PC Res 3069RESOLUTION NO. 3069
BEING A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION
OF THE CITY OF CAMPBELL DENYING A VARIANCE TO
ALLOW A REDUCED FRONT LOT WIDTH FROM THE
REQUIRED 60 FEET TO 58 FEET AND A REDUCED
DRIVEWAY WIDTH TO THE REAR OF THE FLAG LOT FROM
15 FEET TO 12 FEET ON PROPERTY LOCATED AT 1180 W.
LATIMER AVENUE IN AN R-l-6 (SINGLE FAMILY
RESIENTIAL) ZONING DISTRICT. APPLICATION OF MR.
OMID SHAKERI. FILE NO. V 96-02.
After notification and public hearing, as specified by law, and after presentation by the
Community Development Director, proponents and opponents, the hearing was closed.
After due consideration of all evidence presented, the Planning Commission did find as
follows with respect to application V 96-02:
1. The present lot can be developed with two standard sized residential units without a
variance just as similar sized lots in the neighborhood with the same zoning.
2. The dimensions of the lot were self imposed by the prior owner of the parcel.
Based upon the foregoing findings of fact, the Planning Commission further finds and
concludes that the evidence does not demonstrate the following findings:
Strict or literal interpretation in enforcement of the specified regulation would result
in practical difficulty or unnecessary hardship inconsistent with the objectives of the
Zoning Ordinance.
There are exceptional or extraordinary circumstances or conditions applicable to the
property involved or to the intended use of the property which do not apply
generally to other properties classified in the same zoning district.
Strict or literal interpretation in enforcement of the
deprive the applicants of privileges enjoyed by the
classified in the same zoning district.
specified regulation would
owners of other properties
Planning Commission Resolution No. 3069
V 96-02 - 1180 W. Latimer Avenue
Page 2
The granting of the variance will not constitute a grant of special privilege
inconsistent with the limitation on other properties classified in the same zoning
district.
o
Granting of the variance will not be detrimental to the public health, safety, peace,
morals, comfort or general welfare of persons residing or working in the
neighborhood of such proposed use, or be detrimental or injurious to property and
improvement in the vicinity.
PASSED AND ADOPTED this 14th day of January, 1997, by the following roll call vote:
AYES: Commissioners: Alne, Gibbons,
Meyer-Kennedy
NOES: Commissioners: None
ABSENT: Commissioners: None
ABSTAIN: Commissioners: None
APPROVED:
ATTEST '
Steve l-'lasecK1, ~ecretary
Jones, Keams, Lindstrom, Lowe,
Sfisan Keams, Chair