CC Resolution 10322
RESOLUTION NO.
10322
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF CAMPBELL
AUTHORIZING THE PUBLIC WORKS DIRECTOR TO SUBMIT A TDA
DISCRETIONARY FUNDS GRANT APPLICATION FOR THE LOS GATOS
CREEK TRAIL BICYCLE IMPROVEMENT PROJECT (02-09)
WHEREAS, Article 3 of the Transportation Development Act (TDA), Public Utilities
Code (PUC) Section 99200 et seq., authorizes the submission of claims to a regional
transportation planning agency for the funding of projects exclusively for the benefit and/or use
of pedestrians and bicyclists; and
WHEREAS, the Metropolitan Transportation Commission (MTC), as the regional
transportation planning agency for the San Francisco Bay region, has adopted MTC Resolution
No. 875, Revised, entitled "Transportation Development Act, Article 3, PedestrianlBicycle
Projects," which delineates procedures and criteria for submission of requests for the allocation
of "TDA Article 3" funding; and
WHEREAS, MTC Resolution 875, Revised requires that requests for the allocation of
TDA Article 3 funding be submitted as part of a single, countywide coordinated claim from each
county in the San Francisco Bay region; and
WHEREAS, the City of Campbell desires to submit a request to MTC for the allocation
of TDA Article 3 funds to support the projects described in Attachment B to this resolution,
which are for the exclusive benefit and/or use of pedestrians and/or bicyclists;
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the City Council of the City of Campbell
hereby declares it is eligible to request an allocation of TDA Article 3 funds pursuant to Section
99234 of the Public Utilities Code; and
BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of Campbell that there is
no pending or threatened litigation that might adversely affect the project of projects described in
Attachment B to this resolution, or that might impair the ability of the City of Campbell to carry
out the project; and
BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that the City Council of the City of Campbell attests to
the accuracy of and approves the statements in Attachment A to this resolution; and
BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of Campbell that a
certified copy of this resolution and its attachments, and any accompanying supporting materials
shall be forwarded to the Congestion Management Agency of Santa Clara County for submission
to MTC as part of the countywide coordinated TDA Article 3 claim.
PASSED AND ADOPTED by the City Council of the City of Campbell this 4th day of
May, 2004, by the following roll call vote:
AYES: Councilmembers: Furtado, Watson, Dean, Kennedy, Burr
NOES: Councilmembers: None
ABSENT: Councilmembers: None
APPROVED BY:
~ ~~ :-?
Donald R. Burr, Mayor
A~ .
~-&~
Anne Bybee
City Clerk
Re:
2.
3.
4.
RESOLUTION NO.
ATTACHMENT A
Request to the Metropolitan Transportation Commission for the Allocation of Fiscal Year
2004-05 Transportation Development Act, Article 3, PedestrianIBicycle Project Funding
FINDINGS
1.
That the City of Campbell is not legally impeded from submitting a request to the
Metropolitan Transportation Commission foir the allocation of Transportation
Development Act (TDA) Article 3 funds, nor is the City of Campbell legally impeded
from undertaking the project(s) described in "Attachment B" of this resolution.
That the City of Campbell has committed adequate staffing resources to complete the
project(s) described on Attachment B.
A review of the project(s) described in Attachment B has resulted in the consideration of
all pertinent matters, including those related to environmental and right-of-way permits
and clearances, attendant to the successful completion of the project(s).
Issues attendant to securing environmental and right-of-way permits and clearances for
the projects described in Attachment B have been reviewed and will be concluded in a
manner and on a schedule that will not jeopardize the deadline for the use of the TDA
funds being requested.
5.
That the project(s) described in Attachment B comply with the requirements of the
California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA, Public Resources Code Sections 21000 et
seq.), and that the City of Campbell is in possession of the document(s) supporting such
compliance, said document(s) having been made available for public review and stamped
by the County Clerk or County Recorder of the county in which the claimant is located.
6.
That as portrayed in the budgetary description(s) of the project(s) in Attachment B, the
sources of funding other than TDA are assured and adequate for completion of the
project(s).
7.
That the project(s) described in Attachment B are for capital construction and/or design
engineering; and/or for the maintenance of a Class I bikeway which is closed to
motorized traffic; and/or for the purposes of restriping Class II bicycle lanes; and/or for
the development or support of a bicycle safety education program; and/or for the
development of a comprehensive bicycle and/or pedestrian facilities plan; and an
allocation of TDA Article 3 funding for such a plan has not been received by the City of
Campbell within the prior five fiscal years.
8.
That the project(s) described in Attachment B which are bicycle projects have been
included in a detailed bicycle circulation element included in an adopted general plan, or
included in an adopted comprehensive bikeway plan (such as outlined in Section 2377 of
the California Bikeways Act, Streets and Highways Code section 2370 et seq.).
9.
10.
11.
That any project described in Attachment B that is a "Class I Bikeway," meets the
mandatory minimum safety design criteria published in Chapter 1000 of the California
Highway Design Manual.
That the project(s) described in Attachment B are ready to commence implementation
during the fiscal year of the fêquested allocation.
That the City of Campbell agrees to maintain, or provide for the maintenance of, the
project(s) and facilities described in Attachment B, for the benefit of and use by the
public.
Resolution No.
Attachment B
page 1 of 1
TDA Article 3 Project Application Form
Fiscal Year of this Claim: FY 04/05
Contact person: Bill Helms
Mailina Address: 70 North First Street. Campbell, CA 95008
E-Mail Address: billh@cLcampbeILca.us
Secondary Contact (in event primary not available)
E-Mail Address:
Short Title Description of Proiect: Los Gatos Creek Trail
Amount of claim: $ 515,600
Functional Description of Project:
Imnrovements to bicvcle/nedestrian trails on east bank and west bank of Los Gatos Creek northerlv of Camden Avenue and
renlacement of existina bicycle / nedestrian bridae over Los Gatos Creek
Applicant: City of Campbell
Telephone: (408) 866-2153
Telephone:
Financial Plan:
List the project elements for which TDA funding is being requested (e.g., planning, environmental, engineering, right-of-way,
construction, construction management, contingency). Use the table below to show the project budget. Include prior and
proposed future funding of the project. If the project is a segment of a larger project, include prior and proposed funding
sources for the other segments (make certain the use of the currently requested funding is made clear in the "Project
Elements" section below, and include any other clarifying information on the next page).
Project Elements: Construction. Construction Manaaement and Inspection
Funding Source All Prior FYs Application FY Next FY Following FYs Totals
TDA Article 3: 515,600 515,600
list all other sources:
1. Measure 8: 124,400 124,400
2.City park fees 160,000 160,000
3.
4.
Totals 284,400 515,600 800,000
Project Eligibility: YES?/NO?
A. Has the project been approved by the claimant's governing body? (If "NO," on the next page provide the approximate date Yes
approval is anticipated).
B. Has this project previously received TDA Article 3 funding? If "YES," provide an explanation on the next page. No
C. For "bikeways," does the project meet Caltrans minimum safety design criteria pursuant to Chapter 1000 of the California Yes
Highway Design Manual? (Available on the internet at: http://www.dot.ca.aov/ha/oppd/hdm/chapters/t1001.htm).
D. Has the project been reviewed by a Bicycle Advisory Committee? (If "NO," provide an explanation on the next page). Yes
E. Has the public availability of the environmental compliance documentation for the project (pursuant to CEQA) been Yes
evidenced by the dated stamping of the document by the county clerk or county recorder? (If "NO" provide and explanation
on the next page; and note that MTC cannot allocate funds to a project which lacks environmental clearance).
F. Will the project be completed within the three fiscal year time period (including the fiscal year of funding) after which the Yes
allocation expires? Enter the anticipated completion date of project (month and year) 10/05
G. Have provisions been made by the claimant to maintain the project or facility, or has the claimant arranged for such Yes
maintenance by another agency? (If an agency other than the Claimant is to maintain the facility provide its name: