning. Mr. Southerland stated that the surrounding area is either zoned Commercial or R-3; he stated that he is in favor of Commercial or Industrial zoning. Ms. Mildred Robinson of 949 Apricot Avenue, Campbell appeared before the Commission to speak in favor of the R-3 zoning. She wondered how this item originated. Commissioner Dickson explained that a considerable number of applications had been before the Commission for high-density developments on Union Avenue. As a result, the staff was asked to look at some areas to review zoning and this area was one of those. -16- No one else wishing to be heard, Commissioner Vierhus moved that the public hearing be closed. This motion was seconded by Commissioner Hebard and unanimously adopted. RESOLUTION N0. 1665 Commissioner Vierhus moved that the Planning Commission adopt Resolution No. 1665 recommending denial of an amendment to the Land Use Element of the General Plan that the residential density for properties fronting on Apricot Avenue be reduced from High Density Residentail to Medium or Low Medium Density Residential since the proposed land use change is not in the best interest of the City of Campbell and would not aid in the harmonious development of the immediate area, seconded by Commissioner Samuelson, and adopted by the following roll call vote: AYES: Commissioners: Hebard, Dickson, Samuelson, Vierhus NOES: Commissioners: Chairman Pack ABSENT: Commissioners: Campos, Lubeckis At this time Chairman Pack voiced that in the past she has voted against high density residential, and she is in favor of down zoning in the City. Chairman Pack called for a short recess. The meeting reconvened at 10:40 p.m. GP 78-6 This is the time and place for public hearing Land Use Element to consider a possible amendment to the Land City Initiated Use Element of the General Plan for properties known as 806, 820, and 825 South San Tomas Aquino Road and 1192 Hazel Avenue. Mr. Kee located the area in question on the overhead projector. He stated to the Commission that the subject properties are presently indicated on the Land Use Element of the General Plan for Low-Medium Density Residential development, which would allow a maximum of 13 units per gross acre; the present zoning on the subject properties is R-2-S which allows a maximum of 20 units per acre. He stated that the zoning should be consistent with what is shown on the General Plan. It is the staff's recommendation that the Planning Commission recommend an amendment to the Land Use Element of the General Plan from "Low-Medium Density Residential" to "Medium Density Residential" for the subject properties. Chairman Pack declared the p!l~lic hearing open and invited anyone in the audience to speak for or against this item. -17- Mr. Jim Stein, 1203 Hazel Avenue, Campbell appeared before the Commission to let it be known that he objected to apartments being built on Hazel Avenue. Mr. Rick Schneider, Planner II, explained the site on the General Plan map and the uses of the surrounding area. No one else wishing to be heard, Commissioner Dickson moved that the public hearing be closed. This motion was seconded by Commissioner Samuelson and unanimously adopted. RESOLUTION N0. 1666 Commissioner Dickson moved that the Planning Commission adopt Resolution No. 1666 recommending an amendment to the Land Use Element of the General Plan from "Low-Medium Density Residential" to "Medium Density Residential" for properties known as 806,820, and 825 South San Tomas Aquino Road and 1192 Hazel Avenue in order that the proposed residential land use would be compatible with the existing development, seconded by Commissioner Samuelson and adopted by the following roll call vote: AYES: Commissioners: Hebard, Dickson, Samuelson, Vierhus, Chairman Pack NOES: Commissioners: None ABSENT: Commissioners: Campos, Lubeckis .~ GP 78-7 This is the time and place for public hearing to Open Space Element consider proposed amendments to the Open Space Element of the General Plan. Mr. Kee stated that staff was directed by the Planning Commission, at their meeting of November 1, 1977, to review the Open Space Element with the City Attorney to determine its adequacy with regard to the State guidelines. Commissioner Hebard commented that the Open Space Element Draft, which had been distributed to the Commissioners, is a good piece of work in pulling together both the Open Space Element as it existed and other policies stated in the other Elements. However, he felt that it is time that the Commission examine this Open Space Element and the policy that it contains. He felt this Element is rather brief in nature and meets the requirement of having an Open Space Element to the General Plan; however, he feels it is time to consider an aggressive Open Space Element. He stated he would like a number of things considered: (1) an inventory of open space, which would include also those areas of open space resources including having a map showing us the undeveloped properties in the city, (2) some consideration be given to using the Open Space Element as an impetus to amending the Land Use Element and requiring thai more open space be prcvi:3ed on all individual projects in the various zoning districts. -18- Commissioner Hebard also stated that he would like to have staff directed to form a committee with the Park ~ Recreation Commission and the Civic Improvement Commission to come up with an alternate to be considered; possibly a change in policy. Commissioner Vierhus stated that in response to Commissioner Hebard's comments, he feels that the Commission must be somewhat practical about unimproved areas as possible open space; he is not certain that the Commission can go into that field and he is not sure what those areas are. He visualizes open space as playgrounds, parks, etc. Commissioner Hebard stated that his suggestion is to show on the map areas that are open space resources; however they might be zoned, they represent a potential open space. Chairman Pack stated that she felt a study session should have been held to let. staff know the feelings of the Commission. At this time Chairman Pack declared the public hearing open and invited anyone in the audience to speak for or against this item. Commissioner Hebard moved that this Draft Open Space Element be referred to the Park and Recreation Commission and that consideration be given to "beefing up" the action plan. This motion was seconded by Commissioner Dickson, and unanimously adopted by the following roll call vote: AYES: Commissioners: Hebard, Dickson, Samuelson, Vierhus, Chairman Pack NOES: Commissioners: None ABSENT: Commissioners: Campos, Lubeckis At this time Commissioner Hebard moved that the Chairman be directed to work with the Planning Director to set up a study session of Committee .representatives of the Planning Commission, Park and Recreation Commission and Civic Improvement Commission, and other interested parties to examine possible alternatives to the Draft Open Space Element, seconded by Com- missioner Dickson, and adopted by the following roll call vote: AYES: Commissioners: Hebard, Dickson, Samuelson, Chairman Pack NOES: Commissioners: Vierhus ABSENT: Commissioners: Campos, Lubeckis -19- GP 78-8 Thi.S is the time and place for public hearing to Land Use Element consider an amendment to the Land Use Element of Historic Preservation the General Plan pertaining to Historic Preservation, Policy Statement Mr. Kee reported that a Historic Preservation Committee had been formed and they had come up with a policy statement regarding historic preservation to be included as part of the Land Use Element of the General Plan. Chairman Pack declared the public hearing open and invited anyone in the audience to speak for or against this item. No one wishing to be heard, Commissioner Vierhus moved that the public hearing be closed. This motion was seconded by Commissioner Dickson and unanimously adopted. RESOLUTION N0. 1667 Commissioner Dickson moved that the Planning Commission adopt Resolution No. 1667 recommending adoption of the following policy statement regarding Historic Preservation as part of the Land Use Element of the General Plan: "It is the policy of the City of Campbell to encourage the preser- vation of buildings, structures, and natural features that have been designated by the City Council as having a historic or cultural signif- icance for the community", seconded by Commissioner Hebard and unanimously adopted by the following roll call vote: AYES: Commissioners: Hebard, Dickson, Samuelson, Vierhus, Chairman Pack NOES: Commissioners: None ABSENT: Commissioners: Campos, Lubeckis a GP 78-g This is the time and place for public hearing to Circulation Element consider amendments to the Circulation Element of the General Plan. Mr. Kee stated that there are two parts to this Circulation Element amendment; first, the policy statement recommended by the Historic Preservation Legis- lative Committee, and second, staff is requesting assistance from the Commission in determining other areas of the Circulation Element which should be reviewed and/or revised. Chairman Pack declared the public hearing open and invited anyone in the audience to speak for or against this item. ~~ r~ No one wishing to be heard, Commissioner Hebard moved that the public hearing be closed. This motion was seconded by Commissioner Samuelson, and unanimously adopted. RESOLUTION N0. 1668 Commissioner Dickson moved that the Planning Commission adopt Resolution No. 1668 recommending adoption of the following policy statement regarding Historic Preservation as part of the Circulation Element of the General Plan: "It is the policy of the City of Campbell that whenever possible future street improvements and construction shall be com- patible with buildings, sites, and natural features which have been designated by the City Council as having historic or cultural significance for the community", seconded by Commissioner Samuelson, and adopted by the following roll call vote: AYES: Commissioners: Hebard, Dickson, Samuelson, Vierhus, Chairman Pack NOES: Commissioners: None ABSENT: Commissioners: Campos, Lubeckis Chairman Pack stated that, as Chairman, she would like to request that the Planning Director, Planning Commission, staff, and Public Works Department staff study the circulation element of the General Plan and report back to the Commission at the next meeting with a progress report. She asked that a firm date be established fora study session by the next regular meeting of the Planning Commission (February 7, 1978)• Renaming of This is the time and place for public hearing to East Central consider the renaming of East Central Avenue. Avenue Mr. Kee explained that this item was initiated because East Central Avenue and Central Avenue have been separated by recent street construction and in the event of an emergency resulting in a call for police, fire, or ambulance assist- ance, there may be a delay in response time due to possible confusion over the location of the emergency. This matter had been referred to the Civic Improvement Commission and they have submitted two names for consideration: (1) Sam Cava Lane, and (2) Consumer's Lane. Two other names were submitted by the daughter of property owners at 466 East Central Avenue: (1) Le Warne Way, and (2) Walter Way. Chairman Pack declared the public hearing open and invited anyone in the audience to speak for or against this item. No one wishing to be heard, Commissioner Vierhus moved that the public hearing be closed. This motion was seconded by Commissioner Samuelson and unanimously adopted. -21- Commissioner Vierhus moved that the recommendation of the Planning Commission be "Sam Cava Lane", seconded by Commissioner Samuelson and failed by the following roll call vote because of a lack of a majority vote: AYES: Commissioners: Dickson, Samuelson, Vierhus NOES: Commissioners: Hebard, Chairman Pack ABSENT: Commissioners: Campos, Lubeckis Chairman Pack inquired of Mr. Kee if the letter from the daughter of the property owners had been forwarded to the Civic Improvement Commission. Mr. Kee replied that it had not. Commissioner Dickson moved that this item be referred to the Civic Improvement Commission with the letter from the daughter of the property owners at 466 East Central Avenue and be brought back to the Commission at its first meeting in March 1978. This motion was seconded by Commissioner Hebard, and unani- mously adopted. ., .. MISCELLANEOUS PM 77-25 Application of Campbell Union School District for Lands of Campbell approval of a tentative parcel map for the West Union School Valley College site (Campbell Elementary School). District Mr. Kee stated that staff is recommending this item be continued to the February 7, 1978 meeting in order that staff and the School District staff could schedule a meeting to discuss the ramifications of the proposed map regarding possible future development of Parcel No. 2. Commissioner Dickson moved that PM 77-25 be continued to the Planning Commission meeting of February 7, 1978 seconded by Commissioner Hebard, and unanimously carried. ,. ;~ Appointment of Commissioners to Committees Chairman Pack asked if there were any volunteers. Commissioner Samuelson volunteered to again serve on the Sign Review Committee. In addition, the following appointments were made by Chairman Pack: _~2_ Planning Commission Committees - 1978 Member Sign Review Committee Samuelson Architectural Review Committee Dickson, Vierhus Transit Committee Campos Planning Policy Committee Pack Planning Policy Transportation Committee Campbell Elementary School Site Committee Liaison to the City Council Council/Advisory Commission Communication Committee Hebard Pack (Chairman) Pack (Chairman) Alternate Campos Lubeckis Samuelson Vierhus ADJOURNMENT Commissioner Vierhus moved that the meeting be adjourned, seconded by Commissioner Dickson and unanimously adopted. The meeting was adjourned at 11:45 p.m. APPROVED: Margaret M. Pack, Chairman ATTEST: Arthur A. Kee, Secretary RECORDED: Jeannine Wade, Recorder -23-