Loading...
PC Min 11/18/1976PLANNING COMMISSION CITY OF CAMPBELL,CALIFORNIA THURSDAY, 7:30 P.M. MINUTES NOVEMBER 18, 1976 The Planning Corm~ission of the City of Campbell convened this day in regular session, at the regular meeting place, the Council Chambers of the City Hall, 75 North Central Avenue, Campbell, California. ROLL CiaLL Commissioners: Hebard, Campos, V~ierhus, Dickson, Present Samuelson, Pack, Chairman Lubeckis; Secretary Arthur A. Kee; Senior Planner Bruce PoVrell; City Attorney J. Robert Dempster; Engineering Manager Bill Helms, Recorder Phyllis Acker Absent None MINUTES Commissioner Pack moved that the minutes of the November 4, 1976 meeting be appre~ved as received, seconded by Commissioner Campos and unanirnou~ly adopted. COMh1UNICATIONS Mr. Kee reported that the communications received relate to specific items. on the agenda. ARCHITECTURAL RPPROVALS S.A. 76-70 Sign application for Mr. Russell Matesso for approval The Towers of a Special Event Sign (Peace on Earth) to be located Matesso, Russell on top of the eighteen story Towers Building located at 1901 S. Bascom Avenue in a C-2-0 (General Commercial) Zoning District. Comrnissione-~ Pack reported that the Architectural Review Committee met with the applicant and recommends approval subject to the following conditions: 1. Applicant to secure a building permit prior to erection of sign. 2. The Special Event Siyn to be removed by January 15, 1977. Commissioner Vierhus moved that S.A. 76-70 be approved as recommended, seconded by Commissioner Pack and unanimously adopted. PUBLIC HEARINGS UP 76-18 This is the time and place for public, hearing to consider Armann, K. 0. the application of h1r. Kjartan O: Armann fora use permit to allow a garden supply center on property known as 2460 S. 1Jinchester Boulevard in a C-2-S (General Commercial) Zoning District. - 1 - Chairman Lubeckis asked Mr. Kee for his co~unents. Mr. Kee stated that the applicant is requesting approval of a garden center that would include outside storage of materials in addition to the nursery. It is staff's opinion that the proposed development vlould be appropriate at this loca- tion, but that the outside storage of materials, associated with a nursery type of use, should be carefully considered. There have been problems in other areas of the City with outside storage uses with regard to the stacking of materials 18' to 20' high. Staff recommends approval subject to the four conditions out- lined in the staff report. Chairman Lubeckis declared the public hearing open and asked if anyone wished to speal: for or against the use permit. There being no one wishing to be heard, Commissioner Dickson moved that the public hearing be closed, seconded by Commissioner Samuelson and unanimously adapted.. RESOLUTION N0. 1559 Commissioner Dickson moved that the Planning Commission adopt Resolution No. 1559 approving use permit 76-18, application of Kjartan 0. Armann, to allow a garden supply center on property known as 2460 South kJincP~ester Boulevard in a C-2-S Zoning District subject to the conditions recommended by staff, seconded by Commissioner Pack and adopted by the following roll call vote: AYES: Commissioners: Hebard, Campos, Vierhus, Dickson, Samuelson, Pack, Lubeckis NOES: Com~rissioners: None ABSENT: Commissioners: None "S" 76-36 Application of h1r. Kjartan 0. Armann for approval of plans Armann, K. 0. to construct a Woolworth Garden Center on property known as 2460 S. 6Jinchester Boulevard in a C-2-S (General Commer~cial) Zoning District. Conmissionerr Paco; reported that the Architectural Review Committee met with Mr. Armann and recominr~nds approval subject to the conditions recommended by staff. Mr. Armann assured the committee that the storage bins are going to be located on the south side of the property adjacent to the lumber yard property and, tf~erefore, will be screened from the street. The applicant was in agreement with u17 conditions. Commissioner Dickson moved that "S" 76-36 be approved subject to the following conditions: 1. Landscape plan indicating type of plant material, location of hose bibs or sprinkler system and type of fencing to be submitted for approval of the Planning Director at time of application for building permit. 2. Landscaping shall be maintained in accordance with the appr°oved landscape plan. _2_ 3. Faithful performance bond in the amount of $3,000 to be posted to insure landscaping, fencing and striping of parking area within three (3) months of completion of construction, or applicant may file written agreement to complete landscaping, fencing and striping of parking area prior to final Building Department clearance. 4. All mechanical equipment located on roofs shall be screened as approved by the Planning Director. The applicant is notified as part of this application that he is required to meet the following conditions in accordance with Ordinances of the City of Campbell. A. All parking and driveway areas to be developed in compliance with Section 21.50 of the Campbell Municipal Code. All parking spaces to be provided with appropriate concrete curbs or bumper guards. B. Underground utilities to be provided as required by Section 20.16.070 of the Campbell hunicipal Code. C. Plans submitted to the Building Department for plan check shall indicate clearly the location of all connections for underground utilities including water, sewer, electric, telephone and television cables, etc. D. Sign application to be submitted in accordance with provisions of the sign ordinance far all signs. No sign to be installed until application is approved and permit issued by the Building Department. E. Ordinance No. 782 of the Campbell Municipal Code stipulates that any contract far the collection and disposal of refuse, garbage, wet garbage and rubbish produced within the limits of the City of Campbell shall be made with Green Valley Disposal Company. This requirement applies to all single family dwellings, multiple apartment units, to all commercial, business, industrial, manufacturing and construction establishments. F. Trash containers of a size and quantity necessary to serve the development sf~all be located in area(s) approved by the Fire Department. Unless other- wise noted, enclosure(s) shall consist of a concrete floor surrounded by a solid wall or fence and have self-closing doors of a size specified by the Fire Department. All enclosures to be constructed at grade level. G. Applicant shall ri~eet all State requirements for the handicapped. PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT H. File and process a Parcel Map. I. Pay storm drainage area fee (51916.00) J. Easements or provisions for area on-site storm drainage shall be provided to the City Engineer for review and approval. K. Obtain excavation permit for driveway modification, street light relocation, and street tree installation. L. Applicant to consult with City Engineer to arrive at an acceptable plan for driveway widths and locations. - 3 - FIRE DEPARTMENT M. Provide one on-site fire hydrant. N. Provide "2A-IOBC" fire extinguishers. The applicant is notified that he shall comply with all applicable Code or Ordinances of the City of Campbell which pertain to this development and are not herein specified. Motion seconded by Commissioner Campos and unanimously adopted. V 76-5 This is the time and place for public hearing to consider 7ak«moto, D.T. the application of David T. Takamoto, A.I.A., for a variance to Section 21.51.040 of the Campbell Municipal Code to allow a reduction in the required landscaping fora commercial development located on property known as 2260 South Bascom Avenue in a C-2-S (General Commercial) Zoning District. Chairman Lubeckis asked Mr. Kee far his comments. t~1r. Kee stated that the staff recommends denial without prejudice. The subject variance is riot a proper procedure to deal with the request and it was staff's error in posting the item on the agenda. The next item on the agenda is for site approval and there are mechanics within the zoning ordinance to allow the Planning Commission to consider landscaping at the time they consider the site plans. Staff recommends denial without prejudice to remove the item from the agenda. Chairman Lubeclcis declared the public hearing open and asked if anyone tNished to be heard. There being no one wishing to speak, Commissioner Samuelson moved that the public hearing be closed, seconded by Commissioner Pack and unanimously adopted. RESOLUTION N0. 1560 Commissioner Vierhus moved that the Planning Commission adopt Resolution No. 1560 denying without prejudice the application of David T. Takamoto fora vari<nce to Section 21.51.040 of the Campbell Municipal Code, seconded by Commissioner Samuelson and adopted by the following roll call vote: Al'ES: Commissioners: Hebard, Campos, Vierhus, Dickson, Samuelson, Pack, Lubeckis NOES: Commissioners: None ABSENT: Commissioners: None "S" 76-37 Application of David T. Takamoto, A.I.A. for approval Takamoto, D.T. of plans to construct a commercial buildin on property known as 2260 S. Bascom Avenue in a C-2-S General Commercial) Zoning District. - `4 - Corrunissioner Pack reported that the Architectural Review Committee met with the representative from Mr. Takamoto's firm and would recorranend approval subject to the conditions recommended by staff. She added that the plans look very good for this particular site, which is a narrow piece of property and in an area that needs some upgrading. The appli- cant is providing 12 parking spaces vrhich results in a ratio of one space for every ?_16 square feet of gross building area. The site plan indicates that approximately 6% of the net lot area will be landscaped and the applicant will require an exception to the landscape ordinance as provided in Section 21.51.130. Commissioner Hebard requested that the plan be presented for review by the Commission as this is the first time that the Commission has been asked to consider a reduction in the landscaping requirement. Mr. Kee stated this is a 50 foot wide lot between two developments, one of which is in the County. Five parking spaces are provided at the rear of the buildiiny and access is provided by an easement. In order to have a five foot landscape strip at the front, it would require that the building be pushed back, and in the staff's opinion this would be detrimental to the consistency of development along Bascom Avenue and provide an awkward circulation pattern. The ordinance does provide that the Commission may approve less landscaping as provided in Section 21.51.130 of the 7_oning Ordinance, but would require that the Commission make the following findings: 1. That there are special conditions and situations existing, the effect of Vrhich would result in the denial or enjoyment of substantial property rights of the applicant; 2. That the granting of the exception will not be materially detrimental or contradictory to the scheme of the improvements of properties immediately adjacent; 3. That the plans demonstrate a quality landscape proposal. The adjoining properties have less landscaping than provided in this development. Canmissioner Hebard stated that another way of solving the problem would be by reducing the size of the building. He asked staff if there was some tray of providing landscaping that conforms to the ordinance without the exception by giving up sorme parking. Mr. Kee stated there was not--the lot was only 50 feet wide and the only way to increase the landscaping would be to reduce the size of the building, push it back on the lot and make the parking circulation awkward. After considerable discussion on the proposed parking, landscaping and site layout, Commissioner Pack moved that "S" 76-37 be approved subject to the conditions recommended by staff and with a change in Condition No. 2 to read: "Landscape plan indicating type of plant material, location of hose bibs or sprinkler system and type of fencing to be submitted for approval by the Planning Commission at time of application for building permit". -5- Motion seconded by Commissioner Samuelson and unanimously adopted. Cond itions of Approval - "S" 76-37: . 1. Property to be s" r `~~`:{' landscaped as indicated and as added in "red" on plans. 2. Landscape plans ,~~~;~~:a~ing type of plant material, location of hose bibs or sprinkler system a.nd type of fencing to be submitted for approval by the Planning Commissioner at-time of application for building permit. 3. Landscaping shall be maintained in accordance with the approved landscape plan. 4. Faithful performance bond in the amount of $3,000 to be posted to insure landscaping, fencing and striping of parking area within three (3) months of completion of construction, or applicant may file written agreement to complete landscaping, fencing and striping of parking area prior to final Buildinc,~ Department clearance. 5. All mechanical equipment located on roofs shall be screened as approved by the Planning Director. The applicant is notified as part of this application that he is required to meet the following conditions in accordance vaith Ordinances of the City of Campbell. A. All parking and driveway areas to be developed in compliance with Section 21.50 of the Campbell Municipal Code. All parking spaces to provided with appropriate concrete curbs or bumper guards. B. Underground utilities to be provided as required by Section 20.16.070 of the Campbell Municipal Code. C. Plans submitted to the Building Department for plan check shall indicate clearly the location of all connections for underground utilities including water, sewer, electric, telephone and television cables, etc. D. Sign application to be submitted in accordance with provisions of the sign ordinance for all signs. No sign to be installed until application is approved and permit issued by the Building Department. E. Ordinance No. 782 of the Campbell Municipal Code stipulates that any contract far the collection and disposal of refuse, garbage, 4vet garbage and rubbish produced within the limits of the City of Campbell shall be made with Gt°e en Valley Disposal Company. This requirement applies to all single family dwellings, multiple apartment units, to all commercial, business, industrial, manufacturing, and construction establishments. F. Trash container(s) of a size and quantity necessary to serve the development shall be located in area(s) approved by the Fire Department. Unless other- wise noted, enclosure(s) shall consist of a concrete floor surrounded by a solid wall or fence and have self-closing doors of a size specified by the Fire Department. All enclosures to be constructed at grade level. -6- G. Applicant shall meet all State requirements for the handicapped. PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT ' N. File and i~rocess a parcel map. I. Pay balance of storm drainage area fee ($20.00). J. Existing and proposed easements to assure requirement of ingress and egress to be provided for review and approval of the City Engineer. FIRE DEPARTP~ENT K. Provide one "2A 10-BC" fire extinguishers. The applicant is notified that he shall comply with all applicable Codes or Ordinances o-F the City of Campbell which pertain to this development and are not herein specified. Chair~rrrarr Lubeckis dec~iared a recess at 8:40 p.m. Meeting reconvened at 8:55 p.m. ZC 76-9 This is the time and place for continued public hearing to McKee, P,obert L. consider the application of Robert L. McKee on behalf of Corinthian 13ouse Corinthian House, Inc., for a zone change from R-3-S (High Density Residential) to Planned Development for property kno>,vn as 250 Budd Avenue. Chairman Lubeckis asked Mr. Kee for his comments. Mr. Kee advised brat tf3is application is the first of a two-part proposal. The applicant is requesting a zone change from R-3-S to P-D for the purpose of constructing a 104 unit apartment complex far the elderly to be developed in two phases. The General Pian for this area is reflected as high density residential for the site and the area to the west and south. The properties to the east are indicated as medium and io~~r-medium density residential and across Budd Avenue to the north is low density residential. John D. Morgan Park is located to the northwest. It is the staff's opinion that a residential care home for the elderly can best be acconunodated through the Planned Development proceedings. Chairman Lubeckis asked if anyone in the audience wished to be heard. There being no one wishing to speak, Commissioner Vierhus moved that the public hearing be closed, seconded by Commissioner Pack and unanimously adopted. RESOLUTION N0. 1561 Co»u»issioner Vierhus moved that the Planning Commission adopt Resolution No. 1561 recommending that the City Council adopt an ordinance approving ZC 76-9, application of Robert L. McKee, fora zone change from R-3-S to P-D on property known as 250 Budd Avenue based on the findings reconrrnended by staff. Motion seconded by Commissioner Dickson and adopted by the following roll call vote: -7- AYES: Commissioners: Hebard, Campos, Vierhus, Dickson, Samuelson, Pack, Lubeckis NOES: Commissioners: None ABSENT: Commissioners: None PD 76-13 This is the time ,and place for continued public hearing to McKee, Robert L consider the application of Robert L. McKee, on betralf of Corinthian House Corinthian House, Inc., for approval of plans to construct a 105 unit senior citizens' apartment complex on property known as 250 Budd Avenue in a PD (Planned Development/High Density Residential) Zoning District. Chairman Lubeckis asked for the report of the Architectural Review Committee. Commissioner Pack reported that the Architectural Review Committee met vrith the applicant and discussed the comments that have been made concerning the project. The Architectural RevieGV Committee recommends approval of the pro,;ect and the staff also recommends approval. The application was continued from the last meeting in order that tf~e application could be referred to the Civic Improvement Conunission and the County Housing Authority. The Civic Improvement Commission had some comments and they were discussed at the conunittee meeting. Mr. Kee reported that the application is for a 105 unit senior citizens' complex on 1.75 acres of land, -which will result in a density of appro>:imateiy 6?_ units: per net acre. Per. Kee reviewed Phase I and Phase II of the development and pre- sented a rendering for the Commission's review. Mr. Kee reported that Mr•. Burns of the County Housing Authority had contacted the staff and had the following remarks regarding the project: 1. In his opinion, this is a good project. 2. The size of the apartments seem to be somewhat small. (288 square feet) 3. 4lould recommend sliding doors rather than swinging doors for bathroom entry where seniors are involved. 4. Bathrooms should include appropriate hardware for assisting the elderly. Chairman Lubeckis asked the applicant to come forward and reply to the questions referred to the Commission by the Civic Improvement Conunission. Mr. Robert L. McKee, applicant, replied to the 18 questions submitted by the Civic Improvement Commission as follows: 1. Due to economics they decided to eliminate balconies. The landscaping and beautiful area ~vill take the place of balconies. 2. Mr. McKee stated that the ~~rehitectural project manager would be better able to answer questions regarding the outward appearance and aesthetics of the buildings. - 8 - Commissioner Pack reported that the Architectural Advisor was of the opinion that the appearance and aesthetics of the buildings vrere very nice and he had no fault to find with the plans. 3. The average age would be in the high 70's. 4. Five staff people will be assigned to the complex. 5. The units would rent for $400 - $475 for a single and $550 - $625 for couples or double occupancy. 4Jould include three meals a day and utilities. These figures were based on a feasibility study. 6. There will possibly be a median between low and middle income residents. Affluent Christian Scientists have no difficulty in finding housing. 7. If a resident becomes disabled a close friend or relative will be notified. No medical certification will be required in order to qualify for residency unless required by la~v. No one would be put out until adequate provision for their care is made. 8. Ttris is a new concept. Would be available for working mothers and ,,vould provide a harmonious atmosphere for the very young with the older people. The access was discussed rvith the Architectural Review Committee. The nursery would be at the rear of the property and the parking would be available on the left and within easy walking distance of the area. 9. The units will nat be furnished. Most of the older people will want to have their own furniture with them. 10. Utilities will be included. Telephones will be at the expense of the resident. 11. They anticipate that the project will be managed by a husband and wife team who will live on the property 24 hours a day. There will be liaison between the board and the management. 12. A11 residents of the facility must be members of the Christian Scientist Church. That is the only church connection that the home will have. Residents will not be on the board unless there would be a vacancy on the board and one of the residents would be nominated to fill the vacancy. 13. There will be a laundry in each building. 14. Yes there will be a daily check on the residents through the manager. 15. There will not be a paid recreational director. However, there will be a mini bus to take the residents to church, lectures, etc. They feel that the residents will not require a great deal of activity. 16. The property will be fenced on three sides. The side along Budd Avenue will not be fenced. 17. This is not an activity of the church. No one Christian Science Church is the sponsor. A group of Christian Scientists in the area have been working on this concept for the past ten years--a home for Chr°istian Scientists. It is not being built to sell. -9- 18. There will not be covered parking spaces. Possibly 2 or 3 could be covered for visitor parking.' Commissioner Pack asked for a clarification as to the residents. It was her under- standing that they must be Christian Scientists. Mr. McKee replied that was correct. Commissioner Dickson asked Mr. McKee about the concerns expressed by Mr. Burns of the County Housing Authority pertaining to sliding doors and hand rails. Mr. McKee indicated that this would be no problem. Commissioner Pack asked if a project specifically for senior citizens had to comply with State standards on safety equipment. Mr. f~1cY.ee replied that he could not answer that, but in developing a nursing facility they had to comply with all State requirements. The architectural project manager responded by advising that when the plans are sub- mitted fora building permit a]1 of these things will be shown on the plans. The bu~ild~ing inspector, fire department and other agencies will review the plans. At this stage, tine plans are a master plan in concept and deal raith parking, occupancy, landscaping, etc. Chairman Lubeckis asked if anyone in the audience wished to be heard. Mr. Del Lunde, 123 4lilton Drive, was concerned about the use of the left hand corner of the propert:y prior to development in Phase II and also the day care center-- he questioned hose many children a~ould be permitted. Also, what type of .fencing would be provided around the property. h1r. Kee advised that the type of fencing and landscaping will need to come back to the Planning Staff for approval prior to the issuance of a building permit. There will be no access to any street other than Budd Avenue. Mr. Kee pointed out the area proposed for the day care nursery and advised that the zoning ordinance does provide for day care centers in residential zones. Fie stated this is a minor part of the proposal and there is a large area available for such a use. The staff did not feel that the nursery ~~~ould create a noise problem as supervision would have to be pro- , vided. There ar•e very stringent requirements for safety from the Fire Marshal. Commissioner Hebard moved that the public hearing be closed, seconded by Commissioner Di rkson and unanimously adopted. RESOLUTION N0. 1562 Commissioner Pack moved that the Planning Commission adopt Resolution No. 1562 recommending that the City Council adopt an ordinance approving PD 76-13 application of Robert L. McKee and Corinthian House, subject to the conditions recommended by staff, with the added condition that the Building Department require all the safety feattares as specified by h1r. Burns of the County Housing Authority, seconded by Commissioner Samuelson and adopted by the follow- ing roll call vote: - 10 - AYES: Commissioners: Hebard, Campos, Vierhus, Dickson, Samuelson, Pack, Lubeckis NOES: Commissioners: None ABSENT: Commissioners: None Con~»issiorrer Pack stated, that for the record, the Commission thanks the Civic Improvement Commission for their questions and comments regarding the application and appreciates their efforts. ZC 76-10 This is the time and place for public hearing to consider Woodgate Development the application of Woodgate Development Company, Inc. for Company a change of zoning from P-D (Planned Development) to R-1 (Single Family Residential) for property known as 1401 Pollard Road. Chairman Lubeckis asked Mr. Kee for his comments. Mr. Kee advised that the applicant is requesting a change in zoning from P-D to R-1. This zone would be consistent with the General Plan. It is the applicant's intention to develop the parcel as a standard R-1 subdivision with detached housing. The previously approved P-D project approved for the site which incorpor°ated attached and detached townhouses has been dropped. Chairman Lubeckis declared the public hearing open and asked if anyone wished to be heard. Mrs. Yvonne i~1endevil, 1393 Estralita Way, asked rvhy R-1 was again being considered. Would the area residents have anything to say about an R-1 development.. She stated that it is a difficult piece of property to develop and asked that it stay P-D. Mr. Kee stated that if the property is zoned R-1, the applicant may apply for a subdivision map to develop the property and in accord with the zoning ordinance there is no r,equirenrent that the neighborhood be notified for R-1 development. However, he requested that Mrs. Mendevil leave her address Nrith the staff and she would be notified when a subdivision map is filed. The P.-1 would permit less than six houses per acre and he did not see horn that many houses could be placed on this parcel of property. Mrs. Mendevil expressed concern about the fencing and requested that the area be kept open to make sure that the area is not closed off and becomes a hazard to the children in the area. There being no one else wishing to be heard, Commissioner Hebard moved that the Freariny be closed, seconded by Commissioner Campos and unanimously adopted. RESOLUTION N0. 1563 Commissioner Campos moved that the Planning Con>n~ission adopt Reolution No. 1563 recommending that the City Council adopt an ordinance approving ZC 76-10, seconded by Commissioner Vierhus and adopted by the following roll call vote: AYES: Commissioners: Hebard, Campos, Vierhus, Dickson, Samuelson, Pack, Lubeckis NOES: Conunissioners: None ABSENT: Commissioners: Norre - 11 - Mr. Kee stated that if the property is zoned R-1, the applicant may apply for a subdivision map to develop. the property and in accord with the zoning ordinance there is no requirement that the neighborhood be notified for R-1 development. However, he requested that Mrs. Mendevil leave her address with the staff and she would be notified when a subdivision map is filed. The R-1 avould permit less than six houses per acre and he did not see how that many houses could be placed on this parcel of property. Mrs. Mendevil expressed concern about the fencing and requested that the area be kept open to make sure that tine area is not closed off and becomes a hazard to the children in the area. There being no one else wishing to be heard, Commissioner Hebard moved that the hearing be closed, seconed by Commissioner Campos and unanimously adopted. RESOLUTION td0. 1563 Commissioner Campos moved that the Planning Commission adopt Resolution No. 1563 recommending that the City Council adopt an ordinance approving ZC 76-10, seconded by Commissioner Vierhus and adopted by the following roll call vote: FlYES: Commissioners: Hebard, Campos, Vierhus, Dickson, Samuelson, Pack, Lubeckis NOES: Commissioners: None AQSENT: Commissioners: None G.P. 76-2-C Continued public hearing to consider the future use of West Valley blest Valley College Site. College Site Chairman Lubeckis asked Mr. Kee for his comments. Mr. Kee advised that the staff recommends continuance to the first Planning Commission meeting in December, 1976. The staff has been in contact with Dr. Salsbury and he advised that some ~i nf,ormati.on; woul d be fortirco-ni ng wi thi n the next week and on that basis the staff felt that it would be appropriate to have another two week continuance on the public hearing. The sixty day time period has expired after the Campbell Union School District notified public agencies that the West Valley College Site had been declared surplus property. Dr. Salsbury indicated that he would have a report available in a week or so. Conunissioner Pack stated that she was disturbed that Dr. Salsbury did not see fit to write the Conunission a letter, when he knew this item would be on this agenda. She was of the opinion that there was sufficient time from November 9, when a staff member talked to Dr. Salsbury, for him to have had a letter in response. Commissioner Pack moved that G.P. 76-2-C be continued to the December 2nd meeting, seconded by Commissioner Samuelson and unanimously adopted. - 12 - Light Rail This is the tune and pl Feasibility Study consider the Light Rail referred to the City of County Transit District Transit Subcommittee of the City Council. ice for public hearing to Feasibility Study as Campbell by the Santa Clara and as referred to the the Planning commission by Mr. Kee reported that the staff recommends that the public hearing be opened in order to receive testimony from persons wishing to be heard and that the public hearing be continued to the Planning Commission meeting of December 2, 1976. Mr. Kee advised that he had been in contact with the Transit Cistrict and they would have a representative present at that meeting to give a presentation to the Commission. Also, there is to be a meeting of the subcommittee of the Planning Commission to review information that will be forthcoming. Chairman Lubeckis declared the public hearing open and asked if anyone wished to be heard. Commissioner Pack moved that the public hearing on the Light Rail Feasibility Study be continued to the December 2nd meeting, seconded by Commissioner Samuelson and unanimously adopted. MISCELLANEOUS Study Session Chairman Lubeckis advised that the study session of t~Te City Council with ail advisory commissions has been changed to Tuesday, November 30th, 7:30 p.m. in the City Hall Council Chambers. CorTUnissioner Dickson brought up the subject of related items appearing on the same agenda. It is confusing if comments related to both applications are on one ConIITTP.nt sheet, and also it can be confusing if they are separated. CormTissioner Hebard agreed and stated that when there are combined it.eds such as a use permit and approval of plans, possibly staff's comments should be directed to each item - speak to the use permit and then to the plans. This would clarify the matter. Campbell Marine Commissioner Hebard stated that the Campbell Marine project on Winchester and Hamilton has boats parked all over the area and he questioned what has happened to their required parking. Mr. Kee advised that staff would have a report back to the Commission on the December 2nd agenda. Conversion of Commissioner Hebard asked as to the status of the report Residential on the conversion of residential buildings. Quildings Mr. Kee reported that the staff is getting some additional information and would have a report for the Commission on the December 2nd agenda. - 13 - ADJOURPiP~ENT Commissioner Vierhus moved that the meeting be adjourned, seconded by Commissioner Hebard and unanimously adopted. The meeting was adjourned at 10:20 p.m. APPROVED: ~ ~1~/~~i ~ Oleg L e kis, Chairm r ~ v ATTEST: ~ ;',` ~~~ ~ ~ Arthur A. Kee, Sec re~ary ~~ RECORDCD~ ~;i {.~,~~~''~~ ~ r~. 'r'r.L%. Phyllis Acker, Recorder - 14 -