Loading...
CC Resolution 11724RESOLUTION NO. 11124 BEING A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF CAMPBELL APPROVING A NEGATIVE DECLARATION FOR ,4 ZONING TEXT AMENDMENT (PLN2014-165) INVOLVING REVISIONS TO THE CITY'S REQUIREMENTS FOR EMERGENCY SHELTERS, TRANSITIONAL HOUSING AND SUPPORTIVE HOUSING IN CONFORMANCE WITH SENATE BILL 2 (LOCAL PLANNING APPROVAL FOR EMERGENCY SHELTERS AND TRANSITIONAL AND SUPPORTIVE HOUSING); MANUFACTURED HOUSING; SINGLE ROOM OCCUPANCY FACILITIES; AND UPDATES TO DEFINITIONS IN ACCORDANCE .WITH THE CITY'S' 2009-2014 HOUSING ELEMENT OF THE GENERAL PLAN. THE REVISIONS AFFECT. CHAPTER 21.08 (RESIDENTIAL DISTRICTS); SECTION 21.10.080 (M-1) LIGHT INDUSTRIAL ZONING DISTRICT; SECTIONS 21.36.085 AND 21.36.230; AND SECTION 21.72.020 (DEFINITIONS) OF THE ZONING ORDINANCE. After notification and public hearing, as specified by law and after presentation by the Community Development Director, proponents and opponents, the City Council did determine that the adoption of a Negative Declaration provides full and adequate environmental review for approval of a zoning text amendment to revise the City's zoning ordinance requirements related to emergency shelters, transition and supportive housing in conformance with Senate Bill 2, manufactured housing, single room occupancy facilities and updates to definitions in accordance with the City's 2009 - 2014 Housing Element of the General Plan. Environmental Findinqs 1. An Initial Study has been prepared by the City for this project that provides documentation for the factual basis for concluding that a Negative Declaration should be adopted, since no substantial evidence exists, in light of the whole record, that the project may have a significant effect on the environment. Evidentiary Findinqs , The project consists of a Zoning Text Amendment involving revisions to the City's requirements pertaining to emergency shelters and transitional and supportive housing in conformance with Senate Bill 2 (Local Planning Approval for Emergency Shelters and Transitional and Supportive Housing); manufactured housing; single-room occupancy facilities; and updates to definitions in accordance with the City's 2009 - 2014 Housing Element of the General Plan. The Revisions affect Chapter 21.08 (Residential Districts); Section 21:10.080 (M-1) Light Industrial Zoning District; Sections 21.36.085 and 21.36.230; and Section 21.72.020 (Definitions) of the Zoning Ordinance. 2. The Negative Declaration describes the reasons that the proposed Text Amendment project will not have a significant effect on the environment, and therefore, does not require the preparation of an Environmental Impact Report, pursuant to the California Environmental Quality Act Guidelines. 3. There are no responsible agencies or trustee agencies responsible for resources affected by the proposed Text Amendment project. 4. The City of Campbell provided a Notice of Intent to adopt a Negative Declaration to the public via the Campbell Express and the County Clerk. 5. The City of Campbell provided a 20-day public review period of the draft Negative Declaration pursuant to the California Environmental Quality Act Guidelines. The 20-day public review period was between July 30, 2014 and August 19, 2014. 6. The Negative Declaration reflects the independent judgment and analysis of the City Council. Based upon the foregoing findings of fact, the City Council further finds and concludes that: 1. No substantial evidence has been presented from which a reasonable argument could be made that shows that the project will have a significant adverse impact on the environment. 2. The Custodian of the Record for the Negative Declaration and Initial Study is the City Clerk of the City of Campbell, located at 70 North First Street, Campbell, California THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the City Council adopts the Negative Declaration prepared for the project described herein, as set forth as Exhibit A. PASSED AND ADOPTED this 1 Frh day of sP= rPmr,F,- , 2014, by the following roll call vote: AYES: COUNCILMEMBERS: Baker, Low, Kotowski, Cristina, Waterman NOES: COUNCILMEMBERS: clone ABSENT: COUNCILMEMBERS: None ABSTAIN: COUNCILMEMBERS: None - APPROVED: ~ ~`` Ri and M. Waterman, Mayor ATTEST: nne Bybee, City Clerk EXHIBIT A OF ~ CAMn u ~~ 0 0 .~ f L ~R('H APO DRAFT NEGATIVE DECLARATION The Community Development Director has reviewed the proposed project described below to determine whether it could have a significant effect on the environment as a result of the project completion. "Significant effect on the environment" means a substantial, or potentially substantial, adverse change in any of the physical conditions within the area affected by the project including land, air, water, minerals, flora, fauna, ambient noise, and objects of historic or aesthetic significance. Project Title: Zoning Code Text Amendment pertaining to emergency shelters, transitional housing and supportive housing in conformance with Senate Bill 2 (Local Planning and Approval for Emergency Shelters and Transitional and Supportive Housing) and the City's 2009 - 2014 Housing Element. The project also involves revisions to the City of Campbell's zoning code regazding manufactured housing, single-room occupancy (SRO) facilities, and updates to definitions. Project Location: M-1 (Light Industrial) Zone District; Residential Zoning Districts; and City-wide Name and Address of Project Proponent: City of Campbell 70 N. First St. Campbell, CA 95008 Contact Person and Phone Number: Aki Honda Snelling (408)866-2732 Lead Agency Name and Address: City of Campbell Community Development Department 70 N. First St. Campbell, CA 95008 Zoning Designation: ~ M-1 (Light Industrial), Residential Zoning Districts, City-wide General Plan Designation: Light Industrial, Residential Designations, City-wide Project Description: The proposed project is a zoning code text amendment involving revisions to the City's requirements pertaining to emergency shelters, transitional housing and supportive housing in. conformance with Senate Bill 2 (Local Planning and Approval for Emergency Shelters and Transitional and Supportive Housing). The project also involves revisions to the City of Campbell's zoning code regarding manufactured housing, single-room occupancy (SRO) Draft Negative Declaration City of Campbell Zoning Code Text Amendment -Emergency Shelters, TransitionaVSupportive Housing Paee 2 of 3 facilities, and updates to definitions. These revisions are being proposed to the City of Campbell's zoning code in conformance with the City's 2009 - 2014 Housing Element. The purpose of the proposed zoning text amendment is to: • Modify Section 21.10.080 (M-1, Light Industrial zoning district) of Chapter 21.10 (Commercial and Industrial Districts) of the Campbell Municipal Code to allow Emergency Shelters as,a permitted use by right in that portion of the M-1 zone bounded generally by Camden Avenue, Los Gatos Creek County Park, Hacienda Avenue and Winchester Boulevard. '• Modify Chapter 21.08 (Residential District) of the Campbell Municipal Code with'the following revisions: o Modify Section 21.08.030 to allow Manufactured Housing as a permitted use by right (subject to architectural requirements within the parameters of State Law). o Allow Supportive Housing and Transitional Housing as a permitted use by right in all residential zoning district, and remove Transitional Housing as a conditionally permitted use in residential zoning districts. ' o Allow Single Room Occupancy facilities as a conditionally permitted use in the R-3 (Multiple-Family) zoning district. • Modify Chapter 21.36 (Provisions Applying to Special Uses) of the Campbell Municipal Code with the following revisions: o Add a new Section 21.36.085 (Emergency Shelters) in compliance with State law and the 2009 - 2014 Housing Element that addresses: the purpose, locational criteria, development standards, and the operational 'standards for emergency shelters. o Delete Section 21.36.230 (Transitional Housing) as transitional housing is a permitted use by right in residential zoning districts. • Modify Section 21.72.020 (Definitions of specialized terms and phrases) of Chapter 21.71 (Definitions) of the Campbell Municipal Code with the following revisions: o Modify~the definition for "Emergency shelter" in compliance with State law. o Modify the definition for "Family" in compliance with State law. o Include a new definition of "Nontransient." o Clarify "Residential service facility, small (6 or fewer)" serves six or fewer natural persons. o Clarify "Residential service facility, large (7 or more) serves seven or more natural persons. o Include a new definition of"Single Room Occupancy Facility" in compliance with State law. o Include a new definition of "Supportive Housing" in compliance with State law. o Include a new definition of "Target population" in compliance with State law. o Modify the definition for "Transitional housing" in compliance with State law. Project Location and Setting: The proposed zoning code text amendment will provide for compliance with SB 2 and the 2009 - 2014 Housing Element with respect to emergency shelters, transitional housing, supportive housing, manufactured housing, single-room occupancy facilities, and general "clean-up" Drafr Negative Declaration City of Campbell Zoning Code Text Amendment -Emergency Shelters, TransitionaUSupportive Housing Paee 3 of 3 modifications to .the definitions section of the City of Campbell zoning code. The proposed zoning code text amendment will apply to the M-1 (Light Industrial) zoning district, the residential zoning districts, and city-wide with respect to the revisions to the definitions section. The City of Campbell is located approximately 50 miles south of San Francisco in Santa Clara County, one of the nine Counties that make up the region known as the San Francisco Bay Area (ref. Figure 1). The City occupies over six squaze miles of relatively flat land that slopes gently toward the south end of the San Francisco Bay. Campbell is bounded on the north, east and west by the City of San Jose and on the south by the Town of Los Gatos. A small portion of Campbell's southwestern boundary is adjacent to the City of Saratoga. Finding: The Community Development Director finds that the project described above will not have a significant effect on the environment. The attached Initial Study does not identify any potentially significant impacts on the environment. Protest of the draft Negative Declaration: Any person may file a written protest of the drafr Negative Declaration before 5:00 p.m. on August 19, 2014. Such protest must be filed at the Community Development Department, City Hall, 70 North First Street, Campbell, California. The written protest should make a "fair argument" that the project will have one or more significant effects on the environment based on substantial evidence. ?~ Zv/~ TE Aki Honda Snelli Planning Manager TITLE 7 obi / DAT .,.~ ~ ,~ Paull oyan Community Development Director T[TLE City of Campbell NAME OF LEAD AGENCY ZONING TEXT AMENDMENT INITIAL STUDY An environmental evaluation prepared in compliance eeith the California Environmental Quality Act Prepazed by Aki Honda Snelling, Planning Manager Lead Agency City of Campbell Community Development Department July 28, 2014 Public Review Draft Review Periad: July 30, 20'14 to August 19, 2014 OF CAM > _ ~ ~; r u ,::;yix,: ; ~_i y _ c~ F~k C'H IPO. Initial Study for Zoning Test Amendment (Emergency Shelters) Page l of 16 L PROJECT DETAILS PROJECT TITLE Zoning Code Text Amendment pertaining to emergency shelters, transitional housing and supportive housing in conformance with Senate Bill 2 (Local Planning and Approval for Emergency Shelters and Transitional and Supportive Housing) and the City's 2009 - 2014 Housing Element. The project also involves revisions to the City of Campbell's zoning code regarding manufactured housing, single-room .occupancy (SRO) facilities, and updates to definitions. FILE NUMBER PLN2014-165 PROJECT LOCATION • M-1 (Light Industrial) Zoning District (Section 21.10.080 of the Campbell Municipal Code) • Residential Zoning Districts (Chapter 21.08 of the Campbell Municipal Code) • Provisions Applying.to Special Uses (Chapter 21.36 related to Emergency Shelters and Transitional Housing) • Definitions (Chapter 21.72 o£the Campbell Municipal Code) PROJECT PROPONENT City of Campbell Community Development Department 70 N. First Street Campbell, CA 95008 LEAD AGENCY City of Campbell Community Development Department 70 N. First Street Campbell, CA 95008 CONTACT PERSON Aki Honda Snelling, Planning Manager City of Campbell Community Development Department 70 N. First Street Campbell, CA 95008 (408)866-2732 akis@cityo fcampbel 1. com II. PROJECT OVERVIEW PROJECT DESCRIPTION The proposed project is a zoning code text amendment involving revisions to the City's requirements pertaining to emergency shelters, transitional housing and supportive housing in conformance with Initial Study for Emergency Shelters, Transitional Housing and Supportive Housing Page 2 of l5 Senate Bill 2 (Local Planning and' Approval for Emergency Shelters and Transitional and Supportive Housing). The project also involves revisions to the City of Campbell's zoning code regarding manufactured housing, single-room occupancy (SRO) facilities, and updates [o definitions. These revisions are being proposed to the City of Campbell's zoning code in conformance with the City's 2009 - 2014 Housing Element. The purpose of the proposed zoning text amendment is to: • Modify Section 21.10.080 (M-1, Light Industrial zoning district) of Chapter 21.10 (Commercial and Industrial Districts) of the Campbell Municipal Code to allow Emergency Shelters as a permitted use by right in that portion of the M-1 zone bounded generally by Camden Avenue, Los Gatos Creek County Park, Hacienda Avenue and Winchester Boulevard. • Modify Chapter 21.08 (Residential District) of the Campbell Municipal Code with the following revisions: o Modify Section 21.08.030 to allow Manufactured Housing as a permitted use by right (subject to architectural requirements within the parameters of State Law). o Allow Supportive Housing and Transitional Housing as a permitted use by right in all residential zoning district, and remove Transitional Housing as a conditionally permitted use in residential zoning districts. o Allow Single Room Occupancy facilities as a conditionally permitted use in the R-3 (Multiple-Family) zoning district. • Modify Chapter 21.36 (Provisions Applying to Special Uses) of the Campbell Municipal Code with the following revisions: o Add a new Section 21.36:085 (Emergency Shelters) in compliance with State law and the 2009 - 2014 Housing .Element that addresses: the purpose, locational criteria, development standards, and the operational standards for emergency shelters. o Delete Section 21.36.230 (Transitional Housing) as transitional housing is a permitted use by right in residential zoning districts. • Modify Section 21.72.020 (Definitions of specialized terms and phrases) of Chapter 21.71 (Definitions)of the Campbell Municipal Code with the following revisions: o Modify the definition for "Emergency shelter" in compliance with State law. o Modify the defmition for "Family" in compliance with State law. o Include a new definition of "Nontransient." o Clarify "Residential service facility, small (6 or fewer)" serves six or fewer natural persons. ' o Clarify "Residential service facility, large (7 or more) serves seven or more natural persons. o Include a new definition of "Single Room Occupancy facility" in compliance with State law. o Include a new definition of "Supportive Housing" in compliance with State law. o Include a new definition of "Target population" in compliance with State law. o Modify the definition for "Transitional housing" in compliance with State law. . PROJECT LOCATION AND SETTING The proposed zoning code text amendment will provide for compliance with SB 2 and the 2009 - 2014 Housing Element with respect to emergency shelters, transitional housing, supportive housing, manufactured housing, single-room occupancy facilities, and general "clean-up" modifications to the definitions section of the City of Campbell zoning code. The proposed zoning code text amendment Initial Study for Emergency Shelters, Transitional Housing and Supportive Housing Page 3 of 15 will apply to the M-1 (Light Industrial) zoning district, the residential zoning districts, and city-wide with respect to the revisions to the definitions section. The City of Campbell is located approximately.~0 miles south of San Francisco in Santa Claza County, one of the nine Counties that make up the region known as the San Francisco Bay Area (ref. Figure 1). The City occupies over six square miles of relatively flat land that slopes gently toward the south end of the San Francisco Bay. Campbell is bounded on the north, east and west by the City of San Jose and on the south by the Town of Los Gatos. A small portion of Campbell's southwestern boundary is adjacent to the City of Saratoga. ~~~"~9r. FR~ 5co 1 \PAL\ALSO' ~\ILPITAS\ ~` " MOUNTAIN VIEW\OSU NN WALE S/// j ,P~ ~ ~ ~~ t~~~L~~ SA NTA'CLARA ~ rSAY JOSE o !~ 1 Alf-~~YI A C UPE RTINO~~ ~ .~.Carrip e i = • 111 ®G /'~ J MORGAV HI L~ o ~ G tRO\V \yl~,/ '~ f ~~ y ~,~. SANTA CRUZ ` ~~ 1 , /f Figure 1: Regional Location OTHER PUBLIC AGENCY APPROVALS REQUIRED No other public agency approvals are required. REASONABLE FORESEEABLE PROJECTS At the present time, there aze no foreseeable projects that involve the proposed zoning code text amendments. III. ENVIRONMENTAL FACTORS POTENTIALLY AFFECTED: The environmental factors checked below would be potentially affected by the Project, involving at least one impact that is a "Less Than Significant with Mitigation Incorporated" as indicated by the checklist on the following pages. ^ (1) Aesthetics ^ (Page 8) ^ (4) Biological Resources ^ (Page 16) ^ (7) Hazards/Hazardous Materials ^ (2) Agriculture Resources (Page 9) (~) Cultural Resources (Page 17) ^ (3) Air Quality (Page 9) ^ (6) Geology/Soils (Page 18) (8) Hydrology/Water Quality ^ (9) Land UseiPlanning Initial Study for Emergency Shelters, Transitional Housing and Supportive Housing Page 4 of I S (Page 29) (Page 30) (Page 32) ^ (13) Public Services ^ (l4) Recreation ^ (1~Tr~~oit<rROn/Cra~c (Page 33) ~ ~ (Page 33) ~ (Page 33) ^ (16) Utilities/Service Systems ^ (U) Mandatory Findings of Significance (Page 36) ~ (Page 38) IV. ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT EVALUATION: INTRODUCTION The following evaluation has been prepared to determine if the Project may have a "significant impact" on the environment. For the purposes of this study, a significant impact means a substantial or potentially substantial change in the physical environment. EVALUATIONS A "No Impact" rating indicates that based upon the available information, the Lead Agency (City of Campbell) has determined that there will be no impact on the environment. A "Less Than Significant Impact" rating indicates that the impact will be insignificant. A "Less Than Significant with Mitigation Incorporated" rating indicates that a specific change to the project (mitigation measures) will reduce the impact to a level of insignificance. A "Potentially Significant Impact" rating indicates that the impact may or will be significant. DISCUSSION A description ofthe factual data and reasoning used to reach conclusions regarding impact significance follows each section. The impacts of the project are summarized in Section V: Determination and J Recommendation CHECKLIST OF ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT ISSUES Less than AESTHETICS sienieeant 'I' Potentially Wi[h Less Than Significant Slitiga[ion Significant xo Wpuld [he r0 ~t'Ct.' Im act Incur orareO Im act Im act (a) Have a substantial adverse effect on a scenic vista? (b) Substantially damage scenic resources, includin„ but not limited to, trees, rock outero in s, and historic buildings within a state scenic hiahwa ? (c) Substantially degrade the existing visual character or quality of the site and its surroundings? (d) Create a new source of substantial light or Aare which would adversely affect da or ninhttime views in the area? (a-d): The proposed zoning code text amendment will not adversely affect scenic vistas, damage scenic resources, create new source of substantial light or glare, or otherwise degrade the existing visual character of sites within the City. Current development standards pertaining to building height, massing, architectural design, and site layout would be unaffected by the Project. Initial Study for Emergency Shelters, Transitional Housing and Supportive Housing Page ~ of l5 Less then AGRICULTURAL RESOURCES* si=nificant '~' Poten[ialy With Less Than Significant Slitigation Significant So Wotdd [6e ro ~eeC [m act [ncor orated Im act Im act (a) Convert Prime Farmland, Unique Farmland, or Farmland of Statewide hnportance (Farmland), as shown on the maps prepared pursuant to the ^ ^ 0 Farmland Wapping and Monitoring Program of the Califomia Resources Agency, to non-agricultural use? (b) Conflict with existing zoning for agricultural use, or a Williamson Act ^ ^ ^ contract? (c) Involve other changes in the existing environment which, due to their location or nature, could result in conversion of Farmland, to non- ^ ^ ^ a cultural use? *!n determining whether impacts to agricultural resocmces are significant environmental effects, lead agencies may refer to the California Agrindaaral land Evaluation and Site Assessment Mode! (1997) prepared by the California Department ajConservation as an o bona! mode! m use in assessin im acts on a riculture and arm[and.) (a-c): The City of Campbell does not have land designated nor utilized for agricultural use. Therefore, the Project will have no impact on agricultural resource lands. Less than _3_ AIR QUALITY* signmcant Potentially With Less Than Significant ~Iitigalion Significant \o Would [he r0 ~ect: ~ Im act Incor mated im act ~ Im act (a) Conflict with or obstruct implementation of the applicable air quality plan? ^ ^ ^ (b) Violate any air quality standard or contribute substantially to an existing or ' ^ ^ ^ ected air vali violation? ro (c) Result in a cumulatively considerable net increase of any criteria pollutant for which the project region is non-attainment under an applicable federal or ^ ^ ^ state ambient air quality standard (including releasing emissions which exceed uantitative thresholds for ozone recursors)? (d) Expose sensitive receptors to substantial pollutant concentrations? ^ ^ ^ (e) Create objectionable odors affecting a substantial number of people? ^ ^ ^ (a-e): The City of Campbell is located within the southern region of the San Francisco Bay Area air basin. The California Air Resources Board (GARB) coordinates and oversees both State and Federal air quality control progams in Califomia. The management of air quality in the basin is the responsibility of the Bay Area Air Quality Management Distract (BAAQMD). Specifically, the BAAQMD is responsible for monitoring ambient air pollutant levels throughout the basin, and developing and implementing attainment strategies to ensure that future emissions will be, within State and Federal standards. The Bay Area Air Quality Management District (BAAQMD) has established thresholds for determining whether a given project has the potential to cause a significant impact on air quality (from vehiculaz emissions), based upon specified vehicular-trip generation rates. [f a project exceeds the thresholds, a detailed air quality analysis is typically required, as well as project review by BAAQMD staff. If a project does not exceed the thresholds, the project is presumed to have a less than significant impact upon air quality, unless special circumstances indicate otherwise. BAAQMD does not recommend that a detailed air quality impact analysis be prepared for projects generating less than 2,000 vehicle trips per day. The proposed zoning text amendment is not anticipated to generate any additional vehicle trips; therefore, this project does not trigger the need for a detailed air quality impact analysis. Initial Study for Emergency Shelters, Transitional Housing and Supportive Housing Page 6 of l~ All future development subject to the proposed use standard will require separate environmental evaluation in order to determine that any potential impacts related to construction activity are less than significant. Construction activities such as excavation, construction vehicle traffic and equipment and wind blowing over exposed earth could generate exhaust emissions and fugitive particulate matter emissions that could affect local and regional air quality, but the concentrations of these emissions aze not anticipated to be substantial, and would be temporary. Construction activities are also a source of organic gas emissions. Solvents in adhesives, non-water based paints, thinners, some insulation materials and caulking materials would evaporate into the atmosphere and would participate in the photochemical reaction that creates urban ozone. Asphalt used in paving is also a source of organic gases for a short time after its application. ~ Construction vehicles would produce cumulatively insubstantial amounts of ozone emissions. Short-term dust could potentially be produced during excavation and construction. The BAAQMD CEQA Guidelines identify thresholds of significance for construction emissions. BAAQMD's approach to CEQA analyses of construction impacts is to emphasize implementation of effective and comprehensive control measures rather than detailed quantification of emissions. As there is no development proposal associated with the zoning text amendment, all future development will require separate environmental evaluation in order to determine that any potential impacts are less than significant. As part of the City of Campbell's environmental review, a green house gas (GHG) emission analysis is typically prepared to address the provisions of Assembly Bill 33 (AB 32).' However, staff determined that a GHG emission analysis was not required for this project. As discussed in Section 1? - Popzzlation and Housing, the Project will not allow development beyond the anticipated build-out of the General Plan. Therefore, as no unanticipated development will result from the Project, there is no potential for a marked increase in vehicle trips that could lead to unforeseen GHG emissions. (d-e): As the zoning text amendment pertains to use requirements and not a development proposal, the Project will not directly result in the development of new buildings or infrastructure that could expose sensitive receptors to substantial pollutant concentrations or create objectionable odors affecting a substantial number of people. Less than _4_ BIOLOGICAL RESOURCES slgnifi<ant Potentially Wi[h Less Than Si•nificant Slitigaion Si~nificam ~'o Wotdd[he ro~ect Im act Ineor orated Im act Im act (a) Have a substantial adverse effect, either directly or through habitat modifications, on any species identified as a candidate, sensitive, or special status species in local or regional plans, policies, or regulations, or by the California De artment of Fish and Game or U.S. Eish and Wildlife Service? (b) Have a substantial adverse effect on any riparian habitat or other sensitive natural community identified in local or regional plans, policies, regulations or by the California Department of Fish and Game or U. S: Fish and Wildlife Service? (c) Have a substantial adverse effect on federally protected wetlands as defined by Section 404 of the Clean Water Act (including, but not limited to, marsh, vernal pool, coastal, etc.) through direct removal, tilling, hydrological interru lion, or other means? ' AB 32, the Global Wamting Solutions Act of 2006, is State legislation intended to reduce California greenhouse gas emissions (GHG's) to (990 levels by 2020 and to 80 percent below 1990 levels by 2050. Initial Study for Emergency Shelters, Transitional Housing and Supportive Housing Page 7 of 15 Less than BIOLOGICAL RESOURCES e ant s° _~_ Patenfially n w LessTnan Significant Mitigation Significant Su 4Voll(d the !'oject: Im act Incur nrxted Im ac[ Im an (d) Interfere substantially with the movement of any native resident or migratory fish or wildlife species or with established native resident or ~ ^ ^ migratory wildlife corridors, or impede the use of native wildlife nursery sites? (e) Conflict, such as a tree preservation policy or ordinance? ^ ^ ^ (f) Conflict with the provisions of an adopted Habitat Conservation Plan, Natural Community Conservation Plan, or other approved local, regional, or ^ ^ ^ state habitat conservation plan? (a-f): The Project as a zoning code text amendment does not include changes to zoning standards or requirements that would allow new development to adversely affect fauna, flora, other biological J resources. Less than CULTURAL RESOURCES Significant _,_ Potentally With Less Than Signifcant Mitigation Significant So Would the ro ~Eet: Im uct Incor oratetl Im act Im act (a) Cause a substantial adverse change in the significance of a historical ^ ^ ^ resource as defined in 15064.5? (b) Cause a substantial adverse change in the significance of an archaeological ' ^ ^ ^ 15064.5? resource ursuant to (c) Directly or indirectly destroy a unique paleontological resource or site or ^ ^ ^ ' uni ue eolo~ic feature? (d) Disturb any human remains, including thane interred outside of formal ^ ^ ^ cemeteries? (a-d): The Project as a zoning code text amendment does not include changes to development standards or requirements that would allow new development to adversely affect historical, archeological, paleontological, or geological resources. Less than 6 GEOLOGY AND SOILS Significant _ _ Potentially With Less Than Significant llifiga[ion Significant \"o Would the ro ~eCt: Im act Incor oratee Im act [m act Expose people or s[mctures to potential substantial adverse effects, including the risk of loss, idu , or death involvin i) Rupture of a known earthquake fault, as delineated on the most recent ^ ^ ^ Alquist-Priolo Earthquake Fault Zoning Map issued by the State (a) Geologist for the area or based on other substantial evidence of a known fault? Refer to Division of Mines and Geology S ecial Publication 4?. ii) Strong seismic ground shaking? ^ ^ ^ iii) Seismic-related ground failure, including liquefaction? ^ ^ ^ iv) Landslides? ~ ^ ^ ^ (b) Result in substan[izl soil erosion or the loss of topsoil? ^ ^ ^ (c) Be located on a geologic unit or soil [ha[ is unstable, or that would become unstable as a result of the project, and potentially result in on- or off-site ^ ^ ^ landslide, lateral s reading, subsidence, li uefaction or colla se? (d) Be located on expansive soil, as defined in Table 13-I-B of the Uniform ^ ^ ^ Buildino Code 1994), creating substantial risks to life or roe ? (e) ave soils incapable of adequately supporting the use of septic tanks or Itemative waste wafer disposal systems where sewers are not available for ^ ^ ^ 4he din osal of waste water? (f) irectly or indirectly destroy a unique paleontological resource or site or ^ ^ ^ ni ue eolo~ical feature? - t [nitull Study for Emergency Shelters, Transitional Housing and Supportive Housing, Page 3 of 15 (a-f): The Project as a zoning code test amendment will not expose people or structures to potential adverse effects, including the risk of injury or death. According to maps prepared under the Alquist- Priolo Earthquake Fault Zone Act, there are no zoned active faults within the City of Campbell. Further, the Project does not include changes to development standards or requirements that would result in development incumng substantial soil erosion or the loss of topsoil, landslide, liquefaction, or destroying unique paleontological resources. Less than HAZARDS AND HAZARDOUS MATERIALS significant -7- Potenfially With Less Than Signif cant btitigation Significant \o WOltld [he ro ~eCC Im act Incor orated Im act tm act (a) Create a significant hazard to the public or the environment through the ^ ^ ^ routine trans ort, use or dis osal of hazardous materials? (b) Create a significant hazard to the public or the environment through reasonable foreseeable upset and accident conditions involving the release of ^ ^ ^ hazardous materials into the environment? (c) Emit hazardous emissions or handle hazardous or acutely hazardous ' materials, substances, or waste within one-quarter mile of an existing or ^ ' ^ ^ ro osed school? (d) Be located on a site which is included on a list of hazardous materials sites complied pursuant to Government Code Section 65962.5 and, as a result, ^ ^ ^ would it create a sinnificant hazard to the ublic or the environment? (e). For a project located within an airport land use plan or, where such a plan has not been adopted, within two miles of a public airport or public use ^ ^ ^ airport, would the project result in a safety hazard for people residing or working in the roiect area? (~ For a project within the vicinity of a private airstrip, would the project result ~ ^ ^ ^ in a safety hazard for eo le residing or workin in the ro ect area? (g) Impair implementation of or physically interfere with an adopted emergency ^ ~ ^ ^ res onse lan or emer~enc evacuation Ian? (h) Expose people or structures to a significant risk of loss, injury or death involving wildland fires, including where wildlands are adjacent to ~ ^ - ^ ^- urbanized areas or where residences are intermixed with wildlands? (a-h): The scope of the Project as a zoning code text amendment does not include changes to regulatory standards for the handling, transport, storage, use, disposal, or disruption of hazardous materials. Additionally, the City of Campbell General Plan specifically identifies uses that generate substantial amourits of hazardous waste as prohibited uses. Therefore, the Project would not expose persons or property to hazardous materials or conditions. ~ Less than HYDROLOGY AND WATER QUALITY sgnlDeant ~ _8_ Potentially With Less Than Significant Ylitiga[ion Significant No WOUTAlhe Yo~eet Im act Incor orated [m act Im act (a) Violate any water quality standards or waste discharge requirements? ^ ^ ^ (b) Substantially deplete groundwater supplies or interfere substantially with groundwater recharge such that there would be a net deficit in aquifer volume or a lowering of the local groundwater table level (e.g., the ^ ^ ^ production rate of pre-existing nearby wells would drop to a level which would not support existing land uses or planned uses for which permits have been ranted)? (c) Substantially otter the existing drainage panem of the site or area, including through the alteration of the course of a stream or river, in a manner which ^ ^ ^ would result in a substantial erosion or siltation on- or off-site. (d) Substantially atrer the existing drainage pattern of the site or area, including i through the alteration of [he course of a stream or river, or substantially ^ ^ ^ increase the rate or amount of surface runoff in a manner which would result in Floodinn on- or off-site? Initial Study for Emergency Shelters, Transitional Housing and Supportive Housing Page 9 of IS Less man HYDROLOGY AND WATER QUALITY sgnificant _8_ Potentially With Less Than Woldd the ro ~ect: Significam tm act xlitiga[ion Incur orated Signiftcan[ tin uc[ xb hn act (e) Create or contribute runoff water which would exceed [he capacity of existing or planned storm water drainage systems or provide substantial ^ ^ ^ additional sources of olluted runoff? (f) Otherwise substantially degrade water quality? ^ ^ ^ (g) Place housing within a 100-year flood hazard area as mapped on a federal Flood Hazard Boundary or Flood Insurance Rate Map or other flood hazard ^ ^ ^ delineation ma ? (h) Place within a 100-year flood hazard area strucmres which would impede or ^ ^ ^ redirect flood flows? (i) Expose people or structures to a significant risk of loss, injury or death involving flooding, including flooding as a result of the failure of a levee or ^ ^ ^ dam? Q) Inundation by seiche, tsunami, or mudflow? ^ ^ ^ (k) Potentially impact stormwater runoff from construction activities? ^ ^ ^ (I) Potentially impact stortnwater runoff from post-construction activities? ^ ^ ^ (m) Result in a potential for discharge of stormwater pollutants from areas of material storage, vehicle or equipment fueling vehicle or equipment _ maintenance (including washing), waste handling, hazardous materials ^ ^ ^ ~... handling or storage, delivery areas, loading docks or other outdoor work areas? (n) Result in the potential for discharge of stormwater to affect the beneficial ^ ^ ^ uses of the receiving waters? (o) Creace the potential For significant changes in the flow velocity or volume of stormwater runoff [o cause environmental harm? ^ ^ ^ (p) Create significant increases in erosion of the project site or surrounding ~ ^ ^ ^ areas? (a-h): The scope of the Project does not include changes to regulatory standards for water quality, flood hazard areas, or stormwater run-off. Therefore, the Project would not impact hydrological conditions or water quality. Less man _g_ LAND USE and PLANNING significant Potenrially with Less Than Wotd[([he ~ C Significant Mitigation Significant Vo ro ee Im act Incor orated [m act Im act (a) Physically divide an established community? ^ ^ ^. (b) Conflict with any applicable land use plan, policy, or regulation of an agency with jurisdiction over the project (including, but not limited to the ^ ^ ^ general plan, specific plan, local coastal program, or zoning ordinance) ado ted for the u ose of avoiding or miti~atina an environmental effect? (c) Conflict with any applicable habitat conservation plan or natural community ^ ^ ^ conservation Ian? (a): The proposed zoning code text amendment pertains to modifying the zoning code to comply with SB 2 (Local Planning and Approval for Emergency Shelters and Transitional and Supportive Housing) and the' City's ?009 -?014 Housing Element. The revisions of the Project include allowing for emergency shelters as a permitted use by right in the portion of the M-1 Light Industrial zoning district bounded generally by Camden Avenue, Los Gatos Creek County Park, Hacienda Avenue and Winchester Boulevard; transitional housing and supportive housing as permitted uses by right in residential zoning district; manufactured housing in the R-1 zoning district as a permitted use by right (subject to architectural requirements within the parameters of State law); Single Room Occupancy facilities as a conditionally permitted use in the R-3 (Multiple Family) zoning district; and Initial Study for Emergency Shelters, Transitional Housing and Supportive Housing Page 10 of 1 ~ modifications to the definitions section of the zoning ordinance pertaining to emergency shelters. family, nontransient, residential service facility (both small and large), single room occupancy facility, supportive housing, target population and transitional housing. Since the Project as a proposed zoning code text amendment pertains to uses in accordance with State law and the City's 2009 - 2014 Housing Element, the project will not directly result in the development of new buildings not already foreseen pursuant to the City's General Plan or infrastructure that could physically divide the community. Development projects, subject to the new use standards, however, will be reviewed in accordance with all applicable City zoning requirements and State CEQA requirements. (b): The City of Campbell General Plan is a guiding document for City policy. The 2009 - 2014 Housing Element is one of the required elements of the City's General Plan. New land-use related policy actions must be consistent with the General Plan. The project would be consistent with the following General Plan Land Use policies, strategies, and programs, and therefore not conflict with any applicable land use plan or policy document: Housing Element Policy: Policy H-~.3a Zonine Text Amendments: As part of the Governmental Consvaints analysis for the Housing Element update and pursuant to new requirements under SB 2, several revisions to the Campbell Zoning Code have been identified as appropriate to better facilitate [he provision of a variety of housing types. These zoning revisions include: • Specifically List manufactured housing as a permitted use within the R-1 zone, subject to architectural requirements within the parameters of State law. • Revise the curzent zoning definition of "family" consistent with state and federal fair housing laws. • Add single loom occupancy (SRO) facilities within the Code's definition section, and conditionally allow them within the R-3-S zone. • Eliminate the CUP and spacing requirements for. transitional housing in residential zones. • Identify emergency shelters as a permitted use in that portion of the M-1 zone bounded generally by Camden Avenue, Los Gatos Creek County Park, Hacienda Avenue and Winchester Boulevard. See Figure H-2. Emergency shelters will be subject to the same development and operational standards as other permitted uses in M-I zone. However, the City will develop written, objective standards to regulate the following, as permitted under SB 2: • The maximum number of beds,or persons permitted [o be served nightly by the facility; • Off-street parking based on demonstrated need, but not to exceed parking requirements for other residential or commercial uses in the same zone; • The size and location of exterior and interior onsite waiting and client intake areas; ~ • The provision of onsite management; • The proximity of other emergency shelters, provided that emergency shelters are not required to be more than 300 feet apart; M The length of stay; • Lighting; • Security during hours that the emergency shelter is in operation. Initial Study for Emergency Shelters, Transitional Housing and Supportive Housing Page l 1 of 1~ General Plan Policies arid Strategies Policy LUT-3. L Variety of Residential Densities: Provide Land use categories for and maintenance of a variety of residential densities to offer existing and future residents of all income Levels, age groups and special needs sufficietit opportunities and choices for locating in Campbell. Strategy LUT-3.1 a: Consistency with Housing Element: Ensure consistency with the City's Housing Element including ensuring that~[here is adequate land designated to meet Housing goals. Policy LUT-5. L: Neighborhood Integrity: Recognize that the City is composed of residential, industrial, and commercial neighborhoods, each with its own individual character; and allow change consistent with reinforcing positive neighborhood value, while protecting the integrity of the City's neighborhoods. Policy LUT-5.4: t. Industrial Neighborhoods: Safeguard industry's ability to operate effectively, by limiting the establishment of incompatible uses in industrial neighborhoods and encouraging compatible uses. Policy LUT-13.1: Variety of Uses: Attract and maintain a variety of uses that create an economic balance within the City while maintaining a balance with other community land use needs, such as housing and open space, and while providing high quality services to the community. (c): The project does not include any element that would interfere or otherwise affect City or regional habitat conservation or natural community conservation plans. Less than MINERAL RESOURCES signiecant -lO- Potendally With Less Than Significant ?litivadon Signifcam So Wpuld the ro ~eCt Im act [ncor orated Im act Im act (a) Result in the toss of availability of a known mineral resource tkat would be ' ^ ^ ^ of value to the re¢ion and the residents of the state? (b) Result in the loss of availability of alocally-important mineral resource recovery ^ ^ ^ site delineated on a local general Ian, ecific Ian or other land use Ian? (a-d): The scope of the Project does not include movement, obtainment, or management of mineral resources. Therefore it would not result in the lass of availability of a known mineral resource or of a locally-important mineral resource recovery site delineated on a local general plan; specific plan or other land use plan. Len than p NOI°E Si,~,nificant -l i<- Potentially With Less Than ~ Significant Slitigadon Significant So WOU[d [he ro ~eC[Y2Stdt !n: Im act Incor nratetl Im uct Im ac[ (a) Exposure of persons to or generation of noise levels in excess of standards established in the local general plan or noise ordinance, or applicable ^ ^ ^ standards of other agencies? (b) Exposure of persons to or generation of excessive groundborne vibration or ^ ^ ^ oundbome noise levels? (c) A substantial permanent increase in ambient noise levels in the project ' ^ ^ ^ vicinity above levels existino without the ro ect? (d) A substantial temporary or periodic increase in ambieni noise levels in the ' ' ^ ^ ^ ro ect vicini above levels existing without the ro ect? Initial Study for Emergency Shelters, Transitional Housing and Supportive Housing Page 12 of 1 ~ Lcss Ihun~ NO [ S E slgnuicant - ll- ~ Potentially Kith Less Than Significant ..\litigadon SigniMant ~'o 4Yould [he ro'ect result (tt: Im act Incor orated Im act ^n as ~' (e) For a project located within an airport land use plan or, where such a plan has not been adopted, within two miles of a public airport or public use ^ ^ ^ airpott, would the project expose people residing or working in the project area to excessive noise levels? (t) For a project within the vicinity of a private airstrip, would the project expose people residing or working in [he project area [o excessive noise ^ ^ ^ levels? (a-f): The scope of the Project as a zoning code text amendment does not include changes to the City's noise exposure standards nor would directly result in new development. The Project would, therefore, not result in exposure of persons to noise levels or vibration in excess of established standards nor result in a permanent or temporary increase in ambient noise levels. Less than -I2 POPULATION AND HOUSING significant - Potentially With Less Than Significant Sli[iga[ion Significant B'o WOldd[he ro~ECt: Im act Incor orated Im act Im act (a) Induce substantial population growth in an area, either directly (for example, by proposing new homes and businesses) or indirectly (for example, through ^ ^ ^ extension of roads or other infrastructure)? (b) Displace substantial numbers of existing housing, necessitating the ^ ^ ^ construction of re lacement housino elsewhere? (c) Displace'substantial numbers of people, necessitating the cons[mction of ^ ^ ^ re lacement housing elsewhere? (a): The Zoning Code Text Amendment will provide opportunities for emergency shelters in that portion of the M-1 zone generally bounded by Camden Avenue, Los Gatos Creek County Park, Hacienda Avenue and Winchester Boulevard, but is not anticipated to induce substantial growth in that area. The Project will also provide opportunities for manufactured housing, transitional housing, and supportive housing in already residentially zoned district; therefore, no substantial population growth is expected. Additionally, single room occupancy facilities would be conditionally permitted in the R-3 (Multi-Family) residential zoning district; therefore, no substantial population growth is expected. All of these revisions are proposed in accordance with SB 2 and the City's 2009 - 2014 Housing Element. (b-c): The Project as a zoning code text amendment is not anticipated to displace existing housing or substantial number of people as it does not involve a development project. Less than -I3- PUBLIC SERVICES significant Potentially Wi[h Less Than ' Significant SIi[igatian Significant So Would the rO ~eC[.' Im act Incor orated Im act Im act (a) Would the project result in substantial adverse physical impacts associated with the provision of or need for new or physically altered governmental facilities, the construction of which could cause significant environmental impacts, in order to maintain acceptable service ratios, response times or other erformance ob~ectives for an of [he ublic services: i) Fire Protection? ^ ^ ^ ® '~ ii) Police Protection? ^ ^ ^ iii) Schools? ^ ^ ~ ^ iv) Parks? ^ ^ ^ v) Other public facilities? ~ ^ ^ ^ Initial Study for Emergency Shelters, Transitional Housing and Supportive Housing Page 13 of 1 ~ (a): The zoning text amendment is not anticipated to result in substantial adverse physical impacts associated with the provision of or need for new or physically altered governmental facilities, since it does not involve a development project. Less than I4 RECREATION signifieant ' - - Potentially N ith Less Than ' Significant ?Titivation Significam Sa WOU([([he YOl eel: Im act [nrnr orated [m act Im act (a) Would the project increase the use of existing neighborhood and regional parks or other recreational facilities such that substantial physical ~ ^ ^ ^ deterioration of the facilit would occur or be acceleraced? (b) Does the project include recreational facilities or require the consttvetion or expansion of recreational facilities which might have an adverse physical ^ ^ ^ effect on the environment? (a-b): The proposed zoning text amendment is not anticipated to result in an increase in the use of existing neighborhood and regional parks or other regional facilities or include recreational facilities since it is not a development project. Less than TRANSPORTATION and TRAFFIC significant _hj_ - Potentially With Less Than Significant . Yti[igation Significant No WOUld the ro ~ECt: Im act Incor orated Im act Im act (a) Cause an increase in traffic which is substantial in relation to the existing traffic load and capacity of the street system (i.e., result in a substantial ^ ^ ^ increase in either the number of vehicle trips, the volume to capacity ratio on roads, or congestion at intersections)? (b) Exceed, either individually or cumulatively, a level of service standard established by the county congestion management agency for designated ^ ^ ^ roads or hi~hwa's? (c) Result in a change in air traffic patterns, including either an increase in ^ ^ ^ traffic levels or a chan e in location that results in substantial safer risks? (d) Substantially increase hazards due to a design feature (e. g., sharp curves or ^ ^ ^ dangerous intersections) or incom atible uses (e. ~., farm a ui ment)? (e) Result in inadequate emergency access? ^ ^ ^ (f) Result in inadequate parking capacity? ^ ^ ^ (g) ~ Conflict with adopted policies, plans, or prop ams supposing alternative ^. ^ ^ trans ortatien e. ~., bus turnouts, bic cle racks)? (a-e): The Project as a zoning code text amendment is not a development project and, therefore, will not adversely affect traffic conditions, service levels, safety, or emergency access. (f): The Project as a zoning code text amendment is not a development project and, therefore, will not adversely affect parking. (g): The Project does not conflict with adopted policies, plans, or programs supporting alternative transportation. Initial Study for Emeraenev Shelters, Transitional Housing and Supportive Housing Page l4 of LS Less than 16 UTILITIES/SERVICE SYSTEMS S~gwun nt - - vnteatiauy Les Tnaa $ignificvnt }litigation Significant So 4Vou(d the YO'eCl: - Ira a<[ Incur anmd Ira act Ira act (a) Exceed wastewater treatment requirements of the applicable Regional Water ^ ^ ^ uali Control Board? (b) Require or result in the construction'of new water or wastewater treatment or collection facilities or expansion of existing facilities, the construction of ^ ^ ^ which could cause significant environmental effects? (c) Require or result in the construction of new storm water drainage facilities ' or expansion of existing facilities, the construction of which could cause ^ ^ ^ sioniticant environmental effects? (d) Have sufficient water supplies available to serve the project from existing ^ ^ ^ entitlements and resources, or are new or ex anded entitlements needed? (e) Result in a determination by the wastewater reatment provider which serves or may serve the project that it has adequate capacity to serve the project's ^ ^ ^ ro~ected demand in addition to the rovider's esistin~ commitments? . (f) Be served by a landfill with insufficient permitted capacity to accommodate ~ ^ ^ ^ the ro ect's solid waste dis osal needs? (g) Comply with federal, state, and local statutes and revelations related to solid wastes. ^ ^ ^ (a-g): The Project as a zoning code text amendment is not a development project and will, therefore, not adversely impact municipal utility or special district utility services. , Less than I~_ MANDATORY FINDINGS OF SIGNIFICANCE Potentially Significant Wi[h Less Than Significant Slitigation Significant No ' Ira act Incur orated (m as Ira act (a) Does the project have the potential to degrade the quality of the environment, substantially reduce the habitat of a fish or wildlife species, cause a fish or wildlife population to drop below self=sustaining levels, ^ ^ ^ threaten to eliminate a plant or animal community, reduce the number or restrict the range of a rare or endangered plant or animal or eliminate , im onant exam les of the ma'or eriods of Califomia history or rehistory? (b) ' Does the project have impacts that are individually limited, but cumulatively considerable? ("'Cumulatively considerable" means that the incremental ~ effects of a project are considerable when viewed in connection with [he ^ ^ ^ effects of past projects, the effects of other current projects, and the effects of robable future ro~ects?) (c) Does the project have environmental effects which will cause substantial ^ ^ ^ adverse effects on human beings, either direct) or indirect) ? (a): The Project is a zoning text amendment that involves revisions to comply with SB 2 and the City's 2009 - 2014 Housing Element; and to incorporate a geheral "clean-up" of the definitions section, and is not a development project that would substantially degrade the quality of the environment, reduce the habitat, population, or range of species; or eliminate important examples of Califomia history or prehistory. (b): Based on the findings of this Initial Study, the Project would not have individual or cumulative environmental impacts. (c): Based on the findings of the Initial Study, there is no evidence to demonstrate that the Project would cause a substantial adverse effect on human beings, either directly or indirectly. Initial Study for Emergency Shelters, Transitional Housing and Supportive Housing Page 15 of 15 V. DETERVIINATION AND RECOMMENDATION On the basis of this initial evaluation: 1. The City finds that the project could not have a significant effect on the environment, and a NEGATIVE DECLARATION will be re ared. 2." The City finds that although the proposed project could have a significant effect on the environment, there will not be a significant effect in this case because revisions in the project ^ have been made by or agreed to by the project proponent. A MITIGATED NEGATIVE DECLARATION will be re ared. 3. The City finds the proposed project may have a significant effect on the environment, and an ENVIRONMENTAL MPACT REPORT is required. 4. The City finds that the proposed project may have a "potentially significant impact" or "potentially significant unless mitigated impact" on the environment, but at least one effect 1) has been adequately analyzed in an earlier document pursuant to applicable legal standards, ^ and 2) has been addressed by mitigation measures based on the earlier analysis as described on attached sheets. An ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT REPORT is required, but it must analyze only the effects that remain to be addressed. 5. The City finds that although the proposed project could have a significant effect on the environment, because all potentially significant effects (a) have been analyzed adequately in an earlier E]R or Negative Declaration pursuant to applicable standards, and (b) have been ^ avoided or mitigated pursuant to that earlier EIR or Negative Declaration, including revisions or miti ation measures that are im osed u on the ro osed ro'ect, nothing further is required. Prepared by: Aki Honda Sne11 PROJECT PLANNER Planning Manager TITLE City of Campbell .AGENCY r , [GNA URE 7~~/~~ ~ . DATE Initial Study for Emergency Shelters, Transitional Housing and Supportive Housing Page 16 of 1 ~ Reviewed by: Paul Kermoyan DIVISION SUPERVISOR Community Development Director TITLE City of Campbell AGENCY 7~~~~~ A ~ o~' ~*~~ ~'en~j DAT SUPPLEMENTAL INFORMATION EXHIBIT: 1. Draft Municipal Code Text Amendment REFERENCE DOCUMENTS: 1. Bay Area Air Quality Management District (BAAQMD), 1999, BAAQMD CEQA Guidelines-Assessing the Air Quality Impacts of Projects and Plans. 2. Bay Area Air Quality Management District (BAAQMD), June 2010, CEQA Air Quality Guidelines. 3. Bay Area Air Quality Management District (BAAQMD), December 2008, Source Inventory of Bay Area Greenhouse Gas Emissions. ' 4. Califomia Environmental Protection Agency (CEPA) California Air Resources Board (GARB), April 2006, Air Quality and Land Use Handbook: A Community Health Perspective. 5. Califomia Environmental Protection Agency (CEPA) Califomia Air Resources Board (GARB), November 16, 2007, Staff Report: California 1990 Greenhouse Gas Emissions Leve! and 2020 Emissions Limit. 6. Califomia Natural Diversity Database, 2000. 7. Califomia Office of Planning and Research (OPR), June 19, 2008, Technical Advisory: CEQA and Climate Change: Addressing Climate Change through California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) Review. 8. CEQA Guidelines, 2010 version 9. City of Campbell General Plan. l0. City of Campbell Zoning Code. 11. Federal Emergency Management Agency ~(FEMA) Flood Insurance Rate Map, Community Map Number 06086C0237H, Effective Date May 18, 2009. 12. State of Califomia, Seismic Hazard Zones Map, San Jose West Quadrangle, February 7, 2002. ' 13. U.S. Environmemal Protection Agency, April 15, 2009, Inventory ojUS. Greenhouse Gas Emissions and Sinks: 1990- 2007.