CC Resolution 11546RESOLUTION NO. iisa6
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF CAMPBELL
AUTHORIZING THE PUBLIC WORKS DIRECTOR OR CITY ENGINEER TO SUBMIT
APPLICATIONS FOR FISCAL YEAR 2013/14 TRANSPORTATION DEVELOPMENT
ACT (TDA) FUNDS FOR THE CAMPBELL BICYCLE AND PEDESTRIAN PROJECT
AND THE EAST CAMPBELL AVENUE PORTALS PROJECT
WHEREAS, the City of Campbell was awarded $50,328 in TDA Article 3 guaranteed
funds for Fiscal Year 2013/14; and
WHEREAS, the East Campbell Avenue Improvement Project is ineligible to use the FY
2012/13 TDA Article 3 guarantee allocation of $28,268 to funds since the project had
been completed in the fiscal year prior to the grant allocation; and
WHEREAS, rescinding the allocation at this time will allow the funds to be reallocated
as part of this year's guaranteed allocation and increase this year's allocation to
$78,596; and
WHEREAS, staff recommends submitting a TDA Article 3 grant application for $78,596
in FY 2013/14 TDA Article 3 guaranteed funds for the Campbell Bicycle and Pedestrian
Project; and
WHEREAS, the East Campbell Avenue Portals Project is included in the Bicycle
Expenditure Program (BEP) for Valley Transportation Plan 2035 (VTP 2035) and is
therefore eligible to compete for TDA Discretionary funds for the FY 2013/14 grant
cycle; and
WHEREAS, the City of Campbell is being recommended for an award of a One Bay
Area Grant (OBAG) Program grant for $3,718,260 in OBAG grant funds; and
WHEREAS, the OBAG grant requires a local match of $481,740; and
WHEREAS, staff submitted a TDA Article 3 grant application for $385,392 in TDA
discretionary funds from the VTA's BEP; and
WHEREAS, VTA informed the City that the TDA discretionary fund program was
oversubscribed; and
WHEREAS, VTA has offered to prorate the available TDA discretionary funds to
applicants and Campbell would be eligible to receive $267,300; and
WHEREAS, the VTA BEP and TDA discretionary funds require a 20-percent local
match of $66,825; and
WHEREAS, potential sources for the BEP local match include the FY 2013/14 TDA
Article 3 guarantee funds proposed for this year's Campbell Bicycle and Pedestrian
Project; and
WHEREAS, members of the Campbell Bicycle and Pedestrian Advisory Committee
endorse both the Campbell Bicycle and Pedestrian Project and the East Campbell
Avenue Portals Project; and
WHEREAS, the ability to obtain funding approval requires City Council endorsement of
the projects; and
WHEREAS, the Metropolitan Transportation Commission (MTC) requires the City of
Campbell to use language from MTC's Model Governing Body Resolution in this
resolution to obtain MTC's funding approval; and
WHEREAS, MTC requires an Attachment A, "Findings", and an Attachment B, "Project
Application"; and
WHEREAS, Article 3 of the Transportation Development Act (TDA), Public Utilities
Code (PUC) Section 99200 et seq., authorizes the submission of claims to a regional
transportation planning agency for the funding of projects exclusively for the benefit
and/or use of pedestrians and bicyclists; and
WHEREAS, the Metropolitan Transportation Commission (MTC), as the regional
transportation planning agency for the San Francisco Bay region, has adopted MTC
Resolution No. 875, Revised, entitled "Transportation Development Act, Article 3,
Pedestrian/Bicycle Projects," which delineates procedures and criteria for submission of
requests for the allocation of "TDA Article 3" funding; and
WHEREAS, MTC Resolution No. 875, Revised requires that requests for the allocation
of TDA Article 3 funding be submitted as part of a single, countywide coordinated claim
from each county in the San Francisco Bay region; and
WHEREAS, the City of Campbell desires to submit a request to MTC for the allocation
of TDA Article 3 funds to support the projects described in Attachment B to this
resolution, which are for the exclusive benefit and/or use of pedestrians and/or
bicyclists.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of Campbell
that the City Engineer is hereby authorized to request rescission of $28,268 in FY
2012/13 TDA Article 3 guaranteed funds for East Campbell Avenue Improvement
Project;
BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of Campbell that the City
Engineer is hereby authorized to submit a TDA grant application for Fiscal Year
2013/14 to the Valley Transportation Authority to obtain $78,596 in TDA guaranteed
funds for the Campbell Bicycle and Pedestrian Project;
BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of Campbell that the City
Engineer is hereby authorized to submit a TDA discretionary grant application for Fiscal
Year 2013/14 to the Valley Transportation Authority to obtain $267,300 in TDA
discretionary funds from the VTA's BEP for the East Campbell Avenue Portals Project;
BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of Campbell that the City
will provide $66,825 in local funds should the TDA Discretionary Grant be awarded to
the City of Campbell;
BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of Campbell that the City
of Campbell declares it is eligible to request an allocation of TDA Article 3 funds
pursuant to Section 99234 of the Public Utilities Code;
BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of Campbell that there is
no pending or threatened litigation that might adversely affect the project described in
Attachment B to this resolution, or that might impair the ability of the City of Campbell to
carry out the project;
BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of Campbell that the City
of Campbell attests to the accuracy of and approves the statements in Attachment A to
this resolution;
BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of Campbell that the City
of Campbell shall forvvard a certified copy of this resolution and its attachments, and
any accompanying supporting materials to the Santa Clara County Congestion
Management Agency for submission to MTC as part of the countywide coordinated
TDA Article 3 claim.
PASSED AND ADOPTED this 21 sc day of May, 2013, by the following roll call vote:
AYES: COUNCILMEMBERS:
NOES: COUNCILMEMBERS
ABSENT: COUNCILMEMBERS:
Attes~
ne Bybee, ity Clerk
Kotowski, Baker, Waterman, Low
None
Cristina
APPROVED: ~' '
,~' .
",
L,. __....__ __ _
"~'
Evan D. Low, Mayor
Resolution No.
11546
Attachment A
Re: Request to the Metronolitan Transportation Commission for the Allocation of Fiscal Yeaz 2013/14
Transportation Development Ac[ Article 3 Pedestrian/Bicycle Proiect Fundine
Findings
Page 1 of 1
1. That the City of Campbell is not legally impeded from submitting a request to the Metropolitan Transportation
Commission for the allocation of Transportation Development Act (TDA) Article 3 funds, nor is the City of
Campbell legally impeded from undertaking the project(s) described in "Attachment B" of this resolution.
2. That the City of Campbell has committed adequate staffing resources to complete the project(s) described in
Attachment B.
3. A review of the project(s) described in Attachment B has resulted in the consideration of all pertinent matters,
including those related to environmental and right-of-way permits and clearances, attendant to the successful
completion of the project(s).
4. Issues attendant to securing environmental and right-of-way permits and clearances for the projects described in
Attachment B have been reviewed and will be concluded in a manner and on a schedule that will not jeopazdize
the deadline for the use of the TDA funds being requested.
5. That the project(s) described in Attachment B comply with the requirements of the California Environmental
Quality Act (CEQA, Public Resources Code Sections 21000 et seq.).
6. That as portrayed in the budgetary description(s) of the project(s) in Attachment B, the sources of funding other
than TDA are assured and adequate for completion of the project(s).
7. That the project(s) described in Attachment B are for capital construction and/or design engineering; and/or for
the maintenance of a Class I bikeway which is closed to motorized traffic; and/or for the purposes of restriping
Class II bicycle lanes; and/or for the development or support of a bicycle safety education program; and/or for
the development of a comprehensive bicycle and/or pedestrian facilities plan, and an allocation of TDA Article
3 funding for such a plan has not been received by the City of Campbell within the prior five fiscal years.
8. That the project(s) described in Attachment B which are bicycle projects have been included in a detailed
bicycle circulation element included in an adopted general plan, or included in an adopted comprehensive
bikeway plan (such as outlined in Section 2377 of the California Bikeways Act, Streets and Highways Code
section 2370 et sue.).
9. That any project described in Attachment B that is a "Class I Bikeway," meets the mandatory minimum safety
design criteria published in Chapter 1000 of the California Highway Design Manual.
] 0. That the project(s) described in Attachment B aze ready to commence implementation during the fiscal year of
the requested allocation.
11. That the City of Campbell agrees to maintain, or provide for the maintenance of, the project(s) and facilities
described in Attachment B, for the benefit of and use by the public.
MTC Programming and Allocations Section April 2005 TDA Article 3 Model Resolution Page 4
Resolution No. 11546
Attachment B
page 2 of 3
TDA Article 3 Project Application Form
Fiscal Year of this Claim: 2013/14 Applicant: Citv of Campbell
Contact person Matthew Jue
Mailinc Address 70 North First Street Campbell CA 95008
E-Mail Address malthewi~cilvofcampbell.com Telephone: 408-866-2154
Secondary Contact (in event primary not available) Michelle Duinnev
E-Mail Address michellea®citvofcamgbell.com Telephone: 408-866-2159
Short Title Description of Proiect• Campbell Avenue Portals Proiect
Functional Description of Project:
Canstrud Campbell Avenue Portals Proiect
Financial Plan:
List the project elements for which TDA funding is being requested (e.g., planning, environmental, engineering, right-of-way, construction,
inspection, contingency, audit). Use the table below to show the project budget. Include prior and proposed future funding of the project. If the
project is a segment of a larger project, include prior and proposed funding sources for the other segments.
Proiect Elements: Construction, construction engineerino, inspection
Fundin Source All Prior FYs A lication FY Next FY Followin FYs Totals
TDA Article 3 $267,300 $267,300
list all other sources:
1. TDA Article 3 $78,596 G $78,596
2.OBAG CMAO $3,718,260 $3,718,260
3. Ci CIPR $135,844 $135,844
4.
Totals $4,064,156 $135,844 $4,200,000
Project Eligibility: YES?IND?
A. Has the project been approved by the claimant's governing body? (If "N0," provide the approximate date approval is
anticipated). YES
B. Has this project previously received TDA Article 3 funding? If "YES," provide an explanation on a separate page. YES
C. For "bikeways," does the project meet Caltrans minimum safety design criteria pursuant to Chapter 1000 of the California
Highway Design Manual? (Available on the Internet via: http://www.dot.ca.aovl. YES
D. Has the project been reviewed by a Bicycle Advisory Committee? (If "N0," provide an explanation). YES
E. Has the public availability of the environmental compliance documentation far the project (pursuant to CEDA) been
evidenced by the dated stamping of the document by the county clerk or county recorder? (required only for projects that
include construction). YES
F. Will the project be completed before the allocation expires? Enter the anticipated completion date of project (month and
year)June 2016 YES
G. Have provisions been made by the claimant to maintain the project or facility, or has the claimant arranged for such
maintenance by another agency? (If an agency other than the Claimant is to maintain the facility provide its name:
1 YES
MTC Programming and Allocations Sec[ion April 2005 TDA Article 3 Model Resolution Page 5
Resolution No. 11546
Attachment B
page 3 of 3
TDA Article 3 Project Application Form
Proiect Eligibility for Camabell Avenue Portals Proiect
B. Has this project previously received TDA Article 3 funding?
YES. The City of Campbell's TDA Article 3 Guarantee allocation of $19,552 from FY12
was allocated to the City of Campbell's Bicycle and Pedestrian Improvements at
Various Locations Project. This project included two project concepts-one of which
was the Campbell Avenue Portals Project.
TDA Article 3 Claim Applications Appendix A Page t
Resolution No. 11546
Attachment B
page 1 of 3
TDA Article 3 Project Application Form
Fiscal Year of this Claim: 2013/14 Applicant: City of Campbell
Contact person: Matthew Jue
Mailing Address: 70 North First Street, Campbell, CA 95008
E-Mail Address: matthewi®citvofcampbell.com Telephone: 408-866-2154
Secondary Contact (in event primary not available) Michelle Quinnev
E-Mail Address: michelleo~citvofcampbell.com Telephone: 408-866-2159
Short Title Description of Proiect: Campbell Bicvcle and Pedestrian Proiect
Functional Description of Project:
Design and construct Campbell Avenue Portals Proiect. Winchester Boulevard Phase II Proiect. Hacienda Avenue Improvement Proiect, Virginia Avenue
Sidewalk Proiect. and/or Los Gatos Creek Trail Expansion on West Side Proiect (design onlvl
Financial Plan:
List the project elements for which TDA funding is being requested (e.g., planning, environmental, engineering, right-of-way, construction,
inspection, contingency, audit). Use the table below to show the project budget. Include prior and proposed future funding of the project. If the
project is a segment of a larger project, include prior and proposed funding sources for the other segments.
Proiect Elements: Enaineerina, construction, construction enaineerina, inspection
Fundin Source All Prior FYs A lication FY Next FY Followin FYs Totals
TDA Article 3 $78,596 G $78,596
list all other sources:
1.
2.
3.
4.
Totals $78,596 $78,596
Project Eligibility: YES?MO?
A. Has the project been approved by the claimant's governing body? (If "N0," provide the approximate date approval is
anticipated). May 21, 2013 NO
B. Has this project previously received TDA Article 3 funding? If "YES," provide an explanation on a separate page. NO
C. For "bikeways," does the project meet Caltrans minimum safety design criteria pursuant to Chapter 1000 of the California
Highway Design Manual? (Available on the Internet via: http://www.dot.ca.aov). YES
D. Has the project been reviewed by a Bicycle Advisory Committee? (If "N0," provide an explanation). YES
E. Has the public availability of the environmental compliance documentation for the project (pursuant to CEOA) been
evidenced by the dated stamping of the document by the county clerk or county recorder? (required only for projects that
include construction). NO
F. Will the project be completed before the allocation expires? Enter the anticipated completion date of project (month and
year) June, 2016 YES
G. Have provisions been made by the claimant to maintain the project or facility, or has the claimant arranged for such
maintenance by another agency? (If an agency other than the Claimant is to maintain the facility provide its name:
1 YES
MTC Prograauning and Allocations Section April 2005 TDA Article 3 Model Resolution Page 5
U
W
O
Z
Q
~ ~
H Q
W ~
~ ~
W I-
a Z_
~U
Q~
~U
UW
~~
U~
m ~
J
J
W W
m ~
C~
U~
,~~
~~~
ante
z '-`'
Q N
N O
v
O
Z W
a ~
~ ~
WO~SVB
VJ U y
U d C U
N '0 U ~ N
W a s o w d Z
f/1 N - Y
Z c m dF 3
U ~ ~ ~ d ~
~ QmaU ai
U ~ w ~ o ¢'
W ~ ~ c m ~
O ~ C_ ~ N m
Q' U~x~>
~ N M ~ In
~N
0
oQ
c~
z w
a "'
~o
~ ~~ as oilno //
6mp~~afad ueulsapad pue alo~(o!q Ilagdweo -dew ~~!u!o!n loafwd ~
Q
c~
0
Q
pounoo~fmaygew~:f
U
W
a~
J ~
Z
~U
1~
W ~
~U
Z ~
Q a
J
J N
W W
C~
G
V
U t.L
3~V NM0RI3W ~
w O
®-®-®
z
~ ° ~
Z ~ ~
~ ~ ~
o
a °
H9131
)jy~
'~Sp~~
3Atl WOOStlB
bN w
a w
Q
pSb
~
3~tl OIN
J j O(`\
Q
any Jotvi aJ ~ G
OSIJJ
~ i
~J
?
~, ~
MlB ?J31S3HONIM
$'aai~
s~o
a}iyM
°+a
d
a
a
d ~
~„ a' a~
b
E m ~/a0
w
Z
~
Q
o
"~
U >
wo Nvs
AdX3 J ~~ 0
~
0l J ln o
N
Z
O O
Z
2 6
W
~ ~
Nln tl 3Ay ~ O
J Q
~
~ ~
'G
~~
> E
b
b
Y d
3
g
~
O '3+
~ ~ ~
o C
~
ti ~
Q
as ollno ~
a
6,v,p~}oafad sleyod -dew ~(}luloln }oafad Z a~n6y~s}JOdaJ Ilounoo}fnnay}}ew}:f
Avenue Project (OS-04)
BMP Sizing by Volume + Flow Based Method (12" Swale Depth, 4 in/hr infiltration)
48 hr drawdown time, Calculations based on Santa Clara Valley Urban Runoff Pollution Prevention Program
CASOA Stormwater BMP Handbook Approach
May 13, 2013
Drainage
Area ID Depth of
Ponding
Required to
Treat Water (ft)
1 0.9
2 2.9
3 1.9
4 0.2
S 4.3
6 NO BMP
7 4.2
8 0.0
9 0.0
10 0.1
11 0.0
12 0.2
13 0.3
14 0.0
15 0.3
16 1.5
17 0.0
18 O.S
19 0.4
20 0.7
21 0.0
22 0.6
23 0.0
24 0.0
25 0.0
26 0.1
27 0.3
28 0.0