591 W. Hamilton Ave. (73-5)
s. F-:f.~.~. F~.
SMALL HOLDERS ASSOCIATED, REAL ESTATE, lNC.
730B Distel Drive
Los Altos, CA 94022
175 South San Antonio Road} Los Altos} California 94022 . 415-948-0127
i l")-'t~
\ 11 OAT
I
.---¡
i ! ¡
NEW ADDRESS
TO
Phone:
(41:» 961-4820
August 2i, 1973
WGW
-.--- .--
-~
"'rnp ,í~'~_-
~¿I',/¡.l -_._---.' , ~~-T-"'------"----
FT L ! -..-.....-.-.-.--
( ~'. (i, !.'~ ~:::~..- -ç-~:~'G:l_----
,I
Planning Comlolssicn
City of Caíq:~e1'
75 North Centr11 A~e~ue
r-:->!'7,-,hc11 r;,1"'f""'n' "a ,:¡¡:¡n()!)
""""""'.-": ......, ,... ,. J_U_'V
-........-! ,,--,,"--'--"" . .---.---.---------
i
.-------- - ------
Attention:
~1r. Don Hebard
Cha i rfTk'\n
FILE
\
V_I__--------..-..-
,
!
Reference:
Phmning Departmêr."t, Cay of C-~rrpbE;11, Letter,
Dated August i4, lS73, to Pa~l S~eckman, Jr.
from Arthur Kee, Director of Planning
Subject:
Small Holders Associated, Real Estate, Inc.
(S.H.A.R.E., INC.) App1ication - PO 73-5
Gentlemen:
It is our understanding that at the last regular meeting of
the City of Campbell City Council meeting, on August 13, tjle
planning of the free¡ay entrance ð.t San Torr.as ExpressvJay and
Hamilton A\lenue \'¡as finalized. Ire County and City of
Campbell seem to have ag)'eed that d, square 1oop plan is requit'ed
for the future road inteï'chang\;; at San TOiiJaS Expresswv.y and
Hamilton ¡\venue. Since the sq.;¡are loop pìan is a future r'equit'e-
ment it \dll br:; necessary for S.H.A.R.E., Inc. to revise and
repian Parcels 1 and 2 of PO 73..5.
We are requesting a continuanC(9; ð.fI11 a sixty day extension of
PO 73-5, so tlH: we may adequð.tely repl an thi s project.
Sincf;re 1 y,
.-
,
,\
!
S.H.A.R.E., mc.
~1~"."~
Kenneth Fortcnbery
Assista~t Vice President
cc:
Nariinskis and Prodis
Salle and Associates
~îr. 1(. \eJn:m)!) i f:?ctor of Fub 1 it !Aocks, Ci ty of Campbell
CONDITIONS or APPROVAL - PO 73-5
---------.--------.-.- ----
S.H.A.R.E.
A.
Property to be fenced and landscaped as indicated and as added
in "red" on plans.
B.
Landscape plan indicating type of plant material,
hose bibs or sprinkler system and type of fencing
for approval of the Planning Director at time of
building permit.
location of
to be submitted
application for
C.
Landscaping shall be maintained in accordance with the approved
landscape plan.
D.
Faithful performance bond in the amount of $5,000 to be posted
to insure landscaping, fencing and striping of parking area within
three (3) months of completion of construction, or applicant may
file written agreement to complete landscaping, fencing and stripin
of parking area prior to final Building Department clearance.
E.
Trash container(s) of a size and quantity necessary to serve the
development shall be located in area(s) approved by the Fire
Department. Unless otherwise noted, enclosure(s) shall consist of
concrete floor surrounded by a solid wall or fence and have self-
closing doors of a size specified by the Fire Department.
F.
All parking and driveway areas to be developed in compliance with
Section 21.50 of the Campbell Municipal Code. All parking spaces
to be provided riith appropriate concrete curbs or bumper guards.
G.
Underground utilities to be provided as required by Section 20,16.0 0
of the Campbell Municipal Code.
H.
Plans submitted to the Building Department for plan check shall
indicate clearly the location of all connections for underground
utilities including water, sewer, electric, telephone and televisioJ
cables, etc.
I .
Sign application to be submitted in accordance with provisions of
the sign ordinance for all signs. No sign to be installed until
application is approved and permit issued by the Building Departmen .
J.
Ordinance No. 782 of the CampbeUMunicipal Code stipulates that any
contract for the collection and disposal of refuse, garbage, wet
garbage and rubbish produced within the limits of the City of
Campbell shall be made with Green Valley Disposal Company. This
requirement applies to all single family dwellings, multiple
apartment units, to all commercial, business, industrial, manu-
facturing and construction establishffients.
CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL - PD 73-5
'---- -0---_-_'-- --- - -- -------
S.lí.i1.;;:'.L.
Page Two
Fli\L: DEPARTi'JE1;T:
K.
Provide "2ABC" fire extinguishers in metal cabinets as required
by Fire Department. 13.301 (a) U.F.C.
L.
Provide four on-site hydrants and pumper connection.
U. r. c.
13.301 (c)
BUILDING DEPARTMENT:
M.
Exterior walls less than 40 feet from property line shall be
one-hour.
N.
Roof covering (not shown) shall be fire retardant.
ENGINEERING DEPARTMENT:
o.
Engineering requirements will be submitted at the Planning
Commission meeting.
The applicant is notified that he shall comply with all applicable
Codes or Ordinances of the City of Campbell which pertain to this
development and are not herein specified.
-----
--------
(~_--P;r'
Department of Public Works
1555 Bcrqc:r Drive
San Jose, Califor;ia 95112
July 16, 1973
. ,.,
, ¡:
,1. .'
" '.
Hr. Arthur Kee
Secretary to the Planning Commission
City of Campbell
75 North Central Avenue
Campbell, California 95008
" Î " 1 -,-;
;',"'; ';'-'~-J.(I':'I:
C'T',' c;~. Cc,(.,
;: '."." ."':"": r.;::.\>;:,¡,-
Subject:
2 P.D.D. by S.H.A.R.E. - Hamilton West and
Hamilton East at the Vicinity of San Tomas
Expressway and Hamilton Avenue
Dear Mr. Kee:
The County Public Works Department is requested to comment
on these two developments by S.H.A.R.E. to determine the effect
of these proposed developments on the proposed County square
loop interchange design at the intersection of San Tomas
Expressway and Hamilton Avenue.
Sometime ago the County proposed a square loop type inter-
change at the above mentioned intersection. However, the
County has not yet adopted a definite plan depicting future
geometrics and rights of way requirements. To adopt a definite
plan will require the due process of community involvement
meetings, public hearing, environmental impact assessment and
final Board adoption of Official Plan Line. This entire process
will take months to complete.
In view of the existing and the proposed developments the
County staff feels the original square loop concept with the
extension of Mona Way and Merrimac Drive and using Gale Drive
as the loop street will not be efficient or desirable because
of the lack of access control and other movement conflicts.
The County staff has been considering other alternatives such
as the scissor-type interchange, modified diamond, modified
square loop and other possible combinations. Nevertheless,
the County has not pursued any further because of the present
political atmosphere and the enormous cost of building any
type of interchange at this intersection which involves possibly
the relocation of the existing concrete lined flood control
channel. Therefore, it is questionable whether an inter-
change can be justified at this location. The County has not
considered this interchange project in the County's next
five year plan.
The County staff had a meeting with the staffs of the City
of San Jose and the City of Campbell and also the engineer,
the architect and the o\vners of S.H.A.R.E. to discuss the
Hamilton West development. The County had indicated that
this development would not interfere with any of the County's
proposed interchange plans. The Hamilton East development
An Equal Opportunity !:mployer
Mr. Arthur Kee
-2-
July 16, 1973
was never discussed. It seems that the Hamilton East development
will interfere with the County's unadopted plans for the inter-
change at this intersection.
To summarize the situation the County:
1.
Has recognized the possibility of an interchange at the
intersection of San Tomas Expressway and Hamilton Avenue.
2.
Has several studies on the possible geometries including
a modified square loop.
3.
4.
Has not adopted an official plan line.
Has considered this project a very low priority project
because of the lack of local community support and economic
reasons.
Therefore, if the City approves the development of Hamilton
West, it will not interfere with any of the County's plans for
the interchange. If the City approves the development of
Hamilton East, it will interfere with the County's plans for
the interchange and thus will make the chance of building an
interchange even more remote.
The County staff welcomes the opportunity to comment on
this matter and will be glad to discuss it with you if you so
desire. If you have any questions, please call me at 299-2362.
Very truly yours,
JAMES T. POTT
D7i? 16~
AL CHAN
Project Engineer
AKC:vlh
, '
. <,' Ii \\ r f-:',' :
i "":\ ¡ '-,'.
"1) .JUL1CII~¡i;:
CT'{;)¡" Ci:~I\'¡i--:'_._..- ~
'. .:",..:.:,., r°;-~.r,~~~"-'
--
'm J:('i"rJ!Lf'.\f)(-I.()I-S~.\.\r.\CL\n\\',! f ì"
'- '.'-' ....,~_..-.~--,~-_.-_.'._~..._,--,~-.. -,-_..~.,
ì... :
,: C
¡,~ ,: /~.
(J,' ;! ~Ll. CI,l;fOr~r;!t- 95C'C'c' . TU_f~HO~-JE (,~C:'
¡ ~ ì
July 19,
1973
Mr. James T. Patt,
Director of Public Works
Co~~ty of S~nta Clara
1555 Berger Drive
San Jose, California
95112
SUBJECT:
"Square Loop", Hamilton Avenue
and San Tomas Expressway
Dear Hr. Pot-t:
I am enclosing a letter recently received by our Planning
Department from your staff which is in response to a routing
of a property development plan ",.;hich involves both the north-
eas t and the northwest quadra...Ylt~~ of the subj ect intersection.
I would like to take this opportunity to cormnent on certain
of the statements as contained in that. letter. T11e historical
aspect.s of the issue involved are the mëlÍn basis for my
remarks.
You mayor may not be aware that the City of Campbell has for
the past ten years or so been reacting to the various property
development schemes which have been submitted with a view
toward the protection of and, in fact, the dedication for
street. rights of vlay in keeping \"lith the square-loop concept.
which was conceived by your office in the early 1960's.
Property development and street construction has occurred as
a result of this City posture for the last decade so that we
find tbe southwest quac1ral:.t to be completed, sQuare-loop vlÌse,
and the norU)vlest. quadrant to be also complet:ed v.Jith the
exception of the cas t-'Vlest link into t1iC cxpresE.~y.'ay connection.
The twc) ~lpplicatjons \.'hich are referred to in Mr. ChaD's letter,
togc:thcr ,d_th an "dditional one \lhich \-,rE-; have processed recently
for the sole rem3ining quadrant (the southeast), represent a
virtual completion of the netvlork of interchange-service streets.
I have also enclosed an excerpt from a City Planning Crnnmission
meeting of ,Jëmuary tì, 1963, at \>"hic11 you appeared and at: \\,hich
~c;ome di:,:cu,,~;::: ion CO!lccrn ing t1~~ des ir able>- length to be>. allOI,'Jed
for thc ov('Lcrossin~J cJTadicnt occu~rc'd. I recall 'chat this
p3J:ticuLn: fc;:Jt-l1rc \'.'ëlS discussed furth;:,,:l.' bctv,'ccn our respective
stai f s, and the outcome of those d i~3cu:.~ s iOèl S dct.ermined u
cLL-teri,! 'lJpDn \y'hidl \Ile have b¿-¡sC'cl ëll1 of our sub::.~equen-l require-
ments. '1'hc" last enclosure, \.'11.ic~1 is cDntaincc1 herein, is a map
Mr. ,J";::,i(':; ']'. PoLL
-2-
July 19,
1973
daL:r:~;)z~C;(. to U-]ê;t erù -¡",hieh I hë:.vc:: found in our records as
bciL~. t'j]c "Jl:d.::;tcr~ pl,;n" of the total configuration and is
inclu'j~::-! hc:rc ,':': fnrU',::r evidence.
All of t~e various property owners ~ilio have been involved
these 1-,1, ~ns have been led to believe that the interchùnge
one cl¿y become ëJ reëllity, and their on-site plùnning hùs
reflectE,d thùt. \.mc}erstanding.
in
would
In the past couple o£ years we have en a number of occasions
approa::::lcd yuor ¿,terf informally 1di th rcc;uests for updates as
to the current specific designs ùnd/or implemerltùtion schedules
so t:hat ,..Je. w:::JUld })¿; in a better position to acc-ll.rately represent
the facts to prospc:ctive applicants. ì'Je have quite consistently
been pu-t off with the explanation that considerable study was
yet to be done and that we would be informed accordingly. This,
of CCl1.cse, has céêused a rather awkward situation for t11e City
staff; é'.nd we have seen, as a matter of fact, no recourse but
.to proceed, when necessary, ~JÍth our original approach when it
came to development review matters. I am sure that you can
unders'tand our position in that each applicar~t has been insistent,
as to our comments, and it has been impossible for us to fore-
stall his activity on such a nebulous basis. I might say also;
in pas;sing, that the City of Campbell has, from the beginning,
supported the concept entirely; and I am not a'dare of any
disagreement as to the propriety of such a future imple~entation.
This is to imply tha-t all of my comments are, to the best of
my knmvledge, representative of an official City posture and are
not simply my o~m.
Now, at this rather late date, I read out of the enclosed letter
and also out- of vùrious comments and discussions which I have
heard recently that there may be a neVI and different approach
forthcond,lJg from the Count-y of Santa Clara. 'J'he II scissor-t.ype
interchange, modified diamond, modified square loop and other
possible combinations," as referred to in the letter are, I
must say, quite surprising at this point in time. They ùre,
hm'lever, in keepin~1 with certain verbal references wc ha'i e
received as rec\;:nLLy as the last few mont.Ì1s; I refer I specific ally,
to the discussions surrounding a student p:coject at ,the Byatt
House and also to further discussions with your staff. We have
hcélrd, :Cor in~;'cmcc, t1lëltit the City ~lúe,,; ahead \,lith t~he ,:Ùlowancc':
for buildings ê;)d developments in accordance \-.':i.t-h OLl.r plan aLd
the County subsequently adopts a different interchange design,
that this \,,'ill simply nece~~sitatE~ the purchase of ,those llcwly--
constructed edifice;:;. The iroplication that this \\Duld be of
little signific,~r;ce seems in direct conL':'ûdiction to the third
PZll"cl.9tap'h of: t.hc J ctt.cr wherein, "---the enormous cost of buildinq
c:my t.ype (if intcrc11Cìnge at this intersection---," is presented'
as tlH' :i u ':'; t:i.fyin~J r C(l~)on for }-Joss ibJ)' ab;:mdoniJl<:} the orig inal
concept:. J\lso, ill l~cference to the laf,;t sentence of t..hat same
1'11:. :Ji1mc~ T. Pott
-3-
July 19, 1973
l'é<C ,: ::èJ.ph, I rc2Cd 11 per iodic routing s fro:n your off ice of H igh\','ùy
C¿:;pit:, 1 Ir:l))rovcr:~cnt plans which proj cctec1 future yeëlrs I expendi-
t.urCê, in \'lhich this fòcility ~L~s listed. I have or:e in front of
me right no,,; Ylid.ch we received in 1969 and indicates projections
through fiscal year 1980-81 ~1ich includes a plan showing,
specifically, a souare loop at this lociltion aYld y;1-1ich projects
5LJ?J-=-_1.\l:UI_iS:m__Q?~~~D2jt1JX_c for fiscal year 197ï-78. I am"-not--
cerLòin at the mO:Tlent whether this is the latest of such documents
th¿;,t ';.'0 might have since I opened this one at ranGe:", from our
file. The point I æn making is that we have consistently regardeð
the receipt of this sort of document through the years as some
kind of an official declaration on the part of the County. Have
\\'e erred in that we should actually have ignored t:lis information?
Finally, on the basis of the above discussion, I must take
specific issue with Item 4 of the four-point, SUI1',Tnary which is
included on page 2 of the letter. '1'be "lack. of local community
support" is to" me Quite a disturbing comment in that I am not
at all aware of the existence of such an attitude on the part
of the City of Campbell, and I feel that I have been quite close
to the scene throughout the history of this question. I would
sincerely suggest that the writer should probably have given a
bit more time and energy to his research of the record in that
regard or perhaps should have been slightly less receptive to
whatever or whomever represented his sources in formulating such
an opinion.
Since the City is now presented with three new and supposedly
ilmllinent developments of some magnitude which directly relate
to the subj ect in question, I am inclined to t.hink that in the
absence of any marc definitive policy on the part of the County
of Santa Clara, we must proceed as we have in the past. I
intend to request that this subject be considered at a forth-
coming City Council meeting so that at least the City of Campbell
is certain of the object.ive which it v.rill be pursuing.
Very truly yours,
William G. Wren,
Director of Public Works
Vi'Gì'J: 1. s
Enclosure
cc:
Robert C. Stephens,
City I\laJ1,Jgcr
1\1: th ur I~cc,
PJ.clnning Director
rL/~:'!-:j:~C
CO.;:;]S~~'¡:J:':
-,
... C nt )1'\ _.,-\)
~ ,...,-~ ~ I \ I '
..---.-,--.-----"-
J:1:/1E:';
co: ¡; ¡InT~!:
CC: í: ;l::-:T
S¡i:;.ET
~'~JIL1iI;;G
1':2~>.:~'.'J :!~;: f
T'^""""
-'.' ,1 .L . _.2..\11"; "?
2:, ,
1,:Î3
------
.....,\
""'#~ ~-----~
(}-)1TT'-IC "f').r-,>'t",1.
\-. ",d_, \-l",-~'..I
"'_..............,.-=-~~
AG[~m).: _J..::~"y-~ 1 ?L'L-
---- ---...",..--..-.,-.,---.' --",."-"'-'-'-""."'-'--.' -".' ..-...... -.,.
r)::y'!\1:"fl:I:::'1'
L'~"'-: ,
. '-
--
t, ;--:'L I CI.:F_-.C~_~~,--_tt~::_'--~:' t ::. f' ~
--..--- ---~---- ---'-'------ .----
-- - -....- - ..- v - -.. -.. -.. - -.. - - -.... - - ,. - - - ~- --.. -.. - - -" - .,.. - ... - - ~ - - ~ - - -~ - - ---
-------.,-------'.-----. --,--....-.,--------'----
1 ,:1 3 "
'J '-~"
'll:LL=,¡Ü:,3':'
::-/-.J'.=',
ADD:z;-:~::~;
-- '
---------
FLOFOSAL:
t\pp15cat50n
(If
:;hare
Pl'operc:i€s
tOJ"
d D ;) t- "i V eLL
v-
P-D
ï 3-;;.
l'('~)identié1l
lÌ eve ]. () f} 1:-' eo1 t
F.: : ¡ c:
C 0 ;:¡ :;H~ r L j a .l
dcveJopy(-¡! ::
(>I:
propc::'ty
k1)OvD
éJ.:; ~ '..:es';
SC) \
::3:i:ilton
.4-.'('.11U(:.
-----~-----._- .-....',...~
~ ~ .. .. ~-' <-
ìŒcm J:.:;~;~1)ATXC:~J:
" -
The
---~,--,-_.._'-'- ------- ---,-...,--------.-.---------.- -------- ---..-----
County
of
Santa
Cla~a has
no
de fini te
plan
for
the
interchange
at
Hamilton
and
San
Tomas
Expressway
a~c
this
tijEe.
Several
plans
have
------. ----
.-.------ .----------.--- ---- ~--
..,----.--.---.------
.------_..,-----"---- - ------..---,----------------.--------- ------'.-'- --,
been
studied
and
the
proposed
development
does
not
interfel~e
\.JÏ t h
any
....-.- ..---.,------------.---.---.--------- ,---------------~--_._------------- - _.- -----. .
of
the
County's
proposals.
ThepefoT'e,
the
County
oÎ-Santa
Clara
has
--'" --o. ------.-...-..-------- _._,-_..-------~------'-----_.._----- - -.-.-----"'---- ----_.- - --- -.--<..
no
objection
to
the
development
and
Hants
to
express
appreciation
Îor
----- .-..-
having an opportunity to comment on it.
----:<:.,-------_... ..---.,..----.----.--,-----.'...----- '--'--'--"---'--"-'-"------'-""'--'-/::X;~ --0- ~/T<~-'
:;.,/-,,--,,(/t-'t//:.-!...
-:'--::-.:- ~-:::-':'~:-:: :..-:--;-. -:..--;-::;:-:::-:::::..-:::--:.. ~- -:-:,-:"--::-::::-.::,-=-:'--:-'-~~: -:-.:.-:::: -::-:;-:-, -.:'-:"- :::-:,. 7!:~}Ý -- ~:;':/.~~j i;;;~ ~-"--
r'~,..,'~ "'I"-"')'-'1..n"",-;,(' . ill'
'"U:,'L~ 1, ~\_~'" _!.-:1'.!~¡\¡",); 'I
.-
.--.----------..------------ ----,-----'" ----..--------.....-,... -..,----.----- ----...-.- ..------- ------ '-~----
~ =:,=~--=~~==~_:_:= = ~~= :=-lí£~~~- f~:~ ~;_: ::~::- ':= .'=:- ~----=:~==-
£j fJ --. -'.' ~:/ ~<¡-/ /:--..-
. ..-.-" ---_.._--,-_..__._----_..._----,.._,-_._~_._-----"'--[t!-t:7' "7-":-,;:~-:--"-1'- 7'-------------" ---'-""" ----- ---.--
(')"... '. I.i/, ' :'
þ {'Iv ' 'I. .
---'-'--------"--'-'-~----"--"-'--'-----"-"-7'¡:.._'--L"'-Ð,~---,;- --. --_:.__..:..~-_...- -----,-_._---._-~-----_...- -.--- -----
A.N¡,,). l'_L:.;,,'
'NG I"""
~/)"'~,.."J;.:L1...
-- .--_....-~-...._--_....----..-....- -u ----------------- ----"'------'-'--"~~'f'-:'!'.,~'if~';~-''~'- .'.'--- - -...-...----'----. -.' -.- --'- --'u---,'--
---'. ... -- _..-- ..-.." '--'- ..'-~-- ---..,- -..--..,---...-
w....---. -- "------
-, ..---.---.--------- ..---.,..-------.....--- --.----.------ - -_.-
PI.,!').;¡¡¡;:C CC).;:!I~:;S)c;~
r-EVIEt': co; I:iITTEE CO;;; iE;~l'
SHEET
DUILDI;.¡G
DEPA!nf.lE;~T
Dt.IE; ì\.'n~ ~)::, 19'73
-..'>i-..,------.---------
PUBLIC
1:0 Pi; ,)
AGEim:\: J u ], v :1 6. 1973
----------------. -
FlìŒ
DEI'
'J ¡
. .."
: i i
IŒTiJR;';
BY : __cl2:~l v-i,-,--__~9 7,]_._-
_..~ - - -"'0>_"--' -.,,---- --------..,._------_.,"-----.,-~..,.,--- ,._--".... ..~._-_......
I,l,pL I CA:n'
(è F 1" (; P e Y't :i ( ,;
--..-----.---, ------...,--.---.- '....". ----_.~- ---- - "'~.__..- --- -.. -.-
I.])D~Œ~~j Hi?O III t1é'ID(>C;" TELEFI10iŒ 287...1cJ34
"'."'---"-'-.-.---.- "---"'. .....---..-----......- --.--...--,--. -'------ -"--------'- -----
-----------------~-..~-~--~----------~--------"-,.~------------------
Fl~OPOSAL :
¡~pplic¿\"c.:on
of
Shay'c
Properties
for'
a. P l)T' 0 \' ¿¡].
of
clusT':.'.r.
P-D
? 3-,5
residcnt.!.al deveJonrnent and cor.merciaJ... develoDment
~~ .
" ".
pT'operty kno1--1n aJ ..Jl~/l-1est Hamilton Avenue.
~~i\ \
,/
on
.----~_ø~---~-~---------------«---~---W---~-----r-___---~--~------~
I\:COI D:.cNDATIO;JS;
"""'-'----"- --,.. '---"~"-- -,._-,------ ._.._--_._-.,...,--~--- -.'..---.-,.. ---.-- -.--.-..-,-
'-""~'- - .__..-._~._._---_.._,---- -----..--.-..-"..., -----.,---..-..... ..-..---. --..- -..--..- ------ -
-------~-----"-"---'-'-'-------- ......._-~- -,,--- ------'-,_.._~._,.--_._-- "', .-.,
--.-- .._.._---...._--_.._,_.._......_-_.~_.,_._._,_._-- _...._._--~_. ------..-. --- -"----".---
--..-..-,....---, .._.'~--- ----....-.--....--------..----..----...------- ----'---"--"'-'-"'---""-..-...."
.~_..._. '-----""-"'---"---"- -..,- --'--""-----------"'----""-.----'.' ---.. ----.-.-." .._~----.-- --'-"'-"
--. -- --'-"'-'-----'---' ..--..-..-....---- ., -..-----.-.--..- -_._--..-_..__._.._---~-- --.- -------- -.. .-,-- ------ ~---_..
.. ----. --~._-..._,.---,.._,.... ,..--..----..-.....,-.---- --,-~... ..---- -'~_."'". -.-.., ..~,.. -- -- '--' -m"
COì;'[
REQU J E!::;' ¡Urf s :
"-'-.."" ---..-.. -..- --"-'--'-'..-----." .. ---'- ....----...--.--- ---~'-'-' "--"'-"-' -.. -. - --'--.. -"'-""'- ..~."-, ..... ,-- .....--..-- .
_..._-. "--""---"-"""-'---- - -'----"-"-----"'----'.------.-..-...-- --".. '----"-----'--"---'-'-""--'~'-"----
-------- "..- "-'-" .. ---'-----'-"""-"----'--- .-..-.. -.-...-------- "----'-'------ ~ -----....-..-.-...-..--.....- - -- _.....,..
.-...---.--,..- --,-......, ------'--"-"""-"---'---'-'--""""'-'._---'~"-"'-'.-----..-...--'--.-....-------.--..----.-...., "-"--"-'. .._,
-...-----,-----.-....-..--------- -"-_"-"'_"_-"""""_"'_'__"....,-_..~.,_..-._-"....._-"'--"~,",,--.._-, -_.~-
-..... -.......--..---....
-"-"-""._"'---"""-""'-~'-"'--'-"""""-'_.- .-'----""--"'- ---.'.......,.-"'..-.-..----..,.....-.." """'-'-'-""--""-"-.-.-'-'------",
.-...- -"- --- .""."""""'--......-...,....................--. '----""-"".'--..--.-. --".-
----""--"--."'---"----"-"'..---...., """""""'-"----.