Loading...
1620 LaPradera Dr. (1965) / R E eEl P T 807- / , - a; c, ~ » CITY OF CAMPBELL }\}J ,../,/ CAMPBELL. CALIFORNIA V ::::ss (k;æ -t ~ i&v ~ " r/j REVENUE ACCOUNT NO. í II- FUND NUMBER THIS RECEIPT MUST BE MACHINE VALIDATED AND SIGNED BELOW. APR 15 -66 APR 15-66 81 001 A ***277.50 65 001 A *** 170.00 ~ CHECK 0 MONEY ORDER 0 CASH No. 215 9 Thank You CITY OF CAMPBELL ~ "'" "'""' (/ BY LAW OFFICES MANNINA S TAMBLING 11' J~~ 1l' ~¿ iL ' i1 ,//"~' ,Ii ...' HAR.R.ETT W. MANNINA DON A. TAMBLING SUITE 110 EMPIRE BUILDING 510 NORTH FIRST STREET SAN JOSE, CALIFORNIA 95112 294-5061 June 21, 1968 City of Campbell 75 North Central Avenue Campbell, California 95008 Attention: Mr. Thomas S. Prebil, Jr. Civil Engineer Public Works Department Gentlemen: This is to advise you that I represent Elvin Crema, the owner of certain premises located at 1620 LaPradera Drive, Campbell, California. On April 8, 196&, he received a letter from the City of Campbell requesting a payment of the sum of $170.00 for a storm drain fee and the sum of $277.50 for a driveway approach and 5' of 10' commercial sidewalk for a total of $447.50. I have in my possession a receipt dated April 12, 1966, receipt No. 4626 from the City of Campbell acknowledging payment of the total sum of $447.50. I am advised by my client that none of the work has been performed and it certainly seems to me that more than a reasonable time has elapsed within which the work could have been performed and completed. Demand is hereby made upon you to immediately commence the work for which my client paid more than two years ago. You are further advised that my client has sustained damages due to the poor street conditions in that he has recently lost a tenant. HWM: SA CC City of Campbell, Planning Very truly yours, ~ d7 ~,. , . , / /'/ "" /7/1 , ,,' W1£~ 11' "/I é>;"?n<:::f~' HARRETT W. MANNINA /.9.<¿/j'~ t( . Dept. ... - I !!M.Q September 30, 1966 TOI William G. wren, Acting Director of Public Works PROM I Prank T. Lewis, Associate Civil Engineer SUBJBCTI Street Impro".ent. on La Prac!era Drive Dur1n( your ab.ence, the C1ty Man898r d1rected me to d1.cover and report on the historical facts and present status of the La Pradera Drive street ~ravements. Attached is the histor ieal outline prepared by Chuck Gamez. This 1s, I feel, an accurate compilation of the var1ous decisiona and of the fees paid to the C1ty. I !DU8t add that the total SUID of $10,215.17 that Ws paid to the City has been absorbed and that no monies have been encumbered, reatr1cted, or held in a special account for the purpose that it was intended. Also attached 18 a ah..t showing various important facts about each parael in the area bounded by Campbell Avenue, Ban Tomas Aquino Road and Ia 'raciera Drive. I will attempt to outline the significance of these fiqures. "C.A.P. Nwnber" County Asse8sor '. Parcel N'umber for each parcel. our a.si9Ded number for each of the parcels that have pa..ed through this off1ce. Acres in each parcel. This shows the amounts cnMd by each parcel and the amounts that have been paid by ..ch parcel. "Status of Dnprov." Shows 1f they are improved or not. "Deposit for S/w" If the parcel has deposited any money for their portion of . ten foot s1dewalk. "Devel. 5umber" "Approx. Acre." "storm Drain Peen On the right had side of the sheet, please find the total amount expended by the City for street improvements on La Pradera. Also there is an est.1mate of street improvements for the com- plet10n of this street. Item 1 through 5 could be constructed immediately if funds were made available. The reasons in the past for deferral of these improvements was the conflict with the future services involved. I do not feel this is a valid reason at present , because I 1. We can 8afely provide for 8etrMraqe, at this time, with a min1mwn expense. Also an expense we may be able to recover upon development. 1 of 2 . . i 2. The g.s and water companie. will be excavatin( hole. in the pre.ent paV8l8nt no matter what we do. They may easily jack from the 4evelopnent a1de to their main8 at such t1me that it is n..ded. 3. If aidewalk 18 left out of th1s project, we would be in a better POaition t.o add it upon development. 4. I ~.el that the r..80na above plus the following advantages. Dust, d1rt, and maintenance problems will be corrected. 5. Storm draina( e faoilities ~roved. A sater traff1c carrying facility. 6. 7. It puts the burden of future development upon those parcels that develop.:1. It would relieve tile City trom holding money tor an unde1:ermined leng'th of time. 8. It would clarify a contused and chaotic condition that naw.xi.ts with each development application. This is pointed out by the fact that we 414 not cond1tion various developers with the respons1bility of street lights and their underground appurtenances. A condition that should exist. It i8 with these thoughts in mind that I would recommend we construct Items 1 through 5 a8 soon aa funds are made available. I have worked on the financing and will discuss 1t with you if you desire. Also I would like to know if you want me to send a report to the City Manager. Respectfully submitted, Frank T. Lewis, Aasoc1ate Civil Engineer FTL:cb 2 of 2 September 22, 1966 TO: Frank T. Lewis, Associate Civil Engineer FROM: Cruz S. Gomez, Jr. Civil Engineer SUBJECT: La Pradera Dfive Street Improvement The site of the street improvements referred to in this report is the southerly and southeasterly one-half of La Pradera Dtive between San Tomas Aquino Road and Campbell Avenue, and the scope of the street improvements referred to hereon are Portland Cement concrete curb and gutter, four and one-half foot sidewalk, driveways, roadway excavation, relocation of storm water inlet, placement of asphaltic concrete pavement on untreated crushed rock base, and construction of standard guard rail fence. The estimated cost of the construction and/or installation of the above improvements were computed to be Ten Thousand One Hundred Dollars. The intent of this report is to ascertain the current status of the street improvement cited above within the above limits, together with and giving consideration to any money received in the form of cash payments, bonds posted, and/or agreements entered into therefor. The inception of the street improvements mentioned hereon was at the time when Tract No. 1602, Los Ranchitos Gardens, Unit No.2, was presented to the City of Campbell for approval. By an agreement entered into by and between El Rio Development Company and the City of Campbell on November 21, 1955, with which a Faithful Performance Bond in the amount of Seventy- Four Thousand Dollars ($74,000.00) was furnished. El Rio Development Company was subsequently succeeded by the Trojan Construction Company. Resolution No. 255 passed upon and adopted on November 28, 1955, authorized the City's entry into the Agreement and the City approved the final map thereof. These improvements were also covered by an agreement entered into by and between the City and Trojan Construction Company, successors of El Rio Development Company, on April 8, 1957. Trojan Construction Company entered into this agreement in order to receive City's approval for Tract No. 1671, Los Ranchitos Gardens, Unit No.3. The final map was approved and the City authorized entry into this agreement by virtue of Resolution No. 417, adopted April 8, 1957. Trojan Construction Company posted a Forty-Seven Thousand Five Hundred Dollars ($47,500.00) Faithful Performance Bond with this agreement. It appears that there was disagreement among the City officials as to what exactly had been approved on the tentative map for the Los Ranchitos subdivisions concerning the area bounded by La Pradera Drive, San Tomas Aquino Road, and Campbell Avenue. However, it apparently was obvious that it would develop into a shopping center. This area was subdivided peace meal by sales to prospective developer, the first of which was the service station and then the speedy food market. It appears that when these parcels were sold to these prospective developers, there was a clause to the effect that they would pay for the street improvements which pertained to their property, however, the City did not release Trojan Construction Company from their agreements or bonding on their request because the City could not be assured that the improvements would be paid for by anyone else other than Trojan Construction Company. Trojan Construction Company had agreed, in the original agreements, to construct the street improvements by April, 1958, barring any inclement weather; however, in February, 1958, they requested an extension of time which the City Council denied which led to an amendment of the original subdivision agreement. In May, 1959, construction had not yet commenced and the matter was referred to the City Attorney for prosecution. The City Attorney initiated the action by telling Trojan Construction Company that unless they commenced construction the City would ask the bonding company, Insurance Company of Glen Falls, New York, to install the improvements, or take them both to court for default of contract. Subsequent to this, the City made an offer to Trojan Construction Company to amend the agreements and to release Tract No. 1602 and 1671 from their bonds if Trojan Construction Company would provide another smaller bond for the improvements of the South one-half of La Pradera. In lieu of this, however, an amended agreement was entered into in June, 1961, which provided that Trojan Construction Company would pay the City Ten Thousand One Hundred Dollars ($10,100.00) and the City would get the improvements installed. This money was to be paid as follows: Three Thousand upon the execution of the agreement, which was paid on June 6, 1961, and the balance, within six months from June 12, 1961, the date of execution of the agreement. Trojan did not fulfill his obligations and the Mayor, Henry A. Weitzel, with the Council's consent arranged for Trojan Construction Company to pay the Seventy-one Hundred Dollars which remained outstanding in the following manner: Eleven Hundred Dollars, which had been submitted January 31, 1962, and the remaining Six Thousand Dollars in six monthly installments, together with six per cent interest per annum beginning March 10, 1962. This, according to the records at our Finance Office, was done. I was able to find records that indicate that Trojan Construction Company submitted payments as follows: '$3,000.00 $1,100.00 $1,039.00 $1,016.67 $1,026.67 $1,021.50 $1,006.00 $1,005.33 on June 12, 1961, Receipt No. 5262 on February 13, 1962, Receipt No. 5645 on March 26, 1962, Receipt No. 5725 on April 15, 1962, Receipt No. 5763 on May 24, 1962, Receipt No. 5850 on July 9, 1962, Receipt No. 5921 on July 24, 1962, Receipt No. 5959 on August 27, 1962, Receipt No. 6013 Of interest in this matter is that it appears that it was the City Attorney's opinion that the City could not charge a storm drainage area fee. Also, the Ten Thousand One Hundred Dollar estimate did not provide for any underground utilities such as storm drainage, sanitary, which were, in except for laterals and catch basins, gas mains or services, water mains or services, electrolier or bases, or the additional four and one-half sidewalk neeessary for the commercial area. In conclusion, it appears to me that Trojan Construction Company fulfilled their obligations to the City and that the street improvement now necessary are the responsibility of the City of Campbell. A separate study would be of benefit to determine what storm drainage fees have been paid and by what properties, and how much money has been collected from the developers and how much money has been spent on subject site from City funds. Respectfully submitted, {!¿~ xI~7 ~ð Cruz. U. Gomez, ' Jr. Civil Engineer LA PADE-J2A Dr2.IVE CS"1REt:1 \ MPR...OVE M E-NTS C.p>',P DeVEL- ~Ç>PRO)\, S'rOIZIrt DrzAIN FEe Sì A'TU~ of DEPO"!>\i. FOil N IS M be tz.. ~UMbelZ. þ,c ¡z,!: S owe PAID \ MP20V!M! NT~ SIPIiWAL)<:.. -- - 30b-..:\I-'L L. 12.. (A) .3/0 ?~o.o..9 530~~ COMPLEìE N,Ä, -, 10'1 Al AMOt)N1 EXPENDED 3ob-41-~ L,I2,(~) Z.45 1 ðW.~ I,ß6Q,".!" COM PLEìE NA ß'I' C 11'< PQoJ. '=>3- Å R. $ 5, 'Z .4 ß, 1; -4 ¡ -7 - rU, ,.. COMPLEì E N,~. £ Sil MAìE iO COMPLEiE: -41-10 .foOB 4k>5. °'" 0,0 GO Mf'le,E" ~* 'SIREEi ----- \. ~ ìflEe, P~VI~Go -4111 L ' 12., (¡) .7~3 A'Z~,~ 0,0 co MPLETE': Jfr*,.. .~'.i/Sq,FT = ~ ~,85 0.00 -- ---- -- ---- - --,----' \1,000 '5o,FT, @ -41-1'2.. LIZ., (8) } ,5~ 110.0..9 cAMPßHL 1. C UIZ e, ~ Go'! nit 00 ONLY 0,0 ---- ---- ---- - - @ '2"Z'/LI~.n: bD/¡; LIt\), FT. I) ~b ~,'o - 4! - 11 b 1M.'!!! 0,0 t.lONE- D.O -- -- .._,-- '3, ~ EWE rz. L þ.1~lZþL I .too~ -41- 13 L.1Z.(7) .O1~ 17D,09 11 ð'~ NON~ 1. 77, 5.9 l'lO UN, FT, @ LIIt.Pl,: 4~ 0,00 - ---- 4, ':>ìðI2M D2AIÑ F Ac.llI"I~'E:. -AI- 14 L. It, (Aì .184 Q17,~ 0,0 ~DNE 0,0 -~ ----' l,S, (i> 310°-0 : ? 1 0,00 -41- 9 L.R.(Q) .1a\ 2/7.1>p 0,0 \IlONE 0.0 ', CONDUI¡ ArlO PULL E>O¡( , 18'7.00 I L, ,:>, @ \ß7~ : -41- 11 L.!2 . (t¿') t IO~e, 4 60, tt.O 0.0 I CON\P\..ETr: ) :$ ~ I ð ð. 7~ 5Uß-IO1'AL -41-18 l.R,('l) ~ 170, '" 497,°--" 6, '5\D~W.AL~ (4.7') - 41-1~ L. R ,\'l) 770.~ COMPLETf:- ,'-0/50, FT. ~ $ t ~ 5 0 . 00 .6'l9 'Z 80054. !'T. @ 7, SIDêWAL~ (4.5') I 1'Oï¡\L 6,87'1. '7 %0. t_t 33,0. o!! 772 . s~ 'lBOD SQ,fT, @ .'O/~.F".. I "-'130.00 * No'! APPLICt.~LE- - CAMPt>Ell ~þ.'I'\F1¡;D ïllRtJ L,LD..s9 8 E: L.ECïl2oLlerz.s *'Yt AMOLJN\ 1"02. IMP2.0VEMEN1~ )~ IN L\11~~\10N '3 EA ~ '350o.P EÞo ~ 10'70.00 1tW * PÞ>\O L ,\ D, ~~ 1'loooog ~"ð\JLD '5 .\ïl'&FY ':>.D. FH IZ.E ~LJI2,^ENì'S 9, ¡Y-z."CONDUI\ 'Zw LIr", f,T @ l ~ / F1, " 4bß ,00 <?U&-ìOìþ.L . t 4, ß 7~.t>D Tol PlL "II/O~f,'7D If S/J¿ç- ¥ ¿! ~l -, dl\ " L (PLANNING DEPART:lENT CITY OF CAHPBELL 75 NORTH CENTRAL AVENUE CAMPBELL, CALIFORNIA ~&..' '!.f. (s/ Date 4566 CONDITIONS ATTACHED TO "S" APPROVAL OF PLANS OF Elvin Crema , FOR CONSTRUCTION OF office bui1din~ TO EE LOCATED AT: 1620 La Pradera Drive CONDITIONS: ORDINANCE: --1. Storm Drain Fee in amount of $170. --2. Payment to City of cost of construction of driveway approach and Sf of 10' commercial sidewalk. 3. Parking area to be developed in compliance with Section 9319, including required fencing and lighting. RECOMMENDATIONS: 4. LandscapIng to be provided as indicated on plan. S. Landscape Bond in amount of $500 to be posted tò insure land- scaping within three months of completion of building. 6. Landscape plan indicating type of plant material to be submitted for approval at time of application for Building Permit. Section 9316.1 of the Campbell ~unicipal Code reads as follows: Any approval granted under this section shall expire one hundred eighty (180) days after tile date upon whic~l such approval was granted, unless an extension for such approval is obtained by making written application for same to the Planning Commis~ ion at least fifteen (15) days prior to the expiration date of such approval. No building permit shall be issued after the expiration date of any approval until a new approval has been obtained in the manner provided for in this chapter. GRANTED BY THE CITY OF CAMPBELL PLANNING COM:vlISSION AT A REGULAR MEETING HELD ON THE 4th DAY OF April 19166 CITY OF CAMPBELL PLANNING COMMISSION ~,. ./ - Engineering Dept. .///,' i//--r\j""'----L-." /,L ~ 17/ By' _. , . '/",r . / XiXliXiXiill~t, Secretary R.V. Hogan Äf f ~~~ l(ý~ I /{ '3 i/ ({- ¿;. ¿/Ö CITY OF CAMPBELL PLANNING COMMISSION APPLICATION FOR ARCHITECTURAL APPROVAL OF SIGNS ONLY ~\ (\ßC\" \ k- ate 19 \.v~, , In accordance with Section 9316, Chapter 3, Article IX of the Campbell Municipal Code of the City of Campbell, the undersigned hereby makes application for approval of the attached plans. 1. The said improvements will be located on land described as follows: (map or plot) , ' . ' All that certain real property situate in the City of ejmpbell, County of Santa Clara, State of California, described aI follows: \ BEGINNIKG at the point of intersection of the Southeasterly line of La Pradera Drive, as said Drive is shown upon that certain Map entitled, "Tract no. 1671 Los Ranchitos Gardens, Unit No.3"" which M~p was filed £o~ record in the office of the Recorder of the County of Santa Clara, State of California, on April 23, 1957 in Book 81 of i~aps, at pages 10 and 11, with the Northerly line of that certain tract of land described in the Trusi~e's Deed from City Title Insurance Company, a corporation, to Eric Vah} et ux, recorded September 18, 1958 in Book 4176 Official Records. page 425. Santa Clara County QEcords: thence from said point of beginning ~orth 42° 29' 20" East alon9 said Southeasterly line of La Pradera D~ive for ð distance of 77.35 feet to the point of intersection thereof with the Southwesterly linE of that certain tract of land described in the Deed fro~ Ad-Mar Enterprises, Inc., to J. G. Jacobs, dated October 7, 1958, recorded uctober 28, 1958 in Book 4214 Official Records. page 643, Santa. Clara County Records; thence South 47° 30' 4011 East along said Southwesterly line of land so described in the Deed to said Jacobs for a distance of 53.16 feet to the 30uthwesterly corner thereof in the said Uortherly line of land so described in the Trustee's Deed to said Vahl; thence South 87° 34' West along said ;~ortherly line of land so described in the Trustee's Deed to said Vahl for a distance of 110 feet, more or le8s, to the point of beginning, and being a portion of the ~uito ?ancho. J,'.L.Lç\,l. .La ...uç v..........."", ~... ~..- Address of App11can~ Planning Department on: , 19 ~'-'-" ~ ~(~ \.~~\- Ci ty I '£ta te Secretary LC'l~- "S ()~ l\ Telephone Number ~ PLANNI~~ DEPARTMENT CITY OF CAMPBELL 75 NORTH CENTRAL AVENUE CAMPBELL, CALIFORNIA Date April 8. 1965 CONDITIONS ATTACHED TO tiS" APPROVAL OF PLANS OF R. L. Ferzuson , FOR CONSTRUCTION OF office building TO BE LOCATED AT: 1620 La Pradera [rive 1. COND I TI ONS: Landscaping Bond in the amount of $500.00 to be posted to insure landscaping, as shown on plan, within 3 montl1s of completion of building. Masonite as shown on plan to be replaced with metal, or tile, or other weatherproof material. Storm Drain Fee in the amount of $170.00. Cash payment to the City in the amount of $200.00 for one 35' driveway plus sidewalk. l'~o sign to be installed wi thout PlanninggCommiss ion approval. 2. 3. 4. 5. Section 9316.1 of the Campbell Municipal Code reads as follows: Any approval granted under this section shall expire one hundred eighty (180) days after the date upon which such approval was granted, unless an extension for such approval is obtained by making written application for same to the Planning Commission at least fifteen (15) days prior to the expiration date of such approval. No building permit shall be issued after the expiration date of any approval until a new approval has been obtained in the manner provided for in this chapter. GRANTED BY THE CITY OF CAMPBELL PLANNING COMMISSION AT A REGULAR MEETING HELD ON THE 6 til DAY OF April, 1965 CITY OF CAMPBELL PLANNING COMMISSION By: