The URL can be used to link to this page

S 94-08, UP 94-191875 S. BASCOM AVE. CITY OF CAMPBELL PLAN. S 94-08/UP 94-19 1 OF 2 08/2000 Please format one line labels on microfiche: City of Campbell Address File No. CITY OF CAMPBELL ADDRESS FILE NO. q,$CaM 1 1875 S. Bascom Avenue S 95-08 The Pruneyard UP 94-19 go .� o� 0 a� a d , O M wCd �a I NEW ►Vc. Lit EXL '.NSKI !t � R Q W W cc IL Ih v- W SIDEWALK COMPACT SPACE O LANDSCAPINGM STREET TREE TYP. ENLARGED PLAN AT S. BASCOM 1/8° = r_ 01, PRUNEYARD SHOPPING CENTER PROJECT DATA GI.A &VAIL 11OT4-L IF-) TOTAL GIA 16A,5/s .J 64.961 ,f ills —1 LOST GLA -76.1J7 t/ - NE G A 6).576 tJ +19,N)0 eJ 150 .aril (.Y) TOTAL GLI 255,857 tJ 84,791 .J 1168 rail ,YI:T COAN(:F GIA (-11,661 rJ) f+19,810 ,J) OFFICE (F-) OFFICF. .SPACI. PARKING (F.)490 tan (F)1ns tar, IN) Parkin0 U.—I )On tart 16f tart ,Yr1 Chanst Parkins (bam 19 tan) (+50 nnl (N) Parkins R.". J.Wl,000 tJ 1.00 nn/ream 'AILS. I u1 tir•... n„•r.rt, •,d P.r1,er r...n ,ed .vrrd .. .vv.,,.,m<rr toads :...... vl.• md,n,r .tr., .1 er. n.dd,er �..,va.o„e , I HOTEL PARKING I I I � 1 1. -0- - , i 00 Kv �J Ot1Top"R I, tv%& EXI'TINri a•R FI�eoHl17 ►osm& Cw rM .wsux- uno ^a"•d 11R4ETD FUTURE PFivleu567 ."awo,AD �JTKI Ro6,1TS �u/ nas1,R BaF fair+?) FLJ rum ow w rb nme- POWA EPA""% F40T "WAODSL-r Ab-pfvC%vo I7 pebl Ni ft IvompleD vy4ma ..sra.o...� � I4 r6,EE�a �tD ♦ PotI6F nru F_ IJIr i t!4?IYRaEJT�S OF J KELT a O 0 h Q m I BUS.STOP r LANDSCAPED AREA (tt tLCt E) COMP TOR N . I If) BUS STOP y--- -- - - -- -EA-ST CAMPEELL AVENUE-- ---- - - - - - '� GROUND LEVEL 154.144 tJ LEGEND e)Als NORTH tan 719 tan EXISTING TREES (-9( eartl 3.0911,000 ./ �) NEW TREES C; RESTAURANT r= 50' E L S ELBASANI & LOGAN ARCHITECTS 2040 ADDISON STREET WKELEY. CA 94704 PHONE 50547-2929 im PRUNEYARD SHOPPING CENTER RAS[ 4&CAMpo ILAveam CA--U. CAUKM" CONCEPTUAL MASTER PLAN JOB NUMBER 9429.00 DaA^ B. Central Court Passageway - East Elevation I/r- r w / Loading Dock - Axonometric Central Court Passageway - Cross Section ur- r-W ll R[[EEL Rl[CL LEI _CRTCCl[llll --—-------------- Storefront Windows ---- _ _-_-- —1 Warehouse Retail - South Elevation ter- 1•-w t -- ---- --. -- Storefront Wirtdows Storefront Wndrws Storetront fntry Storefront Entry Ctorefront Windows Warehouse Retail - East Elevation 1/81- 1•-W n EntryTrellis - Axonometric V = t�. SWritfunlWn&ws —__.— E L S ELBASANI & LOGAN ARCHITECTS 110 PRUNEYARD . SHOPPING CENTER &%M0MeTCAMMLJ10M4n CAMMQ4 ELEVATIONS 12-: 7-94 A2 iiSC 244.1 i Y24C I--, -T71 14CG z ems(`--- SECOND LEVEL TTM-I --- >- I a F I I I I I I I I I I I i I 11 3 W io=OWR or! I i°°i o; � 1 � ��IIII_III1ll11I � W4T AT I � H h F- p 11111 MTI I I I I I I Ill cc � p d 4 n 1OWR I1 4 1 4 a ITU �__ I _ 1 �� Illlf II II II II IIIlH1+11 %N\ QUADRANT 3 11111 IMI-iiIIIIIr71111I►Iri -,OTE: SHADED ZONES DENOTE \PPROXIMAIE AREAS OF BUILDING, DEK%OLITION. Off��fil V\��I • QUADRANT 1 - - I A l l l l l l l 1 1 1 l l l, I 1 / N/// r---FT- • I \ \ \ :7\ QUADRANT 2 E L S ELBASANI & LOGAN ARCHITECTS 2040 ADWON S ME i BERKELEY. CA W;04 M40t* 50FA19-29:9 1FE PRUNEYARD SHOPPING CENTER I BAwm & CAMM L AvENU6 CAMPULL, CAUFORMA 1 6 --- E A S T C A M P B E L L A V E N U E-- ---- - ----� GROUND LEVEL DEMOLITION JOe µAmp 94 )(MR) oRAw e. D1 °ATE 1875 S. BASCOM AVENUE S 94-08/UP 94-19 1 OF 7 CITY OF CAMPBELL PLAN. 1 ? / 99 C 0 E m U � O _r U ai � • L Cl O " E J J 1 C O W b a 2 e � U u) a, Z A E O OC > G W w J r, iftA NO8 N& Jnxprwws • Survsws • Rarwurs MrW IL Poles" rE. M i4g9E,1 MME9glr No 4wm FAX "1 s$-r 19s 981 R,W, IE 1(10 F W 3' ML FILE 1 OF 1 1675 8. Bucom Avenue 8 94-08 The pruneYe+'d OF 94-19 E L S E I B A S A N I S L O G A N ARCHITECTS oNW 11.1 :wu IDOh o, ireEE' ' BE I.r E ' • .. 104 ',1- _ T �° 2-11 +• jai 7301 Q N V y ^1 C 7 � N `G q ..` m o �1 Q a B m C R! y mm a t �• o mm 1 CITY of CAh1PBELL Commumtv Development Department Current Planning December 11. 1998 Ms. Jeanne Shook-Arterberry Pruneyard Associates 1999 S. Bascom Avenue, Suite 200 Campbell, CA 95008 Re: Allowable Restaurants at the Pruneyard Dear Jeanne: The Master Use Permit (UP 94-191 granted by the Planning Commission established 18 restaurant uses at tha Pnmeyard. The addition of Buca de Beppo would bring the total number of restaurants operating at the Pruneyard to 17. Additionally, we recognize that the square footage allocated for Buca's is equivalent to the space formerly occupied by Martha's. If you have any questions or comments. plea" do not hesitate o contact me at (408) 866-2140. Sincerely, em Gloria Sciara, AICP Planner 11 70 North First Street Campbell. Calilor 91008 1423 ttt 408 866 2140 FAX 408 866 9301 tow 408 966 2790 CITY OF CAMPBELL Community Development Department March 13, 1997 Mr. Ride Wise Momgle Associates 150 Adams Street Demur. CO 80206 Dear Mr Wue. The Cm of Campbell is in recap of your rean.' preliminary submittal for additional signage at the Ptuma]rd for a Bank of America Automated Teller Machine (ATM). After reviewing your proposal the Communty Development Department is unable to appros a your preliminary request for signs because it is riot consistent with the current tenant sign program for the center As part of the recent Pnmeyard remodel, a new sigt program was approved for tJc shopping center (permit number SA 96-)5) which is now the current sign program recognized for the shopping center. I have forwarded a reduced version of the appropriate sign design approval for individual tenant sips for your review. Any variation from the approsed s_gn design guidelines must be approved by the City of Campbell Planning Commission. The City of Campbell is tunable to issue arr required building, electrical or sign permits until a plan and drawings acceptable to the Cm ,and consistent with prior spprm�ls, has ban submittal and approved if you tsve any furrier questions or would like to discuss altemstite design corcepu and the approal process for sign exceiijons by the Planning Commission, please contact meat (409) 966-2140. Sincerely. Daml Senior e- AI r Jeanne Shook-Arlerberry, Pruneyard fWdlum Wilson R Associates administrative file 70 North First Street lAmpbell, California 99008 1433 r9r 408.666 3140 - rat 408.866,8181 - tun 406.966.37" CITY OF CAMPBELL Community Deve3opmant Department February 28. 1991 Mr. Chnstopher Meany Retail Project Director William Wilson & Associates 1999 South Bascom Avenue. Suite. 200 Campbell. CA 95008 Dear Chns We are :n receipt of your letter dated February 20, regarding designation of restaurant spaces approved under the master use permit and site approval (UP 94-19/S 94-08) for the Pmnevard Center .finer reviewing your request and the restaurant dcatgnauons approved either with the master use permit and/or through Temm Improvements. we recognize the re -designation of ututsl34/I36, currently occupied by Chabot .Art Gallen, to unit space number 405 as a restaurant use. As of the time of this letter ther- are 16 rertaurant spaces that have been identified on the approved site map, including an additional credit of 2 restaurants. (Barnes de Noble Cafe and Swenson's - existing uses) for a total of 18 available restaurant spaces under the master use permit and site approval. We recognize two separate restaurant spaces for El Burrc restaurant, one for each floor t I" and 2"a). Currently our documentation indicates that 16 restaurants are established at the site. Two additional restaurant spaces that are currently undesignated. remain available The list of currently active restaurants is a follows. RESTAURANT I El Burro 2. Pollo Rev 3 Rock Bottom Brewery 4 Left at Albuquerque 5 Wrap Works 6 Outback Steakhouse 7. Swenson 8. Guidos 9. Mrs. Fields Cookies 10. Lisa's Tea Treasures 11. Le Boulanger 12. Baines R. Noble Cafe 13, Campbell Roasting Company 14, Boswell's 15 Kyoto Palace 16 •lohnnv Rockets (570/2570) (no unit number. in Barnes dt Noble shell) (730/735/740) (St8)) (114) (no unit number; new pad building) (119) (180/1900 (152) (165) (440) (333/145) (112) (105) (2500) (• 405 leased but not in operation) 70 North Flrtt Street Camphrll. Cahlnrnia VSnnB 14 21 tit 409 86h 2110 rtr 408 96h 1381 - inn 408.866,2790 Chnstopher Meam - Pruneyard Restaurant Designations Page -2- 25 -c been Two additional restaurant spaces identified on the master site pl�iie(Unit n unit NSW SWelllss Fargo As you reassigned to allow Lis:. s Teas lunit M165) and Left at Albuquerq know. Left at Albuquerque also received approval of a coodtuonal use pernut for late hours past I 00 p in . full service of alcoholic beverages. and outdoor seating since that tenant space vvas not onginaltv identified as a restaurnt location. Your assessment of the entitlements granted with the master use permit is correct, and all tune ent The reassignments are subject to review In, the City of Campbell Community Development ally i m masiet use permit entitlements limited the number of restaurants on site to those originally dentified on the site plan at the time of spproval. Any increase in the number o rea aurants requrres�'red and and those Identified under the master use permit and site approval (UP rov by the Planning Commission in accordance witil the C-2-S zoning district and the City of Campbell zoning Ordinance Please feel free to call me or Tim Haley at (1(18) 866-2131) If you have any questions. Smcerch. Tim Haley. Dams I es, Associate Planner Senior lane sc Steve Piasecki, Community Development Director administrative file NEW MAJOR RESTAURANTS AT THE PRt NEYARD as of April I. 1997 RESTAURANT SQUARE FEET I SEAIS (,nstde) SEATS (outside) SEATS (total) Outback Steakhouse 6.411(1 279 48 127 Rock Bottom 9,665 220 63 294 Brewcry 1.5(K) 132 34 1 Left a Albuquerque Wrap Works 1.250 28 0 28 The Garrett 1.650 136 26 172 currenth, cacantl 120 So 170 Johnm_ Rockets i.(XNI to scd) TOTALS 27,365 931, 232 1.167 FEB 06. 97 15:20 FR CARLjp'*--• 415 677 0145 � - 91�507732 P. 02/02 1QWM CFAWH MMDCWES W- MItHICL2i Nf, LIIOm4 120 Yoigrw•r SYw6 bL 100 Say f�ocim, QwM N/a ai-IR-ow r. 41""-41e ell *I of � Ili cO�Q'�-� 7 � � •y c Nld`^n�cz a U a U nc gUin S M / Ihte: Sl3/96 To Londiora Rridom / ® 2/6/27 ya LwO%or! 0 0 1 Sheet Title ATM KIOSK Site Plan 61) SITE PLAN �r 3b.?4—b- o• / irn.► 26-035 OVOQGL IU0? -- TOTAL PAGE.002 •s P R N rYAItt) February 20,1997 lz Mr. Dam Jones Senior Planner City of Campbell 70 North First Street Campbell, CA 95008 Dear Darryl: At the time that the master entirlements were granted for the renovation of the PruneYard Shopping Center, various shops were designated for restaurant use (the designation permits restaurant use including the service of alcohol and outdoor sealing). At the time the designations were made, we agreed that the specified shops were a best guess at where restaurants would locate, but might not constitute the final restaurant locations. We agreed that the restaurant designations could be moved provided the total number of restaurants covered by the master entitlement did not increase, and that we would track any reassignment by letter. This letter requests your confirmation that the restaurant designation for Unit 136 has been moved to Unit 405. As you know, Unit 405 is the unit that we have leased to Johnny Rockets. Please call if you have any questions. Yours truly, 1 vUut-�"j ChristophrcrMeany Retail Project Director cc: Frank Toloui, JR West, Inc. cnrrq!•h CITY OF CAMPBELL Pubh' V -k' Dcpartmrn+ December 5, 1996 Mr. Christopher Meany Retail Project Director The Pnneyard William Wilson & Associates 1999 S. Bascom Avenue, Suite 200 Campbell, CA 95008 SUBJECT: S 94-08/UP 94-19 THE FRUNEYARD - RELOCATION OF SIGNS FROM PUBLIC RIGHT OF WAY Dear Chris: As we indicated previously during our review of the plats for the encroachment permit to construct the public improvements required for the Pnneyard, it will be necessary to have al! signs relocated onto private property. The City will not allow private signs encroaching into the public right of way, and Pjblic Works will not grant final acceptance of the improvements you have constructed until all signs are removed from the public right of way. Please give me a call if you have any questions regarding this matter. Sincerely, 1 �lU.t7� Michelle Quiney City Engineer cc: File EP#95-223 File UP 1875 S. Bascom 94-08/S94-19 Darryl Jones, Senior Planner Frank Cauthorn, Building Official Molly Choat, Pruneyard Bill Seligman, City Attorney J:\MQ\PRYD05 ll+U {OB N66.]790 70 North Fl- Street l.mpha9l, Cahlornu +SOON 1423 '+' 408 8b6 21 io NEW PW F'�\79r a 6OW76.0938 ° T F E h R U N E Y R D o. 1AIII IAAt 151Ist1N IAIIS - November 18, 1996 Mr. Drew Baker R E': E I V E p General Manager Campbell Inn 675 East Campbell Avenue .I r r �r Campbell, CA 95008 PL4NAIA;; pfp7`' RE: Campbell Inn Sign Dear Mr. Baker This letter is to serve as acknowledgment of your letter wherein You request permission , relocate the Campbell Inn sign. This sign as you know, curren(IN straddles both the City of Campbell public right-of- way and the private property of the PruneYard. Please be advise I that no prescriptive easements or rights exist with regard to this sign and as such, the sign must be removed. It is imperative that you remove the sign by November 30, 1996. If it is not removed by that date we will have no choice but to remove it and invoice you for associated expenses. Thank you for your prompt attention to this matter. Sincerely, PRUNEYARD ASSOCIATES, L. L.0 By William Wilson & Associates Its Managing Agent Mollie E. Choate, RPA Property Manager cc: Darryl Jones/City of Campbell 7'>09 1.wtk A..rnnr Iz tinrrr 'Ixl l .irrrli,ll i ,1 ern r.s f-V . -4 Oct-28-96 01 :29P P.01 A FAX M F S S A (; E FROM COMFORT INn AIRPORT 1310 N. FIRST ST. KEN MA—NRAO SAN JOSS. CA 95112 77 BELDEN DR. PHONE (4016t7-1100 LOS ALTOS. CA. 94022 FAX (40614!a-u9) 415 948-3516 RESERVATION (PM) 077-1331 FAX 415 941-SW MANAGER. SC07T CORNELL FACE 1 OF I DATE : 10/29.96 EXECUTIVE INN DOWNTOWN CITY OF CAM►TELL 1214 S. FIRST ST. SENT TO : MICHELLE QUINNY/DARRYL JONES SAN JOSE, CA. "110 PHONE (409) 28MA30 FAX PHONCO : 4UB 376J950 FAX (408) 443.18" RXSKRVATIO14(A0)!09-7"6 SUBJECT: CAMTBELL INN SIGN MANAGER: BARBARA JOHNSON THOMAS BROWN EXECUTIVE INN • SUITES DOJO MONTEREY RD. SAN JOSS. CA. "III REF: CAMPBELL INN - SICN AT PRUNEYARD PROPERTY. PHONE (4N1291-4700 FAX (406) 578.67" RESERVATION (ON) 451-77" MS. QUIKKY R MR JONES. MANAGER: TAMI HILL ATTACHED IS A COFY OF A LETTER 1 HAVE FAXED TO EXECUTIVE INN . SUITES 16MS CONDIT RD. THE PRUKEYARD REGARDING THE ABOVE REFERENCED SIGN. MORGAN HILL, CA. 95437 ►HONE INTO) 770.0404 I HAVE DONE SOME PRELIMINARY ANALYSIS. IF THE SIGN IS FAX 1400) 778-20" RESERVATION (000) 626-422.4 REMOVED THAN: MANAGER:HILEN B JOHN NEMETH I. GUESTS WILL MISS CAM/BELL INN ENTRANCE CAMPBELL INN 2. IT WILL TAKE TWO U TURNS, NOT ONE, AT LIGHT 675 E. CAMPBELL AVE. CAMPBELL. CA. 94WO OR SME STREET OR AT THE SHOPPING CENTER. PHONE (400 J764J00 FAX (402) 3794K" THIS WILL INCREASE THE RISK OF INJURY, TRAFFIC. ECT. RESERVATION (100) 982-4449 MANAGER: DREW BAKER CAMPBELL INN IS THI GATEWAY TO THE CITY. WE HAVE CREATED EXECUTIVE INN - SUITES A PARTNERSHIP Of WORKING TOGCTHIJR WITH THE CITY. I300 CAMDEN AVE. CAMPBELL, CA. 950M PLEASE LET ME KNOW YOUR THOUGHTS IF OUR PROPOSAL IS PHONE 4400) 559.3"0 FAX (4081)71r5721 ACCEPTABLE ON THIS LETTER. v�..M1.� y. 7►t..�-�`" RESERVATION MINI) M3611 KEN MANRAO. OWNER MANAGER: CHRIS SCOTT B.S. IT07) B.S. (Eq.) MBA P.E. (C6.. 00io. P..) AWS Certified I.VP w Oat-28-96 01:29P P.02 Ms Mollie E. Choate Pnmeyard 19" S. Ba%cum Ave 4200 Campbell, Ca 950U8 Fax At 408 371- 3831 Ref Campbell Inn Sign Your letter dated 10/22/96 & 5/31/96 10/28 96 Dar MS Choate, Our sign has been there for the last ekwm years. which is evidence of our right. Your attorney will agree with our position You did offer it Solution to the problem in your letter dated 5/31/06 in which you suggested that *the Sign could be relocated elsewhere on the property' Please obtain the cost from your eootractor 10 move the I FFT LLG of the sign to the right so that the Ie8 leg becomes the right leg This will provide sufficient diaance away from the sidewalk $ should be acceptable to the city. We will reimburse the reawmable competitive cast of moving the I FI 1' LLG. Worse call me if you have any questnms at 415 948-3516 or 408 691-7827. Sincerely Yours, Kenneth S. Maurao, Owner B. S (Pby) 0 S (Eng ) MBA P F (Ca , Ohio, Pa ) A W S Certified luspector cv Mr. Robert Sturges Attorney At Law MCC Ba', x l ieneral Manager, Campbell Inn. �K BY:ELSIRMASANt A LOGAN :ID B 96 : 1:1: n1 :F1sHHA�ANI a IrrGAN' 7r,7W:f:H.'wl:• li 5 ti ' IbaF6^ Orarld tax lran�w�r..�LI IMrro 787j7�• r�.��• ��7�- 1 � .�lW � w1Ctl� C•'L MBMORANDUM -g: b t S - .0 RECEIVED DATE: September 27. 1996 ocl Q 6 10 TO: Darryl Jones J« DeGtieaico 1G OF CN'�PBELL FROM: PROJECT: P-fM ad erg Cener CITY PLANNING DEPT. PROJECT NO.: 9429 SUBJECT: Parking tat resinping and fire lams 0:1 September 25, 199s. we received a letter from die Sterna Clara Camay Fire Drsun-t, roused through Marty Porraseulr of Brian Kanges f1iulk. mgmdmg the Fire Districts' requirements and conditions for the PmneYmd Shi-jTft' Center project. This letter it attached for your information. Item number om of the letter dirxv that,'NI roadways and vehicle acceMA shall be deigned for a minrtmm Iced of 42M Iba.. be a minimum of 20 feet wide, and have a minimum coming radius of 42 feet inside and 60 feet outside. Vertical ckAraaee shill be 15 feet." As diaasarad in our meeting Yatrrday, the scope of this project is limited to tesWong an existing parking lot, and providing new parking where alisting congnwtioa is to be demolished. In addition, them is a several awareness that the Pn=Yard Shopping Center parking count is lest than optimal. At psmaent, therm are several ceoditiom throagbtart the parking set wbam existing vehicle scossses do not meet the Fire Districts' directive. To moot the ditmctkm the entire wwp" center parking layout would Deed to be :odetiped and reconstructed. This would cause impact on existing above ground utilities, crabs, lighting, landscaping and parking cam We arm seeking your assistance in getting relief from this directive and in developing criteria, with the Firm District, for the scope of work which was adopted by the planing Commission on January 24. 1995. Thank you for your immediate attention to this matter. Should you have any questions, please call. cc: Chris Mtaoy. W W r4.A � Marty Pwisseoti, BItF 942wMo92tpin.doc g1VT 8Y:F1.S,nBA.M%l A LOW. :In 6 95 : 13:02 :FI SiF1BAS111 A I.M.AN- IfwnFW.-.ul:f 41 R 1 ,I ��E� aaweer�a.neo ern�..a�enr 4M-4 •7M MXIO"WilN WAAWAU TRNOM MAL rr & APIL &t'; - 3 ;O y ON _ MIAL ea A,.Anj Bern —ems vY _)(PAX Mla Oa MIAL a vM _ FAX tk cm KW �T RY -Il\ II NASA\I i I�Y.A\ :In R: ICI 02 :II S."MS4%1 i IOGA\ i1MY1f'.f'.M'wl:� &ANM O AM COUNTY CIMWAL "M FROTDCt N DETI 1CT 14700 W01DHUFIM 90%RZVAPO L000AlOCGMOWI010 NNs"10 _ NIMMe— U94MI947 "Or'sm V 4A 1 70 SIp1Q�br 1l9S V Brim maws fta album 8EP 2 2 :1M AMWdk L Malty - 640 price wwarr Cawood Cy, CA 9M M". Ahdbwd to dr kdODV M you raaustad m Soplownba 6,199& It was w7ppaad b be o t nwer balwi ll>+ wtA* I wa gar be boll gad We& 1!or itMetluO W you tab tsC-lg rw Cosrw 4 aad 0 of dw r*--Ir11ow alma our sgdfa are a4, H g pdoob at swv4n bop- Aa wG drLvraa. p11ar to w dbWkl !a WW orlW ad" to bt alnlad y Ae aidotlelg hop dr b*gdkf wd , . — d do bep mut be 1w1 Oaa 06 MR No ban we we pldam As flow tat, - a wd8edlaa of otpo6W and Ih� <lirus oar — lipri�tet tad rpriv ise roqu�ewta SON be aor�l;; t am ldud far o Irw pubic 2w tryck adMalnt b dr ptopoaAftokofAcossicRUAftwdimroinineffiect �1701 olar dreurMaaa m Nr gdt I treat b o8rie you that a peaW�I wa dYaowrd by ow tale durbut asasl zmddmtaa of *a the lte apply b two ilia lgdlaltr wa 0bm off, and Finney nd tad coodd trt !bd 1d amttaOYg �daal �alrla tlaMl4lf� of vd"% p4lg and odw ylpslrsrs bo po�Wd a� part of tlr atnlm — arUAwtlo - gbeldd yaa and my I odd bdoesadw you aty a0elatt Do" toe Medal Yotgttrai -- b two plow So" WAO IMwd..0 ia'd WTI cr* M► re •.e ....n. ..... ..- T 9Y:t1S.t1BAGN1 A InGAN :In- F !r. 11:W1 ;n S/ laA.%hM a IMAM laaar.YiafMl:• R SANTA CLARA COY arlla�e�I ClMIIM. FM PROTECTION DUMUCT 14V" wtoaa eokKAR1D i tM 0006. G 11MI&I trod oaV10 No 1517 _ DEVEWME 1T RHVOW COMM M UP94-191694-04 aw as aaasa h,m,l DwvabpmmtW Review for proposed lemcdal at the Ptacryard gwppkg Caper and Pnatryard Inn 1 All ooadways and vddde acoaw @W be daeiprod ioc a miilmum bad of 4Tj000 floe, be a mkthrwm of 21) faat wide, and fare it mhdmum hni fng radios of 42 he k1 " 60 outdda. Ver" daanrta slap ba 13 fait 2 Ptovidt record parcel amp that teAr - all property fins for review. 3 Me frter0tlty of rile eaia" fin aavim wow loop is qustiateW Have the loop sum, by a ltonkad tlu pmoaaetiort aoobaar to daimmine Ittq`rfty and cqmb&y of the aysten. 4 Rae flow br dw dwffkq cairn *A be of srppflytM a mdrduttum of 2A00 Phes PR otiarle at 20 ppasll spnad over not awn that two An hydrada. Ptswida flow adcubtiau for rwfew. Prwids a dw plan dot refieet• So loatlorts of elf enditg five hydeuks, supply II mim turd their dew s Provide in allowable ass arWy* of all btdldbW Provide a dnwkq that raflacls dw locatiomm of e)ftd R and proposed arse aapa:ation walk. 6 All balidkW d" be pe vidod wilha�aauak atic fin sprLJds pRacheolaction. Bartsed Am protection oonttackm *%ah ssbmlt then nU of d%op drzwin , amatpimisid per app&mtbn and appLcife Jew for review, prim to Pany We& 7 L'shtR to remodd aartrudbq, all aft and give prolkttion ayaeals doll veuedn in operation Prior to baUdbW pads ksraaa the amtractor kltall admut a five ochry plan for wview and appcwal. CEL r O D D O G.IfAMNIM ]2/li/9f 1 a, 2 R2/R1 flu DASM At LOGAN AFM PRUNEYARD CBNTIM k M 105 IIASOdf AV., S. ay.I.anar wry a' CM.rMIt �. rbr k..�Ma.wv.. >•ar y la over IM'd vsrt 9M ae► WNT RY:ELS,FIAAS&NI i LOGAV :10 0-715 : 13:04 :U1Si11BASANI i IM4% 40SOM OWN Ri 5 SAKM CIARA COtWrV .rwa�1 CQ��L I Debit cr 2470E 1MfCHEFW �OINiM� .NNNRNNN�1 U*QNM&cA"0Mt01N MMIT94M DEVBLOPUMNT n%WW COMMHNP8 UP94.191004-0l NNN� NNw �n ---- sRaftfad Om itt�e of nbmktmL � des �o�� Humd GMW n am SAGO INpnae fat. 9 Pdw to - -- , c iw the 01ddbwt sb B submit ao okudim drewhW b the 9ddbW Dspwmmnt for teviet► and t AD dWVu " be i. amlp}fsms w#A tbt Nppl abb v-W cro I -Awn at the ftA of nd7edtt&L 10 Ptwtds IN f Il am seperedW tads Nt s,D bmftm what d1tu79w Tbb wwbw oudhm dw mff1hvAm caadidaes noomemyT, sad b ■d A sabotok fiw an wgdM bllidkty pomp wdew. ClL ! D D D D G SARNHS 1?l1SN1 z D7✓RI WAAMM k WCAN A11CFL ?!t[bWARD CWM R M I W5 WCOM AV & SENT BY F1VELBASANI & LWAN :10- 2-35 : 10 09 :ELS'ELBASA.NI & L00AN- 409 379 2572;a 1/ 5 MEMORANDUM FAX RECEIVED DATE: September :7, 1996 r U, TO: Darryl Jones ,jf4NNIN� MEor FROM: Joe duo v PROJECT: Prunc'farcYar d SIT mg Center PROJECT NO.: 9429 SUBJECT: Parking lot restripmg and fire lanes On Septemter 25, 1995, we received a letter from the Santa Clara County Fire District, routed through Many Parissenti of Brian Kangas Foulk, regarding the Fire Disu icts' requirements and conditions for the PruneYard Shopping Center project. This letter is attached for your information. Item number one of the letter directs that, "All roadways and vehicle accesses shall be designed for a minimum load of 42,000 lbs., be a minimum of 20 feet wide, mid have a minimum turning radius of 42 feet inside and 60 feet outside. Vertical clearance shall he 15 feet. ' As discussed in our meeting yesterday, the scope of this project is limited to r;striping an existing parking lot, and providing new patting where existing construction is to be demolished. In addition, there is a general awareness that the PruneYard Shopping Center parking count is less than optimal At present, there are several conditions throughout the parking lot where existing vehicle accesses do not meet the Fire Districts' directive. To reset the directive. the entire shopping center parking layout would need to he redesigned and reconstructed. This would cause impact on existing above ground utilities, nubs. lighting, landx:aping and parking grunts. We arc. .seeking your assistane in getting relief from this directive and in developing criteria, with the Fire Di strict, for the scope of work which was adopted by the Planning Commission on January 24, 1995 Thank you for your imrncdiatc attention to this matter. Should you have any questions, please call cc: Chns Mcany, WW &rA Many Par,ssenti, BKF 9429/M0928pinAm Cam=m ty Dwfdopnnw* D@PMb wit Tot Barbara Lee, Interim City Manager Fr.wa Steve Piaseclu, Community Development Director OR Darryl Jones. Sertior Planner DoW July 23,1996 Re: Pri neyard Shopping Center Update Sockground William Wilsor. and Asaoctxies has completed the major building shell constntction to accommodate the new Barnes and Noble Bookstore. Bank of America and Hollywood Video. Holkwood Video and the Blink of Amena ha%c opened D�vdopaaMt Activily The following development actnip is underway at the Pru wvard. Sidewalks and bmdevard landscaping are complete on Bascom Avenue with the exception of the entrance driveways and sacral ; gns that need to be relocated. The l udsaping in front of the Bank of America has been installed. They have planted uses in front of the building on Bascom Avenue and iniuhted the bougainvillea vines on the trellis along Campbell Avenue to soften the building. Planted In the sidewalk tree wells on Campbell Avenue Imgi tron is being installed and street trees leted except front of the Outback Steakhouse and The sidewalks on Campbell M•enue are comp adjacent to the Union Avenue driveway. Demolition and development of 'Main Street" though the center of the p trojec is 1'rt`c*n8. The Gazebo should be demolished by the end of July. The elevator towers are consuuctad. polio Rey (Mexican fast food Restaurant) to be located between Buries and Noble and Hollywood Video. will start tenant improvements in August 1996. Wells Fargo Bank. located on the north end of the site ruext 10 Marshalls, sviH be reducing their tenant space from 6,000 square feet to approximately I.loo .1.8M square feet. "Left at Albuquerque" (a new upper end restaurant serving southwestern Wells currently locate d in Palolod It Fargo) plans to remodel e o l and occupy the remaining square footage ted tenIons fa the ant improvemments to the Building Division this week. but we have net seen G restaurant. on to Increase number and size of their building Barnes and Noble is seeking a sign excepti mounted silqu_ n center • William Wilson and Associates has submitted a sign Program encompassing new suopq g frastnding signs and tenant identification signs. The center identification signs arc approximately the sane height as the existing signs. The sign exceptions scheduled to be heard by the Planning Commission on August 13. 1996. Au 19% • Outback Steakhouse expects to open in lase July or early gust • Barnes and Noble intends to open by October 1, 19%. • Barbecues Galore plans to open in August 19% ftuta M Mans William Wilson is reviewing the economics of Proceeding with a third office building and has not determined if they intend to pursue the tentative map to subdivide the Pruneyard at this time. i Ms. Mollie E. Choate — Pruneyard 1999 S. Bascom Ave 4200 Campbell, Ca. 95008 Fax # (408) 371-3831 cc: Michele Quinny, City of Catrtpbell Darryl Jones, City of Campbell Ref: Campbell Inn Sign Your letter dated 10/22/96 & 5/31 /96 Ms Choate, We had several discussions with you & the City officials on the subject natter. The conclusion of these discussions are as follows: I City officials agree that it is a good idea to keep the sign, but would need to be moved to an approximate vicinity. Exact location is to be determined via mutual understanding between you, us, & the city officials. 2. Retention of our sign at the location (which was installed I I years ago due to the technical reasons of than city officials and the previous owner.) is important to prevent guests missing the entrance to Campbell Inn, than taking two U-Turns which increases the risk of injury at two different locations one around the entrance to Pruneyard Parking Lot. Please let me know you thoughts' Sincerely Yours. -� Drew Baker, General Manager\ ,4.11,t744U%1 nw T HP RU N EYA0412D June 11,1996 tvILIIAM WILSON & ANNoCIATES Mr. Jonathon Lee Coordinating Engineer Vlest Valley Sanitation District 100 East Sunnyoaks Avenue Campbell, CA 95008 Dear Mr. Lee: .cLtlVED -,11 err �-.�NYtltll Pt', NNING DEPT As we discussed on the phone last week, following is the area occupied by restaurants at the PruneYard before and (anticipated) after renovation: t 12 C.nb.M ca1N. Romp Cu 1 M 11. GWV J RM.u.r. 2.T00 :1! aloes. Gn 1.M6 ;tq &nnwn'. 2.02 190 GuOo'. P...n R.U.—t 4100 210 go' 2'AN MW so TM Gr.e 7•ss. s7o7237S El a— 11M 730 T{- Tarn 2.0F7 7]5 Up" Crw.CN. 2.Ya7 7sG27so Th. T41.o. 14.6M 2400 ter... low 2500 Kyoto P*— 7,520 TOTAL /REa MOVATON aOUARE FO`TFAM 74,271 POMJN..r.ao. 112 � ROMIna 1 114 ThinCORM N— T. N.r + 12W10U 119 8rnr.o'. 2.Op ,90 OuOd, va..n R.M.—A 6.100 250 Fa.. Z0110 ps Nw Tarr 2,000 410 Le a.l..nrn 4.M 7702s75 aawo 71•m Soo Nn. T...1. 6.700 740 Root soRR. alwery 4200 240D YRFR'. 0"—d) 3.370 2500 K7.b PRla lnalWl 11.020 P..7 OUNIK* sb.Nm,R. 6.400 TOTAL P01174IENOVATKM/ EOUAM F(`OTAOE: Kilo Yours truly, tihrtstophcr Meany cc: Steve Pidsecki, Community Development Director, City of Campbell Darryl Jones, Senior Planner, City of Campbell Carl Hays, Outback Steakhouse WILLIAM WILSON 8 ASSOC ID:408-371-3831 JUN O5•96 9:37 No.003 P.02 P K U N C. Y A 1z D li. %''II IIAhi WII%ON h ANSO( I A I I June 3, 1996 Mr. Jonathon Lee Coordinating Engineer West Valley Sanitation Distr,ct 100 East Sunnyoaks Avenue Campbell, CA 95009 Re: Sanitary Sewer at Outback Steakhouse PruneYard Shopping Center Dear Mr. Lee 1 have been advised that your department has made an initial determination that a new service foe of $51,500 is payable for the sanitary hook-up of the Outback Steakhouse restaurant at the PruneYard. Please be advised that.) new service fee is not appropriatt for this project. As stated in the attached letter from the PI•nning Department of the City of Campbell, the Outback Steakhouse parr is just one pan of the renovation of the PruneYard Shopping Center. The entire renovation has been reviewed and entitled as a single project; including the Outback Steakhouse pad, the project actually reduces the square footage of the shopping center. No fees tied to net new construction are appropriate for this project. You should also knc.v that prior to the commencement of the project, the PruneYard had as many as seventeen restaurants in operation (with sanitary sewer service) at one time. Our project reduces the number of restaurant services that wi;l exist, decreasing the sewer demand generated by this shopping center. We look forward to your earliest confirmation that our sanitary sewer connection will be permitted without a fee for new service. Yours truly, Christoph eany encl. cc: Steve Piasecki, Community Development Director, City of Campbell Darryl Jones, Senior Planner, City of Campbell Carl Hays, Outback Steakhouse 1 row Snult, Hn.^nm Arrrrur Surf,71m1 C61111110i CA 9SImrF 'I'rlryrinnrr I4061371-471mr 1 n . imde 1408I 371- lmil a 0* CA" ' �1 s. CITY of CAMPBELL Community Development Department Current Planning May 31, 19% Mr. Chris Meany Pruneyaid Associates, L.P. 1999 S. Bascom Avenue, S.ute 200 Campbell, CA 95008 Re: pruneyard Remodel Dear Chris: This 1':tter shall serve as clarification that the current construction at the pnu►eyard Shopping Center is considered a remodel project by the City of Campbell. This project includes two new outer buildings (to house the Bank of America and the outback Steakhouse): however, these new outer buildings replace interior shopping center space that is being demolished to make way for a roadway through the center of the project. The result of this remodel will be that the overall square footage of this project is being reduced. If you have any questions or require further information, please do not hesitate to contact me at (408) 8662140• Sincer y, vSte Pi 2 Community Development Director cc Darryl Jones, Senior Planner 7r. Nonh Fint Sweet mpbell. Glilorma 97008 1423 M �08.866 2140 aoe.379.:77] nN, 108866 :790 . G M) 29 '% 03:14pm 1 4w 244 45-0 s.a,1...�..d,... R.w,o•auu .o.ns note a o...u,�vwu pw,a Mu�Nwr M1MMRawc.+ pMG MR10w� DeM1on D I.RI MY2w-C- CTws,l D.�. N.M uuU.NOTYw RDl.,c OMa. uM -T 11..—. MM�ldtt 4cWD.O�MP w�weMw, win tMw.o Ths Pttwyad Caller Cam LICCARDO. ROSSL STURGES McNEIL A Mho"M310ML UW' nRFORATM 19WTw AMM— R= 200 Sa+IOU GIaVRM 9612&1493 A0511414670 FAX 14C612M.12 W By Asc male, its, GmpW Inn Sign P,2 2 O.R1w2R101fla t6W1273.8140 FAX MO1632-MJ2 Rou %(xww ado m ma that you adbrmed bw yestrdly that the Prulleysrd GIRT wu going to rala0ve On C=Vw Im alga that is an the Pnuayad try by the ell of this week. Tbs Mimaw and thf xopwty Wpm t0 me to ISM L16160ofAI to usuatllu felt sip whom it is. This would be a eaumwtt implied by the law ltom the use of your ptoparty by aM Ru do bwA& of the Caapbdl Im property during the time it wes owns! by a logic ownw, RTC and its predsowaor. Your 24 hour sa2tie to the Masraw bu not giver thin tine to be mote PAM but the YdioatioRa to me ae obvious. The Mm rws s$ do yw not now tb* Big% 9M this starts to Mt you know that t* do ant Comm to k, if them wu a dedication of the ground the sign is m you shadd have sskad the It o to join in it a ootlatmt to it. The Maaws In CmUialy willing to be considersa all acooaaaodat'11g, but Pnneyad must aaPeet tow► r*u- The PrumyW world be wise to Ia"with its attorney. a11d dw iaw he of dw rands to advice upon is tha creation of sanmwta bl knpbcam when two pacels have been awe owned by the sane owner. Very uuiy youo, ROB��J)ct— TMGES cc: Coy of Cumpbe0 • ��t 1 A yq CITY tx CAMPBELL c „Inll,l,l, n...h,l,ln.n1 April 3,1996 Joe Decredico, Architect ELS Architects 2040 Addison Street Berke'ey, CA 94704 RE: RETENTION OF EXISTING SITE PERIMETER TREES AT THE PRUNEYARD CENTER Dear Joe: The City has reviewed the inventory and survey of the existing trees on -site. and City Based on our review of the plans and survey, site inspections, be saved and integrated into Streetscape standards, the following trees should your final landscape plans for on- and off -site improvements: Tree • Name Size Location 22 Pinus Pines, Italian Stone 28" Bascom Ave. 6 mid -block driveway Pine 21 Pinus Pinta, Italian Stone 28" Bascom Ave. a mid -block driveway Pine 6" Campbell Avtnue between easterly & 133 Geijers parviflors, Australian Willow westerly driveway. 129 Geijers parvifiors, 12" Campbell Avenue between easterly do Austrialian Willow westerly driveway. 128 Geijers perviflora, 12" Campbell Avenue between easterly fi Australian Willow westerly driveway. Ctratonis Silique, 20" Campbell Avenue between westerly none driveway and Highway 17 Carob Tree 21" Campbell Avenue between westerly n ne Fraxinus Velutina 'RAC', Raywoud Ash driveway and Highway 17 none Froxinus Uhdei, Evergreen 20" Campbelldlet � Highway Ash 711 N-1h 1 I..I tilrcrl (iml,ha•II, 1 alllnrnla n51111M IA?± Ili �IIN XM11, ?I 14l „ 111Y M1,1, MiMI IIn, 40N Ron 1700 Pruneyard center Trees - Joe Decredico Page 2 If you have any questions regarding our analysis of the street trees and would like to discuss this further, please feel free to give me a call at (408) %6-2140. Sincere) , D Senior Planner cc:Cluis Meany, Project Director Administrative File 0p CA4, ti wA u r � C MEMQRANDT IM cr r of cti�Fl amp w woars ovAanAt�vr TO: Frank Cauthorn DATE: March 28. 1996 Building Official FROM: Harold Housl,;W Land Development Er-gireer SUBJECT: 1875 S. Bascom - Pruneyard/Outback Steakhouse I want to confirm my previous verbal request that the street right-of-way property lire be de0amioed by a field survey on the north side of Campbell Avenue adjacent to the proposed Outback Steakhouse location. Tie purpose of thi, is to verify that the resaurant is not encroaching into the public right-of-way. Please let me know the statue. CC: 4ffMVW' Michelie Qum ey of cAV .0 r CITY OF CAMPBELL P"k WoAs Depwtamat March 26, 1996 Mr. Christopher Meany Retail Project Director The Pruneyard William Wilson & Associates 1999 S. Bascom Avenue, Suite 200 Campbell, CA 95008 SUBJECT: S 94-08/UP 94-19 THE PRUNEYARD PUBLIC WORKS CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL Dear Mr. Meany 1 would litre to take this opportunity to provide you with an updated list of conditions that must be satisfied prior to release of Public Works clearance for future building permits for the Pruneyard site and for issuance of the encroachment permit for the required public improvements. This serves as an update to our previous letter dated February 29, 1996. ITEMS THAT MUST BE COMPLETED PRIOR TO ISSUANCE OF PUBLIC WORKS CLEARANCE FOR FURTHER BUILDING PERMITS: GRADING PLANS/HYDROLOGY ST►_tDIES- We returned to BKF today our comments on the grading plan for the proposed new retail street a. With the few minor revisions requested. this plan is scceptabk to Public Works and werea will release the grading permit for this area when the signed plans have been submitted and the items listed below have been completed. The fuel overall hydrology and hydraulics study and calculations have also been provided to us for review. We anticipate that all of our questions have been addressed and that no further information is required. 2EDICATION: We have received Grant Deeds for the dedication required along Bascom Avenue and for the Drain in Easement along the westerly Pruneyard border from BKF. A Gram Deed for the additional dedication requited along Campbell Avenue is being prepared by BKF. As soon as we have all of the Gram Deeds from BKF, we yvill review and return them to BKF for any revisions and for execution by Pruneyard Associates. Am I correct to assume that you would prefer to accomplish this dedication by these separate Grant Deeds than by executing the "Letter Agreement" and showing the dedication on the future parcel reap as we had been discussing? 10 N... V. s. Gmpbdl, fi0lomu 95008 1423 m e0B.6r6. 1190 ,�t,u a. 1`t79-19771 n0 TfOa.ff6.7»0 tch 26, 1996 ChiMopha Meany Page 2 ENCRO a PERMIT FF� SECtrttrl,i:t AND DEP4S�: The following permit fees, seen I-, and deposnu must be pOS� FIR 95-278 Security for faithful performance 5110,000 (100% of engineer's estimate) S 4,4J00 • Coition Cash Deposit (4% of engineer 's estimate) Surety for faithful performance $511,000 (100% of engineer's estimate) $ 10,000 • Construction cash deposit (4% of engineer's estimate - S10,0W maz) • Plan check and impection deposit $ 34,715 (Based on fees listed in permit application) • Worker's compensation information sheets will also be requ red from the applicant. XMD PRIOR TO ISSUANCE BEN( OACHMENi PERMIT FOR WTHAT MUST BE ORK OF AN RK IN THE PUBLIC RIGHT OF WAY: • Three sets of approved signed plats for work within the public right of way. (Plan review comments were returned to BKF today, Mach 26, 1996.) • Worker's compensation information sheets received from Contractor • Certificates of Insurance from the Contractor • Comply with terms of Cost Sharing Agreement for EP 095-278 I bope thin his clarified ana updated the status of the conditions that must be satisfied prior to Public Voris electing clen:rance to the Building Division for fumm building Permits and for the issmce if Oe encroachment permit for the public improvements. Please let me know if you have acv gxstiorns. sincerely, Micbelle Quinn" City Engineer a; Martin Parilned, Brie`, Kane . Fan, 9SI Ridder -Park Dr., Ste. 100. Sm . 95131-2305 11SOM1i i�diq oftial Pik IP M-223 Pik FP M-M Pik UP 94-09/94-19 1:\MQ\FRYD04 STREET IMPROVEMENT PLANS FOR PRUNEYARD SHOPPING CENTER ENCROACHMENT PERMIT #95-223 - 1875 S. BASCOM PLAN REVIEW COMMENTS MARCH 25, 19% Previouslv we requested that the "approved landscaped plan" be developed and incorporated into these encroachment permit packages before the next submittal. To date a landscaping plan has not been provided to our Community Development Department for review. Your current plan shows removal of virtually all trees, which is a concept that has not been presented, reviewed, or approved. Since an approved landscaping plan does not exist at this time, the Community Development Department has agreed to allow the street trees to be placed on Campbell Avenue spaced at intervals of 30' on center. The Community Development Department will then take the street tree layout into consideration when reviewing a proposed landscaping plan fo: the entire site. Landscaping sheets show street lights in or extremely close to tree wells which is unacceptable. The purpose of having the cavil and landscaping plans combined is to avoid these type of conflicts. The Campbell Avenue street trees should be located (with 30' spacing) to provide the best spacing between street trees and street lights as possible. Please revise the street tree layout to avoid conflicts with the proposed location of street lights and other facilities, and incorporate these adjustments to the other plan sheets. Remove the tree and tree well at approximate location 10+00 to provide signal visibility. We found two small "typical" cross sections for Campbell and Bascom Avenues on Sheet 4 of these plans. These cross sections are very hard to see. Please revise them so they are clearly visible. The reason for requesting cross sections for Bascom and Campbell was to determine how the grades of the proposed public improvements will conform to the existing or proposed grades on the adjacent private property. Since only one 'typical" cross section has been provided, we are still concerned about the following: Conforms of the p[otwsed public improvements with the adjacent private i�lprovemenr<. It looks like there may he differences in existing versus proposed grades of up to I' or more in some locations at the back of the new walk. Have the on -site improvements been designed to meet the new back of walk grades., If there are trees to be saved at the back of the new walk, the change in existing elevation may not be possible. How the grades and drainage will work at the 11LQpmd new driveway locations. Please provide this information as described below in item 85. Plan Review Comments March 25. 19% Page 2 5. Infotmation regarding how the on -site drainage works with the alley -way approaches has not been provided. We assume that the back of the driveway apron is a high point and that all on -site drainage flows to drains on -site and not out the driveway aprons. On -site drainage is not permitted to flow in the driveway approaches. Please confirm and coordinate this with the on -site plans and show the high points/grade breaks on these plans. 6. No detail has been provided for the bus shelter foundations or the pcc bus pads. We are enclosing specifications from the Santa Clara County Transit District for you to incorporate into these plans. Please note the location of the bus shelters in relationship to the bus pads, and the required clean space in front of the shelters. Revise your plans to incorporate these standards. 7. Please use a radius when connecting rectangular shapes of pcc improvements in the sidewalk areas. Avoid right angle construction in concrete improvements. 8. A phasing plan for closure of the driveways along Bascom and Campbell is still needed for review. Some guidelines such as driveways A, B and C shall riot be removed until driveway D is open to traffic.... etc. are needed. These guidelines can be shown as notes on the demolition plans and civil plans. 9. Existing and proposed street light conduits and property lines look the same. Please use a bolder line type for the proposed conduits and property lines so that existing versus proposed is easily distinguished. 10 Remove note 9 from all sheets. Tree grates will not be required. 11. Note 10B - please remove the word "new". Pull boxes are to be installed at the base of all streetlights - new or existing. Note IOC - please add "at 200 ft intervals" to the end of this note. 12. Please show all pullboxes for the street lights and signal interconnec,. 13. Use the existing centerline bearings from the recorded Record of Survey for Bascom and Campbell Avenues. 14. We are concerned that you have not shown all existing utilities and that there may be potential conflicts between proposed improvements (new street light foundations) and existing utilities (gas lines, sewer lines, etc.). Please confirm that all utilities are shown (i.e. gas line under sidewalk in Bascom Avenue?). Plan Review Comments March 25. 1996 Page 3 15. Please change all references to "redwood bark mulch" to "redwood chips". 16. Where can we find the general note that safe pedestrian and handicap access to and from all bus stops, and around the site must be maintained during construction and demolition? The General Comments will affect more than one single sheet or drawing. Please make sure changes requested are completed on all applicable sheets. SHEET II 1. Change Title Block to show correct address 1875 S. Bascom not 875. 2. Add SI (signal interconnect conduit) and SL (street lighting conduit) to legend. SHEET 2 1. Pi add a catch basin at approximately station 11+13.13 to collect runoff prior to running across driveway. 2. Show the location of the new signal controller cabinet and pullboxes to be installed with Encroachment Permit #95-278. Show the installation of a 2" PVC signal interconnect conduit (with pull rope) from station 13+28 (Hwy 17) to new signal interconnect pullbox at the new controller cabinet at Union to be installed with this permit. The pullbox at station 13+28 shall intercept the existing street light conduit in the sidewalk ar^_a. 3. Remove the note regarding continuation of signal interconnect see EP #95-278. The interconnect shall be installed with this set of plans between Hwy 17 and Bascom. 4. Sidewalk must be on public property. Plans show a portion of sidewalk on private property. If additional right-of-way is to be granted to the City in this area, then show the proposed property line location. If additional right-of-way is not to be granted, then provide us cross sections (right-of-way to right-of-way) of Campbell Avenue for this location. 5. We would prefer the face of curb, back of wale, anal property line to be parallel to the centerline. Why were they designed skewed? We'd prefer a consistent 49' from centerline to back of walk/property line along the stretch of Campbell Avenue between Union and Hwy IT 6. Show the existing dimension from centerline to the south face of curb between Union Avenue and Hwy 17. Plan Review Comments March 25, 1996 Page 4 7. What is the clean out in thr: sidewalk area at station 13+02 for? Please show this and all existing utilities in this area. All existing utilities in this area must be shown to be relocated to private property at back of walk. We believe there art ore existing utilities that are not shown such as water meters and irrigation systems? 8. Please show how improvements on the adjacent Caltrans and Pruneyard right-of-way tie in to these proposed improvements. 9. No reference has been made to obtaining a Caltrars encroachment permit. Have you determined one is not needed? 10. Show the location of the new building (Outback Steakhouse). Show finished floor elevations at the building corners and show how these elevations conform to the proposed back of walk elevations adjacent to the building. 11. Add note that the detail for the handicap ramps in the alleyway approaches will be provided by the City. SHEET 4 AC PAVEMENT REMOVAL & RESTORATION AT NEW PCC IMPROVEMENTS Detail needs to specify the dimensions of the replacement ac/ab section. Please recommend a proposed section. -Revise aggregate base section under the curb and gutter to be 6" class 2 aggregate base per City standards. -Indicate 95% relative compaction for asphalt concrete sections. Show the location of the new building (Bank of America) on the corner of Bascom and Campbell. Show the finished floor elevations and the conform slope between the building elevations and the adjacent proposed back of walk elevations. 3. TYPICAL SECTIONS -Provide note showing the demolition (clearing and grubbing) to the proposed property line. Plan Review Comments March 25. 1996 Page 5 -We believe that Campbell Avenue is 35' from centerline to the south face of curb between Bascom and Union and that this dimension is 32' between c lion and Hwy 17. Please confirm and show these differing dimensions in the plan views and in the cross section. -Show where sawcut lines fall in cross sections lie. 29' from centerline - varies). 4. Clean up partial notes on plan view "existing pedes..." etc. 5. All utilities shown? Gas line on Bascom'? SHEET 5 1. Install pcc bus pad at the relocated bus stop location. 2. Revise and replace all notes "Existing Street Light to Remain" with "Remove and replace existing electroliers with City supplied ciectroliers" on Bascom Avenue. (Sheet 6 also) 3. Show new street lighting conduit to be placed under sidewalk for Bascom frontage. Add note to intercept existing conduit into each street lighting foundation and install pullbox. Install pullbox and pad at base of each .treet light per CSJ detail E-I1. 4. We believe the existing signal interconnect conduit between Campbell Avenue and the northern Pruneyard driveway is on the east side of Bascom Avenue. Your plans show this on the west side. Please confirm the location and revise plans if necessary. 5. All Pruneyard signage must be on private property. We believe the proposed improvements will result in the need to relocate the existing pedestal sign at the corner of Bascom and Campbell. Please confirm this and change the note as required. 6. Add note to replace striping (Detail 39A or 39) as necessary on Bascom Avenue. (Sheet 6 also) SHEET 6 I. All private signage must be removed from the public right-of-way. We believe the sign on the southwest corner of the northern driveway must be relocated. Please confirm and show the relocation of this sign to private property as required. 2. Show new street lighting conduit to be placed under sidewalk for Bascom frontage. Add note to intercept existing conduit into each street lighting foundation and install pullbox. Install pullbox and pad at base of each street light per CS) detail E-I1. Plan Review Comments March 25, 1996 Page 6 3. See comments M2 and k6 for Sheet 5. DEMOLITION PLANS - SHEETS 7 & 8: I. All removed signs to be returned to City of Campbell Service Center. 2. Add bold note to —otect the existing street lighting conduits during demolition. Street lighting must rema.•, operable every evening. -Existing street light conduit on Bascom Avenue shall not be removed or damaged until the new conduit, conductors. and pullboxes are in place and until existing conductors have been spliced to the existing conductors in the new pullboxes. -Existing street lighting on Campbell Avenue shall rat be removed or damaged until new system has been installed and is operational. 3. Extend the limits of the demolition to the proposed property line. 4. Show the location of the new buildings. SHEET 9 - Please see attached plan sheet and I. Add "and shall be slurry seal removal area per City Standards" to note 2. 2. Show pavement fabric (Petromat, Pe(rotac, or approved equal) over joint between existing ac and new ac section in Detail A (typical both sides). Also call for sawcut to full depth of existing pavement section. Call out 95% relative compaction for asphalt and subgrade. 3. Signs shall be placed on street light poles whenever possible. Revise plan to reflect sign locations as provided on the attached sheet 9. 4. Provide dimension for pavement detail 39A (100' beyond curb returns prior to intersections). 5. BIKE LANE pavement markings should be per Caltrans Standard Plan Detail A24D with a Type 1 arrow per SP Detail A24A. Spacing between BIKE. LANE, and the arrow should be 16'. Revise the square footage for these markings w.. the table. 6. B!KE LANE pavement r.tarkings shall be painted and not thermoplastic. Please revise table. Plan Review Comments March 25, 19% Page 7 Where are the back flow preventors, quick coupling valves, and valve boxes to be located? IRRIGATION LEGEND: (Sheet 12) -Revise legend o ca'I for Toro 570 Pop -ups with check valves ® low head and Toro Tree Bubbi •rs (or approved equal). -Call out Hydrorain valves for remote control valves. -Call out Rain Master Commercial, MC+ with port for remote control for the wall mount controller. POP-UP SPRAY SPRINKLER RISER DETAIL: Replace 1/2" King Bros. flex riser with Marlex Swing hint and use PVC. Add the foliov ing to note 16: All cuts to roots shall be made cleanly with a sharp bladed instrument to prevent ripping of roots. 4. PLANTING; NOTES: (Sheet 15): Planting note 83 should refer to Redwook Bark Chips - not mulch. Add City Standard Detail 13 to this sheet. y: mq\pmneyt12 CITY of CAMPBELL March 8, 1996 public Workti Department Mr. Christopher Meany Retail Project Director The Pruneyard William Wilson & Associates 1999 S. Bascom Avenue, Suite 200 Campbell, CA 95008 SUBJECT: S 94-08/UP 94-19 THE PRUNEY.ARD - PUBLIC WORKS CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL Dear Mr. Meany: Per our telephone conversation on March i, 1996, the deposit for plan check and inspection fees associated with encroachment permit #95-223 (Campbell Avenue and Bascom Avenue public improvements) will be calculated based on he fees that were listed on the encroachment permit application that you signed on December 13, 1995. The total amount of the required deposit will be $34,715. All other fees and deposit; listed in my February 29, 1996 correspondence to you will be required as listed. Upon completion of the work and final accerance, you will be responsible for payment of the final jQW cost of the plan check and inspection services. I have attached a listing of the current hourly charge rates that will be used to determine the costs for these services. These charge rates wall be updated on July 1, 1996 and charges incurred after July 1, 1996 will be at the new rates, however I do not anticipar- any significant increases in the charge rates. Following completion of the work, we will provide you with an itemized accounting of the charges and will either refund any excess deposit or require additional fees if necessary. Please let me know if you have any questions. I can be reached at 408-866-2159. Siccemly, m"14f tlC_ d�[ Cr 7 hie, Michelle Quinney City Engineer tx' John Wilson, Webcor &olden, 2755 Canopus Dr.. Ste, 175. San Matto 94Q3 J.514 Martin Pariseeno, Brian, Kaops, Foulk, "I RW&r Park Dr., Son. 100, San lose 95131-2305 Joe DeCredieo, EIS, 2040 Addison St., &rkeley, CA 94704 101ag4 Tanta. sidw !1r•r File EP #95-223 File EP #"-228 Fk UP 94.00NC 19 70 Nmth Ftnt Streit (:•mplxll <'•I,lo.m• 91Mt. i 4' i 4na 86M1 7111) rr'�t' , i'.7]. #inn 40A 86n 2790 4W-37"95u For services rendered from time LIIocBgts+ of mobilization u til tithe secured, irr9udiug salary, benefits and overhead. Bwd� Hoots Baarly Rao Homiy ' Position Administrative Aide 32.21 45.56 Assistant Engineer 41.90 59.73 Associate Civil Engineer 45.92 65.14 City Engineer 54.43 -.69 77.53 29.98 Cie, it Typist Engineering Technician 11 40.96 58.36 Equipment Maintenance Supervisor 39.61 54.94 Maintenance Lead Worker 33.13 25.33 46.77 35.38 Maintenance Worker 1 30.49 42.91 Mainterance Worker Il 34.64 49A4 Mechanic 11 Park Maintenance Lad Worker 33.13 46.77 Park Maintenance Supervisor 40•08 27.96 56'09 39.22 park Maintenance Worker 1 30.49 42.91 park Maintenance Worker 11 25.11 35.39 principal Clerk 37.13 32.76 Public Works Inspector Senior Clerk Typist 25.40 38.79 35.62 55.12 Senior Lighting dt Traffic Technician 36.16 51.28 Signal Lighting Technician 38.67 54.88 Street Maintenance Supervisor 32.10 45.27 Sweeper Operator Traffic Engineer 49.19 68.43 `Three Hour Minimum for Overtime Call •s t r' A'yI. CITY OF CAMPBELL Public Wuhs Department February 29, 19% Mr. Christopher Meany Retail Project Director The Pruneyard William Wilson 8t Associates 1999 S. Bascom Avenue, Suite 200 Campbell, CA 95008 SUBJECT: S 94-08/UP 94-19 THE PRUNEYARD - PUBLIC WORKS CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL Dear Mr. Meany: It is our understanding that construction at the Pruneyard is progressing and that you will soon be requesting Public Works clearance for the release of the grading permit for the new retail street area (previously referred to as Phase I1I) and the demolition and building permits to accomplish the remodel of this area. 1 would like to provide you with a list of the outstanding items that will need to be completed prior to Public Works releasing the clearance for these demolition and building permits. These are the items that are still outstanding from the previous list provided to you on December 8, 1995. RLIM1132:•uu 5 Encroachment permit applications have been submitted for the required public improvements. Encroachment permit #95-278 will cover the work included in the cost sharing agreement for the work at the intersections of Campbell/Union and Bascom/North Pruneyard Driveway. Encroachment permit #95-223 will cover the street frontage improvements on Campbell Avenue and Bascom Avenue. Permit fees that will be due prior to release of the clearance to the Building Division are as follows: EP 95-278 • Security for faithful performance $110,000 (100% of engineer's estimate) • Construction Cash Deposit 4,400 (4% of engineer's estimate) '0 N—h l'Iru 11rcc1 / -a mphell, l'a11111rn1a 9SIN14 I�23 i 408 866 715(` 408 379 2571 till, 408 866 2740 INLW PNN, f.t\ Christopher Meany February 29, :996 Page 2 EP 95-273 • Surety for faithful performance $511,000 (100% of engineer's estimate) • Construction cash deposit 20,440 (4% of engineer's estimate) • Plan check and inspection fee 76,650 (Actual cost - 15% deposit) Worker's compensation information sheets will also be required from the applicant. Permit conditions that must be satisfied before an encroachment permit will be issued and work can begin in the public right of way are as follows: • Three sets of approved signed plans for work within the public right of way. (Plan review comments were returned to BKF on February 20. ) • Worker's compensation information sheets received from Contractor • Certificates of insurance acceptable to City • Comply with terns of Cost Sharing Agreement for EP #95-278 5K. We will be returning to you today our comments on the grading plan for the proposed new retail street area. This plan needs to be revised and resubmitted to us before the Public Works will release the grading permit for this area. The final overall hydrology and hydraulics study and calculations have not yet been provided to us for review. We have conducted individual reviews on a site by site basis per your request, but will need to see the overall hydrology and hydraulics calculations as previously requested before releasing clearapce for the demolition and building permits for any future construction. 5K-3 and 7. As we discussed previously, the parcel map is most likely not going to be filed at this time. Therefore, condition of approval number 5K-3 (Storm Drainage Easement) and condition of approval number I (Dedication to City) will need to be done either by a separate instrument that will need to be prepared by the applicant, reviewed and accepted by the City, and recorde, or by execution of the attached "letter agreement." Whichever arrangement you prefer would be acceptable to the City, but will need to i Christopher Meany j February 29, 1996 Page 3 be completed prior to Public Works issuing clearance for the demolition or building permits for future work. 1 hope this has clarified arid updated the status of the conditions that must be satisfied prior to Public Works releasing clearance to the Building Division for the demolition and building permits for Phase III. Please let me know if you have any questions. Sincerely, �1, J I,.CI�, C�' ��iC•lCitr• j� Michelle Quinney f City Engineer CC. John Wilson. Webcor Builders, 2755 Campus Dr.. Ste. 175, San Mateo 94403-2514 Martin Parissenti. Brian, Kagw, Foulk, 981 Riddder Park Dr.. Ste. 100. San lone 95131-2305 Joe DeCredco, EIS, 2040 Addison St., Berkeley, CA 94704 Dana lama, ara- Planar Frank Cauthorn. Building Official File EP #95-223 File EP #95-228 File UP 94-08/94-19 J:%MQWRYD02 LETTER AGREEMENT BETWEEN THE CITY OF CAMPBELL AND PRUNEYARD ASSOCIATES FOR FUTURE DEDICATION OF EASEMENTS AT 1875 S. BASCOM AVENUE The following easements and dedication will he included on the parcel map for the 1875 S. Bascom Avenue: -Dedication of additional right-of-way along Bascom Avenue to the new back of walk. (See condition 87 of Resolution No. 8776). -Dedication of storm drain easement along westerly boundary of Pruneyard (Condition 5K-3 of Resolution No. 8776). -Dedication of signal maintenance easements for maintenance of traffic signal egbipment at the Campbell Avenue/Union Avenue intersection and at the Bascom Avenue/North Pruneyard driveway intersection. The parcel map including these easements will be filed within 6 months from the date of this letter agreement. If the map is not filed within 6 months of this agreement, separate documents providing the required dedications and easements will be prepared by PRUNEYARD ASSOCIATES for the City's review and recording. AGREED TO THIS _ DAY OF PRUNEYARD ASSOCIATES By: CITY OF CAMPBELL, a municipal corporation of the State of California By: Public Works Direcror CITY tit CAMPBELL PuhL, Vi„r A, Ih•panmcnl February 20, 1996 Martin Parissenti, P.E Brian Kangas Foulk 981 Ridder Park Drive, Suite 100 San Jose, CA 95131-2305 Dear Marry: We have completed our initial review of the plans for the Bascom Avenue and Campbell Avenue public improvements as submitted on December 15. 1995 for Encroachment Permit #95-223. There is a substantial amount of information that is still needed to complete a comprehensive review of these plans. The major items that are missing are outlined on the attached. Please address the issues presented and resubmit the plans for a subsequent review. We have also completed ou: initial review of the plans for the Bascom and Ur ion intersection improvements as submitted on November 20, 1995, for Encroachment Permit #95-278. Our comments for these improvements ar marked on the plan set which we will g.ve to you today. Please return this comment set with subsequent submittals for our review. Please be advised that it is our intention to complete subsequent plan reviews within ten working days from the date of submittal. In order to expedite our review, it is imperative that all review comments be addressed in future submittals, and that NO plan sLs be submitted together. If )ou have any questions at any time regarding our comments, please give Harold Housley a call at 866-2158. Sincerely, Michelle Quinney. P.E. City Engineer Attachments: Plan Review Comments Pavement Removal/Restoration at New PCC Improvements Street Lighting Plans Bascom/Campbell Cc: Mr. Chris Meany, Pruneyard Associates (w/comments) Prnneyard Asr—, L.P., 1999 S. 11mom Ave., Suite 200, Campbell 95008 File EP 95-223 File EP 95-278 ilinaWayLlin— ---- 711 N.-h 1-.- --00 i., i19 r7" ?S]� iiii, .119 9�h ?7011 Nrw PW FAX # 40s-37 6.09ss STREET IMPROVEMENT PLANS FOR PRUNEVARD SHOPPING CENTER ENCROACHMENT PERMIT 095-233 PLAN REVIEW CONINiENTS FEBRUARY 20, 1996 GENERAL CO`-1MENTS; I. Provide a complete set of plans. We have sheets 1-9 of 15. 2. The on -site landscaping and tree protection plans, as required in the conditions of approval for S 94-08/UP 94-19. need to be developed, approved and incorporated into these improvement plans. Please incorporate the appropriate portions of these approved plans in both the demolition and civil sheets before the next plan review submittal. 3 The Bascom Avenue plans are substantially deficient. Please provide stationing for Bascom Avenue, the profile for Bascom Avenue, show stationing and offset for all existing and proposed improve* -gents, and address the additional concems outlined below. 4. Provide cross sections for the entire width of Campbell Avenue (property line to new Pruneyard property line plus 5 feet beyonl) at all of the following locations: the beginning and ends of the project at each 100' station: at all BCs, ECs, BCRs, ECRs, PRC's: angle points: at new and existing drivewa,, cer-hres, and any changes in street width. Provide cross sections for Bascom Avenue si,owi..g centerline to 5 feet beyond the new Pmneyard property line at ail of fixations mentioned above. Cross sections must show all existing and proposed improvements and how conform to adjacent property will be handled. 5. In plan views, plot and label all centerlines and monument lines and distinguish between the nro. Show dimensions from centerlines to existing and oroposed face of curb and back of walk at beginning a,,.l end of project, at all angle points. at 411 BCs and ECs. For Cat .aiWl Avenue. our records indicated the distance from centerline to face of curb on the north side is 45' and the distance to the property line is 47'. These plans dimension differently. Please investigate and explain the difference. Show all utilities clearly and label clearly per legend. We are not able to determine which line represents which utility. 6 In profile views, please show all BCs, ECs, GBs, HPs, LPs, PRCs, etc. Show TC elevation at these locations and provide stations and offsets. Show Flow lines through proposrl driveways. Show all utilities clearly. When showing storm lines, please station all manholes with offsets and provide all invert information. BKF to verify all TC elevations at all conform points. This cannot be left to Contractor to verify. g. Show existing versus proposed signing and striping. This will require an additional plan sheet(s) and include the following: 9. 10. li 12 13 l . traffic sign Ioxations shall be in front of tree wells, not behind tree wells 2. show bus stop sign locations 3. show "no stopping" sign locations 4. show bike lane stripes and sign Iocations 5. show all existing signs/posts to x removed; relocated 6. provide 130- LT bay storage and 60' turn transition for the WB approach at Campbell/Union. Show distance on plan 7. show two -way -left -turn arrow markings g. show spacing of arrows 9. indicate detail # of all pavement stripes and dimension at all angle points t0 show dime'sions on all beginiend ser.ions of street widths 11. salvage the removed signs to the Cit. s Servv�e Center 12. show existing and proposed whcrlchair ramps relative to crosswalks 13. show pavement stripes/markings indicating striping to be paint and all legends and markings to be thermoplastic Please use the City of Campbell Standards for driveway approaches. It is not clear what you are proposing for new driveways It is not clear how the on -site drives wo,k (drainage, grades. improvements, etc) with the new driveway approaches. If alleyway approaches are to be used. please use City standard The type of handicap ramp and the curb radius will need to be reviewed further if the alleyway approach is to be used. Please call out centerline station and offset tar all driveways and include the widtn of proposed driveways. Confirm that loop detectors at the Bascom/Campbell intersection will not be affected by the new striping or improvements Show fixations of home runs (if any) and handhole at lip of gutter and add note for Contractor to protect. Please provide a detail for the bus shelter relocations. Detail the foundations needed. method of connection pcc/pavement, fixation of shel-er in relationship to the walk, etc. Show dispcsition of bus shelter on demo plans 0 e., remove, salvage,elo it e, show Provide station and offset for new location. On Bascom Veiwe, provide how sidewalk/handicap access to the bus will be accomplished through landscaped area. Provide a detail for the concrete bus pad(s) including rebar, depth of pad, joint filler material between pcc anti ac, etc. Dimension these pads (length and width) and provide stationing and offset for them on the plans The County standard bus pad can be used for this. Provide a detail for the pavement removal and replacement. The pavement rer.:oval area is to be a minimum 4' wide and include the pavement key to the existing asphalt roadway. We have attached a detail for your use. 14. Provide a construction phasing plan showing the sequence of the demolition and closure of all driveways. Include this in the plan set. 15. Add general note that safe pedestrian and handicap acc^ss to and from all bus stops must be maintained during construction and demolition. (Safe pedestrian access must he provided around/through site at all times.) 16. Add "Permi. 95-223" outside of the border on all pages -below the Campbell tree. 17. Tree wells and tree grates for Campbell Avenue shall be 48" x 48" cast iron. Type 1, Neenah Foundry, Model No R-8708, or approved equal. Details for the installation of these tree grates should be incl•:ded in the plan set. STREET LIGHTING AND SIGNAL INTERCONNECT GENERAL COMMENTS Where are you proposing to have the signal interconnect conduit (SIC) and the new street lighting conduit installed? The signal interconnect conduit (SIC) and street lighting conduit may be installed beneath the asphalt pavement just beyond the lip of the new gutter or below the proposed sidewalk on Campbell Avenue and/or in the landscape strip on Bascom Avenue. The City has a standard detail for installation in each of these cases. Please make reference to this detail in the plans Plans currently show the SIC aed street light conduit running under the proposed tree wells which is not acceptable. Please revise the plan note pointing to this conduit to read "2" PVC Signal Interconnect Conduit and 1 1/2" PVC Street Lighting Conduit". We are providing you with a set of the existing street lighting system on Bascom Avenue and Campbell Avenue. Please review these plans when designing the new system. The existing street lighting system will need to remain operational until the new system is installed and operational. This should be reflected in the demolition sheets and will require two phases for demolition. Bascd on the existing street light system plans provided, please show the existing PG&E service point for the street light system and include the installation of a No. 5 pullbox as needed to intercept and maintain the existing service until the new system is installed. Show No. 3 1/2 pullbo•.es at the base of each new street light. Show No. 5 boxes for SIC. Ad street lighting conductors shall be #6 THW stranded. All PVC conduits shall contain a hare stranded #8 copper grounding conductor. SIC shall be A & 1 Electric #206-PRIS or approved equal. Include the following in the notes: "Upon operation of new wcet lighting system, the existing system shall be removed and disposed of by the mtractor. Existing street light foundations shall be abandoned 24" below finished grade." -3- HEET COMMENT 1 I . Include all abbreviations used in plans in "Abbreviations" ind:.x, such as LT., RT.. GB.. HP., AP, Pl. etc. 2. Remove Dispositicn legend since it is not used consistently in these plans. 3. Change General Approval Note signature block as follows: Michelle M. Quinney, P.E. City Engineer City of Campbell RCE 844144 Exp. 6-30-97 4. Change Title Block to read. "STREET IMPROVEMENT PLANS FOR PRUNEYARD SHOPPING CENTER - 1875 S. BASCOM AVENUE. ENCROACHMENT PERMIT 95-233 (CROSS REFERENCE EP #95-278). 5. The last item of the Legend is the crosshatched pavement removal area. This will not be an 8" deep hit. Please see detail provided and change legend to read "Pavement Removal and Replacement". 2 1. Please show all existing improvements (driveway, gate, fencing, retaining walls, sewer cleanouts, irrigation systems, water meters, signs, etc.) and property/right-of-way fines at the westerly end of the work on Campbell Avenue. Show how your proposed work will tie into these existing improvements. It appears you are showing work on (or tieing into) the Caltrans right-of-way. Please coordinate this work with Caltrans to obtain any permits needed for this work. Neglecting to work with Caltrans at this location could cause delays at a future date. 2. We suggest putting notes on Sheet 2 only, or repeating all notes on all pages. Do not renumber notes from page to page. 3. Note 1 - revise to read "Remove and replace pavement per detail (Provide detail) 4. Note 2 - revise to read "Construct City Standard A2 Curb and Gutter". 5. Note 3 - is this manhole necessary? We cannot determine what it is for. 6. Note 4 - ramp detail appears to be incorrect. Ramp detail will depend or, what type of driveway you are proposing. -4- SHEET COMMENT 7 Please explain notes 5 and 6. Sidewalk on Campbell Avenue is to he Commercial sidewalk pet City standards with tree wells and tree grates 30' o.c. 8. Note 7 - revise to read "Construct City Standard Drainage Inlet". 9. Note 8 - Please revise as necessary per general comments on street lighting and signal interconnect. 10 Please explain why there is such a large difference between the existing and proposed flow lines in the vicinity of stations 10+80 and 11 +80. 11. Top of curb slope = 0.08`7 is not acceptable. Revise to a minimum of 20%. 12. It is not clear why there is a manhole being placed at station 10+ 80. Will this conflict with new structure? The storm aramage system in this location does not appear to accurately reflect tlx existing conditions. Please show this system clearly and completely in plan and profile views. If there are ou-site systems that tie into (or are planned to be tied into) the public system, please show those in detail. Complete/correct the profile for the storm drainage. We cannot determine where the storm facilities are from your plan. Station all manholes with offsets. Show all inverts, pipe sizes, slopes, etc. Basically, provide complete information on the storm system for review. Grade breaks within driveways are not acceptable 2 Add to note that drainage inlet at location 14 +-30 shall be removed along with the 12" RCP to the new drainage inlet. Do not abandon these in place. 1 Improvements at the comer of Bascom and Campbell Avenue ale unclear. Is the existing ramp to remain or is a new ramp being installed? Please complete plan and profile information m ensure that there will not be a conflict between existing utilities (including traffic datector home runs) and proposed improvement:, including pull boxes. I. What are the rectangles ..rat are located approximately 180' north of Campbell Avenue and 120' south of the northern driveway? -5- SHEET COMMENT 6 1. Provide complete detail of the southwest corner of the Pruneyard northerly drive/Bascom Avenue intersection. There are a number of existing facilities that will need to be relocated in this area with the new streetscape. Since these are not shown, we cannot review at this time. Show existing signs to be relocated. 7 1. Show demolition of median islands if necessary for striping modifications. 2. Remove all El's unless you plan to use the demolition schedule consistently. 3. Identify all facilities and their disposition in the demolition plans. For example, are bus shelters to be removed, salvaged, relocated? Foundations to be abandoned 24" below finished grade, etc. 4. Show all utility and storm lines clearly and add note that they are to be protected during construction. 5. Show curb and gutter removal at all driveways and provide detail for a.c. replacement at new pcL improvements (copy attached). 8 1. Use consistent demo legend. 2. Remove all ©'s unless you plan to use the demolition schedule consistently. 3. Identify all facilities and their disposition in the demolition plans. For example, are bus shelters to be removed, salvaged, relocated? Foundations to be abandoned 24" below finished grade, etc. 4. Show all utility and storm lines clearly and add note that they are to be protected during construction. 5. Show curb and gutter removal at all driveways and provide detail for a.c. replacement at new pcc improvements (copy attached). 6. No dimensions are given for removal areas. Please provide stationing and offsets for demo work 9 1. Incorporate information on this sheet into sheet 8. -6- Please address each of the comments above completely before resubmitting the plans for subsequent reviews. In order to expedite our subsequent review of these plans, it is imperative that all comments be addressed prwi to resubmittal. i towbnydp i -1 s W � w 0 = I L s a � � � U � ly V W �W 4 LL .—fJ lL ` S ` �\1 fLL11 W � .}�V`•n•. u LC I1 LL IJ S f � W 1 CITY of CAMPBELL Pubhr Works DeNltnxm February 13, 1996 John Wilson Webcor Builders 1875 South Bascom Avenue, Suite 2440 Campbell, CA 95008 Dear lobo: radio work will not involve Per our conversation this morning, I have issued Public Works clearance for release of e grading permit for the Outback Steakhouse. As we pbe�.4ven e). if it becomes necessary to any encroachment into the public right -of ' (Camp you will be required to encroach into the public right-of-way for any of the grading work, submit traffic control plans and ',blain an encroachment permit for the work. You, civil engineer, Martin Parissemi, is adding a note to the grading plans reflecting the above and is obtaining the signature of the soils engineer as required on the first page of the grading plans. He will deliver the final signed plans to u1. please let me know if we can be of any further assistance. Sincerely, Michelle Quirttey City Engineer CC Christopher Meant'. Pruneyard Martin Parissenti, BKF Randy Westfall, Public Works Inspector Frank Cauthom, Building Official Darryl )ooea, Senor planner File: 1875 South Bascom Avenue 1:\MQ\LD\1875BASC0M 1V6W PW FAX # 1. Nurth Fi-t Sucet Gmphell, CahlortnR 9700R.^�R' 7v 1771u Inn SOB R66.7 51 City Council ® Report Item No.: 4 Category: Consent Date: January 2, 19% TITLE: Approval of Cost Sharing Agreement with Pruneyard Associates for Construction of Traffic Signal and Intersection Modifications and Budget Adjustment (Resolution/Roll Call) RECOMMENDATION That the City Council adopt the attached resolution approving the cost sharing agreement with Pruneyard Associates for construction of traffic signal and intersection modifications at the Campbell Avenue/Union Avenue intersection and at the Bascom Avenue/North Pruneyard driveway intersection, and approving the attached budget adjustment. DISCUSSION On February 7. 1995, the City Council approved site and architectural and use permits for site modifications at the Pruneyard. The conditions of approval for these permits include the requirement that the applicant: :) complete plans for modifying the Bascom Avenue/Pruneyard North Driveway signalized intersection; and 2) design and construct signal and intcrsection modifications at the Union/Campbell Avenue/Pruneyard driveway intersection. The conditions of approval also limit to $25,000 the Pruneyard's costs for construction of the Campbell/Union signal modifications. ^^th construction costs in excess of $25.000 to be covered by the City through a cost sharing agreement. Staff has negotiated a Cost Sharing Agreement with the Pruneyard which includes construction of the Bascom Avenue/,:orth Pruneyard driveway improvements and the Union/Campbell improvements concurrent with the installation of public right-of-way improvements along both Bascom and Campbell Avenues. Coordinated design and construction of all public improvements by the applicant will resolve potential timing and construction coordination conflicts that might arise if the applicant and the City each have their own design engineer and contractor. Economies of scale should also be realized if all intersection modifications are constructed as part of the applicant's larger project. FISCAL IMPACT The preliminary estimate for construction of the signal and intersection modification work is as follows: Construction Estimate S 80,000 Construction Contingency S 8.000 City Furnished Materials S 30,000 Staff Engineering/Inspection S 12.000 TOTAL PROJECT $130,000 <Less Developer Contiibution> <S25.000> City Punds Required $105,000 1875 S. BASCOM AVE. S 94-08/UP 94-19 2 OF 2 CITY OF CAMPBELL PLAN. 08/2000 ._ t J) _View of new retail from South Bascom Avenue View of new retail from East Campbell Avenue E L S at LQUAN ARCHITECTS 2040 ADDGCN STREE i BERKELEY, CA 94704 PHONE 5KY549-2929 PRUNEYARD . SHQPPING CENTER BMMM&CA@WU CA.EM4 c4xcwm PERSPECTIVES joeNumK P1 DATE 12.1-94 1 L 14 1 II I I S I T E P L A N 1•- 16•-0. E L S ELBASANI & LOGAN ARCHITECTS 2040A0060NSnW mopa Sro rim PRUNEYARD SHOPPING CENTER lama a Cam" AMM too O A c F3 c+ A SITE PLAN & PERSPECTIVES JMWAI W 9429.00 ak"um WN 7-13-95 a 0 0 14 N O R T H E L E V A T I O N EAST_-LEV AT ION S O U T H E L E V A T I O N -V_EST ELEVATION E L S ELBASANI & LOGAN ARCHITECTS mmmm 2040 ADDOON STWEE i BEMMY. CA SW 04 PHOK 5OW2929 K PRUNEYA'RD 1-1 2)HOPPING �,.,IENTER W= d CMD L Aron CAPON" v a` 0 1 0 c ai m ELEVATIONS xe WAWA I 9429.00 ai. Nm ew an 7-13-95 Master Plan Areas: PRUNEYARD MASTER 1. Parking Area at Bank of America I I + PLAN g p 2. Parkin Lot Improvements at Barnes & Noble- ' - .� - - w� 3. Sidewalk Improvements at Hollywood Video :. _ -- - - p � � T � � � � °' � -- � _ - 'I � WILLIAM WILSON • I _ & ASSOCIATES 4. Improvements to Main Street Plazas - - -� �.. - - _ - -�' �—, ," � Y/ ��✓ ��—� I +'� San Mateo, _._.� I � I California 5. Planting Improvements at Identity Sign I� Developer rl �III,,L'I I� I � �i►�I�� r ��s� - j11 I-I� T KE1�1 KAY ASSOCIATES I _ ' �--• I I I /Urbu+Ai Nteetare . __________________________ IkS Susum Street - Studio 321 °y Sax Frueieco, CA 94111 � ,• � I I -I ''� I I I I q� 1 � 1 ,� ~ I � f� (US) 9S6-4S22 Fax Ap PZ 1 I_I i ACc a D LDING V. I l ..,. �� .. • Fr ELEV ,ae.e-1�_Y ]Ir' �� 1 /��1 \\\\\�j:��- sir.,:• • 11i r r.- �� I �,1�� \\\\\III �'R - -� � ,, '/ i Ljy ` � �► '� Jl+AEI � 6 Won i ♦ � ♦ • .� ��ta =�-�� Y l►'iiiir r ilk • �1I � ' - 2-19-98 1 Context Plan Via.. _ - -- ,o .. _ _ _ — — — _ _. _ — _ — — _ — — -_ — i i ♦ it i i i r ■ r �'. ��' _ �� ' - 0 15 w IN F.. Sheet Iof 3 • Legend of Typical Improvements: 1 1 PRUNEYARD I . New 6" Concrete Curb 2. 24" Box Evergreen Elm 7•• Trellis Post spacing to Match 3. New Planting Area / 1 ( Building Pilaster Spacing MASTER 24" Box 4. Existing Pal -King Sti- pine, / i',`1 oND1 N P PLAN 5. New Curve Alignment 6. Irrigation to New Planting Areas , " / 1 Existing Building Face 1 9' Existing Sidewalk 1 r "- r.P it WILLIAM WILSON & ASSOCIATES 2� i ; - - San Mateo, 1 1 I California 3 1831184 1163.7 Developer Plan ° 40E- KE\TKAY I 184) 1 ASSOCIATES � 1 Cdd Fil I I OPEN ® fffulri 1864 107.7 a I I I 185.2 1 I 185.1 1 1 0 185. 1 I i Bank of Arnet ica 185 185.4 n i C T i �185.6 106.6 186.6I I / I — / ]86.4 I RD 858 Cn0 �� 2 18• q• 15•• WC o J� 1971 .db.47 ---� 186.7 _— 18 L- 186.E O MH —s -- -- -- --- 187.5 — -- CAMPBELL AVE. Area I & 2 - Parking Lot Improvements 10 p F- 1 / Scale: l" = 20' Proposed Tree ?roposed Trellis: Painted Metal Posts and Members with Cable Vine Supports xisting Panting Lot Section Face of Building Existing Sign Existing Awning !ram � • ��:. \ Image c.. Proposed Improvements Existing Sidewalk Existing Building `j it-(u Scale: 1 /4" = F - 0" Area 3 - Sidewalk Improvements at Hollywood Video Scale: As Noted Landscappec Arcbitectere k Urban Deaija 1045 Sassome Street . Studio 321 San Francisco, CA 94111 (415) 9W4472 (415) 9W4522 Fax • • • neki x.me.. 9801 As Noted N. 2-19-98 Areas 1, 2, & 3 Sheet 2 of 3 t �I l Terra Nova l Removable Bollards Il Plan El Burro New/Relocated Light Standards Flag Poles 1* Image of Proposed Improvements Removable Bollards 0 i0 :0 :0 F- Existing Conditions C4s a 4 - Enhancements for Main Street Plazas oled 0 5 10 0 V- LiMalllls Jlr�ll Llaua. Image of Proposed Improvements 4 Area 5 - Planting for Identity Sign at Bascom Ave. As Noted W O U PRUNEYARD MASTER PLAN WILLIAM WILSON & ASSOCIATES San Mateo, California Developer KENKAY ASSOCIATES Landscappe Archltecture k Urban Dedss 1045 Sansone Street - Studio 321 Sea Francisco, CA 94111 (415) 956-4472 (415) 956-4522 Fax Pn}el Mumler le 980i As Noted 2-19-98 Areas 4 & 5 Sheet 3 of 3 0 -. 1875 S. BASCOM AVENUE S 94-08/UP 94-19 2 OF 7 CITY OF CAMPBE--L PLAN. 12/99 .. t Approval of Cost Sharing Agreement for Construction of Traffic Signal and Intersection Modifications: Page 2 January 2, 19% The approved conditions of approval limit the Pruneyard's share of the total project cost to S25,000. A budget ;djustment in the amount of $105,0Gd is needed to appropriate the additional funds required for this project. Funds are available from Unappropriated Gas Tax Fund Balarre for allocation to this project. ALTERINATIVES Do not approve the cost sharing agreement and budget adjustment. This is net recommended because the most economical and cooperative way to construct these improvements is at the same time and with the same contractor as the adjacent Pruneyard improvements. Prepared by Agting City Engineer ,1 t j Reviewed by IcQ FinancD ttao: Reviewed by ��/ Public Works Director Approved by: -lre v,- Attachments Re haven Agreement j: Mq\prydcr I RESOLUTION NO. A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF CAMPBELL APPROVING A COST SHARING AGREEMENT WITH PRUNEYARD ASSOCIATES, L.P. FOR THE CONSTRUCTION OF TRAFFIC SIGNAL AND INTERSECTION MODIFICATIONS - CAMPBELL AVENUE AT UNION AVENUE AND BASCOM AVENUE AT THE PRUNEYARD NORTHERN DRIVEWAY WHEREAS, on February 7, 1995 the City Council of the City of Campbell approved S 94-08 /UP 94-19 for site and use modifications to the Pruneyard; and WHEREAS, conditions placed on this approval require the applicant to design and construct street improvements along the Campbell Avenue and Bascom Avenue frontages of the Pruneyard, contribute $25,000 toward construction of signal and intersection modifications at the Campbell Avenue/Union Avenue intersection, and design signal modifications and intersection improvements at the Bascom Avenue/Northern Pruneyard driveway; and WHEREAS, the most economical and efficien mearus to construct the signal modifications and intersection improvements is to combine these improvements with the street improvements required by the City for S 94-08/UP 94-19, and WHEREAS, a cost sharing agreement and budget adjustment have been prepared for design and construction of these improvements; NOW, THEREFORE, BE 1T RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of Campbell, California, as follows: The City hereby approves the Cost Sharing Agreement with Pruneyard Associates, L.P., and budget adjustment in the amount of $105,000 for design and construction of traffic signal and intersection modifications - Campbell Avenue at union Avenue and Bascom Avenue Ft the Pruneyard Northern driveway. PASSED AND ADOPTED this 2nd day of January, 1996, by the following roll call vote: AYES Councilmembers: NOES: Councilmembers ABSENT: Councilmembers: APPROVED. ATTEST: ROBERT S. DOUGHERTY, MAYOR Anne Bybee, Ciq Clerk CiT"L S3?Q' -r- IiSS�D38T 7I'C?i� aE]1�P3LLT 1?Sa�VST1t4i.EN".Ci vrw�aaaa�'.� DEPARTMENT/PRCMU M DnimoN ma - i ■0. PUBLIC WORFS rt;GINEERIAG 1/2/96 SxjEw3 ET TItAME[W M To n$ 1XWMTJC,Zaa z FUND ACCOUNT NUN= MSCR33TIC!'3 AMOUNT 204 204.3799 UNAPPROPRIATED GAS TAX $ 105,000 TUNU tALANCE W40 SE =NC123A88D z FOND ACCOUNT NUN= tZtCIL=CIf AMOUNT •9621.7130 PROJECT OVERHEAD COST $ 12,000 .9621.7883 IMPROViNENTS OTHER THAN $ 93,000 _W BUILDING IAutoscope and Contro:.ler Cabinet) RGMMCNM for RaaQnaswt (so fpMairio)I Per City Council Resolution adopted 1/2/96 regarding Cost Sharing Agreeswnt between City of Campbell and Proneyard Associates for construction of signal and inter- section modificationc at Campbell Avenue/Union Avenue and Bascom Avenue at the northern Pruneyard driveway. 31QnB � tSpBB C171y: DEPARTMENT MW MIANCE DIRECPDR tA1Q®l REV 2/90 .-% AGREEMENT BETWEEN THE CITY OF CAMPBELL AN'D PRUNEYA—RD ASSOCIATES FOR THE CONSTRUCTION OF TRAFFIC SIGNAL AND INTERSECTION MODIFICATIONS - CAMF`BELI. AVENUE AT UNION AVENUE AND BASCOM AVENUE AT THE PRUNEYARD NORTHERN DRIVEWAY THIS AGREEMENT is made and entered into on the _ day of , 1996 by and between the City of Campbell, a muni:ipal cotporation of the State of California, hereinafter refcned to as "Campbell" and Pruiryard Associates hereinafter refereed to as 'Developer". RECITALS WHERE AS. Campbell plaits to comtruct traffic signal and intersection modifications to the imemectio s of Campbell Avenue at Union Avenue and Bascom Avenue at the northern P:uneyard driveway, including, modifications to the existing signal system, remov -1 of existing median islands, installation of new pavement, and removal and replacement of existing pavement markings, and traffic signal conduit and conductors within the public right-of-way (hereinafter referred to as "project"), during fiscal year 1995-95; and WHEREAS, Resolution No. 8776 of the City Council of Campbell on February 7, 1995 did approve S 94-08/UP :4-, , for site modifications and a use permit for the Dtveloper's proposed development at 1875 S Bascom .Avenue (Pntneyed), and WHEREAS, a cotditions of approval of S 94-08/UP 94-19 required the Developer to enter into a cost sharing agreement with Campbell for construction of the traffic signal and intersection modifications for the intersection of Campbel! Avenue at Union Avenue and to provide the design of the traffic signal and iturrsection modifica:ions for the intersection of Bascom Avenue at the northern Pruneyard drveway. and WHEREAS, immediate construrtion of the project is necessitated by the Developer's approved adjacent development at 1875 S. Bascom Avenue; and WHEREAS, the project will benefit U+r public, the Developer, and Campbell; NOW, THEREFORE, in consideration of eacb other's mutual promises, and in satisfaction of the conditions for the Devc!oper's site appriva) a.-d use permit, the parties hereto agree as follows: 1. PLANS AND SPECIFICATIONS Developer will prepare plans for the construction of the project. Specifications to be used for the project will be the City of Campbell Standard Specification. and Details for Public Works Construction. Developer will submit comp"4C project plans to Campbell for review and approval. Developer will comply with all requirements to obtain an encroachment permit to construct the project. 2. AWARD OF CONTRACT AND CONSTRUCTION OF PROJECT _ Developer will solicit bids, award, and administer the construction conract. Developer shall provide three competitive bids for the project to Campbell for review and approval prior to award of s contract for construction of the project. The project may be divided into two separate bid and contract packages. Campbell reserves the right to reject all bids. Developer will award the project work to the lowcst responsible bidder. Campbell and Developer will agree upon a final project cost based upon the bids received. Campbell •,-d Developer will diligently pursue the completion of the project. Time shall be of the essence. 3. INSPECTION OF PROJECT Campbell shall provide inspection for the project as provided for in the encroachment permit. 4. COST SHARING OF PROJECT The cost sharing obligation of the parties under this agreement is as follows: A. Sienal Modifications at the. Bascom Avenue!Nort_hem Pnineva-rd Driveway Developer will pay the entire cost for the design of the modifications to the signalized intersection at Bascom Avenue and the northern Pruneyard driveway. Design shall include an itemized cost estimate for the improvements to be included in the modification to the signalized intersection. Campbell will pay the amount agreed upon by Developer and Campbell as the final project cost for the construction of the modifications to the signalized intersection at Bascom Avenue and tl:e northern Pnmeyard driveway as shown on the approved plans for Encroachment Permit No. 95-278 . mura, mmir-rou-numn. WwMRi. airTl'�l n Developer will pay the entire cost for the design of the signal and intersection modifications at the Union Avenue/Campbell Avenue intersection. Design shall include an itemized cost estimate for the improvements to be included in the modifications to (his intersection. Developer and Campbell will pay the amount agreed upon by Developer and Campbell as the final project cost for the construction of the signal and intersection modifications for the intersection of Campbell Avenue and Union Avenue as shown on the approved Street Improvement Plans for Encroachment Permit No. 95-278. Developer shall pay $25,000 of the final project cost and Campbell will pay the remaining portion of final project costs for the construction of the signal and intersection modifications at the Union Avem,e/Campbell Avenue intersection. -2- Final project costs for each intersection shall ag:xd upon. by Campbell and Developer prior to award of contract for the project work. The estimated cost for the construction of the signal and intersection modifications at both locations is $110,000, of which Developer's share will be $25,000. Following approvai of this agreement, approval of fuel project costs, and upon the request of the Developer, Campbell will deposit with Developer an amount equal to 100% of Campbell's share of the final project costs plus an additional 10% of Campbell's share of the final project costs for approved construction contingencies. All concoction contingency expenses must be approved in writing by the City Engineer prior to Developer incurring any expense. Any costs oyer and above those identified above shall be paid by L:veloper. Developer shall provide securities for all project work as required by the encroachment permit. Cost of such securities to be included in project cost. D. RECONCILIATIUN OF ACTUAL PROJECT COST TO DEPOSIT Within thirty (30) days of completion of the project, Developer will submit a final summary of costs to Campbell for all project work. Within thirty (30) days of completion of the project and prior to final acceptance of the project by Campbell, Developer will provide proof that all project work has been paid for in full and that no outstanding bills or claims for or against project work exist. Developer shall refund to Campbell the difference bervan the amount shown in the final cost summary and the monies deposited with Deveioar within sixty (60) days of project acceptance. E. FINAL ACCEPTANC$ Following completion of the project, Developer shall request a final inspection as required by the encroachment permit and shah complete all work as necessary for final acceptance of the project. Neither Campbell, nor any officer or employee thereof, shall be responsible for any damage or liability occurring by reason of anything dome or omitted to be done by Developer tinder or in connection with any work, authority or jurisdiction delegated to Developer under this Agreement. Developer shall fullv indemnify, defend and hold Campbell harmless from any liability imposed for injury (as defined by Government Code Section 810.8) occurring by reason of anything done or omitted to be done by Developer tinder this Agreem--nt, excluding design services. This indemnity shall include all reasonable costs and attorney's fees incurred in the defense of any claim subject to this provision. -3- OIN Neither Developer, nor an officer or employee thereof, shall be � Yresponsible for any damage or liability occurring by reason of anything done or omitted to be done by Campbell under this Agreement. Campbell shall indemnify, defend and hold Developer harmless from any liability imposed for injury (as defined by Government Code 810.8) occurring by reason of anything done or omitted to be done by Campbell under this Agreement. This indemnity shall include all reasonable costs and attorney's fees incurred in the defense of any claim subject to this provision. G. INSUR A NCF Carpbell shall require any contractor awarded a contract for any portion of the project to secure public liability and property damage insurance and to maintain such insurance in full force and effect until the project is accepted by Campbell. Insurnce shall be in forms and limits of liability as set forth in the City of Campbell Standard Specifications and Details for Public Works Construction, shall name Campbell and Developer and their respective officers and employees as insureds, and shall cover any claim, loss liability, cost or expense arising out of or in any way connected with the project. The aforementioned policy(ics) shall contain a provision that the insurance afforded thereby to Developer and Campbell and their rrspative officers and employees 0-ill be primary insurance to the full limits of liability of the policy, and that if Developer or Campbell, or their respective officers and employees, have other insurance against a loss covered by such policy, such other insurance shall be excess insurance only. Executed by the parties on the date first stated above. PRUNEYA�RD� ASSOCIATES L , IOF CELL, a tiraldpat caporatl" on �� of the State of Calltorub ATTEST By: Mayor Anne Bybee, City Clerk j:tmq\Mdna2 4- CALIFORNIA ALL-PURPOSE ACKNOWLEDGMENT State of county of ��, 777afro Or. art I . 9 J. before me, _ /C �.. /r[n LJ _If � v r o.r w rr s 56 a s personally appeared L�� ....d l. /_)e.r•,[ rrwwn d ap.nn )(personally known to me - OR - ❑ proved is me on the basis of satisfactory evidence to be the person(sf ^,hose name00 taro subscribed to the within instrument and aclmowledged to me that&sherthey executed the same i<�+fi rAheir authorized capacry(iys), and that by r�srAheu signaturego on the instrument the person(e), or the entity upon behalf of which the person(00 acted, executed the instrument. QIrAYLFEN W ftEVENE -41 cIl(bVEdo1o.r vwk - WITNESS my hand and ol,rcial sealEAN r�Mtlio eouNirr Comm E. -" VAV ,1.1009 qwn a �.n r,ea OPTIONAL Though No rnfo n f on Wrow rs nor ropunad or low. rt maY Grow velwoM ro Mraons nrrmp an an dPC1Alnlnf .nd awc pnv n• n.udOW m—al s d rNMIMrrMnl or m.s rurm to .noflyr docur f Description of Attached Document Title or Type of Document A/er—r-1 Acfi,rrre TLr 6, 6, -f 641//—r—id Document Date ..dNumber of Pages:_ Signer(s) Other Than Named Abcve Capacity(ies) Claimed by Signer(s) Signer'sName L,aL. dk Individual X Corporate Officer q Title(s): Ire,.. Aire V:ter Partner — -_ Limited General ❑ Attomey-in-Fact Trustee Guardian or Conservator Ott 9r: ioo c� munD rwa - I Signer Is Representing. Signer's Name u Individual ❑ Corporate CNficer Tltle(s): ❑ Partner — ❑ Limited ❑ Gener ❑ Attorney -in -Fact ❑ Trustee ❑ Guardian or Conservator ❑ Other: Signer Is Representing e.w+weW r.ewh+.....+..••n.s M..w M..rO .o. r.M •Crw'M Usraa►1rM rwaasam raeo.. (r rrsw..�oo.ntr Y CITY of CAMPBELL C, mm t,, D— lop—, Department Joe DeCredico, December 20, 1995 Project Manager - ELS Architects 2040 Addison Street Berkeley, CA 94704 RE: PRUNEYARD REDEVELOPMENT PLANS Dear Joe: Demolition of some of the existing building is underway and the construction of the Bank of America building is progressing, and you will soon be seeking building permits for the next phases of construction. It is my understanding based on our previous conversations that you are working to complete the following list of items and details regarding the plans for the Pruneyard redevelopment project. This letter is forwarded to you inquiring on the status of those plans for the on -site improvements. 1 look forward to having the opportunity to review the plans prior to the issuance of building permits for the Barnes and Noble bu" ':.tg. The following is a list of the items you are currently workin¢ to complete per my understanding of these issues. BASCOM AVENUE IMPROVEMENTS A) Please indicate your intentions for relocating the existing freestanding signs on Bascom Avenue (including those for the Pruneyard) representing the businesses of Welis Fargo, Marshalls, and Bank of America. B) The City has not had the opportunity to review the proposed tree removal, retention or planting plan for Bascom. Please include the proposed landscape plans per the City's streetscape standards also addressing irrigation and installation details. C) Please provide details on how you intend to incorporate the existing bus shelter within the streetscape plan. 70 N,P,,h Fir., Street Campbell, Calif—- 93009 1423 111 408 966 1131) P+1 408 866 8391 111', 403. 866.1790 Joe DeCredico - ELS Architects Pruneyard Redevelopment - page 2 Northern Driveway (Bascom Avenue) A) As discussed with the Public Works staff, the design specifications, details and improvements are to be designed by the Engineering firm designing the other related off -site improvements. The construction of such improvements will be provided by the City. Specific details on coordinating this process will occur via the City Engineer. B) The existing freestanding Pruneyard sign and readerboard may have to be relocated to accommodate the new sidewalk. C) The current plans do not indicate where the pedestrian connection will occur on the north or south side of the driveway from Bascom Avenue into the center. The connection should clearly delineate the pedestrian route through varying materials colors, and/or textures. Central Driveway (Bascom Avenue) Al The entrance throat to the central driveway should be aligned with Bascom Avenue at a right angle. The straight alignment should continue across the first aisle intersection up to the front building line. Southern Driveway (Bascom Avenue) A) There was some discussion regard the placement of the pedestrian connection from Bascom Avenue to the new building. Please verify location of pedestrian path. CAMPBELL AVENUE IMPROVEMENTS A) Please provide a landscape planting and tree retention/removal plan for the Campbell Avenue frontage. The plans should include species, size and quantities of all landscape materials, irrigation and installation details. B) Please indicate the final proposed location for all bus stops and!nr shelters and the trash service area at Campbell Avemie. Joe DeCredico - ELS Architects Pruneyard Redevelopment - page 3 C) Please provide final site plan for the western most pad (Outback Steakhouse) location on Campbell Avenue. This plan should include a clearly delineated pedestrian connection from this pad building to the retail center. The connection should clearly delineate the pedestrian route through varying, materials colors, and/or textures. Please retain terra cots roof tiles from existing buildings or the existing Bank of America building for use on the Outback Steakhousc roof. D) Please identify where the pedestrian connections from Campbell Avenue to the retail center will occur and the type of materials that will be utilized. Main Street A) Current plans submitted to the City do not clearly indicate what types of materials, pedestrian amenities, landscaping, and parking number of compact and standard spaces) will be located in the courtyard area of the Main Street, B) Please indicate what types of materials will be used for the street itself Oe asphalt, tile, pavers) and how pedestrian connections will be delineated. Pedestrian connections appear to be missing at the building frontage and at the western end of the street at the landscaped rotary. Barnes & Noble Building A) There is a large open plaza area in front of the tenant spaces south of the entrance to the Barnes & Noble store. This area is a modification of the site and building plans approved by the City Council. The final modifications to the facade must be resolved prior to issuance of building permits for this building per condition of approval ft9-A &B. The plaza in front shou!d be addressed to meet the original intent of the building to provide a consistent pedestrian arcade treatment. These details may include a row of trees in the outdoor area Or a trellis feature along the east elevation of the building. This t-eatment should include a straight continuation of the curb line. Joe DeCredico - ELS Architects Pruneyard Redevelopment - page 4 B) The awnings were originally approved io be terra cotta in color. Please indicate if .It-; is still the intended :olor scheme and if further discussions regarding a modification the original color scheme are necessary. Please provide additior... awnings in the spaces at the ground level where they are not indicated on your plans. PRUNEYARD SITE A) Please provide details of the proposed landscape plans for the Campbell/Union Avenue driveway. B) Please depict how the Central Fire Districts' requirements for a new 25- foot radius at selected aisles will impact parking, curb lines and matte design. C) Please depict the pedestrian connection from the Los Gatos Creek Trail and the public right of way to the site as required in conditions of approval 6-A dr E and 14-E. D) Please provide a signage plan for the retail complex. E) Please provide plans on the proposed Swensons Ice Cream kiosk in the courtyard area of the UA theater entrance if still applicable. If this list is incorrect please let me know so we may discuss these items in greater detail. If you have any questions regarding any of the aforementioned subjects please feel free to call me at (408) 866-2140. Sf Sbe ere ry: DP r M. Chris Meany, William Wilson & Associates Michelle'2uinney, Acting City Engineer administrative file of CA,y + s m CITY OF CAMPBELL Public Works Department December 4, 1995 Mr. Christopher Meany Retail Project Director The Prunevard William Wilson,& Associates 1999 S. Bascom Avenue, Suite 200 _ Campbell, CA 95008 SUBJECT: S 94-08/UP 94-19 rHE PRITNEYARD - PUBLIC WORKS CONDI11ONS OF APPROVAL Dear Mr. Meany Thank you for meeting with us last week. I believe we have clarified several key issues concerning the Public Works conditions of approval fir your development as outlined below. It is our understanding that the Pruneyard improvements are proceeding in several phases as follows: Phase I - Construct Bank of America building on corner of Bascom/Campbell Avenue and Outback Restaurant building on Campbell Avenue frontage. Phase II - Remove the existing Bank of America building and reconstruct a new building for the new Burns and Noble Bookstore. Phase III - Remove buildings and structures for construction of the center roadway. Public Works has issued clearance to the Building Division for release of the grading and building permits for Phase 1. Public Works has also issued clearance to the Building Division for release of the demolition r.rmit for Phase II work. Currently, Public Works is reviewing the grading and drainage plan and hydraulic/hydrology calculations for the Phase II work. We expect to be completed with this review by December 8, 1995. At that time, we will request that any changes we feel necessary be made to the plans. Upon revision of the plans and final review, Public Works will issue clearance to the Building Division for release of the building permit for Phase lI construction. We understand you would like to have the building permit for Phase II by December 15. 1995. 70 North First Street Campbell, California 97008 1473 — 408. 866 2130 FAX 408 379.2571 inn 406. 866,1790 NEW PW r,tx �} Christopher Meany December 4, 1995 Public Works Conditions of Approval Page 2 Prior to Public Works releasing clearance to the Building Division for building permits for future phases (Phase III), all remaining Public Works conditions of approval must be satisfied. This includes the following: NUMB COMMENTS 4, The City still recognizes the site as one legally. created parcel. If and when the applicant wishes to split the parcel into more lots, a parcel map must be filed. 5L. The applicant must submit an application and obtain an encroachment permit to construct all improvements within the public right-of-way. To date, no application has been received. The applicant must prepare complete plans for all work within the public right-of-way, pay the fees associated with the permit, and post the required securities. We have agreed to issue two encroachment permits for this work. One permit will cover the City/Developer funded improvements at the Campbell/Union intersection and the City funded improvements at the northern Pruneyard driveway. A second permit will cover all other required public street improvements. We also agreed these two permits will be submitted for our review in parallel and will be processed at the same time. 5A-1. Street improvement plans were submitteo to the City on October 27, 1995 - however these plans are not complete. The two complete sets of street improvement plans must include all the items listed in the conditions of approval numbers 5A through 5G and 51 through 5J. All existing conditions must be shown as well as all proposed conditions so that a complete review can be accomplished. 5K. A final grading and drainage plan must be submitted for review for the entire Pruneyard site. At this point, we have agreed to review portions of the final plan in order to release building and demolition permits for various phases. We unnde. ;land you expect to submit the overall final grading and drainage plan within the next two weeks. 5M. The applicant must provide evidence that tney have obtained the required NPDES permit. Christopher Meany December 4, 1995 Public Woes Conuitions of Approval Page 3 5K-3 and 7. Since a parcel map is most likely not going to be filed at this dine, conditions of approval number 5K-3 (Storm Drainage Easement) and condition of approval member 7 (Dedication to City) may treed to be done by a separate instrument that will need to be prepared by the applicant, reviewed and accepted by the City, and recorded. The City is checking to see if a letter agreement between the City and the applicant whereby the �. appli ant agrees to future dedication of the necessary easements and public right-of-way is acceptable until a final parcel mat is fled for the site. At that time, the easements and dedication wculd be offered and accepted on the map - 5E. Construction of the Campbcll/Union signal modifications will be funded in part by the City. Construction of the Bascom Avenue (Northern) driveway ma:ificntions will be funded by the City. It is our understanding that the applicant will award and administer the construction of these improvements concunent with the improvements along Bascom and Campbell Avenues. This will require the applicant and City to enter into a cost sharing agreement. The agreement will requirn that the applicant adhere to the City's ordinances regarding the construction of Public Works projects, which includes soliciting bids, paying prevailing wages, and awarding to the lowest bidder. Three informal bids may be solicited if City funding is $75,000 or less. Formal bidding procedures must be followed if the City's contribution is to exceed $75,000. We will finalize this agreement as soon as complete improvement plans have been submitted to us for review (the agreement will refer to the plans and an estimated construction cost). This final agreement must be taken to City Council for approval. Therefore, we need to work together on this as quickly aspossible to ensure that this condition of approval is satisfied in a timely manner. The City has agreed to provide you with a draft copy of the agreement next week. We understand you have approximately six weeks before hoping to obtain the building permit for Phase III. In order to meet that deadline, we gill need to have all of the conditions listed above completed by December 15, 1995. This will allow us to present tte cost sharing agreement to the City Council for their approval on January 2, 1996. Again, all of these conditions must be satisfied prior to Public Works releasing clearance to the Building Division for the building permits for Phase III. We urge you to address these conditions as soon as possible to avoid delays in your construction schedule. Christopher Meany December 4, 1995 Public Works Conditions of Approval Page 4 In addition, please review all Conditions of Approval, as summarized in Resolution No. 8776, to be certain you will be in compliance with the conditions from other City departments and outside agencies prior to issuance of various permits. Thank you for meeting with us last week and if you have any questibrs, please give me a call at 866-2159. Sincerely, I� Michelle Quinney Acting City Engineer a: File EP / John Wilson, Webcor Builders. 2755 Cangnu Dr., Ste. 175, San Mateo 94103-2514 Martin Parusenti, Brian, Kaaau. r-oulk, 981 Ridder Park Dr.. Ste. 100. San Jose 95131-2303 bcc: Bob Kass, Public Works Director Darryl Jones, commeaity Development Peter Eakland, Traffic Engineer Harold Housley, Land Development Engineer 1:WIQ\PRYD01 h MEMORkNDUM _ CITY OF CAMPBELL To Frank Cauthorn, Building Official o„. December 4,1995 From. Darryl )ones, Senior Fianner 19 fir. Fruneyard Retail Square Footage After reviewing the approved development plans and calcuiations prov:k: -i by the developer/project architect, 1 have confirmed that there will to a reduction in the amount of total square footage for the development site. • Total existing retail area to be demolished 52,190 sf • Total new retail area to be constructed 51,906 sf There will be a net decrease in gross building area of approximately 284 sf. If you have any questions please give me a call. T H4: P RU N EYP---,RD WILII\Nt WI L10N S SOCIATE S November 30,1995 RECEIVED Ms. Michelle Qui:tney `� � I �, —.. Mr. Harold HoutQcy PLANNING LAP City of Campbell 70 North First Stint Campbell, CA 95008 Subject: Public Works Conditions of Approval for the PruneY rd Shopping Center S 94-08/UP 94-19 Dear Michelle aid Harold: Harold has advised is that we must document our compliance with the Conditions of Approval as outlined in City of Campbell Planning Commission Resolution Number 2950, S 94 08W- S .19 adopted January 24, 1995 before Public Works will approve any permit applications for this project (excluding the Permit for Phase 1). Following please find a summary of our compliance as of today's date. Please note that we have worked extensively with City staff over the last year, and at the City's request have tailored our efforts with respect to several of the conditions. 1. Ew t ppmyAL The PruneYard Shopping Center will be modified in conformance with the Project Approval. 2. Future Site Construction (Hotel Exn ansion a d Satellites): The Two "satellite" retail pad buildings have .ern reviewed and approved by the Site And Arohitectwal Review Committee. Final plans for the hotel expansion will be submitted for review when they are complex:. 3. Sigm A. $ivnaae Proga= We are currently preparing a master signage program. B. E=M&AX,%gUL We have requested approval of all planned freeway oriented signs from the City of Campbell. City Council does not seem inclined to favorably consider 7wy such request. 4. pa=1 MAaarcel Conso idatinn: Public Works l:as asserted that the PnmeYard is one legal parcel; the PruneYard is no one legal parcel end there exists no correct legal Ms. Michelle Quinney Mr. Harold Housley S 94-0&1JP 94-19 November 30, 1995 Page 2 argument for such a claim. As a Condition of Approval, we have agreed to record a map which eliminates conflicts with existing or proposed buildings and is not in conflict with applicable code. Based on staff discussions at the time of the preparation of the Conditions of Approval, we have agreed to consolidate the various existing parcels into 4 - 7 parcels. t"mnbell Avenue Sidewalk Plans: I . A demolition plan has been submitted to the City of Campbell. 2. Plans showing the construction of the new curb and gutter have been submitted to the City of Campbell for review. 3. Pavement stamMd striping markers and s_ianage plans- Pavement striping, markers and signage plans have been submitted to the City of Campbell. 4_ Relocation of public dorm dra�2ae fa ili t Public storm drainage facilities [have been] relocated as required for the Campbell Avenue Improvements. These relocations are shown on the Campbell Avenue plans submitted to the City of Campbell for review. B. Traffic Signal Interconnect: A traffic signal interconnect between the Campbell Avenue/Bascom Avenue signal and the Campbell Avenue/Union Avenue signal will be included in the Campbell Avenue plans. C. I uni�y n,_res: New luminaires will be installed if requested by the City Engineer. The relocation of the existing luminaires on Campbell Avenue has been shown on the Campbell Avenue plans submitted to the City for review. Please note the luminaires are to be provided by the City at no cost to the PruneYard. D. Relocation of Traffic Sionals and Loop Detectors: No modification of the Bascom Aventre/Campbell Avenue signal was required to construct the improvements proposed as part of this project. E. RayMa) AV=Mhes the driveway relocation plan has been shown as part of the Campbell Avenue improvement plans submitted to the City for review. P. Boulevard Trejumenaascom Aven= Modifications to Bascom Avenue will be submitted to the City for review in the near future: these modifications will include removal of the existing sidewalk and replacement with a 10 foot planting Ms. Michelle Quinney Mr. Harold Housley S 94-08/UP 94-19 November 30, 1995 Page 3 strip and 7 foot wide sidewalk. After much review at the time of the Project Approval, it was agreed that the strectscape standard of a second 10' landscape zone inside of the sidewalk could not be constructed at the PruneYard because of the impact on parking. G. Bascom Avenue (Northern) Drivemy Modification--: BKF will prepare plans for the signal modifications for submittal to the City. Please note that the City is required to construct this modification at its expense. H. Spccdbumps. Speedbumps will conform in all areas where the parking lot is being reworked. We do not interpret the condition to apply to all speedbumps on the property as a whole. 1. Relocate Bascom Avenue Driveway: the Bascom Avenue driveway will be relocated as part of the Bascom Avenue improvements. These improvements will be submitted to the City in the near future. 1. I indeEground I 1 ill i --L New onsite utilities will be installed for any new or remodeled building. K. Grading and Drain -ice Plan - plays; Grading and drainage plans will be submitted to the City for review. Grading and drainage plans have been submitted to the City for review of the new retail building. G_radina/Erosion Control Plans- Grading/Erosion control plans will be submitted to the City for review if appropriate. Stone DminagcF,,;rar+== A 20' storm drain easement will be recorded as part of the Parcel Map. L. Encroachment Permits: Encroachment permits will be applied for when requested by the City of Campbell. We are awaiting the City's suggestion for a bond amount. M. National Pollutant t)L%ha_%q Flimi nt,� innPPc it ((NPDESI: An NPDES permit will be obtained if appropriate. We have not yet disturbed over 5 acres. Ms. Michelle Quinney Mr. Harold Housley S 94-08/ JP 94-19 November 30, 1995 Page 4 N. 1 ili i c The utility site plan has been submitted to the City for review. 6. Site Plan: A. Final Site Plan- The final site plan has been submitted to the Community Development Director. B. Development�4c� hed I'; Construction has already begun on the pr.,ject site. C. Parking and Striping; The design of the site parking striping is consistent within specified areas. D. Parking and Driv ways: Parking and driveway plans arc shown on the final site plan. E. Pedestrian one tior s: Pedestrian connections have been included in the final site plan. F. Future velopment. The PruneYard shall obtain a special development permit for all future development occurring in the office overlay zone. 7. Dedication to City• Additional right of way (approxima;ely 17 feet wide) along Bascom Avenue will be dedicated at the time n fmal parcel map is recorded. 8. C_a bace Collection: Garbage collection facilities will be approved by the City of Campbell and the Fire Department. 9. New Retail B uild11Q l v No c A. Ruildltlg i esjg0; We have consulted at length with staff regarding the exterior building details. B. 9l9ldi0&-Irralment: We will submit plans indicating pedestrian level treatments as part of our New Retail Street and Sitework phase which is expected to be complete by December 15, 1995. 10. Qemoliting Permit: The Building Official has issued a demolition permit. 11. Handicmmed Acr n.: All new and remodeled buildings will comply with applicable Ms. Michelle Quinney Mr. Harold Housley S 94-08/ JP 94-19 November 30. 1995 Page 5 code. 12. Roof mounted and ground level mechanical equipment will be screened as required by the City of Campbell. 13. Fire protection: All fire protection requirements will be met on the project site. 14. II andscapinu- All landscaping requirements will be met on the project site when complete. 15. Site a s r ion A. o 'c ion and gyipment: All construction and equipment shall comply with City of Campbell municipal code. B. Construction A iyiti c Construction activities shall be limited as outlined in the application. 16. Liquor r� Liquor license requirements shall be complied with at the project site. I hope that the above listing of conditions and our method of response to them helps you in your review of the various permit applications. Please contact me if you have any questions or require additional information. VV7 truly yours, (hr, p easy cc: Steve Piasecki, City of Campbell Darryl Jones, City of Campbell David Word, William Wilson & Associates Joe DeCredico, ELS/Elbasani & Logan Architects Martin Parissenti, Brian Kangas Foulk SENT BY:ELS/ELBASXNI & LOGIN j11-20-95 : 10:18 :ELS/E1.BASANI & LOGAN- 408 379 2572:s li 1 E L S MEMORANDUM FAX & L O A N I 6 GAN ARCHITECTS RECEjvED DATE: November 20, 1995 TO: Darryllooes DepDPBELL Planning pjjAtAING EPT• City of FROM: Joe DO nedwri PROJECIPnmeYard Shopping Center PK() IF.CT NO: 9429 SUBJECT: Square footage relationship. In respowr to ruui acumst fug a comparison of syuarc tootagc between the CAlatlug aetu;l sllacc to be deco -,lished and the new retail space to be c0113trueted, l have made thr following calculations: • E.istfug retail area to he demolished as part of the 'New Retail Building' construction - 32.108 Sr. • Eaiadug entail area to be ckmolished as pan of the "New Bank of America" construction - 10.132 Sr. • Esibiiog icLail area to be demolished as pan of the "New Retail Sweet' construction - 9,950 Sr • Total eautinR retail area to be demolished - 52,190 SF. • Nc- retail area to be constructed 11a "Ncw Retail Building" 44,583 SF. • New retail area to be cotuuucted as "New Bank of Amcnen' - 5,275 SF. • New ictail uca to be consructcd as "New Retail Strut' - 2,048 SF. • Total new retail area to be emrstructed - 11,906 Sr. r{ _ _- a .4 7' tt: Clams Mcany, William Wilson & Associate.+ Many Parisacnti, BKF Rich Lamb, Wobcor Builder. John Wilusn. Webcor Builders c/o PruneVard Field Office 942WM 1 i 1 A' 1Y.LXA 1-1 .u..— snrn s IMI Z. 1.10. itt fro 0.111.1 IN. 310 0.0 100. City of Campbell • Traffic Engineering • Memorandum DATE: November 17, 1995 TO: Steve Piasecki, Community Development Director FROM: Peter Eakland, Traffic Engineer SURIECT: Traffic Analysis for New Pruneyard Tower The City of Campbell agrees to prepare a two phase traffic analysis of an additional office tower at the Pruneyard, working in cooperation with the Pruneyard staff. Phase 1 would consist of a preliminary traffic analysis that would he performed by the City's traffic engineering staff. Phase 11 would consist of a more detailed traffic analysis and would be conducted by a qualified traffic engineering consultant to be hired by the Community Development Department. The second phase would be conducted at the cption of the developer and would utilize as much as possible the assumptions, data, and results generated as part of Phase 1. Phase 1: Preliminary Traffic Analysis The City agrees to perform a preliminary analysis for a office development at the Pruneyard at a cost of S2,250.00. Work would begin as soon as payment is received for this amount. The analysis would be oriented towards identifying any fatal Flaws related to the size or location of development, assessing the need for the Campisi Drive extension, and developing assumptions and data that would be used to develop a more detailed traffic analysis at a later date. The primary objective of the preliminary analysis will be to provide preliminary results so that both the developer and the City can establish the desirability of pursuing more detailed analysis at this time. The analysis will be designed so that much of the data, assumptions, and results can be used as part of a more detailed analysis: but it is not intended that the analysis results are acceptable to the City or do not require additional analysis. Tasks to be performed by Traffic Engineering staff include the following: Task 1. Perform Trip Generation for 100,000 sq. ft. office space. Standard rates contained in the latest ITE Trip Generation manual will be utilized for PM peak hour. Task 2. Change in Existing Traffic Patterns Caused by Extension of Campisi Way into Pruneyard. PM peak hour traffic model runs for baseline conditions wiil be run with and without the Campisi Way extension so that existing turning movement volumes can be adjusted to reflect the addition of this roadway improvement. Task 3. Traffic Distribution and Assignment for New Tower Traffic with and without the Campisi Way Extension. A PM peak hour traffic model nun will be made with the proposed development with and without the Campisi Drive extension so that trip distribution and assignment patterns can be established. Task 4. Preliminary Traffic Analysis including Level of Service Analysis at Major Intersections. The project volumes from Task 3 will be added to existing PM peak hour traffic volumes, and a preliminary level of service analysis will he performed at 10 signalized intersections with and without Campisi Drive. These intersections are as follows: Campbell/Union. Campbell/Bascomb, Bascomb/North Pruneyard Entrance, Bascomb/Campisi, BasombiHamilton, Creekside/Campisi, Crekside/Hwy 17 ramps, Creekside/Hamilton, Hamilton/Hwy 17 southbound ramps. Task 5 Prepare Memo Report describing results of analysis. Upon reviewing the results of Phase 1, the developer would decide whether or not to pursue the development of a more detailed traffic analysis. Phase II: Preparation of Detailed Traffic Impact Analysis Report. This analysis would be prepared by an outside consulting firm to be hired by the City 'n close coordination with the developer. The analysis would be based on baseline traffic and trip forecasts developed as part of Phase I but would include additional analysis involving parking, internal circulation, refinement of level of service analysis, and other issues as appropriate. Included in this phase would be the development of mitigation measures beyond the extension of Campisi Way, including trip reduction, traffic demand management, and vernal circulation modifications. No additional traffic model runs would be anticipated as pan of Phase 11. If required because of major changes in work scope, they would be billed at $750.00 per run, based on the current fee schedule. WILLIAM WILSON 8 ASSOC ID1?8-371-3831 NOV 07'12:52 No.002 P.02 INN o+ T H .sat: P R U N E i A h U %VII I I A M W I I SUN h A%tOt IA 11? Novanber 7. 1995 1.4s. Anne Bybee City Cork City of Campbell 70 North First Street Campbet CA 93008-1423 ;)ear Ma. Bybx: Our aplicuron for a freeway onented sign is on the calendar for this evening's meeting of the C4 Council. our discussions with the Planing staff have led us to believe that we should prepae additiwrl materials for our presentation. Accordingly, we hereby a two week mv,inustion of the hearing of our application Your truly. cc: Daryl )ones. Senior planner. City of Campbell 1� IY'I!1 VrnrlL INrr.wr Ar�nur �rnlr ?Irr 1 !401 CA 9:.IN/11 1-rnr l/nxrr Ia1M11;14710 I nr rinnA•l41WI 771 tY.tl city Council Item Ne 16. ( (� Report Category- New Business Date: November 7, 1995 TITLE: Campisi Way Street Reconstr uWtin (ResolutionfRoll Call Vote) RECONMENDATION That the City Council adopt the attached resolution authorizing the Public Works Director to enter into a Professional Services Agreement with Biggs Cardosa Associates for a feasibility study of the reconstruction of a portion of Campisi Way, and approve a Budget Adjustment for the study. BACKGROUND In 1981. a Local Improvement District (LID 28) was formed to construct Campisi Way between Bascom Avenue and the Los Gatos Creek in order to facilitate development in that area. Because a significant portion of the street was constructed over a former private landfill, the structural section of the new street was designed in a manner that was intended to provide acceptable performance of the street surface while the underlying landfill material continued to settle Unfortunateh, the uneven street settlement that was experienced over the next several years exceeded the design engineer's expectations, creating an unsatisfactory roadway and sidewalk surface When the Prometheus Development Company's project for the current Apple Computer Compam site was approved in the late 1980's, one of the traffic mitigation requirements of that approval was the construction of Creekside Drive, including a traffic signal at the new intersection of Campisi Way and Creekside Drive. In order to ensure that this new roadway construction over sections of the former landfill would not experience similar unacceptable displacement due to settlement. Creekside Drive and the Campisi Way intersection were constructed as a concrete bridge supported by pilings extending to the native soil below the landfill. The City of Campbell and Prometheus Development Company also entered into an agreement to extend the new bridge structure approximately 200 feet southwesterly from the intersection along the portion of existing Campisi Way that was experiencing substantial settlement at that time. The cost of this 200 foot extension was borne by the City. At the time of construction of the strut over existing Campisi Wsy, the design engineers had recommended that the structure be continued for an additional 50-100 feet to ensure that all of the unstable area was permanently bridged. That recommendation was not unplemented because of the lack of additional available funds and staff wanted to monitor performance of the questiortcble section over several more years Campisi Way Street Reconstruction: Page 2 ^ November 7, 1995 DISCUSSION Approximately 50-100 feet of Campisi Way, southwesterly of the portion of the roadway that was replaced with a structure by Prometheus' contractor in 1990, has continued to settle and needs reconstruction to provide a sati-factory public street surface. In order to develop cost estimates for a proposed project to be included in next years' Capital Improvement Program. staff will review alternative reconstruction strategies over the next few months. A proposal has been received from Biggs Cardoss Associates, a structural engineering firm currently involved in the design of several bridge crossings for Los Gatos Creek, to analyze conditions on Campisi and prepare a conceptual design with cost estimates to correct the roadway deficiencies. The cost of that work, including field surveys, would not exceed 515,000. FISCAL EWPACT It is recommended that 515.000 he transferred from Unappropriated Gas Tax Reserves for the cost of the stud% ALTERNATIVES Do not authorize the study This is not recommended because the roadway deficiencies on Campisi Way require correction to avoid increased public liability. Prepared by 1-1-1 1 Envtr ntal ram Ma r ra;7 Reviewed bv. Public Works Direct r Reviewed by. 41�,tJ1_� Fi' nwicc Di?ftrtq C/ Approved by City ger h. campuumpi ^ RESOLUTION NO. A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF CAMPBELL AUTHORIZING THE PUBLIC WORKS DIRECTOR TO EXECUTE A PROFESSIONAL SERVICES AGREEMENT WITH .i3IGGS CARDOSA ASSOCIATES FOR A FEASIBILITY STUDY OF THE RECONSTRUCTION OF A PORTION OF CAMPISI WAY WHEREAS, a portion of Campisi Way is in need of reconstruction, and WHEREAS, a professional services proposal has been received from Biggs Cardosa Associates for a feasibility study for that reconstruction, and WHEREAS, unappropriated Gasoline Tax funds are available and eligible for that study. and WHEREAS. a Budget Adlustmem has been prepared to provide funding for the study from unappropriated gasoline taxes. NOW. THEREFORE. BE IT RESOLVED, that the Public Works Director is hereby authorized to enter into a Professional Services Agreement with Biggs Cardosa Associates for a feasibility study for the reconstruction of a portion of Campisi Way BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED, that a Budget Adjustment in the amount of $15.000 for that purpose is hereby approved. PASSED AND ADOPTED this %i day of November. 1995, by the following roll call vote: AYES: NOES ABSENT APPROVED: DONALD R. BURR. MAYOR ATTEST: Anne Bybee. CmClerk 0 -.1 cmTY CM Comm )=.%. mmQussT wcm sI7>mm3m'r Avabommemmms MT/PROMN DIVIUM �Ts MD. EPtDD:PUM EL ENGINEERING 11 7 95 p/QQOi1r 7v'/�• Z7 auxx=W WYL AMMMWA so sa Ieanvcsn : toMD ACCom NmatA D AMDUNT 204 9619.9999 UNAPPROPRIATED GAS TAX 15,000.00 (204.3799 Transfers Out' so s$ 3CZQC=R3&Aaaa: NMp ACCOUNT YMMER U&SCRIMMI AND= CAPITAL TRANSFERS IN 15.000.00 435 990 .6999 9E19.7883 IMPROVEMENTS OTHER THAN 15,000.CO 435 BUILDINGS (CAMPISI NAY STREET RECONSTRUCTION) IRMmalon fcw Ramgum/! (ia wpmaiflss) t Engineering study for reconstruction of Campisi Nay ■SVnat fipnat BSQnatltss DIPART=ff KwPIIIANCI DTaIC1C0I CIS! NAMASI REV 2/90 OCT-33-1995 14:14 EKF SJ 406 436 1194 P.01 Orion Kwgn Faulk ENC'Wert . Suneron . plew, October 12. 1995 Job No. 956007 MEETING MINUTES PRUNEYARD SHOPPING CENTER CAMPBELLAVENUE IMPROVEMENTS Location: 0ty of Campbell Dade: Thursday. October 12. 1625 D*W YL Attendees: Peter Neakland, City Traffic Engineer Jessie Pu, City Assistant Engineer Jeff Wang, Brian Kangas Foulk Subject: Campbell Avenue Improvements and Traffic Signal Modifications at to Intersection of Campbell Avenue and Union Avenue 1. Based on traffic count performed by City of Campbell, lane configuration of Union Avenue and new driveway from Pruneyard stopping center at the Intersection of Campbell Avenue have been determined. Union Avenue Northbound, ttlere will be one left -turn lane and one left through and right sharing lazes. The new driveway from tl3l,. slnop,->ing center southbound, there will be one excluskm right -turn lane and orie'+ft .vid through sharing lane. 2. Bus Dudcouts on Campbell Avenue Peter Nealand suggested that at 4ea:st one bus duckout be installed on westbound Campbell Avenue in order to prevent rear -end collisions because of the posted speed limit on Campbell Avenue. BKF contacted County Transit and proposed several alternative locations for bus duckouts In the past. Because of .a conflict between proposed landscaping and the bus duckout. the City had previously decided not to install a bus duckout on (. $ub qX �p17f wosmound Campbell Avenue. It �G1r t.}bp w {� G- / sft-T r"rr5cwlra two L�iC 1R.5'-17' 981Roader Pert Df6@ Suaiw . San Jose CA 95131-1305 • W81436SW . fAX140814361194 OCT-13-1995 14:15 D(F` SJ 408 436 1194 P.02 behm Kw" I" EAD'.vrrs • Surveyors • Planners Peter Neaktand " toprdjrSte with County Transit and the City P nn,g DePartr►►ent to detOrMWO whether bus duckouts wil; be installed. Because of the cwxVbw of the a)ftting asiouft pavemern and the cost to WMM a' claw looP datectors, Jessie Pu suggests that a Video Vehicle petecom System be u>sWW at tM klbrsec.'tYon. The City wo intorm Wq which detection system shell be irutallod. a- Peter NeWdeirid suggested that the Proposed trafAt dMde island at the entrance of the meddle driveway or1 CWOW Avsnue"be eliminated. BKF will revise cOrlismixtbn plans to make that driveway a fug axes driveway. S. Siorgill t The nAority of the cost of the signal improvements wO be paid by the City of Campbell. This toot sharing arrengemeM has been previously agreed to by the City and Vildiam Mew Developer of the Pruneyard. MhAM Prepared by Jeff Warp JW:bh c: Attandess Joe DaCradioo Chris Meany Harold Howley, Irian Kmps Foulk ' Engineers • Surveyors • �'iannrrs September 18, 1995 I Job No. 956018-10 RECEIVED SEP 2 1995 -IIY Uk L MPULL PLANNING DEPT Mr. Darryl Jones City ca Campbell Community Development Department 70 N. First Street Campbell, CA 95008 1 PAGE TRANSMITTED VIA FAX TO 408/866-8381 Subject: Pruneyard Shopping Center Dear Darryl: This letter is to clarfy the permitting sequence for the Pruneyard Shopping Center improvements. The Bank of America relocation project will not involve any construction in the public right-of-way adjacent to the driveway entry on Bascom Avenue. The driveway closure, driveway removal, and construction of new curb, gutter and sidewalk will be part of the master site work. Please contact me 6 you have any questions or require additional information. Very truly yours, BRIAN KANGAS FOULK ire 12 Martin B. Parissenti, P.E. Project Manager MBP:bh cc: Joe DeCredico Chris Meany �.,o�vwru*nErerara � 901 Redder Park Drne, Sune 100 • San Jose. CA 95131 1305 • (M) 436 15M • IAM 1W 436 11% 5L%T 81 E1.S/UA%SA%I & LOGAN 9-18-95 11 Sa :E1S/ELUSANI & LOUN- 40886G&Ml:s 1/ 1 E L S MEMORANDUM FAX ELBASANI & LOGAN ARCHITECTS DATE: September I R. 1995 TO: Darryl Jones planning Uepariment City of Campbell FROM: Joe IJeCredlcoAo PROJECT: PnrncYwd Sh mg Center - Bark of America PROJECT NO. 9429 Cr SUBIECT: Driveway Encroachment in response to our conversation this ntonting. I would like to clear up the crndusion sub irwmding the entry into the choppu7r cuter near the site of the propuscd Bank of America building. Our intention is not w close this entry into the %—.rgnng center at this tirne. but mther it, include this work u: the overall site improvement permit package. The Bank of America permit is fur the building, the ATM island, the live toot sidewalk sunounlling the building, and a small amount of grading to raise the building pad and transition to the existing parking tit. During con%litic ion, if it is rtecessary for the general contractor to temporarily close the entiatrce to insure the publics' safety, the general contractui will apply for any appropriate encroachmcm permits. It is my understanding that we will be granted a budding permit orice we submit a preliminary grading plan, which we intend to do today. Please ndvi.e if there is arty misunderstanding. cc- Chris Mcany, William Wilson A Associates Many Parissenti, BKF Rich Lamb, Webcui Builders John Wilson, Webcur Builders c/o PruneYaM.Management Office w29/M09la7iY DOC 7040 AWSON s,artT KI.Ettr C1 nuns ei r�o s�+na• tar 510 813 330, MEMORANDUM 8 CITY OF CAMPBELL To Bob Harary, City Engineer oate July 27, 1995 Front Darryl Jones, Senior Planner)m SiDje1 Bus Duckouts at the PruneYard Thomas Rountree, Environmental Program Manager for the Transportation Agency, forwarded a letter to you on July 20, 1995 regarding the Agency's comments on bus duckout installations at the PruneYard. In response I spoke with Julie Render, who works for Tom, on Wednesday, July 26, 1995 in response to the Agency's comments. I explained to Julie that the site redevelopment did not require any modifications to the curb and gutter at the Bascom Avenue bus shelter, and consequently a duckout at this location would not be feasible. We also discussed the recommended bus duckout locations on Campbell Avenue. I informed her that it was not the City's policy to install bus duckouts on minor arterial streets, and that City staff was also not supportive of this concept. Additionally, the Agency's comments were not part of the package of items negotiated with the project developer. I assured her however, that the two bus stops currently on Campbell Avenue would not be eliminated. She concurred that the City has final approval authority and stated that she appreciated our consideration of their comments. If additional follow-up with the Agency is necessary please let me know. cc-. Steve Piasecki, Community Development Director administrative file TATransportatic Agency 5a Cks County RY,. tgN Rut Cony- wn an July 20, 1995 City of Campbell 801 North First Street San Jose, CA 95110 Attention: Robert Harary, City Engineer Subject: Campbell Avenue Improvement Plan Dear Mr. Harare: On July 13th. Mr. Richard Soto. Brian Kangas Foulk, consulting for the City of Campbell on the Campbell Avenue Improvement Plan associated with the Pruneyard Shopping Center Modification Project, visited the Santa Clara County Transit District offices and requested input on changes proposed to the existing bus stops on East Campbell Avcnue. The proposals discussed included 1) the elimination of the existing westbound bus stop on East Campbell Avenue west of South Bascom Avenuc to discourage potential pedestrian jay -walking with this mid -block bus stop, and 2) relocation of the westbomnd bus stop on East Campbell Avenue opposite North Union Avenue to resolve the conflict with the project's proposed new driveway. Mr. Kiyo Ushino, Passenger Facilities Program Manager, and Mr. Bill Capp,. Scniot Transit Service Development Specialist, have reviewed the pmpe-al d.scnbed above, and District comments are w follows: Elimination of the existing westbound bus stop on East CanU,bell Avenue west of South Bascom We do not support the proposed elimination of the existing westbound bus stop on East Campbell Avenue west of South Bascom Avenue. This stop is a major transfer stop, and elimination would cause a severe adverse impact on passenger transfers between the routes serving East Campbell Avenue (Lines 26 and 61) and South Bascom Avenue (Line 62). Instead of elimination, we suggest that the stop he reheated to west of the proposed project driveway adjacent to the existing bus stop +sce enclosures). The relocated bus stop should be provided with a modified duckout and a sidewalk. The sidewalk should be constructed with a minimum width of eight (8) feet in the area adjacent to the bus stop, consistent with bus stop access standards of the Americans with Disabilities Act (ADA). Relocation of the westbound hits strut on East Campbell Avenue vpjzosire North Union Avenue We suggest that the westb .und bus stop on East Campbell Avenue opposite North Union Avenue be relocated to west of the proposed new driveway (opposite North Union Avenue) to improve transit operations and safety. This bus stop should also he provided with a modified duckout and sidewalk consistent with ADA standards. City of Campbell Page 2 July 20, 1995 In addition to the comments above, we have an additional comment pertinent to the Pruneyard Shopping Center Modification Project. As a pan of that project, we request that the existing southbound Mrs stop on South Bascom Avenue at the project's central driveway be provided with a modified duckout south of the driveway to reduce traffic conflicts and improve safety of transit operations. Here also, a sidewalk consistent with ADA standards should be provided. For clarification, we have enclosed a graphic depiction of the recommendations described above and s. sketch of a "Typical Modified Bus Duckout". We appreciate the oppecunity to provide input regrading the proposed street improvements on East Campbell Avenue. If y( a have any questions, or if further coordination is required, please call Julie Render of my staff at (-r)8) 321-5779. Sinrercly. omas R Environmental Program Manager TDR:JR:kh Fncl,),jrc. cc Richard Soto. Brian Kangas FOtilk Darryl Jones, Campbell Community Development Depanni nt Kiyo Ushino. Faciiiiies Design Bill Capps, Service Development Jim Unites/Ron Wong, Service Development jr416 t� ._. E�s'� 1•� SARC MEETING NOTES July 13. 1995 ECEM NO. 1 2.1s SA 95-24 1875 S_ Bascom Avenue hris Meany Review of proposed freeway oriented and freestanding signs. Project applicant, Chris Meany, made request for freeway oriented aid fre- standing signs on site Stated understanding of difficulty in approving freeway sign SARC members stated concerns regarding number of signs on site. More specific plans and modifications to sign application were require I Applicant would like to pursue freeway svFr; as a separate phase of application. SAC reiterated need for more information. Referred sign modifications to a special S1,RC meeting at a date and time to be specified prior t-he 7/25/95 Planning Commission meeting, and to work with ., , ff on the designs. Resubmittal should consider maintaining existing total size of signage i . .r each freestanding sign. Sign at Bascom g Campbell Avenues should add Barnes 8t Noble in place of existing readerboard sign. Applicant agreed to reconsider sign application submittal for the freestanding signs and stated his desire to pursue freeway sign request at City Council 1UQ Elan Review Building design review for pad buildings (Bank of America & Outback Steakhouse) at the Pruneyard Shopping Center Applicant's architect, Donn t ogan, gave 1 presentation regarding redevelopment of the Pruneyard and the new Bank of America building, noting the following: -Use of building color similar to new retail building •A-cade and trellis elements added to building •A'a,nings added SARC approved the building with final details to be worked out w/staff, including: -Awning over window on East elevation -Further detail work on cornice -Take a second look at :hive through (reduce length of overhang or add supl art column at t -te end of the overhang to help provide terminus or conclusion to building ., , I reduce horizontal feel of building. -Add reveals in stucco wall panels. *Re -analyze arcade proportions "jomd 1 (tLlitT2[ a1011Y[tu OtlMr• of ne• GKnvy (lerk 101 lkM ll I-II11 \Irl'E'1 _ L, hrcf. / .rlili rtllkl '!'sl I 1 INlfll ME!!MJI M!, FEB 12 II is fart '95 •ENV IRON MENTARY F44C"ATI;0N, NAME OF LEAD AGENCY: City of Campbell/Planning Department NAME OF APPLICANT: William Wilson a Associates CLASSIFICATION OF ENVIRONMENTAL DOCUMENT, 1. ( ) NOTICE OF PREPARATION FOR COURT USE ONLY FILING NO. —NO FEE— 2. ;x) NOTICE OF EXEMPTION/STATEMENT OF EXEMPTION —NO FEE- 3. NOTICE OF DETERMINATION ( ) A —NEGATIVE DECLARATION PURSUANT TO SECTION 21080(C) OF THE PUBLIC RESOURCES CODE S1,250.00 (Twelve Hundred Fifty Dollars) —STATE FILING FEE $25.00 (MWenty-five Dollars) —CLERK FEE ( ) B—CERTIFICATE OF EXEMPTION DE MINIMIS IMPACT FINDING —NO FEE— 4. NOTICE OF DETERMINATION ( ) A —ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 21152 OF THE PUBLIC RESOURCES CODE S850.00 (Eight Hundred Fifty Dollars) —STATE FILING FEE S25.00 (Twenty -Five Dollars) —CLERK FEE ( ) B—CERTIFICATE OF EXEMPTION DE MINIMIS IMPACT FINDING —NO FEE — `THIS FORM MUST BE COMPLETED AND FILED WITH ALL ENVIRONMENTAL DOCUMENTS FILED WITH THE SANTA CLARA COUNTY CLERK'S OFFICE. MAKE CHECKS PAYABLE TO: COUNTY CLERK 1 � 1Ml ■Ev rrEl f 1 syprensts N Notice of Detertntinatio CITY OF CAMPBELfr' 70 NORTH FIRST STREET CAM PSELL. CALIFORNIA 980PS - i� i5 �fi �95 De To: _ Office of Planning and Resertarc From: City of p bell 1400 Tenth Street, Room 121. Planning Deparrtt ment 70 North First Sacramento, CA 95814 CAStreet SAKI' Campbell, CA 95008 X County Clerk's Office OY_ Santa Clara County 191 North First Street San ,lose. CA 95113 swilect: Filing of Notice of DetarmInI t'on In compliance with section 21108 or 21152 of the Public Reanuroes Coda. 1875 S. Bascom Avenue - the Pranevard — Project Title City of Campbell/ Darryl Jones (408) 866-2140 Suite Ckannghouse Number Lead Agency Area CodelTelepharc/Fmeasm (If s.Wmaad to Ctearmghoure) Contact Perso., 1875 S. Bascom Avenue, Campbell, CA. Santa Clara, California Project a aBon (include counry) Project Description: Site approval to allow reconstruction ane redevelopment of existing and proposed retail space. Conditional Use Permit to allow the expansion of the hotel use, and to allow restaurants which serve alcoholic beverages, outdoor seating and shared on -site parking. This is n advise dial the has approved the above described project an N«r Nit' February 7. 1995 and her made the following dem+mnuoons retardant the above described project (D-) 1. The project Owi9 &vi0 not) have a significant efface an the envuomrrent. 2. 0 An Environmental Impact Report was prepared for this pro?, vrsuam to tM previsao of CEQA. ® A Negative Declaration was prepared lot this prrjeu ptasua 11 n the ptovis M of CEQA. 3. Mitigation memum 10were n0 ve- nab merle a ro"tq° of the approval of the project. 4. A s atement of Overriding Consademum 15DIVIs Ows' not) adopted for this project. S. Findings (kivese Owen, nab mate ptustunt to the provisaau of CEQA. Thu is,o certify that the final EIR with comments and responses and record of project approval is available In the General Public at 711 N tar• &S"ure Dice received for filing at OPR: February 14, 1995 Senior Planner R-04 Orrobw IM 0 1 A,M CITY of CAMPBELL t av Clerk's Offi e February 9, 1995 The Pruneyard William Wilson L Associates 1999 S. Bascom Avenue, Ste 200 Campbell, CA 95008 Attn: Mollie Choate, Property Manager Dear Ms, Choate: At its regular meeting of February 7, 1995, the City Council held a public hearing to consider site and Architectural modifications and Use Permit approval for property located at 1875 S. Bascom Avenue. After due consideration and discussion, the City Council adopted Fesolution No. 8776 supporting the recommendation of the Planning of a Site and Architectural Permit for site Commission for approval modifications, and a Use Permit for a hotel expansion and restaurant uses serving alcohol, utilizing shared on -site parking, and providing outdoor 75 S. Bascom Avenue (The Pruneyard), seating for property located of 18 subject to findings and Condit.ions of Approval. Please find certified copy of this pesolution attached for your records. Please do not hesitate to contact this office (866-2117)or Darryl regard to community Development Department, should you have any questions the City council's action. Sincerely, C 1�4&_ Anne Bybee City Clerk Enc. cc. Derzyl Jones, C0100. Develop. Dent. jh ro Nor1h V. Sae<1 Campbell, C+hlo,ma 4s00e 041i - 408 ee6.7117 - FAX roe s7�.asee mo Aoe.ea6.»9a RESOLUTION NO. 877b BEING A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF CAMPBELL SUPPORTING THE RECOMMENDATION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION FOR APPROVAL OF A SITE AND ARCHITECTURAL PERMIT FOR Sn E MODIFICATIONS AND A USE PERMIT FOR A HOTEL EXPANSION AND RESTAURANT USES SERVING ALCOHOL, UTILIZING SHARED ON -SITE PARKING AND PROVIDING OUTDOOR SEATING FOR PROPERTY LOCATED AT 1875 S. BASCOM AVENUE (THE PRUNEYARD). After notification and public hearing as specified by law on the application of Mr. David Word, on behalf of Pruneyard Associates, for approval of a Site and Architectural permit to reconfigure existing retail space, construct new retail space, modify on -site pedestrian and vehicular circulation, and parking and landscaping; and a Use Permit to allow hotel expansion, the sale of alcoholic beverages at restaurants, outdoor seating and the continuation of shared parking facilities, after presentation by the Commurity Development Director, proponents and opponents, the hearing was closed. After due consideration of all evidence presented, the City Council did find as follows with respect to applications S 94-08/UP 94-19: 1. The proposal is consistent with the General Plan and Zoning designations which indicate a Commercial land use for this property. 2. The proposed site improvements of 13 percent ou site landscaping and streetscape improvements adequately address the aesthetic concerns related to the project/site. 3. The proposed parking and circulation with the recommended conditions of approval creates a project which integrates the proposed uses on site. 4. No substantial evidence has been presented which shows that the project, subject to conditions of approval, will have a significant negative impact on the environment. 5. There is no evidence before the City determining that the proposed project will have a significant negative impact on wildlife resources. 6. The City of Campbell has prepared an Initial Study for the project in order to determine if the project would have a significant environmental impact. City Council Resolution — S 94-18/UP 94-19 — The Pruneyard Adopted on February 7, 1995 Page 2 7. Adequate on site parking and circulation has been provided for the proposed project and the commercial, office and retail uses on site. 8. All proposed uses are compatible within the site and with adjacent land uses. 9. Usage of the existing square footage will likely increase with proposed renovations including new restaurants, a hotel expansion, and new retail/commercial buildings constructed on site. 10. The existing off -site conditions adjacent to the ingress and egress access points for the site create Level of Service (LOS) and circulation conflicts. Conditions of Approval 5-(d,e,g &i) are required to address traffic increases as a result of the proposed project as specified below: a) 146 additional trips will be generated in the pcax hour and will result in increased traffic circulation delays; b) A signalized intersection with a new driveway will eliminate the problem intersection (driveways) and modify the existinr, Campbell / Union Avenue intersection. 11. Storm drainage easement is required to address additional run. I as a result of :his project. Based upon the foregoing findings of fact, the Planning Commission further finds and concludes that: 1. The proposed project, with conditions of approval, is consistent with the policies of the General Plea and the Zoning Ordinance in effect at the time of the application submittal and is consistent with uses in the immediate area. 2. The proi,used project will aid in the enhancement and the harmonious development of the immediate area. The establishment, maintenance, or operation of the use will not be detrimental to the public health, safety, peace, morals, comfort or general welfare of persons residing or working in the neighborhood of such proposed use. 3. ^z proposed v:: will nc, to detrimental or injurious to property and improvements in the neighborhood or to the general welfare of the City i. ' its residents. A 'A City Council Resolution — S 94-08% UP 94-19 — The Pruneyard Adopted on February 7, 1995 Page 3 4. The proposed project with the conditions imposes, will not have a significant adverse impact on the environment and a Negati-.e Declaration has been prepared for :he project. 5. The proposed site is adequate in size and shape to accommodate the proposed use and site improvements. 6. These conditions are required as related and proportional to the impacts of the project. 7. The proposed use (restaurants serving alcohol) will not result in an over -concentration of such uses in the area, create a nuisance, di, �trb the peace of nearby residents or cause a significant increase in the demand on City services because the proposed use will operate within hours allowed under the Ordinance. Further, the applicants are notified as part of this application that they are required to comply with all app: :able Codes and Ordinances of the City of Campbell and the State of California which pertaii� to this application and are not herein specified. And, t:iat this approval is granted subject to the following Conditions of Approval: project Approval: Approval of this project allows the following: A. Site modifications, including recon:iguration and construction of retail space in accordance with plans date stamped (Exidbit A). B. On -site pedestrian and vehicular circulation; C. Reconfigured parking and landscapin6; D. Use Permit to allow hotel expansion; E. Use Permit for restaurants with outdoor seating, on site sale of alcohol and shared parking facilities; and F. Open area food kiosk to be located in UA Cinema plaza. Future Site Construction (Hotel Expansion and Satellites): Final plans for the hotel expansion and "satellite" retail pads are subject to review by the Sile and Architectural Review Committee and approval prior to issuance of building permits. Retail pad on Campbell can be located anywhere along Campbell Avenue subject to Site and Architectural Review Committee review and Planning Commission approval. Signs A. i a Pr9 rg am: Applicant shall prepare a master signage program for all signs on site which are intended for the advertisement of uses within the site. Said program shall 0% City Council Resolution — S 94-08/UP 94-19 — The Pruneyard Adopted on February 7, 1995 Page 4 conform with the sign ordinance and shall include all wall mounted, projecting and free standing signs. All new signs shall conform to sign program in effect at the time of filing. B. Freeway Signs: All freeway oriented signs require final approval from the City Council. 4. Parcel Map/Parcel Consolidation: A parcel map shall be recorded which eliminates any conflicts with existing or proposed buildings and is not in conflict with any health, safety or other codes as applicable. 5. Public/Street Improvements: Applicant shall construct improvements found necessary by the City Engineer according to generally accepted engineering practice. Applicant shall submit existing and proposed street centerline, monuments, right-of-way lines, public street improvements and public utili f facilities on all required street improvement plans as follows: A. Campbell Avenue Sidewalk Plans: Submit street improvement plans for Campbell Avenue that include: 1. Demolition of existing curb and gutter, portion of the roadway and str-et lighting system. 2. Construction of new concrete curb and gutter with new curb face located 10 feet southerly of existing curb face, 9.5 foot wide sidewalk and street lighting system. The design should transition to the existing curb face at the Bascom Avenue curb return to minimize changes to street improvements at the Bascom Avenue/Campbell P venue intersection. 3. Pavement Striving Markers and Signage Plans: Submit pavement striping, markers and signage plans along Campbell Avenue to reflect proposed vehicle lanes, bicycle lanes and on -street parking associated with the relocated curb and gutter. 4. Relocation of Public Storm Drainage Facilities: Applicant shall undertake a stady in accordance with generally accepted engineering practice to determine requirements for relocation of public storm drainage facilities, if required, to meet the conditions of approval. If required, .A City Council Resolution — S 94-08/UP 94-19 — The Pruneyard Adopted on February 7, 1995 Page 5 submit storm drainage relocation plans and/or public utility relocation pans. On street improvement plans for Campbell Avenue shall include the location of existing public utilities behind existing back of curb and identify remaining utilities to be relocated, if any, relative to the proposed new face of r urb. B. Traffic Signal interconnect : Design and construct a traffic ;ignal interconnect conduit below the sidewalk along Campbell Avenue with conductors connecting the existing Bascom Avenue/Campbell Avenue signal with the proposed modified signal at Campbell Avenue/Union Avenue. Extend the conduit with pull rope westerly to a new pullbox at the westerly limits of the Pruneyard parcel adjacent to the Highway 17 right-of-way. C. Luminaires: Install new city -provided luminaires, if necessary as determined by the City Engineer, on Campbell and Bascom Avenues (to be furnished at no cost to the developer) in conpinction with the Bascom and Campbell Avenue sidewalk improvements. D. Relocation of Traffic Signals and Loop Detectors: Submit plans for :elocation of traffic counting loop detectors at the Bascom Avenue/Campbell Avenue intersection if relocation is due to proposed street improvements and conditions of approval. E. Driveway Approaches: Relocate the two existing westerly Campbell Avenue driveway approaches (northbound into Pruneyard and southbound from Pruneyard) to a combined driveway with a fully signalized intersection at Union Avenue. Replace westerly driveway with curb, gutter and sidewalk to conform to proposed Campbell Avenue street improvements. The City and the applicant shall enter into a cost shzring agreement for construction of required off -site improvements to the Campbell/Union Avenue signal. The applicant shall pay one-half the cost of said off -site improvements at the Campbell/Union Avenue intersection not to exceed twenty-five thousand dollars (b25,000). F. Boulevard Treatment/Bascom Avenue: Submit plans for review and approval of the Planning and Public Works Departments for construction of Bascom Avenue boulevard treatments that include construction/modification of concrete sidewalks, street trees, landscaping and irrigation in conformance with the City's Streetscape Policy. City Council Resolution — S 94-08/UP 94-19 — The Pru•.eyard Adopted on February 7, 1995 Page 6 G Bascom Av-nua (Northern) Driveway Modifications: Submit engineered design plans for two northbound left turn lanes from the site. Design to include: loop detectors, sidewalks, street striping and landscaped pedestrian median. Construction of improvements shall be provided by the City at the City"s expense. H. SMd BumM: Submit plans showing the location and replacement of all on -site speed bumps with City -approved speed undulations (speed bumps). 1. Relocate Bascom Avenue Driveway: Relocate the existing southerly Bascom Avenue driveway approximately 160 feet nort?-erly. Replace existing driveway approach with curb, gutier and sidewalk to conform to Bdscom Avenue boulevard treatment design. ]. Vnderground Utilities: Install new on -site utilities underground per Section 20.36.150 of the Campbell Municipal Code for any new or remodeled buildings. Provide evidence from all utility companies that the proposed development modifications can be served. Comply with the plan submittal, permit and fee requirements of the utilities associated with new or modified service connections. K. Grading and Drainag Plan : All grading plans shall meet City standards as deemed appropriate for the proposed development. A grading permit shall be issued in conjunction with building permits. 1. Plans: Submit grading and drainage plans with hydrology and hydraulic calculations for existing on -site drainage improvements and for proposed on -site grading improvements showing proposed pad elevations of new structures, existing and proposed on -site and off -site grading and storm drainage systems and controlled site drainage onto public right-of-way. 2. Grading/Erosion Control Plans: Submit final grading, grading and erosion control plans to the Planning and Public Works Departments for approval prior to issuance of building or grading permits. City Council Resolution - S 94-08/UP 94-19 - The Pruneyard Adopted on February 7, 1995 Page 7 Storm Drainage Easement: Record a 20-foot wide storm drainage easement parallel and immediately adjacent to the westerly boundary of the Prwieyard. Encroachment Permits: Submit application for an encroachment permit(s), pay fees and post surety for all construction within the City's rigint-of-way. National Pollutant Discharge Elimination i -rr,ittLNPDES : Be advised that the Regional Water Quality Control Board will require that all construction on sites larger than five acres will require the project to be covered by a National Pollutant Discharge Elimination (NPDES) permit. Permit conditions may require construction and post -construction storm water management plans. The applicant is responsible for obtaining this permit, providing plans and paying associated fees. Utilities: All utilities and utility pedestals for new or modified building areas shall be diagramed on a site utility plan indicating the location of the pedestals and how the equipment will be screened prior to the installation of any utility pedestals (transformers) on site, subject to the review z.nd approval by the Community Development Director. Site Plan A. Final Site Plan: All final site plans including satellite pad locations, and location of pedestrian walkway and landscaping, shall be submitted to the City for review and subject to approval by the Community Development Director for substantial compliance with approved plans prior to issuance of building permits. Development Schedule: Applicant shall begin construction within one (1) year of final approval. Parking and Striping: Consistent site parking striping (either 60, 75 or 90 degree angled parking) within specified areas. D. Parking and Lriveways: All parking and driveway areas shall be developed in compliance with Chapter 21.50 of the Campbell Municipal Code, including parking modifications as approved by the City. CityCouncil Resoluti 4 8/UP 94-19 —The Pruneyard Adopted on February 7, 1995 Page 8 Pedestriangonnections: Applicant shall install pedestrian walkway connections from the public right of way as indicated on the site plan - Site plan including pedestrianshall reflect mre nc ionsthroughout thimprovements e site. p. Future Development- Applicant shall obtain a Special Development Permit from the City Council for all future development occurring in the Office (0) Overlay zone. Dedication to Ci : Applicant shall dedicate additional right of way on Bascom Avenue to back of sidewalk and record proper right of way to City as specified by the Public Works Department. Area to be dedicated shall include the to -foot wide landscaped parkway and the 7-foot wide public sidewalk. SarhaoP Collection : Trash containers of a size and quantity necessary to serve rew or modified building areas shall be located in areas approved by the Fire Department. Unless otherwise noted, enclosures, shall consist of a concrete floor surrounded by a solid wall or fence and have self -closing doors of a size specified by the Fire Department. All d accenenclosures hto e tra h enclosucted re area to ade serviceand these containers.area 1\Iew Retail Building Elevations A. Buildin¢ Design: Applicant shall continue to work with staff on resolving articulation of building facade to provide consistency of building elements and details within the retail center. Exterior facade details shall be resolved prior to issu-+nce of building permits. B. Building Treatment: Applicant shall submit plans indicating pedestrian level building treatment, colors and materials. Plans shall include architectural features such as street furniture, bicycle parking facilities, landscape planters, windows, and the like. These plans shall be consistent with the center and City of ar review Campbell approval bythedevelopment subject to Community Development Department. 10. Demolition Wit: Applicant is required to obtain a building permit, subject to review and approval by the Building Official prior to issuance of a demolition permit unless otherwise approved by the Building Offi"ll City Council Resolution — S 94-W/Ui' 94-19 — The Pruneyard Adopted on February 7, 1995 Page 9 11. Handicapped Ac.essibility: All w and remodeled buildings shall provide handicap access in accordance with the Uniform Building Code (UBC), and the Jniform Federal Accessibility S,andards (UFAS) and the Federal Americans with Disaoilities Act (ADA). 12. Mechanical Equipment: All roof -mounted and ground level mechanical equipment, on new or remodeled structures on site, which are visible from the public right of way shall be screened with similar building materials subject to the approval of the Community Development Director. 13. Fire Protection A. Warehouse Retail: All new or remodeled buildings shall comply with requirements of the Central Fire District. Applicant shall provide Fire sprinklers and Type V- one hour construction for the new warehouse retail, as permitted for allowable area increases. UBC 506 A. Hotel Expansion: All new construction shall provide one (1) hour fire resistive construction for all walls and floo*s of the new hotel expansion. UBC 1202 B. Area Separation/Hotel Expansion: All new construction shall provide an area separation for the new hotel expansion as required subject to allowable area increases for the existing hotel. UBC 506 A. Exiting Requirements: All new and renovated tenant spaces (units) with retail occupancies that allow 50 or more persons based en 30 sq.ft. pei occupant must show two means of (- ress separated by one half of the overall diagonal dimensions of served area. UBC chapter 3303 - Table 33A 14. Landscaping A. Site Landscape Plan: Applicant shall provide the required 10% landscaping on site per the zoning ordinance. All landscaping shall satisfy the City's Water Efficient Landscape (W:t ) standards. All landscape plans shall be submitted to the City for review and subject to approval by the Community Development Director. Tree Wells: Applicant shall install 15-gallon shade trees in designated locations on site in all perimeter parking areas of a 1% 14 City Council Resolution — S 94-08/UP 94-19 — The Pruneyard Adopted on February 7, 1995 Page 10 size and type acceptable to the City in conformance with the approved site plan. Tree Protection Plan: Applicant shall provide tree protection plan indicating trees to be protected and maintained on site. Streetscape frees and Landscaping: All street trees shall be installed and maintained in accordance with the Streetscape Guidelines for Bascom and Campbell Avenues including the size and type as specified by the City and approved on the final site plan. Northwest Corner: Applicant shall install landscaping frem Creek Trail Access to hotel expansion along northern property line. Improvements shall include pedestrian connection from Creek Trail into site. 15. Site Construction A. Construction and Equipment: Applicant shall utilize constructi:m equipment which adequately muffles noise in accordance with Section 18.02-030 of the City of Campbell Municipal Code. Construction activities and construction equipment shall comply with all air quality emission policies as determined by the Bay Area Air Quality Management District and the Banding Official for the City of Campbell B. Construction Activities: 1. Hours of construction shall be limited to 7 a.m. to 5 p.m. Monday - Friday, and 8 a.m. to 4 p.m. On Saturdays. No construction activity shall occur on Sundays or Holidays. 2. The construction site shall be watered, as necessary, but not less than twice per day in areas of new construction or grading where dirt is exposed to control dust. 3. Haul trucks and material stockpiles shall be covered. 4. The construction area and surrounding streets shall be swept as necessary, but not less than once daily. All areas shall be adequately fenced for safety per the Building Official. 16. Liquor Licenses: Approval is granted to allow the sc ,ring of alcoholic beverages (including beer and wine) with meals, aL existing or future sit-down restaurants as designated on the approved site plan. City Council Resolution — S 94-08/UP 94-19 — The Pruneyard Adopted on February 7, 1995 Page 11 PASSED AND ADOPTED this 7th day of February 1995, by the following roll call vote: AYES: Counciimembers: watson, Dougherty, Conant, Wilkinson, Burr NOES: Councilmembers: None ABSTAINED: Councilmembers: ,one ABSENT: Councilmembers: APPRO•'r i Donald R. Burr, Mayor ATTEST: Anne Bybee, City Clerk .l1Ft•�ti CITY OF CAMPBELL Community D,lopment Department Building Di—Wo February 8, 1995 Charles Bonno, Project Director 1901 S. Bascom Ave. Campbell, CA 95008 pruneyard Shopping Center renovation SUBJECT: 1875 S. Bascom Ave., Hours of construction 'n hours of tion as a Campbell control exeriorCode noises.Section Thtssect�ion describes such hours of operations shall be 0 pm and Saturday Monday through Friday, 8:00 am to 5:0These to conditions4:0werproe dopted to No holidays.or h construction activity is permitted on Sunday from outsidenoises in the owners to enjoy try and keep the neighborhoods quiet their yards. In adopting these conditions, an exception was included to provide additional hours of construction if no complaints were received from such construction activity. through Friday Your project outside of buildings may begin at WORK ut to 5:f t e b Mondaylbep and 9:00 am to 4:00 pm on Saturdays, NO FORK outside of the building will s permitted to begin outside Oil Sundays or holidays. These hours may remain in effect until the city receives any CA from neighbors about the construction noises. You may choose work in areas that are far away from residences and return to those a-�s that are close by wok in are es after a fa am. In addition you may wish to t rectathe 'curtain of canvas' in order to reduce the level of noise. de tion if and when en we of receivf, any engines complaints ai the assigned timescerning the weswill adviseeyou hat�we will ding return to the established hours in he municipal code. ;U Nurth tint 11ree1 lem�hell. lalllurnl., •�nln la: 'll aUN hFh 111n I,x 408 466 tliNl 1lin 408 86tl :71'n 1875 S. BASCOM AVENUE S 94-08/UP 94-19 3 OF 7 CITY OF CAMPBELL PLAN. 1 ? / 99 2 Pruneyard construction hours Page Please have a copy of this letter signed by your superintendent of this project and return ine copy to me. I will be certain that he is aware of these conditions. A copy of this letter will be sent to the police chief for his officers information. If you have any questions concerning this matter contact this office at 408/866-2130. Very truly yours �- �� RECEIVED Frank A. Cauthom, P.E. i. Building Official .0 r v� �hm�atu PLANNING 1IFPT cc: Police Dept. CDD Director Planning Div. Darryl Jones Building s:afr d% Al( There being no one else wishing to be heard, Mi yor Burr closed the public hearing. M/S: Dougherty/Conant - to adopt a Resolution approving a freeway oriented sign program to include a 72 square foot permanent sign consisting of 24 inch high bronze letters to read "Canyon Creek Apartments," approximately 480 square feet of temporary freeway oriented banner signs to remain in place until # project is 75% leased or out year from the date the signs are installed, and to delete Condition f5 regarding future temporary sign applications. Councilmember Conant withdrew the second on the motion; motion died. M/S: Dougherty/Wilkinson - to adopt a Resolution approving a freeway oriented sign program to include a 72 square foot permanent sign consisting of 24 inch high bronze letters to read "Canyon Creek Apartments," approximately 480 square feet of temporary freeway oriented banner signs to remain in place until the project is 75% leased or one year from the date the signs are installed, and to delete Condition #5 regarding future temporary sign opplicchons. Motion failed by the following roll call vote: AYES: Councilmemben: Dougherty, Wilkinson NOES: Councilmemben: Watson, Conant, Burr M/S: Conant/Watson - to adopt Resolution 8775 approving a freeway oriented sign program to include a 72 square foot permanent sign consisting of 24 inch high brouze letters to read "Canyon Creek," approximately 480 square feet of temporary freeway oriented banner signs to remain in place until the project is 75% leased or one year from the date the signs are installed, and to delete Condition N5 regarding future temporary sign applications. Motion approved by the following roll call vote: AYES: Councilmemben: Watson, Dougherty, Conant, Wilkinson, Burr NOES: Councilmemben: None 1`. Application of William Wilson & Associates for Approval of a Site and Architectural application to reconfigure existing retail space; construct new retail space; on -site pedestrian and vehicular circulation; and parking and landscaping, and a Use Permit to allow hotel expansion; the sale of skobol at restaurants with ogtdoor seating and the provision of shared parking facilities for property located at IM & l�aaa� Avatsua to to C4-S (General Commercial) Zoning District (S 94-08/UP 94-19) (Resolution/Roll Call Vote) This is the time and place for a public hearing to co eider the application of William Wilson and Associates for approval of a Site and Architectural application to reconfigure existing retail space; construct new retail space; on -site pedestrian and vetdcular circulation; and parking and landscaping; and a Use Permit to allow hotel expansion; the sale of alcohol at mstaurants with outdoot seating and the provision of shared parking facilities for property located at 1875 S. Bascom Avenue. NY Oaaf art" 6 Senior Planner Jones - Staff Report dated February 7, 1995 Mayor Burr declared the public hearing open and asked if anyone in the audience wished to be heard. David Word, principal of William Wilson & Associates, appeared before the Council and spoke in support of the application. Mr. Word intrcduced various members of his staff who were in attendance. Don Logan, representing the architectural firm of ELS, appeared before the Council and reviewed the architectural aspects of the project and answered spaific questions regarding design of the rew retail pad and is compatibility to the existing center_ Chris Meaney, William Wilson & Associates, appeared before the Council and spoke regarding the retail component of the project. David Finch, representing Guido's Restaurant, appeared before the Council and spoke regarding the location of an ice cream kiosk and the potentiai rt-gative impact it could have on the adjacent businesses, such as people congestion, traffic and parking. Kathleen Johnson, Santa Cruz resident, appeared before the Council and requested information regarding the construction schedtJe. Dale Pollek, 771 Manx, Campbell, appeared before the Council and spoke regarding traffic flow. David Finch appeared before the Council and again expressed concern regarding the kiosk, and requested that the kiosk issue be considered separately. Community Development Director Piasecki stated that the developer will need to come back with specific details of the kiosk including location, site plan, and architectural dmils, and staff will notify Guido's Restaurant of that meeting. There being no one wishing to speak Mayor Burr declared the public hearing closed. M/S: Conent/Dougherty - to adopt Resolution 8776 supporting the recommendation of the Planning Commission for approval of a Site and Architectural Permit for Site Modifications and a Use Permit for a hotel expansion and restaurant ases serving alcohol, utilizing shared on -site parking and providing outdoor seating for property located at 1875 S. Bascom Avenue, subject to revised Findings and Conditions of Approval. Motion adopted by the following roll c211 vote: AYES: Councilmembers: Watson, Dougherty, Conant, Wilkinson, Burr NOES: C(,uncilmembers: None City ou_-t sYtes 9 C,ty Council Report -% ITEM NO: CATEGORY: Public Ifearing MEETING DATE: February 7, 1995 Tn1E Site and Architectural approval for retail area building modifications, and modifications to site parking, landscaping, and circulation. Use permit approval for a hotel expansion, and restaurants serving alcohol, utilizing shared or. -site parking and providing outdoor seating. RECOMMENDATION That the City Council take an action approving the proposed site and architectural modifications and the use permit subject to conditions of approval. DISCUSSION Backeroun4. This it-m was considered by the Planning Commission on January 24, 1995. The proposed project is cons ;tent with both the current zoning and General Plan designations for the site Qgygjgpment Proposal: The applicant is requesting a Site and Architectural api ovat to allow the reconfiguraticn of existing parking areas r.nd additional landscaping throughout the site, and to demolish and reconstruct portions of structures on the retail portion of the site. A use permit is also required for the project to allow an outdoor food service kiosk, an expansion of the hotel (PruneYard Inn) by 50 rooms, and to allow restaurants to serve alcohol until 11:00 p.m., continue the previous site approval for shared on -site parking, and to provide cutdoor seating. The proposed changes will result in the retail floor area being decreased from 268518 square feet to 255,857 square feet. The hotel floor area will increase from 64,962 square feet to 84,792 square feet. The floor area of the office towers will remain the same but the amount of area dedicated to office uses will be increased from 224,475 square feet to 234,244 square fe?t. Building Design: The design of the new anch r retail building at the southeast corner of the site is also being considered as part of this application. The building will consist of approximately 42,000 square feet of floor area and will be a one story building ranging in height from 25-27 feet. The building features a pedestrian arcade along the Bascom and Campbell Avenue frontages with columns and a projecting awning treatment. The upper portions of the building frontages are proposed to be flat with two inch indentions aimed at providing additional detailing. Additional modulation of this part of the building can be achieved through further design study. City Council Report — February 7, 1995 S 9408/UP 94-19 — The Pruneyard Page 2 Specific designs for the Pruneyard Inn expansion, the relocated Bank of America building, and the other retail/commercial pad, to be located somewhere along Campbell Avenue, are not under review with this application. When development of these buildings is proposed, the application is subject to the Site and Architectural Review Committee's (SARC) review, and approval of the Planning Commission. tThe proposed site plan will improve existing pedestrian and vehicular en: on -site circulation and traffic flow One of the main features of the redevelopment project is the new central driveway or "Main Street" concept which will allow greater tenant visibility and access and circulation throughout the Pruneyard site. lation throug shade in the parking lot The f office towers, and tolicant also rinstallsto the City install ad pted Streetscape Standards n Campbelarea around l and Bascom Avenues. Parking: The project was originally approved with shared parking on -site for all allowed uses. The sate will continue to function in its same capacity with respect to parking. However, aftei site improvements are made to provide a more efficient parking layout, 73 additional spaces will be provided on site. Parking calculations presented in the Planning Commission report are provided for current day comparison purposes only. TraffiC4 Circulation: A traffic report was prepared for this project by the project applicant. The report concludes that additional traffic will be generated by this project but it will not have a significant impact on local streets and intersections. The report does not consider the on- and off -site impacts at the Campbell and Union Avenue driveways and intersection, or the driveway at the northern property line. Excerpts from the traffic report are included to provide additional information on the report's conclusions regarding the project related traffic impacts on Bascom, Campbell and Union Avenues. Staff is working with the applicant to address these issues. Additionally, staff is working with the applicant to reach a resolution regarding the future extension of Campisi Way to the site. These remaining issues regarding the site have not been resolved at the time of writing this report. Staff will report on the status of those development issues at the Council meeting. AI TERNATIVES 1) n i Rernmmendation of t+ie Planning Commission for approval of S 94-08/UP 9449. 2) MgdLfXIhC_ApgQvAL That the City Council adopt additional conditions of approval or findings and/or require additional design alternatives and uphold the decision of the Planning Commission. 1 1 City Council Report — February 7, 1995 S 94-08!UP 94-19 — The Pruneyard Page 3 Attachments: 1. Draft Resolution for Project Approval; 2. Excepts of Traffic Report prepared by the Project Applicant; 3. Planning Commission report -of January 24, 1995; 4. Minutes from the January 24, 1995 Planning Commission. PREPARED BY: — Darrvi I 4' Planner REVIEWED BY. -- Steve Pi c i, munity Development Director APPROVED BY: Mark J. Ochenduszko, City Manager =3 s 1 cF A E`b pl �2�i�SS� EESS2y"i `u: :soe It 4 0^H M ill 14111 `g ` Wig SCU2Q. �� bra &Y��`s=�Er_ 2Y�Bs etaAM k p c_�v E 11" Y„s I to I rtoo!; to y E a Q I- .a " e u j, a gv 11q y 5�. =a' 1 C6 EEp3p it, :yyg rs� .��o egea ggXX� pp,LLF its E 8 E'pyp iC 8s� O77 � t yEE E�S" .a«a 3 Y "g.4 oy•�I ��scoa o$�<��rE��a��°v Ot C 4At R N4 CITY of CAMPBELL in-pa,t —t c,,..,nt Punning January 30, 1995 Mr. David Word Executive Vice President William Wilson & Associates 2929 Campus Drive, Suite 450 San Mateo, CA 94403 Re: S 94-08/UP 94-19 — 1875 S. Bascom Avenue — The i'runeyard Dear Mr. Word: Please be advised that the Planning Commission, at its meeting of January 24, 1995, recommended adoption of Resolution No. 2949 for Site and Architectural and Use Permit applications to the City Council. This item is scheduled for review and consideration before the City Council on February 7, 1995, at 7:30 p.m. In the City Council Chambers at City Hall. If you should have any questions regarding the Planning Commission's action or the Conditions of AFaroval, please do not hesitate to contact the undersigned at (408) 866-2141. Sincerely, Darryl ones Senior Planner co Mr. Chris Meany Retail Project Director William Wilson & Associates 1999 S. Bascom Avenue, Suite 200 Campbell, CA 95008 Mr. Don Logan EIS/Mbassani & Logan Architects 2040 Addison Street Berkeley, CA 94704 70 N„nh h- S-11 c,mr,F<u, Cai,tn, — 9"Fh 1411 trt. 40P 4e61140 FAX 408. 379, 1572 nn> 408 e66.2790 MEMORANDUM CITY OF CAMPBELL PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMFNT TO: Pruneyard Redevelopment File DATE: January 24, 1995 FROM: Ron Mar(luez. P.E. SUBJECT: Recommended Circulation Improvements The purpose of this memorandum is to document the analysis and findings of the review of the driveway entrances for the Pruneyard Shopping Center on Campbell Avenue in Campbell California. The traffic analysis prepared by the developer by Brian Kangas Foulk is focused primarily on the major intersections on the area, it was intended to identify any concerns that the Santa Clara County Congestion Management Agency(CMA) may have with the project. The study concluded that the intersections critical to the CMA would not be significantly, using the CMA definiticn) affected by the project. The Public Works staff concerns are more comprehensive. Of particular concern is the effect of the 1700 trips per hour on 'he street system adjacent to Campbell Avenue. We nave previously identified pedestrian and queuing concerns at the northern Bascom Avenue entrance to the site. An improvement of this intersection has been proposed to address the various concerr� 1-he focus of this memorandum is the effect of traffic increases at the main a,ir2nce to the property along Campbell Avenue. This main driveway is divided into an entrance ind an exit and separated by 125 feet. The exit driveway is separated from Union Avenue by 1p0 feet. The proximity of all these movements to each other result in numerous weaving conflicts on Campbell Avenue. A level of service analysis for the driveway intersection W'h Campbell Avenue identified that left turn movements into the site would result in long traffic delays (LOS D) and the exiting left turns would experience very long traffic delays (LOS E). The traffic volume at the Pruneyard Entrance meets signal warrants, however, a signal this close to the Union Avenue signal would not operate effectively and would reduce the effectiveness of the system. An average of two accidents per year have resulted at the driveway entrances over the last four years. These accidents have been the result of movements into and out of the project site. qm January 24, 1995 Page 2 i Pruneyard Recommended Circulation We have evaluated a member of optio-'s for combining the entrances and exits to the site. The most favorable alternative from a traffic point of view is to cumbine the driveways at a point opposite the Union Avenue intersection. This would provide signalized control for both egress and ingress to the site with only a little additional delay on Campbell Averue and relatively little cost. We have evaluated the operation of such a signal and have estimated that it would operate at a level cf service C Attached are the LOS worksheets developed as part of this analysis. rym 1985 MOM: UNSI GMALIZED INTERSECTIONS PARR-I .................................................................«.. IDENTIFYING INFORMATION AVERAGE RUNNING SPEED, NAJOR STREET.. 35 PEAK MCIR FACTOR ..................... 1 AREA POPULATION ...................... 150000 NAME OF THE EAST/WEST STREET......... CAMPBELL NAME OF THE NORTH/SOUTM STREET....... PRUMEYAC� NNE OF THE ANALYST .................. RJM DATE FIF THE ANALYSIS (mm dd/VV)...... 01-23-1995 TIME PERIOD ANALYZFD................. PIN PEAK OTHER INFORMATION.... PRUKEIARO TRAFFIC WITH REDEVELOPMENT INTERSECTION TYPE AND CONTRC. ..... ........................... ............................. . ..... INTERSECTION TYPE: T-INTERSECTION MAJOR STREET DIRECTION: EAST/NEST CONTROL TYPE SOUTHICUMD: STOP S!GN TRAFFIF VOLUWS ....................................... ----. EB NB NB SB .... .... .... .... LEFT 160 0 -- 34 TMRU 1332 BB5 -- 0 RIGHT 0 11 -- 154 RIMER OF LAMES ...................................... ................ EB YB NB SB ....... ....... ....... ....... LAM 2 2 2 ADJUSTMENT FACTORS P.O.-2 ..................................................................... PERCENT RIGHT TURN CURB RADIUS (ft) ACCELERATION LANE WADE ANGLE FOR RIGHT TURNS FOR RIGHT TURNS ....... .......... ................ ................. EAST901" 0.00 90 20 N NESTRO(NO 0.00 90 20 N NORTHBOUND ----- ... --- SCUTHB011D 0.00 90 20 N VEHICLE COMM ITION ..................................................................... >< SU TRUCKS S COMBINATION AND RV'S VEHICLES S MOTORCYCLES ........... ............. ............. E/S:BOND 0 0 0 WSTBOLM 0 0 0 NORTHBOUND ... --- ... SOUTNBOHD 0 0 0 CRITICAL GAPS ..................................................................... 'ABULAR VALUES ADJUSTED SIGHT DIST. FINAL (Table 10-2) VALUE ADJUSTMENT CRITICAL SAP .............. ........ ........... ............ MINOR RIGHTS SB 5.70 5.70 0.00 S.,J MAJOR LEFT: EB 5.60 5.60 0.00 5.60 MINOR LEFTS SB 7.30 1.30 0.00 7.30 IDENTIFYING INFORMATION ..................................................... ................ NAME OF THE EAST/NEST STREET...... CAMPBELL UK OF THE NORTN/SOITN STREET.... PRUNEYARD DATE AMC TIME OF TNk ANALYSIS..... 01-25-1995 ; PH PEAK OTHER INFORMATION.... PRUREVARD TRAFFIC WITH REDEVELOPMENT CAPACITY AND LEVEL -OF -SERVICE ppfp. .......................................................... I... POTEM_ ACTW(L FLOW- TIAL MOVEMENT SNARED RESERVE RATE CAPACITY CAPACITY CAPACITY CAPACITY MOVEMENT v(pcpM) c (pcpA) c c (MO) (PION) cR cSH. v LOS p M SN MINOR STREET AO AO 2 SS LEFT 37 634 431 A RIGNr zaz e34 tic MAJOR STREET ES LEFT 176 367 367 367 191 D IDENTIFYING INFORMATION NAME OF THE EAST/WEST STREET...... CMPSELL NAME OF TOE NORTH/SO11H STREET.... PRWEYARD PM pfAN DATE AND TIME OF THE ANALYSIf..... 01-23-1995 OTHER INFORMATION.... ►RLNEYARD TRAFFIC WITH REDEVELOPMENT • C A P S S I 01-24-95 COIPREMENVVE ANALYSIS PROGRAM FOR A SINGLE SIGNALIZED INTERSECTION SOLUTION USING PREDETERMiMED CYCLE TIMES FLN:c.bt on CARRELL It UNION (MIMETARD IMM ►.M Pass Hour Scenario 2 MMment ERT ERL ERR $RT SOL SM MT NOL MR NOT Net NOR Phase 1 15 fees R A N Plasm 2- 0 secs E M x R Mae 350 get$ R Y R R MMe 4' 20 AscA A R M y Phase 5 - 0 sots Mae 6 - 0 secs Critical MVMt-•• •••• '•'• •'•• Peak 15 Vol -v0 1015 160 943 84 134 $14 267 11 534 143 Saturation -vph 3e00 1750 1750 1750 1730 3e00 1750 Shrd 3250 Shrd Last tion -sec 2.00 2.00 2.00 2.00 2.00 2.00 2.00 2. DO - Reletive Set 'N' 0.47 0.60 0.95 0.23 0.20 0.3e 1.00 - 0.SO - Effactive Gr-sec 48 13 4E is 33 48 13 - is Move Tim -sec 50 15 So 20 35 50 15 - 20 Min/Pod Tim -set Tim -sec R s e 6 10 6 6 - o - ►rog Eactw Mf 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 - 1.00 - AVDolay/vaA -eec a 28 27 21 13 O 69 - 48 ' level of II —I.. B. D• D• C' O- e. ) E ' Av.•o'/ largo vah 5 3 10 2 2 4 6 7 - VaD Stoppine S 59 93 94 e3 66 56 100 100 - Oo Veh Clear 7 YES YES YES YES YES YES NO 1 No - .... Intersection 1 "table < .. whole Intersacti on - Weighted AV Delay (soc) • 24 Level of Service C- Critiul Manneents - Weighted AV Delay (sec) 40 Lovel of Service E• rr ., - InTer action Capacity Utilization (ICU) - 0.97 Prodatensind Cycle Length is 85 words (Min. time my not be satiofld) • CAPSSI (Rol asse 111 Based on Delay Methodology Par 19R5 NighwY CopocitY MMeal RESOLUTION NO. 2950 BEING A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF CAMPBELL RECOMMENDING APPROVAL OF A SITE AND ARCHITECTURAL PERMIT FOR SITE MODIFICATIONS AND A USE PERMIT FOR A HOTEL EXPANSION AND RESTAURANT USES SERVING ALCOHOL, UTILIZING SHARED OA1-SITE PARKING AND PROVIDING OUTDOOR SEATING FOR PROPERTY LOCATED AT 1875 S. BASCOM AVENUE (THE PRUNEYARD). After notification and public hearing as specified by law on the application of Mr. David Word, on behalf of Pruneyard Associates, for approval of a Site and Architectural permit to reconfigure existing retail space, construct new retail space, modify on -site pedestrian and vehicular circulation, and parking and landscaping; and a Use Permit to allow hotel expansion, the sale of alcoholic beverages at restaurants, outdoor seating and the continuation of shared parking facilities, after presentation by the Community Development Director, proponents and opponents, the hearing was closed. After due consideration of all evidence presented, the Planning Commission did find as follows with respect to applications S 94.08/UP 94-19: 1. The proposal is consistent with the General Plan and Zoningproperty. designations which indicate a Commercial land use for this 2 The proposed site improvements of 13 percent on site landscaping and streetscape improvements adequately address the aesthetic concerns related to the project/site. 3. The proposed parking and circulation with the recommended conditions of approval creates a project which integrates the proposed uses on site. 4. No substantial evidence has been presented which shows that the project, subject to conditions of approval: will have a significant negative impact on the environment. 5. There is no evidence before the City determining that the proposed project will have a significant negative impact nn wildlife resources. 6. The City of Campbell has prepared an Initial Study for the project in order to determine if the project would have a significant environmental impact. Planning Commission Resolution No. 2950 S 94-W/UP 94-19 — The Pruneyard Adopted on January 24, 1995 Page 2 7. Adequate on site parking and circulation has been provided for the proposed project and the commercial, office and retail uses on site. 8. All proposed uses are compatible within the site and with adjacent land uses. 9. Traffic improvements are required based on potential traffic conflicts as a result of the proposed project. 10. Storm drainage easement is required to address additional runoff as a result of this project. Based upon the foregoing findings of fact, the Planning Commission further finds and concludes that: 1. The proposed project, with conditions of approval, is consistent with the policies of the General Plan and the Zoning Ordinance in effect at the time of the app:ication submittal and is consistent with uses in the immediate area. 2. The proposed project will aid in the enhancement and the harmonious development of the immediate area. The establishment, maintenance, or operation of the use will not be detrimental to the public health, safety, peace, morals, comfort or general welfare of persons residing or working in the neighborhood of such proposed use. 3. The roposed use will not be detrimental or injurious to property and improvements in the neighborhood or to the general welfare of the City and its residents. 4. The proposed project with the conditions imposed, will not have a significant adverse impact on the environment and Negative Declaration has been prepared for the project. 5. The proposed site is adequate in size and shape to accommodate the proposed use and site improvements. 6. These conditions are required as related and proportional to the impacts of the project. Planning Commission Resolution No. 2950 S 94-08/UP 94-19 — The Pruneyard Adopted on January 24, 1995 Page 3 The proposed use (restaurants seeing alcohol) will not result in an over -concentration of such uses in the area, create a nuisance, disturb the pease of nearby residents or cause a significant increase in the demand on City services because the 3osed use wil! operate within hours allowed under the Ordinance. Further, the applicants are notified as part of this application that they are required to comply with all applicable Codes and Ordinances of the City of Campbell and the State of California which pertain to this application and are not herein specified. And, that this approval is granted subject to the following Conditions of Approval: Project Approval: Approval of th:s project allows the following: A. Site modifications, including reconfiguration and construction of retail space in accordance with plans date stamped (Exhibit A). B. On -site pedestrian and vehicular circulation; C. Reconfigured parking and landscaping: D. Use Permit to allow hotel expansion; and E Use Permit for restaurants with outdoor seating, on site sale of alcohol and shared parking facilities. F. Open area food kiosk to be located in plaza adjacent to UA Cinema. Future Site Construction (Hotel Expansion_and Sat llllitul: Final plans for the hotel expansion and "satellite" retail pads are subject to review by the Site and Architectural Review Committee and approval prior to issuance of building permits. Retail pad on Campbell can be located anywhere along Campbell Avenue subject to Site and Architectural Review Committee approval. Steps A. Sienaee Program• Applicant shall prepare a master signage program for all signs on site which are intended for the advertisement of uses within the site. Said program shall conform with the sign ordinance and shall include all wall mounted, projecting and free standing signs. All new signs shall conform to sign program in effect at the time of filing. Planning Commission Resolution No. 2950 S 94-08/UP 94-19 — The Pruneyard Adopted on January 24, 1995 Page 4 B. Freeway Sums: All freeway oriented signs require final approval from the City Council. Parcel MaR/Pascal Consolidation: Parcel map shall be recorded which eliminates any conflicts with existing or proposed buildings and is not in conflict with any health, safety or other codes as applicable. Owner/Applicant shall also develop a formula for calculating participation in Campisi extension in conjunc ion with filing of parcel map. (Subject to further discussion) Public/Street IrBprovements: Applicant shall construct improvements found necessary by the City Engineer according to generally accepted engineering practice. Applicant snall submit existing and proposed street centerline, monuments, right-of-way lines, public street improvements and public utility facilities on all required street improvement plans as follows: A. Campbell Avenue Sidewalk Plans: Submit street improvement plans for Campbell Avenue that include: 1. Demolition of existing curb and gutter, portion of the roadway and street lighting system. 2. Construction of new concrete curb and gutter with new curb face located 10 feet southerly of existing curb face, 9.5 foot wide sidewalk and street lighting system. The design should transition to the existing curb face at the Bas,:om Avenue curb return to minimize changes to street improvements at the Bascom Avenue/Campbell Avenue intersection. I Pavement Sint_ Markers gnd SigBage Plans: Submit pavement striping, markers and signage plans along Campbell Avenue to reflect proposed vehicle lanes, bicycle lanes and on -street parking associated with the relocated curb and gutter. 4. Relocation of Public Storm Drainage Facilities - Applicant shall undertake a study in accordance with generally accepted engineering practice to determine requirements for relocation of public storm drainage Planning Commission Resolution No. 2950 S 94-08/UP 94-19 — The Pruneyard Adopted on January 24, 1995 Page 5 facilities, if required, to meet the conditions of approval. If required, submit storm drainage relocation plans and/or public utility relocation plans. On street improvement plans for Campbell Avenue shall include the location of existing public utilities behind existing back of curb and identify remaining utilities to be relocated, if any, relative to the proposed new face of curb. B. Traffic Sienal Interconnect : Design and construct a traffic signal interconnect conduit below the sidewalk along Campbell Avenue with conductors connecting the existing Bascom Avenue/Campbell Avenue signal with the proposed modified signal at Campbell Avenue/Union Avenue. Extend the conduit with pull rope westerly to a new pullbox at the westerly limits of the Pruneyard parcel adjacent to the Highway 17 right-of-way. C. Luminaires: Install new city -provided luminaires, if necessary as determined by the City Engineer, on Campbell and Bascom Avenues (to be furnished at no cast to the developer) in conjunction with the Bascom and Campbell Avenue sidewalk improvements. D. Relocation of Traffic Signals and Loop Detectors: Submit plans for relocation of traffic signals and loop detectors at the Bascom Avenue/Campbell Avenue intersection if relocation of traffic signal facilities are necessitated due to proposed street improvements and conditions of approval. APPLICANT PROPOSES TO EL MDVATE TIus CONDITION. E. Driveway Approaches: Relocate the two existing westerly Campbell Avenue driveway approaches (northbound into Pruneyard and southbound from Pruneyard) to a combined driveway with a fully signalized intersection at Union Avenue. Replace existing driveways with curb, gutter and sidewalk to conform to proposed Campbell Avenue street improvements. APPLICANT PROPOSES TO ELIMINATE 7WS CONDITION. F. Boulevard Treatment /Bascam Avenue: Submit plans for review and approval of the Planning and Public Works Departments for construction of Bascom Avenue boulevard treatments that include construction/modification of concrete sidewalks, street trees, landscaping and irrigation in Planning Commission Resolution No. 2950 S 94-08/UP 94-19 — The Pruneyard Adopted on January 24, 1995 Page 6 conformance with the City's Streetscape Policy. G. Bascom Avenue (Northern) Driveway Modifications: Submit engineered design plans for two northbound left turn lanes from the site. Design to include: loop detectors, sidewalks and street striping and landscaped pedestrian median. Construction of improvements shall be provided by the City at the City's expense. H. Sveed Bumvs: Submit plans showing the location and replacement of all on -site speed bumps with City -approved speed undulations (speed bumps). I. Relocate Bascom Avenue Dnvewav: Relocate the existing southerly Bascom Avenue driveway approximately 160 feet northerly. Replace existing driveway approach with curb, gutter and sidewalk to conform to Basccm Avenue boulevard treatment design. J. ljnder¢roum Utilities: Install new on -site utilities underground per Section 20.36.150 of the Campbell Municipal Code for any new or remodeled buildings. Provide evidence from all utility companies that the proposed development modifications can be served. Comply with the plan submittal, permit and fee requirements of the utilities associated with new or modified service connections. K. Grading and Drainage Plans: All grading plans shall meet City standards as deemed appropriate for the proposed development. A grading permit shall be issued in conjunction with building permits. UM: Submit grading and drainage plans with hydrology and hydraulic calculations for existing on -site drainage improvements and for proposed on -site grading improvements showing proposed pad elevations of new structures, existing and proposed on -site and off -site grading and storm drainage systems and controlled site drainage onto public right-of-way. Planning Commission Resolution No. 2950 S 94-08/UP 94-19 — The Pruneyard Adopted on January 24, 1995 Page 7 2. Grading /Erosion Control Flvns: Submit final grading, grading and erosion control plans to the Planning and Public Works Departr.ents for approval prior to issuance of building or grading permits. Storm Drainage Easement: Record a 20-foot wide storm drainage easement parallel and immediately adjacent to the westerly boundary of the Pruneyard. L Encroachment Permits: Submit application for an encroachment permit(s), pay fees and post surety for all construction within the City's right-of-way. M. National Pollutant Discharge Elimination Pe •mit (NPDES): Be advised that the Regional Water Quality Control Board will require that all construction on sites larger than five acres will require the project to be covered by a National Pollutant Discharge Elimination (NPDES) permit. Permit conditions may require construction and post -construction Aorin water management plans. The applicant is responsible for obtaining this permit, providing plans and paying associated fees. N. Utilities: AB utilities and utility pedestals for new or modified building areas shall be diagramed on a site utility plan indicating the location of the pedestals and how the equipment will be screened prior to the installation of any utility pedestals (transformers) on site, subject to the review and approvpl by the Community Development Director. Site Plan A. Final Site Plan: All final site plans including satellite pad locations, and location of pedestrian walkway and landscaping, shall be submitted to the City for review and subject to approval by the Community Development Director for substantial compliance with approved plans prior to issuance of building permits. Development Schedule: Applicant shall begin construction within one (1) year of final approval. Planning Commission Resolution No. 2950 S 94-08/UP 94-19 — The Pruneyard Adopted on January 24, 1995 Page 8 C. parking jnd Striving: Consistent site parking striping (either 60, 75 or 90 degree angled parking) within specified areas. D. Parking MId Driveways: All parking and driveway areas shall be developed in compliance with Chapter 21.50 of the Campbell Municipal Code, including parking modifications as approved by E. Pedestrian Connections: Applicant shall install pedestrian walkway connections from the public right of way as indicated on the site plan . Site plan shall reflect site improvements including pedestrian connections throughout the site. F. Future Development: Applicant shall obtain a Special Development Permit from the City Council for all future development occurring in the Office (0) Overlay zone. Dedication to City : Applicant shall dedicate additional right of way on Bascom Avenue to back of sidewalk and record proper right of way to City as specified by the Public Works Department. Area to be dedicated shall include the 10-foot wide landscaped parkway and the 7-foot wide public sidewalk. Garbage CollectioI3 : Trash containers of a size and quantity necessary to serve new or modified building areas shall be located in areas approved by the Fire Department. Unless otherwise noted, enclosures, shall consist of a concrete floor surrounded by a solid wall or fence and have self -closing doors of a size specified by the Fire Department. All enclosures to be constructed at grade level and have a level area adjacent to the trash enclosure area to service these containers. New Retail Buildine Elevation. A. ildiU& Design: Applicant shall continue to work with staff on resolving articulation of building facade to provide consistency of building elements and details within the retail center. Exterior facade details shall be resolved prior to issuance of building permits. B. Building Treatment: Applicant shall submit plans indicating pedestrian level building treatment, colors and materials. Plans shall include architectural features such as street furniture, bicycle parking facilities, landscape planters, windows, and the like. These plans shall be consistent with the center and City of Planning Commission Resolution No. 2950 S 94-08/UP 94-19 — The Pruneyard Adopted on January 24, 1995 Page 9 Campbell design and development standards, and are subject to review and approval by the Community Development Department. 10. Demolition Permit: Applicant is required to obtain a building permit, subject to review and approval by the Building Official prior to issuance of a demolition permit unless otherwise approved by the Building Official. 11. HandicaRRgd Accessibi!ity: All new and remodeled buildings shall Provide handicap access in accordance with the Uniform Building Code (UBC`, and the Uniform Federal Accessibility Standards (UFAS) and the F.Aeral Americans with Disabilities Act (ADA). 12. Mechanical Equipment: All roof -mounted and ground level mechanical equipment, on new or remodeled structures on site, which are visible from the public right of way shall be screened with similar building materials subject to the approval of the Community Development Director. 13. &t-Rlorecron A. Warehouse/Retail: All new or remodeled buildings shall comply with requirements of the Central Fire District. Applicant shall provide Fire sprinklers and Type V- one hoar construction for the new warehouse retail, as permitted for allowable area increases. UBC 506 A. Hot -I Expansion: All new construction shall provide one (1) hour fire resistive construction for all walls and floors of the new hotel expansion. UBC 1202 B. Area Separation/Hotel Expansion: All new construction shall provide an area separation for the new hotel expansion as required subject to allowable area increases for the existing hotel. UPC 506 A. Exiting Rtguirements: All new and renovated tenant spaces (units) with retail occupancies that allow 50 or more persons based on 30 sq.ft. per occupant must show two means of egress separated by one half of the overall diagonal dimensions of served area. UBC chap-er 3303 - Table 33A Planning Commission Resolution No. 2950 S 94-08/UP 94-19 — The Pruneyard Adopted on January 24, 1995 Page 10 14. Landscaping A. Site Landscape Plan: Applicant shall provide the required 10% landscaping on site per the zoning ordinance. All landscaping shall satisfy the City's Water Efficient Landscape (WEI S) standards. All landscape plans shall be submitted to the City for review and subject to approval by the Community Development Director. B. Tree Wells: Applicant shall install 15-gallon shade trees in designated locations on site in all perimeter parking areas of a size and type acceptable to the City in conformance with the approved site plan. C Tree Protection Plan: Applicant shall provide tree protection plan indicating trees to be protected and maintained on site. D. Streetscape Trees and Landscaping: All street trees shall be installed and maintained in accordance with the Streetscape Guidelines for Bascom and Campbell Avenues including the size and type as specified by the City and approved on the final site plan. E. Northwest Corner: Applicant shall install landscaping from Creek Trail Access to hotel expansion along northern property line. Improvements shall include pedestrian connection from Creek Trail into site. 15. Site Construction A. Construction and Equipment: Applicant shall utilize construction equipment which adequately muffles noise in accordance with Section 18.02.030 of the City of Campbell Municipal Code. Construction activities and construction equipment shall comply with all air quality emission policies as determined by the Bay Area Air Quality Management District and the Building Official for the City of Campbell. Planning Commission Resolution No, 2950 S 94-08/UP 94-19 — The Pruneyard Adopted on January 24, 1995 Page 11 B. construction Activities: 1. Hours of construction shall be limited M 8 a.m. W 5 p.m., Monday - Friday. (APPLICANT SEEKS A CONSTRUCT- ION START TIME OF 7 a.m. AND APPROVAL OF SAT- URDAY CONSTRUCTION HOURS FROM 7 a.m. to 5 P.M.) 2. The construction site shall be sprinklered with water, as necessary, but not less than twice per day, in areas of new construction or grading where dirt is exposed, to control dust. 3. Haul trucks and material stockpiles shall be covered. 4. The construction area and surrounding streets shall be swept as necessary, but not less than once daily. All areas shall be adequately fenced for safety per the Building Official. 16. Liquor Licenses: Approval is granted to allow the serving of alcoholic beverages (including beer and wine) with meals, at existing or future sit-down restaurants as designated on the approved site plan. PASSED AND ADOPTED this 24th day of January, 1995, by the following roll call vote: AYES: Commissioner: Alne, Higgins, Kearns, Lindstrom, Lowe, Meyer -Kennedy, Perrine NOES: Commissioner: None ABSTAINED: Commissioner: None ABSENT: Commissioner: None APPROVED: Jane Meyer -Kennedy, Chair ATTEST: Steve Piasecki, Secretary planning Commission Minutes of January 24,1995��_ Page 5 Commissioner Higgins, the Planning Commission moved to close the Public Hearing . (7-0) i000 MOTION: On motion of Commissioner H nded by Cam mLaioner Kearns, the Planning Com n adopted Resolution 2949 recommending appro• a S,000 wn f�Dteve� andtPermit to automotive allow the cotutructi building on p located at 535 W. Hamilton Avenue in a PD (Planned opment) Zoning District, by the following roll call vote: AYES: e, Higgins, Kearns, Lindstrom, Lowe, Meyer -Kennedy, Perrine NOES. None A None Chairwoman Meyer -Kennedy read Agenda Item No 3 into the record. 3. S94-08/UP94-18 Public Hearing to consider the application of Mr. David Word, on behalf of William Wilson & Associates, for approval of a Site and Architectural application to reconfigure exist: ng retail space; construct new retail space; on -site p,Wet;trian and vehicular circulation; parking and landscaping; and a Use Permit to allow hotel expansion; the sale of alcohol and outdoor seating in restaurants; and the provision of shared parking facilities for property located at 1875 S. Bascom Avenue (the Pruneyard) in a C-2-S (General ComrrerciLl) Zoning District. Mr. Darryl M. Jones, Senior Planner, presented the staff report as follows: • The project approval has two components: 1. Site approval 2. Use Permit • The project includes major site improvements including: landscaping, the reconfiguration of existing retail space; demolition of some existing retail Avenue through the center of the share inn center and aveway proposed fromBascom ream building with 42AW square feet f oPP 8 prop space. • Applicant is proposing a specific number of restaurants, landscaping of the Planning Commission Minutes of January 24,1995 Page 6 site per streetscape and zoning district standards, hotel expansion and the construction of pad buildings. • The proposed Use Permit will serve as a blanket Use Pernut for the shopping center to allow existing and new restaurant uses to utilize outdoor seating and to sell alcohol with meals. The Use Permit will also allow the addition of an outdoor kiosk, to be operated by Swensen's lee Cream Parlor, to offer food service in the courtyard right outside the movie theaters. • A parking analysis has determined that based on current standards the shared parking is adequate. In fad, parking will be improved by thz addition of 73 spaces through this redevelopment of the site. • The office towers are primarily unchanged with basic cosmeti; upgrades in the lobby and the transformation of the former Sebastian's Restaurant on the top two floors of the taller tower being converted into office space. The proposed changes in the parking areas around the towers are expected to encourage additional use of the space. Enhanced landscaping will add to the aesthetic quality of the area. • The independent (pad) buildings along Campbell Avenue are not specifically proposed at this time. When the applicant is ready to proceed with these pad buildings, t;;eir proposed plans will come before SARC for review. • The project includes a total of 575,00 square feet of gross floor area. • Applicant may eventually propose changes to the Pruneyard Inn sign.. As this sign is freeway -oriented, any changes to the sign wil, come before the Planning Commission and City Council for review and approval. • SARC reviewed and received this project well. SARC members expressed concerns regarding the Bascom Avenue site entrance as it pertains to traffic circulation. In addition, SARC found the upper facade tc be plain. This concern was resolved at the SARC meeting. SARC necommend:d approval. • Two issues remain to be resolved between the applicant and City staff, Conditions of Approval No. 4 and No. 6M. Condition No. 4 concerns the parcel maps/lines. Condition No. 6M pertains to future participation in the Campisi extension and the driveway approaches on Campbell Avenue. Commissioner Lindstrom presented the Site and Architectural Review Committee report as follows: • Concerns raised by SARC included the driveway from Bascom Avenue, the expansion/demolition of buildings and curbs and walkways. SARC had no specific recommendation but rather chose to leave the matter open to the Commiss',n to deade. Commissioner Perrin inquired whether there were to be any limits or editions as far as liquor licenses were concerned. Planning Commission Minutes of January 24 1995 Page 7 Mr. Darryl Jones replied that each new business is subject to a business license approval. Staff would review each business license and consider the appropriateness of the use. Commissioner Perrin asked who approves restaurant uses. Mr. Darryl Jones answered that Planning staff reviews and approves. Commissioner Lindstrom sought clarification regarding the proposed hotel expansion, believing that this expansion was something that was M be discussed further at a later date. Mr. Darryl Jones replied that the expansion would go before SARC and the Planning Commission when a Site application is submitted. Chairwoman Meyer -Kennedy asked whether the Use Permit would allow any restaurant at the Pruneyard to serve alcohol. Mr. Steve Piasecki, Community Development Director, replied that the Use Permit would be a blanket Use Permit which would allow any sit-down restaurant to serve alcohol with meals and to offer outdoor seating. Commissioner Kearns asked about the hotel expansion and whether the Campisi extension would occur in the future. Also whether the Campisi extension would be a Condition of Approval for the hotel expansion. Mr. Darryl Jones responded that the hotel expansion was not expected to cause requirement for the Campisi extension or Condition of Approval. Chairwoman Meyer -Kennedy opened the Public Hearing for Agenda item No. 3. Mr. David Word, Partner, William Wilson k Associates, addressed the Commission as follows: • William Wilson k Associates purchased the Pruneyard in April 1994 from Bank of America and Home Federal. • They arc working hard, planning the future for the Pruneyatd. • Expressed his pleasure at seeking approval for the proposed plans. • Thanked City staff, particularly Steve Piasecki and Darryl Jones, for their professionalism and the professional relationship that has been developed. • They are interested in coming up with solutions that are good for the company and good for the community. • Stated that he was delighted to answer any questions. • Presented a color -coded site plan depicting the retail space currently leased Planning Commission Minutes of January 24,1995 ___ Page 8 out at the Pruneyard and which also demonstrates the large amount of retail space that is currently vacant. • Announced that gross sales at the Pruneyard last year were approximately 25 million dollars and "heading south " • Projections have sales doubling with this proposed renovation. • Redevelopment of the site is anticipated to be completed in 19%. • William Wilson & Associates is currently ir, negotiations with lessees at this time. • Final details/designs are to be worked out. • They continued to make improvements to the office towers. In April, die renovations of the lobbies for both towers will be completed. • The Pruneyard Inn is doing very well with 118 rooms. Of the space earmarked for the hotel expansion, none of it is currently leased. • They are anxious to be a part of the community. • William Wilson & Associates is headquartered in San Mateo. The Pruneyard represents their first investment in Campbell. They are here for the long haul. • Introduced his associates, Mr. Chris Meany (Retail), Mr. Jack Bonno (Leasing) Ms. Mollie Choate Wroperty Manager) and Mr. Don Logan (Principal, ELS Architecture). • Stated that he is confident that the two issues that are not yet 100% settled can be worked out with City staff. Mr. Don Logan, Architect, ELS Architecture, addressed the Commission as follows: • Two issues were broufht up at the SARC meeting: 1. Circulation as a result of the Bascom Avenue driveway. This can be solved through alternate designs. Presented three additional proposals and discussed a fourth proposal suggested by Community Development Director, Steve Piasecki, just prior to this evening's meeting. Felt confident that between all the parties, a workable option can be developed. 2. The high mass in the new building was seen as toe plain. He recommends using joinry in the stucco which creates a pattern effect. Commissioner Lowe inquired whether the driveway neck allowed room for two cars. Mr. Don Logan replied that it did. Mr. Chas Meany, William Wilson & Associates, addressed the Commission as follows: • Identified himself as the person responsible for working out the small points with Steve Piasecki and Darryl Jones. Planning Commission Minutes of January 24, 1995 Page 9 • As a clarification point regarding restaurant uses and liquor sales, advised the Commission that specific spaces have been identified for restaurant uses. QnLy those spaces will be utilized by restaurants. • They are interested in creating 'a downtown feel with a good mix of restaurants. • Asks the Commission to approve the master site plan and the proposed square footage for the project. • Stated that some portions of the building design are done. Any portion not yet designed will be approved at a later date with future Planning Commission review. • Questioned the need for the 20 foot easement to be granted to the City of Campbell along the westerly property line. It is his understanding that there is no definite plan for this easement by the City at this time. After consulting with a Civil Engineer, he is recommending that the easement, if necessary, be reduced to 15 feet and asked that the easement not be recorded. Commissioner Lindstrom requested clarification regarding Conditions of Approval 6(E 4c Fl. Mr. Darryl Jones replied that the intersection at Campbell and Bascom Avenues may require modification. Additionally, the driveway on Campbell Avenue near the Union Avenue light might need to be moved so that the driveway is directly across the intersection from Union Avenue. The applicant is not supportive of these requirements at this time. City Attorney William Scligmann suggested that the City's Traffic Engineer discuss the reasons for these requirements. Mr. Ron Marquez, City of Campbell Traffic Engineer, addressed the Commission as follows: • Staff has reviewed this project at length. • A traffic study was conducted which focuses on regional concerns, particularly those concerns which are a priority to the Congestion Management Agency. • There are currently 1,700 trips per hour at this site. • Conflicts already exist with the high number of traffic movements being accomplished in a small space. He gave as an example the exit driveway from the Pruneyard onto Campbell Avenue near Union. A small amount of roadway separates the exit from the Union Avenue signal. For vehicles attempting to reach the left tun' lane leading onto Union Avenue, vehicles must cross two lanes which are blocked if the Union and Campbeli Avenue signal light is red. However, this area does not experience a major problem in relation to accidents. Approximately two accidents per year have occur in this area Planning Commission Minutes of January 24, 1995 Page 10 (Campbell near Union) over the last four years. • Staff has evaluated options to address these traffic issues, including the Joining or merging of the driveways entering and exiting the Pruneyard to Union Avenue where movements would be controlled by signal lights and offer a good level of service. • Ingress and egress issues equal safety issues. Mr. Darryl Jones added that the City Traffic Engineer would work closely with the applicant's Traffic Engineer. Commissioner Alne stated that he apprc fated the analysis. He added that when circulation between the site and public right-of-way arise, it Lc difficult to overlook the requirements determined necessary by the City's Traffic Engineer. Chairwoman Meyer -Kennedy inquired whether there were any proposed changes on Bascom Avenue signals. Mr. Ron Marquez replied that details were still being worked out. However a need has been identified for additional stacking space. One option being considered is the provision of two left turn lanes at the signal. Mr. Darryl Jones added that Condition of Approval 6(H) addresses this issue. Commissioner Perrine stated that he is very supportive of the blanket Use Permit approval for alcohol service at restaurants. Inquired what would trigger the Campisi extension. Mr. Steve Pia;vck: replied that this project being considered is removing more retail space th a r is adding. At this time the extension of Campisi is not warranted. In the future, discussions with the applicant will be needed. One possibility is to tie th—w discussions in with the Parcel Map. The expansion of Campisi is part o' the City's General Plan and will need to be taken into consideration at a future date. Commissioner Higgins inquired about the no -build area on the site. Mr. Steve Piasecki replied that, at this time, a no -build area is not required on the site. Commissioner Lindstrom inquired the intent and necessity for Conditions of Approval 6 (E k R Mr. Steve Piasecki replied that they relate to technical traffic issues. The applicant is concerned with the costs relating to these two items. He suggested that the Planning Commission Minutes of January 24, 1995 Page 11 Commission allow the details to be worked out between the applicant and staff with ultimate approval by the City Council of the final agreement. This can be accomplished without delaying the project. MOTION: On motion of Commissioner Higgins, seconded by Commissioner Perrine, the Planning Commission unanimously moved to close the Public Hearing. (7-0) Comc:iissioner Lindstrom made a motion to approve the project, with a second by Commissioner Lowe. City Attorney William Seligman proposed a modification to the Findings for this project as follows: Remove existing Finding No. 9: =4affie ad an Replace Finding No. 9 as follows: `ThepUiect will result in intens' 'cation of the usellf the site. ytneZjb1y_additional vehicular trips in and out of the vroie� site. Unless mitiggfed. these additional trio Dill adversely im2u the alreadg substantial traffic flow at the int in4rtss and egzess to the vroiect site resullitn in a higher incidence of traffic accidents and eonyation. The provisions contained in Conditions of Approval 6 and 8 are necessary and reasonable to mitigate this traffic and circulation imRacts and proportioned to the nature and extent gf the protect." At this point Mr. David Word and Mr. Chris Meany inquired if they had the right to speak to this new finding. MOTION: On motion of Commissioner Perrine, seconded by Commissioner Alne, the Public Hearing for Agenda Item No. 3 was reopened. Mr. David Word, Applicant, William Wilson k Associates, addressed the Commission as follows: • The new finding proposed by Mr. Seligmann is not supported by fact and does not conform to the City's own Traffic Engineer's recommendations. Mr. Chris Meany, Applicant, William Wilson & Associates. • The third party traffic engineering report concludes that no traffic mitigation measures are required at this time. plannin Commission Minutes of Janu 24,1995 _ Page 12 City Attorney William Seligmann responded that his proposed finding is based upon the Traffic Engineer's oral report. Mr. Chris Meany: • oniy findings based on fact should be included. M • Expressed that they are interested in working wngs out endat there is a solution out there. Weer, no traffic • In his discussions with Mr. Ron Marquez, Traffic Engineer, mitigation was deemed appropriate. The accident count does not warrant this finding being read into the record. It is constraining and contains inappropriate language. City Attorney William Seligmann replied that the language has a factual basis based on expert opinion. Mr. Ron Marquez, Traffic Engineer. Clarified that the traffic study focused on regional interests not the driveways • at Bascom and Camptell Avenues. There was no discussion of these driveways in the analysis. • There is no disagreement between City staff and the consultants that performed the analysis. City Attorney William Seligmann asked Mr. Ron Marquez whether his proposed finding of fad was consistent with his understanding of this project. Mr. Ron Marquez said that it did. Mr. Steve finding Pias cadded that the be duly noted applicants opposition tes. of (and disagreement with) this g of ri Mr. Chris Meany added: • He is vigorously opposed to the addition of this finding. He believes it inappropriate to have Mr. Seligmann's finding included as a finding of fad. • donee. that staffThey have not seen any traffic tudy by the City d laid out the constralTdS under ch the traffic study was Commissioner Alne asked whether two traffic studies were conducted, one by a third party and another by the City. Mr. Chris Meany replied that he has yet to see a traffic study conducted by City staff. Planning Commission Minutes of January 24,1995 Page 13 City Attorney William Seligmann replied that both studies had been done Commissioner Alne asked whether a summary nad been provided City Attorney William Seligman advised that the staff report represents the summary. Commissioner Alne opined that the Commission benefit from both the internal and external traffic report. Whether the applicant ag-rees with the findings has no bearing. Asked whether this finding of fact proposed by the City Attorney has an adverse effect on the development of this project. Citu Attorney Willia— Seligmann replied that it woulo not. Any recommended approval by the C mission is later reviewed by the City Council for final approval. This find - -ould be removed and/or changed. Mr. Chris Meany stated that staff is doing an admirab.e job keeping them in line. Commissioner Alne asked Mr. Meany whether he felt their position was being jeopardized by this proposed finding of fact. Mr. Chris Meany replied that he would back down from his opposition but still want to express his disagreement on the record. Agrees that the Commission can find as it wishes. Having worked closely with Mr. Ron Marquez, he is surprised by City Attorney Seligman's finding. Commissioner Alne asked Mr Meany a second time whether he felt his position was being diminished in any way. Mr. David Word replied that perhaps "mountains were being made out of mole hills." However, their position is not diminished. They are surprised by the last minute addition to the findings of fact. In a practical sense, it is difficult to leave the project site. They will work with staff to find a solution they can afford. They were simply concerned by the "hammer" language of this on&ng. It does not diminish their project. Commissioner Alne asked the City Attorney what City interests are served with this finding. On the other hand, what City interest are damaged if this finding is not included. City Attorney William Seligma-n replied that it depended on the point of view. The Commission is obligated to justify the conditions for traffic mitigation. Planning Commission Minutes of January 24,1995 Page 14 Commissioner Alne asked what would be the basis for future mitigation. City Attorney William Seligman replied that mitigation would be required on a factual basis as found by the Traffic Engineer. Commissioner Alne clarified that the Commission is concerned with the public's interest. He believes that future interpretation concerns are misplaced. This finding of fact can be added without jeopardizing this project. Mr. Steve Piasecki, Community Development Director proposed an additional Condition of Approval as follows: 16. Liquor Licenses• Approval is granted to allow the e�rving of alcoholic beverage, (including beer and wine) with mealy at existing or future sit- down restpurants as designated on the amno_vyd site -plan. MOTION. On motion of Commissioner Lindstrom, seconded by Commissioner Kearns, the Planning Commission unanimously moved to again close the Public Hearing. (7-0) Commissioner Lindstrom at this time reminded the Commission that his motion for approval was still open. However, he was not supportive of the revised finding of fact proposed by Mr. Seligmann or the additional condition of approval suggested by Mr. Piasecki. Commissioner Alne stated that is was difficult for him to discount the City Attorney's recommendation. Commissioner Lindstrom stated that he did not believe that the wording was necessary. The way the Conditions of Approval are worded is sufficient. Commissioner Perrin inquired whether a middle ground could be reached by toning down the language, removing some of the adjectives. Commissioner Higgins stated that the Commission should benefit from the City Attorney's expertise and the clarifying language should be included. Chairwoman Meyer -Kennedy agreed with Commissioner Higgins and added that the additional Condition of Approval proposed by Mr. Piasecki should also be included. Commissioner Ke;.rns stated her agreement. Commissioner Alne asked Commissioner Lindstrom whether he would accept as Planning Commission Minute; of January 24 1995 Page 15 a friendly amendment the inclusion of the City Attorney's finding of fact language. Commissioner Lindstrom replied that he would accept the additional Condition of Approval but not the revised Finding of Fad as a friendly amendment. Commissioner Alne suggested that the proposed Finding and the additional Condition of Approval be added. Commissioner Kearns asked that Mr. Seligmann's proposed Finding of Fad be repeated. City Attorney William Seligmann read the proposed finding as follows: 'I-JU proiect will result in intengtfication of the the site. Q�alltlg additional � vehicular WIM in attd out of the eject site Unless mitigated these additional l t►affi trips will adversely impact the already suhta teac flaw at tht nv= of ingress and cgras to the vroiect site resultin4 in a hi¢hn inciAence 4� traffic accidents and congestion. The ovisions. contained to Conditions of Approval 6 and x are necessaty and reasonable to mitigate this trgfjjc and c�rculahon impacts and proportioned to the nature and ex- tent of the vroitdj,: Commissioner Alne asked what would cause added trips since the site will include less square footage. Mr. Ron Marquez informed the Commission that the traffic study indicates 146 additional trips during the peak hour. There will be 50 additional hotel rooms. Currently the site has a 30% vacancy rate with is expected to decrease to approximately 6%. Commissioner Alne asked Mr. Marquez what changes in circulation might be required if the site is fully leased. Mr. Ron Marquez responded that staff estimates using the reality of the present with projections. Basically what can be counted today versus what is estimated for tomorrow. Chairwoman Meyer -Kennedy asked if a similar finding of fact was included on the approval for the Hamilton Plaza remodel a few years ago. Mr. Steve Piasecki replied that the Hamilton Plaza project was also required tL make modification to the site due to traffic conditions. He further stated that the existing traffic circulation pattern on Campbell Avenue is bad traffic engineering practice. Planning Commission Minutes of January 24 1995 Page 16 Commissioner Lindstrom opined that all necessary wording was already in place. Commissioner Lowe stated his concern that a project of this quality is being tied up due to the wording of one finding. Commissioner Higgins asked whether Mr. Lindstrom was supportive of Mr. Piasecki's proposed Condition -f Approval regarding the Use Permit as it pertains to the sale of alcohol at restaun nts. Commissioner Lindstrom replied that he would support that added Condition. However existing language in the Findings and Conditions of Approval covers the point being attemptec: through the City Attorneys proposed finding of fad. Commissioner Perrine asked the City Attorney what clout the City is left with without this language. Expressed that prohlems are already there. City Attorney William Seligmann stated that the Findings establish the need for Conditions of Approval. Chairwoman Meyer -Kennedy inquired whether the original finding (09) could be retained. City Attorney William Seligmann stated that it could. Commissioner Perrine suggested adding the following language to the original finding of fad: "Due to intensification of retail actirity en reduced sg a,_re footage. traffic improvements are required based on potential traffic conflicts as a result of the proposed project." Commissioner Lindstrom reiterated his belief that existing Conditions of Approval cover this issue. Commissioner Alne inquired why the proposed language of the finding was necessary. City Attorney William Seligmann replied that it provides specifity. The original la- guage was rather broad. His revised language is more specific. Commissioner Alne asked whether the need for this language was overstated. City Attorney William Seligman answered that he did not believe so but that it was the Commission's decision. planning Commission Minutes of January 24 1995 Page 17 Commissioner Perrin asked the Commission for a volunteer to make a friendly amendment to include the language recommended by the City Attorney. Conunissioner Lindstrom again stated that this amendment was not acceptable to him. Commissioner Alne cautioned the Commission that it did not want to send the wrong message on to the City Council regarding its overall support of this project based on a disagreement over the wording of one Finding of Fact After further discussion by the Commiasiouers regarding the proposed amendment to the original motion, a roil all vote was taken. MOTION: On motion of Commissioner Perrine, seconded by Commissioner moved to recommend approval Kearns, the Planning Commission of the Site and Architectural application (S 94-08) and to approve a Use Permit (UP 94-19) for property located at 1875 S. Bascom Avenue (The Pruneyard) in a C-2 (General Commercial) Zoning District, In include the City Attorney's amended language for the Finding of Fact No. 9 and t0_include the clarifying Condition of Approval as it pertains to on -sale liquor sales by restaurants, by the following roll call vote. AYES: Kearns, Meyer -Kennedy, Perrine NOES: Arne, Higgins, Lindstrom, Lowe ABSENT: None ABSTAIN: None The amendment to the previous motion was defeated on a three to four vote. MOTION: On motion of Commissioner Lindstrom, secouded by the Planning Commission moved to Commissioner Kearns, recommend approval of the Site and Architectural application (5 %-08) and to approve a Use Permit (UP 94-19) for property located at 1975 S. Bascom Avenue (The Pruneyard) in a C-2 (General Commercial) Zoning District, to exclude the City Attorney's amended language for the Finding of Fad No. 9 and in include the clarifying Condition of Approv+l u it pertains to on -sale liquor Therefore the Committee approved sales by restaurants. Resolution 2950 recommending City Council approval of S 94-08 (Site and Architectural approval) and a Use Permit (UP 94-18), by the following roll -call vote: Planning Commis<:on Minutes of January 24, 1995 Page 18 AYES: Alne, Higgins, Kearns, Lindstrom, Lowe, Meyer -Kennedy, Perrin NOES: None ABSENT: None ABSTAIN: None the tten report of Mr. Steve Piasecki, Community Development Director, was ac�rep th the following highlights: • Anntinced that the City Council approved the Design Guidelines at its meeg Monday, January 23, 1995. • At the sa meeting, the appeal of the Fence Exception for 1265 Burrows Road and the ign Application for 500 Railway Avenue were continued to • the Planning C fission meeting of February 7, 1995. Advised the Com ioners of the American Planning Association Planners Institute scheduled March 22-24 in Monterey. Asked any interested Commissioners to noti a department secretary if interested in attending. AD101 RNME�IT The Planning Commission meeting urned at 9:45 p.m., to the next Planning Commission meeting of February 14, 1 at 7:30 p.m., in the Council Chambers, City Hall, 70 North First Street, Campbell, fornia. SUBMITTED BY: Au A- 4�— Corinne A. Shinn, Recording tart' APPROVED BY: Jane Meyer-Kenned�Chairwoman ATTEST: 1 �� Steve`$ia.•ecki, ommunity Development Director ITEM NO.3 STAFF REPORT - PLANNING COMMISSION MEE-LING OF JANUARY 24, 1995 S 94-081UP 94-19 Public Hearing to consider the application of Mr. David Word, Word, D. on behalf of Pruneyard Associates, for approval of a Site and Architectural application to reconfigure existing retail space; construct new retail space: site pedesirian and vehicular circulation; and parking and landscaping; and a Use Permit to allow hotel expansion, the sale of alcohol at restaurants, outdoor seating and the provision of shared parking facilities for property located at 1875 S. Bascom Avenue (The Pruneyard) in a C-2 (General Commercial) Zoning District. STAFF RECOMMENDATION That the Planning Commission take the following action: 1. Adopt a Resolution, incorporating the attached findings, recommending approval to the City Council the Site and Architectural application to allow renovation of the Pruneyard Shopping Center and a Conditional Use Permit to allow expansion of a hotel use and restaurants with outdoor seating, the service of alcohol and shared parking facilities. ENVIRONMENTAL DETERMINATION In accordance with CEQA, the City conducted an Initial Study for this project. The results of the study determined that no significant impacts would be created as a result of the proposed project with implementation of specific mitigation measures. A traffic report has also been prepared for this project which concluded that the project will generate additional traffic but it will not result in significant environmental impacts. Based on the information provided in the environmental assessment, staff has prepared a mitigated Negative Declaration for this project, and is included as an attachment to this report. PROTECT DATA Gross Lot Area: 1,386,000 s.f. 31.8 acres Net Lot Area: 1,270,000 s.f. 29.1 acres Building Coverage: 26% 315,000 s.f. Floor Area Ratio: .45 574,892 s.f. Total Building Area Existine Propmd Retail: 268518 s.f. 255,857 0. Hotel: 64,962 s.f. 84,792 s.f. Office Towers: 224,475 s.f. 234,244 s f• TOTAL 567,724 s.f. 574,892 s.f. Staff Report - Planning Commission Meeting of January 24, 1994 S 94-08/UP 94-19 - 1875 S. Bascom Avenue - The Pruneyard Page 2 Landscape Coverage: 13% 165,000 s.f. Paving Coverage: 61 % 770,000 s.f. Parking Provided: 1,896 spaces Parking Required: Shopping Center: 1:200 1,279 spaces Office Towers: 1:225 1,041 spaces Hotel: 1 per room/employee 193 spaces (168 rooms + maximum of 25 employees at any one time) TOTAL REQUIRED: 2,513 spaces GENERAL PLAN ND ZONING CONSISTENCY General Plan Designation: The General Plan designates commercial uses at the project site. The redevelopment of the property will remain consistent with the General Plan designation for the site. Zoning Designation: The site is zoned C-2 (General Commercial and C-2-0 (General Commercial/Office). The proposed site renovations and development meet all the standards for the zoning district in terms of setbacks, lot coverage, floor area ratio (FAR), height restrictions, parking, open space and architectural compatibility with the neighborhood. DISCUSSION Applicants Pr000saL: The applicant is requesting Site and Architectural Approval to allow the reconfiguration of existing parking areas on site, add landscaping on site, and to demolish and reconstruct structures on the retail portion of the site. The applicant is also requesting approval of a conditional use permit for two uses. First, to allow expansion of a hotel use in the C-2 (General Commercial) zoning district. Second, to allow restaurant uses which serve alcohol, provide outdoor seating, hours of operation for restaurants until 11:00 p.m., and provide shared on -site parking facilities. The applicant proposes to change the retail square footage from 268,518 square feet to 255AS7 square feet of retail floor area. The hotel expansion will increase the size of the facility from 64,%2 square fet, to 84,792 square feet. The floor area of the two office towers will be increased from 224,475 square feet to 234,244 square feet with the conversion of a previous restaurant use to offices. Staff Report — Planning Commission Meeting of January 24, 1995 S 94-08/Up 94-19 — 1875 S. Bascom Avenue — The Pruneyard Page 3 Project Background: The main portion of the site (movie Theaters) was first approved in 1968. The retail portion of the site was approved in 1969 along with a master plan for the site, and was constructed over time (in six phases) starting in 1969. The construction of the office towers began in 1971. The hotel was later constructed in 1989. The previous property owner was r.solved of ov.mership of .he site in 1990. The property was foreclosed upon and in ownership of financial institution until the current owner purchased the site in its present configuration, consisting :4 approximately 500,000 square feet of retail/office floor area, in April of 1994. ANALYSIS Un The proposed project is consistent with the Zoning Ordinance and the General Plan for uses in the C-2-S (General Commercial) zoning district and the Commercial General Plan designation. A Conditional Use Permit is required for: • Hotel expansion of up to 50 new rooms • Restaurant uses which serve alcohol, has outdoor seating, proposed hours of operation (to 0:00 p.m.) and shared on -site parking. Site approval is required for modification to structures and other on -site features such as parking and circulation. Specific site approval is required for: • Shared parking and a reduction in required parking for the entire site • Site and architectural approvals of new commercial/retail structures on site • Site perking modifications and vehicular circulation • Landscape and pedestrian improvements on site • Open area food service kiosk in plaza (in front of UA Theaters) The site is primarily flat and is located adjacent to cffice and retail uses south of the site on Campbell Avenue; Retail and Restaurant uses east of the site on Bascom Avenue; a residential use to the north; and State Highway 17 on the western property line. New uses will be integrated throughout the project site consisting primarily of restaurants and additional retail. An existing bank and a restaurant use will be located on separate construction pads along Campbell Avenue. These uses are also permitted without requiremen, of a use permit in the C-2 zoning district. The buildings are subject to site design review by staff when these structures ar proposed to be constructed. Staff Report — Planning Commission Meeting of January 24, 1995 S 94-08/11P 94-19 — 1875 S. Bascom Avenue — The Pruneyard Page 4 BUILDING DISI .N The design of the new retail structure is being considered as part of the subject application. The structure will he located at the southeast corner of the retail shopping structure will consist of approximately 42,000 square feet of retail space. The height of the proposed structure will range from 25-27 feet, and consist of 1 story. The two main entrances to the structure are oriented towards Bascom Avenue. The entrances are recessed into the body of the structure approximately 14 feet, and are accentuated by a wood timber tower element with a tile roof over each entrance. Other key features of the facades includes columns from the ground level to the upper facade, and awnings over the pedestrian arcade which provide a visual connection to existing building facades and arcades in the shopping center. The Campbell Avenue frontage incorporates a loading dock area to service the new building. The opening to the loading dock will be screened by a decorative gate. The upper facade and roof treatment of the portion of the new structure constructed over the existing retail shops will be recessed from the front wall plane for a portion of the Campbell Avenue frontage. A pitched tile roof element covering the loading dock will be integrated into the upper facade. The wall planes on the Bascom Avenue, and a portion of the Campbell Avenue facade, are primarily flat with minimal articulation on the upper wall facade. This architectural feature is inconsistent with the remainder of the center. Staff has concerns with the current architectural treatment and has determined that further enhancement of the building facade would better serve ,he interest of the community. If the direction of the building is aimed at creating differentiation between the old and the new, then the design of the structure with some minor alterations can achieve the applicants and City objectives. Staff can continue to work with the applicant on a design which lessens the scale of the structure without reducing the overall height of the structure. A specific building design for the proposed addition to the Pruneyard Inn is not being considered at this time. Staff will forward specific site design and elevations of the addition, and the two pad buildings, to the SARC when they are formally submitted to the City for review. These plan, are subject to the review and approval of the Site and Architectural Review Committee and City staff. The existing inner courtyard area, between Martha's and El Burro, will be reconfigured to provide vehicular and pedestrian access between previously unconnected portions of the site. Matching tower elements with stair access to the second Floor will be constructed. w `% Staff Report — Planning Commission Meeting of January 24, 1995 S 94-08/UP 94-19 — 1875 S. Bascom Avenue — The Pruneyard Page 5 SITE DESIGN The site will provide greater opportunities to allow improved vehicular site circulation and traffic Flow, more efficient use of parking areas, installation of tree wells in parking areas and in the public right of way, installation of street landscaping per the city streetscape plan, and pedestrian walkways. The plan as proposed will reduce the number of vehicular/pedestrian conflicts, provide a more efficient site parking layout and on site circulation pattern, and improved pedestrian connections and access both into and within the site. These major renovations include: • A central driveway ("Main Street/Courtyard") with circular vehicular movement at the terminus of the through driveway; • Improved circulation at NE corner of property at Bascom Avenu; (less vehicle stocking, safer pedestrian crossing and traffic backup on Bascom Avenue, left turn movements); • Improved/renovated parking and site circulation; • Landscaping along NW property line; • Installation of trees (in tree wells) in all parking areas throughout the site; • Outdoor seating and eating areas; • A contained area between the office towers; • 'Satellite" pads (1-3) on Campbell Avenue; • Installation of Streetscape standards on Bascom and Campbell Avenues; and • Free standing shopping center and individual signs. There is no proposal to modify the existing freeway oriented sign at this time. OFF -SITE IMPROVEMENTS IN THE PUBLIC RIGHT-OF-WAY • Installation of sidewalk with street trees on the north side of Campbell Avenue; • Installation of traffic improvemer.�s at Union and Campbell Avenues, and street improvements to Campbell Avenue; • Landscaping and new sidewalk on Bascom Avenue PARKING Development of the site was originally approved under a shared parking arrangement for the various uses. The site continues to function in this manner and we will continue to consider and review this property under the guise of a shared parking arrangement between the office towers and the retail/entertainment portion of the site. Staff Report — Planning Commission Meeting of January 24, 1995 S 94-08/UP 94-19 — 1875 S. Bascom Avenue -- The Pruneyard Page 6 If parking were to be calculated based on the separate uses the retail portion of the site would be required to provide 1,279 on site parking spaces based on :55,857 square feet of retail. The office portion would be required to provide 1,041 pa;kmg spaces based on 234,244 square feet of commercial floor area. The hotel would be required to provide a minimum of an additional 193 spaces. Based on these numbers, the minimum parking requirement for the site would be 2,513 parking spaces. The current proposal will provide 1,896 parking spaces on site, resulting in a parking deficit of at least 617 spaces. Redeveiopment of the site wil: result in an increase of 7,169 square feet and 73 additional parking spaces. The total project renovation will improve previously existing conditions Traffic report prepared for the project determined the the traffic and circulation in the area would be impacted by the redevelopment of the property, however the impact on traffic and circulation generated by the project would not be significant. The traffic report did not consider or address the existing site access and egress conditions on Campbell Avenue (or at Union Avenue) or access into the site from the driveway at the northern property line. Additionally, the amount of Floor area currently being leased and utilized in the two office towers was also not considered. Consequently, City staff has identified the aforementioned additional traffic issues which must be address with this project. Traffic improvements are required for the Campbell -Union Avenue intzrsection to address existing and anticipated traffic and circulation congestion related to entering and exiting the site. Current leasing levels for the office towers and retail space indicate a low rate of occupancy. With the revitalization of the site, a higher rate of tenant occupancy will generate additional vehicle trips. This will add to existing traffic circulation conflicts at key traffic points immediately off site. Staff will continue to work with the applicant to resolve the future extension of Campisi Way to Creekside Way and Hamilton Avenue. Future development of the site requires the property owner to participate in the extension of Campisi Way is address additional traffic. Given the significance of the proposed project, staff recommends that the Planning Commission make a recommendation to the City Council for a final determination on the project as a courtesy appeal. r " taff Report — Planning Commission Meeting of January 24, 1995 S 94-08/UP 94-19 — 1875 S. Bascom Avenue -- The Pruneyard Page 7 _SITE AND AR HITLCf tIReL REVIEW CO 1�"ITTEE This application was reviewed by the Site and Architectural Review Committet on December 29, 1994. The Committee was supportive of the overall concept for renovation and redevelopment of the center and indicated that traffic and site circulation related issues, and building facade treatment should be addressed with City staff. Attachments: 1. Findings 2. Conditions 3. Exhibits (Initial Study and Negative Declaration) 4. Location Map Submitted by: — �Q Darryl cs, nner Approved by� t _ Ste Piasecki, C ununity Development Director Attachment M1 FINDINGS FOR APPROVAL OF FILE NO. S 94-081UP 94-19 SITE ADDRESS: 1875 S. BASCOM AVENUE APPLICANT: DAVID R. WORD, WILLIAM WILE -ON & ASSOCIATES P.C. MEETING: JANUARY 24, 1995 The Planning Commission finds as follows with regard to file � 94-08/UP 94-19: 1. The proposal is consistent Wth the General Plan and Zoning designat-.ons which indicate a Commercial land use for this Proper,. 2. The proposed site improvements of 13 percent on site landscaping and streetscape improvements a6equately address the aesthetic concerns related to the project/site. 3. The proposed parking and circulation with the recommended conditions of approval creates a project which integrates the proposed uses on site. 4. No substantial evidence has been presented which shows that the project, subject to conditions of approval, will have a significant negative impact on the environment. 5. There is no evidence before the City determining that the proposed project will have a signific. nt negative impact on wildlife resources. 6. The City 3f Campbell has prepared an Initial Study for the project in order to determine if the project would have a significant environmental impact. 7. Adequate on site parking and circulation has been provided for the proposed project and the commercial, office and retail uses on site. 8. All proposed uses are compatible within the site a„d with adjacent land uses. 9. Traffic improvements are required based on potential traffic conflicts as a result of the proposed project. 10. Storm drainage easemer:t is required to address additional runoff as a result of this project. Findings for Approval of File No. S 94-08/UP 94-19 1875 S. Bascom Avenue -- The Pruneyard Page 2 Based upon the foregoing findings A fact, the Panning Commission further finds and concludes that: 1. The proposed project, with conditions of approval, is consistent with the policies of the General Plan and 'he Zoning Ordinance in effect at the time of the application submittal and is consistent with uses in the immediate area. 2. The proposed project will aid in the enhancement and the harmonious development of the immediate area. The establishment, maintenance, or operation of the use will not be detrimental to the public heath, safety, peace, morals, comfort or general welfare of persons residing or working in the neighborhood of such proposed use. 3. The proposed use will not be detrimental or injurious to property and improvements in the neighborhood or to the general welfare of the City and its residents. 4. The proposed project with the conditions imposed, will not have a significant adverse impact on the environment and a Negative Declaration has been prepared for the project. 5. The proposed site is adequate in size and shape to accommodate the proposed use and site improvements. 6. These conditions are required as related and proportional to the impacts of the project. Attachment #2 CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL FOR FILE NO. S 94-08/UP 94-19 SIT7 ADDRESS: 1875 S. BASCOM AVENUE APPLICANT: DAVID R. WORD, WILLIAM WILSON & ASSOCIATES P.C. MEETING: JANUARY 24, 1995 The applicant is hereby notified, as part of this application, that he/she is required to meet the following conditions in accordance -,vizh the Ordinances of the City of Campbell and the State of California. The lead department with which at the applicant will work is identified on each condition. Additionally, the applicant is hereby notified that he/she is required to comply with all app:icable Codes or Ordinances of the Citv of Campbell ano the State of California that pertain to this development and are not herein specified. 1. Project Approval - Approval of this project allows the following: A. Site modifications, including reconfiguration and construction of retail space in accordance with plans date stamped (Exhibit A). B. On -site peuestrian and vehicular circulation; C. Reconfigured parking and landscaping; D. Use Permit to allow hotel expansion; and Ii Use Permit for restaurants with outdoor seating, on si,. sale of alcohol and shared parking facilities. F. Open area food kiosk to be located in plaza adjacent to UA Cinema. 2. Future Site ConSITUction (Hotel Expansion and Satellites) - Final plans for the hotel expansion and "satellite" retail pads are subject to review by the Site and Architectural Re view Committee and approval prior to issuance of building permits. Retail pad on Campbell can be located anywhere along Campbell Avenue subject to Site and Architectural Review Committee approval. Siens A. Si-naee Prggram - Applicant shall prepare a master signage program for all signs on site which are intended for the advertisement of uses within the site. Said program shall conform with the sign ordinance and shall include all wall mounted, projeciing and free standing signs. No sign shall be installed until such application is approved and a permit issued by the Community Development Department. B. Freeway Sig E - All freeway oriented signs require final approval from the City Council. Parcel Map/Parcel Consolidation - Applicant shall submit a parcel map recording the site as one parcel. The applicant has the ability to apply for further tentative parcel map to subdivide site, subject to City approval. -14 Conditions of Approval — S 94-08/UI' 94-19 1875 S. Bascom Avenue -- The Pruneyard Page 2 Traffic Circulation A, Campisi Dedication Applicant shall offer for dedication a "no build" area on subject property to provide for the future extension of Camp.. Way. Applicant shall be assessed a proportional contribution for installation of the Campisi Way extension as determined by a future study. Applicant not required to extend Campisi with this development . !!MM, vrovements - Applicant shall construct improvements found City Engineer according to generally accepted engineering ant shall submit existing and proposed street centerline, t-Of-way lines, public street improvements and public utility facilities on all required street improvement plans as follows: A ��at+ eu a ,. ,,P Sidewalk Plans - Submit street improvement plans for Campbell Avenue that include: 1. Demolition of existing curb and gutter, portion of the roadway and street lighting system. 2. Construction of new concrete curb and gutter with new curb face located 10 feet southerly of existing curb face, 9.5 foot wide sidewalk and street lighting system. The design should transition to the existing curb face at the Bascom Avenue curb return to minimize changes to street improvements at the Bascoin Avenue!Campbell Avenue intersection. 3. Pavement Strivin I rkers and Sienage Plans - Submit pavement striping, markers and signage plans along Campbell Avenue to reflect proposed vehicle lanes, bicycle lanes and on street parking associated with the relocated curb and gutter. 4. Relocation of Public Storm DrainaQ Fad - Applicant shall undertake a study in accordance with generally accepted engineer practice to determine requirements for relocation of public storm drainage facilities, if any, and for relocation of public utilities, 4 any, as required to meet these conditions of approval. If required, submit storm drainage relocation plans and/or public utility relocation plans. On street improvement plans for Campbell Avenue, show existing location of public utilities behind existing back of curb and identify utilities to remain and to be relocated, if any, relative to the proposed new face of curb. Conditions of Approval — S 94-08/UP 94-19 1875 S. Bascom Avenue — The Pruneyard Page 3 B. Modified Traffic Signal - Submit plans and construct a complete modified traffic signal at the intersection of Campbell Avenue and Union Avenue, acceptable to the City Engineer and Traffic Engineer. Signal design to include replacement of existing traffic controller and installation of loop detectors. C. Traffic Signal Interconnect - Design and construct a traffic signal interconnect conduit below the sidewalk along Campbell Avenue with conductors connecting the existing Bascom Avenue/Campbell Avenue signal with the proposed modified signal at Campbell Avenue/Union Avenue. Extend the conduit with pull rope westerly to a new pullbox at the westerly limits of the Pruneyard parcel adjacent to the Highway 17 right-of-way. D. Luminaires - Install and/or replace City -provided luminaires, if necessary, as determined by the City Eagincer, on Campbell and Bascom Avenues. E. Relocation of Traffic Signals and Loop Detectors - Submit plans for relocation of traffic signals and loop detectors at the Bascot i Avenue/Campbell Avenue intersectiL a if relocation of traffic signal facilities are necessitated due to proposed street improvements and conditions of approval. Driveway ARproachhs - Relocate the two existing westerly Campbell Avenue driveway approaches (northbound into Pruneyard and southbound from Pruneyard) to a combined driveway with a fully signalized intersection at Union Avenue. Replace existing driveways with curb, gutter and sidewalk to conform to proposed Campbell Avenue street improvements. G. Boulevard Treatment/ Bascom _,.'v nu - Submit plans for review and approval of the Planning and Public Works Departments for construction of Bascom Avenue boulevard treatments that include construction/modification of concrete sidewalks, street trees, landscaping and irrigation in conformance with the City's Streetscape Policy. to At Conditions of Approval — S 94-08/UP 94-19 1875 S. Bascom Avenue -- The Pruneyard Page 4 H. Ba.1co Aygnme (Northern) Drives Modifications Submit engineered design plans for two northbound left turn lanes from the sit'. Design to include: loop detectors, sidewalks and street striping. Construction of improvements shall be provided by the City. 1. 5.peed B_ umvs - Submit plans showing the location and replacement of all on -site speed bumps with City -approved speed undulations (speed bumps). RelocateBascom Avenues Driveway - Relocate the existing southerly Bascom Avenue driveway approximately 160 feet northerly. Replace existing driveway approach with curb, gutter and sidewalk to conform to Bascom Avenue boulevard treatment design. K. Underground Utilities - Install new on -site utilities underground per Section 20.36.150 of the Campbell Municipal Code for any new or remodeled buildings. Provide evidence from all utility companies that the proposed development modifications can be served. Comply with the plan submittal, permit and fee requirements of the utilities associated with new or modified service connections. L Grading and Drainage Plans - All grading plans shall meet City standards as deemed appropriate for the proposed development. A grading permit shall be issued in conjunction with building permits. 1. Plans - Submit grading and drainage plans with hydrology and hvdraulic calculations for existing on -site drainage improvements and for proposed on -site grading improvements showing proposed pad elevations of new structures, existing and proposed on -site and off -site grading and storm drainage systems and controlled site drainage onto public right-of-way. 2. Grading/Erosion Control Plans - Submit final grading, grading and erosion control plans to the Planning and Public Works Departments for approval prior to issuance of building or grading permits. 3. Storm Drainage Easement - Dedicate to the City a 20-foot wide storm drainage easement parallel and immediately adjacent to the westerly boundary of the Pruneyard. ♦ so Conditions of Approval — S 94-08/UP 94-19 1875 S. Bascom Avenue — The Pruneyard Page 5 M. Encroachment Permits - Submit application for an encroachment permit(s), pay fees and post surety for all construction within the City's right-of-way. N. National Pollutant Discharge Elimination Permit (NPDES) - Be advised that the Regional Water Quality Control Board will require that all construction on sites larger than five acres will require the project to be covered by a National Pollutant Discharge Elimination (NPDES) permit. Permit conditi,)ns may require construction and post - construction storm water management plans. The applicant is responsible for obtaining this permit, providing plans ant' paying associated fees. o. Utilities - All utilities and utility pedestals for new or modified buiiding areas shall be diagramed on a site utility plan indicating the location of the pedestals and how the equipment will be screened prior to the installation of any utility pedestals (transformers) on site, subject to the review and approval by the Community Development Director. Site Plan A. Final Si,e Plan - All final site plans including satellite pad locatiors, and location of pedestrian walkway and landscaping, shall be submitted to the City for review and subject to approval by the Community Development Director for substantial compliance with approved plans prior to issuance of building permits. B. Development Schedule - Applicant shall comply with the development schedule submitted for the project, including the projected time of project phasing for conshuction. C. Parking and Striping_- Consistent site parking striping (either 60, 75 or 90 degree angled parking) within specified areas. D. Parking and Driveways - All parking and driveway areas shall be developed in compliance with Chapter 21.50 of the Campbell Municipal Code, including parking modifications as approved by the City. All parking spaces shall be provided with appropriate concrete curbs or wheel stops. Conditions of Approval — S 94-08/UP 94-19 1875 S. Bascom Avenue — The Pruneyard Page 6 E. Pedestrian Connections - Applicant shall install pedestrian walkway connections from the public right of way into the site at designated locations. Site plan shall reflect site improvements including pedestrian connections throughout the site. 8. Dedication to City - Applicant shall dedicate additional right of way on Bascom Avenue to back of sidewalk and record proper right of way to City as specified by the Public Works Department. 9. (_arhaoe collection - Trash containers of a size and quantity, necessary to serve new or modified building areas shall be located in areas approved by the Fire Department. Unless otherwise noted, enclosures, shall consist of a concrete Floor surrounded by a solid wall or fence and have self -closing doors of a size specified by the Fire Department. All enclosures to be constructed at grade level and have a level area adjacent to the trash enclosure area to service these containers. 10. New Retail Building Elevations A. B tip lding Design - Applicant shall continue to work with staff on resolving articulation of building facade to provide consistency of building elements and details within the retail center. Exterior facade details shall be resolved prior to issuance of building permits. B. Building —Treatment- Applicant shall submit plans indicating pedestrian level building treatment, colors and materials. Plans shall include architectural features such as street furniture, bicycle parking facilities, landscape planters, windows, and the like. These plans shall be consistent with the center and City of Campbell design and development standards, and are subject to review and approval by the Community Development Department. 11. Demolition Pt rmit - Applicant is required to obtain a building permit, subject to review and approval by the Building Official. 12. Hand OMIW Accessibility - All new and remodeled buildings shall provide hand.cap access in accordance with the Uniform Building Code (UBC), and the Uniform Federal Accessibility Standards (UFAS) and the Federal Americans with Disabilities Act (ADA). Conditions of Approval -- S 94-08/UP 94-19 1875 S. Bascom Avenue -- The Pruneyard Page 7 13. Mechanical Equipment - All roof -mounted and ground level mechan.:al equipment, on new or remodeled structures on site, which are visible from the public right of way shall be screened with similar building materials subject to the approval of the Commu;,ity Development Director. 14. Fire Protection A. Warehouse/Retail - All new or remodeled buildings shall comply with requirements of the Central Fire District. Applicant shall provide Fire sprinklers and Type V- one hour construction for the new warehouse retail, as permitted for allowable area increases. UBC 506 A. B. Hotel Expansion: All new construction shall provide one (1) hour fire resistive construction for all walls and floors of the new hotel expansion. UBC 1202 B. C. Area Separation/Hotel Expansion - All new construction shall provide an area separation f -r the new hotel expansion as required subject to allowable area increases for the existing hotel. UBC 506 A. D. Exiting Requirements - All tenant spaces (units) with retail occupancies that allow 50 or more persons based or. 30 sq.ft. per occupant must show two means of egress separated by one half of the overall diagonal dimensions of ser ed area. 15. Landscaping A. Site Landscape Plan - Applicant shall provide the required 10% landscaping on site per the zoning ordinance. All landscaping shall satisfy the City's Water Efficient Landscape (WELS) standards. All landscape plans shall be submitted to the City for review and subject to approval by the Community Development Director. Landscape Bond - Applicant shall post a faithful performance bond in the amount of $25,000.00 to ensure completion of landscaping and parking areas within 3 months of occupancy. C. Tree Wells - Applicant shall install shade trees in designated locations on site in all perimeter parking areas of a size and type acceptable to the City. 1875 S. BASCOM AVENUE S 94-08/UP 94-19 4 OF 7 CITY OF CAMPBELL PLAN. 12/99 r 1, Conditions of Approval — S 94-08/UP 94-19 1875 S. Bascom Avenue -- The Pruneyard Page 8 D. Tree Protection Plan -- Applicant shall provide tree protection plan indicating trees to be protected and maintained on site. E. Streetscape Trees and Landscaping - All street trees shall be installed and maintained in accordance with the Streetscape Guidelines for Bascom and Campbell Avenues including the size and type as specified by the City and approved on the final site plan. Nor'hwesl Corner - Applicant shall install landscaping from Creek Tra!1 Access to hotel expansion along northern property line. Improvements shall include pedestrian connection from Creek frail into site. 16. `ite Construction A. Construction and Equipment - Applicant shall utilize construction equipment which adequately muffles noise in accordance with Section 18.02.030 of the City of Campbell Municipal Code. Construction activities and construction equipment shall comply with all air quality emission policies as determined by the Bay Area Air Quality Management District and the Building Official for the City of Campbell. Construction Activities - 1. Hours of construction shall be limited to 8 a.m. to 5 p.m. Monday - Friday. 2. Ti.e construction site shall be sprinklered with water, as necessary, but not less than twice per day, to control dust. 3. Haul trucks and material stockpiles shall be covered. 4. The construction area and surrounding streets shall be swept as necessary, `-" not less than once daily. All areas shall be adequately fer .--ed for safety per requirements of the Building Official. CITY OF CAMPBFLL Notice of Intent to Issue a Negative Declaration The Administrator of Environmental Quality of the City of Campbell is preparing to issue a Negative Declaration of environmenW impact for the following proposed project. Case No: S 94-08/UP 94-19 Project Location: 1875 5. Bascom Avenue Project Applicant: Pruneyard Associates Project Description: The project involves the reconfiguration of existing retail floor area: the construction of new retail Floor area: expansion of a hotel use: reconfiguration of site circulation and parking, and the addition of sty landscaping. The Administrator of Environmental Quality of the City of Campbell has reviewed the proposed project and has determined that the project, WITH/k T:;WQIJ:; mitigation measures as conditions of project approval, will not have a significant effect on the environment. A copy of the Negative Declaration may be reviewed or obtained at: City of Campbell Community Development Department 70 N. First Street Campbell, ('A 95008 If you have any questions or comments, please contact the Department no later than ianuary 24. 1995. Administrator of Environmental Quality City of Campbell, California By: DarEyl M. Ions _ Date: -January 3" 1995 Initial Study and Checklist Title ofProposal: Pruneyard Shopping Centr Date Chocl,Ust Submitted: December 199e Agency RegWeing Checklist:_ City of Campbell AgatcpAddress. 70 N. First Street Cily/Suteizip: Campbell, CA 95008 Agency Contact __Darryl Jones. Senior PlannerPhone: (408) 866 2140 DETERMINATION On the basis of this initial evaluation: will a) 1 find that the proposed projects not have a significant effect on the environment, and A NEGATIVE DECLARATION will be prepared......................................................................................... C) b) 1 find that although the proposed project could have a significant effect on the environment, there will not be a significant effect it' this Case bemuse the mitigation measures described on an attached sheet have been added to the project. A NEGATIVE DECLARATION will b prepared. c) 1 fad the proposed pmject may hay.- a significant effect on the environment. and An ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT REPORT is required ............................................ Darryl Jones Sigrahue Print Name City Of Campbell _ January 3, 1995 For Date _ ENVIRONMENTAL CHECKUST FORM PROJECT LOCATION: City of Campbell Santa Clara County City County PROJECT ADDRESS: 1875 S. Bascom Avenue Campbell, CA 95008 DESCRIPTION OF PROJECT: The project involves the reconfiguration of existing retail floor area; the construction of new retail floor area; expansion of a hotel use; :econfiguration of site circulation and parking; and the addition of site landscaping. ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACTS: (CEQA requires that an explanation of all 'yes" and"maybe" answers be provided along with this checklist, incldinS a du ctusion of ways to mitigate the sigNflcant effects identified. You may attach separate shrets with the explanations on them.) Yes Maybe No L EARTH. Will the proposal result in: a) Unstable earth conditions or in changes in geologic substructures? ❑ ❑ b) Disruptions, displacements, compaction or overcovering of the soil? B ❑ ❑ Mched c) Change in tnpognphy or ground surface relief features? ❑ ❑ CH d) The desaoceon, coven& or modification of any unique geologic or physical feataes? ❑ ❑ to e) Any increase in wind cr water erosion of soils, either on or off the site? ❑ ❑ CM f) Changes in deposition or erosion of beachsa nds, or changes in siltation. deposition or erosion whichmay modify the channel of a river or stream or the bed of the ocean or any bay, inlet or lake? ❑ ❑ g) Fxposure of people or property to geologic hazards, such a earthquakes, landslides, mudslides. ground failure, or similar hazards? ❑ ❑ fl. AIR. Will the proposal result in: a) Substantial air emissions or deterioration of ambient air quality? ❑ ® ❑ See b) The creation of objectionableodtrs? ❑ M ❑ attached c) Alteration of au movement. moisture, or temperature, or any change in climate, either locally or regionally? ❑ ❑ M. WATER. Will the proposal result in: a) Changes in currents, or the cause of dirmuon of water movements, in either marine or freshwaters? ❑ ❑cl _ Oy CAP OMU OIYSOMONIAL QOAIM ACT b) Changes in absorption rates, 6aiage patterns, or the tie and smelters Lf surface nmofR 29 ❑ ❑ c) Alterations 10 the course or now of flood waters? ❑ ❑ d) Ct ages in the amount of arface water many water body? ❑ ❑ $I e) Discharge into sat fact waters, or in any ahamion of surface water quality, including, but not limited ux temperature, dissolved oxygen or turbidity? ❑ ❑ f) Alteration Of the direction or rate of flow of ground waters? ❑ ❑ 2 g) Change in the quantity of. -found waters, either through dims a mitiau Or withdrawals. or through interception of an aquifer by cuts or excavations? ❑ ❑ is h) Su'mantial reduction is the amount of water aherwise Available for public I .er supplies? ❑ ❑ i) Exposure of people or pmtperty to water related hazards such as rrooding nr tidal waves? O ❑ M 1V. PLANT LIFE. Will the proposal result in: a) Change in the diversity of species, or number or any specrer of plants (including roses, shrubs, grass, a 'rps, and quake plans)? ❑ ❑ b) Reduction of the numbers of ny unique, rate. or endangered spedes of plants? ❑ ❑ $, c) Introduction of new species of plane into an area, or in ► beirier tat the normal replenishment of existing species? ❑ ❑ d) Reduction in acreage of any ag icultunl crop? ❑ ❑ V. ANIMAL LIFE. Will the proposal result in: a) Change in the diversity of species, or numbers of any spe ies of animals (birds: land animals. including reptiles: fish and shellfish. bnthic Organisms or insects)? ❑ ❑ 12 b) Reduction of the numbers of +c.ty niget, rare. or enNngered species or animals? ❑ ❑ c) introduction of new species of animals into an on. or rtYrll in a barrier to Or migration or movement of animals? ❑ U d) Deterioration to existing fish or wildlife habitat? ❑ ❑ VI. NOISE. Wtil the proposal result in, s) Increases to existing roue levels? ❑ ❑ v b) Exposure of people to severe roue levels? ❑ ❑ Vn. LIGHT and GLARE. Will the proposal: a) Produce new light or Slate? ❑ ❑ t� ' VID. LAND USE. Will At proposal result in: a) Subsunti : alteration of the presentor planned Ind use of an area? ❑ ❑ Q% ' IX. NATURAL RESOURCES. Will the proposal resul: i.i: a) Increase in due rate of use or any natural resources? ❑ ❑ X. RISK OF UPSET. Will the proposal involve: a) A list of an explosion or the miesse of hazardous substartcrs (including. but not limited to: oil, pesticides, chemicals or radin")'n the event Of an awident or upset condaioru? ❑ ❑ • Indicates see attached comment sheet. —QAr CALUKHM A aMvuoMrssr QuAlm ACT b) Possible interference with an emergency response plan or an emapricy evacuation pion? ❑ ❑ XL POPULATION. Will tie proposal: a) Alter the location, distribution, density or growth rate of the hurwi population of an area? ❑ ❑ XIL HOUSING. Will the proposal: a) Affect existing housing, or crease a demand for additional housing? ❑ ❑ �r XM. TRANSPORTATION/CIRCULATION. Will the proposal reralt in: a) Generation of substantial additional vehicular movement? ❑ ❑ b) Effects on existing parting facilities, or demand for new parking? ❑ ® ❑ c) Substantial impact upon existing awportation systems? ❑ ❑ d) Alterations to piesesu patterns of circulation or movement of people and/or goods? ❑ AN ❑ e) Alterations to waterbome. rail or air traffic? ❑ ❑ 19 f) Increase in traffic hazards to motor vehicles. bicyclists, or pedestrians? ❑ ❑ XI V. PUBLIC SERVICES. Wid the proposal have an effect upon. or result in a need for new or altered gover.."wwal services in any of the following areas: a) Fire protection? ❑ ❑ CR b) Police protection? ❑ ❑ Ca c) Schools? ❑ ❑ d) Parks or other recreational facilities' ❑ ❑ e) Maintenance of public facilities, including roads? ❑ CR f) Other governmental services? 12 ❑ XV, ENERGY. Will the proposal result in: a) Use of substantial mows of fuel or energy' ❑ ❑ b) Substantial increase in demand upon existing sources of erwp, or require the development of new somas of energy? ❑ ❑ is X11. UTILITIES and SERVICE SYSTEMS. Will the proposal result in a need for new systerrcr, or substantial alterations to the following atibites: a) Power or natural gas? ❑ ❑ �J b) Communications systems? ❑ ❑ IN C) water? ❑ ❑ 19 d) Sewer or septic tanks? ❑ ® ❑ e) Storm water drainage? o ❑ ' f) Solid waste and disposal? ❑ ❑ XVII. HUMAN HEALTH. Will the proposal result in: a) Creation of any health hazard at potential health hazard (excluding mental here th)? ❑ ❑ b) Exposure of people to potential Health hazards? ❑ ❑ • Indicates see attached comment sheet p t CMJ)ORMA MVMONMLRK QUAl1R .H XVIIL AESTHETICS. Will the proposal rerdt in: a) The obstruction of any scenic vim or view open to the public? ❑ ❑ 10 b) The creation of an Wuhnically offensive site open to public view? ❑ ❑ 10 XIX. RECREATION. Will the proposal rids in: U Impact upon the quality or gwuWty of existing recreational uPp ? ❑ ❑ 5a XX. CULTURAL RESOURCES. Will the proposal: A) Result in the alteration of or the destruction of a prehistoric or ❑ ❑ historic Archaeological silt? b) Result in adverse physical or wnheuc effects to a prehistoric or historic ❑ building, structure, or object? ❑ c) Have the potential w cause a physical change whit h would affect unique ❑ ❑ ethnic cultural values' d) Restrict existing religious or sacred uses within the potential impact area? ❑ ❑ CR XXI. MANDATORY FINDINGS OF SIGNIFICANCE. a) Potential to degrade: Does the project have the pow ntial to degrade the quality of the envwnacent. substantilly reduce the habitat Of A fish a wildlife species. cause a fish or wildtife populauon to drop below self awiruAg lervs. dreaten to e:hninaw a plant or animal community, reduce the mmnber or restrict the range of a rue or endangered plant or asur al or eliminate important ❑ ❑ examples of the major periods of California history or prehistory? b) Short-term: Does the project have the pp=LW to achieve short-term, to the disadvantage of long-term, environmental goals? (A rboet•teem impact an the environment is one which occurs in a m10"Cly, brief. defmitive period of time. ❑ Long-term impacts will endure well into die future.) ❑ c) Cumulative: Dona the project have irrrysrts which are individually limited. but cumulatively considerable? (A project may impact an two err in= separa¢ resources where the impact on each resource is re)ativeto small, but whet the ❑ a effect on the total of those impacts on the envunnem is significant.) ❑ d) Substantial adverse: Dees the project have environmental effects which will ❑ cause substantial adverse effects on human beings, either directly or indirectly? ❑ XXII. DISCUSSION OF ENVIRONMENTAL EVALUA71ON. (This section may be fdkd our by using narrative. or by taint a fonts. tack err rhr example f vets is the CEQA Guide- lines.) XXIIL DISCUSSION OF LAND USE IMPACTS. (An examination of whether the projeu world be consistent with eatrug soniag, plant, and otho appltcabk land ate controls.) (Note: Thts is only a suggested form pwsuani w CEQA Guideline. Stcaon 150630). Public agenda arelfK to devise their own format for initial studies. However. the DETERMINATION'S as essential component of chi+forrre) PRUNEYARD INITIAL STUDY )MI. DISCUSSION OF ENVIRONMENTAL EVALUATION Comment t1 I. EARTH (b) - Development of the project will result in the disruption, compaction and avercovering of the soil. However, the areas that will be covered are already covered by buildings and/or paved driving and walking surfaces. The project will not increase the amount of overcovering or compaction of soil. Comment N2 It- AIR (a=b) - Both site grading and preparation for new construction, and building demolit.on will result in additional dust being generated from the project site area. Large construction related machinery will also release additional particulate matter emissions into the air. Staff has determined (based on construc'ion phasing over time) that the amount of additional matter released into the air will be minimal. The applicant will be required to provide construction equipment which properly muffles emission exhausts and odors, consistent with policies of the Bay Area Air Quality Management District. CQM=a " IU- WATER (bj - Existing drainage patterns, absorption rates, and the amount of su.face runoff will be altered as a result of this project. The site contains an existing drainage system which appears to be adequate. All new and reconfigured structures and circulation routes will be required to demonstrate adequate site drainage prior to issuance -f build�ng and demolition permits. Comment 04 VI. NOISE (a) - Building demolition and reconfiguration .luring construction on site will result in additional noise being generated from the site. Additionally, large construction related machinery will also generate noise. Staff has determined abased on construction phasing over time) that the amount of additional or potential for severe noise will be minimal. The applicant will be required to provide construction equipment which properly muffles noise generated by such equipment, and that construction and clean up activities comply with permitted construction hours in accordance with Sections 18.02.060 and 18.04.035 of the City of Campbell Municipal Code. Comment #5 VIL LIGHT & GLARE (a1 - With the reconfiguration of existing structures and the addition of new structures and access ways on site, there will be an increase in the amount of on site lighting. All lights will be required to be shielded away from adjacent properties However, the amount of additional lighting proposed on site is not expected to be significant and will be reviewed by staff prior to issuance of building permits. Comment Mfi VIII, LAND USE (a) - Development of the proposed project will not result in a substantial alteration of the present or planned land uses in the area. It is expected however, that the project with intensify existing uses at the site. Comment #'7 XIII. TRANSPORTATION / CIRC[ n ATI IN to b c d f) - A traffic report prepared by the project proponent has been prepared and submitted to the City for review. The report concluded that the traffic and circulation in the area would be impacted by the redevelopment of the property, however the impact on traffic and circulation generated by the project would not be significant. Although the traffic report concludes that there will not be a significant increase in additional vehicular movement, there are existing traffic movement and circulation conflicts off site which currently impact the existing transportation system. The traffic report does not consider or address the existing site access and egress conditions on Campbell Avenue (or at Union Avenue) or access into the site from the driveway at the northern property line. These conditions will further impact present patterns of vehicular and pedestrian circulation including the potential for an increase in traffic hazards to motor vehicles, bicyclists, and pedestrians with an increase in traffic to and from the site. The City has determined that the proposed project may :urther inhibit the transportation system's capacity as related to this project. Off site traffic improvements are necessary to minimize further impacts because of additional traffic generated by this project. Comment #9 XVI, 11LIMES & SERVICE SYSTEMS (d e) - The project may result in the need for modifications to the existing sewer system. Additional paved surface areas on site will result in additional runoff. Upgrades to the existing storm drainage system, including new connections, may be required per generally accepted engineering practice. MIL DISCUSSION OF LAND USE IMPACTS The Campbell General Plan designates commercial uses at the project site. Redevelopment of this site will continue to be consistent with the General Plan designation for the site and the immediate area. Likewise, the use is consistent with permitted uses in the designated zoning district and related redevelopment plans for the area. January 13, 1995 CI I Y ()l CA"WIRELL 1 omnunm. I/... LyI), p... ..... ... r t Plan k NOTICE OF HEARING Notice is hereby given that the Planning Commission of the City of Campbell has set the time of 7:30 p.m., or shortly thereafter, on Tuesday, January 24, 1995, in the City Hall Council Chambers, 70 North First Street, Campbell, California, for a Public Hearing tc consider the application of Mr. David Word, on behalf of William Wilson & Associates, for approval of a Site and Architectural application to reconfigure existing retail space; construct new retail space; site pedestria, and vehicular circulation; and parking and landscaping; and a Use Permit to allow hotel expansion; the sale of alcohol at restaurants; outdoor seating and the provision of shared parking facilities for property located at 1875 S. Bascom Avenue in a C-2-S (General Commercial) Zoning District. A Negative Dedaratlon will be prepared for this project. Interested persons may app-•ar and be heard at this hearing. Please be advised that if you challenge the nature of the above project in court, you may be limited to raising only those issues you or someone else raised at the public hearing described in this Notice, or in written correspondence delivered to the City of Campbell Planning Comtission at, or prior to , the public hearing. Questions may be addressed to the Planning Office at (408) 866-2140. Decisions of the Planning Commission may be appealed to the City Council. Appeals must besubmitted to the City Clerk in writing within 10 calendar days of a-, action by the Commission. In compliance with the Americans with Disabilities Act, listening assistive devices are available for all meetings held in the Council Chambers. If you require accommodation, please contact the Community Development Department at 866- 2140, at least one week in advance of the meeting. PLANNING COMMISSION CITY OF CAMPBELL STEVE PIASECKI SECRETARY PLEASE NOTE: When calling about this Notice, please refer to File No. S 94-08/UP 94-19 Address: 1875 S. Bascom Avenue n North Rra fiver( CampArll (ald.vmn vson. n n� .r��,.: _ „ 4- -1, 2740 - \p ..c.,-I C- a ;cDu—k t-.-kc!M- MEMORANDUM 8 CITY OF CAMPBELL To Steve Piasecki Date: December 29, 1994 Community Development Director From Darryl Jones, Senior Planner SuDject: Site do Architectural Review Committee Meeting of December 29, 1994 The Site and Architectural Review Committee (SARC) met on December 29, 1994, to review and discuss the following application: L. 18'_75 South Bascom Avenue (S 94-08 & UP 94-19) — Pnmeyagd. Assodates/Christopher Meany The applicata is requesting Site :cod Architectural approval and a Conditional Use Permit for the renovation, and reconfiguration of the existing Pruneyard Shopping Center. The applicant proposes to provide access through the site from Bascom Avenue, additional landscaping along the site perimeter and in the office towers parking areas, addition of a 42,000 square foot retail building, and expansion of the Pruneyard Inn hotel. The Committee was supportive of the overall concept for renovation and redevelopment of the center. Powever, the Comt Tittee expressed concerns over several items including: Traffic circulation at the through street entry area from Bascom Avenue; Treatment of the c,•per facades on Bascom and Campbell Avenues; Access to and from the site at Campbell and Union Avenues. The applicant agreed to continue to work with City staff to resolve the traffic issues on Campbell Avenue and the through street entryway from Bascom Avenue, and to add details to breakup the upper facade wall planes of the new retail building facing Bascom and Campbell Avenues. co Jane Meyer -Kennedy, Planning Commission Chair Mel Lindstrom, Planning Commission Vice -Chair, (SARC) Susan A. Kearns, Planning .:ommissioner, (SARC) File of C44t � T CITY of CAMPBELL Community Development Department December 29, 1994 Mr. Christopher Meany, Retail Project Manager The Pruneyard / William Wilson & Associates 1999 South Bascom Avenue Campbell, CA 95008 Rr. Application Nos. UP 94-19 / S W 09 (The Pruneyard) Dear Chris: The Planning Division has reviewed your request for A conditional use permit and site approval for consideration of the proposed renovation of the Pruneyar' Shopping Center, Pruncyard Inn expansion and other related site improvements. Your application, submitted December 2, 1994, was deemed complete on December 21, 1994, one week after our last working meeting regarding the project - As of today's date, you have completed an important part of the initial phase in the public review process, which included the project being reviewed by the Site and Architectural Review Committee of the Planning Commission at 9:00 A.M. this morning. The next step in the review process is consideration of your application by the full body of the Planning Commission. Your application has been scheduled for Planning Commission consideration on January 24, 1995. We look forward to working with you to resolve remaining project related issues. if you have any questions regarding the process please feel free to give me a call at (408) 866-2140. ta l oDnY er4 cc Project File 10 Nn1tA 1... Street Gmpbell. <ildnreta 91008 1414 nt. 408 Xn6. 7140 to roe eee east nm IOB fl66 17W MEMORANDUM CITY OF CAMPBELL PUBUC WORKS DEPARTMENT TO: Darryl Jones, Community Development DATE: December 28, 1994 FROM: Ron Marquez, P.E.L -V- 111el( SUBJECT: Pruneyard Modification Traffic This memorandum is a follow up on the previous memoranda to you regarding this subject and dated December 16, and December 13, 1994. 1 understand that you have discussed our concerns with the project developer. The following comments and concerns remain regarding this project. I understand that consideration has been given to modOications of the main entrance to the shopping center on Campbell Avenue. Shifting the entrance to a location opposite Union Avenue to take advantage of the signal at this intersection was not considered practical by the developer at this time. This alternative, however, wouid not cnly improve access to the project it would have the least impact on Campbell Avenue circulation. Other alternatives such as signalizing another combined intersection within 500 feet of Union Avenue would result in corridor inefficiencies. Some modification of the present driveways is necessary to address the weaving conflicts that exist at this intersection. It is recommended that a median be installed along Campbell Avenue from Union Avenue to the Pruneyard Entrance Driveway. This design will channelize and protect the major movements in thr area. The disadvantage of this recommendation is that left turns leaving the project site would be required to make a U-tums at the Union Avenue intersection. In addition, this concept wilt eliminate left turns into the commercial development on the other side of Campbell Avenue. People wishing to make this movement would also be required to make U-tums at the signal. As activity at the Center intensifies, it is recommended that a Union Avenue access be reconsidered. The westbound left turn movement at the Campbell/Union intersection is a critical movement which experiences the most delay at that intersection. The addition of U-turns to the intersection w increase the delay for this movement. It is recommended that this intersection be monitored and that a new Union Avenue access be developed when the level of service for the westbound left turn movement deteriorates to level of service E. This will require the project owner to monitor the intersection and rj m Page 2 December 28, 1994 analyze the operation once yearly. In order to preserve an area for this future access, it is recommended !hat a non -buildable envelope be provided on the site which would be used for this driveway in the future. It is recommended that this envelope be 60 feet wide and 100 feet deep and that it be centered longitudinally on an imaginary northerly extension of the Union Avenue centerline. At the northern Bascom Avenue entrance to the site the predicted voolu Bare such that a second left turn lane is warranted from the project Basc Avenue. This additional lane will reduce the queuing that results at the intersection. As mei tiDned in ourprevious circulation onratdum to you, intersection. heelisis also need to provide for improved pads along both recommended that sidewalks be extended into the development sides of this access. In addition, a small median refuge area is recommended be designed to separate the entering and exiting movements as well as to provide a refuge area for pedestrians. Two additional observations are made regarding the interior circulation and parking design proposed. Specifically the two long south to parkins airking sles near the center of the property do not provide for good pedestrian either the commercial or the office uses on the site. If this design concept is to be retained it is recommended that breaks be providedrbet` pen parked n vehicles at 100-150 foot intervals in order to provide circulation. the existing configuration has an additional east -west aisle which serves this purpose. The wesmmmost parking aisle is oriented for vehicles traveling only in the northbound direction. This is a confusing design which may result in problems fcr users. It is recommended that 90 degree parking be provided in both of these aisles. This is the most flexible design from a circulation and parking point of view. cc: Bob Kass Bob Harary Chuck Gomez Steve Piasecki rjm 1 ':26 t i 94S,-,c,.QATES Safaki Assodates, irK. Ha DcMuo, Sorcc 19: San Frsww.. CallfOrrea %107 Telephonc 415 626 C•993 Fscs—m a 4! S 626 0e41 Facsimile Transmission F'.1 5 To: Darryl Jones Fax No: 408-866-8381 Location: Campbell Community Development Dept Date: December 20, 1994 From: Mark Heffheimer Page 1 of -�L Peg" Copies: Owen Lang • SA'sf File Re: Campbell Pruneyard Plan Review SA 0: 41488.00 Dear Deny] Anached u a Mt:morandum reQardiuS the Pruncyard Proposal Please do no hesitate to call if you ha%e any questions We will submit an m%oice next mvmth for serxices rendered. The [oval fee to-0ate for the plan review is approximately S600 IF YOU DID NOT alit U! E ALL TNB PAGES INDICATEJ, PLEnSE CALL (IS AS SOON AS POSSINU AT 441St 625-M3 FACSIMILE NVMBEa 4.5, 626ow 1 Ot".nw to kil;" fens 11hMil � 71M t Is Memorandum Sasaki Astiodates, Inc. To. Darryl Jones cit;. of catupwl Community Development Department 444 DeFlara )tine Zug 'Q North First Street Sae Franorco. eahror' Campbell. California 95oog 9410' From: )lark Hofflietmer and 0-1 Lang UepMmc 415 6261199; Faaimile 41; 626 "�n44 Date: Decemner 19. 1994 Copies: Re: Pruiie)aid Plan Review. $A N414AR 00 A \LWLSU=COCC iA I Arnval sequence to \MIr W m ae Halle l own Aseuua -Us— cottid 13e rrptart>•: at for tht molorisn, 100 maim options are availablt too soon at beginning of arrival sequence -- decisions must be made toe quickly; b) a potential tot conflicts in mos ement patterns exists due to a multitude of driving, turning, and parking options in the \fain Street South Bascom Avenue entrance area. The quick traffic decisions and movement conflicts diminish the Main Street experience; the circulation hierarch); should be clarified to help motorists understand driving and parking options. • ro4-11I•T a aNC soae45 } East end of ?tam Street could he improved with a) one -wax ciiculauon pattern (per aisle); b) wider laudsc ape strip down centers aisle, ardor ci W"P- u whwda of Gomm Awk. - faR P�PAf►4isl C� Tsar- as V,Ms-6 a Manlst SUM r bwd to dmtw4P rb oW owAd be rora padeMria� arMerd; court at center of Main Street could be more pedesrriammo Ieen! eW Z-Tii I i uucuon of new paving materials, traffic calming elements, and conversion of selected parking spaces to pedestrian ways. B. PDdtitrLal:lrsulal1417 i I OtdMlt o IIeeMTt elver end foglesl ctrtnitMen hk+eeety Ibr isedeete�fs:'also. PdPEb`'Car,.i a ow1� os1(`a) diwMM to daKrststtte Isow pttrMtr wash mo.e hew a1blsNlle at pllwslse so tsiisRYsgswsw. v:em•rudum C—PAetl Prun*&A Par ttevia. '_. Questions. What is the siAnale orogram to assist the shopper'. Is this coordinated with other ,ignite elements ^ How dMs thejAadmj design concept reinforce the circulation design concept' What is the landscape design concept' What is the route a typical shopper takes' What are the dpe estrian ,NW anteni�ies tseatina. drnkine fountains tell hnnec. teach receotacles etc )' I Mrsrals. lighting. and siguage coaldtnlari:e pealsstrtan exparrnrce -- we Srnnfard Shopping Center as possible mocel St't as.5 Etta+-aslrps OtSt i,;a C %ring i Ness warehouse retail creates expansion of panting which should be buffered - to the extent possible whslr shade trees ' Pruveyard is known for oha trees and aArnaxe :anirs. Questionwhat is the proposed tteas sad light ataoduds kit the parksag lots" Adw 1) (]r.le (:trek 11 vlwmlly dratmaive. rimed m a transawn elrtmam for traffic , nativenrm. said is cowepruall) good as a tcinivais w Kaso Ursa; howevar.- caa-o1e, wrrh preaem cswfrgurui:w, hit h, relation to Main Street and would Idrely eon frrr "M veil lvrih sddnion of Mani 9"er Ctreie should he tttrther srudled to CIMM auto circulation, to clarity how traffic sould enter and exit Main Street, trid to better link the office Tower to Nam m„ Circle could be reconfigured, such as with example A ialtachedl. r Bfirgp I . Exisu.ti shopping center has a distinc•ive character -- Spwh.-h design d— te.' root lid", warirWtive roof form. iirow6. window anwAdauooa ca6N-"jMt2 ' et, -- that cc u:-i be built upon Peope red .6011aa haw a eoaterriperary feel. -hough lard to tell W" dltret, aftin -- to tell 94rat are materials, colors, and tM over" ausie"dateae► based or, illustrations. the i uegration of the proposed improsentents with the exitatng conditions could be improved, and should be studied further: Quosdow Hoa will the center he linked together or is the concept to create separate imaaea' What is the image of the new center' 3. Attention should be payed to wail roxrores, enieuietrtar, solor9. oyaaaB treattnartt, fenestration. and lighnng -- else roof forms grid tlastattaa ilwhah a6 present are pwverfW elernems at the extwin earntll — to dDhan• ialaesasio4 of prarsasd with existing- s:e:...a uA�n; •.rn�l: Pv�.yaN Piar 1; F s a.. 4 See revamped Town awl Grw" ,Shopping C*mer ut Nil2&ifi" lalong � Highway 101) as possible model. it tanwya a g iinage• 6s/r Mail blimp acoettt. Ifgtn, and color to centef, without feeling drastically different wP#tNr from old center 3 See renovation of existing shopping center in Coat Modern for usa of wlor and roof maurWO r imam a 1. 1AnA ttm of loadusg dock OK but tre" on *KMr side and muby parking ,paces could be imparted by proposad Myous coofiguratioa. stK"* Does ro - cd :onfigui atien provide an adequate turning radius. At,�.sAt` t are the s e of the vehicle to wired to r' g^. W'hece are rhr anm sp rJr� etc. me o t se Issues could b_ accommoda[ed [hrough pa,p � 'hedul�ne of d. ticeriea dunn8 aloes when c.neer is c osed� L" Se,. eCN v�v t✓� a 'rs Tr2sflX� Feneing,$aaning of loading dock could be enhanced with mwaMaaxuy ► w� ar..d,w uetaud as pieta ofwreltiroaaa ao enhance the pedestrian experience. Q C. nL& M c o poJ stets v�O(-1 Introduction :d new scree; will impact circulation pattern at the shopping street could be a central image of the center. Rot ✓ds5 Cot a !i Ticw1' 2 Suaa could be MW and foil** the aatertng dnv"ny alig 0 0M al "eatwr. Id to he ow jj kestrel a benkevard: thee Intr ion of a street, dewy �oe1R t� < Stud) End of Mernorandum Xri a'l ".en;rudum 'amphll Ptcaeyard Plan Reno Plat 3 MEMORANDUM C TyOF CAMPBELL PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT TO: Darryl Jones,Com Dev DATE: December 16, 1994 FROM: Ron Marquez, P.E. vat SUBJECT: Pruneyard Traffic Addendum Attached Is a memorandum from Jesse which identifies another issue not previously discussed or mentioned in the traffic analysis for the Pruneyard Modification. Please be aware that these concerns should be added to our list of issues for the proposed expansion of the Pruneyard Site. cc: Chuck Gomez Bob Haraiy Bob Harary Steve Piasecki Im MEMQRANDUM _CITY OF CAMPBEIL WBLIC WORKS ^�oARTMENT t TG: Ron Marquez DATE: December 16, 1994 FROM: Jessy Pu SUBJECT: Bascom/Pruneyard Intersection -------------------- ----- ------ -- ------------------------------------------------------------------- 1 have been observing the traffic movements and signal operation on Bascom Ave to improve the signal coordination. I noticed one potential problem on the southbound right -turn traffic going into Pruneyard at the Bascom/Pruneyard driveway signal. The southbound approach has quite a few right -turn traffic but does not have : right -turn lane. The right -turn traffic shares the N3 lane with the thru traffic. When the southbound traffic gets green, the pedestrians get pedestrian walk sign:. 1 observed three potential conflicts: • When the right -turn drivers see pedestrians crossing the Pruneyard crosswalk, they stop and cause potential rear -end conflicts. • Some drivers turn right fast and cause potential pedstrian safety concerns. When I was observing the traffic at this intersection, a senior citizen complained to me that the right -turn traffic does not stop for pedestrians. • 1 saw several right -turn traffic squeezing thru the bike lane to turn right to Pruneyard. This is a potential conflict to the bicyclists. Our traffic counts indicat! that the southbound #3 lane (shoulder lane) carries 40-50% of the total southbound traffic on Bascom. A fair share of traffic on the N3 lane turn right to Pruneyard. It seems that the traffic safety and operation could be improved with the provision of a right - turn lane for the southbound approach and also a sidewalk on the north side of driveway. r MEMORANDUM _ OITY Or CAMPBELL PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT TO: Darryl Jones, Senior Planner DATE: December 13, 1994 FROM: Ron Marquez, P.E�'� Traffic Engineer SUBJECT: Pruneyard Traffic Analysis We have reviewed the Traffic study and plans for the Pruneyard Shopping Center Modification. The following are my comments resulting from that review. The approach to the traf',c analysis is consistent with our request and earlier review of the trip generation estimates for the p oject. The project will add 146 new trips to the existing street system during the PM peak hour. The entire Pruneyard complex adds approximately 1,700 trips during the evening peak hour. The study, on page 24, discusses the parking demand for the project. The parking requirements of the code indicate that the retail complex would need 1,023 spaces, the hotel portion requires 168 spaces, and the office complex 1,041 spaces for a total of 2,218 spaces. A total of 1,896 spaces is proposed to be provided. This results in a deficit as per the ordinance of 322 spaces. There may be some sharing of parking benefit which should be analyzed in light of the substantial deficit. I recommend using the analysis method described in "Shared Parking" as published by ULI. There is no assessment of the operation of the main entrance to the center from Campbell Avenue. This driveway into the site is divided into an entrance and exit and separated by 125 feet. Ttie exit driveway is separated from Union Avenue by 100 feet. The p oximity of all these movements to each other results in numerous weaving conflicts on Campbell Avenue. The traffic volume at the Pruneyard Entrance meets signal warrants, however a signal this close to Lire Union avenue signal would not operate effectively and would reduce the effectiveness of the system. We have evaluated a number of options for combining the entrances and exits to the site. The most favorable alternative from a traffic point of view is to combine the entrance and exits at a point opposite the Union ,Avenue intersection. This would allow signalized control for access to the site with minimal additional delay to Campbell and relatively little additional signal costs. The alternative which we discussed would be to reroute the exiting leg of the access to the Union Avenue intersection and to combine with that signal operation. rjm Page 2 December 13, 1994 The revised interior circulation proposed ti,.augh the center of the commercial area will improve access to the parking area at the rear of the site. Circulation through the area would be improved if the proposed design avoided either a dogleg to the right or to the left. It is recommended that the driveway entrance from Bascom Avenue be realigned to the north to provide a more direct route to the major circulation route to the west side of the project. The Campbell General Plan identifies a proposed new Class II collector connecting Campisi to Campbell Avenue. This extension will provide a more direct connection to the project area from Route 17. Project related traffic could bypass the Bascom and Hamilton intersection by using this access approach. The need for this new road will become more critical as traffic increases along Bascom and Hamilton. It is recommended that consideration be given to this new road in future modifications of this project. The traffic analysis indicates that the additional traffic does not result in Congestion Management Agency(CMA) level impacts to the surrounding street system. There has evidently been some improvement in traffic levels as a result of Route 85 opening. The traffic study does, however, indicate that there will be a traffic impact at the Hamilton and Salmar intersection. This impact does not reach the level of a CMA impact but it will result in long delays for certain movements at the intersection, specifically the northbound right turn movement. The City has a project proposed in the Capital Improvement Program for the widening of Salmar as it approaches the Hamilton Avenue. This project is estimated to cost $188,000 and is proposed to be funded by private development. A second project in the Capital Improvement Program which is directed at this intersection is the Hamilton and Route 17 project. This 1.1 million dollar project is proposed to be funded with federal ISTEA funds at approximately 80%. The balance is to be funded with local funds in the amount of $244,000. The total local funding needed for improvements at this intersection is $432,000. At this time two developments are proposed which ooth have an effect on the intersection of Hamilton and Salmar. The respective share that each project has for the road improvement may be measured on the basis of the number of trips each development generates at the problem intersection. rjm Page 3 December 13, 1994 The two projects and their anticipated trip generation are; Pruneyard Modification 18 Trips peak hour. Breuner's Redevelopment 281 Trips peak hour Total Trips peak hour 299 Based on this distribution of trips, the Pruneyard would be responsible for approximately 6% of the cost of the combined road improvement projects or $26,000. Let me know if you have ques'ions. We should probably discuss this with our respective bosses' participation. cc: Bob Kass Steve Piase.ki Bob Harary rjm I i December 6. 1994 RECE��ED DEC 0 't Planning Department Dm DF CRMPBELL City of Campbell i1iNNING DEPT 70 North First Street Campbell. CA 95008 Attention: Darryl Jones, Senior Planner Re: Development Application for l Ise Permit and Site and Architectural Review 1875 South Bascom Avenue (the PnmeYard) Dear Darryl: We would like to clarify our intention with respect to several elements of the Development Applications we have submitted to the Planning Department: 1. As part of our application, we have requested approval of the conversion of approximately 20.000 square feet of retail area to hotel use. While it is our intention to develop a hotel use of that area. it is possible that we will be unable to conclude an economic arrangement for the development of that area as hotel space. We would like any approvals granted by the City of Campbell to reflect the speculative nature of our hotel development plans and to allow for the continued use of the invoked area as retail space if we are ultimately unsuccessful with our plans for the hotel expansion. 2. Our site plan includes an 8.300 square foot pad building to be constructed on Campbell Avenue. Our application requests that our use of that future building be approved at this time, though we understand that the design and siting of the building will be subject to review by the Site and Architectural Review Committee of the Planning Commission at the time that our plans for that building are more fully developed. We would like any approvals granted to us with respect to this 8300 square feet of new construction to provide that the approved area can he divided into more than one building if that proves more appropriate. 3. As you and Steve Piasecki have requested, we have left the landscaped circle between the shopping center mid office building; on the site plan, th(lugb its removal would have allowed us to add approximately 40 parking spaces to the site. We would like assurance from the City that we will be able to remove the circle and add the parking at a future date if the renovated shopping center proves to be underparked. 4. Our application includes all of the site changes that we intend for the PruneYard. The actual sequencing of the work has not yet been determined. We would like your assurance that we will be able to prosecute the work over time, in sections. as appropriate. Mr. DatryI Jones, Senior Planner December 6, 1994 Page 2 Specifically, we intend to commence the alterations to the office parking lot iminediately upon receipt of our project approval, even though those changes will result in a temporary reduction in the number of parking spaces on the site. You and Steve have adviaed us that you will ask the Planning Commission to require us to file a parcel map that unifies the various parcel that comprise the PruneYard as a condition of our approval. We are not willing to consolidate the PruneYard to one parcel; we are willing to discuss a rationalization of the parcels. Four parcels, one for each of the office towers, hotel and snopping center, might be an appropriate reallocation. We look forward to receiving your comments on our application. We remain very grateful for the high level of attention you are devoting to our project. Yours truly, `i thristophtr Meany Retail Project Director V� y E Y c � 3 f TRAFFIC STUDY ' FOR PRUNEYARD SHOPPING CENTER 1 MODIFICATION DAVID ': AVENUE HAMIITON /AVMUr 1 7� ' --IA-y K 4 woody at AL PB LL ' CAMP 3ELL AVE?E FEMML OR CAMPKLL AVE w110011 AVE � �' � ' OUDD AVENUE m Aff o � AT BASCOM AND CAMPBELL CAMPBELL, CALIFORNIA toomom in& bft Kups NO wI ww. rot or. nuft is* in N&01006t-10 4*8/W1f10• INGIVIGN• $aJAA 04 M111 (Mh 4N-7W 1 TABLE OF CONTENTS eENE e INTRODUC"nON...................................................1 STUDY APPROACH................................................4 SULIMARY......................................................5 DESCRIPTION OF EXISTING CONDITIONS ............................... 7 LEVEL OF SERVICE DEFINITIONS.....................................9 1/ VARIATION OF EXISTING CONDITIONS ................................ 11 A BACKGROUND CONDITIONS........................................13 V PROJECT CONDITIONS ............................................ 15 A al PROJECTIMPACTS...............................................23 (� CONCLUSIONS..................................................25 u w n INTRODUCTION AND SUMMARY INTRODUCTION The purpose of this study is to identify traffic impacts of the proposed Pruneyard Shopping Center modification in the City of Campbell. The project site is located on Bascom Avenue near to intersection of Bascom and Campbell Avenue as shown on Figure 1. The proposed project alignment calls for a reduction in total gross leasable area from 268,518 square feet to 255,857 square feet, and an increase in the total number of occupied hotel rooms from 118 to 168. Access to the site will be provided via three (3) driveways along Bascom Avenue and three (3) driveways along Campbell Avenue. The proposed project is expected to be completed by 1996. This study will evaluate the traffic impacts at key intersections during the P.M. peak hour. Traffic impacts from shopping centers typically occur in the P.M. peak hour. Intersection level of service analyses were performed for the following eight intersections: • Salmar Avenue/Hamihon Avenue • Creekside Way/Hamilton Avenue • Bascom Avenue/Hamifton Avenue V • Campisi Way/Bascom Avenue n • w1 Pruneyard DnvewayBascom Avenue • Campbell Avenue/Bascom Avenue • Union Avenue/Campbell Avenue • Highway 17 NB/Off-ramp at Creekside Way d In addition to analyzing intersections level of service, this report also evaluates parking needs and on -site circulation, with the proposed project. 0 U fa/ r ■ 1 e i DAVID x AVENUE /AVE HAMILTON UE ; WATSON DR u COMES LATI R AVE < / / 9 \ ,q Y ROB AY VE � = i L RIDCEIY OR CA PB LL MCBAIN AVE •r w CAMPBELL AV NUE FEWTRELL DR AMPBELL_ w x �� AVE w >LLJ Q RINCON AVE �Q y > Q .. w / C� O O 0 p � U Q Z B U D D AVENUE m r LOCATION MAP PRUNEYARD SHOPPING CENTER MODMATION CORNER OF BASCOM 3 CAMPSEU AVENtE ■ CAMPBELL CALIFORNIA &ft.....I[mWF9& FIGURE O.Pl II ..... ...... �- - 2 The interssCtions noted above were analyzed to determine the levels of service under four scenarios: f + t • ExWft conditions A 2. Background conditions 3. W l,-P ojecX Mxmt+orre 4. Project with future growth conditions O4 1 h .i 9 M B 3 I F STUDY APPROACH This study is divided into tour phases. The first phase involves determining peak hour r traffic volumes at the study intersections. The existing traffic counts for all eight intersections were obtained from the City. Brian Kangas Foulk counted right -turn volumes at the intersection of Bascom and Campisi Way during P.M. peak. The second phase involves determining site traffic generation and distribution. Traffic generated from the site was assigned to the study intersections for intersection level of service analyses. The third phase involves conducting intersection analyses using the CAPSSI-11 software for ail intersections. Intersec ion level of service analyses were conducted for the four scenarios noted above and for P.M. peak hour only, since major traffic impacts on adjacent streets from the shopping center typicalR, occur in the afternoon peak hour. The fourth phase is a careful examination of capacity calculatic� results to determine if mitigation improvements are needed. 4 I i SUMMARY 4 wat' the reduction of gross leasable area 12,661 squ,'e feet and an additional 50 hotel rooms, the modification of the Pruneyard Shopping Center is expected to generate an additional 14f, trips during P.M. peak hour because of the change of vacancy rate would .* be assumed to change from 30% currently to 6% when the Project is completed. Access to the site would be provided via three driveways on Bascom Avenue and two driveways on Campbell Avenue. Table - S indicates the intersection at Hamilton and Salmar is currently operating V. Level Of Service E+ with an average delay of aPPror.imatey 42 seconds. The remaining ., intersections are operating at Level of Service C or better with an average delay of approximately 20 seconds or less. Under the Project with Future Growth condition. the ►+ intersection at Hamilton and Selmer will operate at Level of Service E with an average ` delay of approximately 45 seconds due to heavy existing northbound and southbound right-tum volume. For the remaining intersections, the levels of service and delay at each of these intersections would remain essentially unchanged. Since the level of service for all n�tsmections are maintained above E, none of the eight intersections are significantly impacted by the project. Therefore, no traffic mitigation would be required for the nrojeet based on level of service impacts. 5 TABLE S SUMMAhY LEVELS OF SERVICE P.M. PEAK HOUR Ewarq BackprourKl W4rAProlact Pralact with FG 4braaGflon Cows Dan AD LOS AD LOS AD LOS AD LOS a FMMoN9aYtir 11N3N4 42 E+ 43 E+ 43 E+ 45 E Harrtor.00skaida 11AXM a B+ a B+ a B+ a B+ FlarrrlorlBuoorn 11A79,94 20 C+ 20 G 20 G 20 C- Cvm raldarAaaa 17 11Anm S A S A S A a A BaaCggR.anlpM 11AI3194 17 C+ 17 C+ 17 C+ 17 C+ Bat-ryPVNyard 11NN94 7 B+ 7 B+ 7 B+ 7 B+ BaaomIr m m Wim 11 e- 11 B- 11 It.. 11 B- ' ' C.rnpoayurron arAm a e+ a B+ a B+ a 6+ FG . FJva Ororrin . AD . Av—W Do* (in aaealda) .J d r1 rI W W r r r 8 M L I DESCRIPTIONS OF EXISTING CONDITIONS Existing intersection vehicular turning movements were obtained from the City of Campbell. Ong geonstrics for study intersections were Obtained rrom aerial photographs and confrcrned by City staff. Exiadng Roadway Salem Hamilton Avenue is a heavily b avelled arterial street. Hamilton Avenue carves an average daily t`aMc (ADT) volume of 87.000 vehicles near Bascom Avenue. it runs In an east -west direction and has sbr through -lanes w4h separate turn lanes at intersections. With three tfxough-Isr»a for each direction and separate turn lanes at the intersections, 588carn Avenue runs In a north -south direction from San Jose to Los Gatos, and also is a ieavily travelled arterial street. it carries average daily traffic of 44,000 vehicles near Hamilton Ave". Campbell Avenue, with two lanes in each direction, is a secondary city arterial street which runs in an east -west direction. 7 Union Avenue ? With one lane in each direction and sep arate turn lanes at some intersections, Union Avenue A is a 89COn<WY City arterial street. Union Avenue starts at Campbell Avenue and ends at Blossom HO Road, morning in a north -south direction. A LW9 fflk2 TWO Ste Clara County bwelt routes serve now the project site. One nms nor h south ak ng Bascom Avenue and one runs east -west alOIV Campbell Avenue and turns on Bascom Averws. On Bssoom Avenue. Route 62 provides local service between P*dmonVSie,rs to Los Gatos. This route operates on 15minute headways during commute periods and on 30-minute hsadways durkV the off peak hours. O" Campbell venue. Route 26 Provides service between Eastridge Mall and Lockheed. South 26 operates on a 30-minute headway all day. 6 n im n P LEVEL OF SERVICE DEFINITIONS Using the T APSSl-t t• computer software, intersection analy a were conducted for all study intersections. Analyses of traffic volumes a- useful in Uideratandlnp the general nature of traffic in an area, but. by #MTW*t s, indicate neiM►er the abMW of the street network to carry additional traffic. nor tt.4 quaiMy of aerwcs worded by to street facitty. For this reason, the concept of "level of service' has been davalopad to correlate nu yWical trsfic volume data to subjective descripi" of traffic performance at intersections_ Table I defines the "Oval of service` catsyoriaa -K trough IP and kxkates the qualutive definition of each catty and the correSpOnding delay. 9 1 TABLE I Intersection Level of Service Definitions Signalized Intersections R Level of service Interpretation Delay (seconds) A Uncongested operations; all queues dear in a single signal cycle (little or no traffic delays). <5 B Stable flow. Vehicle platoons are formed (short traffic delays). 5.1 - 15 C Light congestion; occasional backups on crtical approaches (average traffic delays). 15.1 - 25 n D Significant congestion or critical approaches but Witeroedion functional. Cars required to waft throurh more than one cycle during short peaks. Nc longstarhdmg queues formed (long traffic delays). 25.1 - 40 E Severe congestion with some longstanding queues on criticai approaches. Blockage of intersection may occur if traffic signal does not r, provide for prc4ected turning movements. Traffic queue may block nearby intersection(s) �. upstream of critical approach(es) (very long W traffic delays). 40.1 - 60 F Total breakdown; stop -and -go operation V (extreme traffic delays). >60 t, V v Yn w 10 61 EVALUATION OF EXISTING CONDITIONS The results of the level of service analyses made using existing traffic volumes and lane geometrics at the intersections under study are summarized in Table 11. As seen by the table, with the Hamilton Avenue and Selmer Avenue intersection excepted, all study intersections operate sabsfactorihr at Level of Service C or better. The Intersection of Hamilton Avenue and Salmar Avenue operates at Level of Service E (witty a delay of 42 seconds). The existing P.M. Peak volumes for all study intersections are shown in Figure 2. TABLE II LEVELS OF SERVICE EXISTING CONDITIONS P.M. PEAK HOUR Intersection Count Date Delay LOS 11/3194 42 E+ Harnilton/C►eekside 11/3194 8 B+ Hamilto►VBaacom 11/3/94 20 C+ Creeksids/Route 17 11/3/94 5 A BascorrVCarnpisl 11/3/94 17 C+ Bascorn/Pruneyerd 11/9/94 7 B+ Bascom/Campbell 9/1l94 11 B- Campbell/Union 6/28/n:4 6 B+ Delay (seconds) u 1� w r n a ill ■ ■ ■ "'Ce w M1x��lie. %9 Jla to \ 91, IiAMIL TON AVENUE isx N,m, LAX w a � —o PRUNEVARD J 1 0 CAMPBELL. AVENUE CAMPBELL _ y � AVE Z a � t z o = = 2 O V 91e j � N m EXISTING CONDITION - PM PEAK PR'a4EYARD SHOPPING CENTER CORNER OF BA3COM 6 CAMPBELL AVENUE CAMPBELL CALIFORNIA MM Kowa Frc .., .Z z .c e..a 1 F IBACKGROUND CONDITIONS Evaluation of Background Conditions Background traffic conditions consist of existing traffic volumes added to volumes expected Afrom proocts approved by the City of Campbell but not yet built and occupied. A Turning movements at each intersection for approved projects were provided by City staff. for ,I this study. Figure 3 shows the background turning movement volumes for all study intersections. Background levels of service and delay for each study intersection are contained in Table III. TABLE ill LEVELS OF SERVICE BACKGROUND CONDITIONS P.M. PEAK HOUR Intersection Count Date Delay Background LOS HarrrlkwWSainw 11/3194 43 E+ Hamilton/Creekslde 11 /3/94 fl so- HemplpyBascom 11/3194 20 C- CnNksMe/Route 17 11/3/94 5 A Bascom/Campisi 11/3194 17 C+ BasconVPruneyard 11/9/94 7 B+ BssconVCampbell 9/1/94 11 B- Campbo Wnion WM94 a B+ 13 A — e0o ��er J + ]I! OR ' o�. o Iao � — o J I 0 97 , HAMILTDN AVENUE b < y 1 I Q .° J 1 f 1!? N 1 A ( � Ay PRUNEYARD )'4' 2!o CAMPBELL AVENUE " l CAMPBELL Y�y AVE eV J I ! z euJ- I r i � ree a n ie1 z 0ro1 v 37 m m i L BACKGROUND CONDITION — PM PEAK PRUNEYARD SHOPPING CENTER COPIER OF BASCOM d CAMFWU AVENLJE CAMPBELL 4ft � � I.aNa.-Moen.. RNIA ---- sea. FgURE O.e.. .-� 1.. .e .a 3 la PROJECT CONDITIONS Trip Generation Trip generation rates during the P.M. peak hours for the modified Pruneyard Shopping Center were taken from the Institute of Transportation Engineers publication Trip Generation, Fifth Edition, 1991. P. The traffic will be generated 'Tom two parts of the project; hotel and retail. There will be an 1 . additional 50 new hotel rooms to be added on at the existing hotel. With the reduction of gross leasable area of 12,661 square feet, the project still will generate additional trips rr:ompared to the existing site. This assumes the vacancy rate would change from 30% currently to 6% when the project is completed. Table IV shows all calculation and total trips F, are generated by the project. i5 It' TABLE IV RETAIL ELEMENT The total gross leasable floor area is 268,518 SF The proposed project will eliminat 76,237 SF R The project will acid 83,578 SF Total new leasable area will be 255,857 SF From ITE PM peak Trip Formula for shopping centars Ln(T) = 0,637 Ln(X) + 3.553 where: T = Trips during the peak hour and X = Leasable Floor Area in 1,000's Solving for T (where X = 255.857) = 1,194 Trips This is the anticipated trip generation for the proposed project. The existing trip generation should be estimated and subtracted from the above value to provide an estimate of the anticipated increase in traffic over present volumes. Currently Pruneyard Shopping Center has a vacancy rate of 30%. However, the typical shopping center in Santa Clare County is 6.6% (Source: Business Journal, October 24, 1994). Therefore, the adjusted excess vacancy rate is 214%. The existing adjusted leasable area = 268,518 X 76.8% = 205,685 Using the formula: Ln(T) = 0.637 Ln(X) + 3.553 T = 1039 Trips Therefore, the additional trips expected to the Pruneyard fmm the retail portion = 1,194 - 1,039 = 155 trips during the PM Peak. Assuming a 30% by-pass rate for tnese trips then the new trip generation would be: 155 X 70% = 108 TE HOTEL ELEMENT NUMBER OF NEW ROOM: 50 P.M. PEAK TRIP GENERATION RATE: 0.76 m:/Room P.M. PEAK PROJECTED TRAFFIC VOLUME: 50 X 0.76 re/Room = 38 TE TOTAL PROJECTED TRAFFIC VOLUME INCREASE TOTAL PROJECED TRIP INCREASE = RETAIL + HOTEL 108TE � 18TE=146TE 16 Tric) Distribution P1 Project traffic distribution was provided by City staff using 'Campbell Model 2010 Network". 14 All projected trips were run through the Model 2010 Network to develop traffic assignments. .� Traffic ccinn to ent Project try was assigned to the roadway system consistent with the project traffic distribution Pattern. Both inbound and outbound at P.M. peak hour project traffic volumes for all study intersections are shown in Figure 4. Eamon of Proiecg n ihQ,n Project turning movements were added to the background volumes to obtain the expected total traffic volumes at each intersection. Figure 5 shows the project turning movement volumes for all study intersections. The results of the with -Project analysis are contained in Table V. l L L17 I L e p- f r U 3 -_ o 1 ro 1 `�. goo_ Lo JI —o � i o ! r 0 a p i Lo —o HAMILTON _ AVENUE 1r 31 o R . 1J Z < N 9 to M z o .� —� PRUNEYARD CAMPBELL AVENUE ^ I o.. Ir W 2 Ci 7 W j Z ^i' - g Lo ro of 1r i I i — o PROJECT VOLUMES — PM PEAK PRUNEYARD SHOPPM (INTER CORNER OF BASCOM K CAMPBELL AVENUE CAMPBELL •o , ....: .,�. goo CALIFORNIA xa• r, r ....., ,............ iw.w• ,won.. u�a.r.»..�•. o.• FIOIM o.w 4 � 4W7\ } ,.-i m olio ex — o %9 to 0 HAMIITON AVENUE > Q x In J � ,S♦ 4 a � = to PRUNEYARD JI o CAMPBELL AVENUE rel CAMPBELL / AVE W _R« l.le cx 1 j Z JI Ir f» J U Cz NIm PROJECT CONDITION - PM PEAK PRUNEYARD SHOPPING CENTER CORDER OF BASCOM 3 CAMPBELL AVENUE CAMPBELL C 4LI�ORNIA S TABLE V LEVELS OF SERVICE PROJECT CONDITIONS A P.M. PEAK HOUR rtersection Count Date Delay Background LOS amilton/Salmar 11/3/94 43 E+ Hamllton/Creekside 11/3/94 8 B+ Hamilton/Bascom 11/3194 20 C- Creekside/Route 17 11/3/94 5 A Bascom/Carrlpisi 11/3/94 17 C+ BascorrvPruneyard t 1/9/94 7 B+ Bascont/Campbell 9/1/94 11 B- Campbell/Union 6/28/94 8 B+ PROJECT WITH FUTURE GROWTH Because of traffic growth, all existing traffic volumes need to be updated to the conditions that the project is Completed and the buildings are ready to be occupied with a growth rate of 1.2 percent per year (0.1 percent per month). Project traffic volumes with future growth for each study intersection are shown in Figure 6. The results of the Prcject with Future Growth analysis for each study intersection are contained in Table VI. 20 • �0 �592n S1 to o f r o —sx Z' p7o J j• RJ .51 Asa^ i 5n � fe 0 0� ss -f Y HAMILTON AVENUE • � < JC J f � r5s < � I •, ! r 'A �9 u. -RR �\ A Y _ ? to PRUNEYARD J ie o CAMPBELL AVENUE / CAMPBELL I .1 \\ AVE w r I �O p \ I W j Z Jf 6 z �+ 439J- } r w ° vast ml PROJECT + FUTURE GROWTH CONDITION - PM PEAK PRUNEYARD SHOPPING CENTER CAMPBELL CORNER OF BASCOM & CAKPBEU AVENUE o• CAUFORNIA ,.. r L.. Sca• �' r � • • • � � • � 1.••NN rfOa/... 1.••I.f•- �r. FKXFE :" 8 1 4, TABLE VI all LEVELS OF SERVICE q PROJECT WITH FUTURE GROWTH CONDITIOPIS P.M. PEAK HOUR Intersection Count Date Delay Background LOS HamOton/Salmar 11/3t94 45 E HamlRon/Creekside 11/3/94 8 B+ HamMon/Bescom 11 /3M4 _ 20 C- Creeksice/Flouts 17 1113/94 5 A Bascorn/Campisi 11 /3/94 17 C + BasconVPruneyard 11 /9/94 7 B+ Bascorn/Campbell 9/1 /94 11 13- Campbell/Unk1n W28/94 8 B+ W4 a PROJECTIMPACTS N Level of Service M Adding the project generated traffic, capacity calculations for all study intersections were analyzed using CAPSSI-11 computer software. Intersection traffic volumes for all scenarios are displayed on Figures 2 to 6. The resulting levels of service are shown in Table VII, TABLE VII SUMMARY LEVELS OF SERVICE r P.M. PEAK HOUR Intersection Cc" Dan Existing AD LOS B8CkWata4 AD LOS With-Propct AD LOS ProIW with FG AD LOS HartalloNsaknr 11g3IW 42 E+ 43 E. t 43 E+ 45 E HarrilltArVrreekside IIM3194 a S+ a B+ a B+ a B+ FWMorvSaworn 11/03/94 20 C+ 20 C- 20 C- 20 C- Crooke le/RotAe 17 1 11/03/94 S A 1S A S A S A Baacomr-arnpnl 11 M3/% 17 C♦ 17 C+ 17 C+ 17 C+ Baacar!i/pninayW 11/09/94 7 B+ 7 B+ 7 B+ 7 B+ SaaWfrVCarttpbel 9/1I94 11 B. 11 B- 11 S- 11 S- campo.arunion er29194 a B+ a B+ a e+ a B+ FG - FtAM Growth AD - Averape Delay (in aecorWs) 23 a V r r r 41 As shown in Table VII, the levels of service for all study intersections remain essentially p1 unchanged bet;aeen existing conditions and Project with Future Growth conditions. Access Ditveways for the Proiect Site There are six existing driveways servicing Pruneyard Shopping Center. With the traffic signal, the major driveway is located at the north side of the shopping center at Bascom Avenue with full access. With right -in and right -out on Bascom Avenue, there are two other driveways located south of the major driveway. There are one two-way and two one-way driveways located on Campbell Avenue. All existing driveways are serving properly to the project site and will remain unchanged. All new major traffic circulation aisles in the parking lot will maintain at least 24-feet wide and will not block access to fire truck and other emergency vehicles. PARKING DEMAND According to the City of Campbell Parking Code, a ratio of four spaces per 1.000 square feet is required. The modified Pruneyard Shopping Center would have a retail space of 255,857 square feet. A total of 1.023 parking spaces would be required for retail stores/shopping center use under current standards. For the hotel, one parking space per room is required by the City. The modified 'hotel would have 168 guest rooms. A total of 168 parking spaces should be provided for the hotel. 24 4 4 CONCLUSIONS w The modified Pruneyard Shopping Center would generate 155 additional trips during P.M. peak from retail (assume vacancy rate would be 6.0% when the project is completed). Since approximately 30 percent of the project -generated traffic would be pass -by traffic, the net project traffic impact from retail on the adjacent street is 108 additional trips. There also would be 38 new trips generated by additional hotel rooms during P.M. peak. During P.M. peak, the total project traffic impact in the vicinity of the project site from the entire shopping center is 146 new trips. Using CAPSSI-11 computer software, a total of eight intersections in the vicinity of the project site were analyzed to determine existing conditions and future levels of service when the project is completed. The results of the analysis indicate that under existing conditions, all study intersections, with the intersection of Hamilton and Salmar Avenues excepted, will operate at levels of service between Level of Service A (indicating no delay) and Level of Service E (indicating average delays). The average delay for these intersections range from 8 seconds to 20 seconds per vehicle. The intersection of Hamilton Avenue and Salmar Avenue will operate under ex, oting conditions at Level of Service E with an average delay of 42 seconds per vehicle. Under the Project with Future Growth condition, the level of service at these intersections would remain essentially unchanged with an average delay increase of 3 seconds per vehicle at the intersection of Hamilton Avenue and Salmar Avenue. Since the level of service for all intersections are maintained above Level of Service E, none of the eight intersections are significantly impacted by the project. Therefore, no traffic mitigation would be required for the project based on level of service impacts. K:\DESIGN\946042\TRAFFIC.STD W 25 to 1875 S. BASCOM AVENUE S 94-08/UP 94-19 5 OF 7 CITY OF CAMPBELL PLAN. 1'/99 APPENDDC 28 ' - ; .l ui l iM P6ELL • TRAFFIC COUNT REPORT 11/07/94 DS:47:11 REPORT FILE: 11SFtAS.RCP WE: YSMN/NANILtO OESCAI►TIM: WSCON/AMILTON INTERSECT(O1 ryAM COUNTS NMILTON INIERCOWIT SIS110 i C)(r eF CAwNPl1 0e/20/9L 1 REPORT PRON: K1071 To: 941107 DATA COLUM: 1 ERTIAU WILTON El TItU AT 1ASLYAI (LINE 9%) i fSLT WILTON U LT AT 9A" (LINK 901) 3 1tTOW NMILTOI MI TIRE) AT OASCOM (LINK MZ) A N9LT WILTON r LT AT 9ASCON (LINK 90S) S MITNRU BAK= M THOU AT WILTON (LINK 9OI) ♦ MILT DASCON 10 LT AT WILTON (LINK 9e) 7 OTNRN MSCON MI "Ill AT WILTON (LIVE 904) SILT NASW1 w LT AT NMIILIOF (LIVE 197) v VEST UAI()LTM N OF RASCDN 10 Lut WILTON 1 OF SASCOM 11 ENT WILTON 15 FIT AT MSCO( 17 UMIT NA/(ILION w RT AT NAS001 1! NMIT WmF w RT AT AANIL7O1 14 SMT MSCUI Al ..T RMILTW S COUNT F7LfS: 941031 Now 941101 Tlt %,,a NED 9L110 TIN 941104 FRI 11 0- 9. 12 53 n4uS 3-H 25% L!TI OF iAMPBELL ' 1.1111 COU11T REAORT • MAR1A1.011 11/07/94 page 1 RE1AT NAME: OaSC011/MMILTM VOX-1 Vol-z VOL-3 VOL -a VGL 5 VC; 6 VC: 7 VOL-8 VOL-9 90L10 VOL 11 VOL 12 v0113 VOL 1 Rol W 04 MA EOTMRU EOLT WITWIU WILT R6T111u MOLT SOTMw SOL1 1RST EAST EOA1 WI1 MOAT SORT TOTk r MOM 31 17 1363 6a2R 036 200 100 S76 a7So 4i5 4309 2721 403 is, 3% 513 14556 ROM 31 10 16SOM Sao a" 274 1021 Sn 1051 So" 4M5 316" SSa 172 U" 511 15002 rr -TYL 1 17 1311" S66 Ot01 a" 9% S13M 932 305 4020R 253SM a97 ,60 2S! are 13Tr1M T1I 1 10 1s" S.9 go312 1014 562 113" aN aS30 30" ST VOL 349 US1s76a; WED 2 17 T366 S01 676 269 m 553 gas 373 4243 2653 540 1110 29111 aW UPS WED 2 10 1531 5VI 930 330 1009M 6690 1062 431 46OW 3075 4610 19. 3S0 534 15901 Tw 1 17 13, 1M 631 an 267 WIN MS 09a ri0M 4107 2507 SOa 1S1M 3w a7511 14029 Tw 310 1S43 516M 947" " 10" 625 1090 "a ('S99 3153 555 1W SST SUR 1602" iotsl 1167R "IS 7046 i375 0176 YLO rM UN 35007 220a6 a100 13% 2617 a1W 1202a3 ' AnT'A0t t4e0 517 M1 297 1022 S00 "a 426 4w ma S73 173 .1 11a IS= RW.L.LM) 1311 S16 010 7.Y 9T7 S13 07S 350 4m 253S 401 151 291 a75 13M ft.,—KM) ,"A 642 947 3" 1o09 "0 113a Sae 4606 316S S6a 194 3" 550 16025 St0.091. 122.7 40.0 40.4 34.7 30.2 "A 91.s a7.3 200.E 2SS.A 32.0 13.3 A.7 29.0 WC-0 r Total -ad— of 11- • a u o. .. �a ti•.lut .::e :5 "'I uF „IyF6iL. TRAFFIC COUNT ■EPMT 11/07/94 01:41:40 REPORT FILE: MAFICRE.REP INW. CREEESIOE/MAR1L(pl DESCRIP11Mz CREIESIOE/AAMI LYON INTERSECTION TURN COUNTS RAMILTOM INTERCONNECT STSTO City At CMRORII. Wry Print, lono/n w- REEOIti ►RM: 141031 TO: Y.1107 DATA [QIAI: I E/TMRU WILTON Et TNW AT CRLIMIDE (LIME M2) p 7. I/TNRU NMIL10 1RI TRW AT CREEEftOE (LIMB MR) S MY MMItTOI r ■) TO WTI? AT CI11EMf IOE (l IMM710) L YELI MAPILTON Wit LT AT CREEEfiDE (LIM 701) M S MRT Q7lEASIDE M• AT AT NAIIILTQI (LIM 712) 6 MY MENEM N1 LT AT MMILTM (LIAR 7%) 1 EMT MMILTM to At .AI CRWUIOE ILI< 7A}) i CMXT FILES; 90031 Pm /47101 Tit 9411OZ IM %1103 1W 41/104 FRI 11 U, 04 12. 51 12405 379 2572 LITI OF L.1MP66LL 1.11E 1 l'p111T 1E1I1 - MRRL 1 111 11/0?/F •R/• 1 REPORT M61E: CRRCRf10E/MMILTOD VOL-1 VOL-2 VOL-3 VOL-4 VOL 5 VOL-6 VOL.? ROM RW Raw RIM I". Z W SRW IRm TROY K OR I E6TMN ItTMN WNT wet MIT ■0L1 ERRT TOTAL 6rERlQ TOT-1 TOT-2 TOT-3 TOT-L TOT-S TOT-6 TOT-7 11DM 31 17 2075 1000 609 67 311 Su. 23e SKO 00s 31.0 31.9 10.0 1.1 5.5 9.6 4,7 MOM 31 is 230M 1932 670 66R 309 630 33eM 62M " 36.9 30.9 10.7 1.1 6.9 10.1 �9.7 5.6 _TUE 1 17 1943R 1701M 55" 66 26M SOS 21N1 5227m 7QM 37.i 32.5 10.6 0.9 5.0 4.1 TLC 1 10 [2T Im 660I 56 no 620 204 6003 0A 37.3 31.1 10.e 0.9 6.9 10.2 6.7 YSD 2 17 2012 1767 yes 59 332M 501 Us Mal 719 LA 32.6 10.6 1.1 6.0 9.1 6.4 WED 2 10 2m 2006M 72711 S7 279 "N 237 6223 e09 sS.s 32.2 11.7 5.9 6.5 10.3 LA TOY 3 17 2019 I-M 301 52 307 67" 275 5696 m 36.7 32.3 10.6 0.9 5.6 6.6 5.1 TMu 3 10 2256 2001 IDS 61M 296 600 301 61" 0K 36.4 32.3 11.4 0.7 6.6 9.7 4.9 TDuI 17111 1690t S09s "a n" 6316 2185 4"33 �. RVRrRI• 2139 1e63 637 55 MR S" 273 son R/n1Y(R) 1965 1701 s56 61 260 676 216 5227 767 M►R1taaLR) am 20" 727 66 st2 642 330 6253 W3 StO.Dor. 132.0 106.E M.7 7.e 20.9 62.1 36.5 376.5 Tot►1 mmew of line • ■ W d 17 r G tt �• a, t] 5, QauT 379 2553 LITI LIF iU11`6ELL `- I1/0?/% 09:06:19 1EAFilC iJAA1T !ElOMT lEF4l1 F«E: NMEIIL.IEA !!�:/17/MANIli01 '« AFTER 9/1I/93 «' OESCRIyT10Y: EALAWIT/MMILTOI INTEIEECIICN RAN 00A79 NMILTON 1117EICLNIIICT ETITEM - city NT EMA69il ■ 10/19/03 C2t90NT FA011: 941031 10: 941107 .,A CDLWAj 1 Ep. 0011.1011 10 TOU AT lA111A1 (LIM 502) 2 NNTWU NOILTON r TOW AT EALIM! (LIME 10A) r3 1ALT WIILM r LT AT W-11 (LIFE 501) I. OAT SUjWX a 11 Ai AM1«TOI (LINK 512) 3 NELI EALIM! E L1 AT ■ANILTM (LIE 30E) 1'1 A SEAT Ni, IT O K At NANILTO! (LINE 5111 7 SjWLL WTI? O IT AT MMILTOI COOK SO) N s[00� a NMILTM To • FMAIMT UFP 9 aLAE1 WI«Ta EM TMLAE •1 (LEFT LASE) 10 ENLA[2 NMIIOCII a TOM LAIR IQ (N)9M[ LANE) Il E9LAE3 NM11LTO a INN LA-9 43 (MI01T Lw) 7"v 12 MIT WIILTO 1A ET 10 IT O O -RA1IP ., Scam? FILE: 9",as TIN 941104 lot,"031 . 941101 RR M7102 WED 11 UC 94 ._ o. =4.S Jcp :5 I.IT, OF �AIIPDLLL TNAEr IC COUNT REPORT - MAMSAL.RCE 11/07/9. P.O. 1 REPORT NAME: SAUNA/17/WWit10M "' A•IEO 9/13/93 — ' VOL-1 VOL-2 VOL-3 VOL-4 VOL-5 VOL•6 --7 VOL -a VOL-• VOL 10 VOL 11 VOL 12 ROW am TfRNr fA k OA MR EaTMRU LATUNU L61LT NaRT MOLT SORT SOTARUt SRO~ COLAMEI E6LANE2 EaLANE3 WORT TOTAL AVERAGE TOT-1 IC' A MOI 31 17 2106 1S06 0 4aa 59 0 0 0 658 Sao sus a 6265 49S 33.6 21 TcN 31 1s 20M 1647% 0 453 61 0 0 0 665 604 $16 0 6331 904 32.9 26 A _ TUE 1 17 WON 1"1 0 463 67 0 0 0 566M 4%. s1O 0 9727W OISM 32.9 25 Td 1 13 20% 15" 0 4" 67 0 0 0 645 605 84A 0 4m 963 "33.1 p WED 2 17 1%1 1459 0 477 65 0 0 0 Sao SY6 s57 0 5935 us $3.1 21 WC0 2 10 2121" 16" 0 L96H 70 0 0 0 6a4M 6L2M 795 0 6452P 9220 32.9 25 IH TWU 3 17 1972 14314 0 4S 49N 0 0 0 Sat SIR O72. 0 51a9 a41 33.5 2L T17U 3 is 2072 14% 0 432M Tim 0 0 0 646 634 i92N 0 6291 099 32.9 26 rota. 16M 1n65 0 ""a 515 0 0 0 SON L603 6662 0 49210 �. A-:n. M7 +Us I"# Asa 64 $10 *N% jas 629 S7S am X&f AT3CO minim RLN7 1678 1431 0 432 49 0 0 0 S66 494 792 0 Sm a/a owi..K 2121 1647 0 49. 77 0 0 0 664 642 s72 0 6452 922 T.LO.DRV. 01.4 M.0 0 16.9 1.6 11 0 0 41.7 52.4 29.8 0 2".8 TOTAL —ar, of I'm • a C A P S S I 11-1b-9A COMPREHENSIVE ANALYSIS PROGRAM FOR A SINGLE SIGNALIZED INTERSECTION CITY OF CAMPBELL E . A + PROJECT SOLUTION USING PEQUIRED CYCLE TIME CRZEESIDE 6 HWY 11 NB FLN:hwycra A.M Peak Hour Scenario 4 ^� Movement EBT EBL EBR SBT SBL SBR WBT WBL WBR NBT NBL NBR Phase 1 - 16 secs x x . Phase 2 - 20 sec■ x x - Phase 3 - 0 secs Phase 4 - 0 sees ' Phase 5 - 0 secs Phase 6 - 0 secs Critical Mvmt-•• Peak I • I..,. I I 509 i Sturaton -vp500 1. 1750 3800 5.00 Lost time -see 2.00 2.O0 2.00 2.00 Rat tive Sat 'x' 0.42 0.14 0.19 0.1e Effsetiva Gr-sec 14 14 18 18 Move Tine -eec 16 16 20 20 .1o/Pad T1aN-sec 10 10 20 20 Proq Factor PAP' 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 AvDalay/veh -sec 6 5 4 4 Laval of Sarvice B. B+ Al A Av.'Q/ Lana veh 2 1 1 Vah Stopping s 73 65 55 55 Do Veh Clear 7 YES YES YES YES Whole Intersection - Weighted Av Delay (sec) - 5 Level of Service - A Critical Movements - Wa ighted Av Delay (sec) - 5 Level of Service - BF - Intersection Cap—ity Utilization (ICU) . 0.29 • Required Cycle Length is 36 seconds (All Minimum times are satisfied) . CAPSSI (Release 11) - Based on Delay Methodology Per 1985 Highway Capacity Manual ' C A P 5 S I 11-18-94 COMPREHENSIVE ANALYSIS PROGRAM FOR A SINGLE SIGNALIZED INTERSECTION CITY OF CAMPBELL E • APPROVED SOLUTION USING REQUIRED CYCLE TIME FLN:hwycre P.M Peak Hour Scenario 2 CREEESIDDZ G HHHYY 17 NB Movement I EST EBL ESP SBT SBL SBR NOT NBL HBR NOT NBL NOR Phase 1 - 16 mace x x - x . Phsee 2 - 20 sees - x Phsee 3 - 0 macs Phase 6 - 0 .Coe ' Phase 5 - 0 aeee - Phsee 6 - 0 secs n _I Critical Mvmt-•• •'•• •••• 499 .. Peak IS Vol -vph 569 92 358 5700 Saaur at ion -vph 3500 1750 3800 2.00 Lost time -sec 2.00 2.00 2.00 0.18 Relative Sat 'x' 0.42 0.1e 0.19 1B Effectiva Or -sec It 11 18 20 Nova Time -sec 16 16 20 20 .In/Pod Time -see 30 .0 20 1.00 Prog Factor PAF 1.00 1.00 3-00 AVDelay/veh -seC 6 5 A Level of Service B• B• A 1 Av.'Q'/ lane veh 2 1 1 55 Veh Stopping a 73 65 55 YES Do Veh Clear ? YES YES YES whole Intersection - ueighted Av Delay (sec) • 5 Level Of Service • A Critical Movements - Weighted Av Delay (sec) - Level of Service - B- •• •• - Intersection Capacity Utilisation (1C") - 0.29 Required Cycle Lengt- is 3G seconds (All Minimum times are satisfied) • CAPSSI (Release 11) - Based on Delay Methodology Per 1985 Highway Capacity Manual 1: UT 94 1: 55 IM4U6 37V 257] MITI OF �AXPULL TRAFFIC COUNT R!►ORT 11/07/04 08:54:34 REPORT FILL: CIE 17M.11E► NAME : CIEFRS IDI/M/T17 NR DESCRIPTION: CREECSID!/M.'MI TIT 09 INTERSECTION TURN LSTs M R117CM IMTERCUIMECT SYSTEM CITY DE CAIMELL. JETTY ►11 3/10/DS REPORT FROM: 941031 TO: OL1107 DATA COLIRsIt 1 COLT M Y17 M RAID LT AT CREEESIOE (LINE 1204) 2 MY WTIT M RAW MT AT CREESSIOE (LINK 1211) 3 MRTON CREELSIDE NS TIMI AT NMTT7 r RAW (LINK 12%) AI}.P,P_pft LIEECTIDE 0 TMRf(1 AT MIY17 to RAID (LINK 1202) 3 RAPP 17 IM OFF -MOO TO CMMMtfIDE 6 SOUTN CREECSIDE s OF 17 RR O►T•RW sr-s w CRIFInloE w R or 17 all RAW 0 SSE CREECSIDE U :. DT IT M RAID 3 CODMT FILM NL1031 NON 061101 lUI 941102 1AID 961103 TW 941104 FRI m '� " +'• ,_ .,, TT.V4 37i 2.57: LIT1 OF LA PBELL R TRAFFIC C"T At"T C11217M.RE9 1170779, i666 1 RBFORT MAMM . CRCtSSiCE73M 17 Y6 VOL 1 VOL-2 VOL-5 VOL-4 VOL 5 VOL-6 VOl-7 VOL-0 RCM Rd um %R M TAM LO+ Lou LW XROl W 0A MR EBLT [Ut MBTMRu SBTMRM RA11F SculN SO $ft 107AL 4Vt+6Tf TOT-1 TOT 2 Tjt-3 TOT-: TOT S tO'.6 TCT-- MOM 31 17 597 107 109 31, 704 316 395 4Z1 3465 433 1?.2 3.1 3.1 9.1 20.3 23-6 11.1 MOM 31 10 612 65M 113 ON 697 969M "7 SZZ11 3W" 43M 15.8 2.2 2.9 11.3 16.0 2S.0 ll.5 _ TLe 1 17 565 94 an ZION 659 636r 274 3KM Z%b. 369M 10. 1 3.2 1.0 9. i 22. S 21.6 9.3 T1E 1 16 S69 92 125 357 "1 94T 49611 449 .3m 462 1S.4 2.5 3.4 9.7 17.9 25.6 13.1 ,a 2 17 ON 11011 96 30T 747M 660 2436 417 3257 4O7 19.6 1.. 2.9 9.4 22.9 20.9 9.1 WED 2 16 "1 100 130M 349 691 910 "1 449 )"1 4" 16.1 2.7 3.5 9.5 16.9 24.7 12.5 TMU 3 17 no 104 109 362 RIPS 192 316 46W. 3421 425 17.2 3.0 3.2 10.6 ZO.3 22.9 9.1 T10) 3 16 55" 96 120 370 654M 902 434 4O 3w 4SO 1S.4 2.7 3.3 10J 18.2 25.0 12.0 Tetlt 4716 no no 27" S506 6644 SORB 3SS6 27956 .. A-11" S90 1A III 14 666 431 3" YS U96 "Woup(M) $56 IR M 270 6S4 Au 263 3" 2952 369 IIM+16w(M) 637 110 130 437 747 969 496 522 3m 415 BTO.D-. 24.9 7.6 13.2 4.9 28.7 115.4 64.3 43.1 2r,.7 T9tM1 Rube, of 1IK + 6 •J V 6/ I; r w 11 aT91 1:'S6 V4U6 3T9 2572 OF CAMPBELL I FAA', COURT REPORT 11/07/94 09:00:31 REPORT FILE: 1SC►S•S.RE► WX: SASWL'IIO►Int altar, udsr Rasca. system DESCRIPTION: RAUWJCAPPISSI IMTERSECTIOI TLMM COLMTS A SAR01 tS7RRCOYRRCT SYSTEM • CITY OF CA1PIRLL, JEM ►U 10/23/94 OR _ RE FROM: 9L1031 Ta, 41107 DATA COLLIIM: 1 Ulm CAM►ISSI IS TIALI AT MSC 2 ESLT CAMPISSI N 17 AT SASCOI 3 MTNM MS'COM NG TOWRT AT CAMISSI A WRIT 9AS7a1 AR LT AT CAIPISSI 3 aTATA/ SASCOI sR TARU AT CAIPIS-1 6 SILT 1ASW1 Y LT AT CWWtnl 7 1SLEAVR O LEAVING IMTRASECTIDM R WEST Covint V of RAATSI 9 EMT CAFPIRI 11 IT AT YRCOI 10 WST1NUR DAIYRULT M TOMM AT 949CO 11 ku-, ORIVRINT US lT AT MS= 12 MY SASCOI SR RT AT TJ'JPInI S WAIT FILES: 941031 MOS %1101 TUE 941102 wo %1103 TMU 9A1106 FRI 11 u7 94 12 50 124u6 379 257: MITI uF CAMBELL 0 TRAFFIC COIIMT REPORT - 9SM-9.RE► 11/07/94 PPP. 1 REPORT R1111E: MSCWCMPISSI .11.r, ud.r I-- 7.TM NOL'1 VOL-2 VOL-3 VOL-4 VOL-S --6 VOL-? VOL.* VOL4 VOLIO VOLI1 VM12 ROW ROW low TA W[ DA IIR EOTRRU EBLT 116TMM OLT S9TRRW SALT SRLEAVE WEST ENT WRIT" WRIT S9RT TOTAL AYEAAa TOT-1 10' NOR 31 17 125 S7 1571 101 1302 12" 1977 0 2" 0 0 0 56M 7" 2.2 0 NOR 31 10 146iq 44A 1546 92 1920 101 23" 0 4M 0 0 0 6579 622 2.2 0 A _ TIE 1 17 126 30 15014 07R 1S61 106 1065" 0 27Y 0 0 0 5561U 69)R 2.3 0 TOE 110 120 40 15M „ 1079N 16 2370R 0 372 0 0 0 6M 919 2.0 ,0 wo 2 17 IQ 2511 Ism96 16M 113 1990 0 296 0 0 0 M47 73. 2.4 0 1631 2 10 129 32 in" 11s1 1777 109 2253 0 3" 0 0 0 6SS9 00 2.0 0 INS) 3 17 125 2• 1511 109 149M OR 1910 0 33.3 0 0 C 3397 700 2.2 0 I T11y 3 19 Ilso A 1666 97 I0S7 n 2349 0 396 0 0 0 ii0)1t093S 4230 1.7 0 Teel 16 03 205 12642 799 135" 436 16MI 0 am 0 0 0 4 ISO 35 1560 100 16% 1o5 2123 0 349 0 0 0 6116 NiniI.,(R) ITS 25 1501 07 1492 M /060 0 224 0 0 0 5361 6" nui—clu I" 44 1756 1111 1979 126 237E 0 4" 0 0 0 um 025 SLO.O.v. 93 6.1 43.0 9.1 149.6 10.9 216.7 0 34.2 0 0 0 463.0 TetRl nubcr of IfM • 9 9 1 11/10/04 09:30 0408 370 2572 TRArftC � A CITY of CAmFLL ei PJIe: �F1,EpAy m1'O,2: O7:SS .REI t we: ~�Fro+eerARo �° i Mawr, @AK rEA 'A"ysm rutr ctwrs' . CITY OF C,wIELL. 1RssT ru 10/2snR RCPMT fftft' 9 4 1jo? ro; 9a„Oq CITY of CAMPIIELL "TA COUAW: T M, Public WQAS URp "mcnt 2 URT m1�TARa DRINfNT Lr AT BASH mMIFTARA 0R1Yllyr IT AT "Um" S= OLT IAlildl M rmu AT PRUperm oltivom, Ser'� � RA LT AT PR1gIYARe GaiwMMY N rmWRT AT PMXVAM 1RrVlMT 1 onuur rtLss: x,To7 iv w„a JJR "O9 610O Poet-IS'txend hA transmithl memo 76T •MPAAw . � 3eff bb� .7ess G l .1-160 7o N—h Fun Suet C—PWI- 91008 1411 TVL tos.sse.21io - r.a +og.179.]m TOO 400.0s.2790 0001i902 11/1./s>e R OAr : M7ta1 AVE. st..a. QvrisI .6 eeB37e1361 TRAFFIC DATA i3MIC£ TWFIC DATA SEo11ICE Il.-Nnq b= Pn* r PAGE ez lot. 1 rlu: wpp 11r rmn Nerell 'IT 1MI LT rry Ert -- F— 3wth RT llq! rno Mort MlNtol� S LT 11St1 k.T IT 1MI LT Total PH • 0 0 0 0 0 13 17 1 el 2 lr " 0 0 ° ° 0 SE iD 0 0 0 1. 23 0 20 0 { 4341 0 0 0 0 >• "0 TTAL 0 0 0 p 0 1 71 x ° 0 ° 0 0 0 0 0 „ 0 0 M 10 172 1!0 0 0 0 0 >Z PPI ° 0 0 14 S 73 r 0 0 0 0 yN 0 0 0 . 1 70 N 0 0 ° 0 ° 0 73 "0 :N 0 0 0 0 0 0 O 2 ! 71 33 0 0 0 0 0 0 -7 0 K �Al 0 0 0 17 el µ 1S 0 it IN 123 0 0 0 0 0 M p 0 0 0 t MrAL 0 0 0 A 22 zle 25S 0 0 0 0 0 040 PM PRIOD AOLMS la TNi POMD: e.00 IN - o:OD IN aimwr 011 SrAu PM M ........ VOLLM FOM PFM m" rACMM ........ 01iOt 1Av tart Total .... PEAS ... 0/011t TAy laF! NW" 12100 M 0.00 0 0 0 p Ert e1001N 0.» N 10 /7210 0 0 SwM LOD 0"0 0.01 ltf 0 0 2 S .0 Nat SIOD 111 0.00 129 0 0 0 5700 0 0 0 0 0 0 61t1r0 Intwstcti n NorM e.00 IN 0. OD 0 0 0 0 tort � °• N 10 li210 0 27 0 S 0 72 ... 11rt O.p 0.00 12i 0 0 0 116 2100 0 0 0 0 0 ° o 0 0 t'. :+ 4� e9'.e .BB".: 36'. TPnF :: DA71 SEP Is ■ Faz Tmnsmu Memo » ®• •^,^ 2 - , y C Tiff W".0 Gc v A✓�va a i'K pbr .. A Tiff - FwFs�w.w< /I" T)11[ � O 0 J T21Rwwv6 4V#VCA�ww✓r tiavT P~" iwc d/sc wl wMi. i M4•1. JYVO y.✓ MMP swwa 774C AWA. •w. or . ••r. , •.• wnr. w011•[. IR4 •wa M •w•n. ew.w Ilfwa IN Iwr w1a10 Iw m poow Yw b - bw m . •wens sew wx w ........ wlw.......... .... .i1 lit me FAm •." lbw 1.►. 1.1.1 @%% lbw 1d• ••rw• 1•.w w aw • • e • • • • a>7 •• r 1•>r rle a t •.w bw w aw n• • • .w ww • • •Yw bw w aw • • • e • • • bow+ tw�rwr w,w e.w w 6.417o w • • • • • • • iwL •.T w M Iw il• w e ! �M aw if e • tw ww • • rw aw • • • e • • • 1:3C011 AV[. b 0I 01 0I L 0 J r 46 CPMTII 210 10 L 1S2 1 0 0 CMTST 0 J r 126 O I 0 I 126 M�COTI AY[. r T\1FFIC 04TO SEW41a FOOL: 1 or: rtu: rLT•ow •ASM .v[. •trttwe OW St am, 111w" a1�` IIM�nO b` Mntry fn� M•`t11 F— Lot F— >WM ►— tact YtNtttu pin IT llwl LT IT TMLT R TM LT AT Twl LT TO") 06 PH 0 0 0 13 1 41 A 0 0 0 0 0 = Jlf 0 0 0 17 L M >! fl 0 0 0 0 Tt ,MOwn 0 0 0 M f M is 0 0 0 0 0 N 0 0 0 f 1 31 1< 0 0 0 0 0 R MLL 0 0 0 w 10 1Q 126 0 0 0 0 0 X* .w FO1 0 0 0 14 f M 21 0 G 0 0 0 15 �1f 0 0 0 f 1 M 40 0 0 0 0 0 A Ly 0 0 0 • L T D 0 0 0 0 x r45 0 0 0 1f 4 « Mt 0 0 0 0 0 w —10TLL 0 0 0 41 1! 140 2O 0 0 0 0 0 m ^ eft. • 0 0 at22 m 236 0 0 0 0 0 00/ .. RK FL1[m OOOLVSM FOR TI[ 4t00 1" - 6.00 Al 0[OIiT1Ol 1RMT FOAO MR ........ ..Q i ........ .... POKX M ... FOOT Rawn 4 MAN FAVOR at Tlet1 lift Teal •ts" To% loft O!M litw M O.m Fan 4tw M 0.7T $IL " f.w M o.•1 om ftw M o.m OtnM 4610 M O.m fact o. n f.an o.w t•.t o.m 0 0 0 0 0 • 0 w 10 Ift L10 O • R 1!! o 0 1Ls O T 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 • Lnttn In4wst Ian 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 r t0 112 210 a f 1! 1M 0 0 1. 7w 1.40 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 11 UP PJ 11 JA CITI OF l t'4tKLL •. �+RA fC•�J" t 1 Q O � 3nQ A W w Z c O^ a o u w F c J e W e - I P;w�dcftM1 01 c e I v- �_ J L W e i aL �a e a U Ertp'w�� ' Sow^ T.�AS e e �e� e 1 11 1-9 YJ 11 4% 041-S J-P 2572 rn OF k.lr►SELL o + t ------------- 6.sun L Y Q OD I 3� .. , Wu Zu by Oti ,r—� O N 1 `U s Jn� Wp O.. O � „1....twr►er � �cc o� . , � M Ju � c Q � � U`c M &,t,�-r D • { c r f' t 5 � CL L CAPSSI WORKSHEET A ae htarstiore SALMAR d_ HWY 17 6 HAMLTON -- - - - _ A CRY OF CAIuPBELL —- _--- -- -- ! Cortdtbrc PM Fie Name: EASTBOI�D BOUT )80UPD WE ITSOUND NORTHBOUND Thu left iglytt TAru LNI If101e Thu Left Ilia phm I Left Ifs e PAasho Saalfxtca l t x x x q 2 x x x x x x �I X X 4 A I S .. NAafrlbar of Lanes t t 0 0 1 1 T►atffe Volunas (VPH) E-EXMTNG A•APPROVED P-PROJECT F(i-FUTURE GROWTH •• s06116f1p 1 : E :1c� 10G 3'S 1_11:_� 9�9 1599 19� 0 0 67 466 sowme 2 : EA :�+!~ C 100 !95 n21 956 1600 194 0 0 67 r66 Scorlan0 3 : E-MP 24201 C 100 396 ' ,,35 956 1602 194 0 0 67 466 scarce 4 : E•A+PWO 2� 91 G 101 �0� 11�6 966 t621 1% 0 0 66 satlrason Flow Mate (VP10 Leaf Thee (seecrl6a) _ _ - - hb*M" Tbae (seconds) 0 6t t 0010 E' t OOi' 001' 00 0 61 1.00061 1.0 1.00 1.00 Progress A Feetor0'AF) OPTMN CYCLE TW — - PEOUFiED CYCLE TIME - _ pREDETERM9ED CYCLE TW: Ip .ALL: N Remarks: � NMCaMIIIOWDefN/t Vebwa Glsaetc I�1: f Peak IMAlT01 T6na - s 6r i - n60 set Flow - Z Left Lena tvPttO) 7500 L Few - 1 Thu 1000 S&L Flow - 1 Lore (VPHO ' CAPSSI WORKSHEET Intwsoctim CREEK_SDE 3 HAMILTON A - —CITY OF CAMPBELL Coroum PM Fie Name: EASTBOUND ES'SOtW NORTHWU D w Tln. uh FN N Thm I Lan FW* IThm I Len Iftla tThM I Len FW Phasift0 Sequ.nce 1 x x 2 x X r 3 X X r. s f3 Nwt *w of Lars 13 1 c 0 0 0 3 1 0 0 3 1 Traffic Volmes (VPH) E-EXISTING A -APPROVED P-PROJECT FG-FUTURE GROWTH aowwi0 1 : E _ - 1, 0 130 0 0 0 1e92 56 0 0 62C 300 ae.n.ta 2 : E.A 22a7 0 239 0 0 0 1692 56 0 o C21 300 ac.nato 0 : E•A.P 230o C 24 0 0 0 1903 56 0 6:5 300 Csto--- ♦ : E A-P•FG 232, G 2+5 0 0 0 926 57 0 0 632 SOa aaaratbn Fbw Raw (VPH) _ LLost Tene Moconds) _ - 2 2 2 2 2 1 2 2 2 I+Mun Two (aeoaWs) AoAt Foctm(PAF) ' 00 ' 00 ; 0 1 ool, 00 1 00 1 0011 00 1. 00 1 OCII 00 1.00 OOPn" CYCLE THE L OREQUIRED CYCLE Tt91E: - -- ; OPI E ERMINED CYCLE T*X: LOALL Rartrrks: - " L Imo_ e.� tT�tt j l� L ow I a a0 ` Fbw - 2 Lift Lena 300 fti. Flow- 1 Thm L I= $at. Fbw - 1 FkM Lane (VPHW I wo CAPSSI WORKSHEET Intersacbm BASCOM & HAMLTON Agency: CITY OF CAMPBELL — - - - - — Conditw: FM Fie Name: Pha*Q Sequence EASTBOUND SOUTFBOUND V1fESTBOUND NORTHBOUND If--, Len iFtd Ttru Left MOM I Thru I Left IMOM ITWWU I Left IMOM t 2 9 45 x x x x x x x X x t x x x xe i x x x Number of Lanes 3 1 ? 1 1 13 2 3 2 3 2 t Treff{e VN1rnw. WPM F:FYISTMr. A.APP13nVFn P.aon-Cf:T Fr -it rn ec r0e%WT 4 9csrlrb 1: E 549 564 1134 448 52J 925 J12 184 1014 562 149 SOallarb 2 : E•A 60' 551 564 I140 468 523 925 315 187 1023 562 349 Scerrdo 3 : EM.P 607 �16_6 551 577 1153 648 523 925 319 187 1042 573 351 3Cer1010 4 E-A-P-FG 558 584 1161 453 1 5291 936 32J Ip9 1054 580 J55 Sensation Flow Rate M" Lost Trne (Seconds) sralsan TWO (Secads)- - ---- =-- _ 2 2 2 2 2 Pr Ad t Factor(PAF) 1 0011 0011 0 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.001.00 1.00 1.001.00 1.00 OOPTMUM CYCLE T1rE: - OREOUIRED CYCLE TItiE: OPREDETERMI ED CYCLE TW- l�J Remarks: - k4scalancousMofffiN ValMll Chosen: 4lratlon of Peak Perbd (Aenite t GuMst 16 NA►aTou lost Tine (Seconds) 2 �t 1�ri Ln TYns (sscords) � a JAL flv oeo Sat flow - 2 Left L (VPMO) I 35M Set fMow - 1 Thu L (VPMO) 1Y00 = Set Flow -Set 1�L� L—_ I� CAPSSI WORKSHEET • Intersection: - BASCOM & CAMPISI A enc . CITY OF CAMPBELL - -- - — - - - Contitkn PM Fie Name: O I EASTBOUND SnUTFBOUPC WESTBOUPA NORTHBOUND Traffic Vry- rVtx41 CdY1CTe.IB •_4000nvcn Scwmm* 1 E _ 128 40 372 1851 96 28- - --10 152 48 1442` 99 'V 126 , 3amrb 2 : E•A _-_ 129 40 372 1860 96 28 11 156 48 1,451 49 126 Scetwto 3 : E•A4P 129 40 378 Ie90 96 26 11 156 48 1 1483 10 136 Scwwio 4 : EM4P4F0 131 41 1 382 1 1913 97 28 11 1581 49 115021 104 138 Satwshlo Flow Rate (VPfO Lost This (Seconds) 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 mk*man Tyne (Seconds) Progress Adttalt FaCtor(PAF) t 00 1 00 t 00 00 t 00 1 00 t 00 1 ()Oil 0011 001 00 t 00 )OPTMLM CYCLE TIME OREOURED CYCLE TNE: OPREDETERMNM CYCLE TNE: I O ALL: Remarks_ .. lo11 of Peek Period aftfi* --ra) 15Cesar wAr ��JP 1 Lost Tine Seconds 2 ` MriR. v, (Sscotles) 3 n50 L Sat Flow - 2 Lek Lem (Vf++o) 3300 Sat Flow - 1 Thu Lane (VPHO) L _ N00 Poy Sat. Flow - 1 d Lam (VIOM)-1000� w f4 w CAPSSI WORKSHEET htersectiorc BASCOM 3 PRUNEYARD_ A rtcy: CITY OF CAMPBELL -- -- ----- i Corglum. PM Fie Name: — — — t ramps of Lanes 1 0 1' J I 3 0 S 0 0 1 0 3 n Tr.fr— V�L—. ni Soanarb 1. E Sesnarb 2 ' E•A +1192 0 264 0 0 0 t130 +06 0 +9C5 0 264 0 0 14J9 '06 Sc• wio 3 : E•A-P N71 1905 0 7 _ 0 0 0 SCanrb 4 : E•A-P-FO 926 C 278 0 -J9 i06 0 0 0 1456 107 0 Satintlon Flow Rota (VPH) Lost TYna (socwft) A WW" Tko (seconds) _2 2Z 2 2 2 2 2 2 AdAm Factor(PAF) 1.00 t 00 1.00 t.00 1.00 1.00 1.001 00 L00 1.0 1 00 1 00 OOPTIMUM CYCLE TIME OREOUIRED CYCLE TTE _ OPREDETERMrED CYCLE THE: ALL: Remarks: gat Fbw - 1 Laft ... hrer.m -- sat. Flow - 2 LNt Lanr (VPIq) -- Oat. Flow - t Thu Lana ( ) set. Fbw - 1 Ftlyd Lacy (vpfto) ~ — A CAPSSI WORKSHEET IntersInters cs�tiorr. BASCOM & CAMPBELL A AR—Y., CRY OF CAMPBELL Conditbn: PM FU Name: -- — � i I EASTSWO Sou7►�Ouno wrtsmuP0 I NORTmmm A Thm 1 Let I FVd IThm I Leff JMW 17tm I Leh IFW InyLL I Len INgla Phsaft Sequence 1 x x x 2 x x x i 3 x x x x .91 4 5 Number of Lanes 0 2 0 t 3 2 S .a Tram Vokmes (VPH) E-EXISTNG A•APPROVED PROJECT FG*UnlM GROWTH 90allarb 1 : E 0 1 6f9 1 521 1553 129 497 0 45 38 828 310 29 Somasb 2: E-A 0 632 1553 129 510 0 45 38 1 828 1 3" 29 Scenrio 3 : E-A-P 0 63; 1 1570 lag 5t0 0 45 38 828 3+21 29 Sce11Yb 4 : E•A-P-FO 635 S.'3 �589�. I44 5ifi 0 a6 39 838 3l6 30 Sahration now Rote (VPt) Lott Time (Seconds) _ _ ? 2 z 2 Mranani Tine (Seca ds) Progress Ad001.00 ' 00 1 00 1 00 1.00 1.001.00 1.00 1 001 0011 00 0OPT&ILJM CYCLE TwE: OREOUIRED CYCLE TNE- OPREDETERMfNED CYCLE TW-- 11 ��4 L ad M g"w!tout/DefWt Values Y sm 1!! i 1 r— of Peak Period tMMea) __L _t9 ns Lost TYSec !t - ne5 Sat. Flow 2 L.n Lane (VPHG) . 1 3500 r WL Flow - f Ttru Lane (�I _ _ _ 1Y00 Sat Flow - 1 MpM Lane (VPHMt000 CAPSSI WORKSHEET Intersection CAMPBELL & UMON Agency: CITY OF CAMPBELL Cordtio PM - - - -- Fie Name: � Traffic Vokarws (VPH) E-EXISTING A -APPROVED P-PROJECT FG-FUTURE GROWTH Scwwb 1: E 11201 0 1 92e 1 0 C I o 7731 261 1 0 1 0 1 497 166 SowWb 2: E•A tUl p 93, 0 0 1 0 7e9 26, 0 0 496 165 Seetrrb 3 : E•MP t61 0 932 0 o eos 26. o o .96 171 Sc«wb ♦ : EA-P+FO 11715 dU C C 0 eU 267 0 0 50. 173 Satvetl6n Fbw date (VKO _ Lost Tkm (Seconds) 2 2 1 2 Z 2 - 2 My mun Tlme (Seconds) AaMwl Factor(PAF) 1.001 OO 1 00 1.0011.00 1.00 1.001.0') 1.00 1.0 1.00 1.00 w 0 ,)OPT*" CYCLE TIME: - _--- QREOUIRED CYCLE THE OPREDETERMIED CYCLE TIE- 0 ALL: Remarks: I.gceMnsotAl/Detath V•kws _ _ _. ploserc 'SupsesL QW40M of Peek ! _ Os.recu V i Lost TYns /at. Flow - 2 Left Lam I 3600 t. w - 1 Thu LeIN (VFtfGL um fret. Fbw - 1 Latta =0 A CAPSSI WORKSHEET IntersectioreCREEKSD_E d HWY 17 NB a1 Agemy, CITY OF CANPBELL Cofttitiore PM Fie Name: w EASTMAD I SOU1HBam I WEST13OLM W)RTHBMM Phasing 3eptletice Tart► I LNt IR OM TMu I Le" F41% ru TtLeft F%M Mm I Left Ri 0 1 x x .. 2 x x 3 4 5 6 f nutoer of Lanes 10 1 2 1 1 1 2 0 1 0 1 n 1 0 1 n 1 ; 1 n n T►atflc Vofurlee (VPNQ E-EXISTING A -APPROVED PWROECT FG*UTLFE GROWTH 30anarl0 t: E 0 569 92 J5' 0 0 J 0 0 0 Searrrb 2: EA 09 92 0 0 00 t0498 0 0 Searlrb 3: EMP 0 569 9� J61 0 0 0 0 0 0 Scarrrb 1: EMWFQ 0 5�6 9a 365 00 0 0 Salteatbn Flow Pat. (VPH) Last This (S000neu c 2 2 2 2 2 22 2 2 1 2 2 AKnnt Time (5ecartaa) Aapat Factor(PAF) 1 001.00 11.00 11 00 i 1.00 1.00 1. 0 1.00 1.00 1.0 1.00 1.00 OOPTMJM CYCLE TI E: OREOLF ED CYCLE TIME s `� 0PREDETERN4 ED CYCLE TItiE: O ALL I Remarks: !}+owe i&gaeat - , 2 111 6 n5o SaL Flow - 2 Left Lana ( 3500 - 17hu LON 1500 �- Set Flow - 1 NSM Lana fvP+Ni) NO0 --J ■ C A P S S I COMPREXENSI VE ANALYSIS PROGRAM 11-21-1 MR A SINGLE SIGNALIZED INTERSECTION CITY OF CAMPBELL EXISTING SOLUTION USING PREDETERMINED CYCLE TIMES NAMILPGN 6 SALMAR/Ss HWY 17 or, � P.M Pack Hour FLN=heSm+l Scenario 1 -� Movement SET Phase 1 - 17 secs EBL ERR ' SBT SBL SBR NET WOL WBR Phase 2- 60 sacs X X X MST NBL NBR Phase 3 - S6 secs X X X. Phase / - 25 secs i X X ' Phase 5 - 0 anc■ _ Phase 6 - 0 sacs . _ Critical Must ... •... Peak 1S Vol --Ph 2100 Saturation -vph 5700 400 1121 375 •••• 619 �� 1•ost time -Sac 2.00 1750 5250 Shrd 1750 5700 17SO 67 166 Relative Sat Z. 1.00 2.00 2.00 - 2.00 2.00 2.00 1750 1750 Effective Or -sae 5B 0.62 0.83 - 1.09 0.59 1.17 2.26 2.05 Nova Time Sec 60 S8 SI - SI 7S 15 0. 1.0 Min/Fed Time -see 20 60 56 S6 77 17 23 10 Proq Factor PAP 0.61 0.61 _- 1.00 20 20 10 23 10 12 30 •" AvDelay/vah -Sac 33 - 1.00 0.6: 0.61 Level of service p 20 J9 - 97 31 112 1.00 1.00 .� "-'Q•/ lane veh 12 C. D- _ F s- F •6 91 r, Vah stopping a 61 7 31 - 7 6 t F Do VSA Clear 7 YES 50 92 - 300 00 IS 62 3 16 ___ YES YES - NO YES YES s9 100 - I_ rss np • »» In4rwct ion Oversaturated I valuas N— o� t� ful l c«c _ y Whole Intersection Critical Movements - Weighted Av Delay (sec) . 42 Level of h - Weighted - Intersection Av Delay (see) . service S8 Level of Service . Jr. E- r Ca pactty Utilaastion (ICU) . 1.05 Predetsrminod Cycle Length is 158 n • second• (All Min' us ties• are satisfied) r CAPBSI (Release 11) - Based on Delay Methodology ogy Per 1985 Highway Capacity manual C C 1 A C A P S S I 11-21-94 COMPREHENSIVE ANALYSIS PPOGl1AM FOR A SINGLE SIGNALIZED INTERSECTION CITY OF CAMPBELL E . APPROVED SOLUTION USING PREDETERMINED CYCLE TIMES FLM: hameal HAMILTON 6 EALMAR/SS HWY 17 OFF P.M Peak Mour Scenario 2 Movement ROT SOL ESR SST SOL SSR MST WWBL NOR MST Will. FOR Phew 1 - 17 sees I I I Phase 2 - S9 Dec0 I I I . Phase 3 - S7 sacs I I I Phase 4 - 25 secs I E Phase S - 0 secs Phase 6 - 0 sacs I I I Critical Mvmt-••I Peak 1S Vol -,ph •••• •••• 2115 400 1121 396 6S6 1600 ••« 194 61 ••�• 4N Saturation -vph S700 1750 S2SO Shrd 1750 S700 17SO 17SO 2750 Lost time -see 2.00 2.00 2.00 - 2.00 2.00 2.00 2.00 2.00 Relative fat •I• 1.03 0.63 0.83 - 1.04 0.60 1 17 0.26 1.06 Etfectiv.r Or -sec S7 S7 SS - SS 74 1S 23 40 Move Time -see S9 S9 S7 - S7 76 17 25 42 Min/Ped Time -sec 20 20 20 - 20 20 10 10 10 Frog Factor PAF 0.61 0.61 1.00 - 1.00 0.62 0.61 1.00 1.00 RvDelay/veh -sec 38 20 38 - 93 1S 112 46 96 Level of Service D- C- 0- - F B- P I P Av.•p•/ lane vah 12 7 14 - 21 6 6 3 17 Veh Stopping 6 62 Sl 92 - 100 4S 62 89 100 Do Veh Clear T YES YES YES - MO YES YES YSS M »» Intersection Overr.turated - Delay Values Not Meaningful] «« Whole Intersection - Weighted Av Delay (sse) 43 Level of Service - 24 Critical Movements - weighted Av Delay (see) 60 Level of Service - F •• •• - Intersection Capacity Utilisation (ICU) - 2.06 Predetermined Cycle Length is 1SS seconds (All Minimum times are satisfied) • CAPSSI (Relosse 11) - Based on Delay Methodology Per 1985 Highway Capacity Manuel a C A P S S I COMPREHINSI VE ANALYSIS PROGRAM 11-21-9a FOR A SINGLE SIGNALIXXD INTERSECTION CITY OFCAKPBRLL E + A + PROJECT SOLUTION USIMG PAEDETERMINEO CYCLS TtMSS MANILTON i SALMAA/SB HWY 17 OFF FLRihaaeei P.M Peak Hour Scenario 3 1 Nov�snt PMN 1 - 18 secs BET XBL XBR SBT SBL SBX WET MBL WEB anMBL MBR Phase 2- 59 sacs X XX X X .� Phase 3 - 57 sacs X Phase 4 - 25 secs I X X Phase 5 - 0 secs I X Phase 6 - 0 sacs . Critical Mvet... •... Peak 15 Vol -,ph Saturation -vpA 2120 400 1135 396 •55G 1602 •196 5700 67 •••� 668 Lost ties -sac 1750 52SO Shrd 1750 5700 17SO 2.00 2.00 2.00 1750 17SO Relative Bat 'X• 1.01 - 2.00 2.00 2.00 0.66 0.8< 2.00 2.00 tffeetiw or - 1.08 0.60 1.30 57 57 55 0.26 1.06 Mow Time -sac - 59 55 7S 16 S9 57 23 62 Min/Pad Tlae-sae - 57 77 18 20 20 ` Ptog Factor PAP AvDalay/ h -sac w 0.61 0.61 1.00 1220 1 .00 0.0. 10 30 Level Of Service 39 21 39 - D- 97 16 89 1.00 46 1.00 89 Av.•Q•/ lane veh _ _ C D-F a- F 13 B F Veh Stopping 6 7 15 - 62 21 a 5 51 92 3 16 ' Do Veh Clear J - 100 65 62 US YES YES - s9 IGO no YES YB8 YES no »» Intersection Oversaturated —�- - Delay Values —,lotMeanLngfull «« Whole Intersection - Weighted Av Delay (eec) . 63 Level of Service . Critical Movements - Weighted Av Delay (sac) . 60 X+ .� Level of Service . - Intersection Capacity Itillaation t_ (JCU) . 1.06 Pradeteralned Cycle Length is 1S9 seconds ("11 Minisum times are satisfied) • CAPSSI (Releaea 11) - Based on Delay Methodology Par 1985 Highway Capacity Manual r r r r C A P S S I 11-21-9a COMPREHENSIVE ANALYSIS PROGRAM +. FOR A SINGLE SIGNALIZED INTERSECTION CITY OF CAMPSELL E • A . P . FUTURE GROW-M SOLUTION USING PREDETERMINED CYCLE TIMES FLM�hwal w HAMILT'ON i SALMAR/Sa HMY 17 OFF P.M Peak Hour Scenario i q novsaent EST EEL ESR SET SaL SaR NOT NEL NON NET PUL Nai[ Phase 1 - 17 sac* E E I Phase 2 - S9 aeee E Z E Phase 7 - S7 mace Z Z I Phase 6 - 2S eecs E I ' Phase S - 0 sace Phase 6 - 0 sacs r Critical Nvat ... •••• •.•• .••. .••. Peas 1S Vul -,ph 2169 401 1168 601 66a 1621 196 62 674 Saturation -vph 5700 2750 5250 Shrd 1750 5700 17SO 1750 1750 Lost time -sac 2.00 2.00 2.00 - 2.00 2.00 2.00 2.00 2.00 Relative Sat 'Z' 1.05 0.64 0.85 - 1.10 0.61 1.10 0.27 1.07 affective Or -sec 57 S7 SS - SS 74 is 22 60 Move Tian -sec 59 S9 s7 - S7 76 17 25 62 min/Pod Time-eao 20 20 20 - 20 20 10 10 10 Frog Factor PAP 0.61 0.61 1.00 - 1.00 0.61 0.62 1.00 1.00 A.Delay/veh -mec 61 20 19 - 102 1S 116 66 202 Level of Service a. C- D- - P ■- F E F Av.'p'/ lane veh 11 7 is - 21 a 6 ) 17 Vah Stopping a 61 sl 92 - 100 6S 62 a9 100 Do Veh Clear ? YES YES YES - MO YES YES yam NO »» Intersection Oversaturated - Delay Values Not meaningful[ «« Whole Intersection - Weighted Av Delay (sac) . 65 Level of Service - E Critical Movements - Ne.ghtad Av Delay (sac) - 6S Level of Service . P - Intoramct.on Capacity Utilisation (ICU) - 1.08 Predetermined Cycle Length i; 158 meconds (All Minimum Liars are satisfied) .e • CAPSSI (Release 11) - Eased on Delay Methodology Per 1985 Mighvay Capacity Manual C k P S S 1 II-1S-9• COMPREHENSIVE ANALYSIS PROGRAM FOR A SINGLE SIGNALIZED INTIRSECTION CITY OF CAMPBELL EXISTING SOLVTIOM USING RSQUIRED CYCLE TIME yLNtAame[a P.M Peak Hour Scenario 1 N1IMILTON i CRSSESIDS SST SBL EBA SST SBL SaltWBT NBL NBR PST MSL MSR Mowmant • x x • Phase 1 - 10 Me" X Phase 2 - 27 DOca X - X E _ Phase 3 - 12 sec• Phase 4 - O Seca Phase S - 0 seta Phase 6 - 0 eacsl I Critical Mvmt-•• •••• 1892 .... 56 620 •.•• 300 Peak 15 Vol -vph 2271 238 5700 17SO 52SO 1750 Saturation -vph 5700 1750 2.00 2.00 2 00 2.00 Lost time -See 2.00 2.00 0.46 0.20 O.SB 0.64 Relative Bat 'X• 0.78 0.27 35 8 30 lc Sffectiw Or -sec 25 25 37 10 12 12 Now Time -see 27 27 20 10 10 10 Min/Ped Time -sec 20 20 00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Proq Factor PAY 1.00 1.00 14 14 ]! AvDelay/wh -sac 8 5 A B- B- D• Le" l of Service 8• B. 2 1 2 - lane wh S 2 43 90 IN Vsh StopPin9 6 al 57 YES Y86 Yss TV Do Vah clear ? I US YES I� Whole Interseetion - Weighted Av Delay (sac) 8 Level of Service - of Se - B+ S- Critical Movements - Weighted Av Delay (sec) ' 10 capacity Utilisation Level Oi 9 (ICU) .• •• - Intersection is 49 second* (All Minimum ti"olare satisfied) Raguired Cycle Length • CAPBSI (Release 11) - Based on Delay Methodology Par 1985 Highway Capacity Manual I C A P S S I 11-18-94 COMPREHZNSI VE ANALYSIS PROGRAM FOR A SINGLE SIGNALIZED INTERSECTION CITY OF CAMPBELL E + APPROVED SOLUTION USING REQUIRED CYCLE TIME FLNthamcrs HAMILTON 6 CREEXSIDE P.M Peak Hour Scenario 2 Movement EST E81, EBR SOT SBL SSR NET NBL WON W87 ROL RBR Phase 1 - 10 secs X X Ph** 2 - 27 Nce X X X Ph so 3 - 12 Ncs X X Phases 6 - 0 sees Phase 5 - O see• Phase 6 - 0 sacs Critical Mvmt-•• •'•• Peak I Vol -vph 2287 239 1892 56 621 300 Saturation -vph 5700 1750 5700 1750 5250 1750 Lost time -see 2.00 2.00 2.00 2.00 2.00 2.00 Relative Set 'X' 0.79 0.27 0.46 0.20 0.59 0.86 Effective Or -see 25 25 35 a 10 10 Mow Time -see 27 27 37 10 12 12 Min/Pod Tlr-see 20 20 20 10 10 10 Frog Factor PAP 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 AvDalay/wh -see 9 5 2 11 16 2S Level of Service a+ S+ A B- a- D+ Av.•Q•/ lane veh 5 2 2 1 2 3 Veh Stopping a 82 57 63 86 90 96 Do Voh Clear 7 YES YES YES YES YES YES Whole Intersection - Weighted Av Delay (sec) - 8 Level of Service - B+ Critical Movements - Weighted Av Delay (sec) - 11 Level of Service - B- •• - Intersection Capacity Utilization (ICU) - 0.69 Required Cycle Length is 09 seconds (All Minimum Liam• are satisfied) • CAPSSI (Release 11) - Based on Delay Methodology Per 1985 Highway Capacity Manuel 9, C A P S S 1 11-18-94 COMPREHEN. VE ANALYSIS PROGRAM FOR A SINGLE SIGNALIZED INTERSECTION CITY OF CAMPBELL E + A + PROJECT SOLUTION USING REQUIRED CYCLE TIME FLN:hamcre HAMILTON L CREEXSIDE A.M Peak Hour Scenario 3 Movement NOT EBL EBR SOT SBL SBR WBT WBL WBR NOT NBL NOR Phaea 1 - 10 Saco X X Phase 2 - 23 sees X X X Phone 3 - 12 sacs X X Phase 4 - 0 sees Phase 5 - 0 sacs Phase 6 - 0 sacs Critical Mvmt ... •••• •••• •'•' Peak 15 Vol —ph 2300 242 1903 56 625 300 Saturation -vph 5700 1750 5700 1750 5250 1�50 Lost tier -sac 0.00 2.00 0.00 2.00 0.00 2.00 Relative Sat 'X' 0.79 0.3C 0.46 0.18 0.45 0.77 Effective Or -sec 23 2' 33 B 12 10 Move Timis -eec 23 2i 33 10 12 12 Min/Pad Time -sec 20 20 20 10 10 10 PrFactor PAP 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 AvDolay/vah -see 8 6 2 12 11 19 Level of Service B+ B2 + A B- O- C+ Av.IQ'/ lane veh 5 2 1 2 3 Veh Stopping a 82 62 40 85 O3 94 Do Veh Clear 7 YES YES YES YES Y[a YEN Whole Intersection - Weighted Av Delay (sac) - 7 Level of Service - B+ Critical Movements - Weighted Av Delay (sec) - 9 Level of Service - O+ - Intersection Capacity Utilization (ICU) • 0.67 Required Cycle Length is 45 seconds (All Minimum times are satisfied) • CAPSSI (Roles@* 11) - Based on Delay Methodology Per 1985 Highway Capacity Manual 1 1 M r rA C F. [. L L L L 1. L L C C A P S S 1 11-IB-96 COMPREHENSIVE ANALYSIS PROGRAM FOR A SINGLE SIGNALISED INTERSECTION CITY OF CAMPBELL E + A + P + FUTURE GROWTX SOLUTION USING REQUIRED CYCLE TIME FLN3hamcre HAMILTON 6 CRESXSIDE A.M Peak Hour. Scenario 4 Movement EST ESL EBR SBT SSL SBR WBT WBL NBR MST NBL NSA Phase 1 - 10 sacs X X Phase 2 - 27 secs X X X Phase 3 - 12 sac■ X X Phase ♦ - 0 sacs - Phase S - 0 secs Phase 6 - 0 ases Critical Mvmt ... Peak 1S Vol -vph •••• 2327 245 1926 •••• 57 632 •• 304 Saturation -vph 5700 1750 S700 1750 S250 17SO Lost tlma -sec 2.00 2.00 2.00 2.00 2.00 2.00 Relative Set 'X' 0.80 0.27 0.47 0.20 0.59 0.85 Effective Or -sec 25 25 35 8 10 10 Move Time -sac 27 27 37 10 12 12 Min/Ped Time -sac 20 20 20 10 10 10 Prog Factor PAP 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 AvDelay/vah -see 9 5 2 14 14 26 Level of Service B+ B. A B- S D. Av.'Q'/ lane vsh 5 2 2 1 2 3 vsh Stopping % 83 57 43 66 90 96 Do Veh Cleat 7 YES YES YES YES YES rES Whole Intersection - Weighted Av Delay (sec) - 8 Level of Service - S+ Crit feel Movements - Weighted Av Delay (sec) - 11 Level Of larvics - B- •• •• - Intersection Capacity Utilization (ICU) - 0.70 Required Cycle Length in 49 seconds (All Minimum times are satisfied) • CAPSSI (Release 11) - Based on Delay Methodology Per 1985 Highway Ca)ecity Manual •_ ■ F. 11 IUIMILT0N L BASCOM A C A P S S I COMPREHeNSI VE ANALYSIS PROGRAM FOR A SINGLE SIGNALIZED IN`:ERSECTION EXISTING SOLUTION USING REQUIRED CYCLE TIME P.M Peak Hour 11-IS-96 FLN:hambaa Scenario 1 Movement EST EBL ESR SBT SBL SBR MST WEL WBR NBT MEL RBR Phase 1- 30 seta X X X X Phase 2- 6 sees X % I x Phase 3- 20 oees X X X X Phaws a - 12 sees X % X I Phase 5- 3 sots x X I X Phase 6- 20 sate X X X I Critical Mvmt ... •••• •••• .... .... Peak 15 Vol -vph 1593 549 564 1134 448 523 925 312 184 1014 562 349 Saturation -vph 5700 3500 1600 5700 3500 1600 5700 3500 1600 5700 3300 2600 Lost time -sac 2.00 2.00 2.00 2.00 2.00 2.00 2.00 2.00 2.00 2.00 2.00 2.00 Relative Sat 'I• 0.83 0.90 0.64 0.78 0.91 0.68 0.64 0.79 0.27 0.60 0.88 0.50 Effective Or -see 24 14 39 1s 30 31 18 S 30 21 13 31 Move Time -sec 26 16 41 20 12 36 20 10 32 23 15 33 Min/Pod Time -see 20 10 20 20 10 20 20 10 20 20 30 20 Prog Factor PAY 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 AvDeloy/vah -ooc 19 25 30 21 30 13 19 31 10 17 31 11 Level of Service C. D+ B+ C- D- B- C+ U a- C+ D a- Av.'Q•/ lane veh 7 ♦ 5 6 4 5 5 3 2 5 5 4 Veh Stopping % 92 95 70 93 99 77 89 97 65 86 97 72 Do Veh Clear T YES YES YES YES YES YES I YES YES YES YES YES YES Whole Intersection - Weighted Av Delay (sec) - 20 Level of Service - C+ Critical Movements - Weighted Av Delay (sec) - 22 Level of Service - C- •• - Intersection Capacity Utilization (ICU) - 0.82 Required Cycle Length is 71 seconds (All Minimum times or* satisfied) • CAPSSI (Release 11) - Based on Delay Methodology Par 1985 Highway Capacity Manual C A P S S I 11-18-94 COMPREHENSIVE ANALYSIS PROGRAM FORA SINGLE SIGNALIZED INTERSECTION E . APPROVED SOLUTION USING REQUIRED CYCLE TINE rLN.hambss HAMILTON 6 BASCOM P.M Peak Hour Scenario 2 '4 Movement 98T EBL EBR SBT SSL SSR WBT WBL WBR PDT MBL an Phase 1- 30 sees X I X i Phase 2- 6 aces X X X I , Phama 3- 20 eats X X X i Phase 6- 12 secs X X X I , Phase 5- 3 sac@ X X X X Phase 6- 20 secs X X X I Critical Mvat-••I •••• .... I •..• I .••• Peak 15 Vol -vph 1607 551 564 1310 148 523 925 315 187 1023 562 319 Saturation -ph 5700 3500 1600 5700 3500 1600 5700 3500 2600 5700 3500 1600 Lost time -sac 2.00 2.00 2.00 2.00 2.00 2.00 i.00 2.00 2.00 2.00 2.00 2.00 Relative Sat 'X' 0.83 0.80 0.64 0.79 0.91 0.68 0.64 0.80 0.28 0.61 0.88 0.50 Effective Gr-sae 21 14 39 38 10 34 1B 8 30 21 13 31 love Time -sae 26 16 61 20 12 36 20 10 32 23 1� 33 Min/Pad Time -mac 20 10 20 20 10 20 20 10 20 20 10 20 Prep Factor PAP 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.()0 1.00 1.00 1.00 AvDelay/veh -sae 19 25 10 21 38 13 19 31 10 17 31 11 Leval of Service C. D+ B+ C- D- B- C+ D S- C+ D E- J% . *Q'/ lane veh 7 4 5 6 { 5 5 3 2 5 5 6 Voh Stopping 92 95 70 93 99 77 89 98 65 86 97 72 Do Veh Clear 2 YES YES YES YES YES YES YES YES YES YES YES YES Whole Intersection - Weighted Av Delay (sae) - 20 Leval of Service . C- Critical Movements - Weighted Av Delay (sat) - 22 Level of Service - C- " - Intersection Capacity Utilization (ICU) • 0.83 Required Cycle Length is 71 seconds (All Minimum times are satisfied) • CAPSSI (Rslsase 11) - Based on Delay Methodology Per 1985 Highway Capacity Manual r r r r C C A P S S I 11-18-94 COMPREHENSIVE ANALYSIS PROGRAM FOR A SINGLE SIGNALIZED INTERSECTION E A PROJECT SOLUTION USING REQUIRED CYCLE TIME FLN=hambas HAMILTON 6 BASCOM P.M Peak Hour Scenario 3 Mowmant EST ERL EBR SOT SOL SBR NOT MBL WER NOT MEL NOR Phaee 1- 10 NOCE x x x x Phaee 2- 5 NOCE I X x I Phaea 3- 20 Once I I I x ' Phaee • - 12 Sao* x x I x Phase 5- 3 mace x x I x Phaee 6 - 20 eece x I I•••• x I x Critical Mvmt-••I Peak 15 Vol -vph •••• 1607 551 577 1153 448 523 925 •••• .... 319 107 1042 •••• 573 351 Saturation -vph 5700 3500 1600 5700 3500 1600 5700 3500 1600 5700 3500 1600 Lost time -sec 2.00 2.00 2.00 2.00 2.00 2.00 2.00 2.00 2.00 2.00 2.00 2.00 Relative Sat 'I 0.86 0.85 0.66 0.79 0.90 0.69 0.63 0.80 0.27 0.61 0.08 O.SO [ffectiw Or-eee 23 13 3B 18 10 33 18 B 30 21 13 31 Move Time -sec 25 15 40 20 12 35 20 10 32 23 1S 33 Min/Pad Time -see 20 10 20 20 10 20 20 10 20 20 10 20 Prog Factor PAT 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 AvDelay/vsh -mac 20 28 10 20 36 13 18 30 10 16 31 11 Level of Service C. D+ B- C- D- B- C+ D B+ C+ D [- Av.'Q'/ lane veh 7 a 5 6 C 5 ♦ 3 2 5 5 6 Veh Stopping ♦ 91 97 71 93 98 79 89 97 6S 86 97 71 Do Vmh Clear 7 YES YES YES YES YES YES YES YES YES YES YES YES Whole Intersection - Weighted Av Delay (sae) - 20 Level of Service - C- Critical Movements - Weighted Av Delay (sec) v 23 Level of Service v C- •• •• - Intersection Capacity Utilization (ICU) - 0.83 Required Cycle Length is 70 seconds (All Minimum time• are satisfied) • CAPSSI (Release 11) - Based on Delay Methodology Per 1985 Highway Capacity Manual 6 1 ' C A P S S I 11-18-9♦ COMPREHENSIVE ANALYSIS PROGRAM INTERSECTION A SINGLE SIGNALIZED eFOR E . A . P . FUTURE GROWTH SOLUTION USING R[QUIR[D CYCLE TIME tyNshambaD A p,N peak Hour Scenario / HAMILTON i BASCOM G WBT BL MDR SBT SBL SBR W NDT MBL MBR X Moveent m [BL EBR ,IT I % Pta10 face 1 - X X ' x X % X Phuh. 2- 6 macs x % X X X Phase 3- 20 sece % X % X Phsse ♦ - 13 D*cf % % X 11 Phase S - 7 meet % X I� _ � Phase 6 20 fecD ..�• 09 .j — — I Critical Nvmt-•' .... .... 9J6 727 169 558 58♦ 1167 ♦00 5700 ]SDo 1600 1600 lOS1 SDO 5700 3500 355 1 Peak 1S Vol -,ph -vph 1626 60 ••00 5700 3500 1600 5700 3500 1600 2.70 .66 2.00 2.00 2.00 O.S1 19 Saturation -Dec 2.00 2.00 2.00 2.82 2.95 0.660•se 0.27 0.85 0.70 0. 0.21 O.14 11 3" t1 Lost time Relative Bat 'X' 0.86 0.82 0.66 0. e's 77 18 is 11 34 33 21 2] 16 3- Effective Cr-fec -Dec /0 16 ♦2 20 17 76 20 10 2♦ 1♦ 20 10 20 26 20 20 30 2l 1.04 Nov* Tire Nie/Ped Time-DOC 10 20 20 10 20 1. 1.03 1.O19 1. ODO 1.00 1. 10 1'OCO 1 17 28 1 Proq Factor PAF 1.000 1. �0 1.00 30 19 3♦ 22 D2 D� B � lAvDelay/veh -f*c D' BO C_ D B- 5 3 5 S • Level Of service C+ ♦ 6 7 ♦ 90 98 65 87 97 7 Av.'Q'/ lane veh ♦ 7V 9� 79 97 YES 93 96 YES YES YE Y[s Y[s YE Doh stopping YES YES YES YES YES Do Vet Clear 7 I ---I--I--- --------- Dee) 20 Level of Service � C- - Weighted Av, Delay 23 Level Of Service C- "' Wholf Interfection sec) - ighted eighted Av Delay eit Utilization (ICU) - Critical Mme ov*ntD We Cape Y 0.84 . • - Intersection are satisfied) Length is 72 seconds (All Minimum tiers Required Cycle Manual Per 1995 Highway Capacty M YI . CAPSSI (RDleafe 13) - Based on Delay Methodology r C A P S S I 11-18-9! COMPREHENSIVE ANALYSIS PROGRAM FOR A SINGLE SIGNALIZED INTERSECTION CITY OF CAMPBELL EXISTING SOLUTION USING REQUIRED CYCLE TIME FLM,baspis P.M Peak Hour Scenario 1 BASCOM i CAMPISSI movement EST EBL [BR SET SBL SBR i/BT MBL wBR R "T RBL RBR Phase 1 - 20 sac- X X . X X Phase 2 - 30 secs X ' Phase 3 - 10 Nca X X Phase ! - 32 Nca x X . Phase S - 0 secs Phase 6 - 0 Seca Critical wvmt- •••• •••• Peak 15 Vol -vph 40 128 372 185I 96 28 10 152 !B 1!!2 99 32• satur!tion -vph 3500 Shrd 17SO S70�` 1750 Shrd 3600 Shrd Shrd 2700 27SOOO BAr' Lost time -sec 2.00 - 2.00 2.00 2.00 - 2.00 _ - 0.66 O.S1 - Relativa Sat 'X' 0.19 - 0.85 0.79 0.49 - D.SB _ _ 30 S - Effective Gr-sec 18 - I 70 a 32 10 - Move Timis -see 20 20 32 10 10 10 10 - 10 - - 10 10 - Min/Pod Time -sec 10 - _ - 1.00 1.00 - Prog Factor PAT 1.00 - 1.00 1.00 1.00 - 1.00 13 25 - 30 15 25 - 2! - AvD*lay/veh -sec 16 - _ C_ _ Level of Service C. - D. C. C- _ 6 2 - Av.'Q'/ lane vsh 1 - 5 7 2 2 _ _ - 79 95 87 9SO 9! ! - 9! - Veh stopping \ _ - YES YEB - Do Veh Clear 7 YES - YES YES YES - I YES who to Intersection - Weighted Av Delay (sec) - 17 Level of Service - C+ Critical Movemants - weighted Av Delay (sac) 18 Level of Service • C+ •. - Intwrseetion Capacity Utilisation (ICU) v Required Cycle Length is 72 seconds (All Minimum times are satisfied) • CAPSSI (Raises* 11) - Baud on Delay Methodology Per 1985 Highway Capacity Manual tj 1 C A P S S I COMPREHENSIVE ANALYSIS PROGRAM 11-18-94 FOR A SINGLE SIGNALIZED INTERSECTION A CITY OF CAMPBELL EXISTING SOLUTION USING REQUIRED CYCLE TIME BASCQM 6 CAMPISSI FLNsbaspis P.M Peak Hour Scenario 2 MOYement Phase 1 - 20 sac, NET X EEL NBR SBT SBL SBR WBT WRL WBR NET x NBL NBR Phase 2 - 10 sees X Phase 3 - 20 moos x x x - ^ Phase 1 - 32 coca x x- Phase 5 - 0 Noce X x X X ^ Phase 6 - 0 sees Critical Mvmt-••I ....- -, Pftak 15 Vol -vph 40 129 372 1860 96 28 ••11 ••99 Saturation -vph 3500 156 48 1451 Shrd 17SO 5700 1750 Shrd 3600 126 Lost time -sec 2.00 Shrd Shrd 5700 - 2.00 2.00 2.00 -2.00 1750 Shrd Relative Sat •x Effective Cr-sec 0.19 - - - 2.00 0.85 0.79 0./9 - O.S4 - _ 0.66 2.00 Move Time -sec 18 20 - IB 30 8 - e - - 30 O.S1 - 8 Min/Pod Time -see 10 - 20 32 10 - 10 - _ 32 10 10 10 - • Frog Factor PAF 1.00 10.00 1.00 _- 1.00 10 - 10 - 1.00 1 30 - AYpelay/veA -Noe 16 - 1.00 - 30 15 25 2.00 - Level of Service C. _ 24 - - 13 D. C. 25 Av.,Q'/ lane vsh 1 C_ - C_ - - B- - 6 7 C-- VNA Stopping 7q 2 _ - 2 - - 6 95 87 94 4 - Do VNh Clear- r 7 YES _ - 95 - _ YES YES YES 81 91 - YES - - YES YES y Whole Intersection Critical MOvementa - Weighted AV Delay (sac) . 17 Level of Service . C. ♦1 .r .. - Weighted Av Dela Y (see) 18 Level of ServiceC. - Intersection Capacity Utilisation (ICU) . 0.71 ~ Rz,-aired Cycle Length is 72 second* (All Minimum tim., • are satisfied) L• CAPSSI (Release 11) - Based On Delay Methodology Per 1985 Highway Capacity Manual C C C C 0 I� C A P S S I I1-IB-l6 COMPREHENSIVE ANALYSIS PROGRAM FOR A SINGLE SIGNALISED INTERSECTION CITY OP CAMPBELL EXISTING SOLUTION USING REQUIRED CYCLE TIME BASCOM 6 CAMPISSI FLNtbaspis P.M Peak Hour Scenario 3 N Movement SST ESL Ian SBT SBL SBA NOT VOL MBR NOT NBL OUR Phase 1 - 20 seee X S I Phase 2 - 10 sacs X X X Phase 3 - 10 sece X _ i Phase • - 32 sacs x x � Phass S - 0 es se x X 1{1 Phase 6 - I ease . ' Critical Mvet-••I ,• Peak 15 Vol -vph 40 121 378 1890 96 28 ••ll 156 68 1683 •203 136 } 11 Saturation -vph 3500 Shrd 17SO S700 17SO Shrd 3600 Shrd Shrd 5700 1730 Shrd Lost time -sac 2.00 2.00 2.00 2.00 2.00 2.00 2.00 Relative Sat 'I' 0.19 - 0.86 0.81 0.69 - O.SI 0.68 0.53 Effective Or -sec 18 1S 30 d B Move Time -sac 20 - 20 32 10 - 10 - - 32 10 - Min/Ped Time -set 10 - 10 10 10 - 10 - - 10 10 - .1 Prog Factor PAP 1.00 - 1.00 1.00 1.00 - 1.00 - - 1.00 1.00 t i AvDelay/vch -sec 16 - 31 16 2S - 26 - - 11 2S - Level of Service C. - D C+ C- - C_ - _ B- D+ Av.'Q'/ lane vch 1 - 6 7 2 - 2 6 •� Veh Stopping a 79 - 96 BO 94 - 95 - - O1 2 96 - t Do Veh Clear 7 YES - YES YES YES - YES - - YES YES - Whole Intersection - Weighted Av Delay (sac) . 17 Level of Service . C+ Critical Movements - weighted Av Delay (sac) - 19 Level of Service - C+ •• - Intersection Capacity Utilisation (ICU) - 0.7S Required Cycle Length is 72 seconds (All Minimum times are satisfied) ' • CAPSSI (Release 11) - Based on Delay Methodology Per 1985 Highway Capacity Manual J r A P S S 1 11-18-94 COMS'XEHENSC TVE ANALYSIS PROGRAM ' FOR A SINGLE SIGNALIZED INTERSECTION CITY OF CAMPBELL EXISTING SOLUTION USING REQUIRED CYCLE TIME w BASCOM i CANPISSI FLNxhaspis P.M Peak Hour Scenario '9 Movement Phase 1 - 20 EST EBL E8R SBT SBL SSR WBT WWBL WBR ( NBT MILL NBR same Phase 2 - 10 secs X X X . Phaea 3 - 30 sacs X X X X ' Ph aN • - 32 sacs X X I Phew 5 - 0 sacs ' Phase 6 - 0 sacs . Critical Mvot-•• .... .... �� Peak 1S Vol -,Ph 41 13l 382 1913 91 18 11 Ise 49 IS02 •104 138 Saturation -vph 3c00 Shrd 1750 5700 1750 Shrd 3600 Shrd Shrd 5700 17SO Shrd Lost time -sac 2.00 - 2.00 2.00 2.00 - 2.00 - - 2.00 2.00 - Relative Set 'X' 0.20 - 0.87 0.82 O.SO - O.SS - - 0.69 0.57 Effective Or -sec 18 - 18 30 8 - 8 - Move Tine -sae 20 - 20 32 10 - 10 - 30 8 Min/Pod Tine -sec 10 - 10 10 10 - 10 - 32 10 Pr09 Factor PAF 1.00 - 1.00 1.00 1.CO - 1.00 - - Ic 1.00 10 1.00 AvDelay/veh -sac 16 - 32 16 2S - 24 - Level of service C+ - D C. C- - - 14 25 Av.'Q'/ Lana veh 1 - 6 8 2 C- Vah Stopping 79 - - 96 88 94 - 2 9S 2 Do Vah Clear 7 YES - YES YES YES - - YES - 82 95 YES rigs •. Whole Intersection - Weighted Av Delay (sac) . 17 Level of Services . C+ Critical Movements - Weighted Av Delay (sac) . 19 Level of Service . C+ - Intersection Capacity Utilisation (ICU) . 0.76 u Required Cycle Length in 72 seconds (All Minimum times are satisfied) I.d • CAPSSI (Release 11) - Based on Delay Methodology Per 198S Highway Capacity Manual r rW B8 L C 0 7 13A C A P S S I 11-18-94 COMPREHENSIVE ANALYSIS PROGRAM FOR A SINGLE SIGNALIZED INTERSECTION CITY OF CAMPBELL EXISTING SOLUTION USING REQUIRED CYCLE TIME FLN.prunDas w BASCOM 6 PRUNEYARD P.M Peak Hour Scenario 1 Movement EST EBL ERR SBT SSL SBR MST WBL WSR MST NEL KIM ( Phase 1 - 30 sacs X X Phase 2 - 30 sacs X X Phase 3 - 24 seem X X X sees Phase 4 - 0 Phase 5 - 0 Secs Phase 6 - 0 Sete i Critical Mvmt-•• •••• •••• •••• Peak 15 Vol -vph 259 71 IB9i 264 1430 106 Saturation -vph 1750 1750 5700 Shrd 5700 17SO Lost time -sae 2.00 2.00 2.00 - 2.00 2.00 Relative Sat 'X' 0.81 0.22 0.76 - 0.34 0.33 Effective Gr-see 8 a 22 - 32 a Novo Time -sec l0 10 24 - 34 10 Min/Pod Time -sec 10 10 20 - 20 10 Prog Factor PAF 1.00 1.00 1.00 - 1.00 1.00 AvDelay/voh -sac 23 12 8 - 2 12 Level of Service C- B- B. - A a- Av.'Q'/ lane veh 3 1 4 - 2 1 Von Stopping % 96 85 80 - 36 87 Do Vsh Clear 7 I YES YES YES - I. YES YES Whole Intersection - Weighted Av Delay (sac) • 7 Level of Service - B+ Critical Movements - Weighted Av Delay (See) - 9 Level of Service - B+ " - Intersection Capacity Utilization (ICU) - 0.68 Required Cycle Length is 44 seconds (All Minimum times are satisf).od) • CAPSSI (Release 11) - Based on Delay Methodology Per 1985 Highway Capacity Manual as I C A P S S I 11-18-94 COMPREHENSIVE ANALYSIS PROGRAM FOF A SINGLE SIGNALIZED INTERSECTION CITY OF CAMPBELL E + APPROVED SOLUTION USING REQUIRED CYCLE TIME FLN:prunbas r BASCOM G PRUNEYARD P.M Peak Hour Scenario 2 r r r, r. I' Movement EST EBL EBR SBT SBL SBR WBT WBL WBR NBT NBL NBR Phase 1 - 11 macs % X Phase 2 - 30 once x X Phase 3 - 27 sacs x X x Phase 4 - 0 sacs Phase 5 - 0 secs Phase 6 - 0 macs _• Critical Mvmt-••I •••• I.... -I I _ Peak 15 Vol -vph 259 11 3905 264 1439 106 Saturation -vph 1750 1750 5700 Shrd 5700 1750 Loot time -sac 2.00 2.00 2.00 - 2.00 2.00 Relative Sat 'X• 0.79 0.22 0.73 - 0.35 0.36 Effective Gr-r u 9 9 25 - 35 B Move Time -ssc 11 11 27 - 37 10 Min/Ped Time -sac 30 10 20 - 20 10 Proq Factor PAT 1.00 1.00 1.00 - 1.00 1.00 AvDelay/veh -sec 22 13 7 - 2 14 Level of Service C- B- B+ - A B- A•.'Q'/ lane veh 3 1 5 - Veh Stopping % 95 85 77 - 2 36 1 89 Do Veh Clear 7 YES YES YES - YES YES Whole Intersection - Weighted Av Delay (sec) - 7 Level of Service 8+ Critical Movements - Weighted Av Defy (eec) . 9 Level of Service B+ - Intersection Capacity Utilization (ICU) - 0.67 Required Cycle Length ie 48 seconds (All Minimum times are satisfied; • CAPSSI (Release 11) - Based on Delay Methodology Per 1985 Highway Capacity Manual C A P S S I 11-18-94 COMPREHENSIVE ANALYSIS PROGRAM FOR A SINGLE SIGIIALIZED INTERSECTION CITY OF CAMPBELL E a A • PROJECT Pq SOLUTION USING REQUIRED CYCLE TIME BASCOM L PRUNEYARD FLN:prunbaa t.M Peak Hour Scenw _o 3 " 1__T Movement EBT EBL Phase 1 - 12 secs EBR SBT SBL SSR WBT WOL WSR NOT MM MM y Phase 2 - 30 sec■ X Z • Phu* 3 - 27 sacs Y X X Z Phase 4 - 0 secs Z . Phase 5 - 0 Seca . • Phase 6 - 0 s*cs Critical Mvmt- •... .... Peak PSek 15 Vo1 -+ph 296 75 1905 275 •'•• Saturation h -se 1750 175� 5700 Shrd 1439 106 Lost time -sec 2.00 2.�O 2.00 - 5700 1750 Relativ* Sat 'Z• 0.10 0.10 0.25 - 00 Effectiv* Gr-pC 30 10 25 _ 0.00 0.35 0.37 0.37 Move Time -sec 12 12 27 35 S Min/Pod Tim* -sec 10 30 20 - 37 10 Proq Factor PAT 1.011 1.00 1.00 20 it, AvD*IAy/veh -Dec 24 12 8 - 1.00 1.00 Level of Service C_ B- B. 2 14 Av.'Q'/ lane veh 3 1 5 _ A O' Veh Stopping a 96 83 79 _ 2 1 Do V*h Clear 7 YES YES YES - 38 89 YES YES Whole Intersection - Weighted Av Delay (sec) . 7 Le%jl of Service . 9� Crit ice Movements - Weighted Av Delay (sec) . 10 Level of Service O- - Intersection Capacity Utilization (ICU) . 0.70 Required Cycle Length is 49 seconds (A'.1 Minimum times are satisfied) • CAPSSI (Release 11) - Based or Delay Methodology Per 1985 Highway Capacity Manual e C A P 5 S I 11-18-94 COMPREHENSIVE ANSS.YSIS PROGRAM FOR A SINGLE SIGNALIZED INTERSECTION CITY OF CAMPBELL E + A + P + FUTURE GROWTH ° SOLUTION USING REQUIRED CYCLE TIME FLN:prunbas BASCOM G PRUNEYARD _ P.M Peat Hour Scenario 1 ^ Movement EBT EOL EBR SST SBI, SBR WBT WBL NOR NBT _ NBL NOR Phase 1 - 13 sacs X X •• Phass 2 - 10 sec• X t Phase 3 - 29 secs x x X n Phase ♦ - 0 sec• Phase 5 - 0 eece Ph ue 6 - 0 secs Critical Nvmt-•• •••• •••• .... ^ Peak 15 Vol -vph 299 76 1928 278 1456 107 Sa[uration -vph 175G 1750 5700 Shrd 5700 1750 '+ Lost time -sac 2.(:0 2.00 2.00 - 2.00 2.00 Reltiv ae Sat 'x' 0.(1 0.22 0.75 - 0.36 0.40 Effective Gr-see :.1 31 27 - 37 O Move Time -sec ::3 13 29 - 39 10 Min/Ped Ti -see '10 10 20 - 20 10 Prog Factor PAP 1.00 1.00 1.00 - 1.00 1.00 AvDe lay/veh -ssc 23 13 B - 2 16 ' Level of Service _- B- B+ - A C. Av.'Q'/ lane veh 3 1 5 - 2 1 Veh Stopping a 95 82 78 - 39 90 Do Veh Clear I YES YES YES - YES YES Whole Intersection - Weighted Av Delay (sec) . 7 Level of Service • B+ Critical Movements - Weighted Av Delay (Sec) • 30 Level of Service • B- - Intersection Capacity Utilization (ICU) • 0.70 " Required Cycle Length is 52 seconds (All Minimum times are satisfied) CAPSSI (Release 11) - Based on Delay Methodology tar 1985 Highway Capacity Manual C A P S S I 11-18-94 COMPREHENSIVE ANALYSIS PROGRAM FOR A SINGLE SIGNALIZED INTERSECTION ' CITY OF CAMPBEI•L EXISTIL'G S9LUTI0N USING REQUIRED CYCLE TIME FLN:hascam BASCOM G CAMPBELL P.M Peak Hour Scenario 1 Movement EST ESL ESR SBT SBL SBR NOT WBL WBR NOT NBL NBR Phase 1- 18 Seca X x X X ' Phase 2 - 10 Seca X X X Phase 3- 18 aeCa X X X X Phase 4 - 0 aces Phaae 5 - 0 sees Phase 6 - 0 SSeS I.•.. I- -_-I Critical MVmt-••I •••• •••• Peak 15 Vol -vph 619 521 1553 129 497 45 38 028 330 29 Saturation —ph 3500 1750 5700 1750 1750 1750 17SO 57U0 3500 Shrd Lost time -see 2.00 2.00 2.00 2.00 2.00 2.00 2.00 2.00 2.00 - RelativSat 'X' 0.51 0.86 0.78 0.42 0.50 0.07 0.06 0.43 O.S1 - Effective e Gr-see 16 16 16 8 26 16 16 16 8 - Move Time -sec 18 18 18 10 28 18 16 18 10 - Mi,,/Ped Time-aac 10 10 10 1J 10 10 10 10 10 - Prog Factor PAY 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 - AVDelay/veh -sec 9 19 12 13 5 8 8 9 14 - Level of Sarvle0 B. C+ B- e- A B. B+ e+ B- - Av.'Q'/ lane vah 3 4 4 1 3 0 0 2 2 - Veh S[oppinq 4 79 93 90 89 61 67 67 77 91 - Do Veh Clear 7 YES YES YES YES YES 1 -1 YES YES YES 1 YES - Whole Intersection - Weighted Av Delay (sae) 11 Lsvel of Service 8- Critical Movements - Weighted Av Delay (sac) • 13 Level of Service B- '• - Intersection Capacity Utilization (ICU) - 0.76 Required Cycle Length is 46 seconds (All Minimum times are satisfied) • CAPSSI (Release 11) - Based on Delay Methodology Per 1985 1lighwiy Capacity Manual •'1 C A P S S I 11-18-94 COMPREHENSIVE ANALYSIS PROGRAM FJR A SINGLE SIGNALIZED I"TERSECTION CITY OF CAMPBELL E + APPROVED SOLUTION USING REQUIRED CYCLE TIME FLN:bsscam BASCOM G CAMPBELL P.M Peak Hour Scenario 2 Movement EST ERL I EBR SST SBL SBR HOT WBL MBR NOT NBL NOR Phase 1- 19 sacs X X X X Phase 2 - 10 sees X X X Ph ue 3- 19 secs X X X X Phase 4 - 0 sacs Phase 5 - 0 see■ Phase 6 - 0 aces Critical Mvmt-•• •••• •••• •••• Peak 15 Vol -vph 632 527 1553 129 510 45 38 82a 311 29 Saturation -vph 3500 1750 5700 1750 1750 1750 1750 5-00 3500 Shrd Lost tine -see 2.00 2.00 2.00 2.00 2.00 2.00 2.06 2.00 2.00 - Relati,- Sat 'X' 0.51 0.85 0.77 0.44 0.52 0.07 0.06 0.42 0.53 - Effective Gr-see 17 17 17 B 27 17 17 17 S - Move Time -see 19 19 19 10 29 19 19 19 10 - Min/Ped Time -see 30 30 30 30 30 30 10 10 I'1 - Prog Factor PAF 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 - AvDeiay/veh -see 10 19 12 14 5 8 8 9 15 - Level of Service B+ C+ B- S- B+ B. B+ S+ B- - Av.'Q'/ lane veh 3 5 4 1 3 0 0 2 2 - Vah Stopping a 79 92 89 90 62 66 66 76 91 - Do Veh Clear 7 YES YES YES YCS YES YES YES YES YES - Whole Intersection - Weighted Av Delay (see) • 11 Level of Service - 9- Critical Movements - Weighted Av Delay (sac) • 14 Level of Service • B- " - Intersection Capacity Utilisation (ICU) - 0.76 Required Cycle Length is 48 seconds (All Minimum times are satisfied) • CAPSSI (Release 11) - Based on Delay Methodology Per 1985 Highway Capacity Manual C C A P S S I 1:-18-94 COMPREHENSIVE ANALYSIS PROGRAM FUR A SINGLE SIGNALIZED 1NTFRSECTI0N CITY OF CAMPejrLL E . A . PR0JI:CT SOLUTION USING REQUIRED CYCLE TIME SASCOM G CAMPBELL FLN:bascam P.M Peak Hour Scenario 3 M Movement Phase 1 - 19 eaca EBT ESL EBB SBT SBL SBR I NHT WBL WBR I NBT pBL pBR Puna 2 - 10 sacs x X X Y , Phase 3 - 19 sacs X x X Phase 4- 0 sacs X x x x Phase 5 - 0 sacs , Phase 6 - 0 sacs Critical Mvmt-•• .... Peak 15 Vol —ph 632 527 1570 142 111, 45 •••• Saturation -vph 3500 1750 5700 1750 1750 38 828 312 29 Loat time -see 2.00 2.00 2.00 ?.00 2.00 1750 1750 5700 3500 Shrd Relative Sat •x• 0.51 0.85 0.78 0.49 0.52 2.00 2.00 2.00 2.00 2.53 Effective Gr-sac 17 17 17 8 0.07 0.06 0.42 - Move Time -see 19 19 19 10 27 17 17 17 8 - Min/Pad Time -sac 10 10 29 19 19 19 10 - Prog Factor PAP 1.00 1.00 10 :0 1.00 1.00 10 1.00 10 10 10 10 %v0alay/vah -sac 10 19 12 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 - Level of Service B. C. 15 B- 92 5 6 8 9 15 - Av.•Q•/ lane veh 3 5 S♦ B. B. B. g_ _ Voh Stopping Pp 9 a 79 92 5 89 91 3 0 0 2 2 - Do Veh Clear 7 YES YES YES YES 62 YES 66 66 76 91 I YES YES YES YE8 Whole Intersection - Weighted Critical Movements - Av Delay (sae) . 11 Level of Service . B•- Weighted Av Delay (sac) 14 Laval of Service B- - Intersection Capacity Utilization (ICU) . 0.76 Required Cycle Length is 48 seconds (All Minimun, times are satisfied) CAPSSI (Release 11) - Based on Delay Methodology Per 1985 Highway Capacity Manuel C A P S S 1 11-18-94 COMPREHENSIVE ANALYSIS PROGRAM FOR A SINGLE SIGNALIZED IN"SRSECTION CITY OF CAMPBELL E + A + P + FUTURE GROWTH SOLUTION USING REQUIRED CYCLE TIME FLN: bucu BASCOM G CAMPBELL P.M Peak Hour Scenario 1 I Movement EST EBL EBR SBT SBL SBR NBT WBL WBR NBT NBL PER Phase 1 - 19 Dec, % x - X % X Phass 2 - 10 saca % x - X X Phu& 3- 19 sacs x x Phu, 1 - 0 Secs Phase 5 - 0 sacs Phase 6 - 0 sacs Critical Mvmt-•• 639 �� 533 •••� 1589 141 511 46 39 a39 316 30 Peak 15 Vol -vph 3500 17SO 5700 1750 1750 1750 1750 5700 3500 Shrd Saturation -vph 2.00 2.00 2.00 2.00 2.00 2.00 2.00 2.00 2.00 - Lost tLse -see '%' 0.52 0.86 0.79 0.49 0.52 0.07 0.07 0.17 0.54 - Rolative Sat 8 27 17 17 17 a - Effective Gr-sec 17 17 17 29 19 15 19 10 - Mova Time -Dec 19 19 19 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 - Min/Pod Time-e,c 10 1.00 10 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1. 000 1.00 1.00 1.00 Prog Factor PAY 5 - AvDolay/veh -sac 10 19 12 15 BO HO B+ B� - Level of Service B+ C+ 8- B- B+ - Av.'Q'/ lane vah 3 5 5 2 3 62 66 66 76 92 Vah Stnppinq % 79 93 90 YES 91 YES YES YES YES YES YES = Do Veh Clear 7 YES YES Whole Intersection - Weighted Av Delay (Dec) - 11 Level of Service a - Critical Movements - Weighted Av Delay (Sec) - 14 Level of Service B- • - Intersection Capacity utilization (ICU) - 0.77 Required Cycle Length is 68 s,conds (All Minimum times are satisfied) • CAPSSI (Release 11) - Based on Delay Methodology Per 1985 Highway Capacity Manual I C A P S S I 11-18-94 COMPREHENSIVE ANALYSIS PROGRAM FOR A SINGLE SIGNALISED INTERSECTION CITY OF CAMPBELL EXIST7NG SOLUTION USING REQUIRED CYCLE TIME FLN:camuni CAMPBELL i UNION P.M Peak Hour Scenario 1 99 Movema1 EST EBL ERR SLY SBL son WBT WBL WBR NBT NSL NBN Phase 1 - 30 sacs X X Phase 2 - 20 mace X X X Phase 3 - 12 sacs X _ X X Phase • - 0 Deco Phase 5 - 0 Deco Phase 6 - 0 mace Critical MVmt-•• •••• •••• •••• Peak 15 Vol -vph 1128 928 773 261 497 1" Saturation -vph -900 1750 3800 1750 3500 Shrd Lost time -sac 2.00 2.00 2.00 2.00 2.00 - Relativa Sat 'X' 0.69 0.74 0.31 0.78 0.80 - Effective Or -sec 18 30 28 B 30 - Move Time -sac 20 32 30 10 12 - Mln/Ped Time -sec 20 20 20 10 10 Prog Factor PAP 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 - AvDelay/veh -sac 8 4 2 20 15 - Level of Service B. A A C- C+ Av.'Q'/ lane veh 4 3 2 3 3 - Veh Stopping s 81 61 42 95 94 - Do Veh Clear 7 YES YES YES YES YES - Whole Intersection - Weighted Av Delay (see) • 8 Level of Service - B+ Critical Movements - Weighted Av Delay (sac) • 11 Level of Service - B- - Intersection Capacity Utilisation (ICU) • 0.78 Required Cycle Length is 42 seconds (All Minimum times are satisfied) • CAPSSI (Release 11) - Based on Delay Methodology For 1985 Highwajr Capacity Manual I A CA P S S I 11-18-94 COMPREHENSIVE ANALYSIS PROGRAM FOR A SINGLE SIGNALIZED INTERSECTION A CITY OF CAMPBELL E + APPROVED SOLUTION USING REQUIRED CYCLE TIME A CAMPBELL G UNION FLN:camuni P.M Peak Hour Scenario 2 .q Move"nt ROT EBL FOR SOT SBL SOR ' HOT WBL Phase 1 - 10 ance WOE NST NOL NOR Phase 2 - 20 once X x X X - X P. Phase 3 - 12 secs X - Phase 4 - 0 Seca - X X Phase S - 0 seta - Phan* 6 - 0 Seca Critical Mvmt-••I .... „ Peak 1S Vol -,ph 1151 932 �•�� Saturation -vph 3800 1750 7B9 261 498 168 3800 17SO 3500 dhrd Loot time -sec 2.00 2.00 Relative Set 'X- 0.71 0.75 2.00 2.00 2.00 Effective Or -sec is 0.31 0.78 0.80 - 30 Move Time -see 20 32 28 8 10- Min/Pod Time -sec 20 20 30 10 12 - .. Proq Factor PAF 1.00 1.00 20 i0 10- AvDelay/veh -sac 8 1.00 1.00 1.00 - 5 Laval Of Service B. A 2 20 15 - Av.'Q•/ lane vsh 4 3 A C C. vsh stopping % 91 62 3 3I - Do Veh Clear ? YFS 42 95 94 _ YES YES YES YES „ Whole Intersection - Weighted Av Delay (sec) . 8 Level Of Service . O+ Critical Movements - Weighted Av Delay (sec) 11 Level of Service O- - Intersection Capacity Utilization (ICU) . 0.78 ~ Required Cycle Length is 42 ■sconde (All Minimum times are eatiafied) • CAPSSI (Release 11) - Based on Delay Methodology Per 1985 Highway Capacity Manual N 71 S I COMPREHENSIVECAP ANALSYSIS PROGRAM 11-18-94 FOR A SINGLE SIGNALIZED INTERSECTION CITY OF CAMPBELL E t A . PROJECT SOLUTION USING REQUIRED CYCLE TIME � CAMPBELL i UNION P-M Peak "Our FLNtcamuni Scenario 3 Pq Movement Phase 1 - 30 secs EST EBL EBR SBT SBL SBA W8T WBI- WBR Phase 2 - 20 secs X NBi Phase 3 - 12 Sete r X E ' Phase 4 - 0 Sete ' Phase 5 - 0 eeca X E Phase 6 - 0 eece Critical Mvmt-•• •••• ��_ Peak 15 Vol -vph 1161 932 "•• •••, Saturation -vph Lost 3800 1750 805 264 498 171 time _ -sac Relative Bat 'X• 0.71 0.71 3800 1750 2.00 2.00 3500 Bhrd Effective Gr-sec is 0.75 0.30 30 0.32 0.79 2.00 0.80 - Move Time -see 20 32 28 8 10 Min/Ped Time -see 20 30 10 Prose Factor PAP 1.00 20 1.00 20 10 12 10 AvDelay/veh -sac g 1.00 1.00 Level of Service B. 5 2 21 1.15 - Av.'Q'/ lane vah ♦ A A C- 15 Veh Stopping ♦ 82 3 2 3 C+ - Do Veh Clear 7 YES 61 YES 42 95 3 94 _ —��I ( I YES YES -� YES - Whole Intersection Critical Movements - Weighted - Av Delay (sac) 8 Level of Service .. Weighted - Intersection . Av Delay (sac) 11 Level of Service 9- B- Capacity Utilization (ICU) . 0.78 Required Cycle Length is 42 seconds (All Minimum times CAPSSI (Release 11) - Based are satisfied) on Delay Methodology Per 1985 Highway Capacity Manual I C A P S S I ' CO!(PRENe'NS IVE ANALYSIS PROGRAM 11-18-91 FOR A SINGLE SIGNALIZED INTERSECTION CITY OF CAMPSELL E . A . P ♦ FUTURE GROWTH SOLUTION USING REQUIRED CYCLE TIME •, CAMPBELL L UNION FLNrcanuni P.M Peak Hour Scenario 1 Movement EST EBL EBR SBT SRL SB.� Phase 1 - 10 sacs WBT WBL WBR MST NBL NBR Phase 2 - 20 sacs x Z x _ Phase 3 - 13 sacs x x Phaaa ♦ - x 0 seem Phase S - Y x 0 aacs Phase 6 - O sacs ' .... I I Critical Mvmt-••I Peak 15 Vol -vph 1175 `°•• Saturation 913 •�•• -vph 1175 1750 8 0 ,50 S01 173 Lost time -sec 2.00 3800 1750 3S00 Shrd Relative Sat 'x' 0.74 0.75 2.00 2.00 Effective Gr-sec IS 0.31 0.33 0.82 2.00 - Move Timm -sec 20 31 28 B 0.76 - Min/Pad Time -see 20 33 30 10 11 Prog Factor PAP 1.00 20 20 10 13 AVDola 1.00 1.20 1.10 30 - y/veh -sae 9 5 1.00 Level of Service e. A 3 23 11 Av.•Q•/ lane veh 1 A C_ Veh Stopping3 2 3 B- - \ S/ 51 Do veh Clear 7 YES YES 3 11 96 92 YES YES YES Whole Intersection - Weighted Av Delay--- Critical Movements - Weighted Av Dela(see) . 8 Level Of Service . B. .. Y (see) 10 Level of Service . B_ Intersection Capacity Utilization (ICU) . 0.79 Required Cycle Length is /3 seconds (All Minimum times are satisfied) • CAPSSI (Relasas 11) - Based on Delay Methodology Par 1985 Highway Capacity Manual L 1875 S. BASCOM AVENUE S 94-08/UP 94-19 6 OF 7 CITY OF CAMPBELL PLAN. 12/99 11-18-94 C A P S S I COMPREHENSIVE ANALYSIS PROGRAM FOR A SINGLE SIGNALIZED INTERSECTION CITY OF CAMPBELL E - APPROVED SOLUTION USING REQUIRED CYCLE TIME FlN•hwycre P.M Peak Hour Scenario 1 CREEXSIDE G HWY 17 NB Movement EBT $BL EBR SBT SBL 58R WBR NBT NBL NBR Phase 1 - 16 once x x x . Phan 2 - 20 once x Phase 3 - 0 rocs . Phan 4 - 0 B.C. Phase 5 - 0 Once han 6 - 0 once Critic-1 Mvm I •569 92 •357 49B Peak 15 Vol -vph 5700 Saturation -vph 3500 1750 3800 2.00 Lost time -euc 2.00 2.00 2.00 0.17 Rolative Sat 'X' 0.42 0.14 0.19 18 Effective Gr-sec 14 14 18 20 Move Time -roc 16 16 20 20 Min/Pad Time-SOL 10 10 20 1.00 Prog Factor PAP 1.00 1.00 1.00 4 AvDolay/veh -nC 6 5 4 A Level oService B. B. A 1 f AV.'Q'! lane veh 2 1 1 55 Veh StOPPing • 73 65 55 YES Do VoC Clear 7 YES YES YES I ---I-__ 5 Level of Service - A Whole Intersection - Weighted Av Delay (NBC) 5 Level of Service v B+ Critical Movement• - Weighted Av Delay (ssc) l„29 .•• - Intersection Capacity Utilisation (ICU) Required Cycle Length is 36 seconds (All Minimum times are satisfied) • CAPSSI (Raloase 11) - Based on Delay Methodology Per 1985 Highway Capacity Manua'_ Ir I L L L L L L 9 C A P S S I COMPREHENSIVE ANALYSIS PROGRAM FOR A SINGLE SIGNALIZED INTERSECTION CITY OF CAMPBELL E + A + PROJECT SOLUTION USING REQUIRED CYCLE TIME UREEESIDE i HNY 17 NO A.M Peak Hour Movement Phase 1 - 16 Seca Phu: 2 - 20 Sec■ Ph: ue 3 - 0 socS Phu: 4 - 0 seca Ph ue 5 - 0 seta Phase 6 - 0 Secs Critical Mvmt-•• 11-16-94 FLN:hwycre Scenario 3 EBT EEL EBR SOT SOL SBR NOT ROL NBR NOT NBL NOR X X x x Ptak 15 Vol -vph 569 97 361 503 Saturation -vph 3500 1750 3800 5700 Lost time -sec 2.00 2.00 2.00 2.00 Rant ive Sat 'X' 0.42 0.14 0.19 0.18 Effectivo Gr-sec 14 14 18 1B Move Time -sec 16 16 20 20 Min/Pod Tier -sec 10 10 20 20 Proq Facto+ PAF 1.00 1.JO 1.00 1.00 AvD: Ly/veh -soc 6 5 4 4 Leval of Service B+ B+ A A Av.•Q'/ lone veh 2 1 1 1 Vh Stopping a 73 65 55 55 DoeVeh Claar 7 YES YES YES YES -1. 1 Nhule Int:r:Sction - Ne ightad by Delay (uc) : 5 Lwel of Service - A Critical Movements - Neightod Av Delay (sec) 5 L:vel of Servic: - B+ • - Intersection Capacity Utilization (ICU) - 0.29 Required Cycle Length is 36 seconds (All Minimum times are satisfied) • CAPSSI (Release 11) - Based on Delay Methodology Par 1985 Highway Capacity Manual ,RECEIVED FEB 2 0 1996 CIf ClkmPBELL k*NING DEPT• SMITH & SMITH Landscape Architects Environmental Planners, Inc. Pruneyard Shopping Center Existing Tree Survey TR95004.DOC Pruneyard Shopping Center Existing Tree Survey SB�&(u Size Tree T}ne Comm, m l 34A 4" Oak Fair 2. 35A 9" Elm Fair 3, 102A 10" Canary Island Date Palm 4 104A 13" Canary Island Date Palm 5 36A 9" Pistachio 6. 38A 7" Ligustrum T 39A 14" Blackwood Acacia 8 40A 12" Ash 9. 41A 12" Ash 10 42A 23" Eucalyptus White nark 11. 43A 10" Camphor 12. 44A 23" Ash 13, 45A 9" Ash Poor 14, 46A 12" Incense Cedar 15 47A II" Ash Poor 16 48A 7" Ligustrum 17. 19" Ash 18. 51A 13" California Pepper 19. 52A 16" Eucalyptus Silver Dollar 20. 16" Ash Poor 21. 54A 17" Monterey Pine 22 56A 29" St Pine 23. 57A 25" Elm 24. 58A 33",17" Deodar Cedar (M) Dangerous 25 59A 48" Canary Island Date Palm 45' - 50' Tall 26, 60A 9" Quercus Lobata *27. 61A 34" Canary Island Date Palm 45' - 50' Tall 28, 63A 6" 29. 64A 6" 30. 65A 6" 31. 66A 7",7" Bottlebrush (M) 32. 69A Olive 33. 70A Magnolia 34. 71 A Magnolia 35. 73A Magnolia 36, 76A 12" Privet 37 81A 5" Privet 38. 82A 4" Privet TR95004.130C Pruneyard Shopping Center Existing Tree Survey Tree Tome Comment SAS-- C&C- Si-e 10" King Palm 39. 40, 18" Elm 41 79A 3" Cherry 42. 80A 4" Cherry 43 77A 9" Ligustrum 44. 78A 9" Ligustrum 45 9" Ligustrum Blackwood Acacia(?r) Poor 46 14",7" 47 10" Ligustrum 91, Bottlebrush 48 14" Deodar Cedar 49. 14" Deodar Cedar 50. 14" Deodar Cedar 51 Poor 52. 23" 19" Eucalyptus syderoxylen 53. 19' California Pepper 54. 55 28C Olive 56. 27C Olive 57. 26C Olive 58. 25C Olive 59, 24C Olive 60. 23C Olive 61. 22C Elm 62, 63. 21C 5 5 B 11,88 Mve Olive ( ) 64. 54B 11",3" Podocarpus (M) 65 52B 4",12' Podocarpus(M) 66 51B W, Podocarpus 67, 55B 12",8",I8" Olive(M) 68 57B 9" 10",11",11" Olive(M) 69 53B 10" Podocarpus 70. 50B 6" 6" Podocarpus 71 49B 10" Podocarpus 72. 48B 9" 12" Magnolia Ligustrum 73 74. 47B 46B Il" Loquat 75. 37C Olive 76. 36C Olive TR95014 DOC Pruneyard Shopping Center Existing Tree Survey S&P CA- C Sue Tree T}pe Comment 77. 35C Olive 78. 38C Olive 79. 67C 16" Elm 80. 66C 12",12",13" Olive (M) Fair 81. 65C 10", 12" Olive (M) Fair 82, 40C 23 ' California Pepper/Schinus molle Fair 83 39C 18" Elm 84 20C 12",12",13" Olive (M) Fair 85 10" Olive Fair 86. 19C 12" Olive Fair 87. 10" Olive Fair 88 I8C 22" Olive Fair 89. 16" Canary Island Pine/Pinus canariensis Fair 90 41C 10" Stone Pine 91. 42C 9" Elm Fair 92. 43C II" Elm Fair 93. 15C Olive 94, 14C Olive 95. 45B 9",9",9",12" Olive (M) 96. 44B 9",14" Olive (M) 97, 43B 8",91,13" Olive (M) 98. 42B 12" Elm 99. 41B 9",9",9" Olive (M) 100. 40B 1011,101, Olive (M) 101, 39B 10",9",9",8" Olive (M) 102. 13C Olive 103. 12C Olive 104. I 1 C Olive 105. 1 OC Olive 10& 9C Olive 107. 8C Olive 109. 7C Olive 109. 52C 12" Pinus Canariensis 110. 44C 9" Elm 111. 6C 16" Pinus Canariensis 112. 109A 6" Podocarpus 113. 110A 4" Ligustrum 114. 3",3",5" bottlebrush (M) TR95004.1 0C Pruneyard Shopping Center Existing Tree Survey S&S- CRC- Sire Tree TtVe Comment 115, 45C 9" Elm II& 46C 9" Elrt 117, 2",8",4" Olive (M) 118 50C 7",9",13" Ol ve(M) 119. 49C 12",9" Ohve(M) 120. IC 6" 121. 2C 15" R,dwood 122 SC Olive 123 4C Olive 124, 3C 13",8" Olive(M) 125. 3" Pinus Canariensis 126 8" Bottlebrush 127 6A 10",13",16" Olive (M) 128 7A 12" Australian Willo,v 129 7AA 12" Australian Willow 130. 8A 6" Chinese Pibtache 131, 9A 6" Ligustrum 132, IIA 21" Eucalyptus 133. 13A 12" Australian Willow 134. 14A 24" Pepper 135. 15A 8" Bottlebrush 136. 16A 8" Bottlebrush 137. 17A 8" Bottlebrush 138. 18A 9",3",2" Bottlebrush (M) 139. 38B 12" Elm 140, 37B 18" Elm 141. 36B 10" Elm 142. 105A 16" Pinus Canariensis 143. 106A 12" Pinus Canariensis 144. 107A 10" Pinus Canariensis 145. 108A 18" Pinus Canariensis 146. 19A 12" Camphor 147. 20A 13" Pinus Canariensis 148. 21A 8" Camphor 149. 22A 9" Ligustum 150. 23A 15",14" Olive (M) Fair 151. 24A ll" Elm Fair 152. 26A 6" Privet Fair TREESRVY.DOC Pruneyard Shopping Center Existing Tree Survey SRSz C&C# Size Tree 7tty Comment 153 27A 9",12" Olive (M) Fair 154. 30A 7" Privet 155 31A 13" Olive 156 14" Olive 157. 29A 9" Privet 158, 28A 7" Privet 159. 99A 10" Cedar 160. Hollywood Juniper 161 Hollywood Juniper 162. Hollywood Juniper 163 Hollywood Juniper 164 35B 23" Deodar Cedar 165, 34B 17" Stone Pine 166. 32B 22" Stone Pine 16T 98A 13",15" Redwood (M) 169. 87A 3" Magnolia 169, 88A 7" Magnolia 170. 89A IT' Magnolia 171, 90A 7" Magnolia 172. 91A 8" Magnolia 173. 86A II" Camphor 174. 100A 9",6",5",5" Lo-luat (M) 175 IOTA 9",6",6",9" Loquat(M) 176. 17B 5",6",T' Olive (M) 177. 16B 911,11" Olive (M) 178. 15B 10",12" Olive (M) 179. 14B 911,911,9" Olive (M) 180. 85A II" Olive 181. 13B 911,9" Olive (M) 182. 12B 11"'11" Olive (M) 183. lA 8",10",111, Olive (M) 184 IOB 8",10" Olive (M) 185. 9B 7",12" Olive (M) 186. 8B 15" Myoporum 4�1 187. 2B 1011,101, Olive (M) * 198. 3B 7" 7" 7"3" 8" Olive (M) 0 189. 4B 7",7",7",7' , 7" Olive (M) ift 190. 5B 9",8",14" Olive (M) TR95004.I30C Pruneyard Shopping Center Existing Tree Survey S&Sx C&Ctt Sire free Ape Comment 191. 1 B Redwood 192. 65 14" Magnolia 193. 5' Ficus 194. 7B 12" Magnolia 195, 5' Ficus 196. Ficus 197 Ficus 19& Ficus 199 Ficus 200. Ficus 201 28B 16" Magnolia 202. 6" Ficus *L 203 26B 9",10",10" Olive (M) 204. 27B 8",8",8",4",7" Olive (M) eft 205 25B 10",8,8" Olive (M) 206 29B II" Magnolia 207. 30B 14" Magnolia 208, 31B 10" Loquat 209. 19B 10" Magnolia 210 20B 10" Magnolia 211. I8B 10",11",12" Olive (M) )� 212. 24B 5",8",9" Olive (M) fir 213. 23B 7",8",8",8" Olive (M) j 214. 21B 50" Canary Island 'Date Palm 2!5. 84A 10" Monterey Pine 216. 83A 9" Chinese Elm TR95004.130C 02:22 1 FP( C.-S. Inc TO 14155439740 P.01 RECEIVED � t FEB 2 0 1996 S CITY OF CAMPBELL PLANNING DEPT.01 v i a v � d F r � ! a a~� s v°✓i �j I JLL-08-1995 14119 488 321 8812 �.BS ZO'd ZT83 T2s 801, ZZ:SS 566T-bZ�� 29'd 1i101 C E S E •'�B�o $, .� r�.3 2. .sue ro � ' Z U0 a V ass aS•5 HE ra»88�>'S333ci, �i�-.��SgH333g8Sr38x s c a b .c A ro V O'� •� =C u•a '`J Np Si �'� D r F .X c a- 4 S'roL cZ. .=�_c F-Im Ux � E,� E ��$•B T�C ��V � E g Ez o f �,�•�Y��_`c 2o'ig�+g I� IIII. a1C ea- ..y G. L L G L L L G G L,CC 0L iL OL1� d PC A PCIC CL N N N ' N N N N N N NIVf of 1N , de5.�a^aaZaCdUy.d��,,�m aGda:�A.mn Un No�i�h N.n y'�^vU',i��m.�i, C P 9i O I� = � ec 3 SO2cl .E- is I . . e S PC goo mem I Is, �.drt. 07-28-1995 02:22PM FRQ Z[5. Inc m '1 14155439748 P.02 742 T. z- z 3Iu �I U. u; u. u, u u 0. 6 bIu 3j o�.........,,.......e�„ i a << � JUL-2B-19q5 14:20 408 321 8812 P.9 V-28-190 Q:ZIPM FRC JLL-28-1995 14.20 CCS. 1n m 14155439749 P.e3 I r=l .4 eA °C �• Its 3 0 i 31 o BE SO, Pa` D; ------------------------ R .��xxXaRA4 c 4 4 4 Ttstv,v ARJtaat34 '11408 321I 112 I I I I I I ( 07-28-19M 02:24PM FRO C(S. I= 70 1415543W40 P.04 JLL-28-1995 14:21 d �I it m U. �o n ... V V n n n n V 1� JJ n n n " hill s �<��32��12��IC�R�IC�CLICs�IbnAt 1. 40B 321 SB12' ' I ' 1 4 P.04 MI-29-1995 02: 29"t FRI ,CC5. Inc 70 U1954317N P.eS 7 � 1 1. i i r f~. !` Z' b - V tt x saaax�az�ssssas�aass 1 JLL-2B-1995 14:21 I 1408 321 8812 I P.05 d'�-28-1996 e2:25P11 FRO -CS. Ins TO L4155439740 P.06 s }� JU—2B-19915 14:22 �I �1 E{ GIG��aI� is �167r IVF.�FN W�r�J L.`'L�t, vtr�J VVVVVV � � r VV �WIr Jy Al 3 13 �3�yyI3i 0 0 ...................... o 0 0 0 l o d o 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 o e o o .,. o 0 0 0 0 0 0 o e I ii11n211111{III{ II�� P 9"-28-1?95 02;26'M FRD. XS, Inc TO 1415543'3r40 P.07 I i ,X Z S. w- I VV��77tt��uuul; -'N1It�� _ 4: eV[lai U. ��I~.le�c �I �I�I�,r O v1OICO�0�11i1011 M. J O .. o V N O. O J 0 0 0 O O O O O O .. O A N � a ----------- -- a 0 0 0 O O O 0 0 0� O O N N I a i It ii, JLL-2B-1995 14: 23 11408 . .6r.,99502:2&-" _ 'CS.Im TO m__P._ cm rx \f � (/ ' of _ � : \ � - a � \ � ! � )� I | ■ JLA.-28-1995 i e ° 408 321 _z mso W7-28-19W Q:zsn FFO 'CS. I no m I • M-28-1995 02:2WM FRL 00. Inc 7o 14155439740 r.la 1.4 i HIR- I�"f�ldi�irll �y p IJ w d d did try f l a 5t.;:t,^3rAAotR$ 32 III IllIIIII! .IU_-M-1995 14:254 07-23-1995 02; 28FIl FROaAlkCS. Im m 1415543W40 P.11 JIl-2B-19% 14:25 Lo dlt!e vl-lL- 3 3�3j�3yy��I 3�333� 3�3!'3; I lit�l9,A l ......... I�I 1 a�aaal�II wgK!r Z rzrra92 z IIIIIIIIIII IIIII 7D,P.1111 406 1 9812 PERMIT 95-223: PRUNEYARD REJECTED STREET TREES Trees on Bascom Avenue: (beginning at the north at Ail) #3: Trunk damage due to excessive flush cuts )f limbs. X4 Trunk has excessive "dog -leg" bend with several pruning cuts at that location. #10: Trunk damage due to excessive flush cuts of limbs. Trees on Campbell Avenue: (beginning at the east at 81) N3: Tree has torn limb. N4: Trunk damage. #10: Tree has dead branch tips and scaffold is not trainable. #13: Excessive "dog -leg" bend in trunk. #17: Trunk displays poor wound closure. #18: Trunk not straight. OF'CA,4 i CITY of CAMPBELL Community Development Department Current Planning November 8, 1994 Mr. jack fiunno Asset Management 651 Gateway Boulevard, Suite 980 South San Francisco, CA 94080 Re: Landscaping Proposal — Pruneyard Towers — 1901 & 1999 S. Bascom Ave Dear Mr. Bonno: The Planning Department has reviewed your preliminary landscaping submittal which proposes the introduction of tree wells throughout the parking areas of the office towers at the Pruneyard. In that this proposed plan would reduce the amount of on -site parking currently provided, the decisien for the approval of this plan must rest with the Plan.dng Commission. The application for processing such a request would be a Modification to the previous Site & Architectural approval that allowed the construction of the Pruneyard Towers. Staff has reviewed the preliminary plan and is offering the following suggestions for modifications: 1. That the proposed driveway opening around the courtyard be aligned with the existing driveway circulation pattern. That the finger islands toward the interior of the courtyard area be eliminated. 3. That a decorative pavement treatment be extended across the driveway opening L-k the planter area which frames the courtyard area. 4 That the planter areas proposed adjacent :o the unit pavement area be reduced in size to provide additional parking. These planter areas should still maintain a symmetry with the proposed unit paver area. 70 Nnrlh Fnrt titreet (amphell. C.Mnrnu 95Mta 1471 ir1 408 666 214o t.t 408 379 757? rnn 408 866 2790 Mr. Jack Bono Re: Pruneyard Page 2 5. That the loading areas be designated as limited time parking and striped with parking spaces. 6. That a planter area be provided along the northerly property line. 7. That you investigate the future installation of sidewalks along E. Campbell Avenue and the impact on the proposed parking layout. 8. That the Creek Trail access area at the northwest corner of the site be better defined. 9. That the tree sizes be increased from 15 gallon to 24-inch box. 10. That adjustments be made in some of the puking areas to reduce excessive backup distance. If you should have any question regarding the above items or the review process, please do not hesitate to contact the undersigned at (408) 866-2144. Sincerely, Tim J. Haley Associate Planner cc Steve Piasecki, Community Development Director Darryl M. Jones, Senior Planner Lww or"o► DEMPBTER, IcDONALD. BELIONANN & RAINERI AN AGR ATION OF AT ORN.YR ) LLLLLL (1'►pITINO ION CtMTtI, L„Nc..l'nS "'P..O. CAW►ORNIA M1p1♦ ✓ / ♦ - � I Feb nary 19, 1992 David Estes, Esq. O'Melveny L Myers Embarcadero Center West 275 Battery Street San Francisco, CA 94111-3305 Re: Pruneyard subdivision Dear Mr. Estes: J. wo— - -RECEIVED FE91 1 1992 CITY OE CAMPBEII PLANNING DEPT. This letter will confirm our telephone conversation on February 7, 1992, in which you advised me that the pending foreclosure action has been delayed, and that a case manag'>ment conference is now scheduled for August 11, 1992. In the meantime, I understand that yy�ou will be co�cting me within the next few weeks to discuss ne pofenF1al subdivision of the property. If your understanding of our conversation differs from mine, please let me know as soon as possible. Otherwise, I look forward to discussing this matter with you further in the near future. Sincerely, WILLIAM R. SELIGM cc: Steve Piasechi Don Wimberly Bill Helms Tara Adams ,:'ae No. 0� Development Application Pla w" Dasrt,me t 70 Neraa Fire She, Camel. C&hhrn s9MM (40) ascaro AAA 288-04-1..23 DATEFKM 12/2/94 MAW- C-2'S C$�rlAtF Commercial PRCIMUY ACMIM _ 875 South Bascom Avenue, Campbell TYPEOFAPPLICATkIC14M Use Permit; Sice and Architectural Review APPLiANC PruneYard Associates, ADCREr4 1999 S. Bascom Ave., Suite 200 TELEpHCNEf1081371-4700 CQY/SfATE Camitball, G1 M. 95008 °LiIY(7A7VF3L PruneYard Associates, ..P. A--CRE!& 1999 S. Bascom Avenue, Suite 200 TEL3jjC<4@ (08) 371-4700 =Y/St"ATE Campbell, CA =a 95008 Attach a separate shoe[ ;isnng the names and addre3ses of others you wish to mczive copio of staff repot and agenda, AFFMA ViT/SIGI.ATURE(S): The underagned ptmmntsl, having an interest in the aboverieadbed pmoetty, hereby make this application in accordance with the provisions of the Campbell Mume.pal Codes and, hereby certify that the :reformation green herein is true and come to the lest of my/our knowledge and belief Applicant and Property Owner: PruneYard Associates, L.P. By: l/Wq/l2�2/�am W�ilso/n✓: Associates, as2.1" ag ng Agent NOTE Staff u teoulfed by Slate [ i tJ t�noe r �0-9 f thdr a Lintitun witftin 30 PP days. Only those apoliotiom which are frond complete will be placed on the Commission Agenda. OFFICE USE ONLY PC MemonS Completeness Letter Sent - PC Action: _ 300 Foot Notices Mawled: CC Mesting, Pros Notice Published: CC ACd= Nonce of Prep/Public Review: Pft Pfid: Notice of Determination: Recept No: Rred 7/31 /92 1 please send copies of staff reports and agendas to Mr. David Word Executive Vice president William Wilson & Associates 2929 Campus Drive, Suite 450 San Mateo, CA 94403 Mr. Christoptar Mea+y Retail Projoa Director William Wilson & Associates 1999 South Bascom Avenue, Suite 200 Campbell, CA 95009 Mr. Donn Logan ELS/Elbasam & Logan Arctutects 2040 Addison Street Berkeley, CA 94704 1 .,LE Na Site & Architectural Review Permit — Sappi--W lwiadi- PURPOSE Tha S" end ArchibeC4anl Revew Area is intended to pr—m ora-ty * ss _hence the character, stabe6ty, sand " - W -T of teighlonbsods and meing districts; to rare the 6"Verai pepon of tha Clays zoning Ordinance and General Pie, sad to assure high quality architectural design and optletoar, aft design thfow' the arcdtecorral It a mcca nmendd that the appliosa oche a eppatmnant with a planner prwr to wtbotntlng an apt 11 1 to dlayss the prdimttrry deep of the prgact. This will help the applicant datermine if the proposal is onswal sa with existing review standaids and oldbrrsa ngoiaae. $jjpg_R(„ : The completed appik tk. in" be filed with the Planning Department along with the epproprree fate and all required data. The staff planner who is on duty will give the application and data a cursory review for orepirerrr. The application cannot be accepted 9 the wbedsal is wax mpMss. Alter the projed has bean assigrod to a planer, it will be reviewed In Sae demand for ent•pisaerresa A Ym at" if the appilortbe is oeeplass or R additional buortmtion is required will be sees to the applicar; Mthin 30 days after mess" of the appbador; Nearly all Site and Architectural Review requests ara required to haw an envirorhmewi asteaeterr to dtandne if it will be rstossery to prepare an Env nortinental Impact Rapcat or a Negative Declaration. OQRlicat'on Review- The Manning Staff, the Site and Archite.turel Review Committee, and the Manning Came asion will consider the following in the meow of Site and Architectural Review appliatias: 1. Traffic silay, lion, ad are circulation; 2. ladaopinV ad 3. Building aed rise lsyoat. Staff R_::ew: The Planning Staff will evaluate the request by coadvvdng act: taves ,g I of the site sad mrdesung the proposal in rdatlen to djwdeg straama Staff wig prep.er a written report for the planning caninssion which will analyze the developotant proposal and provide staff reaeresrndebaes. A copy of this report will be seas to the applicant. Slit and Arch4hmtural Review Committee 6ARO: prior to it* Plaruvng Cmssisrwt vesting your application will be revrwad by SARC The CaeaeYtae revierre the spoked= for we layout and building design and than forwards a rassatodauon to the Plruwng Cmheroce, Pablic Natioc At Ion 10 days prior to the public hearing, property owns within 3w fwt of the s.1 c, property wtu be nodfsed by moil of the hearing. In aAAdi n, a notice of its public hearing will ba pobbslyd in the Campbell Eap— Manning rmRrr�t _..Rat Mwti � The Manning Coanmisron a requited to review sad opprow detailed sir, building, and laadaape plans. Staff will preset an oral report and nuoeseedesfm for the proPa*d Pro0cL 1111111 will be f doted by tes"My hee the appBost ad the by any interested perserr who wy wish to cthaeern on the application. The Please Caotnnidon coy than close the public boon and make s dadsfon approving err eaadYlmrlly approving the .89 denying the request, or postponing the deoaion to a later data. Unless an appeal is filed, the pb mng Cammiseson'a decision is final. Li,ty CkRncil: Site and Architectural Revitvr application+ are not required to go before the City Council, unless the Manning Cometrbn's decision a appealed within ten calendar days. Project Summary INFORMATION TO BE Fl=OUT BY APPUCANT Zoning: C-2-S _ Generat Plan Designation: Commercial Proposed Ulf: Retail, Restaurant, Hotel, FXusting Use: Retail, Restaurant, Hotel. Offices Offices 574,893 s.f. 0.45 Gross Floor Area: Floor Area Ratio: No. of Srories: Multi Net Lot Sire. L ZZL OOOaf Parking Spates Provided: 1,896 L.otCoverage: 335,000 Landscape Coverage: 165,OnO PavefnentCoverage: 770,000 Surrounding Uses: North: R—idantial. Creek Trail South: Residential, Retail Fast: Retail West: _ Freeway, Residential R.ed.711i02 *Please see attached area smeary. Sumrtyry of am" and Pm,,..d uaa Shopping Catty: lW E== awn Retail"Reuauram Area (Sq. Ft.) Parkmg Spaces 255 ,857 857 268,518 (12,661) 1 890 119 1'runeYard Lm: ' Hotel Area (Sq. Ft.) Hotel Room 94,792 64,%2 19,830 Parlang Spaces 168 119 50 168 118 SO rn PneYard Towers: Coe Area (Sq Ft. ) Reuauram Area (Sq. Ft.) 234,244 224,475 9,769 Parking Spats 0 9,769 (9,769) 7�9 815 (%) Total: jRetaiVRestaurant Area (Sq. Ft.) Hotel Area (Sq. Ft.) 255,857 278,287 (22,430) Offi- Area 84,792 64,962 19,830 Total Area Sq. Ft.) (q Pinang Spaces 234.2m 574,893 224,475 567,724 2!W 7,169 1,896 1,823 73 Site & Areiiteduasi Rsws Per 2 SITOreental Applinti— ENVIRONMENTAL INFORMATION Are the following items applicable to the project or its effects? Yes No X 1. Change in existing features of any )ekes, hills, or substantial alteration of ground contours. X 2 Change in scenic views or vistas from existing residential arm or public lands or toads. X 3. Change in pattern, scale or character of the general area surrounding the project. X 4. Significant amounts of solid waste or litter. • X 5. (grange in dust, ash, smoke, fumes or odors in vicinity. X 6. Change in lake, stream or ground water quality or quantity, or alteration of existing drainage patterns. • X 7. Substantial change in existing noise or vibration levels in the vicinity. X B. Proposed development is on a filled site or on a slope of 10 percent or more. X 9. Use of and/or disposal of potentially hazardous materials, such as toxic substances, Aammables or explosives. X 10, Substantial change in the demand for municipal services (police, fire, water, etc). X 11. Substantial increase in the demand for fossil fuel consumption (electricity, oil, natural gat, etc.). X 12 Relationship to larger project or series of projects. as _ 13. Additional traffic generation or parking demand. Discuss below all of the above items checked yes. (Attach additional sheets as necessary.) *Some swunt of noise and dirt will be temporarily generated by constr ction. **As requested by staff a trattic study has been ❑r--rl hy a qualified consultant and is attached to this application. 14. Describe the project site as it exists, include information on topography, soil stability, plants and animals, and any cultural, historical or scenic aspects. Describe any existing structures on the site. q— ..h-1 eh vat 15. Describe surrounding properties, including information on plants and animals, and any cultural, historical or scenic aspects. Indicate the intensity of land use and the scale of development (height, frontage, setbacks, etc.) See attached sheet. F,at. 7/1/9' 14. The PruneYard occupies the area between Highway 17 and Bascom Avenue on the north side of Campbell Avenue. The property is primarily flat and fully developed The property includes two office towers sited on the western third of the property, and a hotel and shopping center on the balance of the land The buildings are surrounded by surface parking lots. 15 The west side of the PruneYard abuts Highway, 17 To the north a row of two story apartment buildings seperates the PruneYard from a concentration of office and large format retail buildings. The east side of the property is bounded by Bascom Avenue; the opposite side of the street is lined by retail buildings. The south side of the property is bounded by Campbell Avenue; the opposite side of the street is fined by retail buildings An access point to the Los Gatos Creek Trail is located at the northwest corner of the Property. Sift b ArdfihMUM Rteite peeff 3 PROJECT SLIAMARY 788 pq 13. 6 20,21,22,23,11,1 , IQLSitt: r z a n n p Gross sq. ft. (Proptrty to ce to line Of m1m) 1 .270.000 Net sq. ft. Utilization: Sq. It Percent % Building Coverage ((nduye 0WAIrm pormm) 335,000 z6s IandscapeCoverage 165,000 13% Paving Coverage 770,000 61% Floor Area Pi : Total building sq. ft. divided by net lot size AdIi=t Land Usa ]in T.4111IIi North residential. creek trai L-EzD P-F South residential, retail P-D. C-1-S Gist C-2-S West freeway, residential P-D Parkin: Standard Compac Handicap TOTAL 1,896 g taurant and Assembly Uses Seating Count see attached sheet Residential Pmiects Unit Type A B C Living Area not applicable Garage Area Total Area _ No. of Bedrooms Number of Units Rved 8i30/93 118,19, 12,14 i Project Suttunary Addendum Restaurant and Asssnbly uses. Area Indoor Patio ljpit T4DiDI us (Sq. Ft_) awl 5=1 100 United Artists Movie Theater 20,916 1,480 105 Boswews Bar 2,048 110 112 Campbell Coffee Restaurant 1,785 40 60 114 Ging Jee Restaurant 3,703 120 134 Vacant Restaurant' 2,064 152 Mrs Field's Restaurant 864 12 180 Guido's Restaurant 6,100 219 46 440 Le Boulanger Aestaurant ' 4,025 120 525/530 Vacant Restaurant 1,152 570/2570 El Burro Restaurant 11,828 500 100 740 Booksellers Restaurant' 3,755 2400 Martha's Restaurant 7,860 234 2500 Kyoto Palace Restaurant 7,520 270 2550 Vacant Restaurant 4,554 Pad Vacant Restaurant' 8.300 86,474 ' Propoosed new restaurant use. 4 Attachment C West Valky Swdhttion District 4 AcAnawfedgemntf NOTICE TO APPLICANTS REOARDINZ EFFECT OF WASTE WATER TREATMENT CAPACTIY ON LAND DEVELOPMENT APPROVALS PURSUANT TO DEVELOPMENT OF APN: Please take notice that no vested tight to a building permit shall accrue as the result of the granting of any land development approvals and applications. Pursuant to the adoption of Ordinance 9.W by West Valley Sanitation District 4, the agency providing the sbove dcaibed parcel(s) with sewer service, if the District's Manager and Engineer nukes a determinatiotr that the issuance of a sewer connection permit to a building, or proposed building, on the above described property, will, Ln his opinion, cause the District to exceed its ability to treat adequately the waste water that would result from the issuance of such connection permit, then said permit may not be issued, and, hence, no building pern-u' may be issued by this agency. If the sewer connection permit is issued, it may contain : tantive conditions designed to decrease the wart_ water associated with any land use approval. By Sig -ring below, the applicant acknowledges, at the time of application, that he/she fully understands the above. 1875 South Bascom Avenue, Campbell, CA AddreOafPDsct ,avelo mmAPrunesscietetP. By Will' Wilson 6 Associates as Managing Agent _By Applicants Signatu Date Distribution Original to: West Valley Sanitation District No. 4 100 Fast Sunnyoaks Avenue, Campbell, CA 95008 Copies to: File Applicant R-d. "/ 1, 92 Attachment D Planning Commission Contribution Disclosure Form INFORMATION SHEET This forma must be completed by applicants for, or persons who are the subject of, any proceeding involving a license, permit, or other entitlement for use pending before the Planning Commission. imcortant Notice: Basic Provisions of the Government Code Section 84308 1. U you are an applicant for, or the subject of, any proceedings involving a L mse, permit, or other entitLstmt for use, you are prohibited from malmng a campaign contnibution of 5250 or more to any eomum ,&%ormer, his or her alternate, or any candidate for such position. This prohibition begins on the date your application is filed or the proceeding is otherwise initiated, and the prohibition ends thin months after a final decision is tendered by the Planning Commission. In addition, no commissioner, alternate, or candidate may solicit or accept a campaign contribution of SM or more from you during this period. These prohibitions also apply to your agents, and, if you are a closely held corporation to your maprity shareholder as well. iI. You must tale the attached disclosure farm and disclose whether you or your agent(s) have in the aggregate contributed 5250 or mine to any commission, his or her alternate, or any candidate for the position during the 12-month period preceding the tiling of the application or the initiation of the proceeding. fll. U you or your agent have made a contribution to my commissioner, alternate, or candidate during the 12 months preceding the decision on the applicancn or proceeding, that commissioner must disqualify himself or herself from the decision. However, disqualification is not required if the commissioner, alternate, or candidate mums the campaign contribution within 30 days of laming abort both the contribution and the proceedings. This form should be completed and filled with your application or with the fist written document you file or submitted after the proceeding cmmmoven. 1. A proceeding involving 'a license, permit, or other entitleme..It for use' includes all Lusiness, professional, trade and Lind use licennses and permits, and all other entitlements for use, including all entitlements for land use, all contracts (other than competitively bid, labor or personal employment contracts) and all franchises. 2. Your 'agent' is someone who represents you in connoction with a proceeding involving a license, permit or other entitlement for use. U an individual acting as an agent is also acting in his or he capacity as an employee or member of a law, arclimctura), engineering, consulting firm or similar business entity, both the business entity and the individual are 'agens.' 3. To det-n ine whether a campaign contribution of 5250 or more has been made by you, campaign contributions made by you within the preceding 12 months must be aggregated with those made by your agent within the preceding 12 months or the period of the agencv, whichever is shorter. Campaign contributions made to different commsaione s/councUn en.bers, their alternates, or candidates are not aggregated. This notice summarizes the mapr requirements of Goverment Code Section 84308 of the Political Reform Act and 2 Cal. Adm. Code Section 18438-184388. For more information, contact the Campbell City Attorney at (408) 866- 2125, or lice Fair Political Practices Commission, 428 1 Street. Suite 800, Sacramento, CA 95814, (916) 322-5901. Prepared by: legal Division, Fair Political Practice Commission, May 1986 Rvid.7/1/92 Af odomWD PAV2 ContrA ntfon Dudwm Form 0 TO BE FILLED OUT BY APPLICANT I. 1XI IF CONTRIBUTIONS IOTAL.ING 5250 HAVE NOT BEEN MADE. CHECK HERE AND SIGN BELOW IN SECTION M. 11. TO BE COMPLE1ED ONLY IF CONTRIBUTIONS TOTALING $250 OR MOR HAVE BEEN MADE NAME: ADDRESS: ZIP. TELEPHONE NO: UST COMMISSION MEMBER(S) TO WHOM YOU AND/OR YOUR AGENT MADE CAMPAIGN CONTRIBUTIONS TOTALING $250 OR MORE. AND THE DATES OF THOSE CONTRIBUTIONS. NAME CONTRIBUTOR: (d other than yaasdD DATE (S): AMOUNT (s): NAME CONTRIBUTOR: (if other than yotasdn DATE (5): AMOUNT IS): NAME CONTRIBUTOR: (if other dw. yutrsew DATE (S): AMOUNT (S): 111. SIGNATURE Prun! Associates, L.P. By W' laM Wil Managing Agent ^ } ^' DATE I" !x9ndtum of Appi1 Agent Rvd.7/1 /91 file No. Development �-'T Application �1OaS Daenaart 70 Nardi Fiat Strut. campaall• GtiJorwa 43GOf NQf) r IIeO Ai'IJ& 288-04-1..23 DATEFJZ 12/2/94 2A'HINC C-2-S GB,0tALPLAX Commercial PRCI RfYACCRI : 1875 South Bascom Avenue Campbell TJ'PEOFAPPUCATJeM Pse Permit: Site and Architectural Review APPLICANT, PruneYard Associates, L.P. ADCPJM 1999 S. Bascom Ave., Suite 200 'aEPHCNEt'1081371-4700 C(IY/STATE Abell, CA 95008 24' •'-ROPERIYOIATJER PruneYard Associates, L.P. AD(RJM 1999 S_Bas_om Avenue, Suite 200 7ELEPIJONE (08)371-4700 CRY/SPATE _ Campbell• CA �' 95008 Attach a separate sheet luting the names ::.i .Qotesses agendas. o(others you wish to reserve Copies of staff reports and AFFIDAVIT/SIGNATURE(S): The undersigned person(s), having an inttscst in the above -described property, hereby matte this application in accordance with the provisions of the Campbell MuniapaI Code , belief knowledge hereby oertt[y that the information given herein is true and correct to the bat of my/our Imowledge and • Applicant and Property Owner: PruneYard Associates, L.P. BY am Wilson & Associ as Ma aging Agent By. x NOTE: Staff is requ,.ed by State Law to notify pp�of ,nc tort( letcAess of their applications within 30 days. Only those applicanons which are found complete will be pieced on the Planning Commission Agenda. OFFICE USE ONLY PC Meeting Comple-entss Letter Sent: PC Action: 300 Foot Notices Mailed: _ CC Meetittg: _ Press Notice Published: N CC Action:Notice of Pmp/^ublic Review: Fee Pam: Notice of Determination: Receipt No: _ Rvd. 7/31 /92 Please send copies of staff reports and agendas to Mr. David Word Executive Vice President W"dham Wilson & Associates 2929 Campus Drive, Suite 450 San Mateo, CA 94403 Mr. Christopher Mea-iy Retail Project Director William Wdwn & Associates 1999 South Bascom Av nue, Suite 200 Campbell, CA 95008 Mr Donn Logan ELS/Elbasani & Logan Arci;itects 2040 Addison Street Berkeley, CA 94704 Use Permit Sup#ementW AWortion PURPOSE A Um Permit allows for spacial eondder stion of certain specified uses which may be compatible with en arcs depending on the specifics of the particular case The Use Permit procar is designed to provide the Oty sufficient flexibility to determine whether a specific lend use on a earoln else will be compatible with its environs end the CW aral Plan. PROCESS Praiect Consideration i Pre-Apylication Review: In reviewing a use permit application, the staff and Planning Commission will evaluate such alma as building placement and size, traffic generation, roue, hours of operation, adequacy of parking, circulation, drop-off facilities and overall compatibility of use with adpirung properties. It is rerommendd that the applicant submit a prmliminary proposal to the Planrung Department prior to submission of the formal apphotio,. This will allow, the Piarwng soft to review the request and inform the applicant of possible concerns related to the proposal. Kling of AQplication: The applicant should submit a completed application, filing fee. a written soteme,t and oche required information to the Planning Departmare A planner will be assigned to review the material to make sure all the required information is provided. The applicant will be notified within 30 days es to whether the application w that additional Information is required. Environmental Review: Typically, use permits arc categorically exernpt from the envvonmenol review proms. Site and Architectural Review Committee (SARO: Use permit applications involving exterior modifications require review by SARC. The Committee reviews the application fT F 14 tm site layout and building design and then forwards a recommmd.tlon to the Planning Commissicsc Staff Review: The Planning staff will review the application and conduct a ahe investigation so deersedre the relationship of the rnquat with the Chy'a Gsere Plan, and to analyze land uxA traffic, she plat, and other impacts or conaro of the prof pn*& A- riesse eaff report well be prepared for the Planning Comardsocn (PC) that includes staff s mwourrdahwa and o daaiption of tlw ,I MIC I M t proposal. A ropy of this tepat will be sera to the applicant during the week prior to the PC hearing on the application. Copies are else available to the public Public Notice, AB use permit applications require a public hearlz-4g, which is held during the Planning Commission meeting. At IWO ton days prior to the meeting, property owners within 300 fee of the site will be notified by mall of tine public hearing and a notice will be published in the Campbell Exp ees. The gaff will presser . an oral report and ramvmendation for your application. This presentation will be followed by testimony from the applicant and then by my i niarated persons who may wish to comment on the application. The Planting Commission may than clear the public hearing and make a decision approving or caditionally app-vu%g the request, denying the request, or poatpeting the decision to a lase dow Unless m appal is filed, the Planning Commission's decision will become final unless ratification is required by the City Council. Aocal to City Council Use Permits do not go to the City Council unless the Planning Commuston's detsion is appealed within ten halendar days. Project Summary INFORMATION TO BE FILLED O(fr By APPLICANT Zoning: C-2-S General Plan Designation: Commercial Proposed Use: Retail, Restaurant, Hotel ExiatingUse: Retail, Restaurant, Hotel, Office*573,893 s.f. OTT —ICE — Gross Grass Floor Area: Floor Area Ratio: n d 1, Net Lot Size: _ 1, 2 7 0, 0 0 0 s. f. Landsmpe Coverage: 16 5, 0 0 0 s. f Surrounding Uses: North: Residential, Creek trail: aPs;dential, Retail Fast: Retail West Freeway, Residential Parking Spaces: 1,896 Seating Count s find ! Required pen idad Roeserant and Assn. *Please see attached area summary Suoplementary AnpliMion Addendum Summary of existing and proposed uses PruneYrrd Shopping Center ProRQscd Existing Chamr Retail/Restaurant Area (So Ft.) 255,857 268,518 (12,661) Parking Spaces 1,009 890 119 PruneYard Inn: Hotel Area (Sq Ft) 84,792 64,962 19,930 Hotel Room 168 118 50 Parking Spaces 168 118 50 PruneYard Towers Office Area (Sq.Ft) 234,244 224,475 9,769 Restaurant Area (Sq Ft) 0 9,769 (9,769) Parking Spaces 719 815 (96) Total. RetaiVRestaurant Area (Sq Ft) 255,857 278,287 (22,430) Hotel Area (Sq, Ft J 84.792 64,962 19,830 Office Area (Sq. Ft) 234.2 224,475 9.769 Total Area (Sq,Ft) 574,893 567,724 7,169 Parking Spaces 1,896 1,823 73 Projea Summary Addendum Restaurant and Assembly uses. Area Indoor Patio I1Di1 Tenant UH (SJL.FL) a= Ssatt 100 United lutists Movie Theater 20,916 1,480 105 Boswell's Bar 2,048 110 112 Campbell Coffee Restaurant 1,785 40 60 114 Ging ]ee Restaurant 3,703 120 134 Vacant Restaurant • 2,064 152 Mrs Field's Restaurant 864 12 180 Guido's Restaurant 6,100 213 46 440 Le Boulanger Restaurant ' 4,025 120 525/530 Vacant Restaurant • 1,152 570/2570 El Bum Restaurant 11,828 500 100 740 Booksellers Restaurant • 3,755 2400 Martha's Restaurant 7,860 234 2500 Kyoto Palace Restaurant 7,520 270 2550 Vacant Restaurant 4,554 j Pad Vacant Restaurant ` 8.300 86,474 • Propoosed new restaurant use f use hreeU Ayr1 11 PROEECi' SM AA Y This information must be provided either on the title sheet or site plan, in addition to the supplemental application form. If you would like, you may xerox this worksheet on the site plan or title sheet. PROJECT SUMMARY AA== Farrel Number (APM: 2 as — n c 1 _ _ 2 3 Lot ${7& 1,386,00 0 Gross sq. ft. (Property m amter line of ShWO 1,270,000 Netsq.ft. Utilizatior Sq. ft Percent % Building Coverage 335,000 2 6% (indude andkve portioru) Landscape Coverage 165,000 13 % Paving Coverage 7 7 0. o D o 61 % Floor Area Ratio: Total building sq. it, divided by net lot size 0.45 Building Area: Gross Floor Area 574 , 893 Number of Floors Multi Seating Capacity (if epph.bk) cea ,,tf—hed sheet Adjacent Land UME. TASI u North residential, creex trail P-D, P-F South residential, retail P-D, C-1-S Fast retail C-2-S West freeway, residential P-D Standard Compact Handicap TOTAL 1,896 Awd 10/12/94 Proiect Summary Addendum Rnytauraw and Assembly uses: Area Indoor Patio Ulm is= UK (Sq. Ft-) 5=1 S= 100 United Artists Movie Theca 20,916 1,480 105 80swells Bar 1_048 110 112 Campbell Coffee Restaurant 1,785 40 60 114 Ging Jee Restaurant 3,703 120 134 Vacant Restaurant - 2-064 152 Mrs Field's Restaurant 864 12 180 Guido's Restaurant 6,100 218 46 440 Le Boulanger Restaurant ' 4,025 120 525/530 Vacant Restaurant ' 1,152 570/2570 El Burro Restaurant 11,828 500 100 740 Booksellers Restaurant ' 3,755 2400 Martha's Restaurant 7,960 234 2500 Kyoto Palace Restaurant 7,520 270 2550 Vacant Restaurant 4,554 Pad Vacant Restaurant ' LM 86,474 • Propoosed new restaurant use. AfbdmmW D Pqe 2 Cawtrbuhm Dudwurr Form TO BE FILM OUT BY APPLICANT 1. lx I IF CONTRIBUTIONS TOTALING VW HAVE NOT BEEN MADE, CHECK HERE, AND SIGN BELOW IN SECTION M. 11. TO BE COMPLETED ONLY IF CONTRIBUTIONS TOTALING S250 OR MORE HAVE BEEN MADE NAME: ADDRESS: 7u'. TELEPHONE NO. LIST COMMISSION MEMBER(S) TO WHOM YOU AND/OR YOUR AGENT MADE CAMPAIGN CONTRIBUTIONS TOTALING $250 OR MORE, AND THE DATES OF THOSE CONTRIBUTIONS. NAME CONTRIBUTOR: (if other Hun yourmW DATE (S): AMOUNT (S): NAME -- CONTRIBUTOR: (if other than yourwW DATE (S): AMOUNT (S): NAME CONTRIBUTOR: (if other than yourwW DATE (S): AMOUNT (S): 111. SIGNATURE Pruneyard Associates, L.P. By William son & Associates Agent By: • � � \ 'a/Al UAL L/ DATE: SignammcdApplioM/ Agertt Rvd.7/1/92 IN 114� f FI E P R ll N F Y A R l) ^' .o. December 2. 1904 By Hand Planning Department E C E'v E City of Campbell I)EC L' .:; 1994 70 North First Street Campbell, CA 95008 II r Q, INMYatll Attention: Darryl Jones. Senior Planner PLANNING DEPT Dear Darryl: Enclosed please find: • Use Permit Application for the renovation of the PruneYard. • Site and Architectural Review Application for the renovation of the PruneYard. • 7 full six sets of our plans for the renovation of the PruneYard. • 15 reduced sets of the plans and elevations. • 2 copies of the Traffic Study on the proposed renovation prepared by Brian Kangas Foulk. • Owner's Title Insurance Policy. • Receipt evidencing payment of the following fees: Ilse Permit: Planning Department s1,550 Site and Architectural Review: Planning Department $2,150 Fire Department sl50 W,: understand that our project will be on the agenda of the December 29. 1994 meeting of the Site and Architectural Review Committee of the Planning Commission. Please let us know if we can provide you with any additional information in advance of that meeting. We very much appreciate the time you and Steve have taken to review our plans in advance of this submission. We look forward to continuing to work with you to advance our mutual goal of reenergizing the PruneYard. Yours truly, Christopher-Mcany 1 encl. To: City creek > Please collect am.. receipt for the following monies. ITEM PlamtW Addns_ i Sa7S! M _ I ✓tl nLa.m AMourrr _ I. A� 1 a acres - Goal Nan Amendment 5 $4,425 1 a .le Change 4A25 Planned Development Permit 025 EBt ^-view 4A25 B . 0.1 acre General Plan Amendment 3,225 -- ZoneChange =5 Planned Development Permit 3= EIR Review 3,225 _. 11. Minor, A. Subdivision Map (S+ lots) 3=5 Site and ArcMtectural 10+ K S.F. Z150 Tentative Parcel Map (44.ots) 2,150 B. Site and Architectural 0.10 K S.., 11W Variance (Non-residential) 1350 Text Amedmens Permit I-W 1j50-" Use Ill. Miscen.n_ A. Variance (Residential) %0 Modifications of Approval %0 Modification PD Peromit %0 Reinstatements %0 Revised Development Schedule %0 Extensions of Time 960 B. Lot Une Ad ntme nts 500 Site and Architectural (Res-) tech House) 120 Signs (Ea,:h Sign) Im Fence Excepbon 120 —.— Promown al Events 120 C. Appeals 0 Downtown Develop.nent Permit 0 Historic Preservation Zone, Use Permit, HP Permit 0 IV. Q;.UL Maps 6z General Plan Text 625 Zoning ordfrenoe n Copies (per page) -- Refunlable Deposit - Account 3521 Pie Department Review - Account 013M.3322 Architectural Approval 50 Project Plan Review M I 1 -L' Subdivision 100+ 10 per lot/unit 13 714, f3i~3 IS R t C R 1 V E D For city Clerk only Raadp .�1�� , AmmtPsid: DEC 0 51044 Received by r>� CITY CLERK'S OFFICE Exception for M.pr Project: It is anticipated that the application processing costs of selected major pro)ects will significantly exceed the above fees. In these cases, the Community Development Director may collect a deposit and charge actual time spent to process the application based upon hourly rates. Note Adopted by Resolution No. 0324 by City Council, City of Campbell, 6/ 11 /92. THE PRUNEYARD AND TOWERS PARKING * 1990 City of Campbell Zoning Ordinance No. Space No. Category Allowable Sq. Ft. Factor or Seats Allowable Parkin_ Towers - 1 540.6 Towers - 2 508.5 Total Towers 1049.1 The PruneYard Shopping Center 2156.8 Total Towers 6 Shopping Center required per 3205.9 1990 code Total physical count of parking PruneYard 6 Towers 1. PruneYard Shopping Center 1017.0 2. PruneYard Towers I S II 834.0 Total Towers S Shopping Center 1851.0 Short Fall of required parking <1355> Sequence Parking Credits 8:00 AM - 6:00 PM omit bars 6 theater 716 cred 6:00 AM - 9:00 PM Omit offices 348 cred 9:0o PM - 2:00 AM omit all facilities except bars, theater and PruneYard Inn L956 cred Short Fall w/sequence Parking 8:00 AM - 6:00 PM <639> t:00 PM - 9:00 PM <407> 9:00 PM - 2:00 AM None THE PRUHEY ARD TOWERS Space Allowable Allowable Sq. Ft. No. No. Cateaory Factor or Seats Parkin Towers - I 1. 1st Floor 1/225 S.F. 4554 20.2 2. 2nd a960 39.8 3. 3rd 39.8 4. 4th 39.8 5. 5th 39.8 6. 6th 39.8 7. 7th 39.8 8. 8th " 8960 39.8 9. 9th " 4570 20.3 10. 10th " 20.3 11. llth " 20.3 12. 12th 20.3 13. 14th 20.3 IA. 15th 20.3 15. 16th 4570 20.3 16. 17th Sebastian's 1/3 seats 114 38.0 17. 18th Club Jenine's Lou ge 185 61.7 I 540.6 Towers - II 1. 1st Floor 1/225 S.F. 2545 11.3 2. 1st Floor Bank of the West 1/200 S.F. 5668 28.3 3. 2nd Floor 1/225 S.F. 11726 52.1 4. 3rd " 52.1 5. 4th " " 52.1 6. 5th 52.1 7. 6th " " 52.1 B. 7th 52.1 9. 7th 52.1 10. 9th " 52.1 loth L1726 52.1 308-7� THE PRUNSYARD SHOPPING CENTER, CON-T. Space Allowable Sq. Ft. No. N3. Category Factor or Seats Allowable Parkin Shoes 50. 600 Bonsall's Shoes 1/200 S.E. 4488 22.4 51. 420 Oshman's Sporting Goods -- -- 52. 400 Patrick James -- -- Sporting Goods & Apparel 53. 420 Oshman's Sporting Goods 1/200 S.F. 10499 52.5 54. 150 The Sports Fan 1/200 S.F. 2601 13.0 Vacant 55. 116 1/200 S.F. 2152 10.8 56. 118 1845 9.2 57. 155 8664 43.3 58. 210 3234 16.2 59. 300 2601 13.0 60. 360 1249 6.2 61. 440 3990 20.0 62. 650 3840 19.2 63. 700 3600 18.0 64. 730 2184 10.9 65. 735 21,186 14.9 66. 750 800 4.0 67. 760 3748 18.1 68. 765 2551 12.8 69. 2750 13120 65.6 70. 2400 1/3 seats 280 93.3 71.. 2420 1/200 S.F. 2304 11.5 72. 2430 3560 17.9 2156.E THE PRUNEYARD SHOPPING CENTER CON'T. Space Allowable Sq. Ft. Allowable No. No. Category Factor or Seats Parkin Apparel 22. 134 Cecilia's 1/200 S.F. 2065 10.3 23. 560 For Your Eyes Only 1074 5.4 24. 400 Patrick James " 7373 36.9 25. 124 Trudy's " 4320 21.6 26. 370 Trudy's Brides 27. 370 Trudy's Tuxedo Junctici 5034 25.2 28. 165 Vogue Alley 1785 8.9 Books, Cards S Gifts 29. 138 Banyan II 1/200 S.F. 1083 5.4 30. 740 The Booksellers 3755 18.8 31. 136 California Collectors 3738 18.7 32. 120 Card Carousel 2935 14.7 33. 530 Suds 'N Satin 560 2.8 Theaters, Lounges G Ba s 34. 105 Boswell's Pub 1/3 seats 125 41.7 35. 2400 Martha's Vineyard Lounge 75 25.0 36. 2500 Nijo Castle Lounge 50 16.7 37. 100 United Artists Theaters 1/4 seats 1565 479.1 + Seat. A. over 40 Financial 38. 200 Bank of America 1/200 S.F. 10132 50.0 Towers -II Bank of the west " -- -- 39. 500 Wells Fargo Bank 7140 350 Specialty Shops S Services 40. 235 Ava's wig Fashions 1/200 S.F. 1058 5.3 41. 520 Classy Nails 578 2.9 Towers -I Four Star Travel " -- 42. 470 Jardin De Parfum 512 2.6 43. 148 Men's Room 1248 6.2 44. 160 Movies To Go 1020 5.1 45. 540 Photo Master 1170 5.9 46. 110 Dr. Fred Slater, Optometrist 1632 8.2 47. 530 Suds 'N Satin -- -- 48. 225 Tan City 1194 6.0 49. 162 Unique Eyewear 81`, 4.1 THE PRUNEYARD SHOPPING CENTER Space Allowable Sq. Ft. Allowable No. No. Cateonry Fartnr Grocery 1. 510 Food Villa 1/200 S.F. 27469 137.3 Home Furnishings 6 Accessories 2. 220 Barbeques Galore 1/200 S.F. -- -- 3. 136 California Collectors -- -•- 4. 132 Chabot Galleries 2448 12.2 5. 515 Compliments 29e8 14.9 6. 220 Pool, Patio L Things 9735 48.7 7. 230 Rockwood " Jewelry 8. 525 Gabi Jewelers 1/200 S.F. 578 2.9 9. 333 Proctor 1/200 S.F. 1785 8) Lodging 10. 775 PruneYard Inn 118 rooms 138 138 + Empl. Restaurants 6 Cafe 11. 112 Campbell Coffee Roastin7 1/3 seats 50 16.7 12. 180 The Cookbook 175 58.3 13. 570 El Burro 460 153.3 14. 2550 The Garret 250 83.3 15. 190 Giardino Cafe 50 16.7 16. 114 Ging Jee 175 583 17. 2440 Martha's Vineyard 13'� 45.0 18. 152 Mrs. Field's Cookies 25 8.3 19. 2500 Restaurant Nijo Castle 250 83.3 Tower-1 Sebastian's -- -- 20. 535 Sweet Connection 25 8.3 21. 119 Swensen's Ice Cream Parlor 50 16.7 RESOLUTICN NO:a CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF CAMPBELL COUNTY OF SANTA CLARA, STATE OF CALIFORNIA AHEkEAS, the Planning Commission of the City of Campbell, County of Santa Clara, State of California, did in regular meet- ing assemblea on the 21st day of.lm =3p 1954, after having followed all of the procedures specified by law, recommend to the City Council of the City of Campbell, State of California, by Resolution No. 5 of said Planning Commission a cer*sin raster plan entitled •Tentative Master Plan of Streets and H-snways for the City of Campbell, County of Santa Clara, State of California,* and, WHEREAS, said Master Plan of Streets and Highways shows general locations, widths of rights-o;-way, and recommends a comprehen- sive system of freeways, major thoroughfares, roads and streets and other traffic ways, all in accordance with Section 65466 of the Government Code of the State of California, and- _ 1 WHEREAS, on the e'lst day of January, 1954 the said Planning Commission of the City OA Campbell did in accordance with Section 65507 of the Government Code of California certify to the legis- lative body of the City of Campbell, said Master Plan of Streets and Highways, a.;d VHE id did on the 2 nd dayeofaMarcht1954,,ncil afterfthe givinglty morefCambel thanptenl days notice in a newspaper of general circulation, the Campbell Press, published in the said city, hold a public hearing in ac- cordance with Section 65509 of the Government Code of the State Of California, and WHEnhAS, the City Council of the City of Campbell, after holding and closing said public hearing, did refer the said Master Plan of Streets and Highways back to the City Planning Commission of the City of Campbell for a further study and report, Said report to be made after a comprehensive traffic survey had been taken in said City, and the results of same reported on to the said City Council, and WREekAS,mmon the 4th day of November I954, the said City Planning Commission cf the City of Campbell eid adopt Resolution No. 47 of said Planning Commissioh, Earth that the City Planning Cwhich said Resolution seta ommission has given further study to the said Master Plan of Streets and Highways, and has considered the sane with respect to the results of the comprehensive traffic survey which has been made in the said City of Campbell, and WHEh'EAS, the laid Resolution No Commission recommends to the City 47 of the City Planning Cout:cil of the City of Campbell that it adopt that certain master plan entitled 'Tentative Master Plan of St:•eets and Highways for the City of Campbell, County of Santa Clara, State of California" in the form in which it was originally transmitted to the City Council and of the City of Campbell -2- 7 WHEREAS, the City Planning Commiss! m of the City of Campbell recommends that said master plan be adopted as the •Easter Plan of Streets and Highways for the City of Campbell, County of Santa Clara, State of California*, now therefore, BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of Campbell, County of Santa Clara State of California, in regular meeting assembled on the 22nd day of November , 1954 that that certain document entitled %aster Plan —O tre3 Bets and Highways for the City of Campbell, County of Santa Clara, State of California,* which is attached hereto be and the same is hereby adopted as a Master Plan of the City of Campbell, County of Santa Clara, State of California, in accordance with Section 65508 of the Government Code of the State of California. 65515 ofBthe TGovernmenttCodeoftthe Statecofd aliforniahat in acorance withSthaton the Mayor and Cicy Clerk of the said City of Caapbell are hereby authorized and directed to endorse the said Master Plan for the purpose of certifying that it has been adopted by the City Council of the City of Campbell. Passed and adopted this 22nd day of November 195/ by the City Council of the City of Campbell, State of California by the following roll call votes AYES: Councilmen, Arends, Chargin, Da=, Rose NOES: Councilmen, Morton ABSENT: Councilmen, Nome Mayor ATTEST: ity le ORDINANCE NO.122 AN ORDINANCE JF THE CI1Y OF CAMPBELL, COUNTY OF SANTA CLARA, STATE OF CALIFORNIA, ADOPTING OFFIOIAL PLAN LINES MAPS FOR CERTAIN ROADS AND STREETS WITHIN SAID CITY, PROHIBITING THE PLACING OF LUILDINGS OR STRUCTURES WITHIN SAID PLAN LINES, PROVIDING FOR UNIFORM, STANDARDS OF PRO- CEDURE FOR VARIANCES AND ADJUSTMENTS TO BE ISSUED BY THE CITY COUNCIL WITH RESPECT TO SUCH PLAN LINES, AND REQUIRING THE RECORDING OF SAID PLAN LINES MAPS, BEING A PORTION OF ARTICLE IX, ENTITLED "PIANNING, ZONING, AND SUBDIVISION REGULATIONS OF CAMPBELL MUNICIPAL CODE" WHEREAS, the City Council of the City of Campbell did on the 22nd day of November, 1.954, by Resolution No. 69- of said Council adopt a Master Plan, of Streets and Highways for the City of Campbell; and, WHEREAS, to accomplish fully the purposes of said Master Plar. there have heretofore been adopted certain Official Plan Lines Maps of the City of Campbell, which saiu maps are as follows, to wit: (1) Official Plan Lines Map of San. Tomas Boulevard, which said map was adopted as a part of Ordinance No, b7 on the 21st day of November, 1955. (2) Official Plan Lines Map of Hamilton Avenue, which said map was adopted as a part of Ordinance No. 96 on the 7th day of May, 1956, and, WHEREAS, the City Council of City of Campbell finds it is for the public interest to establish additional plan lines, and to provide a uniform procedure for the _;rantin; of variances and the mating of aadustments in connection with plan lines established, or as they may to hereafter established, -1- NOW, THEREFORE, the City Council of City of Campbell does ordain as follows: SECTION 20:OO.Plan Lines. There are hereby adopted certain additional Official Plan Lines Maps of the City of Campbell, copies of which are attached hereto and made a part hereof, and which are more particularly described as follows: (a) Official Plan Lines of Campbell Avenue as designated and delineated on the maps attached hereto, marked "Exhibit 'A'", and b this reference made a part hereof. (b) Official Plan Lines of Winchester Ro-d as designated and delineated on the maps attached hereto, marked "Exhibit 'B'", and by this reference made a part hereof. Sr'.MON eQ:C1.No Buildings. No building, structure or other improvements shu_1 hereafter be erected or placed within any official plan line, except that this provision shall not apply to lawns, crops, planting, shrubbery and the like; or such ordinary front yard fences and nonpermanent structures, which in the opinion of tht City Planning Commission, will not defeat the purposes of this ordinance. SECTION 20:p2.Procedure of Variances. The City Council of the City of Campbell, upon the recommendation of the City Planning Commission of said City, shall have power to grant adjustments or variances in the strict application of the provisions of Section 20_01 of this ordinance, in cases in which the strict application of such provisions would result in a serious impairment of substantial property rights, in accordance with the following procedure: -2- 1875 S. BASCOM AVENUE S 94-08/UP 94-19 7 OF 7 CITY OF CAMPBELL PLAIN. 12/99 (1) Application for any adjustment or variance permissible under the provisions of this section shall be made to the City Planning Commission and s,, .1 include an application for a permit to erect or place -1P building, structure or other improvements. A filing fee of $15.00 shall accompany each application. (2) Upon the receipt of such application the City Planning Commission shall hold one public hearing thereon, notice of which shall be given by one publication in a newspaper of general circulation in said City not less than ten days prior to the date of said hearing. At said hearin.: the applicant shall present a statement and adequate evidence, it-, snch form as the City Flannin_ Commission may require, showir._=: (a) That there are special circumstances or conditions attached to the property upon which the proposed building, structure or other improvement is sought to be erected or placed. (b) That the grantinc, of the application is necessary for the preservation and enjoyment of substantial property rights. (3) The City Planning Commission shall make Its decision upon said application and shall report such decision to the City Council within thirty (30) days after the receipt of the application by the Secretary of the City Planning Commission. In recommending the granting of any adjustment or variance under the provibiu„b of tha section the City Planning Commission shall designate such conditions in connection therewith as will, in its opinion, result in the adjustment or variance causing the minimum possible i -3- interference with the purposes of this ordinance and with the ultimate accomplishment of the objectives of the Master Street. and Highway Plan of the City of Campbell. (4) In reporting its decision to the City Council, the Planning Commission shall report its findings with respect thereto and all facts in connection therewith and shall specifically and fully set forth any adjustment or variance which is recommended and the conditions designated in connection therewith. (5) Upon receipt of such report the City Council shall by resolution make its decision upon the aforesaid application. If such decision shall approve the granting of an adjustmeriL or variance the permit applied for shall be issued, subject to the conditions designated by the City Counci; and the City Plannin., Commission. In all cases In which adjustments or variances are granted under the provisions of this section the City Council shall require such evidence an:; guarantees as it may deem necessary that the conditions cesi,Snatea in connection with such adjustment or variance are being ano will be complied with. SECTION 20:03. The City Clerk of the said City of Campbell is hereby instructed to cause to be recorded in the Office of the County Recorder of the County of Santa Clara a full, true and correct copy duly attested, of each and every Official Plan Lines Map adopted as a part of any ordinance of the City of Campbell. PASSED A14D ADOPTED this 28th day of JaAiaL�_, lq� 7, by the City Council of the City of Campbell, California, by the following roll call vote: -4- AYES: Councilmen: y&U4, ld$ Rows Sduidb, Chardn ROES: Councilmen: NoVWn ABSENT: Councilmen: NOW NOT VOTING: Councilmen: ■OM yor /j ATTEST: -5- ORDINANCE NO. of A\ ORDINANCE OF THE CI1Y OF CA". BELL, COUNTY CF SANiA CLARA, SAA1E OF CALIFORNIA, ADCPaING AN OFFICIAL PLAN LINES MAP OF HAMILiON AVENUE, PPO- H1BLiING iRF PLACING OF BUILDINGS OR S1RUCiURF.S ti1aHIN SAIL` PLAN LINES, PRCVIDING FOR VARIANCES AND ADJUSAKENAS iC BE ISSUED BY iHl CITY COUNCIL F1iH RESPECT 10 SUCH PLAN LINES, AND REQUIRING 01L RECUIDING OF SAID PLAN LINES MAP. the City Council of the City of Campbell does ordain as follows: SECTION 1. the City Council of the City of Campbell did on the 22nd day of November, 1954 by Resolution No. 69 of said Council adopt a Master Plan of Streets and Highways for the City of Campbell. SECTION 2. io accomplish fully the purposes of said Master Plan there is hereby adopted an Official Plan Lines Map of Hamilton Avenue, a copy of which is attached hereto and made a part hereof, and designated rxhibit A. SECTION 3. No building, structure or other improvements shall hereafter be erected or placed within the official plan lines of Hamilton Avenua, except that this prevision shall not apply to garden and agricultural crop planting and such ordinary farm and front yard fences and such more or less nonpermanent irrigation structures, as in the opinion of the City planning Commission, will not defeat the purposes of this ordinance. SECTION 4. the City Council of the City of Campbell upon the recommendation of the City Planning Commission of said Cit,, shall have power to grant adjustments or variances in the strict application of the provisions of Section 3 of this ordinance in cases in which the strict application of such provisions would result in a serious impairment of substantial property rights. Application for any adjustment or variance permissible under the provisions of this section shall be made to the City Planning Commission and shall include an application for a permit to erect or place the building, structure or other improvements. A filing fee of $15.00 shall accompany each application. Upon the receipt of any such application the City Planning Commission shall hold one public hearing thereon, notice of which shall be given by one publication in a newspaper of general circula- tion in said City within ten days next preceding the date of said hearing. At said hearing the applicant'shall present a statement and adequate evidence, in such form as the City Planning Commission may require, showing: 1. That there are special circumstances or conditions attached to the property upon which the proposed building, structure or other improvement is sought to be erected e- 2. That the granting of the application is necessary for the preservation and enjoyment of substantial property rights. The Cit^ Planning Commission shall make its decision upon said application and shall report such decision to the City Council within thirty (30) days after the receipt of the applica- tion by the Secretary of the said City Planning Commission. In recommending the granting of any adjustment or variance under the provisions of this Section the City Planning Commission shall designate such conditions in connection therewith as will, in its opinion, result in the adjustment or variance causing the minimum possible interference with the purposes of this ordinance and with the ultimate accomplishment of the oi:jectives of the Master Street and Highway Plan of the City of Campbell. In reporting its decision to the City Council of the City of Campbell the City Planning Commission shall report its findings with respect thereto and all facts in connection therewith and shall specifically and fully set forth any adjustment or variance which is recommended and the conditions designated in connection therewith. Upon receipt of such report the City Council shall by rescltuion make its decision upon the aforesaid application. If such decision shall approve the granting of an adjustment or variance, the permit applied for shall be issued, subject to the conditions designated by the City Planning Commission. In all cases in which adjustments or variances are granted under the provisions of this Section the City Council shall require such evidence and guarantees as it may deem necessary that the conditions designated in connection with such adjustment or variance are being and will be complied with. SECTION 5. the City Clerk of the said City of Campbell is hereby instructed to cause to be recorded in the Office of the Countv Recorder of said County a full. true and correct copv.duly attested of the Official Plan Lines Map of Hamilton Avenue which is attached hereto and designated Lxhibit A. Passed and adopted this th day of iiz 1956. Cal or be the City Council of the City o , amp ell, n a. y the following roll call vote: ANTS: Councilmen: 1'crtcn� hose$ Ciaro<_:. NOES: Councilmen : ABSENT: Councilmen : Arenis ROVE n a or / Aii Si: C i tr ci--- --- J- ORDINANCE NO. 87 AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF CAYP?ELL, COUNTY OF SANTA CLARA, STATE OF CALIFORNLk, ADOPTING AN OFFICIAL PLAN LINES YAP OF SAN TO1'A. BOIIEVARn, PROHIBITING THd FU 7NG OF bs ILDINGS OR STRUCT- IM S 'WITHIN SAID PLAN LINES, Pr.OVIDING FOR VARLU CES AND ADJL'ST- Ka!TS TO PE ISSLM BY THE CITY COUNCIL WITH RESPECT TO SUCH PLAN LINES, AND RE UI?.TNG Til RKORDTN, OF SLID PLI-; LINES YAP. The City Council of the City of Capnell does ordain as follower SECTION 1. The City Council of the City of Campbell did on the 22nd day of November, 195L by Resolution No. 69 of said Council adopt a Master Plan of Streets and Highwa.•s for the City of Cornball. SECTI^N 2. To accomplish fully t" purposes of said Master Plan there As hereby adopted en Official Plan Lines Y - of San Tomas Boulevard, a copy of which is attached hereto and made a part hereof, ai,d designated Exhibit A. SECTION 3. No building, structure or other improvements shall hereafter be erected or placed within the offic_sl plan lines of San Tomas Boulevard, except that this provision shall not apply to rerden and n;ricultural crop plantin.v and such ordinarr; farn and front yard fences and such more or less ncnperanent irrigat- ion structures, as in the opinion of the City Plan.^ing Commission, will net defeat the rurposes of this ordinance. SYCT:O:! L. The City Council of the City of Cirnbell upon the recom- nenCat' on of the Cit•; Fl=_in, Con issicr cf i . Cit;, s':all have power to 1-rort Patust^ents or variances in thA strict ar.'_:c^ cn. of the vrcvisionsof Section ? of Viis or'_'-rince in en.s<s in w'.ich t`ie strict `-licatirr of such rrcvisions would result in a sari^_s im-=ir^ent cf substantial property rights. Aprlicati for ary adjustmcnt or v:-iaroe rerissihle under the prcvis- i^ns -f ti.is section s all he rode to the -ih• F'+nrinr Commission and shall include _n ar•lic-ti-n for a permit to erect or place t1.e buildinei str cture or other :L"ro- ve-: nts. I. fi.inr fee of u15.Oc shwa accompany each sr;licaticna. t}.e rec,�irt cf ray such a: lication the City Planning Commission shall w,,,a cane of lic herrir.- thereon, notice of which s'.cll be given b:' one pub- lication in a newscaper of reneral circulzticn it said City within ten days next pre_edl ti +re :cte of the sri,' hearing. At said hearing the applicant shall present a s•aterent ,nc ade- ,ste evidence, in such form as the Cit, PL:nning Commission may re q,dre, 1. That there are special circumstances or conditions attached to the iroperty upon w11ch the prcrosed building, structure or other improvement is sought to he erected or placed. 2 That the ,ranting of the application is necessary for the preservat- ion and enjoyment of substantial property rirhta. The City Planning Corr`ssion shall make its decision upon said applicat- ion and shall report such decision to the City Council within thirty (30) days after the receirt of the application by the Secretory of the said City Planning Commission. In _eco-zrznding the granting f any adjustment or vrsiance under the provisions of t,.is Sect';,n thy. City Flenning Commission shell designate such conditions in con- necticn therewith Ps will, in its opinion, result in the adjustment or variance ceusirk; t;:c :_ .LL .51.. 'nterfir^nc•_ -- t`.e rl:r,.aes of t is :rdinanoe and with the u:t cute acconpl shment of the objectives of *he Paster Street. and HiZhway Flan cf tt+e ]. f C-.r*ell. In reporting its decision to thr Cit.,, Council of the Citr; of Campbell the City Planning Commission shall report its findinre with respect t^,eretc and Pal facts in connecticn therewith cnd shall specifically and fail;* s.t forth ary adjustment. or variance which is recommended and the conditions desi`rtcd in c:_r-cti:n therewith. ;= receint cf a•)ch report the City Council shall by resolution r:a:e its d>ci icr. -^n the :!,resaid A: licatin. If s+:ch decision sh=11 approve the grant- inz ' -n adjustment or variance, the perr.it aoplieA for shall be issued, subject to ti:e c.nelti-ns designated trr the City Planning Cc—issicn. In .-11 cases in w'.ich adjust-ents cr variances are granted under the provisions of this Section the City Council s'nIl require such evidence ar,d guarantees as it may deem necessary that the conditions desiSnced in connection with such adjustment or variance are being and will be complied with. SECTION 5. The City Clark of the said City of Campbell is hereby in- structed to cause to be recorded in the Office of the County Recorder of said Count;, a full, true and correct copy duly attested, of the Official Plan Lines r'ap of Spn Tomas Boulevard which is attached hereto and designated Exhibit L. Passed and adopted this 21at dayof November 1955, by the City Council of the City of Ca-!bel , California, by the following roll can vote: l:iEZ: Councilmen: Counc,']-en: ....... Ovarcilnen. A 4. � JT:..,. Ccuncilmen: ha;cr RTTFST: ` i city Ciery i August 6, i493 Pettit 6 Martin Brobeck, Phleger & Harrison 101 Califor�iia Strect One Market Plaza 35th Floor Spear Street Tower San Francisco, CA 94111 San Francisco, CA 94105 BY FEDERAL EXPRESS Steve Piasecki Director of Planning City of Campbell 70 North First Street Campbell, CA 945008 Re: Possible Parcel Map Conditions Dear Mr. Piasecki: This letter is sent to you on behalf of the Resolution Trust Corporation as conservator for HomeFed RanK, F.A. and 9t9he Bank of America in response io your letter dated June 23, regarding potential conditions for a parcel map for the Pruneyard Office Center, Pruncyard Shopping Center and Fruneyard Inn. We appreciate the _ity,s suggestions for potential conditions for a parcel map which could be processed pursuant to Section 20.16.030 rather than Section 20.16.035 of the City's subdivision urdinance. We have responded to your invitation to suggest modification of the proposed conditions. One of the purposes of this letter is to transmit the attached, proposed modified conditions for discussion. While a primary intent of the redrafting has been to simplify and clarify the meaning of the conditions, changes have also been made which may reflect substantive differences. A second purpose of this letter is to explain the changes that have been made as a prelude to discussion of specific details with the City. We hope that differences will evaporate after discussion. To the extent possible, we have used your language to avoid confusion. however, we have added numerous defined terms to reduce ambiguity. With regard to your transmittal letter, we would like to clarify a few matters. First, with respect to the position of the RTC, the intent remains to seek a subdivision of its - RECEIVED AUG 10 1993 CITY OF CAMPBELL 11 AMMIMr. n:DT Steve Piasecki August 6, 1993 Page 2 perty into two lots, such that the entire parcel map would covet a three to vision• The RTC Would 2fixe to diac�+as tFief possibility of independent, additional conditions for a subdivision of the hotel from the shopping center relating solely to building code issues. The potential division between the shopping center and the hotel could occur as a second phase of a tentative map which permitted the recordation of multiple final parcel maps. Secondly, we appreciate your reference to the lack of the City's need for a traffic study. For the record, we believe that no such study would be required because the parcel map would not be processed pursuant to Section 20.16.035 of thy_ ordinance. With respect to the parking accumulation study, we believe that no such study is required in any event because such a study was done before the center was developed, and it was on the basis of that study that the parking requirement was imposed and has been observed. Lastly, it has been necessary to make a number of assumptions regarding actual factual conditions in order to propose modifications to the draft conditions. we include in this letter some questions which we believe the City could answer, especially regarding existing traffic Those answers would assist in evaluating the implications of the proposed conditions. The balance of t:,is letter is intended to explain proposed modifications to the conditions. Roadwa _Reservation _Area Obviously, the outline of the reservation area is of critical interest to the property owners. on the assumption that an agreement is reached on the area, some modifications to the language have been suggested for clarity and to eliminate the need for any approval for improvements that would not impede future acquisition and construction for roadway purposes. There does not seem to be any reason for City Council approval, to the extent not otherwise required, for modifications of the parking, driveway and landscaped area. The intent is to prevent construction which would increase the value or otherwise make it more difficult to acquire the area for roadway purposes. plan Line Study The baair proposal is believed to be potentially acceptable. Changes in language have been made in order to Steve Piasecki August 6, 1993 Page 3 achieve greater clarity for both parties. The owners are not yet prepared to agree on the appropriate "trigger amount" of new development. However, 20,000 square feet appears to be an exceedingly small amount to justify the study. We would be interested in knowing the: basis for the city's selection of the trigger amount. It wae, our understanding that the City had previously agreed that the roadway right-of-way width would not exceed 40 feet, allowing for two lanes of traffic and two parking lanes. A greater width of right-of-way is of substantial concern to the owners. It would be useful to know the width of the current Campisi Way roadway. Considerable thought has been given to the many ways in which the trigger might be set off and how costs should be apportioned. We have provided more methods to account for those costs between the property owners. We doubt that these matters will be of great concern to the City. However, we also believe that a mechanism should exist to include other property owners who would benefit from the Campisi way extension or contribute to traffic flows which it is intended to alleviate. Therefore, you will find provisions to that effect 4n the new draft. It is also considered important that the City give due consideration to the impacts of the selected alignment. on the affected properties. The owners cannot agree to waive all right of discussion, protest and attempted persuasion at this time. We see no reason why the City should seek that. Roadway Construction We have provided some clarifications with respect to the scope of the Campisi Way extension project and the costs to be included. Of particular importance to the owners is the inclusion of costs of acquisition of the right--of-way and accounting for any offsets or additional losses occasioned due to the taking of the roadway land. In addition, we have attempted to remove apparent inconsistencies between different portions of the document with respect to the need for construction. Although we do not currently have the benefit of advice from a traffic consultant, it appears that the threshold suggested by the City, a 1% increase in the delay for critical lane movements, would be triggered by virtually any increase in traffic. We doubt that a. 1% increase is within the range of error of accurate measurement under the delay method of Steve Piasecki August 6, 1993 Page 4 analysis. If we understand the current situation at the relevant intersections, the delay referred to by the City woul represent less than a half second average stopped delay per vehicle subject to a critical lane movement. we would appreciate the City's explanat'on for the choice of threshold. In addition, we believe that only those signalized intersectionso near the properties and directly affected by the Campisi Way extension should be included in the analysis. We also suggest that there should be a minimum level of impact, in terms of t e properties' contribution to increased traffic at the relevanttll intersections before any construction is required. As in the case of the Plan Line Study, the owners believe that other property owners who contribute to the traffic problem and/or who shall benefit from the construction of the Campisi Way extension should help pay for it. Perhaps the most obvious other affected properties are those on Campisi Way. A change in use would appear likely on the residential property. We have also provided a simplified method for allocation of costs, being the same as that suggested for the Plan Line Study. We do not believe that an accounting system could be successfully maintained to account for the trip generation factors suggested by the City. Given the approach that we have proposed, there would_be no need Lo utilize_t:he_. concept of capacity rights or their exchange, greatly simplifying matters for both the City and the owner. As a result, there would be no need for development limits based on traffic. we assume that the City of Campbell will determine development limits on the properties based on standard planning and zoning approaches, including consideration of overall traffic impacts. Bascom Avenue signal_ Neither owner is amenable to paying for the cost of f _ installation of the relocated Bascom Avenue traffic signal. This project has been proposed by the City to be carried out and is intended to be carried out without regard to any changes at the Pruneyard. The changes proposed are simply to improve traffic flow along Bascom Avenue to the general benefit of the entire population. In fact, relocation of the signal will require changes in the design and operation of the shopping center parking lots and driveways. Assessment District I The owners of the properties are not prepared at this time to waive all right of protest in the event teat the city Steve Piasecki August 6, 1993 Page 5 n proposes to form an assessment district to construct the Campisi Way extension. Whether the owners will be amenable to the formation of an assessment district will depend upon the inclusion of ther owners and appropriate allocation of c benefits. stitute language has been suggested that would allow the cers to initiate an assessment district and include other owners. This may benefit the City by providinq,'an incentive for initiation by those controlling a substantial share of the values or acreage or front footage involved in the potential assessment district. Parcel Access to Campis_Way Language changes have been made to cover all possibilities and to provide objective standards for the location of the easements in terms of the C:ty's interests. Property Interest Frankly, we cannot understand the purpose of the paragraph suggested under this title. Given tenants and /I a creditors, we do not see how the owners could make the declaration requested. Parking Areas We agree that reciprocal parking easements may be unnecessary. We believe that you have already been presented with data that shows that the parking ratios are adequate for office, retail and hotel uses on separate parcels. The owners may choose to have certain easements, but we do not believe that the City will have a reason to require them. Onsite Utility Easements It is not clear to us that any utility easements are required from the City's viewpoint but, to the extent needed, this should not be an issue. Emergency Access Easemeerts The owners need to understand from the C41y the naturA of the city's concerns before formulating a position on this issue. Ingress and Egress We see no need and do not understand the City's request that the owners agree to allow nonexclusive vehicular Steve Piasecki August 6, 1993 Page 6�J•v,"■' and pedestrian use of froth properties. This is not acceptable for the owners and could seriously undermine the very redevelopment which the City anticipates. If, in fact, it is the City's intention to construct the Campisi way extension, there would be even less reason to request such vehicular and pedestrian access easements. We are unaware of any comparable requirement imposed upon any set of properties. Maintenance �l1 ► J,`- Given the nature of theOp/ropo/sedd divisions, weIsee Jno basis or justification for the request tl.at there be any common landscaping or maintenance obligations. obviously, the owners have agreements for maintenance of the driveways used for joint access. Pedestrian and Bicycle_ Easement_to_the_Los Gatos Creek Trail There is not currently any public access easement from Bascom Avenue or Campbell Avenue to the Los Gatos Creek Trail. We fail to understand the justification for the City's request. As framed, it is not acceptable, implying the need to create and reserve an area which would be in conflict with current vehicular use and parking needs. We suggest that this issue, if to be addressed at all, should be addressed at the time of any subsequent development of the properties of any great magnitude and should be dealt with by access from the Campisi Way ` extension when constructed, particularly since that will be the J shortest means of access. We hope that you will find these explanations and comments useful in reviewing the attached draft. We understand that there is not agreement between the owners and the City. However, we believe that sufficient progress is being made that it is worth attempting to eliminate the potential differences. We look forward to your response and would like to meet with you to discuss these matters. You recognize, of course, that just as the City maintains its legal position, the owners of the properties continue to believe that no parcel map is required to confirm their separate ownerships. Sincerely, Brobeck, Phleger 6 Harrison By: A. Haute Gilmore For Bank dT America vaaa� REVISED DRAFT FOR DISCUSSION PURPOSES ONLY Prunevard_Shopping Center_and_Prunevard Office cenkqr Possible Tentative Map Conditions of Approval for Parcelization of Parcel 1 and Parcel 2 (and Parcel 3) (collectively, "Properties"). 1) Roadway _Reservation _Area The area illustrated on the approved tentative map as the Roadway Reservation Area shall be reserved for an extension of Campisi Way from its present southerly terminus through the adjacent residential development of the Properties to Campbell Avenue (the "Campisi Way Extension") and such area shall be designated as the Roadway Reservation Area on the final parcel map. The Roadway Reservation Area shall remain free and clear of any str ctures or improvements other than for parking, landscaping and driveways, including minor structures not to01; have a cosh. \ in the aggregate in excess of $ 2) Plan L1ne Study a) Prior to approvals for any new construction on Parcels 1 or 2 ;or 3), which individually or collectively would result in square feet (the "Study Trigger Amount") of net new occupied space for any use !"Additions"), the owner(s) of the Property(ies) ("owner(s)") on which the Additions are proposed shall agree to conduct a detailed plan line engineering study (the "Plan Line Study"), in order to determine the optimum street alignment under generally accepted traffic and safety engineering princi:les of the Campisi Way Extension and to delineate its precise metes and bounds. Only one Plan Line Study shall be required to be conducted by the Owner(s). Both of the Owners shall have the right to review and comment to the City on the Plan Line Study. b) The Plan Line Study shall include -an assessment of al local traffic and environmental impact"nd appropriate mitigation measures associated with the Camplsi way Extension, ,i ncl-uding impacts on the Properti-" — The Ylam-f-inr-�Gady_g(Lall investigate alternative alignments and shall propose an alignment wilirji-zhall minimize adverse impacts on the Properti `and shall ensure tha�fPie seZ€C n an e construction of the Campisi Way Extension shall not cause either Property or the improvements on them to become nonconforming under city codes, or if already nonconforming in any manner, not to become more nonconforming by reason of the Campisi way Extension. The right of way to be acquired for the Campisi Way Extension shall not exceed 40 ft. in width [and shall contain on -street parking in both directions). The Plan Line Study shall be presented to the Campbell City council which shall approve a final alignment which the Council finds best serves the public health, safety and welfare. c) In the event of Additions to either or both Properties in increments of less than the Study Trigger Amount, then when constructed Additions and proposed Additions will cumulatively equal or exceed the Study Trigger Amount, the City may require the applicant for the Additions which will cause the cumulative total to equal or exceed the Study Trigger Amount to pay for that share of the Plan Line Study allocated to the Owners in accordance with paragraph 2(f) ("Properties Owners Share"). d) The Owner who has paid the Properties Owners Share for the Plan Line Study shall be entitled to reimbursement from the other Owner under the following circumstznces: (i) The other Owner has previously obtained issuance of a building permit ("Approval") for Additions (i.e. "Approved Additions") amounting to less than the Study Trigger Amount in which case reimbursement shall be made upon Approval of the Additions sought by the Owner paying for the Plan Line Study and shall be based on each Owner's pro rata share of the cumulative total Approved Additions; (ii) The other Owner seeks to make subsequent Additions in excess of the Study Trigger Amount, in which case reimbursement shall be made upon Approval by the City of such Additions based on each Owner's pro rata share of the cumulative total Approved Additions; (iii) As Approvals for Additions in excess of the Study Trigger Amount are issued over time, determination shall be made at the time of each Approval as to each Owner's pro rata share of the cumulative total Approved Additions and payment shall be made by one Owner to the other in accordance with their pro rata share of the cumulative total Approved Additions at such time, provided however, that the obligation to make payments to each other shall cease as to any Approvals obtained more than years from the date of recordation of the final parcel map. e) The Plan Line Study shall identify, among other items, the impact. of vehicular traffic generated by Additions on nearby intersections and the amount of vehicular traffic generated by Additions which will require construction of the Campisi Way Extension to avoid a deterioration in the level of service beyond the "Threshold." The "Threshold" shall mean a reduction in level of service by 10% or more at intersections which are ]tees -2- operating or will, after the Additions, be operating at level of service E or worse, as measured by the increase in delay for critical lane movements during the evening peak hour even with other mitigation measures. f) In the event that owners of any properties other than the Properties ("Other Owners") shall seek Approvals for new construction and/or changes in use or occupancy which will contribute to traffic on the Campisi Way Extension and/or through those intersections where the Threshold is applicable, the City shall require payment at the time of Approval by such Other Owners of a share of the Plan Line Study costs and of the costs of the Campisi Way Extension incurred or to be incurred on the basis of the pro rata share of such Other Owners' Properties' contribution of additional traffic to those intersections where the Threshold is computed. Tf Approval is before or during the Plan Line Study, then they shall contribute to the cost of the "lan Line Study and subsequently to the cost of the construction of Campisi Way. If Approval is later than thr Plan Line Study, then they shall reimburse the owners for the cost of the Plan Line Study and shall contribute to the cost of the construction of Campisi way. 3) Scope�_Costs_and Timing of_the_Campisi Way_Extensio_n a) The Campisi Way Extension shall include acquisition of all required right-of-way, relocation and redesign of parking areas as necessary, construction of the roadway itself and suitable signalization, signing and striping, as determined necessary in the Plan Line Study. The acquisition of right-of-way and construction shall include extending the road through the adjacent parcels (Assessor Parcel Nos. 288-03-004 [7 and 288-03-00 7]) located at the terminus of Campisi Way, acquisition of right-of-way required from the Properties and construction of a new traffic signal where the Campisi Way Extension enters Campbell Avenue, as well as modifications to the existing traffic signals at Union Avenue and Campbell Avenue and at Bascom Avenue and Campbell Avenue to accommodate the new signal, to the extent determined by the Plan Line Study to be required. b) 1he Campisi way extension shall be funded prior to occupancy of Additions which individually or collectively are projected to cause the Threshold to be exceeded ("Construction Trigger Amount"). c) Owners shall pay the costs of the Properties Owner's Share of the Campisi Way Extension based on each Owner's pro rata share of the Occupied Additions (i.e., Additions for which occupancy permits have been issued) which contribute to the Properties Owner's share of the Construction Trigger Amount. As 31665 - 3 - Additions in excess of the Construction Trigger Amount are issued occupancy permits over time, determination shall be made at the time of issuance of each occupancy permit and payment shall be made by one owner to the other in accordance with their pro rata share of the cumulative total occupied Additions at such time; provided, however, that the obligation to make payments to each other shall cease after years from the date of recordation of the final parcel map. The cost of the Campisi Way Extension shall include all costs associated with the Campisi Way Extension as described in paragraph 3(a), including but not limited to the costs of acquisitior, of any portions of the Properties required for the Campisi Way Extension with adjustments for increases or decreases in value to the remainder of both parcels in accordance w;f. the same principles used in acgLisition by eminent domain. d) The Properties Owners Share of coE's shall be reduced or subsequently reimbursed based on any amounts properly apportioned to Other owners until _ __ years from the time of completion of the Campisi Way Extension in accordance with paragraph 2(f) or by the amount allocated to other properties in an assessment district formed for that purpose. e) Both of the owners, acting jointly, shall have the right to initiate formation of an assessment district including owL ther properties which may benefit from the Campisi Waon or the development of which may affect the Thand the City agrees to use its best efforts to form suessment district if initiated by both of the Owners. Parcel 2_Accesa_to Campisi_Way_ Extension If necessary for either of the Properties to have direct access to the Campisi Way Extension upon completion, the Owner of the Property having direct access shall grant to the other Owner easements for vehicular ingress and egress to/from Campisi Way Extension at a minimum of two locations to be spaced between the northerly property line of the properties and Campbell Avenue. The easement shall be __ feet wide. The precise locations of the easements shall be agreed to by the Owners provided that they shall be located so as to meet City traffic standards. 5) Covenant and Deed Restriction Each Owner shall record a covenant and deed restriction running with the land, obligating existing and future owners to carry out the foregoing conditions. 3tees -4-