Loading...
PC Min 05/06/1976PLANNING COMMISSION CITY OF CAMPBELL, CA LIFORNIA THURSDAY, 7:30 P.M. CITY HALL COUNCIL CHAMBERS MINUTES MAY 6, 1976 The Planning Commission of the City of Campbell convened this day in .regular session, at the regular meeting place, the Council Chambers of the City Hall, 75 North Central Avenue, Campbell, California. ROLL CALL Commissioners: Campos, Dickson, Samuelson, Pack; Secretary Arthur A. Kee; Senior Planner Bruce Powell; Present City Attorney J. Robert Dempster; Acting Public Works Director Bill Helms; Recorder Carol Locke +Absent Commissioners: Hebard, Stewart, Lubeckis MINUTES Commissioner Pack moved that the minutes of the April 15, 1976 be approved as received, seconded by Commissioner Campos and unanimously adopted.. COMMUNICATIONS Vice Chairman Dickson asked P1 r. Kee if there were any communications. Mr. Kee reported that all communications received relate to specific items on the agenda and would be taken up at the appropriate time. ARCHITECTURAL APPROVALS Vice Chairman Dickson asked Commissioner Pack for the report of the Site and Architectural.Review Committee. "S" 76-8 Commissioner Pacl< reported that the Architectural Garrison, Elmer R. Review Committee recommends continuance to the May 20 meeting on the application of Elmer R. Garrison for approval of plans to construct a 93 unit apartment complex on property known as 3495 South Bascom Avenue in an R-3-S (High Density Residential) Zoning District. The applicant was present at the meeting and was in concurrence with the continuance recommendation. Commissioner Samuelson moved that "S" 76-8 be continued to the May 20, 1976 meeting, seconded by Commissioner Campos and unanimously adopted. "S" 76-11 Commissioner Pack reported that .the applicant was Nelson, Oliver H. not present at the Architectural Review Committee meeting and it was the committee's recommendation that the continued application of Oliver H. Nelson for approval of plans to construct a second industrial building on property known as 520 McGlincey Lane in a M-1-S (Light Industrial) Zoning District be continued to the May 20, 1976 meeting. Mr. Kee advised that the applicant had been in contact with the planning -~ office and requested the two weeks continuance. I ^ Commissioner Pack moved that "S" 76-11 be continued to May 20, 1976, `- seconded by Gommissioner Samuelson and unanimously adopted. "S" 76-12 Commissioner Pack reported that the Architectural Hamm, Neil Review Committee recommends approval of the appli- cation of Neil Hamm for approval of plans to construct an industrial building on property known as 251 East Hacienda Avenue in a CM:B-20 (Controlled Manufacturing)Zoning District subject to the conditions recommended by staff. It should be noted that the revised elevations a~ill come back for final approval by the Planning Director. Commissioner Pack moved that "S" 76-12 be approved subject to the following conditions: 1.' Property to be fenced and landscaped as indicated and as added in red on plans. 2. Landscaping shall be maintained in accordance. with the approved landscape plan. ~ . 3. Faithful performance bond in the amount of $3,000 to be posted to insure landscaping, fencing and striping of parking area within three (3) months of completion of construction, or applicant may file written agreement to complete landscaping, fencing and striping of parking area prior to final building department clearance. 4. All mechanical equipment located on roofs shall be screened as approved by the Planning Uirector. 5. Revised elevations to be approved by the Planning Director. The applicant is notified as part of this application that he is required to meet the following conditions in accordance with Ordinances of the City of Campbell. A. A11 parking and driveway areas to be developed in compliance with Section 21.50 of the Campbell Municipal Code. All parking spaces to be provided with appropriate concrete curbs or bumper guards. B. Underground utilities to be provided as required by Section 20.16.070 of the Campbell Municipal Code. C. Plans submitted to the building department for plan check shall indicate clearly the location of all connections for underground utilities including _ water, sewer, electric, telephone and television cables, etc. "2- ~ '__~ ... R D. Sign application to be submitted in accordance with provisions of the sign ordinance for all signs. No sign to be installed until application is approved and permit issued by the building department. E. Ordinance No. 782 of the Campbell Municipal Code stipulates that any contract for the collection aid disposal of refuse, garbage, wet garbage, and rubbish produced within the limits of the City of Campbell shall be made with Green Valley Disposal Company.This requirement applies to all single family dwellings, multiple. apartment units, to all commercial, ' business, industrial, manufacturing and construction establishments. F. Trash container(s) of a size and quantity necessary to serve the development shall be located in area(s) approved by the fire department. Unless otherwise noted, enclosure(s) shall consist of a concrete floor surroun- ded by a solid wall or fence and have self-closing doors of a size specified by the fire department. All enclosures to be constructed at grade level. G'. Applicant shall meet all state requirements for the handicapped. Bll I LD I NG DEPARTMENT H. Roof covering shall be fire retardant. Section 1603. PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT I. Payment of storm drainage area fee ($468). J. Agreement, bonding, and fees for construction of street improvements. FIRE DEPARTMENT K. Provide "2ABC" fire extinguishers. The applicant is notified that he shall comply with all applicable Codes or Ordinances of the City of Campbe 11 which pertain to this development and. are not herein specified. Commissioner Sameulson seconded the motion and unanimously adopted. Commissioner Stewart arrived and was seated at 7:42 p.m. PUBLIC HEARINGS E.I.R. 76-1 This is the time and place for public hearing to Garrison, E. consider the Environmental Impact Report for "S" 76-8, a proposed apartment complex to be located at 3495 South Bascom Avenue, Campbell. -3- Vice Chairman Dickson reported that this item is related to Item #1 on the agenda and the Commission may wish to either continue this item or open the public hearing so that initial comments may be made. Commissioner Pack stated that she had some comments that she would like to make at this time and requested that the public hearing be opened in order that the applicant could respond. Mr. Kee advised that after discussion at the Architectural Review Comm'sttee, this item as well as Item #5 on the agenda relates to item #1 on the agenda, and it is the recommendation of staff and the committee that the public hearing be opened and that it be continued to the next regular meeting. Vice Chairman Dickson declared the public hearing open~on E.I.R. 76-1. Commissioner Pack stated that after reading the E.I.R. she did not believe that it was very complete and could not accept.it in its present form. She stated that several things were missing from the report. i 1. There was no quantitative noise data submitted. 2. If the traffic is more than 10,000 cars average daily traffic, then the noise will be 60 C.N.E.L. (Community Noise Equivalent Level), which is above the state standard. If the noise level is above state standard as established by State Title 25, then a noise report must be submitted. According to their E.I.R. they said that the daily average traffic is 10,000 cars now and it will reach 18,000 cars in some time in the future. The road wil 1 carry a maximum of 36, 000 cars . 3. If the traffic measures 36,000 Average Daily Traffic in the future, then what will the noise impact be on the project in the future? The E.I.R. did not show that any measurements had been taken. Commissioner Stewart questioned the parking requirements. This particular project will have a population of 195 persons, all adults, and there are only 14G stalls shown. Is it logical to assume that 50 individuals will not have automobiles in an all adult community. Mr. Kee stated that the zoning code requires l~ spaces per living unit and the plans submitted meet the requirement. The Commission may, and the code provides that the Commission may require more or less than the code specifies. The Commission does have the authority to adjust the parking. Commissioner Stewart stated that he realized the project met the code requirements, but he questioned whether it is sufficient. Mr. Kee advised that the staff can check with the people who developed the E.I.R. and also with other cities to determine what their experience has been 4- with th is type of deve lopment. Commissioner Stewart stated that parking seems to be a real problem at apartment developments. There is no criteria for the Commission to accept or reject the parking provided, if it meets the code requirements. However, he did have some questions as to the parking meeting the needs of the project. Commissioner Stewart thought it would be beneficial to open the public hearing for questions from the audience and the developer would have a change to respond. Vice Chairman Dickson asked if anyone in the audience wished to speak for or against the E.I.R. There being no one present wishing to be heard, Commissioner Pack moved that the public hearing be continued to the May 20, 1976 meeting, seconded by Commissioner Stewart and unanimously adopted. Vi76-1 This is the time and .place for public hearing Garrison, Elmer R. to consider the application of Elmer R. Garrison fora variance from 9'-0" to 0'-0" in side yard setback to allow the construction of a tennis court fence for an apartment complex to be located on property known as 3495 South Bascom Avenue in a R-3-S (High Density Residential) Zoning District. Mr. Kee advised that this item relates to Items 1 and 4 on the agenda and it is the staff recommendation that the variance application be continued to the next meeting of the Planning Commission. Commissioner Pack was of the opinion that there should be discussion on this application at this time as this is the first time that a tennis court project has been brought into Campbell and the present guidelines in the code are very specific as to the findings the Commission must make before a variance can be granted. She was of the opinion that this application did not meet any of the requirements outlined in the code for granting a variance. However, a tennis court is open space and would be a nice addition to an apartment complex. Perhaps a change in the code might be considered so the Commission could comply with this application. Mr. Kee stated that this is a possibility. It would require action by the Commission to direct staff to prepare a draft text amendment to the zoning code and to prepare the necessary public hearing notices. Vice Chairman Dickson stated that there is a checklist for findings that must be made before a variance can be granted and he did not feel that this application fits the checklist for consideration of a variance. Commissioner Campos asked if it would require a change in the code or a waiver of the code. Mr. I~ee advised there is a legal decision provided by a former city attorney and a checklist has been established to guide the Commission. The staff would have no objection to noticing a text amendment for public hearing. -5- The text amendment would be to Section 21,48, Open Space, of the Zoning Code. A text amendment to the code takes approximately 90 days, and it might be advisable to leave this item on the agenda and have it come back to the Commission when the other related items for the project are on the agenda. Commissioner Pack advised that in discussing this with the applicant at the committee meeting, he indicated that the 90 days would not hinder him with the progress of the project as the tennis court would most likely be the last thing to be built. ' Commissioner Stewart moved that V 76-1 be continued to the June 3 meeting of :the Planning Commission and that the staff prepare an amendment to Chapter 21.48, Open Space, of the Campbell Municipal Code and notice the text amendment for public hearing. Motion seconded by Commissioner Campos and unanimously adopted.- UP 76-5 This is the time and place for public hearing Grabau, H, B. on the application of Herbert B. Grabau, on behalf St. Andrews of the. Saint 'Andrews Residence for Boys, for a use Residence for Boys permit to allow a correctional institution on property known as 189 North Second Street in a R-1 Zone (Single Family Residential). Vice .Chairman Dickson asked Mr. Kee for his comments. Mr. Kee advised that the applicant is proposing to use an existing residence as a live-in rehabilitation center for approximately six boys. It is intended that the existing facility, a single family home, be used and .only those changes, if any required by appropriate agencies would be made. St. Andrews Residence for Boys is a non-profit corporation. Philanthropic or correctional institutions may be permitted in any zone upon securing a use permit. Certain findings are required to be made by the Planning Commission: that the operation of the use will not be detrimental to the health, safety, peace, morals, comfort or general welfare of persons residing or working in the neighborhood of the proposed use, and that the use will not b~ detrimental or injurious to property and improvements in the neighborhood or to the general welfare of the City. The staff is of the opinion that a use such as the one .proposed is more closely related to a boarding home operation, which, according to the zoning code may be permitted in a R-3 zone or in a R-2 zone with a use permit. The Planning Department has received a letter signed by approximately 76 residents of the area expressing their disapproval of this use at this location. Vice Chairman Dickson asked that the Recorder read the petition. (Petition on file in the office of the Planning Department). -. Commissioner Campos asked if there were any similar half-way houses of this nature in the City of Campbell. Mr. Kee stated that he was not aware of any. There are some convalescent hospitals in the city in the R-3 and R-2 zones. The code does, hovrever, -6- provide that an application can be made for such a use in the R-1 zoning district and approved if the Commission makes the findings that the use will be compatible and not deleterious to the persons residing or working in the neighborhood. The findings that the Commission must make are spelled out in the Zoning Ordinance. Mr. Kee further advised that a boarding house would require the R-2 or R-3 zoning. Vice Chairman Dickson declared the public hearing open and asked if anyone wished to be heard. He suggested that those wishing to speak limit their comments to a few minutes in order to give everyone an opportunity to express their opinion. Mr. John Theamster, Vice President St. Andrews Residence for Boys, 20089 Pierce Road, Saratoga, stated that he wished to speak on behalf of the Board and requested a favorable recommendation from the Planning Commission for the project. He stated that members of the Board have tried to meet with the residents in the area and explain the project. This is a non-profit corporation composed of ten professional men who reside in the Los Gatos, Saratoga and Monte Sereno area. They have worked on this particular project for two years and have spent considerable time and effort in locating a suitable home and establishing plans. They have worked with the County-and State agencies in meeting their requirements. The children who would reside in the home are interviewed and are not accepted unless they feel they will be compatible. The children are wards of the courts, but not because they have committed crimes. They are children who do not have parents. The children who are in the home will be fully supervised and disciplined. He requested a favorable decision- from the Commission and stated that he would be happy to answerrquestions. He did add that they had tried to develop this project in other cities, but this was the first property that they had found that looked feasible to develop. They cannot buy the property. They will rent the home and use it if they can get the use permit. Mr. Theamster stated that the staff comment sheet states that this will be a correctional institution and this is not the case. This will be a rehabilitation center and will provide a home for these boys with a father-mother relationship. He did not believe that the use is inconsistent with the R-1 zoning. They would be operating as a family - not as a boarding house. They would expect to have the boys for several years as most of them do not have parents. The ten men on the board of directors intend to devote their personal time in working with the boys. He stated that institutions are not the place for these boys and they intend to provide a family type life. He stated that the petition cites the size of the lot as a reason for denying the application. He stated that they have found it to be quite adequate and in fact it exceeds the state and county requirements. The petition also states that they are in violation of current zoning. However, the staff has indicated that it would not be a violation of the code require- ments. They are not asking fora variance to the code. No. 4 in the petition states that the on the neighborhood. ~He advised that iorate. They want something good for proposed use would have a deteriorating effec they would not allow the house to deter- the neighborhood. -7- No. 5 in the petition states that the residential property values in the vicinity would be depressed by the proposed use. However, he stated they could find no justification for that statement. The property will not be allowed to become run down. No. 6 of the petition states that the use of this valuable property by a non- profit organization would withdraw it from the tax rolls at a cost to the city. He stated that they do not own the property. However, if they did , own it they would be pleased to pay a commensurate rate of tax to the city. He stated that all the members of the board would welcome any of the area residents to work with them in this project. He stated that the home would not seta dangerous precedent, as claimed in the petition. The boys will have 24 hour surveillance and if a boy did not fit. in with the program, he would be returned to the proper authority. Mr. .Theamster stated that they hope to establish a place which will become a' model for the community and a credit to the neighborhood. They are looking for a chance to prove themselves. i Mr. Kee stated that he would like to clarify the wording in the notice of hearing. In reviewing -the zoning ordinance,Section 21.64.070 (lq) allows a philanthropic or correctional institution with a use permit. He stated that the first part of the justification for the use permit states that the purpose is to provide a complete residential, therapeutic program planned to encourage behaviorial changes which would enable the boys to return to their homes or a foster home and this is where the wording used in the staff comment sheet was taken from. Mrs. Carla Wirth, northwest corner of lst and Grant Streets, stated that the boys have been referred to as wards. of the court and then later on referred to as children with problem's. Children with problems with their parents and not with the law. She spoke in opposition to the project as, in her opinion, it would change the character of the neighborhood and the request, if granted, would not be in keeping with the current zoning. The Commission would be accepting a responsibility for any misfortunes that might occur. She also expressed concern over the real property values in the area. Rev.Corwin Olds, 21.0 North Second Street, stated that he was speaking on behalf of some of his neighbors. He stated that they have a compact neighborhood and some of the residents have owned their homes fora long time and many are retired people. He stated that although senior citizens have received quite a bit of attention lately, he felt that they have some rights as well as the `~ young people - the right to live in peace and with a feeling of security in their neighborhood. He stated that it is something that the people in the neighborhood do not want. Mrs. Velma Olds, 210 North Second Street, also spoke in opposition to the project. She cited the high taxes they now pay and every time a house is sold in the area the taxes go up. This is what she had been told by the tax assessor - $- Mr. Dubois Rhine, 235 North 2nd Street, stated he would like to know how two persons can take youngsters ages 12 to 15 and guarantee that they are going to be model children. Mr. Bob Welch, Star House, 12524 Paseo Flores, speaking on behalf of the project, described the staffing of the home which would consist of a married couple plus outside consultants as needed. He stated that he has six children as many families do. He introduced the people who would be in charge of the home and also advised that the Board members would be on call and would serve as emergency backup. Mrs. Yerkovich, 120 North 2nd Street, asked the applicants if they would vote for such a project if it were going in next door to them. Mrs.. Arlene Conway, 125 North 2nd Street, stated she was also concerned about property values. She stated that she has a 16 year old daughter . and she has worked with culturally deprived children and is aware of the problems. She stated that these children would be from 12 to 17 and she did not want them in her neighborhood. Mr. Dan Bloomfield, 149 North 1st Street, asked the applicants how long they had been looking for a residence in which to house the boys. Mr. Theamster stated that they had been looking for a suitable location for two years. Mr. Bloomfield stated he was opposed to the project in this neighborhood and questioned why they wanted to locate in Campbell. He stated that it would seem to him that in two years they could have found a location in their own neighborhood. Mrs. Cheryl Hartley, 175 North 2nd Street, stated that she did not want this home next door to her. The yard is too small and it would be awful if it were there. Vice Chairman Dickson asked Mr. Theamster about the size of the lot. Mr. Theamster stated that it was 60' x 150' and has five bedrooms. Mr. Boyd Butkins, 6052 Prince Drive, San Jose, stated there is no way that the Planning Commission and City Council can guarantee the future of a neighborhood. A family with six or eight children could move into the house. Vice Chairman Dickson asked Mr. Butkins if they have any similar homes any place else. Mr. Butkins stated that this is-their first venture. Mrs. Wanda Harms, 2nd and Latimer, stated that the applicants should look further for a more suitable site - one with a larger yard. Mr. Theamster requested that the Conunission grant a test trial period of possibly a year in which to prove themselves. He was of the opinion that they could establish and hold the respect of the community if given an opportunity. -9- Vice Chairman Dickson asked Mr. Theamster if he would consider the proposed operation philanthropic or correctional. Mr. Theamster stated that he would think it would be philanthropic - most of the interested people in the project are donating their time and they are trying to back it themselves. !t is not their purpose to be a correctional institution - it will not be a maximum security facility and will have adequate direction. Mr. Oliver Jenson, ]56 North 2nd Street, spoke in opposition to the project. Vice Chairman Dickson stated that all the evidence will be considered before a decision is r~;ade. Sometimes this involves looking at the property, as well as considering testimony from the proponents and opponents. Vice Chairman Dickson asked if anyone else wished to speak.There being no one;wishing to be heard further, Commissioner Samuelson moved that the pub lic hearing be closed, seconded by Commissioner Pack and unanimously adopted. Commissioner Stewart stated that it is not clear that this project would meet the criteria necessary-for justification for location in the R-1 .zone. Mr. Kee stated, that in his opinion, this is an appropriate application. It is within the authority of the Commission to either approve or deny the application. This type of use is allowed in any zone with a use permit. Commissioner Stewart stated that it is obvious that the neighborhood is not right for this project. He did not feel that it would be fair to the project to place it in this area. Before any project of this type can be successful the compatibility with the area should be established. Commissioner Pack stated that as a Planning Commissioner she felt the primary concern should be for the residents of Campbell. She stated that it is a worthwhile cause and she was in sympathy with the people trying to get the project started. If the people in the area think that they do not want the project in their neighborhood, then the Commission should take their concerns very seriously. Commissioner Campos stated that it is an admitted fact that institutions do not do the job of rehabilitating youthful offenders. This is not a new concept, but one that has been tried in San Jose. Halfway houses try to solve the problem and there is a question as to whether or not this is really a workable solution to the problem. He stated he was not entirely in agreement with the rationale pointed out in the petition - some reasons are very valid, and others may not be. He stated that he was not convinced that this is the area for the project. Vice Chairman Dickson stated that he was in agreement with the intent of what the applicant wishes to do. He was of the opinion that 'the applicant had not done the ground work required in the neighborhood to sell the project to the residents. This should be done before such an application ever gets before the Commission: Resolution No. 1510 Commissioner Samuelson moved that the Planning Commission adopt Resolution No. 1510 denying UP 76-5 based upon the finding by the Commission -10- .that this operation would to some degree be detrimental to the health, safety, peace, morals, confort or general welfare of persons residing or working in the neighborhood of the proposed use, .Motion seconded by Commissioner Pack and adopted by the following roll call vote: AYES: Commissioners: Campos, Stewart, Samuelson, Pack, Dickson NOES: Commissioners: None ABSENT: Commissioners: Hebard and Chairman Lubeckis Mr. Kee advised the applicants that they have the right of appeal to the City Council within ten days from the date of this decision. Vice Chairman Dickson declared a ten minute recess. Meeting reconvened. Pl) 75-4 This is the time and place for continued public - Campbell Building hearing on the application of the Campbell Building and Investment Co. and Investment Company for approval of plans, '. elevations, and development schedule to allow construction of an office building to be located - on property known as 54 North Central Avenue in a P-D Zoning District. Mr. Kee advised that the staff recommends a continuance to the first meeting in August and that Mr. Helms would give a status report. Mr. Helms, 9cting Director of Public Works, stated that there has been considerable activity on the part of the consultant and the staf•F in the plans for the parking district. A series of meetings have been held with the property owners and he would expect that the matter would be determined within the next ninety days. Commissioner Stewart moved that PD 75-4 be continued to the first meeting in August, seconded by Commissioner Samuelson and unanimously adopted. PD 76-2 This is the time and place for public hearing Lounsberry, Gary D. to consider the application of Gary D. Lounsberry for a permit to operate a game arcade on property known as 801 West Hamilton Avenue in a neighborhood commercial district in a P-D Zoning District. Vice Chairman Dickson asked Mr. Kee for his comments. Mr. Kee advised that the staff recommends approval subject to two conditions: 1'. Applicant to submit plans of building interior to building department indicating all exits, etc. 2. Applicant to submit plans of building interior and layout of machines to the fire department. This .is an allowed use in a C-l, Neighborhood Commercial, Zoning District subject to the applicant securing a use permit and this proposal is planned to be located in a Planned Development Zone, Neighborhood Shopping Center, known as Hamilton Square. -11- The staff recommends approval subject to the two conditions. Vice Chairman Dickson declared the public hearing open and asked if anyone wished to speak for or against the application. Mr. Gary Lounsberry, appiicant,~explained the .type of operation and the games that would be involved. They stress a family participation operation and have a list of rules which must be followed. The hours of operation would be 12 noon to g p.m~~, Monday through Thursday, 12 to 10 p.m. on Fridays and 11 a.m. to 10 p.m. Saturday and Sunday. In ,the summertime they propose to stay open until 12 p.m. After 10 p.m. children would have to show identi- fication because of the curfew. Commissioner Pack asked Mr. Kee that in his opinion would this be a compatible use with the other merchants adjacent to this store. Mr. lCee stated that this is proposed to be located in a convenience shopping center and it would seem to fit in with the other type of uses already . there. There is a game center in the Prune Yard which has 6 to 8 games. The land use shown on the General Plan is commercial and just across the street there is another neighborhood shopping center - The Riverside Shopping Center. Mr. Kee further advised that if the .Commission does have a concern they may wish to put a time limitation on the approval in order that it could come back for review. Vice Chairman Dickson asked Mr. Kee if the commercial land use would allow this type of operation and Mr. Kee stated that it would. There being no one wishing to speak further, Commissioner Stewart moved that the public hearing be closed, seconded by Commissioner Pack and unanimously adopted. Resolution PJo. 1511 Commissioner Samuelson moved, that the Planning Commission adopt Resolution No. 1511 recommending that the City Council approve PD 76-2, application of Gary D. Lounsberry subject to the conditions recommended by staff, and with a review in two years by the Commission from the date of final approval. Motion seconded by Commissioner Pack and adopted by the following roll call vote: AYES: Commissioners: Campos, Stewart, Samuelson, Pack, Dickson NOES: Commissioners: None ABSENT: Commissioners: Hebard, Chairman Lubeckis PD 76-3 This is the time and place for public hearing Sims. Alan to consider the application of Alan Sims to convert a residential building into a restaurant and to expan~ the existing building. which is located on property known as 866 East Campbell Avenue in a PD Zone. -12- Mr. Kee advised that the staff has received a request from the applicant for a continuance to the next regular meeting. Vice Chairman Dickson declared the public hearing open and asked if anyone wished to speak for or against the application. There being no one present wishing to speak, Commissioner Stewart moved that the public hearing be closed, seconded by Commissioner Campos and unanimously adopted. GP 76-Z-C This is the time and place for continued public West Valley hearing to consider the future use of the West Valley College Site College Site. Mr. Kee advised that the staff recommends a continuance until the first meeting in July. There is a meeting scheduled between the Elementary `~ School District Board, the City Manager's office, the Planning Commission and City Council to review possible development of the college site. Thine might be a need for more than one study session and the continuance to the first meeting in July would provide time for staff and other interested parties to meet and work out recommendations for amendment to the General Plan. There was some discussion as to the possibility of the college moving their headquarters back to Campbell. Commissioner Pack reported that she attended a meeting with the college. board and there was considerable dis- cussion and the administration indicated a willingness to conduct a'study into the possibility of converting the portable units on the campus_on Latimer Avenue into administration type buildings and this study will be forthcoming. No definite decision has been made. Commissioner Pack moved that GP 76-2-C be continued to the first meeting in July, seconded by Commissioner Samuelson and unanimously adopted. MISCELLANEOUS Housing Needs Vice Chairman Dickson asked Mr. Kee for his comments. Assessment Study Mr. Kee stated that the Housing Needs Assessment Study was one of the projects approved for funding under the City's first-year application under the H.C.D. Program. After soliciting proposals, the firm of Ruth, Going and Curtis, Inc. was chosen to complete the study. It should be noted by the Planning Commission that a very important aspect of this study is that it provides base information for the preparation by Staff of the Housing Element of the General Plan and the preparation of Environmental tmpact Reports related to annexations which are now required. Mr-. Kee advised the Commission that the consultant was present to answer any questions that the Conmission may have regarding the study. Vice Chairman Dickson asked if the consultant wished to make-a presentation. -13- Mr. Leo Ruth of the firm Ruth, Going and Curtis, Inc. was introduced. Mr. Ruth indicated that his staff was prepared to discuss the manner in which the study was developed and answer questions. He then introduced Mr. Roger Mobley, the planner in charge of conducting the study. Mr. Mobley presented a brief description of the nature of the study, how it was prepared, and some of the main conclusions and asked if there were any questions. Vice Chairman Dickson asked if same of the projections for the number of low income families expected to reside in Campbell was due to natural increase, immigration, or both. Mr. Jim Gibson,a planner for the consultant, stated .that the population projections were based solely on the existing Campbell population. After some further discussion, the Commission decided that addition a] time' for revi~ was in order. 5 Commissioner Campos moved that the Housing Needs Assessment Study be continued to the next regular meeting in order that it could be reviewed by the full Commission at the next regular meeting and that the study be forwarded to the Council as an informational item.. Motion seconded by Commissioner Pack and unanimously adopted. ADJOURNMENT Commissioner Samuelson moved that the meeting be adjourned, seconded by Commissioner Pack and unanimously adopted. The meeting was adjourned at 10:47 p.m. - APPROVED J. DuWayne Dickson Vice Chairman ATTEST: Arthur A. Kee Secretary -14-