Loading...
Correspondence - August 2010August 13, 210 Community Development Department John Trollman DINAN Engineering 980 Camden Avenue Campbell, CA 95008 Re: Sign Ordinance Variance Request Dear Mr. Trollman: I am in receipt of your August 9, 2010 letter requesting a variance to the City's Sign Ordinance in order to allow afreeway-oriented sign on property located at 980 Camden Avenue. The Freeway Oriented Sign Ordinance was adopted with restrictive language to intentionally limit the number and size of signs that would be visible from the Expressway and Freeway which dissect the community. According to CMC § 21.30.080 E (Freeway-oriented signs), these signs are limited to businesses that traditionally draw a significant number of patrons which include a) gasoline stations, b) hotels and motels, c) commercial schools occupying at least 15,000 square feet of building space, and d) retail stores that occupy at least 50,000 square feet. Basically, there are only four business types or uses that are permitted freeway-oriented signs under the City's Municipal Code. Unfortunately, DINAN Engineering is an automotive repair business and not among those business uses that qualify for such signage. According to the City's Variance Ordinance (CMC § 21.48.010), a variance application may not be accepted requesting a use that is not in conformity with the uses specified by the Zoning Code. In other words, because automotive uses are not among the uses permitted to have afreeway-oriented sign, you would not be allowed to apply for a variance. The City's variance provisions are consistent with State Law (Section 65906 of the Government Code) which states "A variance shall not be granted for a parcel of property which authorizes a use or activity which is not otherwise expressly authorized by the zone regulation governing the parcel or property." In conclusion, there is no current mechanism to allow for a variance from the permitted uses eligible for freeway-oriented signs and therefore no application can be accepted for such a request. Sincerely Kirk Heinrichs Community Development Director John Trollman DINAN Engineering 980 Camden Avenue Campbell, CA 95008 August 9, 2010 Kirk Heinrichs Director of Planning Campbell City Hall 70 N. First Street Campbell, CA 95008 Dear Mr. Heinrichs: RECEIVED AUK pp2olo CPryANNIN~ pEPTII I visited your office last Tuesday and talked with your Steve Prosser about an outside sign for our DINAN Service location at 980 Camden Avenue in Campbell. Our company acquired this business in late 2007. Post the acquisition, we have discovered that the location is a very significant problem. Specifically, "we cannot be found!" I say that because our customers know that Camden becomes San Tomas North of Highway 17; but it turns out that "our little Camden", North of where it supposedly terminates, is an isolated, dead-end cul-de-sac that terminates at our building. Generally we get at least two cell phone calls a week from our customers, asking where we are on Camden and asking for directions. There are no drive-by customers to our main entrance because of the remote and cul-de-sac location. Mr. Prosser made it clear that our request for a highway sign was against the code and could not be allowed. (See Plan, attached.) I am writing this letter to you as the first step in determining how this decision may be appealed and how we could be granted a variance allowing our signage plan. Our business has genuinely been very negatively impacted by the aforementioned isolation of "our Camden" and the only solutions we have been able to identify are "highway signage" or relocation. Our first choice is improved signage, in that, other than our geographic quarantine, we are quite happy as Campbell residents. Shortly after our acquisition of the business, in early 2008, Steve Dinan, our landlord, and our Campbell manager made a direct appeal to the City Council about highway signage. As a result of that meeting all three were left with the impression that we could request a variance; but we did not follow up with a formal request for no other reason but lack of time. This effort at this time is our formal request for a variance and approval of our enclosed signage plan. Please advise me as how to proceed with a more formal request for a variance. You may reach me at the above address or at my cell phone; 408-838-8456. Sincerely, John H. Trollman