CC Resolution 11159RESOLUTION NO. 11159
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF CAMPBELL
AUTHORIZING THE PUBLIC WORKS DIRECTOR TO SUBMIT AN APPLICATION
FOR FISCAL YEAR 2010/11 TRANSPORTATION DEVELOPMENT ACT (TDA)
FUNDS FOR THE HARRIET AVENUE/McCOY AVENUE
ENHANCED CROSSWALK PROJECT
WHEREAS, the City of Campbell has been awarded $18,583 in TDA Article 3
guaranteed funds for Fiscal Year 2010/11; and
WHEREAS, staff recommends submitting a TDA Article 3 grant application for the
Harriet Avenue/McCoy Avenue Enhanced Crosswalk Project for $18,583; and
WHEREAS, the Harriet Avenue/McCoy Avenue Enhanced Crosswalk Project would
install pedestrian-activated flashing beacons, LED signs, and a spot median island at
the Harriet Avenue/McCoy Avenue intersection; and
WHEREAS, members of the Campbell Bicycle Advisory Committee endorse the Harriet
Avenue/McCoy Avenue Enhanced Crosswalk Project; and
WHEREAS, the ability to obtain funding approval requires City Council endorsement of
the project; and
WHEREAS, the Metropolitan Transportation Commission (MTC) requires the City of
Campbell to use language from MTC's Model Governing Body Resolution in this
resolution to obtain MTC's funding approval; and
WHEREAS, MTC requires an Attachment A, "Findings", and an Attachment B, "Project
Application"; and
WHEREAS, Article 3 of the Transportation Development Act (TDA), Public Utilities
Code (PUC) Section 99200 et seq., authorizes the submission of claims to a regional
transportation planning agency for the funding of projects exclusively for the benefit
and/or use of pedestrians and bicyclists; and
WHEREAS, the Metropolitan Transportation Commission (MTC), as the regional
transportation planning agency for the San Francisco Bay region, has adopted MTC
Resolution No. 875, Revised, entitled "Transportation Development Act, Article 3,
Pedestrian/Bicycle Projects," which delineates procedures and criteria for submission of
requests for the allocation of "TDA Article 3" funding; and
WHEREAS, MTC Resolution No. 875, Revised requires that requests for the allocation
of TDA Article 3 funding be submitted as part of a single, countywide coordinated claim
from each county in the San Francisco Bay region; and
WHEREAS, the City of Campbell desires to submit a request to MTC for the allocation
of TDA Article 3 funds to support the projects described in Attachment B to this
resolution, which are for the exclusive benefit and/or use of pedestrians and/or
bicyclists.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of Campbell
that the Public Works Director is hereby authorized to submit a TDA grant application
for Fiscal Year 2010/11 to the Valley Transportation Authority to obtain $18,583 in TDA
guaranteed funds for the Harriet Avenue/McCoy Avenue Enhanced Crosswalk Project;
BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of Campbell that the City
of Campbell declares it is eligible to request an allocation of TDA Article 3 funds
pursuant to Section 99234 of the Public Utilities Code;
BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of Campbell that there is
no pending or threatened litigation that might adversely affect the project described in
Attachment B to this resolution, or that might impair the ability of the City of Campbell to
carry out the project;
BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of Campbell that the City
of Campbell attests to the accuracy of and approves the statements in Attachment A to
this resolution;
BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of Campbell that the City
of Campbell shall forward a certified copy of this resolution and its attachments, and
any accompanying supporting materials to the Santa Clara County Congestion
Management Agency for submission to MTC as part of the countywide coordinated
TDA Article 3 claim.
PASSED AND ADOPTED this 18th day of May, 2010, by the following roll call vote:
AYES: COUNCILMEMBERS:
NOES: COUNCILMEMBERS
ABSENT: COUNCILMEMBERS:
Att t:
nne Bybee, City Clerk
Kotowski, Kennedy, Furtado,,Bakex, Low
None
None
APPROVED: ; ~~
1~~
Evan D. Low, Mayor
Resolution No. 11159
Attachment A
Re: Request to the Metropolitan Transportation Commission for the Allocation of Fiscal Year 2010/11
Transportation Development Act Article 3 Pedestrian/Bicycle Project Funding
Findings
Page 1 of 1
That the t:~"itav r~l" ~ s '1 is not legally impeded from submitting a request to the Metropolitan Transportation
Commission for the allocation of Transportation Development Act (TDA) Article 3 funds, nor is the ~. ~' _, .
(~"aml~bell legally impeded from undertaking the project(s) described in "Attachment B" of this resolution.
2. That the C"itr ~ ~ 11 has committed adequate staffing resources to complete the project(s) described in
Attachment B.
A review of the project(s) described in Attachment B has resulted in the consideration of all pertinent matters,
including those related to environmental and right-of-way permits and clearances, attendant to the successful
completion of the project(s).
4. Issues attendant to securing environmental and right-of-way permits and clearances for the projects described in
Attachment B have been reviewed and will be concluded in a manner and on a schedule that will not jeopardize
the deadline for the use of the TDA funds being requested.
5. That the project(s) described in Attachment B comply with the requirements of the California Environmental
Quality Act (CEQA, Public Resources Code Sections 21000 et seq.).
6. That as portrayed in the budgetary description(s) of the project(s) in Attachment B, the sources of funding other
than TDA are assured and adequate for completion of the project(s).
That the project(s) described in Attachment B are for capital construction and/or design engineering; and/or for
the maintenance of a Class I bikeway which is closed to motorized traffic; and/or for the purposes of restriping
Class II bicycle lanes; and/or for the development or support of a bicycle safety education program; and/or for
the development of a comprehensive bicycle and/or pedestrian facilities plan, and an allocation of TDA Article
3 funding for such a plan has not been received by the ~~= l within the prior five fiscal years.
8. That the project(s) described in Attachment B which are bicycle projects have been included in a detailed
bicycle circulation element included in an adopted general plan, or included in an adopted comprehensive
bikeway plan (such as outlined in Section 2377 of the California Bikeways Act, Streets and Highways Code
section 2370 et seg.).
9. That any project described in Attachment B that is a "Class I Bikeway," meets the mandatory minimum safety
design criteria published in Chapter 1000 of the California Highway Design Manual.
10. That the project(s) described in Attachment B are ready to commence implementation during the fiscal year of
the requested allocation.
11. That the t`itr ~sl' ~ ~ ~ -~~s agrees to maintain, or provide for the maintenance of, the project(s) and facilities
described in Attachment B, for the benefit of and use by the public.
MTC Programming and Allocations Section April 2005 TDA Article 3 Model Resolution Page 4
Resolution No. 11159
Attachment B
Page 1 of 1
TDA Article 3 Project Application Form
Fiscal Year of this Claim: 2010/11 Applicant: City of Campbell
Contact person: Matthew Jue
Mailing Address: 70 North First Street, Campbell, CA 95008
E-Mail Address: matthewiC~citvofcampbell.com Telephone: 408-866-2154
Secondary Contact (in event primary not available): Robert Kass
E-Mail Address: bobk@citvofcampbell.com Telephone: 408-866-2150
Short Title Description of Proiect: Harriet Ave/McCov Ave Enhanced Crosswalk Proiect
Amount of claim: $18,583
Functional Description of Project:
Design and construct flashing beacon system and spot median island at Harriet Ave/McCov Ave intersection
Financial Plan:
List the project elements for which TDA funding is being requested (e.g., planning, environmental, engineering, right-of-way, construction,
inspection, contingency, audit). Use the table below to show the project budget. Include prior and proposed future funding of the project. If the
project is a segment of a larger project, include prior and proposed funding sources for the other segments.
Proiect Elements: Environmental, engineering, construction, construction engineerin4, inspection, contingency
Fundin Source All Prior FYs A lication FY Next FY Followin FYs Totals
TDA Article 3 $18,583 G $18,583
list all other sources:
1. CIPR $30,000 $30,000
2.
3.
4.
Totals $48,583 $48,583
Project Eligibility: YES?/NO?
A. Has the project been approved by the claimant's governing body? (If "N0," provide the approximate date approval is
anticipated). Anticipated Council approval date is 5/18/10 NO
B. Has this project previously received TDA Article 3 funding? If "YES," provide an explanation on a separate page. NO
C. For "bikeways," does the project meet Caltrans minimum safety design criteria pursuant to Chapter 1000 of the California
Highway Design Manual? (Available on the Internet via: http://www.dot.ca.gov). N/A
D. Has the project been reviewed by a Bicycle Advisory Committee? (If "N0," provide an explanation). YES
E. Has the public availability of the environmental compliance documentation for the project (pursuant to CEQA) been
evidenced by the dated stamping of the document by the county clerk or county recorder? (required only for projects that
include construction). Environmental documentation is currently under review. NO
F. Will the project be completed before the allocation expires? Enter the anticipated completion date of project (month and
year) August 2010 YES
G. Have provisions been made by the claimant to maintain the project or facility, or has the claimant arranged for such
maintenance by another agency? (If an agency other than the Claimant is to maintain the facility provide its name:
1 YES
MTC Programming and Allocations Section April 2005 TDA Article 3 Model Resolution Page 5
O` ' ~
Z ~ooooooo~~~
a ~ oa ~
° DooDo T
Z
~~ o o
o
D ~>
end woo e ~ ~ H-
(~
uoiun W
~~o ~ O 3
~ ~ o ~~ ~ ~ ~
~~~~ ~ O ~~ ~~ ~ 0 a
~oooo ~~~Q ~ '~ 0 <~0
~o aooo ~ ti ~ ~ a o
o ooomae so
o° ° ooo~om ''~~ Soy o
~0 r~ o~~ ooh
PnlB ae~seyo ~ ~ D° ~ o
~~ 0 L
~ ~
00 ~ a
~DO ~ ~~ a
o -
d San omas xy ~0 0
W ~--- ~ o ~ ~~ ADD L
~ ~ ~~ ^ o ~~ o ~~
Z W ~ ~~0 ~ [~ ®I o
W ~ ooa~ o ~~ ~~ ~
~o o ~ m
Q ~ o o~ ^ ~ -
o ~ o~~ ~ 3
,V
Y ~ ~ >
~ ~ ° a ~ o ~ oa~ Y[
a ~ o0 0 .~
oo ~ o
a c
W~ o~ o o~
O
W ~ °o ~~a a ,e ~ o
~~ ~ o ~ o
~ v Pa ou nb S ^~ C~ O ~
Q a~
~ = 0
aZ a ~ ~
= w 0 ~~~ w o
D ~ o
O ~ ~0
O V
V ; r ;
a~
~ ~ ~
M
'D
Z
-: a
F H
z Z
Q
C _
V ~
W
a
W '~
m F
~ d
Z
N
W
Q
J Z
W
W
Z
Z
O
a
0
J
W
J
0
d
3
W
Z
11
O
v
~3
E
v
N
t
t