Loading...
PC Res 4253RESOLUTION NO. 4253 BEING A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF CAMPBELL RECOMMENDING THE ADOPTION OF AN ADDENDUM (PLN2015-174) TO A PREVIOUSLY ADOPTED MITIGATED NEGATIVE DECLARATION (PLN2013- 340) FOR A MODIFICATION (PLN2015-170) TO A PREVIOUSLY APPROVED AND MODIFIED PLANNED DEVELOPMENT PERMIT (PLN2013-337 / PLN2015-48), A MODIFICATION (PLN2015-171) TO A PREVIOUSLY APPROVED AND MODIFIED TENTATIVE VESTING SUBDIVISION MAP (PLN2013-339 / PLN2015-49), A PARKING MODIFICATION PERMIT (PLN2015- 172), AND A TREE REMOVAL PERMIT (PLN2015-173) TO ALLOW AN EXPANSION OF AN APPROVED (TWO-PHASE) RESIDENTIAL DEVELOPMENT INCLUDING THE ADDITION OF LESS THAN '/2 ACRE OF PROPERTY AND AN INCREASE FROM 100 UNITS TO 118 RESIDENTIAL UNITS (90 TOWNHOMES AND 28 APARTMENT UNITS), AN EIGHT STALL REDUCTION TO THE REQUIRED NUMBER OF ON-SITE PARKING STALLS, AND REMOVAL OF PROTECTED TREE(S), ON PROPERTIES LOCATED AT 180, 186, 190, 230, 240, 260, 272, 280, 282, AND 290 (PORTION) DILLON AVENUE; 466, 472, 482, AND 488 SAM CAVA LANE; AND 186 GILMAN AVENUE. After notification and public hearing, as specified by law and after presentation by the Community Development Director, proponents and opponents, the hearing was closed. The Planning Commission finds as follows and recomonds adoption of an Addendum to the previously adopted Mitigated Negative Declaration: To expedite CEQA (California Environmental Quality Act) review, the State of California adopted SB 226 (2011), allowing a "streamlined" review for qualifying infill projects, as codified in Public Resources Code Section 21094.5. An infill project may qualify for streamlined review where aproject-level Environmental Impact Report (EIR) has been certified (such as for the General Plan or a specific plan) and the project satisfies applicable "performance measures" (such as proximity to a light-rail station). 2. A qualified infill project may be reviewed under CEQA by preparation of an Infill Environmental Checklist Form (CEQA Guidelines Sec. 15183.3), which incorporates a multidisciplinary environmental review that evaluates various potential environmental impacts, including traffic, air and water pollution, greenhouse gas emissions, noise, and various community impacts. An Environmental Checklist Form may rely on the environmental analysis of the project-level Environmental Impact Report (EIR), including previously adopted mitigation measures, and reference "uniform development policies," sucri as noise or lighting standards that would substantially mitigate potential impacts. Planning Commission Resolution No. 4253 Page 2 Recommending Adoption of an Addendum to a Mitigated Negative Declaration File No.: PLN2015-174 3. Based on the findings of the Infill Environmental Checklist Form, the lead agency may file a Notice of Exemption, a Negative Declaration, Mitigated Negative Declaration, or an Infill Environmental Impact Report (EIR). 4. The project qualifies as a residential infill project pursuant to CEQA Guidelines Sec. 15183.3 in that it is located in an urban area on a site that either has been previously developed or that adjoins existing qualified urban uses on at least seventy-five percent of the site's perimeter. 5. An Infill Environmental Checklist Form was prepared for the project, which resulted in the preparation of a Mitigated Negative Declaration. 6. The City Council adopted the Mitigated Negative Declaration on October 21, 2014, by Resolution No. 11735, as part of the overall project approval. 7. Subsequent to project approval, the applicant submitted a proposal for a revised project that would incorporate three additional properties, allowing the addition of nine townhomes and nine apartment units, increasing the total unit count from 100 to 118 units (90 townhomes and 28 apartment units). Additionally, the revised project would modify the site configuration, reduce the amount of required on-site guest parking, and allow removal an additional protected tree. The proposal will require a Modification (PLN2015-170) to a previously approved and modified Planned Development Permit (PLN2013-33'.7 / PLN2015-48), a Modification (PLN2015-171) to a previously approved and modified Tentative Vesting Subdivision Map (PLN2013-339 / PLN2015-49), a Parking Modification Permit (PLN2015-172), and a Tree Removal Permit (PLN2015- 173). 8. CEQA Guidelines §15164(b) state that an addendum to an adopted negative declaration may be prepared if only minor technical changes or additions are necessary or none of the conditions described in §15162 calling for the preparation of a subsequent Environmental Impact Report or negative declaration have occurred. 9. An addendum to the adopted Mitigated Negative Declaration was prepared, as supported by a supplemental analysis reviewing the potential environmental impacts of the revised project. 10. The addendum was not circulated for public review but was attached to the adopted mitigated negative declaration. 11. The decision making body considered the addendum with the adopted Mitigated Negative Declaration prior to making a decision on the revised aroiect. 12. The mitigation measures previously identified in the Mitigated Negative Declaration are included as Conditions of Approval of the Modified Planned Development Permit and/or Modified Vesting Tentative Subdivision Map. Planning Commission Resolution No. 4253 Page 3 Recommending Adoption of an Addendum to a Mitigated Negative Declaration File No.: PLN2015-174 Based upon the foregoing findings of fact, the Planning Commission further finds and concludes that: 1. No substantial evidence has been presented from which a reasonable argument could be made that shows that the project, as currently presented and subject to the required Conditions of Approval, will have a significant adverse impact on the environment. 2. The Addendum to the Mitigated Negative Declaration reflects the independent judgment and analysis of the City Council upon recommendation of the Planning Commission. 3. Based on the proposed revised project description, the environmental review prepared for the Infill Environmental Checklist/Mitigated Negative Declaration, and a supplemental analysis, the City has concluded that the proposed revised project would not result in any new significant impacts not previously disclosed in the adopted Infill Environmental Checklist/Mitigated Negative Declaration nor would it result in a substantial increase in the magnitude of any significant environmental impact previously identified in the Infill Environmental Checklist/Mitigated Negative Declaration. For these reasons, an addendum to the adopted Infill Environmental Checklist/Mitigated Negative Declaration for the revised Dillon Avenue Townhomes and Apartments Project has been prepared and a supplemental or subsequent Environmental Impact Report or Infill Environmental Checklist/Mitigated Negative Declaration is not required for the proposed revised project. 4. The Custodian of the Record for the Addendum, Mitigated Negative Declaration and Infill Environmental Checklist Form is the Community Development Department of the City of Campbell, located at 70 North First Street, Campbell, California. THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the Planning Commission recommends the adoption of an Addendum (PLN2015-174) to a previously adopted Mitigated Negative Declaration (PLN2013-340) (attached Exhibit A). PASSED AND ADOPTED this 27th day of October, 2015, by the following roll call vote: AYES: Commissioners: Bonhagen, Finch, Kendall, and Rich, Dodd and Young NOES: Commissioners: Reynolds ABSENT: Commissioners: None ABSTAIN: Commissioners: None APPROVED ATTEST: Paul Kermoyan, Secretary