1587 Dell Ave. (84-22)
/j
) -ç -
..ß-=7 .r '.1:::--.<-, (¡.~_.-
W. LESLIE PELIO & ASSOCIATES
1733 DELL AVENUE. CAMPBELL. CA 95008
(408) 379-4000
May 28, 1986
Mr. Bill Helms
City of Campbell
75 North Central Ave.
Campbell, CA 95008
Dear Mr. Helms:
This letter shall serve as a formal request for a lot line
adjustment to parcels 424-33-059 and 424-33-060, commonly
known as 1587 Dell Avenue, Campbell, California.
The lot line shall be adjusted in conformance to the attached
legal description.
If you have any questions please contact me directly.
WLP: sb
CIVIL ENGINEERING ASSOCIATES
CIVIL ENGINEERS: PLANNERS: SURVEYORS
June 2, 1986
Job #86-134
PETER B. McMORROW,P.E.
DONALD V. UTZ
DESCRIPTION FOR LOT LINE ADJUSTMENT
"
. .~\ ':
ALL THAT CERTAIN REAL PROPERTY SITUATE IN THE CITY 'FCUPERTINO, tOUNTY
OF SANTA CLARA, STATE OF CALIFORNIA BEING MORE PARTI ARY DE CRiBED AS
FOLLOWS:
COMMENCING AT THE MOST NORTHERLY CORNER OF PARCEL liB II AS SHOWN UPON THAT
CERTAIN PARCEL MAP RECORDED IN BOOK 228 OF MAPS AT PAGE 43 RECORDS OF
SAID SANTA CLARA;
THENCE SOUTH 58u19123" EAST ALONG THE EASTERLY LINE OF SAID PARCEL liB II A
DISTANCE OF 87.30 FEET TO THE TRUE POINT OF BEGINNING OF THE ADJUSTED
LOT LINE TO BE DESCRIBED;
THENCE SOUTH 31~40100" WEST A DISTANCE OF 239.05 FEET TO A POINT IN THE
WESTERLY LINE OF SAID PARCEL "B" AND THE TERMINUS OF THE ABOVE DESCRIBED
LINE.
455 LOS GATOS BLVD.. SUITE 201 . LOS GATOS, CALIFORNIA 95030. (408) 358-3300
,4/-'.1 { ~/'dd"'E
.-
2~d4
~;\~
V\"'~
~~~
~(ì)
~~~~
~"~~
~ ~O)~
_N;/~dd~ -ð'.9. $' - - : ~ ~ ~ ~
1'. EA"/ST. LðT .l./N¡:::~ ~ ~~~
: I ~ I ~ ~~~
~I ~ ~, ~ ~ ~
~I . ~ ~ ~ I\ì(i
~ ~ ' ~~
~ IV :JJ'4d f7d";!? 2:19. d5 ' (.\j ~ !I)
~I A.oJI'./STE.P LßT L/¡f/¿:: h. ~ ~ ~
I ~ ~ ~ ~ ~
~ ~ ' ~
~ l,\:) '~
, ~ ~
~ ~: ~
~ ~
~
I
.
§
~
~
\6
~
~
~
~
~
"
.
. .
PE¿¿
.
.
~
~
~
\)
~\
{,
~
~
~
r{
t"
~
8!J./!s'
.. ..
II:1J.~O'/Jl7"E 2~/J'S'
AVINL/4='
~ t~
~ 't~
~ ,,~
,~ ~~
~ ~~
~ ~~
~ ~~
~ §~
G¡!
~~
~~
'tl
i
.s:
~
~
~
.~
~
LOU IS II. LA RSON. IN C.
CIVIL AND TRAFFIC ENGINEERING
885 No. San Antonio Road. Los Altos, Californh 94022
(415) 949-1124
'l'RAFFIC REPORT
Proposed Industrial Development
West Side of Dell Avenue
North of Division Street
Campbell, California
for
W. Leslie Pelio & Associates, Developer
December, 1984
CONTENTS
Project Description
Scope of Traffic Report
Trip Generation and Distribution
Other Development Traffic
Traffic Signal Warrants
Intersection Levels of Service
Report Summary
Figure I - Site Plan
Figure 2 - PM Peak Hour Project Traffic Distribution
Figure 3 - PM Peak Hour Traffic Distribution - Morris
Management Development
Figure 4 - Estimated Daily Traffic at Dell & Sunnyoaks
Exhibit A - Existing Traffic Counts (6 sheets)
Report Appendix:
Traffic Signal Warrant Sheets (3)
Level of Service Calculations (4)
PAGE
I
I
I
2
3
4
5
q.~~ g~5
~ ,
Project Description
W. Leslie Pelio & Associates proposes the construction
of an industrial development, pelio 1, consisting of two
new industrial buildings with a total gross floor area of
47,730 square feet. The project is located on the west
side of Dell Avenue, north of Division Street. Access to
the site will be provided by way of two driveway connections
to Dell Avenue. A reduced scale copy of the site plan for
the project, as prepared by Design and Engineering Systems,
Inc., is attached as Figure 1.
Scope of Traffic Report
As requested by the City Traffic Engineer, Mr. Keith
Manley, we have analyzed PM peak hour traffic flow at two
nearby intersections, Dell Avenue and Hacienda Avenue and
Dell Avenue and Sunnyoaks Avenue. Manual traffic counts
were made at these intersections for a three hour period,
from 3:00 PM to 6:00 PM. These traffic counts are included
as Exhibit A. These counts were expanded to an average
daily basis using other recorded counts previously made in
the vicinity of the project, for the evaluation of signal
warrants at the intersections.
Trip Generation and Distribution
Trip generation for the project has been calculated
using aver ate rates given by Caltrans, District 4, trip
generation studies for Industrial Specialty Developments
I
in the Bay Area, of 8 daily trips per 1000 square feet of
floor area, and a 22 percent peak hour factor. (1)
Based on these rates, the project will generate 382
daily vehicle trips and 84 peak hour trips, with 17 trips
inbound and 67 trips outbound during the PM peak traffic
hour.
Project generated traffic has been distributed uni-
formly to the surrounding street system. PM peak hour
project traffic distribution is shown on Figure 2.
Other Development Traffic
There are two other approved developments of significant
size in the vicinity of the Pelio project that are not yet
in operation. One is the March Development Office Project
at 3101 S. Winchester Boulevard, near Chapman Drive. The
EIR prepared for this project states that there would be no
traffic impacts on the Dell Avenue intersections from the
March Development.
The other development is the Morris Management R&D Office
project at Camden Avenue and Winchester Boulevard. Some of
the traffic generated by this project would use the Dell -
Sunnyoaks intersection. A revised traffic distribution for
the Morris Management project, based on a letter dated April
6, 1984 from Earthmetrics, Inc., to the City of Campbell, is
attached as Figure 3.
(1) Caltrans District 4, 15th Progress Report on Trip Ends
Generation Research Counts.
2
Traffic Signal Warrants
Both intersections, Hacienda - Dell and Sunnyoaks -
Dell, are protected by stop signs on all intersection
approaches. Observations of traffic flow at these inter-
sections during the PM peak traffic period (3 PM to 6 PM)
are as follows:
At Hacienda and Dell, there were some backups of
northbound traffic at the intersection. These backups
cleared periodically. There were no significant backups
on the other approaches.
At Dell and Sunnyoaks, there were no significant
traffic backups on any of the approaches.
Traffic counts made at the Hacienda - Dell intersec-
tion on November 29,1984, show that traffic volumes
exceed the minimum requirements for Warrant 1 (Minimum
Vehicular Volumes) for the three peak hours counted.
Traffic counts made by the City of Campbell on June 16,
1982, show that the intersection approach volumes would
exceed the minimum requirements for Warrant 1 for at
least 8 hours of a typical day. A traffic signal warrant
sheet, showing that a signal is warranted at Hacienda
and Dell for existing traffic conditions is included in
the report appendix.
At Dell and Sunnyoaks, the minimum vehicular volume
requirements for Warrant 1 would not be met for any of
the three PM peak hours that were counted. Warrant 2,
3
Interruption of Continuous Traffic, would not apply to
the intersection because it is protected by stop signs
which satisfactorily control the traffic flow. Even if
Warrant 2 were used, it would be met for only two of the
three PM peak hours, so it .is improbable that it could
be met for 8 hours of the day.
A further check for traffic signal warrants at this
intersection was made by expanding the three hour counts
to an average daily basis using the recorded counts
made by the City of Campbell at Hacienda and Dell for
estimating the ratio of PM peak period traffic to total
24-hour traffic. The data is shown on Figure 4. Traffic
signal warrants were calculated for existing plus approved
development traffic and for existing plus approved devel-
opment traffic plus project traffic. The calculations
show that a traffic signal would not be warranted at the
intersection of Sunnyoaks and Dell. The warrant sheets
are included in the report appendix.
Intersection Levels of Service
There are no approved methods for calculating levels of
service at mnsignalized intersections controlled by stop
signs on all approaches. By observation, the intersection
of Sunnyoaks and Dell operates at level of service A - B,
with no long delays to traffic. The intersection of Hacienda
and Dell operates at level of service C - D, with backups
of traffic that clear periodically.
Level of service calculations have been made for con-
ditions if the intersections were signalized, using methods
outlined in Transportation Research Circular No. 212.
4
Level of service calculations are summarized as
follows:
Intersection
Dell - Hacienda
Existing + % Increase to
Existing Approved + Total Intersection
+Approved Project Traffic
0.80 0 * 0.84 D 5.5%
0.55 A 0.58 A 3.9%
development trips at this
Dell - Sunnyoaks
*There are no approved
intersection.
Level of service calculation sheets are included in
the report appendix.
Report Sununary
As requested by the Traffic Engineer of the City of
Campbell, this report analyzes traffic conditions on Dell
Avenue at the intersections of Dell - Hacienda and Dell -
Sunnyoaks. Analysis is based on peak period turning move-
ment counts made at these two intersections during the
hours from 3 to 6 PM.
There is some congestion and delay during the PM peak
traffic period at the intersection of Dell and Hacienda.
A traffic signal would be warranted at this intersection
for existing traffic conditions.
There is no significant traffic congestion at the
intersection of Dell and Sunnyoaks during the PM peak
traffic period. A traffic signal at this intersection
would not be warranted for existing conditions, nor for
conditions with traffic added from other approved develop-
ments and from the project.
5
..'"
,
! I I
.; ,I i
- tl'!.~-"~""
,
I
I
.j
~
..
..;
.?¡
~
,
~....1l!i,ll'.
BLDG. .
1 STOIIY/2 STORY
22,385 LI'.
á-- U;"..,<I,oo'd
h~ ) i : ! . ¡ i ,> I ! : i i !
I , I " " '
LÐ SliE-PLAN-'-=__-~---~--
(J)
r-.
rt
CD
t¡;
I-'
AI
:;j
t'Ij
H
c;)
C
~
II-'
-"':---*"-'--~'~,',C' , " 'ff, '-,'", . =-r---=-~o '
j '1 " " .,
~ '. ' "j,: ' .
¡, J,
".:r"'c' :'c'., --.~ ._~:":f-,=~.- -_...-l-.d¥'~~i
.~ -:1 I
..... "'~ji ;z. "* :; C--~"-'--:r--'-------'¡
. -----.~ - '. ' I
' ¡~~, ~ I
--I + "
, :: ~
- " . ' ,
i.. '. -4 .- I
- J' , "_: EXISTING 8LDG- 'I i
-, . -' ISTOf1Y .
- ~ I
-- . ~ . --:':... 11,520 S.F. I
.~-- ~ i
'---j~-,?: - c I
---I, -- ,::¡. ," j'
~=~' L L : . "'co' t~
t - ~ ¡'::
.C - ¡¡'
'" '
I '
I 0,
, t;1 Ì>
-t-:-+ ~,
-. t:
, ,.
c,
"
';r' ",',
---it-.
-
-----;--
~,+--
"".'O"l'<o'
\1
I'D,
it,.
~ \
i ~
2
w
;:)
Z
W
>
«
. i
-'
-'
W
Q
~
I)-
I~
I '
1_- 1'0"00\(' ex..,.- . ,..
.4'-""v.-T'~
i
<b
,"
SITE DATA
-. ---- -----
LAND AIIEA 128,131.5 5.F.
TOTAL 8I.DG. AREA 41,130 a.F.
-----..-... --
SLOG. COVERAGE 31.1111'1;
---- ..
LANDSCAPING cOVERAQE 14,185.5 5.F, 11.02'1;
- .-
PAVING COVERAGE 55,822 a,F, 50.1111"
PARKING STANDARO 142
COMPACT 33
HANDICAP 4
TOTAL 1711
¡:¡:¡ ~~~
C{JH
z: lJr¡
<e:
z: i5;
5:2 H
c.I) I.
u.I .:
C II:
c
Z
8:
0
.
...J
C
...
I
~¡I
"
.,
ó
:J',
Wi
~!,
,I
¡ :1
..~"
,
Or
~ .
~
CiS
- .--....
.. ".' .,.
SAN TOMAS
EXPRESSWAY
WINCHESTER
BOULEVARD
1 t
t 3
3 t
t 13
1
north
SUNNYOAKS
AVENUE
4
HACIENDA
AVENUE
84 PM Peak Hour Trips
67 Outbound, 17 Inbound
7
f
~ 3
10 ~
1~
FIGURE 2
(84 peak hour trips
67 outbound/17 inbound)
~
PM Peak Hour
Project Traffic
Distribution
5
{ t
21
Wincheste
Boulevard
t
'" 21
53
53
San Tomas
Expressway
31 4--
sunnyoaks
Avenue
Camden
Avenue
Camden
Avenue
FIGURE 3
PM Peak Hour Traffic
Distribution - Morris
Management Development
Route 17
11 ~.
t 42
3
~
11 -¡-
11
t
3
+
u
.....¡
44
L()44
0'1 (Ij
o;r ~
L() 0 o;r MN~
0'1 CO CO N
o;rr-l 0'1 II ?i
N r-I
II u.....¡
II II II .....¡ (Ij
~44'd
U~ A.~
.....¡ ~ (Ij~
~Q) l.D~o
~ S I~
(Ij p" M cJP
~ 0 ~r-
E-ir-l U::JM
Q) .....¡ 0
?i:> ~..c::UJ ¡
r-I Q) ~ .....¡
.....¡ O~ (ljo;r
(Ij U ~N~
O~Q) E-i A.
Q).n
...c:: 0 . ~ I.D
X~~ X UJ I
r:t¡OA. r:t¡r:t¡M
Ex. Daily Traffic = 1630
Other Development = 0
Project = 0
Ex. Traffic 3-6 PM = 285
Est. 24 hour traffic = 1630
3-6 PM is 17.5% of daily traffic
-<
V
IT]
r
r
SUN NYOA K'j
t
Ex. Traffic 3-6 PM = 1357
Est. 24 hour traffic = 3670
3-6 PM is 37% of daily traffic
Ex. Daily Traffic = 3670
Other Development = 0
Project = 84
FIGURE 4
Estimated Daily Traffic
at Sunnyoaks Avenue and
Dell Avenue.
I:tj
:x:
:I:
H
t:tI
H
t-3
:Þ
TABULAR SUMMARY OF VEHICLE COUNTS
Observer MaL Date 11- '»,-<;,¡f Day l1J61J City CA,Aj PeELL R = Righi turn
"S{) II IV Y tJA Jt;: oS S = Straight
INTERSECTION OF Db!.-).. AND L = Lell turn
DELL [JELL $rJN)JY OAK:.S
TIME from SIJUTH TOTAL from ~JEST 'rom EAST TOTAL TOTAL
BEGINS 'rom NORTH North East ALL
- South Wesl
l 5 A Tolal L S A Tolal L S R Tolal l S R Tolal
l!:f on '1; I 7.5 - ID'" In 1'1, 9.1, IQQ - - ~ /I - /1 12 ?J/
151.5 .;;¡Q. hg - I () I 7,/ :;¡Q I/n '}. II - - - q - /1 2.' 1_~2.
1>5':¡f) 41- 1]1 - qq 1'/ Cfg 0' i~ J.-i4 - /1. - II Z.~ ?'11J
-
IF; )./ K ~7 ó8 - q¡( 'i./ R7 J n?{ 'l.{),j - - - ",- - 14 21 2:JD
I 'J?Jf)-1 / J>, 112- 1).69 - ;)0/ he¡ '(ji-f'l Jflb 1:/1 Hli - /If? q~ C;1r'J
II" n,.., 1-'1 4'1, --- 'I:; l.s 1().-1 IIx /q:, - - - JI( - I?; l5? 7_1/
It../.K ,?, 2. '51 - 9,j /.'J. ql 1/1 I cuI - - - /1) II 1t... "l1,()
1/..7,., 1(,., I~P, - í-,4 'fry Cf2 /0 c¡ J 'fr)., - - - /'if - /t1 '),1 "JlrJ
1/ --d.;:; ,il1"" .:.)¡ fJb 2!S 1If) J'J,5 1,Q.1 - - - 1 q liP 11, '1
- -
'L""-J?!)!) 1 '20 1~'i5 - -3oR 67 II/of., 47.:3 '19/ :55 - 11 IO'! RRtt
..
J 7 rC}() 'i,5? ?,b - /:1/ 'Jfl 1/3 ¡HZ 1()h - . - /I - 1~i) J,fr., 1A?
17/5 :,!-,".l -;,J - ":7 1/ II? 133 It; n - - - h - g IA ') .f) J/
/1w 2...1c ~A - JJ'J J'/ ':": jJ() 16'7 - - - ~ - 1'7 2.1) IR"J.
I!///{ IJb 20 1/(,; 7 1h fJ 12.t; - - - 1) - IÍ 10 J? q
, lOti - 18IJn loe IIrI r¡ / ¡j 74 11.91 ;J b?? /" g'L ~f) ,- -~I) fib /"fl,7
Pl', J.lí,
1'5'11;/ 11./1) IJ'1S? .z~Z ')/( (J 72 13'¡q )/5/ 92/ .tiC; F¡',/ì 99 Cf 'lJ)
';/1,.,,/ rn-fal 11hZ 5bl C1?3 2/0 l/If~ /357 ') '1- R () It.">() Ilf Ij ~23 'L1J h5
Cf)
::r
CD
CD
rt
......
0
HI
0'\
tIj
x
p::
H
tI:I
H
t-3
:Þ
TABULAR SUMMARY OF VEHICLE COUNTS
Observer ;!If e I~ Date jI- J.C¡.ð~ Day T If 1/ tZ-5 City ('A /fA P 1'5 ,r::' L L... R = Righi turn
f? £ ~L ¡-I ,Ir ~ / E /t.J f? A S = Siraight
INTERSECTION OF AND L = Lell lurn
pJ:LL P£Ll.. l-/A ~¡ Ii JJ fJA
TIME TOTAL ' TOTAL TOTAL
from NORTH from SIJUTH from ~:EST 'rom EAS T
BEGINS Norlh East ALL
.- South West
L 5 A Tolal L S R Tolal L S A Tolal L S R Tolal
1,:00 0 4-b }..) 71 t~ 1f4- 0 82 /fj'l; 77 / 11 77 ~ - 2-()~
-
Ie;; /) I 1B 4r 70 2-'1; 1)1 0 71 I b' 31- () I~ &)0 - 'J..11
/1); ~o 0 4 I 1b 1.7 hI 67 D / ~b /'11; fb D zz.. bð ~ 'ì b I
-
,,: f'i 36 31 71 74- 7? Jt7 2.ZD ~Ij'" 1,2. b 1 ~ 1,67
0 0 0 -
I 171 I ~2.:3 pO/ ¡q / 1H~ - 4~4' 7-;5 14-~ I ~I 2-tD Cf7,
Ib: 00 0 4-'5 5° tit) 7~ 7/ 0 /4'1- Z';? -;C, 0 z.z. 5'8 - - - 1-17
16" I)" () 2.'? ~~ 1/ 'if) he; 0 / ~,. lOb ~~ 0 21 bZ ..... ~b~
.
,~: 30 () 1;1 1-4- 77 71- '110 0 /52.- '1.27 14t 0 It, 1)8 - "'" lß'7
-
1{,:45' 7-7 4; ?() ç; fJ7 0 / / () 150 ~4- 0 1+ 16 /' 2- Z B
() -
12- b rz5 'j I I '268 273 - r; t I 852 145 - 81 2-2-" /0 7 f..
17:00 / 2.!J 11- 71 68 71 0 14-) 'l1(P tB 0 113 bt - - /' 2.~z..
11:1 r 0 2.4- 5b RO 18 'i/ 0 " /11 !JtJ 0 7 4~ ~ - '-- 1.. 2. I
17:1;0 D 2g tb 71- 51{ 11 0 10+ 178 4+ 0 17 'i7 -- 1,1;7
-
17" fr; 0 2-1 z.ç 4' 21 f3 0 7z II <? ~7 0 ID 47 - - / b 5
-
I 101 J /, tj 27/ 1. 00 ') 'J.n - + 2. 0 t,Qi It.J-t - 50 2-/t - - - "1r;5
"'<. ,~ R.
1/§)/t;',Ib/;, (¡ 3!5 1.1 é1 'J, /4 1$1 ¡<õq 57f{ ~ql) IN/-' - QC1 '2;.15 / I ':! '7
311f íoTAL 2 '1'fl JJ<2q ( 9.:S bl)Cj 11 I" , 13C¡6 ~1..7fl tð7 'lZ1 h'11 "C¡,ð7
(f)
::>'
CD
CD
rt
I\.)
0
HI
0'1
VEHICLE VOLUr\1 E SUl\II\1ARY
LOCATIONßc.'l7 /:1f1~_IEðl.ÞJ9.'f WI~(H£~T{B DI RECTIOK,~.1:L
DH T E ~.:.1to/ 1 ,'.,':::2
t
0100
(12(1(1
0,3 ø 0
(14(10
(15(1(1
06Ü0
0700
080(1
0900
1(100
110(1
120(1
13(10
14(1(1
, j ~~:1C"1
1600
17(1(1
1:::00
19(1(1
20(1(1
21(1(1
22(10
2300
240(1
C'
11
34
"7"7
...'.-'
48
42
141
5(1
I:
,_I
,-,
c.
4
9
;:::
0
I:
....1
11
14
31
39
1:"7
'-'.-'
6(1
:::2
47
I: ,-,
,_IC'
60 60
I: -.
...":"
(
144
160
40
34
,-, I:
C. ,_I
1t.
11
9:::
:::7
-.-.
.:.' ...
24
19
11
;:::
125
14:::
1 :::2
349
-.,,-
.:""t~1
1 ::: :::
:;':::'C"1
.-,,::¡;::-
C. -. '-'
49:::
437
133
1 (1 :::
~ ~ 3 ::: :::
-.
...
1
6
3
1
1
(1
¿
i
4
2
. ,
.-
ø
-.
...
, co
_. ._1
~:9
..2
11:13
~:5
... ,
Lj5
1u7
1"d
1~2
',;3
~~ü
-.
...
4
6
to
-.
...
4
24
12
..,.
..
11
6
1 i
44
-. -.
... ':..
"'?CO
i .-'
51
¿to
2(1
3 hour total = 1230
= 36% of daily traffic
.,. 33 '3 'ð
Ij
ü
ü
....
i r:
3:
3~_j
-. -,
,', "
39
14<2.
co.,
,_I
49
4~5
..,. .~
.. ,
1 (1 ~',;
4:~:
,-, .C'
'::'..'
2u
1.....
1U
Exhibit A,
Sheet 3 åf 6
-,
"~'
-,
,
VEHICLE VOLUI\1 E SU!\1!\IARY
LOCATJON.hIð. 98.J:J..ðcJENDII ~ \JJNrJltf:STER DI RECTION E/B
DATE 06/11/82
(
01(10
0200
0300
(1400
~:::15ØØ
0600
0700
0:::00
Ü900
1000
1100
1200
130(1
1400
1500
160(1
1700
1:::00
1900
2000
2100
2200
2300
.
c
2400
18
43
6:::
45
43
40
74
84
46
62
45
4:::
(
26
1 :::
20
12
:-.:
1
1
1
0
6
:-.::-.:
59
~ ,-
....1 t:.
45
~I::"
._1,_'
4:::
.-. t:"
C"_'
.., ,-,
(.::.
51
.- ,-
t:.'='
co ,-,
....":'
43
-:;,r:.¡
'--'
30
13
~
:::
1 :::2
266
204
1:::0
1 :::7
201
352
¿t.l
i ~:7
¿4(
206
1 :::,:.;
, . ....
.i. .i. ,~.
3075
6
....
.
. ,
2
(1
1
1
, ,
c...
0
.-,
c...
(1
~
....'
19
42
59
........
':.' ...
':' ~.:.1
42
':' ~I
.-,..,
':. (
57
i::"t:"
,_1,_1
72
54
4:::
33
23
19
9
. ,
.:.
co
...1
....
.
....
.
, ,
....
.
, ,
14
....
3
....
4
L ,-
,_'t.
3 hour total = 636
= 21% of daily traffic
:::9
,-""
1:. ':..
........
~. ...
16
1 :::
--
.
2
(1
n
(1
'-..
...
¿to
8~.!
105
4~,~
40
47
t:" ,',
'-":'
106
4::::
,?t:'
,_1.,1
4 ~'
4~~
Exhibit A,
Sheet 4 of 6
A "
'1":';'
'-. ro-
'::',1
1 ::::
1 :
,.
','
[C
,I
of
Lr
VEHICLE VOLUl\1E SUM!\IARY
,tOCA TION }¡o,tOI hELL .sIn HJ4{,~'E~()14
DATE 06/22/82
c.
0100
0200
0300
0400
0500
0600
0700
0t:00
0900
1 0 (H)
1100
1200
1300
140(1
1500
1600
1700
1800
1900
2000
2100
2200
2300
c,
2400
12
26
33
30
C',
...1 ..
66
1(13
63
C'7
,_I._,
C'~
._1,:',
142
133
(
34
4
7
...'
7
::::
1
5
16
::::::::
., .:'
'-"-
39
50
91
90
54
70
100
183
163
39
t:
16
~
4
4
~C'
,.:',,_1
21
30
110
125
157
214
423
311
.-,C' ,-.
'::"'-"::"
262
408
640
435
120
4031
C'
._1
17
. ,
...
~
....
~.
2
11
. ,
,-
~
, .
. ,
4
::.
3
t,
16
21
30
48
,54
103
62
'-7
1:. '-'
75
133
162
89
24
17
14
1::.:
1
4
16
11
18
14
18
71
53
51
20
23
20
14
34
41
30
40
C'~
,_I.:'.
163
C' ,-
,_It-
122
153
, .
.-
~
t.
6
DIRE CT 10 N-.N J B
.
3 hour total = 1483
= 37% of daily traffic
T
9
4
1
~
:::
,.-.
.. .::.
64
50
Exhibit A,
Sheet 5 of 6
23
12
10
~
12
to
VEHICLE VOLUI\1 E SU1\1!\1ARY
LOCA TION~ð Jo'LJ)£u- 3J() HM It:NDJ4
DATE
l
01ÜÜ
Ü20Ü
Ü300
04ÜO
050Ü
060Ü
07ÜÜ
0:::00
C19f1~71
- - ï -
lÜÜO
110(1
1200
1300
,.-.
1400
1500
160(1
170(1
1 :::00
1900
200Ü
2100
2200
2300
240(1
l--
11
1
31
100
114
c:- ,-.
,_I,:.
47
c:--
'-' ~.:.1
7,:,
I '-'
i Ü:::
54
c:- .-.
"-'0::.
c:-c:-
,_1"_1
34
(
1: :
10
':.
'-
1
4
9
,-,"":,
0::...
(1
122
'::¡7
-" I
62
61
32
1 i.:.
:::9
c:- ,-
,_,t.
64
60
36
,-. c:-
o::. ,_"
9
9
.:.
c-
'-'
06/ I':: /:::2
3927'
-.
,~,
0
f1
3
1
~IÒ
, .. ,
.:..:.
146
92
i:. i
64
3:3
. .. .
.:..:.
71
b¿
49
46
.. .
.::. .:.
i c.
~
f
11
.-.
.:.
,-.
0:0
to
-.
.
, .
DIRECTION~
15
3
c:-
,_"
5
14
165
410
555
3:::5
239
.:' oj ,::¡
"- J._,
; ':¡7
.I. -" I
401
336
¿¿¡"ì
225
3 hour total = 547
= 14% of daily traffic
205
117
72
42
36
29
20
12
ü
,
(! ð
,
H 0
h b
7:: 7"3
2211 ).20
1 :::" , , 'li 7
:::;: c¡,.2-
5:: ~ 'i'
4'" r..¡ 7
71; 7 ~
1i"' 117
to~: rr<6
4::: L/ ~
to.! (óo
4 ,~ tILl
1 :1 , Cj
1 ~: '3
1.:::' I L1
L~ /2
ô; ~
-: '5
Exhibit A,
Sheet 6 of 6
" ,
~
2
1
3
....
...
....
I
.,:;
....
.
REPORT APPENDIX:
Traffic Signal Warrant Sheets (3)
Level of Service Calculations (4)
9-4
12.1979
TRAFFIC SIGNALS AND LIGHTING
Traffic Manual
Figure 9.1A
TRAFFIC SIGNAL WARRANTS
DIST
PM
CALC
CHK
DATE
DATE
11-30-84
co
RTE
Major St:
Minor St:
Dell Avenue
Hacienda Avenue
Critical Approach Speed
Critical Approach Speed
35
30
mph
mph
Critical speed of major street traffic ~ 40 mph -- - - -- - - - -- -- 0
OR
In built up area of isolated community of < 10,000 pop. -------- 0
Qg
RURAL (R)
URBAN (U)
WARRANT 1 - Minimum Vehicular Volume
U R
APPROACH 2 or more 7-8
LANES
Both Apprchs, 500 350 600 420 665
Major Street 14001 (2801 14801 13361
Highest Apprc 150 105 200 140 266
Minor Street. 11201 1841 11601 11121
100% SATISFIED
80"A. SATISFIED
Yes 0 No 0
Yes 0 No 0
Hour
. NOTE: Heavier of left turn movement from MaiO( Street included when L T-phasing is proposed
WARRANT 2 - Interruption of Continuous Traffic
MINIMUM REQUIREMENTS 100% SATISFIED Yes 0 No 0
180O¡ SHOWN IN 8!1ACKETSI
80% SATISFIED Yes 0 No 0
U R U R
APPROACH 1 2 or more / /
LANES
Both Apprchs, 750 525 900 630
Major Streel 16001 14201 17201 15041
Highest Apprch 75 53 100 70
Minor Street. 1601 1421 1801 (561
Hour
. NOTE' Heavier of left turn mov~nt from Maior Street included when L T-phasing is proposed 0
WARRANT 3 - Minimum Pedestrian Volume
MiNIMUM REQUIREMENTS
180O¡ SHOWN IN 8!1ACKETsi
100"Æ SATISFIED
80% SATISFIED
Yes 0 No 0
Yes 0 No 0
U
R
Hour
Both Apprchs. No Median
Major Street
Volume Raised
..' Median
Ped's On Highest Volume
X-Walk Xi Ma"or Street
600 420
14801 13361
1000 700
18001 15601
150 105
1120 1841
IF Io4IDBLOCK SIGNAL PROPOSED
0
MIN, !lEOUI!lEMENT DISTANCE TO NEA!lEST ESTA8L ISHED CRWLK, FULFILLED
150 Feet N/E II S/W II Yes 0 No 0
WARRANT 4 - School Crossings
Not Appl icable
See School Crossings Warrant Sheet
0
0
NOTE: Traffic volumes for the hours of 7AM to 2PM are from
recorded counts made by the City of Campbell on June 16r 1982.
Traffic volumes for the hours of 3-6 PM are from manual
turning movment counts made on November 29r 1984.
9-6
12.1979
TRAFFIC SIGNALS AND LIGHTING
Traffic Manual
Figure 9-1C
TRAFFIC SIGNAL WARRANTS
Dell/Sunnyoaks
Existing + Approved
(8as~ on Estimotecl Average Doily Traffic - See Note 2)
(j)
URBAN...........X.................RURAL.......,.................. Minimum Requirements
EADT
1. Minimum Vehicular
SatisHeci Hot Satisfied X Vehicles per day on major Venicles per clay on hig,er-
street (total of both volume minor- street approach
Humber of lanes for moving traffic on each approach approaches) 6345 (one direction only)
1630
Major Street Minor Street U..... ....1 U~an Rural
1 . . . . . . . . . . . ., G)..............".. 8,000 5,600 2,400 1,680
20rmore........ 1................ 9,600 6,120 2,400 1,680
20rmore........ 20rmore........... 9,600 6,120 3,200 2,240
1 . . . . . . . . . . . . - 20rmore........... 8,000 5,600 3,200 2,2'()
2. Interruption of Continuous Traffic
Vehicles per day on major Venicles per clay on hig,er-
Sati sHed Not Satisfied X street (total of both volume minor-street approach
approaches) (one direction only)
Humberof lanes formoving traffic on each approach 6345 1630
Major Street G)n~~ ~t~e.e~ . . . . . . . . . Urban Rurol U rhon Rural
1 ............ 12.000 8,400 1.200 850
20rmore........ 1................ 14,400 10,080 1,200 850
20rmore........ 20rmore........... 1 4, 400 10.080 1,600 . 1,120
1 . . . . . . . . . . . . .. 20rmore........... 12,000 8,400 1,600 1,120
3. Combination
Sati sfied Not Sati sHed X
2 Warrants 2 Warrants
No one warrant sati sfied but following warrants
fulfilled 80% or more......
1 2
G)
HOTE:
1. Left turn movements from the major street may be included with minor street volumes if a separate
signal phase is to be provided for the left.turn movement.
2. To be used only for NEW INTERSECTIOHS orother locations where actual traffic volumes cannot
be counted.
T5-1i)..C
9-6
12.1919
TRAFFIC SIGNALS AND LIGHTING
Traffic Manual
Figure 9-1 C
TRAFFIC SIGNAL WARRANTS De11/Sunnyoaks
Existing + Approved
+ Project
(Baseil on Estimot.cI Anrag. Daily Traffic - s.. Hate 2)
G)
URBAN ................~........ ....RURAL .....,.w................ Minimum Requirements
EADT
1. Minimum Vehicular
SatisHeci Hot Sati s fi ed X Vehicles per day on major Vehicles perdayon higher-
street (total of both volume minor- street approac~
Number of lanes for moving traffic on each approach approaches) (one direction only)
6513 1630
Major Street Minor Street U rMø. a.... Urban Rural
1 . . . . . . . . . . . .. (!)............... .M29- 5,600 2.400 1,680
20rmore........ 1 ................ 9,600 6,720 2,400 1,680
20rmore........ 20rmore........... 9,600 6,720 3,200 2,240
1 . . . . . . . . . . . . - 20rmore........... 8,000 5,600 3,200 2,240
2. Interruption of Continuous Traffic
Vehicles per day on major Vehicles per day on higher-
Sati sHed Not Satisfied X street (total of both volume minor-street approach
. approaches) (one direction only)
Numberof lanes formoving traffic on each approach 6513 1630
Major Street Minor Street Urban Rural Urban Rural
1 ............ (D................ 12.000 8,400 1.200 850
2ormore........ 1..... . . . . . . . . . . . 14,400 10,080 1,200 850
20rmore........ 20rmore........ .. 1 4, 400 10.080 1,600. 1,120
1 . . . . . . . . . . . . .. 20rmore........... 12,000 8,400 1,600 1,120
3. Combination
Sotisfied Not Satisfied X 2 Warrants 2 Warrants
No one warrant satisfied but following warrants
fulfilled 80% or more......
1 2
CD
NOTE:
1. Left turn movements from the major street may be included with minor street volumes if a separate
signal phase is to be provided for the left-turn movement.
2. To be used only for NEW INTERSECTIONS or other locations where actual traffic volumes cannot
be counted.
T5-h>.C
INTERSECTION CAPACITY ANALYSIS
INTERSECTION Dell Avenue - Hacienda Avenue
PEAK HOUR PM Peak CONDITION Existing Traffic
r-
135 T
179 R
A
'-
146 ~)
99 \
i
HAc../ E"NDA
289 L
289 T
C)
COUNT DATE 1l-?q-R4
NORTH
DIRECTION CRITICAL MOVEMENTS CRITICAL VOLUMES
EAST/WEST --< 245
NORTH/SOUTH ~1 314+578 = 892
SUM OF CRITICAL LANE VOLUMES 1136 ~
3 1425 I
NUMBER OF PHASES / CAPACITY AT E
v/e RATIO / LEVEL OF SERVICE 0.80 D
INTERSECTION CAPACITY ANALYSIS
INTERSECTION Dell Avenue - Hacienda Avenue
PEAK HOUR PM Peak CONDITION Existing + Project
0
fì1,
r
r
142 T
179 R
vi
"-
146 L
104 R-<
~
309 L
319 T
!+A<., I £ N D A-
COUNT DATE 11-29-84
C)
NORTH
DIRECTION CRITICAL MOVEMENTS CRITICAL VOLUMES
EAST /~JEST -< 250
NORTH/SOUTH --Ii 321+628 = 949
SUM OF CRITICAL LANE VOLUMES 1199
NUMBER OF PHASES / CAPACITY AT E 3 14?t;
v/e RATIO / LEVEL OF SERVICE 0.84 D
INTERSECTION CAPACITY ANALYSIS
INTERSECTION Dell Avenue - Sunnyoaks Avenue
PEAK HOUR PM Peak CONDITION Existing + Approved
0
\'"
Î
171 L
232 T
~
"-
~50 R
r49 L
t r
..s()tJlJ'¡o~
72 T
379 R
C)
COUNT DATE 11-28-84
NORTH
DIRECTION CRITICAL MOVEMENTS CRITICAL VOLUMES
EAST I~JEST r 49
NORTH/SOUTH ~ r 403 + 379 (-49)
=733
SUM OF CRITICAL LANE VOLUMES 782
: 3 1425
NUMBER OF PHASES I CAPACITY AT E i
I
vie RATIO I LEVEL OF SERVICE 0.55 A
INTERSECTION CAPACITY ANALYSIS
INTERSECTION Dell Avenue - Sunnyoaks Avenue
PEAK HOUR PM Peak CONDITION Existing + ApprmTPn
+ Project
Q
~
r
171 L
239 T
~
'----
'- 50 R
r49 L
t ( ,/ s UNAJV()Ak.~
72 T
409 R
C)
COUNT DATE 11-28-84
NORTH
DIRECTION CRITICAL MOVEMENTS CRITICAL VOLUMES
EAST /~JEST r 49
NORTH/SOUTH ~ 410+409 (-49)
( =770
SUM OF CRITICAL LANE VOLUMES 819
NUMBER OF PHASES / CAPACITY AT E 3 1425
v/e RATIO / lEVEL OF SERVICE 0.58 A
CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL: 84-22
APPLICANT: Riedinger, M. (Design & Engineering Systems)
SITE ADDRESS: 1587 & 1599 Dell Ave. P.C. MTG.
12-11-84
The applicant is notified as part of this application that he/she is required
to meet the following conditions in accordance with the Ordinances of the City
of Campbell and the Laws of the State of California.
1. Revised elevations and/or site plan indicating colors and materials.
Additionally, screening of roof equipment on existing and proposed buildings
prior to application for a building perMit.
2. Property to be fenced and landscaped as indicated and/or added in red on the
plans. Landscaping and fencing shall be Maintained in accordance with the
approved plans.
3. Landscaping plan indicating type and size of plant Material, and location of
irrigation system to be submitted to the Planning Department and approved by
the Site and Architectural Review Committee and/or Planning Commission prior to
issuance of a building perMit.
4. Fencing plan indicating location and design details of fencing ~o be
submitted to the Planning Department and approved by th€ Planning Director
prior to issuance of a building permit.
5. Applicant to either (1) post a faithful performance bond in the amount of
$5,000.00 to insure landscaping, fencing, and striping of parking areas within
3 months of completion of construction: or (2) file written agreement to
co~plete landscaping, fencing, and striping of parking areas. Bond or
agreement to be filed with the Planning Department prior to application for a
building permit.
6. Applicant to submit a plan to the Planning Depart~ent, prior to installation
of PG&E utility (transformer) boxes, indicating the location of the boxes and
screening (if boxes are above ground) for approval of the Planning Director.
7. Applicant to submit a letter to the Planning Department, satisfactory to the
City Attorney, limiting the use of the property as follows: 16,530 sq.ft.
warehousing/manufacturing use and 31,200 sq.ft. office use -- prior to
application for a building permit
8. All ~echanical equip~ent on roofs and all utility ~eters to be screened as
approved by the ?lanning Director.
9. Building occupancy will not be allowed until public i~prove~ents are
installed.
10. All parking and driveway areas to be developed in compliance with Chapter
21.50 of the Ca~pbell Municipal Code. All parKing spaces to be provided with
appropriate concrete curbs or bumper guards.
11. Underground utilities to be provided as required by 5ection 20.16.070 of
the Campbell Municipal Code.
COJD!TIOX5 OF APPROVAL: -22
APPLICANT: Riedinger, M. (Design & Engineering SY5~em5)
SITE ADDRESS: ~587 & 1599 Dell Ave. P.C. MTG.
12-11-84
12. Plans submitted to the Building Department for pl~n chec¡~ shall indic~~e
clearly the location of all connections for underground utilities including
water, sewer, electric, telephone a~è television c~ble~, etc.
13. Sign a?plic~tion to be submitted in accoråance with provisions of the Sign
Ordinance for all signs. No sign to be ins~alled until application is approved
and per~it issued by Planning and Building Depar~men~s <Section 21.58.030 of
the Campbell Municipal Code).
14. Ordinance No. 782 of the Cawpbell Municipal Code stipulates that any
contract for the collection and disposal of refuse, garbage, wet gar~age and
rubbish produced within the li~its of the City of Cawpbell shall be made with
Gree~ V~lley Disposal Company. This requirement a?plies to all single-family
dwellings, multiple apartment units, to all commercial, business, industrial,
manufacturing, and construction establishments.
15. Tras~ container<s} of a size and q~antity necessary to serve the
development s~all be located in area(s) approved by the Fire Department.
Unless otherwise noted, enclosure(s) shall consist of a concrete floor
surrounded by a solid wall or fence and have self-closing doors of a size
specified by the Fire Department. All enclosures to be constructed at grade
level and have a level are~ adJacent to the trash enclos~re area to service
these containers.
1&. Applicant s~all comply with all appropriate State and City require~ents for
the handicapped.
17. The applicant is hereby notified that the property is to be maintained free
of any combus~ible trash, debris and weeds, until the time that actual
construction commences. All existing structures shall be secured by having
windows boarded up and doors sealed s~ut, or be de~olished or removed from the
property. Sect. 11.201 & 11.414, 1979 Ed. Unifor~ Fire Code.
egê~Iç ~QB~~ Q~e~EItlg~~
18. Process and file a parcel map to co~bine the two lots.
19. Participate financially in the amount of $24,000 toward the construction of
a fut~re traffic signal at Hacienda/Dell Ave. intersection.
20. Obtain an e>:cavation permit, pay fees, and post surety to relocate drivew~y
and any other work in the public right-of-way.
Er~g_2gE~~I~s~I
2~. Provide automatic sprinkler systems for both buildings.
monitored by Central Station alarm company.
Systems shall be
22. Provide two on-site fire hydrants adjacent to north and south driveways.
23. Parking shall be prohibited in driveways other than in designated parking
spaces. Signs shall be posted along driveways reading "Fire Lane -- No
Parking."
~Q!bQl~Q Q~e~EI~g~I
24.
No comment& ðt thi& ti.e.
2 of 2