CC Resolution 8379
RESOLUTION NO. 8379
BEING A RESOLUTION APPROVING GRANT APPLICATION --
BAY AREA AIR QUALITY MANAGEMENT DISTRICT -- AB 434 FUNDS
WHEREAS, the City Engineer presented a grant application for AB
434 funds for the Hamilton Interconnect Extension Project, a
combination of Projects 91-17 and 91-18, to the City Council for
approval.
NOW, BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council that the City Engineer is
hereby authorized to apply for the AB 434 funding for the
Hamilton Interconnect Extension Project, Projects 91-17 and 91-
18, in accordance with the attached application.
PASSED AND ADOPTED this 15th day of September
following roll call vote:
, 1992, by the
AYES:
Councilmembers
Kotowski, Conant, Ashworth, Watson, Burr
NOES:
Councilmembers
None
ABSENT:
Councilmembers
None
APPROVED:
~-~
~0,~
- - aId R. Burr, Mayor
--
ATTEST:
j
r;~~~<:?>:::<::r::?:>:::::))):((?:)~((:~:{>>::::}:}:::::):(}:{> ./:<.<.... . ..... :.......::>:... . .. . .... .< ..'.: ... .:....' '.. :.?.:./::
....,.". ,...., .... ,.... ...". '........................, ,..................A843.4.FUNDING..APPLlCATtON....... ......
:}:}::::::}::::::}::::}:::{:\::::{{:::}::::::::::}}}};:::}:=:::::::::::::;::::}<..:<.. .... '.', .,'< '.' ". . .,.... . ...', '. :>:<' ....
"... . .
..--..,...................
........................... .
. - . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . , .
..:' ,......... ::;)'/.::!:::::!::::::::~::!!::::::~i~!:::!::::!::!!i:::::!!..}
I
Agency Name:
City of Campbell. PUblic Works
Contact Person:
Address:
Ph 0 n e No.: (...4.Q.,B)..a.n.fi. - ? 1 h 1
T. Jessv Pu
70 North First St.
Campbell, CA 95008
II PROJECT DESCRIPTION
Hamilton Interconnect Extension.
Please see the attached.
III INFORMATION FOR ESTIMATING EMISSIONS REDUCTION (see instructions)
please see the attached.
(Additional pages can be attached)
IV FUNDING
AS 434 Funding (requested) $ 70 rOO 0 00
Other Funding $ 10.000 00
$
$
$
Total $ 80,000.00
Source:
riry nf r~mphpll
V OTHER (Attach documentation for each "yes" response.)
Will the proposed project be widely used or seen by the public?
Is this the first time a project of this type has been proposed
for implementation in the Bay Area?
Does proposed project have the potential for broad application of results?
Is proposed project consistent with County Congestion Management Program?
Does the proposed project help implement an unfunded or underfunded "Federal" TCM?
Is the proposed project a Public/Private Partnership?
Does the proposed project include the involvement of MBE/WBE?
Does your agency have pOlicies demonstrating a Clean Air Planning Commitment?
Is a copy of resolution from Governing Board authOrizing this application attached?
Resolution to be passed by the City Council on Sept.15,
BAAOMD
AB 434 Funding Application
Yes No
..x. -
- L
..x. -
..x. -
- L
- .x...
- .x....
-X -
- .L
92.
Program Year 1992-93
II. PROJECT DESCRIPTION
This project, "Hamilton Interconnect Extension," is to interconnect
four city traffic signals on Hamilton Avenue to be included in the
existing Hamilton Interconnect System and to interconnect with the
Santa Clara County intersection of San Tomas Expressway (STEX) at
Hamilton Avenue.
Work in this project includes design and installation of traffic
signal interconnect conduits and cables on Hamilton Avenue from the
Winchester Blvd intersection, through the Carlyn Avenue School
crossing signal, through the Llewellyn Avenue intersection, through
the STEX intersection, and to the Darryl Drive intersection. See
the attached sketch for details of project locations.
The objectives of this interconnection are: 1) to coordinate
traffic signals on Hamilton Avenue between the City's and County's
traffic signals to reduce current high percentages of stops at
Hamilton Avenue and STEX; 2) to coordinate signal timing with the
existing Hamilton Interconnect System which extends easterly from
Winchester Blvd to April Way intersection.
proiect Schedule
The design of this project is being initiated by the city. The
schedule of this project indicates the design completion date by
November 6, 1992. If the BAAQMD funding is approved at or before
that time, the current schedule is to advertise for bids in
December 1992, award contract in February 1993, and complete the
construction by April 1993. Please see the attached project
schedule.
III. INFORMATION FOR ESTIMATING EMISSIONS REDUCTION
1. Roadway length to be interconnected = 3800 feet.
2. Average daily traffic = 33,000 vehicles per 24-hour.
3. Existing average speed = 20 mph
Estimated future average speed = 23 mph
4. Existing emission factor, Predicted emission factor,
CO = 25.85 CO = 23
HC = 2.08 HC = 1.84
NOx = 1.88 NOx = 1.82
5&6. Existing emissions, Predicted emissions,
CO = 613,940 CO = 546,250
HC = 49,400 HC = 43,700
NOx = 44,650 NOx = 43,225
7. Emission reductions = 74,815 grams per day
= 0.082 tons per day
= 30.07 tons per year
8. Estimated total project cost = $80,000
Cost effectiveness = $80,000/44.3 = $2660/ton/year
V. OTHER
1. will the proposed proj ect be widely used or seen by the
public?
Yes. This project is located at one of the major arterials in
the city and crossing one of the major expressways in the
County. Approximately 41 to 60 percent of the City's
population drive through this project location. The project
will be described in the City's quarterly newspaper mailed to
all Campbell residents and merchants.
2. Does proposed project have the potential for broad application
of results?
Yes. Almost every city in the Santa Clara County has arterial
streets crossing county expressways. The traffic signals on
the expressways are usually coordinated for the traffic flow
on the expressways only. Traffic to and from the crossing
streets has high percentages of stopping rates at the County
signals. This project is designed to minimize this situation
by interconnecting city signals with the County signal. The
city signal controllers can be programmed to respond to the
electronic pulse from the County signal controller and provide
green progression for traffic on the city street.
3. Is proposed project consistent with County Congestion
Management Program?
Yes. This project is designed to improve traffic flow and
reduce congestion, stops, delay, and fuel consumption without
physically widening the roadway.
4. Does your agency have policies demonstrating a Clean Air
Planning Commitment?
Yes. The City of Campbell adopted an air quality element in
its general plan on June 8, 1987. See the attached copy of
the air quality element.
5. Is a copy of resolution from Governing Board authorizing this
application attached?
No. But the resolution is to be passed by Council on
September 15, 1992.
PROJECT LOCATION
t
/
/
/
!!I
~
~<".
~
t
!
is
[;j
....
"ceo AYe""
Legend
- ~I.uurw
CJ.oII-.!
a.. I c..n.tor
a... II ~
CAIIPIIl8.DlIQ
BAR CHART SCHEDULE FOR HAMILTON INTERCONNECT" & 111_ PROJECT NO. 721.9118/9119.4883
PREPARED BY: TJP 7/1/92 (TO BECOME 730.9118/9119.4883)
TASKS JUL AUG SEP OCT NOV DEC JAN FEe MAR APR MAY
7/20
SCOPESIISSUES I IMI I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I
8/11
MEETING AGENCIES I I I IiI I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I
8/18 9/8
PS&E 500/0 I I I I hlstlf I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I
9/22
PS&E REVIEW I I I I I I W..'.{:I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I J I I I I , I I I
10/6
PS&E 95% I I I I I I I I wrlrJ I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I
10/2(
PS&E REVIEW I I I J J I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I
1C 27
PS&E 100% I I I I I I I I I I I 1M I I I I I I I I I I I I I J I I I I I I I
11/3
FINAL REVIEW I I I I I I I I I I I I Ail I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I
11/6
CITY ENGINEER APRV I I I , I I I I I I I I b1:l I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I
11/6
ENCROACH PERMITS I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I , I I I I I I
11/6
PREP. COUNCIL REP I I I I I I I I I , I mE. I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I
.. TJP VACATION .. I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I , I I I I I I I I I ,
12/7
COUNCIL APRV PROJ I I , I I I I I I I I I III~ I I I I , I I I I I I I I I I
. 1212:
NOTICE FOR BIDS I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I
1211
PREBID MEETING I I I , , I 1 I I I I , I I I J I I I I I I I I I I I I I'i,-
1/11
BIDS OPENING I I I I I I I I , I I I I I I I I I fl*{l I I I I I J I I I I I I I
PREPARE COUNCIL REP , I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I 1'*100,1 I I I I I I I , I I I I
COUNCIL AWARD PROJ I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I
PRECONSTR MEETING , I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I Nt IJ I I I I I I I
CONTRACT SIGNED I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I WH I I I I I I I I
NOTICE TO PROCEED I I , ! , I I I I I , I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I
CONSTRUCTION I I I I I I I , I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I ~II
AS-BUILT PLANS I I I J , I I I I I , I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I ,
,..
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
10 AIR QUALITY
-
ADOPTED JUNE 8, 1987
..
.
.
AIR QUALITY ELEMENT
.
1.
Goals/Objectives and Policy
Implementation
.
A. Goals and Objectives
B. Policy Implementation
.
APPENDIX
.
II. Air Quality Element Background
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
Page
149
150
151
I
.,
,
,
:
,
I
I
,
,
~
~
.
.
r
.
.
.
.
II
II
.
II
.
!.
II
AIR QUALITY ELEMENT
I. GOALS/OBJECTIVES AND POLICY IMPLEMENTATION
A.
Goals/Objectives.
1. To focus on the incremental impact of new development as it
relates to air quality in terms of both:
a) Direct sources of pollution such as electronics
research and development and manufacturing uses.
b) Indirect sources of pollution such as housing,
shopping, and office developments.
2. Within the City's abilities, to work with the Bay Area Air
Quality Management District and other agencies in efforts to
maintain or improve air quality, and to help achieve air quality
standards within the target dates prescribed by law.
3. To provide for development in the community that is consistent
with the adopted General Plan, while not contributing to a
significant decline in air quality.
4. To emphasize air quality as a factor to be considered in the
review of a proposed project's Environmental Impact.
5.
To work with Santa Clara County and adjacent communities to
reduce dependency on the private automobile for transportation.
149