Loading...
1106 Audrey (1986) pld~27) RESOLUTION NO. 7140 BEING A RESOLUTION APPROVING FINAL MAP OF TRACT NO. 7624, AND AUTHORIZING THE MAYOR TO SIGN THE PROPOSED AGREEMENT WHEREAS, there has been submitted to the City Council of the City of Campbell a final map of Tract No. 7624, located on Oburn Court, for approval; WHEREAS, an agreement, approved by the City Attorney as to form which covers certain conditions of approval of said map, has been presented; WHEREAS, the City Engineer has certified that the map conforms to Subdivision Map Act and City Ordinance; NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of Campbell that said map be, and the same is hereby, approved, and that any real property offered for dedication for public use is accepted on behalf of the public in conformity with the terms of the offer of dedication. BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that the Mayor be, and he is hereby, authorized to execute said agreement on behalf of the City of Campbell. PASSED AND ADOPTED this 15th day of April by the following vote: , 19 86 AYES: Counci1menbers: Ashworth, Doetsch, Watson, Podgorsek, Kotowski NOES: Cctmci1menbers: None ABSENT: CounciJJrembers: None APPROVED: c/~ ~~:d(4, Michae17 Kotowski, Mayor By: Ralph Doetsch, Sr., Vice Mayor ATTES~, Ann~e!- ~ttY"'Clerk Tn At:l ON f:..L ,:; .....I! A 'RifE ,y~ .;~-:c Ur,[GIi~,':.L , ,~E: l.riE27: ... j, ..= ':' CC i'_ ,..,,~_~ ClTYOF "..,,' HC, ",y CLERK Y UFrJ.' ,', ,;o~~~~LL, Ch!.ii'C,1:11,\ 8Y~ x!J ~f!. OATED_.__CfJd.?:> I Bt COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT NO.4 OF SANTA CLARA COU NTY RECEr :0 APR 02 1986 Pl~ (27) 100 East Sunnyoaks Avenue Campbell, California 95008 Telephone (408) 378.2407 PUBLIC WUKr\$ ENGINEERING SERVING RESIDENTS OF CITY OF CAMPBELL TOWN OF LOS GATOS CITY OF MONTE SERENO CITY OF SAN JOSE CITY OF SARATOGA UNINCORPORATED AREA April 1, 1986 City of Campbell Public Works Department 70 N. First Street Campbell, CA 95008 RE Tract 7624 Audrey Avenue This is the District's "clearance letter" for the recordation of subject development. This District has reviewed the plans for the sewer system servicing this development. They are essentially complete and will be signed within the next day or two. Fees due this District have been paid. Bond, adequate to insure subject sewer system installation, has been posted with this District. In short, all of the District's requirements for tract recordation have been met. ~::;;;'lb.~ Preston l? Nichols Assistant District Engineer PRN: et E-20 Rev. 2-20-86 J~ . j/laci 11'7(, 2. Y RESOLUTION NO. 7140 BEING A RESOLUTION APPROVING FINAL MAP OF TRACT NO. 7624, AND AUTHORIZING THE MAYOR TO SIGN THE PROPOSED AGREEMENT WlIEREAS, there has been submitted to the City Council of the City of Campbell a final map of Tract No. 7624, located on Oburn Court, for approval; WHEREAS, an agreement, approved by the City Attorney as to form which covers certain conditions of approval of said map, has been presented; WHEREAS, the City Engineer has certified that the map conforms to Subdivision Map Act and City Ordinance; NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of Campbell that said map be, and the same is hereby, approved, and that any real property offered for dedication for public use is accepted on behalf of the public in conformity with the terms of the offer of dedication. BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that the Mayor be, and he is hereby, authorized to execute said agreement on behalf of the City of Campbell. PASSED AND ADOPTED this 15th day of April by the following vote: , 19 86 AYES: Counci1menbers: Ashworth, Doetsch, Watson, Podgorsek, Kotowski NOES: Ccrmci1members: None ABSENT: CounciJmerrbers: None APPROVED: 'I~ ~?:~4 VT .~ c:'."."/ , Michael '. Kotowski, Mayor By: Ralph Doetsch, Sr., Vice Mayor ATTEST7; {L JJ- ~ Anne G. Coyne, ~:ty Clerk THE rORrGC' '"j''':"J f:-:s-rilUM[_:JT IS A TRUE AND co,',n::cr ("CP{ l'O THe:: ORIGINAL ON FiL[ 1 ~ i 3 2U- iCE. CLERK BY DATED 100 East Sunnyoaks Avenue Campbell, California 95008 Telephone (408) 378-2407 SERVING RESIDENTS OF CITY OF CAMPBELL TOWN OF LOS GATOS CITY OF MONTE SERENO CITY OF SAN JOSE CITY OF SARATOGA UNINCORPORATED AREA COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT NO.4 OF SANTA CLARA COUNTY April 1, 1986 City of Campbell Public Works Department 70 N. First Street Campbell, CA 95008 RE Tract 7624 Audrey Avenue This is the District's "clearance letter" for the recordation of subject development. This District has reviewed the plans for the sewer system servicing this development. They are essentially complete and will be signed within the next day or two. Fees due this District have been paid. Bond, adequate to insure subject sewer system installation, has been posted with this District. In short, all of the District's requirements for tract recordation have been met. ~:';;;;'lb.~ Preston J? Nichols Assistant District Engineer PRN:et E-20 Rev. 2-20-86 I n II I I n I I I U - I (] I I IJ t1 SOIL INVESTIGATION On Proposed Subdivision Audrey Avenue near Hack Avenue Campbell, California For Mr. Dan Oburn ~ SO~~~ATI:~!E~~~CALI~:~EERS II I ,11, BAY SOilS, c. SOIL, FOUNDATION AND GEOLOGICAL ENGINEERS P. O. BOX 7493 SAN JOSE, CA 95150 408-448-2010 P. O. BOX 1853 PLEASANTON, CA 94566-0185 415-462-8415 Dan Oburn c/o Steven Arnold, Civil Engineer l211 Park Avenue San Jose, CA 95126 Project No. 662 12 June 1984 Subject: Proposed Subdivision Audrey Avenue near Hack Avenue Campbell, California SOIL INVESTIGATION Dear Mr. Oburn: In response to your authorization, transmitted by Steve Arnold, BAY SOILS has completed a soils investigation at the site of your proposed subdivision in Campbell, California. Our investigation consisted of site reconnaissance, subsurface ex- ploration, laboratory testing, an analysis of the data gathered. According to the data gathered, the site may be developed for the proposed residential development provided the provisions of this report are followed. Should you have any questions or desire additional information, please contact our office at your convenience. Ch-~ Bruce Gaviglio Project Engineer CE 23838 Very truly yours, BAY SOILS, INC. CM:kjs Project ,662 12 June 1984 TABLE OF CONTENTS LETTER OF TRANSMITTAL SOIL INVESTIGATION Purpose and Scope . . . . . . Site Location and Description Proposed Development. . . . . Field Investigation . . . . . Laboratory Tests. . . . Subsurface Conditions . . RECOMMENDATIONS General . . . . . . . . . Grading . . . . Foundations . . . . . . . Slabs-on-Grade. . . . . . . General Drainage Requirements . . . LIMITATIONS AND UNIFORMITY OF CONDITIONS APPENDIX Figure No. 1 - Site Location. . . . . . . . . . Figure No. 2 - Site Plan. . . . . . . . . . . . . Figure Nos. 3 through 6 - Logs of Test Borings. . . . Recommended Grading Specifications. . . . . . . . . . PAGE NO. I 1 - 2 2 2 - 3 3 3 4 4 - 5 5 6 6 7 8 9 10 - 13 14 - 18 Project No 662 12 June 19 SOIL INVESTIGATION Purpose and Scope The purpose of this investigation was to provide soils related data required for the site evaluation and design of one and two-story, wood frame structures in Campbell, California. The data used in the analysis were gathered through a program of site reconnaissance, test borings and testing of soil samples thus obtained. The analysis of these data is the basis of the site evaluation and recommendations contained in this report. Site Location and Description The site of the proposed ten lot subdivision is located on Audrey Avenue just east of the intersection of Hack Avenue (see Figure No.1, Site Location.) The irregularly shaped parcel is bounded on the north by Audrey Avenue and by existing residential lots on the other sides. At the time of our exploration the site was occupied by three residences, two located along Audrey Avenue and one set back some 80 feet from the street. An old tennis court was located I ~ f near the southwest corner (proposed Lot 6). TOpographically the parcel is almost flat. The areas around the houses are landscaped with grass and trees. The presently unin- habited areas have been disked for weed control. 1 Project}.' 662 12 June 1:-.;4 The site locati~n and description are based on a Tentative Tract Map prepared by Steven Arnold (Job 20983, rev. 11 January 1984) for the parcel and on site observations by the Soil Engineer. Proposed Development At this time the parcel is to be divided into ten building lots. Accesswillconsist of a cul-de-sac street which will serve all the lots concerned. Two of the existing residences will remain on their present sites (Lots 1 and 9). The third residence will be removed from the proposed street right-of-way and placed on Lot 10. Some ancillary buildings will be demolished. The remainder of the lots will be graded for the construction of one and two-story wood frame single family structures. Field Investigation The field investigation consisted of a site reconnaissance of the site by the Soil Engineer and the dri~ling of four test borings at the approximate locations shown on Figure No.2, Site Plan. The field exploration was performed on 14 May 1984. The borings, which extended to a maximum depth of 20 feet below the existing ground surface, were drilled with a truck-mounted, con- tinuous-flight, powered earth auger which drills a six inch diameter hole. Samples were taken by withdrawing the auger and dynamically driving a three inch O..D. sampling device into the undisturbed material at the bottom of the hole. The number of blows required 2 --_....~_.""'~....._.,__...."........_..,.,..~.,.. _n"_,'~. Project ~o. 662 12 June 1984 to advance the" sampler one foot, using a 140 pound hammer with a 30 inch drop, was recorded. This data was then converted to the "Standard Blow Counts" which is indicative of soil bearing capacity and settlement characteristics. The soil materials encountered, with selected laboratory data, are presented on Figure Nos. 3 through 6, Logs of Test Borings. Laboratory Tests Laboratory tests were very limited due to the gravel content of the surface soils. Only moisture content and dry density determinations were made on the representative soil samples. The results of these tests, together with the resistance to penetration of the sampler, are shown on the corresponding sample locations on Figure Nos. 3 through 6, Logs of Test Borings. Subsurface Conditions The surface soils consisted of a reddish brown sand with silt and varying amounts of gravel. At a depth of one to three feet the gravel component becomes dominant, and the soil is classified as a red-brown sandy gravel with clasts to three inches in diameter. The material is dense to very dense. A lower horizon encountered at 10-15 feet yielded a similar gravel with a silty, sandy clay matrix. This material was also very dense and slightly moist. The summarize, the materials encountered were dense, with a high allowable foundation bearing and essentially non-expansive. 3 Project} 662 12 June 1~d4 RECOMMENDATIONS General 1. The site is suitable for the proposed development provided the recommendations presented in this report are incorporated into the project plans and specifications. 2. All grading and foundation plans should be reviewed by the Soil Engineer prior to contract bidding. 3. The Soil Engineer should be notified a minimum of two working days prior to any site clearing or grading operations of the prop- erty in order to observe the stripping of contaminated material and to coordinate the work with the grading contractor in the field. Grading 4. Before any grading is performed, the surface of the site should be stripped to remove existing veget~tion and other deleterious materials. The depth of stripping should be determined in the field at the time of grading. It is estimated that stripping depths of three inches or more may be necessary. Existing undesirable items which do not meet the requiremen~s of engineering fill (basements, paving, old building foundations, septic and other buried tanks, leach field, irrigation lines, etc.) should be removed. Tree stumps and root systems should be excavated and removed. 5. After the site has been properly stripped, the top nine to twelve inches of exposed subgrade should be scarified and compacted to a 4 Project . 662 12 June 1984 minimum degree' of compaction of 90 percent as determined by ASTM D1557-70 Laboratory Test Procedure. The degree of compaction is defined in the attached "Recommended Grading Specifictions." After stripping and recompacting, the site may be brought to the desired finished grades by placing engineered fill. 6. All soils encountered during our investigation would be suitable for use as engineered fill except those within the top few inches of organically-contaminated material. Engineered fill should be com- paced to a minimum degree of compaction of 90 percent. 7. Import material to be used as engineered fill must be approved by the Soil Engineer and should meet the requirements contained in the grading specifications. Engineered fill, either imported or locally derived, should be compacted to a minimum degree of compac- tion of 90 percent as defined in the attached specifications. All engineered fill should be placed in lifts not exceeding eight inches in uncompacted thickness. Foundations 8. It is recommended that the proposed structures be supported on spread footing foundations bearing on native subgrade or on engineered fill. Footings should extend a minimum of 12 inches below the lowest adjacent finished grade for one and two-story, wood frame structures. At this depth, design.bearing pressures should not exceed 2500 p.s.f. due to dead plu= live loads. 5 Pro j e c t I. 662 12 June 1984 LIMITATIONS AND UNIFORMITY OF CONDITIONS i: ~ I I I. The recommendations of this report are based upon the assumption that the soil conditions do not deviate from those disclosed in the borings and from a reconnaissance of the site. If any variations ~ I , I or undesirable conditions are encountered during the development of - the site, BAY SOILS, INC. should be notified so that supplemental recommendations may be given. 2. This report is issued with the understanding that it is the re- sponsibility of the owner, or his representative, to ensure that the information and recommendations contained herein are brought to the attention of the Architect and Engineer for the project and in- corporated into the plans, and that the necessary steps are taken to see that the Contractor and Subcontractors carry out such rec- ommendations in the field. 3. The publication of this report constitutes the fulfillment of our contract with the client. Any further work such as plan checks, fill testing etc. will be performed on an hourly basis in accor- dance with our current fee schedule. 7 APPENDIX site Location (Figure No. I) site Plan (Figure No.2) Logs of Test Borings (Figure Nos. 3 through 6) Recommended Grading Specifications '_r"~__..,. ~.., ----..-... ~.~~._, -- ~ t t I , Project No. 662 12 June ' 14 . , \ I:::::. 'v ,0 \ 1 I I I 1 I ----- -- --';~~'" ",,';. Z - - , , ,"'a ::... - U_ N BAY SOILS, INC. FIGURE NO. 1 Site Location 8 ~~~~~~~~~~---------~ - - -- CD I ~ I en t"f t"f 0 0 0 rt rt - U1 0'\ r- ~ w en ~ ... - ~ ~ Z t"f -0 n Sog 0 rt 00 PI X ~ rt ..... .....a o PI ::SIT (1) t-3 (1) CIl rt tJj 0 Ii I'd ..... ~ t"f ::tl lQ 0 8 IT M -' n t-i Z 0 . 0'\ 0'\ t"f tv 0 rt w o :x>' t-3 l:!j .. ~ tv C-4 c: ::s (1) ~ ~ co ~ ~tv en n ~ t'Ij .. S rt tv t-" : II ~ o "TI C; c: ::D m Z o tv (1) X Ii ..... CDCIlt"f CIlrtO ..... ..... rt o..~ (1) I.Q ~ ::s (') CD tJ) ..... IT (1) I'd ~ PI ~ t"f o rt I I Q) ---- z CD X Ii ..... CD CIl t"f CIl rt 0 ..... ..... rt o..~ Cl) \Q ~ ::s o Cl) :I: ~ (") A )> U1< om - :z c ~ t"' o rt ~ o ~ 3nN3^'V A3Han'V Project N 12 June 1 LOGGED BY BG DATE DRILLED 19 May 1984 .j.J o CIl ~ Z 0, >. ~ Q.l '+J r-l ...c r-l 0 .j.J ~'O .Q ~ e c: e C1) rtl rtl >. Cl U) U) . .. . .. . " , o. . 1 . . . , 2 3 4 S 6 7 8 9 . 10 . 11 . 12 . 13 14 IS 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 662 4 BORING DIAMETER 6" BORING NO. 2 Q) >. +J Ul +J +J 0..0 . Q.l 'H +J Or-l<l-/S Ul Q) ~ MISC. <l-/ I . 0 C:~ I-l '-+J l/l I-l <1l . ::l >. LAB l/l~ ..j.J Cl 0 +J I-l ~ 0 +J CIl Ul'O RESULTS ~ l1) ~ ffi >.0, 'H I-l o tIP i!l M 01 A. Cl ~ SOIL DESCRIPTION Reddish brown gravelly (to 1" diameter) SAND, damp, very dense Reddish brown sandy GRAVEL to 3" diameter, damp, very dense Brown clayey SAND and GRAVEL, very dense Boring Terminated At 20 Feet BAY SOilS, INC, FIGURE NO. II 98 7 4 LOG OF TEST BORING Project No. 662 12 June Ir~4 LOGGED BY BG DATE DRILLED 19 May 1984 BORING DIAMETER 6" BORING NO. 3 .jJ 0 Q) 41 :>, 44 Z 0, .jJ Ul .jJ .jJ 0.0 . (II 'r-! .jJ :>, Or-lll-l 5 Ul (II ~ MISC. ~ CIl+J r-l SOIL DESCRIPTION ~ 1 . CIl-l ~ .c r-l 0 "- +J Ul ~ CIl . ;::l :>, LAB .jJ 0,'0 .0 !Illl-l ..jJ Cl () +J ~ 0; e c: e ~o .jJ Q) . Ul'O RESULTS ~IJ) ! c: :>'0; 'r-! Q) rt1 III :>, ::l (II I-l o df> Cl t/) t/) lIlt"") OIQ, Q ~ - '~.o .. .,. Reddish brown gravelly SAND, o . ~ I .. '.. :. I- damp, .. . '. dense - .p.. - 2 .. : 'd' - b~b', - G.'," _3 .. ~'?I- .. 3-1 90 Reddish brown sandy GRAVEL to - d?~~ .. 4 3" diameter, damp, very dense 70 .. lOG 10 '6:;'. - '.,0, ~O.o'~ 5 :0,0,1- - '0'00 - o~o-:. .. 6 .. ~'O~I- - - 0'.0', 6? . ' 7 .. ..0, '0 " - ~;:O: ',qc,o .. 8 . N,~I- - .. :ioO,o p':giJ .. 9 oq',~.. - o' ," - Qf~c 10 . .' '?'~ I- .. D~P~ - DO.' i _ II . :i:;~ l- . I - ro:O '0, j p,p" !.. 12 .. 0'0:0'1- . '0' i - ~l~ ! ~; .0,. I 13 !io~(j: I- .. ,.0 0 , - ,Qo', I. 14 4 ," '0' ,o~~~ .. , ~~~ - ~ IS - Boring Terminated At 15 Feet , '" 16 . - f .. 17 t - .. 18 .. . - " . . 19 - - - 20 .. . - 21 .. - - 22 . - - .. 23 . .. - .. BAY SOILS, INC. I FIGURE NO. 5 LOG OF TEST BORING 12 Project No. 662 12 June 19p-t LOGGED BY BG DATE DRILLED. 19 May 1984 BORING DIA.t.1.ETER 6" BORING NO. 4 +J 0 Q) . Q) :>, 44 Z 0., +J 00 +J +J . 0..0 Q) -rl +J ! >. 0..--144 5 00 Q) ~ MISC. ~ Ql ,+.I ..--I - SOIL ~ I 1::44 1-1 ..c: ..--I 0 DESCRIPTION '-..+.1 00 1-1 Ql ::l ;>, LAB +J 0.,'0 ..0 !Il~ .+.1 Cl U +.I 1-1 ~ e c: e ~o +J Q) . 00'0 RESULTS ;;Lf\ I c: :>,~ 'rl Q) lil lil :>, ~ Q) ~ o dP Cl tJ) tJ) P=lM ()lp., Cl ~ " . , - . ' . .. .: Reddish brown gravelly SAND, I . ~ o~': damp, dense - - . ' , 0 ,. , 2 - ' . .. ,,';:0; - ~'o 3 {j}: Reddish brown sandy 3" - o-o~ GRAVEL to - -;00 diameter, damp, dense .. 4 ().b,( very - - ~. "rQ S cR' .. - '~'c~ · . 0- 6 - ~g~ .. - ':0:0 0'0' 7 - ,o'Q'. - - fjrj:o. 8 ~" .. 'o~O, .. ... i~ .' 9 - ;,',0. .. - 6f: . 10 fdf" - t~ - 6~O - II . '6~., - ~'Q':,-~ - ~O. 12 - o.,tl~ 69' - ~Cf.. ' 13 . =b'o' . ~.., - ~%~ 14 .. ~, ~ . .. - ~OQ ~:Pi . IS ~:o - .' D.' .. 16 ~:o. Brown clayey SAND and GRAVEL to 0, ' .of~ 2" diameter, moist, dense - 0:0 very '''iP. >'; . - - 17 - ',0" 0,'0. - .,..~~9 18 - ,~o- . ;,j~ : .~. - 00 "'0' . - 1'9 9';;.~ . - - g.o:. ... 20 (iQ~ - Boring Terminated At 20 Feet 21 - ~ - - 22 - . - - 23 .. .. - BAY SOilS, INC, I FIGURE NO. 6 LOG OF TEST BORING , I I I 13 Project 662 12 June .L-,84 RECOMMENDED GRADING SPECIFICATIONS for Proposed Subdivision Campbell, California l.l General Description l.ll These specifications have been prepared for the grading and site development of the proposed residential development located in Campbell, California. BAY SOILS, INC., hereinafter described as the Soil Engineer, should be consulted prior to any site work connected with site development. 1.12 Observation by the Soil Engineer must be made during the grading operations so that he can ascertain that the project was constructed in accordance with these specifications. The Soil Engineer should be notified at least two (2) working days prior to any site clearing or grading operations on the pro- perty in order to observe the stripping of surface-contaminated material and to coordinate the work with the Grading Contractor in the field. 1.13 This item shall consist of all clearing or grubbing, pre- paration of land to be filled, filling of the land, spreading, compaction and control of the filled areas to conform with the lines, grades, and slopes as shown on the accepted plans. The Soil Engineer is not responsible for determining line, grade, elevations or slope gradients. The property owner, or his representative, shall designate the person or organizations that will be responsible for these items of work. 1.14 Contents of these specifications shall be integrated with the Soil Report of which they are a part. Therefore, they shall not be used as a self-contained document. I [ t I I 1.15 Any grading operations and/or placement of fill done with- out engineering inspection will be at the ContractorJs risk and no responsibility will be accepted, therefore, on the part of the Soil Engineer. 2.1 Tests 2.11 The standard test used to define maximum densities of all compaction work shall be the ASTM Test Procedure No. DI557-70. All densities shall be expressed as a relative compaction in terms of the maximum dry density obtained in the laboratory by the foregoing standard procedure. 14 .--- "-"---"'~"-'~"--"""'-" ""~-"~"--"'.-_.' -'~~---'~.'.'- . .- _.--~, ~-,.-._..-._. Project N' 662 12 June 1~o4 3.1 Clearing, Grubbing, and Preparing Areas to be Filled 3.11 All timber, logs, trees, brush, and other rubbish shall be completely removed, piled or burned, or otherwise disposed of so as to leave the areas that have been disturbed with a neat and finished appearance, free from unsightly debris. No buring shall be permitted in the area to be filled. Topsoil shall be removed from all structural areas. The depressions made when clearing the trees from the site should not be back- , filled until the beginning Qf the grading operations. The depth of organic topsoil to be removed will be determined in the field by the Soil Engineer but, in general, will vary from three to six inches. 3.l2 All soil deemed soft or unsuitable by the Soil Engineer shall be removed. Any existing rubble shall also be excavated and removed, 3.l3 All underground structures shall be removed from the site such as old foundations, abandoned pipe lines, septic tanks, and leach fields. 3.14 The final stripping and excavation shall be approved by the Soil Engineer during construction before further grading is started. 3.15 After the areas to receive fill have been cleared, stripped and scarified, they shall be disked or bladed until they are uniform and free from large clods. Native subgrade soils in both cut and fill areas shall be compacted to a minimum degree of compaction of 90 percent, and at a moisture content as de- termined in the laboratory. Fill can then be placed to provide the desired finished grades. The Contractor shall obtain the Soil Engineer's approval of subgrade compaction before any fill is placed. ' 3.16 The original ground upon which the fill is to be placed shall be plowed or scarified deeply, and where the slope ratio of the original ground is steeper than 6 horizontal to 1 verti- cal, the bank shall be stepped or benched. At the toe of the sideslope fills the base key shall be at least IS feet in width, cut into firm, natural ground, and sloped back into the hill- side at a gradient of not less than 2 percent. Subsequent keys should be placed at vertical heights of not more than 20 feet, and shall have a width of not less than 10 feet. Ground slopes which are flatter than 6 to 1 shall be benched when con- sidered necessary.by the Soil Engineer. IS Project Nr 662 12 June 1~u4 4.1 Materials Used for Fill 4.11 All fill material shall be approved by the Soil Engin- eer. The material shall be a soil or soil-rock mixture which is free from organic matter or other deleterious substances. The fill material shall not contain rocks or lumps over six inches in greatest dimension, and not more than IS percent large~ than 2~ inches. Materials from the site below the stripping depth may be suitable for use as engineered fill. The Soil Engineer shall determine the suitability of mater- ials, for use as engineered fill. 4.12 The select import material required must be approved by the Soil Engineer prior to transporting it to the project and must meet the requirements of Section 4.11. In addition, im- port material shall have a Plasticity Index not greater than 12. ' 5.1 Placing, Spreading, and Compacting Fill Material 5.11 The fill materials shall be placed in uniform lifts of not more than eight inches in uncompacted thickness. Each layer shall be spread evenly and shall be thoroughly blade- mixed during the spreading to obtain unifor~ity of material in each layer. Before compaction begins, the fill shall be brought to a water content that will permit proper compaction by either (I) aerating the material if it is too wet or (2) spraying the material with water if it is too dry. S.12 After each layer has been placed, mixed and spread evenly, import material shall be compacted to a relative compaction of not less than 90 percent. Native soils to be used in fills shall be compacted to a minimum degree of compaction of 90 per- cent and at a moisture content above the optimum moisture con- tent as determined in the laboratory. Degree of compaction is the ratio of the dry density of the constructed fill to the maximum determined- by ASTM Test Procedure DISS7-70. 5.13 Compaction shall be by sheepsfoot rollers, multiple- pneumatic-tired rollers or other types of acceptable compacting rollers. Rollers shall be of such design that they will be able to compact the fill to the specified density. Rolling shall be accomplished while the fill material is within the specified moisture content range. Rolling of each layer shall be continuous over its entire area and the roller shall make sufficient trips to ensure that the required density has been obtained. No ponding or jetting shall be permitted. 16 Project Nt 662 12 June 1984 5.14 Field density tests shall be made in each compacted layer by the Soil Engineer in accordance with ASTM Test Pro- cedure D1556-64 or ASTM Test Procedure D2922~71. When sheeps- foot rollers are used for compaction, the density tests shall be taken in the compacted material below the surface disturbed by the roller. When these tests indicate that the density of any layer of fill, or portion thereof, is below the required compaction, the particular layer, or portion thereof, shall be reworked until the required compaction has been obtained. 5.15 No soil shall be placed or compacted during periods of rain 'nor on ground which is not drained of all free water. Soil which has been soaked and wetted by rain or any other cause, shall not be compacted until completely drained and un- til the moisture content is within the limits hereinbefore described or approved by the Soil Engineer. Prior approval by the Soil Engineer shall be obtained before continuing the grading operations. 6.1 Utility Backfill 6.11 Where any opening is made under or through the perimeter foundations for such items as utility lines and trenches, the openings must be" resealed so that they are watertight to pre- vent the possible entrance of outside irrigation or rain water into the underneath portion of the structures. The utility trenches extending under the perimeter foundations and con- crete slabs-an-grade floors shall be backfilled with approved fill which will be compacted to 90 percent relative compaction. No ponding or jetting will be permitted. 7.1 Pavement 7.ll The proposed subgrade under pavement sections, expansive native soil and/or fill, shall be compacted to 90 percent rela- tive compaction below a depth of six inches. The top six in- ches of subgrade under pavement section for non-expansive soil and all base rock should be compacted to a minimum of 95 percent relative density. 7.12 All pavement construction and materials used shall con- form with the applicable sections of the latest edition of the Cal Trans Specifications for Pavements, State of California, Department of Transportation. 17 Project N. 662 12 June L 8.1 Graded Slopes Cut and fill slopes shall be graded at a gradient no steeper than 2:1 (horizontal to vertical). 8.12 After the slopes have been graded, they shall be track- rolled completely and provisions should be made for planting of the slopes for erosion control. Drainage facilities shall be constructed to prevent water from flowing directly over the top of the slope. No slope shall be left to stand through a winter season without the erosion control measures having been provided. 9.1 Subsurface Line Removal 9.11 The methods of removal will be designated by the Soil Engineer in the field depending upon the depth and location of the lines. One of the following methods will be used. 9.12 Remove the pipe and fill and compact the soil in the trench according to the applicable portions of Sections 5.1 and 6.1. 9.13 The pipe shall be crushed in the trench. The trench shall then be filled and compacted according to the applicable portions of Sections 5.1 and 6.1. 9.14 Cap the ends of the line with concrete to prevent entrance of water. The length of cap shall not be less than ~ive feet. The concrete mix shall have a minimum shrinkage. 10.1 General Requirements 10.11 Dust Control: The contractor shall conduct all grading operations in such a manner as to preclude wind-blown dirt and dust and related damage to neighboring properties. The means of dust control shall be left to the discretion of the con- tractor. The contractor shall assume liability for claims related to wind-blown material. 10.12 Seasonal Limits: No fill material shall be placed, spread, or rolled during unfavorable weather conditions. When the work is interrupted by heavy rian, fill operations shall not be re- sumed until field tests by the Soil Engineer indicate that the moisture content and compaction of the fill area are as pre- viously specified. 11.1 Unusual Conditions 11.1 In the event that any unusual conditions, not covered by the special provisions, are encountered during the grading operations, the Soil Engineer shall be immediately notified for directions. 18 By/Date Name & Address fro /2', CONSTRUCTION COST ESTIMATE FOR PERMIT NO. /:.' r- Surface Construction Clearing and Grubbing Sawcut Concrete Concrete Removal Curb & Gutter Removal Inlot Drain with Pipe Curb and Gutter Sidewalk Driveway Approach Handicap Ramp Extruded Curb Barricade Street Excavation A.C. Pavement Adjust Manhole to Grade Adjust Handhole to Grade Monument Box w Monument Street Tree (15 gallon) Pavement Striping ($100 min) Pavement Legends ($100 min) Stop,Street Name or Other Sign Pavement Markers Pavement Key Cut Lump Sum Estimate L.F. @ $ 4.00 S.F. @ 3.00 L.F. @ 5.00 EA. @ 500.00 L.F. @ 15.00 ) S. F. @ 3.50 S.F. @ 5.50 EA. @ 1000.00 L.F. @ 6.00 L.F. @ 50.00 , S.F.)X($0.15)x(L") S.F.)X($0.45)x(..:,L.") EA. @ 300.00 EA. @ 200.00 - EA. @ 500.00 EA. @ 200.00 L.F.@ 0.65 EA. @ 40.00 EA. @ 120.00 EA. @ 15.00 L.F.@ 8.00 (?: .. (:.' "/; Surface Subtotal "S" · $ ;;./[/ 907, :;.() I Adjust. for size: S $30.000 add 20%. S .- Street Lighting Electrolier Conduit Conductor. pair Pull Box Storm Drainage 12" or 15" RCP 18" or 21" RCP Street Inlet Manhole Break and Enter Manhole Revised 6/85 . $ "'- . $ . $ . $ . $ . $ . $ . $ . $ . $ . $ . $ . '$ .'- . $ . $ . $ ",.1 b / ; . ./ )), l , , ", , , . ,I. ) ). [' . $ .': · $ ! 0 {1.00 . $ I.,',. · $ ": O. (' ~ . $ . $ . $ . $ ';.., --" ^ " $100.000 subtract 10% -(:- /, :..i l'J, EA. @ 3000.00 L.F.@ 12.00 L.F.@ 4.00 :-/ EA. @ 200.00 .J[.' L.F.@ L.F.@ EA. @ EA. @ EA. @ 60.00 65.00 1800.00 2000.00 600.00 ).. TOTAL ESTIMATE USE FOR BOND $ $ . $ . $ . $ . $ . $ , ~ '- (C 3, /' ) 2,/' //,' II,' /./,..,__ ') ".r '2 ~-, /0 .e-\() <' 200. () . $ . $ . $ . $ . $ . $ Ii-I 1(80,0 ) ,. {-:-,.? }~~,~ ,. l-rr.)JJ.. J ~ 1;1(),;3 (~ .:.~" ~ ~). ,:2 (/,-J ell/,) , '<..' , / ( l (., / 9,r:. ~ l . l,r \ .- vvV' E,:)l ParklTllllir AVemil-! San ,Jus", [;l!"ilrllld W,12R .RECEJVfi} .JUl 2,[; 1985 PUBLIC WORKS ffiG1NEEi},NG PIc} (1..7) PACIFICCSELL," A PacifiC TelesIs Company ~ .' lo4 July 24, 1985 City of Campbell Director of Public Works 70 N. First Street Campbell, CA 95008 Attn: Jim Penoyer RE: Tract No. 7624 Gentlemen: We have no objection to the P.S.E. 's as shown on the attached map. P.S.E. 's do not, however, constitue "an easement acceptable to the utility" as described in our Rule 16 I.e. 2b. It may therefore be advantageous for the developer to grant our Company a Right-of-Way for a portion of the telephone facilities to be placed on the pro- perty served. Any arrangements for such an easement will be made directly with the developer. Yours very truly, (t,c{.~r fO~Manager-Engineering cc: Steven A. Arnold ~,<~ +: "..c-, /:J / \\' " / /'"," t "... i. " .:/ - --=.' ;' ,.;i,/'.71 ;, PACIFIC GAS AND ELECTRIC COMPANY JJD c.Gr ~i IE + 10900 NO, BLANEY AVENUE . CUPERTINO, CALIFORNIA 95014 . (408) 973.8930 Mr. Joseph Elliott Director of Public Works 75 N. Central Avenue ~ampbell, CA 95008 RECE\VEO J UN 0 3 "\~85 PUBUC ~~~\\i\S ENG\NEt.R\NG May 30, 1985 Attention: Mr. Elliott Subject: Easement Approval for Tract # 7624 Dear Sir: The Public Utility Easements shown on the final copy of the tract presented prior to recording, are adequate and satisfactory for the installation of this Company's gas and electric distribution facilities. Should you have any questions, please call Mr. I. Rosa at 973-8930. Sincerely, ~- "/~ ("........... 2.. {;./ [' h , -..-L,- G . B.L. Bunten District Electric Superintendent cc: Pac Bell Arnold Engineering Marketing File MEMORANDUM ~' 0\ C..""" . 8 * ".".. t"", . ,. . , " * v ; " ~ > ar, ,,;-," { C f.o..\.'" CITY OF CAMPBELL To: "j ~r 7 0"2. 4 f l l.e o \.0 0 'r \-\. Co 1.)'" t J ~ vJ.A-\.,~ Subject: r~k D~~Us"4 .- ".,..... Date: S - Itb - f } From: L--1.( _~ 1~ F-U!. I -)- -~; - ~~-i - - (i~1!j ~) -( ~~-l~~;~;:)- - ~ - ~~~; ~- - ~ ~:~ ~ I L.j '3 .s'1,., 0, ,>7 ff.) /' ..P', _~~~_?) J ,eo (7 L) D. D so .A<-. '-.... -- -A~;:';- ~ -$7 Ff: ~ /0/ '17 I .--- STEVEN ARNOLD Civil Engineer 1211 Park Avenue Suite 215 SAN JOSE, CA 95126 [,?gtne.ev0 0s-hma ~ jov-- /ytACJ- tJD. 7~-z4 !S8 t.P. /2" ~c. p. ~/6.00~, F' ~ t7o.oo t Shv-wt. PY"alY'} Ma",haJe &f87S.00 B:l. if, B75.00 ~ S.Janctarrd SfOY"m f}r"at", In/&.5 G 500.00 ea../' {coo. 00 . 4u?> /,.r:. ~"Yo c. P. (3 :/7.9' ~. r:: . .$ S02Z .S" ~ ScIY7;.J-ary $ewe.,- 1Vl(J~ hol.es (3;876,00 ~ . $ /750.00 ~ tYJot?fAYYlevff- &;<.~ e 4~.ao ea.. . q 450.00 1052 62.~ /7415 24gg c.. 1= . A .C. cu.rb. (!, ~ '2.00 l..t::. I> '2 / of.lX> Sa.':;,. A.&. s,'deUlaIJ<. e}/.co 5,/.11. 4 7B&f7.Sa St:Lj;r. A. c. pavemet/J+. e 4> I.~o 59.-f1 . $ 2(P) /22.Sc :fa . Ft. .fevn{'Dv-af"'I pAVef'YI ev'I+ &10. 75 ~..J./ . ~ 18 fd&, .00 1o~/$46, %1.SO file/Permit' CONSTRUCTION COST E~IMATf fOR 7T2 /62 'i 1 !?1 ' 7- D00k"A/' C r I ?/ Address Surface Construction Clearing and Grubbing LLlllp Sum Estimate L.F, . S 3.00 S.F.' 3.00 L.F,' B.OO Sawcut Concrete Concrete Removal Curb and Gutter Removal Inlot Drain with Pipe EA. . 500,00 L.F. . ~6,cv S.F. 8 5,00 S.F, . ],00 EA. 8 900.00 Curb aM &~ttf.l /oU 3,.1,/0 2,2Vo . "2- Sidewalk Driveway Approach 290 Y8 Handicap Ramp Barricade Street Excavation L.F, 8 SO.DO (3JI29s.F. )x(So.2V)xCLL") , 13; '12'1 S,F.)x()O.60)x(L") EA. til 300.00 A.C. Pavement Adjust Manhole to Grade Adjust Handhole to Grade EA. 8 200.00 ro EA. 8 500,00 ;;'cJ EA. 8 200..n L.F. 8 0.60 EA. 8 30.;)1 I EA. 8 120,IY.) EA, 8 15,00 L.F. til 8.[,0 Monument Box w Monument Street Tree (IS gallon) Pavement Striping ($100 min.) Pavement Legends ($100 min.) Stop, Street Name or Other Sign Pavement Harkers Pavement Key Cut Date ? /9/E~ bK, By .. S J/~Rt/, ,dJ ~ I c.; 08. ou /55'2:3,bo , /r- t:,80.(70 . /11500. t7 () , 'l/,3v!J. &0 , .. / 3'- 1-0(. Bo , ..3 O()o.~ , 14 6 fI-o,~i /00, O(J f(T(), c ~ '2.0. tro Street Lighting El ectro Ii er 5 EA. . 3,000.00 / J; ovo. Or,) . Conduit ;;;0 Y L.F. til 15.00 It, 66o.C/l) Conductor, pair If 0 V L.F, 1I 4.00 ~ 1.( luau Pull Box 41 EA. 1I 200.00 floo.d7.J Storm Drainage 12" or 15" RCP ,2a:f' L.F. 1I 10.00 /2, t/8C. UlJ . lB" or 21" RCP L.F. 1I 65,00 Street Inlet :;z.. EA, til 1,800.00 ~ (.00. ",-V Manhole I EA. 1I 2,000.00 .. 2. oOO.~ , Break and Enter Hanhole EA. 1I 600.00 TOTAL ESTIMATE USE FOR BOND Revi sed 3/12/84 $ 3/~ L/31.:2.0 S "J II, 4(:)<) CDJ'..'DTTIONS OF APPf{)VAL: TS 83- 09 ArPL T CA,NT: Lmds 0 f ObuITl SlIT ADDRESS: 1l0G, 1130, 1142 Audrey Ave. P. C. Mig.: 1/10/84 PLJBLT C l\ORKS DEPARTIfL1-..,'T 1. Installation of a sanitary sewerage system to serve all lots within the subdi vi sion in conformance wi th the proposed plans of the County of Santa Clara Sanitation District No.4. Sanitary sewerage service to be provided by said District No.4. 2. Installation of a water distribution system to serve all lots within the subdivision in conformance with the plans of the San Jose Water Ivorks. Water service to be provided by said water company. Fire hydrants and appurtences shall be provided and installed at the locations specified by the Fire Chief, Fire Department, City of Campbell. Fire hydrant maintenance fees shall be paid to City at the rate of $195 per fire hydrant. 3. Subdivider shall create or provide any public service easement and any other public utility and/or public service easements as may be necessary for the installation of any and all public utilities and/ or facilities. 4. Compliance with the provisions of Title 20, Subdivisions of the Campbell ~~icipal Code. 5. Subdivider to pay Stonn Drange Area Fee. 6. Subdivider to furnish copy of Preliminary Title Report. 7. Subdivider shall install street ~rovements and post strrety to guaranty the work; and that this work be done in accordance with Council policy on alternative street improvements (per policy of 12/80). 8. J):dicate right-of-way for proposed Oburn Court to 28' from centerline, and for Audrey Ave. to 30' from centerline. 9. Provide a grading and drainage plan for the review and approval of the City Engineer. 10. Obtain an excavation pennit and pay fees and deposit for all work in the public right-of-way. 11. Subdivider required to pay fee In lieu-of dedication of land for park purposes. PLA~ING DEPAR~~ 12. Prior to approval of final map, subdivider to construct garages or carports for Lots 1 and 9 as approved by Plarming Director. 13. Prior to approval of final map, subdivider to construct 6' wood fence along perimeter property 1 ines of Lots 1 and 9 per City code. 14. Silbdivider to provide evidence satisfactory to the City Attorney that pedestrian access easements or rights-of-way have been abandoned. C()\)DIT JOi\S or APT ,1,: TS ~n - O~) APPLI Q\\jT: L3Jlds J1 Obum SITE ADDRESS: 1106,1130, 1142 Audrey lIVe. PAGE 11\0 IS. Site plans for constnlction on proposed parcels will be reviewed by the Site Cormnittee 3Jld Planning C'..ormnission, prior to issuance of bui lding penni ts. 16. Approval includes site reVIew of existing stnJCtures which are proposed to remain, in order that these stnlcture::; be brought up to compatible architectural standards with the surroUllding neighborhood and new construction. COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT NO.4 OF SANTA CLARA COUNTY December 16, 1983 J(f:~ "\..l:"/~ Lif' .... { Vf^i ~l,1 ~. IJ PU '), /88) bf..I[I, (tv (;/1{," : v , r;~ /<';> ,~ {~,,..... - 'j, "3 J.:: <. , . 'i i...''il/V(} SERVING RESIDENTS OF CITY OF CAMPBELL TOWN OF LOS GATOS CITY OF MONTE SERENO CITY OF SAN JOSE CITY OF SANTA CLARA CITY OF SARATOGA UNINCORPORATED AREA 100 East Sunnyoaks Avenue Campbell, California 95008 Telephone 378,2407 City of Campbell Public Works Department 75 N. Central Avenue Campbell, CA 95008 RE Proposed Tracts and Extensions Audrey Avenue (Lands of Oburn) APN 406-24-037 Attention: James Penoyer Engineering Technician Dear Jim The sanitary sewer requirements for this proposal will remain unchanged from the previous submittal in 1981; i.e., I) The main would have to be extended easterly from the existing one at Hack and Audrey approximately 200 feet then into the cul-de-sac. If the street area within the tract is not a public one an easement will be dedicated on the map. The applicant's engineer was given these requirements previously. The developer would be eligible for approximately 28% of the main sewer installed within Audrey am taking this opportunity to forward him on the District's reimbursement programs. closing date for applications is February Avenue. I the information The next 28, 1984. 2) In the future we are planning an interconnection between Hack and Vale Avenues. Thank you for the opportunity to comment on this proposal. Very truly yours Stephen H. Di~M By Ro ert L. Moehle Engineering Services RLM/j f copy: Kenneth Oburn, 1106 Audrey Avenue, Campbell 95008 enclosures r CITY OF CAMPBELL 75 NORTH CENTRAL AVENUE C AMP BEL L, C A L I FOR N I A 9 5 0 0 8 (408) 378-8141 Department: Planning December 15, 1983 Mr. Steven Arnold 1211 Park Avenue San Jose, CA 95126 RE: TENTATIVE SUBDIVISION MAP (TS 83-09) 1106, 1130 AND 1142 AUDREY AVE. Dear Mr. Arnold: The Planning Director has conducted a preliminary review of the referenced application and found a number of discrepancies between this proposal and the subdivision regulations. Specifically, the following items were noted in a preliminary review of this proposal: 1) Insufficient setback shown on Lot 1, along the proposed cul-de-sac 2) Failure to indicate provision of parking facili- ties for Lots 1 and 9, per Zoning Ordinance require- ments 3) Failure to indicate appropriate radius at entrance to the cul-de-sac. 4) Property 1 ine between Lots 3 and 4 is awkwarcl. In light of these items, the Planning Department must receive a request of exception to the subdivision regulations to allow the substandard setback and would reconmend changes to address the other items. Additionally, please find enclosed an application form for this applica- tion. Please complete and submit with the request for an exception. This material should be submitted by December 20, 1983. If you should have any questions regarding this matter, please do not hesitate to contact the Planning Office. Sincerely, AR1HJR A. KEE r;;~~ PLANNER I I ~ '__.__.__-., (!) CITY OF CAMPBEll MEMm-{ANDUM To: ARTHUR A. KEE Planning Director Date: DoC<=-_ I ~ lor 'lJ:3 '" From: JOSEPH ELLIOTT Director of Public Works Subject: Tentative Subdivision Map Lands of cb u rn _ _ _ _ _ _~p~ 4o~ -.2. ~ -37 The following conditions of approval are recommended\concerning the subject tentative subdivision map submitted by St-e.ve...l\ Arnold. : Installation of a sanitary sewerage system to serve all lots within the sub- division in conformance with the proposed plans of the County of Santa Clara Sanitation District No.4. Sanitary sewerage service to be provided by said District No.4. 2-. 4. s-. I. ~. '1. 10. Installation of a water distribution system to serve all lots within the sub- division in conformance with the plans of the San Jose Water Works. Water service to be provided by said water company. Fire hydrants and appurte- nances shall be provided and installed at the locations specified by the Fire Chief, Fire Department, City of Campbell. Fire hydrant maintenance fees shall be paid to City at the rate of $195 per fire hydrant. 3. Subdivider shall create or provide any public service easement and any other public utility and/or public service easements as may be necessary for the installation of any and all public utilities and/or facilities. Compliance with the provisions of Title 20, Subdivisions of the Campbell Municipal Code. Subdivider to pay Storm Drainage Area Fee. C- Subdivider to furnish copy of Preliminary Title Report. Subdivider shall (install street improvements and post surety to guaranty the work) hllQQ~tIi! itA il!n!l!ms~t ~R~ flU1 6tH l!~1 l.... :1I~Lull ."L. ....L :.,,~. 8\1e- Ifl[l.h iR 1ilu f...L.....:. UI.~ U!Jl DE 11 jlin i Leul IRlIiIIJe"'~I.l Bbl. :..l>~. Dedi cate addi tiona 1 ri ght-of-way to wi den H-ofosed 06 urt\ Cour1- to '"'JD feet from centerline. C.C.&R.'s to be approved by City Engineer to insure provisions for maintenance of buildings and common area. P~ovide a grading and drainage plan for the review and approval of the City [ngi neer. Obtain an excavation permit and pay fees and deposit for all work in the public right of way. By: BILL M. HElMS Ennineerino M~n~n~~ TO: CITY CLERK PLEASE COLLECT AND RECE FOR THE FOLLOW I NG MON I ES P,W, FILE NO, 3372 ACCT . ITEMS ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT ($420) 3370 3372 3372 3372 3372 @9 3372 3372 3372 3395 3373 3373 3373 3373 3372 3373 3521 3521 3521 3520 3510 STORM DRAINAGE AREA FEE PER ACRE (R-I, $1,875; ; MULTI-RES., $2,060; ALL OTHER, $2,250) PLAN EXAMINATION AND CONSTRUCTION INSPECTION FEE (7Of. OF VALUE) TENTATIVE PARCEL MAP FILING FEE ($300) TENTATIVE TRACT MAP FILING FEE ($290) FINAL PARCEL MAP FILING FEE ($275) FINAL TRACT ~~ FILING FEE ($275) VACATION OF PUBLIC STREETS AND EASEMENTS ($455) ASSESSMENT SEGREGATION OR REAF'PORTIOI'NENT ($420 FOR FIRST PLUS $130 EACH ADDITIONAL) LOT LINE ADJUSTMENT FEE/CERTIFICATE OF COMPLIANCE ($300) PARK DEDICATION IN-LIEU FEE PER UNIT ($1.097.00!) COP I ES OF ENG I NEER I NG MAPS AND PLANS ($. SOPER SQ. FT.) WORK AREA TRAFF I C CONTROL HANDBOOK ($ 2 ); ADD I T I ONAL ($1.50 I PROJECT PLANS AND SPECIFICATIONS ($10) MAP REVISIONS TO MAP COMPANIES ($10) EXCAVATION PERMIT APPLICATION FEE ($35) GE'NEPAL COND IT J ONS, STD. PROV I S I ONS 8/ DETA I LS ($10; OR $I/PG) CASH DEPOSIT FAITHFUL PERF~~CE DEPOSIT ~t\ I NTENANCE BOND DEPOS I "!" FIRE HYDRANT MAINTENANCE ($195/EA) POSTAGE OTHER TOTAL B~~ ADDRESS l./ 0 0 ~ .J T S C7l--t--~ ~ NAME PHONE FOR CITY CLERK ONLY ;;;.. ~ ?; (} 0 og;;27 S-. DO CZ>n 3 -(~ - <jJ ~ RECEIPT NO. AMOUNT PAID RECEIVED BY DATE AMOUNT :..2 7 ~< ifV $ c:2(r~~ 727-LGY~ ZIP 9~-CJ ..sO ,JULY li84 TO: CITY CLERK PLEASE COLLECT AND RECEIPT F~ 11iE FOLLOWING MONIES P.W. FILE NO.____ ACCT . ITEMS 3372 3370 3372 3372 ~ 3372 3372 3372 3372 3372 3395 3373 3373 3373 3372 3373' 3521 3521 3521 3520 3510 NAME ADDRESS PRELIMINARY ENV I RalNENTAL IMPACT REPORT FEE ( $200 ) STORM DRAINAGE AREA FEE PER ACRE (R-I, $1,875; MULTI-RES., $2,060; ALL OTHER, $2,250) PLAN EXAM I NAT I C>>f AND CCJlSTRUCT I C>>f I NSPECT I C>>f FEE (7"to OF VALUE) TENTATIVE PARCEL MAP FILING FEE ($250) TENTATIVE TRACT MAP FILING FEE ($240) FINAL PARCEL MAP FILING FEE ( $230) FINAL TRACT MAP FILING FEE ($230) VACAT ION OF PUBL I C STREETS AND EASEMENTS ($380) ASSESSMENT SEGREGAT I C>>f OR ~T I C1NENT( $350 FOR FIRST PLUS $110 EACH ADDITIONAL) LOT LINE ADJUS1MENT FEE/CERTIFICATE OF COMPLIANCE ($250) PARK DEDICATION IN-LIEU FEE PER UNIT ($I,OI2.00t) COPIES OF ENGINEERING MAPS AND PLANS ($ .50 PER SQ. FT.) WORK AREA TRAFF I C can'ROl_ HANDEIOCK ($ 2 ); ADD I T I ONAL ($ t .50 PROJECT PLANS AND SPECIFICATIONS ($10) EXCAVATION PERMIT APPLICATIC>>f FEE ($35) GFIlERAL C~ITICJIS, STD. PROVISICJIS & DETAILS ($10; OR $I/PG) CASH DEPOS I T F AI THFUL PERFORMANCE DEPOS IT MA I NTENANCE BOND DEPOS I T FIRE HYDRANT MA I NTENANCE ($1 95/ EA) POSTAGE OTHER TOTAL ()gvbl. 7g ENT; . INC-~ J .s . FI f!..Sr ST~ PHONE C!.M 13 . FOR CITY CLERK C>>fLY RECEIPT NO. II 9' 7.;1 C =~A: ~tf~ DATE' 1/-...</ -? ..3 AMOUNT I ~ $ JULY Its EXCAVATION PERMIT APPLICATION FEE ($35) GFNEP-AL CONDITIONS. STD. PROVISIONS Be DETAILS ($10; ~ $1/PG) 3521 CASH DEPOSIT TO: ....C...T 3372 3370 3372 3372 3372 3372 3372 3372 3372 3372 3395 3373 3373 3373 3373 ~ 3373 C I TV CLERK PLEASE COLLECT AND RECEI F~ 'tHE FOLLOW I NG MON I ES P." FILE NO. 86-/sY I TJ:'UC:: ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT ($420) STORM ORA I NAGE AREA FEE PER ACRE (R - I. $ 1 . 875 ; MULTI-RES., $2,060; ALL OlliER, $2.250) PLAN EXAMINATION AND CONSTRUCTION INSPECTION FEE (7% OF VALUE) TENTATIVE PARCEL MAP FILING FEE ($300) TENTATIVE TRACT MAP FILING FEE ($290) FINAL PARCEL MAP FILING FEE ( $275) FINAL TRACT MAP FILING FEE ($275) VACATION OF PUBLIC STREETS AND EASEMENTS ($455) ASSESSMENT SEGREGATION ~ REAPPalTIONdENT( $420 FOR FIRST PLUS, $130 EACH ADDITIONAL) LOT LINE ADJUSTMENT FEE/CERTIFICATE OF COMPLIANCE ($300) PARK DEDICATION IN-LIEU FEE PER UNIT (SI.097.00!) COP I ES OF ENG I NEER I NG MAPS AND PLANS (S. SOPER SQ. FT.) WORK AREA TRAFF I C CONTROL HANDBOOK ($ 2 ); ADD I T I ONAL ($'.50 I PROJECT PLANS AND SPECIFICATIONS ($10) MAP REVISIONS TO MAP COMPANIES ($10) F ~ i I '-:3 ~- 3521 FAITHFUL PERFORMANCE DEPOSIT 352 1 MA I NTENANCE BOND DEPOS I T 3520 FIRE HYDRANT MAINTENANCE ( SI95/EA) 3510 POSTAGE NAME O'tHER TOTAL s 3~~ 54-A/TOS ~~ U~~~ ~ PHONE 2- 6 ~ - 1r:2- 2- ZIP 9 ~?Jr:J '2- ADDRESS 1'1 Y () FOR C I TV CLERK ONLY ?V7D ;ji;: JULY 1984 RECEIPT NO. AMOUNT PAID RECEIVED BY DATE' TO: CITY CLERK PLEASE COLLECT AND RECEIP, F~ niE FOLLOW I NG MON I ES ACCT. 3372 3370 3372 3372 3372 3372 3372 3372 3372 3372 3395 3373 3373 3373 3373 3372 3373 3521 3521 3521 3520 P . V q LE NO, ITEMS AMOUNT ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT ($420) STORM DRAINAGE AREA FEE PER ACRE (R-I, $1,875; + ~ "" PC> MULTI-RES., $2,060; ALL OTHER, $2,250) bff5~ 7 3.5 b X~ PLAN EXAMINATION AND CONSTRUCTION INSPECTION FEE Rni j' po J ~C>2 0 (7"10 OF VALUE) L- i-- 2 I: --, 9lf ..c:::::- C3Ti rn ~ I~ TENTATIVE PARCEL MAP FILING FEE ($300) TENTATIVE TRACT MAP FILING FEE ($290) FINAL PARCEL MAP FILING FEE ($275) FINAL TRACT MAP FILING FEE ($275) VACATION OF PUBLIC STREETS AND EASEMENTS ($455) ASSESSMENT SEGREGATION ~ REAPPORTIONMENT ($420 FOR FIRST PLUS $130 EACH ADDfTIONAL) LOT LINE ADJUSTMENT FEE/CERTIFICATE OF COMPLIANCE ($300) -,r,.,1 ~ /, PARK DEDICATION IN-LIEU FEE PER UNIT ($1,097 .oo"!) J 10. , COP I ES OF ENG I NEER I NG MAPS AND PLANS ($, SOPER SQ, FT.) WORK AREA TRAFF I C CONTROL HANDBOOK ($ 2 ); ADD I T I ONAL ($ I .50 I PROJECT PLANS AND SPECIFICATIONS ($10) MAP REVISIONS TO MAP COMPANI ES ('10) r 7" ~ C2.- I~ o~ EXCAVATION PERMIT APPLICATION FEE ($35) GFNEP-AL COND I T IONS, STD. PROV I S I ONS lit DETA I !oS ($10; OR $I/PG) CASH DEPOSIT ---J' F A I niFUL PERFORM..~CE DEPOS I T "'J \ l/ 4 0 D M.e.1 NTENANCE BOND DEPOS I "!" ) 'S-~ FIRE HYDRANT Mft.INTENANCE ($195/FA) 3510 POSTAGE ADDRESS J tf Y 0 NAME OTHER ""L~2"J3 32-/~!r - =3~-rb1 ~ 00 s 07, \""2.S - , TOTAL ~ .1:k~~ ~ZJ PHONE /0IJ1.-L-~ ~ ~ 1./ 2 b 3 --;:/ ). 2 ZIP 9...)7JCl 2 FOR C I TV CLERK ONLY so:::J.. (p ~~~33 ~) OG L;Jr:l)86 .JULY 1984 RECEIPT NO. AMOUNT PAID RECEIVED BY DATE'