1181 Steinway Ave. (1979)
CITY OF CAMPBELL
~/&~
i ~f:. (
75 NORTH CENTRAL
C AMP BEL L. C A L I FOR N I A
(408) 378-8141
AVENUE
95008
Department: OFFICE OF THE MAYOR
November 15. 1979
Mr. Milton Brown
1181 Steinway Avenue
Campbell. CA 95008
Dear Mr. Brown:
At our meeting of November 12. 1979. you appeared before the City Council
and expressed your concern regarding the Steinway access easement
chronology of events. as prepared by our City Manager Robert C. Stephens.
After your departure. I suggested to the remaining members of the
Council. that Councilman Doetsch and I meet with you. to discuss your
concerns in a more informal setting. and attempt to respond to the
questions you have. Our staff has provided us with documentation as to
what happened. based on minutes. and the city's official records. May I
suggest. prior to meeting with Mr. Doetsch and myself. that you provide
to our City Manager in writing. the questions you have or the statements
you would make. in rebuttal to the memorandum written by Mr. Stephens.
When these comments are received. we will have an opportunity to research
the records again. to verify their accuracy.
In any case. we would be pleased to meet with you to discuss these and
any other questions you might have.
sincJrelY.
.,/
NP:RCS:ajr
cc: Councilman Ralph Doetsch. Sr.
Joseph Elliott, Public Works Director V/
Art Kee. Planning Director
,_ ".,;. L ,".. ",~. ;,.,.,,'.f., ..,G_..~._..;~_.,_'''' ,..,.-,,;:,.;.':'~. ...~",....~"=<,,.""..","".......~"""'.........'-~"""...~_"'''~~.. ,,,_... _ .<<,. ~
I
i
I
)/3'1 - //9/
Sfe/nW',/" Acc.~~s
C{1 1""004:> lO:J,\
t=asemen f
I-/t. - "41
&aU/?7~" 1-, creq!J
13ar f-pf7) &r!cn /P
h7 ~~i f~orn sltJc1 cl f;;-
S/(jc..) ey ~;j 51tJck7 /; Ftm/~.
~-1.G.-47' 1Srovvn tAciuin:j FfDre,,~.JEa.s~hUn/; rayJ of Jce.J.
: i
It-I'3-"'(
The...
~ovr
\cfs
~ n n e..)t: <.A ,
re.o. r
5-/~-G,7., \'" 10~W\D-\ ~eD,r~\"\:J 0,," \'\~I"\C\;l\~ Go\lt.'Pl-tis$ion
re- ~JY~Lt f'~Hc"'n. 13rcuJn (,d:lW\f'bil1ed +\.o.t
Count" y~\u'lrLA JecL'cQt/'on J D lSt> +hCtt
Wla'ln~e.nQ\"lc.<. 0 t- +4c. e....~c"WI~....+ """>QS c... f,'obl("tT'\
o.Y\d 1--h~+- \'H. dId not WQ,.,+ 1;:-Q{*~c... \:', h~)
b~Jt"DO~. !-.to Je.C;~I~l""\ st.tJ.
;t\O \ 2() - '-8
flonnin~ CCn.1"""~S.;OI""\ ou-tho,...;-z..c.J .{{1( re.\eo.se...
at bL>itd~n'1 rf'>,"V)1~h CI\ -\-h~ tDLJ~ r~"'t'" let
rYo"iJ~l 4-!'1t\ ~jrH_ t.. J~cL~..\-~ G\,.,cl In"'\Fl""o~~
+-.. 0. stve~:t rtClh 1.'11<. o.~ ofl>,"o\l.,..\ 6'1' +\,~~.
cJ, j:r\~~/nu"'" fDr 0. s.tye.€.+ ('onn~c..tl'n,,\ -t.
~ 0 c:.'I~\""" A. 0.. .
\\-\1-'9, 12tco..-d-c.l
o.jrUIM.~",t. "f'r;~c'na....J
c.u\-jc.- so..c.. LU"'~t'\
t;, le.l:to.tc.. cnJ
<:6\ t4!d cJ fO n to C\C 50.
\ 1"1"- f ro ve.
\"1.-"1...(..-''"-
F ~no. \ -\ \-0\--" ~ \ dj. 'D~ r+ .
bu;\~ b\ t't~tc.~o,..J \"'\oL0
f.'"
oU.>n~J
rH:Jtnu.. arT l\~'
b1 0; n f I""~'- .
'3-"3-7'2.. 1: )t2.t'\t u....Ou...ll'\ an 4~rL~\'t'\L\"\\ -t.. dt.l,.....t-, on) ImrY'o.>c...
;-I-hL c.L>\-l~-s.o.~ fer 0 bu:U,;." 'ft...."'~t .on \It:3.
, . ~e.,,~.... ... c..A v r-I'H,~ .
"""_u' '~'.-~~_~.,,"~,._> .^_,' ?;;:1'. _._ /"~"_.'.";"','-'-3." '.'..,. ': ,~.~. .~T "., -.,:" ..:.~l_~
/0-1/-72..
F,'n~J Orrrovo.\ b,\ bvdcl.'~ t:L~-Fqr+me/1+ {er
St-on~ Co ;fhf. ~ 0\ II 8'.s~. S+011~(.'1 rl,cr" S.\~ n c.d .rhe.
~+o",JArd o;ree""'~"'1 t-" d("d"(,6-t-;. q"d in"1rro",C-
t \, c c u \ - J c - "0. <- . ).-/ c. \., ~ ..J C. " 0 (01\ f, j- /M... ~l~ "
I.... -t-hc. ('..;*7 el,...ks c ff I~c: t I,~+ H" L
~ :J(,"t:c.,'t"\~"'~ \o'</ct~ r-e.co,.-J.e.J.
\o-\'l...-,~ 1'L-z,:z..olc oCY.lI;"<d fro FC...-+,7' /-Eo'~"''''h-l> ""~It.f'~nJ.
~-7..'3-7~. sdW'"oe.l~~ ,,:~,""\t..d .0.c. ....tQI"1Ja....cl. Gt~.'L~o4.fe.....+ 70
J ~J ; C.11 t-c. 0,. ",J \ "'" \"-o~ <. t\""\<. c... \ -J ~ - S.o Co a..5 Q.
CC\4JJ ;D'~ of c:.fF..-<l?V4l c t e. bui~Jil"\\ \cr",,'~~
c.-t II f~. I"'i~ is \-he. 0\"\(. +l4..t ~~OVVh
n(\)<..- \0 I l"c..uecl t-~"c<)J~ 0\"'\.
~-"1.-;"
t,'t"\cJ orr..c>~..l ~\ \ou;\cL'",~ d<(t {oy
.sc~ '"O~ c"- 0.1 \ I t-:3
9 - "2 -7(. I 1'10."\",,-,,, ~
I ("~ c.A tc.
C.."""........H.."... coni invecl -t~c. tTlo.:Jj;O
duJ, ~c. 5~ Yec.~ at \I~nmt:h* .
IO-i-7G:> '1101 j ~;o TV"4c.-t offrouel ~1 Vl.....n.''"'\ (om l-n .~~;o n .
T"e. frpro~~J c0\-A~- SOIL ~D"" ~c. fOUY \ ., t~ off
,H ei '. Wtt'1 \,vo " Co bo ndor1 J bt'c.h.),se -\\'\L ~cu.s~s 0.)
j ; Co n \.h.l,) c..t~A l~ \ t I ~ 0 cl e~ u..t" ~oo'lT\ for th.. .Arc~ t .
, ,
I
"2.. - 10 - 7 r f ;rc... -p~ ,\-,
LIce\(" b,
advIsed -U rOWl""\. t.. ~cc..~ +h, ~<=\s~mf'nt
YlDf rq ....k;....l -\-~CY'L.
'2.~'l..1-78" .. 'Ur..wf' u.>l'D-tL t~ t.-h1 -Vlttn":r"'" r-C.luut",,,\
0.. ~(.Cl.w"';n\ b~~or~ -t\1~ COUtlc.:\.
,.,.~.,'~.....~--~,-,~.....-::-.~...~ .~':."':. -~~:-.-.-..__,-.~."""" "l>w:~.....,..-:.~_"'..':"'"". ..~t'f!'i-;:'..-'-',..,.~.-'.,...-.-..r.r......~.....,--,..':-.".._-,;:"':t~r-~~..":"'~~:~.,..'!.....""'""'...~,-,:.-.-~~';-.;-..r--'..,.,...,..~,.~~..._,.-.~ T -,' "C_ ,...
-:S-7-7(
. 1'~2"2.t> \ co
. 13 rO...u n t
.. -to +0
\.)..) rJc:. 1:. C;-\,"\ MOo '''l'''~U ~0\for{~l"',\
Y".\u~~-t {.... 0.. \"e4":"'\ o.....d o.sk;",\
be.. ot, l~ to f'" rtq"r~ +" 'In .,1.
3~)o-?(' I C.i1, tf\.(lt.......jU .......vo+.c. {-.. -U"ou.J", ......r>J ?.,.'Z.~I)\C>
,:,"~{eo';l\\ to 6" u"'d~rs-\-o....J:t">\ ("~e,c.~~ "'-t
,0. ~c.e..t~t"\\ t.AJ:t~ -tl1.c...... 0.'" 1-'2./-71'. UL.
I, S~; J I.... \--L.<<- \<.~t.... t\....-\ h~ co.,)\J s~ e. f\o
r~'otut;p" t.. -t~c.. \ulo\~_.s t~t\ h.J
elr )u-~~el.
&~
'7~~' "_,~__~.,~'''-'':'''-'- ..... -.-....~_ _....~.'_,..,~<__....._._.i". r~r' ,~~~ ""',"'-'\"" -.q. '.~".., ,~':..':'-~ "'.."-:"~," _._".;".~'-''''';~:';,''F,-",",-_:.'_n"""'...r-.p"",,,-~,,,~ .,-...~.-. ,.....~,-...., " "'~',-.r ....'"'., -'~_~-"""'-""''''-''..'' .~. .
\ ,,'
-N- " v
\ . 0 <
Ul <1\
'" I
<:l IJ!
(:l. P
0 I
&: J
'J
V
Ti;,D
vyq
v.-/ i'<"\ \(eC
ro,\\ b~
\f~~\~~t"~ )
'Pe Z.ZD \0
.~
-----~------
---- - ---- - ------ -
,-----------
--~
S-n:\l'.\WA'< A'JENUE
\ \ 9 \
-
_.._,.............".,,:..,..;.too.~..~ __._~.... .
." '. ,;,.~:-~.:=..... ,,-. , ~~~~-"".~.._.....:.w.....,..-...-,:..'"......:.......~ItF;i~...:'.f...~.....~~~ ;;"..,"'~~;"~...... '-.
~ ~ ~ --------
~ ~ 0 _----
W ~ lD _____- \/ENIjE
.~~~ ;;C\~~ ~
u ~ ~ __=--
'-><
z
Q
~
~
)(
UJ
Z 0
Z N
<r I
~ ~
..J CTl
.J
w
m
~
~
<r
u
~
c[ -
Z 0
W 0 0
a: ~
~ ~ II
)( :: \
(/) W -
W Z w
~ Z
<I ~ ~
U <r
Z 0 u... u
z 0 (/)
0 \.
\
t- ~ ~
~ <[
~ X ~
W \
W
m Z
Q.. Z <..0
~ <r 0>
<r I _
" ) 0, m
..........
0 CY ~
--
4- <'1 ']")
~ :: -
-' ~ ~
v) I :x ~
.u
>- \~ I .
(.-J 'r <)
I I c.::
....
CL l'") 1'-
(J r, ~)
-..J ~ l"-
N
0:: ::>
<1 q
CL
~.:. Z
0
~s ~
~~
)(
N W
~ z
L. --_J Z z
<I <1
Z
-, u...
0
<r
)0- W
m a:
~
z ~
~ <I
<I ~
cr 0
0 ~ -
o
<f
o
0-
(/) 0
?; 0
o ",
a:
~-~-
:J
m
---
-
---
----
/
.")' ,
a:i
o
(l: ___
----- ..'
,...
.,.,
, .
......'
~
,
..
.IL
~
.'.
,or--
~~
~" "b \;, '"
Q\~~ \'"
, .~(:)
.r'
,i:J
~ '
.. -.-.... .~-- .-.-..............-..~
____f t.- - .. - - -' .-.
.406 .
1
!
r .
.
"
,
\
.......... t.
~..~
)
~
t,
" '\!
"
\
~
i;
~
_" ..u___--~
~l
- --- - - -..-.- --------
c.v
c
;.:
"Z:
c::
-.. .... ...
~he access ~hrough his propCTty is only fOT school children. It is l
actually a right-of-way. stated ~he Planner. anyone can use. However, I
staff feels the walkway should be provided for children (other than :
on Winchester) since Manx has now been eliminated. Mr. Pursley does
not ~hink his application generated this need for a walkway an' Kanx
would serve no purpose except ~o satisfy somebody's idea. He would
like ~o have the walkway on the border of one of his lots rather 1han
mutilate his proper~y by putting through a stree~. '
Corumissioner Pack moved MS 67-6 be approved, subject to the following
conditions:
ORDINANCE
1.' Dedication to 60' right-of-way line on Hollis Avenue for remainder
of street.
2.' Dedication of 6' pedes~rian easement from Manx Avenue to Hollis
Avenue.
3., Construction of s~ree~ improvemen~s on Hollis Avenue and sidewalk
for 6' pedestrian easement in accordance with Article 1, Chapter I,
Part 1. of the Campbell Municipal Code.
4. Compliance wi~h underground utility requirements as specified in
Section 9110.6 of the Campbell Municipal Code.
S. Process and file parcel aap with County aecorder's Office.
Commissioner Lyons seconded, and the voice vote was unanimous.
J
,t
.'
,
~
...
Mr. Hogan explained the 30' easement which a~
present ~ravels through from Steinway ~o lo~s
in ~he Coun~y nor~herly from S~einway and ~he
proposal to run a street southerly from Hacienda
Avenue ~o open up loU shown as parcels 20, 21,
48 and .9.
This would give these lots access to a public street and the property
owners would be required to dedica~e and improve the puhlic street
when the. lots were-.developed.
'Informal Hearing
Street Pattern
Area of Hacienda!
Steinway !Peggy!
San Tomas Aquino Road
Many interes~ed parties were present; Mr. Leonard Pri~Chard started
the questionning by inquiring if s~aff had initia~ed this s~ree~
pattern! Mr. Hogan replied they had but only because an applican~ had
asked for deve10pmen~ in this area and the plan was then devised. Mr.
Pri~chard is of the opinion that ~he lo~s on Hacienda would be jeopar~
dized by ~he cutti ~ through of this stree~. He cannot see a reason
for access ~o Lots '8 and 49 and is ~ opponent to the app1ica~ion.
Mr. Hogan read the definition of "lot" from the Ordinance which calls
for: (continued next PBI') I ·
"
\:
~
,
~-
f
~
. ~:
.
.-'1
L
~
- a -
i
'.
..
,.
~
.
.
t
.
t
~,."":"":~~~_'~~.-......"..-:..~~_____.......,_-,.:--~~""":""'::'__'_._.......:..:_-~_....:.r...--_~;"'''''''''';''_'"~'''",J~--.:...-,.J!'..#_'-~'''-'~!.....l."",:_,_::,-,;,;,,'}~.:...t~-~........J.u..,,",:..~.'...~'. ;. :.,;_.....~...> '.ol;.,_ ._.~
.. '.
.
-'
-
~__---"'~-:... .I\a;&,~'
~ T -A.-..........___ .. .~-:
407
()
,,~...-:..
()
..
"
\
, .
[ Section 930l.4S - LOT
Land occupied or to be occupied by a building. or unit group of build-
ings. and accessory buildings together with such yards and/or open
spaces and lot area as are ~equired by this chapter. and having its
principal frontage upon a street, or a place approved by the Commission.
Regarding any easement arrangement. however, the problems are service,
maintenance. and compatibility between all of the .everal (in this case.
six (6)) property owners/neighbors. ---
Mr. Brown. property owner. stated he could not in the past when trying
to purchase lots 48 and 49 obtain a building permit from the County
without dedication of portions of the property. Maintenance of the
easement is a problem and. further, he - for one - 40es not want traffic
noise by his bedroom window.
Commissioner Grim inquired if the maintenance agreement vas not delineated
in his azreement with Mr. Pritchard. Yes. but there is a problem of
maintenance of this easement.
I'
Mrs. Roberts) applicant and owner of Lots 48 and 49. stated her tax
problems and her interest in selling the property and assuring the
buyers' access to the lots from a.public street.
r Chairman Healey stated that due to the immediate nature of their
attendance at another meeting. the Planning Commission must determine
~ whether there is enough interest in having a public hearing set to .
decide the street pattern. Since there are apparently so many problems,
the;Planning Commission will take another look at this plan. '
AdJ~urnment:
Commissioner Pack moved the aeeting be adjourned,
seconded by Commissioner Grim. and the meeting was
adjourned at 9:45 PM, the Commis oners leaving post-haste
for their combined meeting vith e City cil.
ATTEST: ,
1rector.
BY:
[
--. - - .- .=;--~-
~
~~ ~.....-..;....--., .L,~:_-'-~'-"--~'~
_...:......,,1_....--- _._.....~;,r. .~ -....-..
'\
Leonard Pritchard
. .,t:"
. ~
..~
v~
~Q A
QV...... 0/ b
t-/'V
f~.,~
....j
i": '
..'
:1 ;
~.' .
'.
r....
:~
C''')
Lf
o
IH SCUSS lOx
-----------
The Pl&nning Director reported that ~r. Leonard
)'ritc.hnl.l1 hns r(~qucstct1 pctl:1i ssion to obtain a
b\\i.1dinn IH:rmi t {Ol" a lot lOC3.tCl1 at the real" of
1191 Ste i.n'~Cl)' A\' Cllnc: s accesS to this lot be ing
~n eR5crn~nt thnt D~joining property owners arc
uln:illinp. to ,lc:clicnt.c ~md il;~~)1"OVC as n stancl~rd
strect. 'rhc Pl~nni1ig nirector Tccorr.nclldcd t11r.t
the propel'ty o,,:ncrs of lClts 20, 21, 48 and 49
cntcl" int.o Dli nnrr.:c;1;~cnt to dedicate and iJnl'rovc
to a str~ct plan line, ns approved by tIle City
Enr.illccr t fo)" II street connect.ing \":1 th Hacienda
at such ti,::c as l't:quircd 1,y the City of Cnmphell.
Mr. Milton Brown, 1181 Stcinwny, wns present and
statcd thnt he 'HIS ,,'illing to dcdicr-te if the
City would ~cccpt the fc~cc line that he now has
curbed for an exi.sting fence :md he \-ms told t.hat
the propert)' \~0111d hove to bc surveycd to obtain
the correct lines. Mr. nro~n stated th~t he did
not feel that he \\'antc~<1 to spend $1S0 for a survey
aJlll he also di.d not \wnt his fcnce disturbed or
removed if it wace not on ~le correct line. ~r.
nl'm-m .also s ta ted that \-:ha tever t.hey do \'d th C~ SC'~T:\C
he did not '\'tlnt to accept responsibili ty to J!l:l5.ntai
it or ~ccept responsibility for personal or rrO~cTt
dp-mages for anyone using the casement.
1.
Commissio11er Young sttttcd that he felt thnt \\'hcn
the }lr01'e1't)' o\":ners sa'-l the cot.lrlcted cle\~<:.lopmC"nt
that i.s plctnned. for the property they J;'\~.ght c.hr-.nge
thoir minds ~nd ~ant the street put throu~h and
improved. eit>" OrdinRnccS require thnt lots front
on R street,in order to obtain ~ building porruit
and therefore ther.e lots fronting on an eaSt~ment
must ,beappro\'ed by the Planning COlnmissiCln before
a permit CRn be ohtaincd.
Cor.,missionel' llcalc)' asl~c(l if the easement \\'ould st
be used as it had been in the past and it wai stnt
that it \\'Quld 8S the property O\:J\crs had the ri.ght
usc tho easemcnt but \.;ould neccl 'Dcrmission of the
adjoining property o\\'nors to i.mprove it.
COHmission~T lien-ley 'P1'OpOSCS and moves tlUlt the
Building Dcpnl.otmcmt be allo\:ecl to issue J'lel"l~dts f(
~onstruction of residences on the 4 subject lots.
subject to the foilo\dnr, condition:
Th~t the property o~ner~ of lots 20,21, 48 and 49
into nn a~rcn,:.~~nt to ac<1icntc and inpTo\"e to ~ st
plan linc, a~ apprc~ed by "tho City En~inecr, for
st.rcet connecting ,.:i tl1 llacicn<la ^l-:enuc at such ti
as required by the Ci t)' of Cal;lpllcll.
secondcd by Commissioner Lyons and unanimously
..ad~pted .
~"'-r~.- 9..~~-+--'7
..___,.It"'I~..n._ .',.......-_.~............-- """ -....
common ownershIp. A aone chanle and planned development approval
has been granted by the Planninl Co.miaaion and City Council for
. the townhouse development with a condition that a aubdivision map
be filed and approved by the City.
!
This proposal is in accord with the General Plan and the Planned
Vevelopm~nt.approval that exiats on the p~operty.
Commis.ionerDlckaon atated that the .ap ia in accord with what
was presented at the time the PD was approved.
Commissioner Pack moved that the Plannin, Com.ission recommend
approval of T.S. 76-3, Lands of James Day, to the City Council,
seconded by Commissioner Campos and unanimously adopted;
~T.S. 76-~ Tentative Subdivision Map - Lands of
fLands of MaggIo Maggio and Apodaco, Inc. for approval
and Apodaco, Inc. of a land subdivision into ten lots on
property located aouth of Hacienda Avenue
and Shadle Avenue in a R-l (Sinlle ra.ily
Residential) Zoninl District.
~
. I
Chairman Lubeckis asked Hr. kee for his co..ents.
Hr. Kee advised thnt the applicant i. proposing a subdivision of
2.06 acres of land into ten single family lota. The present
zoning is R-l and the area. i. indicated for low-densIty on the
General Plan (les. than six units per acre).
The staff is concerned about the access to the parcels to the
eouth. Several of the -property owners to the south have dedicated
I, - property for the continuation of a atreet from Stainway to Hacianda
Avenue. The proposed .ap doe. not provide for the extension of a
I - street to Steinway. It is the ataff's opinion that the circulation
of the immediate area ahould be resolved and ataff, is reco..ending
a continuance to the next regular meeting in order that street
alignment and the future disposition of the existing atructures
on the property may be resolved.
Chairman Lubeckis a~ked if the applicant was preaent.
~ (co.
q,--1/
Mr. Bob McBain, 100 West Rincon Avenue, repreaenting the applicants,
stated that they were not aware when they filed this .ap that there
were any problems with the property to the south. He asked if the.
dedication was .ade with the intention that- the atreet 10 north or
the atr.et 10 south. He questioned the access that exista.
. "
Chairman Lubeckis asked Mr. McBain if he bad contacted the
property owners to the aouth.
- 13 -
t
Mr. HcBain statld that he did not know abtlr the dedication.
Hr. kee suggested that a continuance be granted so ~he questions
involving the dedication and access could be worked ou~.
Commissioner Campos moved that T.S. 76-4 be continued to the next
regular meeting, seconded by Commissioner Pack and unanimously
adopted.
'I'~c: ,,-=._1:.
"'_ _... _ -. ~ __ _ ,. __ L ~ . __. _ . _ _ .. _ _
_..-".....:.:lo_....--.-__~~ _'__., ........._.... ~ ___.... ,~.........~~~~~~~.~,.... .l. . ....'~),; ~_~~;.i;I.;1V;.~~j;__""....."..~~......;/,a..............:....Io..__-"- ..I
. . ~
..
t
. T. S. 76-4
Lands of Haggio
and Apodaco, Inc.
(..-..")
.oJ
Continued tentativeAdivision map - Lands
of Haggio and Apoda~/lnc. for approval of
a land subdivision Into ten lot$ on property
located south of Hacienda Avenue and Shadle
Avenue In a R-I (Single family Residential)
Zon i ng D i it rI ct.
Vice Chairman Dickson asked Hr. Kee for his connents.
Hr. Kee advised that the staff recommendation Is for approval.
Hr. Helms made a report to the Connlsslon stating that the way these ~ouses have
been constructed there Isnlt room to provide a standard cul-de-sac so they are
recommending that this subdivision be allowed to develop as proposed and that
these four parcels have permanent access across to Stelnway Avenue. Hr. Hel~
has taled to the owners of each of these four parcels and they are In agreement ,-.-
wi th that.
Commissioner Hebard moved that T. 5..76-4 be approved subject to the following
conditions:
1. Installation of a sanlt~ry sewerage system to serve all lots within the
subdivision In conformance with the proposed plans of the County of Santa
Clara Sanitation District No.4. Sanitary sewerage service to be provided
by said District "0. 4. #
2. Installation of a water distribution system to serve all lots within the
subdivision in conformance wi th thE' plans of the San Jose Water Co~any. .
Water service to be provid~d by said San Jose Water Company. Fire hydrants
and appurtenances shall be provided and Installed at the locations specified
by the Fire Chief, Fire Department, City of Campbell. fire hydrant rental
fees shall be paid to City at the rate of $195.00 per fire hydra~t.
3. Subdivider shall create or provide any Public Service Easement and any other'
public utility and/or public service easements as may be necessary for the
Installation of any and all public utilities and/or facilities.
4. Compliance with the provisions of Title 20, Subdivisions, of the Campbell
Hun I ci pa I Code.
S. Subdivider to pay storm drainagE' area fee.
.
6. Subdivider to furnish copy of Preliminary Title Report.
--
7. Subdivider shall enter Into an agreement with City, post bond, 'and obtain
an excavation permit for street Improvements throughout the frontages of any
new streets and through the frontage of Hacienda Avenue as required by City
Engineer.
8. All structures on the site to be removed prior to final map being recorded.
C~llssloner Samuelson seconded the motion and It was unanimoUSly adopted.
-
- lit -
/O-7r, ?eo.
I
- I
-
.
FI re
~ebruary 10.1978
Hr. HI Iton Brown
'1181 Stelnway Avenue
Campbell. CA 95008
Dear Hr. Brown:
The purpose of this letter Is to ask your help In maintaining
access along the private road between your property and 1191
Steim~"-'... Avenue. It has been observed on several occasions,
that. hie I es have been pa.rked on th I s roadway and the access
to the rear parcels have been restricted. At times. vehicles
were parked on both sides of the road. thus preventing access
for vehicular traffic.
In case of a fire In one of the dwellings to the rear, fire
engines would not be able to pass between vehicles parked there.
There would be a delay In the arrival of that fIre equipment,
thus caus.ing added damage to the building by fi reo
In a situation like this. the Fire Department would have to move
these parked vehicles and It is possible that these vehicles
could be damaged In the process.
I am asking your cooperation In seeing to It that a vehicle under
your control Is not parked on that private road.
If you have any questions. please feel free to call my office.
Sincerely,
~. W. Borden. Fire Chief
Camp,. I. I FI z?>ep~rtment
c-q /(.U7-LaA-dt
S. A. Leonarai. Battalion Chl~
Fire Prevention Bureau
Ewe: SAL:nm
cc: Campbell Pollee Department
,,~.,:-~:_~._-"_..:~,~,,~,~.,-i::-::;:~=-:s::.~~:,,~_~~ ;,~:~ ~~,;~~~~"r{~.:i~~'. ',=_,C:~:~~-;C'-:',:: ,,":T<~ .
4 r"IiI -,-.........~
.. .. 'WI Jii
. \ ,.,'.. ' ,,', ._':..~~:"-' ,,:.:..,.;, t~= ,'" ........~~.~.."_.~~"":':"'~'-:-...,~'.'_'"H...""''-',.,..... "" ..
-~.~-~. ;.O.~ .-- - - -,-,--:-:;--- '--":"-':"'0':"'" ._~ - ._~-:-_.._..:...._. -- -.'
Mr. RDbertC.Stevens C1ty MenBger
Cempbe1l,Ce. 95008
75 North Central Ave.
Dear Sir;
I request 8n apen meeting an the Bubject of ths role af eome of the employees
of the city end others 1n the settl"- .~ide e plann1ng map that MeS drar'ed at
a council ..sting in ~e time frame af about ~9b5 end the candmning tha r~ure
of . .ectlon of this arla tqbe~~~.~or now end GEGERATIONS-T~. ~
I snd .y nelqhbor .cr~~e~ even a~re that this was going on untl .
all permits were lseued ebd the use of a private easement of only 30 ft wide
was condmned to use from now on,hDwever en employee of Ca.-obell had a meeting
with the other owners of seid easement end reached a secr at meet1ng ·
I request That the heed Df planning,Engineering,fire prevention,that ,11
members of. the City Councel be notified. '
""~7"'-"-- Pleese heve eveileble the plenning map that Idee proposed end end passed "
.. .......... ....In...the tlme-rrl!!mif'~65-8nd und81".tdhi-eh'+-neu.a~ii bu' \1: rluhe rear of
, '. en easement between llB1 end 1191 Steinway Ave. "- :-~'_._"
PleBse reQuest theclty employee of Campbell thet hed the above MRst!n" 1n
th1s erea et seid meeting. 4
It will teke me considerble time to lay e history of ell of the thing thet
heveheppened in reguerds this matter that~must be presented tD get 8 c1eer
picture Df what hes and is going on. Yours Truly
Mi1tonnBrown
11l$W ~t '
";'.' ,
"
"'~'t'.
t'-:.
,
.
..
f
. .'
-" ~
.. 01,..
........... ...---
,~ -,..
... .,./
" '"
'.r.
.....;Ii:. .
'~"_ ,".r
IL'.:"
.'
.'
,
_.'
.' ...;.
..... -',..
,.
rebruarw '7,. 1978
llB1 Steinway Ave.
Cempbell,Ce.9500e
'"
,-0'" .
~
REC'EIVED
FfBZ 8 1978
.. ~.
,.
..
'. ....
...
; ,
.
. I'rT1t UII"r,r
""" ~ ,," .rQ'X rlf1r.f.
.' ~~ J:
"-
~
,
. 11:, ,~ .AIIIII> "'" u....~_:"~..:,---_.
- ~."~-~ '---.1I_.,'~........~... -
,.A>. '. . "'_. ...-:............... 1 (.
i~~~'" 1
~. ~.:...-.
. .
1
,
-t.,
~
'.... -. '~'..
, '
'.
~. " .
",."-./" -..."'..,...---...,.........-0
.'.' '.-,. ...~._..."'--".'....._..;,....-.-...;....,..'____._..f.".... ~.
~"'''''''''''''''''''''k~..r''';';'''''''~ .........................".;><..~....:.... t^ ...... .. ....~. ...+.........:.~ ..~....:.._-:...._...:..~".....~....~.:....-....:......:......::....~ .~:.J..........,.'"'..,.....;
,
C>
o
March 7, 1978
Mr. Robert C. Stevens
City Manager
75 N. Central Ave.
Campbell, Ca. 95008
Dear Sir:
RECEIVED
MAR 1 0 1978
CITY MAt\;;r.tR'~ m:r.t
My husband and I are residents ot Santa Clara County, in an unincorporated area
which is adjacent to ,and affected by the city ot Campbell.
Our next door neighbor, Mr. Milton Brown, sent :you a letter dated 2/27/7B, request-
ing an open meeting. We wish to reiterate his request and participate in same, due
to verbal harassment by a neighbor and your fire departDent , which are the result
ot decisions made by the city of Campbell. (Ref: Battalion Chief S. Leonardi's letter
to us, dated 2/10nB).
The changes made were diectly involved with our taxable property and done without our
consultation. To my knoiedge, this was against the law. We expect to be able to pre-
sent our position which will, hopefully, make it possible tor us to live in our home,
as the sanctuary it once was.
Your city's decisions and our neighbor's subsequent complaints are an infringement of
our privacy and rights. Please advise when we can meet and please have maps available
which show past and present rulings ot our area, plus all pertinent correspondence;
this may expedite a solution to our problem. Thank you.
Sincer~ ,
~ ~ ~ ~J.V>t~~,
Diane J. Pe Z 0 0
1191 Steinway Ave.
. CaJmpbell, Ca. 95008
phone: 374-7811
"
;'
--, ...:....,-..-- ";.',--,.<;.~, . -.,,-;,,, _.....__.....'a.~_'d."".....""O'-;...-' .~._<.;._---.-_~,.._...:....~,_ ._......... '.' .-~:,. ....:...~~.~~......~..:....,..:....;~~:.::.:-L,~:~~~....,L..-.....i....:..i....~~\.~~,~..:::~9ollo.:~~,~..~',h.,~~.,;....~, t~.~..._ '.\ '.
()
()..'......
' .
+;,.'
. '1
CITY OF CAMPBELL
75 NORTH CENTRAL AVENUE
C AMP 8 ELL, C A L I FOR N I A 9 5 0 0 8
(408) 378-8141
Department: CITY MANAGER'S OFFICE
March 30, 1978
Mrs. Diane J. Pezzolo
1191 Steinway Avenue
Campbell, CA 95008
Dear Mrs. Pezzolo:
This letter and the enclosed material represents the understanding which
I believe we reached when we met with you on Tuesday, March 21, to
discuss the complaints you have relating to an easement between 1181 and
1191 Steinway Avenue.
Enclosed for your information are the official minutes and other documents
relating to the events which led to the current situation which you believe
to have caused problems for you as a result of those four lots to the north
of your home.
As we discussed at our meeting, I can see no resolution of the problems you
describe, because the Maggio Court cul-de-sac did not extend further to the
south to serve the four lots which are currently served by the easement from
Steinway. To the best of my knowledge, all of the actions taken by the staff
and the agencies representing the city were accomplished through appropriate
and due process as specified in the city's planning, traffic circulation,
and building code requirements.
Should you have any further questions relating to the events which led to the
current situation, please call my office and I will be happy to discuss your
concerns.
In closing, I would like to apologize for the letter which was sent to you
from the City's Fire Department relating to keeping the easement clear in order
that the property owners to the rear of your property could have access <as
well as our fire trucks). They were not aware of the special circumstances
involved. I would also hope that the relationship between you and your neighbors
on the rear four lots could be improved since the easement is of importance
for access for all concerned.
--
Sincerely,
R~~,~~
RObert C. Stephens
City Manager
RCS:ajr
Enclosures
cc: Mayor Dean R.Chamberlin
Public W~ector, Planning Director, Building Official, Fire Chief