CC Resolution 12541RESOLUTION NO. 12541
BEING A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY
OF CAMPBELL ADOPTING A MITIGATED NEGATIVE
DECLARATION FOR THE PARKVIEW MIXED USE
DEVELOPMENT PROJECT, CONSISTING OF A ZONING MAP
AMENDMENT (PLN2016-383), PLANNED DEVELOPMENT
PERMIT (PLN2016-378), VESTING TENTATIVE SUBDIVISION
MAP (PLN2016-380), AND TREE REMOVAL PERMIT (PLN2016-
382), FOR PROPERTY LOCATED AT 540, 558 AND 566 EAST
CAMPBELL AVENUE AND 24 AND 34 DILLON AVENUE. FILE
NO.: PLN2016-381
After notification and public hearing, as specified by law, and after presentation by the
Community Development Director, proponents and opponents, the City Council did
determine that the adoption of a Mitigated Negative Declaration (PLN2016-381)
provides full and adequate environmental review of the Parkview Mixed Use
Development Project consisting of a Zoning Map Amendment (PLN2016-383), Planned
Development Permit (PLN2016-378), Vesting Tentative Subdivision Map (PLN2016-
380), and Tree Removal Permit (PLN2016-382).
The City Council thereby finds as follows with regard to the Mitigated Negative
Declaration (PLN2016-381).
The proposed project, the Parkview Mixed Use Development Project ("Project"),
consists of an application for a Zoning Map Amendment (PLN2016-383) to amend
the Campbell Zoning Map to rezone the project site from P-D (Planned
Development) to C-P-D (Condominium Planned Development); a Planned
Development Permit with Density Bonus (PLN2016-378) to allow construction of a
mixed -use development project consisting of 59 residential condominium units, two
commercial spaces totaling 6,512 square feet, and associated improvements; a
Vesting Tentative Subdivision Map (PLN2016-380) to create 59 "air space"
residential condominium unit parcels, one commercial unit parcel, and one common
lot with associated site improvements; and a Tree Removal Permit (PLN2016-382)
to allow removal of on -site protected trees.
2. The project site consists of five parcels located at 540, 558 and 566 East Campbell
Avenue and 24 and 34 Dillon Avenue that would be merged as part of the Vesting
Tentative Subdivision Map.
3. The project site is developed with a vacant auto center, a music store, and two
unoccupied residential structures, all of which would be demolished as part of the
proposed project.
4. The subject property was not included on the Department of Toxic Substances
Control's EnviroStor website at the time of this Initial Study'.
' https://www.envirostor.dtsc.ca.gov/publicaccessed March 29, 2019
City Council Resolution No. 12541 Page 2 of 4
Mitigated Negative Declaration (MND); File No.: PLN2016-381
540, 558 and 566 East Campbell Avenue and 24 and 34 Dillon Avenue
5. The proposed project (Campbell Village T10000011.061) is included on the State
Water Resources Control Board's geotracker website2 since the applicant has
requested regulatory oversight through the County of Santa Clara Department of
Environmental Health (DEH)'s Voluntary Cleanup Program. The DEH is overseeing
the investigative activities and mitigation necessary to protect human health.
6. The Community Development Department has prepared an Initial Study and
approved for circulation a Mitigated Negative Declaration for the Project in
accordance with the requirements of the California Environmental Quality Act of
1970, together with state and local guidelines implementing said Act, all as
amended to date (collectively "CEQA").
7. The Initial Study/Mitigated Negative Declaration concluded that implementation of
the Project could result in a certain significant effect(s) on the environment and
identified mitigation measure(s) that would reduce the significant effect(s) to a less -
than -significant level.
8. In connection with the approval of a project involving the preparation of an Initial
Study/Mitigated Negative Declaration that identifies one or more significant
environmental effects, CEQA requires the decision -making body of the lead agency
to incorporate feasible mitigation measures that would reduce those significant
environment effects to a less -than -significant level.
9. Whenever a lead agency approves a project requiring the implementation of
measures to mitigate or avoid significant effects on the environment, CEQA also
requires a lead agency to adopt a mitigation monitoring and reporting program to
ensure compliance with the mitigation measures during project implementation, and
such a mitigation monitoring and reporting program has been prepared for the
Project for consideration by the decision -maker of the lead agency as attached to
the Mitigated Negative Declaration.
10. The City of Campbell is the lead agency on the Project, and the City Council is the
decision -making body, upon recommendation by the Planning Commission, that
may grant approval to undertake the Project.
11. The Planning Commission has reviewed and considered the Initial Study/Mitigated
Negative Declaration and related Mitigation Monitoring and Reporting Program for
the Project and has recommended that the City Council approve the Project in
compliance with CEQA.
12. By inclusion as "Exhibit A" the Initial Study/Mitigated Negative Declaration and the
Mitigation Monitoring and Reporting Program for the Project are incorporated into
this Resolution.
2 http://p-eotracker.waterboards.ca.gov/ accessed March 29, 2019
City Council Resolution No. 12541 Page 3 of 4
Mitigated Negative Declaration (MND); File No.: PLN2016-381
540, 558 and 566 East Campbell Avenue and 24 and 34 Dillon Avenue
13. The project will not have the potential to degrade the quality of the environment,
substantially reduce the habitat of a fish or wildlife species, cause a fish or wildlife
population to drop below self-sustaining levels, threaten to eliminate a plant or
animal community, substantially reduce the number or restrict the range of a rare or
endangered plant or animal or eliminate important examples of the major periods of
California history or prehistory, with inclusion of mitigation measures.
14. The project will not have significant impacts that are individually limited, but
cumulatively considerable.
15. The project will not have significant environmental effects which will cause
substantial adverse effects on human beings, either directly or indirectly, with
inclusion of mitigation measures.
16. Responsible / Trustee Agencies that have received a copy of this Initial Study
include:
• Responsible Agency: Santa Clara County Department of Environmental Health
• Responsible Agency: Regional Water Quality Control Board
• Responsible Agency: Santa Clara Valley Water District
• Trustee Agency: California Highway Patrol
• Trustee Agency: Department of Toxic Substances Control
• Trustee Agency: California Department of Transportation
17. The Notice of Intent to adopt a Mitigated Negative Declaration was published in the
Campbell Express, a local newspaper of general circulation; provided by mailed
notice to all property owners within a radius of 300-feet of the project site and to
those individuals and organizations requesting notification; posted with the Clerk -
Recorder of the County of Santa Clara; and made available on the City's website.
18. The City of Campbell provided a 48-day public review period of the Mitigated
Negative Declaration pursuant to the California Environmental Quality Act
Guidelines. The public review period was from August 22, 2019 to September 30,
2019.
19. The mitigation measures identified in the Mitigated Negative Declaration are
included as Conditions of Approval of the Planned Development Permit (PLN2016-
378) and the Vesting Tentative Subdivision Map (PLN2016-380).
Based upon the foregoing findings of fact, the City Council further finds and concludes
that:
1. The Planning Commission has independently reviewed and analyzed the Initial
Study/Mitigated Negative Declaration and other information in the record and has
City Council Resolution No. 12541 Page 4 of 4
Mitigated Negative Declaration (MND); File No.: PLN2016-381
540, 558 and 566 East Campbell Avenue and 24 and 34 Dillon Avenue
considered the information contained therein, prior to acting upon or approving the
Project.
2. The Initial Study/Mitigated Negative Declaration prepared for the Project has been
completed in compliance with CEQA and consistent with state and local guidelines
implementing CEQA.
3. The Initial Study/Mitigated Negative Declaration represents the independent
judgment and analysis of the City of Campbell as lead agency for the Project.
4. Based upon the entire record of the proceedings held before the Planning
Commission and all information received that there is no substantial evidence that
the Project will have a significant effect on the environment.
5. The Initial Study/Mitigated Negative Declaration and the Mitigation Monitoring and
Reporting Program for the Project are on file with the Campbell Community
Development Department, as Custodian, located at Campbell City Hall, 70 North
First Street, Campbell, CA 95008 and are available for inspection by any interested
person.
THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the City Council adopts a Mitigated Negative
Declaration (PLN2016-381) (attached EXHIBIT A) for the Parkview Mixed Use
Development Project consisting of a Zoning Map Amendment (PLN2016-383), Planned
Development Permit (PLN2016-378), Vesting Tentative Subdivision Map (PLN2016-
380), and Tree Removal Permit (PLN2016-382) for property located at 540, 558 and
566 East Campbell Avenue and 24 and 34 Dillon Avenue.
PASSED AND ADOPTED this 3rd day of December, -2019, by the following roll call
vote:
AYES: COUNCILMEMBERS: Resnikoff, Bybee, Gibbons, Landry, Waterman
NOES: COUNCILMEMBERS: None
ABSENT: COUNCILMEMBERS: None
ABSTAIN: COUNCILMEMBERS: None
APPROVED:
Ri6k;_rd M. Waterman, Mayor
ATTEST: LJ:1:6�
Wendycwood, City Clerk
MITIGATED NEGATIVE DECLARATION
The Community Development Director has reviewed the proposed project described below to
determine whether it could have a significant effect on the environment as a result of the project
completion. "Significant effect on the environment" means a substantial, or potentially
substantial, adverse change in any of the physical conditions within the area affected by the
project including land, air, water, minerals, flora, fauna, ambient noise, and objects of historic or
aesthetic significance.
Project Title: Parkview Mixed Use Development
Lead Agency : City of Campbell, Community Development Department
70 N. First Street, Campbell, CA 95008
Contact Person: Cindy McCormick, Senior Planner
(408) 871-5103 1 cindym(i%citvofcampbell.com
Date Posted: August 22, 2019
File Number(s): PLN2016-378; PLN2016-380; PLN2016-381; PLN2016-382; PLN2016-383
Project Location: 540, 558 and 566 East Campbell Avenue and 24 And 34 Dillon Avenue
Project Sponsor Name and Address: Cresleigh Homes / Campbell Park Development LLC
Existing Zoning: Planned Development (PD)
Proposed Zoning: Condominium Planned Development (C-PD)
Area Plans: East Campbell Avenue Master Plan (ECAMP)
Existing General Plan: Central Commercial (Mixed Use encouraged per ECAMP)
Proposed General Plan: No change
Project Entitlements: The project requires a Subdivision Map, Zoning Map Amendment (from
PD to C-PD), Condominium Planned Development (C-PD) Permit, Tree Removal Permit, CEQA
review, and Affordable Housing Agreement.
Other Responsible / Trustee Agencies that will receive a copy of this Initial Study:
• Responsible Agency: Santa Clara County Department of Environmental Health (DEH)
I Pursuant to CEQA Guidelines Section 15051, the Lead Agency shall be the public agency with the greatest
responsibility for approving the project as a whole. The Lead Agency will normally be the agency with general
governmental powers, such as the City of Campbell, rather than an agency with a single or limited purpose such as
the Santa Clara County Department of Environmental Health.
• Responsible Agency: Regional Water Quality Control Board (RWQCB)
• Responsible Agency: Santa Clara Valley Water District (Valley Water)
• Trustee Agency: California Highway Patrol (CHP)
• Trustee Agency: Department of Toxic Substances Control (DTSC)
• Trustee Agency: California Department of Transportation (Caltrans)
Existing Setting and Surrounding Land Use: The L-shaped subject property is an assemblage
of five parcels comprising approximately 1.63 (gross) acres, located between Downtown
Campbell and the Pruneyard Shopping Center. Three of the parcels have frontage on East
Campbell Avenue while the remaining two parcels are adjacent to Dillon Avenue. The subject
property is currently developed with a vacant auto center, a music store, and two unoccupied
residential structures, all of which would be demolished to accommodate the project. Abutting
land uses include commercial uses to the north, Campbell Park to the east, residential homes to
the southeast and commercial/industrial/office uses to the south and west.
Project Description:
The subject property includes the following five parcels that will be merged together as part of
the subdivision entitlement:
• 540 E. Campbell Avenue (APN 412-09-029);
• 566 E. Campbell Avenue (APN 412-09-031);
• 558 E. Campbell Avenue (APN 412-09-030);
• 24 Dillon Avenue (APN 412-09-028); and
• 34 Dillon Avenue (APN 412-09-027).
The project consists of a five -story mixed use development with 59 for -sale condominium units
and two commercial spaces totaling 6,512 square feet. The project, which includes a request for a
35% state density bonus and two (2) concessions, will provide nine (9) low-income
condominium ownership units in compliance with California's Density Bonus Law. The 59 units
(including the low-income units) are comprised of nineteen (19) 1-bedroom units ranging
from 722 to 1,158 square feet in area, and forty (40) 2-bedroom units ranging from 1,021 to
1,542 square feet in area. The applicant is providing 59 parking stalls for the residential uses and
49 parking stalls for the non-residential uses. The proposed residential parking exceeds the
minimum parking required under California Density Bonus Law for projects located within one-
half mile of a major transit stop.
The project includes excavation of all contaminated soil (e.g., historic hydrocarbon, metal, and
volatile organic compound affected soil) exceeding regulatory thresholds on the project site and
disposal of that soil at an approved off -site landfill disposal site, with regulatory oversight from
the County of Santa Clara Department of Environmental Health, via a Voluntary Cleanup
Agreement. The project will also include improvements at the Paige Street intersection pursuant
to a cost sharing agreement between the City of Campbell and the applicant.
PUBLIC REVIEW PERIOD
The Initial Study and Mitigation Monitoring Program is available for review from 8:00 AM to
5:00 PM at the Campbell Community Development Department, City Hall, 70 North First Street,
Campbell, CA and online at http://�N,.,ww.citvol'caiiipbell.com/501J'Public-Notices under
Environmental Notices'.
Any person may file a written protest of the draft Mitigated Negative Declaration and/or
Mitigation Monitoring Program during the public comment period running from August 22,
2019 through September 20, 2019 (closing at 5:00 PM). Such protest must be filed at the
Community Development Department, City Hall, 70 North First Street, Campbell, California.
The written protest should make a "fair argument" that the project will have one or more
significant effects on the environment based on substantial evidence.
SUMMARY OF MITIGATION MEASURES
Potentially
Less Than
Less Than No
XIV. MANDATORY FINDINGS OF SIGNIFICANCE
Significant
Significant with
Significant Impact
Impact
Mitigation
Impact
a) Does the project have the potential to degrade the quality of the environment,
substantially reduce the habitat of a fish or wildlife species, cause a fish or wildlife
population to drop below self-sustaining levels, threaten to eliminate a plant or animal
®
❑ ❑
community, substantially reduce the number or restrict the range of a rare or
endangered plant or animal or eliminate important examples of the major periods of
California history or prehistory?
b) Does the project have impacts that are individually limited, but cumulatively
considerable? ("Cumulatively considerable" means that the incremental effects of a ❑ ❑ ® El
project are considerable when viewed in connection with the effects of past projects,
the effects of other current projects, and the effects of probable future projects)?
c) Does the project have environmental effects which will cause substantial adverse El ® ❑ ❑
effects on human beings, either directly or indirectly?
(a) — Less than Significant Impact with Mitigation: Based on the findings of the Initial Study,
construction and operation of the project, with mitigation, would not substantially degrade the
quality the environment; reduce the habitat, population, or range of species; nor eliminate
important examples of California history or prehistory.
(b) — Less than Significant Impact: Based on the findings of this Initial Study, the project
would not have cumulative environmental impacts.
(c) — Less than Significant Impact with Mitigation: Based on the findings of the Initial Study,
there is no evidence to demonstrate that the project, with the required mitigation, would cause a
substantial adverse effect on human beings, either directly or indirectly.
Determination: On the basis of this initial study, and incorporation of the recommended
mitigation measures into the project design:
1.
I find that the project could not have a significant effect on the environment, and a
❑
NEGATIVE DECLARATION will be prepared.
2.
1 find that although the proposed project could have a significant effect on the
environment, there will not be a significant effect in this case because revisions in the
project have been made by or agreed to by the project proponent. A MITIGATED
NEGATIVE DECLARATION will be prepared.
3.
1 find the proposed project may have a significant effect on the environment, and an
❑
ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT REPORT is required.
4.
I find that the proposed project may have a "potentially significant impact" or
"potentially significant unless mitigated impact" on the environment, but at least
one effect 1) has been adequately analyzed in an earlier document pursuant to
applicable legal standards, and 2) has been addressed by mitigation measures based on
❑
the earlier analysis as described on attached sheets. An ENVIRONMENTAL
IMPACT REPORT is required, but it must analyze only the effects that remain to be
addressed.
5.
I find that although the proposed project could have a significant effect on the
environment, because all potentially significant effects (a) have been analyzed
adequately in an earlier EIR or Negative Declaration pursuant to applicable standards,
❑
and (b) have been avoided or mitigated pursuant to that earlier EIR or Negative
Declaration, including revisions or mitigation measures that are imposed upon the
proposed project, nothing further is required.
Cindy McCormick
PROJECT PLANNER
Senior Planner
TITLE
City of Campbell
AGENCY
SIGNATURE
August 22, 2019
DATE
CITY OF CAMPBELL
Community Development Department
MITIGATION MEASURES
1. Aesthetics: None Required
2. Agricultural Resources: None Required
3. Air Quality: The following mitigation measures are required:
Air Quality Mitigation Measure AQ-1: The project shall implement all of the BAAQMD's Basic
Construction measures, as follows:
AQ-1.1: All exposed surfaces (e.g., parking areas, staging areas, soil piles, graded areas, and unpaved access
roads) shall be watered two times per day, unless otherwise directed by the Site Management Plan.
AQ-1.2: All haul trucks transporting soil, sand, or other loose material off -site shall be covered.
AQ-1.3: All visible mud or dirt track -out onto adjacent public roads shall be removed using wet power
vacuum street sweepers at least once per day. The use of dry power sweeping is prohibited.
AQ-1.4: All vehicle speeds on unpaved roads shall be limited to 15 mph.
AQ-1.5: All roadways, driveways, and sidewalks to be paved shall be completed as soon as possible. Building
pads shall be laid as soon as possible after grading unless seeding or soil binders are used.
AQ-1.6: Idling times shall be minimized either by shutting equipment off when not in use or reducing the
maximum idling time to 5 minutes (as required by the California airborne toxics control measure Title 13,
Section 2485 of California Code of Regulations [CCR]). Clear signage shall be provided for construction
workers at all access points.
AQ-1.7: All construction equipment shall be maintained and properly tuned in accordance with
manufacturer's specifications. All equipment shall be checked by a certified visible emissions evaluator.
AQ-1.8: Post a publicly visible sign with the telephone number and person to contact at the lead agency
regarding dust complaints. This person shall respond and take corrective action within 48 hours. The Air
District's phone number shall also be visible to ensure compliance with applicable regulations.
AQ-2: Prior to issuance of a demolition permit for any on -site structures, the Developer shall consult with
certified Asbestos and/or Lead Risk Assessors to complete and submit for review to the Community
Development Director an asbestos and lead survey. It has already been determined that asbestos- and lead
containing materials are present on the subject property. Therefore, the project applicant shall prepare a work
plan, consistent with the requirements of the City. The work plan shall demonstrate how the on -site asbestos -
and/or lead -containing materials will be removed in accordance with current California Occupational Health and
Safety Administration (Cal -OSHA) regulations and disposed of in accordance with all California Environmental
Protection Agency regulations, prior to the demolition and/or removal of the on -site structures. The plan shall
include the requirement that work shall be conducted by a Cal -OSHA registered asbestos and lead abatement
contractor in accordance with Title 8 CCR 1529 and Title 8 CCR 1532.1 regarding asbestos and lead training,
engineering controls, and certifications. The applicant shall submit the work plan to the City for review and
approval. Materials containing more than one percent asbestos that is friable are also subject to BAAQMD
regulations. Removal of materials containing more than one percent friable asbestos shall be completed in
accordance with BAAQMD Section 11-2-303.
70 North First Street • Campbell, CA 95008-1423 • TEL (408) 866-2140 • FAX (408) 866-5140 • E-MAIL planning ( .eityofcampbell.com
Draft Mitigated Negative Declaration — Parkview Mixed Use Development Page 6 of 8
540, 558 and 566 East Campbell Avenue and 24 And 34 Dillon Avenue
4. Cultural Resources:
Cultural Resources Mitigation Measure CUL-1: If archaeological or paleontological resources are
encountered during excavation or construction, construction personnel shall be instructed to immediately
suspend all activity in the immediate vicinity of the suspected resources and the City and a licensed
archeologist or paleontologist shall be contacted to evaluate the situation. A licensed archeologist or
paleontologist shall be retained to inspect the discovery and make any necessary recommendations to evaluate
the find under current CEQA guidelines prior to the submittal of a resource mitigation plan and monitoring
program to the City for review and approval prior to the continuation of any on -site construction activity.
Cultural Resources Mitigation Measure CUL-2: In the event a human burial or skeletal element is
identified during excavation or construction, work in that location shall stop immediately until the find can be
properly treated. The City and the Santa Clara County Coroner's office shall be notified. If deemed
prehistoric, the Coroner's office would notify the Native American Heritage Commission who would identify
a "Most Likely Descendant (MLD)." The archeological consultant and MLD, in conjunction with the project
sponsor, shall formulate an appropriate treatment plan for the find, which might include, but not be limited to,
respectful scientific recording and removal, being left in place, removal and reburial on site, or elsewhere.
Associated grave goods are to be treated in the same manner.
5. Geology and Soils: The following mitigation measures are required:
Geology and Soils Mitigation Measure GS-1: An updated Geotechnical Investigation Report shall be
prepared by a licensed Geotechnical Engineer specializing in soils mechanics, and shall include
recommendations for construction (e.g., earthwork, foundation, slab construction, retaining wall design, etc.).
The updated Geotechnical Investigation Report shall be in substantial compliance with the City Council
approved entitlements, project conditions of approval, and City required mitigation measures to address
potentially significant environmental impacts. The Geotechnical Investigation Report shall be submitted to the
Community Development Director for review and approval prior to application for a building permit.
Geology and Soils Mitigation Measure GS-1.1: The City approved (updated as necessary and date stamped)
Geotechnical Investigation Report recommendations shall be incorporated into the project's final engineering
design and associated (date stamped) plans including but not limited to specific building details, grading,
foundation, foundation loads, utility, demolition, etc.
Geology and Soils Mitigation Measure GS-1.2: The Geotechnical Engineer shall review the final
engineering design and associated (date stamped) plans and shall provide a signed "clean" geotechnical plan
review letter, stating that the (date stamped) plans are in substantial compliance with the City approved
(updated as necessary and date stamped) Geotechnical Investigation Report. This final "clean" geotechnical
plan review letter shall be required with or without project changes.
Geology and Soils Mitigation Measure GS-1.3: Prior to issuance of building permits to begin work, the
plans and building permit applications shall be approved by the Community Development Director and shall
be consistent with the City approved (updated as necessary and date stamped) Geotechnical Investigation
Report and "clean" geotechnical plan review letter.
Geology and Soils Mitigation Measure GS-1.4: The plans submitted for a building permit shall include the
following note which shall be adhered to: "Earthwork, slab subgrade and non -expansive fill preparation,
foundation and slab construction, retaining wall drainage and backfilling, utility trench backfilling,
tieback/soil nail installation and testing, shoring pier installation, pavernent subgrade and aggregate base
construction and site drainage shall be performed as recommended in the City approved (updated as necessary
and date, stamped) Geotechnical Investigation Report and "clean" geotechnical plan review letter.
Draft Mitigated Negative Declaration — Parkview Mixed Use Development Page 7 of 8
540, 558 and 566 East Campbell Avenue and 24 And 34 Dillon Avenue
Geology and Soils Mitigation Measure GS-1.5: Construction Observation and Testing: The earthwork,
foundation, shoring, drainage, and slab construction phases of construction shall be observed and tested by the
Geotechnical Consultant to 1) confirm that subsurface conditions are compatible with the City approved
(updated as necessary and date stamped) Geotechnical Investigation Report and "clean" geotechnical plan
review letter; 2) confirm compliance with the .City approved Geotechnical Investigation Report and "clean"
geotechnical plan review letter and plans including but not limited to concepts, specifications, and
recommendations; and 3) allow design changes (upon City approval) in the event that site conditions differ
from those anticipated.
Geology and Soils Mitigation Measure GS-1.6: In the event of changes in the nature, design, or location of
the project as currently proposed, or if any future improvements are planned, the conclusions and
recommendations presented in the geotechnical reports shall not be considered valid unless: 1) the project
changes are reviewed by the licensed Geotechnical Engineer to confirm the accuracy and adequacy of the
geotechnical reports including the conclusions and recommendations; and 2) the conclusions and
recommendations presented in the geotechnical reports are verified in writing to still be satisfactory to the
City of Campbell; or 3) the conclusions and recommendations have been amended as necessary to be
satisfactory to the City of Campbell.
Geology and Soils Mitigation Measure GS-2 The project shall conform to the requirements of all applicable
Building Codes (as determined by the City of Campbell) to reduce the potential for seismic damage and risk
to future occupants, and to minimize damage from seismic shaking, unsuitable fill, and other geological
deficiencies.
6. Greenhouse Gas Emissions: None Required
7. Hazards and Hazardous Materials: The following mitigation measures are required:
Hazardous Materials Mitigation Measure HHM-1: The applicant shall obtain all required permits, licenses,
and/or other clearances, and shall comply with all orders, laws, regulations, and/or other requirements of all
applicable regulatory and/or enforcement agencies, such as, but not limited to the Santa Clara County
Department of Environmental Health, the California Highway Patrol, the California Department of
Transportation, Water and Air Quality Control Boards, Valley Water, County Fire Department, the
Department of Toxic Substances Control (if applicable), etc.
Hazardous Materials Mitigation Measure HHM-2: The applicant shall comply with all local, state, and
federal requirements with regard to the transport of any clean soil, contaminated soil, hazardous
waste/materials, or other regulated waste/materials.
Hazardous Materials Mitigation Measure HHM-3: The applicant shall prepare an updated Site Remedial
Plan for the excavation and proper disposal of contaminated soil off -site at the appropriate Class I and Class 11
landfills. The quantity of soil to be removed (preliminarily estimated to be approximately 5,800 cubic yards)
shall be calculated and submitted to the City of Campbell Planning Division for acceptance prior to
excavation. The updated Site Remedial Plan shall be approved by the Santa Clara County Department of
Environmental Health, prior to the issuance of building permits.
Hazardous Materials Mitigation Measure HHM-4: Prior to the construction of above grade structures, all
contaminated soil, exceeding the regulatory thresholds, shall be excavated and disposed of off -site at the
appropriate Class I and Class II landfills, in accordance with the Site Remedial Plan (as approved by the City
and the Santa Clara County Department of Environmental Health).
Hazardous Materials Mitigation Measure HHM-5: Prior to issuance of the Certificate of Occupancy, the
applicant shall obtain written confirmation via a Closure Letter from the DEH that certifies that the cleanup
goals or mitigation measures have been accomplished and that no further action is required.
Draft Mitigated Negative Declaration — Parkview Mixed Use Development Page 8 of 8
540, 558 and 566 East Campbell Avenue and 24 And 34 Dillon Avenue
8. Land Use and Planning: None Required
9. Mineral Resources: None Required
10. Noise: The following mitigation measures are required:
Noise Mitigation Measure N-1: All windows and glass doors shall be dual glazed with a minimum STC rating
of 28 (or equivalent) in order to achieve an interior noise level standard of 45 dB CNEL.
Noise Mitigation Measure N-2: Residential units shall include air conditioning units to allow residents to close
windows and doors for acoustical isolation.
Noise Mitigation Measure N-3: Construction activities shall comply with Campbell Municipal Code
restrictions
Noise Mitigation Measure N-4: Mechanical equipment associated with commercial uses and used for air
conditioning shall be mounted inside a mechanical room or shielded from adjacent residences. Deliveries shall
be confined to the daytime hours between 7:00 a.m. and 7:00 p.m.
Noise Mitigation Measure N-5: The rooftop courtyard parapet shall be constructed of solid materials with a
density of 2.5 Ibs/square feet and a height of 5.5 feet, without gaps to allow flanking of the traffic noise.
Noise Mitigation Measure N-6: Use of the rooftop courtyard shall be restricted to the hours of 7:00 a.m. to
10:00 p.m. with restrictions on the use of amplified music and other loud noises such as elevated voices. Any
special event planned in the courtyard shall require approval from the manager and notification of any
residences within 200-feet.
11. Population and Housing: None Required
12. Public Services: None Required
13. Recreation: None Required
14. Transportation and Traffic: None Required
15. Utilities and Service Systems: None Required
16. Mandatory Findings of Significance: No Additional Mitigation Required
CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL
Biological Resource Surveys: If tree removal activities take place during the breeding/nesting season
(February 1 through' August 31), disturbance of nesting activities could occur. To avoid take of any
active raptor nest or significant impacts to nesting birds, necessary tree removal should occur outside
of the nesting season (February 1 through August 31). If tree removal must occur at any time during
the typical nesting season, a pre -construction survey should be conducted by a qualified biologist no
more than 15 days prior to initiation of proposed development activities. If active nests are found on or
immediately adjacent to the subject property, the California Department of Fish and Wildlife should be
contacted to determine appropriate avoidance measures. If no nesting is found to occur, necessary tree
removal could then proceed.