600 E. Hamilton Ave. (84-03)
;1~
('Jc,
f -7 S---
RESOLUTION NO.
7251
BEING AN RESOLUTION'AUTHORIZING AGREEMENT
WITH APPLE COMPUTER COMPANY, A CALIFORNIA
CORPORATION
WHEREAS, Apple Computer Company, a Cal ifornia corporation, has
submitted to the City Council of the City of Campbell an agree-
ment to perform 1 ight recreational activities on City-owned
property described on Exhibit A, attached to said agreement;
WHEREAS, City of Campbell grants to Apple Computer Company, a
Cal ifornia corporation, a license to conduct 1 ight recreation
use on the property, including picnicking, badminton and horse-
shoes, in accordance with all the terms of said agreement;
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the City
of Campbell that the Mayor be, and he is hereby, authorized to
execute said agreement on behalf of said City.
PASSED AND ADOPTED this 2nd
1986, by the following vote:
day of
September
AYES: Counc i 1 members: ASHWORTH, WATSON, PODGORSEK, KOTOWSKI
NOES: Counc i 1 membe rs: NONE
ABSENT: Counc i I membe rs: DOETSCH
~~~
Michael. Kotowski Mayor
ATTEST:
~>:;tZt~-€/Þ- ~# j
Louise B. Pena, Deputy City Clerk
TH~ FOR~1301NG 1N3TRUMENT IS A TRUË
AND CORRECT COpy OF THE ORIGINAL
ON FILE ifJ TH:S OFFICE,
)I,nEST: C'l,"Yffi,A, ü~SN:K,{. CITY CLERK.
CITYOF? c:.:.~f~"::ll'.25 FG~. -
8¡;!J¡lII ~f , ,~J!.Æ ~.
DATED q~,LI-.l) (;
~
~ý{~,-'é~/
L/ 61
ORDINANCE NO. 1557
BEING AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL
OF THE CITY OF CAMPBELL ADOPTING PLANS,
ELEVATIONS, DEVELOPMENT SCHEDULE, AND
CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL FOR THE PLANNED
DEVELOPMENT ZONE ESTABLISHED BY ORDINANCE
OF THE CITY OF CAMPBELL (APPLICATION OF
LINDA KAVANAUGH, ON BEHALF OF BARRY SWENSON
BUILDERS, PD 84-03 ).
The City Council of the City of Campbell does ordain as
follows:
SECTION ONE: That the Zoning Map of the City of Campbell is
hereby changed and amended by adopting the attached Exhibit A
entitled "Plans and Elevations", Exhibit B entitled "Development
Schedule"; Exhibit C entitled "Map of Said Property"; and
Exhibit D entitled "Conditions of Approval", as per the
application of Ms. Linda Kavanaugh, on behalf of Barry Swenson
ßuilders for approval of plans, elevations, and development
schedule to allow the remodeling of an existing building on
property known as 600 E. Hamilton Avenue in a Planned
Development Zoning District. Copies of said Exhibits are on
file in the Planning Department.
SECTION TWO: This Ordinance shall become effective thirty
(30) days following its passage and adoption and shall be
published once within fifteen (15) days upon passage and
adoption in the San Jose Mercury News, a newspaper of general
circulation in the City of Campbell, County of Santa Clara.
PASSED AND ADOPTED THIS 2nd day of April, 1985 by the
following roll call vote:
AYES:
NOES:
ABSENT:
Councilmen: Chamberlin, Kotowski, Doetsch, Podgorsek, Ashworth
Councilmen: None
Councilmen: None
ATTEST:
rb-.co1! ~
City Clerk
APPROVED: /~~ --
John J. ~orth, Mayor
~
~
EFn;Gn Vii UAt't-:: ~
THE FOREGO!NG INSTRUMENT IS A TRUE
AND CORP"cC;T CCPY OF THE ORIGINAL
ON F!~::: IN Ti liS CHICE.
B
PU{;L.{ ¿., \,vO~>
DATED
EXHIBIT 8
STANDARD DEVELOPMENT SCHEDULE
FILE NO: PD 84-03
APPLICANT: LINDA KAVANAUGH, BARRY SWENSON BUILDERS
SITE ADDRESS: 600 E HMllLTON AVENUE
1. Construction to begin within six months of final approval.
2. Construction to be completed within one year of ~tarting
date.
NOTE: Above development schedule is a standard used by the
Planning Department when applicant has not submitted a schedule
for his project.
CONDITIONS OF APPROVAl PD 84-03
APPLICANT: ICavanaugh,--.
SITE ADDRESS: 600 E. Hamilton Ave.
P.C. MTG. February 26,1985
EXHIBIT D
The applicant is notified as part of this application that he/she is required
to meet the following conditions in accordance with the Ordinances of the City
of campbell and the LaWS of the State of california.
1. Revised site plan indicating parking areas to be submitted to the Planning
Department and approved by the planning Director upon recommendation of the
Architectural Advisor prior to application for a building permit.
2. Property to be fenced and landscaped as indicated and/or added in red on the
plans. Landscaping and fencing shall be maintained in accordance with the
approved plans.
3. Landscaping plan indicating type and size of plant material, and location of
irrigation system to be submitted to the Planning Department and approved by
the Site and Architectural Review Committee and/or planning Commission prior to
issuance of a building permit.
4. Fencing plan indicating location and design details of fencing to be
submitted to the planning Department and approved by the Planning Director
prior to issuance of a building permit.
5. Applicant to either (1) post a faithful performance bond in the amount of
$10,000.00 to insure landscaping, fencing, and striping of parking areas
within 3 months of completion of construction; or (2) file written agreement to
complete landscaping, fencing, and striping of parking areas. Bond or
agreement to be filed with the Planning Department prior to application for a
building permit.
6. Applicant to submit a letter to the Planning Department, satisfactory to the
city Attorney, prior to application for building permit, limiting the use of
the property as follows: 1. New mezannine in warehouse - 20,000 sq.ft.; 2.
High cube storage -- 91,400 sq.ft.; 3. Retail sales (including showroom,
offices, accesory stock, clearance and storage) - 64,500 sq.ft.; and 4.
Exterior valls - 1,100 sq.ft.
7. All 8echanical equipment on roofs and all utility meters to be screened as
approved by the Planning Director.
8. Building occupancy will not be allowed until public improvements are
installed.
9. All parking and driveway areas to be developed in compliance with Chapter
21.50 of the Campbell Municipal Code. All parking spaces to be provided with
appropriate concrete curbs or bumper guards.
CONDITIONS OF APPROVA~ PD 84-03
APPLICANT: !Cavanaugh, L.
SITE ADDRESS: 600 E. Hamilton Ave.
P.C. MTG. February 26,1985
PAGE 2.
10. Underground utilities to be provided as required by Section 20.16.070 of
the Campbell Municipal Code.
ll. Plans submitted to the Building Department for plan check shall indicate
clearly the location of all connections for underground utilities including
water, sewer, electric, telephone and television cables, etc.
12. Sign application to be submitted in accordance with provisions of the Sign
Ordinance for all signs. No sign to be installed until application is approved
and permit issued by Planning and Building Departments (Section 21.68.030 of
the Campbell Municipal Code).
13. Ordinance No. 782 of the campbell Municipal Code stipulates that any
contract for the collection and disposal of refuse, qarbage, wet garbage and
rubbish produced within the limits of the City of campbell shall be made with
Green Valley Disposal Company. This requirement applies to all sinqle-family
dwellinqs, multiple apartment units, to all commercial, business, industrial,
manufacturing, and construction establishments.
14. Trash container(s) of a size and quantity necessary to serve the
development shall be located in area(s) approved by the Fire Department.
Unless otherwise noted, enclosure(s) shall consist of a concrete floor
surrounded by a solid wall or fence and have self-closing doors of a size
specified by the Fire Department. All enclosures to be constructed at grade
level and have a level area adjacent to the trash enclosure area to service
these containers.
15. Applicant shall comply with all appropriate State and City requirements for
the handicapped.
16. The applicant is hereby notified that the property is to be maintained free
of any combustible trash, debris and weeds, until the time that actual
construction commences. All existing structures shall be secured by having
windows boarded up and doors sealed shut, or be demolished or removed from the
property. Sect. 11.201 & ll.4l4, 1979 Ed. Uniform Fire Code.
PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT
17. Traffic report to be approved by the City Engineer prior to agendizing this
item before the City Council.
18. Applicant to abide by mitigation measures, including possible restrictions
on the number, size and timing of truck usage on this site as required by the
City Engineer.
FIRE DEPARTMENT
19. Plans for modifications to fire protection systems shall be submitted for
permit and approval.
CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL: PD 84-03
APPLICANT: Kavanaugh, L.
SITE ADDRESS: 600 E. Hamilton Ave.
P.C. MTG. February 26, 1985
PAGE 3.
BUILDING DEPARTMENT
20. Note: Shell plans for this project now under structural plan check for the
cutting of concrete floor for elevation and stairwell into existing structure.
No additional comments at this time.
-
-
.
s
.
-
s
~
",-"
1
~
í
I" I
.i :;,
<",
AVL
H 0"': ,.,.."
. .
-...
,'1.
'4L
j, .a
; ~'O
"', .u
-,r -
,r,.or C
. ,..-0' t . .
- I
.:~: ,
..
'.
. ,.
,.. .
, , ..-f;'"
. , ':. '--
. ~,,"'f~¡t-$; ,~.
t-
, :-<
'.
,.
;, r '.
. ",
. (: IT
FUBLI C HFARIN; HELD BEFORE pLANNING
m.t-fiSSION ON 2-26-85. RES. 2316
JŒ~1NG APProvAL (VOTE: 5-2-0)
RFMJDEL EXI STING BLDG.
. "J
~
,_.-,
1
s
~
~
".r' ~
CITY OF CAMPBEll
70 NORTH FIRST STREET
CAMPBELL, CALIFORNIA 95008
(408) 866-2100
Department: Pub 1 i c Works
February 15, 1985
Ms. Linda Kavanaugh
Barry Swenson Builder
701 North First Street
San Jose, CA 95112
RE:
APPLE COMPUTER SITE, 600 EAST HAMILTON AVENUE
Dear Ms. Kavanaugh:
This letter is to confirm a recent conversation regarding materials,
as yet unsubmitted, that are necessary so that the Public Works De-
partment can complete its evaluation of the subject project.
You will recall that several months ago we indicated we needed a
site plan detailing internal circulation and proposed driveways,
with truck radii shown. This plan should be to scale and should in-
clude details for driveway widths, landscaping modifications, parking
restrictions and other pertinent traffiicengineering details. The
plans should be done by a traffic engineer.
It is our understanding that you are currently on the Planning Com-
mission agenda for February 26. We need to receive the above-
referenced site plan prior to Friday, February 22, in order to
complete our evaluation prior to the Planning Commission meeting.
Pleasg.",f~elfre~ to contact me at your convenience if you have any
ques tions-.
Joseph Ell iott
Director of Public Works
KM/le
- .
. .
LOUIS tl. L^RSON.INc.
CIVIL AND lRAFfI( ENGINEERING
885 No. San Antonio Road. Los Altos, California 94022
(415) 949-1124
REVISED
TRAFFIC REPORT
Proposed Apple Computer Facility
600 E. Hamilton Avenue
Campbell, California
prepared for
Barry Swenson Builder
October, 1984
Revised: November 19, 1984
~ ~~~o~~~ @
CITY OF CAMPBELL
PLANNING DEPARTMENT
..,:.
Louis H. Larson
R.T.E. No. 59
.,;.-
CONTENTS
~
Project Description
Trip Generation and Distribution
Project Traffic Impacts
Truck Traffic Impacts
Internal Circulation
1
2
3
4
6
Figure 1 - AM Peak Hour Project Traffic Distribution
Figure 2 - PM Peak Hour project Traffic Distribution
Report Appendix:
Peak Hour Existing Traffic Counts - Hamilton & Salmar
Level of Service Calculation Sheets - (6 sheets)
Project Description
~
Barry Swenson Builder plans to remodel an existing
building at 600 E. Hamilton Avenue in Campbell for
use as a storage warehouse by Apple Computer, Inc. The
building has 155,000 square feet of floor area. It is
planned that there will be 20,000 square feet of office
area and that there will initially be 40 to 80 employees
at the facility. The maximum number of employees at
the facility, after 2 to 3 years of operation is expec-
ted to be 106. (1)
The Apple Computer facility is a distribution ware-
house with the primary function of receiving, storing
and assembling materials for shipment to foreign destin-
ations. Much of the warehouse inventory will be
stored in bulk, but there will also be open bin§ for
small parts, and there will be provisions for testing
components and for assembly and packaging. (2)
The building is located at the southeast corner
of Hamilton Avenue and Salmar Avenue. Access to the site
is provided by way of driveway connections to Salmar
Avenue.
This building was formerly a Bullock's Clearance
Center, which had 60,000 square feet of retail space
and 92,000 square feet of warehouse space. This Bullock's
Clearance Center is no longer in operation
(1) As stated by Lou Weiss, Apple Computer Company
Representative.
(2) As stated by Ernie Areno of Integrated Handling
Systems, designers of the warehouse equipment.
1
Trip Generation and Distribution
'""-
Caltrans studies on Trip Ends Generation Research
Counts show an average of 4.5 weekday trips per 1000 square
feet of floor area for warehouses, and an average of 14.9
weekday trips per 1000 square feet of floor area for com-
mercial offices in the Bay Area. The combined faciltiy
of 135,000. square feet of warehouse and 20,000 square feet
of office space would generate 906 av~rage daily trips
and 161 peak hour trips, according to these rates given
by Caltrans studies. Calculations are as follows:
Building -Square Daily Peak Hour -Peak Hour
Usage -Feet Trip Rate Trips Factor Trips
Warehouse 135,000 4.5/1000 sf 608 20% 122
Office 20,000 14.9/1000 sf 298 13% 39
(TOTALS:) 906 161
Using a 20 percent - 80 percent inbound/outbound
split, there will be 32 trips inbound and 129 trips out-
bound during the PM peak traffic hour. AM peak hour
traffic will be the same but opposite in direction. The
trips include truck traffic, calculated to be 7 percent
of total traffic. Additional information on truck
traffic follows on page 4.
Project generated traffic has been distributed to
the surrounding street system in accordance with present
travel patterns in the area. AM and PM peak hour pro-
ject traffic distributions are shown on Figures 1 and 2,
respectively. The semi-trailer truck traffic would use
State Route 17 to and from the north, and is not expec-
ted to appear on any city streets except on Salmar Avenue
at the site.
2
Project Traffic Imapacts
..
Levels of service have been calculated at the inter-
section of Hamilton Avenue and Salmar Avenue, for AM
and PM peak traffic hour conditions. Calculations have
been made for existing traffic conditions, for existing
plus approved development traffic, and for conditions
with projeèt traffic added. Approved development traffic
numbers were obtained from the Supplement to Traffic
Report for Proposed Office Building at 851 E. Hamilton
Avenue, Campbell, prepared in August, 1984, by Louis
H. Larson, Inc. Level of service calculations have been
made according to methods outlined in Transportation
Research Circular No. 212, a publication of the National
Academy of Sciences, Transportation Research Board.
Level of service calculations are summarized as
follows:
Existing Existing Percent Increase
Existing +Approved +Approved to Total Inter-
Location Traffic Dev. Trips + Project section Traffic
Hamilton-Salmar
AM Peak 0.62 B 0.70 C 0.74 C 3.4%
PM Peak 0.97 E 1. 05 F 1.06 F 2.2%
During the AM peak traffic hour, the intersection of
Hamilton Avenue and Salmar Avenue will operate at level of
service C {v/c ratio = 0.70} for existing plus approved
development traffic, and level of service will remain at
C {v/c ratio = 0.74} when project traffic is added. During
the PM peak traffic hour, the intersection will operate at
level of service F {v/c ratio = 1.OS} for existing plus
approved development traffic, and level of service will
3
remain at F (v/c ratio = 1.06) when project traffic is
added. Percent increases to total intersection traffic
due to the addition of project generated traffic will
be 3.4 percent during the AM peak traffic hour and 2.2
percent during the PM peak traffic hour. Level of
service calculation sheets are included in the report
...
appendix.
Truck Traffic Impacts
The amount of truck traffic that will be generated
by the project has been estimated from information
provided by Ernie Areno, a representative of Integrated
Handling Systems, Menlo Park, who designed the warehouse
storage and handling equipment, and from information
provided by Lou Weiss of Apple Computer Company, and
from personal observation during a conducted tour of
the facility.
The building has 24 loading docks. There are 3
docks on the west side of the building intended for use
as receiving docks. There are 9 loading docks on the
east side of the building and 12 loading docks on the
south end of the building. These docks will accomodate
trailers or single unit trucks. Normal operation would
be for a truck tractor driver to bring in a trailer for
loading and leave it at the dock where it might remain
for one or two days. The driver may be able to pick up
another loaded trailer or he may drive out in his trac-
tor to another destination. Normally, tractors would
not be parked on 'the site.
4
Mr. Areno estimates that the warehouse equipment
operators can load 6 or 7 trailers in an eight-hour
day. On a peak operating day, 9 or 10 trailers might
be loaded. For a maximum figure, Mr. Weiss had sug-
gested that we use 12 semi-trailer loads per day.
This is equivalent to 24 semi-trailer truck trips
per day.
~
Two-axle truck trips are more difficult to es-
timate. Some warehouse materials may be received in
two-axle trucks and some shipments may go out in two-
axle trucks. Tractors leaving the site without a
load would also be classified as two-axle trucks, as
would ups trucks. We have roughly estimated that the
total number of daily trips by two-axle trucks would
be 20 round trips, 40 total trips. Total of all daily
truck trips would b~his is equivalent to 7
percent of total traffic, which is comparable to truck
percentages reported by Caltrans at other warehouses
and industrial park locations. (1)
Mr. Weiss has stated that Apple Computer intends
to operate the distribution center so that the semi-
trailer units would not be out on the streets before
9:00 AM or after 4:00 PM. This is a desireable stip-
ulation that should be accepted by the city but with
the understanding that it may not be always possible
to strictly enforce.
(1) Study No. 248, Bohannon Industrial Park, Menlo
Park - 6% trucks.
Study No. 146, Crocker Industrial Park, Brisbane
- 7% trucks.
Study No. 212, McGraw Hill Warehouse, Novato-
5% trucks.
5
It should be noted that the estimates of truck
traffic given above are based on Apple Computers'
presently stated plans for operating the facility.
If at some time in the future the operation were
changed, so that all or most of the cargo were handled
in bulk, there could be a much larger generation of
truck traffic by the facility.
~
Internal Circulation
There are four existing driveways at the project
site.
Driveway 1 is located 100 feet south of Hamilton
Avenue and is intended to be used as an exit driveway.
A center median in Salmar Avenue bars left turns at
Driveway 1. Driveway 2, located 400 feet south of
Hamilton Avenue is intended to be used as an entrance
driveway. Driveways 1 and 2 are the main driveways
that will serve the truck docks on the east and west
sides of the building and the employee and visitor
traffic. Driveways 1 and 2 are 26 feet in width. It
is intended that both driveways be widened to 60 feet
to accommodate the large trucks.
Driveway 3 is the main driveway serving the docks
at the south end of the building. These docks are not
accessible from Driveways 1 and 2. Driveway 3 is a
32 foot wide driveway that should be widened to 60
feet so that trucks can turn out without encroaching
on the opposing traffic lane on Salmar Avenue.
6
Driveway 4 is a 40-foot wide driveway at the far
south end of the lot. It could be used as an entrance
driveway if there were no parking of vehicles at this
end of the lot. It is not useable as a truck exit
~
driveway.
Checks made with standard truck turning templates
on an aerial photograph of the site show that the
widened street driveways and the internal traffic lanes
could accommodate rigs with an overall length (tractor
and trailer combination) of 60 feet.
7
-
19 t
+ 5
.~
N
.:-
SAL/1J¡, [')
~ AV. ...- 2
10 ---
19
)
5.-/\\
. 25-...\ 61
s1te !
I
~39
ROUTE 17
9 --¡....
_5
19-
11
i t
42
.
:>
~
z
0
E-4
H
H
~
::x:
Figure!
AM PEAK HOUR
PROJECT TRAFFIC
DISTRIBUTION
-
5 t
. 19
~
N ..
SALl1AR 10
AV. -
5
)
~9
-9
ROUTE 17
2 --+- I
I
I
I
19.../ \ \
100 ~ I 16
. I
s~te
39-7-
--19
5-
t
42 16
~
42
~ tl
(161 trips)
.
:>
~
z
0
~
~
H
~
:I:
Figure ~
PM PEAK HOUR
PROJECT TRAFFIC
DISTRIBUTION
~
REPORT APPENDIX
Peak Hour Existing Traffic Counts:
Hamilton Avenue - Salmar Avenue (2)
Level of Service Calculations:
(6 )
l/{p:L9
INTERSECTION
TURNING MOVEMENTS
I 0 I .-/
15~D I /544) ---,.-
I /(p I ~
I -3 /B~ )
total
~o
r- ~
roO
...
rf)
I'-
0
~t:r)~
0 ct "<t'
::t - ('Í)
) ~ \
, t (
~O~
~ Q
~ ~
- I\<)
~-
~.8
~o
...
-
..
'- I I £Po J
..L- 1/21lß ~
F 168 I
9tP451
total
1~21J I
10 - '1 - 84
DATE
Oì 30- 0830
TIME OF DAY
/-4AMILíON - 5ALMAfZ..
LOCATION
SOURCE: Barton-Aschman Associates
128001
INTERSECTION
TURNING MOVEMENTS
I 0 I --'
11111 1170'21 -,..-
I 3~ I ~
~
total
~-
0- 0
I'õ
\'J...
~ 0
[;]~~
~~~
) ~ \
, ~ (
~-
<:)'0
rõ
...
'-- 1'72 I
..L- 111 ì 4 1/50~ 1
,- ILDD I
13/791
(0 - 1- ß3
DATE
-
...
14& 651
total
1-4,AMIL-,ON - SAt-MAR..
LOCATION
SOURCE: Barton-Aschman Associates
/(Q30 - Iì3C
TIME OF DAY
INTERSECTION CAPACITY ANALYSIS
-
INTERSECTION
PEAK HOUR
HAMILToN Ave. - SALMAR AVE..
AM CONDITION EXIc,TI rJq TRAF-f/ú
.;..
-- ......
\- -.J
-- '-
\!.
u..
0
r-
- (") ~
c ~ ~
~ - ('<)
UJ
) ~~
ISH f :
I ~ ---.".,.
=- } 12110
r58
~ r
HAMll-íON AV.
C'1 (1;)
- -
('C')
CD
COUNT DATE 10 - 4 - B t
NORTH
DIRECTION CRITICAL MOVEMENTS CRITICAL VOLUMES
- 121 (p (poB
EAST/WEST ~ - ::
:¿
~~ 47Z
NORTH/SOUTH - +- J'L::' 245
"\ 2
I
SUM OF CRITICAL LANE VOLUMES 85"4:>
-- --
NUMBER OF PHASES / CAPACITY AT E 4 /375
v/e RATIO / LEVEL OF SERVICE o.(P'2., B
INTERSECTION CAPACITY ANALYSIS
-
INTERSECTION I-4AMILToN AVE. - 5ALMAR. AVE..
PEAK HOUR AM CONDITION EXI5T/N~ + A ppROI/EÞ
-
u..
LI..
0
f:' ?
'- '-"
~ ~ ~
- \.r)
) ~~
r-
OJ)
(v34 f :
lie ~
:=} 12(;~
r 58
~ (
HAMI/...íON A'll.
~ c;:C
- -
ÇY')
CD
COUNT DATE 10-4-84
NORTH
DIRECTION CRITICAL MOVEMENTS CRITICAL VOLUMES
J -:l (p I} £034
EAST/WEST +- - ";
- 2
~~ (ß43 -::334
NORTH/SOUTH ) - + ,~
2
SUM OF CRITICAL LANE VOLUMES ~<oô
NUMBER OF PHASES / CAPACITY AT E -4 1375
v/e RATIO / LEVEL OF SERVICE 0,70 C
1/
INTERSECTION CAPACITY ANALYSIS
-
INTERSECTION ~AM'LToN AVE. - SALMAR AVE..
PEAK HOUR AM CONDITION~X:'sT -t- APPR -t PRúJ&CT
~
It'
'"'" ---
~ ....1
v '-"
- ~ c
0 ,-!) N
~ - \.Iì
) ~~
u.
u.
0
r-
UJ
~3tf ::
35 ~
:= ~ ~lD")
,- II~
~ (
I4AMI L-'íON Av.
C- I;<)
- T
<'Y)
CD
COUNT DATE )0- 4 - 84-
NORTH
DIRECTION CRITICAL MOVEMENTS CRITICAL VOLUMES
- t 1 ~;=A 11 9
EAST/WEST - 3 t- = ú>~4
----+
NORTH/SOUTH ~~ "\ ~6:2. + 11 = 35ß
I ;¿
SUM OF CRITICAL LANE VOLUMES 02.2
NUMBER OF PHASES / CAPACITY AT E 4 1315
v/e RATIO / LEVEL OF SERVICE 0.74 C,
INTERSECTION CAPACITY ANALYSIS
-
INTERSECTION I-IAMILToN AVE. - 5ALMAR. AVE..
PEAK HOUR PM CONDITION EX/STIN(., TRAFFIU
(-1 G¡~oWTI-4) ~
...
r--.. ...--- u..
I- ...) LI..
-.......J 0
'-'
~ ~ N r-
c ~ r-
I!) a UJ
- N -
) ~~
/722 f :
39 ~
=- 1 f2B9
r (PI
~ r
HAMll-íON Av.
\c) \<)
~ ~
~
CD
COUNT DATE 10-11-83
NORTH
DIRECTION CRITICAL MOVEMENTS CRITICAL VOLUMES
.;..-- /~69
EAST/WEST .-<-- - = (P 44
:;.
NORTH/SOUTH ~~ /320 +- 35 = (pq5"
"1 ;z
SUM OF CRITICAL LANE VOLUMES 1339
NUMBER OF PHASES I CAPACITY AT E 4 1375"
vIe RATIO / LEVEL OF SERVICE ().9, E
-¥ A /,).% ANNUM... LTlZcwíj~ frK1o~ HAS BtCN ÅDDE"D1o c:X/s-r,JJq couNTs.
INTERSECTION CAPACITY ANALYSIS
-
INTERSECTION 1-4AMILToN AVE. - SALMAR. AVE..
PEAK HOUR PM CONDITION £XIf:,TIN6 +- APPRövED -
.,;..
r-.. ?
\-
-..J '-'
.s' C() r
a ~ ~
\.t) N -
- -
u.
u..
0
r-
1,1\
) ~~
"-
178"[:
3:> ~
:=J 13c}
r Ci
~ r
I4AM I /.:íON Avo
1.0 K>
fT) \"(
~
CD
COUNT DATE 10- 1l-8'3
NORTH
DIRECTION CRITICAL MOVEMENTS CRITICAL VOLUMES
I 3q t f.ß
EAST/WEST ~ - '" C}v
~ h
~~ 1415
NORTH/SOUTH '" '2 + 35" ~ 747-
I SUM OF CRITICAL LANE VOLUMES 1436
NUMBER OF PHASES / CAPACITY AT E 4 1315
vie RATIO / LEVEL OF SERVICE 1.05 F
v
INTERSECTION CAPACITY ANALYSIS
-
INTERSECTION 1-4AMILTON AVE. - 5ALMAR. AVE..
PEAK HOUR PM CONDITION E'x'ISTINq +A~R()VEÞ\
+ PR-DJE'vT '
..-
,..." ".--
.... ..J
'--' -.....J
u.
u..
0
r-
C'C-r-
\) \.[) .....J>
\.0 c-{ :::
) ~~
UJ
J7ee. ( :
4~ ~
=-] /39J
r 77
~ (
HAM'L-íON Av.
oo;;trY)
L,oN
I.[)
CD
COUNT DATE /0-11-83
NORTH
DIRECTION CRITICAL MOVEMENTS CRITICAL VOLUMES
EAST/WEST ~ 13q/ = <OC!>Co
~ ;2
~~ 14:¿4 + 54 = l (p~
NORTH/SOUTH \ -
I 2
SUM OF CRITICAL lANE VOLUMES /4(02-
NUMBER OF PHASES / CAPACITY AT E 4 J375
v/e RATIO / LEVEL OF SERVICE I. ov F
t
.applcz computczr Inc.
20525 Mariani Avenue
Cupertino. California 95014-2094
(408) 996-1010
October 26, 1984
City of Campbell
Department of Public Works
70 North First Street
Campbell, California 95008
Re:
600 E. Hamilton Avenue
Gentlemen:
We have been requested by Barry Swenson Builders to furnish a
schedule of deliveries to the Hamilton Center.
Originally it was anticipated we would have approximately 47
truck trips per day scheduled at intervals throughout the day
from the hours of 7 to 5. After additional review, it appears
the truck trips will range from 35 to 40 per day.
Ul elSS
Hamilton Center Project Manager
Corporate Facilities
'-
.applcz computczr Inc.
20525 Mariani Avenue
Cupertino, California 95014
(408] 996-1010
~tCê.'
OCr I~~/)
26
PúlllA 190.,
~¡It~~~~1(s
ltvvc-
October 24, 1984
Ci~y of Campbell
71 North Central Avenue
Campbell, CA 95008
Attention:
Public Works Department
Re: Hamilton Center Warehouse
Truck Activity
Apple Computer's new warehouse at 600 East Hamilton Ave, Campbell, CA.,
will have approximately (47) truck trips in and out of the
shipping-receiving area on a daily basis, Monday thru Friday.
.
--
0 We1S
Hamilton Center Project Manager
Corporate Facilities
LOUIS tI. LARSON.INc.
CIVIL AND TRAFFIC ENGINEERING
885 No, San Antonio Road. Los Altos, California 94022
(415) 949-1124
June 27, 1984
Ms. Linda Kavanaugh
Barry Swenson Builder
701 N. First Street, Suite 200
San Jose, CA 95112
Subject:
Proposed Apple Computer Facility at 600 E. Hamilton
Avenue, Campbell, California.
Dear Ms. Kavanaugh:
This letter report gives my analysis of traffic impacts
from the proposed Apple Computer, Inc., building at 600 E.
Hamilton Avenue in Campbell. I have compared estimates of
traffic that would be generated by the Apple facility with
estimates of traffic that was probably generated by operation
of the former Bullock's Clearance Center in the same building.
It appears that the new facility will generate less
daily traffic (906 vs. 1148 daily vehicle trips) and somewhat
less peak hour traffic (161 vs. 165 peak hour vehicle trips)
than the former facility. This seems reasonable, because the
amount of warehouse storage space is being increased and the
amount of office space will be less than the former amount of
retail sales space.
A comparative analysis is given in the following para-
graphs.
PROJECT DESCRIPTION:
Barry Swenson Builder plans to remodel an existing
building at 600 E. Hamilton Avenue for use as a storage
warehouse by Apple Computer, Inc. The bUildi~has 1, 55. ,,00,0
square feet of floor area. It is planned that r~ trnW ~~,1 ~ r¡jì
UdJ
JUí-J 20 1984
CITY OF CA¡V¡¡':J¡J~LL.
PLANNING DEPARTMENT
20,000 square feet of office area and that there will be
40 to 80 employees at the facility.
The building is located at the southeast corner of
Hamilton Avenue and Salmar Avenue. All driveway access
to the site is from Salmar Avenue.
This building was formerly a Bullock's Clearance Cen-
ter and as such had 60,000 square feet of retail space and
92,000 square feet of warehouse space. This Bullock's
Clearance Center is no longer in operation. It reportedly
had an average of 100 employees and completed 225 trans-
actions per average day, when in full operation.
ESTIMATED TRIP GENERATION FOR THE PROJECT:
Caltrans studies on Trip Ends Generation Research
Counts show an average of 4.5 weekday trips per 1000 square
feet of floor area for warehouses in the Bay Area. For
commercial offices, the average weekday trip rate is 14.9
daily trips per thousand square feet of floor area. The
combined facility of 135,000 square feet of warehouse and
20,000 square feet of offices would generate 906 average
weekday trips and 161 peak hour trips, if figured at aver-
age rates given in Caltrans studies. Calculations are as
follows:
Building Square Daily Peak Hour Peak Hour
Usage Feet Trip Rate Trips Factor Trips
Warehouse 135,000 4.5/1000 608 20% 122
Office 20,000 14.9/1000 298 13% 39
(TOTAL:) 906 161
ESTIMATED TRIP GENERATION FOR THE FORMER BULLOCK'S
CLEARANCE CENTER:
There are no specific published studies that have been
made of operations at a facility such as Bullock's Clearance
Center, which was part warehouse and part retail sales.
Freestanding commerical stores typically generate traffic at
at rate of 48 trip ends per thousand square feet of floor
area, per Caltrans studies. A clearance center is not a
typical retail store and would not be expected to generate
traffic at as high a rate as other stores. We believe that
it would be more comparable to a furniture store operation
which is a low volume type of operation and which generates
12 trips per thousand square feet of sales area, according
to average values from Caltrans studies.
2
If we use these lower numbers, we can estimate that
the Bullock's Center generated 1148 daily trips and 165
peak hour trips per average weekday.
Calculations for traffic from the former Bullock's
Clearance Center are as follows:
Building Square Daily Peak Hour Peak Hour
Usage Feet Trip Rate Trips Factor Trips
Warehouse 95,000 4.5/1000 428 20% 86
Retail
Sales 60,000 12.0/1000 720 11% 79
(TOTAL:) 1148 165
REFERENCE MATERIALS:
Copies of Comparison Tables taken from the 15th Progress
Report on Trip Ends Generation Research Counts as published
by the California Department of Transportation, District 4,
are appended for reference. The comparison tables are:
Commercial Store Comparison
Commercial Office Building Comparison
Furniture Store Comparison
Warehouse Comparison
Very truly yours,
LOUIS H. LARSON, INC.
3
('
f,
TABLE 12
r
COMMERCIAL STORE COMPARISONS
r
Standard K-Mart Plaza Average
SITE Payless-Brent- 7 -11 Store Brands
wood Markets Paint Co.
STUDY NO. 241 242 243 276
Background Data
Employees 50 5 14 134
1000 Sq. Fe Gross Floor Area 85,90 2.40 11,00 96.00
1000 Sq. Ft. Sales area 55,10 1.50 10,25
Total Acres 3,86 0,34 0,89 9.30
Parking Spaces 377 20 57 500
Traffic Data
Average WeekdilY Tr¡¡ftic 2965 792 815 4752
Peak Hour 4-5p 7-8a 1-2p 12-1P
Peak Hour % of AWDT 11,9% 7,8% 11,2% 9.8%
Vehicle Occupancy (Autos only) 1.26 1.34 1.32 1.46
Trip Ratios
Weekday Trips Per:
Employee 59,30 158.40 58,21 35.46 45.93
1000 Sq, Ft. Gross Floor Area 34,52 330,00 74,09 49.50 47.74
1000 Sq. Ft. Sales Area 53,81 528,00 79,51 68.39
Acre 768,13 2329.41 915,73 510.96 647.95
Parking Space 7,86 39,60 14,30 9.50 9,77
r
r
r
r
r
r
ri
[
r
r
r
r
r
r
80
['
I
F".;o>' ,--~'V'; ,- . \.i..Ï ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ......, ~ ~ ..... -...J '....I """¿ -...J ...,¡ ...,¡ r...J
TABLE 13
COMMERCIAL OFFICE BUILDINGS COMPARISON
Ragional Calif. McKee Commerce Don Koll
SITE Hdqtn Hexcal Casualty Bid; Claaringhou.e Office
Confidantial Dublin San Mateo Confidential San Mateo San Rafaal Park Confidential Confidantlal Confidential Avarage
STUDY NO, 67 73 198 199 200 213 214 216 216 217
Backgroud Data
Employees 80 180 400 620 200 160 606 670 400 280
1000 Sq, Ft. Floor Area 30,0 46.5 96 126 76.36 50.0 180 169 100 60
Acres 1.23 14,0 10,59 6,42 5,43 3,0 10,0 36 5,0 6,0
Parking Spaces 63 176 301 468 272 140 614 1214 - 245
Parking Space Per Employee ,79 ,98 ,75 ,75 1.36 ,88 .85 1.81 - .88 1.1
Acres of Parking - 3,0 2,89 - 1,40 ,92 - - 3.0 2.5
Traffic Data
Average Weekday Traffic 282 436 973 2097 882 439 2490 3992 967 1376
CO
...A Peak Hour 3,4P 4.5P 4.5P 12.1P 4.5P 7.8A 2.3P 8-9A 8.9A 8-9A
Peak Hour % of AWDT 14,2% 20,6% 19,5% 11,3% 20.6% 16,4% 9,3% 11,2% 14,7% 12,2%
Auto Occupancy - - 1,3 1.2 1.5 1,4 1,2 1.1 1.2 1.2
Trip Ratios
Weekday Trips Per:
Employee 3,5 2,4 2,4 3,4 4,4 2,7 4.1 5,9 2.4 4.9 3-9
1000 Sq, Ft. Floor Area 9.4 9,4 10.1 16,6 11.6 8.8 13.8 23.6 9.7 22.9 14.9
Acre 229 31 92 327 162 146 249 111 193 275 144
Parking Space 4,5 2.5 3.2 4,5 3,2 3.1 4.8 3.3 - 5,6 3,8
Acres of Parking - 145 337 - 630 477 - - 322 550 370
TABLE 14
FURNITURE STORE COMPARISON
SITE Goldeen's L' F' R. B. Furniture Breuner's R. B. Furniture Drexel Breuner Ethan Allen AVERAGE
Furnishing evltz urOlture (San Mateo) (Pleasant Hill) (San Rafael) Heritage (Fremont!
STUDY NO. 311 312 316 320 322 324 327 328
Background Data:
Employees 15 100 10 60 10 11 38 20
Floors 1 2 1.5
1000 Sq, Ft, Gross Floor Area 35.00 193,34 24,00 135,00 21,00 19,00 60.00 25.00
1000 Sq, Ft. Sales Area 30,00 - 18,00 55,00 18,00 15,00 47.00 15,00
1000 Sq, FI. Office Area - 2,00 ,50 1.00 3,00 1.00
1000 Sq, Ft. Storage Area - 6,00 78.00 2,50 3.00 10.00 9.00
Acres 1.5 7,3 - 1.5 -
Parking Spaces 150 348 40 274 48 13 200 35
00
N
Traffic Data:
Average Weekday Traffic 131 832 300 1233 81 182 344 116
Peak Hour 11,12P 12-1P 2-3P 5-6P 4-5P 2.3P 1.2P 10.11A
Peak Hour % of AWDT 12,98 10,34 11.67 10.38 11.11 9,89 9,30 10,34
Truck % of Count 3,17 4,20 10.98 2,68 13,51 1.41 1.91 0
Trip Ratios:
Weekday Trips Per:
Employee 8.73 8,32 30.00 20.55 8,10 16,54 9.05 5.80 12,19
1000 Sq, FI. Gross Floor Area 3,74 4,30 12,50 4.57 3,85 9.58 5.73 4.64 6.28
1000 Sq, Ft, Sales Area 4.37 - 16,67 22,4-2 4,50 12,13 7,32 7,73 12.05
Acres 87.33 113.97 - - - 12f.33 - - 111.27
Parking Space 0,87 2,39 7,50 4.50 1,69 14;00 1.72 3.31 2,90
,
,
,
.
,
(-"""1
0" ....,
A_.",
"~~1.
-'~,..,
~
~
~ - ...-- - - - ,--.... ---. -
~ t ~ ,> \10...1 \.;.....J ~ '--' \¡.,¡.J ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ 1......1 1.......1 I......f "--I j"""""I 1....-1
TABLE 23
WAREHOUSE COMPARISON
Westinghou.. Associated Dohrmann Warner Brol. Confidential Confidential
SITE PX Grocery Appliance Coop. Groc. Hotel Lin llrie Cham. Wrh... Koch Glau Con fl. McGraw
Warehouse Warehou.. Warehouse Supply Warehoule & Adm. LulIQII ll Fittinp dential Hill Avere ll
STUDY NO. 20 21 25 27b 27c 29 69 72 113 212
Background Data
Employees 47 250 28 290 30 JOb 200 129 100 150
1000 Sq. Ft. 100 191 48 328 58 320 100 65 85 167
Floor Area
Acres 4,J 5,0 4,J 13,2 4.5 15,0 4,7 10,0 15,5 5,0
Parking Spilce 300 43 185 132 96 80 100
Parking Spilce
Per Employee 1,0 1.4 0,6 0,7 0,7 0.8 0,7
Acres of Parking -- - -- 1.0 0,5 0.3
Traffic Data
Average Weekday
CD Traffic 494 1279 440 1300 225 1220 440 376 440 366
~
Peak Hour 11,12n 7-& 11.12n 7-88 J.4p 7-& 4-5p 6-7a 4-5p 4-5p
Peak Hour
% of AWDT 152% 13,5% 1J.6% 22,3% 26,7% 25,4% 25,2% 18.6% 18,2% 22.1%
Truck %
of AWDT 5,2%
AulO Occupilncy - - - - -- -- 1.2
Trip Ratiol
We..kdilY T ripS Per.
Employee 10,5 5,1 15,7 4,5 7,5 4,0 2,2 2.9 4.4 2.4 4.3
1000 Sq. Ft 4.9 6.7 9.2 4.0 3.9 3.8 4.4 5.8 5.2 2.2 4.5
Floor Area
Acre 115 256 102 99 50 81 95 38 28 73 81
Pllrkiny Splice 4,3 6,2 6,6 3,3 3.9 6.6 3.7 4.7
Acre of Parking -- -- - - - 376 880 1356 657
,.-
. ,. - Af~f/..."=-
.. ,. r:.
885 No. San Antonio Road. Los Altos, California 94022
....p
~C'.
~/þ . ~¿,
~¿,,^ .? "-~A
~~/, u~ V
'~~~~ ~~
~jP~
.~
LOUIS tI. LARSON.INc.
CIVIL AND 1RAFFIC ENGINEERING
(415) 949-1124
January 24, 1985
City of Campbell
75 N. Central Avenue
Campbell, CA 95008
Attn: Mr. Keith Manley
Re:
Apple Computer Hamilton Center
Dear Keith:
Reference is made to my letter of January 22, 1984, and
accompanying drawings that I delivered to you yesterday.
The layout shown at Driveway No.4 may not be correct.
There may not be enough paved area at the rear of the lot to
make the turn shown for the outbound trucks. I have asked
the Barry Swenson company to verify the lot dimensions.
When I receive this information, I will recheck Driveway No.4.
Very truly yours,
LOUIS H. LARSON, INC.
Louis H. Larson
r;
A. ('(lV-
r- ---
\,L'-
LOUIS tI. LARSON.INc.
CIVIL AND lRAFFIC ENGINEERING
885 No. San Antonio Road. Los Altos, California 94022
(415) 949-1124
January 22, 1984
City of Campbell
75 N. Central Avenue
Campbell, CA 95008
Attn: Mr. Keith Manley
Traffic Engineer
Re:
Apple Computer Hamilton Center
Dear Keith:
We have carefully checked the truck turning movements at
the four driveways on Salmar Avenue that will serve this
facility. We enclose a marked up print of a drawing prepared
by Riley Associates, with suggestions for minor changes to
the driveways.
At Driveway No.1, we have suggested widening the curb
cut from 40 feet to 42 feet to allow for easier exits.
Driveway No.1 is for outbound traffic only.
At Driveway No.2, we have suggested widening the throat
of the driveway to 30 feet, so that trucks can turn in in one
continuous maneuver. This change requires some reduction in
size of the bordering islands.
Driveway No.3 is Ok as drawn.
At Driveway No.4, we have shown the driveway shifted
a few feet to the north, but have retained the curb cut width
of 45 feet.
All of the truck turning paths shown have been made
with a standard 48 foot radius truck turning template, as
prepared by the State of California Department of Transportation
and published in a booklet titled Truck Paths on Short Radius
Turns, dated May, 1972.
Very truly yours,
L~L?~
Louis H. Larson
cc: Linda Kavanaugh, Barry Swenson Builder