CC Resolution 11336RESOLUTION NO. 11336
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF CAMPBELL
ASSURING THE SANTA CLARA VALLEY TRANSPORTATION AUTHORITY (VTA)
AND METROPOLITAN TRANSPORTATION COMMISSION (MTC) THAT THE CITY
OF CAMPBELL WILL COMPLETE THE HACIENDA AVENUE IMPROVEMENT
PROJECT UNDER THE VTA'S COMMUNITY DESIGN FOR TRANSPORTATION
(CDT) PROGRAM
WHEREAS, the City of Campbell (herein referred to as "APPLICANT") is submitting an
application to the Metropolitan Transportation Commission (MTC) for $544,000 in
funding from the 2012 Regional Transportation Improvement Program (RTIP) for the
Hacienda Avenue Improvement Project (herein referred to as "PROJECT" or
"PROJECTS") for the MTC 2012 RTIP, as authorized by MTC by Resolution No. 4028
(herein referred to as "PROGRAM"); and
WHEREAS, SB 45 (Chapter 622, Statutes 1997) substantially revised the process for
estimating the amount of state and federal funds available for transportation projects in
the state and for appropriating and allocating the available funds to these projects; and
WHEREAS, as part of that process, MTC is responsible for programming projects
eligible for Regional Improvement Program funds, pursuant to California Government
Code Section 14527(b), for inclusion in the RTIP, and submission to the California
Transportation Commission, for inclusion in the State Transportation Improvement
Program; and
WHEREAS, MTC will review and include, if approved, 2012 RTIP projects in the federal
Transportation Improvement Program (TIP); and
WHEREAS, MTC has requested eligible transportation project sponsors to submit
applications nominating projects to be programmed for Regional Improvement Program
funds in the RTIP; and
WHEREAS, applications to MTC must be submitted consistent with procedures,
conditions, and forms it provides transportation project sponsors; and
WHEREAS, APPLICANT is a sponsor of transportation projects eligible for Regional
Improvement Program funds; and
WHEREAS, the RTIP Project Programming Request (PPR) form of the project
application, attached hereto (Exhibit A) and incorporated herein as though set forth at
length, lists the project, purpose, schedule and budget for which APPLICANT is
requesting that MTC program Regional Improvement Program funds for inclusion in the
RTIP; and
BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED, that there is no pending or threatened litigation which
might in any way adversely affect the proposed PROJECT, or the ability of APPLICANT
to deliver such PROJECT; and
BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED, that APPLICANT authorizes its Executive Director,
General Manager, or designee to execute and file an application with MTC to program
Regional Improvement Program funds into the RTIP, for the projects, purposes and
amounts included in the project application attached to this resolution; and
BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED, that a copy of this resolution shall be transmitted to MTC
in conjunction with the filing of the APPLICANT application referenced herein, along
with the name and contact information for the APPLICANT's single point of contact.
PASSED AND ADOPTED this 18h day of October, 2011, by the following roll call vote:
AYES: COUNCILMEMBERS: Waterman, Low, Cristina, xotowski, Baker
NOES: COUNCILMEMBERS None
ABSENT: COUNCILMEMBERS: None
APPROVED:
ason T. Baker, Mayor
ATT T'
e Bybee, City Clerk
STATE OF CALIFORNIA • DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
PROJECT PROGRAMMING REQUEST
DTP-0001 (REV. 6/11)
Exhibit A
narP•
District Count Route EA" Pro'ect ID PPNO TCRP No.
04 SCL Hacienda Av.
Project Title: Hacienda Avenue Improvement Project
Proposed Total Project Cost Notes
Component Prior 12/13 13/14 14/15 15/16 16/17 17/18+ Total
E&P (PA&ED)
PS&E
R/W SUP (CT)
CON SUP (CT)
R/W
CON 680,000 680,000
TOTAL 680,000 680;000
Fund No. 1: RTIP TE Program Code
Proposed Funding
Component Prior 12/13 13/14 14/15 15/16 16/17 17/18+ Total Funding Agency
E&P (PA&ED)
PS&E
-
----
R/W SUP (CT)
CON SUP (CT)
R/W
CON 544,000 544,000
TOTAL 544,000 544;000
Fund No. 2: City funds Program Code
Proposed Funding
Component Prior 12/13 13/14 14/15 15/16 16/17 17/18+ Total Funding Agency
E&P (PA&ED)
- - City of Campbell
PS&E
R/W SUP (CT)
_ . -
- - --
------
CON SUP (CT)
R/W
CON
TOTAL
Fund No. 3: Program Code
Proposed Funding
Component Prior 12/13 13/14 14/15 15/16 16/17 17/18+ Total Funding Agency
E&P (PA&ED)
- -- -
-----
PS&E ---
R/W SUP (CT)
CON SUP (CT)
R/W
CON 136,000 136,000
TOTAL 1.36,000 ' 136,000
1 of 2
STATE OF CALIFORNIA ~ DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
PROJECT PROGRAMMING REQUEST
DTP-0001 (REV. 6/11)
nara•
District Count Route EA Pro'ecY ID PPNO TCRP No.
04 SCL Hacienda Av.
Project Title: Hacienda Avenue Improvement Project
Fund No. 4: Program Code
Proposed Funding
Component Prior 12/13 13/14 14/15 15/16 16/17 17/18+ Total Funding Agency
E&P (PA&ED)
PS&E ~ --
R/W SUP (CT)
CON SUP (CT)
R/W
CON
TOTAL
Fund No. 5: Program Code
Proposed Funding
Component Prior 12/13 13/14 14/15 15/16 16/17 17/18+ Total Funding Agency
E&P (PA&ED)
PS&E
R/W SUP (CT)
CON SUP (CT)
R/W --
CON
TOTAL
Fund No. 6: Program Code
Proposed Funding
Component Prior 12/13 13/14 14/15 15/16 16/17 17/18+ Total Funding Agency
E&P (PA&ED)
PS&E
R/W SUP (CT)
CON SUP (CT)
R/W
CON
TOTAL
Fund No. 7: Program Code
Proposed Funding
Component Prior 12/13 13/14 14/15 15/16 16/17 17/18+ Total Funding Agency
E&P (PA&ED)
PS&E
R/W SUP (CT)
CON SUP (CT)
R/W
CON
TOTAL '
2 of 2
Exhibit B
RTIP Project Application
Part 2: Certification of Assurances
The implementing agency certifies that the project for which Regional Improvement Program funding is
requested meets the following project screening Criteria. Please initial each.
I. The project is eligible for consideration in the RTIP. Pursuant to Streets and Highways Code Section
164 (e), eligible projects include improving state highways, local roads, public transit, intercity rail,
pedestrian, and bicycle facilities, anal grade separation, transportation system management,
transportation demand management, soundwal] projects, iutermodal facilities, and safety.
2. For the funds requested, no costs have/will be incurred prior to adoption into the STIP by the C C.
3. A Project Study Report (PSR) or PSR equivalent has been prepared for the project. _ ~7~..
4. The project budget included in Part 2 of the project application reflects current costs updated as of the
date of application and escalated to the appropriate year. ~_
5. The project is included in a local congestion management program (CMP). (Note: For those counties
that have opted out of preparing a CMP in accordance with Govermnent Code Section 65088.3, the
project must be consistent with the capital improvement program adopted pursuant to MTC's funding
agreement with the countywide transportation planning agency.) ~j~Q....
6. The year of funding for any design, right-o~f way and/or construction phases has taken into
consideration the time necessa-y to obtain environmental clearance and permitting approval for the
project. _J~ Q..._ 7y~ ~,
7. The project is fully funded. _~_
8. For projects with STIP federal funds, the implementing agency agrees to contact Caatrans and
schedule and complete a field review within six months of the project being adopted or amended into
the TIP. ~yy7~-
9. For STIP construction funds, the implementing agency agrees to send a copy of the Caltrans LPP 01-
06 "Award Information for STIP Projects -Attachment A" to MTC and the CMA, upon award.
~~
10. The implementing agency agrees to be available for an audit of STIP funds, if requested. _ ~„(~-
The implementing agency also agrees to abide by all statutes, rules and regulations applying to the State
Transportation Improvement Prograu~ (STIP), and to follow all requirements associated with the funds
programmed to the project in the STIP.
These include, but are not limited to:
1. 1/nvironmental requirements: N>JPA standards and procedures for all projects with Federal funds;
CEQA standards and procedures for all projects programmed with State funds.
2. California Transportation Commission (CTC) requirements for transit projects, formerly associated
with the Transit Capital Improvement (TCI) program. These include rules governing right-of--way
acquisition, hazardous materials testing, and timely use of funds.
3. Federal Transit Administration (PTA) requirements for transit projects as outlu7ed in PTA regulations
and circulars.
4. ,Federal Highway Administration (FHWA) anal Caltrans require-l~ents for highway and other roadway
projects as outlined in the Caltrans Local Programs Manual.
5. Fede-•al air quality conformity requirements, and local project review requirements, as outlined in
the adopted Bay Area Conformity Revision of the State Implementation Plan (SIP).