14419 S. Bascom Ave. (98-57)
'UBlJC WORKS DIPAJlTMIIn' RICIIPT
Elroclite July I. 1996
........... b--1. ~T~ \'e> 1
TO: City CIcrtc PUBUC WORKS FILE NO. "\
., l4-4- \'1
PROPI!RTY ADDRESS ~,'P:b~H .<,~.
PI.... colloct.t -... f... dlo folJowioa ....ua:
ACCT; I ITEM ...... .... ...........
4U53'-4921 Project Rev_ (SDKil"v ....jectl S
ENCROACHMENT PERMIT
4722 Afl1llica... Foo
Naa-Ulility _ Permit (5225)
R-I ..... Penoit (No Fool. 50_ PermillY, (SI..')
Utilitv _Permit
An0ri01lCo11octcr S_ ($32j)
Raidaliol SlnIlIOdlor Anlu (5225)
l2U3 Plu CIIeck 0eIJ00it . l". ol ENGR. EST. (5500 ...) . I
UU3 F,idlful p.,fon__ SocwilY (FPS) (I00%O(ENGR.EST.) . . t.. " ... .A. "-
UU3 Lobor ,nd M.ooriala Security (100% of ENGR. EST.) "7 --.. A - . r>>rl
2203 ~onlUlllcn~ Security (100% 0( ENGR.EST.) .
!20J C.... Ool>asit (4% ofENGR.EST.)(55oo ..WSIU.OOO 1lIUI . l ~ /"')
PIu Chcc:k .t h..".._ Foo lNoo-Utilily)
.722 En!ll'.EsI. < S250.000 (I~. of ENGR. EST.)
.. UU3 En!ll'.E.c.>S250.000 (OeIJosi,IW.ofENGR. EST.JSJO.OOO .....).. I.~. ? cp..t;i.. 00
.722 Utilirv < S 100.UOO
Miaimalll Oaane Per I..ocuioII (SI20)
CoaduitI/PipeIi ., 10 500 F... (SI.6OIft)
Abow 500 F... (SI.IIIIII.)
MaMolalV.odlsIEll:. (SI05/a)
Pole SeIIRaoovol (SI05/_1
S.... T...1'laociq/RcaIcm1 (SI05_)
.. UU3 Utilirv> SlOu,nuo AetaaI ColI + 20% .. .
.n2 S_ T... PluIio'llRellloval Pormit (SIU5)
H601 Project Plans A Spocuacioas Project No.
.7601 S......nl S"""ifIClUons .t Ooloils ($liPll SI2IIlooIt1
.76111 Copies of enlinecrin, Maps 4 Pfaat 1$.5OIsq.fl )
47221 ?ealties: F:lillU"l: 10 rescore public iaulI'OvelDClltI (SI..1ICo_ Day)
I (Mwti Codo SecIioa 11.34.010)
.7221 Penalties: Fllilure to correct uuafe coeditionl (SIOOICo_ Doy)
UND DEVELOP!\lE:oi1'
4n2 Lot line AdiUllllHmt (5500)
.722 ~I Map (4 Lots or L..ca) (SI.06O.. S251Loc)
4n2 Fmol Trocr Map (5... More loti) (SI.3IO.. S25lLocl
.722 CelllIIc:a.. of Compliucc (5500)
4722 Callf_ of Comerioa ($300)
.n2 Vocalioa ofPubl;" S......t_.. (5550)
.722 Aucnmcnt ScpeprioII or Rea,lllll .....
F..Split (5550)
Eoch Addirioool LoI (SI711)
.nl Storm DninalJC Ala Fcc Per Acre (R-!. $2.000)
(Muhi.Rcs, =01
(All Other. $2.500) L190
.92111 P:uklond Oed;..tioo Foo
.96li -..
TRAFnC
.nl Inlef"leCbon Tift Couatl (l\wo-Hoar Ca.al) ($6(1)
.nl 10_ TumC"""..(........p....-ol ISm)
4721 T..1I'o: Flow Mo. (Doilv TmTo: Vo_l 1S27l
.nl C...obcll T..1I'o: Modal (F.II Scopo_l ($2..2.50)
4nl c...obcll Tro1l'o: Modal (Red...... Scopo "-en,) ($740)
4271 Truck Penairs ($35""")
4nl :-10 P:ukio. Si"" IS II_ ... S25/IOO)
OTHER
TOTAL S
NAME OF APPUCANT
NAME OF PAYOR PHONE
ADDRfSS ZIP
...~au1 CotI PIa ZO'f.o\'
J;;lI "-(~~I VI;.'"
FOR . r
OTY CLERK ~~VYn .., 4nnn
ONLY t. lJ '..100'''' \' ~\
D... Rocci... .. 405
. _. ....nlllC' 1'V I 2.. \ 401- t"
I Y l . oJ. VII'''' ,
FFar PIa Chcct..18d usa Oeporill. send ~'cUowcopy tel rmance. . . I
D... I.ilillls I
Il:lrocllmol(CllC)oIp(... IM7l
I.
t~~ 1(,\
~A\
o
CITY OF CAMPP.t~L;
REcvr~ BY: JANH
PAYDR; EiE~~fj7C "
TDDA'1" S Di~ -i:: C~~./--t1:. -.~.-,
:-.:-~ ':" :.-.--
;{t:J i -:: : tK ".:~
DESCRIF':I~~;
ENGE ~ SUfD _")
....-.~,....,
~ f Ur:~ ii~'~; t~ ... -.- ...
....'i.l"1J "'ATn.
t.rfi!:L.f\ r ;;.i.i;.
;~uc;::.;
':.." i i i- ~.J ;;,
NO:
!Jt.j0
TENDS~ED~
CHANG~ :
i;";,-
i:.!!i!l!i.
; l~
;3 ,921. ~)G
$3::021:tH)
,u
L~
i"''tTV ,.",. ,-..Ulnnn r l"Ja
'J.;.i; ur i-Hl1rt'tl..L., i-H
,'ii.n/B lj;i,i".~
";~':.:~;;;J...."'!...;..;
1"'\,""""11'" "'II. .......111
Kt.t:VJJ tll: .JHNM
PAYOR: DENNIS ~. ~ONG
--- . .. - - -'--
Uli.~~ ~"" ~ :!~!~ ~
.-.----
.. ".. ....
. ,_ . ."~ . '-'I'..
.";" ~
1!};C~:~; 18
....-~....-....,.-......
.... '
..,. t.. . - .....
... ..., .
.._--- -..
;:..
.,
----------
UtjL;;~:' ;
$3 ~ 2B8 ~ :;)::!
-1.. 'j _c ~"::;..c..;
..;.-'-- ......
~!}''::''':: ~.Hj
~ ~~ -''..':-
$3,9:: = :~::.:,
.....,.-,.. u riA T", .
~i1~t.i\ iH.l.i.ia
i"UL'i'ii un. ..-.c"7t'.,
...nu_~n nu= -.;:_:.,j~.i
TENDE~~EIi:
... ..",
.; :,,;:.]
~
~tIA..i,-~.
i.Ji1HrHJ:' .
.'I.an A"" "'.. '""
i.} l'-.:'I.j\jl!.l'tIJ'
,.;,;.;;~ '
.;": ~~.;' 7';. '..'-.)
.... _. ~.... .u.
- .. - ....
. -. - .
... r...r.
... . ~j.....:
"^.........."'r
ipj:':'"!i ;....t+
~
,.
DOCUMENT:
. ,870442 Titles:1 / Pages: 8
City of Campbell
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
111111111 U 111111 ~
Recording Requested by:
..0014870442..
Fees. + No Fees
Taxes. . .
Cop i es. .
AMT PAID
When recorded mail to:
BRENDA DAVIS
SANTA CLARA COUNTY RECORDER
Recorded at the request of
Ci ty
RDE ** 004/016
6/24/1999
8:57 AM
City Clerk
City of Campbell
70 North First Street
Campbell, CA 95008
(Space above this line for Recorder's use only.)
STREET IMPROVEMENT AGREEMENT
THIS, AGREEMENT (identified as File No. S 98-24 made and entered into this
0::2.3 ~ day of kacj , 19~, by and between DENNIS K. WONG
AND DORA S. NG, HUSBANDAND WIFE AS JOINT TENANTS, hereunder referred to as
"Owner," and the CITY OF CAMPBELL, a municipal corporation of the County of Santa
Clara, State of California, hereinafter referred to as "City."
WHEREAS, on January 26, 1999 the Planning Commission per Resolution No. 3217
granted conditional approval of S 98-24 for that certain real property described in Exhibit A
attached and incorporated as though fully set forth herein, and commonly known as 14419
South Bascom Avenue, which property is hereinafter referred to as "said real property";
WHEREAS, compliance with the terms and conditions of this Agreement are conditions
to the approval of the above described Site and Architectural Permit;
NOW, THEREFORE, IN CONSIDERATION OF THE ABOVE-MENTIONED
APPROV AL, and satisfaction of the conditions to that approval,
(1) Owner shall provide, construct and/or install at his own proper cost and
expense, street improvements as described in Section 11.24.040 of the City Code within 12
months from the date first mentioned hereinabove; provided, however, that in the computation
of said 12 month period, delays due to, or caused by acts of God, viz., unusually inclement
weather, major strikes, and other delays beyond the control of Owner or his successors shall
be excluded.
(2) It is expressly understood and agreed to that if Owner shall fail to complete the
work required by this Agreement within the said 12 month period, the City, after giving ten
(10) days written notice thereof to Owner, or his successors, may construct and/or install said
improvements and recover the full cost and expense thereof from owner, or his successors.
(3) Owner, or his successors, shall cause to be prepared at his cost and expense
improvement plans for the construction and/or installation of said improvements prior to such
construction or installation. Said plans shall be prepared by a civil engineer registered by the
State of California and submitted to the City Engineer for examination and approval.
All of said improvements shall be constructed and/or installed in accordance with those
plans approved by the City Engineer and shall be made under the supervision and inspection
and to the satisfaction of the City Engineer. Said construction and/or installation shall be in
accordance with the existing ordinances and resolutions of the City of Campbell and to all
plans, specifications, standards, sizes, lines and grades approved by the City Engineer, and all
State and County statutes applicable thereto. Upon completion and acceptance of the
improvements by City, Owner, or his successors, shall provide reproducible as-built plans to
the City Engineer.
(4) The construction work of the improvements embraced by this Agreement shall
be done in accordance with the specifications of the City of Campbell and West Valley
Sanitation District of Santa Clara County, where indicated.
(5) Prior to approval of the plans by the City Engineer pursuant to Section (3) of
this Agreement, Owner, or his successors, shall pay to the City for examination of
improvement plans, field inspection of construction of improvements and all necessary
expenses incurred by City in connection with said improvements, a sum calculated in
accordance with Resolution No. 9391, as adopted by the City Council on June 2, 1998, or as
may subsequently be adopted by the City Council.
(6) Owner, or his successors, shall file with City, prior to beginning construction,
surety acceptable to the City in amount equal to the City Engineer's estimated cost of the street
improvements to ensure full and faithful performance of the construction of all the
aforementioned improvement work, excluding sanitary sewers and water distribution system.
Said surety shall guarantee that Owner, and his successors, will correct any defects which may
appear in said improvement work within one (1) year from the date of acceptance of the work
by City and pay for any damage to other work resulting from the construction thereof, as well
as pay the cost of all labor and materials involved. This surety shall remain in effect until one
(1) year after date of final acceptance of said improvements by City. Said surety amount may
be reduced by the City Engineer after the date of final acceptance to not less than twenty-five
(25) percent of its full value.
(7) Upon final release of said surety by City, the obligations of Owner, and his
successors, contained in this Agreement shall be considered null and void.
(8) When called upon by City to do so, Owner, or his successors, will execute a
petition for the formation of any special assessment district created pursuant to any special
assessment act as provided in the Streets and Highways Code of the State of California created
for the purpose of constructing and/or installing any or all of said improvements.
2
,I.
I
(9) Owner, or his successors, shall participate in and become a part of any special
assessment district as described in paragraph (8) of this Agreement.
It is expressly understood that any obligations of Owner, or his successors, contained in
this Agreement that are accomplished to the satisfaction of said City Engineer by said special
assessment district shall be considered null and void.
(10) Owner, or his successors, shall make such deposits or file such bonds and enter
into such agreement as required by West Valley Sanitation District of Santa Clara County to
ensure the installation of a sanitary sewage system to serve said real property, and Owner, or
his successors, shall file with City, upon execution of this Agreement, a letter from said
Sanitation District stating that Owner, or his successors, have made such deposits or filed such
bonds and entered into such agreements.
(11) Owner, or his successors, shall pay to Pacific Gas and Electric Company any
and all fees required for installation of underground wiring circuit to all electroliers within said
real property when Owner, or his successors, is notified by either the City Engineer or the
Pacific Gas and Electric Company that said fees are due and payable.
Owner's, and his successors', obligations under this section shall not be relieved by
delay or the passage of time, but shall remain binding indefinitely and forever.
(12) Owner, or his successors, shall make such deposits or file such bonds and enter
into such agreement as required by San Jose Water Company when called upon to do so to
ensure the installation of a water distribution system to serve said real property, including fire
hydrant. Owner's, and his successors', obligations under this section shall not be relieved by
delay or the passage of time, but shall bind Owner and successors indefinitely and forever.
(13) Any easement and right of way within or without said real property necessary
for the completion of the improvements shown upon aforesaid improvement plans shall be
acquired by Owner, or his successors, at his own cost and expense. It is provided, however,
that in the event eminent domain proceedings are required for the purpose of securing said
easement and right of way, Owner, or his successors, shall deposit or cause to be deposited
with City a sum covering the reasonable market value of the land proposed to be taken and to
be included in said sum shall be a reasonable allowance for severance damages, if any. It is
further provided that in addition thereto such sums as may be required for legal fees and costs,
engineering and other incidental costs shall be deposited with the City.
(14) Owner, or his successors, shall carry out any and all negotIatIons with all
interested parties and shall perform or cause to be performed at his own cost and expense and
to the satisfaction of the City Engineer any and all work required to abandon, remove, raise,
lower, relocate and otherwise modify irrigation line or lines within the boundary of said real
property.
3
I,
(15) To the fullest extent permitted by law, Owner, and his successors, shall
indemnify, defend and hold the City of Campbell, and its agents, employees, attorneys,
officers, officials and assignees harmless from any and all claims, damages, losses and
expenses, including, but not limited to, attorneys' fees, arising out of, or resulting from any
negligent or intentional act or omission (including misconduct) of said Owner, or his
successors, or any subcontractor, or anyone directly or indirectly employed by him, or anyone
for whose acts any of them may be liable in the course of performance of the Agreement.
The Owner, and his successors, shall also indemnify, defend and hold the City of
Campbell, and its agents, attorneys, employees, officers, officials, and assignees harmless
against and from any and all claims, demands, liabilities, losses, lawsuits, judgments,
damages, costs and expenses (including, but not limited to, attorneys' fees and court costs,
whether incurred at trial, appellate or administrative levels) which the City of Campbell may
incur or suffer, or to which the City of Campbell may be subjected resulting from the failure of
Owner, or his successors, or his agents, employees, subcontractors, or anyone performing
services under him, to fulfill any of the obligations imposed under this Agreement.
(16) It is acknowledged that the provisions of this Agreement constitute covenants for
the improvement of the subject real property for the mutual benefit of Owner's property,
commonly known as 14419 South Bascom Avenue, and the City's property, commonly
described as South Bascom A venue where it adjoins Owner's property. These covenants shall
be considered to affect rights in the above-described real properties, and shall be binding on
the heirs, assigns, successors, and grantees of Owner to said real property.
(17) Nothing contained herein shall be construed to transfer any unvested interests in
real or personal property for purposes of the rule against perpetuities.
(18) In the event that Owner, or his successors, should breach any of the terms,
conditions, or covenants of this Agreement, the City shall be entitled to recover, in addition to
any other relief available in law or equity, all costs incurred in attempting to obtain
enforcement of the Agreement, or compensation for such breach. These costs shall include
reasonable attorneys' fees and court costs.
(19) This is the entire Agreement between the parties, and there are no
representations, agreements, arrangements or understandings that are not fully expressed
herein.
(20) This Agreement can be executed in counterparts by the parties hereto, and as so
executed shall consist of one agreement, binding on all parties.
(21) Owner shall provide and construct public street improvements per preliminary
plans titled "Street Improvement Plans for 14419 South Bascom Avenue, Lands of Dennis
Wong, Encroachment Permit 99-181," which are subject to approval by the City Engineer,
prepared by Westfall Engineers, Inc., 14583 Big Basin Way, Saratoga, CA 95070.
4
IN WITNESS WHEREOF, said City has caused its name to be affIxed by its Public
Works Director and City Clerk, who are duly authorized by Ordinance 1951 adopted
September 2, 1997, and said Owner has caused his name to be affixed the day and year first
above written.
Dennis K. Wong and Dora S. Ng, husband and
wife as joint tenants
~~fk~ ,ff.'
Dennis K:W ong
~. ' c
~-tc<..~'
Dora S. Ng
(Notary Acknowledgment for above signator(ies)
MUST be attached.)
CI~~
R;;bert ](ass, Pub~C orks Director
~
. tu~
Anne Bybee, City Clerk
h:\agr\14419bas (mp)
5
'-'
t' .
EXHIBIT A
All that certain real property situate in the City of Campbell, County of Santa Clara, State oi" CaiJornia,
described as follows:
BEGINNING at an iron axle set at the point of intersection of the Northwesterly line of the San Jose-Los
Gatos road, with the Northerly line of that certain 3.00 acre tract of land described firstly in the Deed from
James Long, et ux. to Cornelius O'Donnell dated August 11, 1873, recorded September 5. 1873'in Book 30
of Deeds, page 273, Santa Clara County Records; thence from said point of beginning South 89'" 13' 4011
West along the said Northerly line of the 3.00 acre tract. 114.69 feet to an iron pipe; thence North 00 47'
20" West and parallel with the Easterly line of White Oaks Road for a distance of 86.04 feet to an iron pipe
set on the Southerly line of that ct:rtain tract of land described in the Deed from Raymond Angelo, et ux, to
Clyde J. Stemel. et ux. dated September 19, 1952, recorded September 22, 1952 in Book 2491 Official
Records, page 300, Santa Clara County Records; thence North 890 13' 40" East along said last named line,
177.41 feet to an iron pipe set at the Southeasterly corner thereof on the said Northwesterly line of the San
Jose-Los Gatos Road; thence Southwesterly along the said Northwesterly line of the San Jose-Los Gatos
Road on the arc of a curve to the left, with a radius of 6,028.50 feet. through a central angle of 1000 43"
for an arc distance of 106.46 feet to the point of beginning, and being shown upon that certain Map
entitled, "Record of Survey of the Lands of Raymond Angelo", which Map was filed for record on
December 15, 1955 in Book 65 of Maps. at Page 26.
EXCEPTING THEREFROM all that portion of said land as granted to County of Sli...ta Clara by
instrument recorded January 14, 1971 in Book 9187, page 8, Official Records, and as more particularly
described as follows:
Beginning at the point of intersection of Easterly prolongation of the Northerly line of that certain parcel of
land conveyed in the Deed to Salvatore Cannata and Cannelina J. Cannata recorded April 6, 1959 in Book
4375 of Official Records. Office cf the Recorder, County of Santa Clara, State of California at Page 201
with that certain monument line ~.ablished for record on that i'&&--u\:uiac map entitled IIRecord of Survey of
a Monument Line of South Bascom Avenue from Union Avenue to Lark Avenuell nIed ror record in Book
264 of Maps, Office of the Recorder, County of Santa Clara. State of California at Pages 49 to 54; thence
from said point of beginning Southerly along said monument line to the point of intersection with the
Easterly prolongation of the Southerly line of the above mentioned parcel of land; thence Westerly along
said Easterly prolongation and Southerly line to the point of intersection thereof with a line parallel with
and 43.00 feet distant Northwesterly measured at right angles from said monument line; thence
Northeasterly along said paraUelline to the point of intersection thereof with the Northerly line of the above
described parcel of land; thence Easterly along said Northerly line and Easterly prolongation to the .point of
beginning of this description.
i
,f'
STATE OF CALIFORNIA
COUNTY OF SA~ITA CLARA- StU<- ~~-o
otf .
On
0-43 /rr
before me,
C; t'J/VN/2r /10
(Notary Public)
personally appeared
d).e~~
K. t0~
a.~ ;(
~ s. ,vI!
v
personally known to me (or proved to me on the basis of satisfactory evidence) to be ~erson(s) whose name(s)
is& subscribed to the within instrument and acknowledged to me that he/she~executed the same in
his/her/~ authorized capacity(ies), and that by his/her@ signature(s) on the instrument, the person(s), or the
entity upon behalfofwhich the person(s) acted, executed the instrument.
WITNESS my hand and official seal.
r" ....... .... "-'..
~ CONNIE HO 1-
- Comm. # 1125625 '
(J) NOTARY PUBLIC. CALIFORNIA tn
..... City & County of San Franciscc ....
1 ~y Co~m. EX~jres Jan. ::!~ 2001 r
(This area for notarial seal)
6
STATE OF CALIFORNIA
COUNTY OF SANTA CLARA
On ~~ /~/ /r99
before me, ~LL--?U'_~?l'.P'~<:.?-..
(NotaIy lie). r7,
personally appeared (~.--~~ ~
personally known to me~roved-to.me-oo.-the-b;:Jsi~ of ~tisfactory-evidence) to be the persOIl(,,\> whose name(~) isIare-
subscribed to the within instrument and acknowledged to me that helshe1they executed the same in his/BerIthcir-
authorized capacity(ies), and that by hislberltheir signatureW on the instrument, the person(~ or the entity upon behalf
of which the personOO acted, executed the instrnment.
WITNESS my hand and official seal.
(;?f:-/lLW-~/~;>Z'''7'
(Signature ofNotaIy lie) .
J---------------
MARlENE K. POMEROY
- Q Commission /I 1218428 f
i' Notay Publk: - Carlfania I
j Santa Clara County 1
- - - ~~.:.~~~~
(This area for notarial seal)
I
I,
i.
"'tl:;;o.o.OUl-l I
iil~ III III ::J III ~ .
llol 0 10'< - 3 CP I
enc,<~~CP"O
CD~003~& I
~.i~i~,~~ r
~~ o.lIl-<-o
'<0' e!._ 1Il 0 0. 10 ..2-
Dl-W-(f) ~
CO.... <O-3~~
........ CPo~c:~-
S!l.-g CD o.::J"O c:
!!!..... 5' III 0. 0.... -
CD 0 < '(7; _,::J CP
3-cp 1Il3('")
~ ~ !!l Q ~ CP,
::5; ~30~
00.' 00";;:('")
CD ....55'<0
0.'0 ~ -. 0 ::J
!.o -:J.....S'
CD 1Il -l CP 0 -,
.... -, ~Ul ::J
3; cpUl::.Ul
-. Cp 0. ~ -
~O' 1i5~CPi6
:T<D ~ ~~-
(1);::;: 5' Q CD ~
en3 1O-Q,3
.... Q) ..... CD -. en
~c: ~3a5~
en(il -1Il0.::J
Ul .... 0 ~ 0.
ae>> el-roC')
,<::J CPNOO
OCD ~<O_5.
5i!!/ =g.o>:=-:
llol 0<' o-~ ~ g
g~ CPO"OlIl
0::;: 5=--00
55: coro~:::
:-+ iil 5' ~ 0 2:
~ --..... Ul
e!. ~ ~~. Q)
'0 ~cps-g
CD -('")0.0
:J -,Q)-.c
e!. !l?CD~::J
-< CP::J~:-
~ 5' g. - -l
:: ....3::T
- ~ 0. 0> (ii'
g- CD ~ g. =-,
3' Q,Ul0.3
-'OCCD
"8 Q ~ ::!. C.
~ s:~~~
!=l- CP3-0
)> o>Ul~~:
"0 3 8.<0 ::E
CD 0 w.... _.
.... coo>=
gJ 3.o.go-
::J 0> 0>"0 CP
e!. ::J'<CP....
.... C. ~ ~. ~.
3 _::To::J
~' ~a!=l-a5
g. 3J5-=t1%
"0 0 ::T ::T 0.
o -coCP
~ ~ <OCE ~
ur !:; g.~ 8'
::J 0>'<<03
g n.??"O~
; 8m~g.
::J C::J 0' e!.
en 3. n 0.0<'
CD 0 e!.o-_
iil ::J CD CD 0
0- ::J <0 ....
iil. s: g. 5' S-
CD_cna>
::p
en
'"
....
IS
~
CD
~
a
'"
'"
$
z
o
-l
z
m
C)
o
-l
:;
lJl
r-
m
.....
'..
"JJ
W ro
'On
gz~
if
"-
Cll
A>
"
,..
a
>
3
~
0'
A>
Z
jj;!
~
;:
..
3
~
"T1
C
o
C.,_"'(l(q,\,..,. ...,.~ l
fu V:~7tA_; /"'"
b/?D/1'l
~
~
OJ
r-
m
b
"U OJ
C :II
:Ill>
(') Z
:r (')
)> :r
en
m
o
~
~
=t
II'
I>>
::I
lIl"
o
....
.
I
..
n'
I>>
~
~
('
~
r'
~
)>
(')
(')
o
C
Z
--l
)>
Z
Z
C
)>
r-
"U
m
:II
f) (') z
(') m-l
o Z m
C{fl~:II
Z)>G)m
-l~m~
rriO::$:IlO
:II~~~~
~-lomm
:J
<
CD
en
"*
3
CD
:J
"*
~
()
o
JJ
CD
("')
CD
"'C
"*
ASSJ:G~~ AND RECEIPT OF INVESTMENT CERTIFICATE
'!:'J CI~j OF CAMPBELL, 70 N. FIR~ STREET
~~BiLL, CALIFORNIA 95008 (408) 866-2150
P.W. Permit No.
TR or DE
Loc.
'(9 - J g I
e are the owner(s) of a savinqs account at ?:>____JL 4..c...,,-tl2.......1L-C<--
branch office at ttt"......~f,<...-l~ , California,
icate No. a,ZZ-/-o/7 Y'i in the names of C\9t1'"Q N ~ , "Dennis
and having a present balance of $ '2.'/, er///)
by grant, transfer and assign said account, said investment certificate, said
e (including interest which accrues thereon), and all other rights in connection
ith to the CITY OF CAMPBELL, assignee, for a good and valuable consideration,
of which is hereby acknowledged, for the purpose of insuring construction
bed as follows:
O;lQ,nC't 11,,) V..J t.t.~ i..."
,-......' - ~
(p jj..; l~CJ
investment
iA?D~
I hav
this
verification of said investment certificate and du licate of
to said assi nee.
rstand that assignee Can withdraw from said account any time on his signature alone
resentation of a written order to the issuer. I also understand that I may not
aw from said account unless I present a signed release from the assignee. The
of the certificate assumes no responsibility for the conduct of the assignee and
t on the signature of the assignee without further inquiry.
m') .2 7
, 19~at said office of the issuer.
~ (2 .
sign
print
Assignor
sign
print
;'
, 'lC'\.(,-- "'_p
.Dc.crJ J ^,G
Assignor
ACKNOWLEDGEMENT BY ISSUER
Issue
avail
affirms that there are no other holds on subject account, that subject monies are
le, and that the above described assignment has been noted on the Records of said
issue .
Date vA
l't i
By
~~(~--
f Authorized Sign ure
Title: r1v p
ATTACH
NOTARY
.tfiI~
CURRENT CAllfORllll
IOTARY F.
INSTRUCTIONS TO ASSIGNEE
below for signature identification and as acknowledgement of your notice of
ent. Return this Assignment and Receipt to the issuer at its address above.
one copy of this Assignment and Receipt for your files.
Date:
RELEA
ssignee hereby releases and relinquishes all his right, title and interest in and
d account, said investment certificate, said balance and all other rights in
tion therewith.
City of Campbell
By
Date:
I
CALIFORNIA ALL-PURPOSE ACKNOWLEDGMENT
State of California
County of 6~ ~~
} ss
On 17~ IffY
personally appeared
~
I
r. OFFICIAL SEAL t
....... LORNA K ROACH
5 NOTARY PUBUC . CAUFORNJA Q?
_ . · COMMISSION # 1129385 C
en SANTA CLARA COUNTY ...
, My Commission Exp. March 16. 2001
I
~,'
G$
~
~
to be the personja1 whose name~ is/are- ~
subscribed to the within instrument and g
acknowledged to me that he/sb.e#I'Tey executed ~
the same in his/lJ.o.FItl,eir authorized ~.'...l:
capacity(i~ and that by his/~ ~
signature(ci-r'fn the instrument the person~or ~
the entit;-~p~n behalf of which the personW-- ~.:
acted, executed the instrument. @
~
@
~
@
~
g
g
~
g
g
?i,
~
~
~
~
g
g
~
I
@
~
. I
= personally known to me
~roved to me on the basis of satisfactory
evidence
Place Notary Seal Above
OPTIONAL
Though the information below is not required by law, it may prove valuable to persons relying on the document
and could prevent fraudulent removal and reattachment of this form to another document.
~escription of AttaChe~~~,?,,:~nt . /7 / /1
TI orTy eofD cument~~~
Docu nt Date: ~ umber of Pages: /
Sigoe,(s) Othe' Thao Named Above, ~ dJ~ p~ d::d:
Capacity(ies) Claimed b gner
Signer's Name:
'= Individual
~ Corporate Officer -
~ Partner - C Limited
C Attorney in Fact
L Trustee
[J Guardian or Conservator
[J Other:
RIGHT THUMBPRINT
OF SIGNER
Top of thumb here
Signer Is Representing:
ff~ d-/
J
/"
'-'~/~
1<;;_'
@ 1997 National Notary Association' 9350 De Soto Ave,. P,O, Box 2402' Chatsworth. CA 91313-2402
~"
Reorder: Call Toll-Free 1-800-876-6827
Prod, No, 5907
I.
//
.' I
universal Rational Hydrology Program
CIVILCADDjCIVILDESIGN Engineering Software, (c) 1992 Version 3.0
Rational Hydrology study Date: 5/24/99
~~~~~-~~-~~~~~;-~~;;~;~-~~~~;~~------------------fit:~l:1\l-e:-C)------
DRAINAGE FROM SWALE
98154 OCT 07 1999
---------------------------------------------~------~~~~N--------
********* Hydrology Study Control Informat1on **********
1 5.000
2 10.000
3 15.000
4 20.000
5 30.000
English units used:
Area = acres, Distance = feet, Flow q = fto3js, Pipe diam. = inches
Runoff coefficient method used:
Runoff coefficient 'c' value calculated for the
equation Q=KCIA (K=unit constant, I=rainfall intensity, A=areai
by the following method:
Manual entry of 'c' values
2.500
1. 850
1. 480
1. 300
1.050
--------------------------------------------------------
Rational hydrology study storm event year is
Number of [time, intensity] data pairs = 5
No. Time Intensity
Rational Hydrology Method used:
The modified rational hydrology method is used
where the total area of each stream, area averaged 'c' value
using equation ct = (c1a1 + c2a2 + ... cnan)jat
and rainfall intensity for each particular point is used
to determine the runoff flow q at each point.
stream flow confluence option used:
Stream flow confluence method of 2 - 5 streams:
Note: in all cases, if the time of concentration
or TC of all streams are identical, then q = sum of stream flows
Variables p=peaki i=intensitYi Fm=loss rate; a=areai 1...n flows
q = flow rate, t = time in minutes
Peak flow qp is a function of time, TC:
usual case q1>q2 and t1>t2 then qp = q1 + q2*(i1ji2), tp=t1
some cases q1>q2 and t1<t2 then qp = q2 + q1*(t2jt1), tp=t2
++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
Process from point/station 0.000 to Point/station 1.000
**** INITIAL AREA EVALUATION ****
COMMERCIAL subarea type
Decimal fraction soil group A = 0.000
Decimal fraction soil group B = 0.000
Decimal fraction soil group C = 0.000
Decimal fraction soil group D = 1.000
I
Initial subarea data:
Equations shown use english units, converted if necessary to (51)
Initial area flow distance = 1l0.000(Ft.)
Top (of initial area) elevation = 268.100(Ft.)
Bottom (of initial area) elevation = 266.400(Ft.)
Difference in elevation = 1.700(Ft.)
Slope = 0.01545 s(%)= 1.55
TC = k(0.304)*[(length03)/(elevation change)]OO.2
Initial area time of concentration = 4.588 min.
Rainfall intensity = 2.554(In/Hr) for a 10.0 year storm
Effective runoff coefficient used for area (Q=KCIA) is C = 0.900
Subarea runoff = 0.092(CFS}
Total initial stream area = 0.040(Ac.)
++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
Process from point/station 1.000 to Point/station 2.000
**** PIPEFLOW TRAVEL TIME (User specified size) ****
Upstream point/station elevation = 265.90(Ft.)
Downstream point/station elevation = 265.70(Ft.)
Pipe length = 10.00(Ft.) Manning's N = 0.013
No. of pipes = 1 Required pipe flow = 0.092(CFS)
Given pipe size = 3.00(In.)
Calculated individual pipe flow = 0.092(CFS)
Normal flow depth in pipe = 1.90(In.}
Flow top width inside pipe = 2.89(In.)
critical Depth = 2.21(In.}
Pipe flow velocity = 2.78(Ft/s)
Travel time through pipe = 0.06 min.
Time of concentration (TC) = 4.65 min.
End of computations, total study area = 0.04 (Ac.)
The following figures may
be used for a unit hydrograph study of the same area.
Note: These figures do not consider reduced effective area
effects caused by confluences in the rational equation.
Area averaged pervious area fraction (Ap) = 0.100
Area averaged SCS curve number = 90.0
J
I
I
universal Rational Hydrology Program
CIVILCADD/CIVILDESIGN Engineering Software, (c) 1992
Rational Hydrology study Date: 5/24/99
Version 3.0
------------------------------------------------------------------------
14419 S BASCOM AVENUE, CAMPBELL
DRAINAGE FROM DRIVEWAY
98154
------------------------------------------------------------------------
*********
Hydrology study Control Information **********
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Rational hydrology study storm event year is
Number of [time, intensity] data pairs = 5
No. Time Intensity
10.0
2.500
1. 850
1. 480
1. 300
1. 050
1 5.000
2 10.000
3 15.000
4 20.000
5 30.000
English Units used:
Area = acres, Distance = feet, Flow q = fto3/s, Pipe diam. = inches
Runoff coefficient method used:
Runoff coefficient 'c' value calculated for the
equation Q=KCIA (K=unit constant, I=rainfall intensity, A=areai
by the following method:
Manual entry of 'c' values
Rational Hydrology Method used:
The modified rational hydrology method is used
where the total area of each stream, area averaged 'c' value
using equation ct = (c1a1 + c2a2 + ... cnan)/at
and rainfall intensity for each particular point is used
to determine the runoff flow q at each point.
stream flow confluence option used:
stream flow confluence method of 2 - 5 streams:
Note: in all cases, if the time of concentration
or TC of all streams are identical, then q = sum of stream flows
Variables p=peaki i=intensitYi Fm=loss ratei a=areai 1...n flows
q = flow rate, t = time in minutes
Peak flow qp is a function of time, TC:
usual case q1>q2 and t1>t2 then qp = q1 + q2*(i1/i2), tp=t1
some cases q1>q2 and t1<t2 then qp = q2 + q1*(t2/t1), tp=t2
++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
Process from Point/station 0.000 to Point/station 1.000
**** INITIAL AREA EVALUATION ****
COMMERCIAL subarea type
Decimal fraction soil group A = 0.000
Decimal fraction soil group B = 0.000
Decimal fraction soil group C = 0.000
Decimal fraction soil group D = 1.000
I.
;'
/
Initial subarea data:
Equations shown use english units, converted if necessary to (81)
Initial area flow distance = 160.000(Ft.)
Top (of initial area) elevation = 268.900(Ft.)
Bottom (of initial area) elevation = 267.000(Ft.)
Difference in elevation = 1.900(Ft.)
Slope = 0.01187 s(%)= 1.19
TC = k(0.304)*[(length03)/(elevation change)]Oo.2
Initial area time of concentration = 5.618 min.
Rainfall intensity = 2.420(In/Hr) for a 10.0 year storm
Effective runoff coefficient used for area (Q=KCIA) is C = ,0.900
Subarea runoff = 0.305(CFS)
Total initial stream area = 0.140(Ac.)
++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
Process from Point/Station 1.000 to Point/Station 2.000
**** PIPEFLOW TRAVEL TIME (User specified size) ****
Upstream point/station elevation = 266.50(Ft.)
Downstream point/station elevation = 266.30(Ft.)
Pipe length = 13.00(Ft.) Manning's N = 0.013
No. of pipes = 2 Required pipe flow = 0.305(CFS)
Given pipe size = 3.00(In.)
NOTE: Normal flow is pressure flow in user
The approximate hydraulic grade line above
0.411(Ft.) at the headworks or inlet
Pipe friction loss = 0.387(Ft.)
Minor friction loss = 0.225(Ft.)
Pipe flow velocity = 3.11(Ft/s)
Travel time through pipe = 0.07 min.
Time of concentration (TC) = 5.69 min.
End of computations, total study area =
The following figures may
be used for a unit hydrograph study of the same area.
Note: These figures do not consider reduced effective area
effects caused by confluences in the rational equation.
selected pipe size.
the pipe invert is
of the pipe(s)
K-factor =
1. 50
0.14 (Ac.)
Area averaged pervious area fraction (Ap) = 0.100
Area averaged SCS curve number = 90.0
.j
/
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . -. . .
WESTFALL ENGINEERS
14583 Big Basin Way
Saratoga, CA 95070
Telephone (408) 867-0244
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
1<--------( 0.50'>---------->\
* * * * * * * * * *
* * * *
* *0 0 oWater Surface ( 0.19')000* *
* * * *
* * * *
* * * *
* * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * *
* * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * *
Rectangular Open Channel
------------------------
Flowrate ..................
Veloci ty ..................
Depth of Flow.............
Critical Depth ............
Total Depth ...............
Base width ................
0.305
3.176
0.191
0.226
0.191
0.500
1. 500
0.095
0.882
0.022
0.013
Slope of Channel..........
X-sectional Area ..........
Wetted Perimeter ..........
ARO(2/3) ..................
Mannings ' n' ..............
i.
CFS
fps
feet
feet
feet
feet
~
o
sq. ft.
feet
REPORT To
MR. DENNIS WONG DDS
Los GATOS, C,L\UFORNIJ.\.
RECEIVED
MAV 0 7 1999
FOR
PUBL.IC WORKS
ADMINISTRATIOft
PROPOSED MEDICAL BUILDING
14419 SOUTH BASCOM AVENUE
CAMPBELL, CALIFORNIA
GEOTECHNICAL INVESTIGATION &
PAVEMENT DESIGN
SEPTEMBER, 1 998
PREPARED By
UNITED SOIL ENGINEERING, INC.
3476 EDWARD AVENUE
SANTA CLARA, CALIFORNIA
I.
UNITED SOIL ENGINEERING, INC.
Geotechnical and Environmental Consultants
File No. 4650-51
September 25, 1998
Mr. Dennis Wong DDS
14525 South Bascom Avenue
Los Gatos, CA 95032
Su bject:
Proposed Medical Building
1 441 9 South Bascom Avenue
Campbell,California
GEOTECHNICAL INVESTIGATION &
PAVEMENT DESIGN
Dear Mr. Wong:
We are pleased to transmit herein the results of our geotechnical investigation
and pavement design for the proposed Medical Building. The subject site is
located at 14419 South Bascom Avenue in Campbell, California.
Our findings indicate that the site is suitable for the proposed development
provided the recommendations contained in this report are carefully followed.
The suitability of the site was evaluated by field reconnaissance, drilling,
sampling, and laboratory testing of the surface and subsurface material. The
following report details our investigation, outlines our findings, and presents our
conclusions based on those findings.
If you have any questions or require additional information, please feel free to
contact our office at your convenience.
~A-Y
Cameron Araghi
Project Manager
4650.gi&pd/Copies: 2 to Mr. Dennis Wong DDS
3476 Edward A,,=~ue. Santa Clara, California 95054. (408) 988-2~~:::. Fax (408) 980-1336
!:=ile No. 4650-51
11
TABLE OF CONTENTS
GEQTECHNICAL INVESTIGATION AND PAVEMENT DESJ~N
-"Ar' .-
... . ...
!..__~l:=
I NTRODUCTI ON.....,..............,.......................,.....................................,..,.. '...... 1
PROJECT LOCATION AND DESCRiPTION......................,.......... .............."........... 1
FIELD I NVESTIGA.rION......,.......,...................,................... ...........' ,.....,........,... 1
LABORATORY INVESTIGATION ............,.................,..,...........,.............. ........ ,.,2
SOIL CONDITIONS,.......... ..........................................,......'........... ..., ........." ,..3
GENERAL GEOLOGy.................."....................................... ........,..,. ,...............4
FAULTS AND SEISMICITY .....................,.. ,...........,.....".... ..,............. .......... ......5
GEOLOGIC AN D SEISMIC HAZARDS........ .........................................................6
GROUND SHAKING............,..........,........ ............,.......,................,......,...........6
GROUND RUPTURE. ........ ................,...... .....................,..,.. .............................7
GROUND FAILURE.............. ............. ........ .......... ..........., ........ .......................".7
LIQUEFACTION ........ ............. ......... ......... .......... .....' ........... ........ ....................8
INUN DATION POTENTIAL.......,........................................................................ 8
CONCLUSiONS............................................................................,.................. 9
RECOMMENDA TlONS ........ ...................... ............... ........ .................. ........ ...... 1 0
G RA DIN G ..............................................,................,.,.................................... 1 0
WATER WELLS..................................,............................................................. 1 2
FOU N DATION DESIGN CRITERIA..................................................................... 1 2
RETAINING WALLS... .....................................,.....,.......................... ................ 1 3
CONCRETE SLAB-ON-GRADE CONSTRUCTION... ...... ....................................... 14
EXCAVATION...................,......................................""............ .................."... 1 5
ORAl NAGE...........,..,.........,......,..,......,........................,.,..............".......,...,.... 1 5
ON-SITE UTILITY TRENCHING ...,...........,........................................................ 16
PAVEMENT DESiGN............,.,........,..................,...."",.,...............,.................. 1 7
LIMITATIONS AND UNIFORMITY OF CONDITIONS ...........................................18
REFERENCES.........................,................ ............,................. .......................... 1 9
September 25, 1 998
United Soil Engineering, Inc.
file No. 4650-S 1
111
LIST OF TABLES, FIGURES, APPENDICES
GEOTECHNICAL INVESTIGATIO~~eAVEMENT DESIGN
TABLES
TABLE 1 - SUMMARY OF MOISTURE/DENSITY, UNCONFINED COMPRESSION TEST,
AND DIRECT SHEAR TESTS
TABLE 2 - PROPOSED ALTERNATE PAVEMENT DESIGN SECTIONS
FIGURES
FIGURE 1 - VICINITY MAP
FIGURE 2 - SITE PLAN
FIGURE 3 - FAULT LOCATION MAP
FIGURE 4 - PLASTICITY INDEX CHART
FIGURE 5 - COMPACTION TEST A
FIGURE 6 - R-VALUE TEST
APPENDICES
MODIFIED MERCALLI SCALE
METHOD OF SOIL CLASSIFICATION CHART
EXPLANATION OF BORING LOG SYMBOLS
EXPLORATORY BORING LOG (B-1 AND B-2)
September 25, 1998
United Soil Engineering, Inc.
i.
F:ile No. 4650-51
INTRODUCTION
Per your authorization, United Soil Engineering, lnc. (USE) conducted a
geotechnical investigatio and pavement design, The purpose of this
investigation was to dete mine the nature of the surface and subsurface soil
conditions at the project s te through field investigations and laboratory testing.
This report presents an xplanation of investigative procedures, results of the
testing program, our con lusions, and our recommendations for earth work and
foundation design to ad pt the proposed development to the existing soil
conditions.
ND DESCRIPTION
The project site is located at 14419 South Bascom Avenue in Campbell, California
(Figure 1). The project Sit, is bounded by existing residential development to the
I
west, existing commercia~ buildings to the north, South Bascom Avenue to the
east, existing parking are~ and residential development to the south. At the time
I
of our investigation, the s~bject site was an irregular shaped relatively flat parcel
of land. There was an exifting house located at the southern portion of the site.
Based on the preliminary ~Ian prepared for the subject site, the development will
include the demolition ofl the existing structure and the construction of a two-
story steel frame buildin and a partial carport on the first floor with concrete
slab-on-grade floors and associates improvements. The location of the existing
and proposed structure is shown on Figure 2 - Site Plan.
I
I
I
FIELD INVESTIGATIOi
I
After considering the natu1e of the proposed development, and reviewing available
data on the area, a field !investigation was conducted at the project site by the
project geologist under t e direction of our geotechnical engineer. It included a
September 25, 1 998
United Soil Engineering, Inc.
File No. 4650-51
2
site reconnaissance to detect any unusual surface features, and the drilling of two
exploratory test borings to determine the subsurface soil characteristics. The
borings were drilled on September 18, 1998 with a truck-mounted drill rig using
8-inch diameter hollow stem augers. The borings were drilled to the depths of 20
to 25 feet below the existing ground surface elevation (bgs). The approximate
location of the borings is shown on Figure 2 - Site Plan.
The soils encountered were logged continuously in the field during the drilling
operations. Relatively undisturbed soil samples were obtained by hammering a
2.5-inch 1.0. split-spoon sampler into the ground atvarious depths. A 140 pound
hammer with a free fall of 30 inches was used to drive the sampler 18 inches into:
the ground. Blow counts were recorded on each 6-inch increment of the sampled
interval. The blows required to advance the sampler the last 12 inches of the 18
inch sampled interval were recorded on the boring logs as penetration resistance.'
These values were also used to evaluate the liquefaction potential of the
subsurface soils. After the completion of the drilling operation, the exploratory
borings were backfilled from the bottom of the borehole to the surface with neat
cement in accordance to the rules and regulation of t e Santa Clara Valley Water
District.
In addition, disturbed bulk samples of the near-surf ce soil were collected for
laboratory analyses. The Exploratory Boring Logs cont ined in the Appendix are a
graphic representation of the encountered soil profile; a d also show the depths at
which the relatively undisturbed soil samples were obtai ed.
LABORATORY INVESTIGATION
A laboratory testing program was performed to de ermine the physical and
engineering properties of the soils underlying the site. Moisture content and dry
density tests were performed on the relatively undisturbed soil samples in order to
determine soil consistency and the moisture variation throughout the explored soil
September 25, 1998
United Soil Engineering, Inc.
File No, 4650-51
3
profile (Table I). The strength parameters of the foundation soils were determined
from direct shear tests that were performed on a selected relatively undisturbed
soil samples. A laboratory compaction test was performed on a near-surface soil
sample per the ASTM 01557-91 test procedure. Atterberg Limits tests were also
performed on the near-surfacF soil to assist in the classification of these soils and
to obtain an evaluation of their expansion and shrinkage potential. One R-Value
test was performed on a near-surface soil sample for pavement section design
recommendations, The results of the laboratory testing program are presented in
the Tables and Figures at the emf of this report.
SOIL CONDITIONS
In boring B-1, from the surface to the depth of 8 feet a red-brown, damp, very
stiff silty clay layer was encountered. From the depths of 8 feet to 12 feet, the
soil became red-brown, moist, dense, clayey sandy gravel. From the depths of
12 feet to 17 feet, a red-brown, damp, hard gravelly sandy clay layer was
encountered. From the depths of 17 feet to the end of the boring at 25 feet,
the soil became red-brown, damp, very dense sandy clayey gravel. Boring B-1
was terminated at the depth of 25 feet below ground surface because of
refusal.
Groundwater was not encountered in the both borings to the depths explored. It
should be noted that the groundwater level will fluctuate as a result of seasonal
changes and hydrogeological variations such as groundwater pumping and/or
recharging, A graphic description of the explored soil profiles is presented in the
Exploratory Boring Log contained in the Appendix.
September 25, 1 998
United Soil Engineering, Inc.
p.ile No. 4650-51
4
GENERAL GEOLOGY
The subject site lies In the Santa Clara Valley, within the Coast Range
Geomorphic Province. The regional structure of the area is dominated by the
northwest trending Santa Cruz Mountains to the southwest and the Diablo
Range to the northeast. Folds, thrust faults, steep reverse faults, and strike-
slip faults that developed as a consequence of Cenozoic deformations have
occurred very often within the Coast Range Geomorphic Province and are
continuing !oday,
The Santa Cruz Mountains Range to the southwest of the subject site consists
of two entirely different, incompatible core complexes, lying side by side and
separated from each other by large faults, These two core complexes are Early
Cretaceous Granitic intrusions, and an Upper Jurassic to Lower Cretaceous
eugosynclinal assemblage known as the Franciscan Formation. The Franciscan
Formation is primarily a rapidly deposited complexly intercalated and deformed
mixture of clastic sedimentary, and altered mafic volcanic rocks, with some
chert, limestone, and subordinate amounts of metamorphic rocks (CDMG;
1966). Additionally, the Franciscan Formation has been intruded by numerous
tabular masses of serpentine, probably in the Late Cretaceous. The two core
complexes present in the Santa Cruz Mountains are generally blanketed by
thick layers of Lower Miocene marine and Plio-Pleistocene nonmarine deposits.
Some Tertiary volcanic intrusions are also present in the Santa Cruz Mountains
Oennings & Burnett; 1973). The core complex of the Diablo Range to the
northeast of the subject site is comprised of the Franciscan Formation, The
Franciscan Formation in the Diablo Range is predominantly covered by Upper
Cretaceous to Lower Pliocene marine deposits, with some Oligocene to Pliocene
volcanic rocks which cut through and overlie the marine deposits (Pampeyan;
1963: Rogers; 1972).
September 25, 1998
United Soil Engineering, Inc.
File No. 4650-S 1
5
The Quaternary history of the region is recorded by sedimentary marine strata
alternating with non-marine strata. The changes of the depositional
environment are related to the fluctuation of sea level corresponding to the
glacial and interglacial periods. Late Quaternary deposits fill the ce'nter of the
Santa Clara Valley and most of the strata are of continental origin characterized
as alluvial and fluvial materials (CDMG; 1966), The subject site is located on
Quaternary fluvial deposits at the outer edge of an alluvial fan (Helley & Brabb;
1971: Brabb & Dibblee; 1974). The ffuvial and alluvial deposits beneath the
subject site are greater than 500 feet thick (Bishop & Williams; 1974).
FAULTS AND SEISMICITY
The site lies in an area of active tectonics, but is not located within, or
immediately adjacent to, any of the published Special Studies Zones defined by
the Alquist-Priolo Earthquake Fault Zoning Act of 1972 revised in 1994, nor in
the City of San Jose Special Studies Zones defined in 1983. Three major faults,
the San Andreas, the Hayward, and the Calaveras, are close enough to pose a
significant potential hazard due to seismic activity (Figure 3). The site can be
expected to undergo strong shaking during a major earthquake on any of these
faults.
Studies of the frequency and intensity of earthquakes on the major fault
systems of the Bay Area, suggest a general pattern of reoccurrence. The San
Andreas passes approximately 8.0 miles to the southwest of the site, and has
produced several large earthquakes within historic time. Scientists generally
agree that a major earthquake will occur on the Bay Area segment of the San
Andreas fault on the average of one every 50 years, and that a earthquake
(magnitude 8 - 8.3 on the Richter Scale) will occur on the Bay Area segment of
the San Andreas fault on the average of one every 100 years (Rogers & Williams;
1974), Historical seismic activity on the San Andreas fault includes an
September 25, 1998
United Soil Engineering, Inc.
File No. 4650-51
6
earthquake measuring 6.5 on the Richter Scale which occurred in 1865, the
famous 1906 earthquake with a magnitude of 8.3 on the Richter Scale, and the
recent Loma Prieta earthquake in 1989 measuring 7.1 on the Richter Scaie.
The Hayward and Calaveras faults are located approximately 8.0 miles and 12.0
miles to the northeast of the subject site, respectively. Several moderately large
earthquakes have occurred on the Hayward and Calaveras faults within historic
time. These include earthquakes on of the Hayward fault measuring 7,0 on the
Richter Scale in 1868 and measuring 6.6 on the Richter Scale in 1911, and an
earthquake on the Calaveras fault measuring 6.2 on the Richter Scale in 1984.
Other faults in the general vicinity may also pose a significant, albeit lesser,
potential hazard to the site.
GEOLOGIC AND SEISMIC HAZARDS
The evaluation of site-specific geologic and seismic hazards is based upon
reviewed references, field investigation and laboratory test results. These
hazards include ground shaking, ground rupture, ground failure, and
inundation potential.
GROUND SHAKING
This primary seismic phenomenon involves horizontal and vertical vibratory
motion of the earth surface, The intensity of ground motion for any earthquake
is basically a function of the following parameters: 1) the magnitude of an
earthquake; 2) the distance from the causative fault; and 3) the competence
and consolidation of materials at or near the ground surface (WCA; 1978). In
general, the ground shaking associated with an earthquake is greater with
increasing earthquake magnitudes, and is less with increasing distances from
the causative fault. A copy of the Modified Mercalli Intensity Scale, a subjective
September 25, 1998
United Soil Engineering, Inc.
l;:ile No, 4650-S1
7
assessment of the damage associated with differing earthquake magnitudes, is
presented in Appendix A.
Poorly consolidated materials com manly respond more violently to a qiven
magnitude earthquake than more solid, well consolidated bedrock materials
wIthin the same area (Borcherdt, et al.; 1977). Therefore, for an earthquake on
t~e San Andreas, Hayward or Calaveras faults, amplification of seismic energy will
be greater on alluvial/fluvial deposits than bedrock, but less than on bay mud.
In a major earthquake on the San Andreas, the Hayward, or the Calaveras fault, the
maximum ground surface acceleration in the project site vicinity could be 0,309 to
, 0.35g, and the fundamental period of ground shaking could be from 4.5 to 5.5
seconds (Cooper-Clark; 1974).
GROUND RUPTURE
Rupturing of the earth's surface occurs when subsurface fault displacement
extends upward to the ground surface, and is usually confined to rather narrow
zones along fault traces. Since the subject site is not located over or
immediately adjacent to any known active faults, the likelihood of ground
rupture at the site is low.
GROUND FAILURE
The secondary effects resulting from strong ground shaking may take forms such
as lateral spreading, ground lurching and liquefaction. All of these involve
displacement of the ground surface due to loss of strength or failure of the
underlying materials during shaking. Due to the site conditions, liquefaction is the
primary ground failure to be considered.
September 25, 1998
United Soil Engineering, Inc.
.file No, 4650-S 1
8
LIQUEFACTION
Liquefaction is the transformation of loose saturated silts and sands with less
than 15% clay-sized particles from a solid state to semi-liquid state. This
occurs under vibratory conditions such as those induced by a seismic event, To
help evaluate liquefaction potential, samples of potentially liquefiable soil were
obtained by hammering the split tube sampler into the ground. The number of
blows required to drive the sampler the last 12 inches of the 18 inch sampled
interval were recorded on the log of test boring.
The results from our exploratory borings show that in boring B- 1 (our deepest
boring), the subsurface soil material to the depth of 25 feet consists of very stiff
silty clay to dense clayey sandy gravel to hard gravelly sandy clay to very dense
sandy clayey gravel. Therefore, there is a low possibility for liquefaction to occur at
the site.
INUNDATION POTENTIAL
The subject site is located at 14419 South Bascom Avenue in Campnell,
California. According to the Limerinos and others, 1973 report, the site is not
located in an area that has potential for inundation as the result of a 100 year
flood (Limerinos; 1973),
September 25, 1998
United Soil Engineering, Inc.
File No. 4650-51
9
CONCLUSIONS
1. The site covered by this investigation is suitable for the proposed
development provided the recommendations set forth in this report are
carefully followed.
2, The native surface soil at the project site has been found to have a low
expansion potential when subjected to fluctuations in moisture.
3. On the basis of the engineering reconnaissance and exploratory borings, it is
our opinion that trenches excavated to depths less than 5 feet below the
existing ground surface will not need shoring. However, for trenches greater
than 5 feet in depth, shoring will be required.
4. We recommend the building pad be elevated above the adjacent ground
surface to promote drainage and diversion of water away from the building
foundations.
5. If the site is located in the low-lying area and or adjacent to any creek or
drainage area, minor cracks and separations of the concrete slab-on-grade,
asphalt concrete pavement and/ or curb and gutter should be expected.
6. We recommend a reference to our report should be stated in the grading
and foundation plans ( this includes the geotechnical investigation file no.
and dates ).
7, Specific recommendations are presented in the remainder of this report.
8. All earthwork and grading shall be observed and inspected by a
representative from USE. These operations are not limited to testing and
inspection during grading.
September 25, 1998
United Soil Engineering, Inc.
File No. 4650-S1
10
RECOMMENDATIONS
GRADING
1. The placement of fill and control of any grading operations at the site
should be performed in accordance with the rec'ommendations .of this
report, These recommendations set forth the minimum standards to
satisfy other requirements of this report.
2. All existing surface and subsurface structures, if any, that will not be
incorporated in the final development shall be' removed from the project
site prior to any grading operations. These objects should be accurateiy
located on the grading plans to assist the field engineer in establishing
proper control over their removal. All utility lines, if any, must be removed
prior to any grading at the site.
3. The depressions left by the removal of subsurface structures should be
cleaned of all debris, backfilled and compacted with clean, native soil. This
backfill must be engineered fill and should be conducted under the
supervision of a USE representative.
4, All organic surface material and debris, including grass and weeds shall be
stripped prior to any other grading operations, and transported away from
all areas that are to receive structures or structural fills. Soil containing
organic material may be stockpiled for later use in landscaping areas only.
5, After removing all the subsurface structures, if any, and after stripping the
organic material from the soil, the building pad area should be scarified by
machine to a depth of 12 inches and thoroughly cleaned of vegetation and
other deleterious matter.
6. After stripping, scarifying and cleaning operations, native soil should be
re-compacted to not less than 90% relative maximum compaction using
September 25, 1 998
United Soil Engineering, Inc.
File No. 4650-51
1 1
ASTM 01557-91 procedure over the entire building pad and 5 feet beyond
the perimeter of the pad.
7. All engineered fill or imported soil should be placed in uniform horizomaJ
lifts of not more than 6 to 8 inches 'in un-compacted thickness, and
compacted to not less than 90% relative maximum compaction using ASTM
01557-91 procedure. The base rock, however, should be compacted to
not less than 95% relative maximum compaction. This should extend at
least 5 feet beyond the building perimeter_ in all directions. Before
compaction begins, the fill shall be brought to a water content that will
permit proper compaction by either; 1) aerating the material if it is too wet,
or 2) spraying the material with water if it is too dry. Each lift shall be
thoroughly mixed before compaction to assure a uniform distribution of
water content.
8. When fill material includes rocks, nesting of rocks will not be allowed and
all voids must be carefully filled by proper compaction. Rocks larger than
4 inches in diameter should not be used for the final 2 feet of building
pad. The existing asphalt concrete, if any, should not be incorporated into
the construction of the building pad.
9. USE should be notified at least two days prior to commencement of any
grading operations so that our office may coordinate the work in the field
with the contractor. All imported borrow must be approved by USE before
being brought to the site. Import soil must have a plasticity index no
greater than 12 and an R-Value greater than 25. The fill material in the
parking area can include recycled asphalt concrete and or crushed
concrete, provided the recycled material contains at least 30% of fill
material passing the #4 sieve.
September 25, 1998
United Soil Engineering, Inc.
,File No. 4650-,51
12
10. All grading work shall be observed and approved by a representative from
USE. The geotechnical engineer shall prepare a final report upon
completion of the grading operations.
WATER WELLS
11 . Any water wells and/or monitoring wells on the site which are to be
abandoned, shall be capped according to the requirements of the Santa
Clara Valley Water District. _The final elevation of the top of the well casing
must be a minimum of 3 feet below the adjacent grade prior to any grading
operation.
FOUNDATION DESIGN CRITERIA
12. The proposed building may be supported on a continuous perimeter
foundation and isolated interior spread footings or skin friction pier
foundations. Recommendations are presented in the following paragraphs.
13. When continuous perimeter and isolated interior spread footings are used
for the proposed buildings, they must be founded at 36 inches below the
finished floor elevation or 24 inches below the rough soil pad grade for the
two-story building, respectively, For these conditions, the recommended
allowable bearing capacity is 2,500 p.sJ. for both continuous perimeter and
isolated and interior spread footings. Both the interior and perimeter
foundations should be founded at the same elevation below pad grade, with
the exception of any soil retaining structures or loading dock foundations.
14. Friction piers should be embedded at a minimum depth of 6 feet below the
lowest adjacent exterior grade. The allowable friction value for this type of
foundation is 500 p.sJ.
September 25. 1998
United Soil Engineering, Inc.
File No. 4650-51
1 3
15. We highly recommend that a representative from our office be present to
make any field adjustments during the drilling of the piers.
16. The above bE:arinl.J values are for dead plus live loads, and may be increased
by one-third for short term seismic and wind loads. The design of the
structures and the foundations shall meet local building code requirements,
17, The final design of the foundations and reinforcing required shall be
determined by the project structural engineer responsible for the foundation
design. It is suggested that the foundation design be reviewed by our office
prior to construction,
RETAINING WALLS
18. Any facilities that will retain a soil mass including the underground walls
shall be designed for a lateral earth pressure (active) equivalent to 50
pounds equivalent fluid pressure, plus surcharge loads. If the retaining walls
are restrained from free movement at both ends, they shall be designed for
the earth pressure resulting from 60 pounds equivalent fluid pressure, to
which shall be added surcharge loads.
19. In designing for allowable resistive lateral earth pressure (passive) of 250
pounds equivalent fluid pressure may be used with the resultant acting at
the third point, The top foot of native soil shall be neglected for
computation of passive resistance.
20, A friction coefficient of 0.3 shall be used for retaining wall design, This
value may be increased by 1/3 for short term seismic loads.
21, The above values assume a drained condition, and a moisture content
compatible with those encountered during our investigation.
Septem ber 25, 1 998
United Soil Engineering, Inc.
,File No, .4650-51
14
22. Drainage should be provided behind the retaining wall. The drainage system
should consist of weep holes or perforated pipe placed at the base of the
retaining wall and surrounded by % inch drain rock wrapped in a filter fabric.
The drain rock wrapped in fabric should be at least 12 inches wide and
extend from the base of the wall to within 1.5 feet of the ground surface.
The upper 1.5 feet of backfill should consist of compacted native soil. The
retaining wall drainage system should be sloped to outfall to a discharge
facility.
23. As an alternative to the drain rock and fabric, Miradrain 2000 or approved
equivalent, may be used behind the retaining wall. The Miradrain 2000
should extend from the base of the wall to within two feet of the ground
surface. A perforated pipe should be placed at the base of the wall in direct
contact with the Miradrain 2000. The pipe should be sloped to outfall to an
appropriate discharge facility. The Miradrain fabric at the base of the
Miradrain 2000 panel should be wrapped around the perforated pipe to
prevent soil intrusion into the pipe.
24. We recommend a thorough review by our office of all designs pertaining to
facilities retaining a soil mass.
CONCRETE SLAB-ON-GRADE CONSTRUCTION
25. The native soil on the site was found to have a low expansion potential when
subjected to fluctuation in moisture.
26. A minimum of 5 inches of Class II baserock (recycled base rock and/or
crushed asphalt concrete is not acceptable) and 2 inches of sand shall be
used between the finished grade and the concrete slab. The base rock
should be compacted to not less than 95% relative maximum compaction
according to A5TM 01557-91.
5eptem ber 25, 1 998
United Soil Engineering, Inc.
file No. 4650-51
1 5
27. Use of a vapor barrier under the concrete slab is required if a floor covering
is to be applied. If a plastic membrane is used, it shall be placed between
the base rock and the sand layers.
28, Prior to placing the vapor membrane and/or pouring concrete, the slab
subgrade shall be moistened with water to reduce the swell potential, if
deemed necessary, by the field engineer at the time of construction.
EXCAVATION
29. No difficulties due to soil conditions are anticipated in excavating the on-site
material. Conventional earth moving equipment will be adequate for this
project.
30, Any vertical cuts deeper than 5 feet must be properly shored. The minimum
cut slope for excavation to the desired elevation is one horizontal to one
vertical. The cut slope should be increased to 2:1 if the excavation is
conducted during the rainy season or when the soil is highly saturated with
water.
DRAINAGE
31 . It is considered essential that positive drainage be provided during
construction and be maintained throughout the life of the proposed
structure.
32. The final exterior grade adjacent to the proposed building should be such
that the surface drainage will flow away from the structures. Rain water
discharge at downspouts should be directed onto pavement sections, splash
blocks, or other acceptable facilities which will prevent water from collecting
in the soil adjacent to the foundations.
September 25, 1998
United Soil Engineering, Inc.
.File No. 4650-51
16
33. Utility lines that cross under or through perimeter footings should be
completely sealed to prevent moisture intrusion into the areas under the slab
and/ or footings. The utility trench backfill should be of impervious material
and this material should be placed at least 4 feet on either side of the
exterior footings.
34. Consideration should be given to collection and diversion of roofrunoff and
the elimination of planted areas or other surfaces which could retain water in
areas adjoining the building. In unpaved areas, it is recommended that
protective slopes be stabilized adjoining perimeter bUilding walls., These
slopes should be extended to a minimum of 5 feet horizontally from
building walls, They must have a minimum outfall of 5 percent.
35, If the subgrade soil in the landscaping area is moderately to highly
expansive, proper drainage should be provided in the landscaping area
adjacent to the buiding foundations. A drip irrigation system is
preferable. If the sprinkler system is located adjacent to the building
foundation or concrete walkway, a moisture cut off barrier should be
provided.
ON-SITE UTILITY TRENCHING
36. All on-site utility trenches must be backfilled with native on-site material or
imported fill and compacted to at least 90% relative compaction in
accordance with ASTM D1557-91. Backfill should be placed in 6 to 8 inch
lifts and compacted. Jetting of trench backfill is not recommended. An
engineer from our firm should be notified at least 48 hours before the start
of any utility trench backfilling operations.
37. The utility trenches running parallel to the building foundation should be
located a minimum distance of 10 feet away from the building foundation,
September 25, 1998
United Soil Engineering, Inc.
.File No. 4650-S1
1 7
38. If utility trench excavation is to encounter groundwater, our office should be
notified for dewatering recommendations.
PAVEMENT DESIGN
39. Due to the uniformity of the near-surface soil at the site, one R-Value Test
was performed on a representative bulk sample. The result of the R-Value
test is enclosed in this report. The following alternate sections are based on
our laboratory resistance R-Value test of near-surface soil samples and
traffic indices (T.!.) of 4.5 for parking stalls and 5.5 for driveway areas.
Alternate pavement section designs which satisfy the State of California
Standard Design Criteria, and above traffic indices are presented in Table II.
September 25, 1998
United Soil Engineering, Inc.
.~i1e No, 4650-S 1
1 8
LIMITATIONS AND UNIFORMITY OF CONDITIONS
1. The recommendations presented herein are based on the soil conditions
revealed by our test borings and evaluated for the proposed construction
planned at the present time. If any unusual soil conditions are encountered
during the construction, or if the proposed construction will differ from that
planned at the present time, United Soil Engineering, Inc. should be notified
for supplemental recommendations.
2, This report is issued with the understanding that it is the responsibility of the
owner, or his representative, to ensure that the necessary steps are taken to
see that the contractor carries out the recommendations of this report in the
field.
3. The findings of this report are valid, as of the present time. However, the
passing of time will change the conditions of the existing property due to
natural processes, works of man, from legislation or the broadening of
knowledge. Therefore, this report is subjected to review and should not be
relied upon after a period of three years.
4. The conclusions and recommendations presented in this report are
professional opinions derived from current standards of geotechnical
practice and no warranty is intended, expressed, or implied.
5. This report has been prepared solely for the purpose of geotechnical
investigation and no toxic contamination studies have been performed by
our firm.
September 25, 1998
United Soil Engineering, Inc.
.File No, 4650-51
19
REFERENCES
Bishop and 'NHliClms; 1974 - Thickness of Alluvium, Santa Clara County,
California; California Division of Mines and Geology, Special Report 107,
Plate 4; San Francisco, California.
Borcherdt R.D., Gibbs J. F., Lajoie K.R.; 1977 - Maps showing maximum
earthquake intensity predicted in the southern San Francisco Bay Region,
California, for large earthquakes on the San Andreas and Hayward faults;
United States Geological Survey Miscellaneous Field Studies MF-709.
Brabb and Dibblee; 1974 - Geologic Map, Santa Clara County, California;
California Division of Mines and Geology, Special Report 107, Plate 1; San
Francisco, California.
CDMG; 1966 - Geology of Northern California; California Division of Mines and
Geology, Bulletin 190; San Francisco, California.
Cooper-Clark & Associates; 1974 - San Jose Geotechnical Investigation, Plates
3A & 3B; Ground Response.
Helley E.j" Brabb, E.E.; 1971 - Geologic Map of Late Cenozoic Deposits, Santa
Clara County, California; United States Geological Survey Miscellaneous
Field Studies No. MF-335, Basic Data Contribution No. 27.
Jennings C.W., Burnett j.L.; 1973 - Geologic Map of California, San Francisco
Sheet; California Division of Mines and Geology, Ferry Building; San
Francisco, California.
Limerinos j.T., Lee K.W., Lugo P.E.; 1973 - Flood Prone Areas in the San
Francisco Bay Region, California; United States Geological Survey Open
File Report.
September 25, 1998
United Soil Engineering, Inc.
,File No. 4650-S 1
20
Pampeyan E.H.; 1963 - Geology and Mineral Deposits of Mount Diablo, Contra
Costa County, California; California Division of Mines and Geology,
Special Report 80; San Francisco, California.
Rogers T,H.; 1972 - Geologic Map of California, San Jose Sheet; California
Division of Mines and Geology, Ferry Building; San Francisco, California.
Rogers T.H" and Williams J.W.; 1974 - Potential seismic hazards in Santa Clara
County, California; California Division of Mines and Geology, Special
Report No.1 07.
WCA; 1978 - Analysis of the Geotechnical hazards of the Los Altos Hills;
William Cotton and Associates, Geologic Consultants; Project Number
Gl14-78; April 1978; Los Gatos, California.
Septem ber 25, 1 998
United Soil Engineering, Inc.
TABLES
TABLE I - SUMMARY OF MOISTURE/DENSITY, UNCONFINED
COMPRESSION TEST, AND DIRECT SHEAR TESTS
TABLE II - PROPOSED ALTERNATE PAVEMENT DESIGN SECTIONS
Fil~ No. 4650-51
T A 6.LU
SUMMARY OF MOISTURE, DENSITY,
UNCONFINED COMPRESSION, AND DIRECT SHEAR TESTING
In-Place Conditions Direct Shear Testing
Sample Depth Dry Moisture Unconfined Angle of Unit
No. (Feet) Density Content Compressive Internal Cohesion
(p,cJ.) (% Dry Wt.) Strength Friction (k.sJ.)
(k.s.f.) (Degrees)
1 -1 3 111.0 17.3 20 1.2
1-2 5 101.4 5.8
1-3 10 115.8 6.3
1-4 15 114.5 6.8
1-5 20 116.6 6.3
1-6 25 128.1 6~6
September 25, 1998
United Soil Engineering, Inc.
Fil.e No. 4650-51
"I"ABLE II
PROPOSED ALTERNATE PAVEMENT SECTIONS
Location: Proposed Medical Building
1441 9 South Bascom Avenue
Campbell, California
September 25, 1998
United Soil Engineering, Inc.
FIGURES
FIGURE 1 - VICINITY MAP
FIGURE 2 - SITE PLAN
FIGURE 3 - FAULT LOCATION MAP
FIGURE 4 - PLASTICITY INDEX
FIGURE 5 - PLASTICITY INDEX
FIGURE 6 - "R" - VALUE TEST
~.. ~~:: ~'rl.lll~~. ~~'.:'--tj'~I!;---~ !~':";~~'.. ~~ u5:r1t..~..! - me~;', ~~ ,,,,".-1<,' ~
:;.... il':'~' .....WWW"" .L'~ ~; -:;, d'. .~~~. 11...1:.:. .' '~ ~
';' lI'(ffO .000~~LY.U.~ I EF; Q ~j'o WY _.:I< _ ;.t:, ,. ~'" '\ ~ ~ ~ ...
" ~ft.""""'- ~~~ ..~'i ~: I: ~~I~"~ <r :.1J'... ...- ',or ,,~ L OR ~,~ 0
~ AY -ii AV II' t'T . UNU" lMACT .., 4~ J:::.~~1 ~._ t'WI \ tI.
... U ~.~!~tm-. ~ i~~u '- <~ J t """,..,;. ~'V"" g=.:."". f'" ~1 :;: N~~~ ':')-IiI~ .0 OR;I~ \~:;-~t~
~" ~" 'ftAU" ~ i 0 :;:; c ~!; ~81r..",,1e. . ~ ~IM/ · · 'J~ 0 .~~\~"....;: ~
' U - i- ~ ~ r:r.;......~ ;0 J J' ..v . ~!r.jf /, , ~ ,~'" ~ ...,~ '" ~ .. n ~
1:. l k... c:" < 10", ,.8_J . ......,. --,I. 15 · < 'ri~! - .
~ 'I<>' __ SlJJ'>, - . '~~ c Er:~ ~ J ~ ((..t~. I~ _-l~' 0' i.- ~
~ 2 ~ ~~I~: ~ ~ ! 1]! ~ 0 7~(72 ~ 1~f4~~ ~ ~ OT .~ :~.= ~~~'~ ~ 1t\1~J~;
- & I ... ~ ~ ',' ,..\. L.J . ",GAlt "? ""-T-' y"o'l""'" ~~~ ~
~\" ."'. . ~ I II.... ,~. I!i~ fJ ,~ . Ie llOOl~~\~~-:~~~
~ ~~~~~lli "''"' l~,'~ ,:i.. -rI '~;;>~.~ 7;~~i'i-."~, '~, r~J ~~ ,~~_':fF'~~' ~~
~ LA"" ~~~ . 1 r' ." r; ~. ,,-i!'!l!t ~o,:t"_ -lOll TUIoIIIn ~ .& ~/ ~ -=.1
~! ~: 1!~g""~ ~U~;' -. ~ Z~ ;::3..:~ ..._ ....~ ~~~~~
- ~ .,~'" I- 'Xli 11'./ I - 1- ..~...' ;~'I!iI,-, ~, \. J ,~'-~~, i '\ '\.'\.'\~'~\' ~
I -<=.' ;.;i,. -:. I F.~i if$.r-j(.J:, '7~ :1,,' ',t,". ~....:.:~.:;;,::; ~- ~V~.~....~ ~;~ \..~~ -;:f\
~ :.:r,)..A,'I:: ,~~ ..- .. ~id' .ff ,'!}'-' :-:;; JI' · '.i"" ~ ~:~ ;. -Y , "). ~ ;;';' .v V"~
t..IlV!I" :"';";~~'"Iro t.~. .' /~". .,,:. :-..7 ;;~'r ~,:; M/~.... ~ ~ ~~ ~~ ~~~. L ~
!I ~., Ie -f ,,'i! 'MiI.T. M..I ,2 ~ rr 1_." . ... "\ ~,.io: ~ ~.1.~ ~
';~j7. ".,.,I..~ rl,":l'Qf)t !i. t'i ,Z~llj;. C\~_T':'f,(' ~ ",/'...~ ~
~ . ",,--a;; -I., lJ II; . .)l..uL, .' ~~~ -<~ ~~ ~ ~~ v
~~ '}~"" '~.'~'.,"\i fl:JI"..~,.','fI:..', ',~.;.~; ~.~/~;~ J ~~;.\~) ~~~.'~ ='0. ~ 't'.1 ~~ ~
. ~,' ~. '.,:'~,:.',1~", ~,.'~ ~YA~~ ~t. ~l ~~~n~ ~ ~~~~ ~ ~. ~~IC~ ~~~~
'IL J~ ~t':l:~"<~ 1j:fJI, ~ - ~!j ~ ~'~ ?"''''' ::;"~i.' <;.'<?'~ ~~~~ ~~ ~
." ui. ~, ,~ . ,/<.. . j' .;~~ '6 '" ' ,~~,~" \) r.~ "l
<Ii ,;. ll(1.i ~' ~l\,' .,:,' ,: '1 ~! ~,y\1t.O.v .~... ~ ~1~ i v-" ~- :. ~.,. ;: , '--",
';1, ~ ,'; ...,\... ~. ---\,,~ '-MID '"'" ~ ~
III .1 f',~" .~~~J/.J.. ' J ~ ~~. '~IB. ,,&..~ ~ 'If1l~~"" !'ll ~ {-: ~ \.~, .
r-/.t;......,'1111j...'U_...,'. '~' I ~~i "~T\.Iu{ \'9.~~_ t\~ :::;
.. h~''>:=.,J.:..#~ ". ~ . -.... t',\ ~ .~
'~' ~r,:', ,~~I,.7!. ': .... ~ J~~Jl..r; ~ <II ~ r.SITE1" n...'" ~I~' : ~l,. , ~ 70 \-L- ~
J!~" ;.", .7t'.~ ~ I.L, .- fl/. -~~~ ~
L "1i: ;/, ", ~r "7 ~. -. I 0 \ ~\ . ~ \' ~Y"'''
~ ~1: l~"r::~ ,. "'!I~I:~ 1\ :~ ~lr;:o:J:' ~i ~ ,~ ~~~ \ \~' ~~~&
~ r ~" -:. r":._ '.~ .. ,'\ ~ ''''~J_ E'!~11 UH ~ ~~~"..A 'II-~,
J~ ~ ;.", :;" Er" r~~ ,,'4 .<, ~~~i!'\i~ qf f! ~ ....~~~~~ 0& )l-... ~~ ~
.r-. _ I.. p"J .: I 1...3 o! '1 ":'1<0' -.....0,.- ,_..d ~~.h~ ~lt"'~~~"\ 'l.. t' ~
~ T nO, ' '....t<Ji # 0 c 1- AI:.t Fj/ ~^~nN "'P ~..o.P"" ~ \ ~_..c:t.1I ~. ~ ~
~~.,~ ~ -.- 1lO_..~..~~~_lt...\\'~~~, tr.~W2i.
~ ~;.~ .~ ""..... _ Ii\:l.~ i _,r: .oil i(' ~:~ ,,~y~~~ ~ ~ /}"" .J:.~
llll:;C, ~ -( ;;l_1 m ,If ~ ~ IEl sL ~ ~ r WT v.....
, . ~:M(:..<<eT 2..''''';' UT I'~ tp :=-".....>> ~ ,.:-~ .~ ?\.~
, ~. ,.1' . ; ;M~A~.;,,""'I ,.:___.., I all.oN./'1oooo I~I~ ifirronl'~ ,:,Qlll~ ""\!ll-~~ r"" ,,""'''': .
Uhited Soil Engineering, Inc.
VICINITY MAP
File No, 4650-51
FIGURE
Proposed Medical Building
3476 Edward Avenue
Santa Clara, CA 95054
(408) 988-2990
Drawn by: T.M.
1
14419 South Bascom Avenue
Campbell, California
Scale: NOT TO SCALE Sept.
1998
UJ
~
:::>
lJ
L.l-
N
'-
Q)
.coo
Em
cvm
0.-
Q)
V\
UJ
-J
<(
U
- V\
V\ . 0
PROPERTY BC I ~
0 I-
Lf'I l- I-
\.D 0
1-- --- .q-
Z
0 Q)
z
I Q) r;
u
I L.l- V')
I Q)
I z ~ ::::s
0 c c
I 1= -c Q) I'lS
. BAC <( > .-
I z u <(c
0 0 ::::s '-
r ~ ...J 'Z co E.E
0=
I I u u.J od: I'lS U I'lS
...J U
0 0.. -I I/)U
I ...J :::E Q.. "'C ns
I <( Q) co -
I -$- B-1 lJ VI UJ :E ~Q)
z I-- ......c
I a: \.J - "'C ::::Sa.
0 <( V') Q) aE
co co I/)
I I >- >- 0 ml'lS
I 0::: 0::: c.. _U
I 0 0 0 .q-
I ~ '-
l- e.. .q-
I <(
0::: 0:::
0 0
...J ...J
I 0.. 0..
I x x
I u.J u.J
I u.J u.J
I l- I-
<( <( u
::E ::E c Q).q-
I x x
I l 0 0 - ::::sLf'l
0::: ~ coo
I 0::: 0.. C Q)Lf'lm
0..
0.. 0.. ";: >mcn
L__::~G~~ <( <( Q) <(<(N
VI Q)
VI C -CUI
u.J u.J '- 00
l- I- ~ ns -00
0 0 c ~~m
z z UJ
u.J u.J "'C1'lS_
Q Q "- UJ-oo
0 \.DUO
V') "ns.q-
.....-
"'C .q- C
+- Q) ml'lS
"~ V')
u.J C
I- ::>
0
z
..0
n
~
f\
<6
\..
~
~-,
\
~
1
.
,
o 10 20M!.
( __-.. '<.r.
.
.
1910
I::::. 5.9
SITE
.. ~. ......
."1-
'.~
.~
.~
: -e 1926
. ~ t:::. 6.1
~P~NATION .,~
.~
. ....
Active fault; dashed where .
--... inferred, dotted where concealed
^ 1906 Significant earthquake epicenter
u 8.3 with year of event and
Richter magnitude
FAULT LOCATION MAP File No. 4650-51
Proposed MedIcal Building
FIGURE
United Soil Engineering, Inc.
Drawn by: T.M.
3
3476 Edward Avenue
Santa Clara, CA 95054
(408) 988-2990
14419 South Bascom Avenue
Campbell, California
San Jose, California Scale: NOT TO SCALE
Sept.
1998
PLASTICITY CHART
10
7
4
o
o
CV Y
.~- ,..---' /
CH ME
/
/
/ MV
CI V
..-
V MH
CL , V
N ./ MI
\\\\ \\V
I/ML
60
50
*
X 40
OJ
"'0
C
>- 30
.....
u
......
I/)
~ 20
Cl..
10
20
30 40 50 60
Liquid Limit %
70
80
90 100
PLASTICITY DATA
Key
Symbol
Hole
No.
Depth
ft.
Liquid Plasticity
Limit % Index %
Unified Soil
Classification
S mbol *
.
BAG A
0-1
30 14
CL
*Soil type classification Based on British suggested revisions
to Unified Soil Classification System
United Soil Engineering, Inc.
PLASTICITY INDEX
File No. 4650-S 1
FIGURE
Proposed Medical Building
3476 Edward Avenue
Santa Clara, CA 95054
(408) 988-2990
Drawn by: T.M.
4
14419 South Bascom Avenue
Campbell, California
Scale: NOT TO SCALE Sept.
1998
125
...;
(.)
~
120 -----
12
14
16
18
20
~ 115 :
en
c
Q)
C
~
C
1
I
i
I
i
110 ~---
I
I
I
1
105
10
Moisture Content (% of Dry Weight)
SAMPLE:
A
DESCRIPTION:
Red-Brown Silty CLAY
LABORATORY TEST PROCEDURE: ASTM 01557-91
MAXIMUM DRY DENSITY: 120.0 p.c.f.
OPTIMUM MOISTURE CONTENT: 16.0 %
United Soil Engineering, Inc.
COMPACTION TEST A File No. 4650-S1
Proposed Medical Building
Drawn by: T.M.
3476 Edward Avenue
Santa Clara, CA 95054
(408) 988-2990
14419 South Bascom Avenue
Campbell, California
22
FIGURE
5
Scale: NOT TO SCALE Sept.
1998
24
V')
w 22
:I:
u
~ 20
I
tX:
W
t:i 18
~
0 16
...J
co
<:
I- 14
V')
>-
co
V') 12
V')
UJ
Z
~ 10
~
J:
I- 8
tX:
W
>
0 6
u
4
2
0
EXUDATION PRESSURE(P.S.I.)
800 700 600 500 400 300 200 100
RESISTANCE, R-VALUE TEST 1/
STATE OF CAUFORNIA /
TEST METHOD NO. CALIFORNIA 301 -~ 1/
/
1/
/
/
1/
/
V
/
1/
/
1/ .....
/ ........
1/ .
/ '-
/ \.
V
/
V
/
/
/
o 2 4 6 8 10 12 14 16 18 20 22 24 26
COVER THICKNESS BY EXPANSION PRESSURE - INCHES
SAMPLE: A
DESCRIPTION: Red-Brown Silty CLAY
SPECIMEN
ExUDATION PRESSURE (P.S,I.)
ExPANSION DIAL (.0001 ")
ExPANSION PRESSURE (P.S.F.)
RESISTANCE VALUE, uR"
% MOISTURE AT TEST
DRY DENSITY AT TEST (P.C.F.)
R-VALUE AT 300 P.S.1.
ExUDATION PRESSURE
A
223,0
12.0
52.0
11.0
15.3
117.1
B
366,0
30.0
130.0
24.0
14.4
118.9
C
510,0
37.0
160.0
34.0
13.5
122.6
(18)
United Soil Engineering, Inc.
R-VALUE TEST
File No. 4650-51
Proposed Medical Building
3476 Edward Avenue
$anta Clara, CA 95054
(408) 988-2990
Drawn by: T,M.
14419 South Bascom Avenue
Campbell, California
100
90
80
70
u.J
60 ;:)
...J
<(
50 >
I
c:::
40
30
20
10
0
FIGURE
6
Scale: NOT TO SCALE
Sept.
1998
APPENDICES
MODIFIED MERCALLI SCALE
METHOD OF SOIL CLASSIFICATION
EXPLANATION OF BORING LOG SYMBOLS
EXPLORATORY BORING LOG ( B-1 AND B-2 )
File No, 4650-51
Earthquake Richter Modified Mercalli Intensity Scale* Damage to
Category Magnitude (After Housner, 1970) Structure
1- Detected only by sensitive instruments.
2.0 II - Felt by few persons at rest, especially on I
upper floors; delicate suspended objects
may swing,
3.0 III - Felt noticeably indoors, but not always No
recognized as an earthquake; standing Damage
cars rock slightly, vibration like passing
truck.
Minor IV - Felt indoors by many, outdoors by a few;
at night some awaken; dishes, windows,
doors disturbed; cars rock noticeably.
4.0 V- Felt by most people; some breakage of Architec-
dishes, windows, and plaster; tural
disturbance of tall objects. Damage
VI- Felt by all; many are frightened and run
outdoors; falling plaster and chimneys;
damage small.
5.0 VII- Everybody runs outdoors. Damage to
5.3 building varies, depending on quality of
construction; noticed by drivers of cars.
Moderate 6.0 VIII - Panel walls thrown out of frames; fall of
walls, monuments, chimneys; sand and
mud ejected; drivers of cars disturbed.
IX - Buildings shifted off foundations, Structural
cracked, thrown out of plumb; ground Damage
cracked, underground pipes broken;
6.9 serious damage to reservoirs and
embankments.
Major 7.0 X- Most masonry and frame structures
destroyed; ground cracked; rail bent
slightly; landslides,
XI - Few structures remain standing; bridges
7.7 destroyed; fissures in ground; pipes
broken; landslides; rails bent.
Great 8.0 XII - Damage total; waves seen on ground Near
surface; lines of sight and level Total
distorted; objects thrown into the air; Destruction
large rock masses displaced.
GENERAL COMPARISON BETWEEN EARTHQUAKE MAGNITUDE
AND THE EARTHQUAKE EFFECTS DUE TO GROUND SHAKING
*Intensity is a subject measure of the effect of the ground shaking, and is not engineering measure of
the ground acceleration.
United Soil Engineering, Inc.
File No. 4650,-51
r METHOD OF SOIL CLASSIFICATION CHART 1
-" TYPICAL NAMES JI
MAJOR DIVISIONS SYMBOL
--, I _____M -'.0:.. o' :'.[ .-.-------. -~----,----_._--_._- I
0 GMVELS GW .. .0... . Well graded gravel or gravel-sand mixtures. little or no fines
0 0..-0. .
N "Or' '"
~ ci (More than 1 /2 of GP iloilo ..~ ~..:.. Poorly graded gravel or gravel-sand moistures, little or no fines
'" .4!o..",.
a c -r.o- . --
Vl ^ coarse fraction> GM :.j:' :.r.. Silty gravels, gravel-sand-silt mixtures
0 'ow .0- 0... .;
LLl 17.~~~~
Z IIIN no. 4 sieve size) GC Clayey Gravels, gravel-sand-c1ay mixtures
~ .......;:;; .-if' . '.
0Q) :l~ 0;; ~ ~ l,t..
l..j ~~ SANDS SW Well graded sands or gravelly sands, no fines
LLl po- "Vi f;)....~...
lQ c iloilo iloilo .'. '
(More than 1/2 of SP .. Poorly graded sands or gravelly sands, no fines
~ III . . .
~ . , ..
.... 'I' I.. I iloilo
U ~ coarse fraction < SM ~~~:.~:' Silty sands, sand-silt mixtures
0 - -
~ 1...1; ~)
no. 4 sieve size SC :~~.-. . ~ Clayey sands, sand-clay mixtures
0 SILTS & CLAYS ML Inorganic silts and very fine sand, rock, flour, silty or clayey fine sand or
0
N clayey silt/slight plasticity
ci
~ c: 11/ Inorganic clay of low to medium plasticity, gravelly c1ayes, sandy clay,
a V LL < SO CL
Vl 'oQ) silty clay, lean clays
0 IIIN '1 .
LLl ...... "Vi OL Organic siltys and organic silty clay of low plasticity
Z 0Q)
~ N> II -
-- Q) SILTS & CLAYS MH Inorganic silts, micaceous or diatocaceous fine sandy, or silty soils,
l..j ,- "Vi I
LLl C elastic silt
Z III
~ II.."; ...
u::: .... Inorganic clays of high plastiCity, fat clays
~ LL > 50 CH ..... /J
0 li// --
~ OH Organic clays of medium to high plasticity, organic $ilty clays, organic
silts
HIGHL y OR~ANIC SOIL PT Peat and other highly organic soils
CLASSIFICATION CHART - UNIFIED SOIL CLASSIFICATION SYSTEM
ClASSIFICATION RANGE OF GRAIN SIZES
U.s, Standard Grai n Size
Sieve Size In Millimeters
BOULDERS Above 1 2" Above 305
COBBLES 12' to 3" 305 to 76,2
GRAVELS 3" to No, 4 76,2 to 4.76
Coarse 3" to 3 4" 76,2 to 19,1
Fine 3/4' to NO.4 19,1 to 4.76
SAND No, 4 to No, 200 4.76 to 0,074
Coarse NO.4 to No, 10 4,76 to 2,00
Medium No,10 to No. 40 2.00 to 00420
Fine NoAO to No, 200 00420 to 0,074
SILT AND Below No, 200 Below 0,074
CLAY
PLASTICITY INDEX CHART
10
7
4
o
o
cv lY
CH /' ME
/'
V
/' MV
CI /
CL /' ./" MH
N /
\\\ \ \~L MI
/M
60
50
?R
X 40
Q)
'0
.::
>- 30
,,=
u
....
III
t1l 20
c:
10
20
30
oW SO 60 70
Liquid Limit
%
80
90
100
Method of Soil Classification Chart
United Soil Engineering, Inc.
Loooed Bv: EXPLANATION OF TEST Boring No.
Date Drilled: BORING SYMBOLS
File No. 4650-51
>- ...; ci......; .... !l.. STATIC GROUNDWATER
.... Ell! Q) ....
'* VI .0 Q) Cl
VI " Q) .- -
c<4-:: .... .... III 4= o~ Direct E Q) 0 -
:JC Q)- U - u.. ...J
Q)U ....Q) lXlIl ..c Shear ::I
0" III .... ":: .... .... z c Cl
c. ,- e: e:Cl .- e: y GROUNDWATER FIRST
~ 00 ....0 Test Q) .c 'i:
aJ_ oe:
0 :Eu e:eo UQ) c. .... 0 NOTED
Q) c"" C. eo
E Q) -
0- ::>Vl -
"' 0
In
- ....
U.n
=,:,j,
~
= ....
lSlCl
= Q)
c
DESCRIPTION
V/ -
1/ /- CLAY
~
SliT
" ,.,.
~~~:
...... -
~t::if <:: 11 tl.1 n
-!>.C;:o:
:o::~C?;I-IGRA VEL
~I'" "",
,/ /- .1.
,,' "
I
I ,
: : -
! I c;iltv
.
. .
1-1
1-' . . : I- _,
.. . :'><11
o
00-
o 0 IfrlV\'" Ilv
I _ Sample Taken with sample
nt" ;lnn l;:th rpc;\JItc; aivpn
X I- Sample Attempt - Unsuccessful
No - 113 ~"I '
Rpf\J<;;:tI.d\'"'d in KPmrlrkc;
**
- I-
-
-
~
~
l-
I- I-
Remarks:
Explanation of Test Boring Symbols
United Soil Engineering, Inc.
-,
. Logged By: M.R.
! Date Drilled: 9/18/98
>-
....
VI .
c......
C1IU
oci
C-
o
C1I*
..... ...
:JC
....C1I
VI ......
,- C
00
::iEu
....
VI
.V\~
C1I__
~1II
.3:
....0
C1I_
eco
C1I
Q.
111.0 17.3 25
101.4 5.8 44
115.86.3
I.
114.5 6.8
116.6 6.3
128,16.6
Remarks:
.
43
ci.~
Evi
0..:.::
u -
. .s=
......-
cO\
OC
UC1l
c....
....
::JVI
42
*
*
*
Boring No.
EXPLORATORY BORING LOG B-'I
File No. 4650-51
Direct
Shear
Test
- ....
~v!
-~
~
= ...
~Cl
= Q)
Cl
1.2
50 Blows for 5"
20
1-1
1-3
1-4
1-5
1-6
....
C1I
..c
E
:J
Z
C1I
Cl.
E
n:l
VI
....
C1I
C1I
Ll..
C
01
o
....J
01
C
'C
o
co
.s=
....
Cl.
C1I
C
3
1)"11
~I~-
r/y-
I~~
-llv
),Iv
1-2
5
0.;;:0'
I.:~...o I-
10 :/) '.,
....,p ~
o.~ci
_ :o'..o~
-9"::P'
15 I~~~~::
~' ~
t'
01-
.:j
20 ~'-
~-
L- fi': 9 . _
r-w
~!o I-
~:,,-;.
r-@'
2 5 .~9.
DESCRIPTION
Red-Brown Silty CLAY
damp, very stiff
Red-Brown Clayey Sandy GRAVEL
moist, dense
Red-Brown Gravelly Sandy CLAY
damp, hard
Red-Brown Sandy Clayey GRAVEL
damp, very dense
Refusal
Boring terminated at 25 feet
-
-
-
United Soil Engineering, Inc.
Logged By: M.R.
Date Drilled: 9/18/98
>- ..; ci.<+-:
.... ?R VI Ell!
VI aJ ov; ..:
c:.....; ... .... aJ':t:. 0..:.::
aJu ::JC U -
0' ....0) ~VI . ..c
a. VI .... .~ '- ....
.- c: ctJ'
~ 00 ....0
aJ_ Oc
0 :::Eu ceo vaJ
aJ ct;
Q. ::l Vl
:Remarks:
Boring No.
EXPLORATORY BORING LOG B-2
File No. 46 50-S 1
Direct
Shear
Test
- ....
uvi
=.:.t
~
= ...
~Cl
= OJ
C
"-
0)
.0
E
:J
Z
aJ
Co
E
tIl
Vl
....
0)
aJ
l.l..
s:::
01
o
...J
01
C
'C
o
eo
..c
....
Co
aJ
o
~ [:?; ~
l1/~
1{~
it:
j);~
:'t~
. .~..fo~ -
1 0 ~~.~.
- o~..;.
::(o.!"
- .~of.q;-
.tr.:p'.
_%;}
lS -~-
-~:
Vr
a/-:,.;,
~-
~.v-o
it:.: ~.,
5
20
.... I-
- I-
- -
-
- -
-
~ -
DESCRIPTION
Red-Brown Silty CLAY
damp, very stiff
Red-Brown Clayey Sandy GRAVEL
moist, dense
Red-Brown Gravelly Sandy CLAY
damp, hard
Red-Brown Sandy Clayey GRAVEL
damp, very dense
Boring terminated at 20 feet
United Soil Engineering, Inc.
Greg W. Benton, Architect
15102 Lynn Avenue
Los Gatos, California 95032
(408) 358-9338
RECEIVED
MAY 0 6 1999
MEMORANDUM
PUBL.IC WORKS
ADMINISTRATION
o Telephone
Call: in 0 out X
o Meeting
o Direction
X Request
o Site Visit
Re: 14419 S. Bascom Ave. Office Building
Name(s) Chuck Gomez, Assistant Engineer
& Compan.y: City of Campbell Public Works Department
Date:
Time:
5/6/99
12:40 pm
I am sending this letter on behalf of the owner of the above mentioned project and per my
conversation with Mr. Gomez earlier today. I/we hereby request that Mr. Gomez and the
public works department proceed with the preparation of any agreements, estimates for fees
and bonds, and/or any other paperwork which you anticipate will be needed for the approval of
street improvement for this project. It is our understanding that the plan check process for final
approval and issuance of permits for the street improvement work is in progress and may not
be completed for several weeks. However, upon completion of the agreement process, ahead
of the street improvement plan check, the public works department will approve our application
for the building permit already submitted and approved by all other departments.
As you requested, I am attaching a copy of the latest title report ordered by the property owner
and I have notified our civil engineer of this request for agreements. Please feel free to call
me or the civil engineer for any further information about this project. Your prompt attention to
the completion of this agreement work would be greatly appreciated.
By: Greg W. Benton
cc: Dennis K. Wong, Yitka Cymbal
Please notify originator immediately for any corrections, omissions or deletions.
';~;"':""
~:'fa.'~"""'IIJ.'., ." ;,C >'..,~"iI" .,,,,,,,';i1,,,-,,"<i:;;iiiil,,,..~,.
~?~':~~-: '~' .~:~. ~ ~ ~~ ~v ,~ ;~: y,
'":\Ij'''' " -~'.. ' .,
jt~'~
,4, "_ U ~ Form No 1341 EAGLE
~. {, '"', ALTA Plain Language Owners Policy (6/87)
''''~~~ EAGLE Protection Added (2/10/97)
tr .,;>,
{ft~
~.,;j.'~~~~
~ffir'
..,', ,>:!II
(t,,~
(f?~~
i.V.~
t<.,-.'
'" '!f!.1iI
Id..,~
-',. ...
'.:<iN"
~':>::i;
''':':';, ,,,','
""iliilif
}~/~
"'~'~:
f~,:
{w.;
~.~~
I' .It
~e~
(.~
~c::':
'{J.~~
;f'!f!~
~.::~
t.," .,.
>t~ .
i,,-;&: ~
";..~ I!'!'f
~\,~~
";.1\
,~{~
{i.~"~
tl~
. '<<';'~~
. ~ ~~i' \"'C,,{.. '" '"
,.' ~""'Ii!", -"'.....':~
..J.\~:~~,'~' ,." - ;-:'!:~.- '~.~
,".. '~--,:,,~. ,"'''''''''''''
"'0.;Jt..r:-,0;:j" '
'if_ .~,"'l.
~\,'~
,';" "l
, ~-<<
~:~~
. .f!K
{4~
:(~.
'l.~
,i::i;
~;~~
rrti~
~'::
~;:.';...,>;
('i'i
!:~~
{ !;'/",
,'",<ii-"';- ......".:>J1"."~"-...~~~,""'~.'~.,' t
"" '&J . · . ..;I\l- ,,' ;0 '''''!b'll! irl',,'~ .~' t '
i;' /'" '., . .% ,\<;'i. ;i~" "!I:}~' ~iIl<\~
.'. ,_.',- ...--.- - -'-"---~"-----
yPoky o/)~~ &b~u~nce
First American TItle Insurance lB5i~.wED
MAY 0 6 1999
EACLt: Protection Owner 5 POlicy
ONE-TO-FOUR FAMILY RESIDENCES
PUBL.IC WORKS
ADMINISTRATION
OWNER'S COVERAGE STATEMENT
~
i 4 Someone else seeks Ie la,e awa, vour IllIe Decause 01 a vlolallon 01 a reslflctlon
shown in Schedule ~^'nlc: naDDenec oelof>: vou tJecarne me ownRr J\ 'lour lane
SorneCf.o:" 8!Se ':iee~:" 'L snuwr! ,n Schedule B Decause
j vli':HtllJ!1 aile -mer liur, d VIC,I(jlIOfl alreadv covered by Items
~ : J! 14......n;:' r'd~we!h~',; CrlQ:r:: 8t:carne !,ne QWllel l'l '{uur lane
II1SUrallCe unOer IrllS lIem lj.s !Imlle" 10 your aCluallOSS il1 excess 01
j aeauclIble amount eaual Ie one percenr 11 % i ollhe POIIC, Amount. bul
[,OliO exceea Ihe PoliCy Amounl
: Ie Someone else reluses 10 periorm a conliac: 10 purchase 10 lease or to make a
;rongage loan Decause 01 an, vlolallon on IDur lana 01 any reslflcllons shown
r. Scheaule B willen nappenea Delore 'au oecame me oWller 01 your land
'~IS POliCY IlIsures your tllle Ie the 'and oes:r Co'J Sclleoule U.--
s .j one-lo-lour family reSroen1l3i 101 or ':C'f;iJOr-!~I~fT1 .JIlI!
thai
~
i''Jur 'rl):J!3nCe, a~ GeScr:oec ~Ii 'n:s :,'Cver2'~,; :::a:er'!~rl1
Dale snown In Scneaule ,u.
,::rtr,'r"J~ :JI'
rlsurance IS !Imltea 0'1 the iOiioWHlq
. ExClUSions on page 2
. Excepllons In SClledule B
. Ccndlllons on Dages 3 ano 4
~
\VP ,nSl.:re 'IOU agalflsl actuai less :fjSUilillC "- '.
'):JmeO!l~ else 3:t8' :he
~0unoar,' Wd: i ,~,r
Jate, DLJ;IOS d Sli'Jcture - '"I:ner :han a
,',r-I,~:l ..r'~~roacneS or 'lour lana
-r
. all\' \Ille risks I:uverea Dv tnlS POI Ie!' --
1,1'r;
I C You carmOI aOlaln d :':;'u:lc:ng rJerfl11! tor your lana, :Jf someone ;:ise fetuses to
pertorm a contraci Ie purChase 10 lease or Ie maKe a mortgage loan on your
land. De""'.....:: ~l !J-:I ',":;' n:lIO it \1I01;11p.~ :111 Pl'15t1nn ,llhrllVISlrm law Your
Insuran, i" .naer ',is l:e:1, \8 IS ~Im\teo '.'C:';~!':11 IUS~i ~il ~:"L.I.SS at a
deduclib,,, amour,i :~~allo one percenl We,1 o! 11t I,ey Amoullfdlld 10 our
maximum dollar IImll 01 liability 01 $10.000
ana
~
. afly custs, anprneys tees ana expenses we na'le 10 pay ufloer thiS PoliCY
COVERED TITLE RISKS
~
POliCY covers Ille lollOWIf1O 1IIIe nSKS I! 'nev allw yOllr 1IIIe Of! Ille Pollcv
.Jdir, JI :[, Ole exte!1\ staleo D€!Jh ~ !'lev allecl y'UUr 'ille (dter !.11r;
POliCy UJle Sume ul !neSt; T'i:t' i-k;ji,s Will be :-iulJlectlC d separatt
~eouCIlDle :lnlOIJlII alia to maximum \1011ar ,:",S Wlllcn are less t~,anlhe POI!C'i
:"'iTlOurlt wtlen expressly staled oeltlw Tnese ':,u..ereo Tille Risks .lrt
1 Someone else owns dll Inlerestln yuu; '::,t
A document IS nOI properly Signed, sealea aCKnpwledged. or delivered
Forgery. trauo. Guress lilcompelenC\ ,ncapaclly or Impersonallon
~lJfqery alter the POi ley Date 01 a:: ~"s:r:Jment Oy whlcn S )Tleone
JlIllS ,(, OWl' jr1 'ld"'''''
liie
/Vf: WI'
~:,(iSeC
!'1t .'l)SlS
~
Your eXisting structure, 01 dilY ~Idn L)! II 'a struclure you fnay bUild aMer
lrre PO!IC,! Dale a:. j :eplaCdilcllt.:t ~1r rno(Jltleallorl to the eXlstlrHJ structure.
21 any pdrl 01 II S Gamageo oecause aoolher Derson uses Ihe surlace 01
IOllr lano lor Ihe ex'raCIIOl' or de,elODmenl 01 minerals owned by Illem
The maD anaclleo iC Ihls PollcV (ioes lIul snow Ihe same locallon ana
dimenSions 01 your land as 1I10se Shown In !he publiC records
21 Olher delecls Ileos or encumbrances
~'"
~
COMPANY'S DUTY TO DEFEND AGAINST COURT CASES
~,"!~'J;v',;
,........,'
~ t' : .'
-',-,~I
'1 :"o:::":c:'
:,vt>'~ ' K,
J:10rneys Ites_ ane exs't'rlses Nf: !leUr ;) :i',3t [Jetenst
~
;.1 'Ju ~ldJt~ ,~i
t~e '?,rIC
1 ~:ert; (Ht' reS!rICIIV€ ':c,'>;,nalll) 11!T1i11~~'''';, _,,' ~JSe 01 Hw Idl'C
Ne can enll ~.nls dU:V iJ Jeiena
n Ilem 4 a! me Conoll1011S
ThiS Pollc'! IS nol comDlele "',llhOlll ScneOClles A Jno B
'I''' ny e.<erclslng any 01 OUI opllons Ilsleo
r",ere :5 a ilef1 'J!l yell! ~llie ~eCduse
~~ i~lon~dqt U! ~~t::<':
: IlJdgfllern to}." ,';
1 ctldfge D\ ;,1 ~1Ijrne':)W!1t"
: ',,~ r :.:' J r t
j: L; ~ '11;jtpr!i1
"'~; ,d[Ji:.J
First American Title Insurance Company
fl\ (f~xf ~
\rTfS! )11JU/ L ~
,if IS","':
,1ti-: 'or
c,1 _~~~ ,~u d(jreeiJ
'nalefldl
UlIlers have f10llIS ariSing oul 01 leases ,::ntracls "r opllons
: U Someone else oas an easemenl on VlU' ane
f'RESIIJE.\T
Your title IS uflIlurKe130ie Wi'ilcn JI!O\\~ _::;;:::~;d pe:solllC: relL;sl'
d '':Ofltract 10 ourctlase ir~ li2rlSP. [)f !e <T\(iKe ,1 !IHHtnaqe loai~
[;t'rtor;~'
::;r;CRUARI
~
'L Y()u ,He !oreeo to rern(rvt' YlIIl! exlSllnG S:: JC!l; t ulhel t~'ld;) .j [JU'.Jrl0ar,
'i\dll ur tence [)eCaUSt<
.:J 1\ pxleflllS 1L' j.Ji~ !riHlU "mu ,y
11 vlolales a ftstriC;~l)n snOW1l1I' :::,J,rC,-"r' b
:i YIOlales an eXISlng IQnltlU lav.
any porllon O! I! was DUIII wllMu! )0;3""ng a Olllldlng permit Irom the
crooer governmenl ott\ce or llgenC\ "Olj! InsurallC:e unaer thIS Item
",h1IS Imll1p.lllO aCIII{j! loss ":'l,:::ess 01 a lledLlctltJlt' d!l\OlJl1t
,,~ltl;ji t:, (Ji!P [ld\~t'" 1 ,,; t~k ;lJ111 'llll/'lil]11
:U,i;jr :Ulllt 0\ iiriDI:"~' '.II
t:dSti1!P.f11
l'(JU ~ HJflU1USP 'fle la~'c: :)erd\l~r,;~o::-
Snll\'''' 'Jl'!1t:OtJlt' h ','Ir
::~~,;.l~~:~.;~~~P~~' ~1~t'J. ~~,~L~,s u~;~!~;~~"~~~
EO
iii. )..,.-
P"~~,- \
..,.t ..
.1't.'), '
~\..
"d~',;'
.."f
.....i;
llt -H::;
"f
'-Jf
jo.' ,,::t'
,,"r
IIJ\
~#;;J~
"Vl'
~'i6'-
,....f!I,~
\;t'f:.
-"........,.*
-.'4i'.-...:-
'!e :1:>
~"f
~j9Y
.....~.,'<-
"lllll'f'
~'~
jt ;):~..~
'"',~'
"lIl'f
l#'-'.
l.,,!f/
';9i'
'.~.~
.jt~:
i:~?
1"-.~
il' u;;;
i.f'
~;~
. -.""jt
I~"
'~i;
"A~i
~rJ
JlJf~
. ,,:,:c.
1i-....~."
~.. .
.~..."1;
:!! ...,.,
~"'i'-
.-,~
l~",'
.~'~,
~~-~;.
:-.~}
~,'v.
~J\I"~
~~::,'
::~j,
~~~
~,:\.
< .t;: <.~
. ':,..,," ,l!;.
-,~~,.
EXCLUSIONS
In addition to the Exceptions in Schedule B. you are not insured against loss. costs. attorneys' fees. and expenses resulting from
Governmental police power. and the eXlstf'\:~ C:' violation of any law or government regulation This Includes bUilding and
zoning ordinances and also laws and regL,Ji:OGS concerning
· land use
· improvements on the land
· land division
· environmental protection
This exclusion does not apply to violations or the enlorcement of these matters Nnlch appear In the public recordS at Policy Date
~ This exclusion does not limit the coverage described in Items 12c and d. 13 and 18 of Covered Title Risks
2, The right to take the land by condemning It. unless
. a notice of exercIsing the right appears In the public recordS on the P:JIICY Date
. the taking happened prior to the Policy Date and IS binding on you IliOU bought the land without knowlno 01 the taking
3. Title Risks
. that are created. allowed, or agreed to by you
. that are known to you. but not to us. on the Policy Date - unless they appeared In the public records
· that result in no loss to you
~ . \113 first ,-:;eet your :lllto a:JG' llle r UIIC,y Date - this does not limit the coverage described in Items 3b. 8. 17 and 19 of
Covelt:d Title Risks
4, Failure to pay value for your title
5 Lack of a right
. to any land outside the area specifically described and referred to in Item 3 of Schedule A
or
. In streets. alleys or waterways that tOuch your land
~ ThiS exclusion does not limit the coverage described in Items 5 and 12a C' Covered Title Risks
Policy Page 2
Form No 1341 (6/87)
Schedule A
AL T A Plain Language Policy
W /W estern Regional Exceptions
SCHEDULE A
POLICY NO,:
FILE NO,:
LOAN NO,:
E0214440
20007339-018- LM
0001006238
AMOUNT OF INSURANCE:
DA TE OF POLICY:
AT:
PREMIUM AMOUNT:
I, Name of Insured:
Dennis K. Wong and Dora S. Ng
1
Your interest in the land covered by this Policy is:
A FEE
3, The land referred to in this Policy is described as follows:
SEE SCHEDULE "C" ATIACHED HERETO AND MADE A PART HEREOF
This Policy valid only if Schedule B is attached,
$435,000.00
July 23, 1998
8:00 A.M.
$1,579.05
20007339,p12 rev, (5/1/97)
conn No 1341 (6/87)
Schedule A
AL TA Plain Language Policy
W /Western Region"' r:xc'_ptions
POLICY NO, E02 <4440
SCHEDULE B
EXCEPTIONS
In addition to the Exclusions, you are not insured against loss, costs, attorney's fees, and expenses resulting from:
1, Any rights, interests, or claims of parties in possession of the land not shown by public records,
Proceedings by a public agency which may result in taxes or assessments, or notices of such proceedings,
whether or not shown by the records of such agency or by the public records,
I Any easements or liens not shown by the public records, This does not limit the lien coverage in Item 8 of
Covered Title Risks,
3, Any facts about the land which a correct survey would disclose and which are not shown by the public records.
This does not limit the forced removal coverage in Item 12 of Covered Title Risks.
4, Any water rights or claims or title to water in or under the land,
5, TAXES for the fiscal year 1998-99, a lien not yet due or payable.
6, The lien of supplemental taxes, if any, assessed pursuant to the provisions of Chapter 3,5, (commencing with
Section 75) to the Revenue and Taxation Code of the State of Cali fomi a,
7, A deed of trust to secure an indebtedness in the origmal amount shown below,
Dated: July 16, 1998
Amount: $327,000.00
Trustor: Dennis K. Wong and Dora S. Ng, husband and wife as joint tenants
Trustee: Commonwealth Land Title Co" a California corporation
Beneficiary: Integrated Capital Group, Inc.
Recorded: July 23,1998 under Recorder's Series No, 14299739 Official Records
Loan No,: 0001006238
SCHEDULE B - EXCEPTIONS
(Continued)
NOTE: This policy does not reflect requests for notice of default, subsequent transfer of easements, and similar
matters not germane to the issuance of this policy of title i'lsura.1ce,
COUNTERSIGNED:
Dated: July 23, 1998 at 8:00 A.M.
~;II C~
First American Title Insurance Company
Authorized Signatory
H' iY~x!~
~'T /J1 ~I-- ~
PRESlDIU'T
~
SCHEDULE C
LEGAL DESCRIPTION
All that certain real property situate in the City of Campbell, County of Santa Clara, State 01 .::...i.fornia,
described as follows:
BEGINNING at an iron axle set at the point of intersection of the Northwesterly line of the San Jose-Los
Gatos road, with the Northerly line of that certain 3.00 acre tract of land described firstly in the Deed from
James Long, et ux, to Cornelius O'Donnell dated August 11, 1873, recorded September 5, 1873 in Book 30
of Deeds, page 273, Santa Clara County Records; thence from said point of beginning South 890 13' 40"
West along the said Northerly line of the 3.00 acre tract, 114.69 feet to an iron pipe; thence North 00 47'
20" West and parallel with the Easterly line of White Oaks Road for a distance of 86.04 feet to an iron pipe
set on the Southerly line of that certain tract of land described in the Deed from Raymond Angelo, et ux, to
Clyde J. Stemel, et ux, dated September 19, 1952, recorded September 22, 1952 in Book 2491 Official
Records, page 300, Santa Clara County Records; thence North 890 13' 40" East along said last named line,
177.41 feet to an iron pipe set at the Southeasterly corner thereof on the said Northwesterly line of the San
Jose-Los Gatos Road; thence Southwesterly along the said Northwesterly line of the San Jose-Los Gatos
Road on the arc of a curve to the left, with a radius of 6,028.50 feet, through a central angle of 10 00 43"
for an arC distance of 106.46 feet to the point of beginning, and being shown upon that certain Map
entitled, "Record of Survey of the Lands of Raymond Angelo", which Map was filed for record on
December 15, 1955 in Book 65 of Maps, at Page 26.
EXCEYfING THEREFROM all that portion of said land as granted to County of 54..ta Clara by
instrument recorded January 14, 1971 in Book 9187, page 8, Official Records, and as more particularly
described as follows:
Beginning at the point of intersection of Easterly prolongation of the Northerly line of that certain parcel of
land conveyed in the Deed to Salvatore Cannata and Carmelina J. Cannata recorded April 6, 1959 in Book
4375 of Official Records, Offic,; .-:;f the Recorder, County of Santa Clara, State of California at Page 201
with that certain monument line cs",ablished for record on thaL lid. Li~uiar map entitled "Record of Survey of
a Monument Line of South B~bcorr; Avenue from Union Avenue to Lark Avenue" filed for record in Book
264 of Maps, Office of the Recorder, County of Santa Clara, State of California at Pages 49 to 54; thence
from said point of beginning Southerly along said monument line to the point of intersection with the
Easterly prolongation of the Southerly line of the above mentioned parcel of land; thence Westerly along
said Easterly prolongation and Southerly line to the point of intersection thereof with a line parallel with
and 43.00 feet distant Northwesterly measured at right angles from said monument line; thence
Northeasterly along said parallel line to the point of intersection thereof with the Northerly line of the above
described parcel of land; thence Easterly along said Northerly line and Easterly prolongation to the point of
beginning of this description.
\
n
r
\
~,
~.\ \~
~ ~..>-,,\'~4
~ ~~''''~
-ll. ')
~. ~ t 'f. ~"
t\:l ~ 0 ~J~
.I'll . t~
(Jl ,. 1-15'
ofi ..~~
c "0" .
i ~ f p '~4
___1\ :: 0> < ~dl.p.
: '';J:\,~
\ 10) ~ l"l '. .....
, :u ''''( ~
\ ;:: ~.i,;'~
~ ~~.
J ...,.....
....,'
." "
....::::..
~
e;
:..
CD
:r>
(Jl
(')
o
," .
" "
....
0':':
"T1
3:
r
.-<
@ VI
~^ ~
I
~ -
;1J
!=J
a>
~ ~
~ '
\,lJ;>:I:'
~ <~ ~
\Q l'Tl'"
,,'
~ I
c-<>
I
".,"d'~ 1 ! .-
~ li-:I#'
{; ,
~ r
i\;
~
,
'<
~
~
r
~
,
~
"
"
"
"
c
,
f
J
,
J
CONDITIONS
1. DEFINITIONS
a, Easement - the right of someone else to use your land
~cJr a special purpose,
~. L:lnd - the land or condominium unit described in
S :hedule A and any improvements on the land
which are real property
C. Mortgage - a mortgage, deed of trust. trust deed or
other security instrument.
d, Public Hecords - title records that give constructive
notice 0' matters affecting your title - according to the
state statutes where your land is located
e, Title - the ownership of your interest in the land. as
shown in Schedule A,
~
2. CONTINUATION OF COVERAGE
This Policy protects you as long as you
· own your title
or
. own a mortgage from anyone who buys your land
or
. are liable for any title warranties you make
This Policy protects:
. anyone who receives your title because of your death
and
. the trustee or successor trustee of a trust in which
you are the trustor/settlor to whom you transfer your
title after the Policy Date
3. HOW TO MAKE A CLAIM
a. You Must Give The Company Notice Of Your
Claim
If anyone claims a right against your insured title. you
must notify us promptly in writing,
Send the notice to First American Title Insurance
Company, 114 East Fifth Street, Santa Ana, California,
92701, Attention: Claims Department. Please include
the Policy number shown in Schedule A, and the
county and state where the land is located.
Our obligation to you could be reduced if:
. you fail to give prompt notice
and
. your failure affects our ability to dispose of or to
defend you against the claim
b, Proof Of Your loss Must Be Given To The Company
You must give us a written statement to prove your
claim of loss, This statement must be given to us not
later than 90 days after you know the facts which will
let you establish the amount of your loss,
The statement must have the following facts
. the Covered Title Risks which resulted in your loss
. the dollar amount of your loss
. the method you used to compute the amount of your
loss
You may want to provide us with an appraisal of your loss
by a professional appraiser as a part of your statement of
loss
We may require you to show us your records, checks,
letters, contracts. and other papers which relate to your
claim of loss, We may make copies of these papers,
We may require you to answer questions under oath,
Our obligation to you could be reduced if you fail or refuse to:
. provide a statement of loss
or
. answer our questions under oath
or
· show us the papers we request
and
. your failure or reiusal affects our ability to aispose 01
or to defend you against the claim
4. OUR CHOICES WHEN YOU NOTIFY US OF A CLAIM
After we receive your claim notice or in any other way
learn of a matter for which we are liable, we can do one or
more of the following:
a, Pay the claim against your title,
b Negotiate a settlement
c. Prosecute or defend a court case related to the claim
d. Pay you the amount reqUired by this Policy.
e. Take other action which will protect you,
f. Cancel the coverage described in Items 12d or 18 of
~ Covered Title Risks by paying the amount of
insurance specified in the given Item as the limit for
the particular covered risk, and only those costs,
attorneys' fees and expenses incurred up to that time
which we are obligated to pay,
g Cancel this Policy by paying the Policy Amount,
then In force. and only those costs, attorneys' fees
and expenses Incurred up to that time which we are
obligated to pay
Policy Page 3
~
~
~
(continued from page 3)
5. HANDLING A CLAIM OR COURT CASE
You must cooperate with us in handling any claim or court
case and give us all relevant information.
We are required to repay you only for those sSltement
costs, attorneys' fees and expenses that we ,10prm'e in
advance.
When we defend your title, we have a right to choose the
attorney, We can appeal any decision to the highest court.
We do not have to pay your claim until your case is finally
decided,
6. LIMITATION OF THE COMPANY'S LIABILITY
a, After subtracting any deductible amount that applies.
we will pay up to (i) your actual loss, (ii) the amount of
insurance specified in the given Item as the limit for the
particular Covered Title Risk for ctaims based upon the
coverage described in Items 12d. 15 and 18 of Covered
Title Risks. or (iii) the Policy Amount in force when the
claim is made - whichever is less,
b If we remove the claim against your title within a
reasonable time after receiving notice of it, we will have
no f'~-:~er ~:~2i1ih.' ~8r it.
If YOLl canlle: use any of your Ian: Jecause of a claim
against your title, and you rent reasonable substitute
land or facilities, we will repay you for your actual rent
until:
· the cause of the claim is removed
may have, we can subtract from our liability the amount
by which you reduced the value of that right.
7. TRANSFER OF YOUR RIGHTS
When we settle a claim, we have all the rights you had
against any person or property related to the claim, You
must transfer these rights to us when we ask, and you
must not do anything to affect these rights, You must let
us use your name in enforcing these rights,
We will not be liable to you if we do not pursue these
rights or if we do not recover any amount that might be
recoverable,
With the money we recover from enforcing these rights,
we will pay whatever part of your loss we have not paid,
We have a right to keep what is left.
8. ARBITRATION
If it is permitted in your state, you or the Company may
demand arbitration
The arbitration shall be binding on both you and the
Company. The arbitration shall decide any matter in
dispute between you and the Company.
The arbitration award may:
· include attorneys' fees if allowed by state law
· be entered as a judgment in the proper court
The arbitration shall be under the Title Insurance
Arbitration Rules of the American Arbitration Association,
You may choose current Rules or Rules in existence on
Policy Date.
The law used in the arbitration IS the law of the place where
the property is located,
You can get a copy of the Rules from the Company.
or
· we settle your claim In the event of a claim based
upon the coverage described in Items 12d and 18 of
Covered Title Risks. we will be deemed to have
"settled your claim" for purposes of this prOVision
obligating us to pay you for your actual rent upon
payment to you of the amount of insurance specified
in the given Item as the limit for the particular
Covered Title Risk
c, The Policy Amount Will be reduced by all payments
made under this Policy - except for costs, attorneys'
fees and expenses. All payments made under this
Policy for claims based upon the coverage described
in Items 12d and 18 of Covered Title Risks shall also
reduce the amount of insurance specified in the given ~ 10. GRADUATED LIABILITY COVERAGE
Item as the limit for the partiCUlar Covered Title Risk The Policy Amount stated in Schedule A will increase by
- except for costs, attorneys' fees and expenses five percent (5%), of the original Policy Amount, per year
d The Policy Amount will be reduced by any amount we for the first five years immediately following the Policy
pay to our insured holder of any mortgage shown in Date to a maximum Policy Amount of one hundred twenty-
this Policy or a later mortgage given by you five percent (125%) of the original Policy Amount. This
e II you do anything to affect any right of recovery you increase will happen in each of these years on the
anniversary of the Policy Date,
9. OUR LIABILITY IS LIMITED TO THIS POLICY
This Policy, plus any endorsements, is the entire contract
between you and the Company Any claim you make
against us must be made under this Policy and is subject
to its terms.
POlicy Page 4
/."
.
, ,
LII/I-.)'Lj-
CITY OF CAMPBELL
rvauc WORKS DEPARTMENf
ENGINEER'S ESTIMATE
Addras /14 /tf J?t;&"IYM
Encraoduno Perm' No
~~-
!!ClI?t ok!1
,
DIIe
#/41 &f 9
,
.. II ADDIlcodan No.
I
ITEM I UNIT PRICES FOR PROJECT AMOUNT
NO, DESCRIPTION OUAI'mTIES < SJOK $30 K 10 SI50 K > SI50 K S AMOUm'
I. ~ACE CONSTRUcnON ':
,..OBILIZATION 50() LS 50t). (J 0
f-ONSTRUcnON TRAFFIC
OtrrROLCOtrrROUPHASING LS
f-ONSTRUcnON STAKING LS
I
rONSTRUcnON ~G LS
n. PEMOUTIONJCLU1UNG' ,
I. iLEARING A GRUBBING LS
ZZSOO
2. fA WClT!" P,C,C.lA,C.(UP TO 6') I 50 LF 54.50 $3,00 52.00
I I I
I 3. ~.C.C. REMOV....L 2.7 SY $30,00 523.00 SIO.OO 8/ D. Of)
i ~URB AND GUlTER REMOVAL
i 4, 36 LF $6,00 $3.00 52.00 2--/6 06
I
i
I 5, MEDIAN REMOVAL SF 54.50 52.15 SI.15 I
i
i !
I I i
6, pEMOLISH EXISTING INLETIPLUG RCP'S EA
\ 1\1, I
~ORM DIWNAGJt<
I I. /2' R,C,P. (CLASS V) LF $60.00 S40.00 $20.00
i
I 2. '5' R,C,P. (CLASS III) LF $6$.00 $48.00 $38.00
i I
I !
j 3, 18' R,C.P, (CLASS III) LF m.oo $60.00 m.oo
;
; I
I 4. ~4' R.C.P, (CLASS III) LF SID.OO $68.00 SS9.00
! I
I S. ilO' R.C,P. (CLASS III) lJ' m.oo $75.00 $6$.00
I I
I
I 6. b .-nON "" LF SI.20 SO.75 S0.60
I
I
7. ' DRAINAGE INLET EA SI.600.00 SI.300.00 SI,OOO.oo
C.C. DETAIL 9)
I S. IT GRATE INLET EA SI.400.00 SI.IOO.OO S9OO.00
\ [C.C. DETAIL 6) .
9. i>'"ANDARD MANHOLE EA 52.000.00 SI.600.00 SI.300.00
; I
I fc.SJ. DETAIL [)oil)
PNCLUDES FRAME A UD)
I
10. ~.... :-:..~L .. ... EA $'lOO.OO 5550.00 S4Sl.00
I IV. QNCRE'IE~,' ." ' ,..
\. rlDEWAUt 702- Sf suo 54.50 sus 1;563
2- bRIVEW AY APPROACH 330 Sf $7.50 55.50 $3.7S 2..,4 'IS-
i
27-Jun-96
Page 1 of 4
~<c. <:)
~' ~
t'iV " ~~ ~.
~V ~ ~ ~O~O~
~~ ,0 ~<l-t-
. ,<0" ~\fQ
~'" ~""
t-Q
27-Jun-96
Page 2 of 4
,/'
/'
ITEM' UNr1' PIlICE. PROJEcr AMOUNT
NO. I DESCRlmON , nUAKTmES < bllt S30 K TO S150 K > SI50 K S AMOUNT
7. tONDUcrOR LF SO.1O SO.SS SO.4S
I j
L ruU BOX (NO.3 112) !SA S3OO.00 S240.00 SII5.00
I
9. c~..... !SA S4<Xl.00 ~.OO S3OO.00
. ""'::"',;",, ::.
VB. AND SIGNS .. . '
I. ~EMOVl! ""'. ...",,,"'" "_ SF SZ.50 SI.50 SI.OO
2. EMOVE PVMT. MARKINGS (THERMO) SF 53.00 SZ.OO SI.40
I 3. rEMOVE PVMT STRIPING LF SI,40 SO.80 SO,40 I
I i I
4. FIPING DETAIL 9 LF SI.35 SO.15 SO.35
I I
I rlPlNG DETAIL 29
S. LF SZ.1$ SI.65 SUO I
6. rw'NG DETAIL 32 LF SZ.40 SI,75 SI.1$
I
I
7. fmtlPlNG DETAIL 37 (l"HERMO) LF SI.15 S!.SO SI.OO I
I i I
I I. ~IPING DETAIL 3B (l"HERMO) LF SZ.SO SI.15 SI.IS ,
I I I
9. STRIPING DETAIL J9 LF S!.SO SO,I5 SO.4S I
! I
i 10. STRIPING DETAIL 40 LF SZ.20 SI.1O SI.OO
I i
, I
i 11. ~lMrr LINE LF 51.35 SI.05 SO.9O
I
I
I I
12. FROSSWALX LF SI.35 SI.05 SO.9O I
I ~AVEMENT MARKINGS (PAINT)
I 13. SF SZ.50 SI.9O SI.60 i
I
I 14, rA VEMENT MARKINGS (l"HERMO) SF $5.50 53.80 SZ.60
I
I IS. rA VEMENT MARKER (NON.REFL.) EA 54.50 53.00 52.20
I
I 16. PAVEMENT MARKER (REFLECTIVE) !SA S6.00 54. IS 53. IS
I !
! I I
17. IfYPE K MARKER !SA m.oo $80.00' $'lO.OO I
I i ,
I I i
lB. lrYPE N MARKER !SA m.oo $80.00 $'lO.OO I
I
I i
19. iL V AGE ROAD SIGN !SA SI5.00 m.oo $65.00 I
20. rELOCATE ROAD SlGN !SA SIOO,OO SI5.00 m.oo
I
I 21. C' RD, SIGN ON EXIST. POLE !SA S2OO.00 SI4S.00 SIIO.OO
I .
!SA S3OO.00 $24O.lJl SI95.00
I 22. OAD SIGN WITH POST
I !
27-Jun-96
Page 3 of 4
~ rrEM UNn' PRICES FO... ,.OJECf AMOUNT
/ NO. UANTmES < SJOK K TOSI50K SI50K S AMOUNT
/
/ VW. APING
I. fRIGATlON, PLANTING WORK LS
2- r""ooon EA SI25,oo Sloo.oo SIS.oo
3. rrREE REMOVAL EA S6S0.00 S!OO.OO S4OO.oo
I
I
4. rOOT BARRIER (12") LF S20,oo SIO.oo S6.oo
I
5, ROOT BARRIER (IS") LF 525.00/ S15,oo SIO.oo
I
6. F""~.- EA $325,00 S250.oo
5450.00
7. EET TREE (36" BOX) EA S'lOO.oo S550.oo S4OO.oo
a. rp SOIL BACKFILL CY
I., '. ,,"
IX. ~~;:'::IER"
I. LF $75.00 UO.OO $50.00
i
2- fHAIN LINK FENCE (6') LF S15.OO SII.50 $9,25
3. rAISE MISC. BOX TO GRADE 2- EA SJOO,oo S2OO.oo SI".oo bOO
4. /l"ISE MANHOLE TO GRADE EA S4OO,oo $215,00 S2OO,oo I
I
5, ~STALL MONUMEtn' BOX EA 5450,00 S3S0.00 SJOO.oo
I
6, ~EDlAN BACKFILL CY $19,00 $17,00
PREPARED BY: (/Jfdft.1I E~
IDS SECURITY ENFORCEMEtn' FEE
REVIEWED BY:
TOTAL ESTIMATE FOR FAITHFUL ,
APPROVED BY: PERFORMANCE SECURITY
"See Sectian 66499,4 ollhe Mtp Acl.
H:\CECOSTEST. WK3(MPlREV613196
~ <v <;)
/,,\ ~
(; "'(,/ ~()j c:,
~~ ' t'\. \. ~:~ ~
a. v ~ '\) ~ 0 't-~'O
~ . ~~ ,0 c:,~~
~V~~~
't-Q
f(~f/I'.t~ 5/I/f1
27 -Jun-96
Page 4 of 4
,Of'c'4'4..o
t~... ~~
A ...
1-. ....
<- ,
0,qCH,\ \l'O G
CITY OF CAMPBELL
February 25, 1999
Public Works Department
Greg W. Benton
15102 Lynn Avenue
Los Gatos, CA 95032
Re: Application S 98-24 at 14419 S. Bascom Avenue
Dear Mr. Lynn:
The Planning Commission, at its meeting of January 26, 1999, adopted Resolution 3217
granting a Site and Architectural approval for the construction of a new two-story office
building on the above-referenced property.
At your earliest convenience, I would like to arrange a meeting with you, your consultants,
and the City's Public Works land development representative(s). The purpose of the meeting
would be to review the conditions of approval imposed by the Public Works Department and
the Department's procedures and requirements for satisfaction of those conditions. The land
development representative(s) may also include staff members from the Planning and Building
Divisions, if necessary. We hope this meeting will facilitate your project and assist in making
your project a success.
Please contact me at (408)866-2158 to arrange a meeting time and to answer any questions.
cc: Michelle Quinney, City Engineer
Frank Cauthorn, Building Official
Sharon Fierro, Senior Planner
11: \landdev /14419ba 1 (mp)
70 North First Street Campbell, California 95008,1423 ' TEL 408,866,2150 ' FAX 408,376,0958 . TDD 408,866,2790
MEMORANDUM
CITY OF CAMPBELL PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT
TO:
Gloria Sciara, Project Planner
DATE: December 21,1998
FROM: Michelle Quinney, City Engineer ;vL , "]
Harold Housley, Land Development EngineerU
~
PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL
Site Address: 14419 Bascom Avenue
For File No(s): S 98-24
Project Description: Application for a new professional office building
Applicant: Greg Benton
Street Improvements: Prior to issuance of any grading, drainage or building permits for
the site, the applicant shall execute a street improvement agreement and shall cause plans
for public street improvements to be prepared by a registered civil engineer, pay fees,
post security and provide insurance necessary to obtain an encroachment permit for
construction of the improvements, as required by the City Engineer. The plans shall
include the following:
a. Removal and disposal of existing concrete depressed curb and one existing substandard
street light.
b. Installation of curb and gutter, 10 foot commercial sidewalk, commercial driveway
approach, and one street light.
c. Installation of street trees, tree wells, and irrigation system at 40 foot on center.
d. Protection and/or replacement of all existing underground utilities, including signal
interconnect conduits, street lighting conduits, and PG&E, PacBell, and TCI facilities.
e. Construction of all conforms necessary to join existing improvements.
f. Installation of traffic control signs and markings, as determined by the City Engineer.
g. Installation of all existing and new water meters and sewer cleanouts on private
property behind the public right-of-way line.
h. Installation of 2 inch asphalt overlay from lip of gutter to street centerline along entire
Bascom A venue footage following utility cuts and installation.
Utilities: All new on-site utilities shall be installed underground per Section 20.36.150 of
the Campbell Municipal Code for any new or remodeled buildings or additions. Applicant
shall comply with all plan submittals, permitting, and fee requirements of the serving
utility company.
Utility Installation Plan: Prior to issuance of building permits, the applicant shall submit
a Utility Installation Plan and Schedule for approval by the City Engineer for installation
of all utilities, Streets which have been resurfaced within the previous 5 years will
require boring and jacking for all new utility installations and will also require a pavement
restoration plan for approval by the City Engineer prior to any utility installation.
Page 1 of 2
PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT COMMENTS AND PRELIMINARY
CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL
Site Address: 14419 Bascom Avenue
For File No(s): S 98-24
Project Description: Application for a new professional office building
Applicant: Greg Benton
Maintenance Security: Prior to issuance of occupancy approval for the site, all public
street improvements required by the street improvement agreement and the encroachment
permit must be completed and accepted by the City and the applicant must provide a one-
year Maintenance Security in an amount of 25 % of the Faithful Performance Bond.
Grading and Drainage Plan: Prior to issuance of any grading, drainage or building
permits for the site, the applicant shall conduct hydrology studies based on a 10 year
storm frequency, prepare an engineered Grading and Drainage Plan, and pay fees
required to obtain necessary grading permits. The plans shall comply with the 1994
edition of the UBC including Chapters 18, 33, and Appendix Chapter 33.
Storm Drain Area Fee: Prior to issuance of any grading, drainage, or building permits
for the site, the applicant shall pay the required Storm Drain Area fee. The current fee is
$ 2,500.00 per acre,
National Pollution Discharge Elimination System: Prior to issuance of any grading,
drainage, or building permits, the applicant shall comply with the NPDES and Title 14 of
the Municipal Code concerning storm water pollution control.
Site Plan: Prior to processing the formal application, the developer must submit a
complete Site Plan, including the information listed on Attachment A of the Site and
Architectural Review application and other appropriate information required by the City
Engineer.
City of San Jose Permit: Any construction within the San Jose city limits will require a
permit from that City.
H: \landdev\ 14419bas( mp )
Page 2 of 2
MEMORANDUM
CITY OF CAMPBELL PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT
TO:
Gloria Sciara, Project Planner DATE: August 24, 1998
Michelle Quinney, City Engineer ~ j;
Harold Housley, Land Development Engineer r
FROM:
PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT COMMENTS AND PRELIMINARY CONDITIONS
OF APPROV AL
Site Address:
For File No(s):
Project Description:
14419 Bascom Avenue
PA 98-57
Pre-application
office use.
Dennis Wong
for a new professional office building-dental
Applicant:
COMMENTS: There is an existing house on the site. The frontage is not improved to current
standards.
Street Improvements: Prior to issuance of any grading, drainage or building permits for
'"
the site, the applicant shall execute a street improvement agreement and shall cause plans
for public street improvements to be prepared by a registered civil engineer, pay fees, post
security and provide insurance necessary to obtain an encroachment permit for
construction of the improvements, as required by the City Engineer. The plans shall
include the following:
a. Removal and disposal of existing concrete depressed curb and one existing substandard
street light.
b. Installation of curb and gutter, 10 foot commercial sidewalk, commercial driveway
approach, and one street light.
c. Installation of street trees, tree wells, and irrigation system at 40 foot on center.
d. Protection and/or replacement of all existing underground utilities, including signal
interconnect conduits, street lighting conduits, and PG&E, PacBell, and TCI facilities.
e. Construction of all conforms necessary to join existing improvements.
f. Installation of traffic control signs and markings, as determined by the City Engineer.
g. Installation of all existing and new water meters and sewer cleanouts on private
property behind the public right-of-way line.
Utilities: All new on-site utilities shall be installed underground per Section 20.36.150 of
the Campbell Municipal Code for any new or remodeled buildings or additions. Applicant
shall comply with all plan submittals, permitting, and fee requirements of the serving
utility company.
Utility Installation Plan: Prior to issuance of building permits, the applicant shall submit a
Utility Installation Plan and Schedule for approval by the City Engineer for installation of
all utilities. Streets which have been resurfaced within the previous 5 years will require
boring and jacking for all new utility installations and will also require a pavement
restoration plan for approval by the City Engineer prior to any utility installation.
Page 1 of 2
PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT COMMENTS AND PRELIMINARY
CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL
Site Address: 14419 Bascom Avenue
For File No(s): PA 98-57
Project Description: Pre-application for a new professional office building-dental
office use.
Applicant: Dennis Wong
Maintenance Security: Prior to issuance of occupancy approval for the site, all public
street improvements required by the street improvement agreement and the encroachment
permit must be completed and accepted by the City and the applicant must provide a one-
year Maintenance Security in an amount of 25 % of the Faithful Performance Bond.
Gradin~ and Drainage Plan: Prior to issuance of any grading, drainage or building
permits for the site, the applicant shall conduct hydrology studies based on a 10 year
storm frequency, prepare an engineered Grading and Drainage Plan, and pay fees required
to obtain necessary grading permits. The plans shall comply with the 1994 edition of the
UBC including Chapters 18, 33, and Appendix Chapter 33.
..<
Storm Drain Area Fee: Prior to issuance of any grading, drainage, or building permits
for the site, the applicant shall pay the required Storm Drain Area fee. The current fee is
$ 2,500.00 per acre.
National Pollution Discharge Elimination System: Prior to issuance of any grading,
drainage, or building permits, the applicant shall comply with the NPDES and Title 14 of
the Municipal Code concerning storm water pollution control.
Site Plan: Prior to processing the formal application, the developer must submit a
complete Site Plan, including the information listed on Attachment A of the Site and
Architectural Review application and other appropriate information required by the City
Engineer.
H: \landdev\ 14419bas(mp)
Page 2 of 2
..-
h~
DEVELOPMENT REVIEW COMMENT SHEET
Distribution: November 16, 1998 ~~
Completeness: Novemb~~ 7.4 /Jlc"&,nJ..-- / f ~ t1
Comments: Wa"tIB98~~, 1998!) ...
Tentative P.e. Date: December 22, 1998
ROUTE TO:
~chitectural or Landscape Advisor
~eDepartment
Police Department
Redevelopment Agency
~gineering
~affic Engineering
Corporation Yard
~ilding Division
PROJECT DESCRIPTION: Site and Architectural Permit application for a two story 4,870 square foot
medical office building at 14419 S. Bascom Avenue.
INFORMATION:
File No: S 98-24
APN: 414-44-005
Applicant: Greg Benton for Dennis Wong
Project Address: 14419 S. Bascom Avenue
ZOhing: Professional Office (pending final ordinance challenge period)
General Plan: Professional Office
PROJECT PLANNER: Gloria Sciara
DEPARTMENTAL RECOMMENDATION:
If it can be determined that this project will require minimal or no comments by your department/agency,
please return this comment sheet with your initials to the Project Planner as soon as possible.
Status
Initial
y.
No Comment
Additional informationlrevisions(see attached)
DEVELOPMENT REVIEW COMMENT SHEET
PRE-APPLICATION
Distribution: August 17, 1998
Comments: August 31, 1998
ROUTE TO:
Architectural Advisor
X Fire Department
Police Department
,~ .._~eg,ev~~().PIIlel}.tAg~ncYnr"
~:(: '0',jLiaD.9oe~~lQPn}~fitEpgi~M
-~ " traffic Engineer
Service Center
X Building Division
Recreation and Community Services
PROJECT DESCRIPTION
Pre-application for a new professional office building- Dental office use.
File No.:
PA 98-57
APN:
414-44-005
Applicant:
Dennis Wong
Property Owner:
same
Project Address:
14419 Bascom Avenue
Zoning:
R-3-S
PROJECT PLANNER:
Gloria Sciara
ENVIRONMENTAL DETERMINATION: NONE AT THIS TIME
DEPARTMENTAL RECOMMENDATION:
If it can be determined that this project will require minimal or no comments by your department/agency,
please return this comment sheet with your initials to the Project Planner as soon as possible.
Status
Ini tial
No Comments
Comments
Additional information/revisions(see attached)
~
CITY OF CAMPBELL
DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC WORKS
ENGINEERING DMSION
1. Date ~- \~_~
2. Site Address: \.4-4\C\ -S-.~~C!:i"-4 ff-..-"-E
3. For File No(s): ~ ~ ~ - <;:,-,
4. Project Description: "-iEo...) ~F-E~\.C':>U 6..L t>~~ L R L~
5. Applicant: f':)Ek...)~\~ ~
6. By: c:..-..~4E..2...
PRELIMINARY PROJECT EVALUATION
'e.E::-s Preliminary Title Report: ~~~ \-1,~ 'l2..l~
p~tr_~~:.~;_~~ ;or~oses: ~ ~nl .~~ 't1~~-
,.. L-l~
'\-t I--:::... Public Service Easement:
1-f' ~ Easements:
l-ff-> Vacation of Public Streets/Easements:
It
'-!~
Street Improvements: f2..e.~ 1'"tOt) ~~ of b~~'-
A. Curbs and Gutters ~ e.:.\'~l.I--lO'-l'E' ~~~k.5~00J
~ ~~~LJ\ l~~) (:~.CiW..:r=-~c:::r~,~ 1::::.-:z...
~ ~ ~\.5.1 'l\;::::t2...
B. Sidewalks ~(?)'U.~;'tD.-l ~."'X"" l t -==:::;~~T~
~ Lt::>~ ~L\::::.-
~~
"/ /'
~ C. Driveway ~c>=,=>~c..:::r ~OMk~L^, L
~ \....(t~~'-1
'-l~
D, Landscape ..P~UT ~~_ ',_::;,j~-::s. (
~C""lC )J-)~ Q~'-.t~:2....1 \~GL
\~~TlO p~ ~C;~~
"=S~~c-~p~ ~~b'='>
Page 1 of 4 :::::.
V".)
" f '
/----- ~ ....~.::::::'\( 'W0\2-\id, ~ ~~ 4 \,4 - 4~-
/' \
/' Ol'= ~~ .~\\~ 'TO ~c.E:
.~&~\Z-\..L 1J~~ --z..u O~~\;2.L-(' \0
~eCJ H <t:-- t
E. Traffic Control
,i-.f6.. _ \ \L 1I ~
'-€c-s;;:... F. Pavement \" 2- \', \t.,L lX C Cit2.J't- ~
~-s G. Asphalt Concrete Overlay t'l-l!. 4 \ 0, & C G~\ "- ) ~,
~~ \ h~ ~t::L- lYrlLl~ '
-- , \~~~~Tt~'
~ H. Seal Coat
'-t~s I. StreetLights tz...E=HO\CE- ~~~~~\
l~:::::.-VVt --L '~-::;~\ ~ ~PE \-<:;:'
~~L'--fr-=::.~ l~ \-\.~.,- ! (' I :: ,'r,
J. Other
Traffic Mitigation:
~ Utilities: uL)t::::)a~( ~~ OT, L....t-r-L~,
~~ ~~~~l ~ .~E\~
C~~ ~~L:)~ tL\-.
~ Utility Installation Plan: ~~\. k..)~\ ~~
~ Maintenapce Security:
Ub Coordination with Capital Improvement/Other Projects:
~ Grading and Drainage Plan:
'-l ~ Drainage System: H,J~,,--rh \..........\._
~ StormDrainAreaFee:~~~~ c......
'--Ce~ National Pollution Discharge Elimination System:
Page 2 of 4
i----D Santa Clara Vallev Water District:
.~ Tentative Parcel Map:
~ Parcel Map:
'W~ Tentative Map:
W& Final Map:
~ ~ Monuments:
1-(l'b.- Conditions. Covenants. and Restrictions:
U~ Demolition:
Wf:::::, Reapportionment of Assessments:
'~ Lot Line Ad1ustment:
U& Certificate of Compliance:
'W'b Vacation of Excess Right-of-Way:
~~ Reimbursements:
W~ Plan Lines:
~s. Legal Lot:
Page 3 of 4
.~~SitePlan:\Q:Ib~ \~S
WDT c:::::c::> t-.t c..~- . \ ".
~ ~ ~~ 'PE.t2- l-r'-f Lt . - :Tl.::iJ --.
C\-t'-( Olz::.- Crc~~eLL (erN 0\2.., C;:-~ ~ae>~
<!-L""t"-1 L\ VV\...LT-~Ll ~ ~ \~ ~ I C) C4- ..
~T"Ot2..\'-./\ \:::;>~\~ ~'--tC"':=;.'\'e- ~ l~
C2.-\.:"\';( o~ ~ ';)~~
~L~-s... ~ L:rT\.L-\" Tl C::::-~ ~~
~~~r::::::..""TCl ~""C=- ~~~~ f4L.D Vl
L "'t""''"'\-.. C!:\ F- ~ cJ C!::J -;; t=-
J :\FORMS\PRELPROJ
Rev. 8/4/98
Page 4 of 4
RESIDENTIAL HOUSING
86.04
~ ,......--.-..-.-.-.-..-...-...- ~..lANDSCAPEAAEA._m_m_~..~.._...__.~Imm_..!
;v = ~'
~ ~~
~ ~O
~ ~~
};:
z
o
~
o
)>
"'U
m
~
^
z
(j)
~
9 0
0
-
--'
-0
en ~
O=i
)>m
::;:;)>
......z
::::0
0-
'(j)
~~
'0
q-
'z
(j)
"'U
s;
Z
"
/tvlt;~ <
~~
~=<
~
)>
\J
tQ
~ ~
~ =i
~ m
lQ
~
""'9'L.,
<<'
cno
~~
m m en
:-:I ..
-i
(J) m
0
I '-I 1J
~ ~
. ex>
--
-.0 Z
ex>
....
(]1
q
I
en
=
U>
~
;v
m
m
~
0
m
Z
~
m
;v
....
'" "..
'"
....
'"
Z ....
cD
-i
:r:
^'
m
<
en
o
Z
en
~
("")
o
Zz
enO
-1-1
:::0
C:"'T1
("")0
-I :::0
o
Z
-u
en:::O
-m
-II"
m-
-uS::
I" Z
)>)>
Z:::o
-<
I'V
1\.:2~
~~
~~
~PJ
~
o
~
(j)
m
I'V
o
,-
q
17: ~92~
Jj ~p~
.... ....
.
:....................... .:
0-
I'V
-0
;v~
m~
~::;c
00
<c
m~
om
};:
z
o
~
o
)>
"'U
m
~
m
)>.
o
~
~
(j)
m
:g~
mo
)>U>
o
)>
"'U
m
SOu~
<9-<1~
00
~ -<1l--1
(<''1tu~
.... J'~
'" ~~)'
.... 0~-1;,
" ~I,)
.... <~~
"
....
oo)>oen-ooo.<DsJ
::J <D< ~ <D 16 0 ~o~ ffi 3 en-
0. en o::J -- 0-
<. <D -+~:::::j.; en co::J CO 0 ~
< 0 0 0 -- 0 ::J rro
::J: -0 ~ -0 8 ::J CD ~ -- ~
o 3 :::!. -+ rr 3 <D_.
::J CD -. en ::J
~ mo -+ g ~ cico
<D =t. ~ en or <D
~en "<<. .. 0
CD~ -+< en
-+ O::J ..
0. 0
::J
"'U
o
OJ
C
~
o
z
(j)
~
~~
("")co~o
)>en-m
~o("")z
-Uc:)>Z
OJ-fl"en
m::I: OJ <
I" C:c:::::
I"OJ-O
- I"
(""))>OZ
)>en_(j)
("") z
o G)
~
~
~
~
~
~
~(i' :'0
\ff:~_~~]
CJ)
o
c
-t
:L
---l~
Ii ~
II>
~
I\)
II>
(7)
~ ~
Pi"
^ 3: "'
~ ':b! I ::
~~(JJ""
~ frl.t;>
~ II
I
I
~oO\l' 1. " ;
()Y>~I !.I, : #.
~ I~I
~ \ 48' \
....... 0\
~ ;::-.,
.......
~
I\'i
'~
-
~
v
'"Y1
~
k
~
I
r
(;)
~
!=1
-
--
'\ .:\.. ':,
,~- ""t ~
'.....
.()Y>
o
"-
r
,
\
......
. .'
.' .
.
... 0
".
"' I\)
'0 0
lit
-0
o
r
1>
~'''cJ>
10) \ ~ I...
"", (
ot-i; '~
,
, .fb""
..) ,C!l
~. J~
.....
. ,
.....~\
z.,
~
/-<
!
I
'.
)>
en
VI
/TI
r
@^'
~i
~1~
.
. .
.' . .
:.' "
'.,: : .
. , .
','
'-'
::0
tD
)>
CJ)
(")
o
(f)
)>
Z
-l
)>
n
r-
)>
::0
)>
n
0
, c
O!:
-.oj
-<
Cl
1>-
r
"'1
0
::0
Z
)>
J~
.'.
. ....1.
. .'
", .
. .'
'". .
. .
," .
. .
. . ,,-.
. :.
... 0
" II>
"',
... .
00 II>
~,
,&~ ~,
"'G
r.O
~"
(.01
:VI
~ I~
:(liS ....)
~\(\
~i
U)!e ~
CXi 0
~\
~
."
OJ,
....
1t5
o ""0
Ul 0
to r
)>
o
\.i,'~"'r.1.
/-
~~. ~
~
.~
./
~'
.
~lJ)
o
~~
I
-E9
I
-0
~)>
U1~
/TI
l