476 E. Campbell Ave. (S84-05)
RESOLUTION NO.
7071
BEING A RESOLUTION AUTHORIZING THE MAYOR TO EXECUTE A
SIX (6) MONTH EXTENSION OF STIPULATION AND AGREEMENT
BETWEEN CAMPBELL PARTNERS AND THE CITY OF CAMPBELL
WHEREAS, Campbell Partners has submitted to the City Council of the City
of Campbell a Stipulation and Agreement which covers certain conditions
regarding the denial of an application for construction of an office building
at 476 to 486 East Campbell Avenue, S 84-05; and
WHEREAS, the Stipulation and Agreement executed by the Mayor by Resolution
No. 7006 on July 16, 1985, for a sixty (60) day extension, was approved by the
City Council; and
WHEREAS, the City Attorney recommends a six (6) month extension of said
Stipulation and Agreement.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council that the Mayor be and
he is hereby authorized to execute said Stipulation and Agreement on behalf of
said City.
PASSED AND ADOPTED this
roll call vote:
17th
day of
December
, 1985, by the following
AYES:
Councilmembers:
Ashworth, Doetsch, Watson, Podgorsek, Kotowski
None
NOES:
Councilmembers:
ABSENT:
Councilmembers:
None
APPROVED:
-.. ,,? ,/'"' ,.r
c~ / / .',
~ r' ~.'" .
~/. ,// ¡' ,1 I
~~____I ,
, .
Michael
ATTEST:
114.1'- rO1"::'I:'~!NI" ,.~~, f'I"'!"",T IS ... mul<
þ,'.¡) COR". C' r .:.- T.-IE c.,,:CU;AL
0'; FiLE !'J ,
AH~":Sl....q...,:,t':;l C:-.(~:::, C,i..Y GC£R.K
CITY Ct' ?cocl".. CA,lfOR..
BY . ~ -'7
C""'". B~ 19
STIPULATION AND AGREEMENT
This Agreement is entered into between Campbell Partners, a partnership,
VIC GIACALONE, MARTIN MORICI, JOE MORICI, AND RICHARD HARTMAN, hereinafter
called First Party, and the CITY OF CAMPBELL, hereinafter called Second Party;
WHEREAS, the Campbell City Council at its September 18, 1984 meeting
overturned the decision of the Planning Commission and denied First Party's
application for construction of an office building at 476 to 486 East Campbell
Avenue, Campbell, California, City of Campbell reference number S 84-05;
AND WHEREAS, First Party has a time limitation of thirty (30) days from
the September 18, 1984 date to file litigation in the Superior Court of the
State of California for equitable relief and remedies by way of Writ of
Mandate and other equitable remedies;
AND WHEREAS, the parties hereto are attempting to resolve the issues by
providing for egress on the above referred to properties;
AND WHEREAS, the City of Campbell granted the First Party a six (6) month
extension for filing an action in Superior Court till August 3, 1985;
AND WHEREAS, the City of Campbell granted another six (6) month extension
for filing an action in Superior Court, till January 16, 1985;
AND WHEREAS, additional time is necessary to fulfill the conditions
requisite to providing egress on the above-referenced properties;
NOW, THEREFORE, it is agreed by and between the parties:
1. First Party will refrain from pursuing litigation for at least an
additional six (6) month period, commencing on January 16, 1985.
2. Second Party hereby waives the statutory thirty (30) day requirement
for filing in the Superior Court for an additional period of six (6) months
from January 16, 1985.
3. The parties shall have an additional six (6) month period to resolve
said egress problem, and First Party hereby consents to the additional
six (6) month period beyond the date of January 16, 1985, which is the
expiration of the extension of the original agreement between the parties.
4. The signators for the Second Party warrant that the City of Campbell
has consented to this Stipulation.
Executed this 17th day of December, 1985, in the City of Campbell,
Count of Santa Clara, California. .~ / /"')/\ .,/---' //'""') //'""
\ <,') J~:¿'
-~~~téAiœ'E~L~ ,K{ :~ '
Michael Kotowski, Mayor
~~~
Martin Morici
:---
\ f ,,-\, "- ~
--~~ ,,~,~~
loeMori i .J
(1¿ ~--
Richard Hartman
ATTEST:
An~n~~
THe- -~,.;"""',r; I""--;-~: '~~':T IS A TRUE
I, "', . .'., . c:- 'I¡':~ GHIGINAL
c. ~~
CITY OF CAMPBELL
MEMORANDUM
To: Arthur Kee, Pl anning Di rector
. F,"m~ ~~oe Ell j ott, OJ rector of Pub 1 j c Works
Date:
July 24, 1985
.--11~~~~'&~
- .._.~--
Subject: PLANS FOR 476-486 EAST CAMPBELL AVENUE; AND 175 REDDING ROAD'
..c,.-------
,/
----------------------------------------------------------
This is in answer to your memorandum of July 19,1985, wherein you asked if
traffic studies or other information would be required from our department
regarding these proposed developments.
Regarding the proposed development at 476-486 East Campbell Avenue, it is
requested that a brief traffic study be submitted in which the following in-
formation would be included:
A.
B.
Trip generation of the development.
Effect of traffic generated by this project on Campbell/Dillon intersec-
tion in the a.m. and p.m. peak hours.
C.
Confirm that sight distance is adequate for traffic entering Campbell
Avenue from Dillon Avenue.
It appears that no special information will be neede regarding the proposed
development at 175 Redding Road.
JE/le
attach.
MEMORANDUM
/\ "I,
-~ ?, -( t t
CITY OF CAMPBELL
To:
Joe Elliott
Director of Public Works
Date:
July 19, 1985
From:
Art Kee
Planning Director
Subject: Plans for 476-486 E. Campbell Ave.
----------------------------------------------------------
We have received application for developments as follows:
1.
476-486 E. Campbell Avenue
APN: 413-8-93, 135, 136
Project: 9,600 sq. ft. office complex
2.
175 Redding Road
APN: 413- 23-40
Project: 27 townhomes
Prior to processing these applications I would like to know if traffic
studies or any other additional information will be required by your
department. Please return the plans with your response to the Planning
Department as soon as possible. The plans will be rerouted to your
department for conditions of approval.
/lj
~.^." '" .. ,,(
/ F,¿"
LAW OfflCfS Of -ATHfD.TOn
& Du n n
289 S. SAN ANTONIO ROAD, SUITE 200
LOS ALTOS, CA. 94022
TELEPHONE kl~ 948-3000
MICHAEL A. ATH EATON
. .RO"""O"-,,- CORPaR.TOON
WILLIAM GERALD DUNN
. 'RO'..S10N^, CORPaR"'ON
April 10, 1985
.J
,,( -\,:<
I'1r. Bill Helms '~j ..
Assistant Director of Public
City Hall
75 North Central Avenue
Campbell, California 95009
Works
RECEIVED
MAY 0 3 REC'O
PUBlIC WOR~
£NGIN~G
Re:
510 East Campbell Avenue
Dear Bill:
It is my understanding through Bob Dodge and Dick Hardy that
both you and Bob Dempster have held several meetings regard-
ing the proposed Morici development, and the manner in which
it involves my client, Campbell Building Investment Co.
I am enclosing herewith a plat which I think will illustrate
the various matters which have previously been discussed.
As you know, Mr. Morici, in order to avoid possible litiga-
tion with the City, has approached CBI in an effort to work
out a solution to his problems. At this point in time, I
have been authorized, on behalf of CBI, to make the follow-
ing proposal:
1. CBI vlill grant a non-exclusive easement to Hr. Horici
over the driveway fronting on Dillon Avenue. This driveway is
to be used for egress only. It will contain approximately the
same square footage as the property to be deeded to CBI by Mr.
Morici, as outlined in red on the attached plat.
2. Mr. Morici will grant a non-exclusive easement for
ingress through Orchard-Campbell Avenue in order to permit
parking on the strip outlined in red. Egress, once again,
will be through the driveway to Dillon Avenue.
3. The City will abandon the excess property between the
existing edge of sidewalk and the beauty salon at 510 East
Campbell Avenue.
Mr. Bill Helms
Assistant Director of Public Works
Page Two
April 10, 1985
4. The City will transfer the "sliver" fronting on
Civic Center Drive to CBI.
Obviously, this proposal involves cooperation between CBI,
the City and Mr. Morici. Hopefully, my clients, by their
cooperation, will enable the City to settle its potential
litigation with Hr. Morici.
After you and Mr. Dempster have had time to review the matter,
if you would kindly contact me with reference to the Staff's
assessment of our proposal, I would be most appreciative.
Sincerely,
~~
Michael Atherton
!l1A/ am
cc:
Robert Dempster, Esq.
City Attorney
Campbell Building Investment Co.
Attn: Messrs. Bob Dodge and
Dick Hardy
.~~
.\'~)
J -g.;
Li.:
I!'.
~,',..;<
.¥i,I, 7-."..,', "',,'
t"
~j
1:
L.
-'
~.Je-. ,/
(:1,1, ~
/~/
,
f.
/'
/~
1
,>
j
i
1
j
¡
¡
2/, '5'
Q;¡
()
..
t-
~ 1,7/1 Sf
ARE A" J, 7/0 Sf
BU>(3.
TOPOGRAPHY OF
PI? 0 POS (;øl) E-A oS é-M E-NT
I.\j
~
~I ~
'<
~
-.J
"
....
q
I
,
,
~k I
': 17'
.
, ,
The Best Electrical Company, Inc.
ELECTRICAL CONTRACTORS
February 5, 1985
Ibbert D=J:rps ter
City Attorney
ci ty of CaIrpbell
75 N. Central Ave.
Campbell, CA 95008
Re:
476 to 486 E. Campbell Ave.
Campbe 11 , Ca
Dear Bet>;
My partners, Dick Hartman and Marti fvbrici, and I xœt this Imming
to discuss the IlaITed property. We are in basic agreerrent with your
proposal to exchange a piece of property with the adjacent landowner
to provide egress, which is acceptable to you, fran our property.
The terms under, which we would accept such an exchange, are those
which Marti and I have discussed with you and Bill Helms during
the course of the last two weeks. Basically stated these terms
are, as follCMS:
1. The exchange can be acccmplished wi tbout any cost to
us. ego civil engineering
2. A variance would be allo.ved to provide for (1) parking
space per 250 square feet of building area.
3. We would have the option of using the proPJsed driveway
onto Dillon Ave., as ingress and egress or egress only
with ingress fran CanP:>ell Ave.
4. The "line of sight" would be noved forward substantially,
because of the deletion of the egress onto Campbell Ave.
5. The exchange can be ccmpleted within thirty days of
this date.
I trust, that the above will meet your approval.
248 McEVOY STREET. SAN JOSE. CA 95126 . PHONE 408/2872040 . LIC. NO. 261313
,'.-
Robert r:arpster
City Attorney
City of Camfbell
Februm:y 5, 1985
Page #2
We are all anxious to resolve this matter.
VJG/fp
cc : Marti M:>rici
Dick Hartman
Sincerely,
,..¡t. /'
p8t~
//
/
/~
zo,
: -',7/05,1'
....
0'>,
iii
t--
AREA -/, 7/051
V E£.ÚXAJ
I(IEL
""141fl1(
oN WALt.
;t..,..~ (.
.,.'M.:>,.,.
~ðUNþ
ð'I)(;,
rOPOG~APHY OF-
P/fOPOSE-ð E-ASE-ME-NT
"i
~
'. I ~
,.4" ~
<:)
-.,
-.,
....
q
I
I
I
I
t
".
~: 17'
'.
6 f:\'l,
".p
cIA
BLDG.
8;?,ICK
WALL
8/?/CI(
WAU
Ìr) ," P/?OPé-/?TY UNE-
C) "-
C) ~ .04. C. :Ü."'~,~.'i-:.~/!\!i.'
-_.:.. '1 ROOF "
_=t-_- Ê
-" - - - == PI<°NT OF- "6Ii(ffNHOu.s€-~WINDOWS =::J n
II
II
II
-------
BLDG.
TOPOG/(APHY OF
P/?OPOSE-D E-ASE-ME-NT
~
~
~
s' ~
~
....,
.....
-T .....
q
ò'
CY' I
\0,
,-'
I?~
I
I
I
NOv. /984-
L M. s.
t'"""
~p6
c,.
8RJCK
WALL
¡-
Ie¡
0',
~
....
I pce I
SLAB
BLDG, L ~:H= - GA}Tff-L
SToRAGE SHED ! ROOF POST
I --- r - - -- -~'\.r---t-
-----_u_-T-5'O~~-i" A C~ERM-n...J
- - - - - - -1 - - - - - - -'--
~
n1
~
~1 -
Ò'\ v,
. \ )
Ç) .'
~ ' "
Ç)
~
IY)
f\¡
/~: ,,';': i Ï/I:;-'; I:~~':::"/~'"
,..' \. .. ,.
.,\4. ~.:,
YELli>W
/(IEt...
Al4/ó?/(
01'1 WALL
A-P,;PÆð)( ,
4-' ,cÆð;t..f
G~6UND
Ìt) -"
C> "- . " ..,... '/ . ,
" ,~, .,.....,,~
-~ ~1 _~_OF, :'1. :'" "',1,"t:1i ¡,,'i,.,
=- =1 = == == G~ONT OF "Gfff-:~O~:~=-:;/~~;:;;-~ un
II
II
II
BLDG.
~A L,
""I ¡2. é!:!fV
vJ I ., ;Pu;
'lei- ~i,
¡¿./ c;;
TOPOG/(API-IY OF
P~OPOSt-D E-ASE-ME-NT
~
~
~
s'
~
<:)
......,
......,
......
q
r
C>
IY)
14
11"'"
!I__L
25'
- un~- - . ., ...,
!?:._--~
NOv. /984-
LM,S
F.
APPEALS
Appeal of the decision of the Planning Commission approving
plans and elevations to allow construction of an office
building at 476 to 486 E. Campbell Ave. in a C-2-S (General
Conmercial ) Zoning District.
11. S 84-05
PlANNING CDt-MISSION REmt-fENMTION
That the City Cmmcil uphold the decision of the Planning Commission approving
plans and elevations to construct an office building at 476 to 486 E. Campbell
Ave., subject to the attached conditions.
DISCUSSION
At its meeting of August 14, 1984 the Planning Conmission approved a Site and
Architectural application to allow the construction of a 6,299 sq. ft. office
building on the project site, (vote: 3p2-1J . This approval has been appealed to
Cmmcil. The attached letter of appeal is based upon the Planning Commission
not giving adequate consideration to public safety.
The applicant's proposal indicates the construction of a two-story office
building. The proposed office space ~uld be provided on a single floor
constructed over on -grade parking facilities. The proposed building
would cover approximately 51% of the project site.
Building materials are indicated as shiplap wood siding for walls and
metal roofing material.
The applicant has provided 28 parking spaces (16 standard, 11 compact, 1
handicapped) for this project. The provided parking satisfies the parking
ratio of 1:225 for office uses. .
The Architectural Advisor and Staff had some minor concerns regarding build-
ing materials and a back-up distance behind sϾ stalls. These concerns
would be addressed with the subnittal of revised plans as required by Con-
di tion 1.
Staff had reconmended denial of this project because the Public Works
Department could not support the proposed ingress! egress to this proj ect.
The minutes of the August 14, 1984 Planning Conmission meeting are attached
for the ColD'lcil' s review.
COST
-
No direct cost.
I
PREPARED BY
Planning Staff
September 18,1984
AGENDA
: " -- . :-<Ç ,
Ci ty Counci 1
City of Campbell
70 N. First St.
Campbell, CA 95008
RE: S 84-05
476 to 486 E. Campbell Ave.
RECE\'JEO
~UG 24: 1984
11\ QØ11 pi
(J e,' ~,Ó~
ðf~
August 24, 1984
Gentlemen:
I appeal the decision of the Planning Commission in granting
approval of application S 84-05 at their meeting of August 14,
1984 .
It is my assertion that the Commission erred in not giving
adequate consideration for the public safety as required under
Campbell Municipal Code Section 21.42.040 (1) (A) & (8).
He d
f 205 Ca1ado Ave.
Campbell, CA 95008
7:30 P.M.
PlANNING aM!ISSICIi
cm OF r»IPBELL, CALIroRNIA
MINt.TŒS
AlOJST 14, 1984
'DIe Planning Cœmission of the City of CaD;>bel1 convened this day in regular
session at the regular meeting place, the Council Chambers of the City Hall,
70 N. First St., Qøupbe11, California.
ROLL C'AIL
Present
Cœmissioners: Perrine, O1rist, Ibward, Fairbanks,
Dickson; Planning Director .ArtJJ.tr A. lee, Principal
Plarmer Philip J. Stafford, City Attorney J. Robert
Dellpster, Recording Secretary Linda Dennis.
Ccmnissioner Xaso1as *
Absent
*Chairnøn Dickson noted that Qmnissioner ICasolas J8d contacted him, and was
not present due to a previous family COIIII1itment.
APPJUV AI. OF MINUTES
July 24,1984
MIS: Pet:rine, Ibward - 'I1Jat the minutes of the
Planning Ccmnission meeting of July 24, 1984
be approved as subnitted. Motion carried with
a vote of 4-0-1-1, with Ccmnissioner lCasolas
being absent, and Ccmnissioner Fairbanks ab-
staining due to absence £ran that meeting.
,
.
,
* * *
ARæITEC'IURAL APPROVALS
S 84-05
Ibnas, J.
Continued application of Mr. Jim IUnas, on be-
half of Vandersan Constroction Inc., for approval
of plans and elevations to allow the construction
of an office building on property lcnown as 476 to
486 E. Campbell Avenue in a C-2-S (General Can-
llercial) Zoning District.
Ccmnissioner O1rist reported that this item ws before the Site and Archi-
tectural Review Cœmittee. 'Ibe CcIIIni.ttee is bringing the item to the
Qmnission without a recDlIIDeI1dation in that there is a considerable 8DDmlt
of information to be presented on the project.
Mr. lee reviewed the application for the QJIImissicm, and stated that Staff
is reCODllleJlding denial. The basis for this recaønendation is prlaril y
due to the concerns of the Public 1t»rks Department regarding the ingress!
egress of the proj ect. Mr. JCee continued that it is his œderstanding
that the applicant is requesting a decision this evening.
Mr. Helms stated that this appl ication has been before the Omnission a
In.Jnber of times in several different forms. The plan currently before
-2-
the Ccmnission calIsfor an office building with parking below the building.
Staff bas spent a great deal of time meeting with the applicant to address
ingress/egress concerns. Staff is of the opiniœ that it is possible to I
safely enter the property from an easterly direction along Campbell Avenue.
'lbe concern is the exiting from the pl'Operty, due to the restricted line-of-
sight by the buildings to the south of this property. The sight -distance
canbined with the speed of the vehicles traveling along Campbell/Railway Avenues is
such that Staff is of the opinicm that there is not adeqœte time for a
vehicle exiting the property to do so safely. With the speeds that are
being experienced on this street, Staff feels there isoot a sufficient margin of
safety. Mr. Helms further explained various traffic IDvements in this area, concluding
that with the speeds, traffic 1IÐvements, and restricted sight -distance, an unsafe
situation is created for vehicles exiting the site. Mr. Helms added that
it is his understanding that the applicant bas spoken with adjacent property
owners about the possibility of an easement; bJwever, there has not been an
agreement, and the applicant is not pursuing any other options at this time.
Ccmnissioner Fairbanks asked Mr. Helms if he was saying that he was not com-
fortable with the exiting from the property.
Mr. Helms stated that this -s exactly correct. Staff does not feel exiting
from this property can be done safely onto Campbell Avenue within the confines
of the property lines given the existing conditions.
CoDInissicmer Fairbanks as1œd about the ingress of the project.
Mr. Helms indicated that the ingress is proposed as a sweeping type of driveway,
similar to that at Water Tower Plaza.
Ccmnissioner Perrine asked if Mr. Helms -s saying that the property is un-
developable as it stands now.
]
Mr. Helms stated that the property was not developable as it exists, in Staff's
opinion.
Mr. Tony Gschwend, Director of Transportation, Brian -Kangas-Faulk, S95 Price
Avenue, Redwood City, stated that his firm conducted a spot speed survey in
the project area to determine what speeds are around Railway Avenue. Speeds
were detetmi.ned to be 32 mph average critical speed, which would mean that
under critical conditions a stopping distanCe of 210' wuld be necessary.
Prom the curve to the proposed egress there is a distance of 230', which is
very close in terms of stopping distance. He acknowledged that the ingress
185 safe. Mr.Gschwend noted that the egress is as far to the easterly corner
of the site as it can be, and while he is in agreement that the _rgin is
small--it is the best that can be dœe given the current traffic conditions
in the vicinity.
Ccmnisshmer Fairbanks questioned the back-up distances, architectural design,
roof design, and colors.
Mr. Kee noted that sene of the parking area needed to be re-wor1œd to address
the back-up distanCes, and there seems to be adequate roan on site to &cCOJlltD-
date the needed distances.
I
-3-
'- Ccmnissiøner C1rist DOted that the building is designed to Etch the type of
.. IÐtif of the Water Tower Plaza c:.oq>lex, usini similar metals and sidings.
Additionally, the' building has SCJDe interestIng glass amcepts; the building
6; has been set back as far to the rear of the site as possible to open the
. line of sight tithe upper story is a glass facade which is open inside with
- plant materials for accent. '
Omirman Dickson indicated his mderstamüng that even if the bu11ding size
were to be reduced, there is still no way to have safe distances needed for
exiting the site.
Mr. Helms noted that Staff does not have a problsn with the size of the
building. Staff feels that the site has unsafe exiting conditions.
Ccmnissicner Christ noted that there was discussion of 'eroblems with the
loading area. It was suggested there might be a potsital problem with
vehicles using the ingress for egress. He continued that he was of the
opinion that there is a need to design the curbing at the ingress so that
it would discomageanyone from using it as an exit. The applicant was
aware of this problem and is going to make those changes to help eliminate
this possibility.
,
M/: Fairbanks - That S 84-05 be denied. M:>tion dies for lack of a
second.
).tiS: Olrist, Ibward - That S 84-05 be approved, subject to conditions
listed in the Staff CaJment Sheet.
..
Discussion
Mr. Helms noted that under Public Works Ccnditions of Approval, Staff is
recœmending that the plans be subnitted to the Public Works Department
for review and approval for all off-site improvements compatible with
approved on-site layout.
Camdssioner Howard added that the approva11Ðu1d be subject to the
alignment of the ingress/egress meeting the direction of the Public
Works Department; snd, all back-up distance problems to be addressed
to the satisfaction of the P1.amrlng Director.
Callnissioner Fairbanks noted she 1ØÜd be soeakin£ against the Jll)tion, based
on the testimmy of Public Works Staff; sruf, the blue roofing. She continued
that the Public 1brks Department is usually conservative and careful with
their opinicns, snd they are suggesting that the egress for this site is
not safe. Additionally, she felt that the blue roof would stand out too
JU:h; and, although she fomd the angles and design of the building interest-
ing' she felt it-JWaS not right for this site.
I
Omnissicner Perrine as1œd if one 'VOted for the project, were they voting
for the safety of the project.
Mr. Dempster stated that the 'VOte would be for all the cœditions that DIlSt
be met prior to issœnce of the permit or amstroction.
-4-
C1lÙ:nœn Dickson stated that he would be voting against the DDtion for
reasons stated by the Public Works Staff. He felt that the ingress/
egress smuld be demJnstrated before approval.
Vote on }obtion
Approval of S 84-05, subject to conditions as
indicated in the Staff Cœment Sheet, and sub-
ject to the alignment of the ingress/egress
meeting the direction of the PuDlic Works
~tment; and, all back-up distance problems
bemg addressed to the satisfaction of the
Plannmg Director. M7tion carried with the
following roll call 'VOte:
AYES: Cœmissioners: Perrine, Christ, Howard
Ji>ES: Cœmissioners: Fairbanks, Dickscm
ABSmI': Camdssioners: J{asolas
. . .
S 84-14
Nikakhtar, B.
Continued application of Mr. Behrooz Nikakhtar
for approval of plans and elevations to allow
the construction of a S-unit apartment build-
ing on property known as 1430 W. Latimer Ave.
in an R-2-S (M.ütiple Family Residential)
Zoning District.
Conmissioner Christ reported that this itB11 was before the Site and Archi-
tectural Review Ccmnittee. Concerns discussed with the applicant included
the roof line; and the possibility of the apartments being converted into
additional mrl.ts in that the plans indicate 2 doors to the front in close
proximity of each other, and the apartments are a larger than mrmal size.
The Ca1mittee is of the opinion that the roof line should be continued
out to the edge of the hli1ding so that the hip roof could not been seen
fran the street. Additicmally, the Ca1mittee felt that the door into the
kitchen should be replaced with a solid wall. CoIImissioner Christ continued
that it is his understanding that the concern with the roof line will be;-
addressed with revised plans. It was also the Cœmittee's understanding
that the applicant did not agree to walling in the (\)or into the kitchen.
The Calmittee's concern with this extra door is the possibility for some
of the mrl. ts to be easily _de into two mrl. ts with the addition of one
wall. The Site Ccmni ttee is rec:cmnentÜng denial, œless these cœcerns
can be addressed.
Cœmissioner Ibward asked if Condition Q was discussed by the Site CoIIInittee,
and if there could be a statement included in the deed which eliminated the
possibility of dividing these a¡ørtments into additional units.
Camdssioner Christ noted that this was discussed by the Site OIIInittee,
and even if the extra door is eliminated, it is the feeling of the Conmittee
that the letter referred to in Condition Q wou1d be required. 'the diffi-
culty of the sitœtion is in the enforcement.
i
J
I
I
~ì
, AU616.
I
, . PUBUC V~Oj{K~
t,~ÐiG\tifE¡t\tiQ
(
1
I
CITY OF CAMPBELL
75 NORTH CENTRAL AVENUE
CAMPBELL, CALIFORNIA 95008
(408) 378-8141
Planning
Department:
Date: August 15,1984
CONDITIONS ATTACHED TO "S" APPROVAL OF PLANS OF
FOR CONSTRUCTION OF OFFICE BUILDING
MR. JIM OOM\S
TO BE LOCATED AT
476 TO 486 E. CAMPBELL AVENUE.
CONDITIONS:
AS INDICATED ON THE AITAŒIED LIST.
Section 21.42:090 of the Campbell Municipal Code reads as follows:
Any approval granted under this section shall expire one year after
the date upon which such approval was granted, unless an extension
for such approval is obtained by making written application for same
to the Planning Commission at least fifteen (15) days days prior to
the expiration date of such approval.
No building permit shall be issued after'the expiration date of any
approval until a new approval has been obtained in the manner pro- .
vided for in this Chapter. .
Approval effective ten (10) days after decision of approval of the
Planning Commission.
GRANTED BY THE CITY OF CAMPBELL PLANNING COMMISSION AT A REGULAR MEETING
HELD ON THE 14th DAY OF AUGUST , 19 84 .
CITY OF CAMPBELL
PLANNING COMMISSION
BY: Cl.~.~
ARTHUR A. KEE, S~
cc: Bill Fisher, Kravitz & EJmre
Grubb & Ellis
COND I T IONS OF' APPROVAL: S 84-05
APPL I CA T I ON OF': Ibnas, J.
SITE ADDRESS: 476-486 E. Cænpbell Ave.
n/a
1
2
3
n/a
4
5
6
7
8
9
P C MTG:
8/14/84
Revised elevations and/or site plan to be approved by the Planning
Director upon recommendation of the Architectural Advisor, within
30 days of the Planning Commission approval.
Revised elevations and/or site plan to be approved by the Site &
Architectural Review Committee and/or the Planning Commission with-
in 30 days of Planning Commission approval. ROOF PLAN TO oo~æ BACK TO
SITE REVIEW ffiM.ITTI'EE.
Property to be fenced and landscaped as indicated and/or added in
red on plans. landscaping and fencing shall be maintained in
accordance with the approved plans.
Landscaping plan indicating type and size of plant material, and
location of irrigation system to be submitted for approval of the
Site & Architectural Review Committee and/or Planning Commission
prior to application for a building permit.
Landscaping plan indicating type and size of plant material, and
location of irrigation system to be submitted for approval of the
Planning Director prior to application for a building permit.
Fencing plan indicating location and design details of fencing to
be submitted for approval of the Planning Director prior to applica-
tion for building permit.
Applicant to either (1) post a faithful performance bond in the
amount of $3,000 to insure landscaping, fencing, and striping
of parking areas within 3 months of completion of construction; or
(2) file written agreement to complete landscaping, fencing and strip-
ing of parking areas prior to application for a building permit.
Applicant to submit a plan, prior to installation of PG&E utility
(transformer) boxes, indicating the location of the boxes and
screening(if boxes are aboveground) for approval of the Planning
Di rector.
Applicant to submit a letter, satisfactory to the City Attorney,
limiting the use of the property to: 6,299 square feet of
office use, square feet of speculative industrial
use, and -- square feet of warehouse use, prior to
issuance of a building permit.
All mechanical equipment on roofs and all utility meters to be
screened as approved by the Planning Director.
Building occupancy will not be allowed until public improvements
are installed.
*n/a: not applicable to this application.
PAGE 2
CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL: S 84-05
APPLICATION OF: Dumas, J.
SITE ADDRESS: 476-486 E. Campbell Ave.
The applicant is notified as part of this application that he/she is required
to meet the following conditions in accordance with Ordinance of the City of
Campbell and Laws of the State of California.
A
B
c
D
E
F
G
n/a
n/a
All parking and driveway areas to be developed in compliance with
Section 21.50 of the Campbell Municipal Code. All parking spaces
to be provided with appropriate concrete curbs or bumper guards.
Underground utilities to be provided as required by Section
20.16.070 of the Campbell Municipal Code.
Plans submitted to the Building Department for plan check shall
indicate clearly the location of all connections for underground
utilities including water, sewer, electric, telephone and tele-
vision cables, etc.
Sign application to be submitted in accordance with provisions of
the Sign Ordinance for all signs. No sign to be installed until
application is approved and permit issued by the Building Depart-
ment (Section 21.68.030 of the Campbell Municipal Code).
Ordinance No. 782 of the Campbell Municipal Code stipulates that
any contract for the collection and disposal of refuse, garbage,
wet garbage and rubbish produced within the limits of the City of
Campbell shall be made with Green Valley Disposal Company. This
requirement applies to all single-family dwellings, multiple apart-
ment units, to all commercial, business, industrial, manufacturing,
and construction establishments.
Trash container(s) of a size and quantity necessary to serve the
development shall be located in area(s) approved by the Fire De-
partment. Unless otherwise noted, enclosure(s) shall consist of
a concrete floor surrounded by a solid wall or fence and have
self-closing doors of a size specified by the Fire Department.
All enclosures to be constructed at grade level~ and have a level
area adjacent to the trash enclosure area to service these containers.
Applicant shall comply with all appropriate State and City re-
quirements for the handicapped.
Noise levels for the interior of residential units shall comply
with minimum State (Title 25) and local standards as indicated
in the Noise Element of the Campbell General Plan.
Applicant is hereby notified that he will be required to pay
Park Dedication In-Lieu Fee which will be assessed at the time
the subdivision map is submitted.
STANDARD FIRE HAZARD ABATEMENT COMMENT: The applicant is hereby notified that
the property is to be maintained free of any combustible trash, debris and weeds,
until the time that actual construction commences. All existing structures shall
be kept secured by having windows boarded up and doors sealed shut, or be demolish-
ed or removed from the property. Sect. 11.201 & 11.414, 1979 Ed. Uniform Fire Code.
PAGE 3
CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL: S 84-05
APPLICATION OF: Dumas, J.
SITE ADORESS: 476-486 E. Campbell Ave.
FIRE DEPAR'IMENT
H.
1.
Entire building shall be protected by an automatic sprinkler system.
Provide I-hr. occupancy separation between garage and office levels.
PUBLIC 1\DRKS IEPAR1MENT
J. Applicant to meet all conditions of the Public Works Department.
The applicant is notified that he/she shall comply with all applicable Codes or
Ordinances of the City of Campbell which pertain to this development and are not
herein specified.
.
N
I
.I
(
ti
~
.
-.
&>
.
-.